AN UPDATED LIST OF ERRATA
QUANTUM FIELD THEORY
C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber
October 2005
CHAPTER I
Page 16, line 1, after “force law ”, add “it follows that ”
Page 16, line 3, instead of “ we learn . . . ”
read “ This expression holds for a weak magnetic field when we average over the motion
of the orbiting particle. It amounts to dropping total time derivatives, and shows . . . ”
∂I ∂I ∂I ∂I
Page 20, eq. (1-88), instead of “ − =0 ” read “ + =0 ”
∂t2 ∂t1 ∂t2 ∂t1
Page 23, eq. (1-97),
e µν = ∂L e µν = ∂L
instead of “ Θ ∂ν φi − gµν L ”, read “ Θ ∂ ν φi − g µν L ”
∂(∂µ φi ) ∂(∂µ φi )
Page 27, eq. (1-131),
∂L δL
instead of “ π(x, t) = = · · ·”, read “ π(x, t) = = ··· ”
∂∂0 ϕ(x, t) δ∂0 ϕ(x, t)
Page 31, eq. (1-158)
∂Lint ∂Lint
instead of “ J µ = j µ + = ··· ” read “ J ν = j ν + = ··· ”
∂[∂µ α(x)] ∂[∂ν α(x)]
Page 33, eq. (1-169)
e ret (p) = −1 e ret (p) = −1
instead of “ G ” read “ G ”
adv (p0 ± iε) − p2 − m2 adv (p0 ± iε)2 − p2 − m2
Page 34, eq. (1-172), instead of “e±iωp x0 +··· ” read “e∓iωp x0 +··· ”
Page 35, last line, instead of “ Sec. 1-2 ” read “ Sec. 1-1-2 ”
Page 41, eq. (1-212), instead of “ · · · = −j.e
j∗ ” read “ · · · = −e
j.e
j∗ ”
CHAPTER II
Page 47, eq. (2-3)
∂2 2 2 ∂2
instead of “ ∂t 2 − ∇ − m ψ(x, t) = 0 ” read “ ∂t2 − ∇2 + m2 ψ(x, t) = 0 ”
Page 59, eq. (2-50)
Σ.k 1 Σ.k
instead of “ P (nk )Λ± (k) = I ± |k| Λ± (k) ” read “ P (nk )Λ± (k) = 2 I± |k| Λ± (k) ”
Page 60, eq. (2-51)
instead of “ 6k+m
2 ” read “ 6k+m
2m ”; instead of “ −6k+m
2 ” read “ −6k+m
2m ”
Page 61, line –9, instead of “ b/d∗ ” read “ d∗ /b ”
eh̄ ”
Page 66, lines 5, 7 and 12 , instead of “ 2mc eh̄ ”
read 2m
1
eh̄ ”
Page 66, line 7, instead of “ mc read eh̄
m ”
mZ 4 α5 mZ 4 α5
Page 82, line 13, instead of “ ” read “ ”
n3 πn3
Page 84, line 1,
α mM α2 mM
instead of “ Etot = m+M − +· · · ” read “ E tot = m+M − +· · · ”
2n2 m + M 2n2 m + M
Page 93, eq. R(2-118) R
instead of “e d4 x2 A(x
6 2 )SA (x2 , x1 ) ” read “e d4 x2 SF (x3 , x2 ) A(x
6 2 )SA (x2 , x1 ) ”
CHAPTER III
Page 109, eq. (3-16), last line
instead of “ [ak , ak0 ] = δ(k − k 0 ) ” read “ [ak , a†k0 ] = δ(k − k 0 ) ”
Page 117, eq. (3-56), instead of “ ∆(x − y) = · · · ” read “ ∆(x) = · · · ”
Page 119, second line R
i de
k Im(η1∗ η2 )
instead of “ D(η2 )|η1 ) = |η1 + η2 ) ” read “ D(η2 )|η1 ) = e |η1 + η2 ) ”
Page 119, eq. (3-67)
R R
instead of “fen (k) = d3 x eik.x Fn (x) = Fen (k)”, read “fen (k) = d3 x e−ik.x Fn (x) = Fen (k)”
Page 120, eq. (3-69)
P R P R
instead of “ϕc (x) = n ϕn,c de
k e−ik.x Fn∗ (k)”, read “ϕc (x) = n ϕn,c de
k e−ik.x Fen∗ (k)”
Page 135, eq. (3-136),
p end of first line p
0
instead of “ k = k 2 + µ2 ” read “ k 0 = k2 + µ2 ”
Page 135, line –6, first part of the equation
0 0
instead of “ ε(λ) (k).ε(λ ) (k) = δλλ0 ” read “ ε(λ) (k).ε(λ ) (k) = −δλλ0 ”
Page 140, line 11, instead of “ u = a2 k 2 /π ” read “ u = a2 k 2 /π 2 ”
Page 149, eq. (3-169), instead of “ {ψξ (x), ψ̄ξ0 (x0 )} = · · · ”, read “ {ψξ (x), ψ̄ξ0 (y)} = · · · ”
Page 153, line 5, instead of “ C = iγ 0 γ 2 ” read “ C = iγ 2 γ 0 ”
Page 156, line 17, instead of “ γ 5 Cu∗ (k̂, ε) = · · · ” read “ γ 5 Cu∗ (e
k, ε) = · · · ”
Page 159, line –6
instead of “ γ 0 O µ (p0 , p)† γ 0 = O µ (p0 , p) ” read “ γ 0 O µ (p0 , p)† γ 0 = O µ (p, p0 ) ”
Page 160, line 6, in the bracket of Eq. (3.203), add a fourth term +γ 5 (q 2 γ µ −/
q q µ )F4 (q 2 )
Page 160, lines 10-11
instead of “ F3 (q 2 ) = −F3 (q 2 ). Thus parity conservation alone yields F3 = 0.”
2
read “ F3 (q 2 ) = −F3 (q 2 ) and F4 (q 2 ) = −F4 (q 2 ). Thus parity conservation alone
yields F3 = F4 = 0.”
Page 160, lines 14, instead of “1 = 2 = −3 = 1.” read “1 = 2 = −3 = 4 = 1.”
Page 161, line 2, instead of “ σ µν = 2i [γµ , γ ν ] ” read “ σ µν = 2i [γ µ , γ ν ] ”
CHAPTER IV
X X
Page 179, line 17, instead of “ ” read “ ”
1≤k<l≤N 1≤l<k≤N
Page 188, line 15, instead of “ F (A) ” read “ T (A) ”
Page 193, eq. (4-113), line 1, instead of “ (P −eA)2 −m2 = · · ·” read “ (P −eA)2 = · · ·”
CHAPTER V
Page 207, first line of eq. (5-28)
instead of “ hp1 , . . . , pn , in|S|q1 , . . . , ql , outi ” read “ hp1 , . . . , pn , in|S|q1 , . . . , ql , ini ”
a†m |0ih0|an P∞ a†m |0ih0|an
Page 209, line 4, instead of “ · · · = m!n! · · · ” read “ · · · = m,n=0 m!n! ··· ”
Page 215, line –5, middleRline of the equation R
instead of “ · · · − iZ −1/2 d3 x · · · ” read “ · · · − iZ −1/2 d4 x · · · ”
Page 222, eq. (5-88), instead of “ εi .j(x) ” read “ εi .j(y) ”
Page 223, line 12,
delete “, using the fact that WM (x − y) depends only on (x − y)2 ”
Page 225, line –6, instead of “ · · · b† (qi , αi )|0i ” read “ · · · b† (pi , αi )|0i ”
Page 228, line –3, instead of “ = 8ki .pi kf .pf [· · · ” read “ = 8ki .pi kf .pi [· · · ”
Page 232, eq. (5-120), instead of “ −4(ε1 .ε2 ) ” read “ −4(ε1 .ε2 )2 ”
Page 239, line –3, instead of “ · · · (6 pf + 6 k + m)γ 0 (6 pf + 6 k + m) · · · ”
read “ · · · (6 pf + 6 k + m)γ 0 (6 pi + m)γ 0 (6 pf + 6 k + m) · · · ”
Page 240, line 3, instead of “ · · · pi .k pj .k] ” read “ · · · pi .k pf .k] ”
Page 240, third line of eq. (5-150)
2
p2i sin2 θi + p2f sin2 θf 2
p2i sin2 θi + p2f sin2 θf
instead of “ 2ω ”, read “ 2ω ”
(Ef − pf cos θf )(Ei − pi sin θi ) (Ef − pf cos θf )(Ei − pi cos θi )
Page 246, line 9, instead of “ . . . complex field ϕ to describe . . . ”
read “ . . . complex field ϕ, creating A and annihilating A, to describe . . . ”
3
CHAPTER VI
m2 e 4 m4 e 4
Page 278, eq. (6-39), instead of “ ” read “ ”
4E 2 (2π)2 4E 2 (2π)2
Page 281, eq. (6-47)
α h5 8E 4 − m4
instead of “ − + ··· ”
2E 2 4 E 2 (E 2 − m2 )(1 − cos θ)
α2 h 5 8E 4 − m4
read “ − + ··· ”
2E 2 4 4E 2 (E 2 − m2 )(1 − cos θ)
Page 286, one line before eq. (6-65)
instead of “ |T |2 = 4[· · ·] ” read “ |T |2 = 4[· · ·]2 ”
δ δ
Page 290, line –7, instead of “ i ” read “ i ”
∂ϕc (x) δϕc (x)
Page 294, line 10, instead of “ Sec. 4-3 ” read “ Sec. 4-2-2 ”
Page 298, line –2, instead of “ 2L − 4V + 4 < 0 ” read “ 2I − 4V + 4 < 0 ”
Page 303, line –4, instead of “ zi = zj0 ” read “ zj = zj0 ”
Page 311, four lines after eq. (6-119)
instead of “ after elimination of α1 = 1 − α2 − α3 , yield, for α = α2 = α3
(0 < α < 21 since 0 < α1 < 1 ) ”
read “ after elimination of α3 = 1 − α1 − α2 , yield, for α = α1 = α2
(0 < α < 21 since 0 < α3 < 1 ) ”
CHAPTER VII
Page 326, line 10, instead of “ log(Λ2 /m2 ) ” read “ ln(Λ2 /m2 ) ”
Page 328, line 17, instead of “ Sec. 6-3-2 ” read “ Sec. 7-3-2 ”
Page 333, line –10
instead of “ . . . ultraviolet divergent. ” read “ . . . ultraviolet convergent. ”
Page 345, line –11, instead of “ Sec. 3-3-4 ” read “ Sec. 4-3-4 ”
Page 354, line –2
instead of “ ϕ tanh ϕ + (1 − ϕ tanh ϕ) ” read “ 21 ϕ tanh ϕ + (1 − ϕ coth ϕ) ”
Page 355, line 8, instead of “contributions ” read “contribution ”
α α
Page 361, line –10, instead of “ B = ··· ” read “ B = ··· ”
4π 2 2π 2
Page 370, line –5, instead of “ vol. 75, p. 1912, ” read “ vol. 75, p. 898, ”
4
CHAPTER VIII
Page 377, line 9
k kν δ µν −m22 kµ kν δ µν +m22
instead of “ [(p−k)2µ−m 2 ]n (k 2 −m2 )p ” read “ [(p−k)2 +m21 ]n (k2 +m22 )p
”
1 2
1 1
instead of “ [(p−k)2 −m21 ]n (k2 −m22 )p−1
” read “ [(p−k)2 +m21 ]n (k2 +m22 )p−1
”
Page 380, line 17, instead of “ Therefore ωv is ” read “ Therefore ω̂v is ”
Page 381, line 8, instead of “ at least an . . . ” read “ at least one . . . ”
Page 383, eq. (8-23), instead of “ · · · = 2Ll − 4Il ” read “ · · · = 4Ll − 2Il ”
Page 408, end of eq. (8-78), instead of “ Aσ (x)|0i ” read “ Aσ (0)|0i ”
2 2
M kσ
Page 409, line 6, instead of “ −i µ2 (kM
2 −M 2 ) ” read “ −i µ2 (k 2 −M 2 ) ”
2
−M 2 2
−M 2
Page 409, line 13, instead of “ B(k 2 ) = λ k k2 ” read “ B(k 2 ) = −λ k k2 ”
Page 410, line 5, instead of “ Contracting Eq. (8-83) with kσ and . . . ”
read “ Contracting Eq. (8-83) with qσ and . . . ”
Page 410, last line, instead of “ p1 , p2 , p3 , p4 ” read “ k1 , k2 , k3 , k4 ”
Page 413, line –6, instead of “ +eZ1 ψ̄ Aψ
6 ” read “ −eZ1 ψ̄ Aψ
6 ”
Page 421, eq. (8-124), instead of “ C2 ” read “ C1 ”
Page 421, line –7, instead of “ [· · ·]d/2−4 ” read “ [· · ·]d−4 ”
CHAPTER IX
Page 430, line –3
instead of “ Mk,k+1 = Mk−1,k = · · · 1≤k ≤n−1 ”
read “ Mk,k+1 = Mk+1,k = · · · 0≤k ≤n−1 ”
X X An,m
Page 437, eq. (9-46), instead of “ A = An,m · · · ” read “ A = √ ··· ”
n,m n,m n!m!
Page 438, line 2" # "n−1 #
n−1
X X n−1
X
instead of “ exp z̄n zn−1 − z̄k zk + z̄1 z0 − i · · · ” read “ exp z̄k+1 zk − z̄k zk − i · · · ”
1 0 1
Page 438, line 10, instead of “ which requires to ” read “ which requires us to ”
η̄ η̇ − η̄˙ η η̄˙ η − η̄ η̇
Page 442, eq. (9-77), instead of “ ” read “ ”
2i 2i
5
Page 459, after eq. (9-155), instead of “ A canonical . . . ”
read “ Requiring that the g’s have vanishing Poisson brackets, a canonical . . . ”
Page 471, line 8
instead of “ integrate the normalized version of ϕ
ė in the subspace orthogonal to ψ. ”
read “integrate in the subspace orthogonal to ψ, the normalized version of ϕ.
ė ”
CHAPTER X
Page 480, interchange figures 10-3 and 10-4 but not their captions.
Page 480, eq. (10-24), instead of “ S(x1 , y1 ; x2 , y2 ; J )|J =0 ”, read “ S(x1 , x2 ; y1 , y2 ; J )|J =0 ”
Page 492, eq. (10-72), instead of “ D −3 χ(P ) ” read “ D −3 χ(p) ”
Page 497, line 9, instead of “ p0 = ∓E/2 + ω − iε ” read “ p0 = ∓E/2 − ω − iε ”
R R
Page 499, line –7, instead of “ (E 0 −E) d3 p η † (p)ϕ(p)”, read “ (E 0 −E) d3 p η † (p)ϕ0 (p)”
Page 499, eq. (10-107), instead of “ η ∗ (p) ” read “ η † (p) ”
Page 504, second line of eq. (10-120), instead of “ (k 0 +m2 )−· · · ” read “ (k 0 +m)2 −· · ·”
CHAPTER XI
Page 523, lines 4-6, instead of “ the lagrangian reads . . . decoupled massless fields, ”
read “ the lagrangian has the form
2
ξ 2
L = 12 (∂ρ)2 + 12 (∂ξξ )2 1 + vρ 1+f v − µ2 (v + ρ)2 − λ4 (v + ρ)4
with some function f . From this we see that the ξ correspond to (n − 1) massless fields,”
Page 547, last equation before Figure 11-13
instead of “ · · · = δ 4 (x − y) Tkl
α
[φl (y) + vl ] ” read “ · · · = −iδ 4 (x − y) Tkl
α
[φl (y) + vl ] ”
Page 551, replace lines 1-5 by
“ At k12 = k22 = 0, hence k1 .q = k2 .q = k1 .k2 , only two independent tensors are consistent
with these requirements :
B1 µνρ = εµνστ k1σ k2τ qρ
and B2 µνρ = (εµρστ k1 ν − ενρστ k2 µ ) k1σ k2τ − εµνρσ (k1σ − k2σ ) k1 .k2 .
A third possible tensor B3 µνρ = (εµρστ k2 ν − ενρστ k1 µ )k1σ k2τ is actually not independent,
because of the identity qσ ετ µνρ +qρ εστ µν +qν ερστ µ +qµ ενρστ +qτ εµνρσ = 0 . This expresses
that a totally antisymmetric rank 5 tensor vanishes in four dimensions. Contracted with
k1σ k2τ , this yields B1 µνρ = B2 µνρ + B3 µνρ . We therefore write the following expression
when k12 = k22 = 0
Tµνρ (k1 , k2 ) = εµνστ k1σ k2τ qρ T1 (q 2 ) (11 − 188)
+ [(εµρστ k1 ν − ενρστ k2 µ ) k1 k2 − εµνρσ (k1 − k2 ) k1 .k2 ] T2 (q 2 ) .
σ τ σ σ
Consequently,
q ρ Tµνρ = εµνστ k1σ k2τ q 2 T1 (q 2 ) + T2 (q 2 ) (11 − 189) ”
6
Page 553, line 7, an updated value is Γexp = (7.75 ± 0.5) eV.
CHAPTER XII
Page 564, line 6, instead of “ s(0) = x1 , s(1) = x2 ” read “ x(0) = x1 , x(1) = x2 ”
Page 574, line –13, instead of “ the latter ” read “ Γ ”
Page 577, line 12, instead of “ M0 = −∆δij · · · ” read “ M0 = −∆δab · · · ”
Page 595, replace lines 1–7 in small characters by the following, also in small characters
To be precise we write det MF (A) ≡ ∆F (A, F (A)) R accordingg to the definition
∆−F
1
(A, C) = D(g) δ(F ( A) − C)
For a gauge transformation independent of A we have obviously
∆F (gA, C) = ∆F (A, C)
due to the group invariance of the measure D(g). In the present case however where
A0 =g(A)A F (A) = F 0 (A0 ) = F 0 g(A)A
the gauge transformation depends on the potential. We shall show that the jacobians in D(A) and ∆ F
conspire to cancel. Consider
Z Z Z
D(A)∆F (A, F (A)) = D(A)∆F (A, F (A)) D(A0 ) δ A0 −g(A)A
Z
× ∆F 0 (A, F (A)) D(g) δ F 0 (gA) − F (A)
Both terms between brackets on the right hand side are equal to unity. The argument of the last δ-function
vanishes for g = g(A), we can therefore substitute the generic g for g(A) in the first δ-function. We then
−1
set A =g B, recognize that D(A) = D(B) and integrate over B. Thus, using the invariance of ∆ under
potential independent gauge transformations
Z
D(A) ∆F (A, F (A)) =
Z
−1 −1 −1
= D(A0 )D(g) ∆ F A0 , F g
A0 ∆F 0 A0 , F g
A0 δ F 0 (A0 ) − F g
A0
Z
−1
= D(A0 )D(g) ∆F (A0 , F 0 (A0 )) ∆F 0 (A0 , F 0 (A0 )) δ F 0 (A0 ) − F g
A0
Z
= D(A0 ) ∆F 0 (A0 , F 0 (A0 ))
The last equality follows from the integration over g and translates in precise terms Eq. (12-129).
Page 596, eq. (12-137), erase the first “ 0= ”
Page 600, line –10, instead of “ Ie1 = I − · · · ” read “ Ie1 = Ie − · · · ”
Page 603, line –9, instead of “ involve no λ5 matrix ” read “ involve no γ5 matrix ”
Page 611, line –10, instead of “ (k 2 − m2 )−1 ” read “ (k 2 − M 2 )−1 ”
7
Page 625, line 8, an updated value is sin2 θW ' 0.23.
CHAPTER XIII
Page 635, line 11
instead of “the derivative (∂/∂x)das (α1 , x) ” read “the derivative (∂/∂x)das (α, x) ”
∂ ∂
Page 648, eq. (13-61), instead of “ · · · = m0 ··· read “ · · · = 21 m0 ···
∂m0 ∂m0
∂m0 (Λ/m, g) ∂m0 (Λ/m, g0 )
Page 649, eq.(13-65), instead of “ ” read “ ”
∂m ∂m
Page 653, line –3, instead of “ . . . Migdal ”
read “ . . . Migdal, as well as the three-loop one worked out by Tarasov, Vladimirov
and Zharkov ”
Page 653, line –2, instead of “+O(g 7 ) ”
g7
read “+ (4π) 6 − 2857 3 1415 2
54 C + 27 C Tf −
158 2
27 CTf + 205
9 CCf Tf − 44 2
9 C f Tf − 2Cf2 Tf + O(g 9 ) ”
Page 660, line 14, instead of “ . A mean ” read “ . A means ”
Page 662, line –3, instead of “Experimental conditions, sin2 (θ/2) 1, ”
read “Experimental limitations on the accessible range of sin2 (θ/2) ”
Page 670, eq. (13-124), instead of “ m2µ /q 2 → ∞ ” read “ m2µ /q 2 → 0 ”
R d4 p
R d4 q
Page 676, eq. (13-144), instead of “ (2π)4 ” read “ (2π)4 ”
Page 683, line 4, instead of “ which play ” read “ which plays ”
Page 683, line –5
instead of “ W (q 2 , −ω) = −W (q 2 , −ω) ” read “ W (q 2 , −ω) = −W (q 2 , ω) ”
Page 689, line 9, add
“ For the three-loop calculation, see O.V. Tarasov, A.A. Vladimirov and A.Yu. Zharkov,
Phys. Lett., ser. B, vol. 93, p. 429, 1980. ”
APPENDIX
Page 696, line –2, eq. (A-40), instead of “ (2π 3 ) ” read “ (2π)3 ”
INDEX
Page 702, left column, line –6
instead of “ paramagnetic representation ” read “ parametric representation ”
Page 702, right column, line 26
instead of “ Gell-Mann low function ” read “ Gell-Mann Low function ”
