Dividend Policy PDF
Dividend Policy PDF
Dividend Policy PDF
Introduction :
What is Dividend?
What is dividend policy?
Theories of Dividend Policy
Relevant Theory
Walter’sModel
Gordon’s Model
Irrelevant Theory
M-M’s Approach
Traditional Approach
What is Dividend?
Bond Dividend
Property Dividend
Composite Dividend
Contd.
Special Dividend
What is Dividend Policy :
Regularity
Requirements of Institutional Investors
Dimensions of Dividend Policy
Pay-out Ratio
Funds requirement
Liquidity
Shareholder preference
Taxes
Contd.
Stability
Stable dividend payout Ratio
Stable Dividends or Steadily changing Dividends
Types of Dividend Policy
Walter’s Gordon’s
Model Model
Infinite time
Formula of Walter’s Model
D + r (E-D)
P = k
k
Where,
P = Current Market Price of equity share
E = Earning per share
D = Dividend per share
(E-D) = Retained earning per share
r = Rate of Return on firm’s investment or Internal Rate of Return
k = Cost of Equity Capital
Illustration :
Growth Firm (r > k):
r = 20% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If D = Rs. 4
P = 4+(0) 0.20 /0 .15 = Rs. 26.67
0.15
If D = Rs. 2
P = 2+(2) 0.20 / 0.15 = Rs. 31.11
0.15
Illustration :
Normal Firm (r = k):
r = 15% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If D = Rs. 4
P = 4+(0) 0.15 / 0.15 = Rs. 26.67
0.15
If D = Rs. 2
P = 2+(2) 0.15 / 0.15 = Rs. 26.67
0.15
Illustration :
Declining Firm (r < k):
r = 10% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If D = Rs. 4
P = 4+(0) 0.10 / 0.15 = Rs. 26.67
0.15
If D = Rs. 2
P = 2+(2) 0.10 / 0.15 = Rs. 22.22
0.15
Effect of Dividend Policy on Value of Share
No External Financing
Firm’s internal rate of return does not always
remain constant. In fact, r decreases as more and
more investment in made.
Firm’s cost of capital does not always remain
constant. In fact, k changes directly with the firm’s
risk.
Gordon’s Model
According to Prof. Gordon, Dividend Policy almost
always affects the value of the firm. He Showed how
dividend policy can be used to maximize the wealth
of the shareholders.
The main proposition of the model is that the value of
a share reflects the value of the future dividends
accruing to that share. Hence, the dividend payment
and its growth are relevant in valuation of shares.
The model holds that the share’s market price is equal
to the sum of share’s discounted future dividend
payment.
Assumptions:
Allequity firm
No external Financing
Constant Returns
Perpetual Earnings
No taxes
Constant Retention
E (1 – b)
P =
K - br
Where,
P = Price
E = Earning per Share
b = Retention Ratio
k = Cost of Capital
br = g = Growth Rate
Illustration :
Growth Firm (r > k):
r = 20% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If b = 0.25
P0 = (0.75) 4 = Rs. 30
0.15- (0.25)(0.20)
If b = 0.50
P0 = (0.50) 4 = Rs. 40
0.15- (0.5)(0.20)
Illustration :
Normal Firm (r = k):
r = 15% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If b = 0.25
P0 = (0.75) 4 = Rs. 26.67
0.15- (0.25)(0.15)
If b = 0.50
P0 = (0.50) 4 = Rs. 26.67
0.15- (0.5)(0.15)
Illustration :
Declining Firm (r < k):
r = 10% k = 15% E = Rs. 4
If b = 0.25
P0 = (0.75) 4 = Rs. 24
0.15- (0.25)(0.10)
If b = 0.50
P0 = (0.50) 4 = Rs. 20
0.15- (0.5)(0.10)
Criticisms of Gordon’s model
As the assumptions of Walter’s Model and
Gordon’s Model are same so the Gordon’s
model suffers from the same limitations as
the Walter’s Model.
Modigliani & Miller’s Irrelevance Model
Depends on
Firm’s Earnings
Depends on
1 ( D1+P1 )
Po =
(1 + p)
Where,
Po = Market price per share at time 0,
D1 = Dividend per share at time 1,
P1 = Market price of share at time 1
1 (nD1+nP1)
nPo =
(1 + p)
Google
Financial management by prasanna chandra.