Wwtbugs PDF
Wwtbugs PDF
Wwtbugs PDF
BUGS
CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSE
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSE
WWTBUGS©8/1/2018 www.abctlc.com 2 Toll Free (866) 557-1746
Printing and Saving Instructions
TLC recommends that you download and save this pdf document and
assignment to your computer desktop and open it with Adobe Acrobat
DC reader.
You can complete the course by viewing the course on your computer
or you can print it out. This course booklet does not have the
assignment (the test). Please visit our website and download the
assignment (the test).
State Approval Listing Link, check to see if your State accepts or has
pre-approved this course. Not all States are listed. Not all courses are
listed. Do not solely trust our list for it may be outdated. It is your sole
responsibility to ensure this course is accepted for credit. No refunds.
Professional Engineers: Most states will accept our courses for credit
but we do not officially list the States or Agencies.
Most of our students prefer to do the assignment in Word and e-mail or fax the
assignment back to us. We also teach this course in a conventional hands-on
class. Call us and schedule a class today.
Copyright Notice
1999-2018 Technical Learning College (TLC) No part of this work may be reproduced or
distributed in any form or by any means without TLC’s prior written approval. Permission
has been sought for all images and text where we believe copyright exists and where the
copyright holder is traceable and contactable. Other materials including text and artwork
are in the public domain or fair use (the state of belonging or being available to the public
as a whole, and therefore not subject to copyright.) All material that is not credited or
acknowledged or referenced in the rear of this course is the copyright of Technical Learning
College. All other unacknowledged references are in the Water/ Wastewater Sampling and
Water Chemistry Courses. Most unaccredited photographs have been taken by TLC
instructors or TLC students. All written, graphic, photographic or other material is provided
for educational information only. We will be pleased to hear from any copyright holder and
will make good on your work if any unintentional copyright infringements were made as
soon as these issues are brought to the editor's attention. This educational training course
and assignment is intended for educational purposes only. Every possible effort was made
to ensure that all information provided in this course is accurate. Therefore, Technical
Learning College accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for the application or
misuse of any information included herein.
Information in this document is subject to change without notice. TLC is not liable for errors
or omissions appearing in this document.
Contributing Editors
James L. Six Received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering from the
University of Akron in June of 1976, Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio,
Number 45031 (Retired), Class IV Water Supply Operator issued by Ohio EPA, Number
WS4-1012914-08, Class II Wastewater Collection System Operator issued by Ohio EPA,
Number WC2-1012914-94
Joseph Camerata has a BS in Management with honors (magna cum laude). He retired
as a Chemist in 2006 having worked in the field of chemical, environmental, and industrial
hygiene sampling and analysis for 40 years.
James Bevan, Water Quality Inspector S.M.E. Twenty years of experience in the
environmental field dealing with all aspects of water regulations on the federal, state, and
local levels. Teacher and Proctor in Charge for Backflow Certification Testing at the ASETT
Center in Tucson for the past 15 years and possess an Arizona Community College,
Special Teaching Certificate in Environmental Studies.
Dr. Pete Greer S.M.E., Retired biology instructor, chemistry and biological review.
Jack White, Environmental, Health, Safety expert, City of Phoenix. Art Credits.
Technical Learning College (TLC) offers affordable continuing education for today’s
working professionals who need to maintain licenses or certifications. TLC holds several
different governmental agency approvals for granting of continuing education credit.
TLC’s delivery method of continuing education can include traditional types of classroom
lectures and distance-based courses or independent study. TLC’s distance based or
independent study courses are offered in a print - based distance educational format. We
will beat any other training competitor’s price for the same CEU material or classroom
training.
Our courses are designed to be flexible and for you do finish the material on your leisure.
Students can also receive course materials through the mail. The CEU course or e-manual
will contain all your lessons, activities and instruction to obtain the assignments. All of
TLC’s CEU courses allow students to submit assignments using e-mail or fax, or by postal
mail. (See the course description for more information.)
Students have direct contact with their instructor—primarily by e-mail or telephone. TLC’s
CEU courses may use such technologies as the World Wide Web, e-mail, CD-ROMs,
videotapes and hard copies. (See the course description.) Make sure you have access to
the necessary equipment before enrolling, i.e., printer, Microsoft Word and/or Adobe
Acrobat Reader. Some courses may require proctored closed-book exams depending
upon your state or employer requirements.
Flexible Learning
At TLC, there are no scheduled online sessions or passwords you need contend with, nor
are you required to participate in learning teams or groups designed for the "typical"
younger campus based student. You can work at your own pace, completing assignments
in time-frames that work best for you. TLC's method of flexible individualized instruction is
designed to provide each student the guidance and support needed for successful course
completion.
Course Structure
TLC's online courses combine the best of online delivery and traditional university
textbooks. You can easily find the course syllabus, course content, assignments, and the
post-exam (Assignment). This student friendly course design allows you the most flexibility
in choosing when and where you will study.
Classroom of One
TLC offers you the best of both worlds. You learn on your own terms, on your own time,
but you are never on your own. Once enrolled, you will be assigned a personal Student
Service Representative who works with you on an individualized basis throughout your
program of study. Course specific faculty members (S.M.E.) are assigned at the beginning
of each course providing the academic support you need to successfully complete each
course. Please call or email us for assistance.
We welcome you to do the electronic version of the assignment and submit the answer
key and registration to us either by fax or e-mail.
If you need this assignment graded and a certificate of completion within a 48-hour turn
around, prepare to pay an additional rush charge of $50.
Contact Numbers
Fax (928) 468-0675
Email [email protected]
Telephone (866) 557-1746
Intended Audience
Wastewater Treatment Operators; Pretreatment and Industrial Waste Inspectors. The
target audience for this course is the person interested in working in a wastewater
treatment or pretreatment/industrial wastewater facility and/or wishing to maintain CEUs
for certification license or to learn how to do the job safely and effectively, and/or to meet
education needs for promotion.
Prerequisites: None
When a student registers for a correspondence course, he or she is assigned a start date
and an end date. It is the student's responsibility to note dates for assignments and keep
up with the course work. If a student falls behind, he or she must contact TLC and request
an end date extension in order to complete the course. It is the prerogative of TLC to
decide whether to grant the request.
Grading Criteria
TLC will offer the student either pass/fail or a standard letter grading assignment. If TLC
is not notified, you will only receive a pass/fail notice.
ADA Compliance
TLC will make reasonable accommodations for persons with documented disabilities.
Students should notify TLC and their instructors of any special needs. Course content may
vary from this outline to meet the needs of this particular group. There is an alternative
assignment available.
Note to students: Keep a copy of everything you submit. That way if your work is lost
you can submit your copy for grading. If you do not receive your graded assignment or
quiz results within two or three weeks after submitting it, please contact your instructor.
We expect every student to produce his/her original, independent work. Any student
whose work indicates a violation of the Academic Misconduct Policy (cheating, plagiarism)
can expect penalties as specified in the Student Handbook, which is available through
Student Services; contact them at (928) 468-0665.
A student who registers for a Distance Learning course is assigned a "start date" and an
"end date." It is the student's responsibility to note due dates for assignments and to keep
up with the course work.
If a student falls behind, she or he must contact the instructor and request an extension of
her/his end date in order to complete the course. It is the prerogative of the instructor to
decide whether or not to grant the request. You will have 90 days from receipt of this
manual to complete it in order to receive your Continuing Education Units (CEUs) or
Professional Development Hours (PDHs). A score of 70% or better is necessary to pass
this course.
Educational Mission
The educational mission of TLC is:
To provide TLC students with comprehensive and ongoing training in the theory and
skills needed for the environmental education field,
To provide TLC students opportunities to apply and understand the theory and skills
needed for operator certification,
To provide a forum in which students can exchange experiences and ideas related to
environmental education,
To provide a forum for the collection and dissemination of current information related to
environmental education, and to maintain an environment that nurtures academic and
personal growth.
Course Objective
To provide a detailed understanding wastewater treatment microorganisms, activated
sludge, wastewater treatment sampling techniques and biological monitoring, bug
identification and microorganism control methods.
This manual will cover general laws, regulations, required procedures and generally accepted
policies relating to wastewater treatment and wastewater sampling. It should be noted, however,
that the regulation of wastewater treatment, sampling and other hazardous materials is an ongoing
process and subject to change over time. For this reason, a list of resources is provided to assist
in obtaining the most up-to-date information on various subjects.
This manual is not a guidance document for employees who are involved with pollution control or
wastewater treatment. It is not designed to meet the requirements of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or Department of Labor-Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) or state environmental or health departments.
This course manual will provide general educational awareness guidance of activated sludge. This
document is not a detailed wastewater treatment textbook or a comprehensive source book on
occupational safety and health.
Technical Learning College or Technical Learning Consultants, Inc. makes no warranty, guarantee
or representation as to the absolute correctness or appropriateness of the information in this
manual and assumes no responsibility in connection with the implementation of this information. It
cannot be assumed that this manual contains all measures and concepts required for specific
conditions or circumstances. This document should be used for educational guidance and is not
considered a legal document.
Individuals who are responsible for the treatment of wastewater, wastewater sampling or the health
and safety of workers at wastewater sites should obtain and comply with the most recent federal,
state, and local regulations relevant to these sites and are urged to consult with OSHA, EPA and
other appropriate federal, state, health and local agencies.
When sludge is not removed or is settling improperly, the sludge will denitrify and rise to
the top. The sludge will flow over the weir as seen in this photograph and clog filters.
The CWA provides for the delegation by the EPA of many permitting, administrative, and
enforcement aspects of the law to state governments. In states with the authority to implement
CWA programs, the EPA still retains oversight responsibilities. In 1972, Congress enacted the first
comprehensive national clean water legislation in response to growing public concern for serious
and widespread water pollution. The Clean Water Act is the primary federal law that protects our
nation’s waters, including lakes, rivers, aquifers, and coastal areas.
Lake Erie was dying. The Potomac River was clogged with blue-green algae blooms that were a
nuisance and a threat to public health. Many of the nation's rivers were little more than open sewers
and sewage frequently washed up on shore. Fish kills were a common sight. Wetlands were
disappearing at a rapid rate.
Today, the quality of our waters has improved dramatically as a result of a cooperative effort by
federal, state, tribal and local governments to implement the pollution control programs established
in 1972 by the Clean Water Act. The Clean Water Act's primary objective is to restore and maintain
the integrity of the nation's waters. This objective translates into two fundamental national goals:
For example, the Clean Water Act requires major industries to meet performance standards to
ensure pollution control; charges states, and tribes with setting specific water quality criteria
appropriate for their waters and developing pollution control programs to meet them; provides
funding to states and communities to help them meet their clean water infrastructure needs;
protects valuable wetlands and other aquatic habitats through a permitting process that ensures
development, and other activities are conducted in an environmentally sound manner. After 25
years, the act continues to provide a clear path for clean water and a solid foundation for an
effective national water program.
In 1972
Only a third of the nation's waters were safe for fishing and swimming. Wetlands losses were
estimated at about 460,000 acres annually. Agricultural runoff resulted in the erosion of 2.25 billion
tons of soil and the deposit of large amounts of phosphorus and nitrogen into many waters. Sewage
treatment plants served only 85 million people.
Today
Two-thirds of the nation's waters are safe for fishing and swimming. The rate of annual wetlands
losses is estimated at about 70,000-90,000 acres according to recent studies. The amount of soil
lost due to agricultural runoff has been cut by one billion tons annually, and phosphorus and
nitrogen levels in water sources are down. Modern wastewater treatment facilities serve 173 million
people.
The Future
All Americans will enjoy clean water that is safe for fishing and swimming. We will achieve a net
gain of wetlands by preventing additional losses and restoring hundreds of thousands of acres of
wetlands. Soil erosion and runoff of phosphorus and nitrogen into watersheds will be minimized,
helping to sustain the nation's farming economy and aquatic systems. The nation's waters will be
free of effects of sewage discharges.
The use of sewage collection systems brought dramatic improvements to public health, further
encouraging the growth of metropolitan areas. In the year 2000 approximately 208 million people
in the U.S. were served by centralized collection systems.
Wastewater Treatment
In 1892, only 27 American cities provided wastewater treatment. Today, more than 16,000 publicly-
owned wastewater treatment plants operate in the United States and its territories. The
constructions of wastewater treatment facilities blossomed in the 1920s and again after the
passage of the CWA in 1972 with the availability of grant funding and new requirements calling for
minimum levels of treatment. Adequate treatment of wastewater, along with the ability to provide a
sufficient supply of clean water, has become a major concern for many communities.
What is in Wastewater?
Wastewater is mostly water by weight. Other materials make up only a small portion of wastewater,
but can be present in large enough quantities to endanger public health and the environment.
Because practically anything that can be flushed down a toilet, drain, or sewer can be found in
wastewater, even household sewage contains many potential pollutants. The wastewater
components that should be of most concern to homeowners and communities are those that have
the potential to cause disease or detrimental environmental effects.
Biological
In nature, bacteria and other small organisms in water
consume organic matter in sewage, turning it into new
bacterial cells, carbon dioxide, and other by-products.
Activated Sludge is a suspended growth process for removing organic matter from sewage by
saturating it with air and microorganisms that can break down the organic matter. Advanced
Treatment involves treatment levels beyond secondary treatment.
Organisms
Many different types of organisms live in wastewater and some are essential contributors to
treatment. A variety of bacteria, protozoa, and worms work to break down certain carbon-based
(organic) pollutants in wastewater by consuming them. Through this process, organisms turn
wastes into carbon dioxide, water, or new cell growth.
Bacteria and other microorganisms are particularly plentiful in wastewater and accomplish most of
the treatment. Most wastewater treatment systems are designed to rely in large part on biological
processes.
Pathogens
Many disease-causing viruses, parasites, and bacteria also are present in wastewater and enter
from almost anywhere in the community. These pathogens often originate from people and animals
are infected with or are carriers of a disease. Graywater and blackwater from typical homes contain
enough pathogens to pose a risk to public health. Other likely sources in communities include
hospitals, schools, farms, and food processing plants.
Some illnesses from wastewater-related sources are relatively common. Gastroenteritis can result
from a variety of pathogens in wastewater, and cases of illnesses caused by the parasitic protozoa
Giardia lambia and Cryptosporidium are not unusual in the U.S. Other important wastewater-related
diseases include hepatitis A, typhoid, polio, cholera, and dysentery. Outbreaks of these diseases
can occur as a result of drinking water from wells polluted by wastewater, eating contaminated fish,
or recreational activities in polluted waters. Some illnesses can be spread by animals and insects
that come in contact with wastewater.
Even municipal drinking water sources are not completely immune to health risks from wastewater
pathogens. Drinking water treatment efforts can become overwhelmed when water resources are
heavily polluted by wastewater. For this reason, wastewater treatment is as important to public
health as drinking water treatment.
Ciliate
Vorticella is a stalked ciliate. There are at least a dozen species found in activated sludge
ranging in length from about 30 to 150 μm. These organisms are oval to round shaped,
have a contractile stalk, a domed feeding zone, and a water vacuole located near the
terminal end of the feeding cavity.
This course contains general EPA’s CWA federal rule requirements. Please be
aware that each state implements wastewater/safety/environment regulations that
may be more stringent than EPA’s regulations. Check with your state
environmental agency for more information.
Effect of TSS
o Increases turbidity
Less light - reduced photosynthesis.
Causes fish's gills to get plugged up.
o Increases silting
Reduces lifetime of lakes.
Changes benthic (i.e., bottom) ecology.
Effect of pH
o Organisms are very susceptible to acids and bases.
o Recommended to have near neutral conditions (6.5 - 8.5).
Effect of Pathogens
May infect:
o Humans
o Animals
The country has a vast system of collection sewers, pumping stations, and treatment plants.
Sewers collect the wastewater from homes, businesses, and many industries, and deliver it to
plants for treatment. Most treatment plants were built to clean wastewater for discharge into
streams or other receiving waters, or for reuse.
Years ago, when sewage was dumped into waterways, a natural process of purification began.
First, the sheer volume of clean water in the stream diluted wastes. Bacteria and other small
organisms in the water consumed the sewage and other organic matter, turning it into new bacterial
cells; carbon dioxide and other products. Today’s higher populations and greater volume of
domestic and industrial wastewater require that communities give nature a helping hand. The basic
function of wastewater treatment is to speed up the natural processes by which water is purified.
There are two basic stages in the treatment of wastes, primary and secondary.
In the primary stage, solids are allowed to settle and removed from wastewater. The secondary
stage uses biological processes to further purify wastewater. Sometimes, these stages are
combined into one operation.
The Preliminary Treatment is purely physical stage consisting of Coarse Screening, Raw Influent
Pumping, Static Fine Screening, Grit Removal, and Selector Tanks. The raw wastewater enters
from the collection system into the Coarse Screening process. After the wastewater has been
screened, it may flow into a grit chamber where sand, grit, cinders, and small stones settle to the
bottom.
Collected Grit►
Fine Screening►
Primary Clarifier
Pollutants that are dissolved or are very fine and remain suspended in the wastewater are not
removed effectively by gravity settling. When the wastewater enters a sedimentation tank, it slows
down and the suspended solids gradually sink to the bottom. This mass of solids is called primary
sludge. Various methods have been devised to remove solids, newer plants have some type of
mechanical equipment to remove the settled solids and some plants remove solids continuously
while others do so at intervals.
Secondary Treatment
After the wastewater has been through Primary Treatment processes, it flows into the next stage
of treatment called secondary. Secondary treatment processes can remove up to 90 percent of the
organic matter in wastewater by using biological treatment processes. The two most common
conventional methods used to achieve secondary treatment are attached growth processes and
suspended growth processes.
Thus, after this process has taken place within the Oxidation Ditches the wastewater then enters
Secondary Clarification process which can provide this physical separation.
Here is a grinder pump that is installed after the bar screens. This debris is sent to the
landfill.
Scum Box
Lagoon Systems
Lagoon systems are shallow basins that hold the wastewater for several months to allow for the
natural degradation of sewage. These systems take advantage of natural aeration and
microorganisms in the wastewater to renovate sewage.
Sampling Industrial Waste, in this photograph, the Inspector or Sampler is shaking the
sample to make sure that the sample is mixed-up before pouring off a smaller sample into
the smaller sample bottles on the ground. Normally, these Inspectors or Samplers will
work in pairs. Get used to having wastewater and/or industrial waste/odors all over your
clothes. But other than that, spiders, grease, confined spaces, irate customers, the
interesting odors and dangerous Hydrogen Sulfide gas; this is a good job to have, a secure
and well-paying job.
Temperature
The best temperatures for wastewater treatment probably range from 77 to 95 degrees Fahrenheit.
In general, biological treatment activity accelerates in warm temperatures and slows in cool
temperatures, but extreme hot or cold can stop treatment processes altogether. Therefore, some
systems are less effective during cold weather and some may not be appropriate for very cold
climates.
Wastewater temperature also affects receiving waters. Hot water, for example, which is a byproduct
of many manufacturing processes, can be a pollutant. When discharged in large quantities, it can
raise the temperature of receiving streams locally and disrupt the natural balance of aquatic life.
pH
The acidity or alkalinity of wastewater affects both treatment and the environment. Low pH indicates
increasing acidity while a high pH indicates increasing alkalinity (a pH of 7 is neutral). The pH of
wastewater needs to remain between 6 and 9 to protect organisms. Acids and other substances
that alter pH can inactivate treatment processes when they enter wastewater from industrial or
commercial sources.
Hydrogen sulfide or H2S problems are very common in the collection and wastewater system. There
are many chemicals used to help or treat this problem. Here are a few used in the treatment of
hydrogen sulfide problems: Salts of zinc, lime, hydrogen peroxide, chlorine and magnesium
hydroxide. Hydrogen sulfide production in collection systems can cause a number of problems such
as corrosion of the pipes, manholes, and creation of hazardous atmospheres and foul odors. The
best method of controlling hydrogen sulfide is to eliminate its habitat or growth area by keeping
sewers cleaner, this will harbor fewer slime bacteria.
Here are some important statements regarding the reduction of hydrogen sulfide: Salts of zinc and
iron may precipitate sulfides, lime treatments can also kill bacteria which produce hydrogen sulfide,
but this creates a sludge disposal problem and chlorination is effective at reducing the bacteria
which produce hydrogen sulfide. Hydrogen sulfide conditions occur in the sewer system because
of the lack of oxygen.
Pathogens
Disinfection of wastewater and chlorination of drinking water supplies has reduced the occurrence
of waterborne diseases such as typhoid fever, cholera, and dysentery, which remain problems in
underdeveloped countries while they have been virtually eliminated in the infectious micro-
organisms, or pathogens, may be carried into surface and groundwater by sewage from cities and
institutions, by certain kinds of industrial wastes, such as tanning and meat packing plants, and by
the contamination of storm runoff with animal wastes from pets, livestock and wild animals, such
as geese or deer. Humans may come in contact with these pathogens either by drinking
contaminated water or through swimming, fishing, or other contact activities. Modern disinfection
techniques have greatly reduced the danger of waterborne disease.
Nutrients
Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus are essential to living organisms and are the chief nutrients
present in natural water. Large amounts of these nutrients are also present in sewage, certain
industrial wastes, and drainage from fertilized land. Conventional secondary biological treatment
processes do not remove the phosphorus and nitrogen to any substantial extent. They may convert
the organic forms of these substances into mineral form, making them more usable by plant life.
When an excess of these nutrients over-stimulates the growth of water plants, the result causes
unsightly conditions, interferes with drinking water treatment processes, and causes unpleasant
and disagreeable tastes and odors in drinking water.
The release of large amounts of nutrients, primarily phosphorus but occasionally nitrogen, causes
nutrient enrichment which results in excessive growth of algae. Uncontrolled algae growth blocks
out sunlight and chokes aquatic plants and animals by depleting dissolved oxygen in the water at
night. The release of nutrients in quantities that exceed the affected waterbody’s ability to assimilate
them results in a condition called eutrophication or cultural enrichment.
Thermal
Heat reduces the capacity of water to retain oxygen. In some areas, water used for cooling is
discharged to streams at elevated temperatures from power plants and industries. Even discharges
from wastewater treatment plants and storm water retention ponds affected by summer heat can
be released at temperatures above that of the receiving water, and elevate the stream temperature.
Unchecked discharges of waste heat can seriously alter the ecology of a lake, a stream, or estuary.
Organic compounds normally are some combination of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and
other elements. Many organics are proteins, carbohydrates, or fats and are biodegradable, which
means they can be consumed and broken down by organisms. However, even biodegradable
materials can cause pollution. In fact, too much organic matter in wastewater can be devastating
to receiving waters.
Large amounts of biodegradable materials are dangerous to lakes, streams, and oceans, because
organisms use dissolved oxygen in the water to break down the wastes. This can reduce or deplete
the supply of oxygen in the water needed by aquatic life, resulting in fish kills, odors, and overall
degradation of water quality.
The amount of oxygen organisms need to break down wastes in wastewater is referred to as the
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and is one of the measurements used to assess overall
wastewater strength.
Some organic compounds are more stable than others and cannot be quickly broken down by
organisms, posing an additional challenge for treatment. This is true of many synthetic organic
compounds developed for agriculture and industry.
In addition, certain synthetic organics are highly toxic. Pesticides and herbicides are toxic to
humans, fish, and aquatic plants and often are disposed of improperly in drains or carried in
stormwater. In receiving waters, they kill or contaminate fish, making them unfit to eat. They also
can damage processes in treatment plants. Benzene and toluene are two toxic organic compounds
found in some solvents, pesticides, and other products. New synthetic organic compounds are
being developed all the time, which can complicate treatment efforts.
They also can trap trash, plants, and other materials, causing foul odors, attracting flies and
mosquitoes and other disease vectors. In some cases, too much oil and grease causes septic
conditions in ponds and lakes by preventing oxygen from the atmosphere from reaching the water.
Onsite systems also can be harmed by too much oil and grease, which can clog onsite system
drainfield pipes and soils, adding to the risk of system failure. Excessive grease also adds to the
septic tank scum layer, causing more frequent tank pumping to be required. Both possibilities can
result in significant costs to homeowners.
Petroleum-based waste oils used for motors and industry are considered hazardous waste and
should be collected and disposed of separately from wastewater.
Large amounts of many inorganic substances can contaminate soil and water. Some are toxic to
animals and humans and may accumulate in the environment. For this reason, extra treatment
steps are often required to remove inorganic materials from industrial wastewater sources. For
example, heavy metals which are discharged with many types of industrial wastewaters are difficult
to remove by conventional treatment methods. Although acute poisonings from heavy metals in
drinking water are rare in the U.S., potential long-term health effects of ingesting small amounts of
some inorganic substances over an extended period of time are possible.
Nutrients
Wastewater often contains large amounts of the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus in the form of
nitrate and phosphate, which promote plant growth.
Organisms only require small amounts of nutrients in biological treatment, so there normally is an
excess available in treated wastewater. In severe cases, excessive nutrients in receiving waters
cause algae and other plants to grow quickly depleting oxygen in the water, deprived of oxygen,
fish and other aquatic life die, emitting foul odors.
Nutrients from wastewater have also been linked to ocean "red tides" that poison fish and cause
illness in humans. Nitrogen in drinking water may contribute to miscarriages and is the cause of a
serious illness in infants called methemoglobinemia or "blue baby syndrome."
Solids
Solid materials in wastewater can consist of organic and/or inorganic materials and organisms. The
solids must be significantly reduced by treatment or they can increase BOD when discharged to
receiving waters and provide places for microorganisms to escape disinfection. They also can clog
soil absorption fields in onsite systems.
Settleable solids: Certain substances, such as sand, grit, and heavier organic and inorganic
materials settle out from the rest of the wastewater stream during the preliminary stages of
treatment. On the bottom of settling tanks and ponds, organic material makes up a biologically
active layer of sludge that aids in treatment.
Suspended solids: Materials that resist settling may remain suspended in wastewater. Suspended
solids in wastewater must be treated, or they will clog soil absorption systems or reduce the
effectiveness of disinfection systems.
Dissolved solids: Small particles of certain wastewater materials can dissolve, like salt in water.
Some dissolved materials are consumed by microorganisms in wastewater, but others, such as
heavy metals, are difficult to remove by conventional treatment. Excessive amounts of dissolved
solids in wastewater can have adverse effects on the environment.
Gases
Certain gases in wastewater can cause odors, affect treatment, or are potentially dangerous.
Methane gas, for example, is a byproduct of anaerobic biological treatment and is highly
combustible. Special precautions need to be taken near septic tanks, manholes, treatment plants,
and other areas where wastewater gases can collect.
During this five-day period, aerobic (oxygen-consuming) bacteria decompose organic matter in the
sample and consume dissolved oxygen in proportion to the amount of organic material that is
present. In general, a high BOD reflects high concentrations of substances that can be biologically
degraded, thereby consuming oxygen and potentially resulting in low dissolved oxygen in the
receiving water.
The BOD test was developed for samples dominated by oxygen-demanding pollutants like sewage.
While its merit as a pollution parameter continues to be debated, BOD has the advantage of a long
period of record.
Organic Carbon
Most organic carbon in water occurs as partly degraded plant and animal materials, some of which
are resistant to microbial degradation. Organic carbon is important in the estuarine food web and
is incorporated into the ecosystem by photosynthesis of green plants, then consumed as
carbohydrates and other organic compounds by higher animals. In another process, formerly living
tissue containing carbon is decomposed as detritus by bacteria and other microbes.
Waterless urinals are reducing water use but are concentrating the wastestream. Water
conservation education is taught at schools and this too is affecting our flow dynamics and
microorganisms or MO’s. Anything new always affects the bugs and no one cares but us.
According to studies, water use in many homes is lowest from about midnight to 5 a.m.,
averaging less than one gallon per person per hour, but then rises sharply in the morning
around 6 am to a little over 3 gallons per person per hour. During the day, water use drops
off moderately and rises again in the early evening hours. Weekly peak flows may occur
in some homes on weekends, especially when all adults work during the week. In U.S.
homes, average water use is approximately 45 gallons per person per day, but may range
from 35 to 60 gallons or more.
Engineers must allow for additional flows during wet weather due to inflow and infiltration of extra
water into sewers. Excess water can enter sewers through leaky manhole covers and cracked
pipes and pipe joints, diluting wastewater, which affects its overall characteristics. This can increase
flows to treatment plants sometimes by as much as three or four times the original design load.
The main focus of wastewater treatment plants is to reduce the BOD and COD in the effluent
discharged to natural waters, meeting state and federal discharge criteria. Wastewater treatment
plants are designed to function as "microbiology farms," where bacteria and other microorganisms
are fed oxygen and organic waste. Treatment of wastewater usually involves biological processes
such as the activated sludge system in the secondary stage after preliminary screening to remove
coarse particles and primary sedimentation that settles out suspended solids. These secondary
treatment steps are generally considered environmental biotechnologies that harness natural self-
purification processes contained in bioreactors for the biodegradation of organic matter and
bioconversion of soluble nutrients in the wastewater.
Biosolids Stabilization
Prior to utilization or disposal, biosolids are stabilized to control odors and reduce the number of
disease-causing organisms. Sewage solids, or sludge, when separated from the wastewater, still
contain around 98 percent water. They are usually thickened and may be dewatered to reduce the
volume to be transported for final processing, disposal, or beneficial use.
Dewatering Processes
Dewatering processes include drying beds, belt filter presses, plate and frame presses, and
centrifuges. To improve dewatering effectiveness, the solids can be pretreated with chemicals such
as lime, ferric chloride, or polymers to produce larger particles which are easier to remove.
Land Application
In many areas, biosolids are marketed to farmers as fertilizer. Federal regulation (40 CFR Part 503)
defines minimum requirements for such land application practices, including contaminant limits,
field management practices, treatment requirements, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements. Properly treated and applied biosolids are a good source of organic matter for
improving soil structure and help supply nitrogen, phosphorus, and micronutrients that are required
by plants.
Biosolids have also been used successfully for many years as a soil conditioner and fertilizer, and
for restoring and re-vegetating areas with poor soils due to construction activities, strip mining or
other practices. Under this biosolids management approach, treated solids in semi liquid or
dewatered form are transported to the soil treatment areas. The slurry or dewatered biosolids,
containing nutrients and stabilized organic matter, is spread over the land to give nature a hand in
returning grass, trees, and flowers to barren land.
Restoration of the countryside also helps control the flow of acid drainage from mines that
endangers fish and other aquatic life and contaminates the water with acid, salts, and excessive
quantities of metals.
Incineration
Incineration consists of burning the dried solids to reduce the organic residuals to an ash that can
be disposed of or reused. Incinerators often include heat recovery features. Undigested sludge
solids have significant fuel value as a result of their high organic content.
However, the water content must be greatly reduced by dewatering or drying to take advantage of
the fuel potential of the biosolids. For this reason, pressure filtration dewatering equipment is used
to obtain biosolids which are sufficiently dry to burn without continual reliance on auxiliary fuels. In
some cities, biosolids are mixed with refuse or refuse derived fuel prior to burning. Generally, waste
heat is recovered to provide the greatest amount of energy efficiency.
Effective stabilization of wastewater residuals and their conversion to biosolid products can be
costly. Some cities have produced fertilizers from biosolids which are sold to help pay part of the
cost of treating wastewater. Some municipalities use composted, heat dried, or lime stabilized
biosolid products on parks and other public areas.
A wastewater collection and treatment system under some form of common ownership that collects
wastewater from two or more dwellings or buildings and conveys it to a treatment and dispersal
system located on a suitable site near the dwellings or buildings is a cluster system.
Decentralized systems include those using alternative treatment technologies like media filters,
constructed wetland systems, aerobic treatment units, and a variety of soil dispersal systems. Soil
dispersal systems include pressure systems such as low pressure pipe and drip dispersal systems.
These systems treat and disperse relatively small volumes of wastewater, and are generally are
found in rural and suburban areas.
While septic tanks and soil absorption systems have significant limitations, decentralized systems
can effectively protect water quality and public health from groundwater and surface water
contamination if managed properly (i.e. properly sited, sized, designed, installed, operated, and
maintained). Nitrate concentrations in groundwater that exceed the drinking water standards can
cause health problems.
Onsite Treatment
Onsite wastewater systems contain three components: a treatment unit which treats water prior to
dispersal into the environment; a soil dispersal component which assures that treated water is
released into the environment at a rate which can be assimilated; and a management system which
assures proper long term operation of the complete system.
Disinfection of the treated effluent may be provided prior to dispersal. A typical onsite system
consists of a septic tank followed by an effluent distribution system. Alternative treatment systems
include aerobic treatment and sand filtration systems. We will cover this in much more detail in a
few more pages.
Anaerobic bacteria in the sewage break down the organic matter, allowing cleaner water to flow
out of the second chamber. The liquid typically discharges through a subsurface distribution
system. Periodically, the solid matter in the bottom of the tank, referred to as septage, must be
removed and disposed of properly.
As with the typical septic system, the effluent discharge from an aerobic system is typically released
through a sub-surface distribution system or may be disinfected and discharged directly to surface
water. Aerobic treatment units also require the removal and proper disposal of solids that
accumulate in the tank.
Dispersal Approaches
Traditional onsite systems include treatment units followed by a drainfield or absorption field.
Wastewater from the treatment unit is dispersed through a suitable soil layer where it receives
additional treatment by the soil microorganisms and filtering properties of the soil. If the soil is
unsuitable for the installation of a soil absorption field, alternative methods can be used to further
treat or distribute the treated effluent.
The most common alternative dispersal systems include low-pressure pipe, mounds, drip disposal,
and evapotranspiration beds.
Absorption Field
When soil conditions permit, the most common method to disperse septic tank or aerobic system
effluent is an absorption field consisting of a series of perforated parallel pipes laid in trenches on
gravel or crushed stone or as a direct discharge to the soil through trenches.
Typically, effluent flows into the absorption field from a distribution box which maintains an even
flow of effluent to the absorption field. From there, the effluent drains through the stone and into
the soil which provides further treatment.
Mound System
When the soil is not conducive to percolation or when the groundwater level is high, a mound
system is commonly used. A mound system is a distribution system constructed above the original
ground level by using granular material such as sand and gravel to receive the septic tank effluent
before it flows to the native soil below.
The effluent flows to a dosing tank that is equipped with a pump. Here the effluent is stored until
there is sufficient liquid. Once the liquid is pumped out, it moves evenly throughout the mound
before reaching less permeable soil or groundwater. The granular material acts as a treatment
medium and improves the removal of pollutants in ways that may not be provided by substandard
native soils.
Evapotranspiration Beds
Evapotranspiration (ET) bed is an onsite dispersal system where pretreated wastewater
evaporates from the soil surface or is transpired by plants into the atmosphere. Usually, ET beds
are used in arid climates and there is no discharge either to surface or groundwater. Vegetation is
planted on the surface of the sand bed to improve the transpiration process and landscaping
enhances the aesthetics of the bed.
The same area from above photo, but clean and dry, these are porous air diffusers. A
rare photo.
Communities benefit from effective onsite system management programs by enjoying improved
protection of public health and local surface water and groundwater resources, preserving rural
areas, protecting property owners’ investments through increased system service life, and avoiding
the need to finance costly central wastewater collection and treatment systems.
Some examples of hazardous household materials include motor oil, transmission fluid, antifreeze,
paint, paint thinner, varnish, polish, wax, solvents, pesticides, rat poison, oven cleaner, and battery
fluid. Many of these materials can be recycled or safely disposed of at community recycling centers.
A drive-thru household hazardous waste collection site, trying to keep the toxic material
out of the sewer system. These workers usually get to keep lots of goodies and take the
materials home while at the same time keeping the bad stuff from upsetting the plant. I
worked a day at one of these facilities and I was amazed with the chemicals that people
keep around the home, example, 1 pound of liquid Mercury and another had a bottle of
Sodium Cyanide.
The Clean Water Act directs the EPA to develop criteria for water quality that accurately reflect the
latest scientific knowledge about the effects of pollutants on aquatic life and human health. In
developing these criteria, the EPA examines the effects of specific pollutants on plankton, fish,
shellfish, wildlife, plant life, aesthetics, and recreation in any body of water. This includes specific
information on the concentration and dispersal of pollutants through biological, physical, and
chemical processes as well as the effects of pollutants on biological communities as a whole.
States may use the criteria that are developed by the EPA to help set water quality standards that
protect the uses of their waters or they may develop their own water quality criteria. The EPA
publishes human health and aquatic life criteria and is currently developing sediment and biological
criteria. These criteria are complementary; each is designed to protect specific types of living
organisms or ecological systems from the adverse effects of pollution.
The EPA publishes these levels as human health criteria that the states use, along with other
information, to set allowable concentrations of pollutants in their water quality standards. In this
way, the EPA and the states work together to protect people from exposure to harmful pollutants
in surface waters.
Biological Criteria
A water body in its natural condition is free from the harmful effects of pollution, habitat loss, and
other negative stressors. It is characterized by a particular biological diversity and abundance of
organisms. This biological integrity--or natural structure and function of aquatic life--can be
dramatically different in various types of water bodies in different parts of the country. Because of
this, the EPA is developing methodologies that states can use to assess the biological integrity of
their waters and, in so doing, set protective water quality standards. These methodologies will
describe scientific methods for determining a particular aquatic community's health and for
maintaining optimal conditions in various bodies of water.
Summary
The goal of all biological wastewater treatment systems is to remove the non-settling solids and
the dissolved organic load from the effluents by using microbial populations. Biological treatments
are generally part of secondary treatment systems. The microorganisms used are responsible for
the degradation of the organic matter and the stabilization of organic wastes. With regard to the
way in which they utilize oxygen, they can be classified into aerobic (require oxygen for their
metabolism), anaerobic (grow in absence of oxygen) and facultative (can proliferate either in
absence or presence of oxygen although using different metabolic processes). Most of the micro-
organisms present in wastewater treatment systems use the organic content of the wastewater as
an energy source to grow, and are thus classified as heterotrophes from a nutritional point of view.
The population active in a biological wastewater treatment is mixed, complex and interrelated.
Genera
By example, in a single aerobic system, members of the genera Pseudomonas, Nocardia,
Flavobacterium, Achromobacter and Zooglea may be present, together with filamentous organisms
(Beggioata and Spaerotilus among others). In a well-functioning system, protozoas and rotifers are
usually present and are useful in consuming dispersed bacteria or non-settling particles. More
extensive description and treatment of the microbiology of wastewater treatment systems are given
elsewhere (Stanier, 1976). The organic load present is incorporated in part as biomass by the
microbial populations, and almost all the rest is liberated as gas (carbon dioxide (CO2) if the
treatment is aerobic, or carbon dioxide plus methane (CH4) if the process is anaerobic) and water.
In fisheries wastewaters the non- biodegradable portion is very low.
Unless the cell mass formed during the biological treatment is removed from the wastewater (e.g.,
by sedimentation or other treatment described in the previous section), the treatment is largely
incomplete, because the biomass itself will appear as organic load in the effluent and the only
pollution reduction accomplished is that fraction liberated as gases. The biological treatment
processes used for wastewater treatment are broadly classified as aerobic in which aerobic and
facultative micro-organisms predominate or anaerobic which use anaerobic micro-organism.
If the microorganisms or Bugs are suspended in the wastewater during biological operation, the
operations are called "suspended growth processes", while the micro-organisms that are attached
to a surface over which they grow are called "attached growth processes". This section explains
the principles and main characteristics of the most common processes in each case.
Aerobic Processes
In these, the reactions occurring can be summarized as:
Most of the BNR processes involve modifications of suspended growth treatment systems so that
the bacteria in these systems also convert nitrate nitrogen to inert nitrogen gas and trap phosphorus
in the solids that are removed from the effluent.
Carbon Adsorption
Carbon adsorption technology can remove organic materials from wastewater that resist removal
by biological treatment. These resistant, trace organic substances can contribute to taste and odor
problems in water, taint fish flesh, and cause foaming and fish kills.
Carbon adsorption consists of passing the wastewater effluent through a bed or canister of
activated carbon granules or powder which remove more than 98 percent of the trace organic
substances. The substances adhere to the carbon surface and are removed from the water. To
help reduce the cost of the procedure, the carbon granules can be cleaned by heating and used
again.
Granular Carbon
The utilization and disposal of the residual process solids is addressed by the CWA, Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and other federal laws. These Federal laws re-enforce
the need to employ environmentally sound residuals management techniques and to beneficially
use biosolids whenever possible. We will cover this in much more detail in a few more pages.
The purpose of this section is to provide an overview of the major factors driving decisions to
enhance nutrient removal at WWTPs. This section characterizes the industry based on U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) survey information. This section describes the negative
impacts of nutrient enrichment, highlighting the history of water quality changes in key regions of
the country. EPA and State initiatives to reduce nutrient pollution from wastewater treatment
discharges are summarized in this training course. Lastly, we will highlight several barriers to
enhancing nutrient removal at wastewater plants.
Wastewater treatment has generally been defined as containing one or more of the following four
processes: (1) preliminary, (2) primary, (3) secondary, and (4) advanced - also known as tertiary
treatment.
Preliminary treatment consists of grit removal, which removes dense inert particles and screening
to remove rags and other large debris. Primary treatment involves gravity settling tanks to remove
settleable solids, including settleable organic solids. The performance of primary settling tanks can
be enhanced by adding chemicals to capture and flocculate smaller solid particles for removal and
to precipitate phosphorus. Secondary treatment follows primary treatment in most plants and
employs biological processes to remove colloidal and soluble organic matter. Effluent disinfection
is usually included in the definition of secondary treatment.
EPA classifies advanced treatment as “a level of treatment that is more stringent than secondary
or produces a significant reduction in conventional, non-conventional, or toxic pollutants present in
the wastewater” (U.S. Public Health Service and USEPA, 2008). Other technical references
subdivide advanced treatment, using the terms “secondary with nutrient removal” when nitrogen,
phosphorus, or both are removed and “tertiary removal” to refer to additional reduction in solids by
filters or microfilters (Tchobanoglous et al, 2003).
Effluent filtration and nutrient removal are the most common advanced treatment processes. The
CWA requires that all municipal wastewater treatment plant discharges meet a minimum of
secondary treatment. Based on data from the 2004 Clean Watersheds Needs Survey, 16,543
municipal WWTPs (99.8 percent of plants in the country) meet the minimum secondary wastewater
treatment requirements.
Nitrogen is typically limiting in estuarine and marine systems and phosphorus in fresh water
systems. According to the 2007 report Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation’s Estuaries: A
Decade of Change, increased nutrient loadings promote a progression of symptoms beginning with
excessive growth of phytoplankton and macroalgae to the point where grazers cannot control
growth (Bricker et al., 2007). These blooms may be problematic, potentially lasting for months at a
time and blocking sunlight to light-dependent submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV). In addition to
increased growth, changes in naturally occurring ratios of nutrients may also affect which species
dominate, potentially leading to nuisance/toxic algal blooms. These blooms may also lead to other
more serious symptoms that affect biota, such as low DO and loss of SAV. Once water column
nutrients have been depleted by phytoplankton and macroalgae and these blooms die, the bacteria
decomposing the algae then consume oxygen, making it less available to surrounding aerobic
aquatic life.
Consequently, fish and invertebrate kills may occur due to hypoxia and anoxia, conditions of low to
no DO. Eutrophic conditions may also cause risks to human health, resulting from consumption of
shellfish contaminated with algal toxins or direct exposure to waterborne toxins. Eutrophication can
also create problems if the water is used as a source of drinking water. Chemicals used to disinfect
drinking water will react with organic compounds in source water to form disinfection byproducts,
which are potential carcinogens and are regulated by EPA.
Advanced eutrophic conditions can lead to “dead zones” with limited aquatic life, which describes
the hypoxia condition that exists in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. A recent U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) report titled Differences in Phosphorus and Nitrogen Delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from
the Mississippi River Basin documents the contribution of nitrogen and phosphorus from
agricultural and non-agricultural sources in the Mississippi River basin (Alexander et al., 2008).
On June 16, 2008 the joint federal-state Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task
Force released its 2008 Action Plan for Reducing, Mitigating, and Controlling Hypoxia in the
Northern Gulf of Mexico and Improving Water Quality in the Mississippi River Basin, which builds
upon its 2001 plan by incorporating emerging issues, innovative approaches, and the latest
science, including findings from EPA’s Science Advisory Board.
Improvements include more accountability through an Annual Operating Plan, better tracking of
progress, state and federal nutrient reduction strategies, and a plan to increase awareness of the
problem and implementation of solutions (USEPA, 2008b).
Nutrient pollution has also caused significant problems in the Chesapeake Bay. Elevated levels of
both nitrogen and phosphorus are the main cause of poor water quality and loss of aquatic habitats
in the Bay. Significant algae blooms on the water surface block the sun’s rays from reaching
underwater bay grasses. Without sunlight, bay grasses cannot grow and provide critical food and
habitat for blue crabs, waterfowl, and juvenile fish.
Although the health of the Lake improved dramatically, in recent years, there has been renewed
attention to the re-emergence of a “dead” zone in Lake Erie, again due to nutrient loadings. Recent
studies by scientists and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have also
hypothesized a relationship between excessive nutrients in the Lake and the presence of two
aquatic invasive species – the zebra mussel and the quagga mussel (Vanderploeg et al., 2008).
Development and population increases in the Long Island Sound Watershed have resulted in a
significant increase in nitrogen loading to the Sound. The increased nitrogen loads have stimulated
plant growth, increased the amount of organic matter settling to the benthic zone, lowered DO
levels, and changed habitats.
The primary concerns in the Sound include hypoxia, the loss of sea grass, and alterations in the
food web. Management efforts are currently underway to reduce nitrogen pollution by more than
half with a focus on upgrading WWTPs with new technologies and removing nitrogen by reducing
polluted run-off through best management practices on farms and suburban areas (Long Island
Sound Study, 2004). The above represent four examples of impaired large water bodies impacted
by nutrient loadings. There are more than 80 additional estuaries and bays, and thousands of rivers,
streams, and lakes that are also impacted by nutrients in the U.S. In fact, all but one state and two
territories have CWA section 303(d) listed1 water body impairments for nutrient pollution.
Collectively, states have listed over 10,000 nutrient and nutrient–related impairments.
Climate change may also be a significant influence on the development of future eutrophic
symptoms. According to the report Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation’s Estuaries: A
Decade of Change, the factors associated with climate change that are expected to have the
greatest impacts on coastal eutrophication are:
• Increased temperatures
• Sea level rise
• Changes in precipitation and freshwater runoff
Increased temperatures will have several effects on coastal eutrophication. Most coastal species
are adapted to a specific range of temperatures. Increases in water temperatures may lead to
expanded ranges of undesirable species. Higher temperatures may also lead to increased algal
growth and longer growing seasons, potentially increasing problems associated with excessive
algal growth and nuisance/toxic blooms.
Additionally, warmer waters hold less DO, therefore potentially exacerbating hypoxia.
Temperature-related stratification of the water column may also worsen, having a further negative
effect on DO levels.
Climate change models predict increased melting of polar icecaps and changes in precipitation
patterns, leading to sea level rise and changes in water balance and circulation patterns in coastal
systems. Sea level rise will gradually inundate coastal lands, causing increased erosion and
sediment delivery to water bodies, and potentially flooding wetlands. The increased sediment load
and subsequent turbidity increase may cause SAV loss. The positive feedback between increased
erosion and algal growth (as erosion increases, sediment associated nutrients also increase,
stimulating growth) may also increase turbidity. The loss of wetlands, which act as nutrient sinks,
will further increase nutrient delivery to estuaries.
These conclusions indicate climate change is a significant threat to the species composition and
function of aquatic ecosystems in the U.S. However, critical uncertainties exist regarding the
manner in which specific species and whole ecosystems will respond to climate change. These
arise both from uncertainties about how regional climate will change and how complex ecological
systems will respond.
Indeed, as climate change alters ecosystem productivity and species composition, many
unforeseen ecological changes are expected that may threaten the goods and services that these
systems provide to humans. Required by Section 303(d) of the CWA, the 303(d) list is a list of
state’s water bodies that do not meet or are not expected to meet applicable Water Quality
Standards with technology-based controls alone.
NPDES permits for wastewater discharges contain, among other information, effluent limits for
“conventional” pollutants such as biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids
(TSS), and pH as well as limits for specific toxicants including various organic and inorganic
chemicals. Permits may also include effluent limits for “non-conventional” pollutants such as
nitrogen and phosphorus.
Effluent limits can be technology-based and/or water-quality based. EPA has established
technology-based, secondary treatment effluent limits for BOD as 5-day biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD5), TSS, and pH.
Water-quality based effluent limits are set if the technology-based limits are not sufficient to
maintain the water quality standards (WQS) of the receiving water. Federal and State regulations
related to WQSs and Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are expected to drive down NPDES
effluent limits for nitrogen and phosphorus. WQS define the goals for a water body by designating
its uses, setting criteria to protect those uses, and establishing provisions to protect water bodies
from pollutants. Criteria can be narrative or numeric.
Regulatory agencies can adopt nutrient criteria to protect a water body against nutrient over-
enrichment and eutrophication caused by nitrogen and phosphorus. In June 1998, EPA issued a
National Strategy for the Development of Regional Nutrient Criteria. This was followed by
publication of recommended nutrient criteria for most streams and lakes in 2001. In a January 9,
2001 Federal Register notice, EPA recommended that states and other regulatory agencies
develop a nutrient criteria plan to outline their process for adopting such nutrient criteria (Federal
Register, 2001).
As of May 2007, only a handful of States and Territories had adopted nutrient criteria for nitrogen
and phosphorus (USEPA, 2007a), although many have made progress in criteria development.
CWA Section 303(d) requires states to develop TMDLs for water bodies on the 303(d) list of
impaired waters. A TMDL is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant a water body can
receive and still meet WQS. TMDLs serve as a tool for implementing WQS. The TMDL targets or
endpoints represent a number where the applicable WQS and designated uses (e.g., such as public
water supply, contact recreation, and the propagation and growth of aquatic life) are achieved and
maintained in the water body of concern.
TMDLs identify the level of pollutant control necessary to meet WQS and support the designated
uses of a water body. Once a TMDL is set, the total load is allocated among all existing sources.
The allocation is divided into two portions - a load allocation representing natural and non-point
sources and a waste load allocation representing NPDES permitted point source discharges.
In many regions, water bodies have a poor ability to assimilate nutrients or water bodies are already
impaired from past pollution and the water body cannot handle large loads of additional nutrients.
In these cases, TMDLs may require nutrient permit levels to be even lower than what might be
allowed otherwise by nutrient criteria.
The spinning reel for this oxidation ditch is mixing or aerating properly.
Anaerobic Bacteria
Anaerobic, heterotrophic bacteria that commonly occur in lagoons are involved in methane
formation (acid-forming and methane bacteria) and in sulfate reduction (sulfate reducing bacteria).
Anaerobic methane formation involves three different groups of anaerobic bacteria that function
together to convert organic materials to methane via a three-step process. General anaerobic
degraders - many genera of anaerobic bacteria hydrolyze proteins, fats, and poly saccharides
present in wastewater to amino acids, short-chain peptides, fatty acids, glycerol, and mono- and
di-saccharides. These have a wide environmental tolerance in pH and temperature.
Photosynthetic Organisms
Acid-forming bacteria - this diverse group of bacteria converts products from above under
anaerobic conditions to simple alcohols and organic acids such as acetic, propionic, and butyric.
These bacteria are hardy and occur over a wide pH and temperature range.
Methane forming bacteria - these bacteria convert formic acid, methanol, methylamine, and acetic
acid under anaerobic conditions to methane. Methane is derived in part from these compounds
and in part from CO2 reduction. Methane bacteria are environmentally sensitive and have a
narrow pH range of 6.5-7.5 and require temperatures > 14o C.
Note that the products of the acid formers (principally acetic acid) become the substrate for the
methane producers. A problem exists at times where the acid formers overproduce organic acids,
lowering the pH below where the methane bacteria can function (a pH < 6.5). This can stop
methane formation and lead to a buildup of sludge in a lagoon with a low pH. In an anaerobic
fermenter, this is called a "stuck digester". Also, methane fermentation ceases at cold temperature,
probably not occurring in most lagoons in the wintertime in cold climates. A number of anaerobic
bacteria (14 genera reported to date (Bolt et al., 1994)) called sulfate reducing bacteria can use
sulfate as an electron acceptor, reducing sulfate to hydrogen sulfide.
This occurs when BOD and sulfate are present and oxygen is absent. Sulfate reduction is a major
cause of odors in ponds. Anaerobic, photosynthetic bacteria occur in all lagoons and are the
predominant photo-synthetic organisms in anaerobic lagoons. The anaerobic sulfur bacteria,
generally grouped into the red and green sulfur bacteria and represented by about 28 genera
(Ehrlich, 1990), oxidize reduced sulfur compounds (H2S) using light energy to produce sulfur and
sulfate. Here, H2S is used in place of H2O as used by algae and green plants, producing S04-
instead of O2. All are either strict anaerobes or microaerophilic. Most common are Chromatium,
Thiocystis, and Thiopedia, which can grow in profusion and give a lagoon a pink or red color.
Finding them is most often an indication of organic overloading and anaerobic conditions in an
intended aerobic system.
Conversion of odorous sulfides to sulfur and sulfate by these sulfur bacteria is a significant odor
control mechanism in facultative and anaerobic lagoons, and can be desirable.
Oxygen is normally provided by natural or forced ventilation. Commercial on-site systems use
synthetic media and receive wastewater from overlying sprayheads for aerobic treatment and
nitrification. Nitrified effluent returns to the anoxic zone to mix with either septic tank contents or
incoming septic tank effluent for denitrification. A portion of the denitrified effluent is discharged for
disposal or further treatment. Aerobic tanks are available in residential or small community sizes.
Typical trickling filters systems currently available are capable of producing effluent BOD and TSS
concentrations of 5 to 40 mg/L. Nitrogen removal typically varies from 0 to 35 percent although
removal percentages as high as 65% have been demonstrated through USEPA’s Environmental
Technology Verification (ETV) program. Phosphorus removal is typically 10 to 15 percent.
Multi-pass systems result in higher treatment quality and assist in removing Total Nitrogen (TN)
levels by promoting nitrification in the aerobic media bed and denitrification in the anaerobic septic
tank. Factors affecting performance include influent wastewater characteristics, hydraulic and
organic loading, medium type, maintenance of optimal DO levels, and recirculation rates.
Mechanical aerators have the added value of potential operation as mixers or aerators. The
decanter is a critical element in the process. Several decanter configurations are available,
including fixed and floating units. At least one commercial package employs a thermal processing
step for the excess sludge produced and wasted during the “idle” step. The key to the SBR process
is the control system, which consists of a combination of level sensors, timers, and microprocessors
which can be configured to meet the needs of the system.
Sand filters are aerobic, fixed-film bioreactors. Bioslimes from the growth of microorganisms
develop as films on the sand particle surfaces. The microorganisms in the slimes capture soluble
and colloidal waste materials in the wastewater as it percolates over the sand surfaces. The
captured materials are metabolized into new cell mass or degraded under aerobic conditions to
carbon dioxide and water. Most biochemical treatment occurs within approximately 6 inches of the
filter surface. Other treatment mechanisms that occur in sand filters include physical processes,
such as straining and sedimentation, to remove suspended solids within the pores of the media.
Most suspended solids are strained out at the filter surface.
Chemical adsorption can occur throughout the media bed. Adsorption sites in the media are usually
limited, however. The capacity of the media to retain ions depends on the target constituent, the
pH, and the mineralogy of the media. Phosphorous is one element of concern in wastewater that
can be removed in this manner, but the number of available adsorption sites is limited by the
characteristics of the media.
Sand filters can be used for a broad range of applications, including single-family residences, large
commercial establishments, and small communities. Sand filters are frequently used to pretreat
septic tank effluent prior to subsurface infiltration onsite where the soil has insufficient unsaturated
depth above ground water or bedrock to achieve adequate treatment. They are also used to meet
water quality requirements (with the possible exception of fecal coliform removal) before direct
discharge to surface water.
Sand filters are used primarily to treat domestic wastewater, but they have been used successfully
in treatment trains to treat wastewaters high in organic materials such as those from restaurants
and supermarkets. Single-pass ISF filters are most frequently used for smaller applications and
sites where nitrogen removal is not required. However, they can be combined with anoxic
processes to significantly increase nitrogen removal.
The basic components of recirculating filters include a recirculation/dosing tank, pump and controls,
distribution network, filter bed with an underdrain system, and a return line. The return line or the
underdrain must split the flow to recycle a portion of the filtrate to the recirculation/dosing tank.
Recirculation ratios are typically between 3:1 and 5:1. In the recirculation tank, the returned aerobic
filtrate mixes with the anaerobic septic tank effluent before being reapplied to the filter. RSFs can
be used for a broad range of applications, including single-family residences, large commercial
establishments, and small communities. They produce a high quality effluent with approximately
85 to 95 percent BOD and TSS removal. In addition, almost complete nitrification is achieved.
Denitrification also has been shown to occur in RSFs. Depending on modifications in design and
operation, 50 percent or more of applied nitrogen can be removed (USEPA, 1999). To enhance
this capability, they can be combined with a greater supply of biodegradable organic carbon, time,
and mixing than is normally available from the conventional recirculation tank.
Natural Systems
The natural systems described here include constructed wetlands and floating aquatic plant
treatment systems. Wetland systems are typically described in terms of the position of the water
surface and/or the type of vegetation grown. Most natural wetlands are free water surface (FWS)
systems where the water surface is exposed to the atmosphere; these include bogs (primary
vegetation mosses), swamps (primary vegetation trees), and marshes (primary vegetation grasses
and emergent macrophytes) (USEPA, 2000e). subsurface flow (SF) wetlands are specifically
designed to treat or polish wastewater and are typically constructed as a bed or channel containing
appropriate media.
Constructed wetlands treat wastewater by bacterial decomposition, settling, and filtering. As in tank
designs, bacteria break down organic matter in the wastewater, aerobically, anoxically and
anaerobically. Oxygen for aerobic decomposition is supplied by the plants growing in the wetland.
Solids are filtered and finally settle out of the wastewater within the wetland. After about two weeks
in the wetland, effluent is usually discharged by gravity to an unlined wetland bed. If these systems
discharge effluent to surface ditches, they require a NPDES permit.
The submerged plant roots do provide substrate for microbial processes. However, the amount of
oxygen that emergent macrophytes can transmit from the leaves to their roots is negligible
compared to the oxygen demand of wastewater. Therefore, subsurface flow wetlands are devoid
of oxygen. The lack of oxygen in these subsurface flow systems means that ammonia oxidation via
biological nitrification will not occur without the use of an additional unit process, such as a gravel
trickling filter for nitrification of the wastewater ammonia. Vertical flow wetland beds are a
modification of subsurface flow wetlands which contain gravel or coarse sand and are loaded
intermittently at the top surface. Unlike ammonia oxidation, nitrate removal in a subsurface flow
wetland can be rapid and effective because the anoxic conditions and carbon sources necessary
to support the treatment reactions occur naturally in these systems.
FWS wetlands with long detention times can remove minor amounts of phosphorus through plant
uptake, adsorption, complexation, and precipitation. However, removal via plant uptake is limited
to phosphorus retained in plant litter that is buried by sediments before plant decomposition occurs
(i.e. peat building process). Phosphorus removal is typically greater in the first year or two because
of soil absorption and rapidly expanding vegetation but decreases when the system reaches
equilibrium, and unburied plant litter releases phosphorus back into the water as it decomposes.
Phosphorus removal is also possible with the use of an addition process, such as chemical addition
and mixing prior to a final deep settling pond.
Aquatic systems using duckweed have been used for a number of years to treat wastewater for
various purposes (WEF, 2001). Duckweed (Lemna spp.) are floating macrophytes. Duckweed
fronds can double their mass in two days under ideal conditions of nutrient availability, sunlight,
and temperature. Although duckweed can be found in most regions, the rate of growth is optimal
at 20 to 30o C and they grow best in a pH range of 3.5 to 8.5.
Recent studies have shown that about 80 percent of the nitrogen and 50 percent of the phosphorus
in wastewater are derived from urine although urine makes up only 1 percent of the volume of
wastewater (Larsen and Leinert, 2007). Separating the urine from wastewater could offer various
advantages: WWTPs could be built on a smaller scale, water bodies will be better protected from
nitrogen and phosphorus pollution, nutrients could be recycled for agricultural use, and various
constituents of concern including hormones and pharmaceutical compounds could be removed
before being mixed with wastewater and released to the environment.
A major benefit would be reduced energy consumption at WWTPs as a result of reduced treatment
requirements for nitrogen. Also, separating 50 to 60 percent of urine could reduce in-plant nitrogen
gas discharges and result in fewer impurities in methane captured from sludge digestion.
Organizations such as the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag) are
currently experimenting with the development and application of “NoMix technology” to separate
urine from solid waste at the toilet bowl. While similar in size and shape to current toilets, this new
technology has two waste pipes – a small front one that collects and diverts urine into a storage
tank, and a larger rear waste pipe that operates like a standard toilet. The first of these toilets were
installed in two “eco-villages” in Sweden in 1994 and since then have spread to other locations
throughout the country and to Denmark, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. The concept is now
taking hold in Austria and Germany. While the pollutant-free urine, or “urevit,” can be spray-applied
directly onto agricultural fields; in the Netherlands, a company called Grontmij trucks stored urine
to a special treatment plant where the phosphate is precipitated out as a mineral called struvite and
used as a fertilizer.
Novaquatis, a branch of Eawag is experimenting with extracting nitrogen and potassium from urine
that can be sprayed directly onto crops. Eawag is also experimenting with a pilot decentralized
basement sewage plant where domestic wastewater is treated in a MBR so it can be reused for
flushing the toilets or watering the garden and the sewage sludge is composted. While still
experimental, some of these technologies may have practical future applications if widely
applicable low-cost solutions can be found for urine transport, or stable and cost-effective
technologies can be developed for decentralized treatment.
Sustainability concerns are also driving the wastewater treatment industry to start looking at sludge
as a renewable resource. Historically, agricultural use has been the traditional approach for
disposal of municipal sludge due to its high nutrient content for fertilizing crops, and its low cost
approach. As scientific advances detect smaller and smaller quantities of contaminants (i.e., heavy
metals, pathogenic microorganisms, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products), the public,
farming organizations, and the food industry are raising concerns about continuing this practice. As
noted above, researchers are discovering that valuable products can be generated from sewage
treatment byproducts such as energy extracted from anaerobic digestion, construction materials
such as bricks, and nutrients such as phosphorus that can be extracted from sludge and used as
fertilizer.
In February 2008, the non-profit Global Water Research Coalition, an international water research
alliance formed by 12 world-leading research organizations, released a report titled, State of
Science Report: Energy and Resource Recovery from Sludge (Kalogo and Monteith, 2008). The
report focuses on:
• The international situation of energy and resource recovery from sludge
• How the use of different sludge treatment processes affects the possibility of recovering energy
and/or materials from the residual sludge
• The influence of market and regulatory drivers on the fate of the sludge end-product
• The feasibility of energy and resource recovery from sludge
• The social, economic, and environmental performance (triple bottom line or TBL assessment) of
current alternatives technologies
In the report, energy recovery technologies are classified into sludge-to-biogas processes, sludge-
to-syngas processes, sludge-to-oil processes, and sludge-to-liquid processes. The technologies
available for resource recovery discussed in the report include those to recover phosphorus,
building materials, nitrogen, and volatile acids.
The report, which covers both established as well as emerging technologies, will be used as the
basis for development of the coalition’s future strategic research plan on energy and recovery from
sludge. As a technical resource, it provides a valuable overview of sludge disposal practices in
various countries such as the U.S., the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden,
Japan, and China; and presents a number of treatment processes for resource recovery.
Other groups have looked at recovering phosphorus from the supernatant from anaerobic
digestion. Several different processes have been proposed that rely on precipitation of the
phosphorus as either struvite or calcium phosphate. Work is underway on projects in Italy,
Germany, the Netherlands, and Canada (SCOPE, 2004).
Nitrogen
Nitrogen is an essential nutrient for plants and animals. Approximately 80 percent of the earth’s
atmosphere is composed of nitrogen and it is a key element of proteins and cells. The major
contributors of nitrogen to wastewater are human activities such as food preparation, showering,
and waste excretion. The per capita contribution of nitrogen in domestic wastewater is about 1/5th
of that for BOD. Total nitrogen in domestic wastewater typically ranges from 20 to 70 mg/L for low
to high strength wastewater (Tchobanoglous et al., 2003). Factors affecting concentration include
the extent of infiltration and the presence of industries. Influent concentration varies during the day
and can vary significantly during rainfall events, as a result of inflow and infiltration to the collection
system.
Nitrogen components in wastewater are typically reported on an “as nitrogen” basis so that the total
nitrogen concentration can be accounted for as the influent nitrogen components are converted to
other nitrogen compounds in wastewater treatment.
WWTPs designed for nitrification and denitrification can remove 80 to 95 percent of inorganic
nitrogen, but the removal of organic nitrogen is typically much less efficient (Pehlivanoglu-Mantas
and Sedlak, 2006). Domestic wastewater organic nitrogen may be present in particulate, colloidal
or dissolved forms and consist of proteins, amino acids, aliphatic N compounds, refractory natural
compounds in drinking water (e.g. Humic substances), or synthetic compounds (e.g. ethylene
Diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)).
The importance of organic nitrogen has increased as effluent limits on nitrogen have become more
stringent. With more impaired waterways from nutrient loads, effluent limits for total nitrogen (TN)
concentrations of 3.0 mg/L or less are becoming more common. The dissolved organic nitrogen
(DON) concentration in the effluent from biological nutrient removal treatment facilities was found
to range from 0.50 to 1.50 mg/L in 80 percent of 188 plants reported by Pagilla (STAC-WERF,
2007) and values as high as 2.5 mg/L were observed.
Thus, for systems without effluent filtration or membrane bioreactors (MBRs) that are trying to meet
a TN treatment goal of 3.0 mg/L, the effluent DON contribution can easily be 20 to 50 percent of
the total effluent nitrogen concentration, compared to only about 10 percent for conventional
treatment (Pehlivanoglu-Mantas and Sedlak, 2004).
The chemical composition of DON in wastewater effluents is not completely understood. Sedlak
(2007) has suggested that only about 20 percent of the DON has been identified as free and
combined amino acids, EDTA, and other trace nitrogen compounds. About 45 percent may be
unidentified low molecular weight compounds and the other 35 percent as unidentified high
molecular weight compounds containing Humic acids and amides. Similar results were found by
Khan (2007). Early work by Parkin and McCarty (1981) suggested that 40 to 60 percent of effluent
DON is non-bioavailable. The non-bioavailable portion is also referred to as recalcitrant DON
(rDON).
Primary clarifier
The orthophosphate fraction is soluble and can be in one of several forms (e.g., phosphoric acid,
phosphate ion) depending on the solution pH. Polyphosphates are high-energy, condensed
phosphates such as pyrophosphate and trimetaphosphate. They are also soluble but will not be
precipitated out of wastewater by metal salts or lime. They can be converted to phosphate through
hydrolysis, which is very slow, or by biological activity.
Organically bound phosphorus can either be in the form of soluble colloids or particulate. It can
also be divided into biodegradable and non-biodegradable fractions. Particulate organically bound
phosphorus is generally precipitated out and removed with the sludge. Soluble organically bound
biodegradable phosphorus can be hydrolyzed into orthophosphate during the treatment process.
USEPA approved colorimetric methods are routinely used to measure phosphorus levels as low as
0.01 mg/L. On-line analyzers that use the colorimetric method are available from venders (e.g., the
Hach PhosphaxTM SC phosphate analyzer).
Principles
Chemical precipitation for phosphorus removal is a reliable, time-tested, wastewater treatment
method that has not drastically changed over the years. To achieve removal, various coagulant
aids are added to wastewater where they react with soluble phosphates to form precipitates. The
precipitates are removed using a solids separation process, most commonly settling (clarification).
Chemical precipitation is typically accomplished using either lime or a metal salt such as aluminum
sulfate (alum) or ferric chloride. The addition of polymers and other substances can further enhance
floc formation and solids settling. Operators can use existing secondary clarifiers or retrofit primary
clarifiers for their specific purposes.
The molar ratio of aluminum to phosphorus required for phosphorus removal ranges from about
1.38:1 for 75 percent removal, 1.72:1 for 85 percent removal, and 2.3:1 for 95 percent removal.
For iron compounds, a ratio of about 1:1 is required, with a supplemental amount of iron (10 mg/L)
added to satisfy the formation of hydroxide (WEF and ASCE, 1998).
To supplement stoichiometry calculations, designers should consider jar tests and, in some cases,
full-scale pilot tests to gauge the effects on the required dose of competing reactions; the influence
of pH and alkalinity, adsorption, and co-precipitation reactions; and the interaction with polymers
that are added to increase coagulation and flocculation (WEF and ASCE, 1998; Bott et al. 2007).
Aluminum or ferric iron salts can be added to the primary clarifier, secondary clarifier, tertiary
clarifier, or directly into the activated sludge aeration tank. Multiple additions can increase
phosphorus removal efficiency. Ferrous salts can only be added to the aeration basin since it needs
to be oxidized to ferric to precipitate the phosphorus.
The solubility of aluminum and iron salts is a function of pH. The optimum solubility for alum was
previously reported to occur at a pH range of 5.5 to 6.5, significantly lower than most influent
wastewater. Recent studies (Szabo et al., 2008) showed that the range for both iron and alum is
between 3.5 and 7.5 with the highest efficiency between pH 5.5 and 7.
Chemicals such as lime compounds, caustic soda, and soda ash can be used to raise the pH of
the waste stream prior to biological treatment processes or discharge. It is important to understand
that alkalinity is consumed during the precipitation reactions, and precipitation will be incomplete if
insufficient alkalinity is present.
When lime is added to wastewater, it first reacts with the bicarbonate alkalinity to form calcium
carbonate (CaCO3). As the pH increases to more than 10, excess calcium ions will react with
phosphate to precipitate hydroxylapatite [CA5(OH)(PO4)3].
Because it reacts first with alkalinity, the lime dose is essentially independent of the influent
phosphorus concentration. Tchobanoglous et al. (2003) estimates the lime dose to typically be 1.4
to 1.6 times the total alkalinity expressed as CaCO3.
The typical reaction between calcium compounds and phosphorus is represented below:
The molar ratio required for phosphorus precipitation with lime is approximately 5:3, but can vary
from between 1.3 to 2, depending on the composition of the wastewater. As with iron and aluminum
salts, jar tests can be used to determine correct doses for a specific wastewater stream
(WEF,1998).
Lime addition can raise the pH to greater than 11. Because activated sludge processes require pH
levels below 9, lime cannot be added directly to biological treatment processes or it will cause
process upsets. Lime can be added to primary sedimentation tanks and removed with the primary
sludge or it can be added as a tertiary treatment process after biological treatment. When added to
primary tanks, it will also result in the removal of colloidal material through coagulation and settling,
with a concomitant removal of TSS up to 80 percent and chemical oxygen demand (COD) up to 60
percent.
In either case, pH adjustment is needed and typically accomplished by adding CO2 or a liquid acid
such as sulfuric acid, nitric acid, or hypochlorite (Tchobanoglous et al., 2003; USEPA, 1999a).
Hortskotte et al. (1974) showed that when the primary effluent is discharged directly to a nitrifying
activated sludge plant, the hydrogen ions produced may neutralize the high pH. However, when
denitrification is practiced and the operator wishes to make use of the soluble COD in the primary
effluent, the effluent must be neutralized before discharging it to the anoxic zone.
Lime requires special handling and operations practices that further set it apart from chemical
precipitation by metal salts. Although the formation of carbonate scaling on equipment and pipes
is a drawback of lime treatment, lime slaking, where quicklime (CaO) is reacted with water to form
calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2), is the biggest operational disadvantage.
“Pre-precipitation” is when chemicals are added to raw water to precipitate phosphorus in the
primary sedimentation basins.
“Co-precipitation” involves adding chemicals to form precipitates that can be removed with
biological sludge.
“Post-precipitation” is when chemicals are added after secondary sedimentation and precipitants
are removed in a tertiary process such as sedimentation or filtration (Tchobanoglous et al., 2003).
Because it requires a high pH to achieve a low phosphorus concentration, lime cannot be added
directly to biological reactors or to the secondary clarifiers.
Multipoint additions of iron or aluminum salts have been very effective and can typically remove
more phosphorus than single-point applications. There are several advantages to post-precipitating
phosphorous using a tertiary treatment technique (after biological processes in a separate reactor):
• Microorganisms rely on phosphorus as a food source. If too much phosphorus is removed prior
to biological treatment, biological processes may suffer. For activated sludge, the minimum ratio of
phosphorus to BOD5 for a rapidly growing (low solids retention time (SRT)) system is typically
about 1:100 (WEF and ASCE, 1998).
• Competing chemicals in the primary sedimentation basins can increase the required dose.
• Phosphorus enters the treatment plant as soluble orthophosphate, soluble polyphosphates, and
organically bound phosphorus. Most of the polyphosphates and much of the organically bound
phosphorus are converted to more simple orthophosphates during biological treatment. If the
influent contains significant polyphosphates and/or organically bound phosphorus, locating
chemical treatment after biological processes would be more efficient and achieve lower effluent
levels.
• The removal of carbonate alkalinity and phosphorus by lime prior to biological treatment can have
a negative impact on nitrification processes (WEF and ASCE, 1998). Also, removing phosphorus
to very low concentrations upstream of denitrification filters can negatively affect the denitrification
process. Previous studies showed that the hydroxide alkalinity can be balanced by the hydrogen
ions produced during nitrification.
• Sludge recalcification can be used to achieve high removal efficiencies using lime in tertiary
treatment. One potential advantage to adding chemicals during primary treatment instead of tertiary
treatment is reduced capital costs and space requirements as a result of removing additional BOD
and TSS and reducing the load to downstream processes, thereby reducing the size of the
subsequent activated sludge basins and the amount of oxygen transfer needed.
Chemicals should be well mixed with the wastewater to ensure reaction with soluble phosphates
and formation of precipitates. Chemicals may either be mixed in separate tanks or can be added
at a point in the process where mixing already occurs. Bench-scale and pilot scale tests are often
used to determine the correct mixing rate for a given composition of wastewater and chemicals
used, including polymer (USEPA, 1999a).
The types of clarifiers used for tertiary processes include conventional, one or two-stage lime,
solids-contact, high-rate, and ballasted high-rate (BHRC). Several patented BHRC using different
types of ballast such as recycled sludge, microsand, and magnetic ballast (USEPA, 2008a) have
been developed in recent years. The advantages of high-rate clarification are that the clarifiers
have a smaller footprint and are able to treat larger quantities of wastewater in a shorter period of
time. In addition, as an add-on during wet weather, they can help prevent sanitary sewer overflows
(SSOs) and combined sewer overflows (CSOs).
The following patented processes are examples of high rate clarification including
performance estimates:
• DensaDeg® uses a coagulant in a rapid mix basin to destabilize suspended solids. The water
flows into a second tank where polymer (for aiding flocculation) and sludge are added. The sludge
acts as the “seed” for formation of high density floc. This floc is removed in settling tubes (USEPA,
2008). The main advantages of this process are a smaller footprint and denser sludge which is
easier to dewater. Pilot testing for City of Fort Worth, Texas found a phosphorus removal rate of
88-95% for DensaDeg® (USEPA, 2003).
• Actiflo® uses a coagulant in a rapid mix basin to destabilize suspended solids. The water flows
to a second tank where polymer (for aiding flocculation) and microsand are added. Microsand
provides a large surface onto which suspended solids attach, creating a dense floc that settles out
quickly. Clarification is assisted by lamella settling. Product pilot testing in Fort Worth, Texas
showed a phosphorus removal efficiency of 92-96% for Actiflo® (USEPA, 2003).
• The CoMag process uses the addition of magnetic ballast with metal salts to promote floc
formation. Settling is followed by high gradient magnetic separation for effluent polishing and
recovery of the magnetic ballast (USEPA, 2008a). CoMag is currently in operation at a 4.0 million
gallons per day (MGD) wastewater treatment plant in Concord, Massachusetts. The vendor has
guaranteed an effluent phosphorus concentration not to exceed 0.05 mg/L (EPA Region 10, 2007).
The success of phosphorus removal by chemical addition depends on proper instrumentation and
control. Dosage control typically takes the form of manual operation (for small systems),
adjustments based on automatic flow measurements, or the more advanced on-line analyzers with
computer-assisted dosage control.
Salinity can create problems when biosolids are land applied or when the effluent is returned to
existing water supply reservoirs. Biological phosphorus removal was developed in South Africa due
to the high rate of indirect recycling of wastewater effluent which led to excessive total dissolved
solids (TDS) during dry periods. High total salts can reduce germination rates for crops and
negatively affect the soil structure.
Lime traditionally produces a higher sludge volume compared to metal salts because of its reaction
with natural alkalinity. An advantage of lime sludge is that some stabilization can occur due to the
high pH levels required. One disadvantage is that lime can cause scaling in mechanical thickening
and dewatering systems. There are also differences in the amount and characteristics of sludge
generated by alum versus ferric salts. Although alum tends to produce less sludge than do ferric
salts, alum sludge can be more difficult to concentrate and dewater compared to ferric sludge.
Principles
In wastewater treatment, nitrogen removal occurs in two sequential processes: nitrification and
denitrification. An overview of each process is provided below.
Nitrification
Nitrification is an aerobic process in which autotrophic bacteria oxidize ammonia or nitrite for energy
production. Nitrification is normally a two-step aerobic biological process for the oxidation of
ammonia to nitrate. Ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) is first converted to nitrite (NO2 -) by ammonia
oxidizing bacteria (AOB). The nitrite produced is then converted to nitrate (NO3-) by nitrite oxidizing
bacteria (NOB). Both reactions usually occur in the same process unit at a wastewater treatment
plant (e.g. activated sludge mixed liquor or fixed film biofilm).
The group of AOB most associated with nitrification is the Nitrosomonas genus, although other
AOB such as Nitrosococcus and Nitrosospira can contribute to the process. Nitrobacter are the
NOB most associated with the second step, although other bacteria including Nitrospina,
Nitrococcus, and Nitrospira have been found to also oxidize nitrite (Tchobanoglous et al., 2003;
USEPA, 2007c).
Nitrifying bacteria grow slower and have much lower yields as a function of substrate consumed,
compared to the heterotrophic bacteria in biological treatment processes. The maximum specific
growth rate of the nitrifying bacteria is 10 to 20 times less than the maximum specific growth rate
of heterotrophic bacteria responsible for oxidation of carbonaceous organic compounds in
wastewater treatment. Thus, the nitrification process needs a significantly higher SRT to work
compared to conventional activated sludge processes. The SRT needed for nitrification in an
activated sludge process is a function of the maximum specific growth rate (which is related to
temperature), the reactor dissolved oxygen concentration, and pH. Nitrification rates decline as the
DO concentration decreases below 3.0 mg/L and the pH decreases below 7.0 mg/L. With sufficient
DO and adequate pH, typical nitrification design SRTs range from 10 to 20 days at 10oC and 4 to
7 days at 20oC (Randall et al.,1992).
Denitrification
In municipal and industrial wastewater treatment processes, denitrification is the biological
reduction of nitrate or nitrite to nitrogen gas (N2) as indicated by equation below.
NO → NO → NO → N O → N (5-1)
Recent research has shown that nitrite reduction is accomplished by a much more specialized
group of heterotrophic bacteria than those performing the conversion of nitrate to nitrite (Katehis,
2007).
Denitrification by heterotrophic nitrifying bacteria and by autotrophic bacteria has also been
observed. An example of a heterotrophic nitrifying bacteria that can denitrify is Parococcus
pantotropha, which obtains energy by nitrate or nitrite reduction while oxidizing ammonia under
aerobic conditions. A readily available carbon source, such as acetate, is needed (Robertson and
Kuenen, 1990). The conditions required for this form of denitrification are not practical in biological
wastewater treatment.
Although oxygen is known to inhibit denitrification, denitrification has been observed in activated
sludge and fixed film systems in which the bulk liquid DO concentration is positive. This is due to
the establishment of an anoxic zone within the floc or biofilm depth. Hence, a single system can
carry out simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. The DO concentration that is possible for
simultaneous nitrification and denitrification depends on a number of factors including the mixed
liquor concentration, temperature, and substrate loading. The DO concentration above which
denitrification is inhibited may vary from 0.10 to 0.50 mg/L (WEF and ASCE, 2006; Tchobanoglous
et al., 2003; Barker and Dold, 1997).
The organic carbon source for denitrifying bacteria can be in the form of:
• Soluble degradable organics in the influent wastewater
• Soluble organic material produced by hydrolysis of influent particulate material
• Organic matter released during biomass endogenous decay
A general rule of thumb is that 4 g of wastewater influent BOD is needed per g of NO3-N to be
removed through biological treatment (Tchobanoglous et al., 2003). When denitrification occurs
after secondary treatment, there is little BOD remaining so a supplemental carbon source is often
needed.
The most common exogenous carbon source in use is methanol; however, due to issues regarding
its safety, cost, and availability, some wastewater systems are using alternative carbon sources
such as acetic acid, ethanol, sugar, glycerol, and proprietary solutions depending on the needs of
their particular facility (deBarbadillo et al., 2008).
Biological denitrification reactions produce alkalinity and heterotrophic biomass. Based on the
stoichiometry of the reactions, denitrification will produce a 3.57 mg/L of alkalinity as CaCO3 for
each mg/L of NO3ˉ−N consumed. Heterotrophic biomass produced can be estimated as 0.4 g
volatile suspended solids (VSS) produced for every gram of COD consumed. Growth kinetics for
denitrifiers are dependent on a number of factors including carbon substrate type and
concentration, DO concentration, alkalinity, pH, and temperature, with carbon source being the
most important.
Current Configurations
Biological nitrogen removal can be accomplished by a variety of treatment configurations using
suspended growth, attached growth, or combined systems. In the past, some WWTPs were
required to only remove ammonia-nitrogen in wastewater to reduce toxicity to aquatic organisms
with no limits on nitrate or total nitrogen.
However, most treatment plants are now required to remove nitrogen because both ammonia-
nitrogen and nitrate-nitrogen can stimulate algae and phytoplankton growth and lead to
eutrophication of U.S. waterways. For biological nitrogen removal, it is essential that nitrification
occur first followed by denitrification.
Total nitrogen removal for the MLE process is typically 80 percent, and the process achieves total
effluent nitrogen concentrations ranging from approximately 5 to 8 mg/L with internal nitrate recycle
ratios of 2 to 4 based on the influent flowrate (2-4Q).
The SBR control system allows it to mimic most other suspended growth processes such as the
MLE or Four-Stage Bardenpho system. It typically completes 4 to 6 cycles per day per tank for
domestic wastewater. If properly designed and operated, SBRs can achieve about 90 percent
removal of nitrogen (WEF and ASCE, 2006).
Oxidation Ditches
Oxidation ditches are looped channels that provide continuous circulation of wastewater and
biomass. A number of operating methods and designs have been developed to achieve nitrogen
removal, all of which work by cycling the flow within the ditch between aerobic and anoxic
conditions. DO can be added to the aerated zone using horizontal brush aerators, diffused aerators
with submersible mixers, or vertical shaft aerators (WEF and ASCE, 2006). Patented designs
include the NITROX process, Carrousel, and BioDenitro (WERF, 2000a). Many oxidation ditch
configurations can achieve simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal.
Step Feed
The step feed biological nitrogen removal process splits the influent flow and directs a portion of it
to each of several anoxic zones, with the highest proportion of influent flow going to the first zone
and steadily decreasing until the last anoxic zone prior to clarification. The biomass in the later
stages are not just treating influent flow but are also used to reduce nitrate from the upstream
zones.
Disadvantages include the need to control the DO concentration of aeration zones preceding the
downstream anoxic zones and the need to control the flow splitting to the step feed points.
Attached Growth and Hybrid Systems Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS)
Integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) is any suspended growth system (e.g., MLE, Four-
Stage Bardenpho) that incorporates an attached growth media within the suspended growth reactor
in order to increase the amount of biomass in the basin.
IFAS systems have higher treatment rates than suspended growth systems and generate sludge
with better settling characteristics. Many types of fixed and floating media are available, including:
• Rope: also called looped-cord or strand media. Consists of a polyvinyl chloride-based material
woven into rope with loops along the length to provide surface area for the biomass (WERF, 2000b).
Proprietary designs include Ringlace, Bioweb, and Biomatrix (USEPA, 2008a).
• Moving Bed with Sponge: proprietary products include Captor and Linpor (USEPA, 2008a).
• Plastic Media: several types of free-floating plastic media are available from Kaldness. Other
media types include fabric mesh (e.g., AccuWeb) and textile material (Cleartec).
Membrane materials are either organic polymers or inorganic materials such as ceramics. They
are designed in modular units and are typically configured as either hollow fiber bundles or plate
membranes (USEPA, 2007d) For biological nutrient removal applications, the design SRTs and
design principals for MBR systems are similar to those used for systems with secondary clarifiers.
One of the main differences is that the MBR systems operate at a higher MLSS concentration which
results in smaller tanks and smaller space requirements. In addition, membrane separation
provides for greatly reduced TSS in the effluent, typically below 1.0 mg/L, and hence slightly greater
removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Operational issues include potential for membrane biofouling
and increase pumping costs (USEPA, 2007d; WEF,2005).
The remaining 75 percent of the population is served by centralized wastewater treatment facilities,
which collect and treat large volumes of wastewater. There is, in fact, a growing movement toward
decentralized or clustered wastewater treatment systems to reduce cost, to provide groundwater
recharge near the source, and for speed and ease in siting since they are generally located
underground. The use of residential cluster development is gaining in popularity across the U.S. as
a means to permanently protect open space, preserve agricultural land, and protect wildlife habitat
(Mega et al., 1998).
Phosphorus Removal
Few phosphorus removal processes are well developed for onsite wastewater systems application
(USEPA, 2008e). The controlled addition of chemicals such as aluminum, iron, and calcium
compounds with subsequent flocculation and sedimentation has had only limited success because
of inadequate operation and maintenance of mechanical equipment and excessive sludge
production. Most notable successes have come with special filter materials that are naturally high
in their concentration of the above chemicals, but their service lives are finite. Studies of high-iron
sands and high-aluminum muds indicate that 50 to 95 percent of the phosphorus can be removed.
However, the life of these systems has yet to be determined, after which the filter media will have
to be removed and replaced. Use of supplemental iron powder mixed with natural sands is also
being researched. Aside from specialized filter media, the most likely phosphorus-reduction
systems are iron-rich intermittent sand filter (ISF) media and SBRs. These are discussed in more
detail below.
Nitrogen Removal
Processes that remove 25 to 50 percent of total nitrogen include aerobic biological systems and
media filters, especially recirculating filters (USEPA, 2008f). The vast majority of on-site and cluster
nitrogen-removal systems employ nitrification and denitrification biological reactions. Most notable
of these are recirculating sand filters (RSFs) with enhanced anoxic modifications, SBRs, and an
array of aerobic nitrification processes combined with an anoxic/anaerobic process to perform
denitrification. Some of the combinations are proprietary.
A few recently developed highly instrumented systems that utilize membrane solids separation
following biological nitrification and denitrification are capable of removing total nitrogen down to
very low concentrations (i.e. 3 – 4 mg/L TN). Nitrogen removal systems generally are located last
in the treatment train prior to subsurface wastewater infiltration system (SWIS) disposal or surface
water disposal, in which case a disinfection step is typically required. Usually, the minimum total
nitrogen standard that can be regularly met is about 10 mg/L. These technologies can be either
above ground or below ground.
EPA issued a Water Quality Trading Policy in 2003 to provide guidance to States and Tribes on
how trading can occur under the CWA and its implementing regulations. The policy discusses CWA
requirements that are relevant to water quality trading including: requirements to obtain permits,
antibacksliding provisions, development of WQSs including an antidegradation policy, NPDES
permit regulations, TMDLs and water quality management plans. EPA also developed a number of
tools and guidance documents to assist states, permitted facilities, non-point sources, and
stakeholders involved in the development of trading programs. Recently, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) National Resources Conservation Service released a Nitrogen Trading Tool
(NTT) prototype for calculating nitrogen credits based on the Nitrogen Loss and Environmental
Assessment Package Model (Gross et al., 2008).
Water quality trading programs have been successfully implemented in several states and
individual watersheds across the county. For example, nitrogen pollution from point sources into
the Long Island Sound was reduced by nearly 25 percent using an innovative Nitrogen Credit
Trading Program. In Connecticut, the program was implemented among 79 sewage treatment
plants in the state. Through the Nitrogen Credit Exchange, established in 2002, the Connecticut
program has a goal of reducing nitrogen discharges by 58.5 percent by 2014. A recent American
Society of Civil Engineers journal article points out, however, that regulatory frameworks for water
quality trading programs have yet to be adopted by the majority of States. Barriers to adopting such
programs include uncertainty in: (1) the mechanisms for determining appropriate credits and ratios
between point sources and distributed sources; and (2) approaches to ensure that promised
reductions actually occur (Landers, 2008).
Aeration is often used to refresh the wastewater flow at the influent channel.
Sample preservation should be performed immediately upon sample collection. For composite
chemical samples each aliquot should be preserved at the time of collection. When use of an
automated sampler makes it impossible to preserve each aliquot, then chemical samples may be
preserved by maintaining at 4 degrees C until compositing and sample splitting is completed.
When any sample is to be shipped by common carrier or sent through the United States Mails, it
must comply with the Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR part
172). The person offering such material for transportation is responsible for ensuring such
compliance. For the preservation requirements of Table II, the Office of Hazardous Materials,
Materials Transportation Bureau, Department of Transportation has determined that the
Hazardous Materials Regulations do not apply to the following materials: Hydrochloric acid (HCl)
in water solutions at concentrations of 0.04% by weight or less (pH about 1.96 or greater); Nitric
acid (HNO3in water solutions at concentrations of 0.15% by weight or less (pH about 1.62 or
greater); Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.35% by weight or less (pH
about 1.15 or greater); and Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in water solutions at concentrations of
0.080% by weight or less (pH about 12.30 or less).
Samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection. The times listed are the maximum
times that samples may be held before analysis and still be considered valid. Samples may be held
for longer periods only if the permittee, or monitoring laboratory, has data on file to show that for
the specific types of samples under study, the analytes are stable for the longer time, and has
received a variance from the Regional Administrator under Sec. 136.3(e). Some samples may not
be stable for the maximum time period given in the table. A permittee, or monitoring laboratory, is
obligated to hold the sample for a shorter time if knowledge exists to show that this is necessary to
maintain sample stability. See Sec. 136.3(e) for details. The term ``analyze immediately'' usually
means within 15 minutes or less of sample collection. Should only be used in the presence of
residual chlorine.
Maximum holding time is 24 hours when sulfide is present. Optionally all samples may be tested
with lead acetate paper before pH adjustments in order to determine if sulfide is present. If sulfide
is present, it can be removed by the addition of cadmium nitrate powder until a negative spot test
is obtained. The sample is filtered and then NaOH is added to pH 12.
Samples should be filtered immediately on-site before adding preservative for dissolved metals.
Guidance applies to samples to be analyzed by GC, LC, or GC/MS for specific compounds.
The pH adjustment is not required if acrolein will not be measured. Samples for acrolein receiving
no pH adjustment must be analyzed within 3 days of sampling.
When the extractable analytes of concern fall within a single chemical category, the specified
preservative and maximum holding times should be observed for optimum safeguard of sample
integrity. When the analytes of concern fall within two or more chemical categories, the sample
may be preserved by cooling to 4 deg. C, reducing residual chlorine with 0.008% sodium
thiosulfate, storing in the dark, and adjusting the pH to 6-9; Samples preserved in this manner may
be held for seven days before extraction and for forty days after extraction. Exceptions to this
optional preservation and holding time procedure are noted in footnote 5 (re the requirement for
thiosulfate reduction of residual chlorine), and footnotes 12, 13 (re the analysis of benzidine).
For the analysis of diphenylnitrosamine, add 0.008% NA2S2O3 and adjust pH to 7-10 with NaOH
within 24 hours of sampling.
The pH adjustment may be performed upon receipt at the laboratory and may be omitted if the
samples are extracted within 72 hours of collection. For the analysis of aldrin, add 0.008% NA2S2O3.
Sufficient ice should be placed with the samples in the shipping container to ensure that ice is still
present when the samples arrive at the laboratory. However, even if ice is present when the
samples arrive, it is necessary to immediately measure the temperature of the samples and confirm
that the 4OC temperature maximum has not been exceeded.
In the isolated cases where it can be documented that this holding temperature cannot be met, the
permittee can be given the option of on-site testing or can request a variance. The request for a
variance should include supportive data which show that the toxicity of the effluent samples is not
reduced because of the increased holding temperature.
The sampler must be completely assembled before performing QA/QC procedures. After
QA/QC is complete, a sufficient amount of weight must be attached to the tubing to keep the
strainer submerged in the effluent for proper siphoning of the sample, without allowing the
strainer to hit the bottom of the flume. Make sure the intake tubing does not kink.
Upon exiting the confined space, continue to follow the confined space entry procedures as
outlined by OSHA Standards. When you return to the sampling vehicle, you must immediately
perform field tests and preserve the samples according to the techniques set forth by Standard
Methods or the State/Federal Rule.
All paper work must be filled out completely before the sampling crew's departure. This
paperwork includes the chain of custody which is turned in to the laboratory with the samples,
"Metering Station Field Observation Form" or equivalent form that remains with the sampling
site file, and the Multi-City Metering Station Sample Record of which the original is given to
the Water Quality Inspector or representative and the copy is given to the SROG or equivalent
representative. If there is not a representative at the site, these copies will be turned over to
the Water Quality Inspector with the originals at the end of the week.
Unscheduled sampling is used to determine the compliance status of the user. Instances
of noncompliance are often identified during unannounced monitoring visits. No notice is
given for this type of sampling. This type of sampling is performed two to four times a year,
at each industrial user site, over a two to five-day period to obtain sampling data
This activity is also helpful in identifying industrial or commercial users which may discharge
pollutants of concern.
The POTW is responsible for coordinating the plant sampling activity with laboratory personnel
who prepare any special sampling bottles and laboratory appurtenances necessary (i.e. trip
blanks, etc.) to complete the sampling objectives.
Control Authorities should measure flow to allow for collection of flow-proportioned composite
samples, which are required, unless flow-proportional sampling is not feasible. Flow-
proportional composite samples are preferred over time composite samples particularly where
the monitored discharge is intermittent or variable.
Desired analyses dictate the preparation protocols, equipment, and collection bottles to use
to avoid contamination of samples or loss of pollutants through improper collection. Sampling
for such pollutants as pH, cyanide, oil and grease, flashpoint, and volatile organic compounds
require manual collection of grab samples. Similar to composite samples, grab samples must
be representative of the monitored discharge and are to be collected from actively flowing
wastestreams. Fluctuations in flow or the nature of the discharge may require collection of
and hand-compositing of more than one grab sample to accurately access compliance.
Chain of custody forms serve as a link between field personnel and the laboratory and
contain information regarding the sample matrix, type, and handling. Lab reports should
contain the minimum information specified in 40 CFR §403.12(o)(1)(ii-iv) as well as any
additional information necessary to demonstrate compliance with 40 CFR Part 136
requirements (e.g., analytical methodology, sample preparation date and time, time of
analysis).
Use of standardized forms which prompt recording of information necessary for demonstrating
compliance with applicable requirements, will aid in ensuring it can be used as admissible
evidence in enforcement proceedings or in judicial actions.
Preserve with 1:1 nitric acid to a pH < 2. Store sample on ice to four degrees
Centigrade.
(3) EPA Test Method 608 and 625i samples are informational samples only.
These results are used for local limits data.
608 and 625 samples are collected as composite samples. At the influent
channel: Collect one 1-liter amber glass bottle of each sample (608, 625).
Check samples for chlorine. At the effluent channel: Collect one 4-liter amber
glass bottle of each sample (608, 625). Check samples for chlorine. If Cl2 is
present in the samples, use sodium thiosulfate (Na2S203) to eliminate
chlorine. Store samples on ice to four degrees Centigrade.
(4) 625/Phenols are collected as a grab sample. Collect one 4-liter amber glass
bottle at the effluent channel only. Check the sample for chlorine. If Cl2 is
present, use sodium thiosulfate (Na2S203) to eliminate chlorine. Store sample
on ice to four degrees Centigrade.
PARAMETER CONTAINER
Helminth Ova & Enteric Virus 1 Qt Plastic Bag (Ziploc)
Metals + 500 ml Plastic Bottle
Nitrogen (total) 4 oz Glass Bottle
TOC (Total Organic Carbon) 4 oz Glass Bottle
Fecal Coliform (autoclaved from lab)
6 hr hold time 500 ml Plastic Bottle
(1) Sampling sites must meet the objectives of the program or study.
(2) At the sampling sites the river must be flowing freely and the sample must be
as representative as possible of river flow at that site. Consideration of all
safety factors must be observed.
(3) Samples must be collected at midstream of the main channel at
approximately two-thirds of the depth unless specific depths have been
requested.
(4) All safety precautions must be observed during sampling which includes the
use of harnesses, waterproof boots and other equipment.
EDCs may interfere with the endocrine systems by damaging hormone-producing tissues,
changing the processes by which hormones are made or metabolized, or mimicking hormones. In
addition to natural and synthetic forms of human hormones that are released into the environment,
there are a multitude of synthetic organic compounds that are able to disrupt the endocrine system.
Public concern about EDCs in the environment has been rapidly increasing since the 1990s when
researchers reported unusual sexual characteristics in wildlife. A report by the USGS, found that
fish in many streams had atypical ratios of male and female sex hormones (Goodbred et al., 1997).
In England, researchers found that male trout kept in cages near WWTP outfalls were developing
eggs on their testes and had increased levels of the protein that is responsible for egg production
(vitellogenin) (Sumpter, 1995; Kaiser, 1996). Follow-up laboratory studies showed that synthetic
forms of estrogen (17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2)) could increase vitellogenin production in fish at
levels as low as 1-10 ng/L, with positive responses seen down to the 0.1-0.5 ng/L level (Purdom et
al., 1994).
Human estrogens have the ability to alter sexual characteristics of aquatic species at trace
concentrations as low as 1 ng/L (Purdom et al., 1994). WWTP effluents have been identified as a
primary source for EDCs in the environment, with the bulk of their endocrine disrupting activity
resulting from human estrogen compounds (Desbrow et al., 1998, Snyder et al., 2001). The
synthetic estrogen, EE2, and the natural estrogens, estrone (E1) and 17β-estradiol (E2), are the
greatest contributors to endocrine disrupting activity in WWTP effluent (Johnson et al., 2001) with
EE2 showing the greatest recalcitrance in WWTPs (Joss et al., 2004). Influent concentrations range
from below detection to 70 ng/L for EE2, 670 ng/L for E1 and 150 ng/L for E2 (Vethaak et al., 2005,
Clara et al., 2005b). Other EDCs include tributyl tin, which was previously used in paints to prevent
marine organisms from sticking to ships, nonylphenol (a surfactant), and bisphenol A (platicizer
and preservative).
PPCPs encompass a wide variety of products that are used by individuals for personal health or
cosmetic reasons, and also include certain agricultural and veterinary medicine products. PPCPs
comprise a diverse collection of thousands of chemical substances, including prescription and over-
the counter therapeutic drugs, veterinary drugs, fragrances, sun-screen products, vitamins, and
cosmetics. Many of these products, notably the pharmaceuticals for human or animal use, are
specifically designed to be biologically active, and some PPCPs may also fall into the category of
EDCs described previously.
Estrogens of Concern
Name Chemical Structure Name Chemical Structure
E1 Estrone C18H22O2
E2 17β-estradiol C18H24O2
E3 Estriol C18H24O3
EE2 17α-ethynylestradiol C20H24O2
One caveat regarding studies on emerging contaminants is that their concentrations in wastewater
influent are often quite low (e.g., concentrations of ng/L to μg/L range) and may be close to method
detection limits. Therefore, small variations between measured influent and effluent concentrations
may show large variations in apparent removal efficiencies, possibly even producing negative
calculated removals.
Clara et al. (2005a), Kreuzinger et al. (2004), and Oppenheimer et al. (2007) observed enhanced
removal with increasing SRTs for most of the EDCs and pharmaceuticals tested and found no
significant differences in removal performances between conventional activated sludge systems
and MBR when operated at similar SRT10 °C. This is likely due to the molecular weight of the study
compounds, which was smaller than the molecular weight cut-off of the ultrafiltration membranes
in the MBR.
Researchers have observed similar findings for natural estrogens with higher removal percentages
at longer SRTs. Effluent concentrations for three natural estrogens were measured near their
detection limits at SRTs10° C higher than 10 days, with their critical SRTs10° C estimated between
5 and 10 days (Clara et al., 2005a).
Ternes et al. (1999) found no significant elimination of this compound during batch experiments;
however, Baronti et al. (2000) and Joss et al. (2004) report greater than 85 percent removal in full-
scale WWTPs. For the pharmaceuticals ibuprofen and bezafibrate, Clara et al. (2005a) reported
more than 95 percent removal during treatment and calculated the critical value for SRT10° C at 5
days for ibuprofen and about 10 days for bezafibrate. Analogous removal results were obtained in
several other studies (Stumpf et al., 1998; Buser et al., 1999; Zwiener et al., 2001, as cited in Clara
et al., 2005a; Oppenheimer et al., 2007). Clara et al. (2005b) noted no or slight removal of these
two pharmaceuticals and two musk fragrances (tonalide and galaxolide) at a WWTP with a low
SRT of 1 to 2 days.
Clara et al. (2005a, 2005b) also found that the pharmaceutical carbamazepine was not removed
during wastewater treatment. In addition, these studies found contradictory results for diclofenac
(e.g., removal rates ranged from no removal to > 70 percent at SRTs of > 10 days (Clara et al.,
2005b)). Clara et al. (2005a) also cited several examples where conflicting results were obtained
for diclofenac. No significant removal was reported by Buser et al. (1999) and Heberer (2002a);
whereas, Ternes et al. (1998) observed elimination rates of up to 70 percent.
Clara et al. (2005a, 2005b) concluded that the removal potential for conventional WWTPs and
MBRs depends on the SRT. They further concluded that high removal rates can be achieved at
SRTs10° C of more than 10 days. These parameters correspond to the design criteria for nitrogen
removal in the German Association for Water, Wastewater and Waste (ATV-DVWK, 2000) and the
urban wastewater directive of the European Community (91/271/EEC) for WWTPs in sensitive
areas. In its 2005, technical brief, “Endocrine Disrupting Compounds and Implications for
Wastewater Treatment,” WERF summarized information from several studies that examined the
effectiveness of current wastewater treatment technologies in the removal of EDCs.
Although the WERF 2005 technical brief states that in general, EDC treatment effectiveness is
improved with increased SRT, it does not provide the specific SRTs that are associated with the
cited removal rates.
Oppenheimer et al. (2007) examined the relationship of SRT to treatment removal efficiencies for
20 PPCPs that are commonly found in the influent of U.S. treatment facilities. Many of the studies
already discussed here have been conducted primarily in Europe, were conducted at small-scale
WWTPs and bench/pilot plants under controlled conditions, and focused on estrogens and
prescription pharmaceuticals rather than PPCPs. The Oppenheimer et al. (2007) study also noted
trends regarding the effect of HRT and pure oxygen systems compared to conventional aeration
systems on PPCP removal.
Oppenheimer et al. (2007) defined a minimum critical SRT as the minimum time needed to
consistently demonstrate greater than 80 percent removal. The results of the study showed that
this critical SRT was compound dependent but that the majority of the 20 PPCPs were consistently
removed in those treatment plants operating at SRTs of 5 to 15 days. Specifically, 9 of 12 frequently
occurring PPCPs were effectively removed through secondary treatment (e.g., ibuprofen).
The results for galaxolide conflicted with those reported by Clara et al. (2005b) who generally found
high removal rates with SRTs > 10 days and Kreuzinger et al. (2004) who reported removal at SRT
between 25 to 40 days. Oppenheimer et al. (2007) found that some compounds such as
octylphenol, tri-(chloroethyl) phosphate, and triphenylphosphate were not well removed by
secondary treatment; however, these were seldom detected in the influent samples. Based on
these results, Oppenheimer et al. (2007) concluded that secondary treatment provides an “effective
first barrier” for the 20 PPCPs in the study.
Oppenheimer et al. (2007) also noted trends regarding the effect of HRT and pure oxygen systems
compared to conventional aeration systems on PPCP removal but determined that insufficient data
existed to make any definitive conclusions. When the PPCP removal performance of a high-purity
oxygenated activated sludge plant was compared to a conventional aeration system, the pure
oxygen system showed higher removal rates although its SRT was shorter than the conventional
aeration plant (i.e., 1 day versus 3 days). In addition, different HRTs operating at similar SRTs had
similar removal rates, and therefore suggested that HRT does not significantly affect removal
effectiveness in the investigated PPCPs.
The WERF (2005) technical brief indicated that secondary biological treatment that includes
nitrification, nutrient removal, and disinfection may remove more than 90 percent of certain steroids,
and >95 percent of alkyl phenols; whereas, secondary biological treatment without nitrification and
disinfection may decrease removal of these by more than 15 percent. Batt et al. (2006) investigated
the role of nitrifying bacteria in activated sludge in the biodegradation of two pharmaceuticals,
iopromide and trimethoprim.
The biodegradation of these compounds was conducted in two lab-scale bioreactors using biomass
from a stage-2 activated sludge WWTP (operated at an SRT of 49 days). In one of the bioreactors,
nitrification was not inhibited (Batch-1 reactor); in the other, nitrification was inhibited with
allylthiourea (Batch-2 reactor). Monitoring was also conducted in the WWTP and compared to
results obtained from the batch reactors. Both reactors exhibited high removal rates for iopromide;
however for trimethoprim, Batch-1 showed a high removal rate of 70 percent, contrasted to the
Batch-2 reactor removal rate of approximately 25 percent with nitrification inhibited. Removal rates
within the treatment plant, however, were consistent for both pharmaceuticals, showing significantly
higher removal rate after nitrification (approx. 60 percent for iopromide and 50 percent for
trimethoprim) compared to activated sludge treatment only ( <1 percent for both).
Based on these results, Batt et al. (2006) concluded that nitrifying bacteria have a key role in the
biodegradation of pharmaceuticals in WWTP that are operated at higher SRTs. This conclusion is
supported by Marttinen et al. (2003), who investigated the fate of phthalates in a WWTP with
nitrogen removal and observed that about one third of the removal occurred in the
nitrification/denitrification treatment phase.
Studies by Yi and Harper (2007), Khunjar et al. (2007), and others have focused on the
mechanisms of estrogen removal during nitrification. Possible mechanisms include sorption of
estrogens to solids and biotransformation within the treatment facility, especially in the presence of
nitrifying activated sludges (Khunjar et al., 2007).
Further work is needed in this area as these tests did not identify the EE2 degradation product to
confirm cometabolic degradation and the role of heterotrophs was not accounted for in some tests.
The focus of a Khunjar et al. (2007) study was to identify the role of ammonia oxidizing bacteria
compared to heterotrophic bacteria in the biotransformation of EE2. They used pure cultures of
ammonia oxidizing Nitrosomonas europaea and heterotrophic cultures that were enriched with
monooxygenase and dioxygenase enzyme systems. Nitrifying activated sludge mixed liquors were
taken from two WWTPs to seed the cultures. EE2 concentrations were 10-15 μg/L. The results of
their study showed significant sorption of EE2 to the predominantly heterotrophic culture but none
to the N. europaea culture.
In addition, biotransformation of EE2 was significant in the N. europaea culture. They observed
three major EE2 metabolites at different phases of N. europaea culture growth that suggest
differential action on each byproduct by the nitrifying bacteria; however, additional work is needed
to identify these byproducts. The authors also noted that additional research is needed with
continuous flow cultivated N. europaea to determine whether these metabolites are likely to be
present in nitrifying activated sludge. Also, N. europaea was not significantly inhibited at EE2
concentrations at or below 10 μg EE2/L, suggesting that ammonia oxidation may not be significantly
impacted by concentrations of EE2 that may be typical of those found in the environment.
As previously discussed, the WERF (2005) technical brief evaluated RO removal rates for several
compounds. Specifically, the WERF brief cites numerous studies in which RO achieved removal
rates of 90 percent or better for naturally occurring and synthetic steroids, organohalides, metals
/organometals, and alkyl phenols.
In addition, Oppenheimer et al. (2007) found that RO was effective in removing all 20 investigated
PPCPs below the detection limit including those that were not consistently removed at SRTs of 30
days (i.e., galaxolide) using conventional activated sludge treatment or media filtration.
This should represent the waste characteristics of the entire batch discharge to the sewer.
One hand composite per batch discharge would be equivalent to a 24-hour composite sample
taken at other types of facilities. The sampling data would be compared with the average daily
categorical standards or local limits where applicable.
Parshall Fume and Ultrasonic Flow Meter. Here is a great trick if you do not
have a stand for your ultrasonic probe, simply use a reflective street cone to hold
your probe. Notice the debris and most POTW’s will write a NOV for not
maintaining the flume and/or uncleanness.
Most POTW’s will define the sampling methods which must be used by industrial users (IUs)
to obtain representative samples to show compliance with their permits: Example
(2) 24-hour flow proportional composite samples where feasible. The POTW
may waive this requirement if the IU demonstrates that this method is not
feasible. Samples would then be taken by means of time proportional
composite sampling methods or by hand composite where the IU can
demonstrate that this will provide a representative sample of the effluent
being discharged.
The volume of sample to be collected by any of these methods is dependent on the number
and types of analyses that must be performed.
Label the sample containers and place them in an iced cooler before storage.
Timed Composites
Timed samples are usually taken in instances where the intention is to characterize the wastes
over a period of time without regard to flow, or where the flow is fairly constant. Timed
composite samples consist of a series of equal volume grab samples taken at regular
intervals. Usually the interval is 15 minutes with a maximum sampling duration of 24 hours.
However, other intervals can be used and may be more appropriate under some
circumstances. Samplers are available which can take up to 10 discreet samples per bottle,
for a total of 240 discreet samples. The sampler may be programmed to take any number of
samples into one composite bottle which has a 2.5-gallon capacity.
Equal volume samples taken at varying time intervals are most often collected by the sampling
inspectors. A flow measuring device should be used in conjunction with the automatic
sampler.
This sampling method is used for all sampling activities except for instances where grab
samples are required or time proportional sampling is more expedient and can provide the
same accuracy as flow proportional sampling (i.e., constant flow levels).
The equipment that is kept in the sampling vehicle is dependent on the types of sampling
activities planned each week, while the equipment stored in the storeroom is for back-up
needs and future sampling demands.
Each sampling vehicle should be equipped with at least one sampler and one flow meter more
than is needed for the particular sampling period. For example, three scheduled flow
proportionate sampling sites would require a vehicle to be equipped with four samplers and
four flow meters. At least one spare battery for each type of equipment taken into the field
should also be placed in the sampling vehicle.
Ancillary equipment, such as supports, harnesses, blowers, etc., that must be carried in each
vehicle will depend on the nature of the sampling location.
In order to keep the equipment in good working order, it should be maintained and cleaned
on a regular basis. Routine maintenance and cleaning procedures should be written into the
procedures.
Basic maintenance of the flow meters includes: periodic replacement of the internal desiccant,
plotter paper, ribbon, fuses, and any broken re-roll spool assemblies. Note: on this assembly
there are two tabs on the sides of this piece which are extremely thin and easily broken.
The NiCad and Gel Cell or equivalent batteries need to be recharged on a regular basis.
Any battery that reads less than 12.50 when checked should not be installed or left on any of
the sampling equipment. At the battery charging station, areas are set aside for batteries that
need to be charged and batteries already charged.
To prolong battery life, batteries should be charged for a maximum of 24 hours, in accordance
with the procedures described in the manufacturer's operations and maintenance manuals.
It is important to note that charged NiCad batteries, if left unused for a long time, are
nevertheless slowly discharging.
When a sampler, flow meter, or ancillary equipment needs more specific repairs, the
manufacturer representative should be contacted and arrangements made for repair or
replacement of the equipment.
(1) Break down the sampler and lay the three components in a row.
(3) Set the glass composite jars and Teflon caps off to the side, to be cleaned
separately from the samplers.
(4) Pour a small amount of diluted (1:128) O-Syl disinfectant and MICRO soap
into each sampler component, the bucket containing the strainers and
weights, and the composite jars.
(a) Partially fill the sampler bases and cover with water.
(b) Use a brush to scrub the inside and outside of each sampling
component. Using a small bottle brush, thoroughly scrub the inside
of the intake tube and the float housing of the sampler head (these
are critical areas since they come in contact with the sample).
(c) Rinse off the soap with fresh water.
(d) Stack each component so that it will dry quickly and thoroughly.
(e) Reassemble the sampler after the components are dry, and store it
in the proper compartment of the sampling van. Leave the sampler
lid loose so moisture won't be trapped.
(f) Clean the strainers and weights in the bucket. Empty the contents of
the bucket and rinse the bucket, strainers, and weights. After they
have dried, place them in the proper storage areas of the sampling
van.
(g) Drain the wastewater tank of the sampling van into the sewer drain.
(h) Refill the fresh-water tank on the sampling van with potable water.
(2) Thoroughly scrub the inside and outside of the jars until they are sparkling
clean. Make sure that all oil and grease are removed.
(4) Pour a small amount of 1:1 nitric acid into one jar, and securely place the
proper Teflon cap on the jar. Swirl the nitric acid throughout the jar, remove
the lid, and pour the nitric acid into the next jar. Repeat this procedure until
all the bottles have been treated. Rinse bottles with water after the acid wash.
NOTE: Wear safety glasses or a full-face shield to protect your eyes.
(5) Place jars in the drying oven. If jars are to air dry use Acetone to clean the
bottles the same way as stated in (4) above. Let the jars and caps dry
completely.
(6) Place the jars, with their caps on loosely, in their respective places on the
sampling van.
(1) A permanent sampling location(s) must be identified for use by the POTW
and the IU.
All permitted industries are required to install a sampling vault. The location of the vault is
designated by the enforcement inspector. The enforcement inspector responsible for an
individual company or site is responsible for providing directions (maps) of the specific
sampling points, as well as current copies of permits and the name of the contact person and
phone number. This information needs to be kept current in the sampling file. Locations of
sampling points need to be compared to what is listed on the currant permit. If sampling points
that the POTW is using do not agree with permit location, do not sample -refer to Chief
Inspector or Supervisor.
(2) The sampling location should be easily accessible and relatively free of safety
hazards.
(3) For categorical industries, there should be, if possible, no discharge present
other than that from the regulated process.
(4) If the rate of industrial process discharge flow is needed (i.e., where mass
limitations are applied), the sampling location will need to be located where
the flow of the wastestream is known or can be measured or estimated and
flow rates for the other wastestreams obtained.
(5) In instances where sampling must be performed in the sewer outside of the
building, the IU must install a sampling vault in accordance with Code.
It is essential that the sample containers be made of chemically resistant material, and do not
affect the concentrations of the pollutants to be measured.
In addition, sample containers should have a closure (i.e., leak proof/resistant, Teflon lined)
that protects the sample from contamination and be properly labeled before leaving the
sampling site.
Sample preservation is needed for composite samples, for example, which may be stored for
as long as 24 hours prior to transferring them to the laboratory.
Recommended preservatives and holding times that should be used for specific pollutants are
presented in the front of this section.
Split samples are taken for Local Limits (pretreatment) sampling and when requested by an
industry or laboratory. Split samples requested by an industry are analyzed by their lab at
their expense.
The laboratory prepares all trip blanks/travel blanks used by the sampling crews. This is
performed in the laboratory rather than in the field in order to assure that there is no field
contamination in the blanks.
Any contamination detected in the blanks would result from field exposure which could in turn
affect collected samples.
Chain-of-Custody
Documentation of all pertinent data concerning the collection, preservation and transportation
of samples is critical to the overall success of the Wastewater Sampling Program. If sampling
is performed for the Pretreatment program, any sampling data may be used as evidence in
court proceedings against a noncompliant industrial user. In this case documentation
becomes critical. This form is a legal document and is of major importance in a court hearing.
Specific procedures with regard to chain of custody are outlined below:
(1) The sampling crew takes a sufficient supply of pre-numbered Industrial Waste
Lab Reports, (custody forms) and sample containers into the field.
(2) The sampling crew fills in the sampling form at the time of sample collection,
and returns the form to the lab along with the collected sample. Specific
information to be completed on the form includes:
(d) SUBMITTED BY: This will have a preprinted truck number. The
sampling crew will write in their initials on the blank line which
follows.
(k) NOTES TO LAB: Includes any special notes to the lab, such as
special analysis required of the sample, a letter code which is
assigned to the entity being tested the amount of flow if sample is
flow proportional, grab sample pH and temperature, and/or actual
sample temperature.
(l) FIELD TEST: Results of any field tests including sample pH,
hexavalent chromium, dissolved sulfides, copper, and residual
chlorine.
(3) When the sampling is completed at a site, the sampling crew labels the bottles
with the label letter designation. The samples are sealed with chain of
custody seals and placed in an ice chest for transportation to the lab.
(4) The sampling crew submits the samples and the chain of custody form to the
laboratory.
(5) The laboratory logs the samples and assigns a Lab Reference Number to the
sample. The sample is tracked by means of this number.
(6) Laboratory personnel sign and date the form, and return it to the sampling
crew who makes two copies of the form. One copy is for the sampling crew
files and the other is for data entry. The original form is returned to the
laboratory. It is also important to note that the sampling vehicle should be
kept locked at all times when the sampling crew is not in the vehicle, or in full
view of the vehicle.
Automatic sampler - Each section should be clean, especially the inlet tube.
Intake tubing - Cleaned or new Tygon or Teflon should be used according to the samples
you are collecting.
Intake line strainer - Clean or stainless steel or Teflon.
Pump tubing - Clean or new medical grade silicone tubing.
Composite bottle - Generally glass is used for this and it’s extremely important that it is
clean.
1. Rinse bottle and cap with tap water to remove any residual contaminants.
2. Wash bottle and cap with a phosphate free soap and tap water.
3. Rinse bottle and cap with tap water to flush off any soap.
4. Add 1:1 nitric acid to bottle, cap and shake to cover entire inside of bottle and cap.
Pour out 1:1 nitric acid.
5. Triple rinse bottle and cap with analyte free water.
6. Allow bottle and cap to dry.
7. Store Bottle with cap loosely screwed onto bottle to keep contaminants out.
1. Pump clean tap water through tubing, using the automatic sampler pump to
transfer water from one container to another.
2. Place tubing into another container that has a phosphate free soap in it and pump the
soapy water through the tubing 3 or 4 times while catching the discharge in a separate
container.
3. Pump clean tap water through tubing to rinse out soap.
4. Add 1:1 nitric acid to clean tap water and pump this solution through tubing 3 or 4 times.
5. Pump analyte-free water through tubing until all residual acid has been removed.
6. Keep tubing in a clean place until next sampling event.
Flowmeter
Washing
Drying
Change plotter paper
Change printer ribbon
Change desiccant
Recharge battery
Record keeping - keep a record of cleaning dates. What was cleaned, and when.
A modern wastewater treatment facility may have up to 10 different sampling sites some
are necessary for compliance purposes, some sites are to please certain agendas or for
political purposes. These sampling sites may include Local Limits, QA/QC, Influent,
Outfall, Chlorine residual, and many more sites to maintain compliance and to ensure
that the plant is running efficiently.
When the containers and preservatives are received from the laboratory, check to see that
none have leaked. Be aware that many preservatives can burn eyes and skin, and must be
handled carefully. Sampling bottles should be labeled with type of preservative used, type of
analysis to be done and be accompanied by a Safety Data Sheet (SDS).
Make sure you can tell which containers are pre-preserved, because extra care must be
taken not to overfill them when collecting samples in the field. Check with the laboratory about
quality control procedures when using pre-preserved bottles. Coolers used for sample
shipment must be large enough to store containers, packing materials and ice. Obtain extra
coolers, if necessary. Never store coolers and containers near solvents, fuels or other
sources of contamination or combustion. In warm weather, keep coolers and samples in the
shade.
Field Parameters
Measure and record the field parameters of temperature, electrical conductivity, pH and
dissolved oxygen in an undisturbed section of stream flow. Other parameters may be
measured, if desired.
Trip blanks are prepared by the laboratory using bottles supplied by the sampler. They are
picked up by the person who begins the sampling day. Trip blanks are placed in the cooler
which contains the other samples and remain there until the samples are turned into the
laboratory.
1. Collect Field Equipment Blank AFTER collecting a sample and BEFORE moving to
the next sampling location.
2. After collecting sample, triple rinse sample measuring container, usually a
graduated cylinder, using High Purity water.
3. Open a sealed bottle of High Purity Water.
4. Pour the High Purity Water into the sample measuring container that was just
rinsed.
5. Pour the High Purity water from sample measuring device into sample bottles
labeled for the Field Equipment Blanks.
6. Repeat Steps 3 through 5 until all Field Equipment Blank sample bottles have been
filled.
7. Process samples using standard procedures and submit to laboratory.
An equipment blank is high purity water which has been collected in a composite sample
bottle or a series of discrete bottles from an automatic sampler. Equipment blanks are used
to evaluate the reliability of composite samples collected in the field.
The data produced from the equipment blank indicates the performance of the sample
collection system, which involves the cleaning of sampling equipment, and accessories,
preservation techniques, and handling of samples.
The objective is to demonstrate that the samples are not contaminated by inadequate
cleaning of equipment, contaminated preservation additives or sample collection techniques,
and to provide documented records on Quality Assurance Practices.
(2) Program the sampler to collect the proper amount of high purity water that
is representative of the sample parameters that will be collected at that site.
Grab samples are excluded. Pump high purity water through the strainer
and intake tubing prior to filling the sampler bottle. Then, place the strainer
into as many fresh, uncontaminated bottles of high purity water as needed
to collect the necessary volume of sample.
(3) If the sampler is set up in the discrete mode, the crew must then transfer the
collected samples into the field composite bottle and shake to mix
thoroughly.
(4) Transfer the sample from the field composite bottle into its respective lab
sample bottles. Test and preserve the samples as appropriate for the
parameters being analyzed.
(6) Sample lines should be as short as possible and the smallest practical
diameter to facilitate purging, reduce lag time, and give adequate
consideration to maximum transport velocity. Also, they should have
sufficient strength to prevent structural failure.
Specific Techniques
Sampling techniques in addition to the above general guidelines must also recognize
differences in sampling methodology, preservation, and analytical methods.
The following sections specify techniques that differ by pollutant group and discuss such
factors as sampling methodology (e.g., composite, grab, etc.), type of container,
preservation and holding time.
Due to the volatility of these compounds, only grab samples can be taken. If a composite
sample is needed, individual grab samples must be collected and composited in the
laboratory prior to analysis.
The procedures that must be followed in taking these samples are outlined below.
NOTE: Gloves, clothing, face, and eye protection must be worn when handling volatile
organics.
In addition, the sampling crew must thoroughly clean those parts of the body that have been
exposed to these materials.
(1) For each sampling date, the lab will also provide two additional
bottles to be used as a backup in case of breakage. These sampling
vials are only good for one week. If any are unused, they must be
returned to the lab for disposal.
(2) The lab will provide one sample trip blank per sampling date. This
bottle is to be kept on ice until the samples are submitted to the lab.
At least one day prior to sampling, go to the lab and request the
sample bottles (40 ml vials) for the specific sampling site, as
indicated by the sampling plan. The laboratory will arrange to have
the appropriate number of sample bottles prepared, based on the
number of analyses to be performed. The sampling crew should
make sure that all bottles are provided for these samples by the lab
technicians.
(3) Collect the sample in a clean glass beaker. Test for chlorine with
the Hach test kit. If there is any chlorine residual, neutralize the
chlorine with sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) and retest for chlorine.
Repeat until there is no chlorine residual. Make notes on chain of
custody sheet if extra amounts of sodium thiosulfate are required for
neutralization.
(4) Remove the vials from the ice. There will be two empty vials for the
601 sample and two vials with HCl for the 602. The HCl will already
have been measured into the vials by the lab personnel.
(5) Fill the vial to just overflowing in such a manner that no air bubbles
pass through the sample as the vial is being filled. This is
accomplished by pouring the sample from the beaker into the vial
along the side of the vial to minimize the possibility of entrapping air
in the sample. Do not rinse out or overfill the vials, this will wash out
the preservative in the vial.
(6) Seal the vial so that no air bubbles are entrapped in it. Remember
to put the Teflon side of the cap facing down onto the vial.
(7) To be sure there are no air bubbles, turn the vial upside down and
tap it against the palm of the hand. Check to see if there are air
bubbles along the sides or bottom of the vial. If there are bubbles,
(8) All samples must be maintained at four degrees centigrade from the
time of collection until the time of extraction. Custody seals must be
placed on all samples, and all paper work must be filled out properly.
(9) Return the sample bottles and QA/QC bottles to the laboratory the
same day the sample is collected.
The procedures that must be followed in taking these samples are outlined below.
(1) Samples must be collected in certified clean one-gallon amber glass bottles
with Teflon lids.
(2) Travel blanks or QA/QC bottles may not be required with the samples.
(3) Grab samples must be collected in amber glass bottles. They do not have
to be completely filled, but must be a minimum of 1/3 to 1/2 full. Bottles
should not be pre-washed with samples prior to filling.
(4) For composite sampling, glass composite bottles must be used and pre-
cleaned. Teflon tubing must be used for the suction piping. The pump tubing
must be medium grade silicone rubber.
(5) The composite bottle in the sampler must be kept refrigerated (putting ice in
the sampler) at 4 degrees Celsius. If amber glass is not used, (i.e. 2 1/2-
gallon clear composite sampler bottle,) the sample must be protected from
the light during collection and compositing. The compositing must be done
in the field (i.e. when discrete sampling has been used).
(6) All samples must be iced at four degrees Celsius from the time of collection
until extraction.
(7) The sample should be checked for the presence of chlorine using field test
kits that provide results in accordance with EPA methods 330.4 and 330.5.
If chlorine is determined to be present, 80 mg of sodium thiosulfate should
be added to each bottle. The sample must be retested for chlorine. This
procedure must be repeated until there is no residual of chlorine shown. The
amount of sodium thiosulfate added must be noted on the chain of custody
if in excess of 80 mg.
(8) All necessary paperwork must be completed at sampling site. All bottles
must be properly labeled, and have custody seal.
(2) For composite sampling, place the lid on the bottle and agitate the bottle to
completely mix the composite sample.
(3) Transfer the required amount from the composite container to either a 500
ml or 2000 ml clean plastic bottle. Check the pH of the sample as
described in Section 8.7.2.5.
(4) Add nitric acid (1:1 solution) to the sample to reduce the pH to below 2.0.
Usually, 2 ml/500 ml is sufficient. Recheck the pH to be sure it is below 2.0.
Make a note on the lab sheet if more than two ml of acid is required to bring
the pH below 2.0.
(5) Label the sample bottle with the corresponding IW number and proper
analysis code letter. Attach the custody seal to the sample, then store in the
ice chest until transferred to the laboratory. Fill out the IW lab sheet with all
the pertinent information, being careful to include all required parameters
and the type of analysis required, e.g., ICP/furnace.
(6) When a grab sample is necessary, rinse out the receiving sample bottle with
an aliquot of the sample stream at least three times. Then fill the sample
bottle and proceed with steps two through four described above.
(8) If more than one site is sampled per day, a clean composite container (i.e.,
two and one half-gallon glass jar), must be used at each site.
(9) If a discreet sampler is being used, at the time of collection combine all the
samples that have been collected into a single clean composite bottle.
Then follow the preceding steps one through four, and refer to step six if a
split is requested.
NOTE: 2000 ml is the standard, but for batch dischargers 1000 ml is adequate.
(c) Test the cyanide sample for pH and temperature with the pH
meter. Record the results on the custody sheet (Industrial Waste
(IW) lab sheet).
(d) Test for chlorine with Hach Total Chlorine Test Kit (the
instructions are located in the kit)
(e) If chlorine is present in the CN sample, neutralize it with Ascorbic
Acid (C6H8O6). For ascorbic acid neutralization, add C6H8O6, a few
crystals at a time, until five mls of sample in the test tube produces
no color. Then add an additional 0.06 g of C6H8O6 for each liter of
sample volume.
(f) Once all Cl2 has been neutralized, preserve the sample with
Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) and raise the pH to >12. Verify the >12
pH with a pH meter or pH test strips.
(g) Mark on the side of the CN sample bottle the Lab sheet number
(using a water proof marker), and place a corresponding custody
seal across the sample bottle tightened cap. Place a Cyanide label
on the bottle if cyanide is suspected of being present in the sample.
(h) Store the CN sample in the ice at four degrees Celsius and transport
it to the laboratory.
Total Sulfides
(1) The Total Sulfide sample is collected as a grab sample only. Use a clean
500 ml plastic bottle to collect the sample. This sample may be pumped
into the sample container or collected directly from the discharge side of
the sampling device.
(2) Preserve the sample with 1 ml of 2N Zinc Acetate (C4H6O4Zn) and then
add Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) to raise the pH > 9.
(3) Label and seal the sample with a custody seal. Cool to 4c.
(1) This is a grab sample only. The bottle used to take the sample must be the same
bottle given to the laboratory for analysis. Do not pump or transfer the wastewater
sample into the bottle. Obtain a level one clean 1000 ml glass bottle, do not use a
pre-preserved bottle because you will lose the preservative when collecting the
sample.
(2) Collect the sample by placing the bottle neck down (up-side down) into the effluent
stream below the surface. This should be as close to the discharge pipe or point as
physically possible. Turn the bottle, allowing the bottle to fill, while keeping the bottle
below the surface. Remove the filled bottle and cap it. Never skim the surface of
the effluent stream.
(3) Preserve the sample using five ml of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) for method 413.1 or
hydrochloric acid (HCL) for method 418.1 (6:1 Ratio) to a pH of less than two.
Reference 42 of methods 418.1 and 41 of methods 413.1. When more than five ml
of HCL is used to lower the pH to less than two, make note of how much additional
acid is used, and record this on the lab sheet. Also indicate required analyses
method on lab sheet.
(2) When more than one sample is being taken from a composite bottle, the
BOD/COD/SS is taken first. The lab needs 1000 ml if the sample is cloudy
or has solids. If the sample is clear, you must collect 2000 ml. Transfer the
appropriate volume to the sample bottle.
(3) Take the pH/temperature of the sample with either pH paper and a
thermometer, or the pH meter carried on the sampling trucks.
(4) Label the sample bottle and place a custody seal over the lid. Store on ice
at four degrees centigrade.
(5) Should split samples be requested, they are given when it is sure there is
enough sample for POTW’s requirements. Users must provide their own
sample containers and allow POTW’s staff to pour off samples.
Most of the equipment required for virus sampling should be available on the
sampling trucks. However, some equipment is virus sampling specific. The
needed equipment is as follows:
Connect the hoses and filter housing (with no filter) to the pump, and run the
effluent through it for one to two minutes to flush the system. Next, pump effluent
into the two 55-gallon drums and rinse them out. (Note: If disinfection was not
possible after the last sampling, then 50-100 gallons of effluent should be pumped
through the entire equipment set up prior to placing the filter in the housing.)
Pump effluent almost to the top (just above the handles) of both containers. While
the drums are filling, check the water in the drums for chlorine using the Hach test
kit and record the results and the temperature on the custody sheet.
After visual observation has determined that all the sodium thiosulfate has
dissolved, retest to make sure there is a <0.1 ppm chlorine residual. If chlorine
was removed, take the hose from the channel, allow it to drain, and re-prime the
pump with the de-chlorinated water.
Refuel the pump, restart it, and adjust the water flow so that it is close to 15-20
seconds per gallon. Make sure the housing doesn't leak. Try to keep this amount
of flow, since too great a flow will cause pass-through in the filter. Pump the water
from both containers until they are empty.
Stop the pump, remove the filter (wear clean latex gloves), and place it in its original
zip-lock bag. The washers do not need to go with the filter, but if they fall into the bag
it is better to leave them than take the chance of contaminating the filter trying to
remove them.
Fill in the information area on the zip-lock bag with a marker, indicating the plant
being sampled and the date, and put it in the cooler with the blue ice provided. The
blue ice keeps the temperature at 4 degrees Celsius to prevent significant die-off of
the viruses.
Parasitological Sampling
Parasitological sampling utilizes the same equipment and techniques as in the virus sampling
described above. However, a different type of filter, which is provided by the Lab, is used.
(2) Refill one of the color viewing tubes to the 5 ml mark with a sample (this is the test
sample). Using the clippers provided in the test kit, open one ChromaVer three
chromium reagent powder pillow. Add the contents of the pillow to the sample.
Stopper and shake to mix and put the tube in the color comparator.
(3) Fill the other viewing tube with a sample and put it in the left side of the color
comparator (this is the blank).
(4) Let the viewing tubes sit in the color comparator for approximately 5 minutes. The
samples should not be exposed to direct sunlight.
(5) Hold the color comparator up to a light source and view the two samples through the
two openings in the front. Rotate the dial on the holder until the color appears the
same in both samples. Record the results from the dial (which is read in mg/l Cr +6)
onto the chain of custody form.
(2) Add three drops of activator (amber colored liquid) and mix well.
(3) Break a sulfide chemet Type S glass ampule and add the contents to the 25 ml
container.
(5) Take a reading and record the results on the chain of custody form. If the reading is
0.0 then show the results less than 0.1 mg/l.
Sampling Techniques for Free and Total Chlorine (older colorwheel Hach Kit)
Procedures for determining free chlorine are as follows.
(1) Rinse out the two color viewing tubes with a portion of the sample to be tested.
(2) Refill one of the color viewing tubes to the 5 ml mark with a sample (this is the test
sample). Using the clippers provided in the test kit, open one DPD free chlorine
reagent powder pillow. Add the contents of the pillow to the sample. Stopper and
shake to mix and put the tube in the color comparator. All of the powder does not
have to dissolve to obtain correct readings.
(3) Fill the other viewing tube with the original sample and put it in the left side of the
color comparator (this is the blank).
(4) Let the viewing tubes sit in the color comparator for approximately 1 minute. The
samples should not be exposed to direct sunlight.
(5) Hold the color comparator up to a light source and view the two samples through the
two openings in the front. Rotate the dial on the holder until the color appears the
same in both samples. Record the results from the dial (which is read in mg/l free
chlorine) onto the chain of custody form.
(2) Refill one of the color viewing tubes to the 5 ml mark with a sample (this is the test
sample). Using the clippers provided in the test kit, open one DPD total chlorine
reagent powder pillow. Add the contents of the pillow to the sample. Stopper and
shake to mix and put the tube in the color comparator. All of the powder does not
have to dissolve to obtain correct readings.
(3) Fill the other viewing tube with a sample and put it in the left side of the color
comparator (this is the blank).
(4) Let the viewing tubes sit in the color comparator for approximately 3 minutes. The
samples should not be exposed to direct sunlight.
(5) Hold the color comparator up to a light source and view the two samples through
the two openings in the front. Rotate the dial on the holder until the color appears
the same in both samples. Record the results from the dial (which is read in mg/l
total chlorine) onto the chain of custody form.
COD Reactor
Wastewater treatment operators run laboratory tests and analysis to monitor the treatment
plant operation. These analyses are for testing the process control and indicate how well
a particular process is working. Operators will analyze the results and if needed, will make
operational adjustments.
Composite Samples
A composite sample consists of several grab samples collected from the same spot over
a specific period of time and merged into a single sample. A composite sample is more
arduous, complicated and usually inconvenient than a simple grab sample. Collecting a
sample every few minutes and adding it to a single bottle is tedious, boring, and costly. To
help solve this problem, a 24-hour automatic sampler is often used. The automatic
sampler consists of a battery pack, a programmable timer, a pump, and as many as 24
bottles.
The automatic sampler has the capability to be programmed to draw a certain volume of
sample every few minutes and deposit each sample into one bottles that are preserved or
refrigerated. At the end of the sampling period, the operator can retrieve the bottles, bring
them back to the lab and create a single composite sample. Analysis can now be
performed on a single composite sample that is more representative of the wastewater
quality than a grab sample.
Unweighted Composite
An unweighted composite collects the same sample volume at a constant time interval.
For example, the operator collects 100 ml every hour for 6 hours. At the end of the time
period, there will be 12 individual bottles representing the wastewater quality over the 6
hour time period. The operator now composites the samples by pouring from each bottle
into a large bottle and mixes the composite.
Primary pH standard values are determined using a concentration cell with transference,
by measuring the potential difference between a hydrogen electrode and a standard
electrode such as the silver chloride electrode. The pH scale is traceable to a set of
standard solutions whose pH is established by international agreement.
Measurement of pH for aqueous solutions can be done with a glass electrode and a pH
meter, or using indicators like strip test paper.
pH measurements are important in water and wastewater processes (sampling) but also
in medicine, biology, chemistry, agriculture, forestry, food science, environmental science,
oceanography, civil engineering, chemical engineering, nutrition, water treatment & water
purification, and many other applications.
Contents
History
The scientific discovery of the p[H] concept of was first introduced by Danish chemist
Søren Peder Lauritz Sørensen at the Carlsberg Laboratory back in 1909 and revised to
the modern pH in 1924 to accommodate definitions and measurements in terms of
electrochemical cells. In the first papers, the notation had the "H" as a subscript to the
lowercase "p", as so: pH.
Alkalinity
Alkalinity is the quantitative capacity of an aqueous solution to neutralize an acid.
Measuring alkalinity is important in determining a stream's ability to neutralize acidic
pollution from rainfall or wastewater. It is one of the best measures of the sensitivity of the
stream to acid inputs. There can be long-term changes in the alkalinity of rivers and
streams in response to human disturbances.
Reference. Bates, Roger G. Determination of pH: theory and practice. Wiley, 1973.
Technical Definition of pH
In technical terms, pH is defined as the decimal logarithm of the reciprocal of the
hydrogen ion activity, aH+, in a solution.
In this calculation of electrode potential, E, follows the Nernst equation, which, for the
hydrogen ion can be written as
The reference electrode may be a silver chloride electrode or a calomel electrode. The
hydrogen-ion selective electrode is a standard hydrogen electrode.
Firstly, the cell is filled with a solution of known hydrogen ion activity and the emf, ES, is
measured. Then the emf, EX, of the same cell containing the solution of unknown pH is
measured.
The difference between the two measured emf values is proportional to pH. This method
of calibration avoids the need to know the standard electrode potential. The
proportionality
If you were to apply this practice the above calculation, a glass electrode is used rather
than the cumbersome hydrogen electrode. A combined glass electrode has an in-built
reference electrode. It is calibrated against buffer solutions of known hydrogen ion activity.
IUPAC has proposed the use of a set of buffer solutions of known H+ activity.
Two or more buffer solutions should be used in order to accommodate the fact that the
"slope" may differ slightly from ideal.
The electrode is first immersed in a standard solution and the reading on a pH meter is
adjusted to be equal to the standard buffer's value, to implement the proper calibration.
The reading from a second standard buffer solution is then adjusted, using the "slope"
control, to be equal to the pH for that solution. Further details, are given in the IUPAC
recommendations.
When more than two buffer solutions are used the electrode is calibrated by fitting
observed pH values to a straight line with respect to standard buffer values. Commercial
standard buffer solutions usually come with information on the value at 25 °C and a
pH Indicators
Visual comparison of the color of a test solution with a standard color chart provides a
means to measure pH accurate to the nearest whole number. Indicators may be used to
measure pH, by making use of the fact that their color changes with pH. More precise
measurements are possible if the color is measured spectrophotometrically, using a
colorimeter of spectrophotometer. Universal indicator consists of a mixture of indicators
such that there is a continuous color change from about pH 2 to pH 10. Universal indicator
paper is made from absorbent paper that has been impregnated with universal indicator.
pOH
pOH is sometimes used as a measure of the concentration of hydroxide ions, OH−, or
alkalinity. pOH values are derived from pH measurements. The concentration of
hydroxide ions in water is related to the concentration of hydrogen ions by
So, at room temperature pOH ≈ 14 − pH. However this relationship is not strictly valid in
other circumstances, such as in measurements of soil alkalinity.
Extremes of pH
Measurement of pH below about 2.5 (ca. 0.003 mol dm−3 acid) and above about 10.5 (ca.
0.0003 mol dm−3 alkali) requires special procedures because, when using the glass
electrode, the Nernst law breaks down under those conditions.
Non-aqueous Solutions
Hydrogen ion concentrations (activities) can be measured in non-aqueous solvents. pH
values based on these measurements belong to a different scale from aqueous pH values,
because activities relate to different standard states. Hydrogen ion activity, aH+, can be
defined as:
where μH+ is the chemical potential of the hydrogen ion, μoH+ is its chemical potential in the
chosen standard state, R is the gas constant and T is the thermodynamic temperature.
Therefore pH values on the different scales cannot be compared directly, requiring an
intersolvent scale which involves the transfer activity coefficient of hydrolyonium ion.
The concept of "Unified pH scale" has been developed on the basis of the absolute
chemical potential of the proton. This scale applies to liquids, gases and even solids.
Applications
Water has a pH of pKw/2, so the pH of pure water is about 7 at 25 °C; this value varies
with temperature. When an acid is dissolved in water, the pH will be less than that of pure
water. When a base, or alkali, is dissolved in water, the pH will be greater than that of pure
water.
A solution of a strong acid, such as hydrochloric acid, at concentration 1 mol dm−3 has a
pH of 0. A solution of a strong alkali, such as sodium hydroxide, at concentration 1 mol
dm−3, has a pH of 14. Thus, measured pH values will lie mostly in the range 0 to 14, though
negative pH values and values above 14 are entirely possible.
The pH of an aqueous solution of pure water is slightly different from that of, a salt such
as sodium chloride even though the salt is neither acidic nor basic. In this case, the
hydrogen and hydroxide ions' activity is dependent on ionic strength, so Kw varies with
ionic strength. The pH of pure water decreases with increasing temperatures. One
example is the pH of pure water at 50 °C is 6.55.
Seawater
The pH of seawater plays an important role in the ocean's carbon cycle, and there is
evidence of ongoing ocean acidification caused by carbon dioxide emissions. pH
measurement can be complicated by the chemical properties of seawater, and several
distinct pH scales exist in chemical oceanography.
As part of its operational definition of the pH scale, the IUPAC defines a series of buffer
solutions across a range of pH values (often denoted with NBS or NIST designation).
These solutions have a relatively low ionic strength (~0.1) compared to that of seawater
(~0.7), and, as a consequence, are not recommended for use in characterizing the pH of
seawater, since the ionic strength differences cause changes in electrode potential.
To resolve this problem, an alternative series of buffers based on artificial seawater was
developed. This new series resolves the problem of ionic strength differences between
samples and the buffers. The newest pH scale is referred to as the total scale, often
denoted as pHT.
If the pH of a solution contains a weak acid requires the solution of a quadratic equation.
If the pH of a solution contains a weak base may require the solution of a cubic equation.
For strong acids and bases no calculations are necessary except in extreme situations.
The general case requires the solution of a set of non-linear simultaneous equations.
A complicating factor is that water itself is a weak acid and a weak base. It dissociates
according to the equilibrium
where [H+] represents for the concentration of the aquated hydronium ion and [OH-]
stands for the concentration of the hydroxide ion. Kw has a value of about 10−14 at 25 °C,
so pure water has a pH of approximately 7.
This equilibrium needs to be considered at high pH and when the solute concentration is
extremely low.
Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is an example of a strong acid. The pH of a 0.01M solution of HCl
is equal to −log10(0.01), that is, pH = 2.
Sodium hydroxide, NaOH, is an example of a strong base. The p[OH] value of a 0.01M
solution of NaOH is equal to −log10(0.01), that is, p[OH] = 2.
From the definition of p[OH] above, this means that the pH is equal to about 12. For
solutions of sodium hydroxide at higher concentrations the self-ionization equilibrium must
be taken into account.
First, an acid dissociation constant is defined as follows. Electrical charges are omitted
from subsequent equations for the sake of generality
and its value is assumed to have been determined by experiment. This being so, there
are three unknown concentrations, [HA], [H+] and [A-] to determine by calculation. Two
additional equations are needed.
C stands for analytical concentration. In some texts one mass balance equation is
replaced by an equation of charge balance. This is satisfactory for simple cases like this
one, but is more difficult to apply to more complicated cases as those below.
Together with the equation defining Ka, there are now three equations in three unknowns.
When an acid is dissolved in water CA = CH = Ca, the concentration of the acid, so [A] =
[H]. After some further algebraic manipulation an equation in the hydrogen ion
concentration may be obtained.
Titration Method
a. Principle
Hydroxyl ions present in a sample, because of dissociation or hydrolysis of solutes react
with additions of standard acid. Alkalinity thus depends on the end-point pH used.
b. Reagents
i) Standard Hydrochloric Acid – 0.02 N.
ii) Methyl Orange Indicator – Dissolve 0.1 g of methyl orange in distilled water and dilute
to 1 liter.
iii) Sodium carbonate solution, 0.02 N : Dry 3 to 5 g primary standard Na2CO3 at 250oC
for 4 h and cool in a desiccator. Weigh 1.03 gm.
(to the nearest mg), transfer to a 1-L volumetric flask, fill flask to the mark with distilled
water, dissolve and mix reagent. Do no keep longer than 1 week.
c. Procedure
Titrate over a white surface 100 ml of the sample contained in a 250-ml conical flask
with standard hydrochloric acid using two or three drops of methyl orange Indicator.
(NOTE – If more than 30 ml of acid is required for the titration, a smaller suitable aliquot
of the sample shall be taken.)
d. Calculation
Total alkalinity (as CaCO3), mg/l = 10 V or NxVx50x1000
Alkalinity to Phenolphthalein
The sample is titrated against standard acid using phenolphthalein indicator.
a. Reagents
i) Phenolphthalein Indicator Solution :
c. Calculation
1000 V1
Alkalinity to phenolphthalein (as CaCO3), mg/l = --------------------
V2
Where
V1 = volume in ml of standard hydrochloric acid used in the titration, and
V2 = Volume in ml of the sample taken for the test.
Caustic Alkalinity
a. General
Caustic alkalinity is the alkalinity corresponding to the hydroxides present in water and is
calculated from total alkalinity (T) and alkalinity to phenolphthalein (P).
b. Procedure
Determine total alkalinity and
alkalinity to phenolphthalein and
calculate caustic alkalinity as Caustic
shown in Table below. Alkalinity or Carbonate Bicarbonate
Result of Titration Caustic Hydroxide Alkalinity as Concentration as
Alkalinity or Hydroxide Alkalinity Alkalinity as CaCO3 CaCO3
as CaCO3 Carbonate Alkalinity CaCO3
as CaCO3 Bicarbonate
Concentration as CaCO3
Result of Titration
P=0 0 0 0
P<1/2T 0 2P T-2P
P=1/2T 0 2P 0
P>1/2T 2P-T 2(T-P) 0
P=T T 0 0
The alkalinity of water is a measure of its capacity to neutralize acids. The alkalinity of
natural water is due to the salts of carbonate, bicarbonate, borates, silicates and
phosphates along with the hydroxyl ions in free state.
However, the major portion of the alkalinity in natural waters is caused by hydroxide,
carbonate, and bicarbonates which may be ranked in order of their association with high
pH values.
Alkalinity values provide guidance in applying proper doses of chemicals in water and
waste water treatment processes, particularly in coagulation and softening.
Alkalinity (Total)
References: ASTM D 1067-92, Acidity or Alkalinity of Water.
The alkalinity of water is a measurement of its buffering capacity or ability to react with
strong acids to a designated pH. Alkalinity of natural waters is typically a combination of
bicarbonate, carbonate, and hydroxide ions. Sewage and wastewaters usually exhibit
higher alkalinities either due to the presence of silicates and phosphates or to a
concentration of the ions from natural waters.
Alkalinity inhibits corrosion in boiler and cooling waters and is therefore a desired quality
that must be maintained. Alkalinity is also measured as a means of controlling water and
wastewater treatment processes or the quality of various process waters. In natural
waters, excessive alkalinity can render water unsuitable for irrigation purposes and may
indicate the presence of industrial effluents.
Hardness (calcium)
Reference: West, T. S., DSC, Ph.D., Complexometry with EDTA and Related Reagents,
3rd ed., p. 46, 164 (1969).
Originally described as water's capacity to precipitate soap, hardness is one of the most
frequently determined qualities of water. It is a composite of the calcium, magnesium,
strontium, and barium concentrations in a sample. The current practice is to assume total
hardness refers to the calcium and magnesium concentrations only.
Completely de-hardened water, resulting from sodium zeolite or other suitable ion
exchange treatment, is required for various processes-including power generation,
printing and photo finishing, pulp and paper manufacturing, and food and beverage
processing. Hard water can cause scale formation on heat exchange surfaces, resulting
in decreased heat transfer and equipment damage.
The Titrimetric Method. This method is specific for calcium hardness. The EGTA titrant in
alkaline solution is employed with zincon indicator. Results are expressed as ppm (mg/L)
CaCO3.
Shelf-life. 8 months. Although the reagent itself is stable, the endpoint indicator has a
limited shelf-life. We recommend stocking quantities that will be used within 7 months.
Anaerobic:
Organics intermediates + CO2 + H2O + energy
Where the intermediates are butyric acid, mercaptans and hydrogen sulfide gas. At least two
general forms of bacteria act in balance in a wastewater digester: Saprophytic organisms and
Methane Fermenters. The saprophytes exist on dead or decaying materials. The methane
fermenters live on the volatile acids produced by these saprophytes. The methane fermenting
bacteria require a pH range of 6.6 to 7.6 to be able to live and reproduce. Aerobic conditions
indicate that dissolved oxygen is present. Aerobic bacteria require oxygen to live and thrive. When
aerobes decompose organics in the water, the result is carbon dioxide and water.
Aerobic:
Organics + Oxygen CO2 + H2O + energy
Dissolved Oxygen in a water sample can be detrimental to metal pipes in high concentrations
because oxygen helps accelerate corrosion. Oxygen is an important component in water plant
operations. Its primary value is to oxidize iron and manganese into forms that will precipitate out
of the water. It also removes excess carbon dioxide. The amount of dissolved oxygen in a water
sample will affect the taste of drinking water also.
Methods of Determination
There are two methods that we will be using in the
lab. The membrane electrode method procedure is
based on the rate of diffusion of molecular oxygen
across a membrane. The other is a titrimetric
procedure (Winkler Method) based on the oxidizing
property of the (DO). Many factors determine the
solubility of oxygen in a water sample. Temperature,
atmospheric pressure, salinity, biological activity and
pH all have an effect on the (DO) content.
Iodometric Test
The iodometric (titration) test is very precise and reliable for (DO) analysis of samples free from
particulate matter, color and chemical interferences. Reactions take place with the addition of
certain chemicals that liberate iodine equivalent to the original (DO) content. The iodine is then
measured to the starch iodine endpoint. We then calculate the dissolved oxygen from how much
titrate we use. Certain oxidizing agents can liberate iodine from iodides (positive interference), and
some reducing agents reduce iodine to iodide (negative interferences). The alkaline Iodide-Azide
reagent effectively removes interference caused by nitrates in the water sample, so a more
accurate determination of (DO) can be made.
Methods of analysis are highly dependent on the source and characteristics of the sample. The
membrane electrode method involves an oxygen permeable plastic membrane that serves as a
diffusion barrier against impurities. Only molecular oxygen passes through the membrane and is
measured by the meter. This method is excellent for field testing and continuous monitoring.
Membrane electrodes provide an excellent method for (DO) analysis in polluted, highly colored
turbid waters and strong waste effluents.
Samples are taken in BOD bottles where agitation or contact with air is at a minimum. Either
condition can cause a change in the gaseous content. Samples must be determined immediately
for accurate results.
The dissolved oxygen test is the one of the most important analyses in determining the quality of
natural waters. The effect of oxidation wastes on streams, the suitability of water for fish and other
organisms and the progress of self-purification can all be measured or estimated from the dissolved
oxygen content. In aerobic sewage treatment units, the minimum objectionable odor potential,
maximum treatment efficiency and stabilization of wastewater are dependent on maintenance of
adequate dissolved oxygen. Frequent dissolved oxygen measurement is essential for adequate
process control.
Terms Review
Aerobic (AIR-O-bick) - a condition in which free or dissolved oxygen is present in the aquatic
environment.
Aerobic Bacteria (aerobes) – bacteria which will live and reproduce only in an environment
containing oxygen. Oxygen combined chemically, such as in water molecules (H2O), cannot be
used for respiration by aerobes.
Anaerobic (AN-air O-bick) - a condition in which “free” or dissolved oxygen is not present in the
aquatic environment.
Anaerobic Bacteria (anaerobes) – bacteria that thrive without the presence of oxygen.
Saprophytic Bacteria – bacteria that break down complex solids to volatile acids.
Methane Fermenters – bacteria that break down the volatile acids to methane (CH4) carbon
dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O).
This course contains general EPA’s CWA federal rule requirements. Please be
aware that each state implements wastewater/safety/environment regulations that
may be more stringent than EPA’s regulations. Check with your state
environmental agency for more information.
2. Insert the DO probe from the meter into your BOD bottles.
Record the DO for Tap and DI water. Now continue with
the Winkler Burette method.
1. Add the contents of one MANGANESE SULFATE powder pillow and one ALKALINE
IODIDE-AZIDE reagent powder pillow to each of your BOD bottles (TAP and DI)
2. Immediately insert the stoppers so that no air is trapped in the bottles and invert several
times to mix. A flocculent precipitate will form. It will be brownish-orange if dissolved
oxygen is present or white if oxygen is absent.
3. Allow the samples to stand until the floc has settled and leaves the solution clear (about
10 minutes). Again invert the bottles several times to mix and let stand until the solution
is clear.
4. Remove the stoppers and add the contents of one SULFAMIC ACID powder pillow to
each bottle. Replace the stoppers, being careful not to trap any air bubbles in the bottles,
and invert several times to mix. The floc will dissolve and leave a yellow color if
dissolved oxygen is present.
5. Measure 200 ml of the prepared solution by filling a clean 250-ml graduated cylinder to
the 200-ml mark. Pour the solutions into clean 250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks. Save the last
100 mls for a duplicate.
6. Titrate the prepared solutions with PAO Titrant, 0.025N, to a pale yellow color. Use a
white paper under the flask.
7. Add two droppers full of Starch Indicator Solution and swirl to mix. A dark blue color will
develop.
8. Continue the titration until the solution changes from dark blue to colorless (end point).
Go Slow- drop by drop. Record the burette reading to the nearest 0.01mls.
9. The total number of ml of PAO Titrant used is equal to the mg/L dissolved oxygen.
4. What factors would determine which the best method to use is?
2. Tap water
200ml final Burette reading-
Sample initial Burette reading- -______________=________________mg/L
mls
100ml final Burette reading
Sample initial Burette reading- -______________=_________________mg/L
mls x 2
3. What are some factors that can alter the (DO) content prior to testing?
TDS in drinking-water originate from natural sources, sewage, urban run-off, industrial wastewater,
and chemicals used in the water treatment process, and the nature of the piping or hardware used
to convey the water, i.e., the plumbing. In the United States, elevated TDS has been due to natural
environmental features such as: mineral springs, carbonate deposits, salt deposits, and sea water
intrusion, but other sources may include: salts used for road de-icing, anti-skid materials, drinking
water treatment chemicals, stormwater and agricultural runoff, and point/non-point wastewater
discharges.
In general, the total dissolved solids concentration is the sum of the cations (positively charged)
and anions (negatively charged) ions in the water. Therefore, the total dissolved solids test
provides a qualitative measure of the amount of dissolved ions, but does not tell us the nature or
ion relationships.
In addition, the test does not provide us insight into the specific water quality issues, such as:
Elevated Hardness, Salty Taste, or Corrosiveness. Therefore, the total dissolved solids test is
used as an indicator test to determine the general quality of the water.
Total Solids
The term "total solids" refers to matter suspended
or dissolved in water or wastewater, and is
related to both specific conductance and turbidity.
High TSS can block light from reaching submerged vegetation. As the amount of light
passing through the water is reduced, photosynthesis slows down. Reduced rates of
photosynthesis causes less dissolved oxygen to be released into the water by plants. If
light is completely blocked from bottom dwelling plants, the plants will stop producing
oxygen and will die. As the plants are decomposed, bacteria will use up even more oxygen
from the water. Low dissolved oxygen can lead to fish kills.
High TSS can also cause an increase in surface water temperature, because the
suspended particles absorb heat from sunlight. This can cause dissolved oxygen levels to
fall even further (because warmer waters can hold less DO), and can harm aquatic life in
many other ways, as discussed in the temperature section. (The decrease in water clarity
caused by TSS can affect the ability of fish to see and catch food.
High TSS in a water body can often mean higher concentrations of bacteria, nutrients,
pesticides, and metals in the water. These pollutants may attach to sediment particles on
the land and be carried into water bodies with storm water. In the water, the pollutants
may be released from the sediment or travel farther downstream. High TSS can cause
problems for industrial use, because the solids may clog or scour pipes and machinery.
Similar to TSS, high concentrations of TDS may also reduce water clarity, contribute to a
decrease in photosynthesis, combine with toxic compounds and heavy metals, and lead
to an increase in water temperature. TDS is used to estimate the quality of drinking water,
because it represents the amount of ions in the water. Water with high TDS often has a
bad taste and/or high water hardness, and could result in a laxative effect.
The TDS concentration of a water sample can be estimated from specific conductance if
a linear correlation between the two parameters is first established. Depending on the
chemistry of the water, TDS (mg/l) can be estimated by multiplying specific conductance
(micromhos/cm) by a factor between 0.55 and 0.75. TDS can also be determined by
measuring individual ions and adding them up.
Conductivity Meter
Apparatus
- Buchner funnel and adaptor
- Filter flask
- Filter paper 110 mm diam., Whatman 1-4
- 1030 drying oven
- Desiccator
- Balance
- Graduated Cylinder
Procedure
1. Dry the filter papers in oven at 1030 c to remove all
traces of moisture.
4. Place the paper in the bottom of the Buchner funnel and carefully arrange so
that the outer edges lay snugly along the side. Careful not to touch it with
your finger. Use a glass rod. Wet the paper, turn on the vacuum and make a
good seal, make a pocket covering the bottom of the funnel.
5. Add 20 to 100 mls of sample at a sufficient rate to keep the bottom of the
funnel covered, but not fast enough to overflow the pocket made by the filter
paper. Record the Volume used.
6. Remove the filter paper with tweezers. Dry in a 1030 c oven for 30 minutes.
Remove and desiccate. Reweigh the filter paper (W2) to the nearest 0.01g.
Calculation:
Where:
(W1) and (W2) are expressed in mg.
(W1) = mass of the prepared filter
(W2) = mass of the filter and sample after the filtration step.
Top left, filters being baked at 105oC. Right photograph, filters in desiccant.
Calculation:
The results obtained from the suspended matter test
and settleability test on aerated mixed liquor are used to obtain the SVI.
Calculation:
During the settleometer test, operators not only check how the solids settle out they can
also determine the rate of denitrification in the clarifier.
(W2) = mg (W2) = mg
Settleability Calculations:
Some plants are designed in steps for nitrification/denitrification as shown in the picture
above.
Sample Collection
Fecal coliform must be collected in a clean, sterile borosilicate glass or plastic bottle
containing sodium thiosulfate. Pre-sterilized bags or bottles containing sodium thiosulfate
can also be used. Sodium thiosulfate is added to remove residual chlorine which will kill
fecal coliforms during transit. 0.1 ml of 10% sodium thiosulfate is added to a 120 ml sample
bottle prior to sterilization. The minimum bottle size should be 120 ml to allow enough
head space (1") for proper sample mixing.
Collection Procedure
Select a site that will provide a representative sample. Fecal
coliform samples are always grab samples and should be drawn
directly from the flow stream without using collection other
devices. We do not want to cross contaminate the sample. Keep
the sample bottle lid closed tightly until it is to be filled.
Remove the cap and do not contaminate the inner surface of the
bottle, neck, threads or cap. Fill the container without rinsing,
being sure to leave ample air space to allow mixing. Rinsing will
remove the dechlorinating agent. All samples should be labeled
properly with date and time of collection, sampler's name, and
sample collection location. Leaking sample bottles allow for
contamination of the sample and should be discarded and the
sampling repeated.
Preservation
Fecal coliform samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection to prevent
changes to the microorganism population. Fecal coliforms must be transported on ice, if
they cannot be analyzed within 1 hour of collection. Fecal coliforms transported at ambient
temperature may reproduce and higher bias to the numbers than desired or they may be
killed off resulting in lower numbers, if handled poorly such as transport in sunlight. Fecal
coliform samples should be stored by the laboratory in a refrigerator until time of analysis.
The maximum holding time for state or federal permit reporting purposes is 6 hours.
This glass bottle is used for quality control (QA/QC) for bacteria samples tubes.
This operator is splitting the sample for bacteriological analysis. Always wear gloves for
your and others’ safety. We have all seen the operator holds a sandwich in one hand
while working in the lab, or the operator does not wear gloves at all.
Most activated sludge processes are used to degrade carbonaceous BOD. It is also possible to
design and/or operate the basic system to oxidize ammonia (nitrification).
Many plants are now designed to achieve nitrification. Other system modifications include
phosphorus removal and biological denitrification. Activated sludge plants are usually designed
from pilot plant and laboratory studies.
From this approach, it is possible to design a process based on the amount of time the sludge
spends in the system, generally termed mean cell residence time (MCRT), or on the amount of
food provided to the bacteria in the aeration tank (the food-to-microorganism ratio, F/M). What does
this mean?
Suppose a person ate 10 pounds of hot dogs (BOD) and weighed 200 pounds (MLSS).
It would be 10 lbs. to 200 lbs. If we divide 200 into 10, the ratio is .05 or 5%.
Amoeba
a. The optimum operating point of either helps obtain the desired effluent concentration.
b. Both provide a means for maintaining the best effluent and sludge quality.
c. Both techniques attempt to regulate rate of growth, metabolism, and stabilization of food
matter.
d. Both techniques indicate the solids level needed to stabilize the food and attain sludge
quality.
e. The desired solids level is controlled by wasting.
1. To maintain – waste amount of net daily
2. To increase – decrease waste rate
3. To decrease – increase waste rate
f. They are interrelated so changing one control changes the other.
g. Once the control point is set, it should remain constant until change in effluent or sludge
quality requires a change.
The operating control point is that point when the best effluent and sludge quality is obtained for
the existing conditions.
You have people who will put their noses up at some things and others who would eat anything.
Predators typically eat from a narrow set of prey, while omnivores and scavengers eat from a
broader food selection.
Food (organic loading) regulates microorganism numbers, diversity, and species when other
factors are not limiting. The relative abundance and occurrence of organisms at different loadings
can reveal why some organisms are present in large numbers while others are absent.
Aerobic Bacteria
The aerobic bacteria that occur are similar to those found in other treatment processes such as
activated sludge. Three functional groups occur: freely dispersed, single bacteria; floc-forming
bacteria; and filamentous bacteria. All function similarly to oxidize organic carbon (BOD) to
produce CO2 and new bacteria (new sludge).
Most heterotrophic bacteria have a wide range in environmental tolerance and can function
effectively in BOD removal over a wide range in pH and temperature. Aerobic BOD removal
generally proceeds well from pH 6.5 to 9.0 and at temperatures from 3-4oC to 60-70°C
(mesophilic bacteria are replaced by thermophilic bacteria at temperatures above 35°C). BOD
removal generally declines rapidly below 3-4°C and ceases at 1-2°C.
A very specialized group of bacteria occurs to some extent in lagoons (and other wastewater
treatment systems) that can oxidize ammonia via nitrite to nitrate, termed nitrifying bacteria.
These bacteria are strict aerobes and require a redox potential of at least +200 m V (Holt et al.,
1994).
Odors can be minimized by using minimum depths of up to 2 m, while algae production is reduced
with liquid retention time of less than two days. The solids will also accumulate, all along the
aeration basins in the facultative lagoons and even in comers, or between aeration units in the
completely mixed lagoon. These accumulated solids will, on the whole, decompose in the bottom,
but since there is always a non-biodegradable fraction, a permanent deposit will build up.
Therefore, periodic removal of these accumulated solids becomes necessary. We will cover this
in much more detail in a few more pages.
As our country and the demand for clean water have grown, it has become more important to
produce cleaner wastewater effluents, yet some contaminants are more difficult to remove than
others. The demand for cleaner discharges has been met through better and more complete
methods of removing pollutants at wastewater treatment plants, in addition to pretreatment and
pollution prevention which helps limit types of wastes discharged to the sanitary sewer system.
Currently, nearly all WWTPs provide a minimum of secondary treatment. In some receiving waters,
the discharge of secondary treatment effluent would still degrade water quality and inhibit aquatic
life. Further treatment is needed.
Advanced treatment may also involve physical-chemical separation techniques such as adsorption,
flocculation/precipitation, membranes for advanced filtration, ion exchange, and reverse osmosis.
In various combinations, these processes can achieve any degree of pollution control desired. As
wastewater is purified to higher and higher degrees by such advanced treatment processes, the
treated effluents can be reused for urban, landscape, and agricultural irrigation, industrial cooling
and processing, recreational uses and water recharge, and even indirect augmentation of drinking
water supplies.
RBC’s with integral units treat unsettled sewage and has the capability of providing
primary and secondary settling in the unit.
An oxidation ditch is a modified activated sludge biological treatment process that utilizes
long solids retention times (SRTs) to remove biodegradable organics. Oxidation ditches
are typically complete mix systems, but they can be modified to approach plug flow
conditions.
An oxidation ditch is a modified activated sludge biological treatment process that utilizes
long solids retention times (SRTs) to remove biodegradable organics.
Oxidation ditches are typically complete mix systems, but they can be modified to
approach plug flow conditions. (Note: as conditions approach plug flow, diffused air must
be used to provide enough mixing. The system will also no longer operate as an oxidation
ditch).
Preliminary treatment, such as bar screens and grit removal, normally precedes the
oxidation ditch. Primary settling prior to an oxidation ditch is sometimes practiced, but is
not typical in this design. Tertiary filters may be required after clarification, depending on
the effluent requirements. Disinfection is required and re-aeration may be necessary prior
to final discharge.
Disadvantages
Effluent suspended solids concentrations are relatively high compared to other
modifications of the activated sludge process.
Requires a larger land area than other activated sludge treatment options. This can prove
costly, limiting the feasibility of oxidation ditches in urban, suburban, or other areas where
land acquisition costs are relatively high.
Surface aerators, such as brush rotors, disc aerators, draft tube aerators, or fine bubble diffusers
are used to circulate the mixed liquor.
The mixing process entrains oxygen into the mixed liquor to foster microbial growth and the motive
velocity ensures contact of microorganisms with the incoming wastewater. The aeration sharply
increases the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration but decreases as biomass uptake oxygen as
the mixed liquor travels through the ditch.
Solids are maintained in suspension as the mixed liquor circulates around the ditch. If design SRTs
are selected for nitrification, a high degree of nitrification will occur.
Oxidation ditch effluent is usually settled in a separate secondary clarifier. An anaerobic tank may
be added prior to the ditch to enhance biological phosphorus removal.
An oxidation ditch may also be operated to achieve partial denitrification. One of the most common
design modifications for enhanced nitrogen removal is known as the Modified Ludzack-Ettinger
(MLE) process.
Wastewater and return activated sludge (RAS) are introduced into the first reactor which
operates under anoxic conditions. Mixed liquor then flows into the second reactor
operating under aerobic conditions. The process is then reversed and the second reactor
begins to operate under anoxic conditions.
Algae are desirable in lagoons as they generate oxygen needed by bacteria for waste stabili-zation.
Three major groups occur in lagoons, based on their chlorophyll type: brown algae (diatoms), green
algae, and red algae. The predominant algal species at any given time is dependent on growth
conditions, particularly temperature, organic loading, oxygen status, nutrient availability, and
predation pressures. A fourth type of "algae" common in lagoons is the cyano-bacteria or blue-
green bacteria.
These organisms grow much as the true algae, with the exception that most species can fix
atmospheric nitrogen. Blue-green bacteria often bloom in lagoons and some species produce
odorous and toxic by-products.
Blue-Green Bacteria
Blue-green bacteria appear to be favored by poor growth conditions including high temperature,
low light, low nutrient availability (many fix nitrogen) and high predation pressure. Common blue-
green bacteria in waste treatment systems include Aphanothece, Microcystis, Oscillatoria and
Anabaena.
Algae can bloom in lagoons at any time of the year (even under the ice); however, a succession of
algae types occurs over the season. There is also a shift in the algal species present in a lagoon
through the season, caused by temperature and rotifer and Daphnia predation. Diatoms usually
predominate in the wintertime at temperatures <60°F. In the early spring, when predation is low
and lagoon temperatures increase above 60°F, green algae such as Chlorella, Chlamydomonas,
and Euglena often predominate in waste treatment lagoons. The predominant green algae change
to species with spikes or horns such as Scenesdesmus, Micractinium, and Ankistrodesmus later in
the season when Rotifers and Daphnia are active
(these species survive predation better).
Algae grow at warmer temperatures, longer detention time, and when inorganic minerals needed
for growth are in excess. Alkalinity (inorganic carbon) is the only nutrient likely to be limiting for
algal growth in lagoons. Substantial sludge accumulation in a lagoon may become soluble upon
warming in the spring, releasing algal growth nutrients and causing an algal bloom. Sludge
resolution of nutrients is a major cause of high algal growth in a lagoon, requiring
sludge removal from the lagoon for correction.
Bacterial growth on BOD releases CO2 which subsequently dissolves in water to yield carbonic
acid (H2CO3). This rapidly dissociates to bicarbonate ion, increasing the lagoon alkalinity. Bacterial
oxidation of BOD causes a decrease in lagoon pH due to CO2 release.
Algal growth in lagoons has the opposite effect on lagoon pH, raising the pH due to algal use for
growth of inorganic carbon (CO2 and HCO3). Algal growth reduces the lagoon alkalinity which may
cause the pH to increase if the lagoon alkalinity (pH buffer capacity) is low. Algae can grow to such
an extent in lagoons (a bloom) that they consume all of the CO2 and HCO3 present for
photosynthesis, leaving only carbonate (CO23) as the pH buffering species. This causes the pH of
the lagoon to become alkaline. pH values of 9.5 or greater are common in lagoons during algal
blooms, which can lead to lagoon effluent pH violations (in most states this is pH = 9). It should be
noted that an increase in the lagoon pH caused by algal growth can be beneficial. Natural
disinfection of pathogens is enhanced at higher pH.
Rotifers and daphnia are particularly important in controlling algal overgrowth and these often
"bloom" when algal concentrations are high.
These microinvertebrates are relatively slow growing and generally only occur in systems with a
detention time of >10 days. Mosquitoes grow in lagoons where shoreline vegetation is not removed,
possibly causing a nuisance and public health problem.
Culex tarsalis, the vector of Western Equine Encephalitis in the western U.S., grows well in
wastewater lagoons (USEPA, 1983). The requirement for a minimum lagoon bank slope and
removal of shoreline vegetation by most regulatory agencies is based on the public health need to
reduce mosquito vectors.
Bacteria are friendly creatures; you never find one bacteria on its own. They tend to live together
in clumps, chains or planes. When they live in chains, one after the other, they are called
filamentous bacteria - these often have long thin cells. When they tend to collect in a plane or a
thin layer over the surface of an object, they are called a biofilm. Many bacteria exist as a biofilm
and the study of biofilms is very important. Biofilm bacteria secrete sticky substances that form a
sort of gel in which they live. The plaque on your teeth that causes tooth decay is a biofilm.
Facultative Bacteria
Most of the bacteria absorbing the organic material in a wastewater treatment system are
facultative in nature. This means they are adaptable to survive and multiply in either anaerobic or
aerobic conditions. The nature of individual bacteria is dependent upon the environment in which
they live. Usually, facultative bacteria will be anaerobic unless there is some type of mechanical or
biochemical process used to add oxygen to the wastewater. When bacteria are in the process of
being transferred from one environment to another, the metamorphosis from anaerobic to aerobic
state (and vice versa) takes place within a couple of hours.
Anaerobic Bacteria
Anaerobic bacteria live and reproduce in the absence of free oxygen. They utilize compounds such
as sulfates and nitrates for energy and their metabolism is substantially reduced. In order to remove
a given amount of organic material in an anaerobic treatment system, the organic material must be
exposed to a significantly higher quantity of bacteria and/or detained for a much longer period of
time. A typical use for anaerobic bacteria would be in a septic tank. The slower metabolism of the
anaerobic bacteria dictates that the wastewater be held several days in order to achieve even a
nominal 50% reduction in organic material. That is why septic tanks are always followed by some
type of effluent treatment and disposal process. The advantage of using the anaerobic process is
that electromechanical equipment is not required. Anaerobic bacteria release hydrogen sulfide as
well as methane gas, both of which can create hazardous conditions. Even as the anaerobic action
begins in the collection lines of a sewer system, deadly hydrogen sulfide or explosive methane gas
can accumulate and be life threatening.
Aerobic Bacteria
Aerobic bacteria live and multiply in the presence of free oxygen. Facultative bacteria always
achieve an aerobic state when oxygen is present. While the name "aerobic" implies breathing air,
dissolved oxygen is the primary source of energy for aerobic bacteria. The metabolism of aerobes
is much higher than for anaerobes. This increase means that 90% fewer organisms are needed
compared to the anaerobic process, or that treatment is accomplished in 90% less time. This
provides a number of advantages including a higher percentage of organic removal. The by-
products of aerobic bacteria are carbon dioxide and water. Aerobic bacteria live in colonial
structures called floc and are kept in suspension by the mechanical action used to introduce oxygen
into the wastewater. This mechanical action exposes the floc to the organic material while
treatment takes place. Following digestion, a gravity clarifier separates and settles out the floc.
Because of the mechanical nature of the aerobic digestion process, maintenance and operator
oversight are required.
The presence of protozoans and metazoans and the relative abundance of certain species can be
a predictor of operational changes within a treatment plant. In this way, an operator is able to make
adjustments and minimize negative operational effects simply by observing changes in the
protozoan and metazoan population.
Aspidisca
Nematode
Taxonomy
Taxonomy is the science of categorizing life forms according to their characteristics. Eighteen
different categories are used to define life forms from the broadest down to the most specific. They
are: Kingdom, Phylum, Subphylum, Superclass, Class, Subclass, Cohort, Superorder, Order,
Suborder, Superfamily, Family, Subfamily, Tribe, Genus, Subgenus, Species and Subspecies.
Identifying the genus is usually specific enough to determine the role of the organisms found in a
wastewater treatment system.
Process Indicators
Following taxonomic identification, enumeration and evaluation of the characteristics of the various
organisms and structures present in a wastewater sample, the information can be used to draw
conclusions regarding the treatment process.
A spherical floc particle indicates immature floc, as would be found during start-up or a process
recovery. A mature floc particle of irregular shape indicates the presence of a beneficial quantity of
filamentous organisms and good quality effluent. An excess of dispersed growth could indicate a
very young sludge, the presence of toxic material, excess mechanical aeration or an extended
period of time at low dissolved oxygen levels.
Certain protozoans, such as amoebae and flagellates dominate during a system start-up. Free
swimming ciliates are indicative of a sludge of intermediate health and an effluent of acceptable or
satisfactory quality. A predominance of crawling ciliates, stalked ciliates and metazoans is an
indicator of sludge with excellent health and an effluent of high quality.
Filamentous Bacteria
Filamentous Bacteria
They can affect the sludge volume index (SVI).
They can cause poor settling if dominant.
They can fill up a clarifier and make it hard to settle, causing TSS carryover.
They can increase polymer consumption.
They can increase solids production and cause solids handling costs to increase
significantly.
The fat storage property of the bacteria is also an asset in settling. As the bugs “bump” into each
other, the fat on each of them sticks together and causes flocculation of the non-organic solids and
biomass. From the aeration tank, the wastewater, now called mixed liquor, flows to a secondary
clarification basin to allow the flocculated biomass of solids to settle out of the water. The solids
biomass, which is the activated sludge, contains millions of bacteria and other microorganisms, is
used again by returning it to the influent of the aeration tank for mixing with the primary effluent and
ample amounts of air.
Paramecium is described as a filter-feeding ciliate because its cilia move and filter bacteria from
the water.
Vorticella sp.
Vorticella is a stalked ciliate. There
are at least a dozen species found
in activated sludge ranging in
length from about 30 to 150 μm.
These organisms are oval to round
shaped, have a contractile stalk, a
domed feeding zone, and a water
vacuole located near the terminal
end of the feeding cavity.
The stalk resembles a coiled spring after its rapid contraction. Indicator: If treatment conditions are
bad, for example low DO or toxicity, Vorticella will leave their stalks. Therefore, a bunch of empty
stalks indicates poor conditions in an activated sludge system. Vorticella sp. are present when the
plant effluent quality is high.
Euchlanis sp.
This microscopic animal is a typical rotifer.
Euchlanis is a swimmer, using its foot and
cilia for locomotion. In common with other
rotifers, it has a head rimmed with cilia, a
transparent body, and a foot with two strong
swimming toes.
Nitrospira gracilis
Nature gives, takes and does everything in-between. Nowhere is this better exemplified than the
biological solution it offers to mankind's waste problems. An illustration of nature's work is its
influence on the constant cycle of biological waste treatment. Microorganisms, like all living things,
require food for growth.
Biological sewage treatment consists of many different microorganisms, mostly bacteria, carrying
out a stepwise, continuous, sequential attack on the organic compounds found in wastewater and
upon which the microbes feed.
Aerobic digestion of waste is the natural biological degradation and purification process in which
bacteria that thrive in oxygen-rich environments break down and digest the waste. During this
oxidation process, pollutants are broken down into carbon dioxide (CO2), water (H2O), nitrates,
sulfates and biomass (micro-organisms). By optimizing the oxygen supply with so called aerators
the process can be significantly accelerated.
Problems may appear during the operation of activated sludge systems, including:
High solids content in clarified effluent, which may be due to too high or too low solids
retention time and to growth of filamentous microorganisms.
Rising sludge, occurring when sludge that normally settles rises back to the surface after
having settled. In most cases, this is caused by the denitrification process, where nitrate
present in the effluent is reduced to nitrogen gas, which then becomes trapped in the
sludge causing this to float. This problem can be reduced by decreasing the flow from the
aeration basin to the settling tank or reducing the sludge resident time in the settler, either
by increasing the rate of recycle to the aeration basin, increasing the rate of sludge
collection from the bottom, or increasing the sludge wasting rate from the system.
Bulking sludge, that which settles too slowly and is not compactable, caused by the
predominance of filamentous organisms. This problem can be due to several factors of
which the most common are nutrient balance, wide fluctuations in organic load, oxygen
limitation (too low levels), and an improper sludge recycle rate.
Insufficient reduction of organic load, probably caused by a low solids retention time,
insufficient amount of nutrients such as P or N (rare in fisheries wastewaters), short-
circuiting in the settling tank, poor mixing in the reactor and insufficient aeration or presence
of toxic substances.
Odors, caused by anaerobic conditions in the settling tanks or insufficient aeration in the
reactor.
Filamentous Organisms
The majority of filamentous organisms are bacteria, although some of them are classified as algae,
fungi or other life forms. There are a number of types of filamentous bacteria which proliferate in
the activated sludge process. Filamentous organisms perform several different roles in the process,
some of which are beneficial and some of which are detrimental. When filamentous organisms are
in low concentrations in the process, they serve to strengthen the floc particles. This effect reduces
the amount of shearing in the mechanical action of the aeration tank and allows the floc particles
to increase in size.
Larger floc particles are more readily settled in a clarifier. Larger floc particles settling in the clarifier
also tend to accumulate smaller particulates (surface adsorption) as they settle producing an even
higher quality effluent. Conversely, if the filamentous organisms reach too high a concentration,
they can extend dramatically from the floc particles and tie one floc particle to another (interfloc
bridging) or even form a filamentous mat of extra-large size.
Due to the increased surface area without a corresponding increase in mass, the activated sludge
will not settle well. This results in less solids separation and may cause a washout of solid material
from the system. In addition, air bubbles can become trapped in the mat and cause it to float,
resulting in a floating scum mat.
Due to the high surface area of the filamentous bacteria, once they reach an excess concentration,
they can absorb a higher percentage of the organic material and inhibit the growth of more desirable
organisms.
Some filaments have more than one version of the filament species, with slightly different
characteristics for identification.
N. Limicola I
N. Limicola II
N. Limicola III
Thiothrix I
Thiothrix II
Filamentous Identification
Filaments can be internal or external, and they can be free of the floc structures or found intertwined
in the floc. Most labs think that filaments need to be extending from the floc in order to be a problem.
This is not true. Internal filaments can cause more problems than external filaments. Think of
internal filaments causing a structure like a sponge. It will retain water easily and be harder to
dewater, will be hard to compress and will take up more space, thereby increasing solids handling
costs.
Filaments present in the system do not always mean there is a problem. Some filaments are good
if they form a strong backbone and add a rigid network to the floc. They help give the floc more
structure and settle faster. Filaments are good BOD degraders also. They are only a problem when
they become dominant. If filament abundance is in the abundant or excessive range, having a
Filamentous Identification performed is recommended.
When Gram and Neisser stains are performed for filamentous Identification, the types of filaments
found present will be noted on the Floc Characterization sheet to the right of the filament section
and will be noted on the Cover Sheet. A Filament Causes sheet, Filamentous Predominance sheet
and corrective actions will be given and included with the report. A Filamentous Worksheet will be
included. Individual sheets on the actual filaments present in the sample will be included with more
information on that particular filament.
Let’s do a quick review of the Bugs…. We will go much more into detail later…
Nocardia amarae
Nocardia amarae, a common cause of disruptive foaming in waste treatment plants, is a slow
growing, usually gram-positive, chemoautotrophic, filamentous, strict aerobe that produces the
biosurfactant trehalose. Colonies can be brown, pink, orange, red, purple, gray or white, so color
alone is not a key to identifying this species. N. amarae, member of the Actinomycetes family, is
not motile, so it relies on movement of the water to carry it through the system. It produces catalase,
urease and nitrate reductase enzymes, but not casease. The foam from Nocardia amarae is usually
a viscous brown color unless algae are entrapped in it, in which case it appears green and brown.
Nostocoida limicola
Nostocoida limicola is yet another common cause of disruptive foaming in waste treatment plants,
motile in its Hormogonia and sometimes Trichome phases. This oxygenic phototrophic species
often forms a confluent gel encasing flattened discs or large sheets of cells, forming symbiotic
relationships with other species. Staining gram-positive, Nostocoida produces round cells within
tight coil formations. Nostocoida can also be dentified by their starburst effect formations using
phase contrast microscopy at 400 to 1000x magnification. After chlorination, a few dead cells
sticking out identify stress to this species.
Thiothrix
Thiothrix spp., the second most common cause of disruptive foaming in wastewater treatment
plants appears as straight to slightly curved cells with rectangular shape form filaments up to 500
microns in length, in multicellular rigid filaments, staining gram-negative, with obligately aerobic
respiration. Thiothrix are mixotrophic, using several small organic carbons and reduced inorganic
sulfur sources for growth and energy. Thiothrix I is one of the largest filament found using phase
contrast microscopy at 400 to 1000x magnification. Thiothrix II produces rectangular filaments up
to 200 microns in length and is easily identified by their starburst effect formations using phase
contrast microscopy at 400 to 1000x magnification.
Microthrix parvicella
Microthrix parvicella is another common cause of disruptive foaming in waste treatment plants,
producing filaments up to 400 microns in length, easily visualized by phase contrast microscopy at
400x magnification. This species is usually found outside floc, tangling with structures in the
system, but can also be found hanging out of the floc.
Sphaeroliticus natans
Sphaeroliticus natans is another filamentous species, and yet it is reputed to increase settleability
by branching between flocs, increasing surface area. Cells are straight to slightly curved, up to
1000 microns in length and stain gram-negative. These large cells can be easily visualized by
phase contrast microscopy at 100x magnification.
Certain conditions favor the proliferation of filamentous species. A low F/M (food to mass) ratio
favors filamentous organisms, because their higher ratio of surface area to volume provides them
with a selective advantage for securing nutrients in nutrient limited environments. When a plant
runs an extremely long sludge age, the slower growing filaments have a better chance to establish
a strong colony. As a strict aerobe, high levels of oxygen are necessary to sustain this species.
Mesophilic, Nocardia amarae thrives in temperatures from 17 to 37 deg. C.
Filamentous Bacteria
A problem that often frustrates the performance of activated sludge is bulking sludge due to the
growth of filamentous bacteria. Sludge bulking can often be solved by careful process
modifications.
Figure 1.
A micrograph of Microthrix parvicella, gram stain x 1000
Figures 1 and 2 show typical views of Microthrix by using light microscopy and scanning electron
microscopy respectively. It is not difficult to recognize using standard staining and microscopy,
giving a positive response to Gram stain and being of fairly easily recognized morphology (Seviour
et al. 1999). Of all the filaments creating difficulties in activated sludge plants, it is one of the most
easily recognized, but there is a commercial test kit available which uses fluorescent situ
hybridization (or "FISH") to permit visual identification should one feel the need.
Similarly, poor mixing, poorly designed and inadequate aeration systems, cyclic overloading and
low process D.O. levels can contribute to the creation of anoxic and anaerobic zones in what are
supposed to be aeration basins.
Figure 3.
Dry Microthrix parvicella foam
trapped in an anoxic zone of a
BNR plant. aeration basin.
While it is often convenient to group filaments together, it does appear the Microthrix has received
special attention because of its ability to proliferate. More selective investigation of Microthrix has
indicated that it has quite well defined requirements. The nature of Microthrix is such that it has
the capability of using long chain fatty acids (oleic acid) and their esters (triglycerides of palmitic
and stearic acid) (fats and oils) as sources of carbon and energy.
Lipids and LCFA are present in all domestic wastewater streams and often constitute a significant
part of it. Values of 25-35% of the incoming COD have been reported, and it can support a
substantial biomass production in a treatment plant. LCFA are generally easily consumed in
activated sludge, and the consumption rate of LCFA under aerobic or anoxic conditions has been
found to be rapid.
Studies indicate that M.parvicella consumes exclusively long chain fatty acids (LCFA), and that it
is able to take up LCFA not only under aerobic, but also under anaerobic and anoxic conditions
(Andreasen, K. and Nielsen, P.H. (2000)). It has been reported that M. parvicella is able to out-
compete other bacteria particularly well in alternating anaerobic-aerobic and anoxic activated
sludge systems. This ability is based on a high uptake and storage capacity for LCFA under
anaerobic conditions and a subsequent use of the stored substrate for growth with oxygen (or
nitrate) as electron acceptor.
Figure 5.
Microthrix parvicella foam trapped
near a mechanical aerator.
Most interestingly, M. parvicella has a maximum growth rate near 22° C, zero growth rate at 30° C
and is capable of quite reasonably large growth rates at as low as 7° C which gives it a significant
advantage in the competition with floc formers during winter in cold climates.
It was observed that by adding PAX a morphological modification of the filamentous bacterium M.
parvicella occurs. The morphological modification is probably the reason why the hydrophobic
property of the filaments decreases. Paris et al. (2003) included micrographs which indicated that
the Microthrix parvicella appeared to shorten in length after dosing (Figure 7) and no longer inhabit
the zones between flocs.
PAX
PAX (or PAX-14 or polyaluminium chloride) used for
Microthrix control is a flocculant or coagulant
commonly used in water and wastewater treatment.
The 14 or other number associated with the name
refers to the particular grade of the chemical. Nielsen
et al. (2003) report that PAX-14 is Al13O4(OH)24
(H2O)127+ and it is produced from Al(OH)3 at high
temperature and high pressure. PAX-14 and 18 are
being used in several countries with good success for
controlling M. parvicella - in particular Denmark where
PAX-14 has been applied successfully in treatment
plants with biological N and/or P removal for 91 out of
500 plants in 2002. Figure 8.
Foam build-up in a secondary
clarifier resulting in solids loss and
turbid effluent.
Proposed Treatment Regime
In the fall, to prevent the normal appearance of M. parvicella during the coming winter and to control
problems with M. parvicella (winter, spring). Dosage: 0.5-1.5g Al/kgSS/day usually added to return
sludge. PAX should be dosed continuously over the treatment period at the chosen level. Removal
of floating sludge before and during dosing is recommended. Microscopic examination of the
biomass and regular testing of biomass settling is also a very good idea and the dosing at the
chosen remedial rate until a target SVI or preferably DSVI is reached should be the rule. It is not
yet fully clear why PAX has the effect that it does, but the research continues. It is known that other
Al salts have little effect on surface associated enzymes after 15 min, and no effect on surface
hydrophobicity and surface associated enzymes.
Relatively long, non-motile filaments (100-1000 µm). Straight or smoothly curved with tree-like false
branching. The cells are round-ended and rod shaped (1.0-1.8 x 1.5-3.0) and are contained in a
clear, tightly fitting sheath. Note: They can be rectangular when the cells are tightly packed within
the sheath. The cell septa are clear and easily observable with indentations. Filaments radiate
outward from the floc surface into the bulk solution and can cause sludge settling interference by
inter-floc bridging. The filament is usually Gram negative and Neisser negative. There are no sulfur
granules. Poly-ß-hydroxybutric acid (PHB) is frequently observed as dark intracellular granules. In
wastewater that is nutrient deficient, an exocellular slime coat may be present. Attached growth is
usually uncommon, but may occur when at low growth rate.
Control
RAS chlorination can be used to get rid of the filaments but
process changes should also be made. Cell lysis occurs readily
on this type of filament, although the empty sheaths still remain.
Sludge wasting is necessary to remove them entirely from the
system.
Rank
Sphaerotilus natans ranks 6th in number of predominance. Typically, not found in pulp-mills with
activated sludge.
Environment
This filament is usually found in environments
where there is low DO or low F/M and the
presence of organic wastes. Wastes containing
starch seem more selective to this filament.
Bulking is more common in industrial wastes. The
filament appears to be facultative fermentative,
which is unique for most filaments.
Control
Manipulation of F/M (usually an increase) and DO concentration can be used to control the
filaments. A selector may be used and chlorination. System changes include changing from a
complete mix to plug flow aeration basin configuration.
N. limicola ranks 12th in number of predominance in industry. Typically, not found in kraft mills.
Common in municipalities.
Relatively large, non-motile filaments (100-500 µm). Straight or smoothly curved filaments with no
branching. Cells are rectangular (1.4 x 2.5 µm) and a clear cell septa is present without
indentations at the septa. Filaments are found radiating outwards from the floc structure causing
inter-floc bridging.
Similar Organisms
Type 021N is similar when in the bulk solution and with no attached growth, although Type 021N
has no sheath.
Environment
This filament is usually found in environments where there are limited nutrients (N or P). It can
also be found in wastes containing specific compounds with sulfides and/or organic acids or
environments with low DO. Sometimes found in plants with high pH in the aeration system.
This particular Rotifer is a great indicator bug for fresh and brackish water. With the
increasing use of antibiotics, wastewater facilities are noticing passage through the
treatment process. The toxicity effects the reproduction of the organisms in the water.
This ciliate is heavy metal resistant, Stylonychia mytilus, isolated from industrial
wastewater has been shown to be potential bioremediator of contaminated
wastewater. The ability of Stylonychia to take up variety of heavy metals from the medium
could be exploited for metal detoxification and environmental clean-up operations.
Key Terms
Aerobic (AIR-O-bick) - A condition in which free or dissolved oxygen is present in the aquatic
environment.
Aerobic Bacteria – Bacteria which will live and reproduce only in an environment containing
oxygen.
Aerobes -Oxygen combined chemically, such as in water molecules (H2O), cannot be used for
respiration by aerobes
Anaerobic (AN-air O-bick) - A condition in which “free” or dissolved oxygen is not present in the
aquatic environment.
Anaerobic Bacteria – Bacteria that thrive without the presence of oxygen. (Anaerobes)
Saprophytic bacteria – Bacteria that break down complex solids to volatile acids.
Methane Fermenters – Bacteria that break down the volatile acids to methane (CH4) carbon
dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O).
Add water and the critter springs back to life. Scientists have exposed dried-up water bears to
extreme heat, bitter cold, and even massive doses of radiation -- and the teeny animals still revived.
The key to the critters' survival may be a sugar they produce as they dry out. By coating structures
inside and between the critters' cells, the sugar keeps the cells from sticking together and breaking.
When water is added, the sugar dissolves -- and the creepy crawlies burst back into action.
Amino acid: A functional group consisting of a carbon with a carboxylic acid, "-COOH" and an amine,
"-NH2." These compounds are the building blocks for proteins.
Anabolism: Biosynthesis, the production of new cellular materials from other organic or inorganic
chemicals.
Anaerobes: A group of organisms that do not require molecular oxygen. These organisms, as well as
all known life forms, require oxygen. These organisms obtain their oxygen from inorganic ions such as
nitrate or sulfate or from protein.
Anaerobic process: A process that only occurs in the absence of molecular oxygen.
Anoxic process: A process that occurs only at very low levels of molecular oxygen or in the absence
of molecular oxygen.
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD): The amount of oxygen required to oxidize any organic matter
present in a water during a specified period of time, usually 5 days. It is an indirect measure of the
amount of organic matter present in a water.
Carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD): The amount of oxygen required to oxidize
any carbon containing matter present in a water.
Chemical oxygen demand (COD): The amount of oxygen required to oxidize any organic matter in
the water using harsh chemical conditions.
Decomposers: Organisms that utilize energy from wastes or dead organisms. Decomposers
complete the cycle by returning nutrients to the soil or water and carbon dioxide to the air or water.
Denitrification: The anoxic biological conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas. It occurs naturally in
surface waters low in oxygen, and it can be engineered in wastewater treatment systems.
Deoxygenation: The consumption of oxygen by the different aquatic organisms as they oxidize
materials in the aquatic environment.
Facultative: A group of microorganisms which prefer or preferentially use molecular oxygen when
available, but are capable of using other pathways for energy and synthesis if molecular oxygen is not
available.
F/M Ratio: Another method for control wasting is to maintain a constant food-to-microorganism (F:M
or F/M) ratio. With this method, the operator will try to increase or decrease the MLVSS to match an
increase or decrease in the BOD entering the plant. Most plants will operate best at a specific F/M
ratio between 0.05 - 0.1. If the optimum F/M has been determined from experience and can be
maintained, a good effluent may be produced with consistent plant operation. The F/M ratio is to be
calculated at least weekly and related to the efficiency of treatment plant operation. An F/M ratio
between 0.05 - 0.15 BOD/lb MLSS is usually considered acceptable for an extended aeration process.
Nitrogen fixation: The conversion of atmospheric (or dissolved) nitrogen gas into nitrate by
microorganisms.
Nitrogenous oxygen demand (NOD): The amount of oxygen required to oxidize any ammonia
present in a water.
NPDES: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. The discharge criteria and permitting
system established by the U.S. EPA as a result of the Clean Water Act and its subsequent
amendments or the permit required by each discharger as a result of the Clean Water Act.
MCRT - Mean Cell Residence Time: The average time a given unit of cell mass stays in the
activated sludge biological reactor. It is typically calculated as the total mixed liquor suspended solids
in the biological reactor divided by the combination of solids in the effluent and solids wasted.
Mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS): The total suspended solids concentration in the activated
sludge tank.
Mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS): The volatile suspended solids concentration in
the activated sludge tank.
Organic compound: Any compound containing carbon except for the carbonates (carbon dioxide,
the carbonates and bicarbonates), the cyanides, and cyanates.
Organic nitrogen: Nitrogen contained as amines in organic compounds such as amino acids and
proteins.
Oxidative phosphorylation: The synthesis of the energy storage compound adenosine triphosphate
(ATP) from adenosine diphosphate (ADP) using a chemical substrate and molecular oxygen.
Secondary treatment: In wastewater treatment, the conversion of the suspended, colloidal and
dissolved organics remaining after primary treatment into a microbial mass which is then removed in
a second sedimentation process. Secondary treatment includes both the biological process and the
associated sedimentation process.
Sludge: A mixture of solid waste material and water. Sludges result from the concentration of
contaminants in water and wastewater treatment processes. Typical wastewater sludges contain from
0.5 to 10 percent solid matter. Typical water treatment sludges contain 8 to 10 percent solids.
Thiols: Organic compounds which contain the "-SH" functional group. Also called mercaptans.
Total solids: (TS) Is the amount of organic and inorganic matter that is contained in a water.
Total suspended solids: (TSS) Is the amount of suspended (filterable) matter in a water.
Ultimate biochemical oxygen demand (BODu): The total amount of oxygen required to oxidize any
organic matter present in a water, i.e. after an extended period, such as 20 or 30 days.
Volatile solids (VS) is the amount of matter which volatilizes (or burns) when a water sample is
heated to 550oC.
This course contains general EPA’s CWA federal rule requirements. Please be
aware that each state implements wastewater/safety/environment regulations that
may be more stringent than EPA’s regulations. Check with your state
environmental agency for more information.
Pretty soon the population of bugs gets too large and some of them need to be removed to make
room for new bugs to grow. We remove the excess bugs by sedimentation in the same kind of
tanks used for primary treatment. In the tank, the bugs sink to the bottom and we remove them.
The settled bugs are also called waste activated sludge. The waste sludge is treated separately,
and the remaining wastewater is now much cleaner. In fact, after primary and secondary treatment,
about 85% or more of all pollutants in the wastewater has been removed and it goes on to
Disinfection. These systems originated in England in the early 1900's and earned their name
because a sludge (mass of microbes) is produced which aerobically degrades and stabilizes the
organic load of a wastewater. Below diagram shows the layout of a typical activated sludge system.
Organic Load
The organic load (generally coming from primary treatment operations such as settling, screening
or flotation) enters the reactor where the active microbial population (activated sludge) is present.
The reactor must be continuously aerated. The mixture then passes to a secondary settling tank
where the cells are settled. The treated wastewater is generally discharged after disinfection while
the settled biomass is recycled in part to the aeration basin.
The cells must be recycled in order to maintain sufficient biomass to degrade the organic load as
quickly as possible. The amount that is recirculated depends on the need to obtain a high
degradation rate and on the need for the bacteria to flocculate properly so that the secondary
settling separates the cells satisfactorily. As the cells are retained longer in the system, the
flocculating characteristics of the cells improve since they start to produce extra cellular slime which
favors flocculating.
Other versions of activated sludge systems (e.g., extended aeration, contact stabilization, step
aeration and pure oxygen processes) are used in other kinds of wastewaters but are not known to be
applied to treat fisheries wastewaters. They are discussed elsewhere (Metcalf and Eddy Inc., 1979;
Eckenfelder, 1980). In all activated sludge systems, the cells are separated from the liquid and
partially returned to the system to have a relatively high concentration of cells that degrade the organic
load in a relatively short time.
The organic matter is a carbon and an energy source for the bug’s cell growth and is converted
into cell tissue. The oxidized end product is mainly carbon dioxide, CO2. The substance in the
sports dome is referred to as mixed liquor. The stuff in the mixed liquor is suspended solids and
consists mostly of microorganisms, suspended matter, and non-biodegradable suspended matter
(MLVSS).
The make-up of the microorganisms are around 70 to 90% organic and 10 to 30% inorganic matter.
The makeup of cells varies depending on the chemical composition of the wastewater and the
specific characteristics of the organisms in the biological mass. The picture below shows the basic
outline of an aeration tank. Just remember that pretreatment is crucial prior to the activated sludge
process.
Before we dive into the tank, in the space provided, list three key components of
pretreatment (headworks) and how each benefits the process.
1.
2.
3.
Before we start the game, we need to make sure we have a stadium and all components are in
place and operating properly. In the space provided, define the following terms:
See Glossary in Rear.
Let’s first look at the different aeration tank designs and how they function. We will focus
on the following:
Anaerobic:
Aerobic:
DO:
BOD:
COD:
Process Design:
Because the entire tank contents are the same quality as the tank effluent, there is a very low level
of food available at any time to a large mass of microorganisms.
This is the major reason why the complete mix modification can handle surges in the organic
loading without producing a change in effluent quality. The type of air supply used could be either
diffused air or a mechanical aerator. Complete mix process may be resistant to shock loads but is
susceptible to filamentous growths.
At the end of the tank, depending on detention time, the oxygen consumption may primarily be the
result of endogenous respiration or nitrification, which we will talk more about later on. The same
characteristics are present when the aeration tank is partitioned into a series of compartments.
Each compartment must have the oxygen supply and design to meet the individual compartment
needs. Plug flow configurations have the ability to avoid “bleed through,” the passage of untreated
organics during peak flow. These configurations are often preferred when high effluent DO’s are
sought because only a small section of the tank will operate at a high DO. In a complete mix
configuration, the entire tank must operate at the elevated DO.
Contact stabilization is best for smaller flows in which the MCRT desired is quite long.
Therefore, aerating return sludge can reduce tank requirements by as much as 30 to 40 % versus
that required in an extended aeration system. The volumes for the contact and stabilization tanks
are often equal in size and secondary influent arrangements.
They can be operated either in parallel as an extended aeration facility or as a contact stabilization
unit. This flexibility makes them suitable for future expansion to conventional activated sludge,
without increasing the aeration tank, by merely adding more clarification capacity.
With this arrangement, oxygen uptake requirements are relatively even and the need for tapered
aeration is eliminated.
Step feed configurations generally use diffused aeration equipment. The step feed tank may be
either the long rectangular or the folded design. Secondary influent flow is added at two or more
points to the aeration tank, usually in the first 50 to 75% of the length.
It is also possible to use the same process approach by compartmentalizing the tank and directing
flow lengthwise through the compartments. Usually, the last compartment does not receive any raw
waste.
This process operates at a high MCRT (low F/M), resulting in a condition where there is not enough
food in the system to support all of the microorganisms present. The microorganisms therefore
compete very actively for the remaining food and even use their own cell structure for food.
This highly competitive situation results in a highly treated effluent with low sludge production.
(Many extended aeration systems do not have primary clarifiers and they are package plants used
by small communities.)
The main disadvantages of this system are the large oxygen requirements per unit of waste
entering the plant and the large tank volume needed to hold the wastes for the extended period.
Oxidation ditches use mechanical brush disk aerators, surface aerators, and jet aerator devices to
aerate and pump the liquid flow. Combination diffused aeration and pumping devices are
commonly used in Europe.
The tanks in this system are covered to retain the oxygen gas and permit a high degree of oxygen
use. A prime advantage of the staged reactor configuration of the oxygenation system is the
system’s ability to match the biological uptake rate with the available oxygen gas purity.
The dissolution of oxygen and the mixing of the biological solids within each stage of the system
are accomplished with either surface aeration devices or with submerged turbine-aeration systems.
The selection of either of these two types of dissolution systems largely depends on the aeration
tank geometry selected.
The particular configuration of oxygenation tank selected for a given system, that is, size of each
stage, number of stages per aeration tank, and number of parallel aeration tanks, is determined by
several parameters including waste characteristics, plant size, land availability, and treatment
requirements.
Aside from the aeration tank, the other key factor in an oxygen activated sludge system is the
oxygen gas source. There are three sources of oxygen supply: liquid oxygen storage, cryogenic
oxygen generation, and pressure-swing adsorption generation.
The first of these requires no mechanical equipment other than a storage tank that is replenished
by trucked-in liquid oxygen. This method is economically feasible for small (less than 4 mgd) or
temporary installations.
For conventional activated sludge, a sludge age of 3-10 days is typical. For extended
aeration activated sludge, older sludge ages of 15-30 days are common. F/M ratio and
sludge age is inversely related (1 divided by the sludge age approximates the F/M ratio).
The older the sludge, the lower the F/M ratio; conversely, the younger the sludge, the
higher the F/M ratio. All three process control methods are regulated by wasting sludge.
It is the key to controlling the activated sludge process. The operator should monitor
MLSS, F/M ratio and sludge age to waste accordingly and thus ensure optimal operations
and process stability.
Excess Solids
Solids are generated by microorganism growth and reproduction. The influent BOD
supplies the food for the growth and reproduction. As microorganisms’ populations
multiply, excess solids (microorganisms) must be removed (wasted). If excess solids are
not removed, the mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and sludge age will increase and
process efficiency will be lowered. Sludge settling rates are affected. Eventually, if excess
solids do not get wasted, they can overflow the clarifier weirs and into the receiving water.
Wasting Sludge
Wasting sludge is the most important operational process control of the activated sludge
process. By wasting sludge on a consistent basis, preferably daily, the biomass within the
aeration tank will remain healthy and at a consistent MLSS level.
Wasting Rates
The concentration of WAS has a direct bearing on how much to waste and the volume
wasted. On a volume basis, a thicker waste activated sludge (high WAS concentration)
will require less amount of wasting than a thinner waste activated sludge (low WAS
concentration).
Young Sludge
Young sludge consists of sludge which has not yet reached a high enough sludge age to
be most effective in a particular activated sludge process. Billowing whitish foam is an
indicator that the sludge age is too low. Young sludge will often have poor settling
characteristics in the clarifier, and can leave straggler floc in the clarifier effluent. Young
sludge is often associated with a high F/M. To correct for young sludge, it is necessary to
decrease wasting rates. This will increase the amount of solids under aeration, reduce the
F/M ratio, and increase the sludge age.
RAS Concentration
Varying the RAS flow rate will affect the concentration and detention time of clarified solids.
Adjusting the RAS pumping rate allows the return of more or less concentrated solids
while also increasing or decreasing the depth of the sludge blanket. RAS flow rates can
be paced off influent flow rates.
Hydraulic Overloads
Solids washouts
If the flow is too high through the final clarifier, the solids will not have enough time to settle
and can wash out over the weirs. This can result in a loss of solids from the system and
effluent permit violations.
Denitrification
When RAS flow rates are too low, thick sludge blankets in the final clarifier can result. The
operator will see gas bubbles (from nitrogen gas) and rising/floating sludge clumps on the
clarifier surface.
Foaming Problems
Problem: Young sludge (white billowing foam)
Solution: Increase sludge age
or
Problem: Filamentous foaming organisms (Nocardia, Microthrix)
Solution: Adjust environmental conditions. Adjust F/M ratio, sludge age and dissolved
oxygen. Reducing incoming grease is one of the most important factors to control surface
filamentous forming organisms.
or
Problem: Industrial/chemical discharges (surfactants, phosphates, etc.)
Solution: Enforce sewer use ordinance
Lack of Nitrification
Problem: Improper environmental conditions
Solution: Nitrifying bacteria are very sensitive to environmental factors, such as very low
dissolved oxygen, alkalinity, and temperatures. An older sludge (> 8 days) is usually
needed for their growth. Adjust these environmental conditions, as you can, to support the
growth of nitrifying bacteria.
Diffused Aerators
Mechanical Surface Aerators
Submerged Turbine Aerators
The two most common types of aeration systems are subsurface diffusion and mechanical aeration.
Diffused air systems have been around longer than you.
Opened tubes were used or perforated pipes located at the bottom of aeration tanks. But a more
efficient process was desired, born to the process, porous plate diffusers. In the diffused air system,
compressed air is introduced near the bottom of the tank. Let’s look at the definition for diffused
aeration:
There are a variety of hybrid air diffusion systems used in the process; we will focus on the basic
components.
The following diagram highlights the main parts of the diffused aeration system.
The diffused aeration systems are also divided into fine bubble, medium and coarse or large bubble
diffusers. The fine bubble diffusers are built of porous materials (grains of pure silica or aluminum
oxide are bonded ceramically or by resins) which provide very small bubbles of high surface area
that favor the oxygen transfer from the air to the wastewater. The medium bubble diffusers are
perforated pipes or tubes wrapped with plastic or woven fabric. The coarse or large bubble diffusers
can be orifice devices of various types, some of which are designed to be non-clogging.
The static aerators are vertical tubes placed at the bottom of the aeration tank, with packing material
along its length. The compressed air is supplied from the bottom of the tubes, forcing a mixture of
air and water through the packing, where most of the oxygen transfer to the wastewater takes
place. They have been used mainly in aerated lagoons.
As illustrated in the photograph below, the rotation of the motor shaft is transferred to the blower
shaft by means of a flexible coupling or through drive belts. The blowers that we will refer to are
centrifugal blowers.
The centrifugal blower works like a centrifugal pump or a fan. Rotating impellers or fans cause
movement of the air through the blowers. You have an intake side that takes in the air and the
discharge side the forces the air out. The number of impellers you have will determine if it is a multi-
stage or single-stage blower. The photograph below illustrates the major components of a
centrifugal blower.
1. What are two ways that the motor and the blowers can be attached?
2. When using flexible couplings, what are some maintenance concerns to consider?
Blowers may be provided with additional equipment. For example, safeguards can be installed to
protect equipment and operators. Temperature sensors can be used for bearing housing, vibration
sensors protect the unit by shutting it down if limits are exceeded. Condensation drains should be
provided on the bottom of blowers to drain off any accumulated moisture.
The compressed air from the blowers moves into a system of pipes and valves. The amount of air
supplied from the blower is controlled by regulating valves mounted on the intake and/or discharge
side of the blower. Usually butterfly valves are used and depending on your budget, you could have
manually operated or use automation.
Blowers usually discharge to a common manifold, so check valves are installed at the discharge of
each blower. The intake and discharge pipes are called the air mains. They are connected by a
flexible connection to allow for vibration and heat expansion in the piping. In the winter months, the
best place to be is in the blower room. There is a pressure relief valve on the discharge manifold
to protect the blower from excessive back pressure overload. When this occurs the operator will be
awakened on the midnight shift. Pressure gauges are used in several areas on the discharge side
of the blowers. In some cases, you may see them on the intake side for use in calculations of pump
efficiency.
On the intake side, where air is supplied, you would have some type of filtering to remove dirt
particles that could clog the diffusers. It also protects the blowers from excessive wear. Replaceable
filter units are the simplest for operations. Bag house dust collectors are bulky and expensive,
though maintenance may be less. In some cases, electrostatic precipitators may be an advantage,
shocking if operators are not careful, in areas of poor air quality. Most systems have utilized
pressure drop measuring to indicate when it is time to replace or clean the units.
Coarse bubble diffusion devices, or large-hole diffusers, produce larger bubbles than porous plates,
porous tubes, or synthetic socks. The larger bubbles provide less surface area for air-liquid contact
and will result in less oxygen transfer efficiency than that obtained with fine bubble diffusers.
Mechanical Aeration
There are several main types of mechanical
aeration devices. The floating and fixed
bridge aerators are quite common. Some
use a blade to agitate the tank’s surface
and disperse air bubbles into the aeration
liquor. Others circulate the mixed liquor by
an updraft or downdraft pump or turbine.
This action produces surface and
subsurface turbulence, while diffusing air
through the mixed liquor.
The motor speeds are usually in the 1800 rpm range. This speed is reduced to the 30 to 70 rpm
range with gear reducers.
Other systems use both compressed air and a mechanical device to trap
the bubbles. In one such system, submerged turbine aeration, air is
injected below a rotating turbine blade that shears and disperses the air.
Submerged turbine applications have also used a draft tube operating in a downdraft-pumping
mode.
Because microorganisms are continually produced, a way must be provided for wasting some of
the generated biological solids produced. This is generally done from the round or rectangular
shaped clarifiers.
Let’s first look at the components of a rectangular clarifier. Most are designed with scrapers on the
bottom to move the settled activated sludge to one or more hoppers at the influent end of the tank.
It could have a screw conveyor or a traveling bridge used to collect the sludge. The most common
is a chain and flight collector. Most designs will have baffles to prevent short-circuiting and scum
from entering the effluent.
The activated sludge is removed from the hopper(s) and returned by a sludge pump to the aeration
tank or wasted. Since we mentioned return and waste what do the following terms represent?
RAS:
WAS:
Some clarifiers may not have scum removal equipment so the configuration of the shaft may vary.
As the flights travel across the bottom of the clarifier, wearing shoes are used to protect the flights.
The shoes are usually metal and travel across a metal track.
Remember, the gear moves the drive chain. If a heavy load is put
on the sludge collector system, the shear pin should break. This
means the gear would simply slide around the shaft and
movement of the drive chain would stop.
The motor is connected to a gear reduction unit which is commonly connected to additional gearing. The
drive cage is rotated around a center column by the motor and gear reduction unit. Although the drive motor
runs at about 1800 rpm, the gear reducer lowers the output speed so that the sludge collector mechanism
goes through one revolution every 20 to 30 minutes. Usually, the motors used on clarifier mechanisms are
totally enclosed, fan cooled motors, suitable for outside operation.
We looked at the main parts of the drive unit. Now let’s take a look
at the sludge collector and the scum removal system mechanism.
The main parts of the unit are: the rake arm; the scraper blades;
the adjustable squeegees; the surface skimmer; the scum baffles;
and the scum box.
An effluent weir goes around the circumference of the tank and allows clarified liquid to flow evenly from the
tank. The effluent launder collects the tank overflow and takes it to a low point in the launder where a pipe is
used to take the effluent to the chlorine contact basin or other means of treatment.
Some clarifiers may have a scum trough heater. The scum removal system rotates around the clarifier at a
very slow rate. In subfreezing temperatures, the scum box and pipe could freeze. This problem can be
overcome by using immersion heaters, or putting infrared lamps over the scum box. Some clarifiers are
covered.
1. Single aeration tank or multiple aeration tanks designed for completely mixed or plug flow.
2. An aeration source to provide adequate oxygen and mixing: sources can be compressed air,
mechanical aeration, or pure oxygen.
3. A clarifier to separate the biological solids (activated sludge) from the treated wastewater.
4. A means of collecting the biological solids in the clarifier and recycling most of them (return activated
sludge, RAS) to the aeration tank.
5. A means of removing or wasting excess biological solids (waste activated sludge, WAS) from the
system.
The rate and extent of BOD5 (5-day BOD) removal in primary treated (settled) or untreated wastewater
depends on the relative quantities of soluble, colloidal, and suspended BOD5, and a soluble BOD5 content
of approximately 20 to 40% of the total. These proportions may vary, particularly in warmer climates where
long collection system residence times and the higher wastewater temperatures may result in a higher
proportion of soluble BOD5. This is caused by the bacterial degradation of a portion of the colloidal and
settleable fractions.
With typical municipal wastewater, a well-designed activated sludge process should achieve a
carbonaceous, soluble BOD5 effluent quality of 5mg/L or less. Similarly, with clarifiers designed to maximize
solids removal at peak flows and adequate process control, the average SS in the effluent should not exceed
15 mg/L. On a practical basis, an effluent with 20/20 mg/L BOD5 and SS should be attained, assuming
proper operation. Potential capabilities of the process are 10/15 mg/L Bod5 and SS. To consistently achieve
values lower than 10/15 mg/L, some type of tertiary treatment is required.
Nitrification
Of the total oxygen demand exerted by the wastewater, there is often a sizeable fraction associated with the
oxidation of ammonia to nitrate. The autotrophic bacteria Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter are responsible for
this two-state conversion. Being autotrophic, these nitrifying organisms must reduce oxidized carbon
compounds in the wastewater, such as CO2 and its related ionic species, for cell growth. As a result, this
characteristic markedly affects the ability of the nitrifying organisms to compete in a mixed culture.
The nitrifying bacteria obtain their energy by oxidizing ammonia nitrogen to nitrite nitrogen and then to nitrate
nitrogen. Because very little energy is obtained from these oxidation reactions, and because energy is
needed to change CO2 to cellular carbon, the population of nitrifiers in activated sludge is relatively small.
When compared to the normal bacteria in activated sludge, the nitrifying bacteria have a slower reproduction
rate.
Nitrifying organisms are present to some extent in all domestic wastewaters. However, some wastewaters
are not nitrified in existing plants because they are designed for the higher growth rate of bacteria responsible
for carbonaceous removal. As the MCRT is increased, nitrification generally takes place. The longer MCRT
prevents nitrifying organisms from being lost from the system when carbonaceous wasting occurs or, more
accurately, the longer MCRT permits the build-up of an adequate population of nitrifiers.
Because of the longer MCRT required for nitrification, some systems are designed to achieve nitrification in
the second stage of a two-stage activated sludge system.
The oxygen demand for complete nitrification is high. For most domestic wastewaters, it will increase the
oxygen supply and power requirements by 30 to 40% because complete nitrification requires from 4.3 to 4.6
lb. of oxygen for each lb. of ammonia nitrogen (4.3 to 4.6 mg/mg) converted into nitrate, and wastewaters
generally contain 10 to 30 mg/L of reduced nitrogen. Nitrification systems generally are not operated at
intermediate (40 to 80%) removals; stable operation is achieved when essentially complete nitrification
(greater than 90%) occurs.
Optimum growth of nitrifying bacteria has been observed in the pH range of 8 to 9 although other ranges
have been reported. A substantial reduction in nitrification activity usually occurs at pH levels below 7,
although nitrification can occur at low pH.
While nitrification occurs over a wide temperature range, temperature reduction results in a slower reaction
rate.
The temperature effect is made less severe by increasing the MCRT. During the conversion of ammonia to
nitrate, mineral acidity is produced. If insufficient alkalinity is present, the system’s pH will drop and
nitrification may be inhibited.
Bacteria Highlights
A change in the numbers or predominance of microorganisms in activated sludge is usually gradual. The
time required for a complete shift from one species to another will normally be seen in: 2 to 3 MCRT's.
A large amount of long filamentous bacteria will prevent good settling. The liquid above this mass is called
the supernatant.
Endogenous respiration of microorganisms in an extended aeration plant will complete the oxidation process
of an organic material.
The best location for microscopic examination of activated sludge in a conventional system is at the effluent
end of the aeration system. The examination can reveal a predominant number of rotifers and nematodes,
this condition may indicate that the F/M ratio is too low and this would be normal in an extended aeration
process.
or = BOD, kg/day
MLVSS, kg
The overall approach for designing such systems is to determine the target SRT for the system based on
influent characteristics (i.e., BOD, ammonia-nitrogen, organic nitrogen), environmental conditions such as
temperature and flow characteristics (i.e., average daily, maximum monthly, diurnal peak).
Most activated sludge treatment plants will readily nitrify if they have sufficient aerobic SRT and can deliver
sufficient oxygen maintaining 2 mg/L DO or greater. For plants having difficulty in nitrifying due to insufficient
tank volume, there are some emerging technologies which can improve the process.
One of these is bioaugmentation. Bioaugmentation is accomplished by seeding the activated sludge process
with an external source of nitrifying bacteria (also known as external bioaugmen-tation) or making process
improvements to increase the activity of or enrich the nitrifier population (also known as in situ
bioaugmentation).
External bioaugmentation uses either commercial sources of nitrifiers or sidestream processes to grow
nitrifiers onsite. Early experiences with commercial sources were not consistent, so most work to date has
been with sidestream production onsite (USEPA, 2008a). Two patented sidestream configurations for
external bioaugmentation are the Single reactor High-activity Ammonia Removal Over Nitrite (SHARON)
process and the In-Nitri® process. Both provide high temperature sidestream nitrification using ammonia
from the anaerobically digested sludge dewatering liquid or digested supernatant. The nitrifiers grown in the
sidestream reactor are fed to the main liquid treatment stream.
Both use flow through reactors with hydraulic retention times (HRT) in the 2 to 3-day range. In the SHARON
process, nitrification is stopped mainly at nitrite by such process control methods as low DO concentration,
low pH and/or low SRT. Full-scale operating systems for the SHARON process include installations at
Utrecht, Rotterdam, Zwolle, Beverwijk, Groningen, The Hague in the Netherlands, and a system in New York
City. Seeding from a diffused air biological nutrient removal process to stimulate nitrification in a parallel
oxygen process has proved successful at a number of locations (Bott et al., 2007). Emerging in situ
bioaugmentation technologies used to enhance nitrifier growth and shown to be successful in bench, pilot,
and/or full-scale trials are described briefly below (USEPA, 2008a):
• The Bio-Augmentation Regeneration/Reaeration (BAR) process was developed in the U.S. and is identical
to the Regeneration-DeNitrification (R-DN) process developed independently in the Czech Republic. It works
by recycling ammonia-laden filtrate or centrate from dewatering of aerobically digested sludge to the head of
the aeration tank. The sidestream is fully nitrified, seeding the aeration tank with additional nitrifying bacteria
which allows for reduced SRT.
• Aeration Tank 3 (AT3) is similar to the BAR process except that it sends a smaller fraction of the return
activated sludge (RAS) to the aeration tank in order to stop the nitrification process at the nitrite stage.
• Bio-Augmentation Batch Enhanced (BABE) process uses a SBR to grow nitrifiers by feeding it RAS and
reject water from the sludge dewatering process. After treatment, concentrated nitrifiers are recycled to the
head of the aeration tank.
A major disadvantage of these technologies compared to suspended growth systems is that denitrification is
fully dependent on addition of a supplemental carbon source. Suspended growth processes, on the other
hand, can be designed to denitrify 80 percent or more of nitrate using the incoming BOD as the carbon
source, which is a lower cost solution.
Consequently, trickling filters and RBCs have fallen out of favor for nutrient removal applications. In recent
years, manufacturers have developed new technologies called biological aerated filters (BAF) to achieve
BOD removal and nitrification. USEPA (2008a) identifies two existing BAF designs as established
technologies: the Biofor® system and the Biostyr® system. The Biofor® filtration system is a fixed bed, upflow
system with a dense granular media that is designed to expand during filtration. Air is sprayed into the filter
to maintain an aerobic environment. The Biostyr® system is similar but uses a media that is less dense than
water and held in place during operation by a screen at the top of the cell.
BAF can be configured in series to remove BOD in one unit and ammonia-nitrogen in the next or it can be
designed for BOD removal and nitrification in a single unit depending on process goals. Advantages of BAF
include its smaller footprint, higher hydraulic loading rates, and less susceptibility to washout than suspended
sludge systems (Verma et al., 2006).
Another fixed film process that has gained popularity lately is moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBR). These
reactors involve biofilm attached to a plastic media in a series of fluidized bed reactors. The plastic media
help promote specialization of the biofilm within each reactor for either nitrification or denitrification (WEF and
ASCE, 2006). Mixers or medium bubble diffuse aeration are used to keep the media suspended, depending
on whether the system is anaerobic or aerobic. MBBR has a shorter SRT and smaller footprint than activated
sludge processes. It has also proven to be effective in cold temperatures (Bott et al., 2007).
Separate-Stage Denitrification
A separate-stage denitrification system may be appropriate for plants that are regularly achieving nitrification
and need to add denitrification capabilities. Attached growth systems (denitrifying filters) are more common
than suspended growth systems, although suspended growth systems have been used for some treatment
plants. Suspended growth reactors typically have short SRTs (2 to 3 hrs.) and a small aerated zone following
the denitrification zone to oxidize excess methanol and release contained nitrogen gas bubbles (WEF and
ASCE, 2006).
Denitrification filters typically have a small footprint compared to suspended growth systems and have the
added advantage of achieving denitrification and solids removal simultaneously. They were first installed in
the 1970s and have evolved into two main process configurations (USEPA, 2007c):
• Downflow denitrification filters are deep bed filters consisting of media, support gravel, and a block
underdrain system. Wastewater flow is directed over weirs onto the top of the filter where a supplemental
carbon source, typically methanol, is added. Backwashing (typically air scouring and backwashing with air
and water) is conducted at regular intervals to remove entrapped solids from the filter.
• Upflow continuous backflow filters do not have to be taken off-line for backwashing, as it is an integral part
of the filtering process. Wastewater enters the bottom of the filter where a carbon source, typically methanol,
is added. Water flows up through an influent pipe and is dispersed into the filter media through distributors.
Filtered water discharges at the top of the filter. Filter media continuously travels downward, is drawn into an
airlift pipe at the center of the filter, and is scoured before being returned to the filter bed.
One wastewater system in Connecticut reported that key design issues for them were influent piping design
to minimize aeration, maintaining a consistent flow to the filters, and control of methanol feed based on
influent COD (Pearson et al., 2008).
The tubes held in this photograph should be placed in an autoclave. One tube is a standard or
QA and the other would indicate contamination.
Dissolved Oxygen
Nitrifying bacteria are also more sensitive to DO levels as compared to aerobic heterotrophic bacteria, with
growth rates starting to decline below 3 to 4 mg/L with significant reduction below 2 mg/L. The nitrification
rate at a DO concentration of 0.50 mg/L is only about 60 percent of that at a 2.0 mg/L DO concentration.
Studies have shown that the amount of oxygen available to nitrifying bacteria can be limited by floc size,
requiring higher bulk DO concentrations under higher organic loading conditions (Stenstrom and Song,
1991). At DO concentrations less than 0.5 mg/L, the effect is greater for Nitrobacter than for Nitrosomonas.
This can result in higher NO2-N in the effluent and have a negative impact on chlorine disinfection as 1 g of
NO2-N consumes 5 g chlorine for oxidation. DO must normally be less than 0.2 to 0.5 mg/L, otherwise there
will be inhibition of the denitrification process.
pH and Alkalinity
Nitrification generally operates well within a pH range of 6.8 to 8.0 (WEF and ASCE, 2006). At lower pH
values the nitrification rate is much slower and at pH values near 6.0 the nitrification rate may only be about
20 percent of that with a pH of 7.0 (Tchobanoglous et al., 2003). Alkalinity is consumed during the nitrification
process but partially replenished (up to 62.5 percent) during the denitrification process. Depending on the
influent wastewater alkalinity, there may be a sufficient alkalinity reduction due to nitrification to decrease to
unacceptable levels. Addition of chemicals such as lime, sodium hydroxide, or soda ash can be used to
replace the alkalinity consumed by nitrification to maintain acceptable pH levels.
Methanol is currently the most common external carbon source used in denitrification because of it
low cost. It has several drawbacks, however, namely:
• It is highly flammable and implicated in some storage tank explosions and fires (Dolan, 2007); however,
with proper design and operation problems can be minimized.
• It is not the most efficient source for most treatment configurations.
• Costs have begun to fluctuate widely (deBarbadillo et al., 2008).
• Availability is a problem in some areas (Neethling et al. 2008).
• Reported low growth rates under cold temperatures (Dold et al. 2008).
Other sources of carbon include ethanol, acetic acid, corn syrup, molasses, glucose, glycerol, and industrial
waste products. The WEF Nutrient Challenge Research Plan (2007) identified research on alternative carbon
sources as priority for operators, owners, and engineers of wastewater systems. In December of 2007, the
2nd External Carbon Workshop was held in Washington, DC to discuss the state of the technology and
research needs. WERF is also currently formulating a standard protocol for evaluation of external carbon
alternatives.
Flow equalization basins can be used to handle wet weather events; however, this requires available space
and capital investment. USEPA (2008a) identifies a number of innovative storage and treatment technologies
used to manage influent flows during wet weather events.
Nitrification systems need sufficient oxygen transfer for ammonia oxidation in addition to BOD removal. Such
systems should consider the impact to diurnal loadings and ammonia addition in recycle streams. The influent
TN concentration may have daily peak values that are 1.5 to 2.0 times the daily average loading. Higher peak
loadings require longer SRTs to assure that sufficient nitrifying bacteria are present to remove ammonia at a
greater rate, while maintaining a low effluent ammonia concentration. Often anaerobic digester sludge
dewatering operations occur during the day and produce return recycle streams high in ammonia
concentration (500-1000 mg/L) at times that coincide with the high influent diurnal ammonia loads. Recycle
equalization or treatment helps to provide a more stable nitrification system and lower effluent NH3-N
concentrations.
2) the production of alkalinity to offset the alkalinity used by nitrification, which in some cases eliminates the
need to purchase alkalinity, and
3) a more stable, better settling activated sludge process as the anoxic-aerobic processes favor good settling
floc-forming bacteria over filamentous growth.
For TN effluent goals of 3 to 5 mg/L or lower, some form of post anoxic treatment is generally needed. One
option is to convert an MLE process to a Bardenpho process by adding another anoxic aerobic set of tanks.
Although the endogenous respiration rate of the bacteria can be used to consume nitrate in the post anoxic
tanks, it is often necessary to add an exogenous carbon source. Other alternatives to using exogenous
carbon sources include denitrification filters instead of adding more activated sludge tank volume, step feed
with carbon addition in the last pass, and IFAS processes.
Denitrification processes require sufficient carbon to drive the nitrate/nitrite reduction reactions.
Characterization of the influent wastewater with regard to its organic strength and soluble fraction and the
TN and ammonia concentrations is needed to fully understand a system’s carbon needs. In addition, design
and operating methods that eliminate or minimize DO feeding to anoxic zones can reduce the amount of
exogenous carbon needed and provide a more stable operation. Low DO zones prior to downstream anoxic
tanks or for withdrawal of recycle to preanoxic zones should be considered.
The impact this will have on total sludge production by a treatment plant will depend upon how much waste
sludge is produced by other treatment units such as primary clarifiers and chemical treatment with
precipitating chemicals.
Stormwater
This type of runoff, called stormwater, may carry oil and gasoline, agricultural chemicals, nutrients,
heavy metals, and other toxic substances, as well as bacteria, viruses, and oxygen-demanding
compounds. A recent EPA study indicated roughly one-third of identified cases of water quality
impairment nationwide are attributable to stormwater, whether from farmland, streets, parking lots,
construction sites, or other sources.
Principles
Biological phosphorus removal is achieved by contacting phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAOs) in the
RAS with feed, containing volatile fatty acids (VFA), in a zone free of nitrates and DO (anaerobic zone).
Phosphorus is released in this zone providing energy for uptake of VFAs that are polymerized and stored
inside the PAO cells. The anaerobic zone is followed by an aeration zone where the polymerized VFAs are
metabolized and phosphorus is taken up again to store excess energy from the metabolism.
The phosphorus content of the mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) would be similar to that of the waste
activated sludge (WAS). When nitrification occurs in the aeration basin, nitrates will be present in the RAS,
resulting in some metabolism of the VFA before storage, thereby reducing subsequent phosphorus uptake.
Some form of denitrification (anoxic zones) must be used to reduce/remove the nitrates from the RAS. The
process flow sheets now known as Pho-redox (A/O) and 3 Stage Pho-redox (A2/O) as well as the modified
Bardenpho process were first published by Barnard (1975) as the Pho-redox flow sheets for the removal of
phosphorus. The theory for the functioning of the PAO was first suggested by Fuhs & Chen (1975).
Some magnesium and potassium ions are co-transported across the cell walls with phosphates. PAOs can
only get energy from the food they have taken up in the anaerobic zone when they pass to the aerobic zone
where oxygen is available. They use oxygen to metabolize the stored products, deriving enough energy to
take up all the released phosphates as well as those in the influent, and store them in the cells. The WAS
will contain sufficient phosphate-enriched PAOs to remove most of the phosphorus from the waste steam
once enhanced BPR is established.
The right carbon source, in this case a combination of acetates and propionates, is essential for BPR. The
wastewater characteristics are thus important. In general, it can be said that you need at least 40:1 COD:TP
or about 18:1 BOD5:TP in the process influent wastewater to reduce effluent phosphorus to less than 1.0
mg/L. In addition, some of the COD should consist of short chain VFAs. More COD may be required if nitrates
must also be denitrified.
Biological phosphorus removal can work in with or without nitrification. When nitrification occurs,
denitrification within the process is important to reduce the nitrates that may be returned with the RAS. While
the anaerobic zone serves mostly as a contact zone for VFAs and PAOs, some fermentation of easily
biodegradable carbon compounds (rbCOD) to acetate and propionate may take place. In most plants the
readily biodegradable material is in short supply and must be reserved for the PAOs.
In the absence of electron acceptors such as DO and nitrates in the anaerobic zone, PAOs are favored to
grow since they can take up and store the VFA under anaerobic conditions, thereby making it unavailable for
other aerobic and facultative heterotrophs in the aerobic zone.
Biological removal of both nitrogen and phosphorus at the same WWTP is common. Both funct-ions require
a carbon source. While denitrification organisms can feed on quite a number of easily degradable materials
such as methanol, sugar, glucose, acetate and propionate, PAOs are restricted to the latter two for
polymerization and storage (e.g. adding methanol to the anaerobic zone will reduce nitrates but not assist in
the removal of phosphorus).
Current Configurations
The basic design of anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic zones, in that order, has been achieved in many different
configurations. The configurations vary in the number of stages, the nature and location of recycles, and the
operation of the process. Each process was modified from the standard biological activated sludge design in
order to accomplish various design goals (e.g., protection of the anaerobic zone from excess nitrate recycle).
The primary processes are listed below.
Of these, all will also biologically remove nitrogen except for the Pho-redox process.
• Pho-redox (A/O)
• 3 Stage Pho-redox (A2/O)
• Modified Bardenpho
• University of Capetown (UCT) and Modified UCT (MUCT)
• Johannesburg (JHB), Modified Johannesburg, and Westbank
• Orange Water and Sewer Authority (OWASA)
• Oxidation ditches with anaerobic zones or phases added
• SBR operated with an anaerobic phase
• Hybrid chemical/biological processes
The performance of these technologies depends on many site specific factors, including but not limited to
temperature, hydraulic and organic loading, recycle rates, and return streams. The technologies described
in this section are generally capable of phosphorus removal to effluent levels between 0.5 and 1.0 mg/L.
Operating strategies that can be used to enhance biological treatment and achieve these and, in some cases,
even lower effluent levels.
Biological phosphorus removal can be combined with other technologies to achieve very low effluent
concentrations (< 0.2 mg/L). Chemical addition combined with biological removal of phosphorus has been
used to consistently achieve low levels. WEF and ASCE (1998) recommend that WWTPs have chemical
addition capabilities even for well operating BPR plants to provide backup phosphorus removal in the event
of power outages, pipe breaks, or other unforeseen events.
Solids removal can also be a limiting factor in achieving phosphorus removal below 0.2 mg/L. Very low
phosphorus levels generally require a TSS level of less than 5 mg/L. Tertiary filtration (see membrane
bioreactors), and advanced clarification processes can achieve TSS levels less than 5 mg/L.
In addition, a nitrate rich liquor is recycled from the end of the aerobic zone to the head of the anoxic zone to
enhance de-nitrification. A shortcoming of the 3 Stage Pho-redox process is that there will be nitrates present
in the RAS, potentially making the process unreliable.
Modified Bardenpho
The Bardenpho process removes nitrogen to low concentrations. The addition of an anaerobic zone at the
head of the process enables phosphorus removal as well. The process consists of 5 stages: an anaerobic
stage followed by alternating anoxic and aerobic stages. A nitrate-rich liquor is recycled from the first aerobic
stage, designed for complete nitrification, to the first anoxic stage. The RAS is recycled from the clarifier to
the beginning of the anaerobic zone. Since the nitrates in the RAS ranges from 1 to 3 mg/L, it does not
seriously interfere with the mechanism for phosphorus removal as can happen in the 3 Stage Pho-redox
process.
Several modifications of the process exist. Sometimes it can be difficult to achieve the level of denitrification
in the anoxic zone required to protect the anaerobic zone from nitrates when the zone is receiving both RAS
and high internal nitrate recycle flows. This problem led to the development of the modified UCT process,
which splits the anoxic zone into two stages.
The nitrate rich recycle from the aerobic zone is recycled to the head of the second anoxic stage. The nitrate
containing RAS is recycled to the first anoxic stage where it is denitrified. Next, the denitrified RAS is recycled
from the end of the first anoxic stage back to the head of the anaerobic stage and mixed with the incoming
wastewater.
The modified JHB process adds a recycle from the end of the anaerobic zone to the head of the pre-anoxic
zone to provide residual, readily biodegradable compounds for denitrification.
The Westbank process is similar to the JHB process but adds some primary effluent to the anaerobic zone
to assist in denitrification with the remainder of the primary effluent being discharged to the anaerobic zone.
During storm flows, excess flow is passed directly to the main anoxic zone. VFA obtained from acid
fermentation of the primary sludge is passed to the anaerobic zone.
Next, the fermented supernatant is passed to an anaerobic (nutrition) zone and mixed with the RAS to initiate
BPR. Mixed liquor then flows from the nutrition zone to an anoxic zone and then to an aerobic zone.
Alternatively, simultaneous nitrification and denitrification takes place in the aeration zone.
Oxidation Ditches
There are several oxidation ditch designs that can remove phosphorus. They normally consist of an
anaerobic zone ahead of the oxidation ditch whereas simultaneous nitrification and denitrification takes place
within the ditches. Oxidation ditches typically operate as racetrack configurations around a central barrier,
with forward mixed liquor flows of approximately 1 foot per second or more. It is possible, by manipulating
the DO transferred to the mixed liquor, to establish both anoxic, aerobic and near anaerobic zones within the
racetrack configuration, even though the high flow velocities accomplish complete mixing of the wastewater
with the RAS.
There are many forms of oxidation ditches, such as the Carousel, the Pasveer Ditch and the Orbal process.
The Orbal process creates anaerobic and anoxic zones in the outer of three concentric oval shaped ditches
with the RAS recycled from the clarifier to the anoxic zone. It is also possible to introduce an anaerobic tank
before the ditch to accomplish BPR in the combined system. The Pasveer Ditch and the Carousel system
also can be used in conjunction with an anaerobic zone to accomplish BPR, in addition to simultaneous
nitrification and denitrification within the ditches. Because of the very high internal recycle within the ditches,
very low nitrate concentrations can be achieved in the mixed liquor before settling, and anaerobic conditions
are easy to maintain in the anaerobic zone, thereby resulting in efficient BPR. The layout would resemble a
Pho-redox process with simultaneous nitrification-denitrification (SND) in the aeration basin. Alternatively,
the Carousel or Pasveer Ditch could be used as the aeration stage in either the 3 Stage Pho-redox or the
Modified Bardenpho process.
The VT2 process at Bowie, MD, operates two Pasveer ditches in series with dedicated anoxic, near anaerobic
and aerobic zones. It also has a side stream anaerobic zone that receives only 30 percent of the influent flow
to enhance BPR. Denitrified MLSS for the anaerobic zone are obtained from the end of the near anaerobic
zone of the adjacent ditch. Operated without primary sedimentation, the system consistently obtains very low
(<0.25 mg/L) effluent TP without chemicals or effluent filtration. The ditches are operated in series because
the plant has limited clarification capacity, and series operation results in lower MLSS concentrations to the
clarifiers. The biodenipho process also uses pairs of ditches.
The ditches in the biodenipho process operate in alternating anoxic-aerobic modes. An anaerobic tank is
placed before the ditches for BPR and the ditches are alternated between nitrification and denitrification.
However, SBRs are almost always operated without primary sedimentation, so they still usually have a
favorable BOD5:TP ratio for effluent TP of somewhat less than 1.0 mg/L during the settling phase.
The Biological Chemical Phosphorus and Nitrogen Removal (BCFS) configuration is similar to the modified
UCT process. In this process, a sludge stream is removed from the anaerobic zone. Ferric chloride is added
to the sludge thickener to remove phosphate. This provides an advantage over chemical addition to the
secondary clarifier because it does not require the chemical sludge to be recycled. There is an existing plant
at Holten in the Netherlands (WEF and ASCE, 2006), but no performance data are available.
Microscope being utilized to view activated sludge MO’s. Thiothrix is a type of filament that can
grow in the aeration basin of an activated sludge plant. Low DO levels are a possible cause to the
growth of this long filament.
Such a system can be set for a given wasting rate with complete assurance that variable system head or
concentration conditions will not affect its ability to remove the microorganisms required. WAS systems
must have sufficient capacity to deal with both the hydraulic and/or organic load changes and process
changes.
Mixing energy and oxygen transfer are provided through mechanical or diffused aeration. The amount of
oxygen that has to be transferred by the aeration system is theoretically equal to the amount of oxygen
required by the organisms in the system to oxidize the organic material.
The DO concentration in the aeration tank must be sufficient to sustain at all times the desirable
microorganisms in the aeration tank, clarifier, and return sludge line back to the aeration tank. When oxygen
limits the growth of microorganisms, filamentous organisms may predominate and the settleability and quality
of the activated sludge may be poor.
On the other hand, over aeration can create excess turbulence and may result in the breakup of the biological
floc and waste energy. Poor settling and high effluent solids will result. For these reasons, it is very important
to periodically monitor and adjust the aeration tank DO levels and, for diffused air systems, the air flow rates.
RAS Control
To properly operate the activated sludge process, a good settling mixed liquor must be achieved and
maintained. The MLSS are settled in a clarifier and then returned to the aeration tank as the RAS. This
keeps a sufficient concentration of activated sludge in the aeration tanks so that the required degree of
treatment can be obtained in the allotted time period. The return of activated sludge from the secondary
clarifier to the aeration tank is a key control parameter of the process.
to rapidly collect and thicken the settled solids for return to the aeration tanks or wasting to the sludge
processing facilities.
Clarifier size and hydraulics may limit the range of practical return adjustments. Regardless of calculated
values, return rates should not be reduced to the level where slowly moving, thick clarifier sludge will plug
the sludge withdrawal pipes.
Also, low return rates during the night should be increased to approach the anticipated higher return rates
during the day before, rather than after, the increased wastewater flows actually reach the plant. Increasing
the return sludge flow after the flow increase may cause a hydraulic overload condition resulting in a
carryover of solids into the clarifiers (washout).
The aeration tank and the secondary clarifier must be looked at as a system where the MLSS are stored in
the aeration tank during minimum wastewater flow and then transferred to the clarifier as the wastewater
flow and then transferred to the clarifier as the wastewater flows initially increase.
The clarifier acts as a storage reservoir for the MLSS during periods of high flow. The clarifier has a
constantly changing depth of sludge blanket as the MLSS moves from the aeration tank to the clarifier and
vice versa.
This approach keeps the MLSS and sludge blanket depths more constant throughout high and low flow
periods and also tends to maintain a more constant F/M and MCRT.
Settleability
The settleability test can be used to estimate the desirable sludge return rate. This method uses the sludge
volume in a 2-L settleometer at the end of a 30-minute settling period to represent the underflow and the
supernatant volume to represent the overflow.
Lagoons in series.
Rotating Biological Contactors can be supplied as part of an integral package plant to treat sewage from
various communities. Integral units are provided in sizes of up to a 500-population equivalent. A smaller
version is also available for small private installations.
Each plant is designed to meet the specific requirements of the site and the effluent quality required.
Key Advantages
Short contact periods are required because of the large active surface.
Capable of handling a wide range of flows.
Sloughed biomass generally has good settling characteristics and can easily be separated from the
waste stream.
Operating costs are low, as little skill is required in plant operation.
Retention times are short.
Low power requirements.
Low sludge production and excellent process control.
Problems
White biomass over most of a RBC disc can be resolved by increasing the age of the sludge.
RBC Principles
The principles of the rotating biological contactor originated in the early 1900's but its application to sewage
treatment did not occur until the 1960's when the present system was developed. The process employed
relies on the well-established principle of biological oxidation using naturally occurring organisms to ensure
even the most stringent effluent standards can be achieved.
The biozone is fitted with a series of baffles between each bank of media to prevent short circuiting and to
ensure maximum performance.
The biomass passes from the biozone into the final settlement zone where it settles to form humus sludge.
This is then regularly pumped out using either an air lift system or submersible pumps and returned to the
primary zone.
The clarified liquid decants from the top of the tank as effluent that can be discharged to a reed bed for further
clarification or direct to a watercourse.
All of these processes rely on the fermentation of some of the mixed liquor for producing VFA that assists in
the biological removal of phosphorus. The Town of Cary, NC, has been using a system by which some of the
sludge in the return streams of a biological nitrogen removal plant is subjected to anaerobic conditions similar
to that of the other processes described above resulting in an effluent phosphorus concentration of less than
0.5mg/L.
There is a similarity between these processes and ad hoc processes for switching off aeration in plug-flow
plants for promoting phosphorus removal. These ad hoc processes take various forms. The Piney Water,
CO, plant is a 5-stage Bardenpho plant with no primary sedimentation and little VFA in the influent, which
resulted in little phosphorus removal. By switching off a mixer in one of the anaerobic zones, sludge settled
to the bottom and fermented, which supplied the VFAs for reducing the orthophosphorus to less than 0.2
mg/L.
A similar operation at the Henderson, NV, plant in a JHB type process had the same effect. Some plug-flow
aeration plants succeeded in reducing phosphorus to below 1 mg/L by turning off aeration at the feed end of
the plant, such as the Blue Lakes and Seneca plants operated by the Metropolitan Council Environmental
Service in Minnesota and the St. Cloud, MN, plant.
The Joppatowne plant operated by Harford County, MD, consists of an MLE plant with some sludge
accumulation in the anoxic zone while reducing the phosphorus from 7 mg/L in the influent to around 1 mg/L
in the effluent. All of these plants use the same principle of fermenting some of the mixed liquor sludge or
underflow from the final clarifiers, either inside the main stream tanks or in a side stream basin. There are
many instances where enterprising operators can achieve 80 percent or more phosphorus removal by turning
off air or mixers in conventional treatment plants. There is a Catabol plant in Cartersville, GA (USEPA,
2008a); however, there are no published data for this plant.
Recent studies suggest that the instantaneous COD:P ratio is more important than the overall average
(Neethling et al., 2005). Short term drops in the BOD:P ratio in the primary effluent to below that required for
sustainable phosphorus removal correlated well with rises in effluent phosphorus. Intermittent recycles of
phosphorus rich return streams may cause short term variability in the BOD:P ratio. Controlling or eliminating
these recycles can improve plant performance. Weekend changes in the BOD:P ratio also can affect
performance.
Another group of organisms, glycogen accumulating organisms (GAOs), also has the ability to take up
acetate in the anaerobic zone, not by using energy in phosphate bonds but by using stored glycogen as the
energy source. Under certain conditions, such as high temperatures or low phosphorus concentrations
relative to the influent bioavailable COD, they may out-compete PAOs for the VFAs, which would result in
less or no release of phosphorus in the anaerobic zone. This in turn will result in less or no overall phosphorus
removal. GAOs use the stored energy in the form of glycogen to take up VFAs and store them as a complex
carbohydrate containing poly-hydroxy valerate (PHV), instead of PHB formed with poly-phosphorus as the
energy source. When this begins to happen, there is a slow decline of phosphorus removal by the biological
system.
There is still a debate amongst researchers about the conditions likely to favor GAOs over PAOs.
Summarizing a number of publications, it would appear that the following conditions favor the growth of GAOs
over that of PAOs:
• High SRT
• High temperature over 28 °C
• Longer non-aerated zones
• Stronger wastes with low TKN content
• Periods of intermittent low BOD loads
• If the VFA consists mostly of either acetate or propionate
• Polysaccharides such as glucose are fed to the anaerobic zone.
• Low pH in the aerobic zone
Further confirmation is needed for some of these factors.
It is more accurate to look at the rbCOD/P ratio for good phosphorus removal, which ranges from 10 to 16.
(Barnard, 2006). Surveys show that it is rare for a WWTP treating municipal sewage to achieve more than
95 percent removal of phosphorus by biological processes without adding VFAs (Neethling et al., 2005).
Isovaleric acid, however, is much more expensive than acetic acid and is more odorous. It also is not
significantly generated in the primary sludge fermentation process. Addition of rbCOD such as sugars and
alcohols containing two carbons or more can increase phosphorus uptake by PAOs when added to the
anaerobic zone but may cause sludge bulking if dosed in excess (Jenkins and Harper, 2003).
Sludge Fermentation
Anaerobic fermentation produces VFA consisting mainly of acetic and propionic acid. Some configurations,
such as the Westbank and OWASA configurations, make use of anaerobic fermentation of the primary sludge
to provide VFAs to the nutrient removal process. A fermentation process, however, can be added to any
configuration to provide VFAs, especially in areas where little fermentation takes place in the collection
system. Fermentation of the primary sludge or the RAS will produce VFA. Primary sludge fermentation is
used more frequently.
There are several primary sludge fermenter designs that can accomplish this. The simplest configuration
involves allowing the formation of a thicker sludge blanket in the primary clarifier itself and returning some of
the thickened sludge to either the primary clarifier or to a mixing tank ahead of the primary clarifier to allow
elutriation of the VFA to the primary effluent. This is referred to as an activated primary sedimentation tank
(Barnard, 1984). Another variation is to pump some sludge to a complete-mix tank ahead of the primary
clarifier, to accomplish fermentation.
The sludge is then passed to the primary clarifier for elutriation of the VFA. Both of these processes lead to
an increased load on the primary clarifier and some VFA may be lost due to aeration between the primary
clarifier and the anaerobic zone. Sludge age should also be controlled to prevent methanogenic bacteria from
growing and converting the VFA to methane. Usually, a SRT less than 4 days is sufficient for this.
Alternative methods accomplish fermentation in a gravity sludge thickener by holding the sludge under
anaerobic conditions for 4 to 8 days. The supernatant can then be fed directly to the anaerobic zone and a
high load on the primary clarifier can be avoided. Thickening can either be accomplished with a single
thickener or in two stages. The two-stage process can either be a complete mix tank, followed by a thickener
or two thickeners in series. It has been shown that adding molasses or other sources of readily biodegrable
COD can improve the performance of fermenters (Bott et al., 2007).
RAS can also be fermented in a side stream process. The fermentation zone is similar to the anaerobic or
anoxic zone of many biological processes. RAS fermentation could be used in any BPR process, but is most
common in processes without primary clarifiers. Research and experience have revealed some key design
considerations for primary fermenters (WEF and ASCE, 2006).
These processes can have high solids content and may need a positive displacement pump to operate
properly. Because fermentation can lower the pH and produce carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide,
corrosion resistant materials should be used. Odor control may also be necessary if hydrogen sulfide is
produced. Monitoring of pH and oxidation reduction potential (ORP) may be desirable to control the process.
Temperature
High temperatures can have an adverse effect on phosphorus removal. At temperatures greater than 28° C,
phosphorus removal will generally be impaired, apparently by the predominance of the GAOs (Bott et al.,
2007). At the low end of the temperature scale, Erdal et al. (2002) found that PAOs outcompeted GAOs at
5° C even though the PAO metabolism was slower at 5° C than at 20° C. The GAOs virtually disappeared in
the 5° C reactor. Modeling studies have shown that GAOs can predominate at higher temperatures because
of their increased ability to uptake acetate at those temperatures compared to PAOs (Whang et al., 2007).
Low temperatures can also lower phosphorus uptake but have been shown to not be an issue in well operated
and properly acclimatized plants (WEF and ASCE, 2006).
The problem can be avoided by increased baffling or changing the mixing rates. This problem is more likely
to occur when the downstream zone is aerated, because aeration of mixed liquor increases the liquid depth,
making the liquid level in the aerobic zone higher than in the non-aerated zone.
pH
Low pH can reduce and even prevent BPR. Below pH 6.9 the process has been shown to decline in efficiency
(WEF and ASCE, 2006). This is possibly due to competition with GAOs. Filipe, et al. (2001), found that GAOs
grow faster than PAOs at a pH of less than 7.25.
Because many wastewater processes such as chemical addition and nitrification can lower pH, this should
be monitored and adjusted if necessary. It also has been shown that it is not possible to establish enhanced
biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) when the pH is less than 5.5, even though an abundant amount of
acetic acid is present in the anaerobic zone (Tracy and Flammino, 1987; Randall and Chapin, 1997).
Additionally, release may happen in aerobic zones that are too large, resulting in stored substrate depletion
and destruction of PAO cells by endogenous metabolism. Since there was no food storage associated with
the phosphorus release, additional carbon is then required to take up the phosphorus released, but the
amount in the influent may be insufficient.
Therefore, chemicals must be added to remove the excess phosphorus. Over-design of biological nutrient
removal systems could thus lead to a higher demand for an external source of VFA. Phosphorus will be
released in sludge treatment processes that are anaerobic. Gravity thickening of BPR sludge can lead to
phosphorus release if long retention times are used. Using mechanical dewatering instead of gravity
dewatering allows less retention time and less phosphorus release (Bott et al., 2007). It is usually
recommended that dissolved air flotation (DAF) be used to thicken BPR sludge to reduce the amount of
phosphorus release. DAF thickening can be quite successful for the reduction of release, but if the thickened
sludge is left on the DAF beach too long before removal, excessive release will occur, just as it will when the
sludge is left too long in a gravity thickener.
Anaerobic digestion will also lead to phosphorus release although some phosphorus will be precipitated as
either a metal salt (e.g. calcium phosphate) or as struvite (magnesium ammonium phosphate, MgNH4PO4).
BPR sludge takes up and releases magnesium along with phosphates, and these two ions combine with
ammonium, also present in abundance in anaerobic digesters, to form struvite.
Struvite formation is very fast, and will continue until one of the three ions is reduced to that ion’s solubility
level. Magnesium is usually present in the lowest concentration, and its depletion typically limits struvite
formation within the anaerobic digester.
Calcium phosphate precipitates also tend to form in anaerobic digesters, but they form much more slowly
than struvite and the formation tends to be non-stoichiometric. If substantial amounts of phosphates are
precipitated by calcium along with the struvite formation, there will be little if any propensity for struvite to
form when the sludge exits the anaerobic digesters. Also, if the digested sludge is composted after
dewatering, the resulting Class A sludge will be enriched in magnesium, phosphorus, nitrogen, and, to a
lesser extent, potassium, which also is taken up and released with phosphorus by PAOs.
Thirty percent of the phosphorus entering the anaerobic digesters at the York River plant during BPR
experimentation was recycled back to the headworks from belt filter press dewatering (Randall et al., 1992).
Alternatives to anaerobic digestion such as composting, drying, or alkaline treatment can be used to reduce
phosphorus release. There have been several studies which have examined using struvite precipitation as a
way of recovering phosphorus from supernatant from digesters. When anaerobic release of phosphorus
occurs, recycling these streams can overload phosphorus removal processes. The effect can be worsened
when the waste handling process is only operated intermittently.
Inhibition
EBPR, like any biological process, can be inhibited by chemicals toxic to the organisms. Although not as
sensitive to inhibition as nitrification and rare in practice, the BPR process can be inhibited by toxic chemicals,
including high concentrations of acetate (Randall and Chapin, 1997).
Struvite can precipitate in anaerobic processes. With abundant phosphorus and ammonia, it is usually only
the magnesium that is in short supply. Some magnesium is released from the digested cells with the
phosphorus and may increase struvite precipitation. Some processes have proposed precipitating out struvite
or other phosphate solids to avoid phosphorus return in recycle streams (Bott et al., 2007). The struvite
crystals, however, depending upon where they form, can plug centrifuge ports, and pumps and pipes used
to convey the sludge, if not controlled. Plugged lines are very difficult to clean.
Note that baffling is essential to prevent backmixing because the liquid level in the aerated zone will always
be higher than that in the non-aerated zone. Therefore, an overflow baffle should be used between zones.
Considerations should also be made for additional pumping needed for any recycle streams. Proper sizing
of the anaerobic zone is important to ensure sufficient VFA is formed and taken up in the aeration basin. If
an aerobic zone is converted to an anaerobic zone, care should be taken to ensure that the remaining aerobic
zone is sufficiently sized to achieve treatment objectives.
For plants that already have BPR but need additional phosphorus removal, the designers should start by
identifying areas that may be limiting the current process. For example, if recycle streams are intermittent,
overloading of the process may occur during recycle and the process performance may suffer.
Flow equalization to enable constant recycle flows may be an option in these cases. RAS when returned to
the anaerobic zone may introduce nitrates or oxygen that will interfere with PAO performance. The
phosphorus content of the return streams could be reduced by adding some chemicals to precipitate some
of the phosphorus. Reducing oxygen introduction to the anaerobic zone from upstream processes may be
needed to optimize phosphorus removal.
Plants looking to improve phosphorus removal performance should also closely examine the plant for
secondary release of phosphorus. If sludge blankets in clarifiers are too deep, anaerobic conditions can
develop and cause secondary phosphorus release. This can be minimized by using deeper clarifiers,
maintaining low sludge blankets, and increasing the RAS rate, so that the released phosphorus is pumped
from the bottom of the clarifier rather than flowing over the effluent weir.
Sludge handling can also cause excessive phosphorus release such as in gravity thickeners, DAFs and
anaerobic digesters. If supernatant from these processes when poorly managed is recycled, it can overload
the process. Options in this case would be to eliminate the recycle, improve operation of the process, change
the process, or treat the recycle stream to remove phosphorus before it is returned to the plant.
Another area to examine in seeking improved phosphorus removal is the COD:P ratio. If the ratio is low,
supplementing the current process with VFAs may provide additional removal. VFAs can either be added as
a chemical addition process or produced through fermentation of primary or secondary sludge.
Other ways of improving TP removal include filtration and chemical addition. Phosphorus is often attached
to colloidal particles and very low phosphorus levels usually require removal of TSS. Membrane bioreactors
(MBR) in combination with biological and/or chemical phosphorus removal can result in very low effluent
levels due to enhanced solids removal. Chemical addition with or without filtration can also achieve low
phosphorus levels.
Effluent Filtration
Effluent filtration in combination with chemical precipitation can be used to remove phosphorous down to
very low levels (< 0.1 mg/L). USEPA Region 10 (2007) found that 2-stage filtration through use of a first and
second stage filter or by providing tertiary clarification prior to filtration, resulted in the lowest effluent
phosphorus concentrations of 23 WWTPs evaluated. Effluent filtration can also be used to remove soluble
organic nitrogen that is not removed through biological treatment or settling.
These filters have the advantage of having no moving parts other than the air compressor and requiring less
energy and maintenance than traditionally backwashed filters. They are sometimes referred to by the trade
name Dynasand.
Traveling-Bridge Filters
Traveling-bridge filters consist of long shallow beds of granular media. Wastewater is applied to the top of
the media and flows downward. Each cell is individually backwashed by a traveling-bridge while the other
cells continue to operate. The bridge uses filtered water to backwash the filters and includes surface wash
to breakup matted solids or clumps of solids.
Fuzzy Filters
The fuzzy filter uses a proprietary synthetic filter media that is highly porous. Water flows not only around the
media but also through it, allowing much higher filtration rates. The media is held in place by a metal plate
and flow is from the bottom of the bed upwards. The filter is backwashed by raising the plate and introducing
a horizontal air stream from alternating sides causing the media to roll back and forth. The effluent is returned
to the plant.
Discfilters
Discfilters are a series of parallel mounted disks used to support a cloth filter media. Water enters a central
tube and flows out between the two layers of cloth in each disk. The disks rotate and are normally 60 to 70
percent submerged. The portion above the water is backwashed using spray nozzles.
Membranes
Membrane systems use a pressure head to drive water through a permeable membrane. Membrane filters
are typically classified by their pore size which in turn determines the size of the particles they exclude.
Microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis (RO) remove increasingly smaller particles.
Microfiltration and ultrafiltration remove 3 to 6 logs of bacteria, 95 percent or more BOD, along with most
particles (WEF, 2006). Nanofiltration removes nearly all particles including some viruses. RO removes all
particles as well as most large dissolved constituents. The energy cost for applying the pressure head and
the need to replace membranes make membrane filtration a more expensive technology. It can achieve very
low concentrations of nutrients and other contaminants, however, and is common in water re-use projects.
Membranes can be configured a number of ways including hollow fiber, spiral wound, plate and frame,
cartridge, or in pressure vessels. Membranes can foul from organics, biological activity, or metals in the
wastewater. Typically the water must be pre-treated before using these membranes. Pretreatment could be
conventional filters, cartridge filters, or larger membrane filters. Disinfection may also be required to prevent
biological fouling.
The Blu-CAT process combines the Blu-Pro process with addition of advanced oxidants. Early pilot tests
show that this process is capable of removing other emerging contaminants along with phosphorus and
microorganisms (USEPA, 2008a).
Pressure Filters
Pressure filters are similar to conventional media filters except they are contained in closed containers and
are filtered under pressure. The increased pressure creates a greater head loss and allows longer times
between backwashes.
Too fast of a filtration rate can cause floc to break up and pass through the filter. The optimal filtration rate
depends on floc strength, which in turn depends on the biological treatment processes prior to filtration (e.g.,
Higher SRTs lead to weaker flocs). The filtration rate, along with the loading rate will determine the area of
the filter required.
The higher the loading rate, the more frequent backwashes will be required and the greater the head loss
across the filters. Typical filtration rates are 5 to 15 meters per hour for gravity filters and up to 20 meters per
hour for pressure filters (WEF and ASCE, 1998).
There are several ways the flow rate can be controlled in filters. Constant-rate fixed head filtration maintains
a constant flow through the filter. This will lead to an increased head above the filter as the filter run
progresses. In constant-rate variable head filtration the rate is kept the same and the filter is backwashed
when the head reaches a certain value.
In variable-rate filtration, the rate of filtration decreases throughout the filter run until it reaches a minimum
value and is backwashed. Variable-rate filtration is less common than constant-rate filtration.
Proper backwashing is also important to filter operation. Without proper backwashing there can be
breakthrough of particles and turbidity. Lack of a proper backwash can also lead to accumulation of materials
on the surface of the filter that can form mudballs and cracks, which can allow solids to pass through the
filter. A surface wash or air scour may also be helpful to prevent accumulation of mudballs or grease. Surface
wash or air scour is also helpful for traveling bridge filters. Without surface wash traveling bridge filters are
limited to an influent TSS concentration of 40 to 50 mg/L (WEF and ASCE, 1998).
If membrane filters are used, fouling can be an important consideration. Cellulose acetate membranes can
be damaged by biological activity. Disinfection is often used to prevent biological fouling of the membranes.
Some membrane materials such as polyacramides, however, can be damaged by chlorine. This can be
avoided by using an alternative disinfectant, a different membrane material, or by de-chlorination.
Lowering the pH can help to prevent mineral fouling of nanofiltration or reverse osmosis membranes. Besides
pre-treatment, chemical cleaning of the membranes may also be required periodically. Monitoring of effluent
quality and pressure differential can be important to help identify membrane fouling or failure.
Other research has focused on enhancements to existing technology. For example, the Blue-Pro system
combines continuous backwashing filters, a well-known technology, with a hydrous ferric oxide coating and
ferric salt addition to remove phosphorus by adsorption as well as filtration.
Mathematical Modeling
8.1 The Need for Models
WWTPs are complex systems that depend on numerous biological, chemical, and physical processes to
achieve effluent goals. Because of the complex behavior of the processes and the variability in wastewater
characteristics, biological populations, and plant design, it is not always possible to predict how changing any
one variable will affect the effluent quality.
Plant designs that work for one influent wastewater and climate may not perform well in different conditions.
Pilot scale or full scale trials can help to determine the effect of various parameters, but costs and time to
cover all possibilities may be prohibitive. Therefore, models fill an important need by enabling simulation of
a process and estimating the impact that changing parameters will have on the treatment effectiveness.
Some references use the term to refer to sets of mathematical equations that characterize a process, other
references use model to refer to the computer program used to solve these equations. This section will use
the former and will use the term “simulator” to describe the computer program.
Model equations for processes such as clarification and settling are well known and fairly simple. Modeling
biological wastewater processes such as activated sludge, however, is much more complicated. The primary
set of models for activated sludge processes has been compiled by the International Water Association
(IWA). The first model was developed in 1986 and was called the activated sludge model (ASM). Later known
as ASM1, this model was able to model the biological oxidation of carbon, nitrification, and de-nitrification.
Although the ASM model gained widespread use among both academia and industry, it had limitations. For
example, the model assumed constant temperature and pH, did not include EBPR, and the biological
reactions did not depend on the carbon source.
In order to improve the model, IWA developed four other ASM models; ASM2, ASM2d, ASM3, and ASM3
with BioP. ASM2 and ASM2d were intended to add EBPR. The ASM3 models were intended to deal with
limitations such as the independence of the ASM1 model of temperature and carbon source. In addition,
other models were developed to seek to improve upon the ASM model.
The metabolic biological phosphorus model of the Delft University of Technology (TUDP) was developed to
fully account for the metabolism occurring in PAOs during EBPR. Barker and Dold (1997) developed a model
(B&D) to include different rates of growth depending on the carbon source.
When selecting models, the processes required and the range of normal operating parameters for the plant
should be considered and compared to the available models. For example, if chemical phosphorus removal
is to be used in a plant, the plant is limited to using either the ASM2 or ASM2d models. Each model also has
a range of temperatures and pH over which it is valid.
* OSHA PEL 1 PPM - IDLH 10 PPM and Fatal Exposure Limit 1,000 PPM
The current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit
(PEL) for chlorine is 1 ppm (3 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m(3))) as a ceiling limit. A worker's
exposure to chlorine shall at no time exceed this ceiling level. * IDLH 10 PPM
Physical and chemical properties of chlorine: A yellowish green, nonflammable and liquefied gas
with an unpleasant and irritating smell. Can be readily compressed into a clear, amber-colored
liquid, a noncombustible gas, and a strong oxidizer. Solid chlorine is about 1.5 times heavier than
water and gaseous chlorine is about 2.5 times heavier than air. Atomic number of chlorine is 17.
Cl is the elemental symbol and Cl2 is the chemical formula.
Monochloramine, dichloramine, and trichloramine are also known as Combined Available Chlorine.
Cl2 + NH4.
HOCl and OCl-; The OCL- is the hypochlorite ion and both of these species are known as free
available chlorine. These are the two main chemical species formed by chlorine in water and they
are known collectively as hypochlorous acid and the hypochlorite ion. When chlorine gas is added
to water, it rapidly hydrolyzes. The chemical equation that best describes this reaction is Cl2 + H2O
--> H+ + Cl- + HOCl. Hypochlorous acid is the most germicidal of the chlorine compounds with the
possible exception of chlorine dioxide.
Yoke-type connectors should be used on a chlorine cylinder's valve, assuming that the threads on
the valve may be worn.
The connection from a chlorine cylinder to a chlorinator should be replaced by using a new,
approved gasket on the connector. Always follow your manufacturer’s instructions.
On 1-ton Chlorine gas containers, the chlorine pressure reducing valve should be located
downstream of the evaporator when using an evaporator. This is the liquid chlorine supply line and
it is going to be made into Chlorine gas.
In water treatment, chlorine is added to the effluent before the contact chamber (before the clear
well) for complete mixing. One reason for not adding it directly to the chamber is that the chamber
has very little mixing due to low velocities.
Here are several safety precautions when using chlorine gas. In addition to protective clothing and
goggles, chlorine gas should be used only in a well-ventilated area so that any leaking gas cannot
concentrate. Emergency procedures in the case of a large uncontrolled chlorine leak are as follows:
Notify local emergency response team, warn and evacuate people in adjacent areas, and be sure
that no one enters the leak area without adequate self-contained breathing equipment.
Here are several symptoms of chlorine exposure. Burning of eyes, nose, and mouth, coughing,
sneezing, choking, nausea and vomiting, headaches and dizziness, fatal pulmonary edema,
pneumonia, and skin blisters. A little Cl2 will corrode the teeth and then progress to throat cancer.
Approved method for storing a 150 - 200-pound chlorine cylinder: Secure each cylinder in an
upright position, attach the protective bonnet over the valve and firmly secure each cylinder. Never
store near heat. Always store the empty in an upright, secure position with proper signage.
Leak detectors should be located 1 foot above the floor of the chlorine storage room and
should activate an alarm when a chlorine leak occurs. It is preferable that the detector be
capable of differentiating between two or more chlorine concentrations to alert personnel
of the severity of the release. This would help determine the appropriate procedure for
entrance to the room, ventilation, or other solutions. Self contained breathing apparatus
(SCBA) should not be located within the chlorine storage room. It is preferable that this
equipment be located in a convenient location where personnel can easily access it in the
event of an emergency.
The length of the chlorine gas and liquid chlorine pipelines should be as short as possible.
All the safety equipments should be readily available and handy. The Plant should have
provisions for exhausting chlorine gas, if a leak develops. Ideally a chlorine gas leak
absorption system can be provided for gas leak evacuation and neutralization. An
automatic or manual Shut - Off Valve and Pressure Relief Valve is also included for safe
operation.
Safety Data
NIOSH IDHL: 25 ppm
NIOSH Ceiling: 0.5ppm/15 minutes
PEL/TWA: 1 ppm
TLV/TWA: 1 ppm
TLV/STEL: 3 ppm
TLV/IDLH: 25 ppm
Reactivity
1. Conditions Contributing to Instability: Cylinders of chlorine may burst when exposed
to elevated temperatures. Chlorine in solution forms a corrosive material.
2. Incompatibilities: Flammable gases and vapors form explosive mixtures with chlorine.
Contact between chlorine and many combustible substances (such as gasoline and
petroleum products, hydrocarbons, turpentine, alcohols, acetylene, hydrogen, ammonia,
and sulfur), reducing agents, and finely divided metals may cause fires and explosions.
Contact between chlorine and arsenic, bismuth, boron, calcium, activated carbon, carbon
disulfide, glycerol, hydrazine, iodine, methane, oxomonosilane, potassium, propylene, and
silicon should be avoided. Chlorine reacts with hydrogen sulfide and water to form
hydrochloric acid, and it reacts with carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide to form phosgene
and sulfuryl chloride. Chlorine is also incompatible with moisture, steam, and water.
3. Hazardous Decomposition Products: None reported.
4. Special Precautions: Chlorine will attack some forms of plastics, rubber, and coatings.
Flammability
Chlorine is a non-combustible gas.
The National Fire Protection Association has assigned a flammability rating of 0 (no fire
hazard) to chlorine; however, most combustible materials will burn in chlorine.
1. Flash point: Not applicable.
2. Autoignition temperature: Not applicable.
3. Flammable limits in air: Not applicable.
4. Extinguishant: For small fires use water only; do not use dry chemical or carbon
dioxide. Contain and let large fires involving chlorine burn. If fire must be fought, use water
spray or fog.
Fires involving chlorine should be fought upwind from the maximum distance
possible.
Keep unnecessary people away; isolate the hazard area and deny entry. For a massive
fire in a cargo area, use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles; if this is impossible,
withdraw from the area and let the fire burn. Emergency personnel should stay out of low
areas and ventilate closed spaces before entering.
Containers of chlorine may explode in the heat of the fire and should be moved from the
fire area if it is possible to do so safely. If this is not possible, cool fire exposed containers
from the sides with water until well after the fire is out. Stay away from the ends of
containers. Firefighters should wear a full set of protective clothing and self- contained
breathing apparatus when fighting fires involving chlorine.
* NIOSH REL
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has established a
recommended exposure limit (REL) for chlorine of 0.5 ppm mg/m(3)) as a TWA for up to a
10-hour workday and a 40-hour workweek and a short-term exposure limit (STEL) of 1
ppm (3 mg/m(3))[NIOSH 1992].
* ACGIH TLV
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has assigned
chlorine a threshold limit value (TLV) of 0.5 ppm (1.5 mg/m(3)) as a TWA for a normal 8-
hour workday and a 40-hour workweek and a STEL of 1 ppm (2.9 mg/m(3)) for periods not
to exceed 15 minutes. Exposures at the STEL concentration should not be repeated more
than four times a day and should be separated by intervals of at least 60 minutes [ACGIH
1994, p. 15].
Isotopes
Isotope Half Life Cl-37 Stable
Cl-35 Stable Cl-38 37.2 minutes
Cl-36 301000.0 years
In 1774, in his small experimental laboratory, Swedish pharmacist Carl Wilhem Scheele
released a few drops of hydrochloric acid onto a piece of manganese dioxide. Within
seconds, a greenish-yellow gas arose. Although he had no idea at the time, he had just
discovered chlorine.
The fact that the greenish-yellow gas was actually an element was only recognized several
decades later by English chemist Sir Humphrey Davy. Until that time, people were
convinced that the gas was a compound of oxygen. Davy gave the element its name on
the basis of the Greek word khloros, for greenish-yellow. In 1810 he suggested the name
"chloric gas" or "chlorine."
One of the most effective and economical germ-killers, chlorine also destroys and
deactivates a wide range of dangerous germs in homes, hospitals, swimming pools,
hotels, restaurants, and other public places.
Chlorine's powerful disinfectant qualities come from its ability to bond with and destroy the
outer surfaces of bacteria and viruses. First used as a germicide to prevent the spread of
"child bed fever" in the maternity wards of Vienna General Hospital in Austria in 1846,
chlorine has been one of society's most potent weapons against a wide array of life-
threatening infections, viruses, and bacteria for 150 years.
When the first men to set foot on the moon returned to earth (Apollo 11 mission: 24.7.69)
a hypochlorite solution was chosen as one of the disinfectants for destroying any
possible moon germs.
Chlorine is slightly soluble in water. It reacts with water to form hypochlorous acid
and hydrochloric acid. The hypochlorous acid breaks down rapidly. The
hydrochloric acid also breaks down; its breakdown products will lower the pH of
the water (makes it more acidic).
Since chlorine is a gas it is rarely found in soil. If released to soil, chlorine will
react with moisture forming hypochlorous acid and hydrochloric acid. These
compounds can react with other substances found in soil.
Properties
Because it is highly reactive, chlorine is usually found in nature bound with other elements like
sodium, potassium, and magnesium. When chlorine is isolated as a free element, chlorine is a
greenish yellow gas, which is 2.5 times heavier than air. It turns to a liquid state at -34°C (-
29°F), and it becomes a yellowish crystalline solid at -103°C (-153°F). Chemists began
experimenting with chlorine and chlorine compounds in the 18th century. They learned that
chlorine has an extraordinary ability to extend a chemical bridge between various elements and
compounds that would not otherwise react with each other. Chlorine has been especially useful
in studying and synthesizing organic compounds -- compounds that have at least one atom of
the element carbon in their molecular structure. All living organisms, including humans, are
composed of organic compounds.
Chlorine is one of the most abundant chemical elements on Earth. It is ubiquitous in soils,
minerals, plants and animals. Seawater is a huge reservoir of dissolved chlorine weathered
from the continents and transported to the oceans by Earth's rivers.
Chlorine is also one of the most useful chemical elements. Each chemical element has its own
set of unique properties and chlorine is known as a very reactive element--so reactive, in fact,
that it is usually found combined with other elements in the form of compounds. More than
3,500 naturally occurring chlorinated organic (associated with living organisms) compounds
alone have been identified.
Chlorine's chemical properties have been harnessed innovatively for good use. For example,
this element plays a huge role in public health. Chlorine-based disinfectants are capable of
removing a wide variety of disease-causing germs from drinking water and wastewater as well
as from hospital and food production surfaces. Additionally, chlorine plays an important role in
the manufacture of thousands of products we depend upon every day, including such diverse
items as cars, computers, pharmaceuticals and military flak jackets. As the ninth largest
chemical produced in the U.S. by volume, chlorine is truly a "workhorse chemical."
Definitions
Chlorine Gas Feed Room
A chlorine gas feed room, for the purposes of this document, is a room that contains the
chlorinator(s) and active cylinder(s) used to apply chlorine gas at a water or wastewater
facility.
Gas Chlorinator
A gas chlorinator is a device used to meter and control the application rate of chlorine gas into
a liquid. There is the danger of the gas escaping at a water or wastewater treatment facility.
The gas chlorinator should be isolated from a water or wastewater treatment plant.
Chlorine Cabinet
A chlorine cabinet is a pre-assembled or factory built unit that contains the equipment used to
apply chlorine gas at a water or wastewater treatment facility. It is isolated from a water or
wastewater treatment plant.
Beginning
The common chemical equation could be A + B --> C + D. This is chemical A + chemical B,
the two reacting chemicals will go to products C + D, etc.
Oxidation
The term “oxidation” originally meant a reaction in which oxygen combines chemically with
another substance, but its usage has long been broadened to include any reaction in which
electrons are transferred.
Oxidation and reduction always occur simultaneously (redox reactions), and the substance
which gains electrons is termed the oxidizing agent. For example, cupric ion is the oxidizing
agent in the reaction: Fe (metal) + Cu++ --> Fe++ + Cu (metal); here, two electrons (negative
charges) are transferred from the iron atom to the copper atom; thus the iron becomes positively
charged (is oxidized) by loss of two electrons, while the copper receives the two electrons and
becomes neutral (is reduced).
Electrons may also be displaced within the molecule without being completely transferred away
from it. Such partial loss of electrons likewise constitutes oxidation in its broader sense and
leads to the application of the term to a large number of processes, which at first sight might
not be considered to be oxidation. Reaction of a hydrocarbon with a halogen, for example, CH4
+ 2 Cl --> CH3Cl + HCl, involves partial oxidation of the methane; halogen addition to a double
bond is regarded as an oxidation.
Dehydrogenation is also a form of oxidation; when two hydrogen atoms, each having one
electron, are removed from a hydrogen-containing organic compound by a catalytic reaction
with air or oxygen, as in oxidation of alcohol to aldehyde.
Oxidation Number
The number of electrons that must be added to or subtracted from an atom in a combined
state to convert it to the elemental form; i.e., in barium chloride (BaCl2) the oxidation number
of barium is +2 and of chlorine is -1. Many elements can exist in more than one oxidation
state.
Now, let us look at some common ions. An ion is the reactive state of the chemical, and is
dependent on its place within the periodic table.
Have a look at the “periodic table of the elements”. It is arranged in columns of elements,
there are 18 columns. You can see column one, H, Li, Na, K, etc. These all become ions as
H+, Li+, K+, etc. The next column, column 2, Be, Mg, Ca etc. become ions Be2+, Mg2+, Ca2+,
etc. Column 18, He, Ne, Ar, Kr are inert gases. Column 17, F, Cl, Br, I, ionize to a negative F-,
Cl-, Br-, I-, etc.
What you now need to do is memorize the table of common ions, both positive ions and
negative ions.
Positive ions will react with negative ions, and vice versa. This is the start of our
chemical reactions. For example:
Na+ + OH- --> NaOH (sodium hydroxide)
Na+ + Cl- --> NaCl (salt)
3H+ + PO43- --> H3PO4 (phosphoric acid)
2Na+ + S2O32- --> Na2S2O3
For example, since aluminum exists in its ionic state as Al3+, it will react with many negatively
charged ions; for example: Cl-, OH-, SO42-, PO43-.
When the left hand side of the equation is written, to balance the number of chlorine’s (Cl-)
required, the number 3 is placed in front of the ion concerned, in this case Cl-, becomes 3Cl-.
On the right hand side of the equation, where the ions have become a compound
(a chemical compound), the number is transferred to after the relevant ion, Cl3.
Another example:
Al3+ + SO42- --> AlSO4 (incorrect)
2Al3+ + 3SO42- --> Al2(SO4)3 (correct)
Remember to encase the SO4 in brackets. Why? Because we are dealing with the sulfate
ion, SO42-, and it is this ion that is 2- charged (not just the O4), so we have to ensure that the
“ion” is bracketed. Now to check, the 2 times 3+ = 6+, and 3 times 2- = 6-. We have equal
amounts of positive ions, and equal amounts of negative ions.
Reaction is going to be the Na+ reacting with a negatively charged ion. This will have to be the
chlorine, Cl-, because at the moment the Na+ is tied to the OH-. So: Na+ + Cl- --> NaCl
The H+ from the HCl will react with a negative (-) ion this will be the OH- from the NaOH.
So: H+ + OH- --> H2O (water).
The Mg2+ needs to react with a negatively charged ion, this will be the PO43-,
so: 3Mg2+ + 2PO43- --> Mg3(PO4)2
(Remember the swapping of the positive or negative charges on the ions in the left side of
the equation, and placing it in front of each ion, and then placing this number after each ion
on the right side of the equation)
What is left is the H+ from the H3PO4 and this will react with a negative ion, we only have the
OH- from the Mg(OH)2 left for it to react with.
6H+ + 6OH- --> 6H2O
Where did I get the 6 from? When I balanced the Mg2+ with the PO43-, the equation became
3Mg2+ + 2PO43- --> Mg3(PO4)2
Therefore, I must have required 3Mg(OH)2 to begin with, and 2H3PO4, ( because we originally
had (OH)2 attached to the Mg, and H3 attached to the PO4. I therefore have 2H3 reacting with
3(OH)2. We have to write this, on the left side of the equation, as 6H+ + 6OH- because we
need it in ionic form.
The equation becomes:
6H+ + 6OH- --> 6H2O
The balancing of equations is simple. You need to learn the valency of the common ions (see
tables). The rest is pure mathematics; you are balancing valency charges, positives versus
If one ion, example Al3+, (3 positive charges) reacts with another ion, example OH- (one
negative ion) then we require 2 more negatively charged ions (in this case OH-) to counteract
the 3 positive charges the Al3+ contains.
Take my earlier hint, place the 3 from the Al3+ in front of the OH-, now reads 3OH-, place the 1
from the hydroxyl OH- in front of the Al3+, now stays the same, Al3+ (the 1 is never written in
chemistry equations).
The 3 is simply written in front of the OH-, a recognized ion, there are no brackets placed
around the OH-. On the right hand side of the equation, all numbers in front of each ion on the
left hand side of the equation are placed after each same ion on the right side of the equation.
Brackets are used in the right side of the equation because the result is a compound.
Brackets are also used for compounds (reactants) in the left side of equations, as in
3Mg(OH)2 + 2H3PO4 --> ?
Cl 2 + H 2 O → HOCI + HCI
(chlorine gas) (water) (hypochlorous acid) (hydrochloric acid)
All three forms of chlorine produce hypochlorous acid (HOCl) when added to water.
Hypochlorous acid is a weak acid but a strong disinfecting agent. The amount of hypochlorous
acid depends on the pH and temperature of the water. Under normal water conditions,
hypochlorous acid will also chemically react and break down into a hypochlorite. ion
The hypochlorite ion is a much weaker disinfecting agent than hypochlorous acid, about 100
times less effective.
Let’s now look at how pH and temperature affect the ratio of hypochlorous acid to hypochlorite
ions. As the temperature is decreased, the ratio of hypochlorous acid increases. Temperature
plays a small part in the acid ratio. Although the ratio of hypochlorous acid is greater at lower
temperatures, pathogenic organisms are actually harder to kill. All other things being equal,
higher water temperatures and a lower pH are more conducive to chlorine disinfection.
Types of Residual
If water were pure, the measured amount of chlorine in the water should be the same as the
amount added. But water is not 100% pure. There are always other substances (interfering
agents) such as iron, manganese, turbidity, etc., which will combine chemically with the
chlorine.
This is called the chlorine demand. Naturally, once chlorine molecules are combined with
these interfering agents, they are not capable of disinfection. It is free chlorine that is much
more effective as a disinfecting agent.
So let’s look now at how free, total and combined chlorine are related. When a chlorine residual
test is taken, either a total or a free chlorine residual can be read.
Break-point chlorination is where the chlorine demand has been satisfied, and any additional
chlorine will be considered free chlorine.
The CT concept, as developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Federal
Register, 40 CFR, Parts 141 and 142, June 29, 1989), uses the combination of disinfectant
residual concentration (mg/L) and the effective disinfection contact time (in minutes) to measure
effective pathogen reduction. The residual is measured at the end of the process, and the
contact time used is the T10 of the process unit (time for 10% of the water to pass).
These requirements are based on unpolluted raw water sources with Giardia levels of = 1
cyst/100 L, and a finished water goal of 1 cyst/100,000 L (equivalent to 1 in 10,000 risk of
infection per person per year). Higher raw water contamination levels may require greater
removals as shown on Table 4.1.
TABLE 4.1
Level of Giardia Reduction
Raw Water Giardia Levels*
Recommended Giardia Log
Reduction
< 1 cyst/100 L 3-log
1 cyst/100 L - 10 cysts/100 L 3-log - 4-log
10 cysts/100 L - 100 cysts/100 L 4-log - 5-log
> 100 cysts/100 L > 5-log
*Use geometric means of data to determine raw water Giardia levels for compliance.
Required CT Value
Required CT values are dependent on pH, residual concentration, temperature, and the
disinfectant used. The tables attached to Appendices A and B shall be used to determine the
required CT.
Results shall be reported as a reduction Ratio, along with the appropriate pH, temperature, and
disinfectant residual. The reduction Ratio must be greater than 1.0 to be acceptable.
Chlorine Residual: The concentration of chlorine in the water after the chlorine demand has
been satisfied. The concentration is normally expressed in terms of total chlorine residual,
which includes both the free and combined or chemically bound chlorine residuals.
Combined Chlorine Residual: The amount of chlorine used up in a water purification system;
used as a monitoring measurement by system operators. Combined chlorine is defined as the
residual chlorine existing in water in chemical combination with ammonia or organic amines
which can be found in natural or polluted waters. Ammonia is sometimes deliberately added to
chlorinated public water supplies to provide inorganic chloramines.
Free Chlorine: Free chlorine is defined as the concentration of residual chlorine in water
present as dissolved gas (Cl2), hypochlorous acid (HOCl), and/or hypochlorite ion (OCl-). The
three forms of free chlorine exist together in equilibrium.
HOCl H+ + OCl-
Their relative proportions are determined by the pH value and temperature. Regardless of
whether pre-chloration is practiced or not, a free chlorine residual of at least 1.0 mg/L should
be maintained in the clear well or distribution reservoir immediately downstream from the point
of post-chlorination and .2 mg/L in the distribution system to guard against backflow.
Total Chlorine Residual: The total of free residual and combined residual chlorine in a water
purification system; used as a monitoring measurement by system operators. Total chlorine is
the sum of free and combined chlorine. When chlorinating most potable water supplies, total
chlorine is essentially equal to free chlorine since the concentration of ammonia or organic
nitrogen compounds (needed to form combined chlorine) will be very low. When chloramines
are present in the municipal water supply, then total chlorine will be higher than free chlorine.
Pre-chlorination: The addition of chlorine at the plant headworks or prior to other water
treatment or groundwater production processes and mainly used for disinfection and control of
tastes, odors, and aquatic growths.
Breakpoint chlorination: Breakpoint chlorination means adding Cl2 to the water until the Cl2
demand is satisfied. Until all the microorganisms are killed.
What are the physical properties of chlorine, what hazards does it present, what
advantages does it have over most other disinfectants, and how does it react with
bacteria?
Physical and chemical properties of chlorine: A yellowish green, nonflammable and liquefied
gas with an unpleasant and irritating smell. Can be readily compressed into a clear, amber-
colored liquid, a noncombustible gas, and a strong oxidizer. Solid chlorine is about 1.5 times
heavier than water and gaseous chlorine is about 2.5 times heavier than air. Atomic number of
chlorine is 17. Cl is the elemental symbol and Cl2 is the chemical formula.
Chlorine reacts with bacteria as if it was very corrosive and burns the skin or covering killing
the bacteria.
What is the purpose of a fusible plug, at what temperature does it melt, and where is it
located on 150-lb. and 1-ton cylinders?
Fusible plug is a safety device that melts. If the temperature of a full Cl2 cylinder is increased
by 50o F or 30o C, a rupture may occur. It will melt at 158 to 165 degrees F. It is found on the
side of a 1-ton container and on top of the 150-pound cylinder and is located in the valve below
the valve seat.
What is the correct procedure to follow in changing a chlorine cylinder and what item
should always be replaced with a new one in doing so?
Hook up the chlorinator to the container or cylinder with the chlorine valve turned off. Use the
gas side not the liquid if using a 1-ton container. Remove the cylinder valve outlet cap and
check the valve face or damage. Clean with wire brush if necessary. If the valve face is smooth,
clean proceed with hooking up the cylinder. Check the inlet face of the chlorinator and clean if
necessary. Place a new lead gasket on the chlorinator inlet, place the chlorinator on the
cylinder valve, install the yoke clamp and slowly tighten the yoke clamp until the two faces are
against the lead gasket. Tighten the yoke, compressing the gasket one half to three quarters
turn, do not over tighten. Replace the lead gasket with every change out.
How, when and where should chlorine residuals be taken and what information do they
provide? The sample must be taken within the distribution system of your PWS. If you take it
before the distribution system you will not get an accurate reading. The sample must be taken
at the same tap that you take the Bac-t sample.
When a low voltage direct current (DC) power supply is applied to the electrodes in the cell, the
sodium and chlorine ions in the brine are attracted in opposite directions to the polarized
electrodes. The sodium ion passes across an ion selective membrane leaving the chlorine ion
to combine with a second chlorine ion, which makes a chlorine gas bubble at the anode
(electrode).
When the sodium crosses the membrane, it combines with a hydroxyl ion at the cathode
(electrode) making sodium hydroxide, or caustic soda (NaOH). The hydroxyl ion originates from
the dissolution of water at the cathode where hydrogen gas also develops. The membrane in
the cell keeps the two solutions separate; otherwise, the chlorine gas bubble would immediately
combine with the caustic soda forming sodium hypochlorite, or bleach. This process, which
uses a membrane to separate the two solutions, is called the chlor-alkali process. The chemical
equation for the chlor-alkali process is illustrated in the following equation:
The safest way to be sure that the amount of chlorine added is sufficient is to add a little more
than is required. This will result in a free chlorine residual that can be measured easily. This
chlorine residual must be maintained for several minutes depending on chlorine level and water
quality. Table 4 lists the free chlorine residual level needed for different contact times, water
temperatures and pH levels.
Kits are available for measuring the chlorine residual by looking for a color change after the test
chemical is added. The test is simple and easy for a homeowner to perform. If chlorination is
required for the water supply, the chlorine residual should be tested regularly to make sure the
system is working properly. The kit should specify that it measures the free chlorine residual
and not the total chlorine. Once chlorine has combined with other chemicals it is not effective
as a disinfectant. If a test kit does not distinguish between free chlorine and chlorine combined
with other chemicals, the test may result in an overestimation of the chlorine residual.
Table 4. Necessary chlorine residual to disinfect water for various contact times, water
temperatures and pH
Water Temp. 50 degrees F
Necessary chlorine residual (mg/l)
Contact time (minutes)
pH 7 pH 7.5 pH 8
40 0.2 0.3 0.4
30 0.3 0.4 0.5
20 0.4 0.6 0.8
10 0.8 1.2 1.6
5 1.6 2.4 3.2
2 4.0 6.0 8.0
1 8.0 12.0 16.0
Water Temp. 32 - 40 degrees F
Necessary chlorine residual (mg/l)
Contact time (minutes)
pH 7 pH 7.5 pH 8
40 0.3 0.5 0.6
30 0.4 0.6 0.8
20 0.6 0.9 1.2
10 1.2 1.8 2.4
5 2.4 3.6 4.8
2 6.0 9.0 12.0
1 12.0 18.0 24.0
Example: What is the necessary chlorine residual for well water with pH 7.5?
The well water is 38 degrees F when it enters the house. The pump delivers 7 gallons per
minute and after the chlorine is added it is held in a 100 gallon holding tank.
1. Contact time (from Table 5) - gallons per minute for 50-gallon tank = 5 minutes
2. Multiply by 2 for a 100-gallon tank = 10 minutes.
3. Necessary chlorine residual (from Table 4)- for water at 38 degrees F and pH 7.5 = 1.8
mg/l.
Simple chlorination involves maintaining a low level of free residual chlorine at a concentration
between 0.30 to .5 mg/l for at least 30 minutes. The residual is measured at the faucet most
distant from the where chlorine is added to the water supply.
To ensure the proper contact time of at least 30 minutes, a holding tank can be installed (Table
5). Pressure tanks, while often thought to be sufficient, are usually too small to always provide
30 minutes of contact time.
When the water cannot be held for at least 30 minutes before it is used, super chlorination is
an alternative. For superchlorination, a chlorine solution is added to the water to produce a
chlorine residual of between 3.0 and 5.0 mg/l, which is about ten times stronger than for simple
chlorination.
The necessary contact time for this concentration is reduced to less than five minutes (Table
4). The water will have a very strong chlorine smell. If this is not desirable, the chlorine can be
removed just before it is used with a carbon filter (Note: may not be currently allowed under
your Department of Health for private water supplies).
Oxidation Chemistry
Oxidation chemistry has long been an accepted and effective part of many water treatment
programs. Oxidizing chemicals used in today's water treatment programs include: chlorine,
chlorine dioxide, bromine, bromine/chlorine releasing compounds, ozone and hydrogen
peroxide.
Oxidizing microbiocides are often found at the forefront of many cooling water treatment
programs. In large volume or once-through cooling systems they are usually the primary biocide
and often are the most cost-effective programs available to a plant. When selecting these
economical and versatile chemicals, several factors should be considered before a technically
sound program is implemented. Environmental and regulatory impact, system pH, process
contamination, and equipment capital and maintenance expense all play a role in the decision-
making process.
The primary killing mechanism these types of microbiocides use is oxidizing protein groups
within a microorganism. Proteins are the basic components of essential cellular enzymes that
are necessary for life-sustaining cellular processes such as respiration. The destruction of these
proteins deprives the cell of its ability to carry out fundamental life functions and quickly kills it.
One oxidant is chlorine dioxide, which appears to provide an additional killing mechanism.
Chlorine dioxide is able to diffuse readily through hydrophobic lipid layers of an organism,
allowing it to react with cellular amino acids, which directly inhibits protein synthesis. Since
amino acids are the basic building blocks of all cellular proteins, destruction of these molecules
has a devastating effect on the microorganism.
Chlorine scrubber
This hydrolization provides the active toxicant, HOCl, which is pH-dependent. In alkaline cooling
systems, it readily dissociates to form the hypochlorite ion (OCl-). This dissociation
phenomenon is important to remember when working with systems that will operate at a higher
pH. In alkaline conditions, OCl- becomes the predominant species and lacks the biocidal
efficacy of the non-dissociated form. Considerably more HOCl is present at a pH of 7.0 than at
pH 8.5.
It is also widely known that chlorine is non-selective, making it very sensitive to contamination
from either cooling water makeup or from in-plant process leaks. Ammonia, organic acids and
organic compounds, sulfides, iron and manganese all easily react with HOCl. The amount of
chlorine needed to react with these contamination species is referred to as chlorine demand
and it must be satisfied before active HOCl is available to provide a free chlorine residual.
Pathophysiology
Chlorine is a greenish-yellow, noncombustible gas at room temperature and atmospheric
pressure. The intermediate water solubility of chlorine accounts for its effect on the upper airway
and the lower respiratory tract.
Exposure to chlorine gas may be prolonged because its moderate water solubility may not
cause upper airway symptoms for several minutes. In addition, the density of the gas is greater
than that of air, causing it to remain near ground level and increasing
exposure time.
Mechanism of Activity
The mechanisms of the above biological activity are poorly understood
and the predominant anatomic site of injury may vary, depending on
the chemical species produced. Cellular injury is believed to result
from the oxidation of functional groups in cell components, from
reactions with tissue water to form hypochlorous and hydrochloric acid,
and from the generation of free oxygen radicals.
The cylinders are on a scale that operators use to measure the amount used each day. The
chains are used to prevent the tanks from falling over. Chlorine gas is stored in vented rooms
that have panic bar equipped doors. Operators have the equipment necessary to reduce the
impact of a gas leak, but rely on trained emergency response teams to contain leaks.
Solubility Effects
Hydrochloric acid is highly soluble in water. The predominant targets of the acid are the epithelia
of the ocular conjunctivae and upper respiratory mucus membranes. Hypochlorous acid is also
highly water soluble with an injury pattern similar to hydrochloric acid. Hypochlorous acid may
account for the toxicity of elemental chlorine and hydrochloric acid to the human body.
Pathological Findings
Pathologic findings are nonspecific. They include severe pulmonary edema, pneumonia,
hyaline membrane formation, multiple pulmonary thromboses, and ulcerative tracheobronchitis.
The hallmark of pulmonary injury associated with chlorine toxicity is pulmonary edema,
manifested as hypoxia. Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema is thought to occur when there is a
loss of pulmonary capillary integrity.
Small portable chlorine measuring kit. The redder the mixture the “hotter” or
stronger the chlorine in solution.
(Make sure you buy a test kit using the DPD method, and not the outdated orthotolodine
method.)
Chlorine test kits are very useful in adjusting the chlorine dose you apply. You can
measure what chlorine levels are being found in your system (especially at the far ends).
Free chlorine residuals need to be checked and recorded daily. These results should be
kept on file for a health or regulatory agency inspection during a regular field visit.
The most accurate method for determining chlorine residuals to use the laboratory
amperometric titration method.
Chlorination may produce adverse effects. Taste and odor characteristics of phenols and
other organic compounds present in a water supply may be intensified. Potentially
carcinogenic chloro-organic compounds such as chloroform may be formed.
Free chlorine reacts readily with ammonia and certain nitrogenous compounds to form
combined chlorine. With ammonia, chlorine reacts to form the chloramines:
monochloramine, dichloramine, and nitrogen trichloride.
The presence and concentrations of these combined forms depend chiefly on pH,
temperature, initial chlorine-to-nitrogen ratio, absolute chlorine demand, and reaction time.
Both free and combined chlorine may be present simultaneously. Combined chlorine in
water supplies may be formed in the treatment of raw waters containing ammonia or by
the addition of ammonia or ammonium salts.
Hach’s AutoCAT 9000™ Automatic Titrator is the newest solution to hit the disinfection
industry – a comprehensive, benchtop chlorine-measurement system that does it all:
calibration, titration, calculation, real-time graphs, graphic print output, even electrode
cleaning. More a laboratory assistant than an instrument, the AutoCAT 9000 gives you:
High throughput, performs the titration and calculates concentration, all
automatically.
Forward titration, USEPA-accepted methods for free and total chlorine and
chlorine dioxide with chlorite.
Back titration, USEPA-accepted method for total chlorine in wastewater.
Accurate, yet convenient: the easiest way to complete ppb-level amperometric
titration.
Summary of toxicology
1. Effects on Animals: Chlorine is a severe irritant of the eyes, mucous membranes, skin, and lungs
in experimental animals. The 1 hour LC(50) is 239 ppm in rats and 137 ppm in mice ()[Sax and
Lewis 1989]. Animals surviving sub-lethal inhalation exposures for 15 to 193 days showed marked
emphysema, which was associated with bronchiolitis and pneumonia [Clayton and Clayton 1982].
Chlorine injected into the anterior chamber of rabbits' eyes resulted in severe damage with
inflammation, opacification of the cornea, atrophy of the iris, and injury to the lens [Grant 1986].
2. Effects on Humans: Severe acute effects of chlorine exposure in humans have been well
documented since World War I when chlorine gas was used as a chemical warfare agent. Other
severe exposures have resulted from the accidental rupture of chlorine tanks. These exposures
have caused death, lung congestion, and pulmonary edema, pneumonia, pleurisy, and bronchitis
[Hathaway et al. 1991]. The lowest lethal concentration reported is 430 ppm for 30 minutes [Clayton
and Clayton 1982].
Exposure to 15 ppm causes throat irritation, exposures to 50 ppm are dangerous, and exposures
to 1000 ppm can be fatal, even if exposure is brief [Sax and Lewis 1989; Clayton and Clayton
1982]. Earlier literature reported that exposure to a concentration of about 5 ppm caused respiratory
complaints, corrosion of the teeth, inflammation of the mucous membranes of the nose and
susceptibility to tuberculosis among chronically-exposed workers.
However, many of these effects are not confirmed in recent studies and are of very dubious
significance [ACGIH 1991]. A study of workers exposed to chlorine for an average of 10.9 years
was published in 1970. All but six workers had exposures below 1 ppm; 21 had TWAs above 0.52
ppm. No evidence of permanent lung damage was found, but 9.4 percent had abnormal EKGs
compared to 8.2 percent in the control group.
The incidence of fatigue was greater among those exposed above 0.5 ppm [ACGIH 1991]. In 1981,
a study was published involving 29 subjects exposed to chlorine concentrations up to 2.0 ppm for
4- and 8-hour periods. Exposures of 1.0 ppm for 8 hours produced statistically significant changes
in pulmonary function that were not observed at a 0.5 ppm exposure concentration. Six of 14
subjects exposed to 1.0 ppm for 8 hours showed increased mucous secretions from the nose and
in the hypopharynx.
Responses for sensations of itching or burning of the nose and eyes, and general discomfort were
not severe, but were perceptible, especially at the 1.0 ppm exposure level [ACGIH 1991]. A 1983
study of pulmonary function at low concentrations of chlorine exposure also found transient
decreases in pulmonary function at the 1.0 ppm exposure level, but not at the 0.5 ppm level [ACGIH
1991].
Acne (chloracne) is not unusual among persons exposed to low concentrations of chlorine for long
periods of time. Tooth enamel damage may also occur [Parmeggiani 1983]. There has been one
confirmed case of myasthenia gravis associated with chlorine exposure [NLM 1995].
Methods that are effective in controlling worker exposures to chlorine, depending on the feasibility
of implementation, are as follows: Process enclosure Local exhaust ventilation General dilution
ventilation Personal protective equipment.
Chlorine Storage
Chlorine should be stored in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area in tightly sealed containers that are
labeled in accordance with OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard [29 CFR 1910.1200].
Containers of chlorine should be protected from exposure to weather, extreme temperatures
changes, and physical damage, and they should be stored separately from flammable gases and
vapors, combustible substances (such as gasoline and petroleum products, hydrocarbons,
turpentine, alcohols, acetylene, hydrogen, ammonia, and sulfur), reducing agents, finely divided
metals, arsenic, bismuth, boron, calcium, activated carbon, carbon disulfide, glycerol, hydrazine,
iodine, methane, oxomonosilane, potassium, propylene, silicon, hydrogen sulfide and water,
carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide, moisture, steam, and water. (Sulfur dioxide is used for de-
chlorination).
Providing detailed information about the removal and disposal of specific chemicals is beyond the
scope of this guideline. The U.S. Department of Transportation, the EPA, and State and local
regulations should be followed to ensure that removal, transport, and disposal of this substance
are conducted in accordance with existing regulations.
For new and upgraded facilities, from the chlorine room, chlorine gas vacuum lines should be run
as close to the point of solution application as possible. Injectors should be located to minimize the
length of pressurized chlorine solution lines. A gas pressure relief system shall be included in the
gas vacuum line between the vacuum regulator(s) and the chlorinator(s) to ensure that pressurized
chlorine gas does not enter the gas vacuum lines leaving the chlorine room.
The gas pressure relief system shall vent pressurized gas to the atmosphere at a location that is
not hazardous to plant personnel; vent line should be run in such a manner that moisture collecting
traps are avoided. The vacuum regulating valve(s) shall have positive shutdown in the event of a
break in the downstream vacuum lines.
Capacity
The chlorinator shall have the capacity to dose enough chlorine to overcome the demand and
maintain the required concentration of the "free" or "combined" chlorine.
Methods of Control
Chlorine feed system shall be automatic proportional controlled, automatic residual controlled, or
compound loop controlled. In the automatic proportional controlled system, the equipment adjusts
the chlorine feed rate automatically in accordance with the flow changes to provide a constant pre-
established dosage for all rates of flow. In the automatic residual controlled system, the chlorine
feeder is used in conjunction with a chlorine residual analyzer which controls the feed rate of the
chlorine feeders to maintain a particular residual in the treated water.
In the compound loop control system, the feed rate of the chlorinator is controlled by a flow
proportional signal and a residual analyzer signal to maintain particular chlorine residual in the
water.
A manual chlorine feed system may be installed for groundwater systems with constant flow rates.
Standby Provision
As a safeguard against malfunction and/or shut-down,
standby chlorination equipment having the capacity to
replace the largest unit shall be provided. For uninterrupted
chlorination, gas chlorinators shall be equipped with an
automatic changeover system. In addition, spare parts shall
be available for all chlorinators.
Weigh Scales
Scales for weighing cylinders shall be provided at all plants
using chlorine gas to permit an accurate reading of total daily weight of chlorine used. At large
plants, scales of the recording and indicating type are recommended. As a minimum, a platform
scale shall be provided. Scales shall be of corrosion-resistant material.
You can use a spray solution of Ammonia or a rag soaked with Ammonia to detect a small Cl2
leak. If there is a leak, the ammonia will create a white colored smoke, Ammonium Chloride.
Safety Equipment
The facility shall be provided with personnel safety equipment including the following: Respiratory
equipment; safety shower, eyewash; gloves; eye protection; protective clothing; cylinder and/or
ton repair kits.
Respiratory equipment shall be provided which has been approved under the Occupational Health
and Safety Act, General Safety Regulation - Selection of Respiratory Protective Equipment.
Equipment shall be in close proximity to the access door(s) of the chlorine room.
Ventilation
Gas chlorine rooms shall have entirely separate exhaust ventilation systems capable of delivering
one (1) complete air change per minute during periods of chlorine room occupancy only. The air
outlet from the room shall be 150 mm above the floor and the point of discharge located to preclude
contamination of air inlets to buildings or areas used by people. The vents to the outside shall have
insect screens.
Heating
Chlorine rooms shall have separate heating systems, if a forced air system is used to heat the
building. The hot water heating system for the building will negate the need for a separate heating
system for the chlorine room. The heat should be controlled at approximately 15oC.
Cylinders or containers shall be protected to ensure that the chlorine maintains its gaseous state
when entering the chlorinator.
Access
All access to the chlorine room shall only be from the exterior of the building. Visual inspection of
the chlorination equipment from inside may be provided by the installation of glass window(s) in
the walls of the chlorine room. Windows should be at least 0.20 m2 in area, and be made of clear
wire reinforced glass. There should also be a 'panic bar' on the inside of the chlorine room door
for emergency exit.
The chlorine gas storage room shall have provision for ventilation at thirty air changes per hour.
Viewing glass windows and panic button on the inside of door should also be provided. In very
large facilities, entry into the chlorine rooms may be through a vestibule from outside.
Scrubbers
For facilities located within residential or densely populated areas, consideration shall be given to
provide scrubbers for the chlorine room.
Some WWT plants transfer and store chlorine from tankers to holding tanks as shown in
the above photograph.
True or False. Even brief exposure to 1,000 ppm of Cl2 can be fatal. True
How does one determine the ambient temperature in a chlorine room? Use a regular thermometer
because ambient temperature is simply the air temperature of the room.
How is the effectiveness of disinfection determined? From the results of coliform testing.
In the production of chloramines, the ammonia residuals in the finished water, when fed in excess
of stoichiometric amount needed, should be limited to inhibit growth of nitrifying bacteria.
Chlorine Dioxide
Chlorine dioxide may be used for taste and odor control, or as a pre-disinfectant. Total residual
oxidants (including chlorine dioxide and chlorite, but excluding chlorate) shall not exceed 0.30 mg/L
during normal operation or 0.50 mg/L (including chlorine dioxide, chlorite and chlorate) during
periods of extreme variations in the raw water supply.
Chlorine dioxide provides good Giardia and virus protection but its use is limited by the restriction
on the maximum residual of 0.5 mg/L ClO2/chlorite/chlorate allowed in finished water. This limits
usable residuals of chlorine dioxide at the end of a process unit to less than 0.5 mg/L.
Where chlorine dioxide is approved for use as an oxidant, the preferred method of generation is to
entrain chlorine gas into a packed reaction chamber with a 25% aqueous solution of sodium chlorite
(NaClO2).
Warning: Dry sodium chlorite is explosive and can cause fires in feed equipment if leaking solutions
or spills are allowed to dry out.
Ozone
Ozone is a very effective disinfectant for both Giardia and viruses. Ozone CT (Contact Time) values
must be determined for the ozone basin alone; an accurate T10 value must be obtained for the
contact chamber, residual levels measured through the chamber and an average ozone residual
calculated.
Ozone does not provide a system residual and should be used as a primary disinfectant only in
conjunction with free and/or combined chlorine.
Ozone does not produce chlorinated byproducts (such as trihalomethanes) but it may cause an
increase in such byproduct formation if it is fed ahead of free chlorine; ozone may also produce its
own oxygenated byproducts such as aldehydes, ketones, or carboxylic acids. Any installed
ozonation system must include adequate ozone leak detection alarm systems, and an ozone off-
gas destruction system.
Ozone may also be used as an oxidant for removal of taste and odor, or may be applied as a pre-
disinfectant.
Liquid ozone is very unstable and can readily explode. As a result, it is not shipped and must
be manufactured on-site. Ozone is a light blue gas at room temperature.
It has a self-policing pungent odor similar to that sometimes noticed during and after heavy
electrical storms. In use, ozone breaks down into oxygen and nascent oxygen.
O 3 → O2 + O
It is the nascent oxygen that produces the high oxidation and disinfections, and even
sterilization. Each water has its own ozone demand, in the order of 0.5 ppm to 5.0 ppm.
Contact time, temperature, and pH of the water are factors to be determined.
Ozone generator
Enclosed UV lamp assembly. Assemblies will often need frequent cleaning and
bulb replacements, there are facilities with 1,000’s of bulbs.
The lamp itself does not come into with contact water, the lamp is placed inside a quartz
tube, and the water is in contact with the outside of the quartz tube. Quartz is used in this
case since practically none of the UV rays are absorbed by the quartz, allowing all of the rays
to reach the water. Ordinary glass cannot be used since it will absorb the UV rays, leaving
little for disinfection.
The basic design flow of water of certain UV units is in the order of 2.0 gpm for each inch of the
lamp. Further, the units are designed so that the contact or retention time of the water in the unit is
not less than 15 seconds. Most manufacturers claim that the UV lamps have a life of about 7,500
hours, which is about 1 year’s time. The lamp must be replaced when it loses about 40% to 50%
of its UV output; in any installation this is determined by means of a photoelectric cell and a meter
that shows the output of the lamp. Each lamp is outfitted with its own photoelectric cell, and with its
own alarm that will be activated when the penetration drops to a present level.
Ultraviolet radiation is an excellent disinfectant that is highly effective against viruses, molds, and
yeasts; and it is safe to use. It adds no chemicals to the water, it leaves no residual, and it does not
form THMs. It is used to remove traces of ozone and chloramines from the finished water. Alone,
UV radiation will not remove precursors, but in combination with ozone, it is said to be effective in
the removal of THM precursors and THMs.
The germicidal effect of UV is thought to be associated with its absorption by various organic
components essential to the cell’s functioning. For effective use of ultraviolet, the water to be
disinfected must be clean, and free of any suspended solids. The water must also be colorless and
must be free of any colloids, iron, manganese, taste, and odor.
These parameters will probably require at least filtration of one type or another. The UV
manufacturer will of course stipulate which pretreatment may be necessary.
The table indicates that most of the disinfectants will leave a by-product that is or would possibly be
inimical to health. This may aid with a decision as to whether or not precursors should be removed
before these disinfectants are added to water.
If it is decided that removal of precursors is needed, research to date indicates that this removal can
be attained through the application of controlled chlorination plus coagulation and filtration, aeration,
reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, GAC (Granular Activated Charcoal) or combinations of others
processes.
According to the journal Nature, chlorine atoms can affect nitrogen oxides and ozone
production, reducing the life cycle of methane gas. When exposed to the atmosphere,
chlorine atoms can deplete the ozone. This reduces the ozone's ability to block ultraviolet
rays, which can contribute to skin cancer in humans. It can also contribute to the
greenhouse effect.
“CT” (minutes•mg/L) in the context of water treatment is defined as the product of: C, for “residual
disinfectant concentration” in mg/L (determined before or at the first customer) and T, for the
corresponding “disinfectant contact time” in minutes. CT is a measure of the disinfection process
reaction time, but CT is only one of several variables that control the effectiveness of the disinfection
process.
CTCALC = C × T
TDT = V/Q
Volume Equations:
Cylindrical: π x r2 x d Pipeline: π x r2 x l
Rectangular: l x w x d
d = minimum water depth
π = 3.1416
Disinfection Segments
Total inactivation = Σ log inactivation from each disinfection segment
Disinfection Profile
Almost all community and non-transient, non-community public water systems that use Surface
Water or Ground Water Under the Direct Influence of Surface Water sources are required to
develop a disinfection profile. Systems are required to retain the disinfection profile in graphic form
and it must be available for review by the state as part of a sanitary survey.
The EPA has developed a disinfection profile spreadsheet calculator that calculates and graphs the
disinfection profile for Giardia and viruses. The spreadsheet can be downloaded from:
http://www.epa.gov/safewater/mdbp/lt1eswtr.html.
The presence of chlorine residual in drinking water indicates that: 1) a sufficient amount of chlorine
was added initially to the water to inactivate the bacteria and some viruses that cause diarrheal
disease; and, 2) the water is protected from recontamination during storage. The presence of free
residual chlorine in drinking water is correlated with the absence of disease-causing organisms, and
thus is a measure of the potability of water.
While chlorine's most important attributes are its broad-spectrum germicidal potency and persistence
in water distribution systems, its ability to efficiently and economically address many other water
treatment concerns has also supported its wide use. Chlorine-based compounds are the only major
disinfectants exhibiting lasting residual properties. Residual protection guards against microbial
regrowth and prevents contamination of the water as it moves from the treatment plant to household
taps.
Definitions
When chlorine is added to water, some of the chlorine reacts first with organic materials and metals
in the water and is not available for disinfection (this is called the chlorine demand of the water). The
remaining chlorine concentration after the chlorine demand is accounted for is called total chlorine.
Total chlorine is further divided into: 1) the amount of chlorine that has reacted with nitrates and is
unavailable for disinfection which is called combined chlorine and, 2) the free chlorine, which is the
chlorine available to inactivate disease-causing organisms, and thus a measure to determine the
potability of water.
For example, if using completing clean water, the chlorine demand will be zero, and there will be no
nitrates present, so no combined chlorine will be present. Thus, the free chlorine concentration will
be equal to the concentration of chlorine initially added. In natural waters, especially surface water
supplies such as rivers, organic material will exert a chlorine demand, and nitrates will form combined
chlorine. Thus, the free chlorine concentration will be less than the concentration of chlorine initially
added.
The amount of chlorine added to the water is known as the chlorine dose. This is a measured quantity
chosen by the operator and introduced into the water using a chlorinator or hypochlorinator.
As the chlorine reacts with bacteria and chemicals in the water, some of the chlorine is used up. The
amount of chlorine used up by reacting with substances in the water is known as the chlorine
demand. If nothing reacts with the chlorine (as would be the case in distilled water), then the chlorine
demand is zero. However, in most cases the operator should count on some of the chlorine dose
being used up when it reacts with substances in the water.
The amount of chlorine remaining in the water after some of the chlorine reacts with substances in
the water is known as the chlorine residual. This lab introduces a test which can be used to calculate
the chlorine residual. The chlorine residual is the most important of these three values - dose,
demand, and residual - because it represents the actual amount of chlorine remaining in the water
to act as a disinfectant.
WWTBUGS©8/1/2018 www.abctlc.com 350 Toll Free (866) 557-1746
The test for chlorine residual is performed frequently at most water treatment plants. Since
regulations require a certain level of chlorine in water at the far ends of the distribution system,
operators should be sure to test the chlorine residual in the distribution system as well as in the clear
well.
Understanding Pre-Chlorination
Chlorination is the application of chlorine to water to accomplish some definite purpose. In this
lesson, we will be concerned with the application of chlorine for the purpose of disinfection, but you
should be aware that chlorination can also be used for taste and odor control, iron and manganese
removal, and to remove some gases such as ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Chlorination is currently
the most frequently used form of disinfection in the water treatment field. However, other disinfection
processes have been developed. These alternatives will be discussed at the end of this lesson.
Pre-chlorination is the act of adding chlorine to the raw water. The residual chlorine is useful in
several stages of the treatment process - aiding in coagulation, controlling algae problems in basins,
reducing odor problems, and controlling mudball formation. In addition, the chlorine has a much
longer contact time when added at the beginning of the treatment process, so prechlorination
increases safety in disinfecting heavily contaminated water.
Post-chlorination is the application of chlorine after water has been treated but before the water
reaches the distribution system. At this stage, chlorination is meant to kill pathogens and to provide
a chlorine residual in the distribution system. Post-chlorination is nearly always part of the treatment
process, either used in combination with prechlorination or used as the sole disinfection process.
Until the middle of the 1970s, water treatment plants typically used both prechlorination and post-
chlorination. However, the longer contact time provided by prechlorination allows the chlorine to react
with the organics in the water and produce carcinogenic substances known as trihalomethanes. As
a result of concerns over trihalomethanes, prechlorination has become much less common in the
United States. Currently, prechlorination is only used in plants where trihalomethane formation is not
a problem.
The process has a high energy consumption, for example over 4 billion kWh per year in West
Germany in 1985, and produces equal (molar) amounts of chlorine and sodium hydroxide, which
makes it necessary to find a use for the product for which there is less demand, usually the chlorine.
There are three production methods in use. While the mercury cell method produces chlorine-free
sodium hydroxide, the use of several tons of mercury leads to serious environmental problems. In a
normal production cycle a few hundred pounds of mercury per year are emitted, which accumulate
in the environment. Additionally, the chlorine and sodium hydroxide produced via the mercury-cell
chloralkali process are themselves contaminated with trace amounts of mercury. The membrane and
diaphragm method use no mercury, but the sodium hydroxide contains chlorine, which must be
removed.
Chlorine exposure appears to cause physical, chemical, and biochemical alterations to the cell wall,
thus destroying the cell’s protective barrier, terminating vital functions, resulting in death of the
microorganism. A possible sequence of events during chlorination would be: (1) disruption of the cell
wall barrier by reactions of chlorine with target sites at the cell surface, (2) release of vital cellular
constituents from the cell, (3) termination of membrane-associated functions, and (4) termination of
cellular functions within the cell. During the course of this sequence of events, the microorganism
dies, meaning it is no longer capable of growing or causing disease.
Chlorine dissolved in water forms a weak corrosive mixture of hydrochloric and hypochlorous acid.
The corrosivity of chlorine solutions in water creates problems in handling chlorine spills and chlorine
containers.
Chlorine reacts with many compounds. Because of its great affinity for hydrogen, it removes
hydrogen from some compounds, such as hydrogen sulfide. It also reacts with ammonia or other
nitrogen-containing compounds to form various mixtures of chloramines. It reacts with organic
materials, sometimes with explosive violence.
Now the free and available oxidizer is combining with contaminants and its effectiveness is reduced
according to how much combining took place. Although the hydrogen ion does not play a direct
reduction role on copper surfaces, pH can influence copper corrosion by altering the equilibrium
potential of the oxygen reduction half-reaction and by changing the speciation of copper in solution
(Reiber, 1989). Copper corrosion increases rapidly as the pH drops below 6; in addition, uniform
corrosion rates can be high at low pH values (below about pH 7), causing metal thinning. At higher
pH values (above about pH 8), copper corrosion problems are almost always associated with non-
uniform or pitting corrosion processes (Edwards et al., 1994a; Ferguson et al., 1996). Edwards et al.
(1994b) found that for new copper surfaces exposed to simple solutions that contained bicarbonate,
chloride, nitrate, perchlorate or sulphate, increasing the pH from 5.5 to 7.0 roughly halved corrosion
rates, but further increases in pH yielded only subtle changes.
The prediction of copper levels in drinking water relies on the solubility and physical properties of the
cupric oxide, hydroxide and basic carbonate solids that comprise most scales in copper water
systems (Schock et al., 1995). In the cupric hydroxide model of Schock et al. (1995), a decrease in
copper solubility with higher pH is evident. Above a pH of approximately 9.5, an upturn in solubility
is predicted, caused by carbonate and hydroxide complexes increasing the solubility of cupric
hydroxide. Examination of experience from 361 utilities reporting copper levels under the U.S. EPA
Lead and Copper Rule revealed that the average 90th-percentile copper levels were highest in
waters with pH below 7.4 and that no utilities with pH above 7.8 exceeded the U.S. EPA's action
level for copper of 1.3 mg/L (Dodrill and Edwards, 1995). However, problems associated with copper
solubility were also found to persist up to about pH 7.9 in cold, high-alkalinity and high-sulphate
groundwater (Edwards et al., 1994a).
In the pH range of 7-9, both the corrosion rate and the degree of tuberculation of iron distribution
systems generally increase with increasing pH (Larson and Skold, 1958; Stumm, 1960; Hatch, 1969;
Pisigan and Singley, 1987). Iron levels, however, were usually reported to decrease with increasing
pH (Karalekas et al., 1983; Kashinkunti et al., 1999; Broo et al., 2001; Sarin et al., 2003). In a pipe
loop system constructed from 90- to100-year-old unlined cast iron pipes taken from a Boston
distribution system, iron concentrations were found to steadily decrease when the pH was raised
from 7.6 to 9.5 (Sarin et al., 2003). Similarly, when iron was measured in the distribution system
following a pH increase from 6.7 to 8.5, a consistent downward trend in iron concentrations was
found over 2 years (Karalekas et al., 1983). These observations are consistent with the fact that the
solubility of iron-based corrosion by-products decreases with increasing pH.
Water with low pH, low alkalinity and low calcium is particularly aggressive towards cement materials.
The water quality problems that may occur are linked to the chemistry of the cement. Lime from the
cement releases calcium ions and hydroxyl ions into the drinking water. This, in turn, may result in a
substantial pH increase, depending on the buffering capacity of the water (Leroy et al., 1996). Pilot-
scale tests were conducted to simulate low-flow conditions of newly lined cement mortar pipes
carrying low-alkalinity water (Douglas et al., 1996). In the water with an initial pH of 7.2, alkalinity of
14 mg/L as calcium carbonate and calcium at 13 mg/L as calcium carbonate, measures of pH as
high as 12.5 were found.
Similarly, in the water with an initial pH of 7.8, alkalinity of 71 mg/L as calcium carbonate and calcium
at 39 mg/L as calcium carbonate, measures of pH as high as 12 were found.
Analytical Procedure
Section 409C of Standard Methods includes a General Discussion section on amperometric titration
for the determination of chlorine in aqueous solutions. That discussion is applicable to the procedure
used by the authors. Also included in Standard Methods is a section concerning the titration
apparatus. Basically, the titration equipment consists of a buret capable of accurately delivering 0.01
mL of titrant, a sample cup, and a stirring device in which is housed a platinum electrode and a KCl
reference electrode. Several companies manufacture amperometric titrators that fit this general
description. The experience of the senior author is that some of the commercial titrators are less
suitable than others, primarily because of the small surface area of some of the electrodes employed.
A Wallace and Tiernan amperometric titrator was used by the authors in developing and applying
the procedure described below.
Reagents
a. Chlorine-free water. Only distilled or demineralized water that is free of chlorine should be used in
preparing reagents. Chlorine-free water may be prepared by passing distilled or demineralized water
through a suitable activated carbon filter adsorption column. The water may be tested for the
presence of chlorine by titrating a sample as described in the Procedure section. Any deflection in
the meter upon the addition of PAO titrant indicates the presence of chlorine or other oxidants that
would interfere in the titration procedure.
b. Standard phenylarsine oxide (PAO), 0.00564 N. See Standard Methods Section 409B, paragraph
3a.
Standardization – Dilute 50.00 mL of freshly prepared 0.0002256 N potassium biniodate to 200 mL
in chlorine-free water. Add approximately 1.5 g KI and stir to dissolve. Add 1 mL acetate buffer and
allow to stand in the dark for 6 minutes. Titrate using the amperometric titrator and determine the
equivalence point as detailed in the Procedure section. If the standard PAO is 0.00564 N, exactly
2.00 mL of PAO will be required to reach the equivalence point.
c. Phenylarsine oxide titrant, 0.000564 N. Dilute 10.00 mL of 0.00564 N PAO to 100.0 mL in chlorine-
free water.
Standardization – Dilute 5.00 mL of 0.0002256 N potassium biniodate to 200 mL with chlorine-free
water. Add approximately 1.5 g KI and stir to dissolve. Add 1 mL acetate buffer and allow to stand in
the dark for 6 minutes. Titrate using the amperometric titrator and determine the equivalence point
as detailed in the Procedure section below. If the PAO titrant is 0.000564 N, exactly 2.00 mL of PAO
will be required to reach the equivalence point.
d. Potassium biniodate, 0.0002256 N. Dissolve 0.7332 g reagent grade KH(IO3)2 in 500 mL chlorine-
free water and dilute to 1.00 L. Dilute 10.00 mL of that solution to 100.0 mL with chlorine-free water.
That solution is used for the standardization of the PAO and should be freshly prepared.
e. Acetate buffer solution, pH 4. See Standard Methods1 Section 409B, paragraph 3e.
f. Potassium iodide, (KI), reagent grade crystals.
The exact amount of KI added is not critical, but the analyst should weigh 1.5 g of this reagent
periodically to become familiar with the approximate amount required. Add 1 mL of acetate buffer
and allow the microammeter on the titrator to reach a stable reading; the titration should be started
within about 30 seconds following the addition of the KI to the sample.
Full-scale deflection on the microammeter is 100 units. The meter should be initially adjusted to read
between 90 and 100 units. Record the initial reading prior to the addition of titrant. Titrate by adding
suitable volumes of titrant and recording the titrant volume added and the resultant current reading.
At least three (and preferably five to ten) readings of current and titrant volume added should be
obtained prior to passing the equivalence point; then add excess titrant to ensure that there is no
further meter deflection. Record the final meter reading. If, during the titration, the meter reading falls
to near or below 10 units, record the low reading, re-adjust the meter to read between 90 and 100
units, record the high reading, and continue the titration. This approach allows calculation of the total
meter deflection, which is used in determining the equivalence point.
The equivalence point is determined by plotting the total meter deflection as a function of titrant
volume added. It is important that the total meter deflection be used in preparing this plot. A straight
line is drawn through the first few points in the plot and a second straight line is drawn parallel to the
abscissa and corresponding to the final total deflection in the meter reading.
The equivalence point is determined by the intersection of those two lines. When 0.000564 N PAO
is used as the titrant, the chlorine concentration is 0.1-times the titrant volume at the equivalence
point. This plotting procedure is also outlined in the ASTM Water Manual8 under procedures ASTM
D1253 (Tests for Residual Chlorine in Water) and ASTM D1427 (Tests for Residual Chlorine in
Waste Water).
c. Sample storage and handling. Chlorine measurements should be made as soon after sample
collection as possible. Samples to be analyzed for chlorine should be stored in the dark and packed
on ice if they must be held for more than a few minutes before analysis. Chlorine compounds are
highly reactive and may be rapidly lost from samples due to the effects of volatilization,
phototransformation, and chlorine demand. Storage of samples on ice and in the dark between
sampling and analysis will help minimize the rate of dissipation. It is important to estimate the
changes that occur in chlorine content in the subject water between sample collection and analysis.
The original chlorine content in any sample can be computed given the measured concentration and
the holding time. A time-lag study should be performed on a regular basis for each type of water
being analyzed because of variability in water compositions. The sample set used for the study
should be handled in the same way as other samples (i.e., the samples should be kept cold and in
the dark). Even when time-lag studies are made a part of the routine analytical procedure, it is
important that the delay between sample collection and chlorine analysis be held to a minimum.
Sodium Hypochlorite
Sodium Hypochlorite, or bleach, is produced by adding elemental chlorine to sodium hydroxide.
Typically, hypochlorite solutions contain from 5 to 15% chlorine, and are shipped by truck in one- to
5,000- gallon containers.
Advantages
Solution is less hazardous and easier to handle than elemental chlorine
Limitations
Limited shelf-life
Corrosive to some materials and more difficult to store than most solution chemicals
Calcium Hypochlorite
Calcium hypochlorite is another chlorinating chemical used primarily in smaller applications.
It is a white, dry solid containing approximately 65% chlorine, and is commercially available
in granular and tablet forms.
Advantages
More stable than sodium hypochlorite, allowing longer storage
Limitations
Dry chemical requires more handling than sodium hypochlorite
Advantages
Minimal chemical storage and transport
Limitations
More complex and requires a higher level of maintenance and technical expertise
Advantages
Strongest oxidant/disinfectant available
Limitations
Process operation and maintenance requires a high level of technical competence
Breaks down more complex organic matter; smaller compounds can enhance microbial re-
growth in distribution systems and increase DBP formation during secondary disinfection
processes.
Ultraviolet Radiation
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation, generated by mercury arc lamps, is a non-chemical disinfectant. When UV
radiation penetrates the cell wall of an organism, it damages genetic material, and prevents the cell
from reproducing. Although it has a limited track record in drinking water applications, UV has been
shown to effectively inactivate many pathogens while forming limited disinfection byproducts.
Advantages
Effective at inactivating most viruses, spores and cysts
Limitations
No residual protection
Mercury lamps may pose a potable water and environmental toxicity risk
Alternative Disinfectants
Up until the late 1970s, chlorine was virtually the only disinfectant used to treat drinking water.
Chlorine was considered an almost ideal disinfectant, based on its proven characteristics:
Effective against most known pathogens
Provides a residual to prevent microbial re-growth and protect treated water throughout the
distribution system
Eliminates slime bacteria, molds and algae that commonly grow in water supply reservoirs,
on the walls of water mains and in storage tanks;
Removes chemical compounds that have unpleasant tastes and hinder disinfection; and
As importantly, only chlorine-based chemicals provide “residual disinfectant” levels that prevent
microbial re-growth and help protect treated water throughout the distribution system.
Even where water treatment is widely practiced, constant vigilance is required to guard against
waterborne disease outbreaks. Well-known pathogens such as E. coli are easily controlled with
chlorination, but can cause deadly outbreaks given conditions of inadequate or no disinfection. A
striking example occurred in May 2000 in the Canadian town of Walkerton, Ontario. Seven people
died and more than 2,300 became ill after E. coli and other bacteria infected the town’s water supply.
A report published by the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General concludes that, even after the well
was contaminated, the Walkerton disaster could have been prevented if the required chlorine
residuals had been maintained.
Some emerging pathogens such as Cryptosporidium are resistant to chlorination and can appear
even in high quality water supplies. Cryptosporidium was the cause of the largest reported drinking
water outbreak in U.S. history, affecting over 400,000 people in Milwaukee in April 1993. More than
100 deaths are attributed to this outbreak. New regulations from the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) will require water systems to monitor Cryptosporidium and adopt a range of treatment
options based on source water Cryptosporidium concentrations. Most water systems are expected
to meet EPA requirements while continuing to use chlorination.
When applied to water, each of these forms “free chlorine” (see Sidebar: How Chlorine Kills
Pathogens). One pound of elemental chlorine provides approximately as much free available chlorine
as one gallon of sodium hypochlorite (12.5% solution) or approximately 1.5 pounds of calcium
hypochlorite (65% strength). While any of these forms of chlorine can effectively disinfect drinking
water, each has distinct advantages and limitations for particular applications. Almost all water
systems that disinfect their water use some type of chlorine-based process, either alone or in
combination with other disinfectants.
Chemical Control
Chlorine disinfectants destroy hydrogen sulfide (which has a rotten egg odor) and remove ammonia
and other nitrogenous compounds that have unpleasant tastes and hinder disinfection. They also
help to remove iron and manganese from raw water.
Water Treatment
Every day, approximately 170,000 (U.S. EPA, 2002) public water systems treat and convey billions
of gallons of water through approximately 880,000 miles (Kirmeyer, 1994) of distribution system
piping to U.S. homes, farms and businesses. Broadly speaking, water is treated to render it suitable
for human use and consumption. While the primary goal is to produce a biologically (disinfected) and
chemically safe product, other objectives also must be met, including: no objectionable taste or odor;
low levels of color and turbidity (cloudiness); and chemical stability (non-corrosive and non-scaling).
Individual facilities customize treatment to address the particular natural and manmade
contamination characteristic of their raw water.
Surface water usually presents a greater treatment challenge than groundwater, which is naturally
filtered as it percolates through sediments. Surface water is laden with organic and mineral
particulate matter, and may harbor protozoan parasites such as Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia
lamblia.
Water Distribution
In storage and distribution, drinking water must be kept safe from microbial contamination.
Frequently, slippery films of bacteria, known as biofilms, develop on the inside walls of pipes and
storage containers. Among disinfection techniques, chlorination is unique in that a pre-determined
chlorine concentration may be designed to remain in treated water as a measure of protection against
harmful microbes encountered after leaving the treatment facility. In the event of a significant
intrusion of pathogens resulting, for example, from a broken water main, the level of the average
“chlorine residual” will be insufficient to disinfect contaminated water. In such cases, it is the
monitoring of the sudden drop in the chlorine residual that provides the critical indication to water
system operators that there is a source of contamination in the system.
With passage of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Response Act of 2002, Congress
required community water systems to assess their vulnerability to a terrorist attack and other
intentional acts. As part of these vulnerability assessments, systems assess the transportation,
storage and use of treatment chemicals. These chemicals are both critical assets (necessary for
delivering safe water) and potential vulnerabilities (may pose significant hazards, if released). Water
systems using elemental chlorine, in particular, must determine whether existing protection systems
are adequate. If not, they must consider additional measures to reduce the likelihood of an attack or
to mitigate the potential consequences.
Disinfection is crucial to water system security, providing the “front line” of defense against biological
contamination. However, conventional treatment barriers in no way guarantee safety from biological
attacks. Additional research and funding are needed to improve prevention, detection and responses
to potential threats.
There is a distinct pattern to the emergence of new pathogens. First, there is a general recognition
of the effects of the pathogen in highly susceptible populations such as children, cancer patients and
the immunocompromised. Next, practitioners begin to recognize the disease and its causative agent
in their own patients, with varied accuracy. At this point, some may doubt the proposed agent is the
causative agent, or insist that the disease is restricted to certain types of patients. Finally, a single or
series of large outbreaks result in improved attention to preventive efforts. From the 1960’s to the
1980’s this sequence of events culminated in the recognition of Giardia lamblia as a cause of
gastroenteritis (Lindquist, 1999).
While useful, statistics derived from surveillance systems do not reflect the true incidence of
waterborne disease outbreaks because many people who fall ill from such diseases do not consult
medical professionals. For those who do seek medical attention, attending physicians and laboratory
and hospital personnel are required to report diagnosed cases of waterborne illness to state health
departments. Further reporting of these illness cases by state health departments to the CDC is
voluntary, and statistically more likely to occur for large outbreaks than small ones.
Despite these limitations, surveillance data may be used to evaluate the relative degrees of risk
associated with different types of source water and systems, problems in current technologies and
operating conditions, and the adequacy of current regulations. (Craun, Nwachuku, Calderon, and
Craun, 2002).
Upon infection by coliphage in the water sample, the E. coli host cells are lysed and stable indolyl
product that is dark blue is visible within each plaque. Viral plaques are easily identified and
enumerated by the distinct blue circle. Because of contamination by naturally occurring bacteria in
streamwater samples, antibiotic- resistant host-culture strains, E. coli CN-13 (resistant to nalidixic
acid) and E. coli F-amp (resistant to streptomycin and ampicillin) are used as hosts for somatic and
F-specific coliphage, respectively. Large sample volumes, such as 1-L volumes or greater, are
recommended for detection of coliphage in ground water. Because the SAL method is impractical for
sample volumes above 100 mL, an alternative method should be used for ground-water sample
analysis.
One example, currently being tested by USEPA, is a two-step enrichment presence-absence method
(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999e). Samples for enumeration of C. perfringens are
analyzed by use of the mCP agar method (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1996c). Standard
MF techniques are used, and the plates are incubated anaerobically for 24 hours at 44.5°C. After
incubation, the plates are exposed to ammonium hydroxide, and all straw-colored colonies that turn
dark pink to magenta are counted as C. perfringens. In the laboratory, C. perfringens analyses are
done on 100-, 30-,and 10-mL volumes of streamwater. In the case of a high-flow or high-turbidity
streamwater sample, lower sample volumes may be plated.
Method 1623 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999c) is recommended for detection of
Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in water. The oocysts are concentrated on a capsule filter
from a 10-L water sample, eluted from the capsule filter with buffer, and concentrated by
centrifugation. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) is used to separate the oocysts from other
particulates in the sample. In IMS, the oocysts are magnetized by attachment of magnetic beads
conjugated to an antibody and then are separated from sediment and debris by means of a magnet.
Fluorescently labeled antibodies and vital dye are used to make the final microscopic identification
of oocysts and cysts. The reverse-transcriptase, polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and cell-
culture methods are recommended for detection of enteric viruses in water samples (G. Shay Fout,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, written commun., 1997; U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1996c). To prepare samples for RT-PCR and cell culture, attached viruses are eluted from
a 1MDS filter with beef extract (pH 9.5), concentrated using celite (pH 4.0), and eluted with sodium
phosphate (pH 9.5).
For RT-PCR analysis, viruses are isolated from the eluate by ultracentrifugation through a sucrose
gradient, and trace contaminants are removed by extraction with a solvent mixture. During these
steps, the 10-L streamwater sample (or 2,000-L ground-water sample) is concentrated down to 40
μL. An aliquot of the concentrate is used for RT-PCR, wherein any target viral RNA is converted to
DNA and amplified by use of an enzymatic process. The RT-PCR products are analyzed by agarose
gel electrophoresis and confirmed by hybridization. The enteric viruses detected by use of this
method include enterovirus, hepatitis-A, rotavirus, reovirus, and calicivirus.
For cell-culture analysis, the sample eluate is added to a monlayer of a continuous cell line derived
from African green monkey kidney cells (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1996c). Each cell
culture is examined microscopically for the appearance of cytopathic effects (CPE) for a total of 14
days; if CPE
For bacteria samples, membrane-filtration (MF) equipment and MF procedure blanks are used to
estimate analytical bias.
If contamination from a MF equipment or procedure blank is found, results are suspect and are
qualified or not reported. Proper and consistent procedures for counting and identifying target
colonies will be followed, as described in Myers and Sylvester (1997).
• After counting, turn the plate 180° and ensure the second count is within 5 percent of the first count.
Have a second analyst check calculations of bacterial concentrations in water for errors.
For coliphage, Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and enteric virus samples, equipment and field blanks are
used to determine sampling and analytical bias. Equipment blanks for these analyses are different
from the MF equipment blanks for bacterial analysis. An equipment blank is a blank solution (sterile
buffered water) subjected to the same aspects of sample collection, processing, storage,
transportation, and laboratory handling as an environmental sample, but it is processed in an office
or laboratory. Field blanks are the same as equipment blanks except that they are generated under
actual field conditions.
• For enteric virus analysis, collect one equipment blank after collection of the first sample to ensure
that equipment cleaning and sterilization techniques are adequate.
• For coliphage, Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and enteric virus analyses, collect field blanks periodically.
At a minimum, the number of field blanks should equal 5 percent of the total number of samples
collected. Five percent of samples collected for bacterial and viral indicators (total coliforms, E. coli,
enterococci, C. perfringens, and coliphage) should be nested replicate samples to estimate sampling
and analytical variability. For streamwater samples, concurrent replicates to estimate sampling
variability are collected by alternating subsamples in each vertical between two collection bottles.
For ground-water samples, sequential replicates are collected one after another into separate sterile
bottles. Concurrent and sequential replicates are then analyzed in duplicate (split replicates) to
estimate analytical variability.
• Because of the expense associated with collection and analysis of samples for pathogens
(Cryptosporidium and enteric viruses), collect only one replicate sample per year at a site wherein
detection of pathogens was found in an earlier sample.
To assess analytical bias of the sampling and analytical method, 2 to 5 percent of the samples
collected for enteric virus should be field matrix spikes.
• Run all but 10 L of ground water through the 1 MDS filter and collect the remaining 10 L in a carboy.
In the laboratory, the poliovirus vaccine will be added to the 10 L and then passed through the same
WWTBUGS©8/1/2018 www.abctlc.com 366 Toll Free (866) 557-1746
1MDS filter. Analysis will be done by use of the cell-culture and RT-PCR methods. • All cell-culture
positive samples are serotyped to identify or discount laboratory contamination. Because of the
variability in the performance of Method 1623 for recovery of Cryptosporidium and Giardia, each
sample will be collected in duplicate—one will be a regular sample and the other a matrix spike. The
laboratory will add a known quantity of cysts and oocysts to the matrix spike to determine recovery
efficiency, as described in USEPA (1999c).
The microbiology laboratories must follow good laboratory practices—cleanliness, safety practices,
procedures for media preparation, specifications for reagent water quality—as set forth by American
Public Health Association (1998) and Britton and Greeson (1989). Some specific guidelines are listed
in the following paragraphs.
Reference cultures are used by the central laboratory to evaluate the performance of the test
procedures, including media and reagents. Pure cultures of E. coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, and
Streptococcus faecalis (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md.) are used to ensure that
MF culture media and buffered water are performing adequately. A pure culture of C. perfringens,
isolated from a sewage sample and verified by standard procedures, is used to evaluate the test
procedure and each lot of media and reagents.
Because contamination of samples from coliphage during the analytical procedure is highly probable
(Francy and others, 2000), a negative control of host and sterile buffered water is run concurrently
with each batch of samples. In addition, to ensure that the method is being executed properly, a
positive-control sewage sample is run with each batch of samples. A laminar flow safety hood is
recommended for processing the samples for coliphage analysis. Alternatively, a separate coliphage
room may be established to discourage laboratory contamination during the analytical process. An
ultraviolet light is installed and operated for 8 hours every night in the safety hood or coliphage room
to reduce contamination.
The laboratory should follow the QA/QC guidelines in Method 1623 (U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1999c) for Cryptosporidium and Giardia and in the cell-culture and RT-PCR analysis for
enteric viruses (G. Shay Fout, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, written commun., 1997; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1996c).
Filter efficiency can be improved in a number of ways, such as with the use of fluted filter
paper. Other types of materials may be used to effect separations based on size, similar to
filters, such as molecular sieves.
The process of passing a mixture through a filter is called filtration. The liquid produced
after filtering a suspension of a solid in a liquid is called filtrate, while the solid remaining in
the filter is called retentate, residue, or filtrand.
Another species, Mycobacterium xenopi, has been reported as the waterborne cause of spinal
infections following a look-back exercise on over 3000 patients who had undergone discectomy
operations some years beforehand (Astagneau et al. 2001).
Molecular techniques have been developed for the diagnosis of M. paratuberculosis infections and
applied to human surgically resected tissues. M. paratuberculosis was detected in approximately
30% of samples, but the sets of results from different laboratories have been conflicting. Some
studies were unable to detect the organism; in other studies, the organism was detected in a smaller
percentage of healthy subjects. In addition, a few Crohn’s disease patients have shown clinical
remission when treated with anti-tuberculosis drugs. There is therefore much more work to be done
to acquire a better understanding. M. paratuberculosis may be present in surface water contaminated
by cattle faeces. Routine testing for indicator organisms would detect faecal pollution, and normal
water treatment processes of coagulation and filtration are likely to remove mycobacteria. It is
unlikely that drinking-water is a major source of M. paratuberculosis, and its association with Crohn’s
disease is still under investigation.
Burkholderia Pseudomallei
Burkholderia pseudomallei is the cause of melioidosis, an acute pneumonia often followed by
systemic infection with later presentations of abscesses. The organism is widespread in the
environment and was originally described in Rangoon in patients compromised by severe poverty
who had presumably inhaled the organism in dust when sleeping on the ground. It occurs commonly
in southeast Asia and has been detected in service personnel repatriated from those areas in the
past. It was also investigated as a biological weapon by several nations, to be released as an aerosol
and cause pneumonia infection in those exposed. A recent study in Bologna, Italy, detected B.
pseudomallei in 7% of 85 samples of drinking-water collected from public and private buildings.
Francisella Tularensis
Tularaemia is a zoonosis caused by a highly infective and virulent organism Francisella tularensis,
which occurs throughout the northern hemisphere but has never been isolated within the United
Kingdom. It occurs in a wide range of animal reservoir posts and can be isolated from the
environment in water and mud. It is transmitted to humans who come in close contact with the animal
reservoir, arthropods that feed on them or debris and dust associated with them. It can also be
transmitted through the ingestion of contaminated water. Human epidemics sometimes occur and
are associated with epizootics in the animal
Bacteria of potential health concern 75 populations, evidenced by die-offs. There are several
presentations of tularaemia in humans, depending on the route of exposure. Ingestion usually results
in
oropharyngeal tularaemia, with fever, pharyngitis and cervical lymphadenitis. Other forms include
ulcero-glandular, pleuropneumonic and typhoidal. Following the recent war in Kosovo, over 900
suspected cases of tularaemia were identified and 327 cases confirmed serologically. The
epidemiological investigation pointed to rodent-contaminated wells, and rodent carcasses found in
some wells tested positive for F. tularensis (Reintjes et al. 2002). In a waterborne outbreak reported
from Spain, 19 cases who had contact with river-caught crayfish were identified (Anda et al. 2001).
Attempts to isolate F. tularensis from water were unsuccessful. Drinking-water was not involved. F.
tularensis is notoriously difficult to culture, requiring a source of cysteine. F. tularensis was
investigated and developed as a biological weapon; the infectious dose was found to be extremely
low — 10 organisms.
The remaining bacteria of concern are either heterotrophs that might have a role in disease or
emerging pathogens that do have a role in disease and could possibly be waterborne. It is important
that these organisms and diseases are kept under surveillance in order to confirm or refute the
suggested associations. Many of the organisms are difficult to grow, and there is no validated trigger
of when to look for them.
Many new molecular techniques for the detection of pathogens and putative pathogens in water are
being described (Waage et al. 1999a,b,c; Lightfoot et al. 2001). DNA chips that have the capacity to
detect up to 44 pathogens on one single chip are being developed.
These tests are very expensive when compared with the routine monitoring tests carried out in the
water industry and in public health monitoring. The HPC should be evaluated as the signal of
changing events in a drinking-water supply to trigger the utilization of these new molecular tests to
detect the new bacteria of concern and any associated virulence genes.
In addition to general purposes methods, EPA has approved special purpose analytical methods.
These methods were developed to work in samples or for pollutants specific to certain industrial
categories. For example, methods specific to the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Pesticide
Chemicals industrial categories are listed in Tables IF and IG, respectively, at 40 CFR Part 136.
Methods specific to other industrial categories are listed or incorporated by reference into the
regulations at 40 CFR Parts 401-503. These include methods specific to the Pulp, Paper, and
Paperboard category (40 CFR Part 430), and specific to Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge
(biosolids) (at 40 CFR Part 503.) Industry-specific methods that are approved for compliance
monitoring in the industry for which they are designated may be used for general use, if the same
method is listed in Tables IA to IE, or IH at 40 CFR 136.3.
Water is primarily a liquid under standard conditions, which is not predicted from its
relationship to other analogous hydrides of the oxygen family in the periodic table, which
are gases such as hydrogen sulfide. The elements surrounding oxygen in the periodic table,
nitrogen, fluorine, phosphorus, sulfur and chlorine, all combine with hydrogen to produce
gases under standard conditions.
The reason that water forms a liquid is that oxygen is more electronegative than all of these
elements with the exception of fluorine. Oxygen attracts electrons much more strongly than
hydrogen, resulting in a net positive charge on the hydrogen atoms, and a net negative
charge on the oxygen atom.
The presence of a charge on each of these atoms gives each water molecule a net dipole
moment. Electrical attraction between water molecules due to this dipole pulls individual
molecules closer together, making it more difficult to separate the molecules and therefore
raising the boiling point.
However, some situations may require the use of respirators to control exposure. Respirators must
be worn if the ambient concentration of chlorine exceeds prescribed exposure limits. Respirators
may be used before engineering controls have been installed, during work operations such as
maintenance or repair activities that involve unknown exposures, during operations that require entry
into tanks or closed vessels, and during emergencies. Workers should only use respirators that have
been approved by NIOSH and the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA).
For additional information on the selection and use of respirators and on the medical screening of
respirator users, consult the latest edition of the NIOSH Respirator Decision Logic [NIOSH 1987b]
and the NIOSH Guide to Industrial Respiratory Protection [NIOSH 1987a].
The resistance of various materials to permeation by chlorine liquid and chlorine gas is shown below:
Any chemical-resistant clothing that is used should be periodically evaluated to determine its
effectiveness in preventing dermal contact. Safety showers and eye wash stations should be located
close to operations that involve chlorine.
Splash-proof chemical safety goggles or face shields (20 to 30 cm long, minimum) should be worn
during any operation in which a solvent, caustic, or other toxic substance may be splashed into the
eyes.
In addition to the possible need for wearing protective outer apparel e.g., aprons, encapsulating
suits), workers should wear work uniforms, coveralls, or similar full-body coverings that are laundered
each day. Employers should provide lockers or other closed areas to store work and street clothing
separately.
Protective clothing should be kept free of oil and grease and should be inspected and maintained
regularly to preserve its effectiveness. Protective clothing may interfere with the body's heat
dissipation, especially during hot weather or during work in hot or poorly ventilated work
environments.
Scope
You are required to recognize the dangers and hazards associated with confined spaces, and
this program is designed to assist you in the safety of and compliance with the OSHA standards
associated with such.
Most WWTP’s will utilize the Fire Department for all rescues and additional assistance dealing
with confined spaces, understanding that most Fire Department operations utilize additional in
house SOG's/SOP’s pertaining to such operations.
Definitions
Confined space:
Is large enough or so configured that an employee can bodily enter and perform
work.
Has limited or restricted means for entry or exit (i.e. tanks, vessels, silos, storage
bins, hoppers, vaults, and pits are spaces that may have limited means of entry).
Is not designed for continuous employee occupancy.
Permit required confined space (permit space), is a confined space that has one or more of the
following characteristics:
1. Contains or has a
potential to contain a
hazardous atmosphere.
3. Has an internal
configuration such that an
entrant could be trapped or
asphyxiated by inwardly
covering walls or by a floor
which slopes downward and
tapers to a smaller cross-
section.
Newspaper and magazine articles abound with stories of workers injured and killed from a variety of
atmospheric factors and physical agents. Throughout the construction jobsite, contractors and
workers encounter both inherent and induced hazards within confined workspaces.
Inherent Hazards
Inherent hazards, such as electrical, thermal, chemical, mechanical, etc., are associated with specific
types of equipment and the interactions among them.
Examples include high voltage (shock or corona discharge and the resulting burns), radiation
generated by equipment, defective design, omission of protective features (no provision for
grounding non-current-carrying conductive parts), high or low temperatures, high noise levels, and
high-pressure vessels and lines (rupturing with resultant release of fragments, fluids, gases, etc.).
Inherent hazards usually cannot be eliminated without degrading the system or equipment, or without
making them inoperative. Therefore, emphasis must be placed on hazard control methods.
Induced Hazards
Induced hazards arise, and are induced from, a multitude of incorrect decisions and actions that
occur during the actual construction process. Some examples are: omission of protective features,
physical arrangements that may cause unintentional worker contact with electrical energy sources,
oxygen-deficient atmospheres created at the bottom of pits or shafts, lack of safety factors in
structural strength, and flammable atmospheres.
Vaults
A variety of vaults are found on the construction jobsite. On various
occasions, workers must enter these vaults to perform a number of
functions.
Oxygen-Deficient Atmosphere
One of the major problems confronting construction workers while
working in vaults is the ever-present possibility of an oxygen-
deficient atmosphere.
Electrical Shock
Electrical shock is often encountered from power tools, line cords, etc. In many instances, such
electrical shock results from the fact that the contractor has not provided an approved grounding
system or the protection afforded by ground-fault circuit interrupters or low-voltage systems.
Vibration could cause the materials on top of the vault to roll off and strike workers. If the manhole
covers were removed, or if they were not installed in the first place, materials could fall into the vault,
causing injury to the workers inside.
Condenser Pits
A common confined space found in the construction of nuclear power plants is the condenser pit.
Because of their large size, they are often overlooked as potentially hazardous confined spaces.
These below-grade areas create large containment areas for the accumulation of toxic fumes, gases,
and so forth, or for the creation of oxygen-deficient atmospheres when purging with argon, Freon,
and other inert gases. Other hazards will be created by workers above dropping equipment, tools,
and materials into the pit.
Manholes
Throughout the construction site, manholes are commonplace. As means of entry into and exit from
vaults, tanks, pits, and so forth, manholes perform a necessary function. However, these confined
spaces may present serious hazards which could cause injuries and fatalities. A variety of hazards
are associated with manholes. To begin with, the manhole could be a dangerous trap into which the
worker could fall. Often covers are removed and not replaced, or else they are not provided in the
first place.
Pipe Assemblies
One of the most frequently unrecognized types of confined spaces encountered throughout the
construction site is the pipe assembly. Piping of sixteen to thirty-six inches in diameter is commonly
used for a variety of purposes.
For any number of reasons, workers will enter the pipe. Once inside, they are faced with potential
oxygen-deficient atmospheres, often caused by purging with argon or another inert gas. Welding
fumes generated by the worker in the pipe, or by other workers operating outside the pipe at either
end, subject the worker to toxic atmospheres.
The generally restricted dimensions of the pipe provide little room for the workers to move about and
gain any degree of comfort while performing their tasks. Once inside the pipe, communication is
extremely difficult. In situations where the pipe bends, communication and extrication become even
more difficult. Electrical shock is another problem to which the worker is exposed.
Ungrounded tools and equipment or inadequate line cords are some of the causes. As well, heat
within the pipe run may cause the worker to suffer heat prostration.
Ventilation Ducts
Ventilation ducts, like pipe runs, are very common at the construction site. These sheet metal
enclosures create a complex network which moves heated and cooled air and exhaust fumes to
desired locations in the plant.
Ventilation ducts may require that workers enter them to cut out access holes, install essential parts
of the duct, etc. Depending on where these ducts are located, oxygen deficiency could exist. They
usually possess many bends, which create difficult entry and exit and which also make it difficult for
workers inside the duct to communicate with those outside it. Electrical shock hazards and heat
stress are other problems associated with work inside ventilation ducts.
WWTBUGS©8/1/2018 www.abctlc.com 378 Toll Free (866) 557-1746
Tanks
Tanks are another type of confined workspace commonly found in construction. They are used for a
variety of purposes, including the storage of water, chemicals, etc.
Tanks require entry for cleaning and repairs. Ventilation is always a problem. Oxygen-deficient
atmospheres, along with toxic and explosive atmospheres created by the substances stored in the
tanks, present hazards to workers. Heat, another problem in tanks, may cause heat prostration,
particularly on a hot day.
Since electrical line cords are often taken into the tank, the hazard of electrical shock is always
present. The nature of the tank's structure often dictates that workers must climb ladders to reach
high places on the walls of the tank.
Sumps
Sumps are commonplace. They are used as collection places for water and other liquids. Workers
entering sumps may encounter an oxygen-deficient atmosphere.
Also, because of the wet nature of the sump, electrical shock hazards are present when power tools
are used inside. Sumps are often poorly illuminated. Inadequate lighting may create an accident
situation.
Containment Cavities
These large below-grade areas are characterized by little or no air movement. Ventilation is always
a problem. In addition, the possibility of oxygen deficiency exists. As well, welding and other gases
may easily collect in these areas, creating toxic atmospheres. As these structures near completion,
more confined spaces will exist as rooms are built off the existing structure.
Electrical Transformers
Electrical transformers are located on the jobsite.
They often contain a nitrogen purge or dry air.
Before they are opened, they must be well vented
by having air pumped in.
Heat Sinks
These larger pit areas hold cooling water in the
event that there is a problem with the pumps
located at the water supply to the plant--normally
a river or lake--which would prevent cooling
water from reaching the reactor core.
Unusual Conditions
WWTBUGS©8/1/2018 www.abctlc.com 379 Toll Free (866) 557-1746
Confined Space within a Confined Space
By the very nature of construction, situations are created which illustrate one of the most hazardous
confined spaces of all--a confined space within a confined space.
This situation appears as tanks within pits, pipe assemblies or vessels within pits, etc. In this situation,
not only do the potential hazards associated with the outer confined space require testing,
monitoring, and control, but those of the inner space also require similar procedures.
Often, only the outer space is evaluated. When workers enter the inner space, they are faced with
potentially hazardous conditions. A good example of a confined space within a confined space is a
vessel with a nitrogen purge inside a filtering water access pit. Workers entering the pit and/or the
vessel should do so only after both spaces have been evaluated and proper control measures
established.
Session Conclusion
In this discussion, we have defined inherent and induced
hazards in confined spaces. We have examined typical
confined spaces on construction sites and we have
described representative hazards within these confined spaces.
Purpose
The Permit Required Space (PRCS) Program is provided to protect authorized employees that will
enter confined spaces and may be exposed to hazardous atmospheres, engulfment in materials,
conditions which may trap or asphyxiate due to converging or sloping walls, or contains any other
safety or health hazards.
Many workplaces contain confined spaces not designed for human occupancy which due to their
configuration hinder employee activities including entry, work and exit. Asphyxiation is the leading
cause of death in confined spaces.
WWTBUGS©8/1/2018 www.abctlc.com 380 Toll Free (866) 557-1746
Subpart P applies to all open excavations in the earth's surface.
All trenches are excavations.
All excavations are not trenches.
3. During confined space entries, a watchmen or attendant must be present at all times.
4. Constant visual or voice communication will be maintained between the safety watchmen and
employees entering a confined space.
5. No bottom or side entry will be made or work conducted below the level any hanging material or
material which could cause engulfment.
6. Air and oxygen monitoring is required before entering any permit-required confined space. Oxygen
levels in a confined space must be between 19.5 and 23.5 percent. Levels above or below will require
the use of an SCBA or other approved air supplied respirator. Additional ventilation and oxygen level
monitoring is required when welding is performed. The monitoring will check oxygen levels, explosive
gas levels and carbon monoxide levels. Entry will not be permitted if explosive gas is detected above
one-half the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL).
7. To prevent injuries to others, all openings to confined spaces will be protected by a barricade when
covers are removed.
[58 FR 4549, Jan. 14, 1993; 58 FR 34846, June 29, 1993; 63 FR 66039, Dec. 1, 1998]
Oxygen
Explosive ( % LEL)
Toxic (PPM)
Testers Signature
Pre-entry Fluid System Isolation Yes No
Pumps /lines blinded, blocked, disconnected
Ventilation Source Established
Mechanical Forced Air
Natural Ventilation
Post Ventilation Pre-Entry Atmospheric Checks
Time
Oxygen (%)
Explosive ( % LEL
Toxic (PPM)
Tester Signature
Communication Procedures Established per specific Confined Space SOP
Rescue Procedures established per specific Confined Space SOP
Training Verification - for the following persons & space to be entered YES NO
All persons entering Confined Space
All persons acting as Supervisor for the Entry
All persons assigned backup positions
All persons assigned to monitor access and interior activities
All persons assigned to emergency rescue team
Equipment on Scene YES NO NA YES NO NA
Gas Monitor Life Line
Safety Harness Hoisting
Equipment
Fall Arrest Gear Powered Comm
Eq.
SCBAs Air Line
Respirators
Protective Clothing Elect Gear
Properly Rated
Periodic Atmospheric Checks
Time (am - pm)
Oxygen
Explosive ( % LEL)
Toxic (PPM)
Testers Signature
Entry Supervisor
Entry supervisors are responsible for the overall permit space entry and
must coordinate all entry procedures, tests, permits, equipment and other
relevant activities.
Verify by checking that the appropriate entries have been made on the
permit, all tests specified by the permit have been conducted, and that all procedures and
equipment specified by the permit are in place before endorsing the permit and allowing
entry to begin.
Terminate the entry and cancel the permit when the entry is complete or there is a need for
terminating the permit.
Verify that rescue services are available and that the means for summoning them are
operable.
Remove unauthorized persons who enter or attempt to enter the space during entry
operations.
Entry Attendants
At least one attendant is required outside the permit space into which entry is authorized for
the duration of the entry operation. Responsibilities include:
To know the hazards that may be faced during entry, including information on the mode,
signs or symptoms, and consequences of the exposure.
To continuously maintain an accurate count of entrants in the permit space and ensures a
means to accurately identify authorized entrants.
To remain outside the permit space during entry operations until relieved by another
attendant (once properly relieved, they may participate in other permit space activities,
including rescue if they are properly trained and equipped).
To communicate with entrants as necessary to monitor entrant status and alert entrants of
the need to evacuate.
To monitor activities inside and outside the space to determine if it is safe for entrants to
remain in the space; orders the entrants to immediately evacuate if: the attendant detects a
prohibited condition, detects entrant behavioral effects of hazard exposure, detects a
situation outside the space that could endanger the entrants; or if the attendant cannot
effectively and safely perform all the attendant duties.
To summon rescue and other emergency services as soon as the attendant determines the
entrants need assistance to escape the permit space hazards.
To perform non-entry rescues as specified by that rescue procedure and entry supervisor
and not to perform duties that might interfere with the attendants' primary duty to monitor
and protect the entrants.
1. Make certain that all pre-entry requirements as outlined on the permit have been completed
before any worker is allowed to enter the confined space.
2. Make certain that any required pre-entry conditions are present.
3. If an in-plant/facility rescue team is to be used in the event of an emergency, make sure they
would be available. If your Employer does not maintain an in-plant rescue team, dial 911 on any
telephone for the Rescue Squad.
4. Make sure that any communication equipment which would be used to summon either the in-
plant rescue team or other emergency assistance is operating correctly.
5. Terminate the entry upon becoming aware of a condition or set of
conditions whose hazard potential exceeds the limits authorized by the entry
permit.
If the person who would otherwise issue an entry permit is in charge of the entry
and present during the entire entry, then a written permit is not required if that
person uses a checklist as provided in the section on "Permits".
If the workers leave the confined space for any significant period of time, such
as for a lunch or other break, the atmosphere of the confined space must be
retested before the workers reenter the confined space.
Unauthorized Persons
Take the following actions when unauthorized persons approach or enter
a permit space while entry is under way:
1. Warn the unauthorized persons that they must stay away from the permit space,
2. Advise unauthorized persons that they must exit immediately if they have entered the
space, and
3. Inform the authorized entrants and the entry supervisor if unauthorized persons have
entered the permit space.
Entrants
All entrants must be authorized by the entry supervisor to enter permit spaces, have received
the required training, have used the proper equipment, and observed the entry procedures
and permit requirements.
Hazard Control
Engineering Controls
Locked entry points
Temporary ventilation
Temporary Lighting
Administrative Controls
Signs
Employee training
Entry procedures
Atmospheric Monitoring
Rescue procedures
Use of prescribed Personal Protective Equipment
1. Only authorized and trained employees may enter a confined space or act as safety
watchman/attendant.
5. No bottom or side entry will be made or work conducted below the level of any hanging
material or material which could cause engulfment.
6. Air and oxygen monitoring is required before entering any permit-required confined
space. Oxygen levels in a confined space must be between 19.5 and 23.5 percent.
Levels above or below will require the use of an SCBA or other approved air supplied
respirator. Additional ventilation and oxygen level monitoring is required when welding
is performed.
The monitoring will check oxygen levels, explosive gas levels and carbon monoxide
levels. Entry will not be permitted if explosive gas is detected above one-half the Lower
Explosive Limit (LEL), or 10% of a specific gas explosive limit.
Permits will expire before the completion of the shift or if any pre-entry conditions change.
Permits will be maintained on file for 12 months.
What is the likelihood that key personnel of the rescue service might be unavailable at
times?
If the rescue service becomes unavailable while an entry is underway, does it have the
capability of notifying the employer so that the employer can instruct the attendant to abort
the entry immediately?
OSHA's Construction Safety and Health Regulations Part 1926 do not contain a permit-required
confined space regulation. Subpart C, §1926.21 Safety training and education specifies training for
personnel who are required to enter confined spaces and defines a "confined or enclosed space."
These requirements are shown below.
(ii) For purposes of paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this section, "confined or enclosed space" means any
space having a limited means of egress, which is subject to the accumulation of toxic or flammable
contaminants or has an oxygen deficient atmosphere. Confined or enclosed spaces include, but are
not limited to, storage tanks, process vessels, bins, boilers, ventilation or exhaust ducts, sewers,
underground utility vaults, tunnels pipelines, and open top spaces more than 4 feet in depth such as
pits, tubs, vaults, and vessels.
OSHA's Construction Regulations also contain requirements dealing with confined space hazards in
underground construction (Subpart S), underground electric transmission and distribution work
(§1926.956), excavations (Subpart P), and welding and cutting (Subpart J).
Further guidance may be obtained from American National Standard ANSI Z117.1-1989, Safety
Requirements for Confined Spaces. This standard provides minimum safety requirements to be
followed while entering, exiting and working in confined spaces at normal atmospheric pressure. This
standard does not pertain to underground mining, tunneling, caisson work or other similar tasks that
have established national consensus standards.
2. TRAINING FOR AUTHORIZED ENTRANTS Your employer must ensure that all authorized
entrants know the emergency action plan and have received training covering the following subjects
prior to entering any permit entry confined space:
WWTBUGS©8/1/2018 www.abctlc.com 393 Toll Free (866) 557-1746
a. Hazard Recognition: Each worker must understand the nature of the hazard before entering and
the need to perform appropriate testing to determine if it is safe to enter.
b. Use of Personal Protective Equipment: Each employee must be taught the proper use of all
personal protective equipment required for entry or rescue, and the proper use of protective barriers
and shields.
c. Self-Rescue: Each worker must be trained to get out of the confined space as rapidly as possible
without help whenever an order to evacuate is given by the attendant, whenever an automatic
evacuation alarm is activated, or whenever workers recognize the warning signs of exposure to
substances that could be found in the confined space. They must also be made aware of the toxic
effects or symptoms of exposure to hazardous materials he could encounter in the confined space.
This includes anything that could be absorbed through the skin or which could be carried through the
skin by any solvents that are used. They must be trained to relay an alarm to the attendant and to
attempt self- rescue immediately upon becoming aware of these effects.
d. Special Work Practices or Procedures: Each worker must be trained in any modifications of
normal work practices that are necessary for permit entry confined space work.
Rescue practice training. In the photo above, the sand bag represents a fallen victim.
a. Proper use of the communications equipment furnished for communicating with authorized
workers entering the confined space or for summoning emergency or rescue services.
c. Recognition of the unusual actions of a worker which could indicate that they could be
experiencing a toxic reaction to contaminants that could be present in the space.
d. Any training for rescuers, if the attendant will function as a rescuer also.
e. Any training for workers who enter the confined space, if the permit specifies that the duty of the
attendant will rotate among the workers authorized to enter the confined space.
An atmosphere becomes flammable when the ratio of oxygen to combustible material in the air is
neither too rich nor too lean for combustion to occur. Combustible gases or vapors will accumulate
when there is inadequate ventilation in areas such as a confined space.
Flammable gases such as acetylene, butane, propane, hydrogen, methane, natural or manufactured
gases or vapors from liquid hydrocarbons can be trapped in confined spaces, and since many gases
are heavier than air, they will seek lower levels as in pits, sewers, and various types of storage tanks
and vessels. In a closed top tank, it should also be noted that lighter than air gases may rise and
develop a flammable concentration if trapped above the opening.
The byproducts of work procedures can generate flammable or explosive conditions within a
confined space. Specific kinds of work such as spray painting can result in the release of explosive
gases or vapors. Welding in a confined space is a major cause of explosions in areas that contain
combustible gas.
Chemical reactions forming flammable atmospheres occur when surfaces are initially exposed to
the atmosphere, or when chemicals combine to form flammable gases. This condition arises when
dilute sulfuric acid reacts with iron to form hydrogen or when calcium carbide makes contact with
water to form acetylene.
Other examples of spontaneous chemical reactions that may produce explosions from small
amounts of unstable compounds are acetylene-metal compounds, peroxides, and nitrates. In a dry
state, these compounds have the potential to explode upon percussion or exposure to increased
temperature.
Another class of chemical reactions that form flammable atmospheres arise from deposits of
pyrophoric substances (carbon, ferrous oxide, ferrous sulfate, iron, etc.) that can be found in tanks
used by the chemical and petroleum industry. These tanks containing flammable deposits will
spontaneously ignite upon exposure to air.
Combustible dust concentrations are usually found during the process of loading, unloading, and
conveying grain products, nitrated fertilizers, finely ground chemical products, and any other
combustible material.
High charges of static electricity, which rapidly accumulate during periods of relatively low humidity
(below 50%) can cause certain substances to accumulate electrostatic charges of sufficient energy
to produce sparks and ignite a flammable atmosphere. These sparks may also cause explosions
when the right air or oxygen to dust or gas mixture is present.
Toxic Atmospheres
The substances to be regarded as toxic in a confined space can cover the entire spectrum of gases,
vapors, and finely-divided airborne dust in industry. The sources of toxic atmospheres encountered
may arise from the following:
1. The manufacturing process (for example, in producing polyvinyl chloride, hydrogen chloride is
used as well as vinyl chloride monomer, which is carcinogenic).
2. The product stored [removing decomposed organic material from a tank can liberate toxic
substances, such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S)].
3. The operation performed in the confined space (for example, welding or brazing with metals
capable of producing toxic fumes).
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a hazardous gas that may build up in a confined space. This odorless,
colorless gas that has approximately the same density as air is formed from incomplete combustion
of organic materials such as wood, coal, gas, oil, and gasoline; it can be formed from microbial
decomposition of organic matter in sewers, silos, and fermentation tanks.
CO is an insidious toxic gas because of its poor warning properties. Early stages of CO intoxication
are nausea and headache. CO may be fatal at as little as 1000 ppm or 10% in air, and is considered
dangerous at 200 ppm or 2%, because it forms Carboxyhemoglobin in the blood which prevents the
distribution of oxygen in the body.
CO is a relatively abundant colorless, odorless gas. Therefore, any untested atmosphere must be
suspect. It must also be noted that a safe reading on a combustible gas indicator does not ensure
that CO is not present. CO must be tested for specifically. The formation of CO may result from
chemical reactions or work activities, therefore fatalities due to CO poisoning are not confined to any
particular industry. There have been fatal accidents in sewage treatment plants due to
decomposition products and lack of ventilation in confined spaces.
Another area where CO results as a product of decomposition is in the formation of silo gas in grain
storage elevators. In another area, the paint industry, varnish is manufactured by introducing the
various ingredients into a kettle, and heating them in an inert atmosphere, usually town gas, which
is a mixture of carbon dioxide and nitrogen.
In welding operations, oxides of nitrogen and ozone are gases of major toxicologic importance, and
incomplete oxidation may occur and carbon monoxide can form as a byproduct. Another poor work
practice, which has led to fatalities, is the recirculation of diesel exhaust emissions. Increased CO
levels can be prevented by strict control of the ventilation and the use of catalytic converters.
Examples of primary irritants are chlorine, ozone, hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, sulfuric
acid, nitrogen dioxide, ammonia, and sulfur dioxide. A secondary irritant is one that may produce
systemic toxic effects in addition to surface irritation. Examples of secondary irritants include
benzene, carbon tetrachloride, ethyl chloride, trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, and
chloropropene.
Irritant gases vary widely among all areas of industrial activity. They can be found in plastics
plants, chemical plants, the petroleum industry, tanneries, refrigeration industries, paint
manufacturing, and mining operations. Prolonged exposure at irritant or corrosive concentrations
in a confined space may produce little or no evidence of irritation. This may result in a general
weakening of the defense reflexes from changes in sensitivity. The danger in this situation is that
the worker is usually not aware of any increase in his/her exposure to toxic substances.
Asphyxiating Atmospheres
The normal atmosphere is composed approximately of 20.9% oxygen and 78.1% nitrogen, and
1% argon with small amounts of various other gases. Reduction of oxygen in a confined space
may be the result of either consumption or displacement.
Oxygen may also be consumed during chemical reactions as in the formation of rust on the
exposed surface of the confined space (iron oxide). The number of people working in a confined
space and the amount of their physical activity will also influence the oxygen consumption rate.
A second factor in oxygen deficiency is displacement by another gas. Examples of gases that
are used to displace air, and therefore reduce the oxygen level are helium, argon, and nitrogen.
Carbon dioxide may also be used to displace air and can occur naturally in sewers, storage bins,
wells, tunnels, wine vats, and grain elevators. Aside from the natural development of these
gases, or their use in the chemical process, certain gases are also used as inerting agents to
displace flammable substances and retard pyrophoric reactions.
Gases such as nitrogen, argon, helium, and carbon dioxide, are frequently referred to as non-
toxic inert gases but have claimed many lives. The use of nitrogen to inert a confined space has
claimed more lives than carbon dioxide. The total displacement of oxygen by nitrogen will cause
immediate collapse and death.
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon dioxide and argon, with specific gravities greater than air, may lie in a tank or manhole
for hours or days after opening. Since these gases are colorless and odorless, they pose an
immediate hazard to health unless appropriate oxygen measurements and ventilation are
adequately carried out.
Oxygen Deprivation
Oxygen deprivation is one form of asphyxiation. While it is desirable to maintain the atmospheric
oxygen level at 21% by volume, the body can tolerate deviation from this ideal. When the oxygen
level falls to 17%, the first sign of hypoxia is deterioration to night vision, which is not noticeable
until a normal oxygen concentration is restored. Physiologic effects are increased breathing
volume and accelerated heartbeat.
Mechanical Hazards
If activation of electrical or mechanical equipment would cause injury, each piece of equipment
should be manually isolated to prevent inadvertent activation before workers enter or while they
work in a confined space. The interplay of hazards associated with a confined space, such as
the potential of flammable vapors or gases being present, and the build-up of static charge due
to mechanical cleaning, such as abrasive blasting, all influence the precautions which must be
taken.
To prevent vapor leaks, flashbacks, and other hazards, workers should completely isolate the
space. To completely isolate a confined space, the closing of valves is not sufficient. All pipes
must be physically disconnected or isolation blanks bolted in place. Other special precautions
must be taken in cases where flammable liquids or vapors may re-contaminate the confined
space.
The pipes blanked or disconnected should be inspected and tested for leakage to check the
effectiveness of the procedure. Other areas of concern are steam valves, pressure lines, and
chemical transfer pipes. A less apparent hazard is the space referred to as a void, such as double
walled vessels, which must be given special consideration in blanking off and inerting.
Thermal Effects
Four factors influence the interchange of heat between people and their environment. They are:
(1) air temperature, (2) air velocity, (3) moisture contained in the air, and (4) radiant heat.
Because of the nature and design of most confined spaces, moisture content and radiant heat
are difficult to control.
As the body temperature rises progressively, workers will continue to function until the body
temperature reaches approximately 102oF.
When this body temperature is exceeded, the workers are less efficient, and are prone to heat
exhaustion, heat cramps, or heat stroke. In a cold environment, certain physiologic mechanisms
come into play, which tend to limit heat loss and increase heat production. The most severe
strain in cold conditions is chilling of the extremities so that activity is restricted. Special
precautions must be taken in cold environments to prevent frostbite, trench foot, and general
hypothermia.
Noise
Noise problems are usually intensified in confined spaces because the interior tends to cause
sound to reverberate and thus expose the worker to higher sound levels than those found in an
open environment.
This intensified noise increases the risk of hearing damage to workers, which could result in
temporary or permanent loss of hearing. Noise in a confined space which may not be intense
enough to cause hearing damage may still disrupt verbal communication with the emergency
standby person on the exterior of the confined space. If the workers inside are not able to hear
commands or danger signals due to excessive noise, the probability of severe accidents can
increase.
WWTBUGS©8/1/2018 www.abctlc.com 402 Toll Free (866) 557-1746
Vibration
Whole body vibration may affect multiple body parts and organs, depending upon the vibration
characteristics. Segmental vibration, unlike whole body vibration, appears to be more localized
in creating injury to the fingers and hands of workers using tools, such as pneumatic hammers,
rotary grinders or other hand tools which cause vibration.
Other Hazards
Some physical hazards cannot be eliminated
because of the nature of the confined space
or the work to be performed. These hazards
include such items as scaffolding, surface
residues, and structural hazards. The use of
scaffolding in confined spaces has
contributed too many accidents caused by
workers or materials falling, improper use of
guard rails, and lack of maintenance to insure
worker safety.
Abbreviations:
PEL - permissible exposure limit: Average concentration that must not be exceeded during 8-
hour work shift of a 40-hour workweek.
STEL - Short-term exposure limit: 15-minute exposure limit that must not be exceeded during
the workday.
REL - Recommended exposure limit: Average concentration limit recommended for up to a
10-hour workday during a 40-hour workweek.
IDLH - Immediately dangerous to life or health: Maximum concentration from which person
could escape (in event of respirator failure) without permanent or escape-impairing effects
within 30 minutes.
For example, a mixture of 90 percent methane and 10 percent air will test nonflammable because
there is not enough oxygen to support the combustion process in the flammability meters. This
mixture will not support life and will soon become explosive if ventilation is provided to the space.
Before entry, spaces must be ventilated until both oxygen content and flammability are acceptable.
Flammability Meters
Flammability meters are used to measure the amount of flammable vapors or gases in the
atmosphere as a percent of the LEL/LFL. The oxygen content must be near 21 percent for results
to be meaningful.
Protective Devices
Fall-Protection Equipment
Fall-protection equipment for confined spaces should be the chest-waist harness type to minimize
injuries from uncontrolled movements when it arrests a worker's fall. This type of harness also
permits easier retrieval from a confined space than a waist belt. Adjustable lanyards should be
used to limit free fall to two feet before arrest.
Respirators
An industrial hygienist should select respirators on the basis of his or her evaluation of possible
confined-space hazards. NIOSH-approved respirators should be identified in the approved
procedure required by the confined-space entry permit. It is important to note that air-purifying
respirators cannot be used in an oxygen deficient atmosphere.
Lockout/Tagout Devices
Lockout/tagout devices permit employees to work safely on de-energized equipment without fear
that the devices will be accidentally removed. Lock and tag devices are required to withstand a 50-
pound pull without failure. Devices used to block or restrain stored mechanical energy devices must
be engineered for safety.
Safety Barriers
Safety barriers separate workers from hazards that cannot reasonably be eliminated by other
engineering controls. Required barriers will be identified in the approved confined-space entry
procedure.
Retrieval Equipment
A tripod or another suitable anchorage, hoisting device, harnesses, wristlets, ropes, and any other
equipment that may be needed to make a rescue must be identified in the confined-space safe-
entry procedures.
It is important that this equipment be available for immediate use. Harnesses and
retrieval ropes must be worn by entrants unless they would increase hazards to the
entrants or impede their rescue.
FREE CHLORINE RESIDUAL: Regardless of whether pre-chloration is practiced or not, a free chlorine
residual of at least 1.0 mg/L should be maintained in the clear well or distribution reservoir immediately
downstream from the point of post-chlorination. The reason for chlorinating past the breakpoint is to provide
protection in case of backflow.
FREE CHLORINE: In disinfection, chlorine is used in the form of free chlorine or as hypochlorite ion.
FREE OIL: Non-emulsified oil that separates from water, in a given period of time.
FREQUENCY DEPENDENT SELECTION: A decline in the reproductive success of a morph resulting from
the morph's phenotype becoming too common in a population; a cause of balanced polymorphism in
populations.
FUNCTIONAL GROUP: One of several groups of atoms commonly found in organic molecules. A functional
group contributes somewhat predictable properties to the molecules that possess them.
FUNDAMENTAL NICHE: The total resources an organism is theoretically capable of utilizing.
The diverse assemblage of organisms that carry out all of their life functions within the
confines of a single, complex eukaryotic cell are called protozoa.
Paramecium, Euglena, and Amoeba are well-known examples of these major groups of
organisms. Some protozoa are more closely related to animals, others to plants, and still
others are relatively unique. Although it is not appropriate to group them together into a
single taxonomic category, the research tools used to study any unicellular organism are
usually the same, and the field of protozoology has been created to carry out this research.
The unicellular photosynthetic protozoa are sometimes also called algae and are
addressed elsewhere. This report considers the status of our knowledge of heterotrophic
protozoa (protozoa that cannot produce their own food).
Free-living Protozoa
Protozoans are found in all moist habitats within the United States, but we know little about
their specific geographic distribution. Because of their small size, production of resistant
cysts, and ease of distribution from one place to another, many species appear to be
cosmopolitan and may be collected in similar microhabitats worldwide (Cairns and
Ruthven 1972). Other species may have relatively narrow limits to their distribution.
Marine ciliates inhabit interstices of sediment and beach sands, surfaces, deep sea and
cold Antarctic environments, planktonic habitats, and the algal mats and detritus of
estuaries and wetlands.
Protozoa are around 10–50 micrometer, but can grow up to 1 mm and can easily be seen
under a microscope. Protozoa exist throughout aqueous environments and soil. Protozoa
occupy a range of trophic levels. As predators, they prey upon unicellular or filamentous
algae, bacteria, and microfungi.
Protozoa play a role both as herbivores and as consumers in the decomposer link of the
food chain. Protozoa also play a vital role in controlling bacteria populations and biomass.
As components of the micro- and meiofauna, protozoa are an important food source for
microinvertebrates. Thus, the ecological role of protozoa in the transfer of bacterial and
algal production to successive trophic levels is important. Protozoa such as the malaria
parasites (Plasmodium spp.), trypanosomes and leishmania are also important as
parasites and symbionts of multicellular animals.
Most protozoa exist in 5 stages of life which are in the form of trophozoites and cysts. As
cysts, protozoa can survive harsh conditions, such as exposure to extreme temperatures
and harmful chemicals, or long periods without access to nutrients, water, or oxygen for a
period of time.
The process by which the protozoa takes its cyst form is called encystation, while the
process of transforming back into trophozoite is called excystation.
Protozoa can reproduce by binary fission or multiple fission. Some protozoa reproduce
sexually, some asexually, and some both (e.g. Coccidia). An individual protozoan is
hermaphroditic.
Classification
Protozoa were commonly grouped in the kingdom of Protista together with the plant-like
algae and fungus-like water molds and slime molds. In the 21st-century systematics,
protozoans, along with ciliates, mastigophorans, and apicomplexans, are arranged as
animal-like protists. However, protozoans are neither Animalia nor Metazoa (with the
possible exception of the enigmatic, moldy Myxozoa).
Sub-groups
Protozoa have traditionally been divided on the basis of their means of locomotion,
although this is no longer believed to represent genuine relationships:
* Flagellates (e.g. Giardia lambia)
* Amoeboids (e.g. Entamoeba histolytica)
* Sporozoans (e.g. Plasmodium knowlesi)
* Apicomplexa
* Myxozoa
* Microsporidia
* Ciliates (e.g. Balantidium coli)
There are many ways that infectious diseases can spread. Pathogens usually have
specific routes by which they are transmitted, and these routes may depend on the type
of cells and tissue that a particular agent targets. For example, because cold viruses infect
the respiratory tract, they are dispersed into the air via coughing and sneezing.
Once in the air, the viruses can infect another person who is unlucky enough to inhale air
containing the virus particles.
Agents vary greatly in their stability in the environment. Some viruses may survive for only
a few minutes outside of a host, while some spore-forming bacteria are extremely durable
and may survive in a dormant state for a decade or more.
Most have mitochondria although some have later lost theirs. Mitochondria were
derived from aerobic alpha-proteobacteria (prokaryotes) that once lived within their
cells.
Eukaryotic Cells
Eukaryotic cells are generally much larger than prokaryotes, typically with a thousand
times their volumes. They have a variety of internal membranes and structures, called
organelles, and a cytoskeleton composed of microtubules and microfilaments, which plays
an important role in defining the cell's organization.
The nucleus is surrounded by a double membrane, with pores that allow material to move
in and out. Various tube- and sheet-like extensions of the nuclear membrane form what is
called the endoplasmic reticulum or ER, which is involved in protein transport. It includes
rough sections where ribosomes are attached, and the proteins they synthesize enter the
interior space or lumen. Subsequently, they generally enter vesicles, which bud off from
the smooth section. In most eukaryotes, the proteins may be further modified in stacks of
flattened vesicles, called Golgi bodies or dictyosomes.
Vesicles may be specialized for various purposes. For instance, lysosomes contain
enzymes that break down the contents of food vacuoles, and peroxisomes are used to
break down peroxide which is toxic otherwise.
Contractile Vacuoles
Many protozoa have contractile vacuoles, which collect and expel excess water, and
extrusomes, which expel material used to deflect predators or capture prey. In multicellular
organisms, hormones are often produced in vesicles. In higher plants, most of a cell's
volume is taken up by a central vacuole or tonoplast, which maintains its osmotic pressure.
Many eukaryotes have slender motile projections, usually called flagella when long and
cilia when short. These are variously involved in movement, feeding, and sensation. These
are entirely distinct from prokaryotic flagella. They are supported by a bundle of
microtubules arising from a basal body, also called a kinetosome or centriole,
characteristically arranged as nine doublets surrounding two singlets. Flagella also may
have hairs or mastigonemes, scales, connecting membranes, and internal rods. Their
interior is continuous with the cell's cytoplasm.
Centrioles
Centrioles are often present even in cells and groups that do not have flagella. They
generally occur in groups of one or two, called kinetids that give rise to various
microtubular roots. These form a primary component of the cytoskeletal structure, and are
often assembled over the course of several cell divisions, with one flagellum retained from
the parent and the other derived from it.
Centrioles may also be associated in the formation of a spindle during nuclear division.
Some protists have various other microtubule-supported organelles. These include the
radiolaria and heliozoa, which produce axopodia used in flotation or to capture prey, and
the haptophytes, which have a peculiar flagellum-like organelle called the haptonema.
These pseudopods are also used to capture prey; they simply engulf the food. They can
detect the kind of prey and use different 'engulfing tactics'.
The image from the last page shows several cell organelles. Left from the center we can
see aspherical water expelling vesicle and just right of it, the single nucleus of this species
can be seen. Other species may have many nuclei. The cell is full of brown food vacuoles
and also contains small crystals.
Protozoa Information
Our actual knowledge of salinity, temperature, and oxygen requirements of marine
protozoa is poor (although some groups, such as the foraminifera, are better studied than
others), and even the broadest outlines of their biogeographic ranges are usually a
mystery.
Soil-dwelling protozoa have been documented from almost every type of soil and in every
kind of environment, from the peat-rich soil of bogs to the dry sands of deserts. In general,
protozoa are found in greatest abundance near the soil surface, especially in the upper 15
cm (6 in), but occasional isolates can be obtained at depths of a meter (yard) or more.
Protozoa do not constitute a major part of soil biomass, but in some highly productive
regions such as forest litter, the protozoa are a significant food source for the
microinvertebrates, with a biomass that may reach 20 g/m2 of soil surface area there.
The word amoeba or ameba is variously used to refer to it and its close relatives, now
grouped as the Amoebozoa, or to all protozoa that move using pseudopods, otherwise
termed amoeboids.
There is also a deep oral groove containing inconspicuous compound oral cilia (as found
in other peniculids) that is used to draw food inside. They generally feed upon bacteria
and other small cells. Osmoregulation is carried out by a pair of contractile vacuoles, which
actively expel water absorbed by osmosis from their surroundings.
Parasites
Protozoa are infamous for their role in causing disease, and parasitic species are among
the best-known protozoa. Nevertheless, our knowledge has large gaps, especially of
normally free-living protozoa that may become pathogenic in immunocompromised
individuals. For example, microsporidia comprise a unique group of obligate, intracellular
parasitic protozoa. Microsporidia are amazingly diverse organisms with more than 700
species and 80 genera that are capable of infecting a variety of plant, animal, and even
other protist hosts.
They are found worldwide and have the ability to thrive in many ecological conditions. Until
the past few years, their ubiquity did not cause a threat to human health, and few
systematists worked to describe and classify the species.
Recently, however, certain human pathogens were shown to not only survive but also to
multiply in the cytoplasm of free-living, nonpathogenic protozoa. Indeed, it is now believed
that protozoa are the natural habitat for certain pathogenic bacteria. To date, the main
focus of attention has been on the bacterium Legionella pneumophila, the causative
organism of Legionnaires' disease; these bacteria live and reproduce in the cytoplasm of
some free-living amoebae (Curds 1992). More on this subject in the following pages.
Symbionts
Some protozoa are harmless or even beneficial symbionts. A bewildering array of ciliates,
for example, inhabit the rumen and reticulum of ruminates and the cecum and colon of
equids. Little is known about the relationship of the ciliates to their host, but a few may aid
the animal in digesting cellulose.
Data on Protozoa
While our knowledge of recent and fossil foraminifera in the U.S. coastal waterways is
systematically growing, other free-living protozoa are poorly known. There are some
regional guides and, while some are excellent, many are limited in scope, vague on
specifics, or difficult to use. Largely because of these problems, most ecologists who
include protozoa in their studies of aquatic habitats do not identify them, even if they do
count and measure them for biomass estimates (Taylor and Sanders 1991).
Parasitic protozoa of humans, domestic animals, and wildlife are better known although
no attempt has been made to compile this information into a single source. Large gaps in
our knowledge exist, especially for haemogregarines, microsporidians, and
myxosporidians (see Kreier and Baker 1987).
Museum Specimens
For many plant and animal taxa, museums represent a massive information resource. This
is not true for protozoa. In the United States, only the National Natural History Museum
(Smithsonian Institution) has a reference collection preserved on microscope slides, but it
does not have a protozoologist curator and cannot provide species' identification or
verification services. The American Type Culture Collection has some protozoa in culture,
but its collection includes relatively few kinds of protozoa.
As components of the micro- and meiofauna, protozoa are an important food source for
microinvertebrates. Thus, the ecological role of protozoa in the transfer of bacterial and
algal production to successive trophic levels is important.
Because of the small size of protozoa, their short generation time, and (for some species)
ease of maintaining them in the laboratory, ecologists have used protozoan populations
and communities to investigate competition and predation.
The result has been an extensive literature on a few species studied primarily under
laboratory conditions. Few studies have been extended to natural habitats with the result
that we know relatively little about most protozoa and their roles in natural communities.
Intraspecific competition for common resources often results in cannibalism, sometimes
with dramatic changes in morphology of the cannibals (Giese 1973). Field studies of
interspecific competition are few and most evidence for such species interactions is
indirect (Cairns and Yongue 1977).
Contractile Vacuoles
Many protozoa have contractile vacuoles, which collect and expel excess water, and
extrusomes, which expel material used to deflect predators or capture prey. In multicellular
organisms, hormones are often produced in vesicles. In higher plants, most of a cell's
volume is taken up by a central vacuole or tonoplast, which maintains its osmotic pressure.
Many eukaryotes have slender motile projections, usually called flagella when long and
cilia when short. These are variously involved in movement, feeding, and sensation. These
are entirely distinct from prokaryotic flagella. They are supported by a bundle of
microtubules arising from a basal body, also called a kinetosome or centriole,
characteristically arranged as nine doublets surrounding two singlets. Flagella also may
have hairs or mastigonemes, scales, connecting membranes, and internal rods. Their
interior is continuous with the cell's cytoplasm.
Centrioles
Centrioles are often present even in cells and groups that do not have flagella. They
generally occur in groups of one or two, called kinetids that give rise to various
microtubular roots. These form a primary component of the cytoskeletal structure, and are
often assembled over the course of several cell divisions, with one flagellum retained from
the parent and the other derived from it.
Paramecium
Members of the genus Paramecium are single-celled, freshwater organisms in the
kingdom Protista. They exist in an environment in which the osmotic concentration in their
external environment is much lower than that in their cytoplasm. More specifically, the
habitat in which they live is hypotonic to their cytoplasm. As a result of this, Paramecium
is subjected to a continuous influx of water, as water diffuses inward to a region of higher
osmotic concentration.
Giardiasis
Giardiasis is a commonly reported protozoan-caused disease. It has also been
referred to as “backpacker’s disease” and “beaver fever” because of the many cases
reported among hikers and others who consume untreated surface water. Symptoms
include chronic diarrhea, abdominal cramps, bloating, frequent loose and pale greasy
stools, fatigue and weight loss.
The incubation period is 5-25 days or longer, with an average of 7-10 days. Many
infections are asymptomatic (no symptoms).
Giardiasis occurs worldwide. Waterborne outbreaks in the United States occur most
often in communities receiving their drinking water from streams or rivers without
adequate disinfection or a filtration system. The organism, Giardia lamblia, has been
responsible for more community-wide outbreaks of disease in the U.S. than any other
pathogen. Drugs are available for treatment but are not 100% effective.
All of these diseases, with the exception of hepatitis A, have one symptom in common:
diarrhea. They also have the same mode of transmission, fecal-oral, whether through
person-to-person or animal-to-person contact, and the same routes of transmission,
being either foodborne or waterborne. Although most pathogens cause mild, self-
limiting disease, on occasion, they can cause serious, even life threatening illness.
Particularly vulnerable are persons with weak immune systems such as those with HIV
infections or cancer. By understanding the nature of waterborne diseases, the
importance of properly constructed, operated and maintained public water systems
becomes obvious.
While water treatment cannot achieve sterile water (no microorganisms), the goal of
treatment must clearly be to produce drinking water that is as pathogen-free as
possible at all times. For those who operate water systems with inadequate source
protection or treatment facilities, the potential risk of a waterborne disease outbreak is
real. For those operating systems that currently provide adequate source protection
and treatment, operating and maintaining the system at a high level on a continuing
basis is critical to prevent disease.
Cryptosporidiosis is typically an acute short-term infection but can become severe and
non-resolving in children and immunocompromised individuals. The parasite is
transmitted by environmentally hardy cysts (oocysts) that, once ingested, excyst in the
small intestine and result in an infection of intestinal epithelial tissue. The genome of
Cryptosporidium parvum was sequenced in 2004 and was found to be unusual amongst
Eukaryotes in that the mitochondria seem not to contain DNA. A closely-related species,
C. hominis, also has its genome sequence available. CryptoDB.org is a NIH-funded
database that provides access to the Cryptosporidium genomics data sets.
When C. parvum was first identified as a human pathogen, diagnosis was made by a
biopsy of intestinal tissue (Keusch, et al., 1995).
There have been six major outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis in the United States as a result
of contamination of drinking water (Juranek, 1995). One major outbreak in Milwaukee in
1993 affected over 400,000 persons.
Outbreaks such as these usually result from drinking water taken from surface water
sources such as lakes and rivers (Juranek, 1995). Swimming pools and water park wave
pools have also been associated with outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis. Also, untreated
groundwater or well water public drinking water supplies can be sources of contamination.
The highly environmentally resistant cyst of C. parvum allows the pathogen to survive
various drinking water filtrations and chemical treatments such as chlorination. Although
municipal drinking water utilities may meet federal standards for safety and quality of
drinking water, complete protection from cryptosporidial infection is not guaranteed. In
fact, all waterborne outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis have occurred in communities where
the local utilities met all state and federal drinking water standards (Juranek, 1995).
Giardia infection can occur through ingestion of dormant cysts in contaminated water, or
by the fecal-oral route (through poor hygiene practices). The Giardia cyst can survive for
weeks to months in cold water and therefore can be present in contaminated wells and
water systems, and even clean-looking mountain streams, as well as city reservoirs, as
the Giardia cysts are resistant to conventional water treatment methods, such as
chlorination and ozonolysis.
Zoonotic transmission is also possible, and therefore Giardia infection is a concern for
people camping in the wilderness or swimming in contaminated streams or lakes,
especially the artificial lakes formed by beaver dams (hence the popular name for
giardiasis, "Beaver Fever"). As well as water-borne sources, fecal-oral transmission can
also occur, for example in day care centers, where children may have poorer hygiene
practices.
The life cycle begins with a non-infective cyst being excreted with feces of an infected
individual. Once out in the environment, the cyst becomes infective. A distinguishing
characteristic of the cyst is 4 nuclei and a retracted cytoplasm. Once ingested by a host,
the trophozoite emerges to an active state of feeding and motility. After the feeding stage,
the trophozoite undergoes asexual replication through longitudinal binary fission. The
resulting trophozoites and cysts then pass through the digestive system in the feces. While
the trophozoites may be found in the feces, only the cysts are capable of surviving outside
of the host.
Distinguishing features of the trophozoites are large karyosomes and lack of peripheral
chromatin, giving the two nuclei a halo appearance. Cysts are distinguished by a retracted
cytoplasm. This protozoa lacks mitochondria, although the discovery of the presence of
mitochondrial remnant organelles in one recent study "indicate that Giardia is not
primitively amitochondrial and that it has retained a functional organelle derived from the
original mitochondrial endosymbiont"
On average, about one in 10 people who are infected with E. histolytica becomes sick
from the infection. The symptoms often are quite mild and can include loose stools,
stomach pain, and stomach cramping.
Amebic dysentery is a severe form of amebiasis associated with stomach pain, bloody
stools, and fever. Rarely, E. histolytica invades the liver and forms an abscess. Even less
commonly, it spreads to other parts of the body, such as the lungs or brain.
Scientific Classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Phylum: Amoebozoa
Class: Archamoebae
Genus: Entamoeba
Species: E. histolytica
Vorticella is a genus of protozoa, with over 100 known species. They are stalked inverted
bell-shaped ciliates, placed among the peritrichs. Each cell has a separate stalk anchored
onto the substrate, which contains a contracile fibril called a myoneme. When stimulated
this shortens, causing the stalk to coil like a spring. Reproduction is by budding, where the
cell undergoes longitudinal fission and only one daughter keeps the stalk.
Vorticella mainly lives in freshwater ponds and streams - generally anywhere protists are
plentiful. Other genera such as Carchesium resemble Vorticella but are branched or
colonial.
Domain: Eukaryota
Phylum: Ciliophora
Class: Oligohymenophorea
Subclass: Peritrichia
Order: Sessilida
Family: Vorticellidae
Genus: Vorticella
Rotifers get their name (derived from Greek and meaning "wheel-bearer"; they have also
been called wheel animalcules) from the corona, which is composed of several ciliated
tufts around the mouth that in motion resemble a wheel. These create a current that
sweeps food into the mouth, where it is chewed up by a characteristic pharynx (called the
mastax) containing a tiny, calcified, jaw-like structure called the trophi. The cilia also pull
the animal, when unattached, through the water. Most free-living forms have pairs of
posterior toes to anchor themselves while feeding.
Rotifers have bilateral symmetry and a variety of different shapes. There is a well-
developed cuticle which may be thick and rigid, giving the animal a box-like shape, or
flexible, giving the animal a worm-like shape; such rotifers are respectively called loricate
and illoricate.
Like many other microscopic animals, adult rotifers frequently exhibit eutely - they have a
fixed number of cells within a species, usually on the order of one thousand.
Individuals of some species form two distinct types of parthenogenetic eggs; one type
develops into a normal parthenogenetic female, while the other occurs in response to a
changed environment and develops into a degenerate male that lacks a digestive system,
but does have a complete male reproductive system that is used to inseminate females
thereby producing fertilized 'resting eggs'.
Resting eggs develop into zygotes that are able to survive extreme environmental
conditions such as may occur during winter or when the pond dries up. These eggs
resume development and produce a new female generation when conditions improve
again. The life span of monogonont females varies from a couple of days to about three
weeks.
Bdelloid rotifers are unable to produce resting eggs, but many can survive prolonged
periods of adverse conditions after desiccation. This facility is termed anhydrobiosis, and
organisms with these capabilities are termed anhydrobionts. Under drought conditions,
bdelloid rotifers contract into an inert form and lose almost all body water; when
rehydrated, however, they resume activity within a few hours.
Bdelloids can survive the dry state for prolonged periods, with the longest well-
documented dormancy being nine years. While in other anhydrobionts, such as the brine
shrimp, this desiccation tolerance is thought to be linked to the production of trehalose, a
non-reducing disaccharide (sugar), bdelloids apparently lack the ability to synthesize
trehalose.
Bdelloid rotifer genomes contain two or more divergent copies of each gene. Four copies
of hsp82 are, for example, found. Each is different and found on a different chromosome,
excluding the possibility of homozygous sexual reproduction.
Mitochondria
The bacterial cell is surrounded by a lipid membrane, or cell membrane, which encloses
the contents of the cell and acts as a barrier to hold nutrients, proteins and other essential
components of the cytoplasm within the cell.
As they are prokaryotes, bacteria do not tend to have membrane-bound organelles in their
cytoplasm and thus contain few large intracellular structures. They consequently lack a
nucleus, mitochondria, chloroplasts and the other organelles present in eukaryotic cells,
such as the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum.
A bacteriophage (from 'bacteria' and Greek phagein, 'to eat') is any one of a number of
viruses that infect bacteria. The term is commonly used in its shortened form, phage.
Typically, bacteriophages consist of an outer protein hull enclosing genetic material. The
genetic material can be ssRNA (single stranded RNA), dsRNA, ssDNA, or dsDNA
between 5 and 500 kilo base pairs long with either circular or linear arrangement.
Bacteriophages are much smaller than the bacteria they destroy - usually between 20 and
200 nm in size.
Phages are estimated to be the most widely distributed and diverse entities in the
biosphere. Phages are ubiquitous and can be found in all reservoirs populated by bacterial
hosts, such as soil or the intestine of animals.
One of the densest natural sources for phages and other viruses is sea water, where up
to 9×108 virions per milliliter have been found in microbial mats at the surface, and up to
70% of marine bacteria may be infected by phages.
In contrast, "lysogenic" phages do not kill the host but rather become long-term parasites
and make the host cell continually secrete more new virus particles. The new virions bud
off the plasma membrane, taking a portion of it with them to become enveloped viruses
possessing a viral envelope. All released virions are capable of infecting a new bacterium.
Numbers of salmonella may be so low in clinical samples that stools are routinely also
subjected to "enrichment culture", where a small volume of stool is incubated in a selective
broth medium, such as selenite broth or Rappaport Vassiliadis soya peptone broth,
overnight.
These media are inhibitory to the growth of the microbes normally found in the healthy
human bowel, while allowing salmonellae to become enriched in numbers. Salmonellae
may then be recovered by inoculating the enrichment broth on one or more of the primary
selective media. On blood agar, they form moist colonies about 2 to 3 mm in diameter.
The ability to produce biofilm (a.k.a. "rugose", "lacy", or "wrinkled") can be an indicator of
dimorphism, which is the ability of a single genome to produce multiple phenotypes in
response to environmental conditions. Salmonellae usually do not ferment lactose; most
of them produce hydrogen sulfide which, in media containing ferric ammonium citrate,
reacts to form a black spot in the center of the creamy colonies.
Classification
Salmonella taxonomy is complicated. As of December 7, 2005, there are two species
within the genus: S. bongori (previously subspecies V) and S. enterica (formerly called
S. choleraesuis), which is divided into six subspecies:
* I—enterica
* II—salamae
* IIIa—arizonae
* IIIb—diarizonae
* IV—houtenae
* V—obsolete (now designated
S. bongori)
* VI—indica
Shigella dysenteriae is a species of the rod-shaped bacterial genus Shigella. Shigella can
cause shigellosis (bacillary dysentery). Shigellae are Gram-negative, non-spore-forming,
facultatively anaerobic, non-motile bacteria.
S. dysenteriae, spread by contaminated water and food, causes the most severe
dysentery because of its potent and deadly Shiga toxin, but other species may also be
dysentery agents. Shigella infection is typically via ingestion (fecal–oral contamination);
depending on age and condition of the host as few as ten bacterial cells can be enough
to cause an infection. Shigella causes dysentery that result in the destruction of the
epithelial cells of the intestinal mucosa in the cecum and rectum. Some strains produce
enterotoxin and Shiga toxin, similar to the verotoxin of E. coli O157:H7. Both Shiga toxin
and verotoxin are associated with causing hemolytic uremic syndrome.
Shigella invades the host through epithelial cells of the large intestine. Using a Type III
secretion system acting as a biological syringe, the bacterium injects IpaD protein into cell,
triggering bacterial invasion and the subsequent lysis of vacuolar membranes using IpaB
and IpaC proteins. It utilizes a mechanism for its motility by which its IcsA protein triggers
actin polymerization in the host cell (via N-WASP recruitment of Arp2/3 complexes) in a
"rocket" propulsion fashion for cell-to-cell spread.
The most common symptoms are diarrhea, fever, nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, and
straining to have a bowel movement. The stool may contain blood, mucus, or pus (e.g.
dysentery). In rare cases, young children may have seizures. Symptoms can take as long
as a week to show up, but most often begin two to four days after ingestion. Symptoms
usually last for several days, but can last for weeks. Shigella is implicated as one of the
pathogenic causes of reactive arthritis worldwide.
Bottom Photo: Another method is using a petri dish with a filter membrane. The broth and
membrane used vary depending on the sample type for water or wastewater.
In fact, stormwater runoff in urbanized areas has been found to be surprisingly high in
fecal coliform bacteria concentrations. General coliforms, E. Coli, and Enterococcus
bacteria are the "indicator" organisms generally measured to assess microbiological
quality of water.
Keep in the back of your mind that the ratio of indicators to actual pathogens is not
fixed. It will always be different, sometimes very different. Whenever you are trying to form
a mental map of reality based on water tests, you should include in the application of your
water intuition an adjustment factor for your best guess of the ratio between indicators and
actual pathogens.
The samples are taken in sterile 100 mL containers. These containers, when used for
chlorinated water samples, have a sodium thiosulfate pill or solution to dechlorinate the
sample.
The sample is placed in cold storage after proper sample taking procedures are
followed. (See sample
procedures below)
Procedure:
1. Counters are alcohol wiped.
2. Bench sheets are filled out.
3. Samples are removed from refrigeration.
4. Sterile wrapped utensils are placed on counters.
5. Filtration units are placed onto sterile membrane filters by aseptic technique using
sterile forceps.
6. Sterile petri dishes are labeled.
7. The samples closures are clipped.
8. The sample is shaken 25 times 1 foot in length within 7 seconds.
9. 100 mL is filtered and rinsed with sterile distilled water 3 times.
10. The membrane filter is aseptically removed from filter holder.
11. A sterile padded petri dish is used and the membrane filter is rolled onto the pad
making sure no air bubbles form.
12. The sterile labeled lid is placed on the petri dish.
13. 2 blanks and a known is run with each series of samples.
14. The samples are placed in the 35oC + .5oC incubator stacked no higher than 3 for
22 – 24 hours (Humidity can be maintained by saturated paper towels placed under
containers holding petri dishes.)
15. After 22- 24 hours view the petri dishes under a 10 –15 power magnification with
cool white fluorescent light.
16. Count all colonies that appear pink to dark red with a metallic surface sheen – the
sheen may vary in size from a pin head to complete coverage.
17. Report as Total Coliform per 100 mL.
18. If no colonies are present report as <1 coliform/100mL.
Anything greater than 1 is over the limit for drinking water for 2 samples taken 24 hours
apart. Further investigation may be necessary – follow Standard Methods accordingly.
Viruses vary in size from the largest poxviruses of about 450 nanometers (about 0.000014
in) in length to the smallest polioviruses of about 30 nanometers (about 0.000001 in).
Viruses are not considered free-living, since they cannot reproduce outside of a living cell;
they have evolved to transmit their genetic information from one cell to another for the
purpose of replication. Viruses often damage or kill the cells that they infect, causing
disease in infected organisms.
A few viruses stimulate cells to grow uncontrollably and produce cancers. Although many
infectious diseases, such as the common cold, are caused by viruses, there are no cures
for these illnesses.
The difficulty in developing antiviral therapies stems from the large number of variant
viruses that can cause the same disease, as well as the inability of drugs to disable a virus
without disabling healthy cells. However, the development of antiviral agents is a major
focus of current research, and the study of viruses has led to many discoveries important
to human health.
Capsids
The viral protective shell, or capsid, can be either helical (spiral-shaped) or icosahedral
(having 20 triangular sides). Capsids are composed of repeating units of one or a few
different proteins. These units are called protomers or capsomers. The proteins that make
up the virus particle are called structural proteins. Viruses also carry genes for making
proteins that are never incorporated into the virus particle and are found only in infected
cells. These viral proteins are called nonstructural proteins; they include factors required
for the replication of the viral genome and the production of the virus particle.
Capsids and the genetic material (DNA or RNA) they contain are together referred to as
nucleocapsids. Some virus particles consist only of nucleocapsids, while others contain
additional structures.
Some icosahedral and helical animal viruses are enclosed in a lipid envelope acquired
when the virus buds through host-cell membranes. Inserted into this envelope are
glycoproteins that the viral genome directs the cell to make; these molecules bind virus
particles to susceptible host cells.
Bacteriophages
The most elaborate viruses are the bacteriophages, which use bacteria as their hosts.
Some bacteriophages resemble an insect with an icosahedral head attached to a tubular
sheath. From the base of the sheath extend several long tail fibers that help the virus
attach to the bacterium and inject its DNA to be replicated, direct capsid production, and
virus particle assembly inside the cell.
Virus Classification
Viruses are classified according to their type of genetic material, their strategy of
replication, and their structure. The ICNV report published in 1995 assigned more than
4000 viruses into 71 virus families. Hundreds of other viruses remain unclassified because
of the lack of sufficient information.
There are five types of hepatitis -- A through E -- all of which cause inflammation of the
liver. Type D affects only those who also have hepatitis B, and hepatitis E is extremely
rare in the United States.
Type B hepatitis can be contracted from infected blood, seminal fluid, vaginal
secretions, or contaminated drug needles, including tattoo or body-piercing
equipment. It can also be spread from a mother to her newborn.
Type C hepatitis is not easily spread through sex. You're more likely to get it
through contact with infected blood, contaminated razors, needles, tattoo and
body-piercing equipment, or manicure or pedicure tools that haven't been
properly sanitized, and a mother can pass it to her baby during delivery.
Cyanobacteria
Cyanobacteria include unicellular and colonial species. Colonies may form filaments,
sheets or even hollow balls. Some filamentous colonies show the ability to differentiate
into several different cell types: vegetative cells, the normal, photosynthetic cells that are
formed under favorable growing conditions; akinetes, the climate-resistant spores that
may form when environmental conditions become harsh; and thick-walled heterocysts,
which contain the enzyme nitrogenase, vital for nitrogen fixation. Heterocysts may also
form under the appropriate environmental conditions (anoxic) wherever nitrogen is
necessary.
Heterocyst-forming species are specialized for nitrogen fixation and are able to fix nitrogen
gas, which cannot be used by plants, into ammonia (NH3), nitrites (NO2) or nitrates (NO3),
which can be absorbed by plants and converted to protein and nucleic acids.
Many cyanobacteria also form motile filaments, called hormogonia, that travel away from
the main biomass to bud and form new colonies elsewhere. The cells in a hormogonium
are often thinner than in the vegetative state, and the cells on either end of the motile chain
may be tapered. In order to break away from the parent colony, a hormogonium often
must tear apart a weaker cell in a filament, called a necridium.
Each individual cell of a cyanobacterium typically has a thick, gelatinous cell wall. They
differ from other gram-negative bacteria in that the quorum sensing molecules
autoinducer-2[4] and acyl-homoserine lactones are absent. They lack flagella, but
hormogonia and some unicellular species may move about by gliding along surfaces. In
water columns some cyanobacteria float by forming gas vesicles, like in archaea.
DIMENSIONS
CYLINDER: Volume (Cu. ft) = 3.14 X Radius (ft) X Radius (ft) X Depth (ft)
FLOW RATE (gpm): Flow Rate (gpm) = 2.83 (Diameter, in)2 (Distance, in)
Height, in
MANNING FORMULA
Q = Allowable time for decrease in pressure from 3.5 PSI to 2.5 PSI
q = As below
V = Velocity (ft./sec.)
= Pipe Roughness
R = Hydraulic Radius (ft)
S= Slope (ft/ft)
AMPERAGE = Voltage
Ohms
STABILIZATION PONDS
FIXED MEDIA
ORGANIC LOADING (lbs BOD/day/1000 cu. ft.) = Pounds of BOD applied per Day
1000’S OF Cubic Feet of Media
ACTIVATED SLUDGE
ORGANIC LOADING (lbs./day/cu. ft.) = Pounds of Volatile Solids applied per Day
Volume of Digester (cu. ft.)
Once complete, just simply fax or e-mail the answer key along with the registration
page to us and allow two weeks for grading. Once we grade it, we will e-mail a
certificate of completion to you.
Call us if you need any help. If you need your certificate back within 48 hours,
you may be asked to pay a rush service fee of $50.00.
You can download the assignment in Microsoft Word from TLC’s website under
the Assignment Page. www.abctlc.com
You will have 90 days in order to successfully complete this assignment with a
score of 70% or better.
If you need any assistance, please contact TLC’s Student Services. Once you are
finished, please mail, e-mail or fax your answer sheet along with your registration
form.