Scribd
Upload
76 views2 pages

Aloha

The document is a letter providing advice to someone in prison about legal strategies related to their conviction. It warns against redemption processes and other alleged strategies promoted by disinformation agents. It then outlines six common failures of jurisdiction that could make a conviction void, including issues with the indictment, assistance of counsel, and speedy trial rights. It concludes that being a member of a bar association means the judge and prosecutor's membership in a private organization violates separation of powers.

Uploaded by

El_Noble
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
76 views2 pages

Aloha

The document is a letter providing advice to someone in prison about legal strategies related to their conviction. It warns against redemption processes and other alleged strategies promoted by disinformation agents. It then outlines six common failures of jurisdiction that could make a conviction void, including issues with the indictment, assistance of counsel, and speedy trial rights. It concludes that being a member of a bar association means the judge and prosecutor's membership in a private organization violates separation of powers.

Uploaded by

El_Noble
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Richard Cornforth

P.O. Box 1369


Bethany, Oklahoma 73008

Eric Richard Eleson


Salinas Valley State Prison
Fac. A-1-103 up J-59564
U.S.P.S. Box 1050
Soledad, California 93960-1050

Aloha Eric,

The material that you are referring on void judgments is likely all that can be excerpted
from the book.

Please be informed: There is no such thing as “redemption process.” Also, you are not a
secured party nor are you a surety. Although your imprisonment is a contract in
commerce, you are not in any way part of that contract. I specifically advise you not to
“common law copyright” your name, write checks on closed accounts, write site drafts
under any theory, file any non-statutory liens, and especially DON’T WRITE ANY
BILLS OF EXCHANGE. These are all frauds perpetrated on you by either government
disinformation agents or useful idiots. Trying any of these alleged strategies, certainly
including redemption, will likely extend your stay in prison.

I do not mean to be the bearer of bad news. My mission has always been to publish and
republish the truth as found in statutes, rules, and controlling common law authorities.
Certainly, you may chose to believe in the so-called redemption process – that is your
First Amendment Right; however, you do so at your own peril.

Having embraced you of the above, it may be true that your conviction and sentencing
were extralegal and therefore you have the best chance of freedom and exoneration by
attaching the jurisdiction of the court. The common jurisdictional failings in criminal
cases are:

1. Denial of the Constitution’s mandate for judicial review of your indictment. In


other words, you cannot be compelled to plead before a magistrate judge as a
mere magistrate is deprived of subject matter jurisdiction to review an indictment
for a felony crime.
2. An indictment, information or grand jury, that fails to charge you with a crime.
Only Congress and the legislatures can enact statutes that describe certain acts as
crimes and further articulate the elements of the crime. Also, the indictment must
be based on the sworn testimony of at least one lay witness who testifies that they
either are the victim of or saw the crime occur.1
3. Denial of effective assistance of counsel. In a criminal case which could result in
incarceration, you must be afforded an assistant from the arraignment hearing
through the sentencing hearing. Assistant means exactly that – not a public
defender unless you elect to turn your defense over to a public defender.
4. Lapse of the Speedy Trial Act which provides that you must be indicted within the
applicable statute of limitations, a trial must be scheduled within forty days of
your arraignment, you must be given 30 days to prepare for the trial, and the voir
dire of the jurymen must begin within a total time span of 70 days.
5. Prosecutorial misconduct – a criminal defendant’s character is never an issue in
any trial. Personal comments about you or even “speech” which casts aspersions
on you rise to a level of prosecutorial misconduct.2
6. Fraud on the court where either the judge or the prosecutor make false statements
or false writings to influence the outcome of the proceedings – this is true
regardless of whether the judge or prosecutor has actual knowledge of the falsity
of the statement or writing.3

NOTE: these issues are substantive, meaning relating to the Constitution and also still
apply even if you take a plea bargain. It is important to comprehend that all of the above
are NOT subject to prospective waiver.

HERE’S THE CLINCHER: even if none of the above are true, your conviction was void
if the judge or judges and the prosecutor or prosecutor are members of any bar
association. Being a member of a bar association is different from being admitted at bar
before some respective court. The truth is that bar associations are private, commercial
business entities. Many, including many in positions of authority, claim that bar
associations are part of the Judicial Branch of Government; however, this argument is
both specious and false as having the prosecutor and the judge both serve in the judicial
branch at the same time that the prosecutor is serving in the executive or Article II branch
of government would violate the Constitution’s mandate for a separation of powers.

I hope this information is helpful.

RC

November 28th 2007

1
Ann exception would be a murder case where there are no witnesses.
2
Character attacks can also rise to a level of slander, libel, or defamation if not directly relating to the
actual charge against you.
3
The reason for this is that both the judge and prosecutor have a duty to make inquiry to verify that the
information is both truthful and trustworthy.

You might also like