Paper 01
Paper 01
Paper 01
net/publication/3341096
Space Charge Formation and its Modified Electric Field under Applied Voltage
Reversal and Temperature Gradient in XLPE Cable
CITATIONS READS
80 101
4 authors, including:
John Fothergill
City, University of London
171 PUBLICATIONS 4,050 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Space charge in polyethylene under combined ac and dc electric fields View project
All content following this page was uploaded by John Fothergill on 03 July 2014.
G. Chen
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
J. C. Fothergill
Department of Engineering
University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
ABSTRACT
The results of space charge evolution in cross-linked polyethylene power cables under
dc electrical field at a uniform temperature and during external voltage polarity
reversal are presented in the paper. A mirror image charge distribution was observed
in the steady state, but the pre-existing field altered the way in which the steady state
charge distribution was formed from that obtaining when the cable was first polarized.
Polarity reversing charge was generated in the middle of the insulation and moved
towards the appropriate electrodes under the influence of a field in excess of the
maximum applied field. Our results show that the mirror effect is a steady state effect
that is due to cross-interface currents that depend only on the interface field and not its
polarity. Measurements on cable sections with an elevated mean temperature and
temperature gradient show that the interface currents are temperature dependent, and
that differences between the activation energies of the interface and bulk currents can
eliminate and possibly even invert the polarity of the space charge distribution.
Index Terms - Space charge, PEA, XLPE insulated power cables, voltage polarity
reversal, temperature gradient, “mirror image effect”
0.5 30 min
- 80kV for 90min
0 time 0.5
0
-0.5
0
-1 -0.5
a
0.5 1
Charge density (C/m3)
Positive voltage
0 0.5
-0.5 0
-1.5 -1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Position (mm) -1.5
(b) Space charge during the polarity reversal ramp-up 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Position (mm)
(d) “Mirror image” space charge distribution with capacitive charge
removed from the electrode signal
Figure 3. Space charge development over the voltage polarity reversal
3.2 SPACE CHARGE ACCUMULATION IN XLPE Measurements of space charge accumulation and decay
CABLES WITH A TEMPERATURE GRADIENT in Cable B under a temperature gradient were carried out on
a new piece of HVDC prototype cable. A temperature
Cable B (prototype HVDC power cable with 5.7mm
difference of 13oC between conductor and outer sheath was
thick insulation) was used to investigate the influence of a
obtained with the central conductor heated up to 70 oC while
temperature gradient on space charge behaviour. First
leaving outer semiconductor sheath in a natural convection
however, the space charge behaviour was measured for a
condition. The space charge accumulation during
uniform temperature (room temperature T~25oC) under the
polarization is shown in Figure 5a, and its subsequent
application of an external voltage of + 80kV to the inner
behaviour during depolarization in Figure 5b. Because the
conductor. This cable exhibited homocharge at the inner
space charge density in the bulk insulation is very small in
electrode and heterocharge at the outer electrode, and so all
comparison with that at a uniform room temperature its
the measurements were carried out both with the external
presence could only be discerned from the two induced
voltage applied and also with the external voltage
image charge peaks at the outer and inner electrodes,
temporarily switched off during the measurement. This
obtained when the applied voltage was removed for
procedure allowed a clear separation of the homocharge
measurement (i.e. the capacitive charge present during
from the capacitive charge on the inner electrode.
polarization was temporarily removed) . A very small
positive charge peak (homocharge) was observed next to
Figure 4a shows the space charge accumulation obtained
inner conductor (high temperature side), similar to that
with temporary removal of the external voltage. The
found at a uniform room temperature. In this case however,
strongest feature is a heterocharge peak next to the outer
there is no measurable heterocharge near the outer
electrode. A barely noticeable homocharge peak was also
conductor. A further difference is that the space charge
generated adjacent to the inner electrode (anode). After
accumulation reaches its saturation level within about two
reaching a steady state distribution the external voltage was
hours and then this amount of charge disappears within two
removed and the electrodes short-circuited, and
hours following the removal of the applied voltage with the
measurements made of the space charge over a period of de-
two electrodes short-circuited. In contrast room temperature
polarization. It was found that there was hardly any
accumulation takes about 24 hours and the subsequent
detectable change in the space charge distribution over 48
charge removal has not been achieved after 48 hours.
hours of de-polarization, see Figure 4.
2
2 Outer electrode Inner electrode
Outer electrode Inner electrode 1.5
(cathode) (anode)
1.5 1
Charge density (C/m3)
0 time In 2 hours
1 hr
0.5
1 8 hr
24 hr 0
Charge density (C/m3)
0.5 -0.5
-1
0
-1.5
-0.5 -2
0 2 4 Position (mm) 6 8 10
2 hrs
(a) Space charge accumulation under applied voltage (measurement with 0.5
external voltage temporarily removed)
0
2
Outer electrode Inner electrode -0.5
1.5 0 time -1
1 hr
8 hr -1.5
Charge density (C/m3)
1
24 hr
48 hr -2
0.5 0 2 4Position (mm)6 8 10
-1 4 DISCUSSION
-1.5 4.1 ELECTRICAL FIELD AND SPACE CHARGE
DISTRIBUTION DURING POLARIZARION AND
-2 VOLTAGE REVERSAL
0 2 4
Position 6
(mm) 8 10
From a design engineers point of view the important
(b) Space charge profiles in decay after short-circuiting
factor during polarity reversal of a dc power cable is the
Figure 4. Space charge behaviour in prototype HVDC cable B at room
temperature behaviour of the electric field distribution. However this is
both dependent upon and involved in the time dependence
of the space charge. Therefore the transient field and space charge separation in the middle of the insulation where the
charge distribution must be discussed together. field is largest. For a period of time both the original charge
Figure 6 shows the electric stress distributions calculated and the polarity reversing charge co-exist in the bulk, before
on the basis of the space charge profiles presented in figure the charge peaks near the electrodes change polarity. This
3. During the 90 minutes of positive polarization (+80kV can be seen from figure 7, which shows the time-dependent
on the central conductor) heterocharge at both electrode behaviour of the integrated bulk charge density magnitude
have increased the interfacial stresses at the outer and inner (i.e. total charge independent of polarity) for a one metre
interface from the applied values of 20.5kV/mm and 45
25.3kV/mm to 30.3kV/mm and 27.3kV/mm respectively.
40
The electric stress in the central part of the insulation is
35
Polarity reversal
30 Applied (+)
20
Electric stress (kV/mm)
20
(+) volt for 90' 15
10
10
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 5 Positive polarity Negative polarity
-10 (-) volt for 90'
Applied (-) 0
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
-30 External voltage application time (min)
Soon after volt reversal
-40
Position (mm)
Figure 7. Total bulk charge magnitude through polarization cycle.
Figure 6. Electric stress distributions on voltage reversal
section of cable, throughout the polarization and polarity
The heterocharge accumulation may be due to the reversal cycle. The capacitive charge is excluded from the
separation of ionised species. This would be expected to integration. It can be seen from figure 7 that the total space
give equal amounts of heterocharge at both electrodes in the charge in the cable section first decreases following polarity
absence of charge injection from the electrodes, since the reversal, but then starts to increase without going through
electrode interfaces can be expected to be blocking for ionic zero. Thus it is clear that the space charge regions produced
species. However this is not the case here as there is a during polarization do not just decrease, pass through zero,
greater increase of the outer interface stress due to a larger and then reverse polarity. Instead compensating space
amount of heterocharge in that region. This can be seen charge regions co-exist with the original space charge. The
from figure 3, where the charge density in the region of the observation in figure 3c that these compensating charges
inner electrode is smaller than that near to the outer originate in the middle of the cable correlates their
electrode in both polarities. Since the volume of material is generation with the electric field maximum that exists there
smaller for a given radial distance is smaller near the inner when the polarity reversal is made.
electrode it is clear that the amount of charge there is These results show that the dynamics of space charge
smaller than that near the outer electrode. It therefore seems accumulation on polarity reversal is not a time reversal
that there is charge injection from the electrodes and that image of the dynamics that occur during polarization. The
this is greatest at the inner conductor. However it has field distribution as modified by the existing space charge
recently been shown [26] that heterocharge may be formed has an effect on the space charge dynamics, and charge
in cables by means of many very fast small charge packets generation may not take place in the same location as it did
injected from both electrodes. This would also explain the on initial polarization This result suggests the way in which
results obtained as long as injection from the inner electrode polarity reversal may influence insulation reliability. Space
is greater than from the outer electrode. charge generation in the middle of the insulation and its
The charge accumulated during polarization retains almost movement towards the electrode regions will cause two high
the same distribution during the voltage reversal ramp. The field regions to move towards the electrodes with increasing
only changes during this period are the penetration of the local currents and possibly charge recombination in the
space charge near the outer electrode into the bulk and electrode/interface regions, both of which may cause
reduction of the amount of space charge at the inner damage [27,28].
electrode. This latter feature tends to confirm the existence
of charge injection from the inner conductor. Figure 7 also shows that the space charge distribution has
The electric stress in the central part of the insulation not reached a steady state after 90 minutes of polarization,
shows a significant enhancement. The maximum stress in though it is showing signs of saturation. In addition it can be
this region is about -30kV/mm, which is much higher than seen that the total charge on polarity reversal is higher than
the applied value of -25.3kV/mm at the inner interface in that obtaining on initial polarization. An inspection of figure
the absence of space charge. On the other hand, the stresses 3d shows that this is because the amount of heterocharge at
at the inner and the outer interfaces are reduced to about the inner electrode is greater than it was during initial
20kV/mm and 10kV/mm respectively, where the charge polarization, i.e. an exact mirror image has not been formed
generated on polarization now becomes homocharge. As during the poling time. Nonetheless the electric field
can be seen in figure 3c the charge that reverses the polarity distribution obtaining after 90 minutes of re-polarization at -
of the original space charge regions seems to originate from
80kV is almost a mirror image of that found after 90 electrode interfaces. The different values of the interface
minutes of polarization at +80kV. fields resulting from differences in space charge magnitude
reflect the differences in geometry and nature of the
4.2 “MIRROR IMAGE EFFECT” CHARGE
respective electrodes. A mirror image effect in the space
DISTRIBUTION
charge and electric field distributions will be produced when
The mirror image effect [25] refers to steady state space an opposite polarity voltage is applied to the conductor if
charge distributions that are inverses of one another when and only if the current across each of the electrode interfaces
the cable conductor is subjected to voltages of opposite has the same value for the same voltage magnitude,
polarity. This effect occurs whether the opposite polarity whatever the voltage polarity. This is the essential meaning
was achieved by polarity reversal as here, or by the of the mirror charge effect [25]. An explanation for the
application of opposite polarity voltages to different mirror charge effect therefore requires an explanation as to
sections of the same cable [29]. An example of the latter why the electrode interface current magnitude should only
feature measured on a different cable [29] is given in figure depend upon the electric field magnitude and not its
8. This figure also shows that the mirror effect includes polarity. This implies that there is no contact charge layer
space charge of both polarity at the outer electrode. The formed in the insulator, as the contact charge field would
injected charge can be seen as an extension of the capacitive introduce an asymmetry between positive and negative
peak into the insulation over a period of time, denoted as cross-interface currents. This means that there is no
„HOMOCHARGE‟ on the figure. Clearly therefore the difference between the chemical potential (Fermi energy) of
mirror effect occurs regardless of the nature and origin of an electron in the electrode material and in the XLPE at the
the space charge. interface. Such a situation is likely for the carbon loaded
3 polyethylene semiconductor electrodes used in cables. An
Anode
0 time 1 hr (inner electrode)
understanding of the process whereby charge carriers pass
2 Charge in 4 hr 8 hr
from the electrode into the insulator is required to complete
bulk insulation the explanation, and this is not yet available. Two
Charge density (C/m3)
18 hr 30 hr
1 alternative mechanisms have been proposed: thermal
activation via the vacuum state [30] to and from states
0 within the polymer, and tunnelling, with and without
thermal assistance, between the Fermi energy of the
-1
Homocharge
electrode and donor and acceptor states within the polymer
located in a narrow region of energy around the Fermi
-2 Cathode
energy of the polymer at the interface [31]. Of the two, the
(outer electrode) tunnelling process [31] seems the most likely in this case as
-3 the energies of the states between which the transfer occurs
0 1 2
Position 3
(mm) 4 5 will be very close and any thermal assistance will be to the
most effective state for tunnelling This intermediate state
(a) Positive voltage at central conductor will be the same whether electrons are being transferred
3
from the electrode or to the electrode. The interface electric
Anode
(outer electrode)
field will control the current in this case via its influence
2
upon the height and more particularly the width of the
0 time 1 hr
4 hr 10 hr
interface barrier (see section 9.2.2. of [32]).
The origin of the space charge is irrelevant to the
Charge density (C/m3)
18 hr 30 hr
1
generation of the mirror image effect however the
0
generation of compensating charges in the middle of the
insulation during polarity reversal in cable A indicates that
-1
Homocharge
in that case they are likely to be field-separable ionic species
Charge in [33-35]. In particular the lack of a change in the positive
bulk insulation
-2
charge around the outer electrode during the polarity
Cathode reversal ramp up indicates that the positive charge has a low
(inner electrode)
-3
mobility and that the mobile species is the negative charge.
0 1 2
Position 3
(mm) 4 5 What is clear though is that the conductivity of mobile
(b) Negative voltage at central conductor charge species in the insulating material is greater than the
conductivity of charges transferring across the electrode
Figure 8. Space charge distributions in a third type of XLPE cables with
opposite voltages applied at central conductor. Taken from [29] interfaces before the space charge distribution reaches a
steady state. It is this that leads to the formation of hetero
Our results have also shown that the mirror effect is not space charge regions, which increase the interface fields and
preserved during the charge dynamics brought about by reduce the bulk field so that the current across the interface
polarity reversal. The mirror image charge effect is thus a can come into coincidence with the bulk current. On
steady state feature independent of the nature of the space polarity reversal the reduction of the interface fields reduces
charges, and the way that their distribution is produced. the interface currents, while the high field in the middle
Since the key feature defining a steady state is that the radial process the space charge currents that invert the charges at
current must be the same at all radial position it must be the interfaces.
concluded that the field distribution produced by the mirror
space charge distribution is one such that current is
everywhere the same, including the currents across the
4.3 SPACE CHARGE ACCUMULATION AT reversing charges will be produced by interface currents.
ELEVATED TEMPERATURE This may be more damaging to the cable than charge
generation in the middle of the cable by ion separation.
Cable B was used for the measurements in elevated
temperature and so the results are not strictly comparable
with those of cable A. However the space charge 5 CONCLUSIONS
distribution at a uniform temperature of 25 oC approaches
a steady state that is very similar to that found in cable A, It has been shown that the mirror image charge effect is a
figure 3a, with a large positive heterocharge at the outer steady state effect that is independent of the nature and type
electrode when the conductor had a potential of +80 kV. of the charges and the dynamics involved in the formation
The difference is that the heterocharge peak is spread more of the charge distribution. The reason for the occurrence of
widely than in cable A, and there is a small amount of a mirror space charge distribution is that the currents across
homocharge at the inner conductor that is reducing with the electrode interface are dependent only upon the
time. The time taken to reach the steady state is much magnitude of the interface field and not its polarity. It is
longer than in cable A, possibly because the insulation suggested that these currents are produced by a thermally
thickness is larger so that the charge transit time is longer. assisted tunnelling of charge carriers through the interface
The longer transit time may also be the reason why a barrier.
negative heterocharge has not yet appeared near the inner Measurements made during the polarity reversal process
electrode. The positive charge at the outer conductor shows show that the space charge reversal is influenced by the pre-
very little evidence of decaying when the cable was short- existing field distribution. Consequently space charge is
circuited just as the positive heterocharge in cable A did not generated in the middle of the insulation, where the field is
reduce during the polarity reversal ramp up, see figure 3b. It higher than the design stress. This leads to currents moving
therefore appears that this charge is the same in both cables, charge from the bulk to the interfaces, and a high field
i.e. a relatively immobile ion species originating with the position moving towards the electrodes that may be a source
volatile cross-linking by products that are present in both of damage.
cables. The measurements made in a temperature gradient Temperature gradients such as will be found in service
with a mean elevated temperature can therefore be used to change the space charge distribution because the activation
gain some insight into the effect of temperature on space energies for the cross-interface currents are different to
charge distributions., and hence indirectly upon the those for bulk transport. Here the space charge is much
temperature dependence of the bulk and interface currents. reduced, but this may not always be the case as the outcome
Figure 5a shows that higher temperatures has removed the depends upon details of the interface and semiconductor
heterocharge region near to the outer electrode and material among other things.
increased the homocharge at the inner electrode. This
behaviour is consistent with a situation in which the REFERENCES
interface currents have increased more rapidly with the [1] Y.Zhang, J.Lewiner, C.Alquie, and N.Hampton, “Evidence of
increase in temperature than the current in the body of the strong correlation between space-charge buildup and breakdown
insulator, i.e. the interface currents are activated with higher in cable insulation”, IEEE Trans. DEI, vol. 3, pp.778-783, 1996.
[2] N. Hozumi, H. Suzuki, T. Okamoto, K. Watanabe and A.
activation energy than the currents in the insulation Watanabe, “Direct Observation of Time-dependent Space
material. The inner electrode with a higher temperature than Charge Profiles in XLPE Cable under High Electric Fields”,
the bulk material and the outer electrode, and thus has a IEEE Trans. on DEI, Vol. 1, pp.1068-1076, 1994.
higher injection current than the bulk current and so gives a [3] R.Bartnikas, “Performance characteristics of dielectrics in the
presence of space charge”, IEEE Trans.DEI, vol.4, pp544-557,
net homocharge, which reduces the interface field at the 1997.
inner electrode (to 17kV/mm) to bring the two into [4] P. K. Watson, “The transport and trapping of electrons in
coincidence. The temperature at the outer electrode is less polymers”, IEEE Trans. on DEI, Vol. 2, pp. 915-924, 1995.
than that in the bulk material but its increase is still [5] B. Sanden, "Space charge accumulation in fresh and degassed
XLPE insulation", 28th Diel. Soc. Meeting, pp.225-233, Sept
sufficient to increase the interface current there and bring it 1998.
into coincidence with the bulk current without a significant [6] K. R. Bambery and R. J. Fleming, “The temperature
build-up of space charge. Similar results have been found dependence of space charge accumulation in cross-linked
recently for MVdc-cables at a similar applied field [36] polyethylene”, Journal of Thermal Analysis, Vol. 50, pp. 19-31,
1997.
(i.e.10kV/mm in [36], here 14kV/mm), and temperature [7] Y. Tanaka, G. Chen, Y. Zhao, A. E. Davies, A. S. Vaughan and
gradient close to that obtaining here. In view of our T. Takada, “Effect of additive on Morphology and space charge
speculation that the injection current involved carrier accumulation in low density polyethylene”, IEEE Trans. on
tunnelling through a potential barrier this result shows that DEI, Vol. 10, pp. 148-154, 2003.
[8] L. A. Dissado, G. Mazzanti and G. C. Montanari, “The role of
the optimum process involves thermal activation from trapped space charges in the electrical aging of insulating
around the relevant Fermi energy to a state where the barrier materials”, IEEE Trans. Diel. Electr. Insul., Vol. 4, No. 5, pp.
width is sufficiently reduced to allow tunnelling to become 496-506, 1997.
effective [31, 37]. [9] A. See, L. A. Dissado and J. C. Fothergill, “Electric field
requirements for charge packet generation and movement in
While it clear that in these measurements the elevated XLPE”, 7th International Conference on Solid Dielectrics,
temperature has almost eliminated space charge in the cable, pp.232-235, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, 2001.
this cannot be taken as an axiom. Different interfaces and [10] M. Mammeri, C. Laurent and J. Salon, “Influence of space
bulk material may have different conductivity activation charge build up on the transition to electrical treeing in PE
under ac voltage”, IEEE Trans. Diel. Electr. Insul., Vol. 2, No. 1
energies and may result in an inversion of the steady state , pp. 27-35, 1995.
space charge to homocharge. In this case polarity reversal [11] G. Chen, T. Y. Tay, A. E. Davies, Y. Tanaka and Takada,
will result in transient high interface fields, and hence the “Electrodes and charge injection in low-density polyethylene
using the pulsed electroacoustic technique”, IEEE Trans. on [35] K. S. Suh, S. J. Hwang, J. S. Noh and T. Takada, “Effect of
DEI., Vol. 8, pp. 867-873, 2001. constituents of XLPE on formation of space charge”, IEEE
[12] T. Maneno, T. Futami, H. Kushibe, T. Takada and C. M. Cooke, Trans. on DEI., Vol. 1, pp.1077-1083, 1994.
“Measurement of Spatial Charge Distribution in Thick [36] D.Fabiani, G.C.Montanari, C.Laurent, G.Teyssedre,
Dielectrics Using the Pulsed Electroacoustic Method”, IEEE P.H.F.Morshuis, R.Bodega, and L.A.Dissado, “HVDC cable
Trans. on EI., Vol. 23, pp.433-439, 1988. design and space charge accumulation: Part 3 effect of
[13] K. Fukunaga, H. Miyata, T. Takhaashi, S. Yashia and T. Niwa, temperature gradient”, IEEE Elect.Insu. Mag., to be published,
“Measurement of Space Charge Distribution in Cable Insulation 2008.
Using the Pulsed Electroacoustic Method”, Pro. 3rd Int. Conf. on [37] R.M. Hill and L.A. Dissado, “The temperature dependence of
Polymer Insulated Power cables, Versailles, France, pp. 520- relaxation processes”, J. Phys. C: Solid State Physics,Vol. 15,
525, 23-27 June, 1991. pp5171-5193, 1982.
[14] R. Liu, T. Takada and N. Takasu, “Pulsed Electroacoustic
Method for Measurement of Charge Distribution in Power
Cables under both AC and DC Electric Field”, J. Phys. D. Appl.
Mingli Fu was born in Shannxi, China in 1962. He
Phys, 26, pp. 986-993, 1993.
received the B. Eng. in electrical engineering from
[15] N. Hozumi, H. Suzuki, T. Okamoto, K. Watanabe and A.
Xian Jiaotong University, China in 1983. He spent
Watanabe, “Direct Observation of Time-dependent Space
many years at China Electric Power Research
Charge Profiles in XLPE Cable under High Electric Fields,
Institute (CEPRI) as a Research and Development
IEEE Trans. on DEI, Vol. 1, pp. 1068-1076, 1994.
engineer before he came to UK as a visiting research
[16] X. Wang, D. Tu, Y. Tanaka, T. Muronaka, T. Takada, C.
fellow at the University of Southampton in 1997, and
Shinoda and T. Hashizumi, “Space charge in XLPE power cable
later on obtained his PhD from the same university. He is currently a
under dc electrical stress and heat treatment”, IEEE Trans. Diel.
lecturer at the University of Leicester, UK. His research interests lie in
Electr. Insul., Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 467-474, 1995.
dielectric materials, high voltage technology and the insulation system
[17] T. Mureonaka, Y. Tanak, T. Takada, S. Maruyama and H.
ageing and integrity diagnosis.
Mutou, “Measurement of space charge distribution in XLPE
cable using PEA system with flat electrode”, IEEE Annual
Len A. Dissado (SM’96, F’06) was born in: St.
Report, Conf. on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric
Helens, Lancashire, U.K on 29 August 1942 He was
Phenomena, pp. 266-269, San Francisco, USA, 1996.
educated: Thomas Linacre Technical School, Wigan,
[18] T. Tanaka and A. Greenwood, Advanced power cable
Lancashire, 1953-1960, gaining a State Scholarship
technology, Volume I, CRC Press Inc., USA, pp. 144-145, 1983.
for University Entry in 1959. He graduated from
[19] M. Fu and G, Chen, “Space Charge Measurement in Polymer
University College London with a 1st Class degree in
Insulated Power Cables Using Flat Ground Electrode PEA
Chemistry in 1963 and was awarded a PhD in
System”, IEE Pro. –Sci. Meas. Technol. Vol. 150, No. 2, pp.89-
Theoretical Chemistry in 1966 and DSc in 1990.
96, 2003.
After rotating between Australia and England twice he settled in at
[20] Y. Li, M. Aihara, K. Murata, Y. Tanaka and T. Takada, “Space
Chelsea College in 1977 to carry out research into dielectrics. His
charge measurement in thick dielectric materials by pulsed
interest in breakdown and associated topics started with a consultancy
Electroacoustic method”, Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 66, No.7,
with STL begun in 1981. Since then he has published many papers and
pp.3909-3816, 1995.
one book, together with John Fothergill, in this area. In 1995 he moved
[21] Z. Liu, Electrical Insulation Design, - Power Cables, Mechanic
to The University of Leicester, and was promoted to Professor in 1998.
Industry Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese), 1981
He has been a visiting Professor at The University Pierre and Marie
[22] I. W. McAllister , G. C. Chichton and A. Pedersen, “Charge
Curie in Paris, Paul Sabatier University in Toulouse, and Nagoya
Accumualtion in DC Cable: a Macroscopic Approach”, Proc. of
University, and has given numerous invited lectures, the most recent of
the 1994 IEEE Int. Symp. Electrical Insulation, Pittsburgh, PA,
which was the Whitehead lecture at CEIDP 2002 in Cancun, Mexico.
USA, pp. 212-216, 5-8 June, 1994.
He was awarded the title Docteur Honoris Causa by the Universite
[23] I. W. McAllister , G. C. Chichton and A. Pedersen, “Space
Paul Sabatier in 2007. Currently he is an Associate Editor of IEEE
Charge Field in DC Cables”, Proc. of the 1996 Int. Symp.
Transactions DEI, co-chair of the Multifactor Aging Committee of
Electrical Insulation, Montreal, Canada, pp. 661-665, 16-19
DEIS and a member of DEIS Administrative Committee.
June, 1996.
[24] T. Tanaka and A. Greenwood, Advanced power cable
George Chen was born in China in 1961. He
technology, Volume I, CRC Press Inc., USA, 1983.
received his BEng (1983) and MSc (1986) in
[25] K. R. Bambery and R. J. Fleming, “Space charge accumulation
Electrical Engineering from Xian Jiaotong
in two cable grades of XLPE”, IEEE Trans. DEL, Vol. 5, pp.
University, China. After he obtained his PhD (1990)
103-109, 1998.
from the University of Strathclyde, UK, on the work
[26] S.Delphino, D.Fabiani, G.C.Montanari, L.A.Dissado,
of permanent changes in electrical properties of
C.Laurent, G.Teyssedre, “Fast charge packet dynamics in XLPE
irradiated low-density polyethylene, he joined the
insulated cable models”, Ann.Rep.CEIDP (IEEE
University of Southampton as postdoctoral research fellow and became
pub.07CH37929), pp421-424, 2007
senior research fellow subsequently. In 1997 he was appointed as a
[27] J.Artbauer, “Electric strength of polymers”,
research lecture and promoted to a Reader in 2002. Over the years, he
J.Phys.D:Appl.Phys, Vol. 29, pp446-456, 1996
has developed a wide range of interests in High Voltage Engineering
[28] C.Laurent, “Optical pre-breakdown warnings in insulating
and Electrical Properties of Materials and published over 100 papers.
polymers”, IEEE Electr.Insul.Mag., Vol..15, pp5-13, 1999
[29] M. Fu, G. Chen and J. C. Fothergill, “Mirror image effect space
John C. Fothergill (SM'95, F'04) was born in
charge distribution in XLPE power cable under opposite
Malta in 1953. He graduated from the
stressing voltage polarity”, Proc. Of 14th Inter. Symp. on High
University of Wales, Bangor, in 1975 with a
Voltage Eng. (ISH), Beijing, China, August 25-29, 2005
Batchelor‟s degree in Electronics. He continued
(CDROM).
at the same institution, working with Pethig and
[30] D.K.Davies, “Charge generation on dielectric surfaces”,
Lewis, gaining a Master‟s degree in Electrical
Brit.J.Appl.Phys . (J.Phys.D), ser.2, Vol.2, pp1533-1537, 1969
Materials and Devices in 1976 and doctorate in
[31] T. J. Lewis, “Electrical effects at interfaces and surfaces”, IEEE
the Electronic Properties of Biopolymers in 1979. Following this he
Trans. on EI, Vol. EI-21, pp. 289-295, 1986.
worked as a senior research engineer leading research in electrical
[32] L.A.Dissado and J.C.Fothergill, Electrical Degradation and
power cables at STL, Harlow, UK. In 1984 he moved to the
Breakdown in Polymers (P.Peregrinus Ltd for IEE, London,
University of Leicester as a lecturer. He now has a personal chair in
1992)
Engineering and is currently Pro-Vice-Chancellor.
[33] T. Takada, “Space charge formation in dielectrics”, IEEE Trans.
on EI., Vol. Ei-21, pp. 873-877, 1986.
[34] M. Ieda, “Carrier injection, space charge and electrical
breakdown in insulating polymers”, IEEE Trans. on EI., Vol.
EI-22, pp.261-267, 1987.