TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY RESULT Weight per MEANS OF VERIFICATION
MFO's Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
AREAS KRA
VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING
SATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR
Q E Ave
(MOV) (5) (3) (2) (1) RESULTS
(4)
(22.5%)

Showed knowledge Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge Showed knowledge No acceptable

Quality of content and its content and its of content and its of content and its evidence was shown
integration within and integration within and integration within and integration within and
across subject areas across subject areas as across subject areas across subject areas
1. Classroom Observation tool as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
(COT) rating sheet and/or inter with a rating of 7 rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
observer agreement form
about knowledge of content
within and across curriculum
1. Applied knowledge teaching areas
of content within and
across curriculum 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
Basic Education Services

teaching areas developed highlighting

integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY

7.5%
3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of content
and its integration in other Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
subject areas lessons using MOV 1 lessons using MOV 1 lessons using MOV 1 the given MOV evidence was shown
and supported by any and supported by any 1 and supported by any
4. Performance tasks/test 1 of the other given of the other given MOV 1 of the other given
MOV MOV
materials Highlighting
integration of content Efficiency
knowledge within and across
subject areas

5. Others (Please specify and

provide annotations)

Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY RESULT Weight per MEANS OF VERIFICATION
MFO's Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
AREAS KRA
VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Demonstrated Demonstrated effective Demonstrated Demonstrated No acceptable

effective teaching teaching strategies to effective teaching effective teaching evidence was shown
(22.5%)

strategies to promote promote critical and strategies to promote strategies to promote

critical and creati e creati e thinking, as critical and creati e critical and creati e
Quality thinking, as well as well as other higher- thinking, as well as thinking, as well as
other higher-order order thinking skills as other higher-order other higher-order
1. Classroom Observation thinking skills as shown in MOV 1 with a thinking skills as thinking skills as
tool (COT) rating sheet and/or shown in MOV 1 with rating of 7 shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
inter observer agreement a rating of 8 a rating of 6 a rating of 5
form about teaching
strategies that enhance
2. Used a range of learner achievement in
teaching strategies literacy and numeracy skills
that enhance learner
achievement in 2. Lesson plans/modified
Basic Education Services

literacy and numeracy DLLs developed used in

skills. teaching highlighting learner-
centered strategies that
promote literacy and
CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND PEDAGOGY

7.5% numeracy skills

3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in
Submitted 4 or more Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted lesson as No acceptable
other subject areas lessons as evidently as evidently shown in as evidently shown in evidently shown in evidence was shown
shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
4. Performance tasks/test Efficiency supported by any 1 of by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of
materials used in teaching the other MOV given MOV given the other MOV given the other MOV given

5. Results of assessment
used in teaching

6. Others (Please specify and

provide annotations)s)

Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Timelin Weight
MFO's RESULT Objectives ACTUAL
e per KRA
AREAS VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Used different Used different teaching Used different Used different No acceptable
teaching strategies strategies that develop teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was shown
that develop critical critical and creative that develop critical that develop critical
1. Classroom Observation tool Quality and creative thinking thinking and/or other and creative thinking and creative thinking
and/or other HOTS HOTS as shown in and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
(COT) rating sheet and/or
(22.5%)

as shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 with a rating of as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1

interobserver agreement form with a rating of 7 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
about teaching strategies to
develop critical and creative
thinking, as well as other
higher order thinking skill
3. Applied a range of
teaching strategies 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
to develop critical developed used in teaching
Basic Education Services

and creative highlighting different teaching

thinking as well as strategies that develop critical
other higher-order and creative thinking and/or
thinking skills other HOTS
7.5%
3. Instructional materials
highlighting different teaching
strategies that develop and
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

critical and creative thinking

skills and/or other HOTS Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 No acceptable
lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 lesson of the evidence was shown
4. Performance tasks/test MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the other and any 1 of the acceptable MOV
Efficiency the other acceptable acceptable MOV other acceptable
materials used in demonstration
MOV MOV
teaching

5. Results of assessment used

in teaching

6. Others (Please specify and

provide annotations)

Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Weight
MFO's RESULT Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
per KRA
AREAS VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable

management management management management evidence was
strategies that engage strategies that engage strategies that engage strategies that engage shown
learners in learners in learners in learners in
Quality activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
(22.5%)

shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with a shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 rating of 5 a rating of 4

4. Managed
classroom structure
to engage
learners, individually 1. Classroom Observation tool
or in groups, in (COT) rating sheet and/or
meaningful interobserver agreement form
Basic Education Services

exploration, about managing classroom

discovery and structure that engages leaners in
hands-on activities various activities
within a range of
physical learning 7.5% 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
environments. highlighting various classroom
management strategies that
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

engage learners in activities/

tasks in different physical
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 No acceptable
learning environments lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 lesson of the evidence was
MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the other and any 1 of the other acceptable MOV shown
3. Others (Please specify and Efficiency the other acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
provide annotations) MOV

Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Weight
MFO's RESULT Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
per KRA
AREAS VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable

Quality management strategies management management management strategies evidence was
of learner behavior that strategies of learner strategies of learner of learner behavior that shown
1. Classroom Observation tool
(22.5%)

promote positive and behavior that behavior that promote positive and
(COT) rating sheet and/or non-violent discipline promote positive and promote positive and non-violent discipline
interobserver agreement form as shown in MOV non-violent discipline non-violent discipline as shown in MOV
about management of classroom submitted with a rating as shown in MOV as shown in MOV submitted with a rating
of 7 submitted with a submitted with a of 4
behavior using the following
rating of 6 rating of 5
strategies:
5. Managed learner
1. Providing motivation
behavior
constructively by
Basic Education Services

2. Praising the learners/giving

applying positive
positive feedback
and non-violent
discipline to ensure
3. Setting house rules/ guidelines
learning-focused
environments 7.5%
4. Ensuring learners' active
participation
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

5. Allowing learners to express

their ideas/opinions Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lesson as evidenced by evidence was
6. Giving equal opportunities to shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and either by MOV 2 or 3 shown
learners Efficiency supported by any supported by any supported by any but no evidene of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV sharing with others

7. Encouraging learners to ask

questions

8. Others (Please specify and

provide annotations)

Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Weight
MFO's RESULT Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
per KRA
AREAS VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable

Quality management strategies management management management strategies evidence was
of learner behavior that strategies of learner strategies of learner of learner behavior that shown
(22.5%)

1. Classroom Observation tool promote positive and behavior that behavior that promote positive and
non-violent discipline promote positive and promote positive and non-violent discipline
(COT) rating sheet and/or as shown in MOV non-violent discipline non-violent discipline as shown in MOV
interobserver agreement form submitted with a rating as shown in MOV as shown in MOV submitted with a rating
about using differentiated, of 7 submitted with a submitted with a of 4
developmentally appropriate rating of 6 rating of 5
learning experiences
6. Used
differentiated, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developmentally developed highlighting
Basic Education Services

appropriate learning differentiation in content,

experiences to product, process, learning
address learners' environment or others according
gender, needs, to learners' gender,
strengths, interests 7.5% needs, strengths, interests, and
and experiences experiences
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
differentiation in content, differentiated teaching differentiated differentiated differentiated teaching evidence was
product, process, learning strategies in at least 2 teaching strategies in teaching strategies in strategies in at least 2 shown
environment or others according Efficiency lessons as evidenced at least 2 lessons as at least 2 lessons as lessons as evidenced
to learners' gender, needs, by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 evidenced by MOV 1 by MOV 1 and
strengths, interests and supported by 1 of the and supported by 1 of and supported by 1 of supported by 1 of the
experiences other acceptable MOV the other acceptable the other acceptable other acceptable MOV
MOV MOV

4. Others (Please specify and

provide annotations)

Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Weight
MFO's RESULT Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
per KRA
AREAS VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable

implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
Quality and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
(22.5%)

with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

1. Classroom observation tool

(COT) rating sheet and/or
interobserver agreement form
7. Planned,
about using developmentally
managed, and
sequenced teaching and learning
implemented
process
developmentally
Basic Education Services

sequenced teaching
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
and learning
highlighting developmentally
processes to meet
sequenced instruction that meet
curriculum
the curriculum goals and varied
requirements and 7.5%
teaching contexts
varied teaching
CURRICULUM AND PLANNING

contexts
3. Instructional materials used to Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 2- Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 1 lessons as No acceptable
implement developmentally lessons as evidenced 3 lessons as as evidenced by evidenced by any 1 of evidence was
sequenced teaching and learning by MOV 1 and 2 and evidenced by MOV 1 MOV 1 and 2 and the other acceptable shown
process to meet curriculum supported by any 1 of and 2 and supported supported by any 1 of MOV
the other acceptable by any 1 of the other the other acceptable
requirements and varied
Efficiency MOV acceptable MOV MOV
teaching context

4. Others (Please specify and

provide annotations)

Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Weight
MFO's RESULT Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
per KRA
AREAS VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated in No acceptable

Quality participated in participated in participated in LACs/FGDs/meetings evidence was
LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/meetings to discuss shown
(22.5%)

to discuss to discuss to discuss teacher/learner

teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich
feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as shown in
instruction as shown in instruction as shown instruction as shown the MOV submitted
the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted

1. Personal notes of teachers on

8. Participated in LACs/FGDs/meetings with proof
Basic Education Services

collegial discussions of attendance

that use teacher and
learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions
enrich teaching on use of teacher and learner
experience 7.5% feedback to enrich teaching
practice with proof of attendance
CURRICULUM AND PLANNING

Participated in at least Participated in at Participated in at Participated in at least No acceptable

4. Others (Please specify and
4 LACs/FGDs/meetings least 3 least 2 1 LACs/FGDs/meetings evidence was
provide annotations)) as evidently shown in LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/meetings as evidently shown in shown
any 1 of the given MOV as evidently shown in as evidently shown in any 1 of the given MOV
any 1 of the given any 1 of the given
Efficiency MOV MOV

Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Weight
MFO's RESULT Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
per KRA
AREAS VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No acceptable
varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and evidence was
learning resources learning resources learning resources learning resources shown
including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
Quality address learning goals address learning address learning address learning goals
as shown in MOV 1 goals as shown in goals as shown in as shown in MOV 1
(22.5%)

with a rating of 7 MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating with a rating of 4
of 6 of 5

1. Classroom observation tool

(COT) rating sheet and/or
interobserver agreement form
9. Selected, about using appropriate teaching
Basic Education Services

developed, and learning resources,

organized and used including ICT
appropriate teaching
and learning Examples:
resources, including
7.5%
ICT, to address  Activity sheets/ task
CURRICULUM AND PLANNING

learning goals sheets/work sheets

Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
 Powerpoint presentations
varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and evidence was
 Video clips learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, shown
 Modules including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
 SIMs-Strategic Intervention evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
Materials Efficiency MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported
by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of by any 1 of the
 Others
acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Weight
MFO's RESULT Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
per KRA
AREAS VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable

organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was
1. Classroom Observation tool diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative shown
(COT) rating sheet and/or and summative and summative and summative and summative
interobserver agreement form Quality assessment strategies assessment assessment assessment strategies
(22.5%)

about using diagnostic, consistent with strategies consistent strategies consistent consistent with
formative and summative curriculum with curriculum with curriculum curriculum
assessment strategies requirements as shown requirements as requirements as requirements as shown
in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with in MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 of 4
2. Prepared Lesson
plans/modified DLLs developed
used in teaching highlighting use
of formative assessment
strategies
Basic Education Services

10. Designed, selected,

organized and used 3. Developed diagnostic tests :
diagnostic, formative
and summative
assessment strategies
(a) with TOS reviewed by
consistent with superior;
7.5%
curriculum (b) with sample accomplished
ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING

requirements questionnaire/ answer sheets

4. Developed summative tests:

(a) with TOS reviewed by Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
superior; assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tools as evidence was
(b) with sample accomplished evidently shown in any evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in any shown
questionnaire/ answer sheets Efficiency of the acceptable MOV any of the acceptable any of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV
MOV MOV

5. Developed performance tasks:

(a) with rubrics reviewed by
superior;
(b) with sample accomplished
rubrics

6. Others (Please specify and

provide annotations)

Timeliness
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Weight
MFO's RESULT Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
per KRA
AREAS VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E T
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Frequently showed Occasionally showed

Consistently showed Rarely showed prompt
prompt and clear prompt and clear
prompt and clear and clear No acceptable
communication of the communication of the
communication of the communication of the evidence was
learners needs, learners needs,
learners needs, learners needs, shown
progress and progress and
progress and progress and
(22.5% )

1. At least 3 samples of Quality achievement to key

achievement to key achievement to key
achievement to key
stakeholders, stakeholders,
corrected test papers of the stakeholders, including
including including
stakeholders, including
parents/guardians as parents/guardians as
same 3 learners in the same shown in the MOV
parents/guardians as parents/guardians as
shown in the MOV
learning area with parents' or shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
submitted submitted
submitted submitted
guardians' signature and date of
12. Communicated receipt
promptly and clearly
the learners; needs, 2. Minutes of PTA meetings or
progress and Parent-Teacher Conferences in
Basic Education Services

achievement to key all quarters with proof of parents'/

stakeholders., guardians' attendance
including parents/
guardians 3. Report cards with parents' or
guardians' signature in all
7.5%
quarters supported by minutes
ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING

of meeting
Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable
4. Communication with parents' combination of at least combination of at combination of at combination of at least evidence was
or guardians using various 4 of the acceptable least 3 of the least 2 of the 1 of the acceptable shown
modalities MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV

Efficiency
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter

6. Other documents showing

learners' needs, progress and
achievement submitted to other
stakeholders

Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were No acceptable
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 distributed across 1 evidence was
Timeliness quarters quarters quarters quarters shown
 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY, EFFECIENCY, TIMELINESS RATING

KEY MEANS OF VERIFICATION
Weight
MFO's RESULT Objectives Timeline ACTUAL
per KRA
AREAS VERY SCORE
OUTSTANDING SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY POOR E
(MOV) (5)
SATISFACTORY
(3) (2) (1) RESULTS Q Ave
(4)

Consistently performed Frequently performed Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable

Quality various related various related performed various various related evidence was
work/activities that work/activities that related work/activities work/activities that shown
contribute to the contribute to the that contribute to the contribute to the
teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
1. Certificate of Recognition or
Participation

2. Certificate of Training

3. Certificate of Speakership
(10%)
Basic Education Services

4. Committee involvement

13. Performed various 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular

related work/activities
that contribute to the 6. Book or Journal Authorship/ Co-
10.0%
PLUS FACTOR

teaching-learning Authorship/ Contibutorship

process.
7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship

8. Coaching and mentoring learners

in competition

9. Mentoring pre-service/in-service Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable
teachers Efficiency different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of acceptable MOV evidence was
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown
10. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness