ALBERT LEPAWSKY

PROFESSOR OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA

ADMINISTRATION

THE ART AND SCIENCE

OF ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

OXFORD & IBH PUBLISHING CO.

CALCUTTA • BOMBAY • NEW DELHI
ADMINISTRATION
A BORZOI BOOK IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

EDITED BY

V. O. Key, fr., HARVARD UNIVERSITY

First Published in the U.S.A. by Alfred A. Knopf Inc.
Copyright 1949 by Alfred A. Knopf Inc.

Reprinted 1952, 1955, 1960.

FIRSI' INDIAN EDmON 1965

This book has been published with the assistance of the Joint
Indian-American Standard \Vorks Programme.

Published by Oxford & I B H Puhlishing Co., 36, Chowringbee Road,

Calcutta·16 and printed by Mis. Glasgow Printing Co. Private Ltd.,
HOlVBAH
 PREFACE

THIS BOOK deals with a field of human experience known as ad-

ministration. Administration is sometimes referred to by specialized
words such as management or organization, by particular terms such
as executive work, or by general concepts such as public administra-
tion. Regardless of the name or nature of this supposedly new
science, it is an art and technique which reaches far back into the
'cJ(perience of civilized man. For this reason, we include in this book
ideas about administration presented by many authorities ranging
from Aristotle and Socrates to Wilson and Stalin. Also included are
the contributions of some three hundred other writers less renowned
but no less convincing as to the importance of administration and its
related subjects of management and organization.
The book does not undertake to present all the latest data about
the art of large-scale administration, or every up-to-date technique of
management, or the last word on the science of organization. The
aim is rather to help the reader, whether he be a specialized student
or an interested citizen, to realize that administration has long been
practiced as an art, science, and vocation; to help him understand the
important role of administrative machinery in social, economic, and
political affairs; to develop an appreciation of sound and tested ad-
ministrative methods, managerial techniques, and organizational de-
vices; to aid in recognizing unsound administrative practices; and
vi I'REFACE

finally, to help some readers discover whether they themselves are

interested in pursuing an administrative or executive career.
I do not agree, any more than will the reader, with everything
said by the practitioners and professors of administration who are so
extensively quoted in this book. Indeed, some of the readings pre-
sented here may be challenged as partially incorrect, and in some
cases as inutually inconsistent. The material has been compiled in
its present form solely because over a period of fifteen years of teach-
ing and practice in the field of administration, I have found it
effective in clarifying an otherwise intricate subject.
The contents of this book have been gleaned from a wide range
of classical aJ}d historical sources as well as from contemporary ex-
perience aDd empirical knowledge. All of the readings are quotations
from original sources; adaptations or translations are so indicated.
The selection and sequence of the readings have undergone
several revisions based upon their use in the classroom. In the last
few years, I have used the readings in several university courses in
public administration, and a few of my colleagues have similarly used
the readings. I hope the book has been enriched as a result of this
classroom experie~ce. Selected graduate students in my seminar
courses have given the material careful study and thorough criticism
and have helped me select some of the quotations. I am also in-
debted to the many authors and publishers who willingly gave per-
missionito quote from their works.
The project was completed while I was both teaching in the De-
partment of Political Science at the University of Alabama and
carrying on research as a member of the University's Bureau of
Public Administration. Simultaneously, I was acting as Educational
Director to the Southern Regional Training Program, an educational
experiment in the field of public administration involving the Uni-
versities of Alabama, Kentucky, and Tennessee, as well as state, local,
and federal agencies in the Southern region, such as the Tennessee
Valley Authority. I am greatly indebted to the staff members of these
institutions. The work could hardly have been brought to fruition
at this time without the encouragement of Professor Roscoe C.
Martin, Head of the Department of Political Science at the Uni-
versity of Alabama, Director of the Bureau of Public Administration,
and Chairman of the Committee which administers the Southern
Regional Training Program.
I also wish to acknowledge the stimulus of my colleagues at other
vii PREFACE

institutions, particularly the University of Chicago and the Public

Administration Clearing House. Professor Leonard D. White of the
former institution, Louis Brownlow of the latter, and Charles Mer-
riam of both, inspired my work from the outset. I am also mindful
of the enlightenment, often unintended but nevertheless genuine,
contributed by the many public officials and employees-American
and foreign, national, regional, state, and local-with whom I have
worked in the past. Professor V. O. Key, Jr., of the Johns Hopkins
University, gave a thorough reading to the manuscript and offered
many helpful suggestions. The assistance of my wife, Rosalind
Almond Lepawsky, in compiling the manuscript was invaluable.

ALBERT LEPAVVSKY

Tuscaloosa. Alabama
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

AFTER THIS COLLECTION was originally compiled, there were certain

gaps that had to be filled by further research. I knew the kind of
material I was looking for in order to complete the collection, but
except for a few obvious cases I had no way of discovering who had
written the readings I wanted, nor any assurance that they had been
produced at all. As I was trying to break new ground there were few
standard categories and no indexes I could appeal to. The research
therefore had tci) take the proverbial form of searching for a needle in
a haystack. It would have been a prohibitive task had I not had the
genuine interest and fine help of many graduate students and
assistants. A still larger number of students were asked to utilize the
material before final inclusion in the collection as part of their
training and also as a means of testing the pedagogical value of the
readings themselves.
In all of these efforts the following participated: Virginia Ash-
craft, Peter Bersano, Mary Blagg, Robert Boston, Frances Brashears,
John Boyne, Hayward Cameron, Mary Crawley, Hoyt Crider, Francis
Day, John Dorsey, Elliot Falk, John Fenton, Edith Fostor, Cath-
erine Fox, Burton Friedman, Daniel Grant, Waldo Haines, John
Haltom, Ralph Hammond, Anna Hatton, Edward Hobbs, Erin
Hubbert, Paul Jenkins, Kathleen Johnson, Luther Johnson, Leon
Joyner, Mary King, Hugh LeBlanc, Charles McBurney, Caroline
McClurkin, John McConnell, Howard McCormick, Robert Mac-
ix
x ACKNOWLEDCMENT

Millan, Buford McRae, Carolyn Marshall, Salvatore Messina, Alfred

Moore, Beulah Pardue, Abner Pratt, Ralph Purcell, Homer Reed,
Caroline Renfro, Ann Richard, Paul Rilling, Mary Shadow, Bernice
Shaw, Julius Sparkman, Mary Tanksley, James Thomas, Helen Van-
derkooi, Katherine Wade, and Claude Woltz.
Research and secretarial assistance of a high order was rendered
by Libby Anderson, Margaret Bittner, Kay Flood, Christine Redden
and Alice White.
To all of these men and women I acknowledge my indebtedness
and express my appreciation.

A. L.
 ADMINISTRATION

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

1 The Significance of Administration 3

PART I: THE ART OF ADMINISTRATION

l Administrative Functions II

3 Administration and Policy 40

4 History of Administration 77
5 American Administration 107
6 Comparative Administration 153
7 Administration and Bureaucracy 18 5

PART II: THE SCIENCE OF ORGANIZATION

8 The Problem of Organization

9 Types of Organization
10 Staff and Line Organization
11 The Organization in Practice
12 The Geography of Organization
13 The Process of Reorganization
xii CONTENTS

PART III; THE TECHNIQUE Of MANAGEMENT

14 Personnel Management 41 7
15 Budgeting and Financial Control 4 60
16 Planning and Programming 49 2
17 Research, Reporting, and Public Relations 537
18 Legal Procedures 5~
19 Management Practices 594

CONCLUSION

20 The Study of Administration 635

INDEX OF NAMES }
fol1ows page 6~
INDEX OF SUBJECTS
 INTRODUCTION

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ADMINISTRATION

 CHAPTER ONE

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATION, like other fields of knowledge, may be defined in

various ways, but there is wide agreement on the following aspects
of the subject: (1) Certain established practices and techniques in
society are recognized as constituting the field of administration
or management. (2) These administrative practices and managerial
techniques enable the various organizations of a society-its govern-
ments and business enterprises, its social clubs and labor unions-
to fulfill their responsibilities and to execute their programs. (3)
These administrative techniques are as significant a part of the end
result as the actual programs to be carried out.
Although most persons would admit that social ends are depend-
ent upon administrative means, some insist that the techniques of
administration are minor as compared with the human objeotives in-
volved. They therefore ask: "Why concern ourselves with the meth-
ods of administration and management, if we are trying to manage
the wrong things or administer for the wrong ends?" Still others ask:
"Of what use is it to over-emphasize human ends or to struggle with
social programs if we neglect the means whereby all ends are attained
and ignore the techniques necessary to administer any program?"
In answer to these questions, contributions will be studied in this
chapter from the following men who have given penetrating thought
to the subject: 1) Henri Fayol, a French engineer and industrialist,
writing in 1916; 2) Paul Pigors, an American sociologist interested in
social psychology, 1935; 3) Brooks Adams, an American lawyer and
historian, 1913; 4) James Burnham, an American political philoso-
pher, 1941; 5) Charles E. Merriam, an American political scientist,
1945; and 6) Charles A. Beard, an American historian, 1941.
3
4 ADMINISTRATION

The choice of these authorities and the order in which they are
presented is not necessarily meant to reflect favorably upon one point
of view or another. The sequence selected here is intended merely to
clarify, compare, and contrast the experience and ideas of some of the
more challenging thinkers who have observed the administrative proc-
ess and have written on its significance.

1. THE UNIVERSAL IMPORTANCE OF ADMINISTRATION

The twentieth century has yet to produce as balanced a combina-

tion of able practitioner and keen student of administration as Henri
Fayo!. Born in 1841, Fayol was graduated at the age of nineteen from
the well-known French school of mines at St. Etienne. Although he
went to work directly as an engineer for the powerful mining ana
metallurgical firm of Commentry-Fourchambault, remained with
that firm for the rest of his life, and ultimately became its head, his
main contribution lay in his scientific work in the field he called "gen-
eral administration." One motive for Fayol's vigorous defense of ad-
ministration as a subject for serious scientific study was the fact that
he saw France, in the period between the Franco-Prussian War and
World War I, disintegrating for lack of administrative ability and
managerial efficiency. Hoping to make sounder administrative prac-
tices available to French civil and military agencies, he fostered the
"Center of Studies in Administration" in Paris, as a kind of French
Public Administration Clearing House. Fayol was one of the princi-
pal consultants to the French government during the crisis period
of World War I and a leading participant in the International Con-
gress of Administrative Sciences. Despite his conservative views about
French politics, he was in complete agreement on questions of gov-
ernmental organization with the rising French socialist of those days,
Leon Blum, who, as Prime Minister, was later to try out some of the
administrative ideas they both held in common. This is, as we shall
see, but one of several such instances of agreement on administrative
matters among political opposites, an instance which helps to estab-
lish the view Fayol insisted upon, namely, that administration is a
subject of universal importance.

HENRI FAYOL
Industrial and General Administration 1
Every employee in an undertaking-workman, foreman, shop
manager, head of division, head of department, manager, and if it is a
" Henri Fayol: Industrial aud Geneml Administration. Adapted from pp. IO, 12,
'" 17, 54,60, 61, 68, So. TIauslated by J. A, Coubrough for the International Man·
5 THE SICNIFICANCE OF ADMINISTRATION

state enterprise the series extends to the minister or head of a state de-
partment-takes a larger or smaller share in the work of administration,
and has, therefore, to use and display his administrative faculties. By ad-
ministrative knowledge we mean planning, organization, command, co-
ordination, and control: it can be elementary for the workman, but must
be very wide in the case of employees of high rank, especially managers
of big concerns. Everyone has some need of administrative knowledge.
The differences between the qualities and knowledge required by
the manager of a big undertaking even if he is the head of a State, and
those required by a craftsman, are differences only of degree. Out of a
hundred hours spent by the workman in a big industrial undertaking, only
a few arll'taken up by administrative questions-such things as sundry in-
formation passed on to the foreman, discussions about wages or the hours
or a6angements of work, time given to meetings of sick funds, societies,
etc. The foreman receives and transmits the results of the workman's ob-
servations; receives, transmits and sees to the carrying out of orders; makes
observations himself and gives advice; and clearly gives more time to ad·
ministration. The time taken up by administrative questions increases
with the employee's level in the industrial hierarchy, and even the ordinary
engineer is closely concerned with the problems of ordtr, foresight, dis-
cipline, organization, and the selection and training of workmen and fore-
men. This may seem rather surprising, but the explanation is quite simple;
the manager of a metallurgical division, for instance, which consists of
blast furnaces, steel works, rolling mills, etc., has for many years been con·
cerned with metallurgy. But all the details which he learned at school
about mines, railways, constmction work, etc., are no longer more than
vaguely useful to him, while the handling of men, order and planning, in
a word all the elements of administration, are constantly claiming his at-
tention. The general manager has to consider in addition to these, thc
commercial and financial problems, State regulations, etc.
The elements which make up the values of an important manager
or State official are the same as those found in the least important em·
ployee, but they are combined in different proportions. The coefficients I
have assigned to the various characteristics of each grade of employees
express my personal opinion; they are therefore open to criticism, and I
am quite sure that they will be challenged; but f believe that, whatever
alterations may be made in these coefficients, the following conclusions
will hold good: Technical ability or the special ability appertaining to the
function is the chief characteristic of the lower employees of a big under-
taking and the heads of small industrial concerns; administrative ability
is the chief characteristic of all the men in important positions. Technical
ability is the most important quality at the bottom of the industrial ladder
and administrative ability at the top. A workman's chief characteristic is

agement Institute. Originally published in Bulletin de Ja societe! de r industrie minerale,

No.3. Reprinted by permission.
19 1 6,
,
technical ability. As we go up the scale, the relative importance of ad-
ministrative ability increases, whilst that of technical ability becomes less.
The chief characteristic of a manager is administrative ability, and as we
go further up the scale, this characteristic predominates to an ever greater
extent.
The absolute importance and proportions of these elements differ
so much in the values of the two classes that at first sight it is diilicult to
reaiize that they are the same. It is advisable for me to point out that I am
not trying to compare the value of a workman with that of a foreman OT
manager; there is nothing in common between the different values. The
units are not of the same kind or of the same importance; the element of
which they are composed changes in going from one rank to another. I
have simply tried to express [in the following table] the relative impor-
tance of the various abilities which make up the total value of any partic-
ular grade of employee.
All>lIN1STRATIVl! OTHEll MANAC2- TEClDilCAL Oil
ABILITIES OF MENT ABnITIES, SPECIAL ABILl~

PLANNING, OR- INCLUDING COM- TIES APPER-

GANIZATION, MERCIAL, 1"1NAN- TAINlNC TO THE.
COMMAND, COOK- CIAL, CUSTODIAL, PARTICULAR.
DINATION, CONTROL ACCOUNTING FUNCTION

STAFF OF BIG
ESTABLlSHMENTS:
Workman 5% 10% 85%
Foreman 15% 25% 60%
Shop Manager 25% 3°% 45%
Department Head 35% 35% 30%
Plant Manager 4°% 45% 15%
General Manager 50% 4°% 10%
HEADS OF VARIOUS
SlZED FIRMS:
Small Firm 25% 45% 30%
Large Firm 40% 45% 15%
Very Large F"mn 5°% 40% 10%
HEADS OF STATE
UTABLISHMENTS:
Ministry 50% 4°% 10%
State Department 60% 3"% 8%

The. manager must never be lacking in knowledge of the special

profesSion which is characteristic of the undertaking: the technical pro-
fession in industry, commercial in commerce, political in the State, mili-
tary in the Army, religious in the Church, medical in the hospital, teach-
ing in the school, etc. The technical function has long been given the
degree of importance which is its due, and of which we must not deprive
it, but the technical function by itself cannot endure the successful run-
ning of a business; it needs the help of the other essential functions and
particularly of that of administration. This fact is so important from the
7 11IE SIGNifICANCE OF ADMfNISTIATION

point of view of the organization and management of a business that I do

not mind how often I repeat it in order that it may be fully realized.
An examination of the characteristics required by the employees
and heads of undertakings of every kind leads to the same conclusions as
the foregoing study, which was confined largely to industrial concerns. In
the home and in affairs of State, the need for administrative ability is pro-
portional to the importance of the undertaking. Like every other under-
taking, the home requires administration, that is to say planning, organiza-
tion, command, coordination and control. Nothing but a theory of ad-
ministration, which can be tanght and then discussed by everybody, can
put an end to the general uncertainty as to proper methods, which exists
in the isolation of our households. There is therefore a universal need for
a knowledge of administration.

Although Fayol was one of the first writers to state administrative

propositions in such broad and scientific terms, his views on the uni-
versal importance of administration were not entirely new. A review
of the history of administration shows that a common administrative,
managerial, or business skill for the various professions has been rec-
ognized for centuries." During the present century, experts in indus-
trial and business administration as well as in civil and military ad-
ministration have tried to do in the United States and in other
nations what Fayol did in France to establish administration as a
universal art.'
Some, however, have expressed doubt about the extent to which
administration can be regarded as a specialty separable from the tech-
nical or subject-matter field with which one happens to be dealing.
For example, Professor Lewis Meriam of Brookings Institution, an
experienced Federal civil servant, argued that administrators should
be primarily subject-matter specialists because "the differences be-
tween administrative positions are . . . of more practical signifi-
cance than their similarities.'" Professor of Business Administration
Dan Throop Smith of Harvard University also warned: "'\Ie usually
think of an individual doing administrative work not as an adminis-
trator, but as a businessman, an Army officer, or a civil servant. More

• See Chapter 4. See also such nineteenth·century essayists as John Ruslcin: "Unto
This Last." Tbe Combill Magazine, August 1860, vol. 2, p. 163. James W. Gilbort:
"The History and Principles of Ancient Commerce." Tbe Merchants' Magazine, Sep.
tember 1848, vol. 19, p. 257·
• Edward D. Jones: "The Relation of Education to Industrial Efficiency: The
Study of the General Principles of Administration." American Economic Review,
Marcb 1915, vol. ;, p. 216. Arthur G. Coons: "Management's Professional Responsi.
bilities," Advanced Management, Dec. 1946, vol. ll, p. 142. Brchon Somervell:
"Management."Public Administration Review, Autumn 1944, vol. 4, p. 257.
• Lewis Meriam: Publk Service and Special Training. Chicago: The University of
Chicag<> Press; 1936, p. 1;.
8
specifically, we think of him, if he is a businessman, as a merchant,
a production man, a sales manager, or a financial expert; while the
Army officer may be a company commander, a staff officer, or a tac-
tician; and the civil servant, a diplomat, a postmaster, or a revenue
collector. It is true that all of these jobs involve administration: yet
each of them is intimately bound up with a more or less specialized
subject matter and it does not follow that a good production man win
make a good diplomat or company commander.'"
Dan Throop Smith, however, concludes that "although good ad-
ministrators are not necessarily interchangeable, there appear to be
certain recurring aspects of administrative work to which attention
may be profitably directed." Most experts in the study of private ad-
ministration or industrial management are beginning to agree more
and more with the British writer Oliver Sheldon that "industry
shares a need common to every social enterprise from church to
guild, municipality to empire, war to university." • The idea that the
administrative process is a universal one is even more widely ac-
cepted by writers in the field of public administration. With few
exceptions, they agree with Professor Leonard D. White of the Uni-
versity of Chicago, who regards public administration as merely "a
special case of the larger category, administration, a process which is
common to all organized human effort and which is highly devel-
oped in modern corporate business, in the church, in the Red Cross,
in education, and in international bodies, public and private." 7
We see, therefore, a general acceptance of Henri Fayol's thesis
of the universality of the administrative process. Not all these writers
accept Fayol's allocation of such high percentages of significance to
the administrative or managerial skills as compared with the tech-
nicalor special subject-matter skills. However, authorities and experi-
enced men of affairs are increasingly struck, as was Fayol, with the
appearance of common administrative factors and recurring manage-
rial problems in our social, economic, and political organizations.

2. THE STABILIZING ROLE OF ADMINISTRATION IN SOCIETY

While all these writers agree about the importance of adminis-

tration, there are differences of opinion about the degree of impor-
tance of administration. Is administration one of the major influ-
• Dan Throop Smith: "Education for Administration." Harvord Busiaess Review,
Spring 1945, vol. '3, p. 360.
• Oliver Sheldon: Philosophy oJ Manag_. London: Isaac Pitman and Sons;
'93 0 , p. 33·
7 Leonard D. White: Introduction to the Study oJ Public Administration. New
York: The Macmillan Company; 1939, pp. 3-+
9 THE SICNIFICANCE OF ADMINISTRATION

ences in the readjustment of our society or does it have the task only
of stabilizing social institutions? Professor Paul Pigors of the Massa-
chusetts Institute of Technology, who is quoted below, feels that a
primary function of administration is that of stabilizing social insti-
tutions. I nterested not only in the leadership function of society's
managers but also in the "followership" role of both the administra-
tors and the "administered," 8 industrial psychologists like Pigors
have shown an abiding interest in administration as a means of keep-
ing society in balance while its institutions are at the same time
undergoing a process of change and adjustment.

PAUL PlCORS
Leadership or Domination·
How did the innovations of yesterday become the institutions of
today? An idea does not institutionalize itself. It has to be organized.
When the initiator has proposed a plan and inspired a group of followers
with the desire to pursue it, he must devise a way in which their joint pur-
pose can be realized. It is this process of organization and management
which I call administration. No group movement endures without it. The
administrator just sets up a structure of laws, rules, mechanisms, that is
designed to accomplish a specific purpose and then directs the working
of all its constituent elements, so that an institution is comparable to a
machine with standard parts. Each part is designed to perform a special-
ized purpose to which it is adapted. It is replaceable, and the demand
is not so much for individuals with creative imagination as for trained
functionaries with suitable abilities. Every part of the machine conforms
to a standard pattern and professional schools or colleges turn out candi-
dates to replace those who drop out of active service. In this way institu-
tions are maintained from year to year. They aim at that balance between
energy expended and results achieved, which we call efficiency.
The administrative function, therefore, insures the continuance
of the existing order ~~th a minimum of effort and risk. Its fundamental
aim is to "carry on" rather than to venture along new and untried paths.
Administrators are, therefore, the stabilizers of society and the guardians
of tradition. They are stabilizers in both a positive and a negative sense,
for not only do they make possible the continuance of the ideas which
they convert into institutions: they also frustrate many innovations to
which they deny their support. With the weight of their authority they

• Paul Pigors: "Types of Fofiowers," Tournai of Social Psychology, May 1934, vol. ;,
pp. 378-383. Hatlow S. Person: "The Call for Leadership," Bulletin of the Taylor
Society, April 1933, vol .• 8, p. 42.
• Paul Pigors: Leadership 01 Domination, selected from pp. 264-8. Reprinted
by permission of Houghton MilBin Company. Copyright '935, Houghton MilBin
Company.
10
confront every attempt to initiate a new development, and test it with a
view to its effect on established interests. They resist change and stow
down the rate of experimentation so that the main body of society can
keep pace with it. The ponderous social machinery which is so irritating
to the impulsive initiator is thus a safeguard against sudden changes
which paralyze the Jess adaptable members of society aud which would
result in chaos if subjected to no check.
The administrative function comes easily to conservatives for the
principal requirement of administration is unquestioning conformity to
the standards embodied by the particular institution.

Pigors did assign to the administrative Jeader the additional func-

tion of initiating certain social changes and organizing new institu-
tions; and other social scientists have pointed out that the adminis-
trator has the responsibility of operating in a '1iberal" as well as a
"conservative" setting.'· But few went so far as did the social his-
torian Brooks Adams.

3. THE ROLE OF ADMINISTRATION IN SOCIAL CHANGE

Brooks Adams advocated that the chief function of administra-

tion should be to facilitate social change, or paradoxical as it may
seem, to assure social stability by facilitating social change. Great-
grandson of President John Adams, grandson of President Quincy
Adams, brother of the "educated" Henry Adams, Brooks Adams pro-
duced, during the early 1900'S, a series of unorthodox historical es-
says. Their titles were more radical than their contents: The Law of
Civilization and Decay, "The Collapse of Capitalistic Government,"
and The Theory of Social Revolutions. The last of these is quoted
below; the first was regarded by Theodore Roosevelt as a "melan-
choly" but "powerful" book with "a very ugly element of truth." 11
And Mr. Roosevelt did not remain unaffected by it when he became
President.
BROOl(5 ADAMS
The Theory of Social Revolutions ,.
The present industrial era brought with it a new governing class,
as every considerable change in human environment must bring with it a
--;Qj(;mball Young: Social Psychology, An Analysis 01 Human Behavior, New York:
F. S. Crofts and Company; 1936, pp. 371-80. See also our Chapter 3.
11 Theodore Roosevelt: "The Law of Civilization and Decay."' The Forum, January
1897. vol. 22, pp. 573, 577.
1Z Brooks Adams: The Theory of Social Revolutions, adapted from pp. 2-3, 204-5,
'07-8, 216. New York: n.e Macmillan Company; 1913. Reprinted by permission of
Henry Adams.
11 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A""NISTRATION

governing class to give it expression. Perhaps, for lack of a recognized

name, I may describe this class as the industrial capitalistic class, C()m-
posed in the main of administrators and bankers. I conjecture that this
class attained its acme of popularity and power, at least in America, to-
ward the close of the third quarter of the nineteenth century. Almost at
the opening of the present century a progressively rigorous opposition
found for its mouthpiece the President of the Union himself. If Mr.
Roosevelt became, what his adversaries are pleased to call, an agitator, his
agitation had a cause which is as deserving of study as is the path of a
cyclone.
There can be no doubt that the modem environment is changing
faster than ani environment ever previously changed; therefore, the social
center of gravity constantly tends to shift more rapidly; and therefore
modem civilization has unprecedented need of the administrative or
generalizing mind. I take it to be an axiom, that perfection in adminis-
tration must be commensurate to the bulk and momentum of the mass
to be administered, otherwise the centrifugal will overcome the centrip-
etal force, and the mass will disintegrate. In other words, civilization will
dissolve. A moment arrives when the minds of any given dominant type
fail to meet the demands made upon them, and are superseded by a
younger type, which in tum is set aside by another still younger, until
the limit of the administrative genius of that particular race has been
reached. Then disintegration sets in, the social momentum is gradually
relaxed, and society sinks back to a level at which it can cohere.
It is in dealing with administration, as I apprehend, that civili-
zations have usually, though not always, broken down, for it has been on
administrative difficulties that revolutions have for the most part super-
vened. Advances in administration seem to presuppose the evolution of
new governing classe$, since apparently, no established type of mind can
adapt itself to changes in environment even in slow-moving civilizations,
as fast as environments change. Administration is the capacity of co·
ordinating many, and often conflicting, social energies in a single organ-
ism, so adroitly that they shall operate as a unity. This presupposes the
power of recognizing a series of relations between numerous special social
interests, with all of which no single man can be intimately acquainted.
Probably no very highly specialized class can be strong in this intellectual.
quality because of the intellectual isolation incident to specialization; and
yet administration or generalization is not only the faculty upon which
social stability rests, but is possibly the highest faculty of the human mind.

Twenty years later, Professor Wallace B. Donham, Dean of the

Graduate School of Business at Harvard University, repeated that
"if our civilization breaks down, it will be mainly a breakdown of
administration";" and authorities in the field of public administra-
a Wallace B. Donham: "The Theory and Practice of Administration." Harvard
Business Review, Summer 1936, vol. 14, p. 409·
12 ADM.HI$1'RATION

tion like Professor John M. Gaus of the Graduate School of Public

Administration at Harvard and Dean Paul H. Appleby of the Max-
well Graduate School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse
University have quoted Brooks Adams's view." Similarly, President
Arthur G. Coons of Occidental College, an economist and also an
experienced public official, declared: "The administrator's position
(and that of his staff of assistants) is pivotal and strategic. . . . A
confused and harassed world is groping for some economic and social
philosophy possessing an explicable rationale for the modern world.
. . . It asks that this rationale be capable of drawing all groups,
classes and corporate entities into a more effective social coherence
or sense of unity wherein the limits both of individual initiative or
activity and of social control may be understood. Students of society
and the responsible administrators of our society are now expected to
be helpful in meeting this great social need.""
The writer who has given considerable attention to Brooks
Adams's analysis of administration, though not to his conclusions,
is the American philosopher James Burnham.

4. THE THREAT OF THE MANAGERIAL REVOLUTION

It was the view of Professor James Burnham, of New York Uni-

versity, that the essential quality of the emerging society is its "man-
agerial" character; in fact, in Burnham's mind, the managers have
already "taken over" modern society.

JAMES BURNHAM
The Managerial Revolution 18
I shall present a theory-which I call "the theory of the manage-
rial revolution." During the past century, dozens, perhaps even hundreds,
of "theories of history" have been elaborated. All of the theories, with
the exception of those few which approximate to the theory of the
managerial revolution, boil down to two and only two. The first of these
predicts that capitalism will continue for an indefinite, but long, time, if
not forever:' that is, that the major institutions of capitalist society, or
U John M. Gans and Leon O. Wolcott: Public Administration and the United
States Department ot Agriculture. Chicago: Public Administration Service; '940, p.
199. See also Paul H. Appleby: Policy and Administration. University, Alabama: Unj.
versi~ of Alabama Press; 1949, p. ;1.
1 Arthur G. Coons: "Management's Professional Responsibilities." AdvImced
Management, December 1946, vol. 11. p. 141.
1& James Burnham: The Managerial Revolution. adapted from 1'1'. 7, 29, 96-7. 20 3,
';7, .8 .. Reprinted by permission of The John Day Company. Cupyright '94', by
The John Day Cumpany.
13 Ttl! SIGNIFICANCE OF ADMINISTRATION
at least most of them, will not be radically changed. The second predicts
that capitalist society will be replaced by socialist society. The theory of
the managerial revolution predicts that capitalist society will be replaced
by "managerial society," that, in fact, the transition from capitalist society
to managerial society is already well under way.
The contention that control over the instruments of production
is everywhere undergoing a shift, away from the capitalists proper and to-
ward the managers, will seem to many fantastic and naive, especially if
we are thinking in the first instance of the United States. Consider, it
will be argued, the growth of monopoly in our times, Think of the Sixty
Families, with their billions upon billions of wealth, their millions of
shares of stock in the greatest corporations, and their lives which exceed
in luxury and display anything even dreamed of by the rulers of past ages.
The managers, even the chief of them, are only the servants, the bailiffs
of the Sixty Families. How absurd to call the servant, master!
Such would have been the comment if anyone had in the early
fifteenth century been so much a dreamer as to suggest that control was
then shifting from the feudal lords toward the small, dull, vulgar groups
of merchants, and traders and moneylenders. Consider, it would have
been argued, the splendid, insolent dukes and barons and princes, with
their shining armor and their castles and crowds of retainers, and the
land, all the land, in their grasp. Merchants, moneylenders! They are only
purveyors to the mighty, fit to provide them with the luxuries required by
their station and occasionally to lend them a few despised ducats for
provisioning an army or building a new fortress.
The New Deal is a phase of the transition process from capital-
ism to managerial society. The New Deal is not Stalinism and not Nazism.
But no candid observer, friend or enemy of the New Deal, can deny that
in terms of economic, social, political, ideological changes from traditional
capitalism, the New Deal moves in the same direction as Stalinism and
Nazism.
But what about the bitter disputes among the various types of
what I have stated are all managerial ideologies? How can these be ex-
plained if the ideologies are all "the same"? Are the disputes, thought so
notorious, "unreal"? I wish to guard against possible misunderstanding.
These disputes are not "unreal" and the ideologies are not "the same."
Such a contention would be ridiculous and easily disproved. What I am
maintaining is simply this: Communism (Leninism-Stalinism), fascism-
Nazism, and to a more-partial and less-developed extent, New Dealism
and Technocracy, are all managerial ideologies.
The managers-these administrators, experts, directing engineers,
production executives, propaganda specialists, technocrats-are the only
social group among almost all of whose members we find an attitude of
self-confidence. Bankers, capitalist owners, liberal politicians, workers,
farmers, shopkeepers-all these display, in public and private, doubts and
fears and worries and gloom. But no one who comes into contact with
14
managers will fail to have noticed a very considerable assul'aDCe in their
whole bearing. They know that they are indispensable in modern society.
Others besides Burnham had pointed to the powerful position of
the managers in the American economy; 17 and in 1948, United States
Senator Ralph E. Flanders of Vermont made bold to assert: "We
call our system 'capitalism.' . . . It might better be called manager-
ism." ,. But Burnham was one of the few to warn about the threat
of a managerial revolution. Before he adopted his critical attitude to-
ward deviations from capitalism, Burnham had himself been an ac-
tive left-wing political thinker, serving as co-editor of the American
Marxist journal, The New International. He had therefore had the
kind of experience that encouraged him to portray contemporary
events in doctrinaire terms; and in suggesting that governmental
management in the form of the New Deal was dictatorship, Burn-
ham brought down upon his head the objections of American ad-
ministrators with a firm faith in democracy.
The most vigorous critic of Burnham's thesis was David E. Lilien-
thal, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Tennessee Valley
Authority, an outstanding example of New Deal governmental enter-
prise which Burnham had particularly criticized as being part of the
managerial revolution. Lilienthal characterized Burnham's work as
"an important book" which "no administrator in public or private
enterprise should fail to read," but added that the book was "super-
ficial, pontifical, and as full of unsupported assumptions as a country
dog is full of burrs." Furthermore, Lilienthal warned: "Here is a pre-
view of the kind of package in which the confused and discredited
notions of an American social revolution are to be sold to the Ameri-
can middle class, and particularly the administrators, managers, and
executive technicians. . . . Any book that tells a particular classifi-
cation of men that they are devilishly important and are about to
'take over' will be sweetly persuasive to many of them. And besides,
the phrase 'managerial society' is a natural; it is so much more appeal-
ing to the average man than its synonym: 'fascism.''' ,.

5.. THE PROSPECTS Of A MANAGERIAL EVOLUTION

Another critic of the Burnham thesis was Charles E. Merriam,
who nevertheless attributed a decisive position to the managers of
11 Adolph A. Berle, Jr. and Cardiner C. Means: The Modem Corporation and
Private Property. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1932,
" Ralph E. Flanders; "Management's Part in the Free Enterprise System," Address
to the Business Conference. Stanford University, July 20, 1948.
" David E. Lilienthal: ''Management-Responsible or Dominant." Public Ad-
ministration Review, Summer 1941, vol. 1, pp. 390-•.
15 TIlE SIGNIFICANCE 01' ADMINISTltATION

a democratic society. As Chairman of the Department of Political

Science at the University of Chicago between the two World Wars,
Professor Merriam inspired a generation of students and practitioners
of public administration. As a local political leader in Chicago and
as a national adviser to liberal American Presidents from Theodore
Roosevelt to Franklin Roosevelt, Merriam recognized the practical
significance of public management. In his overall treatise on System-
atic Politics, Merriam devoted the final but perhaps the most signifi-
cant section of his chapter on "The Organs of Government" to what
he calls "the managerial organ."

CHARLES E. MERRIAM

Systematic Pelitics"

In modern industry the managerial groups in many areas rise to

a position more significant than that of the owners or the workers. De-
cision often rests largely in their hands, providing, of course, they are able
to point to a generous measure of financial success in their particular
enterprise. Wages to the workers, profits to the owners, prices and goods
to the consumers--these are allocated in great measure by the managers
of the concern and tolerated on the terms just stated.
The managerial group develops also in other social groups as well
as in industry. Labor, agriculture, and professional associations tend to
set up a strong structure in which the managerial skills and personalities
are very prominent. In the ecclesiastical groupings this form of organi-
zation has long been evident, not only in the Catholic church but in other
creeds and organizations as well.
If we ask why cities must have managers, or the Dairymen's As-
sociation have a manager, or steel or motors have a skilled staff of man-
agers, not so called perhaps, or the labor group, or the political party, we
find the answer in the increasing number and specialization of functions
and the correspondingly increasing need for ways and means of inte-
grating these specializations. The increasing size of modern societies
and the proliferation of their complex activities make new forms of bind·
ing the machinery together indispensable to successful functioning.
It is not necessary to conclude that the managerial groups have
assumed complete domination over the concerns in which they are
found, although this may be the fact in various instances, but only to
reckon with the undoubted truth that the managerial factor in public
and private enterprise has taken on a far more significant role than before.

"'Charles E. Merriam: Syste~I>ted from pp. ,6'-4. Reprinted

by permission of The UniversityAch~~~igbt '94S. The University of
Chicago Press. •
16 ADMINISTtA1ION
This new role which has puzzled and alarmed the "owners" in ind[lStry
and the policy-makers in government is not, however, primarily a p<lwer
role, but a specialization of the evolving and complex character which
we now confront in our civilization_
We may, of course, always raise the question-not in point of
fact always raised-of what the relation of these managers is to the t!nds
of the state or the ends of other groups and to the special techniquc::s of
the particular group and to its special social composition. In the complex
power pattern of organization how are these managerial element~ re-
lated to the organization of the consent of the governed, so vital a fOrce
in the life of every form of human association? In the struggle for advan-
tage and mastery these larger factors may, indeed, pass unnoticed, but
from the point of view of the student of politics and government, they
are of supreme importance in judging the trends and possibilities of man-
agerial evolution in modem society..

Merriam thus preferred to think of the managers not as powerful

revolutionaries who, as in Burnham's view, were threatening to dom-
inate society, but rather as technicians whose services were indispen-
sable to the evolution of modem society. In this view he had the ~up­
port of his fellow social scientist and historian Charles A. Beard.

6_ ADMINISTRATION AS THE KEY TO MODERN SOCIETY

Charles A. Beard won early recognition for his Economic If)ter-

pretation of the Constitution, published in 1913, a work which was
both highly accepted and severely criticized. In his later and nlore
general historical works, Beard veered away from his earlier empha-
sis on economic determinism and stressed the decisive influence of
technology and administration upon the welfare of the common j!lan
in America. But Beard's emphasis on administration was by no mea~S
a late development in his life. A professor of politics at Colunlbla
University until World \Var I, Beard became Director of the T(ain-
ing School for Public Service in 1915. The Training School was jlfIil-
iated with the New York Bureau of Municipal Research, which has
been regarded as the first organization established in the United
States to deal with public administration in a systematic and sci~­
tific way. In 1918 Beard became Director of the Bureau. The readmg
here quoted is from one of his latest works, with the emphasis on. the
importance of technology and administration which has characterIZed
Beard's thinking almost from the beginning of his productive period
of scholarship.
17 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ADMINISTRATION

CHARLES A. lEARD
Public Policy and the General Welfare 11
The modern society is a Great Society. It consists of many differ-
ent groups woven together in a complicated process of production. Every
enterprise in the Great Society, as well as the Great Society itself, rests
upon administration. Industry on a large scale depends upon organization
-upon the management of large numbers of employees of different
crafts and arts and the disposition of materi,.l goods. In some industries
the administrative organism is national and even international in its
range. Thousands, hundreds of thousands, of men and women must be
brought together and distributed among various departments of produc·
tion. They must be graded in a vast economic hierarchy, with skilled
engineers and managers at the top and simple day laborers at the bottom.
They must be assigned specific and al?propriate tasks in the operation of
the organization. They must be directed, controlled.
The state in the Great Society, like the private corporation, also
rests upon administration. So, whatever may be the future, the science of
administration wIll be an essential instrument of human welfare. To over-
throw by violence any form of government is mere child's playas com-
pared with the tasks of administering the functions of a Great Society.
Lenin and his followers found it comparatively easy to pull down the
weak political structure bequeathed by the Russian bureaucracy to the
Kerensky government. On the morning after the revolution the Bol-
shevists had possession of all the trappings of power-the army, the rail-
ways, the public buildings, and machinery of state; but although wearing
the robes of power they were powerless. Where did they then tnrn? To
the science of administration, including the Taylor system, the experience
of American capitalism. In other words, administration-not the sword-
is the key to enduring power in the Great Society.
Few writers besides Beard have credited administration with
being the keystone science of modem society." Speaking in 1937 on
the specialized subject of the measurable "work unit" in administra-
tion, Beard asserted: "There is no subject more important-from its
minute ramifications of unit costs and accounts to the top structure
of the overhead-than this subject of administration. The future of
civilized government, and even, I think, of civilization itself rests
upon our ability to develop a science and a philosophy and a practice
of administration competent to discharge the public functions' of
civilized society." .. In his stimulating criticism of Beard's views, Pro-
n Charles A. Beard: Public Policy and the General Welfare, adapted from pp. 148,
158-60. Reprinted by permission of Rinehart and Company, Inc. Copyright, 1941.
22 See the ideas of Glenn Negley, Chapter 20.
II Charles A. Beard: "The Role of Administration in Government," The Wodc
Unit in Federal Adminisb:ation. Chicago: Public Administration Service; 1937, p. ).
18
fessor Dwight Waldo has asked: "Is a Philosopher-King or a Com-
munist or Fascist Party charged with a greater responsibility than
preserving civilization?" ..

SUMMARY

The majority of authorities quoted in this chapter agree that

administration plays an important role in society. But while they
agree on the importance of administration, they assign to the subject
different degrees of significance. Henri Fayol believes that the ad-
ministrative process is universal, that its existence is percentage-wise
the most important element in practically all vocations and profes-
sions, and that there is therefore a widespread need for the scien-
tific study of administration. While Paul Pigors feels that the rnain
purpose of administration is to preserve the status quo in society,
Brooks Adams regards administration as a more important-indeed
as the most important-human faculty because its function is to
facilitate social change and to cushion the shock of social revolution.
James Burnham contends that the administrators or managers of
society have appropriated so much power that the decisive revolu-
tion has already arrived, neither fascistic nor communistic revolu-
tion, but managerial. Charles E. Merriam denies this thesis and re-
gards administration as the evolution of another human technology
leading to man's adaptation to his complex environment. Charles A.
Beard attributes perhaps the highest role to administration; to him
it is the key science of contemporary civilization.
Economic and social historians like Charles A. Beard who attri-
bute vast powers to the state, great managers and engineer-industrial-
ists somewhat critical of government like Henri Fayol, sober scholars
with a socialist slant to their thinking like Brooks Adams, social psy-
chologists like Paul Pigors interested in stable social and industrial
relations, reformed radicals like lames Burnham who flee from the
capitalist to the communist ideology and back again, political pro-
gressives like Charles E. Merriam who remain steadfast in theit de-
votion to 'democracy-all these writers agree as to the decisive im-
portance of administration.
What is the nature of this significant type of human endeavor?
The various answers will be found in the following chapters.
.. Dwight Waldo; The Administrative State. New York; The Ronald Press Com·
pany; 1948, p. 90 .
 PART I

THE ART OF ADMINISTRATION

 CHAPTER 1WO

ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS

EXACTLY what does an administrator do? Administrative functions,

managerial activities, or executive duties vary among government,
business, and other kinds of institutions; and, within each of tbese
institutions, on various levels of responsibility, administrative fll nc -
tions differ in intensity if not in kind. Some general types of ad-
ministrative duties are common to practically an jobs. These activi-
ties will be described in this chapter.
H~ are rwt L'lJIR.'\!l.TreU' ,'rere- aUtre.,.. ok (i:nn..'L'imT:f-'Ut.im~ 'eco-
nomic, or political-which should or should not be undertakeI\ by
government, business, or other institutions. Whether this govern-
ment or that business should administer one social function or an-
other is a different problem and will be discussed in later chap~ers.
We will search here merely for the administrative, managerial, or
executive processes which are common to all undertakings of society
and which apply in varying degrees to all levels of responsibility, ftom
chief executive to section chief, from gang boss to apprentice, from
office manager to messenger boy. .
In the six sections of this chapter the reader will be introdl.\ced
to the administrative process, but not until the last of these sectIons
will ~n attempt be made to define, in any formal way, the more gen-
eral functions known as administration, management, and orgarliza_
tion.

1. A LISTING OF EXECUTIVE DUTIES

One of the most concrete enumerations of administrative dl.\ties

or executive functions is the list prepared by Luther Gulick Ufldel
21
22 AllMINISTIIATION

the catchword POSDCOJIB. Before defining the tenn, it is wen to point

out that Gulick attributed to Fayol the kind of functional analysis of
administration which he summarized under POSDCOJIB. Like Fayol,
Gulick combined the scholarly search for the universal with practical
experience in the field of administration. He was one of the first
students of Charles Beard at the New York Training School for Pub-
lic Service, and he succeeded Beard in becoming the director of the
Training School and the New York Bureau 'of Municipal Research
which merged under his direction into the National Institute of
Public Administration. As director of the Institute, Gulick became
one of the most widely consulted experts in public administration-
local, state, national, international. With Charles Merriam, Gulick
served on President Roosevelt's Committee on Administrative Man-
agement in the 1930'S. The President's managerial functions, in his
capacity as chief executive, as well as the administrative functions
carried on by other chief executives or lesser executives in govern-
ment and business, comprise the activities included under Gulick's
POSDCOJIB.

LUTHER CULiCK
'apen on the Science of Administration 1
What is the work of the chief executive? What does he do?
The answer is POSDCORB.
POSDCORB is, of course, a made-up word designed to call attention
to the various functional elements of the work of a chief executive be-
cause "administration" and "management" have lost all specific content.
POSDCORB is made up of the initials and stafl!is for the following activities:
PLANNING, that is working out in broad outline the things that
need to be done and the methods for doing them to accomplish the pur-
pose set for the enterprise;
ORCANlZlNC, that is the establishment of the formal structure of
authority through which work subdivisions are arranged, defined and c0-
ordinated for the defined objec~ive;
STAFFING, that is the whole penonnel function of bringing in
and training the staff and maintaining favorable conditions of work;
DllU!Ci'lNG, that is the continuous task of making decisio~ and
embodying them in specific and general orders and instructions and Serv-
ing as the leader of the enterprise;
CQ-ORDINATINC, that is the all-important duty of inter-relating the
various parts of the work;

l Luther Gulick: "Notes 011 the 'Theory of Orpnization," Papas on the Science of
1,.
.Administlation. p. Reprinted by pcnDission ollnstitute of Public Admiaisti'ation.
Copyright '917. JDJtitute of PubliC Administtation.
 ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS
lIEPOHlNC, that is keeping those to whom the executive is respon-
sible informed as to what is going on, which thus includes keeping him-
self and his subordinates informed through records, resean:h and inspec>
tion;
BUDGETING, with all that goes with budgeting in the form of fiscal
planning, accounting and control.
This statement of the work of a chief executive is adapted from
the functional analysis elaborated by Henri Fayol in his wlndustrial and
General Administration." It is believed that those who know administra-
tion intimately will find in this analysis a valid and helpful pattern, into
which can be fitted each of the major activities and duties of any chief
executive.

Although POSDCORB is a useful abbreviation for administrative

functions, managerial processes, or executive duties, many authorities
have not accepted it. Dan Throop Smith, for example, admitted that
all jobs involve administration, but he warned: "Each of them is
intimately bound up with a more or less specialized subject matter." •
Professor Lewis Meriam also admitted that POSDCORB is "a godsend
to anyone who attempts to teach a course in general public adminis-
tration, because it gives seven pegs on which to hang the detailed facts
and principles that are common to administrative positions"; but,
Meriam continued, "the most important thing that has been omitted
from that fascinating word 'POSDCORB' is knowledge of a subject mat-
ter. You have to plan something, you have to organize something, you
have to direct something. When you have to select your staff, you
have to determine what the different classes of employees will have
to do and then what they will have to know in order to do it. Intimate
knowledge of the ~ubject matter with which an administrative agency
is primarily concerned is indispensable to the effective, intelligent ad-
ministration of that agency." •
Certainly, many capable executives, indeed the majority of them,
have in the past risen to important administrative posts as subject-
matter specialists rather than as management experts; although quite
possibly during the early stages of their careers, they had devoted a
large part of their efforts to «administration" without calling it by that
name. It is understandable, then, that Lewis Meriam, like Dan
Throop Smith and other critics of the purely manageriiil approach to
administration, does acknowledge: "It is unquestionably true that
those seven broad categories ate common to practically aU admipistra-
tive positions." • The POSDCORB idea is thus widely accepted in Amer-

• See Chapter 1.
• Meriam: Public Service and Special Training, pp. 1-1.
• Meriam: Public Service and SpecW Training, p .•.
24
ican textbooks dealing with public administration;' and American
governmental authorities sometimes accept a similar kind of classi-
fication of managerial tasks in their official administrative manuals.-
In business administration various modifications of PQSDCOlUl
were previously available. In the 1920'S, men like Edward D. Jones,
pioneer professor of commerce at the University of Michigan, simi-
lady listed some eleven functions of the business administrator.'
Similarly Percival White, industrial manager and author of an early
textbook on Business Management, included in his list of adminis-
trative duties Gulick's elements of coordination, planning, organiza-
tion, and direction; but he made some additions like analysis and
measurement, thus suggesting the more specific intellectual com-
ponents of the administrative process.' In 1924, Henry S. Dennison,
also an experienced businessman and later a New Deal planner,
presented a "job analysis" of managing, which included an even more
detailed analysis of the mental processes involved in administration!
One of the most realistic descriptions of the functions of an
executive is offered by Professor Dimock: "First, he must keep the
enterprise on an even keel. . . . Second, he must delegate everything
he can. . . . Third, if the program is going along satisfactorily, he
then has the time and nervous energy with which to chart the course
that lies ahead." ,. There is much soundness in Dimock's simple
summary that "the executive does three principal things: He is a
trouble shooter, a supervisor, and a promoter of the future pro-
gram"; 11 but it is also clear that the effective administrator does not
permit anyone of his functions to run too far ahead of the others.

2. AN AMERICAN CABINET MEMBER'S ADMINISTRATIVE

ACTIVITIES
The precise emphasis to be given one set of administrative duties
or another varies from institution to institution, from department to
• John M. Pfiffner: Public Administration. New York: The Ronald Press Company:
1946, pp. 19-.0. John D. Millett, in Fritz Morstein Marx (ed.): Elements of Public
Administration. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1946, p. 146_ Leonard D. White:
Introduction to the Study of Public Administration. New York: The Macmillan Com·
pany: 1939, p. 309·
• See, for eXample, U. S. Bureau 01 the Budget: "Tasks of Management," Memo
randum and Chart I·HO·I, 1946.
'Edward D. Jones: The Administration 01 Industrial Enterprises. New York:
Longmans Green and Company: 19,6, p. 148.
'Percival White: Business Management. New York: Henry Holt .od Co. 1926;
pp.96--&.
• Henry S. Dennison: "Who Can Hire Management." Bulletin of the Taylor
Society, JUDe '9'4, vol. 9, p. 103.
,. Marshall E. Dimock: The Eseentive in Aetinn. New Yorlc: Harper aod Brothers,
pp.83-4.
11 Dimock: The E_utive in Action, p. 16.
25 AOM1MtSTttATIVI FUNCTIONS

department, and from time to time, even though essentially the same
list of managerial duties is performed by executives at aU levels of ad-
ministrative responsibility. At the cabinet level of authority, we have
a typical record of the daily administrative events which transpired
in the office of William C. Redfield, Secretary of Commerce during
the administration of President Wilson. Redfield was an industrialist,
primarily interested in the export trade, who represented the liberal
business wing of the Wilson "New Freedom" administration." He
entered New York politics early in 1902, serving as Commissioner of
Public Works for the Borough of Brooklyn. Ten years later he was
elected to Congress. After a two-year term, during which he showed
an intense interest in the problems of scientific management,1$ he en-
tered President Wilson's Cabinet.

WILLIAM C. REDFIELD
With Congress and Cabinet ,.
Let us follow the Secretary of Commerce through a day's work.
Before he reaches his office, the heavy morning mail has been distributed
to eight bureaus and to the several divisions which compose the Secre-
tary's office. Some has gone to the Assistant Secretary, and only such as
requires the Secretary's personal care is placed on his desk. Among the
letters is one from the White House enclosing a bill just passed by Can·
gress, that affects the work of the department. The letter asks if the Secre·
tary knows any reason why the President should not sign it. A check for
perhaps $500,000 comes from the contractor who finishes and sells the
government sealskins, this amount covering only a part of the season's
catch. The department's pay roll is presented for signature. Congress
sends a resolution calling for information or asks appearance before a
committee. There are requests for business conferences, various reports
and letters from the eight bureaus of the department, many requests for
information and assistance, a share of complaints-the usual business
mail. It is business mail; there is little that is political about it.
The Solicitor enters, visibly disturbed, with the Congressional
Record in his hand. Senator X or Representative Y has made some imagi·
native remarks about the work of the department or has introduced a
bill changing its structure. Perhaps a measure favored by the department
is delayed or opposed. An act has been passed lICCJuiring certain work for
which there is no appropriation. The Solicitor asks if he should go to the
Capitol and try to straighten matters. "Do so and report." The Director
.. See William C. Redfield: The New Industrial Day. New York: The Century
Co.; 1912.
:ta See Chapter S.
"William C. Red6dd: With Congress md Cabinet. Selected frOID pp. '4S-6. Re·
printed by pennission of Doubleday " Company, Inc. Copyright 19%4, Doubleday,
Page " Company, Inc.
of the Bureau of Standards telephones that the American Societf of
Automotive Engineers (or some other scientific body) is to meet t"jJere
the next day. "Will the Secretary come out and say a few words of wel-
come and also look over the plans for equipping the new laboratoryt" .
The Commissioner of Lighthouses enters with his naval aich1-
tect to submit drawings of a new seagoing tender for the Pacific a:~st.
He remains to say that the light station on Navassa Island, West In~1e5,
is completed after serious difficulties arising from isolation and the Ia:k
of fresh water. He shows the schedule for new aids to navigatiorl .lD
Alaskan waters for the present year, and expresses concern about tht! tn-
adequate depot near Hampton Roads. He urges particularly that steps
be taken to secure from Congress adequate pay for the district jnspect~rs.
Perhaps he leaves a copy of the Lighthouse Service Bulletin contail~mg
such items as the following: "The keeper of Cape Ann Light Staflon ,
Massachusetts, reports: 'At 9 P.M., December 31, a large flock of geese
bound south hit the north tower, killing five. Three broke through the
glass in the tower, breaking two window panes and clipping the prisms
of the lens very badly on the northeast side:" (Bad for the tower, but
good for the keeper's table.)
The disbursing clerk comes in hastily to say that the House ~P­
propriations Committee has reported a "cut" that will involve dischar~ng
part of the force of an important division; also that another appropriation
will be useless in its proposed form, since it pIOvides only for the jield
service and prohibits employment of the necessary help in Washington.
R~ \.., 1:.~1,.<l,. I:.~ <:.~w.w,.""""~I:.~ \\\~ ~'l.<:l;_" t~ t\\~ <:.1,.<:.,,~ ~\ \\\'t CR,w.w.;"~<:!:. wrl.
to arrange, if possible, for a hearing.
A number of callers who are waiting in the anteroom must be
received, although it is almost time for lunch. Here is one of them with a
strange question. He is the head of the largest concern of its kind in the
land, and asks: "Mr. Secretary, why is a business man not believed in
Washington?" Elsewhere, he says, his word is accepted as a matter of
course, but in the national capital he meets polite incredulity. He is told,
inter iilia, that suspicion in Washington often usurps the place of wisoom,
and that it is unfortunately too true that some business men come here
with minds singularly devoted to their own interests and not over"con-
cemed with the public welfare. Confidence is withheld from some who
deserve it because there are others who do not.
When the Secretary returns from lunch, a note awaits him saying
that the Director of the-Census wishes him tu see the new integrating
counter which is ready on ·the fourth flnor. This gives an opportun_ity
to exhibit to the Representative who accompanies him the counter, whlch
has been developing for months under a special appropriation. 1t is
planned to be ready for work on the census of 1920. After.examinitlg it
he takes the Representative to the census machine shop, on the seco~d
floor, that he may see in operation the very wonderful tabulating machm-
cry which the Bureau of the Census designs and builds for its own use·
 ADMINISTIATIVE 'UNCTIONS

Back to the office on the seventh IIoor to receive a telephone

mes.l3ge from Foreign and Domestic Commerce, saying the commercial
attache at Shanghai cables that with his aid an American maker of tex-
tile machinery has secured an order for $2,000,000 worth of cotton-mill
equipment. A less happy announcement is that the commercial attache
to Buenos Aires, en route down the west coast of South America, has
been shipwrecked. He fortunately escaped unhurt, but with the loss of his
personal baggage.
The Secretary's confidential clerk comes in with a pile of papers
from all the services which require signature; with them is the outgoing
mail. There is but time before the day closes for a conference about the
Laboratory at Fairport, Iowa, recently destroyed by fire. Here we inoculate
fish with germs to maintain the pearl-button industry. The conference
ends the day, but the actual incidents given afford only a glimpse of the
work that lies behind them.

Before Redfield's book appeared, Raymond Poincare, who had

been a Minister, Premier, and President of France, described tIle
"well-filled" day of a French cabinet minister, its "formidable mass of
correspondence," its "interminable procession of people soliciting
favors," and its "desks and tables loaded with great portfolios,
crammed with every kind of document." Without constant work and
careful management, Poincare pointed out, the ministcr becomes
"merely the plaything of Parliament or the tool of his departmental
bureaux." "

3. THE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES OF A BUSINESS MANAGER

The many similarities and differences between the activities of a
premier or a government department head and those of a big busi-
ness magnate are revealed in the weekly schedule followed during
the 1930'S by Alfred P. Sloan, Jr. as head of the General Motors
Corporation. After a distinguished record at the Massachusetts In-
stitute of Technology, Sloan, at twenty-four, became President of the
Hyatt Roller Bearing Company, manufacturers of one of the many
parts that helped develop the infant automobile industry. Young
Sloan solved engineering problems, supervised production, financed
the operations, did maintenance and repair work, and made the
major sales trips. In the last capacity he came to know the automobile
industry and its problems. He was brought into General Motors by
its founder, \Villiam C. Durant, and when Pierre Du Pont succeeded
to Durant's interests in the post-war depression of 1920, Du Pont
'" Raymond Poincare: How France Is Governed. New York: Robert M. McBride
and Company; 1919, pp. 175~.
28
selected Sloan as his executive vice-president. General Motors of the
1930'S and the 1940'S, largely a product of Sloan's administrative
skill, combined a score of motor car divisions from Chevrolet to
Cadillac.

"Alfred P. Sloan, Jr.: Chairman" ,.

Procedures, embod}~ng the basis of a scientific approach to man-
'agement, are certainly the most characteristic and most tangible part of
Mr. Sloan's work. Since the committee meetings give such pattern as
there is to Mr. Sloan's week and month, some glimpse into their work-
ings may most easily be got by following him through a few days.
Picture him, then, arriving at his office shortly after nine-thirty
of a Monday morning, striding nervously over the taupe carpets of the
broad, paneled entrance halls. He drops into his chair, starts to study a
batch of correspondence, reports, and newspaper clips concerning Gen-
eral Motors and related topics. At ten there is a meeting of the Policy
Committee. Discussion turns on whether or not C. M. should exhibit at
the New York World's Fair. It must come before this august group be-
cause it will involve at least $2,000,000; more than that if the Fair is held
over for another year. Plans for an exhibit and estimates of attendance are
produced. The general economic situation is considered. Other ways of
spending the money are compared. Mr. Sloan devotes himself to getting
all views out in the open, laying particular emphasis on the positive views.
For lunch he goes to the C. M. executive dining room where he
sits at the head of one of the long tables and chats with whoever happens
to be beside him-there is no fixed order-while he hurriedly and some-
what absently takes his food. Here he may survey a cross section of C. M.
executives, who collectively are plump, pink, and fortyish. well dressed up
to but definitely not beyond the point of nattiness, a solid and earnest
little island of Detroit set in the urbane crosscurrents of Manhattan.
Back in his office, he plunges into the dictation of correspondence,
of which he has an enormous amount and at which he goes with great
speed and concentration. A large part of ,it is with other Ceneral Motors
men and in this way he manages to keep up with a number of topics that
might escape the more formal routine. He leaves the office at about six
o'clock, taking with him some new financial report or economic study for
homework.
Tuesday he talks over points for the annual report with John
Thomas Smith, his legal chief of staff, and with Donaldson Brown, his
financial chief. In the intervals he is on the telephone with President
Knudsen in Detroit, as he is most days, keeping up on operations.
Wednesday and Thursday are given over to twelve General
Motors dealers, nominated by the divisional sales organizations to form a
,. "Alfred P. Sloan. Jr.: Chairman." Fortune. April 1938. vol. '1. selected from
p, 1 u. Reprinted by permission.
29 ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS

part of the Dealer Council-there are four regional groups in aU-who

have come at G. M.'s expense to discuss their problems with Chairman
Sloan and his other officers. Freely and vehemently they go at the ques-
tions of cross-selling and allocation of territories. They are at it all day for
two days.
So goes the New York week. On Friday he may devote himself
to advertising, reading copy and fussing over it with his pencil. And there
is always more correspondence. On Saturday, if much work needs to be
doue, or even on Sunday, he may come in to the office, although G. M. is
committed to a five-day week.
On the following Monday night he gets on the train for Detroit,
accompanied by Messrs. Brown and Smith and bv Albert Bradley, who
is Brown's junior teammate on the financial staff. Here, at nine thirty, he
goes into a meeting of the Engineering Policy Group. Sometimes these
meetings are brief and highly informal. At such a one the engineer, Hunt,
may speak up to say again that he never thought freewheeling was worth
a damn, whereat Grant, the G. M. sales chief, may admit sheepishly that
the dealers don't want it so much any more-an admission to be greeted
by a chorus of "Let's can it!" led by Sloan himself. But today the business
cannot be disposed of so simply. Preliminary submissions for the 1939
Buicks are in and the items must be gone over one by one. All are aware
that cars in the price class of Buick no longer account for 35 per cent of
the market but something nearer 10 per cent, and tliat therefore a large
independent tooling expense cannot be incurred.
That evening Mr. Sloan and the other New York men go to a
set of dormitory rooms right in the General Motors building and continue
their talks with Detroit officials of G. M. Mr. Sloan retires early, for sleep
is the one relaxation he takes seriously, but is down in the morning to have
his breakfast at the basement coffee counter, sitting on a stool. This day
the Distribution Policy Group will talk about the costs and benefits of a
more liberal cancellation clause in the dealer contract. In the afternoon
Mr. Sloan may get out to look over progress on the new Diesel plant.
Thursday the Administration Committee meets and it is another all-day
affair. In a darkened room chart after chart is thrown on a screen, showing
the state of General Motors inventories, dealers' stocks, the rate of sales;
showing also pertinent trends in the general economic life of the country.
Charts may be held for a while on the screen while points are discussed.
Afterward the talk turns on production schedules and the extent to which
new plant additions may be desirable. Then he boards the train for New
York again.

The opportunity of copying Sloan's organizational system has of

course been limited, and his managerial methods, especially his com-
mittee procedures, have not been universally accepted. His personal
administrative practices, however, reRect, in some degree, the types
of functions similarly carried on by other executives at aU levels of
the American economy.

4. SOME SIMPLER BUT SIGNIFICANT FUNCTIONS OF

ADMINISTRATION
Not all administrative duties are carried on in the glamorous sur-
roundings of cabinet offices and taupe carpets. Donald C. Stone here
gives a typical picture of some of the more pedestrian but nonetheless
practical aspects of the administrative process. Stone is well-equipped
to portray the realities of administration. After training in public ad-
ministration at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs
at Syracuse University, he worked his way through the fields of police
administration, municipal management, state administration, Federal
administrative management, and international administration. Al-
though his main experience in public management was in his capacity
as consultant to governments, ranging from rural towns to the United
Nations, his official posts included Assistant Director of the Bureau
of the Budget and Director of Administration of the Economic Co-
operation Administration. In all his posts he engaged in the widest
scope of administrative activities, including the drab but crucial daily
duties which he emphasizes below.

DONALD C. STONE
"Characteristics of Administration" 11
We speak of administration as being the organization and direc-
tion of persons in order to accomplish a specified end. But these are just
vague words. Their interpretation lies in an examination of the day·to-day,
hour-to-hour, and year-to-year juxtaposition of persons, ideas, and events
in an organization engaged in carrying out some specific program of work.
Administration is the simplest of actions, like the signing of a letter, the
reporting to a superior of the need for more funds, or the interview of a
complainant. I was going to say the hiring of a person, but that is by no
means a simple action! At the same time, administration consists of the
most complex of actions-the inauguration of a welfare program, the de-
velopment of a slum clearance project, the conduct of hearings to fix
bituminous coal prices, the certification of a State public-assistance plan
as being in conformity with established Federal standards, OT the layout of
a city water system.
Most people tend to think of administration in grandiose terms,
as being only actions of great magnitude. Achlally it is the simple, as well
11 Donald C. Stone: "Planning as an Administrative Process." Address to the Na-
tional Conference on Planning, May 12, 1941.
31 ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS

as difficult, evety-day decisions and acts which in the aggregate become

administration. A report came back to me the other day of a talk given by
a very competent Federal administrator to a meeting of the junior mem-
bers of the American Society for Public Administration. He had told them
about a troublesome case he was handling. A claimant had been taken
violently iJ1 one day in a field office and the office manager had called in a
doctor. Later on the doctor petitioned the Federal Government for pay-
ment of the bill because the claimant had refused to pay. Said the Federal
administrator to the prospective junior administrators, "If you don't like
to straighten out all kinds of small troubles like that, you won't like ad-
ministration. It's not all making decisions on the principles of public ad-
ministration as they are written in the text books."

Such managerial functions are characteristic of other levels of gov-

ernment besides the national. As we shall see, the United Nations
as well as individual nations, cities as well as states, call for common
techniques of management. Carl Sandburg, the famous biographer
of Lincoln and one of America's leading poets, has described from
his own experience how the processes of municipal management be-
come entangled with the problems of international reform. In 1910,
Sandburg left his promising newspaper job in Chicago in order to
help elect Emil Seidel as the first Socialist mayor of Milwaukee. After
his election, Seidel appointed Sandburg as his secretary. Sandburg'S
biographer reports the secretary's first official experience as follows:
"In its pre-election propaganda, the party had talked more or less
about establishing an international co-operative brotherhood of man.
Certain newspapers and bankers and industrialists were watching un-
easily to see what course it would take, once it came into power. The
Mayor was sworn in solemnly. He moved into his office and stood
with Sandburg at his side, receiving the congratulations of faithful
delegations that called upon him in this his hour of triumph. He had
been mayor perhaps ten minutes when the telephone rang. Sandburg
the idealist reached the receiver. A voice said: 'There's been a dead
dog in the alley besides my store on Grand Street for three days. It's
beginning to stink. I want you to do something about it.' Sandburg
promised to attend to it, and did. He found the department re-
sponsible for the removal of dead dogs and ordered it to go to work.
And at that same time he discovered a practical side to politics that
had nothing to do with the brotherhood of man, the theory of gov-
ernment, or even with the other practical consideration of getting out
the vote." 1$
Sandburg'S administrative experience has often been duplicated
.. Karl w. Detzer: Carl Sandburg. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company;
1941, pp. 83-4·
32 ADM••tSTlt'11ON

at the municipal level. Typical is the world reformer Joe Astell, who
is the local alderman of South Riding, a classic novel about British
municipal government. At one point in the story, Astell takes aD in-
ventory of his career, which ranged from his thankless fight for world
peace to his achievements of "solid concrete results," such as the
erection of a municipal swimming pool or a sewage disposal plant.
Bitterly he reminisces: "You begin by thinking in terms of world-
revolution and end by learning to be pleased with a sewage farm." ,.
In carrying out even these humble functions of municipal sewage
disposal or sanitary inspection there is repeated the same pattern of
the administrative process experienced by Secretary of Commerce
Redfield or G.M.C. Chairman Sloan.
At a minor level of administrative responsibility, such as the posi-
tion of municipal inspector, the subject-matter may differ, but there
is the same sequence of reports, interviews, correspondence, and in-
spections. This similarity is made clear in an interesting series of es-
says prepared by a number of British officials and collected by the
British Institute of Public Administration in 1935 and 1937. The
various descriptions of the administrative workday presented in this
series constitute a catalogue of daily duties applicable to almost all
administrative jobs. Whether the report is that of A. H. Walker,
Sanitary Inspector and Housing Inspector for the Metropolitan
Borough of St. Pancl'as, or of J. T. Hutton, Public Assistance Officer
of the London County Council, of G. F. Cotton, birector of Victual-
ling for the Royal Navy, or of Stanley Cursiter, Director of the Na-
tional Galleries of Scotland, there is a common core of administra-
tive experience involving the recognized activities of "correspond-
ence," "coordination," and "consultation.""

5. ACTIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE WORKDAY

These common characteristics of administrative activity are ap-

plicable to the local community as well as to a world-wide hierarchy.
The following studies, produced by careful observers, indicate the sur-
prising Similarity between (a) the daily calendar of His Holiness,
the Pope, and (b) the daily schedule of an American city manager.

,. Winifred Holtby: South Riding. New York: The Macmillan Company; 19~6,
p.UL
.. "Off the Beaten Path." Public Administration. April '937. vol. 15, pp. ,,8-67.
«A Day in My 0IIiciaI Life." Research Studies in Public Administration. London: The
lostitute of Public Administration; 1955.
33 ADMINISTIATIVI !'UNCTIONS

(a) KEEl VAN lIOII(

Pope Pius XII, Priest and Statfiman 11
A Pope is no doubt the hardest worked person in the world, with
a daily routine more severe than that of a head of State and head of Gov-
ernment combined. A large part of a Pope's day is reserved for audiences.
Each of the 1,2.00 Archbishops and Bishops of the Catholic Church is
obliged to visit Rome once every five years, the canonical ad limina visit.
This, in practice, means that there is one such important visitor almost
every day for whom the Pope has to prepare by reading up previous re-
ports so as to familiarize himself with the situation of his visitor's diocese.
Then there are private..audiences of distinguished personalities, arranged
generally through their legations. Most of his time, however, is taken up
by group audiences of pilgrims who have come from near and far to see
the Pontiff, to kiss his ring, and to hear a fatherly word from his lips. Pius
XII has broken with many traditions; he moves freely among his visitors,
and these functions have nothing of the rigidity which both his predeces-
sor's age and temperament had imposed. Religious functions at which he
has to appear as the central figure are another heavy toll on his time and
on his physique. As the Pope's daily consultation with his Secretary of
State-reviewing the affairs of the world and the Church in general-
takes already a couple of hours every morning, one can easily calculate
that it is not until the afternoon is well gone that the Pope can settle down
to undisturbed study.

(b) "Safeguarding Managerial Time" ..

There is no accepted set of duties and responsibilities for a city

manager, nor are there any "guaranteed" techniques for solving administra-
tive problems. Some managers swear by certain techniques as indispensable
tools of management, but others have achieved equal success without
these "indispensable" techniques. However, beneath the superficial dif-
ferences in positions and the apparent nonconformity in techniques, care-
ful analysis reveals that "over-all administration," or management, has
certain common characteristics wherever it is found.
There probably is general agreement that the principal functions
of a city manager are to organize, to plan, to direct, to coordinate, to con-
trol, and to represent the administration in contacts with the council, with
outside agencies, and with the public. These functions, together with
finance and personnel mmagement, are the elements of management

11 Kees Van Hoek: Pope Pius XIl, Priest and Statesman. Selected from pp. 86-8.
Reprinted by permission of Philosophical Library, Inc. Copyright 1945, Philosophical
Lib....ry, Inc.
22 "Safeguarding Managerial Time." Public Management, September 1941, vol. 23.
selected front pp. 259, .64. Reprinted by permission.
34 ADMINISTaATIOII

which the city manager cannot delegate without surrendering in part his
claim to the title of chief administrator.
The 2:0 city managers, for the purpose of this study, kept for a
week a daily record of time Spellt on different activities. An average work
week of 54 hours was reported and, on the basis of a six-day week, a nine-
hour day would be distributed as follows:

Talking with citizens in office and over telephone: 2 hours

Conferences with department heads: 1 it, hours
Planning current activities and future work: 1 hour
Handling correspondence: 1 hour
Formal and informal meetings with city council: 50 minutes
Inspecting municipal activities: 50 minutes
Attending meetings and talking before various groups: 40 minutes
Preparing official reports: 30 minutes
Interviewing candidates for positions: 20 minutes
Miscellaneous: 20 minutes

Most managers realize that they must relieve themselves of the

Jess important work and devote more time to such managerial functions
as planning and coordination which they cannot afford to delegate. Their
work days are endless chains of exacting duties, with scarcely any intervals
in which they can see the job as a whole. Constructive thinking is most
likely to occur when the manllger has mastered the art of unhurried
management.

Administrators at all levels of responsibility devote a large pro-

portion of their time to such acts as consultations with staff and pub-
lic. Administration thus becoIJles a matter that can be understood in
such pedestrian terms as conversations, conferences, correspondence,
interviews, reports, and just plain sitting and thinking."

6. THE THREE BROAD FUNCTIONS-ADMINISTRATION, MAN-

AGEMENT, ORGANIZATION

No matter how concrete tbe various administrative functions be-

rome durin% the oldiwdry wOikda'j, they have to be das<;ified 'Unde~
a few general headings if they are to be outlined for profitable study.
What terms can be chosen, therefore, as the most general "pegs," as
Lewis Meriam calls them, on which to hang the major administrative
functions? A broad and helpful classification of functions has been
furnished by writers such as the American, J. William Schulze, and
the Englishman, Oliver Sheldon .
.. See Louis Brownlow's definition of an administrator, Chapter %0.
35 ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS

J. William Schulze determined upon the scientific study of admin-

istration after a period of practical managerial experience. As comp-
troller for the Robert H. Ingersoll Company, which was engaged in
war production during World War I, Schulze found the bottleneck
in his organization to be not only the factory but also the various ad-
ministrative, clerical, sales, and managerial offices of the company.
Considering these administrative problems, he set forth his basic
"definitions" in.1919 before the Taylor Society, an organization de-
voted to the study of scientific management. These are the concepts
presented below. In the same year, Schulze published his textbook,
Office Management." Comptrollers of commercial firms such as
Schulze were generally regarded during the Mauve Decade as office
managers or glorified bookkeepers who "sat at a high desk on a stool
and handled large and cumbersome bound ledgers" and had "an
ability to write a good Spencerian hand and a tendency to wear an
alpaca coat and an eye shade."" Yet it was the "office manager" like
Schulze who was regarded as the authority on administration by the
British "philosopher of management" Oliver Sheldon.
Oliver Sheldon, noted author of The Philosophy of Management,
was a British industrial consultant who became interested during the
interval between the two World Wars in describing the "science of
industrial management which was developing before our eyes.""
Sheldon wanted "management to be an integral and highly trained
part of the community to take the initiative so far as possible within
its own sphere, in raising the general ethical standard and conception
of social justice." 2T He constantly sought to bring scientific and
definitive thinking to the subject of administration. As his source for
a proper definition of the concept, it is interesting that he chose the
practical American manager, J. William Schulze."

(a) OLlYER SHELDON

The Philosophy of Management"
Administration is the function in industry concerned in the de-
termination of the corporate policy, the co-ordination of finance, produc-
.. J. William Schulze: ~ Management. New York: McCraw·Hill Book Com-
pany, Inc.; 1919 .
.. Walter D. Fuller: "What the Senior Executive Expects of the Office M ....
ager." American Management Association, 1937, Office Management Series. No. 711,
P·36.
"Oliver Sheldon: The Philosophy of Management. p. xii. See note >9 .
.... Sheldon: The Philosophy of Management. p.• 86.
IS For Sheldon's reference to Schulze see The Philmophy of Management. p. ;2,
n.2 .
.. Oliver Sheldon: The Philosophy of Management. Adapted from p. 3•. Reprinted
by permission of Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons. Copyright 1930, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons.
tion and distribution. the settlement of the compass of the organization,
and the ultimate control of the executive.
Management proper is the function in industry concerned in the
execution of policy. within the limits set up by administration, and the,em-
ployment of the organization for the particular objects set before it. .
Organization is the process of so combining the work which I.n-
dividuals or groups have to perform with the faculties necessary for Its
execution that the duties. so formed, provide the best channels for the
efficient, systematic, positive, and co-ordinated application of the avail2 ble
effort.
Organization is the formation of an effective machine; man:lge-
ment, of an effective executive; administration, of an effective direction.
Administration determines the organization; management uses it. -:d-
ministration defines the goal; management strives toward it. Organizapon
is the machine of management in its achievement of the ends determill ed
by administration.

( b) J. WILLIAM SCHULZE
"Some Definitions .. •o
Administration is the force which lays down the object for wlii~h
an organization and its management are to strive and the broad poli,cles
under which they are to operate. An organization is a combination of the
"''C,,"'C'>'b'l>;:'J \\~Th'l>'" \it'>",'6'b, Th'l>\~'l>\'b, "''\)'\)\'b, 'C"1~'''i>Th'C'''''', ,*,\);.\.,>,,'6 "'1>'l>1:'C '.nn..
appurtenances, brought together in systematic and effective correlation, to
accomplish some desired object. Management is the force which I&ds,
guides, and directs an organization in the accomplishment of a pre-
determined object.
The words management and administration are so frequently IIsed
synonymonsly that one rather hesitates to draw a distinction betweel)
them, for, after all, usage gives a word its meaning. Yet there is a con~
tion in the minds of many of us giving the word administration a mearllllg
broader than either organization or management; in fact, many of us look
upon it as encompassing both. Probably the form of our government is
somewhat responsible for this conception. The president, who with .his
cabinet is regarded from an organization and management point of vIew
as the official elected by the people to lay down, year by year during his
administration. the objectives toward which the country is to strive jlnd
the polkies under which it is to operate, typifies the administrative force
behind our government. His messages to congress and his proclamatiOns
to the public are administrative in their purpose. After the messages ba~
resulted in congressional enactment and the proclamations have beetf is-
sued, the various governmental heads of departments, typifying manJIge-
so 1- William Schulze: "Some Definitions." Bulletin of the Taylor Society. Inne
1919, vol. 4, p. :2. Reprinted by permission.
37 AOWINISTUT1VE fUNCTION$

ment, direct the govemmenW organization in the carrying out of the ob-
jects laid down in the acts of congress and the presidential proclamations.

One difficulty in employing this broad definition of functions is

the lack of uniform usage among authorities. The same author fre-
quently reverses himself and interchanges terms like administration
and management. Sheldon himself, although he defines the term ad-
ministration as broader than management, goes on to speak of "Man-
agement, in this general sense, including both Administration and
Organization."" This British conception seems to be the general
European usage, adopted also by Fayol, in which management is
given a broader meaning than administration." In the United States
too, these terms are occasionally interchanged or used synonymously,
just as they have already been so used in this book. As a further ex-
ample, the field of American public administration has widely
adopted Leonard D. White's view that administration is concerned
"with the management of men and materials in the accomplishment
of the purposes of the state," and that administration is "broadly
managerial in nature." sa When White defines and enumerates the
components of public administration, he lists organization and per-
sonnel management, as well as financial and legal controls, thus
giving administrative functions the more inclusive definition. This
practice is common among American specialists in industrial admin-
istration."
In American usage, therefore, administration includes manage-
ment and organization, but more particularly it involves a larger ele-
ment of objectives, programs, or policies. As Schulze points out, this
broad American conception of administration probably arises from
our "form of government" in which the President, as chief executive,
is given a range of duties that go far beyond "organization and man-
agement." This consideration takes us into the relationship between
administration and policy, the subject of our next chapter.

SUMMARY
The actual processes or functions of administration havc been de-
scribed in a variety of ways in this chapter. 111CY range from abstrac-
31 Sheldon: Philosophy of Management, p. 33 .
.. Fayol: Industrial and General Administration, pp. 8-9 .
.. Leonard D. White: An Introduction to the Study of Public Administration.
New York: The Macmillan Companv; 1939, p. 6. See also W. H. Leffingwell: "The
Present State of the Art of Office Management." Bulletin of the Taylor Sodety, April
192;, vol. 10, p. 97, and C. B. Going: Principles of Industrial Engineering. New Yoa:
McGraw·HiII Book Company, Inc.; 1911, p. 6.
.. Reginald E. Gillmor: "The Ultimate Science." Advanced Management, June
1947, vol. 12, pp. 53-8.
38
tions like Gulick's POSDCOllB to detailed time studies of the
mundane tasks of administnttion as in the case of a city manager.
The nature of administrative duties has been clarified further by
Donald Stone's description of the pedestrian phases of administra-
tion. Between the administrative workday of Pope Pius XII and that
of cabinet secretary William Redfield or corporation chairman Al-
fred P. Sloan, Jr. there is place for every conceivable type of under-
taking.
These various functions, processes, activities, or duties are further
described in this book under the three headings suggested by the
final reading of Schulze and Sheldon; administration, organization,
and management. One of the earliest attempts following that of
Schulze to organize the material in the field of adminisfration in a
somewhat similar fashion waS made by Professor Leon C. Marshall,
Dean of the School of Commerce and Administration at the Uni-
versity of Chicago. In a summary chapter of his readings on Business
Administration, under the heading, "Basic Features of Administra-
tion," Marshall suggested a three-fold breakdown in the following
terms: "We have now reached a stage in our study where it is worth·
while to raise the general question of what is involved in administra-
tion. We are primarily concerned with business administration, but
this general question may well be considered with public administra-
tion, school administration, and other possible forms of administra-
tion in the background of our thinking. . . . Let us arbitrarily use
the term administration to include (a) policy formation, (b) the
planning and setting up of the organization, and (c) the running of
the organization." ••
The concepts administration, organization, and management will
be clarified in the remaining chapters of this book. Meanwhile, we
will proceed in the following five chapters with the material devoted
to administration proper. Since the over-all title of this book is also
administration, the reader will note that we are usin the term in two
senses. Irs, a mlDlstraiJon IS use m e roa sense to include
Oi'ganizatJon an . econ a rmmstra Ion IS use ~ as
some ng separate from t e techniques of rrtaxragemenroi'1he
~nce Of fir!fitJZalliw; that IS, as the art of formulating progxams or
~ lCles et er these prognmrsil:rvtlWe o~iectIves regardin suDfeCt-
rna er or 0 ratmg po ICle regar mg mana emen Itse
o avol t IS ou e usage we cou 0 course, coin a new term
for the more comprehensive concept of administration. No acceptable
term comes to mind unless we use a phrase entirely new like "social
sa Leon C. Marshllll: Business Aclministllltion. Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press; '9", p. 7;6.
39 ADMINISTlATIYE FUNCTIONS

engineering.'~ .. In our concern with terms and definitions, however,

we must not be led into what Henry Dennison, a genemtion ago,
called the "pet Taylor Society distinction between administmtion
and management."·7 Every field of study involves conflicts over
terminology and uncertainty over definition. Our main object is un-
derstanding rather than mere definition, and until a new terminology
is adopted, it is more practical to retain the existing usage, however
unstandard it may be. Nevertheless, in order to prevent confusion,
the sense in which the term is being employed, especially when pre-
cise connotation is essential to the discussion, will be indicated.
What may be more disturbing to the reader at this stage of the
discussion is the fact that while administration consists of such
concrete duties as conferring, telephoning, inspecting, and corre-
sponding, it also seems to involve a significant measure of program
formulation or policy determination. But it is generally held that
administration begins only when policy-making ends. This perplex-
ing relationship between policy and administration is the subject of
the next chapter.
3. As early as 1909 William H. Tolman produced a work entitled Social Engineering.
New York: McGraw Publishing Co.; 1909. It dealt, however, mostly with personnel
management. The term Social Engineering was also used in 1931 by Paul W. Ward:
Intelligence in Politics. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1931, p. 120.
The scientific management term human engineering was used by Horace B. Drury:
"Scientific Management and Progress." Bulletin of the Taylor Society, February 1917,
voL 3, pp. 9 '7· Charles Merriam also used the term in "Government and Business."
TournaI 01 B~silless, July '933, voL 6, p. 188. It had been used earlier by Dean Roscoe
Pound of the Harvard Law School.
"Henry S. Dennison: "\Vho Can Hire Management." Bulletin of the Taylor
Society, June 1924, voL 9, p. 106. See an earlier criticism of Schulze's definition by
H. S. Person: "On Mr. Schulze's Definitions." Bulletin of the Taylor SOCiety, October
1919, vol. 4, pp. 47-8. Person recommended the use of the term direction "above"
administration and management and the term planning below them. More than twenty
years later, he repeated and refined his recommendation. H. S. Person: "Research and
Planning as Functions of Administration and Management." Public Administration
Review, August '940, vol. 1, pp. 67-8,
 CHAPTER TIIREE

ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY

ANY attempt to define administration with precision involves con-

sideration of the fine distinctions that have been drawn between
the terms administration and policy. At what point are we to draw
the line between the formulation of a political, economic, or social
policy, and the execution or administration of that policy? In the
field of government, authorities consider the line of dem.hcation to
be bctween the enactment of a law and its execution, but as Henry
Taylor, a renowned nineteenth century British administrator, ob-
served: "Wise men have always perceived that the execution of po-
litical measures is in reality the essence of them." 1
Many experts, however, find it necessary to divide and subdivide
their subiect-matter before they can define and describe it. For this
rcason, practically all authorities on administration have tried to dis-
tinguish, with different degrees of success, between administration
and policy. They sometimes refer to the distinction as one between
policy-making and policy-execution, or between legislative and exec-
utive powers, between law-making and law-enforcement, or between
rule-making and rule-application; and sometimes they imperceptibly
change terms altogether, shifting from the contrast between admin-
istration and policy to a contrast between administration and politics.
In order to clarify the practical distinctions-or better yet, the actual
relationships-that exist between these various aspects of policy and
administration, a dozen selections based largely upon American and
1 Hellry Taylor: The Statesman. Cambridge; W. Heffer & Sons; 11}27. p. xxv.
40
41 ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY

British experience with large-scale activity in public administration

will be presented in this chapter.

1. THE DOGMA OF DIFFERENTIATING ADMINISTRATION

FROM POLITICS AND POLICY

Since the nation's beginning, American statesmen have observed

a differentiation between policy matters and administrative matters,
but it was \Voodrow Wilson who made one of the first dogmatic
distinctions between politics and administration in the 1880'S. As a
college professor and university president, \Voodrow Wilson dealt
with the subject of government and public administration for
twenty-five years before he became Governor of New Jersey in 1911,
President of the United States in 1913, and founder of the League
of Nations in 1919. Indeed, Wilson's political critics regarded him
as an inspiring teacher and an effective college administrator, but a
poor politician and an inept President. \Vhether Wilson deserves
to be thus characterized is a question still being wcighed on thc scales
of history. As a student of government, \Vilson's abiding interest
lay primarily in constitutional and political problems and only sec-
ondarily in the field of administration. His first article on political
science, written while he was a college senior, dealt with "Cabinet
Government in the United States"; it was published in the Inter-
national Review,' the editor of which was, ironically, Henry Cabot
Lodge, later to become the leader of the "willful band" of senators
who defeated the proposal for American participation in the League
of Nations. Wilson's first book, Congressional Government, pub-
lished in 1885, was also more a political than an administrative trea-
tise.
His first analysis of the field of administration was presented the
next year, when, as a young college teacher, he prepared a papcr,
"The Study of Administration," published in the Political Science
Quarterly in 1887. This paper, quoted below, was reputed to have
formally launched the subject of administration as distinct from pol-
itics_' Even before. he went into politics, Wilson came to be deeply
interested in the practical application of administrative skills. He
was an advocate of civil service reform, and he was especially im-
pressed with the "general manager" system of city government which
originated in Staunton, Virginia, his own birthplace, and which was
2 \Voodrow \Vilson: "Cabinet Government in the United States." International
Review, August ,879, vol. 7, pp. 146-63·
• See the authorities quoted by White: Introduction to the Study ot Public Ad-
ministration, p. 10
42
the forerunner of the widespread city manager system. Wilson was
thus a combinatinn of political reformer and executive leader, scholar
and statesman, politician and administrator. How well did he fare in
trying to interrelate, or rather to disentangle, politics from admin-
istration?

WOODROW WILSON
"The Study of Administration'"
Public administration is detailed and systematic execution of
public law. Every particular application of general law is an act of ad-
ministration. The assessment and raising of taxes, for instance, the hang-
ing of a criminal, the transportation and delivery of the mails, the equip-
ment and recruiting of the army and navy, etc., are all obviously acts of
administration; but the general laws which direct these things to be done
are as obviously outside of and above administration. The broad plans of
governmental action are not administrative; the detailed execution of
such plans is administrative.
This is not quite the distinction between Will and answering
Deed, because the administrator should have and does have a will of his
own in the choice of means for accomplishing his work. He is not and
ought not be a mere passive instrument. The distinction is between gen-
eral plans and special means.
Most important to be observed is the truth already so much and
so fortunately insisted upon by our civil service reformers; namely, that
administration lies outside the proper sphere of politics. Administrative
'questions are not political questions. Although politics sets the tasks for
administration, it should not be suffered to manipulate its offices. The
field of administration is a field of business. It is removed from the hurry
and strife of politics; it at most points stands apart even from the de-
batable ground of constitutional study. It is a part of political life only as
the methods of the counting-house are a part of the life of society; only as
machinery is part of the manufactured product. But it is, at the same
time, raised very far above the dull level of mere technical detail by the
fact that through its greater principles it is directly connected with the
lasting maxims of political wisdom, the permanent truths of political
progress.
One cannot easily make clear to every one just where administra-
tion resides in the various departments of any practicable government
without entering upon particulars so numerous as to confuse and distinc-
tions so minute as to. distract. No lines of demarcation, setting apart ad-
ministrative from non-administrative functions, can be run between this
• Woodrow Wilson: "The Study of Administration." Political Science Quarterly,
Tune 1887, vol. >. adapted from pp. 209-1;. The essay was reprinted in the Quarterly,
December 1\)41, vol. 56, pp. 481-506.
 AIMIIINIS1'L\TION AND POLICY

and that department of government without being run up hill and down
dale, over dizzy heights of distinction and through dense jungles of
statutory enactment, hitber and thither around "ifs" and "buts," "whens"
and "howevers," until they become altogether lost to the common eye not
accustomed to this sort of surveying, and consequently not acquainted
with the use of the theodolite of logical discernment. A great deal of ad-
ministration goes about incognito to most of the world, being confounded
now with political "management," and again with constitutional principle.

On the basis of Wilson's essay a distinct separation was devel-

oped, not only between politics and administration, but also between
policy and administration. This dichotomy dominated American
thought in government and other administrative organizations for
the next fifty years. Wilson drew a line of demarcation between pol-
itics and administration, but he was dubious about stretching this
line across the "dizzy heights" and "dense jungles" of pratical gov-
ernment. Those professors who accepted Wilson's essay as dogma
did not discover until it was republished fifty years later, accompa-
nied by his covering letter to the editor of the Political Science Quar-
terly, that Wilson himself did not regard his "paper" too highly.
Wilson had admitted that he was merely presenting "a semi-popu-
lar introduction to administrative studies" and that "it goes critically
round about the study, considering it from various outside points of
view, rather than entering it and handling its proper topics." •
As a young and enthusiastic teacher of government, Wilson
presented not so much a scientific definition of administration as a
challenge to the great evils of the day, spoils in politics and the pa-
tronage system. President Garfield had been assassinated in 1881 by
a disappointed office seeker, and in 1883 the Civil Service Reform
Act, familiarly known as the Pendleton Act, was passed. But this act
was merely a statutory beginning and like all laws required vigorous
administration. For these reasons, not because of more universal and
scientific considerations, Wilson proclaimed "the truth . . . that
administration lies outside the proper sphere of politics." He was, of
course, looking to the future effects of administrative reform; for, he
pointed out, "Civil service reform is thus but a moral preparation
for what is to follow. It is clearing the moral atmosphere of official
life by establishing. the sanctity of public office. . . . By sweetening
its motives it is rendering it capable of improvi~g its methods of
work." • Wilson had also pointed to this main issue in his previous
book, Congressional Government, where he had urged "the drawing
5 Woodrow Wilson: Letter to Professor Edward Seligman, November 11, 1886.
A facsimile appears with the reprinted article cited in footnote 4, above.
• Wilson: "The Study of Administration," p. >10.
 ADMINISTRAnoll

of a sharp line of distinction between those offices which are political

and those which are non-political. The strictest rules of business dis-
cipline, of merit-tenure and earned promotion, must rule every office
whose incumbent has naught to do with choosing between poli-
cies." 7
Wilson was not alone in advocating a clean-cut separation of
administration from politics. In 1879, Albert Stickney had argued in
his True R.epublic that "public servants must have duties of only one
class. The men in the executive administration should have nothing
to do with general legislation; and the men who have to do "'lith gen-
eral legislation-the deliberating and deciding as to the policy of all
departments of Government-should not meddle with the details of
administration of anyone department." ,
Another of \Vilson's contempora'ril:s who was greatly concerned
about the mixing or "meddling" of politics with ndministration was
Professor Frank J. Goodnow, who Inter became President of The
Johns Hopkins University. Goodnow formalized his conception of
administration in 1900 in his aptly entitled book, Politics and Ad-
ministration. Goodnow's definition was similar to \Vilson's, although
he made the technical distinction, which \Vilson had rejected, be-
tween politics as "the expression of the will of the state" and admin-
istration as "the execution of that will;" • but what was more impor-
tant in Goodnow's concept of administration was the fact that he
saw its wider implications in the long sweep of American history.
"The use of the word 'administration,' " he pointed out, "is unfortu-
nately somewhat misleading, for the word when accompanied by the
definite article is also used to indicate . . . popularly the most im-
portant executive or administrative authorities"; that is, the govern-
ment of the day and the political leadership in the \'>'bite House.
Consequently, although Goodnow, like \Vilson, felt constrained to
make the distinction between politics and administration because of
the contemporary "necessity of administrative efficiency," he also in-
sisted that administration had constantly to be related to politics
if government was to work successfully. He therefore asked and tried
to answer the significant question which Wilson had avoided: "What
parts of this function of administration should be subjected to the
control of the function of politics?" t.
There was little immediate reaction to Goodnow's queries as to
T Woodrow \Vi/son: Congressional Government. Boston: Houghton, Mifllin Com-
pany; 1885, p. 290.
S Albert Stickney: A True Republic. New York; Harper and Brothers; 1819, pp.
195-6.
• Fronk J. Goodnow; Politics and Administration. New York; The Macmillan
Comf;1I1 Y; 1914. p. 22.
, Goodnow: P,,'itics and Arlmillistution, pp. 20. 22, 78-<),.
45 ADMINISTtATION AND POliCY

relating, not merely separating, administration and politics. Wil-

son's well-phrased though somewhat ambiguous demarcation Con-
tinued to be the accepted formula among many political scientists
and most specialists in public administration.

2. ADMINISTRATION AS A SEPARATE BRANCH OF

GOVERNMENT

\V. F. Willoughby tried to give an even more separate status to

administration, not merely by marking it off from politics, but by
setting it up as a fourth branch of government, along with the legis-
lative, the executive, and the judicial. Although this plan represented
a radical departure from American constitutional theory. it was only
an extended vcrsion of 'Vilson's separation of administration and
politics or policy. After considerable experience as a Federal civil
servant and as a consultant to the Chinese govcrnment before 'Vorld
'Var I, Professor Willoughby served for a period of sixteen years as
Director of the Institute of Government Research at the Brookings
Institution in \Vashington. He produced the studies quoted below
while working at Brookings.

(a) w. F. WILLOUCHBY

Tile Government of Modern States 1l

In the threefold classification of go\ernmental powers no recogni-

tion is given to Administration as a separate function or branch of gov-
ernment. In so far as anv account at all is taken of this function in that
classification, it is confused with, and treatcd as a part of, the execntive
function. To so great an extent is this true that the two terms "executive"
and "administrative" are used almost interchangeably. This is exceedingly
unfortunate since, as we shall see, the t\\'o terms should be employed as
connoting operations which arc distinct in character.

(b) w. F. WILLOUCHBY

Principles of Public Administration 12

The term "administration" may be employed in political science

in two senses. In its broadest sense, it denotes the work involved in the
actnal conduct of governmental affairs, regardless of the particular branch
of government concerned. It is thus quite proper to speak of the adminis-
11 W. F. ~'ilIoughby: The Government of Modern States, p. 23 L Reprintc<I by
pennission of Appleton·Century.Crofts, Inc. Copyright 1920.
12 W. F. Willoughby: Principles of Public Administration, p. 1. Reprintc<I by
pennission of The Broolcings Institution. Copyright 1927. The Broolcings Institution.
tration of the legislative branch of government, the administration of
justice or judicial affairs, or the administration of the executive power,
as well as the administration of the affairs of the administrative branch of
government, or the conduct of the affairs of the government generally. In
its narrowest sense, it denotes the operations of the ad}l1inistrative branch
only. It is in its latter, restricted, sense that the term is employed in the
present volume.

(e) W. F. WILLOUCHBY
"The Science of Public Administration" 11
Properly to understand this definition it is necessary to point out
the distinctions that are implied in it. The first of these is that between ad-
ministration and legislal:ion strictly speaking. If the work of our so-called
legislative bodies is analyzed, it is found to fall into two distinct classes;
one, the enactment of laws, properly speaking, which have for their pur-
pose to determine and regulate the conduct of private citizens in their
relations to one another and to the government; and, two, the determina-
tion, subject to constitutional limitations, of how the government, and
particularly the administrative branch of the government, shall be or-
ganized, and what work shall be undertaken, how such work shall be per-
formed, what sums of money shall be applied to such purposes, and how
this money shall be expended. It is unfortunate that the same designation,
"laws" or "statutes," is given to both classes of enactments through which
expression is given to the determinations reached. The two have almost
nothing in common.
The importance of this distinction from the standpOint of the
science of administration is evident. When enacting statutes of the second
character, our legislative bodies are acting precisely as a board of directors
of a private corporation when such a board attempts the direction of the
affairs of the cQrporation. They are, in fact, performing the functions of an
administrative board and their acts, as such, are purely of an administrative
character. It is certain th'at due appreciation is not had, either by legislators
themselves, or by the general public, of the extent to which our legisla-
tures are integral, and, indeed, dominating, parts of our administrative
machinery. Misled by a loose use of terms, one usually thinks of aU ad-
ministrative powers being lodged in the executive branch of government.
In point of fact real administrative authority, and primary responsibility
for. the conduct of the administrative affairs of the government, reside,
under our political system, in the so-called legislative, rather than in the
executive, branch of the government.

,. W. F. Willoughby: "The Science of Public Administration." Selected from

pp. 40-44. John M. Matthews and James Hart (eds.): Essays in Political Science in
Honor of Weste1 Woodbury Willoughby. Reprinted by pennisssion of The Johns
Hopkins Press. Copyright 1937, The Johns Hopkins Press.
47 ADMIMl$1V.T1ON AND POUCY

A second important distinction is that between executive and ad-

ministrative powers. Here, also, confusion has resulted from a fallure to
distinguish between things which are essentially different. As commonly
employed, the two terms "executive" and "administrative" are used as al-
most synonymous terms. The most striking illustration of this is the desig-
nation of the administrative departments of the National Government
as "executive" departments. In point of fact these departments do not
have an iota of executive authority. They are administrative departments
pure and simple. With the exception, to a certain extent of the State, War,
and Navy Departments, they are not even under the direction of the chief
executive except in so far as Congress has seen fit so to ptOvide. In the
first organization of our governments, national and state, care was taken
to make it clear that the President and the Governors should, in all cases,
be given the executive power. This term "executive power" was not
deemed, however, to be synonymous with, or even to include, administra-
tive power. The latter power was, as has been pointed out, vested wholly
in the hands of the legislature, and is today exercised by that branch of our
governments through agents directed and controlled by it.
It is true that there has been a strong movement during recent
years to emphasize the responsibility of the chief executive for administra-
tive matters. This has come about, partly by administrative power being
conferred by statute upon the President and Governors, and partly by
these officers making use of their political powers to make their will pre-
vail with respect to administrative policies and procedures.

Willoughby'S recognition of administration as a fourth branch

of government is the most extreme, but probably the most logical,
result of the strict separation of administration and politics initiated
by Wilson. Why stop with the differentiation of administration from
politics or policy or law-making; why not make it an independent
branch? Repudiating the constitutional interpretation of the Fed-
eralist to the effect that administration "falls peculiarly within the
province of the executive department," Willoughby took the drastic
position that separated administration from the executive branch
as well as from the other branches of government. He made one im-
portant proviso, however, namely, that the legislative branch should
dominate. Far from such executive subordination to the legislature,
the historic trend of American constitutional practice, beginning
with the Federalist period, had demonstrated the continued growth
of the executive power in relation to Congress, interrupted only by
such events as the controversy over reconstruction during the admin-
istration of Andrew Johnson."
,. Leonard D. White: The Federalists. New York: The Macmillan Company;
1948, p. 78. Paul H. Appleby: Policy and Administration. University, Alabama: Um-
1rersity of Alabama Press; 1949, p. u6.
48 AOMINISTIlATIOfI

Willoughby's distinction between the administrative and the

executive branches might have been regarded as mere speculation,
were it not for the fact that for a generation he impressed this view
upon the students and staff at Brookings Institution. In 1937, Presi-
dent Roosevelt's Committee 011 Administrative Management re-
ported its plans to strengthen, under the chief executive's direction,
the administrative management of the Federal government; but the
Brookings view, held by Lewis Meriam as well as by W. F. Wil-
loughby, was urged upon Congress and virtually became that body's
counter-conception of the original intention of the Constitution.
How call we explain this effort to reduce the administrative
powers of the constitutional executive?
First, Wilson had separated administration from politics, and
now Willoughby was virtually cutting it off from the executive who
was the popularly elected political chief of the government. Wil-
loughby revealed his reasons when, in presenting his "fourth branch"
theory, he explained: "It is now recognized that, if anything, a popu-
larly controlled government is one which is peculiarly prone to finan-
cial extravagances and administrative inefficiency. It is now seen that
our original conceptions regarding the separation of powers must be
radically reviscd." "
Th~s, political scientists in the 1920'S, and especially specialists
in public administration. were still seeking to keep administration
free from partisan or spoils politics, even though spoils politics were
beginning to disappear. 'The formula used in the 1920'S was different,
but the object was the same. Few political scientists have been willing
to go to \Villoughby' s extreme in trying to keep administration free
from "popularly controlled" politics. Nor were thcy willing to accept
his radical departure from the established American view of the sep-
aration of powers. In the next generation, \VilIoughby's "fourth
branch" theory was rarely accepted,'O but Wilson's dualism of ad-
ministration and polities was widely supported among American
specialists in public administration. Among them was Professor John
M. Pfiffner.

3. DISTINGUISHING ADMINISTRATION fROM POltTICS

As a faculty member of the School of Public Administration at

the University of Southern California since 19l9, Professor Pfiffner
,. Willoughby: PrillCiples 01 Public Administration. p. viii.
,. See Harvey Walker: Public Administration in the United States. New York:
Farrar and Rinehart; '937. Walker suggests thai it may be "more satisfactory to add
administration to the former three with a resulting recognition of four classes of gov-
ernmental power." Pp. 3-4. 7.
 ADMINISTRATION AN. POLICY

belped to develop an independent curriculum for the field of public

administration. and to extend his classroom and textbook knowledge
widely among the public offitials of Southern California. As an ex-
perienced teacher, researcher, and writer, Pfiffner combined his in-
terest with an urge for precisiQn in the exposition and clarification of
administrative data and ideas. He sought persistently for a clean-<:ut
definition of the concept of public administration, as the following
reading shows.
JOHN M. PFIFFNER
Public Administr,tion 11

The friends and advocates of the new public administration are

not blind to the ways of politics, for they have too often come in contact
with its worst manifestations. l\iorem'er, they are too intelligent and ex·
perienced to give even passing tonsideration to its elimination. Instead,
politics is regarded as an inevittble and necessary part of the process of
government, It must, however, be controlled and confined to its proper
sphere which is the determination, crystallization, and declaration of the
will of the community. Administration, on the other hand, is the carrying
into effect of this will once it h~s been made clear by political processes.
From these premises, therefore, is derived the keystone of the new public
administration-the conclusion that politics should stick to its policy'
determining sphere and leave administration to apply its own technical
processes free from the blight of political meddling.
Let no apostle of politi~al realism think that advocates of such a
separation of powers are unawate of its doctrinaire pitfalls. They do not
advocate that it be embalmed i1lto constitutional breakwaters designed to
stand for centuries, as was the <:jassical threefold division into legislative,
executive, and judicial function~. The desire is merely to establish a rule
of action which will automatic~lIy detemline, in most cases, whether a
given matter is properly of legisl~tivc or administrative competence. There
is no denial that in a considerable number of instances questions of policy
will be closely intermingled with administrative action. Such a situation
will be much more aggravated ill some fields of activity than others.
Politics and administration cannot always be separated and iso-
lated. The realization of this f~ct should not, however, vitiate the basic
soundness of aJ(entleman's aJ(reemenl;. growing out of tradition, that one
will not encroach upon the othh in a meddlesome manner. The success
to be attained in this direction will depend largely upon the extent to
whicJl partisan politics is kept out of administration, and upon the as'
surance of tenure given to technical and expert personnel. This will entail

" John M. Pfiffner: Public Admillistration, selected from pp. 9-11. Reprinted by
permission of The Ronald Press Com,pany. Copyright 1935, The Ronald Press Com,
pany,
just as ~eat an obligation for the administrative personnel tQcabst3in {rQm
political controversy as for the· political officers to keep hands off ad-
ministration.

In his revised edition a decade later, Pfiffner emphasized that in

some instances politics and administration "are so intermingled and
confused that a clear distinction is difficult"; and he advocated that
"the line between the two should be shaded from black to various
shades of grey, finally merging almost imperceptibly into the
white." ,. Nevertheless, he adhered to the conclusion that "politics
should stick to its policy-determining sphere and leave administration
to apply its own technical processes free from the blight of political
meddling."
The "no-meddling" point of view has continued to be commonly
held by many of the authorities in political science and public ad-
ministration since the 1880'S. Professor John Vieg recently explained:
''The public service has much to gain and nothing to lose from ob-
serving the implications of the dichotomy of politics and administra-
tion. To the degree that administrative officials make clear by word
and deed that they regard themselves principally as agents of policy,
the public will be likelier to confine itself to the control of policy
in the legislative area, leaving administration free to do its work with-
out direct political interference." 1,
Thus the dichotomy developed. Wilson's distinction between
politics and administration came to be more generally referred to as
one between policy and administration. A most widely quoted
authority in thus identifying the scope of public administration was
Leonard D. White, although like Wilson he continued to point to
the relationship between the two. White's Introduction to the Study
of Public Administration flexibly presented the Wilson definition
in the following terms: "In its broadest sense, public administration
consists of all those operations having for their purpose the fulfill-
ment or enforcement of public policy as declared by the competent
authorities." Who are these "competent authorities"? In some cases
they might be the administrators themselves, for White pointed
out that "officials are concerned with the making of policy as well as
its execution/' and that "in the world of affairs a line between ad-
ministtation and that which is to be administered is often almost
indistinguishable." .. White has also helped to explain how the same
11 Pfiffner: Public Administllltion (revised edition, 1946). pp. 1.1-•.
18 Fritz Motslein Marx (ed.): Elements of Public AdmiuistIlltion. New Yorlc:
Prentlce.HalI, lnc.; 1946, p. 9.
.. White: Introduction, p. ). (1<n9 ed.) White further explained: ''For priIctiad
as well as technical reasons • • • it is necessary to stop short <If all bullWl probbns
awl human policies in an dort to clear OIle path through the field of pnblic ....
motivation .for eJficiency and BOn-partisanship, which impelled
Wilson in the 1880's lind inBuenced Willoughby in the 19:10'5, con-
tinued to favor the separation of administration from policy and
politics. As part of President }Ioover's survey of Recent Social
Trends, published in 1933, White examined the remarkable achieve-
ments in the "more responsible and efficient conduct of public
affairs" since 1900, explaining the trend on the basis of such factors
as "the muckraking period of 1900-1910 . • . , the persistent agita-
tion against the spoils system and for better municipal institutions
. _ . , the World War and the subsequent illcrease in public expend-
itures . . . , the financial burden of the immediate post-war period
. . .. , the depression . . . , [and the J great pressure for reduction
of public expenditures and taxation." 2t
The drive for administrative efficiency was thus continued. For
the specter of spoils politics there was now substituted the threat
of fiscal proBigacy. As a consequence, it was still advisable to culti-
vate an administrative art free from the forces of partisan politics
mentioned by Wilson, and from the politics of "a popularly con·
trolled government" as mentioned by Willoughby.

4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AS CHIEF LEGISLATOR

In the 1920'S, during a harsh period of post-war realism, a few

American political scientists had begun research into what Charles
E. Merriam called the New Aspects of Politics." While these special-
ists recognized the importance of the administrative art, they did not
neglect some of the more significant realities of the political world.
One of these political scientists was Howard Lee McBain. At the
• same time Willoughby was arguing at Brookings Institution that the
chief executive should not preside over the administrative depart-
ments, Professor McBain, working at Columbia University, made
the disturbing annOuncement that the President was not merely
chief executive; he was chief legislator.
ministration." White'. 1948 edition used a similat definition although the delinitive
sentence deleted the phrase "as declared by the competent authorities." See also his
elarifying comments about policy in his interesting review of the work of Chatles Jean
Bonnin, a French scholar of the Napoleonic period: "The Just Official." Public Ad·
ministration Review, Summer 1945, vol. 45, pp. 271-4.
".Leonard D. White: Trends in Public Administration. New York: McGraw·HilI
Book Company, loc.; 19~~, pp. 8-<}. As cady as 1926, in his first edition of Introduc·
tion to the Study of Public Administration, White bad also pointed out: "The ob.
iective of public administration is ellicient conduct of blic business." P. S•
.. Charles E. Mcn:iaIn: New Aspects of Polities. ~: The University of Chi-
cago Press; 1925.
 JIOWAtlO L1£ Uca.uN
The Living Constitutioa ..
The prime function of the President is not executive at aU. It is
legislative.
True enough, the constitution vests "all legislative powers" in
Congress. It purports to withdraw the President from his major executive
role and to put him upon the legislative stage in only three minor and ex-
ceptional roles. He may call Congress in extraordinary session; he may
deliver m~; he may ~-ero proposals of law which, if o>ngress is still
in session, may be passed over his veto by a tw(}othirds vote of each house.
Popular demand for the appearance of the President in these lesser parts
leaves him little time to star as Chief Executive. Politics has transformed
his minor into his major role. The exceptions to his activities as Chief
Executive are more important than the constitutional rule.
We hold him accountable for what he succeeds in getting Con-
gress to do and in preventing Congress from doing. Once in office, except
for considerations of the patronage, which is politics rather than executive
business, the time and thought of the President and his Cabinet are de-
voted far more largely to legislative than to executive matters. This is true
even when Congress is not in session.
The President, then, is a Chief Legislator rather than a Chief
Executive. Moreover, this results not only from the practice of politics
hut also from law. The constitution vests executive power in the Presi-
dent. But Congress vests executive power nearly everywhere except in the
President. Whenever an office is created its powers and duties are de-
termined by statute. The incumbents of executive offices look to the law,
not to the President, for the SOurce and scope of their authorities. Such
statutes, it is true, make liberal use of the phrase "subject to the direction
and control of the President"; but the day by day activities of the several
branches of the administration are in fact carried on quite independently
of the President.
To conceive the President as the general manager of a vast ad-
ministrative organization with his hand of control resting day by day upon
all of its ramifying parts is to imagine a ,'ain thing. The interregnum
which \1iaS all but complete duting President \Vilson's long illness offers
proof enough if proof were needed. The executive wheels of government
did not stop. Indeed, except fot the extraordinary international situation
and for the fact that the law requires the presidential signature upon many
documents, little administrative difficulty or embarrassment was en-
countered.
Such is the nature of the American presidential system in action.
------
.. Howard Lee McBain: The Liv;ng Coustitution. Selected hom pp. 11;-'0. Re·
printed by permission of The Macmillan Company. Copyright 19%7, n.e MlICInillan
Company.
9 ADMINISTUTION AND POLICY'
T() say that it .embodies an "almost complete isolation of the erecutive
branch from the legislatnre" is to look no further than the letter of the
constitntion. It is to ignore the fact that the dead bones of the furlda-
mental Jaw are quickened into being by the 8esh and blood of politics,

In making the chief executive the chief legislator, McBain brought

administration back into the field of politics and policy with renewed
vigor. Others had seen this relationship not only in the Federal gov-
ernment, but in the states and cities as well, where aggressive gover-
nors and strong mayors were popularly expected to put a program
through the legislature or the council, just as a forceful President
was popularly expected to get action from Congress. Willoughby,
several years before McBain, had recognized this relationship al-
though he had decried it." Moreover, the law-making process at
practically all levels of American government is replete with evidence
that administrative officers are expected to participate in policy-n:tak-
ing. In the prevailing American business culture as well, managers
and executives are frequently expected to "lead" their boards of
trustees. In American organizational life, too, the executive secretary
who cannot "carry his board with him" is generally regarded as in-
effective. All good administrators at almost all levels of responsibility,
whether they are chief executives, middle executives, or petty execu-
tives, watch pending legislation generally to see that it does not ob-
struct their administrative operations, and eliective administralOlS
generally have their own programs and legislation to push throllgh
their respective legislative bodies." Governmental or administrative
lobbying is sometimes frowned upon, but the administrator and his
staff who will not, with discretion, do their share may soon find
themselves without anything to administer. As McBain suggests, the
chief executive is merely the chief legislator at the vortex of a policy-
making process that not only permits but requires the participatioll of
administrators at aU levels of authority.

5. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AS CHIEF POLICY-MAKER

With the coming of the New Deal, the line between the execu-
tive and the legislative, and between administration and policy, first
.. Willoughby: The Government of Modem States, pp. ~s-6. Wilson had also
made ~ reference to the president's "legislative and policy·making role" in '''The
Stndv of Administmtion:' p. %u.
-~-.See V. O. Key: Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Thomas Y.
CrneII Com 7, pp. 702-10. For 8 meaJing discussion of Iobbvin£ includiaa
• " see Dorothy Delzer: AppointIlIent on the Hill. iilew york:
pany; ICU8, pp...6, S<>-3·
began to waver mote seriously and then became more stabilized than
in previous periods df American history-but only at the.~ .0£
an obvious incursion of "administr:ttion" into the "policy" ~.
This readjustment was colorfully analyzed by Luther Gulick, who
wrote the following when the New Deal was but a half"':Year old.

LUTHER CULICK

"PoIitks, Administration and the 'New Deal'"''

A major objective of American governmental refurm is to "take

administration out of politics." Hardly a month goes by during Which
some one does not arise to demand that we "take the schools out of polio
tics," or it may be the health department, or tax administration, Ot the
supervision of banking and insurance, or highway administration. But it is
always the same tune and the same words, "take administration Out of
politics."
And how do we proceed to take administration out of politil$?
Thus far we have been dealing with "politics" in the vulgar .\eDse
as a part of the spoils system. But this is not the scientific nor th~ sig-
nificant meaning of the word. In its true meaning, politics is action, attion
which has to do with the control of rulers. The politics of a govern~ent,
the control of the direction of a government, has therefore beeI\ the
supreme stake of revolution and reform since the dawn of history. The
onwaro'marcD o{ aemocracy .nas Deen (ne graaila( extensIon o{ die ngl'tt to
participate effectively in this control to the ordinary men and women who
are governed and served by government. This is what we mean by "self-
government." In this true sense, politics cannot be taken out ~ ad-
ministration nor administration out of politics, for surely no one d<:sires
to take away the control and leave rulers a free hand to do whatever they
wish. This would be to tum back the clock and throwaway the most
precious prize that mankiud has won through the years.
But how are we to distinguish between politics as the essential of
democratic control and "politics" which is part of the spoils system?
If the state legislature passes a law requiring all apartment h()uses
to have an automatic gas cut-olf which will stop the flow of gas when a
building catches fire, is this "politics" or politics? When the specifications
of a city for sewer pipe are drawn so that only one manufacturer of a
patented design can meet the requirements, is this "politics" or politics?
When the tariff on aluminum is increased, or when the Congress \utes
to free the Philippines, are these "politics" or politics? Are the excIl\sion
of unmigratlon, the suspension of tax sales and mortgage foreclosures, the

.. Luther Cuilck: "Politics. Administtation and the 'New Deal.''' Annals Of the
AmericaJI Academy of Political ""d Social Science, September 19U. vol. 169, selI!Cted
from pp. n. S9. 63. 65-6. Reprinted by permission.
closing of banks, or the approval of fictitious balance sheets for insUtllnce
companies "politics" or politics?
Into the midst of this situation has come the "New Deal." 1'he
New Deal is the decision of the Nation to have the government becCme
the super-holding company of the economic life of America. The }Jew
Deal is politics; it is policy. Its success rests upon administration. file
central fact of importance in this administration is the development l'nd
the enforcement of a master plan which will give central cOnsistency to
all the objectives, all the programs, all the organizations, all the procedt1res
of the government. To achieve this end, there must be developed a ,lew
and revolutionary extension of the practice and theory of administration.
We have not only to adjust our government and administration to ~he
industrial and machine era, but also to adapt it to the new super-holdmg
company revolution which has engulfed us.
The working arrangements of modern government are not so
much the result of theory as of the process of trial and success. All the
philosophies have been fashioned from these results, and most of the
theories have done more or less violence to the facts, because they were
put together by men and given currency by groups which had before tli~
a limited set of facts and a definite objective. John Locke and Montesqu'~eu
were surrounded by the mechanisms of conuol of arbiuary power wl1.lch
had developed with the decay of feudalism, before the growth of political
parties, general education, and democracy. They therefore thought that
th.e ~te. di'lisi.Q13. Qt ~'!(all. 11.13.<1. tb..e 1l.'5ll.tem. <It lI.\l.tQma.Ii<:. i.l!..te..:naI
checks and balances was a final philosophical buth. At least, it did ~
to give them the civil liberty and freedom from arbiuary power wlJlch
at the time mankind ardently desired.
This freedom had been largely achieved when Woodrow WilSon
and Frank J. Goodnow examined democracy. They were surroundeO. by
spoils politics and governmental inefficiency in an age of technolo!?cal
specialization. They therefore divided all government into politics and
adminisuation, assigning to certain organs of government the functions of
politics, of policy conuol, and reserving for other organs the expert ~k
of execution of those policies. This theory is equally a product of tIme
and desire.
We now face a new situation and a new necessity. The govC11l
ment is becoming and is apparently destined to remam, at least to a de-
gree, the super-holding company of the economic life of the Nation. ~e
fundamental new function which government assumes in this procd~ IS
that of devising and imposing a consistent master plan of national life.
This will require a new" division of actual work, and therefore a new theory
of the division of pow~. While it is perhaps too early to state such a
theory, it is clear that it will be concerned not with checks and balanceS or
with the division of policy and administration but with the division be·
tween policy veto on one side and policy planning and execution on the
~. .
 , Gulick's theme was adopted by others. In 1936, there appeared
E. Pendleton Herring's definitive work on Public AdminiStration
and the Public Interest, replete with evidence of administmtive par-
ticipation in policy-making." The next year, 1937, Marshall E.
Dimock revived Goodnow's original conception under the new title
of Modem Politics and Administration and described how the two
processes of administmtion and politics or policy are "coordinate
rather than exclusive."" By 1940, Carl J. Friedrich of Harvard Uni-
versity, reviewing the New Deal experience, finally declared the poli-
tics-administration dichotomy a "misleading distinction" which had
become "a fetish, a stereotype in the minds of theorists and practi-
tioners alike." ..
Although Gulick's suggestion of the planning concept was not
widely adopted as synonymous with administrative policy-making, it
was a significant reminder to Americans that a related terminology of
governmental powers was evolving elsewhere in the world, especially
in the Soviet Union. The Russians were experimenting with a less
orthodox method of classifying basic governmental functions, in-
cluding the administrative. In one of the most detached and descrip-
tive treatises on Russian management published in the United States,
the Russian system was described as follows: "Soviet Law and litera-
ture try to distinguish current 'operative' functions-procuring and
disposing of goods, hiring labor, supervising production-from 'plan-
ning' proper and, more generally, from 'directives' or policy-making.
In theory, the manager of a single plant is confined to operative func-
tions, while special government organs do the planning within gen-
eral directives provided by the Party." 80 This system provided a
division of functions similar to that recommended the previous year
in the introductory issue of Public Administration Review by Har-
low S. Person, one of the original American advocates of scientific
management. Person was critical of our "constitution with its divi-
sion of responsibilities and authorities and its checks and balances,"
and he advocated the introduction of concepts like planning as well
as direction, administration, and management."
.. E. Pendleton Herring: Public Administration and the Public Interest. New
York: McCraw-Hili BooIc Company, Joe.; 1936•
.. Marshall E. Dimock: Modern Politics and Administration. New York: American
Book Company; '937, p. 243 •
.. Carl J. Friedricb: "Public Policy aod the Nature of Administrative Responsi-
bility." Carl J. Friedrich and Edward S. Mason (eels.): Public Policy, Yearbook of
the Graduate School of Public Administration, 1940. Cambridge: Harvard Univermy
Press; 1940, p. 5.
ao Gre&orY Bienstock, Solomon M. Schwan, and AIu'on Yugow: Management in
Russian Industry and AgriculttJn:. London: Oxford University Pte$$; 194 p. m.
Ol Harlow S. Person: "Research and Planning as Functions of Administration and
Manap:mertt." Poblic ~ .Review, Autumn 1'}40, vol. 1. p. 66.
S1 ....'NISTRATt9N AND POLICY

Meanwhile, the country had entered a new phase of large-scale

enterprise, namely, the emancipation of the European continent
from the Fascist yoke. In the course of the vast military undertakings
of World \Var II, millions of Americans came to know the same
distinctions, now written in blood, between directives, plans, and
operations.

6. POliCY-MAKING IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

After World War II, as the country approached the mid.century,

a more clarifying formula, if not a precise definition, was found for
the relationship between the concepts of politics or policy on the one
hand, and administration or management on the other. This formula
was conceived without devising a new branch of government under
the title planning or rejecting the existing American distribution of
poweI;.'i between the legislative, executive and iudicial branches.
One of the outstanding statements of the newer formula was pre·
sented by Paul H. Appleby. Appleby was a newspaper publisher until
he became Assistant to Secretary of Agriculture Henry A. Wallace
in 1933, Undersecretary of Agriculture in 1940, and Assistant Direc-
tor of the Budget in 1944. In 1947 he became Dean of the Maxwell
School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University,
which had carried forward some of the ideas of training for the pub-
lic service started by Charles Beard at the New York Training School
for Public Service.

PAUL H. APPLEBY
Policy and Administration"
For purposes of this discussion, the government of the United
States will be considered as operating through eight distinct processes-
all political processes. The first process on the list is the Presidential
nominating process. The second process is the general nominating proce,s.
The third process is voting-the electoral process. The fourth is the legis-
lative process, involving everything that is done by legislative bodies. The
fifth is the judicial process. The sixth is the party maintenance and opera-
tion process, exclusive of the making of nominations. The seventh is the
agitational process, ~nvolvillg the organization and political use of other
than party groups-petitioning, public comment, de\>ate and demands.
The eighth is the administrative or executive process, involving
everything done by agencies other than the legislative and judicial ones.
a> Paul H. Appleby: Policy and Administration, adapted from pp. 8, '0, 12, .0-••
'3, 27-30, 4;-6, 76-7. ~, 9', 116. Reprinted by permission of University of
Alaballl;! Press. Ctlpytight 1949. Univexsity a{ A1abanla Pr$S.
58
Administration is, within. rather wide limits, the application of policy
perany formulated in law. Successively the application is made more
specific by policy formulations applied to particular publics. made still
more specific by application to smaller publics, and finally to individnal
cases. Conversely, it is the formulation and application of policy in par-
ticular cases made more and more general at successively higher levels
representative of successively larger publics, until at the highest execu-
tive level the President is representative of the whole American public.
Administration is in very large measure these two processes carried on
simultaneously.
A rough, popular separation between policy and administration is
valid. It is not truly a separation, however; it is a kind of tentative delega-
tion of power under which the public says, "We can not and will not
bother with such matters as a general rule; we can attend well to only so
much. But whenever we are much disturbed about something we are
delegating to you, we shall suspend the delegation." Congress, the Presi-
dent, the head of a Department, the head of a Bureau, the head of a Di-
vision and the head of a Section take similar positions, regularly exercising
only those powers felt to be necessary to their respective general responsi-
bilities, delegating everything else, and reserving the right to review any-
thing done under delegation.
It may be said that legislative bodies make very general policy
and that administrators make policy by applying that general policy at
successively less abstract levels. While there is truth in this, it is by no
means uniformly valid. Claims bills regularly enacted in considerable
number provide one familiar example of quite specific policy-making by
Congress. Eliminations of specific appropriations for single jobs provide
another kind of example. One may recall, too, the Congressional spank-
ing given to a recent Secretary of the Treasury for changing the pay of
charwomen in the Treasury building without specific Congressional ap-
proval The most noyel developments in governmental form in our later
history have been of a sort that would make possible a charge that Con-
gress has encroached upon the Executive, rather than the other way
around. The General Accounting Office as an arm of Congress has come
to exercise a pervasive executive control as readily to be faced with a charge
of unconstitutionality as the extreme instance of exercise of executive
power. The most extreme exercises of policy-making by executives have
been admittedly unconstitutional or illegal, or highly questionable, actions
by certain Chief Executives: the Louisiana Purchase by Jefferson and the
Emancipation Proclamation by Lincoln are outstanding examples. Re-
assurance would seem to lie in the fact that no one of the actions most
seriously questioned from constitutional or legal standpoints has been
itself disapproved by the people at the time or in subsequent history.
If one wishes. then, to define policy as that which Congress de-
cides, and adlJlinistration as that which the executive branch does, policy
and adlJlinistration may be regarded as somewhat separated. and the
definitions, like so many others Paving to do with social processes, become
rather meaningless. Similarly, w.ithin the executive branch, if policy is de-
fined as decision.making at toP levels and administration is decision-
making and decision-applicatiol1 at lower levels, a kind of separation is
achieved, but the definitions 31:e not useful. The position taken in this
discussion is that description is more appropriate than definition, that
many types of decisions involving policy-making are and must be dele-
gated as a usual thing, and that. on the other hand, almost any type of
decision may become on occasid n a matter for top-level consideration and
determination.
h '1>\", to\I::!.y. m ... \"'\oep'tRHl!. 'IlpC"r.tm-, :J:, -lCViC'Ji.'1taruvt -J. -guve-.,.-
ment workers who are not non1lally policy-making; they are not adminis-
trative either. Yet there are oc~sions when file clerks or telephone op-
erators contribute to policy-maj(mg. A very simple but vivid example of
this process may be given. It is the story of a New York businessman, the
vice president of an industrial company, who was told by the company's
president to "run down to WaShington and see the President." The er-
rand had to do with a matter jjl which the President was certain to have
a strong, personal interest. In Washington, the visitor called on the tele-
phone, in succession, each of the persons on the White House staff whose
names he had ever heard, but he could reach none of them. Knowing the
nature of his business, I assureJ him that he would get an appointment
with the President if he simply told his story to the girl on the White
House switchboard. He did, anO had a most interesting half-hour with the
President. The operator said to herself, "I'd better tell the chief operator
about this." The chief operator thought, "I'd better tell General Wat-
son's secretary." The General SlIid to himself, "It sounds as if the Presi-
dent will want to see him; I'd petter check with the Boss." Policy often
is involved in every step of suc):! transactions.
The great distinction l1etween government and other organized
undertakings is to be found in the wholly political character of gov-
ernment. The great distinction between public administration and
other administration is likewise to be found in the political character
of public administration. As the same business is handled at successively
higher levels it characteristically takes on successive increments in political
character, increments in broad &ocial applicability and total-governmental
significance. As business begins fO approach the levels occupied by political
officers, it comes closer to being ~ly political busin~, and clos~r to the
area of the partisan-political. While the vast "bulk ot the political process
by which most of the governIJlent's. business is ~ndled is wholly non-
partisan, civil servants working at high levels need to be able to work
effectively with officials who have party responsibility and who have
political responsibility to the party leader who is the Chief Executive. The
adequate bridging ot the non_partisan-political .leadership to party lead-
ership is a progressive phenomel1On within the executive hierarchy, taking
on acute aspects at very top leVC1s and requiring there much more con-
sideration than is commonly given it. No sharp, hard-aml·fast line exists
between the civil service and the pollticaJ..ofJicer level; none shOlUd exist.
The adminis\tative hierarchy is an organ receiving messages of
popu1ar demands, many of them contradictory. It is an organ responding
to such demands, reconciling them, and in the course of response in-
jecting considerations of prudence, perspective, and principle, including
regard for other popular demands and aspirations than those expressed in
the chorus of the moment. All this is a political process, much of it com-
pleted within the area of administration.

This flexible concept of the essential interplay between ad-

ministration and policy had been having a parallel development in
American industry and business. As early as H)09, J. Shirley Eaton
illustrated the interrelated "system of defined discretion . . . in each
rank of the organization" in a field of study he called "railroad admin-
istration."" In a stimulating discussion before the Taylor Society in
the 1920's, Henry S. Dennison described policy-making as taking
place "anywhere along the line."" In the 1930'S professors of Amer-
ican business administration were beginning to wonder whether the
distinction between policy and administration was a workable one."
At the very time the New Deal was, as described by Gulick, breach-
ing the line between policy and administration, the General Motors
Corporation, for reasons not unsimilar, recast the relationship be-
tween its management and its Board of Trustees, creating a "Policy
Committee" and an "Administrative Committee" which consisted of
overlapping membership." Indeed, one of the most effective picto-
rial presentations of Appleby's thesis of the overlapping zones of
policy-making was contributed by Vice-Chairman Donaldson Brown
of General Motors in 1943.37
In the social sciences, a similar trend of thought was occurring.
For example, the psychologist Walter Van Dyke Bingham took the
position in 1939 that every administrator and assistant administrator,
"far down the line . . . no matter how explicitly the act of Congress
may be worded, no matter how precisely his superiors have specified

sa J. Shirley Eaton: Education for Efficiency in Railroad Service, U. S. Bureau of

Education, '90<}, Bulletin No. 10, whole No. 420, p. ll.
s< DennisOn: "Who Can Hire Management," p. 106. See the ideas of Mary P.
Follett, our Chapter 11-
II John Calhoun Baker: Directors and Their Functions. Boston: Division of Re-
search, C!lIduate School of Business Administration, Harvard Univemty; 194" pp.
'4-7. Robert A. Gordon: Business Leadership in LaIge Corpo.rations. Washingl:on:
Brookings Institution; 194;, pp. ;1-2.
aG Ct:netlIl Motars CotpO!lItion: "Financial Statement, March 31, 19)7. Annual
Report for the Year Ended I>ecemher 31, 1937," pp. 3?-1l· . .
., Donaldson Brown: "Industrial Ma~t as a National RCSOI!II'C." Reprinted
ill The Conference Bo#d Manageml!J1t Record, i\priI U~43, vol. S, p. 14S.
 ADMINISTIATION ANO POLICY

the progwn," possesses a "zone of latitude within which his own

philosophy, his own basic policies are determinative."" Similarly,
the political scientist Charles Merriam declared: "Within the circle
of larger policy, (the manager) develops smaller areas of policy of his
own."" Other authorities like Herbert A. Simon designated the
whole process as one of "decision-making," regardless of its policy
or administrative nature." Still other teachers of political science like
G. Homer Durham accepted the concept of "administrative poli-
tics";" V. O. Key wrote on the subject of "Administration as Poli-
tics";" and finally, in 1945, Professor J. Donald Kingsley, after an
interesting administrative experience on the White House staff, ac-
cepted the thesis later clarified by Appleby, and announced: "Admin-
istration is a branch of politics." ..
Mter a review of this "rise of heterodoxy," Professor Dwight
Waldo concluded that the separation between politics and adminis-
tration had become an "outworn credo."" Yet the issue is a historic
one and will continue to be debated. Although the framers of the
Constitution helped to constmct, in the device of the chief executive,
a unique bridge between politics or legislation and administration or
management, the Federalists continued to be disturbed by the prob-
lem. James Madison, furthermore, "saw some difficulty in drawing the
exact line between subjects of legislative and ministerial deliberations,
but still such a line most certainly existed."" The search went on,
but no more fruitfully during the Federalist period than later. In one
of the frequent debates on congressional versus executive power to
layout post roads, Congressman Theodore Sedgwick from Massa:
chusetts declared "that it was impossible precisely to define a bound-
ary line between the business of Legislative and Executive; but from
his own experience, as a public man, and from reflection, he was in-
duced to believe, that as a general rule, the establishment of prin-
ciples was the peculiar province of the former, and the execution of
them, that of the latter. He would, therefore, at least, generally, as
88 Walter Van Dyke Bingham: "Administrative Ability, Its Discovery and De-
velopment." Society for Personnel Administration, '939, pamphlet NO.1, p. 4 .
.. Merriam: Systematic Politics. p. 149.
··Herbert A. Simon: Administrative Behavior. New Yor1t: The Macmillan Com·
pany; 1947·
., G. Homer Durham: "Politics and Administration in Intergovernmental Rela-
tions." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, January 1940.
vol. ~07, pp. 1-6. Albert SchliJlle used this term in 18<n; see below, p. 71 .
•• Key: Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. Chapters 7. '3 .
•• 1- Donald Kingsley' "Political Ends and Administrative Means: The Administra-
tive Principles of Hamilton and Jefferson." Public Administrdtion Review, Winter
'945, vol. S. pp. 87-9·
"Waldo: The Administrative State, p. IU.
".Annals of The Congress of The United States, Novemhe:r 19, 179~,. volume J.
p.699.
much as possible, avoid going into detail"" This statement is not a
model of clarity, but it expresses pragmatically the American way of
handling the difficult problem of relating policy and administration.

7. THE POLICY ROLE OF BRITISH ADMINISTRATORS

The British long ago recognized the administrator's responsibility

for policy matters. The theory of the separation of powers between
the executive, legislative, and judicial, which is the constitutional
basis for the American demarcation between policy and administra-
tion, does not, however, dominate English administrative thought.
As a matter of fact, the English abandoned the theory even before
the framers of the American constitution, belatedly influenced by the
writings of Charles Montesquieu, ''borrowed'' it from England!'
Instead of the threefold executive, legislative and judicial powers, the
trinity of powers which best. describes the British Parliamentary
system is Crown, Cabinet, and Civil service; and since all three of
these share both policy-making and administrative functions, the
American dichotomy is not entirely applicable to England.
The duties of "the administrative class" are officially recognized
to be primarily "those concerned with the formation of policy.""
Sydney and Beatrice Webb, the venerable couple of British politics,
went so far as to admit in their Constitution tor the Socialist Com-
monwealth of Great Britain: "The Government of Great Britain is
in fact carried on, not by the Cabinet. nor even by the individual
ministers, but by the Civil Service." ••
Particularly cognizant of the policy powers of the higher adminis-
trative class are the ministers or the members of the Cabinet, who,
in addition to being members of Parliament, also supervise the par-
ticular department in the name of the current government. Regard-
less of party they adhere to the traditional pattern of ministerial
relations to the Civil Service, on both policy and administrative
questions. This adherence is dearly demonstrated by the common

•• Annals of the Congress ot the United States, volume 3, December 7, 1791, p.

~39. See also White; The Federnlists, p. 5'·
fT Madison criticized this error of the "oracle," Montesquieu, concerning the
British constitution. Tbe Federalist, No. 46. See F. T. H. Fletcber; Montesquieu and
English Politics, 175<>-1890. London: EdWllrd Arnold and Company; 1939, pp. %7%-1.
Ramsay Muir; How Britain is Governed. Boston; Houghton Mifllin Company; 1935,
pp. 1<>-%1 .
.. Parliamentary Papers, "Report of the Civil Service National Whitley COllllCil
R~nixation Commitree," Feb. 17, 19%0, See. 43.
Sydney and Beatrice Webb; Constitution for the Socialist Commonwealth 01
Great Sritain. London; Longmaru Green and Company; 19:>0, p. 67.
position adopted by such diverse political leaders as (a) the Conserv-
ative Austen Chamberlain, and (b) the Socialist Herbert Morrison.

(al AUnEN CHAtoUIERLA1N

"Civil Service Traditions""

It is a mistake to suppose--and I hope it always will be a mistake
to suppose-that the civil servant governs this country. It is no doubt
true, as the late Sir William Harcourt said on some occasion, that a gov-
ernment of civil servants would be a very able and a very efficient govern-
ment, but then, as he added, they would all be hanged to the lamp posts
before the end of six months. It is the business of the Civil Service to
have at the service of the Ministry all past experience. We Ministers ar-
rive full of ideas which we believe to be novel, as novel as they are ex-
cellent; we are only astonished that our predecessors have never thought
of them, and our only anxiety is lest someone should publish them be-
fore our Bill is out. Then the civil servant says, "Oh yes, oh yes, I think
before you do that perhaps you had better see a memorandum which was
written in 1914 on that subject, or the observations which we made for
your predecessor when he put forward the same proposal and which in-
duced him to drop it." That is the brst stage. The second stage is to pre-
sent to the Minister such constructive suggestions as they can develop out
of their experience to meet his policy. I remember an argument with one
distinguished civil servant who was head of the Post Office when I was
Postmaster-General, in which, through a long hour, he sought to dis-
suade me, from doing that which I thought it was expedient to do. I now
knew the worst, and rightly or wrongly I persisted in my opinion, and
expressed my intention of carrying it out. And then my eminent friend
discharged the second valuable function of the civil servant. "Well," he
said, "if you will do a silly thing, of course you must, but is it essential to
you to do it in that silly way?" And having done his utmost to dissuade
me from doing it, he then showed me how to do it with the least friction
and the smallest disadvantage.

(b) HEBERT MORRISON

Socialisation ami Transport"
The popular fiction that the civil servants are anxious to foist
their own policy upon Ministers is not true in my experience. The civil
servants like their Minister to do well; they feel persoually humiliated if
.. Austen Chamberlain: "Civil Service Traditions." Public Administration, Jan~
Reprinted by pemtission. This selection is part 01 Chamberlaiu s
1930, ,,01. 8, pp. 3-4.
Inaugural Address as President 01 the British Institute of Public Admiuistratiou for the
sessiOII192.9-30. The full title is "Civil Service Traditions and the League of Nations."
11 Herbert Morrison: SociaIimion and Transport. Loodon: Constable .. Co.; pp.
100-0,. Copyright 1933. Constable 4: Co. Reprinted by pemtission.
he makes blunder.;; they take enormous pains to give him all the facts
Md to warn him against pitfalls. If they think the policy he contemplates
is wrong they will tell him why, bnt always on the basis that it is for him
to settle the matter. And if the Minister, as is sometimes the case, has
neither the courage nor the brains to evolve a policy of his own, they will
do their best to find him one; for, after all, it is better tbat a department
should be run by its civil servants than that it should not be run at all.
It was my task to change the policy which had so far been pursued
by the-Ministry of Transport. We argued it all out; we examined all the
"snags" which the civil servants found for me and which I found for my-
self in plenty; but at the end of the discussions, when I made it clear what
the policy was to be, the civil servants not only gave of their best to make
my policy a success, but nearly worked themselves to death in labours be-
hind the scenes, in the conduct of various secondary negotiations, and in
the handling of the Bill before the JOint Select Committee of Lords and
Commons-where there were only three Labour Members out of a total
membership of ten.
Responsibility for policy rests upon Ministers whether they are
weak or strong, and it is important that the civil servants should be the
instruments, and not the masters of policy. They would have been just
as loyal to a Conservative Minister; and that is well.

The accepted British view, therefore, would seem to be that ad-

ministration is "the handmaid of policy." "TIle administrator, as the
expert adviser to the political leader. must, under the British system,
be "on tap, and never on top"; 53 he must, as G. D. H. Cole has re-
marked, "put his politics in his pocket." 54
In his eulogy of Austen Chamberlain as an ideal minister in so
far as the relationship between administrators and politicians was
concerned, another British statesman and educator, Eustace Percy,
explained: "Without intimate give and take between minister and
permanent official, neither would discharge his proper responsibility:
the minister for what to do, the civil servant for how to do it. That
distinction was in the last resort clear; upon its maintenance rested
the whole structure of government; but it must also allow for every
gradation of advice and argument before the final issue was
reached." ..
• , Charles Christie: "A Note on Administrative Principle." Public Administration,
January 1932, vol. 10, p. 9, .
.. EdWllrd McChesney Sai!: Political Institutions, • Preface. New York: D. Apple·
tOD"Ccntury Company: 1938, p. 325 .
.. G. D. H. Cole: "Reconstruction in the CivJ1 and Mtmicipal Services." Public
Administration, January-June 1942, vol. lO, p. 3.
50 Eustace Percy; "Austen Chamberlain." Public Admim.tnition, April 1937, rol.
1:;,p. u6.
 ADMINISTlATIOfi! AND POUcl'

8. THE ADMINISTRATIVE CUSS AND BRITISH POliTICS

These subtle gradations of "advice" by a strongly entrenched and

a highly respected "administtative class" can be more decisive and
perhaps more dangerous than Chamberlain and Morrison \\rere
ready to admit. This was the viewpoint of Harold J. Laski, profe~sor
at the London School of Economics and Political Science, a leaQing
policymaker for the Labor Party, and a frequent guest lecturet at
American universities.

(a 1 HAROLD J. LASKI
Parliamentary Government in England ""
You cannot ask an abl~ man to concern himself with questions
like education, public health, factory legislation, safety in mines, witl'lout
two consequences following. To ask him to discover facts is to ask hiill to
indicate conclusions; and the V!!ry fact that he reports conclusions n~ces.
sarily indicates a theory of acti()n. There is not, I think, as some of the
critics of the civil service have Sllggested, a conscious lust for power on the
part of those who direct it. Those who govern it [the British civil serVice]
belong, effectively, to the same class that rules the House of Commons.
Largely, they go to the same schools and universities; after admissiol) to
the service, they belong to the same clubs. lbeir ideas, or rather, th~ as-
sumptions upon which their id(!as rest, are the same as those of the lnen
who own the instruments of production in our society. Their success, as a
civil service, has been mainly huilt upon that fact. Their ideas of the
margins of possible action are iIluch the same as those of the ministers
who have been responsible for tl'jeir decisions. There is little or nothing in
the experience they bring to the interpretation of their environment wliich
would lead them to question the assumptions upon which our sYStem
rests. The neutrality of the ciVIl service has not yet been tested by the
need to support a policy which, like that of a socialist party, might well
challenge the traditional ideas for which it has stood.
I do not for a moment suggest that the civil service would not
meet such a test with adequacy; I note only that, so far, the need to fl}eet
it has not arisen. The real problems will only begin to emerge when this
is not the case. Would Sir Maurice Hankey, for example, who has testified
.hdnrt' ;J .Roy.a.1 Cnnunissian th9t be beJjev~ the JJ3WnaJiz:JDOD of the
armaments industry would be a "disaster," be able easily to collaborate
with a Labour government d~termined upon that policy? Would a
Treasury which has been so continuously hostile to a big policy of public
.. Harold J. Laski: Parliamentary Government in England. Selected from pp.
200-1, a6r6. Reprinted by pennission of The Viking Press, Inc. Copyright 1938,
Harold 1. Laski.
works be able easily to collaborate with a Cabinet which had no ~thy
with its hostility? Would a Foreign Office so largely responsible for the
Hoare-Laval proposals {Anglo-French support of Mussolini in the E:thi-
opean Dispute, 193.5-1936] be able to put all its mind and heart be~ind
a minister who built his whole policy upon the socialist interpretation of
the principles of collective security?

(bl HAROLD J. LASKI

"The Education of the Civil Servant" IT
No one who has seen the collaboration of the higher CivJ1 Service
and ministers at first hand will be inclined, except in service to a theory, to
argue that it is adequately described as a relation between a superior and
his subordinates. Ministers, no doubt, have the final word; but that
finality is the outcome of a complex process in which the relevan~ in-
fiuences are both too numerous and too intricate to be described by a
single category. In pure constitutional principle, no doubt, Sir Eyre Crowe
[Assistant and Permanent Undersecretary for Foreign Affairs, 1912-1\125J
took his orders from Lord Grey [Foreign Minister, 1905-1916]; but l do
not think any careful student of Sir Eyre Crowe's remarkable memoranda
would accept the constitutional principle as a final summary of theit re-
lationship.

After tne overwhelming LaDor Farty VictOry {oNowing *'i)rlcf

War II, it was still not certain that an "administrative class" sus-
pected of wearing the old school tie of the more favored ruler~ of
British society could be trusted to enforce a socialist program. 'fhe
political commentator C. M. Woodhouse concluded: ".Socialism
means neither more nor less than government by permanent officl::tls"
and that "the Labour Party is in process of abolishing [the power of
the permanent officiall not by overwhelming it, but by giving way
to it." .. With regard to foreign affairs, Laski's reference to Sir E:yre
Crowe brings to mind one of the most dramatic cases of this sort of
administrative politics. Crowe, an austere civil servant in the British
Foreign Office, not only directed the course of British policy tOWard
Germany before World War I," but after the war was instrumelltal
in unmaking the first Labor Government over its Russian policy in

or Harold J. Laski: "The Education of the Civil Servant." Public Administration

1943, vol. 21, selected from p. 1 S. Reprinted by permission. '
.. C. M. Woodhouse: "The Politician in Eclipse." The Nineteenth Century JIlId
After. June 1948, vol. 143, p. 312 .
.. Sidney Bradshaw Fay: The Origins of the World War. New York: The ~
Illillan Company; 1929, vol. I, p. 1;; vol. 2, pp. 357, 380, 387,492, 501, 536.
 ADMINI$TllATION AND I'OLICV

a situation which came to a head during the famous Zinoviev inci-

dent of 19'4."

9. POlICY-MAKING AND ADMINISTRATION IN FOREIGN

AFFAIRS
In the field of foreign policy-making we find many glaring cases of
administrative domination or administrative sabotage which call for
both careful use and careful control of the powers of civil servants.
The British had ample opportunity to learn this lesson in the making
of their colonial policy during the long era of imperialism. Colonial
records reveal how severe seventeenth century colonial administra-
tors dealt irresponsibly with the American colonies." When, in the
nineteenth century, Britain was in danger of losing her Canadian
possessions, the official "Report on the Affairs of British North
America" by Lord Durham complained that the actual management
of the colonies was in the hands of "the permanent but utterly ir-
responsible members of the [Colonial] office." Charles Buller, the
keenly observant Secretary of the Durham Mission to Canada and a
member of the Parliamentary Radical Party during the British re-
form period of the 1830'S, dubbed this type of dictatorial official
"Mr. Mothercountry" in his remarkable plea for "Responsible Gov-
ernment for Colonies." .,
In the United States, too, there seems to be a reluctance to inter-
fere with permanent officials in the diplomatic field. This practice
is based, no doubt, upon the customary need for consistency and
continuity which characterizes the realm of diplomacy. However,
the problem is no longer one of mere diplomatic consistency or
academic distinction between policy and administration; here are in-
volved the tremendous stakes of war and peace and of life and death
for vast numbers of people. The actual workings of diplomacy in
terms of day-by-day decisions in the field of foreign affairs has been
clearly described by Frank Snowden Hopkins, Assistant Director of
.. United Kingdom: Parliamenrnry Papers, "Report of the Board of Enquiry ap-
pointed by the Prime Minister to investigate certain statements affecting Civil Servants,"
Cmd. 3037, Feb. 1928. Ibid., "Minutes by the Lord Commissioners of his Majesty's
Treasury and the Secrernry of State for Foreigu Affairs on the Report of the Board of
En~uiry appointed by the Prime Minister to investigate certain statemems affecting
Civli Servants," Cmd. 3038, Feb. 1928. N. P. Coates; ''The Zinoviev Letter, the Case
for a Full Investigation." London, 1928, 17 pp. pamphlet .
• 'A. Lawrence Lowell: The Government of England. New York: The MIICJllI1ian
Company; 1916, vol. 1. p. 177.
ft Reprinted in E. M. Wrong: Charles Buller and Responsible Government.
London and New York: Oxford University Pres" 1926, pp. 85-17°.
the Foreign Service Institute in the State Department of the United
States. Hopkins was "cominced that the central problem ·of· the
Foreign Service is not the quality of the personnel but the way the
service is administered." He had in mind specifically the question of
how policy and administration clash and mesh in terms of both the
daily operations and the long-range objectives of the State Depart-
ment.

FRANK SNOWDEN HOPKINS

"A Suggested Approach to the Problem of Imprcwing the Adminis-
trative Efficiency of the Department of State" II
In a proper distribution of responsibilities policy-making and over-
all planning are the responsibilities of the people at the top. The carrying
out of policies is the job of subordinates. To put this principle in capsule
fonn policies are made at the top, operating decisions are made further
down. But if policies are not made at the top, because the people at the
top are too busy to make them, then many operating decisions cannot
be made flUther down the chain of command, because the people lower
down do not have any clearcut policies to guide them in making de-
cisions. The result then is that these decisions have to be referred up-
ward, and the busy people at the top have even more decisions to make
and are busier than ever. The only way to deal with this congestion at the
top is for the people at the top to put their time on making policies, and
to refer operating decisions downward to the lowest level on which they
can be made effectively.
In the case of the Department of State and of diplomatic organi-
zations generally, something quite different is true. In the modem world,
the Secretary of State participates personally in diplomatiC negotiations.
His principal assistants personally participate in the technical problems of
day-to-<lay diplomacy. The technical problems of diplomacy are so urgent,
so pressing and so difficult that there is a tendency for all the abler people
to concentrate on them. The very persons who mnst perfonn executive
functions, because they head up important branches of the Department's
organization, are so busy with their technical functions that they cannot
find time for executive leadership.
The result of such a log-jam is that in desperation people lower
down in the organization, under pressure to get necessary things ac-
complished, start making decisions themselV(:S anyway, decisions which
are really policy decisions because when they are taken they begin to have
an effect on policy. This condition is recognized in the Department by
the saying that "policy is made on the cables."
eaFmU: Snowden Hopkins: "A Suggested Approach to the Problem of 1mpr0lling
the Administrative Elliciency of the Department of State." 'I'he American fi'weign
Serviot 10ll11111l, M>nl 1946. vol. ~l. adapted from pp.14. 5~. Reprinted by permiasion.
 In other words, day-to-day decisions are made which add up to a
determination of policy. Instead of policy being made first, decisions are
made first; instead of policy governing decisions, decisions govern policy;
instead of people at the top making policy, while people at the lower
levels made decisions, top executives make both policies and decisions on
some matters, while subordinates make both policies and decisions on
> others. The sad truth is-and it may as well be faced frankly-that in the
Department of State as it is organized today, too many operating officials
are attempting to make policy. What everyone must realize is that when
policy-making becomes a free-for-all, no one person's policy is likely to
prevail, and every one with ideas is doomed to frustration. The usual out-
come of policy-making on the operating level is thus something which
is satisfactory to no one. On the other hand the line officer can actually
work more creatively if there is clear direction from above, because he can
operate with authority and with freedom from opposition. The proper
role of the officer with strong convictions about policy is not to try to make
his ideas prevail on the operating level, but to try to get them adopted by
policy-making top executives.

The somewhat uncontrolled situation described by Hopkins was

especially apparent in the immediate post-war period during the
transition in the leadership of the State Department from Cordell
Hull to James Byrnes. For example, a deep split among State De-
partment personnel was revealed on such fundamental questions as
American policy toward the remaining pro-Fascist nations. As de-
scribed colorfully by a popular newspaper columnist: "Jimmie Byrnes
wasn't fully aware of it while abroad, but his top State Department
aides have been carrying on more feuds in his absence than Cordell
Hull's Tennessee mountaineers."" To curtail this internecine con-
Hict as well as policy-making "on the cables," General George Mar-
shall who succeeded to the Secretaryship of the Department in
January 1947, appointed a Policy Planning Staff and strengthened
the Department's Executive Secretariat. But the imposition of in-
ternational operational duties as well as foreign policy-making upon
the State Department as a whole continued to cause so much dif-
ficulty that the Hoover Commission on Organization of the Execu-
tive Branch of the. Government was led to conclude in 1949 that
these practices "contribute to the low esteem in which the State De-
partment is held in the eyes of Congress, the press, the general pub-
lic, and, indeed, of many of its own personnel." ..
Hopkins's advice to administrators in the State Department is
.. Drew Pearson's syndicated newspaper column, October 20, 1946•
.. The Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of tbe Government.
"Foreign Alfairs," Feb. 1949, p. 16.
70
valid not merely in the realm of foreign affairs, but in all functions of
government and business and at all levels of administrative responsi-
bility. In accordance with this view, executives or administrators have
a distinct responsibility in relation to policy, but in exercising that
responsibility, they must refrain from acting in violation of already
established policies, even if they believe these policies to be wrong.
If there are no established policies to guide them, they must help to
get such policies established or they will find themselves making un·
related and uncorrelated decisions "on the cables." As to existing
policies which the administrator does not like, he must know when
to criticize them and when to abstain from criticism, when to act
and when not to act. If inaction hurts his conscience or pride or
sense of achievement, his job is to change his chief's mind instead
of engaging in administrative manipulation of his own.
The superior policy·makers and the higher administrators, on
the other hand, have the responsibility of giving heed to their staffs
and advisers and even of encouraging among their subordinates the
expression of different opinions. For superiors to discourage entirely
the expression of dissent within their own organization is as ques-
tionable a procedure as unfettered and independent decisions by
subordinates "on the cables." In a democracy which seeks constantly
self-corrective policies, the experts, administrators, managers, tech-
nicians, and specialists should, within the rules of the game and the
confines of their official responsibility, be encouraged to speak up
rather than remain quiet."

10. A SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP

BETWEEN ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY

How shall we summarize these controversial questions concern-

ing the relationships between administration and policy? A useful
suggestion comes from the writings of two outstanding European
profe~ors of social science: (a) Albert Schiiffie, a member of the
Austrian Cabinet in the 1870'S, and (b) Karl Mannheim, who left
Germany for England during the Nazi regime .

.. This consideration touches 011 the question of administtative neub:1Ility and

loyalty. See David M. Levitan: "Neutrality of the Public Service." Public Administta·
!ion Review, Autumn 1942, vol. %, p. J23. Abo Roger S. Abbott: ''The Fedetal
Loyalty Program: Background and Problems." .American Political Science Review,
lome 1948, vol. 42, pp. 4~. Special reference is made to the State Department,
pp. 498-9. See .Iso Carrol Kl1patrick: "Washington Wony.Go.Ronnd:' '48 Maga.
zine, March 1948, vol. 2, pp. u6-3%.
71 ADMINISTUTIOM AND POLICY

(II) ALIIRT scHXFnE

"The Scientific Conception of Politics.. ..,
Each of the infinitely varied aspects of the state actually has two
sides which overlap but which should be kept apart for practical and
ot
theoretical purposes: the side equilibrium, tradition or continuity, and
a second side of flnidity, growth, change and decisions to face unique
sjtuations. One may call the fin>t administration, and the second politics.
The mass of an official's work is the taking care of current busi-
ness, legally and technically established in accordance with tradition. As
a rule the officials are not politicians nor do they imagine themselves to be
statesmen. Yet to a certain degree and in some cases the official is called
upon to carry on politics, namely when he calls the attention of higher
authority to certain needs, whetl he picks out the best solution to achieve
a sound goal, when he mediates between contradictory interests.
On the one hand, the established bodies of the state use firmly
established rules which can be p.pplied to more or less regularly recurrent
routine cases. On the other hand, governmental experience proves that
the will of the whole cannot be established in advance for all times. For
each individual case, there carlnot be a positive law in advance which
covers all details. A pure mechanical routine of the State is impossible. If
the administration of criminal justice, for example, were to proceed duti-
fully without politics, there wovld be no law of mercy. Similarly it would
be fatal to have a strictly mechllnical administration of the army. Particu-
larly the so-called inner administration of new institutions requires some
politics among the executive officials beside the mechanical service, in
order to reconcile contradictory interests. In Austria this process is there-
fore called "political administration."

(b) KARL MANNHElfo'

"The Prospects of Scielltific Politics....
It must be admitted tpat the boundary between the two classes .
is in reality rather flexible. For instance, the cumulative effect of a gradual
shift of administrative procedure in a long series of 'concrete cases may
actually give rise to a new principle. Or, to take a reverse instance, some-
flimg as unique as a new socia) movement may'De aeeplY permeatea wim

fir Albert SchafiIe, "Ober den Wissenschaftlichen Begrilf der Politik." Zeitschrift
fUr die Cesamte Staatswissemchaft; 1897. adapted from pp. 57cr600. Translated by
the author with the assistance of Dr. Melvin Valk .
.. Karl MannbeiD): "The prospects of Scientific Politics." Ideology and Utopia.
Adapted from pp. 101-04. Transfated by Loui. Wirth and Edward A. Shib from
Mannbeim'. Ideologic und Utopie (19'9). Reprinted by. permission of Hatcourt,
Brace and Company. Copyright 1936. Harcourt, Brace and Company.
72
"stereotyped" administrative and routinizing elements. The expression
"settled routinized elements" is to be regarded figuratively. Even the most
formalized and ossified features of society are not to be regarded as things
held in store in an attic to be taken out when needed for use. Neverthe-
less, the contrast between the "routine affairs of state" and "politics" of-
fers a certain polarity which may serve as a fruitful point of departure.
If the dichotomy is conceived'lUore thenretically, we may say:
Every social process may be divided into a rationalized sphere consisting
of settled and routinized procednres in dealing with situations that recur
in an orderly fashion, and the "non·rational" by which it is surrounded.
We are, therefore, distinguishing between the "rationalized" structure of
society and the "non-rational" matrix. A further observation presents
itself at this point. The chief characteristic of modem culture is the
tendency to include as much as possible in the realm of the rational and
to bring it under administrative control-and, on the other hand, to re-
duce the "non-rational" element to the vanishing point.
Rationalized as our life may seem to have become, all the ra-
tionalizations that have taken place so far are merely partial since the most
important realms of our social life are even now anchored in the non·
rational. Our economic life, although extensively rationalized on the tech-
nical side, and in some limited connections calculable, does not, as a
whole, constitute a planned economy. Our social structure is built along
class lines, which means that not objective tests but non-rational forces of
social competition and struggle decide the place and function of the in·
dividual in society. Dominance in national and international life is
achieved through struggle, in itself non-rational in which chance plays an
important part. These non-rational forces in society form that sphere of
social life which is unorganized and unrationalized, and in which politics
becomes necessary.

This flexible conception of policy and agministration has been

adopted by other scholars:" but Mannheim's incisive idea of polarity
is a particularly useful one when supplemented by the recent Ameri-
can conception of overlapping zones of policy responsibility. Re-
stated briefly, the suggestion is that all decisions fall somewhere be-
tween the .two poles of (1) the routine, administrative, or rational,
and (:I) the unique, political, or non-rational; and that somewhere
along this scale, men locate their position at any given time and
place, thus combining some degree of routine and control with the
.. M~x Weber: Wirtschatt und Gesel1schatt (Tiibingen: 1922) referred to in
H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills: From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York:
Oxford University Press; 1946, p. 53. J. H. Van Devanter: "How to Develop Execu·
tive Ability. Industrial Management, Oct. 19ZQ, vol. 60, pp. 260-6'4, quoted by
Leon C. Marshall: Business Administration. Chicago: University of Chicago !'Jess;
19U, pp. 810-11. B. W. Walker Watson: "The Elements of Public Administnltion,
~ Dogmatic Introduction." Public Administration, Oct. 1932, vol. 10, p. 399.
 ADMINISTRATION ANO POLICY

unique and creative aspects of life. It is a scale along which men

move, not a mold in which their lives are irrevocably cast.
This idea does not mean that the manager of routinized or ra-
tionalized affairs does not undertake unique or important assign-
ments. Nor does it mean that routine or systematic work cannot have
creative aspects. Obviously, the human urge is to be unique and
creative, but at the same time a drive to be systematic or rational
exists. The danger is that one may, in his administrative methods,
be rational but for non-rational or irrational purposes, and the result
is that instead of being creative, one is destructive. Consequently,
effective administration can be dangerous, for sometimes the means
do not justify the ends any more than the ends justify the means.
Social scientists like Mannheim have recognized the dangers of such
"rationality," and they have therefore distinguished between "func-
tional rationality" with respect to technique or administration, and
"substantive rationality" with respect to objectives and purpose,'·
Good administration of poor policy may be more dangerous than
poor administration of good policy, which is an added reason why a
mature society must be interested in the relationships between policy
and administration, not merely in their differentiation.

SUMMARY

The attempt to arrive at a doctrinaire demarcation between policy

and administration has been the vulnerable point in American ad-
ministrative thought. The distinction was classically stated by Wood-
row Wilson in 1886, but was deepened by scholars like W. F.
Willoughby who went so far as to designate administration as a
fourth branch of government. Other political scientists and specialists
in public administration refused to go this far, but continued the
drive to divorce politics from administration, further· intensifying
the demarcation. Although the distinction was partially justified, a
major explanation for the American pattern of thought was the need
to eliminate spoils and partisan politics from corrupting the ad-
ministration of government.
In Britain, also, much interest existed in the subject, but there
the effort was in clarifying the relationship rather than in establishing
the distinction between politics and administration. Only after the
United States entered a period of intensified governmental responsi-
bility after W orId War I, the world-wide depression, and World War
II, did a similar attitude develop in this country. It was mid-century
,. See The Technique of MunicipaI Administration, Chkago: Institute for Train·
ing in Municipal Administration; 1940,1'1" 1-2.
74
before men like McBain, Gulick, and Appleby could sufficiently
establish the idea that politics and administration were intimately
linked and were separable only under particularly defined circum-
stances. Whatever the justification or the cause of the earlier Ameri-
can distinction, one result was to make American administrative per-
sonnel, as well as scholars of administration, fearful of policy ques-
tions and somewhat unrealistic in political matters.
The barrier between administrative thought and political prac-
tice may be particularly serious in a period of institutional change.
The recent history and the nature of administration in the United
States, as in Britain, suggests that there may well be more administra-
tors of conservative persuasion who block governmental innovations
than there are radical administrators who sabotage conservative poii-
cies. The record of the German civil service under the \Veimar Con-
stitution offers some significant evidence of this tendency; for it has
been argued that without the right wing tendency of the German
civil service, Hitler's Third Reich would never have come to power.l1
The experience of the New Deal seems to reveal that the greater
danger, if any, is not that of a revolutionary bureaucracy ready to
overthrow the existing regime nor even a liberally-minded "adminis-
trative class" willing to support left-of-center experiments in govern-
ment. The balance of fact may well be on the side of resistance by
entrenched administrators and other bodies of officials who, along
with special interests, oppose governmental innovations, thus keep-
ing administrative opposition or obstructive lethargy going until a
change of political party puts a current stamp of popular approval on
these .subtle forms of administrative sabotage.
Perhaps the most promising way of continuing a healthy separa-
tion between politics and administration, while entertaining a grow-
ing concern about the need for tying them together, is to refine the
relation of. the administrator or managerial expert to policies or
political questions. Administrators at all levels of responsibility are
being constantly thrown into the area of decision-making, and their
decisions inevitably add up to major policies in the subsequent course
of events. As the British experience with social legislation has shown,
the possession by an experienced class of administrators of the rele-
vant facts on complex social issues points almost automatically to the
desired policies. American administrative policy-making may not go
tbis far, but it may be evolving in this direction.
As a matter of governmental evolution, therefore, the administra-
tor cannot avoid some policy-making responsibility. However, he can
" Arnold' Brecht: "Civil Service Reform in Germany," Personnel Administnltion,
Jan. 1947, vol. 9. pp. 1-2. Compare Fritz Morstein Marx: Covernment in the Third
Reich. New York: McCraw·HiII Book Company, Inc.; 1936, p. 119.
75 ADMINISTUTtON AND "ICY

more accnrntely define his role with relation to policy. Specifi()ally

administrators should (1) constantly gather facts and prepare find:
ings that may lead to changes in policy or to policy decisions; (2)
inform their chief, and with his approval inform the policy-making
body or the public, of these facts and findings; and (3) recom~end
and initiate policies but advocate them only with superiQr CO~nt.
Any effective administrative corps helps to define policy previo'lls to
the legislative stage, to draft the law which is to carry out the de%ired
program, and to define post-legislative policy, whether that policy in-
volves the substance of the program and possible legislative reviSions
or whether it involves the machinery of enforcement, that is, what is
strictly referred to as administration.
The more recognized policy-making bodies and the legislative_
type agencies may then be free to exercise not merely their choi~e of
alternative policies, but the higher controls essential to any r~pre­
sentative, responsible or effective body. These bodies can (1) fix
responsibility upon the administrators for results in terms of the ac-
cepted standards, (2) encourage competence among administr~tors
by adequately rewarding effective management, (3) improve the
conditions of work and maintain the morale of the rank and file who
have to carry on the day-by-day burdens of modem administration,
and (4) by these and other activities dignify the authority of the
agency or institution for which they are responsible."
TI1.r Jim> .ht'.tm..~l' ymli!'l' .:>.1.0 .adm\ni~l;>;:>.t.inl' .ru-.!'Slm.!'_o J;nm.!'.lphat
easier to define as the situation grows more technical and prufes-
sionalized. In some positions in industrial and governmental mallage-
ment, a tendency exists to define policy powers and administrittive
responsibilities by means of precise professional standards, (::are-
fully prepared management manuals, or concrete job description~ for
each position. This procedure is especially valid in the more prufes-
sional posts, even in the field of government like city managersl:Jips,
in which an accepted list of standards and a code of behavior bave
begun to develop." But such preconceived and precise stanqards
are hard to formulate, and the administrator must constantly face
h.is responsibility tor making the decisions that add up to new poli-
CIes. ,
From the standpoint of social philosophy, some promise exists
in the idea that all administrative acts and decisions move alOhg a
scale between two poles, the rational or administrative, and the hon-

TO Leonard D. White: "Legislative Responsibility For the Public Service," New

HQrizons In Public Administl1ltion. University, Alabama: University of Ala1>ama Press;
1945, Chapter 1.
.,. Riehard S. Childs: "Best Practice Under the Manager Pian." Natronal Municipal
Review, Supplement, January 1933, (revised ed. 1945), p. 44.
76
rational or political. Despite a possible conilict between· administra-
tion and politks in this sense-that is, between the systematically
managed society and the good or sound society-administrators can
envision their "rational" or systematic techniques as an essential part
of the rational or "sound" values of life. This kind of analysis sug-
gests how the search for values and ideals can be blended into the
newer search for methods and techniques. Administration, therefore,
is important not only because it deals with means and methods, but
because it also determines ends and values. Administration should,
therefore, never be allowed to deteriorate, as some would permit,
into a systematic but sterile know-how.
 CHAPTER FOUR

HISTORY OF ADMINISTRATION

THE tasks performed by the modem administrator have been carried

o? throughout history; the "manag_er" has had the job of manning
hiS organization, financing or supporting it, checking or inspecting
his progress, conferring with his subordinates or employees, meeting
with his policy-making or policy-approving superiors or council, and
planning his future program. Modern research about the past has re-
vealed impressive analogies with contemporary administrative tasks.
There is abundant evidence of large-scale conquests and occupations
of territory by ancient legions and hordes; far-Hung activities of royal
courts; widespread temporal powers exercised by religious hierarchies;
princely or private estate management on a scale almost as extensive
as that of the modem business corporation or world cartel; vast pub-
lic works programs including irrigation projects comparable to
modern power programs like the Tennessee Valley Authority.
To what extent were the ancient, medieval, and early modem
civilizations conscious of an art of administration? Was there some
awareness then of what we now term the science of organization?
Howald are the supposedly modem techniques of management?
Readings covering the following eras may help answer these ques-
tions:
1. The ancient Egyptian dynasties and Ptolemaic Egypt
2. Ancient China
3. The ancient Greek city-state of Athens
4. The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire
5. Medieval England and France
77
 78 AllMlNJSftATION

6. Seventeenth- and eighteentb-centnry Cennany and Austria

7. Nineteenth-century America
8. The twentieth century
In the earliest periods the conscious references to administration are
few or obscure, and the administrative connotations are sometimes
at the mercy of the hieroglyphist and the translator. Nevertheless en-
lightenment is provided by modern researchers and scholars, and the
ancient roots of the art of administration soon become apparent.

t. EGYPTIAN ADMINISTRATION

In ancient Egypt, for example, there was a recognizable system

of large-scale administration although we find little trace of the man-
agement devices or the type of administrative speculation that we
know today. This becomes clear if we read selected material from the
Egyptian papyri, dated around 1300 B.C., and interpretations thereof
by such authorities as James H. Breasted, founder of the Oriental In-
stitute at the University of Chicago and one of the world's foremost
Egyptologists; 1 Max Weber, German lawyer, economist, and social
scientist, who probed deeply into the administration of ancient civili-
zations as well as contemporary societies; 2 and Michael Rostovtzeff,
Russian-trained historian who became director of Yale University's
archaeological studies in the Near East.·
(a) PAPYRI SALLIER AND ANASTAS.
Instructions, Exhortations and Warnings to Schoolboys'
Behold, there is no calling that is without a director except (that
of) the scribe, and he is the director.
Put [the scribe] in thine heart, that thou mayest protect thyself
from hard labour of any kind and be a magistrate of high repute. Set thine
heart on being a scribe, that thou mayest direct the whole earth.
Procure for thyself this calling of a magistrate, that thou mayest
attain it when thou art become old. Fortunate is a scribe that is skilled in
1 See Charles Breasted: Pioneer to the Past. New Yark: Charles Scn1mer's SODS;
194~·
• For Weber's biography see Gerth and Mills: From Max Weber, Chapter 1.
• Rostovtzeil also wrote in other fields of ancient history. See his Economic History
of the Hellenistic World. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1941. And see his The Social and
Economic History of the Roman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1926.
• "The Inslruction of Duauf," (aboul 1300 B.C.) and "Exhortations and Warnings
to Schoolboys." (about 1350 B.C.) Quoted in Adolf Erman: The Literatore of tlie
Ancient Egyptians. Adapted from pp. 7', 189, 193, 19;. Translated by Aylward M.
Blackman. Reprinted by permission of Methuen and Company. Copyright 1927,
Methuen and Company.
 HISTORY OF ADMINI$TIIA11OM

his calling, a master of education. Persevere every day; thus shalt thou ob-
tain the mastery over it.
And now the scribe landeth on the embankment and will register
the harvest. The porters [minor officials] carry sticks, and the negroes
[police] pahn-ribs. They say: "Give corn." "There is none there." He
[the delinquent taxpayer] is stretched out and beaten, he is bound and
thrown into the canal.

(b) PAPYRUS HARRIS

Concerning the Reign of Ramses III'
I made for thee great decrees for the administration of thy
tempTe, recorded in the halls of writings of Egypt. I appointed for thee
archers and collectors of honey, bearing incense to deliver their yearly
impost into thy august treasury. I made for thee boatmen and tax-officials
of the people, whom I created to collect the impost of the Two Lands,
the taxes and the exactions, in order to transport them to thy treasury in
the house of Re, in order to double thy divine offerings more than a
million times. I appointed slaves as watchmen of thy harbor, in order to
watch the harbor of the Heliopolitan canal in thy splendid place. I nlade
doorkeepers of the slaves, manned with people, in order to watch and
protect thy court. I made slaves as watchmen of the canal-administration,
and the watchmen of the pure barley, for thee likewise.

(e I MAX WEIER
"Bureaucracy" •
In Egypt, the oldest country of bureaucratic state administration,
the public and collective regulation of waferways for the whole country
and from the top could not be avoided because of technical economic
factors. Amoog essentially technical factors, the specifically modern means
of communication enter the picture as pacemakers of bureaucratization.
Public land and waterways, railroads, the telegraph, et cetera-they must,
in part, necessarily be administered in a public and collective way; in
part, such administration is technically expedient. In this respect, the
contemporary means of communication frequently playa role similllr to
that of the canals of Mesopotamia and the regulation of the Nile in the
ancient Orient. The degree to which the means of communication have
'''Concerning the Reign of Ramses III." lames H. Breasted: Ancient Records of
Egypt. Selected from vol. 4, pp. '44, '46-7, Reprinted by permission of The Univer'
sity of Chicago Press. Copyright 1906, The University of Chicago Press. This papyrus is
apparently a testimonial written by Ramses IV in the name of his father, Ramses III,
who reigned 1198-67 B.C.
'Max Weber: "Bureaucracy." Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills: From Max
Weber: Essays in Sociolo@'. Selected from pp. '12-13. Reprinted by permission of
Oxford Univ~sity Press. Copyright 1946, Oxford University Press. Translated from
Weber's Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 19U.
been developed is II condition of decisive importance for the possibility of
bureaucratic administmtion, although it is not the only decisive condition.
Certainly in Egypt, bureaucmtic centralization, on the basis of an almost
pure subsistence economy, could never bave reacbed the actual degree
which it did without the natural trade route of the Nile.

(d) MICHAEL ROSTOVT%EFF

A Large Estate in Egypt in the Third Century I.C.T
l11e Ptolemies in Egypt inherited from the Pharaohs a highly
elaborated administrative and economic organization of a peculiar land
with an economic basis quite unique when compared with other parts of
the civilized world. The leading idea of the ancient Egyptian state, that of
the Fourth, Eleventh and Eighteenth Dynasties, was a strict coordination
of the economic efforts of the whole population to secure for each mem-
ber of the community and for the community as a whole the highest pos-
sible degree of prosperity. The Ptolemies grasped the idea and made it
their own, because it was the easiest way to govern Egypt and because it
was in complete accordance with the personal character of the rule of the
Ptolemies, who regarded Egypt as their private property, as their large
house. Accordingly, the ancient system of a personal and bureaucratic ad-
ministration of Egypt, with the economic point of view predominant, was
restored, systematized and concentrated in the hands of the new Tnler
and his servants, his bureaucracy.
For the first time the administmtive system of Egypt was, so to
say, codified; it was coordinated and set into motion like a well organized
machine, constructed for a special, well defined and well understood pur·
pose. No discretion on the part of the state's agents was tolemted, al-
though the whole system was based on force and compulsion, very often
on brute force. After investigating conditions in Philadelphia as reflected
in the correspondence of Zenon, we have before us just one piece of the
work of the Ptolemaic machinery. Every phase of activity in Philadelphia
is regulated by the administrative machine of the Ptolemies: agriculture,
cattle breeding, industry and commerce are conducted on lines identical
with those 011 which life in Egypt as a whole was run. Philadelphia was
Egypt ill miniature.

Following the "planned economy" of Ptolemaic Egypt: we find

continued evidence of systematic, though not always efficient, public

'Michael Rostovtzeif: A Large Estate in Egypt in the Trurd Century lI.C. Uni-
"ersil]' of \Visconsin Studies in the Social Sciences and History; No.6, selected from
pp. ,,6-,<;). Reprinted by permission of University of Wis(onsin. Copyright, 1922,
University of \Visconsin.
• Sherman Leroy Wallace: "Ptolemaic Egypt: a Planned Economy." The Greek
Political Experience, Studies in Honor of WillWn Kelly Prentice. Prioceton: Princeton
University Press; 1941, Chapter 10.
81 HISTORY Of ADM'NISTRATION

administration. This becomes more apparent as we study Egypt's

neighbors in the Near East, such as the Byzantine Empire (A.D.
330-14;3), or the Ottoman Empire, especially under Suleiman the
Magnificent (A.D. 1;20-66).·
The Ottoman "Ruling Institution" was a highly perfected system
of civil service, although it was based on a mixed Christian and
Mohammedan caste system. Neither the despotisms of the ancient
Egyptians nor the more enlightened dynasties of their Levantine
neighbors were without their organized bureaucracies, central and
provincial, which reached far back into the history of this region'S
civilization.

2. CHINESE ADMINISTRATION

Despite the popular conception that Confucianism was merely

a code of ethics, the problem of government was central to Con-
fucian philosophy and to the culture of ancient China. Confucius
himself, after many years of teaching, turned to government as a
profession at the age of fifty. To be sure, he was disappointed in his
administrative accomplishments after occupying posts ranging from
local magistrate to prime minister. However, upon retiring from pub-
lic affairs he devoted the remainder of his long life to writing not only
in the field of moral philosophy and ethics but also in the field of
politics and government. His cryptic sayings include observations
about loyal and correct officials. At one point he declared: "Though
a man could hum through the Odes-the three hundred-yet should
show himself unskilled when given some administrative work to do
for his country; though he might know much of that other lore, yet
if, when sent on a mission to any quarter, he could answer no ques-
tion personally and unaided, what after all is he good for?" 10
Among Confucius' contemporaries were those with a more con-
crete interest in administrative methods and management. One of
these was Micius or Mo-Ti, who founded a branch of the Confucian
school that differed mainly on questions of phil"sophic detail rather
"Albert Howe Lybyer: The Govemment of the Ottoman Empire in the Time of
Suleiman the Magnificellt. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1913: especially
Chapters %, 6, and appendix " "The Sacred Book of the Affairs of the Turles," Venice:
1543. See also E. N. Gladden: "Administration of the Ottoman Empire under Sulci·
man." Public Administration, Apnl '937, vol. 15, pp. 187-93. Ottoman Statecrait,
The Book of Counsel for Vezirs and Governors of Sari Mehmed Pasha, translated
from the Turkish by Walter Livingston Wright, Jr. PrincetOll: Princeton University
Press; 1935.
,0 Confucius: Analects, Boolc XIII. World's Great Classics, Oriental Literature,
vol. 4, "The Literature of China-The Analects of ConfuciUS." Trausbte<! by William
Jennings. New York: The Colonial Press; 1899.
 82
than on principle. Micius wrote as early as ;00 B.C., but a more
specific "constitution" or manual for the government and administra-
tion of China was attributed to one, Chow or Chou, who was re-
puted to have used this manual 600 years earlier.u
The modern Chinese scholar Leonard Hsii, had much more to
say about the ancient Chinese "Rules of Public Administration,"
than Confucius' parables had revealed." Hsii, trained both in the
law and the social sciences, was Head of the Department of Sociol-
ogy and Dean of the School of Social Work at Yenching University,
and had held numerous political posts in China during the 1920'S
and 30'S.
The ancient records, like those of Micius and Chow, quoted be-
low, indicate to what extent the evidence compiled by scholars like
Hsii substantiates the rise and the development of administration as
an art, of organization as a science, or of management as a technique,
among the ancient Chinese.

MICIUS

(a) Works of Micius 18,

Whoever pursues a business in this world must have a system. A

business which has attained success without a system does not exist. From
ministers and generals down to the hundreds of craftsmen, every one of
them has a system. The craftsmen employ the ruler to make a square and
the compass to make a circle. All of them, both skilled and unskilled, use
this system. The skilled may at times accomplish a circle and a square by
their own dexterity. But with a system, even the unskilled may achieve
the same result, though dexterity they have none. Hence, every craftsman
possesses a system as a model. Now, if we govern the empire, or a large
state, without a system as a model, are we not even less intelligent than
a common craftsman?

11 No reliable proof is available as to the exact age or authenticity of the Constitu·

tion of Chow because of the famous episode of the burning of the Chinese books in >1 3
B.C. Although many of the Chinese classics are later reproductions which left room for
adulterations of all kinds, most modern Chinese scholars and administrators regard as
authentic even spurious literature of this kind, as reIIecting important aspects of
thought and practice for those years of the ancient period during which it "reappeared."
Wu accepts Chow; Hs;; bas his reservations. Kuo-Cheng Wu, n. 13 below, pp. 3,
37--8; Leonard Shihlien Hsn. n. 1 S below, pp. xiii-xvi, n. 1.
11 See also the work by the American political scientist and United States Senator,
Elbert D. Thomas: Chinese Political Thought. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1921.
18 Works of Micius. Quoted in Kuo-Cheng Wu: Ancient Chinese Political Theo·
ries, p. 226. Reprinted by permission of The Conlmercial PrCSII. Copyright 1928,
The Commercial Press.
83 HISTOaY OF ADMINISTbTlON

(b) The Constitution of Chow"

Eight regulations he [the Prime Minister] holds to govern the
different departmenl:ll of government. The first pertains to their organiza-
tion so that the government of the state may be established. The second
pertains to their functions so that the government of the state may be
clarified. The third pertains to their relationships so that the government
of the state may be cooperative. The fourth pertains to their procedure so
that the government of the state may be efficient. The fifth pertains to
their formalities so that the government of the state may appear per-
manent. The sixth pertains to their control so that the government may
be complete. The seventh pertains to their punishment so that the gov-
ernment of the state may be corrected. The eighth pertains to their
reckoning so that the government of the state may be audited.

(e) LEONARD HSU

"Rules of Public Administration" 11
We may now discnss the practical suggestions of Confucins in
the way of public administration in order to bring about a benevolent
rule. In the first place, the rulers and conductors of government should
know thoroughly the conditions of the country. Knowing these condi-
tions, the conductors of government should take careful note of natural
and social calamities, [and] they should undertake to remove the causes
of all trouble.
In the second place, the conductor of government should "hold
the mean." What Confucins meant by holding a "mean" is to approach
a problem by seeking the widest differences of opinions and by making
the most careful study of the facts in the spirit of absolute impartiality
and unselfishness, and then to solve it moderately, practicably, and logi-
cally, in accordance with the best ethical rules.
In the third place, public spirit is essential in the proper conduct
of government affairs. Confucius condemns favouritism and partisanship.
Fourthly, the government should promote the economic welfare
of the people.
The fifth principle in the proper conduct of public administration
is "to keep busy." Confucius says that "the art of government is to keep
the affairs of government before the mind without weariness, and to prac-
tise them with undeviating consistency." The institution of benevolent
1< The Constitution of Chow in Wu: Ancient Chinese Political Theories, BooIc I,
p. 40. Reprinted by permission of the Commercial Press. Copyright 19~8, The
Commercial Press.
to Leonard Shihlien Hsii: "The Rules of Public Administmtinu," The PoJitiaal
Philosophy of Confucianism. Selected from pp. Ul-4- Reprinted by permission of
E. P. Dutton and Company, Inc. Copyright 193', E. P. Dutton md Company, lac.
 ADMfMISDATION

government based upon virtue and Ii [Cbinese code of propriety] means a

thorougbgoing political reorganization. From watching the smallest phe-
nomena in the State to observing the operation of the fundamental poli-
cies of government, administmtors should occupy themselves busily with
affairs at every moment.
The sixth and last principle in the proper conduct of public ad-
ministration is to choose honest, unselfish, and capable public offiGers.

Professor Edward S. Corwin of Princeton University, an expert

on Chinese government, aptly summarized Confucius' conception
as follows in his foreword to Hsii's book: "Finally, Confucius
teaches us that the task of government is that of good housekeeping.
He at once anticipates the modern 'administrative state' and supplies
it with a Utopia." ,.
Following Confucius, there were other achievements in Chinese
administration, especially in the perfection of a strangely modern
system of civil service examination." Hu Shih, the former Chinese
Ambassador to the United States, who described this system, traced
some of its origins to the Han Dynasty (202 B.C.-A.D. 219): "TIle
Han Empire in its great days was almost as large as the China of to-
day. Without modern means of transportation and communication,
the work of administering such a vast empire from a central govern-
ment at Chang-an, maintaining unity and peace for four hundred
years, and thereby setting up a permanent framework of a unified na-
tionallife for 2000 years was the greatest achievement of the political
genius of the Chinese people." 18
One thousand years after the Han Dynasty, we see these ad-
ministrative skills at work, in the time of the "Gay Genius," Su
Tungpo (1036-1101), and especially during the tenure of the "Bull-
headed Premier" of that day, Wang Anshih, the "practical socialist"
who was brash enough to undertake an agricultural subsidy and loan
system comparable to the New Deal's "ever-normal granary" with
many of its associated nation-wide financial controls.'·
The Chinese carried on fOt many centuries, before the advent of
the modern art or science of administration, a system of administra-
tive housekeeping, a well-developed civil service, and an appreciation
of many of the "modem" problems of public management.
.. HsU: The Political Philosophy of Confucianism, p. x.
" See Chapter 14.
1. Hu Shih: «Historical Foundations for a Democratic China." Tames Lectures on
Government, University of Dlinois; 2nd Series, p. 58. Also see Interim Proceedings of
the Institute of World Affairs, Problems of Peace. University of Southern Cali{omia;
1944-4" vol. 21, p. 58.
1. Lin Yutang: The Gay Genius, the Life and Times of Su Tungpo. New York:
The John Oay CO.; '947. Henry R. WiUianuon: Wang An Shih. London: A. probs-
thain, 1935; vol. 2, especially pp. 144-8.
8S HISTORY OF ADMINISTRATION
3. GREEK DEMOCRATIC ADMINISTRATION

The GTeeks, like the ancient Egyptians and Chinese, left few
records about their administrative system, in spite of the rich contents
of Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Politics. Still, we may obtain
glimpses of Greek administration from (a) Pericles' remarks con-
cerning Greek democracy in his funeral oration of 430 B.C. honoring
the heroes of the Peloponnesian \Var, (b) an interpretation of
Athenian democracy by the American Professor of Greek, Walter R.
Agard, and (c) Socrates' dialogue with Nicomachides.

(a) PERICLES
Funeral Oration 20
Our government is called a democracy, because its administration
is in the hands, not of the few, but of the many. Yet, although all men
are equal in the sight of the law, they are rewarded by the community on
the basis of their merit; neither social positioll nor wealth, but ability
alone, determines the service that a man renders. Our citizens are inter-
ested in both private and public affairs; concern over personal matters does
not keep them from devoting themselves also to the community. In fact
we regard the man who does no public service, not as one who minds his
own business, but as worthless. All of us share in considering and deciding
public policy, in the belief that debate is no hindrance to action, but that
action is sure to fail when it is undertaken without full preliminary dis-
cussion. Consequently, we show the utmost initiative in what we do and
the utmost deliberation in what we plan.

(b) WALTER R. ACARD

What Democracy Meant to the Greeks"

Whom did Pericles mean by "the many," and how did they ad-
minister affairs?
First it must be understood that "the many" was a relative term;
it did not include a majority of the population. Political rights were en-
joyed only by men over eighteen years of age, born of Athenian parents
enrolled in the citizen class. This number in 430 B.C. was around 40,000.
There were probably about 2.4,000 metics (resident aliens) who had set-
tled in Athens for busines~, industrial, or professional purposes. If we add
20 Pericles: Funeral Oration. Translated and quoted by Walter R. Agard: What
Democracy Meant to the Creeks. Selected from pp. OO-l. Reprinted by permission. of
University of North Carolina Press. Copyright 1941, University 01 North Carolina
Press.
21 Walter R. Agard: What Democracy Meant to the Creeks. Adapted from pp.
69-71. Reprinted by permission of North Carolina Press. Copyright 1941, University
01 North Carolina Press.
to these the women and children and upwards of 100,000 slaves (war-
captives), who likewise had no part in public administration, it will ap-
pear that perhaps one-tenth of the total population had political rights.
The electorate itself, however, was a thoroughly democratic
group, including country gentlemen, business men, craftsmen, farmers
and day laborers, of whom the last three classes formed a large majority.
And these men actually did participate in government to a degree un-
known in societies where a much larger proportion has been able to vote.
Every policy, domestic or foreign, was formulated by the assembly, in the
deliberations and decisions of which every citizen shared. The Council of
Five Hundred, of which fifty members held active office each month, was
the chief executive body, preparing the agenda for the assembly and over-
seeing financial and foreign affairs; this council was elected annually by lot
from the roster of citizens over thirty years of age. Nearly all legal cases
were tried in popular courts, for which there was a panel of six thousand
citizens chosen annually by lot. The same method of selection applied
to the lesser administration offices, including the Commissioners for Pub-
lic Works, the Police Commissioners, and the Archons, who had charge
of fopnal state occasions and presided over the law courts. In practical
terms this meant that every citizen of Athens during the course of his life
h<Jd been engaged in public service. Perhaps on one day he was actually
chairman of the Council (for that office, too, was passed around in a
democratic way), so was virtually president of the Athenian Common-
wealth.
There were no appointive offices, and only in the case of the
Board of Generals did the people actually elect their representatives rather
than choose them by lot.

(c)· SOCRATES
Discourse with Nicomachides"
Seeing Nicomachides, one day, coming from the assembly for the
election of magistrates, Socrates asked him, "Who have been chosen
generals, Nicomachides?" "Are not the Athenians the same as ever,
Socrates?" he replied; "for they have not chosen me, who am worn out
with serving from the time I was first elected, both as captain and cen-
turion, and with having received so many wounds from the enemy (he
then dre~ aside his robe, and showed the scars of the wounds), but have
eJected Antisthenes, who has never served in the heavy-armed infantry,
nor done anything remarkable in the cavalry, and who indeed knows noth-
ing, ?ut how to get money."
"Is it not good, however, to know this," said Socrates, "since he
wHl then be able to get necessaries for the troops?" "But merchants," re-
.. Plato and Xenophon: Socratic Discourses, Book m, Chapter 4. Translated by
J. S. Watson, edited by Ernest Rbys. Reprinted by permission of J. M. Dent, and E. P.
button and Co., Inc. Everyman's Library. Discourse from Xenopbon's MetJIOI:lIbilia.
S7 HISTORY OF ADMINISTRATION

plied Nicomachides, "are able to collect money; and yet would not, on
that account, be capable of leading an army."
"Antisthenes, however," continued Socrates, "is given to emula-
tion, a quality necessary in a genenl. Do you not know that whenever he
has been chorus-manager he has gained the superiority in all his choruses?"
"But, by Jupiter," rejoined Nicomachides, "there is nothing similar in
managing a chorus and an army."
"Yet Antisthenes," said Socrates, "though neither skilled in music
nor in teaching a chorus, was able to find out the best masters in these de-
partments." "In the army, accordingly," exclaimed Nicomachides, "he
will find others to range his troops for him, and others to fight for him!"
"Well, then," rejoined Socrates, "if he find out and select the
best men in military affairs, as he has done in the conduct of his choruses,
he will probably attain superiority in this respect also."
"Do you say, then, Socrates," said he, "that it is in the power of
the same man to manage a chorus well, and to manage an army well?" "I
say," said Socrates, "that over whatever a man may preside, he will, if he
knows what he needs, and is able to provide it, be a good president,
whether he have the direction of a chorus, a family, a city, or an army."
"By Jupiter, Socrates," cried Nicomachides, "I should never have
expected to hear from you that good managers of a family would also be
good generals." "Come, then," proceeded Socrates, "let us consider what
are the duties of each of them, that we may understand whether they are
the same, or are in any respect different." "By all means," said he.
"Is it not, then, the duty of hoth," asked Socrates, "to render
those under their command obedient and submissive to them?" "Un-
questionably." "Is it not also the duty of both to appoint fitting persons
to fulfill the various duties?" "That is also unquestionable." "To punish
the bad, and to honour the good, too, belongs, I think, to each of them."
"Undoubtedly."
"And is it not honourable in both to render those under them
well,disposed towards them?" "That also is certain." "And do you think it
for the interest of both to gain for themselves allies and auxiliaries or not?"
. "Certainly; but what, I ask, will skill managing a household avail,
if it be necessary to fight?" "It will doubtless, in that case, be of the
greatest avail," said Socrates; "for a good manager of a house, knOWing
that nothing is so advantageous or profitable as to get the better of your
enemies when you contend with them, nothing so unprofitable and
prejudicial as to be d~feated, will zealously seek and provide everything
that may conduce to victory, will carefully watch and guard against what-
ever tends to defeat, will vigourously engage if he sees that his force is
likely to conquer, and, what is not the least important point, will cau-
tiously avoid engaging if he finds himself insufficiently prepared."
"Do not, therefore, Nicomachides," he added, "despise men
skillful in managing a household; for the conduct of private affairs differs
from that of public concerns only in magnitude; in other respects they
88
are similar; but what is most to be observed, is, that neither of them are
managed without men; and that private matters are not managed by one
species of men, and public rnattetS by another; for those who conduct
public business make use of men not at an differing in nature from those
whom the managers of private affairs employ; and those who know how to
employ them, conduct either private or public affairs judiciously, while
those who do not know, will err in the management of both."

In 462 B.C. Pericles introduced a scheme for the compensation of

officials, thus facilitating the continued participation in public ad-
ministration by citizens who had to work daily for their living.'"
Still, the Greeks never did develop a specialized civil service, and the
Greek system therefore continued to differ from that of the hired
administrators and powerful overseers of the Egyptian Pharaohs,
and from the scholarly civil service of the Chinese. The real effective-
ness of popular discussion in the Greek Assembly was sometimes
ridiculed by the Greek playwrights of that day; 24 and later Paul, who
knew the Greeks well, found that they "spent their time in nothing
else, but either to tell or to hear some new thing." 25
There is a general belief, too, that the Greeks were "deficient in
the habits of business." '" Even Socrates' mature definition of manage-
ment found no sympathy with a mind like Aristotle, who opened his
Politics with a refutation of the universal traits of the good manager."
It might, therefore, be contended that the Greeks never really grasped
the general concept of management. This is not a new criticism of
the use of the Greek experience as a historical source for the study of
administration. In 17"].7 the Cameralist philosopher Peter von Lude-
wig also cited Socrates and Xenophon as authorities for the historic
idea that good management is essential to the good state; and in
answer to the same challenge, Ludewig admitted that Socrates and
Xenophon "were heathens," but, he explained, they "must somehow
have obtained divine enlightenment." 2S Those scholars who advocate
the recentness of administration as an art, science, or systematic tech-
nique, have not adequately analyzed the accounts furnished by the
ancient Greek civilization.
"" J. B. Bury: A History of Greece. New York: Random House, Inc. The Modern
Library Edition, p. 334.
2' See, for example. Aristophanes: uAchamians."
.. Acts of the Apostles. 17:21.
,. James W. Gilbart: "The History and Principles of Ancient Commerce." The
Merchants' Magazine and Commercial Review, September ,8.;8, vol. '9, p. 256 .
• ! Book I, Chapter 1.
.. Albion W. Small: The Cameralists, The Pioneers of German Social Polity, pp.
2,6-7. Reprinted by permission of The University of Chicago Press. Copyright 190'},
The University of Chicago Press.
89 HISTORY OF ADMINISTRATION

4. ROMAN MAGISTRATES, MASTERS AND MANAGERS

The Romans administered larger realms and did so more method-

ically than did the Greeks; Z9 but only after the time of Julius Caesar
and the Roman Republic and not until the Roman Empire under
Augustus-that is, about 25 B.C.-was a paid civil service established.
Like the Greeks, the Romans were not very articulate about the
details of their administrative system, but there is enough historical
material to demonstrate their systematic capabilities in large-seale
management. Below are quotations from Marcus Tullius Cicero,
Roman lawyer and statesman of the time of Caesar; Aurelius Cas-
siodorus, Roman Senator and administrative aide to the Ostrogoth
kings at the time of the barbarian invasions around 480 A.D.; and Pro-
fessor Arthur E. R. Boak, an American scholar of Roman history.

(a) CICERO
De Officiis 30
Those whom nature has endowed with the capacity for ad-
ministering public affairs should put aside all hesitation and take a hand
in directing the government; for in no other way can a government be ad·
ministered or greatness of spirit be made manifest. Those who mean to
take charge of the affairs of government should not fail to remember two
of Plato's rules: first to keep the good of the people clearly in view that
regardless of their own interests they will make their every action conform
to that; second, to care for the welfare of the whole body politic and not
in serving the interests of some one party to betray the rest. For the ad-
ministration of the government, like the office of a trustee, must be con-
ducted for the benefit of those entrusted to one's care, not of those to
whom it is entrusted.

(b) CICERO
De Legibus .,
The function of a magistrate is to govern, and to give commands
which are just and beneficial and in conformity with the law. For as the
29 Gilbart: "The Commerce of Ancient Rome," vol. 20, pp. 27-8. J. H. lIof·
meyer: "Civil Service In Ancient Times." Public Administration, January 1927, vol. S,
PP·76-<13.
30 Cicero: De OfficiiS. Adapted from Books I and II. Translated by Walter Miller.
Reprinted by pennission of Harvard University Press. ,
"Cicero: De Legibus. Selected from Book Ill. sees. 1 and 2. Translated by C. W.
Keyes. Reprinted by permission of Harvard University Press from the Loeb Classical
Library.
 ADMIHISTltATfOII

laws govern the magistrate, so the magistrate governs the people, and it
can truly be said that the magistrate is a speaking law, and the law a silent
magistrate. Without [government], existence is impossible for a house-
hold, a city, a nation, the human race, physical nature, and the universe
itself. Accordingly we must have magistrates, for without their prudence
and watchful care a State cannot exist. In fact the whole character of are·
public is determined by its arrangements in regard to magistrates. Not only
must we inform them of the limits of their administrative authority; we
must also instruct the citizens as to the extent of their obligation to obey
them. .

(C I CASSIODORUS
"Formula of The Magisterial Dignity" 82
The Master's is a name of dignity. To him belongs the discipline
of the Palace; he calms the stormy ranks of the insolent Scholares [the
household troops). He introduces the Senators to our presence, cheers
them when they tremble, calms them when they are speaking, sometimes
inserts a word or two of his own, that all may be laid in an orderly manner
before us. It rests with him to fix a day for the admission of a suitor to our
Aulicum Consistorium, and to fulfil his promise. The opportune velocity
of the post.horses is diligently watched over by him. The ambassadors of
foreign powers are introduced by him, and their evectiones [free passes by
the postal-service] are received from his hands.
To an officer with these great functions Antiquity gave great
prerogatives: that no Provincial Governor should assume office without
his consent, and that appeals should come to him from their decisions.
He has no charge of collecting money, only of spending it. It is his to ap-
point peraequatores of provisions in the capital, and a Judge to attend to
this matter. He also superintends the pleasures of the people, and is bound
to keep them from sedition by a generous exhibition of shows.
Take therefore this iIlustrious office and discharge it worthily,
that, in all which you do, you may show yourself a true Magister. If you
should in anywise go astray (which God forbid), where should morality
be found upon earth?

(dl ARTHUR E. R. BOAK

"The Roman Magistri" 88
Magister is a Latin word not appearing in Greek until after the
Roman conquest. Magister contains the idea of superior power. It is prob-
sa Cassiodorus: "Fonnula of the Magisterial Dignity." Selected from pp. 302-3,
The Letters of Cassiodorus, with an Introduction by Thomas Hodgkin. London:
Henry Frowde; 1886.
.. Arthur E. R. Beak and lames E. Dunlap: "The Roman Magistri." Two Studies
in Later ADman and Byzantine Administzation. Univet>ity of Michigan Studies, Hu·
manistic Series; vol. 14, adapted from pp. ;, 6, 8, u. Reprinted by permission of the
University of Michigan. Copyright 1924, The Macmillan Company.
91 RISTon 0' ADMINISTItA'nON

ably a derivative from magis, and is applicable to that one of any group of
individuals who has more authority than the rest. Paulus says that it was
given as a title to persons "to whom is entrusted the special superintend-
ence of affairs, and who, above the Jes~ owe diligence and care to the
business of which they are in charge." rt.~s this simple yet wide mean-
ing of the word magister, so closely akin to',t'lm: of our own Master, that
permitted its adoption as an official title' in" practically all branches of
Roman public and private life. A title capable of such wide application
was always accompanied by some qualifying epithet, as, for example,
Master of the Horse (magister equitum) or Master of the Census
(magister census) .
Since the presence of regular official titles indicates a certain
degree of order and regularity in the conduct of affairs, one must place
the introduction of these Masters at a time when Rome had attained a
sufficient stage of material and cultural advancement to require the
systematic organization of the various activities of her citizens. Thus the
Master in Bankruptcy (magister auctionis) is the fruit of considerable
legal experimenting with bankruptcy cases; the Schoolmasters (Iudi-
magistri) presuppose a fairly widespread demand for elementary educa-
tion; the Master of the Companies of publicani (magister societatis) is
the product of a well-developed system of tax farming; the Master of the
Herd (magister pecoris) and the Taskmaster (magister operum) can only
have appeared with a well-organized and widely extended system of
ranching and farming on a large scale, i.e. with a great territorial expansion
of the state; while the Shipmaster (magister navis) is a figure which doubt-
less first arose after the appearance of Rome as a world power. Festus says
that there were Masters, not only of the liberal arts, but also of rural
districts, of associations, and of villages or city quarters.
The various uses of the word "president" may offer an English
analogy. In many colleges there were Ministers, ministri, who acted as
assistants to the Masters.

Although some of this material demonstrates "the form rather

than the substance" of Roman administration," and although less is
known about Roman administrative technique than about Rome's
military history, there is some evidence to assume that even under
the supposedly less efficient Republic the Romans knew much about
how to administer their own affairs and those of their subject colonies.
As for the Roman Empire, until external forces mpre weighty than
administrative deficiencies alone brought about its destruction," it
.. Edward Gibbon: The Decline and Fan of the Roman Empire. New York: Ran·
dom House Inc., Modem Library Edition, vol. 2, p. 453·
.. For a somewhat stronger view of the significance of administrative deficiencies
accompanying the disintegration of Greece and Rome, see Charles A. Beard: "Philoso-
phy, Science and Art of Public Admin_~:: Address before the annual conference
of the Governmental Reseattb Association. Princeton, N. J.; September 8, 1939. A
 ADM'NtsTItATlON

demonstrated a facility for management on a vast scale that has

caused the envy of medieval as well as modem men.

5. ADMINISTRATION THR.OUGH THE MIDDLE AGES

Although comprehensive speculation about the administrative
process was infrequent during the Middle Ages, there is considerable
evidence of administrative systemization and large-scale management.
Royal domains, ecclesiastical provinces, and feudal manors had to be
managed somehow; contemporary treatises reveal the management
of estates and the duties of their administrative officials.
One of these is the Capitulary of the Imperial Estates of Charle-
magne, dated A.D. 812. With the emergence of the national state, a
similar development of managerial technique in the fiscal field fol-
lowed. One of the most remarkable contemporary treatises on this
subject is the English Dialogue concerning the Exchequer, written
about 1179 by Richard Fitz-Neal, Treasurer of England and Bishop
of London. Quoted below is an introductory and an explanatory
paragraph from this fascinatingly detailed document of English
medieval administration, together with a sample of the contents of
Charlemagne's Capitulary. The story of medieval administration has
moreover been summarized by many modern scholars. Schuyler C.
Wallace, Professor of Government and History at Columbia Univer-
sity, is prominent in this field. His studies of state and lOcal adminis-
trative problems, practical consultation with federal agencies, and
broad experience as Director of the School of International Affairs at
Columbia University since 1946 lend much interest to his comments
concerning the evolution from medieval to modern administration.
(a) Capitulary of the Imperial Estates of Charlemagne"

When our stewards should command our work to be done in the

fields, sowing, ploughing, reaping, mowing, and harvesting the grapes, let
each of them supervise the work to be done in such manner that all may
be done well. If they are not in the district or cannot be there in person,
let them send a capable person or one well accredited to supervise our
affairs and' to bring them to a good end. And let the stewards see to it that
none but trustworthy people be employed in our service in their stead.
British scholar also speaks of "the obviously inadequate administrative system of the
Republic" and "the collapse of the administtative system." Hofmeyer: "Civil Service
in Ancient Times," p. 86 .
.. "Capitulary of the Imperial Estates of Charlemagne." R<l}' C. Cave and Herbert
H. Coulson: A Source Book For Medieval Economic History. Selected from pp. ,8-
2.4. Reprinted by permission of The Bru<:e Publishiug Company. Copyright 1936, The
Bruce. PUblish.ing Company. The original Capitulary appeared in J. P. Migne: 1'a-
trologiae CIlt$U$ Completus. Pans: 1861, vol. 97, pp. 349-;8.
 HlSTOII.l' Of ADMINISTRATION

Let our mayors, foresters, stablemen, cellarets, deans, toIl-gather-

ers, and other officers do regular and fixed duties, and let them pay land
taxes for their holdings; and for the manual work due to them let them
perform their office well. And whatever mayor has a benefice let him find
a substitute, so that the substitute may relieve bim of his manual work
and other services. No mayor shall have more land in his district than he
can cover and administer in a day.
Let each steward have good workmen in his district, that is,
smiths, goldsmiths, silversmiths, leather-workers, turners, carpenteIS,
shield-makers, fishermen, falconers, that is to say those who look after the
hawks; soap-makers, brewers, that is to say those who know how to make
beer, cider, perry, or other liquid which is fit to drink; bakers who can do
the same for our needs; net-makers who know how to make nets well both
for hunting and for fishing or for fowling; and other workmen to enu-
merate whom is tedious. Let them know well how to take care of our
woods which the people call parks, and let them repair them in season,
and let them in no way wait until it be necessary to rebuild them. And let
them do likewise about all buildings.
We wish that whatever our stewards have kept or set aside for our
use be written down in a letter, and what they have given away should
likewise be written down. They should then inform us by letter of what
remains.
Our mayors shall not be chosen from powerful men but from
those of the middle class who are faithful.

(b) RICHARD FIT%-NEAL

Dialogue Concerning the Exchequer 87
In the 2. 3rd year of the reign of King Henry II, while I was sitting
at the window of a tower next to the River Thames, a man spoke to me
impetuously, saying: "master, hast thou not read that there is no use in
science or in a treasure that is hidden?" when I replied to him, "I have
read so," straitway he said: "why, therefore, dost thou not teach others
the knowledge concerning the exchequer which is said to be thine to such
an extent and commit it to writing lest it die with thee?" I answered: "10,
brother, thou hast now for a long time sat at the exchequer, and nothing
is hidden from thee, for thou are painstaking. And the same is probably
the case with the others who have seats there." But he, "just as those who
walk in darkness and grope with their hands frequently stumble,-so many
sit there who seeing do not perceive, and hearing do not understand."
Then I, "thou speakest irreverently, for neither is the knowledge so great
81 Richard Fin·Neal: Dialogue Concerning the Exchequer in Ernest F. Hender·
SOIl:Select Historical Documents of tbe Middle Ages. Selected Itom pp. >1-3. p.
Reprinted by permission 01 G. Bell. Copyright 1912, G. Bell. For tbe original, see
RiChard, Son of Nigel: Dialogues de Scaccario. Arthur Hughes, C. G. Crump, and
C. Johnson (eels.). Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1,1,,1.
 ADMINIST1IATlOM

nor does it concern such great things; but perchance those who are with
important matters have hearts like the claws of an eagle, which do not
retain small things, but which great ones do not escape." And he, "so be
it: but although eagles fly very high, nevertheless they rest and refresh
themselves in humble places; and therefore we beg thee to explain humble
things which will be of profit to the eagles themselves." Then I, "I have
feared to put together a work concerning these things because they lie
open to the bodily senses and grow common by daily use; nor is there
nor can there be in them a description of subtile things, or a pleasing in-
vention of the imagination." And he, "those who rejoice in imaginings,
who seek the flight of subtile things, have Aristotle and the books of
Plato; to them let them listen. Do thou write not subtile but useful
things." Then I, "I see that thou are angry; but be calmer; I will do what
thou dost urge; Rise, therefore, and sit opposite to me; and ask me con-
cerning those things that occur to thee."
Not in the reckoning, but in its manifold judgments does the
superior science of the exchequer consist. For it is easy when the sum re-
quired has been put down, and sums which have been handed in are
placed under it for comparison, to tell by subtraction if the demands have
been satisfied or if anything remains. But when one begins to make a
many-sided investigation of those things which come into the fisc in vary-
ing ways, and are required under different conditions, and are not collected
by the sheriffs in the same way,-to be able to tell if the latter have acted
otherwise than they should is in many ways a grave task. Therefore the
greater science of the exchequer is said to consist in those matters.

(cl SCHUYLER WALLACE

"The Great Leviathan and the Science of Administration""

The history of many current administrative institutions leads us

far back through Anglo-Norman times into the ages of Roman rule,
especially in Gaul. After the Roman Empire crumbled, the Christian
Church, as a hierarchy of power, survived and in some respects supplanted
the Roman government, and still exists in its pristine forms-a chief
executive, a college of staff advisers, archbishops, bishops, traveling agents,
parish priests, and congregations of the faithful. Concerned with the
management of property, finances, revenues and privileges, as well as the
care of sonls, it has survived the revolutions of the centuries and furnished
a continuing example of administrative organization and method.
Besides the heritage of Roman institutions, both secular and ec-
clesiastic, has been the heritage of administrative organization and pro-
cedure connected with military affairs-one of the first and frequently the
.. Schuyler Wallace: "The Great Leviathan and the Science of Administration."
Federal Departmentalization, A Critique of Theories of Organization. Pp. 3-4. Re-
printed by permission of The Columbia University Press. Copyright 1941, The
Columbia University Press.
 HISTORY OF ADMINISTltATION

paramount int~ of the State. After the rather loosely knit feudal army
of the early Middle Ages was supplanted gradually by the small standing
army of professional soldiers and officers of the seventeenth and eighteenth
centuries, the organization and direction of armies became perhaps the
first care of the modem State. For the scattered and more or less inde-
pendent feudal bands, furnishing most or all of their own supplies, was
substituted the single army, with its hierarchy of relationships and power
running down from the commander-in-chief through the various grada-
tions of officers to the lowest private in the ranks. In tum the army had
now to be supplied by the State with food, clothing and implements of
war_nd this added an enormous burden to the agencies of military ad-
ministration. It may be said indeed that 'the army was the first modern ad-
ministrative system as effectively organized as the administration of the
Roman Empire at its height, and that some of the greatest talent pro-
duced by Western civilization was dedicated to its improvement.

Fitz-Nears detailed Dialogue concerning the day-by-day opera-

tions of the English medieval Exchequer and Charlemagne's detailed
Capitulary for the management of his imperia) domains are merely
medieval archetypes dealing with the more powerful and efficient
central agencies, royal demesnes, and ecclesiastical estates. Walter of
Henley'S Husbandry appeared in the late 1200'S and was, for the
lesser feudalities and the manors, a useful English technical hand-
book for 200 years, not only with respect to methods of land cultiva-
tion but also with respect to methods of allocating the tasks and
recording the services of tenants and serfs.'" Recent studies have re-
vealed some of the managerial problems of life on the medieval manor
and aIso the striking resemblance to modern management of medieval
resource or forest administration by royal officers." Local government
administration was carried on by manor officials or ecclesiastical per-
sonnel, and to many historians, the Catholic prelates and the parish
clergy were medieval administrators par excellence."
In view of the evidence of "administrative talent and experience"
within the royal councils," it is surprising that more managerial
maturity has not been widely attributed to this period. Bishop Stubbs
"Elizabeth Lamond (ed. and trans.); Walter of Henley's Husbandry, together
with an Anonymons Husbandry, Senescbaucie and Robert Gr~setestes' Rules. London
and New York: Longmans, Green and Company; t 890, pp'. XIX, xx. .
.. H. S. Bennett: Life on the EngllSh Manor. Cambridge, England: The Um-
versity Press, 1938, Chapter 7, "Manorial Administration.". Nellie Neilson: ':The
Forests" in The English Government at Work, '3%7-'336: ed.ted by James F. WIllard
and William A. Morris. Cambridge, Mass.: The Medieval Academy of Amenca,
1940, Chapter 9 .
.. See, for example, the comments of Arnold J. Toynhee: A Study of Hist0'1'
London: Oxford University Press; 1939, vol. 4, pp. 527-8; and D. C. Somervell,
abridgement, 1947. pp. 350, 358.
"Willard and Morris: The English Government at Warlc, '327-'33 6 , p. 30.
96 ADMINISTRATION

has carefully studied the Curia Regis and the Chancery" and has
indefatigably haced the minutiae of the Royal "Household" and the
"Wardrobe."'" Rarely, however, do we get the insight originally fur-
nished by Fitz-Neal himself not only into the fascinating detail of the
fiscal procedure of the Exchequer, but into the significance which the
medieval administrator attnbuted to the conscious study of the ad-
ministrative process. More obscure for the modern study of ad-
ministration is the field of medieval church administration. Church
documents have been a good source for understanding such subjects
as ecclesiastical politics and papal revenues." Few historians, how-
ever, have used all the techniques of modern research to examine
fully the extensive system of parish or apostolic administration which
grew up during the Middle Ages.'· Some of the most conscientious
scholars of the Medieval Academy of America early in their compre-
hensive studies "abandoned the presentation of the administrative
duties of the clergy." "
Much of the fascinating administrative work carried on by me-
dieval parliaments, synods, councils, manors, or counting-houses re-
mains stored away in the still extant royal parchments, ecclesiastical
chronicles, church registers, manor rolls, commerciallctters, and con-
temporary treatises. But what original researches have not yet fully
developed, resourceful scholars have postulated. Ernest Barker has
attributed the secularization of the Church's public scn'ices to the in-
creasing administrative resources of the modem state," while Carl J.
Friedrich has supported the thesis that the rise of modern govern-
ment is virtually identical with the development of administrative
bureaucracy.'·
os 'Villiam Stubbs: The Constitutional History at England. Oxford: The Clarendon
Press; 1 8<)1 •
.. Thomas F. Tout: Chapters in the Administrative History at Medieval England.
Manchester: The University Press; '9'0 .
.. Sec, for e""mple, William E. Lunt: Papal Revenues in the Middle Ages. New
York: The Columbia University Press; 1934.
46 TIlC most extensive studies of parish administrdtion are those for a later period
( 1689-1835) by Sydney and Beatrice \Vebb: English Local Government trom the
Revolution to the Municipal Corporation Act: The Parish and the County. London:
Longmans Green and Company; 1906. There is one suggestively entitled volume by
the Rev. TI,omas Joseph McDonough: Apostolic Administrators, An Historical
SynopsiS and Commentary. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press;
1941. The book is merely a technical study in canon law dealing with the power and
status of papal representatives.
"""ilIard and Morris: The English Government at Work, 1327-1336, p. vi .
.. The Development of Public Services in Western Europe, ,660--1930. London:
Oxford University Press; 1944, pp. 67-8 .
.. Constitutional Government and Politics. Boston: Little, Brmvn and Company;
'941, pp. 1<)-20. See also Cad J. F,ied,kh and Taylor Cole: Responsible BureauCt1lCy.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1932, Chapter 1.
 HISTORY OF AOMINISTItATION

6. THE GERMAN AND AUSTRIAN CAMERALISTS AS MODERN

ADMINISTRATORS
The belief that systematic administration is a product only of j:he
last century or two should finally be dispelled by the study of the
Cameralist period. The Cameralists were a group of German :,md
Austrian professors and public administrators whose activities h.~ve
been traced as far back as 1550, and who flourished especially durlllg
the 1700'S. The period of the Cameralists coincided with the cen-
tralized paternalistic state of Frederich \Villiam I of Prussia (1713-
40) and Maria Theresa of Austria (1740-80). The Cameralists hilve
generally been identified with the British Mercantilists and ~he
French Physiocrats, and in common with these schools of politiCal
economy, they emphasized the enhancement of the physical wealth
of the state. However, they expressed this interest not only in teims
of national economics and fiscal reforms, but equally in tcrms of
systematic administration, particularly in the field of public ~d­
ministration. To what extent Cameralist thought and practice Ill-
corporated administration as a body of general knowledge comp;lra-
ble to contemporary public management can be judged from the
quotations below from Melchoir von Osse, Georg Zincke and Joh;lnn
von Justi. These writers combined professorial posts with public s~rv­
ice to the emerging German nation. Although Osse appeared so e')~ly
( 1550) tbat bis identification witb Cameralism is remotc, by the
time Justi appeared in 1760, the movement was in full swing, jlnd
indeed Justi did little more than popularize the vast body of km,wl-
edge and practice already available.
The foremost scholar of Cameralism at the height of its develOp-
ment in the seventeenth century was Georg Zincke. He probably ~ld
more for the training of administrators than any other Camerahst .
As a professor at Leipzig, he offered courses in the "Science of ]:..aw
and Cameralism." His bibliography on Cameralism had over 2,or:o
titles of which 500 dealt with financial administration, and 500 .pIth
other distinct administrative topics, including 164 titles on "agricul-
tural administration" alone. To facilitate the use of this material by
his numerous students who were training for the public service, he
classified each of these bibliographical items as "learned" or ,Iun_
learned," and as "very good," "good," "moderately good," "bad". or
"very bad."" He is quoted below from his own comprehenSive
Cameralist Library, which is a four-volume treatise on the prDC~­
dures and principles of political economy, fiscal science, and pubhc
administration .
.. Small: The Cameralist., p. zs6.
98 ADMtNlST1lATIOfI

No discussion of Cameralism would be complete without refer-

ence to the modern scholar of this historical movement, Professor
Albion W. Small of the University of Chicago. Although he was
primarily a sociologist and social theorist, Small was the American
discoverer, interpreter, and translator of the whole Cameralist school
of public administration.
(a) MELCHOIR YON OSSE
Test.ment S1
It is among all wise people beyond dispute, that every magistracy
may prove and make evident its virtue and aptitude in two ways. First, in
time of war, through manly deeds, good sagacious projects, and protection
of their lands and subjects, second, in time of peace, through ordering and
maintaining of good godly righteous government, judiciary, and policey
{administration].
And since every government in temporal affairs is of two parts,
namely government and policey [administration] and then the judiciary
and justice, it is in order that the aforenamed land in this respect also
should be blessed of God before many other lands. For, in the first place,
as respects the government, His Excellency [The Elector of Saxonylor-
dered his court with many dignified people, with counts, nobles, doctors,
etc., ytho hear the causes presented, reflect upon these matters, weigh and
consult, and with timely advice render true and right decisions. His Ex-
cellency has also filled the civic offices with functionaries, with orders that
each shall receive what is due, and that justice shall always be rendered to
the subjects. For in this country, God be praised, domestic peace is main-
tained, and many wholesome publications appear against oppression and
irregular administration.

( b) CEORG ZINCKE
Cameralist Library'2
Using means of livelihood is called managing [wirthschafftenJ.
When the produce provides not merely the wants and conveniences of
physical life, but also that excess which we call riches, we call it good
management. If the means of livelihood for a land and people are to be
flourishing, good management must prevail among and over them. It
follows that the ruler, or those who assist him in these important matters,
must have the knowledge necessary to insure good management, and must
51 Melchoir von Osseo Testament, quoted in Small:. The Cameralists, selected
from pp. '5-0, .1l--9. Reprinted by permission of The University of Chicago Press.
Copyright 1909, The University of Chicago Press.
"Georg Zincke: Cameralist Libr2lY, quoted in Small: The Cameralists, p. '53.
Reprinted by permission of The University of Chicago Press. Copyright 1909, The
University of Chicago Press.
" HISTOIIY 01 ADMINlSTIAnON
exert the ubnost endeavor to secure the application of this knowledge
throughout the land. This is necessary not only for the sake of promoting
good management in the land, and to put the people in the way of ready
means, but it is necessary in order to secure the sources of the prince's own
ready means.
It follows that a prince needs genuine and skillful cameralists.
By this name we mean those who possess fundamental and special knowl-
edge about all or some particular part of those things which are necessary
in order that they may assist the prince in maintaining good management
in the state.

(C) JOHANN YON ,um

Political Economy sa
The great management of the state rests virtually upon the same
rules which other management must observe. In both establishments the
ultimate purposes are to acquire "means," to assure what has been ac-
quired, and to use reasonably the goods possessed. The housekeeping of
the state is merely of incomparably greater extent than that of a private
person.
Next to the economic lectures should follow in order the course
on police science. This is also the first part of the great Oekonomie (man-
agement) of the state, since it includes the chief measures intended to
preserve and increase the general means of the republic. All the methods
whereby the riches of the state may be increased, in so far as the authority
of the government is concerned, belong consequently under the charge
of the police. The science of police is consequently the more immediate
basis for the cameral and finance sciences proper, and the expert in police
science must sow, as it were, in order that the cameralist in tum may reap.
It wiII hardly be supposed that I should regard a single man as
sufficient to teach the economic and cameralistic sciences in universities.
At least two teachers should be appointed, of whom the one should deal
chiefly with police and commercial science, the other with economics and
finance. For if these sciences are to be taught completely, fundamentally
and to real purpose, each of these professors must have time to treat of
this or that portion of his sciences in detail in separate courses of lectures,
in order that each may have opportunity to make himself proficient in that
branch to which he proposes to devote himself. Some wiII want to make a
career in the manufacturing system, some in the bureaus of taxation and
revenue, Some in forestry, or the forestry bureau, and all must have 0p-
portunity to get detailed instruction in the selected specialty. The tradi-
tional professorship of politics in the universities should be so filled that
future ambassadors and ministers could profitably hear the occupant dis-
sa Johann von Justi: Political Economy, quoted in Small: The Cam=lislS,
adapl.e<!_ from pp. 303, 306-07. Reprinted by permission of The University of Chicago
Press. Copyright 1909, The University of CIiicago Press.
100 ADMtNISTIlATIGN

cuss statesmanship, and so that the doctrines taught would not seem
ridiculous to actual ministers and statesmen.

(d) ALBION SMALL

The Cameralists"
TIle term Kammer, derivatives of which have been transliterated
into English to denote a theory and practice for which Englishmen have
no exact equivalent, is itself a variant of the Latin camera, in turn from the
Greek KalLapa, "anything with a vaulted roof or arched covering"; Heyse's
F'remdworterbucb [says J "camera or Kammer in the more restricted sense
is the apartment where the counselors charged with administration of the
revenues of a principality assembled: the persons themselves, Kammerriitlle
and Kammer·Assessoren." Cameralism was the routine of the bureaus in
which the administrative employees of governments, first of all in the
fiscal departments, did their work; or in a larger sense it was systematized
governmental procedure, the application of which was made in the ad·
ministrative bureaus. Lexis, in Conrad's Dictionary, under the title
"Kameralwisscnschaft," states that the emperor Maximilian I established
several Reichskammer, e.g., the Kammergericht, 1495, and that in the
course of the sixteenth century the type of administration began to be de·
veloped in the chief states of the Empire.
Cameralism was an administrative technology. Ludewig (1727)
specifies and partially describes in turn, as items in the excellence of the
Prussian system: the administration of charity; medical and sanitary in·
stitutions; colonies; the establishment of many industries, and regulation
of the same; redemption of waste lands; construction of water·ways;
profitable farming of certain royal prerogatives; selection of capable young
men as subordinates in administrative offices; written ordinances and laws
for all functionaries; reforms of the currency; establishment of the office of
comptroller; careful signing of royal decrees; administration of justice and
expediting of legal processes; consequent improvement of the royal
finances; simplification of ceremonial.
In a word, the cameralists were a series of German writers, nom
the middle of the sixteenth to the end of the eighteenth century, who ap-
proached civic problems from a common viewpoint, who proposed the
same central question, and who developed a coherent civic theory, cor·
responding with the Gennan system of administration at the same time in
course of evolution.

In Small's aptly described term, Camera, the reader will recog·

nize the elements of the Exchequer of Fitz·NeaI's day; and in the

"Small: The Cameralists. adapted from pp. vii-viii, z, 18, 217-18, ;91. Re·
printed by permission of The University of Chicago Press. Copyright, '909, The
University of Chicago Press.
t01 HISTORY 0' ADMINISTUTION

stra_nge Getman tenn policey, the reader will discover the concept of
polIce, the forebear of the term public administration in the United
States." Moreover, there were a score of other well-known seven-
teenth- and eighteenth-century Cameralists besides Osse, Zincke, and
Just~ who ably combined scholarship and practice in the administra-
tive field, especially Seckendorff, Gasser, Dithmar, and Sonnenfels."
These phases of the Cameralist philosophy were not widely studied
in the United States, but contemporary scholars with a good grasp of
this era of European history thoroughly agree with Small's unique
interpretation of the Cameralists' role in developing the social
sciences and the administrative disciplines."'

7. SCIENTIFIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE NINETEENTH

CENTURY

While the Cameralist philosophy did not make much headway

outside Germany and Austria, in the major European countries a
parallel tendency existed during the eighteenth and nineteenth cen-
turies "to promote the growth of a common European standard of
administration and public service." .. Meanwhile, what was happen-
ing in the emerging American culture?
The formation of the United States was not merely a revolu-
tionary achievement in widening the scope of political democracy
for mankind. The United States also represented a notable develop-
ment in executive and administrative achievement, including, first,
the successful establishment of the elective presidency as a con-
tinuous system for the executive management of a republic; and
second, the phenomenal growth of scientific management. The end
of the nineteenth century also witnessed in the United States a re-
vival of administrative speculation in which Woodrow Wilson played
a large part. In analyzing administrative history, Wilson gives due
credit to the Prussian background, although he does not refer to the
Cameralist contribution, nor does he agree that "systematic" ad-
ministration had received much attention before the nineteenth cen-
tury. Regardless of the validity of this interpretation, Wilson's con-
ception of the "Study of Administration," presented in 1886, was
another landmark in the history of this significant field of knowledge .
.. See Chapter >0 •
.. Small: The Cameralist•.
51 Louise Sommer: "Cameralism." Encvclopedia of the Sodal Sciences. vol. >,
pp. 158-60. Carl J. Friedrich: "The Continental Tradition of Training Administrators
in Law and Jurisprudence." The Journal of Modem History. June 1939. vol. 11, pp.
"9-48. .
.. Barker: The Development of Public Services in Western Europe. p. 93·
lOZ
\VOOMOW Wn.soM
"The Study of AdnIinistr.tioR" lit
The science of administration is the latest fruit of that study of
the science of politics which was begun some twenty-two hundred years
ago. It is a birth of our own century, almost of our own generation. No one
wrote systematically of administration as a branch of the science of govern-
ment until the present century had passed its first youth and had begun
to put forth its characteristic flower of systematic knowledge. Up to our
own day all the political writers whom we now read had thought, argued,
dogmatized only about the constitution of government. The question was
always: Who shall make law, and what shall that law be? The other ques-
tion, how law should be administered with enlightenment, with equity,
with speed, and without friction, was put aside as "practical detail" which
clerks could arrange after doctors had agreed upon principles.
One does not have to look back of the last century for the be-
ginnings of the present complexities of trade and perplexities of com-
mercial speculation, nor for the portentous birth of national debts. Good
Queen Bess, doubtless, thought that the monopolies of the sixteenth cen-
tury were hard enough to handle without burning her hands; but they are
not remembered in the presence of the giant mouopolies of the nineteenth
century. The perennial discords between master and workmen which now
so often disturb industrial society began before the Black Death and the
Statute of Laborers; but never before our own day did they assume such
ominous proportions as they wear now. In brief, if difficulties of gov-
ernmental action are to be seen gathering in other centuries, they are to be
seen culminating in our own.
This is the reason why administrative tasks have nowadays to be
so studiously and systematically adjusted to carefully tested standards of
policy, the reason why we are having now what we never had before, a
science of administration. The weightier debates of constitutional prin-
ciple are even yet by no means concluded; but they are no longer of more
immediate practical moment than questions of administration. It is get-
ting to be harder to run a constitution than frame one.
But where has this science of administration grown up? Surely
not on this side of the sea. American writers have hitherto taken nO very
important part in the advancement of this science. It has found its doc-
tors in Europe. It is not of our making; it is a foreign science, speaking
very little. of the language of English or American principle. It employs
only foreigu tongues. It has been developed by FrenCh and German pro-
fessors. If we would employ it, we must Americanize it.
_...
To what extent Wilson is correct in implying the recentness of
systematic administration is a question of definition and interpreta-
.. Woodrow Wilson: ''The Study of Administration." Political Scimce Quarterly,
June 1887, vol. ~,seIected from pp. 198-.0., ~o4. See also Chapter ;, D. 4.
103 HISTOItY OF A....NIST1tA1'tON
tion which the reader may determine fQr himseH in the light of the
evidence presented in this chapter. There are extenuating factors if
Wilson's interpretation is rejected. For one thing, many of the rec-
ords and researches now available about the ancient and medieval
periods were accumulated after Wilson studied and taught political
science and public administration. Moreover, Wilson did not expect
that his "paper" would be accepted as the authoritative or scholarly
essay on the subject, and he frankly said to the editor of the Political
Science Quarterly when he submitted it for publication in 1886: "I
send the paper, but I wish to be taken literally-as meaning what I
say in just the way I say it-when I sugg~st that if you return it, so
far from hurting my feelings in the least, you will only be confirming
me in the thought that it is too slight." eo
Nevertheless, as Wilson indicates, administrative development in
America borrowed noticeably from European and particularly from
German political science and Prussian public administration, which
in turn had grown out of the Cameralist school.

8. MANAGEMENT IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY

Another development in addition to the governmental was the

impetus given to administrative technique by the industrial revolu-
tion, as explained in the following contribution from Charles Beard.

CHARLES A. BEARD

"The Elements of Sciefttific AdministratiOft""

While the lawyers were monopolizing the science of public ad-
ministration there was growing up outside the academic world an inchoate
science of industrial administration, known as scientific management.
The origins of this new and significant movement in human thought have
been traced back as far as 1832., when Charles Babbage, an English stu-
dent of industry, wrote his treatise on The Economy of Manufacturers.
About fifty years later, Henry R. Towne, an American manufacturer and
head of a large industry, sought to interest engineers and administrators
in the aspects of management in industry. This seed feU upon stony
ground, although Mr. Towne successfully applied some of his principles
in his own factory. It was not until 1903 that the modem science of man·
agement really began to take form. In that year, Frederick W. Taylor read
before the American Society of Mechanical Eugineers a paper on the
.. Wilson: Letter to Edward Seligman, Nomnber 11, ,886.
.. Charles A. Beard: ''The Elements of Scientific Administration." Public Policy
and General Welfare, ~Iected from pp. '52-5. Reprinted by permission of Rinehart
and Company, Inc. Copyright '94'.
104
principles of scientific shop management. This was the beginning pf a
llood of literature on the subject which has grown into a vast bodf of
knowledge embracing experience, practice, and theory. . .
In 1907, four years after Mr. Taylor announced the results of ~lS
studies to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, there wrui m-
corporated in New York City a new institution which was destine,l to
work a profound influence on the study of public administration in the
United States. I refer to the New York Bureau of Municipal Research.
The purposes of this institution among others were (I) to promott! ef-
ficient and economical municipal government, (:z) to promote the ac3op-
tion of scientific methods of accounting and reporting the detail:> of
municipal business, and (3) to collect, classify, analyze, correlate, and
publish facts as to the administration of municipal government.
The Bureau of Municipal Research, however, laid special sp-ess
upon the comparative study of public and private administration. It ~ook
as its concrete data the experiences of American manufacturing corpora-
tions as well as the experiences of public administration. It observed the
ways in which private corporations managed finances and accounts, j(ept
pay rolls, purchased supplies, and organized huge labor forces. In a word,
it sought to unite in the science of administration a wide range of hmnan
administrative experience, public and private.

There is considerable confirmation for the view that seien tific

Th'1>"U'A1,<:.;%'¢.."U\ '*'1>';, "}>'¢..'Ii~\'t~ \)'j
V...'t~'t...;.'\:,\. W. \'A1\~"1 )"U \\)'¢.. 't;'lt.11J
1900'S and that it goes back as far as the early 1800's to Charles 13ab-
bage, but each authority who acquiesces in this conclusion also sug-
gests that there were origins behind Babbage. Thus Schuyler Wal-
lace, who also refers to Babbage's work as a precedent for Taytor's
contributions to scientific management, traces this phase of the in-
dustrial revolution back to medieval, military, and ecclesiastical ad-
ministration." British authorities also cite Babbage as a forerunner to
Taylor but some, like L. Urwich and E. F. L. Brech, remind us that
Babbage was himself indebted to Monsieur Coulomb for his "time
observation." .. On the other hand, Harlow S. Person, the American
student of scientific management, links Babbage with an earlier
Frenchman, Monsieur Perronet, a pin manufacturer who wade
"over-all time studies of the major operations involved." ..
But the "origins" continually recede. Oliver Sheldon, the En~lish
philosopher of management who in 1925 was one of the first to re-
mind us of Babbage's contribution, went still further back, as we }lave

.. Wallace: Federal Departmentalization, p. 5.

.. Urwich and Brech: The Making of Scientific Management. London: Manage'
ment Publications Trust; 1945, vol. 1, p. 25 .
.. Harlow S. Person; "'Fhe Genius of Frederick W. Taylor." Advanced Manage-
ment, January-March '945, vol. 10, p. 4.
105 HlSTOlY Of ADMINISTlATION

seen, to the thirteenth-century Walter of Henley as "the earliest

protagonist of scientific management." Sheldon then concluded:
"Each generation has doubtless had its scribe who thought scientifi-
cally about the ploughing of the soil, the throwing of the shuttle, the
beating of the iron, or the hewing of the trees. Then came the days
when the ploughman, the weaver, the smith and the woodman dis-
carded the old tools of their crafts, and strode amazedly into the
towns where the new factories reared their ugly forms. . . . So
finally, the torch was handed on from one generation to another, till,
amid the immense structure of American industry, it passed to the
hand of Frederick Taylor." ..
Frederick W. Taylor is part of the detailed story of American ad-
ministration which is reserved for the next chapter, but meanwhile
we may conclude that if modern management is modern in origin,
it is so by definition only. 'T!Ie technique of management, like the art
of administration and the science of organization, has ancient roots
and medieval branches.

SUMMARY

Information on many current issues of modern management can

be found in a variety of historical sources. The ancient Egyptians had
a long experience with bureaucratic civilization. Civil service systems
were highly developed by the Chinese. The Greeks had a system of
democratic control over administration, whatever we may think of
it, and the Romans could teach us much about large-scale manage-
ment and international administration. As to the use of established
procedures for the management of affairs, we could profit from the
study of the methods of monks and medieval magistrates. And as to
administrative systemization, in terms of both professional practice
and scientific speculation, the ideas of the Cameralists of two
hundred years ago have not yet been surpassed.
Administrative history, therefore, has not been a straight-line
development. The various elements of administration have risen and
declined and then risen again; there are ancient origins of supposedly
modem aspects; and imperceptibly, accretions of administrative lore
and management technique have become inextricably interwoven
with our civilization. Perhaps the major new comp!>nent contributed
by modem science to the ancient art of administration has been on
"Oliver Sheldon: "The Development of Scientific Management in England."
Harvard Business Review. January 192>. vol. ;, p. U9. But a similar sort of scientific
thorougilliess was attn1>uted ta De Agricultura ?f Cato (~34-1~~ D.C._) ~~ to Rem,!!
Rusticarum of Varra (116-.8 B.C.). See Fairfax Harrison: A Vttgmaa Fanner•
.Roman Farm ~t. New York: The Macmillan Co.; 1913·
106 ADMINISTRA.....

the technological side, including the combination ·of mechanical,

methodological, and mana&erial technique. Professor Harold Zj~
one of the political scientists who agree that modem administrallOn
is not so modem after all, points out furthermore that in the past
"there was not the detailed consideration, the organized attention,
the elaborately planned programs, and the high degree of profes-
sionalism."" Finally, the helief bas emerged, in the course of the de-
velopment of the human intel1igence, that the administrative tech-
nology itself is a most promising tool for the welfare of mankind and
must be more systematically pursued .
.. Harold link: Government and Politics in the United States. New York: 'The
Macmillan Company; 194Z, p. 493.
 CHAPTER FIVE

AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION

ALTHOUGH history reveals many common threads of administrative

experience, individual nations reflect unique and varied administra-
tive characteristics. The United States, for example, melting pot of
other cultures though it may be, has a singular administrative herit-
age. Some aspects of the American administrative system have al-
ready been described, such as the constant drive to free administra-
tion from "politics"; and throughout this book other aspects of
American administration will be analyzed in further detail. In this
chapter only the most distinctive features of American administra-
tion will be discussed.
One can, of course, extract from a careful study of American ad-
ministration a long list of basic administrative qualities, but they
would all tend to fall between the two dominant American predilec-
tions for ("1) democratic participation or control and (2) technical
competence and efficiency. Almost by definition the emphasis of an
administrative system is on technical efficiency; oot, diverting as it
may seem to the students of administrative technique, popular par-
ticipation or democratic control over administration is as prominent
a part of the American administrative system as is technical compe-
tence.

1. THE ADMINISTRATIVE IMPULSE IN AMERICAN DEMOCRACY

This democratic control was evident from the nation's beginning.

Even Alexander Hamilton, who preferred an executive elite of aristo-
107
108
cratic character, wished to combine "a vigorous Executive" with the
more popular "genius of republican government." Consequently, he
wrote as follows in the Federalist in 1788 about the emerging system
of American administration.

(a) ALEXANDER HAMILTON

The federalist, Number 70 '
There is an idea, which is not without its advocates, that a vigor-
ous Executive is inconsistent with the genius of republican government.
The enlightened wen-wishers of this species of government must at least
hope that the supposition is destitute of foundation; since they can never
admit its truth, without at the same time admitting the condemnation
of their own principles. Energy in the Executive is a leading character in
the definition of good government. It is essential to the protection of the
community against foreign attacks; it is not less essential to the steady ad-
ministration of the laws; to the protection of property against those ir-
regular and high-handed combinations which sometimes interrupt the
ordinary course of justice; to the security of liberty against the enterprises
and assaults of ambition, of faction, and of anarchy. Every man the least
conversant in Roman story, knows how often that republic was obliged
to take refuge in the absolute power of a single man, under the formidable
title of Dictator, as well against the intrigue of ambitious individuals who
aspired to the tyranny, and the seditions of whole classes of the com-
munity whose conduct threatened the existence of all government, as
against the invasions of external enemies who menaced the conquest and
destruction of Rome.
There can be no need, however, to multiply arguments or ex-
amples on this head. A feeble Executive implies a feeble execution of the
government. A feeble execution is but another phrase for a bad execution;
and a government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be, in
practice, a bad government.

(bl ALEXANDER HAMILTON

The federalist, Number 72'
The administration of government, in its largest sense, compre·
hends all the operations of the body politic, whether legislative, executive,
or judiciary; but in its most usual, and perhaps its most precise significa-
tion, it is limited to executive details, and falls peculiarly "within the
province of the executive department. The actual conduct of foreign
negotiations, the preparatory plans of finance, the application and dis·
1 Alexander Hamilton: The Fed=list, Nnmber 70. New York Packet; March 18,
1788.
• Alexander Hamilton: The Federalist, Number 7'. New York Paclcet; Man:h 21,
1788.
109
bmsement of the public moneys in conformity to the general appropria-
tions of the legislature, the arrangement of the army and navy, the direc-
tions of the operations of war,-these, and other matters of a like nature,
constitute what seems to be most properly understood by the administra-
tion of government. The persons, therefore, to whose immediate moJ.nage-
ment these different matters are committed, ought to be considered as the
assistants or deputies of the chief magistrate, and on this account they
ought to derive their offices from his appointment, at least from his nomi-
nation, and ought to be subject to his superintendence. This view of
the subject wm at once suggest to us the intimate connection between the
duration of the executive magistrate in office and the stability of the
system of administration.

'I1!is American device, the administratively powerful yet demo-

cratically controlled type of executive, represented what is perhaps
the most creative contribution of American administration. The
historic uniqueness of the American presidency rested on the fact
that the ultimate power of public management was concentrated in
the hands of an elected chief executive instead of a hereditary mon-
arch, an executive who "''liS "at one and the same time the chief of
state, the leader of the legislature, the leader of a political party, the
commander-in-chief of the military forces of the nation, and toe ex-
ecutive manager of the government."·
Fortunately, the philosophy and program of the first President
was conducive to the success of this system from the beginning.'
Washington, too, believed that "free and equal Representation of the
People," and "an efficient and responsible Executive" were "the
great Pillars" on which the new country was to rest.' While Wash-
ington, in his first inaugural address, claimed he was "unpracticed in
the duties of civil administration," his whole record as provincial sur-
veyor, land merchant, army commander, plantation manager, and
President, bespeaks his devotion to the canons of proficient adrninis-
tration." He was himself a highly efficient administrator and on one
occasion pointed out to his plantation manager: "There is much
more in what is called hard work, that is in the matter of conducting
business, than is generally imagined." , He even cautioned his "Execu-

• Louis Brownlow: "The Executive Office of the Presidency." Public Administra·

tion Review, Winter '94', vol. " p. 102.
• White: The Federalists. James Hart: The American Presidency In Action: 1789,
A Study In Constitutional History. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1948.
• GeorI!C Washington: Letter to Catherine Macaulay Graham, January 9, 1790·
John C. Flt2patrick (ed.): The Writings of George Washington, vol. JO, p. 4~'
• White: The Federalists, p. 101. Douglas Southall Freeman: George Washington.
New York: Charles Scribner's Sons; 1948.
• Georll" Washington: Instructions to John Fairfax, January " 1789. Fitzpatrick:
The Writings of Ceoq:e Washington. vol. 30, pp. 17;~ n. 4·
110 AOMJtUftA~

live Officers" of cabinet rank: "In all important matters, to deb'Jx!rate

maturely, but to execute promptly and vigorously. And not to put
things off unbl the Morrow which can be done, and require tP be
done, today. Without an adherence to these rules, business nev~
WIll be wen done, or done in an easy manner; but will always be m
arrear, with one thing treading upon the heels of another."· ~l­
though he did not express a systematic formulation of exectlbve
responsibility, Washington offered more than mere platitudes 011 ad-
ministrative efficiency. From the standpoint of governmental tech-
nique, he was one of a compact group of American leaders wh()? as
Leonard D. White has shown in his classic study of The Federajlsts,
had "an intuitive grasp of the administrative art" and who "set new
levels of achievement before a people still close to colonial de-
pendence." •
During the Federalist period, even the "new science of busin(-ss,"
according to one Boston banker in 1784, "has been greater than. our
most sanguine expectation ever had form'd.'" ,0 At the same time,
the new government set out to encourage the related field of indd!>t!)'
with its endless possibilities for technical perfection. Washington ~n
1790 found that "the number of new manufacrures introducec:l III
one year is astonishing"; U and in 1791, Alexander Hamilton, the
first Secretary of the Treasury, chose deliberately the direction of the
nation's technological development in basing his report on M;1nu-
factures upon "the truth" that "manufacturing pursuits are suscep-
tible in a greater degree of the application of machinery than tho&<: of
agriculture." 12
Hamilton saw reflected in his own administrative genius some of
the tremendous technical competence of American managemeot in
both public and private affairs. Retired from the Secretaryship ot th~
Treasury to private practicem New York City but still active in polI-
tics, he wrote in 1798 concerning "the business of government": "I
anticipate with you that this country will, erelong, assume an attitude
"George Washington: Letter to the Secretary of War, June 13, 1796. Fitz·
patrick: The Writings of Grorge Washington, vol. 35, p. 138.
• White: The Federalists, p. 513.
,. Letter of Thomas Willing to William Philips and others, January 6, 1714. B~nk
of North America Letter Book. Quoted in N. S. B. Gras: The Massachusetts Frrst
National Bank of Boston, 1784-1934. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; '937,
pp. ~'0-11. See also Robert A. East: Busmcss Enterpri!e in the American Revolu-
tionary Era. New York: The Columbia UnivetSity Press; 1938, Studies in H~,
Economics and Public Law, No. 439.
11 George Washington: Letter to Catherine Macaulay Graham, January 9, 1790 .
Fitzptltrid: The Writings of George W.shington, p. 497. .
,. Alelcander HamIlton: Manufactures. Submitted to the House of Representatives,
December 5, 1791. Henry Cabot Lodge (ed.): The Works of Alexander Hamilton.
New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons; vol. 4. p. 8Q.
11' AMnteAN ADM1NJ$1UTION

correspondent with its great destinies-majestic, efficient, and opera-

tive of great things. A noble career lies before it." a

2. THE DEMOCRATIC CHARACTER OF AMERICAN

ADMINISTRATION

Alexis de Tocqueville was a twenty-five-year-old French judge

when he came to the United States in 1831 to study certain Ameri-
can prison reforms that had been reported in Europe. De Tocque-
ville decided, however," to devote the bulk of his time and effort to
extensive visiting and note-taking throughout the United States. He
was enamoured of the new American republic, and he felt that
France, suffering from the effects of an "unfinished revolution,"
ought to be told how this experiment in democracy actually func-
tioned:His Democracy in America, published in 1835, has been
widely regarded as the most outstanding foreign classic on American
life of the nineteenth century. Some of its keenest passages con-
cerned the democratic bases of American administration.

ALEXIS DE TOCQUEYILLE
Democracy in America"
Nothing is more striking to II European traveler in the United
States than the absence of what we term the government, or the adminis-
tration. Written laws exist in America, and one sees the daily execution
of them; but although everything moves regularly, the mover can no-
where be discovered. The hand that directs the social machine is in-
visible. Nevertheless, as all persons must have recourse to certain gram-
matical forms which are the foundation of human language, in order to
express their thoughts, so all communities are obliged to secure their ex-
istence by submitting to a certain amount of authority, without which
they fall into anarchy. This authority [consists in America] in distributing
the exercise of its powers among various hands and in multiplying func-
tionaries, to each of whom is given the degree of power necessary for him
to perform his duty.
The political activity that pervades the United States must be
seen in order to be understood. No sooner do you set foot upon American
13 A~nder Hamilton: Letter to Rufus King, October 2, 1798. Lodge: The Worla
of Alexander Hamilton, vol. 10, p.3'"
,. Phillips Bradley: Introdnction to De Tocqueville: Democracy in America.
New York: Alfred A. Knopf, "Inc.; J945·
,. Alexis de TocquevilJe: Democracy in America. Adapted from vol. 1, pp. 7, 70,
91-2, 211-12, Chapter 14. Reprinted by permission of A1f1ed A. Knopf, Inc. Copy-
right 1945, Alfred A.. Knopf, Inc.
112
ground than you are stunned by a kind of tumult; a confused clamor is
heard on every side, and a thousand simultaneous voices demand the
satisfaction of their social wants. Everything is in motion around you;
here the people of one quarter of a town are met to decide upon the build-
ing of a church; there the election of a representative is going on; a little
farther, the delegates of a district are hastening to the town in order to
consult upon some local improvements; in another place, the laborers of
a village. quit their plows to deliberate upon the project of a road or a pub·
lic school Meetings are called for the sale purpose of declaring their dis·
approbation of the conduct of the government; while in other assemblies
citizens salute the authorities of the day as the fathers of their country.
Societies are formed which regard drunkenness as the principal cause of
the evils.of the state, and solemnly bind themselves to give an example of
temperance. If an American were condemned to confine his activity to his
own affaits, he would be robbed of one half of his existence; he would
feel an immense void in the life which he is accustomed to lead, and his
wretchedness would be unbearable.
How does it happen that in the United States, where the in-
habitants have only recently immigrated to the land which they now
occupy, and brought neither customs nor traditions with them there;
where they met one another for the first time with no previous ac-
quaintance; where, in short, the instinctive love of country can scarcely
exist; how does it happen that everyone takes as zealous an interest in the
affairs of his township, his county, and the whole state as if they were his
own? It is because everyone, in his sphere, takes an active part in the gov-
ernment of society.
The citizen looks upon the fortune of the public as his own, and
he labors for the good of the state, not merely from a sense of pride or
duty, but from what I venture to term cupidity. It is unnecessary to study
the institutions and the history of the Americans in order to know the
truth of this remark, for their manners render it sufficiently evident. As
the American participates in all that is done in his country, he thinks him-
self obliged to defend whatever may be censured in it; for it is not only his
country that is then attacked, it is himself. The consequence is that his na-
tional pride resorts to a thousand artifices and descends to all the petty
tricks of personal vanity. Nothing is more embarrassing in the ordinary
intercourse of life than this irritable patriotism of the Americans.
In the United States, where public officers have no class interests
to promote, the general and constant influence of the government is bene-
ficial, although the individuals who conduct it are frequently unskillful
and sometimes contemptible. There is, indeed, a secret tendency in
democratic institutions that makes the exertions of the citizens subservient
to the prosperity of the community in spite of their vices and mistakes;
while in aristocratic institutions there is a secret bias which, notwithstand-
ing the talents and virtues of those who conduct the government, leads
them to contribute to the evils that oppress their fellow creatures. In
113 AME..ICAN ADM1MISTUTtOM

aristocrat«: governments public men may frequently do harm without in-

tending it; and in democratic states they bring about good results of
which they have never thought. The men who are entrusted with the
direction of public affairs in the United States are frequently inferior, in
both capacity and morality, to those whom an aristocracy would raise to
power. It is incontestable that the people frequently conduct public busi·
ness very badly; but it is impossible that the lower orders should take a
part in public business without extending the circle of their ideas. and
quitting the ordinary routine of their thoughts. The humblest individual
who cooperates in the government of society acquires a certain degree of
self.respect; and as he possesses authority, he can command the services
of minds more enlightened than his own. He is canvassed by a multitude
of applicants, and in seeking to deceive him in a thousand ways, they really
enlighten him. He takes a part in political undertakings which he did not
originate, but which give him a taste for undertakings of the kind. I have
no doubt that the democratic institutions of the United States, joined to
the physical constitution of the country, are the cause (not the direct, as
is so often asserted, but the indirect cause) of the prodigious commercial
activity of the inhabitants.
The authority which public men possess in America is so brief
and they are so soon commingled with the ever changing population of
the country that the acts of a community frequently leave fewer traces
than events in a private family. The public administration is, so to speak,
oral and traditional; no one cares for what occurred before his time: no
methodical system is pursued, no archives are formed, and no documents
are brought together.
Nevertheless, the art of administration is undoubtedly a science.
But the persons who conduct the administration in America can seldom
afford any instruction to one another. In America the power that conducts
the administration is far less regular, less enlightened, and less skillful, but
a hundredfold greater than in Europe. In no country in the world do the
citizens make such exertions for the common weal. I know of no people
who have established schools so numerous and efficacious, places of pub-
lic worship better suited to the wants of the inhabitants, or roads kept in
better repair. Uniformity OI permanence of design, the minute arrange-
ment of details, and the perfection of administrative system must not be
sought for in the United States; what we find there is the presence of a
power which, if it is somewhat wild, is at least robust, and an existence
checkered with accidents, indeed, but full of animation and effort. The
first of the duties that are at this time- imposed upon those who direct
our affairs is to educate democracy, to reawaken, if possible, its religious
beliefs; to purify its morals; to mold its actions; to substitute a knowledge
of statecraft for its inexperience, and an awareness of its true interest for
its blind instincts, to adapt its government to time and place, and to
modify it according to men and to conditions. A new science of politics
is needed for a new world.
 114
De Tocqueville was addressing himself not only to America but
to France and the rest of Europe, where administration had remained
largely unaffected by the levelling movements touched off by the
American Revolution,'" De TocqueviIle's America, however, had
heard President Andrew Jackson in his first annual message to Con-
gress in December 1829 advocate that "the duties of all public officers
are, or at least admit of being made, so plain and simple that men of
intelligence may readily qualify themselves for their performance."
The result may have been that the public business was sometimes ad-
ministered "very badly" as de Tocqueville indicated, although there
has been some exaggeration of Jacksonian inefficiency and a distinct
lack of appreciation of Jackson's personal skill as an administrator."
In any case, the Jacksonian emphasis upon democratic participation
in administering American affairs has been hailed for its salutary
effects by foreign observers, both before and after de Tocqueville,18
as the very essence of the American epic. One hundred years after de
TocqueviIle, another penetrating French observer, Andre Siegfried,
came to America and reported: "A European in America is rather
puzzled when he comes to look for the state. . . . It is difficult to
distinguish the state from the majority of its citizens, of whom it is
really the reflection. . . . Lack of permanency in the administration
is another result of the direct type of democracy that exists in Amer-
ica." 19 Although there had been a notable evolution since de Tocque-
ville's day, the drive for democratic control, as Siegfried pointed out
a century afterward, still persisted in playing a major role in the man-
agement of American affairs.

3. ORIGINS OF THE AMERICAN EFFICIENCY MOVEMENT

De Tocqueville's democratic America is only part of the overall

picture. The technical aspect of American administration, the ef-
ficient America that constantly seeks technological proficiency and
.. For the study of this "levelling" influence on American administration, studies
d state and local affairs are more revealing than the well-known facts at the Federal
level. See the series of studies launched by the Committee on Research in Economic
History of the Social Science Research Council, especially Oscar Handlin and Mary
F"'Il Handlin:. Commonwealth: Massachusetts 1774-186 •. New York: New York
Umversity Press; 1947-
17 Albert $omit: "Andrew Jackson As Administrator." Public Administration Re-
view, Summet 1948, vol. 8, pp. 181H}6.
18 See the foreign observers quoted by Henry Steele Commager (ed.): America in
Perspective, The United States Through Foreign Eyes. New York: Random House,
Inc., 1947.
to AndIe Siegfried: America Comes oi Age. New York: Harcourt, Brace and
Company; 1927. p. %40.
liS AMERICAN AOMlNlSTRAl'IOIII

perfectio~ completes the picture. For reasons which we will ex-

amine later, the efficiency movement has become associated with the
engineer Frederick Taylor, who is honored with fathering the entire
"scientific management" movement. Taylor, however, was preceded
by a number of experts who helped win this reputation for American
management. Henry R. Towne, President of the Yale and Towne
Lock Company, is outstanding. In 1886, Towne delivered before the
American Society for Mechanical Engineers his classic paper, quoted
below, a paper which helped launch the efficiency movement in
American management.

HENRY TOWNE
"The Engineer As An Economist" to
To insure the best results, the organization of productive labor
must be directed and controlled by persons having not only good execu-
tive ability, and possessing the practical familiarity of a mechanic or en-
gineer with the goods produced and the processes employed, but having
also, and equally, a practical knowledge of how to observe, record, analyze
and compare essential facts in relation to wages, supplies, expense account,
and all else that enters into or affects the economy of production and the
cost of the product. There are many good mechanical engineers;-there
are also many good "business men"-but the two are rarely combined in
one person. But this combination of qualities, together with at least some
skill as an accountant, either in one person or more, is essential to the
successful management of industrial works, and has its highest effective-
ness if united in one person, who is thus qualified to supervise, either
personally or through assistants, the operations of all departments of a
business, and to subordinate each to the harmonious development of the
whole.
Engineering has long been conceded a place as one of the modern
arts, and has become a well-defined science, with a large and growing
literature of its own, and of late years has subdivided itself into numerous
and distinct divisions, one of which is that of mechanical engineering. It
will probably not be disputed that the matter of shop management is of
equal importance with that of engineering, as affecting the successful con-
duct of most, if not all, of our great industrial establishments, and that the
management of works has become a matter of such great and far-reaching
importance as perhaps to justify its classification also as one of the modem
arts. A vast amount of accumulated experience in the art of workshop
management already exists, but there is no record of it available to the
world in general, and each old enterprise is managed more or less in its own
.. Henry Towne: "The Engineer as an Economist." T_tions of the American
Society of Mechanical Engineers, .886, vol. 7, pp• ..pll-c].
116 ADMJNlSTlATlON

way, receiving little benefit from the paranel experience of other similar
enterprises. Surely this condition of things is wrong and should be
remedied. But the remedy must not be looked for from those who are
"business men" or clerks and accountants only; it should come from those
whose training and experience has given them an understanding of both
sides (viz: the mecha!1ical and the clerical) of the important questions
involved. It should originate therefore, from those who are also engineers.

Twentieth-century America has so thoroughly accepted the role

of the engineer as industrial manager that Towne's summons to the
engineers to become economists sounds somewhat out-of-date.
Towne's paper of 1886 has been regarded in authoritative circles as
"a convenient milestone to mark the beginning of . . . the manage-
ment movement in American industry." 21 But like most "mile-
stones" of management we find previous markers in what Towne
termed "the organization of productive work." Washington himself,
in transmitting to his farm manager, John Fairfax, "A View of the
Work at the Several Plantations in the Year 1789 and General Direc-
tions for the Execution of it," illustrated Towne's later thesis in the
following way: "For take two Managers and give to each the same
number of labourers, and let these labourers be equal in all respects.
Let both these Managers rise equally early, go equally late to rest,
be equally active, sober and industrious, and yet, in the course of the
year, one of them, without pushing the hands that are under him
more than the other, shall have performed infinitely more work. To
what is this owing? Why simply to contrivance resulting from that
forethought and arrangement which will guard against the misap-
plication of labour." 22
Just as Towne had predecessors like Washington, so he also had
like-minded contemporaries and successors, the most renowned of
whom was Frederick Taylor.

4. TAYlORISM-THE EFFICIENCY PHASE OF AMERICAN

PRODUCTION

At the same session at which Towne delivered his notable paper

to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, a young engineer
" The Taylor Society: Scientific Management in American Industry, Harlow S.
Person (ed.l. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1929, p. 6. See similar references in L.
Urwick and E. F. L. Brech: The Making of Scientific Management, vol. 1, Thirteen
Pioneers. London: Management Publications Trust; 1945, p. 33.
22 George Washington: Letter to John Fairfax, January 1, 1789. Fitzpatricl:::
The Writings of George Washington, vol. 30, pp. 17,)-76, n. 7.
117 AMERICAN ADMINISTUnoN

from the Midvale Steel Company in Philadelphia, by the name of

Frederick Winslow Taylor, made a few remarks about "the shop-
order system of accounts." This system, Taylor asserted, bad been de-
veloping at Midvale for "the past ten years" and furnished the "es-
sential facts in relation to wages, supplies, expense" for Towne's
"workshop management." "" It was not until a generation later that
Taylor's drab precision studies of the "time and motion" expended
by workmen was defined as follows under the dramatic title of the
"scientific management" movement: "Literally with a stop-watch,
scale, and a tape, Mr. Taylor measured the distances that men and
materials traversed, and gradually evolved the theory that a large per-
centage of both labor and material was needlessly wasted-often as
high as 60 to 80 per cent in a single department-through improper
supervision and direction. Through changes which he effected he
materially reduced the time in which the operations were done. By
a comparison of figures he expressed the economies which his method
effected in specific terms of minutes, cents and ounces." ..
Frederick Taylor'S biography is part of the intimate relationship
between American management and American democracy." After a
liberal education in both American and European schools, he de-
cided, in the midst of the severe depression which began in 1873, to
become a machinist. Starting as a shop laborer at Midvale in 1878,
his rise was rapid, and by 1884 he was made chief engineer. From the
beginning he was interested in scientifically achieving "a bigger out-
put" at the lathes, and he reported his experiments and achievements
in a number of highly technical papers on "shop management" to
the American Society of Mechanical Engineers." It was not until
1911 that he refined the general principles of management which
bear his name; but by this time the scientific management move-
ment had acquired a broader connotation than Taylor had ever in-
tended .

.. Transactions of the ASME; 1886, vol. 7. pp. 475-6. The main paper delivered
under the title, "The Shop-Order System of Accounts," was not Taylor's. huf that of
Henry Metcalfe of the Waterveliet Arsenal in Troy, N. Y., ibid. pp. 440-68 .
.. A. W. Shaw: "'Scientific Management' in Business." Review of Reviews, March
191" vol. 43, p. 3>7.
"" For biographical sketches of Taylor see Frank B. Copley: Frederick W. Taylor,
Father of Scientific Management. New York and London: Harper and Bros.; 1923,
2 voh. Harlow S. Person: ''The Genius of Frederick W. Taylor." Advanced Manage-
ment, January-March, 1945, vol. 10, pp. ~-11. UIWich and Brech: The Making of
Scientific Management, vol. 1, Chapter 3-
.. Frederick W. Taylor: "A Piece Rate System." Transactions of the ASME; ,895,
vol. 16, pp. 856-903. This was later expanded and published as "Shop Management"
in '903, vol. l.4. pp. 1337-1446. "The Art of Cutting Metals," ibid., 1907, vol. ~8,
pp·3 1 - 2 79·
118
FUDlRICit TAYLOR
The PrillCipies of Scielltiflc: ~"
President [Theodore] Roosevelt, in his address to the Cavemon
at the White House, prophetically remarked that "The conservation of our
national resources is only preliminaty to the larger question of national
efficiency.n We can see our forests vanishing. OUT water·powers going to
waste, Our soil being carried by floods into the sea; and the end of our
coal and our iron is in sight. But our larger wastes of human effort, which
go on every day through such of our acts as are blundering, ill-directed, or
inefficient, and which Mr. Roosevelt refen to as a lack of "national ef-
ficiency," are less visible, less tangible, and are but vaguely appreciated.
We can see and feel the waste of material things. Awkward, in-
efficient, or iJI-directed movements of men, however, leave nothing visible
or tangible behind them. Their appreciation calls for an act of memory, an
effort of the imagination. And for this reason, even though our daily loss
from this source is greater than from our waste of material things, the one
has stirred us deeply, while the other has moved us but little. The search
for better, for more competent men, from the presidents of our great
companies down to our household servants, was never more vigorous than
it is now. And more than ever before is the demand for competent men in
excess of the supply. .
This paper bas been viritten:
FIRST. To point out, through a series of simple illustrations, the
great loss which the whole country is suffering through inefficiency in al-
most all of our daily acts.
SECOND. To try to convince the reader that the remedy for this in-
efficiency lies in systematic management, rather than in searching for some
unusual or extraordinary man.
THIRD. To prove that the best management is a true science, rest-
ing upon clearly defined laws, rules, and principles, as a foundation. And
further to show that the fundamental principles of scientific management
are applicable to all kinds of human activities, from our simplest individual
acts to the work of our great corporations, which call for the most elaborate
cooperation.
One of the important objects of this paper is to convince its
readen that every single act of every workman can be reduced to a science.
With the hope of fully convincing the reader of this fact, therefore, the
writer Pl"9poses to give several more simple illustrations from among the
thousands which are at hand.
For example, the average man would question whether there is
--:::-::0--:-:-:-:::-
IT Frederick Taylor: The Principles of Scientific Management. Selected from pp.
5-'7, 64-S. Reprinted by permission of Harper .. Brothers. Copyright '947, Harper
.. Brothers. 'The 1947 edition is published in a combined volume entitled Scientific
Management, which also contains Taylor's Shop Management and his testimony before
the House of Representatives.
119
much of any science in the work of shoveling. Yet there is but litt1e doubt.
if any intelligent' reader of this paper were deliberately to set out to find
what may be called the foundation of the science of shoveling, that with
perhaps 15 to 10 hours of thought and analysis he would be almost sure
to have arrived at the essence of this science. On the other hand, so com-
pletely are the rule-of-thumb ideas still dominant that the writer has never
met a single shovel contractor to whom it had ever even occurred that
there was such a thing as the science of shoveling. This science is so ele-
mentary as to be almost self-evident.
For a first-class shoveler there is a given shovel load at which he
will do his biggest day's work. \VIlat is this shovel load? Will a first-class
man do more work per day with a shovel load of 5 pounds, 10 pounds, 15
pounds. 20, 25. 30, or 40 pounds? Now this is a question which can be
answered only through carefully made experiments. By first selecting two
or three first-class shovelers, and paying them extra wages for doing trust-
worthy work, and then gradually varying the shovel load and having all
the conditions accompanying the work carefully observed for several
weeks by men who were used to experimenting, it was found that a first-
class man would do his biggest day's work with a shovel load of about 21
pounds. For instance, that this man would shovel a larger tonnage per day
with a 21-pound load than with a 24-pound load or than with an IS-pound
load on his shovel. It is, of course, evident that no shoveler can always
take a load of exactly 21 pounds on his shovel, but nevertheless, although
his load may vary 3 or 4 pounds one way or the other, either below or
above the 21 pounds, he will do his biggest days work when his average
for the day is about 21 pounds.

Despite the aura of broad principle with which Taylor's ideas have
been surrounded, the essence of Taylorism remained this search for
efficient operations in the individual mechanical process or in the
single industrial plant, thereby making time-and-motion study "the
chief cornerstone of scientific management." 28 Even in this field.
Taylor had his peers and contemporaries, including his brilliant as--
sistant, Henry L. Gantt, and Frank B. Gilbreth, who made contribu-
tions of great scientific precision to the fields of management and
organization."" Indeed, if we are looking for the real origins of the
components of American scientific management, we might well go
back to men like Benjamin Franklin and his experiments, to Alex-
ander Hamilton and his Society for Useful Manufactures, and cer-
tainly to Thomas Jefferson.
As a leader of the anti-Federalist Democratic-Republicans, Jeffer-

.. Robert F. Hoxie: "Scientific Management and Labor Welfare." Journal of

Politica! Economy, November 1916, vol. 24, p, 838 .
.. See Chapter 8. See also R L. Gantt's Wod:. Wages, and ProJits. New York:
McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc,; 1913.
120 ADMINISTRATION

son was reputed to be less interested in efficient management than

were the commercially minded Federalists. In his scientific interests
he was accused of "always pursuing visionary theories of the closet
which experience constantly contradicts."'· However, his skill as an
effective manager of men and events has been underrated. Certainly
no one who has seen Jefferson's horne at Monticello can deny his
typically American preoccupation with efficient operations in the
form of scientific gadgets. In 17&), as he began to dig the foundation
for his new horne, he entered into his Account Book the following
record of a phenomenally early type of time-and-motion study which
later became the essence of Taylorism: "Four good fellows, a lad
and two girls of about 16, each in 8Y2 hours dug in my cellar of
mountain clay a place 3 feet deep, 8 feet wide and 16Y2 feet long
equaling 14~ cubical yards under these disadvantages, to wit: a very
cold snowy day which obliged them to be very often warming; under
a cover of planks, so low, that in about half the work their stroke was
not more than ~ of a good one; they ate their breakfast in the time
which one of them went to cook; they were obliged to keep one or
two constantly hauling away the earth to prevent its rolling in again.
From [this] I think a midling hand in 12 hours (including his break-
fast) could dig and haul away the earth of 4 cubical yards in the same
soil."
Perhaps it was because Taylor chose to focus the spotlight of
"scientific management" not on Theodore Roosevelt's Square Deal
program to stop the "sabotage" of the nation's resources but on the
"soldiering" of American workmen, that his system, though widely
heralded in technical and intellectual circles, met such widespread
resistance in the forum of public discussion and democratic politics.
This identification of scientific management with workshop manage-
ment and labor efficiency to the neglect of other obvious forms of
waste, intensified the latent conflict between the American concepts
of productive efficiency and popular democracy. This conflict had
dogged Taylor's life and work from the very beginning. In the 1880'S
his co-workers at Midvale had called him a "damn piece-work
hog,"'2 and his fellow scientific managers later confessed that he
suffered from a "lack of human warmth."" Labor's reaction to Tay-
lorism was the expression of intense fear of the stop-watch, hatred

•• Letter from Robert Goodloe Harper to his constituents, January 5, '797.

American Historical Association: Annual Report, '9'3, vol. 2, p. 25.
81 Thomas JefIerson's Garden Book, 1776-,824. Edwin Morris Betts (00.) Phila·
delphia: American Philosophrc Society; '944. p. ,6-'7.
32 See note 34, pp. '4"-'2 .
.. Ralph E. Flanders: The Functions of Management in American Ufe. Stanford,
California: Graduate School of Business, Staoford University; '949, p. 16.
121 AMERICAN ADMINISTRAnON

for the "speed-up," and hostility toward time-and-motion study.

These suspicions led to serious stn1:es, and in 1911 the House of
Representatives decided to look into the "Taylor and other sys-
tems of shop management."" The House investigating commit-
tee of three members, including William C. Redfield, whose
administrative work we have already analyzed, produced a fasci-
nating record in the field of American industrial psychology. Taylor
testified: "The most important fact which is connected with the
working people of this country . . . is the fact that the average
working man believes it to be for his interests and for the interest
of his fellow workmen to go slow instead of going fast." Mr.
O'Leary, representing the molders employed in the government na-
val yards in the Boston area, answered: "An efficiency system to us
is more than a bugaboo. It means to us an increased production and
a lessened cost, which in turn means to us that the men will be driven
to a high pitch and that their wages will be less. . . . It has always
worked out the same-that inducements were offered to the men to
increase their speed, sometime to the limit of human endurance,
then would come a change and the men would be expected to pro·
duce the same output for less money."" Following these extended
hearings, Congress attached a rider to the military appropriation
bill, prohibiting the use of such funds for "time study with a stop-
watch or other time-measuring device." •• This ban has becn contin-
ually re-enacted, and while the stop-watch technique is prohibited
only under appropriation acts for military supplies, it has made gov-
ernment administrators generally somewhat wary of Taylorism in
government, even during World War It"
The pattern of American democracy has thus complicated the
efficiency movement in industry and business, just as de Tocqueville
discovered it had affected the administration of American govern-
ment from the very beginning of the nation's history.
.. H""rings Before Special Committee of the House of Representatives to Investi·
gate the Taylor and Other Systems of Shop Management. 6l0d Congress, lSt Session,
1912 .
.. Hearings, n. 34 above, pp. 4, 1378. Taylor has often been labeled a labor·baiter
and reactionary. He was, it is true, adamant against such tools of "industrial democracy"
as Iabor·management committees or "shop" committees. Nevertheless, his personal
philosophy was full of sympathetic utterances for labor. On such. qu~stions moreover,
as scientifically based utility regulation and public power invesbgaoons, Taylor lent
his support to the early stages of this movement started by one of his main disciples,
Morris L. Cooke. See CopTey: Frederick W. Taylor, vol. 1, pp. 4l~, 188; vol. l, pp.
394-7. •
os Introduced as H. R. 17800, September 30, 1914. See also, Public Law 374,
78th Congress, lod Session, Cbapter 303, H. R. 4967. Ibid., Chapter l~, H. R. 45>9·
81 Management Improvement Branch, Division of Administrative Management,
U. S. Bureau of the Budget, "Legislative Restrictions on Time Studies in the Federal
Governmenf," May 18, '945.
122
5. SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT AND AMERICAN DEMOCRACY
If Taylor's efficiency movement did not fit in readily with the
egalitarian demands of American democracy, the broader scientific
management movement, as conceived by American economic states-
men like Louis D. Brandeis, did. Brandeis' contnoution to American
scientific management has been overshadowed by his renown as a
justice of the United States Supreme Court for a period of "5 years
and by his previously established reputation as a progressive Boston
lawyer who had successfully fought municipal corruption, protected
the rights of labor, divulged insurance scandals, busted trusts, and
supported the conservation movement. Although he was stamped as
a radical of the progressive era of Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow
Wilson and Robert La Follette, Brandeis became the oracle of the
scientific management movement for American business when, in
1910, he happened to be drawn into the national struggle over rail-
road control by Boston merchants and eastern shippers who reo
quested him to represent them before the Interstate Commerce
Commission in their fight against increased railroad rates. It was be-
fore this forum that Brandeis popularized the idea of scientific
management.
This relationship between American progressivism and American
efficiency emerged from the fact that Brandeis, an indefatigable stu-
dent of contemporary afiairs, bad read Taylor's book on Shop Man-
agement, had met Taylor's assistant, H. L. Gantt, and had been
inspired by another engineer named Harrington Emerson, who was
interested in the national problem of railroad efficiency." In the
introduction to his book on Efficiency as a Basis for Operations and
Wages, published in 1909, Emerson had, in the following words,
sounded the Brandeis doctrine of combining democratic individ-
ualism and social well-being: "There is today a more direct conneC-
tion than ever before between individual, corporate, and national
efficiency, and individual; family and social well being."" Conse-
quently, in preparing his railway case before the Interstate Commerce
Commission, Brandeis got in touch with Emerson, and he consulted
Taylor, Gantt, Cooke and others including even Henry Towne. It
was at one of Brandeis' conferences with these engineers that the
term "scientific management" was adopted for the broader move-
ment.'" Lining up on the stand his imposing engineering talent, in-
.. See Brandeis' letter written to Copley in 1916. Copley: Frederick W. Tay/or,
vol.2, p. 370 .
•• Harrington Emerson: Ellicienc"y as a Basis for Oper.ltions and Wages. New York:
John R. Dunlap: 1909. Preface.
"'Thi. meeting took place in Gantt's apartment. Gilbreth was present but Taylor
was not. For more details, see Horace B. Drury: ScieJltilic MgnagemeJlt, A History:md
123 AMRICAN ADMINISTRATION

eluding not only Emenon but Towne and others, Brandeis mar-
shaled before the Interstate Commerce Commission a masterful
array of data about the problems of railroad management. Quoting
Emerson's testimony in the course of the hearings, he outraged the
railroads and startled the country with the following interjection
about the principles of scientilic management: "We will show you,
may it please your Honors, that these principles, applicable to all
businesses, are applicable to practically all departments of all busi-
nesses and that the estimate which has been made that in the rail-
road operation of this country an economy of a million dollars a day
is possible is an estimate which is by no means extravagant.""

(I) LOUIS D. BRANDEIS

"The Fruih of Efficiency""
Under scientific management the employee is enabled to earn
without greater strain upon his vitality from twenty-five to sixty per cent
and at times even one hundred per cent more than under the old system.
The larger wages are made possible by larger production; but this gain in
production is not attained by "speeding up." It comes largely from re-
moving the obstacles to production which annoy and exhaust the work-
man-obstacles for which he is not, or should not be made, responsible.
The management sees to it that his machine is always in perfect order.
The management sees to it that he is always supplied with the necessary
materials. The management sees to it that the work comes to him at
proper times, with proper instructions and in proper condition. The man-
agement sees to it that he is shown the best possible way of doing the
job; that is, the way which takes least time, which takes least effort, and
which produces the best results. Relieved of every unnecessary effort, of
every unnecessary interruption and annoyance, the worker is enabled
without greater strain to furnish more in production. And under the ex-
hilaration of achievement he develops his capacity.
Unionism does not prevent the method of scientific management.
It is true that unions, in some trades, have bitterly opposed the introduc-
tion of the piece rate or the bonus system without scientific management,
just as other uniC!ns have opposed the day rate system without scientific
Criticism. New York: Columbia University Press; 192~, Studies in History, Economics
and Public Law, vol. 6;, no. 2, pp. 35-<1. Although Taylor had used the term
"scientific management," as early as 1903 and again in 1909, his. use of the term was
either incidental or he used it merely to refer to certain technical shop practices within
the ~dividual factory or firm, and not to "the movement."
"Evidence tden by the Interstate Commerce Commission in the Matter of Pro·
posed Advances in Freight Rates by Carriers. 6151 Cougress, 3rd Session, Senate Docu-
ment No. 72;, November 21, 1910, p. 2620 •
.. Alfred Lief: The Social And Economic VieWll of Mr. Justice Br.mdeis. Brief in
the railway rate bearings, selected from pp. 391-<1 •. Reprinted by permission of The
Vanguard Press. Copyright 1930, The Vanguard Press.
124
management. And very intelligent labor leaders have from time to time
objected_nd objected properly-to ruthless methods of "speeding uP";
but, as shown above, "speeding up" is not scientific management nor, as
also shown above, is the piece rate system, with or without a bopus,
scientific management.

(b) LOUIS D. lRANDEIS

BusiJless-A ProfessiOll"
So much has been said of increasing the efficiency of labor that
the importance of increasing the efficiency of materials, of plant, of w()rk-
ing capital, and of improving service has not been fully appreciated. And
yet the economies and the profits arising from the scientific handlin{i of
those factors in business are probably, in the aggregate at least, as great as
from the increased effiCiency of labor itself. .
Saving the waste in materials is attained in part through secUlmg
that article which is determined by scientific tests to be best adapted to
the needs; and incidentally proper tests tend to eliminate dishonesty. in
purchasing. Saving of waste in material is attained in part by so utili~mg
it that a lower cost results, even if the article was purchased at a higher
price. It is attained in part through proper methods of storage and ac-
counting, which prevent actual waste of the material itself and dishoncesty
in its use. Saving in plant is attained not only by adopting the best, bur by
so equalizing, placing and using the equipment through careful planr!i~g
as to secure practically its fun use all the time; thus reducing the capital
invested upon which charges for depreciation, interest or rental, taxes and
insurance, must be earned. Saving in working capital is attained by so
controlling and linking the quantity of supplies necessarily carried. an(l so
eliminating delays in the process of manufacture. as to reduce materially
the amount invested in raw material and supplies and in work in process.
Scientific management seeks to do for industry systematically Imd
comprehensively in conserving effort, materials and capital. what hereto--
fore has been done sporadically and partially. In discussing the efficiency
of labor a construction altogether too narrow has been given by some to
the term "labor." The labor to be made more effective is that of the
managers and high-salaried officials quite as much as that of the wilge-
earners. Indeed, the increased efficiency of the wage-earner is not possible
until the heavy demands which scientific management makes upon tllose
controlling and directing the business. including superintendents and
foremen, are fully met. Increased efficiency must begin with those hi~her
up. This is of the essence of scientific management.
The coming science at management. in this century, marks an ad-
vance comparable only to the coming of the machine in the last. 'fhe

.a Louis D. Brandeis: Business-A Profession_ Adapted from pp_ viii, ;9-41. Re-
printed by pennissioo. Copyright '9'4. Small, Maynard " Co.
125 AMERICAN ADiotINIST1lA1ION

profits from the machine were absorbed by capital. But we have developed
a social sense, and now of the profits that are to come from the new
scientific management, the people are to have their share.

Brandeis' dramatic disclosures of the need for scientific manage-

ment of management, as well as of labor, swept the country. A public
debate before the Economic Club of New York was arranged in
March 1911, at which Brandeis and Emerson defended scientific
management against James O. Fagan, representing the railroads, and
James Duncan, representing the American Federation of Labor.
Fagan was sarcastic: "Do you wish to experiment with an invention
of any kind? Try it on the railroad. Would you like to test any social
or industrial reform movement? Try it on the railroad." Duncan
was ironic: "But what about the professions? The new cult is mostly
composed of lawyers, a few editors, and an unknown quantity called
'intellectuals.' Why not practice 'efficiency-management' among
those. . .. Why try the experiment 'on the dog' all the time? Begin
with the lawyers, for instance. What a field there is among the legal
fraternities to practice efficiency-management!" ..
It was therefore the task of the engineers and their scientifically
minded associates in other professional fields to give support to the
scientific management movement. Efficiency societies were organ-
ized; one of these was merged with the Society of Industrial Engi-
neers and came to be known as the Taylor Society, later renamed the
Society for the Advancement of Management. Following the publi-
cation of Taylor's Principles, a flood of books and articles on scientific
management appeared, most of them of a technical nature, which
attempted to apply the new panacea to almost every human en-
deavor. Mrs. Scudder Klyce even wrote an article on "Scientific Man-
agement and Moral Law."" Morris L. Cooke, one of Taylor's earliest
disciples in the field of government who had as early as 1910 applied
the canons of efficiency to a revealing study of the American univer-
sities," concluded his article on 'The Spirit and Social Significance
of Scientific Management" by waming: "There is nothing to prevent
scientific management from becoming a nuisance [but1in my opin-
ion, we shall never fully realize either the visions of Christianity or
the dreams of democracy until the principles of scientific manage-
ment have permeated every nook and cranny of the working

.. Tames o. Fagan: "The Dream of Scientific Management on Railroads." The

Tournai of Accountancy, May 1911, vol. 1%, p.•. James Duncan: "Efficiency," p. 31.
.. MIX. Klyce was the wife of Lieutenant Klyce of the School of Marine Engineer·
ing at the Naval Academy. Copley: Frederici W. Taylor, vol. 1, p. 386.
.. Morris L. Cooke: Academic and Indnstrial EBiciency. New York: The Carnegie
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1910, Bulletin No. s.
 126
world." •• Scientific management thus became a movement that was
not restricted to industrial Taylorism. It demonstrated anew the per-
vasiveness of technology in the management of American affairs. The
participation of men like Brandeis and Taylor revealed the consen-
sus, regardless of political faith or economic philosophy, that in
America there was a distinct relationship between personal and pr0-
fessional proficiency on the one hand, and national and social e1Ii-
ciency on the other."

6. SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION AND SCIENTIFIC DISTRIBUTION

Dexter S. Kimball, Professor of Machine Design and Construc-

tion at Cornell University, was one of the few engineers of his time
who discerned the wider implications of scientific management. Pro-
fessor Kimball was not a "professional" or "intellectual," as Brandeis
and his supporters were later called. His career paralleled Taylor's,
but he chose a different road, one moving toward the goal of demo-
cratic distnbution rather than toward mere efficient production. But
whereas Taylor'S technique was glorified into a philosophy, Kimball's
philosophy lay buried in his technical textbooks for another gen-
eration.
Kimball started as an apprentice and journeyman in a West Coast
iron works in 1881. He finally rose to the position of designing engi-
neer at the Anaconda Mining Company in 1&)8, after which he went
to Cornell to teach. He advanced through the various grades of pro-
fessorship to Dean of the College of Engineering, where he served
until his retirement in 1936. When the scientific management move-
ment burst forth in 1911, Kimball refused to let his enthusiasm for
American engineering run away with his judgment about American
management. He insisted, in classroom and text book, that "scientific
distribution" was more important in American democracy than sci-
entific production." As seen below, he not only took issue with
Taylor, but also elaborated on Brandeis' view as well

<7 Morris L Cooke: "The Spirit and Social Significance of Scientific Management."
TournaI of Political Economy, June 1913, vol. 21, p. 493 .
.. In an interesting essay, Brandeis, who had become • millionaire lawyer, had
conlidently announced: "Between what we do and what we are capable of doing, there
is a difference of 100%." For Brandeis' role in the scientific management movement,
see also Mason's Brmdeis, n. 64, below.
"Kimball has been petsistent in this analysis. He included it in the first edition of
his text, Principles of Industri2l 0Pnizatioo. New York: McGraw Hill Book Corn·
pany, Inc.; 1913. He has retained it ID his later editions with the addition of up-to-date
references. See Kimball and Kimball: ibid., 1947,
'27 AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION

OUTER S. KIMRAU
"Another Side of Efficiency Eltgmeering""
In these days when hurry and speed are the keynote of industty it
would seem to be almost sacrilegious, or at least a mark of ignorance to
raise one's voice even in doubt, to say nothing of protest, against any ways
or means of increasing production. Yet I cannot but think that only cer-
tain aspects of some of the new methods of increasing production are be-
ing presented and that those aspects, which are so alluring, entirely over-
shadow certain others and hence do not give a true perspective of what
the net results will be.
The mental and physical welfare of the individual members of any
form of organized society are dependent largely upon three factors,
namely: (1) The natural resources at the command of the community.
(2) The tools and methods of production which are available to develop
these resources. (3) The knowledge and organization whereby the fruits
of labor may be fairly and equally distributed.
Many civilizations have possessed immense natural resources, and
modern nations possess tools of production such as the world has never
seen; but only in the Simplest forms of organization has equitable distri-
bution of the products of labor been achieved; all experience goes to show
that increased productive capacity does not necessarily mean increased
revenue to the producer; but on the contrary may, if he is not alive to his
own interest, mean an actual decrease. We read of few nations who have
starved to death for lack of tools or methods of production, but the high-
way of history is paved with the bones of civilizations which came to grief
on the rocks of unfair distribution. Many of the existing modern nations
still carry dreadful scars received in bloody revolutions which had their
genesis in this, the greatest of problems of organized society, while many
more tremble on the brink of similar disasters.
These new methods then, are means of increasing man's produc-
tive power and fall, therefore, under the second item of the classification.
To what extent will they effect the third item, namely, equitable distri-
bution of the products of labor?
A diligent search through the literature of efficiency engineering
fails to disclose any new principle regarding the distribution of the fruits
of labor. True, the workman of all kinds has benefited very greatly by the
improved methods, and it is also true that he is better clothed, fed, housed,
and particularly better educated than formerly; but the fact remains that
his progress has not been proportionate to his increased productive capac-
ity. I am willing to concede, therefore, that these so-called new methods
will increase production; that in all probability they will, in time, be gen-
erally used and that the general effect should benefit humanity; but I see
.. Dexter S. Kimball: "Another Side of Efficiency Engineering.'" American Ma-
cJJmist, August10, 1911, vol. 35, selected from pp.• 63-S. Reprinted by permission.
128 ADMINl5ftAl'ION

no reason for thinking that they inherently possess any power to change
the problem of distribution. It may be that these methods wm even Iilake
it necessary for the worker to redouble his efforts.
If the fruits of production under methods as they now exist could
be more fairly distributed and the wastes due to foolish and oppressive
financiering eliminated so that the producing classes, employer and em-
ployee alike, would receive what is justly theirs, much of the problem
would be solved; if Mr. Taylor or Mr. Gantt, or Mr. Brandeis can only
tell us how this can be done, they will do more for humanity, as it exists
in organized society, than anyone, economist or engineer, who has ever
walked this planet, and infinitely more than can be accomplished by the
most refined methods of production which they can develop. The great
problem which confronts us is not and has not for many years been that
of production, but distribution. We can now produce more manufactured
goods than we can use, and far more than is needed to make us all com-
fortable. All the new productive processes possible will throw little light
on the problem of why we find in many places, at one time, storehouses
filled with raw material, idle factories equipped with the finest tools the
world has even seen and people walking the street without food or cloth-
ing, yet willing to work.
The problem is too complex to be solved by the simple expedient
of increased production. There still remain the questions of competition,
unfair taxation, immigration and a dozen other factors that are not as yet
within the control of the employer, be he ever so fair minded, or of the
employee, be he ever so strongly organized. 1 am not sure but what a small
readjustment of some of these would do as much for the workers, both
employer and employee, as a large increase of productive power. What
we need most is scientific distribution.

Except for critical economists like Professor Willard E. Hotch-

kiss of Northwestern University or Professor Robert F. Hoxie of the
University of Chicago," Kimball's plea for scientific distribution fell
on stony ground in the field of business and industry, and was not
pursued until a stronger demand arose for a more responsible econ-
omy in the United States."

" Willard E. Hotchkiss: "Northwestern University School of Commerce," Journal

of Political EL'Ooomy, March 1913, vol. 21, p. 208. Robert F. Hoxie: Scientific Man·
agement and Labor. New York: D. Appleton and Company; 1915.
51 "Scientific Distribution." Annals of the American Academy of Political and
Social Science, September 1924, vol. 11;. This symposium represented a limited 9pp!i·
cation of the idea, as did an even more restricted incursion duri"li the early movement
for scientific management: "Reducing the Cost of Food Distribution." Al1JllIls, Novem-
ber 1<) 13, vol. 50. For the later development in its broader implications, see Edwin G.
NouJSe and Associates: America's Capacity to Produce, and Maurice Leven, Harold G.
Moulton, and Clark Warburton: America's Capacity to Consume. These studies are
part of a Brookings Institution series summarized later as Distribution of IncoU)e In
Relation to Economic Progress. Washington: Brookings Institution; 19,6.
129 AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION

7. SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT IN GOVERNMENT

The American drive for efficient, systematic, and scientific man-

agement was an infectious movement. It permeated not only Hie
factory, but also the business office, the sales shop, and the govern-
mental bureau. In the Federal government, the scientific manage-
ment movement manifested itself in the establishment under Presi-
dent Taft of the Commission on Economy and Efficiency, in June
1910," before the railway rate hearings, which helped to popularize
scientific management, had started. An almost identical estimate of
$1,000,000 of waste per day, was attributed to the national govern-
ment, and President Taft had therefore launched a program of effi-
ciency which a leading engineering journal, in March 1910, described
as "a good example in ferreting out the various wastes of money in
carrying on the business enterprises which form a great part of gov-
ernmental administration." ,.
American government was thus forehanded about attacking its
own problems of efficiency despite a reputation for bureaucratic lag.
In 1885, two years before Towne opened the movement for business-
like industrial management, Woodrow Wilson in his Congressional
Government had sounded a similarly timely challenge for American
government when he announced: "Efficiency is the only just founda-
tion for confidence in a public officer, under republican institutions
no less than under monarchs." 55 As an advocate of administrative
efficiency via civil service reform, Wilson tried to rebalance Tocque-
ville's democratic America with Taylor's efficient America. As early
as 1885 he was telling Towne's America to beware of Jackson'S Amer-
ica: "No one imagines that the dry goods or the hardware trade, or
even the cobbler's craft, can be successfully conducted except by
those who have worked through the laborious and unremunerative
apprenticeship, and who have devoted their lives to perfecting them-
selves as tradesmen or as menders of shoes." Wilson spoke ruefully
of "that besetting error of ours, the error of trying to do too much by
vote." "Self-government," he said "does not consist of having a hand
in everything, any more than housekeeping consists necessarily in
cooking dinner with one's own hand." '" He was well aware of the

2,.
!IS Acts of June 1910. 61St Congress, 2nd Session, Chapter 384.
54 "An Industrial Waste and a Proposed Remedy." Industrial Engineering and the
Engineering Digest, March '910, vol. 7, p. 213· . .
55 Woodrow Wilson: Congressional Government. Boston: Houghton M.mm Com·
pany; 1900, p. 2". See also Dorntan B. Eaton: Civil Service in Great Britain. New
York: Harper & Brothers; 1880, pp. 4'7-8 .
.. Woodrow Wilson: ''The Study of Administration." Political Science Quarterly,
June ,887. vol. 2, p. 214.
 130
potential conHict as well as of the possible reconciliation between
what he later termed "Democmcy and Efiiciency." '"
The devotees of Jacksonian equalitarianism or of de Tocqueville's
democracy were not readily reconciled to Wilson's reformism any
more than were the working men of Taylor'S time reconciled to
Brandeis' pleas for scientific management. Max Weber, the brilliant
German observer of American politics, descnbed how difficult it was
to destroy the "old point of view of American democracy" with re"
gard to civil service reform. In answer to the question he addressed
to American workers in 1904. as to why they allowed themselves to
be governed by politicians they did not respect, he was told: "We
prefer having people in office we can spit upon rather than a caste
of officials who spit upon us." Weber went on to explain: "Those
American workers who were against the 'Civil Service Reform' knew
what they were about. They wished to l>e governed by parvenus of
doubtful morals rather than a certified caste of mandarins." .. It was
not sufficiently conceded, however, as Leonard White later pointed
out, that "the principal concern of the great band of original civil
service reformers was not greater administrative efficiency but pure"
fied elections and a more wholesome democracy." ,.
Nevertheless, at the very time the civil service reform movement
was still having difficulties in the United States, the administrative
techniques of government were undergoing refinements which paral-
leled, if they did not precede," those of business. In 1905 the move-
ment began for the establishment of the pioneer organization of
twentieth-century public administration, the New York Bureau of
Municipal Research." The movement was fostered by the famous
"ABC powers" of the municipal management movement, William
H. Allen, Harry Bruere, and Frederick A. Cleveland, and later by
academicians like Charles A. Beard." Their improvements in the

'1 Woodrow Wilson: "Democracy and Efficiency." Atlantic Monthly, March 1901,
vol. 87, pp. ,89-99 .
.. Gerth and Mills: From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, pp. 71, 1l0.
.. White: Introduction to the Study of Public Administration, p. 282.
"It is widely believed that American public administration bas for the most part
imitated business in this movement. See, for example: Waldo: The Administrative
State pp. 70-71. The material in this chapter shows that this belief is partially true,
but that some of the influence or cross·fertilization has in many respects been tbe re-
verse. See also chap. 7, below.
01 Taft's Commission on Economy and Efficiency had several Federal precedents.
"Conditions <>f Business in the Departments of the Government at Washington."
House of Representatives; 53rd Cong., 3d Sess., Report No. 1851, February 18, 1895 .
.. See Frederick A. Cleveland: Organized Democracy. New York: Longman.
Green and Co, Inc.; 1913, p. 438. It is noteworthy that tbe family <>f Edward H.
Harriman, one of the few railroad magnates who seriously applied some of Emerson's
an<! Brandeis' theories about railroad management, took an active part in tbe New York
movement.
131
bttdgeting..person and procedural techniques in one of the coun.
try's major governmental authorities, New York City, had appealing
possibilities for the more general movement toward "The Efficiency
of City Government," which was the subject in 1912 of a symposium
of the American Academy of Political and Social Science." At the
same time, the influence of Cleveland and other critics was brought
to bear at the Federal level of government. The movement came to
a head in 1910 and 1911 in their work on the Commission on Econ-
omy and Efficiency appointed by President William Howard Taft.
Taft later opposed Brandeis' appointment to the Supreme Court,
and Brandeis considered Taft, from the standpoint of the progressive
movement, a "wobbler... with no firm convictions." Both
Brandeis and Taft, however, agreed on the significance to the
nation of scientific management, just as they ultimately became
warm colleagues fm the Supreme Court bench." As President, Taft
entertained a high conception of the responsibility of the American
executive," a position which led him to give some of the earliest
support obtained from the White House for the management move-
ment.

WILLIAM HOWARD TAfT

Economy and Efficiency in die Government Service"
Efficiency and economy in the Government service have been
demanded with increasing insistence for a generation. Real economy is the
result of efficient organization. Recognizing my share of responsibility for
efficient and economical administration, I have endeavored during the
past two years, with the assistance of heads of departments, to secure the
best results. As one of the means to this end I requested a grant from
Congress to make my efforts more effective. An appropriation of $100,000
was made June 25, 1910, "to enable the President to inquire into the
methods of transacting the public business of the executive departments
and other Government establishments, and to recommend to Congress
such legislation as may be necessary to carry into effect changes found to
be desirable that can not be accomplished by Executive action alone."
This vast organization has never been studied in detail as one
piece of administrative mechanism. At no time has the attempt been
.. "The Efficiency of City Government." Annals of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science, May 19U, vol. 41.
.. Alpheus Thotruls Mason: Brandeis, A Free Mali's Life. New York: The Viking
Press; 1946, pp. S37-39, 367.
.. William Howard Taft: Ethics in Service. New Haven: Yale University Press;
191$, chap. 3.
"William Howard Taft: Economy and Efficiency in the Government Service.
U. S. House of Representatives; 61nd Congress, 2nd Session. Document No. 458.
Message of the President, January 17, '91>· Selected hom pp. 3-5. 10-11, 1l'>--lQ.
132 ADMINISTRATION

made to study all of these activities and agencies with a vieW to the as-
signment of each activity to the agency best fitted for its performance, to
the avoidance of duplication of plant and work, to the integration of all
administrative agencies of the Government, so far as may be practicable,
into a unified organization for the most effective and economical dispatch
of public busifU;SS. Although earnest efforts have been put forth by ad-
ministrative officers and though many special inquiries have been made
by the Congress, no exhaustive investigation has ever before been in-
stituted concerning the methods employed in the transaction of public
business with a view to the adoption of the practices and procedure best
fitted to secure the transaction of such business with maximum dispatch,
economy, and efficiency.
In accordance with my instructions, the Commission on Economy
and Efficiency, which I organized to aid me in the inquiry, has divided the
work into five fields of inquiry having to do respectively with organiza-
tion, personnel, business methods, accounting and reporting, and the
budget.
In every case where technical processes have been studied it has
been demonstrated beyond question that large economies may be ef-
fected. The subjects first approached were those which lie close to each
administrator, viz., office practices. An illustration of the possibilities
within this field may be found in the results of the inquiry into the
methods of handling and filing correspondence. Every office in the Gov-
ernment has reported its methods to the commission. These reports
brought to light the fact that present methods were quite the reverse of
uniform. Some offices follow the practice of briefing all correspondence;
some do not. Some have flat files; others fold all papers before filing. Some
use press copies; others retain only carbon copies.
The reports also show not only a very wide range in the methods
of doing this comparatively simple part of the Government business, but
an extraordinary range in cost. For the handling of incoming mail the
averages of cost by departments vary from $5.84 to $81.40 per 1,000. For
the handling of outgoing mail the averages by departments vary from $5.94
to $69.8<} per 1,000. This does not include the cost of preparation, but is
confined merely to the physical side of the work. The variation between
individual offices is many times greater than that shown for averages by
departments.
The use of labor-saving office devices in the service has been made
the subject of special inquiry. An impression prevails that the Government
is not making use of mechanical devices for economizing labor to the
same extent as are effiCiently managed private enterp,rises. A study has
been made of the extent to which devices of this character are now being
employed in the several branches of the GovernmeIlt and the opportuni-
ties that exist for their more geIleral use. In order to secure information
as to the various kinds of labor-saving devices that are in existeIlce and as
to their adaptability to Government work, an exhibition of Jabor-5aving
133 AMERICAN ADMINISTUTION

office appliances was held in Washington from July 6 to 15, 1911. One
hundred and ten manufacturers and dealers participated, and more than
10,000 officers and employees visited the exhibition.

The annals of history have yet to produce a chief magistrate's

message with such detailed solicitude for mechanical efficiency.
American public administration continued to follow, parallel with
American private management, the objective of economy and effi-
ciency. "\¥hether in business or in government, the main managerial
techniques were those suggested in President Taft's message: budget-
ing or accounting, personnel or labor snpervision, methodical plan-
ning or production control, techniques which have become, as we
shall see, the stock-in-trade of both public and business administra-
tion in the United States.
Taylorism's faith in the existence of the one best way to do each
operation, productive or procedural, was thus applied to these man-
agement problems in government and business. In his suggestive
critique of The Administrative State, which appeared in 1948,
Dwight Waldo cryptically remarked: "Just as there is one best way
to shovel coal, there is one best way to organize or conduct an ad-
ministrative activity. Since both 'best ways' rest on facts they arc. of
course, True, and not proper subjects for differences of opinion." '"
True or not, the technology of Taylorism became, along with the
democratic credo, one of the main elements in American public ad-
ministration.

8. TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNOCRACY IN AMERICAN LIFE

TIle potential cleavage between technology and democracy per-

sisted, hoy:ever, and this split gave rise to severe criticisms and
radical conceptions of American management, including such move-
ments as Veblenism and Technocracy.
Thorstein Veblen, reared in the pioneer Norwegian-American
settlement of Wisconsin and bred in the intellectual atmosphere of
the new University of Chicago, became "the bad boy" of Amcrican
economics.'" As in the case of the Boston Brahmin, Brooks Adams,
Veblen's books and essays were always a little toa suggestive: The
Theory of the Leisure Class; Absentee Ownership and Business En-
terprise in Recent Times; The Higher Learning in America, A
Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Businessmen;
<11 Waldo: The Administrative State. p. 59.
<IS Joseph Dorfman: Thorstein Veblen and His America. New York: The Viking
Press: 1935-
134
"Bolshevism and the Vested Interests in America"; "A Soviet of
Technicians"; and "The Red Terror Comes to America." Actually,
Veblen's major thesis remained the same throughout the forty years
of his productive period of writing. According to Veblen, America
was faced with a perpetual conflict between what he called business
and what he called industry, the one driven by the pecuniary urge for
individual profit and personal gain, the other stimulated by the social
objectives of scientific technology for mass production and mass con-
sumption. Veblen's reputation for radicalism and his sardonic criti-
cisms of American life have obscured his admission, similar to Kim-
ball's, that "the system of industrial competition, based on private
property, has brought about, or has at least coexisted with, the most
rapid advance in average wealth and industrial efficiency that the
world has seen."" .
Veblen did not stand alone in his criticism of American manage-
ment. His was an era of protest and hope which begal; around 1&)0.
Many Americans bad seen the vision, described in 1888 by the uto-
pian Edward Bellamy in his Looking Backward, of a virtually toiless
society which Taylorisrn and scientific management had now made
technologically possible.'· Less utopian, but equally appealing, was
the popular picture of The Promise of American Life, drawn by
Herbert Croly in 1909." Croly's book gave further expression to the
political progressivism of the period that produced Theodore Roose-
velt's "Square Deal" and Woodrow Wilson's "New Freedom," and
which foreshadowed Franklin Roosevelt's "New Deal." Veblenism
was merely an ironical and intellectual expression 72 of a national pro-
gressivism which was critical of the prevailing system of administering
American affairs.
The major critics of the system were not the intellectuals, as
Veblen himself acknowledged, but the very engineers who managed
to keep the system going. Certainly this was true of a limited group
of inquiring American engineers who appeared on the scene during
the depression of the 1930'S. Known as the Technocrats and led by
Howard Scott and his Continental Committee on Technocracy, they
undertook, in conjunction with the Industrial Engineering Depart-
ment of Columbia University, an "energy survey of North America"

.. Thorstein Veblen: The Place of Science in Modern Civilization. New York:

B. W. Huebsch; 1919, p. ~9L
,. See the interestin!? biography by Arthur E. Morgan: Edward Bellamy. New Yorio::
The Colombia UniverSIty Press; '944,
" Herbert Croly: The Promise of American Ute, New Yorl:: The Macmillan Com-
pany; 1909.
,. See Chapters , and ,6, See also Charles A. Madison: Critics aod Crusaders.
New York: Henry Holt and Company; 1948.
115 AMRICAH ADMINISTIATlctN

as a basis for their planned converSion

of the economy from one pf
price to one of production. The Technocrats drew noticeably from
Veblenism. Scott had conferred with Veblen before the latter's death
in 1929. However, Scott and the Technocrats insisted upon "the corn -
plete independence" of their movement." How truly independent
Technocracy and Veblenism were, or how really intertwined th.ey
were in the emerging skein of American administrative thought, c:l n
be determined from a comparison of the following readings.

(a) THO.STEJN VEBLEN

TIle Instinct of Workmanship 1<
In current theoretical formulations the businessman is discuss~
under the caption of "entrepreneur," "undertaker," etc., and his gains are
spoken of as "wages of superintendence," "wages of management," alJd
the like. He is conceived as an expert workman in charge of the works, a
superior foreman of the shop, and his gains are accounted a remunerati<ln
for his creative contribution to the process of production, due to l.is
superior insight and initiative in technological matters. But under current
conditions-the conditions of the past half century-and more p:lr-
ticuJarly under the conditions of that large·scale industry that is Ctlf-
rently accounted the type of modern industry, the businessman has ceas.m
to be foreman of the shop, and his surveillance of industry has ceast:d
effectually to comprise a technological management of its details.
The view here spoken for, that the modern businessman is nect:S·
sarily out of effectual touch with the affairs of technology as snch and jn-
competent to exercise an effectual surveillance of the processes of jn-
dustry, is not a matter of bias or of vague opinion; it has in fact become a
matter of statistical demonstration. Even a cursory survey of the current
achievements of these great modern industries as managed by busine5s,
men, taken in contrast with the opportunities offered them, should con-
vince anyone of the technological unfitness of this business management
of industry. Indeed, the captains of industry have themselves latterly l»
gun to recognise their own inefficiency in this respect, and even to aP-
preciate that a businessman's management of industrial processes is not
good even for the business purpose-the net pecuniary gain. So, a proft:S-
sional class of "efficiency engineers" is coming into action, whose duty it
is to take invoice of the preventable wastes and inefficiencies.

10 Howard Scott: "A Note on the Work of Thorstein Veblen." Introduction to

Technocmcy, pp. ;<)-61; see also Dorfman: ThoIStein Veblen, pp. 510-'4. See es·
peciaIIy the remarks of Stuart Chase: "Technocracy-An Interpretation." New yotk:
The John Day Pamphlets; No. '9, '9H·
,. Thorstein Veblen: The Instinct of Worbnanship. pp. 221-2. Reprinted by
pennission of The Viking Press. Copyright 19'4, B. W. Huebsch, IDe.; '942, Ann B.
Sims.
136 ADMlNISTIlATIOIC

(b) THORSTEIN YElLEN

The Engineers and the Price System"
It is the industrial experts, not the business men, who have finally
begun to criticize this businesslike mismanagement and neglect of the
ways and mean of industry. Right lately these technologists have begun
to become uneasily "class-conscious" and to reRect that they together con·
stitute the indispensable General Staff of the industrial system. They are
beginning to take stock of that all-pervading mismanagement of industry
that is inseparable from its control for commercial ends. So the engineers
are beginning to draw together and ask themselves, "What about it?"
There is assuredly no present promise of the technicians' turning their in-
sight and common sense to such a use. There need be no present appre-
hension. The technicians are a "safe and sane" lot, on the whole; and
they are pretty well commercialized, particularly the older generation, who
speak with authority and conviction, and to whom the younger generation
of engineers defer, on the whole, with such a degree of filial piety as
should go far to reassure all good citizens. And herein lies the present
security of the Vested Interests, as well as the fatuity of any present alaml
over Bolshevism and the like; for the whole-hearted cooperation of the
technicians would be as indispensable to any effectual movement of over-
turn as their unwavering service in the employ of the Vest~d Interests is
indispensable to the maintenance of the established order.

(e) THORSTEIN YEBLEN

Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise "Ill
The official personnel of civil government, the constituted au-
thorities who have had the making and surveillance of precedents and
statutory regulations touching these matters in recent times, have neces-
sarily been persons of businesslike antecedents, imbued with an inveterate
businesslike bias, governed by business principles, if not also by business
interests. In any democratic community, such as the American, the of-
ficial personnel which is vested with jurisdiction and initiative will be, in
the main, tested by conformity to these three canonical articles: national
integrity, devout observance, and business-as-usual. A democratic com-
munity addicted to business enterprise and devout observances will not
tolerate an official personnel endowed with a different equipment of
habitual predilections. These persons wh<! make up this official personnel,
and in whose hands is the power to act, locally, departmentally, and at
is Thorstein Veblen: The Engin=s and the Price System. Selected from pp. 44
71, 137. Reprinted by per".'ission of The Viking Press. Copyright 1921, B. W. Hue'
bsch, Inc.; 1949, Ann B. SIms.
i. Thorstein Veblen: Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise. Selected from
.a.
pp. 409, 4,8-<). Reprinted by permission of The Viking Press. Copyligbt 19'3, W.
Huebsch, Inc.
137 AMI"leAN ADMIMISTl.AnoN

large, wt'll go into action as practical men, faithful to the joint governance
of these settled habits of thought whose creatures they are. With a men-
tality compounded of national integrity and business principles they will
devoutly follow out the drift of the two conjointly; to such effect that in
the official apprehension the community's fortunes are bound up with
the pursuit of its business enterprise.

(d) HOWAl.D SCOTT

Introduction to Technocracy 11
Technocracy is a research organization, founded in 1920, com-
posed of scientists, technologists, physicists, and biochemists. It was or-
ganized to collect and collate data on the physical functioning of the
social mechanism on the North American continent. Its methods are the
result of a synthetic integration of the physical science that pertain to
the determination of all functional sequences of social phenomena. Tech-
nocracy makes one basic postulate: that the phenomena involved in the
functional operation of a social mechanism are metrical. It defines science
as "the methodology of the determination of the most probable." While
the modern technologist lives and does his work under the price system,
he has to do his thinking in other than pecuniary terms; there is no way of
avoiding that. The nature of his work, the facts, relations and forces
handled by him impose the use of unvarying standards whereby he may
make exact measurements. His world is one of materials, energy resources,
quantitative relations and rates of energy conversion.
While financiers and business men have occupied positions of
authority and control in the fields of production, the technologist has de-
signed the machines, the engines and the continuous processes that ac-
count for the present rate of energy conversion. Within narrow limits he
has worked witD. freedom, so that it may be said that he has been the
principal agent in bringing on the present industrial capacity. But he has
had nothing to do with methods of distribution. Financial business has
not only exercised complete control over this field and dictated what
should be produced regardless of the resources available, but has also
failed in the distribution of the ever-increasing volume of goods and
services released by the accelerating rates of energy conversion.
When the technologist looks at the processes of distribution, as
he is forced to do at the present juncture, a number of things thrust them-
selves upon his attention. He notes immediately that all measurements
in this field of ac~ivity are made by a pecuniary standard that is con-
tinuously variable, and that all relations are expressed as prices. Hc notcs
that price controls the utilization of energy resources, the rate of flow of

11 Howard Scott: Introduction to Tedlflocracy. Adapted from pp 2'!-31,"N, 40,

48--9. Reprinted by permission of The John Day Company. Copyright '933, The John
Day Company.
138
materials and labor into the field of use or consumption. The only feature
of the system that seemingly cannot be brought under the jurisdiction of
price control is the rate of energy conversion.
Technocracy proposes no solution, it merely poses the problem
raised by the technological introduction of energy factors in a modem in-
dustrial social mechanism. Continental America possesses all the essential
qualifications for such a mechanism-sufficient energy and mineral re-
sources; adequate water precipitation, more than enough arable land of
proper chemical stability; highly developed technological facilities backed
by a trained personnel; powerful research organizations. Physically this
continental area has no choice but to proceed with the further elimina-
tion of toil through the substitution of energy for man hours. There can
be no question of returning to premachine or pretechnological ways of
life; a progression once started must continue. Retrogressive evolution
does not exist.

Although Technocracy offered no concrete plan, it presented a

dramatic vision of American administration. Valid or not, Technoc-
racy represented one of the most indigenous proposals yet made for
reconstituting the overall approach to American management in
terms of the unique achievements of technology. In native American
style, Scott put Towne and Veblen, Taylor and Brandeis in capsule
form. Although he referred almost alarmingly to our "riffraff of
social institutions," Scott insisted that Technocracy was purely Amer-
ican, and he warned: "America can expect no help in the solution of
this problem from any current social theory. . . . No theory of so-
cial action or governance now existing or proposed in Europe, could
in any way be endemic to that unique set-up of geologic conforma-
tion, technique, equipment, and personnel peculiar to North Amer-
ica." 1. Unlike some of the "intellectuals" who followed Veblen, Scott
was no mere critic of American life infatuated with foreign deriva-
tions from doctrinaire socialism; but, like them, his basic attack was
against the pecuniary standard as a measure of American manage-
ment.
Technocracy and Veblenism did not depend solely upon either
the socially minded engineers of the American Technical Alliance or
the European inspired American intellectuals. In an unusually scath-
ing comparison of "American and European Business Methods"
prepared in 1921 for the first issue of Administration, the new Ameri-
can journal of business analysis and control, Dwight T. Farnham,
Director of The Society of Industrial Engineers, which was linked
up with the Taylor Society, stated: "In America exists a tendency
for each millionaire to improvise his own executive and business
,. Scott: Introduction to Technocracy, pp. 43-4.
139 AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION

methods as he piles up his million. Thereafter this material proof of

his success remains a monument to the correctness of the said
method and a personal tribute to their author. Of course it is quite
possible that he might have made two million if he had adopted
other methods-but such thoughts are disturbing_ man shouldn't
be a hog anyway, he reasons, and a million ought to be weighty
enough proof of success for any practical man." 7. American engineers
had long debated the discrepancy between financial and physical
values and physical and social values. Even Henry R. Towne, one
of the founders of the industrial management movement, started his
classic essay in 1886 with the significant statement: "The monogram
of our national initials, which is the symbol for our monetary unit,
the dollar, is almost as frequently con joined to the figures of an en-
gineer's calculations as are the symbols indicating feet, minutes,
pounds, or gallons." 8.
If Technocracy had no concrete plans for sustaining the union of
American technology and democracy, Administocracy did, and the
country set out under the New Deal to apply them."

9. A FOREIGN VIEW OF AMERICAN EFFICIENCY AND

DEMOCRACY

Although the Soviets continued to wag their finger at the Ameri-

can depression, they entertained a secret admiration for American
experiment and experience; and sometimes it was not so secret. In
1935, as the United States advanced toward recovery, two Soviet
writers,llya Ilf and Eugene Petrov, visited America. Some Americans
had, in 1932., read their humorous Little Golden Calf," a satire on
Russian institutions, and they now expected to see American institu
tions equally lampooned and lambasted. However, when, in 1937
Ilf and Petrov reported their findings in Little Golden America, the
book proved to be a charming mixture of praise and criticism, and
above all, caught the businesslike efficiency of American life with its
associated overtones of social democracy.

19 Dwight T. Farnham: HAll1crican and European Business Methods," Administra

tion, January 1921, vol. )., p. 30.
80 Henry R. Towne: *'The Engineer as an Economist." Transactions of the ASJ\1E,

.886. vol. 7. p. 428. .

81 Guy S. Claire: Administocracy, the Recovery Laws an4- Then Enforcement.
New York: The Macmillan Company; '934.
82 flya flf and Eugene Petrov: Little Golden CaU. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
10£.; 1932.
140
ILYA 11.' AND EUGENE .nTIlOV
little Golden America ..
America is seriously and dangerously ill. The country is now fuc·
ing its own reductio ad absurdum. It is capable now today of feeding a
billion people, and yet, it cannot feed its own hundred and twenty minion.
Nevertheless, we can still learn much from America. We are doing that.
But the lessons which we learn from America are episodic and too
specialized.
To catch up with America! That task which Stalin set before our
people is immense, but in order to carry out this task we must first of an
study America, study not only its automobiles, its turbine generators and
radio apparatuses (we are doing that), but likewise the very character of
the work of American workers, engineers, business people, especially the
business people, because if our Stakhanovists sometimes outstrip the
norms of American workers, while the engineers are no worse at times
than the American engineers (about that we heard frequently from
Americans themselves), still, our business people or economists are con·
siderably behind American business people and cannot compete with
them in any way.
We will not discuss now the attributes of our economists, their
loyalty to ideas, their devotion, their efficiency. These are the attributes
of the Communist Party, which brought them up. Nor will we touch upon
the deficiencies of American business people, their lack of loyalty to
ideas, their lack of principles, their chase after the dollar. These are the
defects of the capitalism which brought them up. It is important right
now for us to study their attributes and our defects, because it is neces-
sary for us to learn from them. Not only engineers but also economists, our
business people, must learn from them.
The American businessman alwavs finds time for a business con-
versation. The American sits in his office 'with his coat off and works. He
works quietly, unobtrusively, without making any fuss. He is never late
anywhere. He never hurries anywhere. He has only one telephone. No
one waits for him in his reception room. because an appointment is
usually made with absolute accuracy, and not a single extra minute is
wasted during the interview. He is occupied only with his business, ex·
c1usively with his business. When he holds conferences nobody knows. In
all likelihood, he holds conferences rarely.
Should an American say in the course of a conversation, even in-
cidentally, ''I'll do that," it is not necessary to remind him of anything at
all in the future. Everything will be done. The ability to keep his word, to

"llyn flf and Eugene Petrov: Little Goldell America. Adapted from pp. 380-2.
Reprinted by permission of Rinehart and Company, In<:. Copytight 1937, Rinehart
and Company, Inc.
141 AMitteA" AlIMIJIIlSTtATIOIIl

keep it firmly, accurately, to burst, but keep his word-this is the most
important thing which our Soviet business people must learn from
American business people.
We wrote about American democracy, which in fact does not
give man freedom and only masks the exploitation of man by man. But in
American 1ife there is a phenomenon which should interest us no less
than a new machine modeL That phenomenon is democracy in inter-
course between people, albeit that democracy, too, covers social inequality
and is a purely outward form. The outward forms of such a democracy
are splendid. They help a lot in work, deliver a blow to bureaucracy, and
enhance human dignity.
Americans are very angry with Europeans who come to America,
enjoy its hospitality, and later scold it. Americans often told us about this
with annoyance. What can be said about America, which simultaneously
horrifies, delights, calls forth pity, and sets examples worthy of emulation,
about a land which is rich, poor, talented, and ungifted? We can say
honestly with hand on heart, that we would not like to live in America. It
is interesting to observe this country, but one does not care to live in it.

vVhether in vowing that they did not want to live in America,

IIf and Petrov really had their "hand on heart" or, as most Americans
rather suspected, their tongue in their cheek, is immaterial. Their
admiration for the competence of American managers and business-
men was unequivocaL Moreover, their reaction was typical of many
Europcan critics who have never ceased to comment upon the re-
freshing competence of American technicians and managers." Even
Veblen, who charged American management with being "techno-
logically incompetent," spoke highly of "this unremitting attention
of businessmen to the affairs of industry," admitting that "within
the business community there is properly speaking, no leisure class,
or at least no idle class." "
In evaluating American administration, however, I1f and Petrov,
like Veblen and Scott, and to some extent Brandeis and Kimball,
distinguished between technical competence and technological or
technocratic competence. For them, America had an envious supply
of productive and business skill in its individual enterprises; what it
lacked was the overall managerial know-how and the comprehensive
administrative skill necessary to distribute steadily thc fruits of a
superior democratic system.

"Not so favorable was the description of American business by the Englishman

Bristed in the 18,0'5: "They can work at their desks all day for days together. .
but they are continually bilious, dyspeptic and altogether seedy ~ and) Tequire strong
excitement to amuse them." Quoted in Miriam Beard: A History 01 the Business Man.
New York: The Macmillan Company: 1938, pp. 636-7-
.. Veblen: Instinct of \Vor}:manship, p. 226.
142

10. AMERICAN MANAGEMENT AND INDtVIDUAL COMPETENCY

Of the many Americans who might be cast in the role of Ilfs and
Petrov's competent businessmen, outstanding examples would be (a)
Eugene E. Wilson, President of the United Aircraft Corporation
during the critical production days of World War II, and (b) Hen-
ning Webb Prentis, wartime President of the Armstrong Cork Com-
pany and ex-President of the National Manufacturers Association.

(a) EUCENE E. WILSON

"Fundamentals of Freedom" ..

Manufacture comprises five elements, each of which, singularly

enough, begins with the letter HM." You can write a formula about it-
M = ml + m2 + m3 + m4 + ms. Where "M" is manufacturing, ml is
money, m2 is men, m3 is machinery, m4 is material and ms is manage-
ment. The first four of these, i.e., money, men, machinery and material,
are tangible. Management, however, is not tangible. You can't buy it in
the market place. You can't create it out of hand. It is born, not made. You
don't appreciate it until you no longer have it-then, it's too late. It is
that priceless ingredient, a sort of catalyst, that furnishes the impulse by
which the other four m's are converted from inert, unrelated elements into
a living mechanism, like, say, an aircraft engine.
Its importance is discounted by some, like the bright reformer
who said of an industrialist, "All he knows is how to produce!" Now, the
superiority of American management cannot be accounted for on the
grounds that we are a superior race. We don't subscribe to that doctrine.
Our performance can be ascribed, however, to the superiority of American
freedom. Our forefathers left us this priceless heritage, not only to free us
from the compulsion and regimentation of the Old World, but to enable
us to develop and utilize the resources of the New. This, we have done,
while in other lands, even greater resources still lie fallow.
And the guiding light of our system has been hope-hope of re-
ward. In business, the reward must be profit, for profit is not just material
gain-it is the index of worth, the signal beacon that in the free play of
natural forces, indicates which course should be abandoned and which
pursued. More importantly, it is the great controller, or regulator, of costs
-the incentive to get costs down. This, in turn, forces volume up, and we
get the economy of abundance. \Ve get, too, a vital, living economy-not
the dead hand of bureaucracy .

.. Eugene E. Wilson: "Fundamentals of Freedom." Address to the Annual Meet.

ing of the Union League Club of Chicago; May 28, '942. Pp. 4-5.
143 .wlllleAN ADMINISTlIATIc*

CM .. W. fRENTlS
"Industrial Maftag_t ill a Republic" IT
No, there can be no question about the technical efliciency of
American industrial management. But the events of the past fifteen ye.ars
prove definitely that mere professional proficiency is not enough to pr~·
serve the environment of freedom. Too high a degree of specialization ~n
industrial management is self-defeating in the field of politics and pUb~IC
relations. Many of us have become so absorbed in playing the industrIal
game efficiently that we have forgotten that the game itself cannot cc>n-
tinue very long, if the fields-local and national-on which it must be
played, are not kept in good order. In other words, as we have conc~'ll­
trated on being good managers of industry, we have far too often becOl~e
poor citizens and left the affairs of the big league-the national industr~~1
economy-to politicians and reformers. Ours, after all, is a business civili-
zation and if that civilization is to be preserved, its professional manag~.rs
must not only be good economic technicians but also good citizens m
every sense that that word implies.
The freedom we have enjoyed in America is not the fruit of fpr-
tuitous accident, of great natural resources, or of mere isolation from the
tangled skein of European politics. It is the direct result of educaticm,
purposeful thinking, and hard work. It is the child of personal competerlcy
-intellectual competency, physical competency, moral competency
which the men who founded this nation so eminently typified. To preseive
·ltSe.'t, a representatIve aemocracy mouia, there'tore, guara ana encour;tge
individual competency with every means at its command. For only intel-
lectually competent men can fully discharge the responsibilities of citiztn-
ship, weigh new proposals of government against the lessons of history,
and vote intelligently. Only physically competent men can create the
wealth required to produce a rising standard of living, foster education
and finance necessary government activities. Only morally competent
men will support religion, assist the incompetent, succor the unfortunllte,
and exercise the self-restraint necessary to preserve our free institutions,
Obviously freedom can only be had by competent men who unOer-
stand the basic principles of self-government and who recognize tflat
"eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." Every citizen must do his pJl:t,
but industrial managers have a peculiarly heavy burden of responsibilIty
to carry in this connection, because ours is a business civilization. y..re
industrial managers must, therefore, be shining examples of civic virtue,
using that phrase in its classical sense. We must eliminate unethical ptac-
tices in our own enterprises so that business can always come proudly ijlto
the court of public opinion with clean hands. We must be keenly cOIl-

81 H. W. Prentis: "Industrial Management in a Republic." Paper read at the 2S oth

meeting of the National Industrial Conference Board; March 18, '943. New y.,,-k:
Newcomen Society; '943, selected &om pp. 10-11, 13-15. 25.
144
scious of the social significance of our day by day decisions. We must
raise the standard of living by passing along the benefits of improved
technique and quantity production through lower prices. and higher
wages. We must constantly endeavor to create better working conditions
by the elimination of health and accident hazards. We must steadily seek
ways and moons of regularizing employment and cushioning the effect
of advancing technology on the lives and fortunes of our workers. We
must seek, in ~hort, to be industrial statesmen rather than mere business
men.

Wide popular support exists for Prentis' views that "the cult
of competency" was the pillar of American democracy; and Ameri-
cans were conscious of the fact, as Walter P. Chrysler has demon-
strated in his Life of an American Workman, that some of the most
successful business magnates and industrial managers come from
the ranks of the workmen." Less recognition is given to the
claim that technical competence is identical merely with business
competence, or that American business leadership is necessarily the
mainstay of the American way of life. Had these business leaders
given more credence to the more representative American philosophy
or to the full span of American history on this point, Prentis might
not have attributed such preponderance to "the business and profes-
sional men who established the American Republic." ., James Trus-
low Adams, previous to the depression in 1929, prematurely described
the United States as "A Business Man's Civilization."" As America
experien<;ed the promising boom of the 1920'S, the businessmen
themselves believed in increasing numbers that they were "the most
influential class in the country." .,
Contesting this class-conscious philosophy, one professor put the
more popular ideology, which prevailed by the end of World War
Il, in the following words: "For once, I prefer the French who say
les affaires sont Ies affaires-business is business. And, maybe, nothing
is the mattcr with business, or with its ruling us: after all, this base
world never had a milder master. Let those who can, make money,
and let nobody begrudge it to them. But after we have given to the
modern Caesars what is rightfully theirs-the coins with their image
on them--could we not stop there instead of going ahead and link-

B' Walter P. Chrysler: Life of an American Wodman. Philadelphia: The Curtis

Publishing Company; 19,8. This book was originally a series of articles published in
the Saturday Evening Post.
'" Prentis: "Industrial Management in a Republic," p. 13 .
• G James Truslow Athuns: "A Business Man's Civilization." Harper's Magazine,
July 19'9, vol. 15Q, p. '42.
91 Samuel O. Dunn: "The 'Practical' Socialist." Nation's Business, November
19.8, vol. 16, p. 1:;.
145 AMERICAN ,....'NISTbTlON

ing top salaries to genius, money-making to God's service, or business

for profit to the promotion of liberty?" ..

11. THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION OF AMERICAN

TECHNOLOGY
American labor leaders, too, believed in the "cult of competency"
but they felt that membership was no longer restricted to business
management. This philosophy was expressed in 1940 by (a) Philip
Murray, ex-coal miner, chairman of the United Steel Workers of
America and of the Congress of Industrial Organizations, and (b)
in 1945 by Walter Reuther, ex-automobile worker and head of the
largest CIO union, the United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural
Implement Workers of America.
(a) PHILIP MURRAY
"Management and Organized Labor""
The next step is the recognition of the interest that labor has
in the conduct of business. Today the ownership of industry is sharply
separated from the control. The stockholder usually has no voice what-
soever in the administration of his company. Only an exceedingly small
percentage of them can or do attend stockholders' meetings. Proxies are
gathered by the management at corporate expense. Management has
usurped the prerogatives of ownership and is in fact responsible to no one
but its patrons, finance capital.
When management resists labor organization, it is fighting to pre-
serve this usurpation at the expense of the ownership. The next step, there-
fore, is to raise ownership and labor to a common level with management,
and when this is done, we can take the next great voluntary move forward
in the solution of the problems of unemployment and job security. If this
effort fails, then government regulation, either benevolent or fascistic, is
the only road remaining.

(b) WALTER REUTHER

"Conversion of Government-Owned War Plants""
We propose that the Congress set up two public authorities,
similar in organization and function to the Tennessee Valley Authority:
•• AJexander H. Pekelis: «Of Freedom and Profits." Public Administration Re-
view, Summer 194;, vol. " p. 281. •
.. Quoted in Morris Llewellyn Cooke and Philip Murray: Organized Labor and
Production. pp.• ,1-2. Reprinted by permission of Harper '& Brotbers. Copyright,
'940, Harper ... Brothers .
.. Walter Reuther: "Conversion of Government·Owned War Plants," Are War
Plants Expendable? Ypsilanti: Willow Run Local ,0, UAW-CIO; '945. selected
from pp. 4-" 15. 21.
J46
a Housing Production Authority, and a Railroad Equipment Production
Authority. These public corporations WIll be authorized to operate gov-
emment-owned war plants as they bec()me available in a comprehensive
program for the manufacture and distribution of low-cost housing and
modem railroad rolling stock. With final victory, we can empkly, througb
this two-fold program, six million people who would be engaged directly
and indirectly in the mass production and mass distribution of rolling
stock and low-cost housing. We can, by means of this program, meet one-
tenth of our national employment budget-sixty million jobs.
The program will be both comprehensive and flexible. There will
be three methods of plant operation. Each of the two authorities will be
empowered to;
( 1) lease plants to private manufacturers, to be operated as part
of the program;
(z) directly operate government-owned plants;
(3) lease plants to workers' producer cooperatives, to be operated
as part of the program.
It is conceivable that in the execution of such an over-all production
program some plants will be operated directly by one of the two public
authorities, some by private management and others by workers cooper-
atives. Each plant could contribute to the total program as do plants in
the BZ9 heavy bomber program. The program must meet three minimum
requirements;
(1) It must establish an equitable wage pattern;
( 2. ) I t must provide a good, low-cost product;
(3) It must operate in a manner to protect the government's
investment.
The ultimate promise lies beyond mere employment, in an in-
dustrial democracy in which workers will be people. not so many "hands"
punching timeclocks or so many robots going through the motions of
production without a sense of creating or bekmging. Workers crave
status, a status of dignity, worthy of free men. They see the promise of
such status in an economy of security and abundance, made possible by
the full utilization of men and machines. If the promise proves a mirage,
beware; our free way of life is not perpetually guaranteed against the
shocks of frustration and despair.
It is important to observe that the Authority which is here pro-
posed will, like the Tennessee Valley Authority, be able to act as a
gigantic yardstick, by which the efficiency of older methods will be
measured_

There is a difference, it will be noted, between Murray's fear of

"benevolent" government regulation and Reuther's bold program
of public enterprise. Quoting Veblen,. Reuther nevertheless urged
his agressive plan for labor's participation in management "in behalf
147
of the technicians and production workers." .. American "engineers"
since Veblen (and Towne too) have sought to become economists
and managers, but seldom was this desire expressed by American
workmen, whether they were regarded as skilled technicians, semi-
skilled operatives, unskilled workers, or union leaders. Even Thor-
stein Veblen, who had inquired into the fantastic possibilities of an
American "Soviet of Technicians," had dismissed the prospects of
American labor toward this end, since its conservatism limited it to
bargaining for the immediate needs of its own craft unions. He re-
garded the American Federation of Labor as "one of the Vested
Interests, as ready as any other to do battle for its own margin of
privilege and profit"; and at the time he wrote in the early 1920'S, he
saw "no other organization in sight which differs materially from the
Federation ... unless a doubtful exception shoud be claimed for
the Railroad Brotherhoods.""
All these disputes were before the day of mass unionization of in-
dustry under the c.I.O. in the 1930'S. Since then, A.F. of L. unions
too, like the International Ladies Garment Workers Union, which
had pioneered in union experiments with social security and educa-
tional programs, now went so far as to accept and perfect the hated
time-and-motion studies of Taylorism as a basis for wage negotia-
tions.81 The United Mine Workers, which shifted from C.I.O. to
A.F. of L. under the dynamic leadership of John L. Lewis, also en-
gaged in the administtation o{ wdfate and health sewke<,; fot it'S
members, with the support not only of its powerful membership but
also of recognized specialists recruited from the fields of public health
and military administration." Meanwhile, a systematic public ad-
ministration of labor-sponsored programs had evolved, including the
New Deal's social security program and official labor boards sympa-
thetic with the newer trends. Governmental employees in clerical and

"Walter Reuther: "Our Fear of Abundance." The New York Times Magazine;
September 16. 1945. Alfred P. Sloan, in 1941. bad anticipated Iarge·scale cbanges in
tbe organization of tbe prefabricated housing industry in his Adventures of • White·
Collar MIIJl. New York: Doubleday. Doran and Company. Inc.; 1941. pp. 197-9·
.. Thorstein Veblen: The Engineers and the Price System. pp. 87-90. p,entis
had also pled lor the peace-time use of ". larger reservoir of spending power." "In·
dustrial Management in • Republic." pp. 29-30 .
.,. William Comberg: A Ttade Union Analysis of Time Stndy. Chicago: Science
Research Associates; 1948. See especially the Foreword by David Dubinsky. President
of the I.L.G.W.U .
.. See the comprehensive report of the United States Coal Mines Administration.
A Medical Survey of the Bitnminous Coallndusby, submitted to tbe Departmellt of
the Interior on March 17. 1947. by Rear Admiral Joel T. Boone. Director of the
Medical Survey Group. FollOWing tbe coal strike of 1946 and the subs<:quent court
decisions. the U .M.W. announced the appointment. as Executive Officer of its own
Medical and Hospitalization Service. of Dr. Wanen F. Draper. formerly of the I). S.
Public Health Service and former Major General. I). S. A.
 148 ADMINtSTItATfOM

administrative posts at the same time began to intensify their own

union movement, and by the end of World War II, the embarrass-
ing question even began to be asked in industrial circles, "Should
management be unionized?"" Moreover, World War II saw the
flowering of labor-management committees which brought workmen
closer than ever before to both the powers and the problems of man-
agement. After World War II a reaction set in against labor's re-
cently favored position, but even non-labor sources undertook to
support such unusual measures as the guaranteed annual wage recom-
mended by Reuther.")·
Reuther's program of telling management how to operate the top-
side technology of American production was admittedly a funda-
mental "invasion of prerogatives that management has heretofore
assigned to itself." ,., From the perspective of the mid-century, how-
ever, it was a mistake on the part of business to dismiss labor's in-
cursion into American management as an effervescence of W orId
War II and as outside the stream of American administration. Labor's
participation had its roots in the American urge for both democratic
sharing and technological competence. Mary Follett's New State had
pointed out at the end of World War I that the pressure of war had
resulted in the recognition of labor "in the management of industry";
and this belief had led her to her main conclusion that "a new state
is coming-we cannot be blind to the signs on every side." 102 In
1919, at a warm Taylor Society discussion on the subject, Professor
Felix Frankfurter of the Harvard Law School, who was regarded as
Brandeis' successor when he later mounted the Supreme Court
bench, predicted that labor would soon be demanding "some share
in management." 103 By 1934, with the advent of the New Deal, Pro-
99H. \V. Anderson: "Should Management Be Unionized?" American Manage·
ment Association, 1945, Personnel Series~ No. C)O.
100 National Planning Association. Release, August 15, 1948. See the review of the
literature in this field by Herman Feldman: "Annual Wage, Where Are 'We?" Ameri·
can Economic Review, December '947, vol. 37, pp. 823-47.
101 James A. Wechsler: "Labor's Bright Young Man." Harper's Magazine, March
1948, vol. 196, p. 270.
102 Mary Follett: The New State. New York: Longmans Green and Company, Inc.;
1918, pp. 327, 330. See also Earl Dean Howard: 'The Development of Government
in Industry." IlIillois Law Review, March 1916, vol. 10 pp. 567-73. \V. M. Lieserson:
"Employment Management, Employee Representation and Industrial Democracy."
United States Department of Labor,. 1919. Address before tbe National Association
of Employment Managers, Cleveland, May 23, 1919. John D. Rockefeller, Jr.: "Rep.
resentation in Industry." Address before the W at Emergency and Reconstruction Con·
fcrence 01 the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, Atlantic City, December
5, 1918.
103 Felix Frankfurter: "Industrial Relations, Some Noteworthy Recent Develop-
ment,." Bulletin of the Tarlor Society. December '9'9, vol. 4, p. 14. Frankfurter had
recently been Chairman of tbe War Labor Policies Board, and, quoting Lord Robert
Cecil, was basing his views largely on wartime British experience.
149 AMDICAN ADMINISTRA110N

fessor Walter J. Shepard of Ohio State University, the President of

the American Political Science Association, analyzed the emerging
"Philosophy of the Good Life," as including first, the right of the
worker to "creative work"; second, the right to "an adequate standard
of living"; and third, the right '"to a substantial share in the manage-
ment of the industry to which he has devoted his labor and his
life." ,..
A demand for a system of administration that was both "scien-
tific" and "democratic" was felt beyond labor and industrial circles.
As one of the agencies that had long participated, if not "interfered,"
in the productive process itself, American government also had a stake
in making public administration both technically competent and
democratically responsive.

12. AMERICAN MANAGEMENT AND DEMOCRATIC GOALS

One of the advocates of the need for technically competent man-

agement in all phases of American democracy was Harold D. Smith,
Budget Director of the United States during the critical years of
1939-46. Smith was trained as an engineer but became interested in
municipal management, state government and national planning.
When he became Director of the Budget, President Roosevelt leaned
heavily upon him although Smith had no party affiliations and was
not known as a New Dealer. In spite of his preoccupation with higher
policy, Smith sponsored improved administrative management in
all of the departments of the national government and in the overall
executive staff agencies. After the arduous war years, Smith resigned
to become Vice President of the International Bank of Reconstruc-
tion and Development. During the previous year, there had appeilred
a compilation of his lectures from which he is quoted below
concerning the relationship between administrative technique and
American democracy.

HAROLD D. SMITH
The Management of Your Government 105
In our concentration on techniques we sometimes forget what
the administrative machine is supposed to accomplish. Of course this
concentration rarely exists in wholly undiluted form, but the managetllent
,.. Walter I. Shepard: "Philosophy of the Good Life." l'residential Address before
the American Political Science Association, December 28, '934.
, .. Harold D. Smith: The Management 01 Your Government. Selected from pp.
28-q, 179. Reprinted by permission of The McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. Copy·
right 1946, The McGraw·HiIl Book Company, Inc.
150
profession in its schools, its literature, and its pmctice generally has been
concerned with methods and means rather than with ends.
In fact, it appears that some of those in the management profes-
sion have a high abstract intelligence in their technical field, but not a
very high social intelligence.
After all, it is the goals of management that are important, and
the tools become important only as they aid in reaching those gOills.
Through its resources the profession, by more or less scientific methods,
can determine how to assemble parts into a whole with the minimum
outlay of man·hours; it can determine how to route or to "process" a
piece of paper with the minimum number of movements and the mini·
mum outlay of human effort. With all these analyses, however, it has
no assurance that the people who do the work do it willingly or with any
sense of accomplishment. They may, because of lack of interest or htck
of understanding of the bigger objectives, among other reasons, work at
a pace or in a manner far below their abilities. If they were more in·
formed about the large objectives and consequently were more sensitive
to the goals, they would be less enslaved by the mechanics of attaining
these goals.
The complexities of modem industrial society have put these
democratic institutions and the individualistic spirit to a supreme test.
The fact that a number of nations have failed in that test has brought
Western civilization to near-destruction. We need more consideration of
the general welfare, more appreciation of the value of democratic institu-
tions and the worth of the individual, to weld an organized front that
will forestall forever that threat of destruction. In the fall of 1944,
President Truman, at that time Senator, described the situation clearly
when he declared: "If this country can utilize all of its man power to
make engines of destruction with which to overwhelm our enemies,
surely we can use that same man power to improve our cities, build
highways, erect decent homes, and provide every workingman with more
of the good things of life."
The democracies have proved that they can effectively mobilize
all their resources for war. They must also prove that they can organize
to solve the problems of peace. In this they will succeed only if indi-
vidual freedom is blended with social responsibility. The management of
democratic government must be imbued with both individual freedom
and social responsibility in order to master its peacetime task.

Harold Smith's view of the priority of humanitarian objectives

over mere techniques in a democracy was voiced by Leonard White in
his dialogue with T. V. Smith on "the civic art in America" in 1939:
"Don't misunderstand what we administrators mean when we use
the short hand of efficiency and economy. . . . When we say ef-
ficiency we think of homes it saved from disease, of boys and
lSI AMftICAN ADMINISTI.\TJC)N

girls in schools prepared for life, of ships and mines protected agaiTlst
disaster, of airplanes guided safely along the radio beam through fog
and rain to the haven of a friendly ai~rt. We do not think in tenns
of gadgets and paper clips alone." Political scientists, public ad-
ministrators, and many American citizens, like Smith and White,
thus believe in the reconciliation of American technology with Ameri-
can democracy. These are pervasive ideas. They take us back to the
question, already examined, of the essential relations between man-
agement or administration and objectives or policies; they also le11d
forward to delicate questions of governmental planning and ad-
ministrative bureaucracy.'01 Yet the two driving forces of democracy
and technology remain the broadest elements by which we dm
characterize American administration.

SUMMA1V

From its beginning as a nation, the United States combined the

democratic urge for popular participation in the management of
affairs, as noted by de Tocqueville, with the technical facility I'or
proficient production and efficient procedures, as demonstrated by
Washington, Hamilton, and Jefferson, and perfected by Henry
Towne and Frederick Taylor. Similar canons of economy and ef-
{\cieuq 'Rete applied t<l tb.e ?1:oced\l1:~ of American democtati.c '{,ov-
ernment itself, as reHected in the work of President Taft's Commis-
sion on Economy and Efficiency. But economy and efficiency were
not enough. Efficient administration required, as represented by
Louis Brandeis, scientific management of management as well as of
labor and, according to Dexter Kimball and other writers, it also re-
quired the scientific distribution of the fruits of labor as well as
efficient production itself. Continuing evidence of technological ;n-
competence as well as undemocratic behavior in American life per-
sisted, but whether this evidence was exposed by iconoclastic critics
like Thorstein Veblen or cryptic commentators like Howard Scott,
the comparative superiority of American technique and American
democracy was widely accepted-even by Soviet critics like lIya Ilf
and Eugene Petrov.
The American consensus in combining efficient production afld
democratic marlagement was strengthened by the wide support it re-
ceived, ranging from business executives like .Henning Prentis a~d
Eugene Wilson to labor executives like Walter Reuther and Philtp
'08 Leonard White and T. V. Smith: Politics and Public Service. New York: Harper
6: Brbthezs; 1939, pp. 7-8·
101 See Chapters 2, 7, aud 16.
152
Murray. Their means differed, the one insisting upon leadership in
both government and industry by competent business ma~,
while the other demanded for "technicians and production worliers"
a voice in the overall management of the American system. Looking
at these problems from the highest vantage point of national responsi-
bility, that is, from the Executive Office of the President, Harold
Smith was convinced of the necessity and the possibility of rec<JnciI-
ing the varied forces of American democracy-popular and techtJical,
private and public. As the nation reached the mid-century point, the
contest became more heated. Excepting a world-wide conflagration,
hope still ran high for continuing the historic combination of democ-
racy and efficiency in administering American affairs.
 CHAPTER SIX

COMPARATIVE ADMINISTRATION

ALTHOUGH mankind possesses a common stock of administrative

experience, every nation tends to develop its own unique administra-
tive pattern. These national differences emerge out of the special
social setting, the peculiar economic bent, and the particular political
culture of each country. We will attempt in this chapter to sketch
distinctive administrative profiles in 1) Great Britain, 2) France, 3)
Germany, 4) Soviet Russia, 5) Latin America, and 6) international
government. The first three represent compact nations with rela-
tively well-established administrative patterns. In the case of the last
three, the administrative systems are in flux, but seem to be drawing
upon cosmopolitan managerial experience, notably from the United
States.
A description of the detailed features of each national administra-
tive system would require a treatise of its own. Not only are such ad-
ministrative data fragmentary for many nations, but even if avail-
able for all, they would not serve the main purpose of this chapter,
which is to present some distinctive administrative profiles rather
than the specific features of individual administrative systems. For
this reason, and at the risk of appearing fragmentary, the material
will comment broadly on the administrative culture of the six il-
lustrative cases.

1. THE EXPERT-LAYMAN RELATIONSHIP IN BRITISH

ADMINISTRATION
The British government, and especially the expert British civil
service system, has for years been a source of curious and even envious
153
154
interest to Americans. ' On the other hand, British indnstrial and
business management has so far had few devotees on this side of the
Atlantic.' Nor did the ptevailing American sentiment become more
receptive toward British business management when, within a few.
years after World War II, England found it necessary to nationalize
its coal industry, banking, civil aviation, transportation, communica-
tion, and electricity systems, or when it set out to socialize steel.'
Most Americans did not realize until mid-century that the Conserva-
tive Party, as well as the British Labor Party, was committed to the
program of collectivizing large-scale enterprise, and they remained
bewildered at the persistence of political freedom among those whom
they regarded as regimented socialists. These anomalies of British
policy may become clearer when one understands that Britain's tradi-
tion of combining the skill of the expert with the insight of the lay-
man is as basic to the Englishman in the management of his affairs as
his desire to preserve his political freedom while securing his eco-
nomic subsistence.
This progressive adherence to the expert-layman tradition has
been confirmed by several observers of British affairs: (a) A. Law-
rence Lowell, American lawyer, political scientist, President of Har-
vard, and renowned American authority on the English government;
(b) Theodore Morison, British educator and administrator; (c)
Francis L. C. Floud, a civil servant of the British "administrative
class"; and (d) Paul Einzig, an American journalist who observed
the continued dependence upon the expert-layman combination
when, after World War I Britain's Labor Government seriously em-
barked on its socialist plans.

(al A. LAWRENCE LOWELL

The Government of England'

Of all the existing political traditions in England, the least known

to the public, and yet one of those most deserving attention, is that
which governs the relation between the expert and the layman.
The first branch of the English government to reach a high
--_---
'One of the earliest of several basic studies of the British public service was Dorman
B. Eaton; Civil Service in Great Britain. New York; Harper & Brothers, 1880. The
book was !irst issued in 1879 under the title "Report Concerning Civil Service in
Great Britain." 46th Congress; 2nd Session, House of Representatives, Doc. I, part 7.
• Herbert N. Casson; "Britain's Ways of Work and Ours." Nation's Business
April 1928, vol. 16, p. 21 et seq. '
• See, for example, Senator Ralph E, Flanders; The Fnnction of Management in
American Life, p. 8.
0A. Lawrence Lowell; The Government of England. Selected from ",,1. " pp. '73-
74, 17~. Reprinted by permission of The Macmillan Company. Copyright '9"9, The
Macmillan Company.
155 COlotPAItATIYI AOMINISTRATtoH
point of development was that which dealt with the administration, of
justice; and it is here that we first see the cooperation of professional ~nd
lay elements. The justice of the peace was in most cases a Iandown~ a
country gentleman, not skilled in law. The justice supplied, in fact, the
lay, not the professional, element in his own court; the requisite I~gal
knowledge bein,g usually furnished by his clerk, who was learned in the
law; or, at least, learned in the duties of the justice of the peace as set
forth in the statutes and in the manuals published for the purpose.
The reader will prohably remember Dickens' burlesque [in Pick-
wick Papers] of the relation in the scene at Ipswich, where after milch
whispering between the justice (Mr. Nupkins) and his clerk (Mr. Jinks)
the magistrate says to Mr. Pickwick:-
"An information has been sworn before me that it is apprehended
you are going to fight a duel, and that the other man, Tupman, is Your
aider and abettor in it. Therefore-eh, Mr. Jinks?"
"Certainly, Sir."
"Therefore, I call upon you both to-I think that's the C04rse
Mr. Jinks?" '
"Certainly, Sir."
"To-to-what, Mr. Jinks?" said the magistrate pettishly.
"To find bail, Sir."
"Yes. Therefore, I call upon you both-as I was about to say
when I was interrupted by my clerk-to find bail." '
Leslie Stephen, I think, remarks somewhere that the chara<:ter_
istic feature of the English system of government is a justice of the P~ce
who is a gentleman, with a clerk who knows the law; and certainly the
relationship between the titular holder of a public post, enjoying the
honours, and assuming the responsibility, of office, and a subordinate,
who, without attracting attention, supplies the technical knowledge <IDd
largely directs the conduct of his chief, extends throughout the Engiish
government from the Treasury Bench to the borough council.

(b) THEODORE MORISON

"Ciyil Service Traditions'"

The theory and practice of Parliamentary Government is that

decisions are taken by Ministers and that the Civil Servants supply the
Minister with the information necessary for coming to a right decision.
From this general proposition there follow certain consequences WGich
have become maxims in Whitehall.
( 1) The Civil Servant must place before his chief the arguml\nts
on both sides of the case, fully and fairly. Whatever his own sympatllies

"Theodore Morison: "CiVIl Service Traditions." Public Administration, Jan. '9.6,

vol. 4, selected from p. ''I. Reprmted by permISSIon.
156
may be he must put before his chief all the arguments which may be
urged against the view which is taken in the office.
(2) When the decision is once taken he must loyally carry out
the policy chosen, even though he may have preferred a diHerent one.
( 3) The Civil Service is responsible for continuity of policy, or
such continuity as is possible under our system of Party Government. A
Civil Servant whom I know used frankly to recognize the fact that one
part of his programme was more likely to be passed by the Conservatives
and another part by the Liberals. "Progress in Whitehall," he used to
say, "is not in a straight line; it is a series of zigzags." But he kept before
himself the goal which he hoped to attain. The Civil Service is thus a
corrective of Party Government; its proper concern is the good of the
nation as a whole irrespective of party, and to each Minister in turn it
submits this national point of view.
(4) The Civil Servant must observe absolute silence and discre-
tion as to what occurs in the office. The decision when once taken is
that of the Minister or of Cabinet, and it is contrary to tradition for a
Civil Servant to take credit for any measure accepted by Parliament,
though he may in fact have been the author of it. As the decision is his,
the Minister must take full responsibility for it. If the decision happens
to be wrong he must not shield himself by blaming his officials and it is
expected that he should defend his officials if they are attacked in public;
if he cannot defend them he must resign.

(C) FRANCIS FLOUD

"The Sphere of the Specialist in Public Administration'"
It is said that the English nation is proverbially suspicious of
experts, and whether that is so or not it is certainly the case that it has
been almost invariably the practice that the members of the Government
of this country are selected not on the ground of their expert knowledge
of the department of which they take charge, but because they are men
of affairs who are capable of coming to decisions, not on their own
IOlowledge, but on the evidence submitted to them by others. On the
whole, this system has worked well, largely because each new Minister,
however ignorant he may be of the work of his office, can rely on finding
a body of disinterested and experienced officials who can supply him
with all the evidence and information he needs, and can advise whether
any policy he proposes is practicable. Indeed, I am not sure that if the
secrets of our hearts were revealed we should not say that we prefer to
have an open minded though ignorant Minister to one who comes to his
office with a modicum of knowledge and the belief that he knows more
than his permanent advisers on all the problems of his department. I
• F,ancis Floud: "The Sphere of the Specialist in Public Administration." Public
Administration, 1923, \'01. 1, pp. 118-19,122. Reprinted by permission.
157 COMPARATIVE ADMINISTRATION

should be sorry if it was considered necessary that the Minister of Health

must be a doctor, the Minister of Agriculture a farmer, the President of
the Board of Trade a merchant, or the First Commissioner of Works a
builder.
We English are an illogicaJ nation, we have built up our civiliza-
tion without any attempt to reduce our constitutions to writing, and we
have, as our critics tell us, an incurable habit of trusting to muddling
through all the problems that confront us. But, at the same time, we are
an intensely practical people. The spirit is more than the letter or the
written word and the problem of the specialist in public administration
depends far more upon cultivating in all ranks of the Service a spirit of
goodwill and mutual cooperation than upon any precise delimitation of
functions.

(d) PAUL EIN%IG

"The Front Office Goes Socialist" 1

The gradual application of Socialism in Britain since 1945 was

not accompanied by any "purge" of m.anagements, not even in the less
drastic form of wholesale dismissals. On the contrary, the Socialist Gov·
ernment went out of its way to establish friendly relations with top
managements, of both nationalized and private enterprises in so far as
this could be done without sacrificing any essential part of its program.
While Ministers and senior officials were unhesitatingly placed in charge
of affairs they knew little or nothing about, the Government was realistic
enough to prefer to have experienced executives in charge of nationalized
enterprise.
The Government holds out appreciable inducements to expert
business executives willing to serve under it. In the first place, the
salaries of top managers in nationalized industries remain at the same
high level as under private ownership. In some instances, the boards of
nationalized industries have enticed managers from private business
through the offer of higher pay. There is certainly no question of leveling
down managerial salaries to the scale of pay of government officials. Even
though the Bank of England has become practically the City branch of
the Treasury, the salaries of its officials remain well above the salaries of
the corresponding classes of Treasury officials. The story goes that, when
the news of the overwhelming Socialist victory in the 1945 general elec-
tion was received at a gloomy dinner party in New York, one of the
guests remarked, "Poor Catto, now he's sure to be hanged." Instead of
that, Lord Catto was requested to remain as Governor of the Bank of
England after it was nationalized. There were, in fact, a few resignations
from nationalized industries, but not many. Generally speaking, most

'Paul Einzig: "11l< Front Office Goes Socialist." Nation's Business, May 1948,
vol. 36, adapted from pp. 42,43,67. Reprinted by permission.
158
executives regard themselves as nonpolitical business men whose job is
to run their banks, factories or merchant firms.

This expert·layman formula is not exclusively British. Like Pick-

wick at Ipswich, Cicero noticed among the Romans that "many of
those who hold magistracies, being in ignorance of the official power
granted to them by the law, know only as much as their clerks want
them to know.'" The formula is "peculiarly British"· in that the
British have converted what would otherwise be regarded as institu-
tionalized ignorance of their lay leaders into a virtue of their public
administration. They argue that their system is all the better because
the amateurishness of their leaders compels them to accept the ex-
pertness of their administrators. It has been remarked that one
British cabinet member was able to shift so readily from his responsi-
bilities as head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the Home Office
primarilr because he had so little to do with either.
Obviously, there are dangers in the layman's dependence upon the
expert, not the least of which is the possibility of the abuse of power,
especially by an all-powerful "administrative class." What if an ex-
pert permanent under-secretary seriously abuses his position either
by exercising too much power himself or by preventing his amateur
political chief from exercising enough power? In that case, said the
distinguished Sir Norman Fenwick Warren Fisher, who, as Per-
manent Under-Secretary of the Treasury, sat at the very top of the
hierarchy of the British public service, "I should ask him to be
less of an ass." 10 More serious still, what would happen if the expert
lacked the requisite skill? This prospect of expert incapacity during
the critical post-war period was faced by Sir John Anderson, who not
only rose to the top of the administrative class as a permanent under-
secretary but also became a high cabinet member in the wartime
government. Anderson's main concern was not the wisdom of the
program itself, but "the danger that the process of extending na-
tional ownership and control might run ahead of the appropriate
technique." 11 Similarly, Sir Josiah Stamp, an outstanding British in-
dustrial leader, warned, after his observation of American govern-
• Cicero: De Legious, Book III, p. 461. See also tbe commeuts about Roman
"amateur" and "expert" in George H. Steveuson: Roman Provincial Administration.
Oxford: B. Blackwell; 1939.
• Francis Flond: "The Spbere of the Specialist," p. 118. One of the ""rliest
statement" following the publication of Lowell's book, concerning the "amateur" and
the "expert," was Ramsey Muir: Peers and Bureaucrats. Londou: Constable aud Co.;
1910.
,. Don K. Price: "Civil SelVice in Britain." Civil SelVice Assembly, Bulletin NO.3,
January '937. Reprinted from Washington Post, December 19-", 1936.
11 Sir John Anderson: "The Machinery of Governmeut." Public Administratiou,
Autumn 1946, vol. '4, p. '54.
159
mental experimentation in 1936: "One cannot safely legislate beyOl\d
the capacity of experienced administration to execute," 11
The efficiency of the British civil service was seriously questionw.
during the post-war economic transition," In particular, the British
had to admit that their industry was lagging not only mechanically
and technologically but also in terms of managerial technique. In
spite of British forerunners to Frederick Taylor h'ke James Watt
Robert Owen and Charles Babbage," in spite of administrative\y~
minded predecessors to Henri Fayol like the English banker James
Gilbart,'" and in spite of the early welcome given to scientific man-
agement in British engineering circles,'· there was, after the World
War, evidence of what Americans have harshly called Technologi~al
Stagnation in Great Britain." As a consequence, one of the major
steps of the Labor Government was to launch a drive for industrial
efficiency in post-war Britain; ,. and, indeed, as part of the post-war
economic aid program of the United States, a joint Anglo-American
Productivity Council was established. It is interesting to note that On
this Council, the conception of the expert was widened to inclUde
labor leaders as well as managers among the Americans as well as the
British; the eight American members inc1uded not only such In-
dustrialists as Philip D. Reed, Chairman of the General Electric Com-
pany but also Victor Reuther, Educational Director of the United
Automobile and Aircraft Workers Union.'·
J.r;t .F.>:)flarui, .\!" .i.< ..r..mui.J:W .w ~ .i.W'.re.a.'ii.~~ .re..r..!J,cmi.?eil .!:h# "fbe
social ascendancy of the white collar over the worker's muffler has
gone forever." But the expert qualifications of the civil servants, of
2<)

the so-called "black-coated workers," and of the British administta.

'2 Quoted by Victor Weybright: "Our Civtl Servants." Survey Graphic. FebfUQry
'936, vol. '5, p. 116.
111 D. N. Chester: ''The Efficiency of the Central Government." Public Adm;"is.
tration, Spring 1948, vol. .6, pp. 10-'5. See also Harold J. Laski: ''The Educatjon
of the CivIl Servant." Public Administration, April '943, vol. ll, p. '3.
14 Charles 13abbage: The Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London: C.
Knif,ht; 1832 .
• "The History and Principles of Ancient Commerce." The Merchants Maga,
zine and Cornmercial Review, September 1848, vol. '9, p. '57.
"L. Urwich and E. F. L. Brech: The Making of Scientific Management. Lond'm:
Management Publications Trust; 1946, vol. 2, British Industry, Chapter 3.
'1 Machinery and Allied Products Institute: Techoological Stagnation in Great
Britain. Chicago: Machinery and Allied Products Institute; January 1948. But see H.
R. Dennison: "Hopeful Factors in the British Economy.' Foreign AHaits, January
1947, vol. 2;, pp. 277-8,.
ll! "Creating a New Britain." Labor and Industry in Britain, September, OctOber
'947, vol. ;, p. ,6,.
,. House of Commons, Debates. July 28. 1948. The &.st meeting of the Conr,ct1
took place in London October 25-November 6, 1948 .
.. C. J. Newman, President. of the National Association of Local Government
OfIiCllIS: Loc:aI GoverJJJDeDt Scrvic:c, July-August, 1948, p. 136.
 l60
tors and experts generally, still remains a paramount consideration.
Although the British labor movement started out with a strong dose
of syndicalist thought regarding workers' control of industry, the
general trend of thought of British Fabianism and English Socialism,
strengthened now with the challenge of political victory on the part
of the Lab6r.Party, has been to insist upon governmental and man-
agerial organs of control rather than "proletarian planning." '" Em·
barked on a drastically new policy with extremely limited resources
and committed to a revised economy from which there may be no
turning back, the tight little island realizes more than ever that its
fate may depend upon its expert business managers and public ad-
ministrators. On the governmental side alone, C. M. Woodhouse
predicted, with characteristic British humor, that the issues at future
British general elections "will not be that Policy A is preferable to
Policy B, but that Commissar A is better than Commissar B in carry-
ing out The Policy." ..
Englishmen have pondered these prospects of a totally expert
state, managed without politicians since the time of Francis Bacon,
who predicted in his sixteenth century utopia, The New Atlantis,
a government of technicians, architects, astronomers, and physicians,
but without politicians. However, it is unlikely that England will,
even under the duress of contemporary circumstances, hand her fate
to the expert administrator alone. She will hardly forsake her simul-
taneous dependence upon the amateur politician who has, after all.
ruled her jointly with the expert for so many years.

2. THE FRENCH EXPERIENCE WITH ADMINISTRATIVE

SYSTEMATIZATION

In France, the administrator and the civil servant, Ie fonction-

naire, plays a more dominant but less effective role. Few observers
take exception to the conclusion that in French public administra-
tion the inefficient Monsieur Le bureau has a disdain for the public
and regards his official desk as his private domain. However, it is not
only in France that "the bureaucratic germ is peculiarly virulent" and
that "red tape often chokes the process of administration."" We
must therefore look beyond bureaucracy for the apparent French in-
eptitude for administration. This feature of French life, to the extent

21 Robert A. Dahl: "Workers' Control of Industry and the British Labor Party."
American Political Science Review, October 1947, vol. 41, pp. 8, 5-900.
"C. M. Woodhouse: "The Politician in Eclipse," p. 311.
.. For this widespread characterization of French administration see the findings
and references in Walter Rice Sharp: The French Civil Service.
161 (;OMPARATIYE .... INISTRATIOH

that it does exist, is in strange contrast to the systematic tradition

arid logical emphasis of French culture, as shown by readings from
the following: (a) Hippolyte Adolphe Taine, English-trained French
historian, describing, in 1890, the Napoleonic era; (b) Professor Wal-
ter Rice Sharp, Chairman of the Department of Government at the
City College of New York, and an authority on French institutions,
writing after W orId War I; and (c) R. P. Schwarz, an observer of
French affairs, Parisian economic editor, and an economic consultant
for various British, American, and French firms, writing after W orId
WarII.
(a) HIPPOLYTE TAIN!

The Modem Regime"

A new France, not the chimerical, communistic, equalized, and
Spartan France of Robespierre and St. Just, but a possible, real, durable,
and yet levelled and uniform France, logically struck out at one blow, all
of a piece, according to one general principle, a France, centralized, ad-
ministrative, and, save the petty egoistic play of individuals, managed in
one entire body from top to bottom,-in short, the France which
Richelieu and Louis XIV had longed for, which Mirabeau after 1790 had
foreseen, is now the work which the theories of the monarchy and of the
Revolution had prepared, and toward which the final concurrence of
events, that is to say, "the alliance of philosophy and the sabre," led
the sovereign hands of the First Consul. [Napoleon].
It forms one unique, vast, monumental block, in which a))
branches of the service are lodged under one roof; in addition to the
national and general services belonging to the public power, we find here
others also, local and special, which do not belong to it, such as worship,
education, charity, fine arts, literature, departmental and communal in-
terests, each installed in a distinct compartment. All the compartments
are ordered and arranged alike, forming a circle around the magnificent
central apartment, with which each is in communication by a bell; as
soon as the bell rings and the sound spreads from division to sub-division,
the entire service, from the chief clerk down to the lowest employee, is
instantly in motion.
Nowhere in Europe are human lives so well regulated, within
lines of demarcation so universal, so simple, and so satisfactory to the
eye and to logic: the edifice in which Frenchmen are henceforth to move
and act is regular from top to bottom, in its entirety as well as in its
details, outside as well as inside; its stories, one above the other, are
adjusted with exact symmetry; its juxtaposed masses form pendants and

.. Hippolyte Taioe; The Modem Regime. Selected from Book II, Cbapter 3,
sees. 3-4. Reprinted by permission of Henry Holt and Company. Copyright 18<)0,
Henry Holt and Company.
lQ
counterpoise; aU its lines and foons, every dimension and proportion, aD
its props and buttresses combine, through their mutnaJ dependencies. to
compose a harmony and to maintain an equilibrium. In this respect the
stmcture is classic. For the first time in modem history we see a society
due to ratiocination and, at the same time, substantial; the new France.
under these two heads, is the masterpiece of the classic spirit.

(b) WALTEa RICE SHARP

The French Civil Service"
By the dawn of the present century, the domain of public ad-
ministration in France had become far·reaching. Its activities were multi-
farious: it was bUIlding highways, bridges, and canals; it was operating
one railway system and closely regulating the operation of all the others;
it had a monopoly on the manufacture of matches and tobacco; it was
administering accident compensation and old age pension acts; it was
running theatres, opera houses. and musenms and making famous tapes-
tries and porcelain; it was gathering statistical and other scientific data
of all kinds. Conservative deputies and senators and Le Temps might
continue to rant against the insidious menace of etatisme to individual
enterprise, but as elsewhere in western Europe. State intervention in
France grew apace under liberal republican rule. It is evident how the
impact of etatisme, plus the formidable difficulties left by the war, [had]
complicated the problems of French public administration. The old
bureaucratic heritage of monarchical. pre-industrial times no longer [met]
the needs and aspirations of the French nation.
As the business of the state expanded, the wheels of administra-
tion turned more and more slowly. Reform projects gathered dust in
sagging archives at Paris. Always formalistic to excess, office method
seemed to grow increasingly devious. Masses of detail choked the slow-
moving hierarchical machinery which, by its very nature, permitted few
lateral "short cuts" in the handling of correspondence and reports.
M. Chardon's masterful indictments of this paperasserie are filled with
examples of its failure to meet the demands of an industrial age upon the
agencies of government. Territorially, the government of France is an ex-
ample of advanced centralization; functionally, it is anything but that.
In these days Frenchmen are prone to talk eloquently about
"rationalizing" their industrial organization. Indeed, during the past dec-
ade they have made admirable strides toward the injection of modem
science and technology into their economic processes. If they would only
tap this reservoir of energy and resourcefulness for an administrative
"rationalization," the behavior of their official bureaucracy might show
equally significant changes. The pattern of French political democracy
.. Walter Rice Sbatp: The French Civil Service. Adapted from pp. 7. 11. 2.4. 31,
S62. Reprinted by permission of The Macmillan Company. Copyright 1931, The Mac-
millan Company.
163
needs to be re-cut so as to give full play to technical competence in the
development of a planned national life. For this task the French people
lack neither human intelligence nor material resources. The question
rather is whether they can break throngh the cramping confines of a
stubborn institutional traditionalism.
Our study has revealed portents that this may already be on the
way, albeit gradually, fitfully. It would be foolish to anticipate sweeping
reform. Plus ~ change, plus c'est 13 meme chose, runs a celebrated
French proverb. Short of the sudden emergence of "a common purpose
in pea.ce as vivid and compelling" as the motives which inspired France
during the war, the transition from sleepy Napoleonic bureaucracy to
a well-knit congeries of public services managed according to twentieth
century technical principles may be unduly prolonged.

(c) R_ P. SCHWARZ
"Report on France""
As for the defects of the administration, they are not adequately
explained by "purges" of collaborationists, sabotage by many Vichyites
still retained in responsible posts, and similar easy excuses. Unfortunately,
the evil goes much deeper. To anybody familiar with pre-war France, the
growing inadequacy of French administration was even then apparent.
The truth of the matter seems to be that every country has the admin-
istration for which it is prepared to pay. Demagogic attacks on the Civil
Service always brings applause from certain quarters. The phenomenon
is not confined to France. But possibly those who attack the French
functionary will, when French economy gets normal again, discover
gradually that efficient service and initiative require adequate pay as a
corollary. And it may even dawn upon them that, in the end, this is
cheaper than to maintain Civil Servants On salaries so inadequate that
only fools would not supplement them by graft.
On that score, however, I regret that I have not been able to
notice much change in the pre-war mentality. There is a vicious circle
leading from poor payment of the Civil Servants to inadequate public
services; from inadequate public services to cynicism among their users;
from cynicism to reliance on self-help and admiration for the debrouiJlard,
the man who knows how to "wangle it"; from admiration for the wangler
to determination to pay for inadequate public services the minimum of
taxes--those taxes which alone could provide better remuneration for
Civil Servants. And there you are back at the beginning.
The preceding remarks are not intended to explain away serious
defects of administratiou, or shortcomings, equally serious, in the public's
attitude and behaviour. To succeed, a system [needs] to be upheld either

.. R. P. Schwarz: "Report on France." Fortniglltly, July 1945, vol. 164, adapted

from pp. 3-4. Reprinted by permission.
164
from the inside, by the self-discipline of the population, as in the British
case; or from the outside, by iron administrative control-the German
case, until recently. In the French case, apart from the desperate character
of the shortages, there is a perceptible la"k of self.discipline and an even
worse lack of administrative efficiency. Both are openly admitted by in-
telligent French people. When one meets with cases of this kind, one
cannot, as a' friend of France, help disappointment at finding that the
lessons of the ·inter·war years should not have been learned better. In a
nation so intelligent, so gifted in many ways, so worthy of admiration,
these serious blemishes hurt doubly because they tarnish a picture that
one would somehow have desired perfect.

Inefficiency in France is thus not restricted to the higher civil

servants. Henri Fayol's complaints about 'Tincapacite de l'etat" 27
cannot be fairly restricted to the French state, as there is a similar in-
flexibility ill French industrial management. Andre Siegfried has re-
marked: "Each time standardization achieves a new conquest, Amer-
ica hails it as a victory of civilization, while France considers it with
some melancholy." 2!\ French labor has been notoriously volatile with
regard to matters of scientific management. The introduction of
Taylor'S time study methods in French industry as early as 1907-1908
led to violent opposition in labor circles.29 The periodic indiscipline
of labor and of the quick-triggered syndicalist unions arc not merely
characteristic of industry but suffuse the whole structure of the white-
collared clerks and the civil service. In 1932, the French civil service
unions fought a government sponsored salary reduction by a unique
form of sabotage: they threatened to enforce all of the regulations on
the law books and thus paralyze French society.'" "Indiscipline" is ad-
mittedly "the glaring defect of the French character." at
It would be a mistake to underrate French management com-
pletely. French home management "is often a model of planning and
organization." '2 The brilliant capacity of Frenchmen is not wholly
restricted to art and literature or to the crisis period of war. Napoleon
was not France's only administrative genius." It should be recalled
27 Henri Fayo!: L'incapacite industrielle de Ntat. Paris: 1921. Reprinted from
Revue politique et Parlementaire, March 10, 1921.
.. Andre Siegfried: "French Industry and Mass Production." Harvard Business
Review, October 1927, vol. 6, p. 10.
211 Paul bevinat: ScientiJic Management in Europe. Geneva: International Labor
OlIice; 1<127.
so Dispatch of Edmond Taylor, Chicago Tribune Press Service, Paris, Jannary '3,
1932.
81 Humbert Michaud: "The Problem of Political Reform in France." The Nine-
teenth Century and After, lune 1948. vol. 143, p. 3>6.
.. FayoI: Industrial and General Administration, p. 41.
.. See Chapter '4, sec. 3.
165 COMPARATIVE ADMINISTRATION

that even in the field of scientific management Monsieur Coulomb

preceded the Englishman, Charles Babbage, in his pin-manufacturing
experiments, and as early as 1-;00, Monsieur Perronet is said to have
revealed an earlier appreciation of some of the elements of scientific
management."
The over-congested and over-centralized governmental operations
of France have been regarded as far less imaginative, it is true, but
France is no longer the only country facing the challenge of admin-
istrative centralization in an interdependently technological age.
French regionalism has had some success." Guerillas, operating in
the Nazi-clominated provinces during World War II without bene-
fit of Parisian centralization, reflected as brilliant an example of co-
ordinating "local operations" as this form of military experience
provides. A talent for spectacular innovation and creative invention
is inherent in French life generally, and especially in time of crisis.
Despite a widespread disdain for systematization, this ability ex-
presses itself not only in an artistic manner but also in orderly and
logical form, and in the past this faculty has constituted one of the
most dynamic aspects of French administration.'·
Nor is the French governmental system properly described purely
in terms of an unstable system of political parties and ministerial
succession, the so-called "dance of portfolios." A clear-cut and careful
system of administrative adjudication of the rights of individual
citizens is evident in French government. Even on the organizational
side, the French have shown some ability to experiment in govern-
ment, notwithstanding the unfortunate fact that they do not have
a corresponding sense of personal subordination to the organiza-
tional structure. For example, there have been few extra-<lepart-
mental agencies of control in France similar to the British Treasury
or to the United States Civil Service Commission or to comparable
overall staff agencies in other countries; but there is frequently a
brilliant use of staff work even within the so-called political "cabi-
nets" which co-ordinate and supervise the centrifugal tendencies of
the independent bureaus in the individual French ministries. sT
The French administrative system is still "in transition,"" and
it may remain so pending France's "unfinished revolution." at The
French have not yet reconciled the libertarian and egalitarian maxims
.. See Chapter 4 .
.. R. K. Gooch: Regionalism in France. New York: The Century Co.; 1931.
.. Harrington Emerson, Efficiency as a Basis for Operation and Wages, p. 40.
aT See Chapter 10 .
.. Walter Sharp: The French Civil Service, Bureaucracy in Transition .
.. W. L. Middleton: The French Political System. New York, E. P. Dutton and
Co. Inc_. 1933.
166
of the French Revolution of 1789 with the classic. administrative
hierarchy of the Napoleonic Consulate imposed on the nation in
1799 (the year VIII). Taine aptly said in 18<}0 in his preface to The
Modern Regime: 'The machine of the year VIII, applied to us for
three generations has shaped or fixed us as we are, for good or ill; if for
a century, it sustains us, it represses us for a century. These ideas are
ours. Therefore, we hold on to them, or rather they have taken hold
of us." ,. The struggle for an effective and humanitarian administra-
tion in France has been a contest between compelling ideologies and
creative men who have shown their strength at the opportune mo-
ment.

3. ADMINISTRATIVE RATIONALIZATION OF THE GERMAN

COMMUNITY

The Germans have long demonstrated a flair for both systemiza-

tion in thought and efficiency in action which has led other nations
to the extremes of admiration and fear. We will have occasion to ob-
serve some of their exemplary organizational and procedural prac-
tice." However, observers of German life have been undecided as to
whether this type of efficiency is a genuine part of the nation's culture
or whether it represents an obsession which screens a more funda-
mental weakness. Despite their reputed efficiency, the Germans, dur-
ing their nearest approach to world domination, in World War II,
proved to be short-sighted planners and bickering managers where
they were expected to be strongest-in the realm of industrial
strategy and military production." Although there have always been
conflicting loyalties within the nation and within the civil service,'"
an intense devotion to both the ethnic community and to an orderly
national life has persisted in Germany. Germans of various political
persuasions have commented upon this drive for precise administra·
tion and orderly efficiency. Among them were: (a) Karl loewen-
stein, who became a professor of political science at Amherst College
after coming to the United States during the 1930'S; (b) Adolph
Hitler, who echoed the philosophy of bureaucratic efficiency in Mein
Kampf in 1925; and (c) Karl Mannheim, German sociologist who
•• Taine: The Modem Regime, p. iv•
.. See Chapters 8, 19 .
.. United States Strategic Bombing Survey: The Ellects of Strategic Bombing on
the Genrum War Economy. October 31, 194;; Chapter S.
.. Paul Kosolc: Modern Germany, A Study of Conllicting Loyalties. Chicago: The
University of Chicago Press; 1933. See also our Chapter 3.
wrote simultaneously, but diametrically, about the German faith in
"scientific politics" and "administrative rationalization."

(a) KARL LOEW£NSTEIN

Government and Politics in Germany"

From its inception, the Prussian state rested on the two piDars
of the army and a highly trained civil service. Out of the needs of a
permanent army and a centralized financial administration grew that
second pillar of German political traditions, the officialdom of the rising
Prussian State. Under Frederick William I (1713-1740) the dualism be-
tween territorial and central administration was overcome. Similarly, as
in England in the eighteenth century for different reasons, the person of
the King became nominally divorced from the actual administration and
the administrative agencies. Under Frederick I (1688-1713), the first
King of Prussia (1701), "cabinet government" was fully developed; but
the name implied an entirely different type of government from its name-
sake in England. It denotes the strictest pattern of personal government,
in which the monarch, separated from his ministers and advisers, closeted
alone in the solitude of his "cabinet," makes the ultimate decisions on
his personal responsibility, while his ministers, merely organs of execu-
tion, perlorm his will as it emanates in the form of "cabinet orders."
Many generations later, under the Third Reich, the cabinet orders were
revived as what is known as the "Edict of the 'Fuehrer'" (Fuehrerbefehl).
This system of personal government was workable only by creating and
carefully building up the most efficient permanent civil service. Public
officials were recruited partly from the army-wherefrom German civil
administration has acquired its tradition of military exactness-partly
from professionally trained jurists and administrators ("cameralists")
who, imbued with devotion to the person of the King and justified pride
in professional efficiency, served, with scanty remuneration, for the honor
of the service.
Prussian authoritarian government, rooted in ilie supreme power
of the Crown and the corresponding devotion of army and civil service,
crude and rustic as it may appear when compared to the secular splendor
of contemporary France or to the already cosmopolitan broadness of
political life in contemporary England, reveals not the slightest trace of
spiritual or political freedom; it was Spartan, hard, efficient. What wonder
that Germany, whenever in distress, has taken comfort in returning to
the governmental philosophy and military principles of the Frederician
era!
.. Karl Loewenstein: Government and Politics in Gennany in Governments of
Coatinental Europe (James T. Shotwell, ed.). Selected from pp. '90-1. Reprinted
by permission of The Macmillan Company. Copyright '940, The Macmillan Company.
HiS ADMINISTIIATION

(b) ADOLPH HITLER

Meill Kampf"
Germany was the best organized and the best administered coun-
try in the world. One could well accuse it of bureaucratic red-tape, but
this was no different in all the other States, even rather worse. But what
the other States did not possess was the wonderful solidarity of this
apparatus as well as the incorruptible, honest loyalty of its representatives.
Better to be a little pedantic, but honest and loyal, rather than en-
lightened and modern but inferior of character, and, as is frequently
shown today, ignorant and incompetent. For, if one likes to pretend that
the German administration of the pre-War time was thought bureau-
cratically genuine, but bad from the business point of view, to this one
can answer only the following; Which land of the world had a better
managed and commercially better organized administration in her State
railways than Germany? What thereby distinguished especially the body
of German officials and the apparatus of administration was its in-
dependence of the various governments whose political convictions were
not able to exercise any influence on the poSition of German State offi-
cials, the incomparable body of officials of the old Reich.

(C) KARL MANNHEIM

"The Prospects of Scientific Politics"'"
The fundamental tendency of all bureaucratic thought is to tum
all problems of politics into problems of administration. As a result, the
majority of books on politics in the history of German political science
are de facto treatises on administration. If we consider the role that
bureaucracy has always played, especially in the Prussian state, and to
what extent the intelligentsia was largely an intelligentsia drawn from the
bureaucracy, this onesidedness of the history of political science in Ger-
many becomes easily intelligible.
The attempt to hide all problems of politics under the cover of
administration may be explained by the fact that the sphere of activity
of the official exists only within the limits of laws already formulated.
Hence the genesis or the development of law falls outside the scope of
his activity. As a result of his socially limited horizon, the functionary
fails to see that behind every Jaw that has been made there lie the socially
fashioned interests and the Weltanschauungen of a specific social group.
He takes it for granted that the specific order prescribed by the concrete
.. Adolph Hitle" Mein Kampf. Adapted from pp. 386-7. Reprinted by permission
of Houghton Mimin Company. Copyright 1941, Houghton Mimin Company .
.. Karl Mannheim: "The Prospects of Scientific Politics," Ideology and Utopia.
Translated hy Louis Wirth and Edward Shils. Reprinted by permiSSion of Harcourt,
Brace and Company. Selected from pp. 105-<>6. Copyright 1936, Harcourt, Btace
and Company. Translated from Mannheim's, Ideologie und Utopie, 1929.
19) COMPARATIVE ADMINISTRATION

law is equivalent to order in general He does not underst:md that every

rationalized order is only one of many forms in which socially conflicting
non-rational forces are reconciled.
Every bureaucracy, therefore, in accord with the peculiar em-
phasis on its own position, tends to generalize its own experience and to
overlook the fact that the realm of administration and of smoothly
functioning order represents only a part of the total political reality.
Bureaucratic thought does not deny the possibility of a science of politics,
but regards it as identical with the science of administration. Thus non-
rational factors are overlooked, and when these nevertheless force them-
selves to the fore, they are treated as "routine matters of state."

Rationalization in administration has in the past done much for

Germany. England, as a weakened victor of World War II, will be
doing well if she meets the challenge of greater efficiency which con-
fronts her as effectively as Germany attacked the rationalization pro-
gram after her defeat in World War I. Hitler not only extolled the
rational perfection of the pre-Weimar civil service, but also reiterated
the theory that German rationalization was a major means of at-
taining strategic power and spiritual unity for the German people."
However, the racist strain alone does not account for German ra-
tionalization. Besides the influence of American Taylorism," the fore-
most German advocate of scientific management was Walter Rath-
eneau,'· democratic statesman and foreign minister, an intensive
German nationalist during the post-war period of the Weimar Con-
stitution, and yet the first victim of National Socialist or Nazi as-
sassination."" The incongruities between the objectives of Hitler's
rationalization and those of Ratheneau were manifold; and when
they came to a head in World War II, Nazi Germany was destroyed
by its own inner contradictions-political and administrative-and
not merely by a foreign military coalition. A reorganized Germany,
desirous of taking full advantage of its tradition of rationalization,
must harmonize its "administrative efficiency" with "popular con-
tro!." 51 The Germans would do well to recall the warning of scholars

<1 Adolph Hitler: Speech to Industry Club at Dusseldorf, 1932. Norman H.

Baynes (ed.): The Speeches of Adolph Hitler. London: Oxford University Press; '942,
vol. 1, p. 800 .
.. H. Hinnenthal: German Rationalization and the German Efficiency Commis-
sion. Berlin: Reichskuratorium tur Wirtschaftlichkeit; 192.7 .
.. Walter Ratheneau: The New Economy. Berlin: S. Fischer; 1918. See also Urwick
and Brech: The Making of Scientific Managemellt, vol. I, Thirteen Pioneers, Chapter 8.
50 Arnold Brecht: "Walter Ratheneau and the German People." Journal of Polio
tics, February 1948, vol. 10, pp. 20-48.
51 James K. Pollock: "The Role of the Public in a New Germany." American
Political Science Review, June 1945, vol. 39, pp. 464-73.
170
like Max Weber and Karl Mannheim." that there is. after :In. some
relationship between "rationalization" and "rationality"; and that, if
the German community is to remain intact, it must possess a sub-
stantive rationality of purpose and policy as well as a functional ra-
tionalization of administrative technique. And this is a lesson that
merits the attention not only of Germany but of the entire world.

4. RUSSIA'S ATTEMPT TO COMBINE CAPITALIST COMPETENCE

WITH COMMUNIST CREDO

The principal paradox in the contemporary contest between com-

munism and capitalism is the fact that Soviet Russia, which is the
chief exponent of communism, has adopted for its model the major
managerial theories of the United States, the strongest advocate of
capitalism. This anomalous admiration for the managerial techniques
of the United States along with bitter criticism of its institutions and
leaders is characteristic of the Soviets. This duality is seen in Russia's
two dictators since the communist revolution: (a) Vladimir l1yich
Ulyanov. better known as Nikolai Lenin, son of a school administra-
tor, professional revolutionary. and supreme Communist Party man-
ager, who always remained, however, an avid student of American
management, particularly of the industrial management movement;
and (b) Yosip Visarionovitch Dzhugashzili, later known as Joseph
Stalin, who also seemed to be strangely at horne in many of the de-
tails of American management.

(a) NIKOLAI LENIN

"The Urgent Problems of the Soviet Rule""
We are now confronted by the problem which is the most urgent
and which characterizes the present period; to organize the management
of Russia. We, the Bolshevik party, have convinced Russia. We have won
Russia from the rich for the poor, from the exploiters for the toilers. It
is now up to us to manage Russia. For the first time in the history of the
work the Socialist party has succeeded in completing, essentially, the task
of winning power and suppressing the exploiters, and in coming close
to the problem of management. We must prove worthy of this. We must
not fail to see that besides the ability to convince and win in civil war,
successful management depends on the ability fOT practical organization .
.Were we to attempt now to continue the expropriation of capital with the
.. See Chapter 3.
.. NilZol3i Lenin: "The Urgent Problems of the Soviet Rule." Pravda, April ~ll,
1une 1919, vol. 4, selected .from
1918. Trnnslated in Bulletin of the Taylor Society,
pp. 3$-7 . Reprinted by petmission.
171 COMPARATIVE ADMtNISTIIATtON

same intensity as heretofore, we would surely be defeated; for our work

of the organization of proletarian accounting and control has not kept
pace with the work of the direct "expropriation of the expropriators." If
we wm now turn all our efforts to the work of the organization of ac-
ccunting and control we shall be able to solve this problem, we shall
overcome our shortcomings and shall win our "campaign" against capital.
We should try out every scientific and progressive suggestion of
the Taylor System. To learn how to work-this problem the SoViet
authority should present to the people in all its comprehensiveness. The
last word of capitalism in this respect-the Taylor System-as well as
all progressive measures of capitalism, combined the relined cruelty of
bourgeois exploitation and a number of most valuable scientific atill.in-
ments in eliminating superfluous and useless motions, in determining the
most correct methods of work, the best systems of accounting and con-
trol, etc. The Soviet Republic must adopt valuable and scientific technical
advance in this field. The possibility of socialism will be determined by
our success in combining the Soviet rule and the Soviet organization
of management with the latest progressive measures of capitalism. We
must introduce in Russia the study and the teaching of the new TaYlor
System and its systematic trial and adaptation.

(b) IOSEPH STALIN

"Foundations of Leninism" ..
l.eninism is Jj w.hooJ w.bf'J"t' t.he st»ily of the thenry .aDD pr1If'tice
of Leninism produces a special type of Party and State official, a Spetial
kind of style in public work. What are the characteristics of this stYle?
what its peculiarities?
There are two: a. revolutionary zeal, inspired by the RUSSian
spirit; and b. businesslike practicality, inspired by the American spirit.
The combination of these two in Party and State work constitute what
we call "style" in our activities.
Revolutionary zeal is the antidote to laziness, routinism, Con-
servatism, apathy of thought, slavish adherence to tradition and to the
beliefs of our forefathers. Revolutionary zeal is a life.giving force which
stimulates thought, spurs on to action, thtows the outworn into the
limbo of forgotten things, and opens the portals of the future. Without
such zeal, there can be no advance. But it has a drawback, seeing that in
practice it tends to vent itself in revolutionary talk unless it is intimately
combined with level-headedness and business-like action imbued With
the American spirit: There is no lack of examples of the kind of de-
generation referred to above. Who has not had experience of the f<lta!
disease of "revolutionary" planning, of "revolutionary" projects which
.. Joseph Stalin: "Foundations of Leninism." Lecture delivered at Sverdloff IJni-
versity, April '9'4. Eden and Cedar Paul (trans.): Leninism, selected from pp.'n-7.
Reprinted by permission of C. Allen & Unwin. Copyright, '918, C. Allen & UnWin.
112
are concocted in the blind belief that a decree can change everything, can
bring order out of chaos? No one has ridiculed this unwholesome faith in
paper decrees and plans more effectively than Lenin.
Lenin was in the habit of countering revolutionary phrase-
mongering by imposing common, everyday tasks, thereby emphasising
the fact that revolutionary fantasy is opposed to the whole spirit and
practice of Leninism. We read in [Lenin's) The Creat Initiative: "Fewer
high.falutin phrases, and more simple, everyday deeds. . . . Less political
chatter, and more attention to the plain but living facts of communist
construction."
The best antidote to revolutionary fantasy is practical work im·
bued with the American spirit. Such business·like, practical endeavour is
an unquenchable force, one which recognises no obstacles, one which,
by sheer commonsense, thrusts aside everything which might impede
progress, one which invariably carries a thing once embarked upon to
completion (even though the affair may seem a puny one), one without
which any genuine work of construction is impossible. But the practical,
businesslike American spirit is liable to degenerate into narrow·minded,
unprincipled commercialism if it be not allied with revolutionary zeal.
Who does not know of cases where narrow·minded and unprincipled
commercialism has led a so-called bolshevik into devious ways inimical
to the revolutionary cause? No one has ridiculed this disease of commer·
cialism more bitingly than has Lenin. He stigmatises it as "narrow prac·
ticalism," as "brainless commercialism." He was wont to contrast it with
living revolutionary work; he would emphasise the need for revolutionary
vision in all the domains of our everyday work; and would lay especial
stress upon the point that commercialism is as opposed to the true spirit
of Leninism as is revolutionary fantasy .
.A combination of revolutionary zeal with the practical spirit can·
stitutes the essence. of Leninism as manifested in Party and in public
work.

Soviet admiration of American technological management is com-

bined with intense devotion to the Soviet ideology by all levels of
leadership and laymen in Russia. Molotov, also a keen student of
managerial affairs, put the idea into special Soviet terminology when
he advocated in 1934 "a proletarian, industrial, technical intelligent-
sia"; and in 1935, Stalin made the training of cadres of "industrial
and technical intelligentsia" a major project of the Soviet Second Five
Year Plan." The Russian scientific management movement, as Lenin
indicated, was identified with Taylor's name even before 1920. Be-
ginning in the 1920'S, a Central Council of Scientific Organization

"" Joseph Stalin: ''The Tam of the Second Five Year Plan." Report to the Seven·
teenth Party Congress, '9'14. Socialism Victorious. New York: Internatiorutl Publishers;
p. 408. See Chapttt '4.
173 COMf'AUTIYI ADMINlSTUnoN

of Labor, Production, and Administration was established,.. and the

Soviets also employed German and American engineers in consid-
erable numbers. But during the 1930's and 1940'S a tendency pre-
vailed to popularize the Soviet campaign for greater and more
efficient production by applying to the movement not the names of
outstanding managers like Taylor but rather those of Russian workers
or "technicians" like Stakhanov or Matrosov.61
Whether Russian leaders fully comprehended the techniques of
modem administration and will remain adept in applying the pre-
cepts of efficiency is a question which may not be answered for some
time. Some of the most serious American critics of the Soviet leader-
ship expressed, during the crisis of World War II, great admiration
for the Russian leaders as "capable administrators."" Even before
World War II brought an element of allied admiration into Ameri-
can-Soviet relations, American business observers were not uni-
versally critical of Soviet management.'· Other detached observers
who have worked with the Russians have seen much evidence in war
and peace of effective administrative practices-within the confines
of higher directives, to be sure, but not as completely hamstrung by
a centralized bureaucracy or party mechanism as is commonly be-
lieved. After one of the more objective and accurate studies available
on the subject, Professor Julian Towster, of the University of Chi-
cago, concluded in 1948 that "Soviet managerial personnel consists
overwhelmingly at energetic administrators." eD

5. LATIN-AMERICAN ADMINISTRATION IN TRANSITION

The Latin-American republics are borrowing their newer ad-

ministrative patterns from the United States and Europe, but they
are grafting these upon vestiges of their own cultural past. Adminis-
trative developments in Central and South America vary, of course,
from country to country, but interesting type-studies and broad gen-
eralizations are available:
(a) The traditional Latin-American administrative trait of per-
sonal dependence upon a political chief was described in 1945 by
Professor William Ebenstein of Princeton University. Although in-

58 George Filipetti: Industrial Management in Transition. Chicago: Richard D.

Irwin, Inc.; 1946, p. 188.
01 USSR Information Bulletin. February 11. 1948, p. 79.
M Lite, March 29. 194~, vol. 13. p. 38.
50 Arthur Goodfriend: "Commumsm Runs a Store." Nation's Business. July '937.
vol. '5, p. ,67. et seq.
eD Julian Towster: Political Power in the USSR, '917-1947. New York: Oxford
University Press, '948. p. 397.
174
terested in comparative European politics. Professor Ebenstein has
devoted himself to firsthand observation of Mexican admitlistration.
(b) An unusually strong development of public administration
in a country like Brazil was revealed in 1944 by the studies of Profes-
sor Henry Reining. Also a former Princeton political scientist, Pro-
fessor Reining was at one time Director of the National Institute
of Public Affairs, a leading American public service training agency_
He joined the staff of the University of Southern California after his
war-time assignment to Brazil.
These readings present the range of Latin-American administra-
tive experience rather than any particular aspects.

ta) WILLIAM E'BENSTEIN

"Public Administration in Mexico" 11
In preconquest Mexico the Aztec king headed public administra·
tion, and he was assisted by the nobility, the clergy, and the military
class; it is obvious that the subsequent Spanish theory and practice of
government, before and after Mexican independence, did not constitute
a marked deviation from the preceding Mexican (Indian) pattern. This
situation is in contrast with that in Englisb-speaking North America,
where the gulf between tbe Indians and the English settlers with their
religious and political experience of self-rule was so wide as to be prac-
tically unbridgeable. In some parts of Mexico, where Spanish is neither
spoken not understood and where the social and political institutions of
preconquest days are wen preserved, the weight of tradition is particularly
evident. In such areas personal loyalty to the jefe {chief] of the local group
or tribe still constitutes the main administrative vehicle through which
political decisions and measures of a central or regional character are
transmitted. The more impersonal, standardized procedures and agencies
of modern public administration are absent in such communities.
The Mexican civil service legislation distinguishes between
"workers of confidence" (traba;adores de coniianza) and "ordinary work-
ers" in public employment. Nowhere is there a clear definition of the
public "workers of confidence," and the definition that all those em-
ployees whose appointment has to be approved by presidential decree
are "workers of confidence" is purely formal. In general, what is called
the administrative class in other countries makes up the "workers of con-
ndence" in the Mexican civil service. It is interesting that while we
think of the highest administrative class in this country or in England in
terms of the policy-framing authority that it possesses, in Mexico the
element of personal relationship between ministerial and departmental
., William Ebenstcin: "Public Administration in Mexico." Public Administration
Review. Spring 1945. vol. s. adapted from pp. 103. 107-08, HO. Reprinted by permis-
SIOn.
175 COMPAItATIYE ADMINISTRATION

heads and their immediate suoordinatl:s is the decisive criterion in legally

defining this top group in the bureaucracy. This is but one of the many
ways in which the personal nature of Mexican, as indeed most Latin
American, government and administration expresses itself. It reflects sur-
viving elements of the old feudal Spanish order in which personal trust
and confidence were the determining factor in governmental relation-
ships.
Political instability throughout the history of Mexico since the
achievement of independence has also resulted in the evil of militarism
in government and administration. Army men have considered high posts
of a political, financial, or diplomatic character as a domain of their own.
Only if Mexico continues on the road of stability will the prestige of the
generals and colonels decline.

(b) HENRY REININe

Department of Public Service of Brazil"

The high prestige which public administration enjoys in Brazil

is quite striking. There is none of the apologetic, hat-in-hand attitude
which so often characterizes U. S. A. administrators, especially in the
field of personnel management. In Brazil, personnel administration,
budgeting, organization and management analysis, and certain material
controls are consolidated under the DASP [Departamento Administrativo
do Servico Publico].
Closely akin is the missionary zeal with which almost all of the
DASP-ians are possessed. To them public administration is not just a job
but a mission, in fact, a crusade which will deliver the land from the ig-
norant and the inefficient. They practice their science, they preach it,
they teach it; they even steal for it space in official reports. Again related
is the persuasive attitude of DASP officials toward the ministries and the
states; witness the establishment of the DA's and the interdepartmental
councils. Not for nothing is the term "orientation," often used in divi-
sion and section titles in the DASP.
At the same time FiscaJizacao [central inspection] is an equally
popular designation and denotes the very real power which the DASP
wields. The DASP is an excellent example of the integrated system of
control. Single-headed with the ancillary activities united under its
charge, and implemented by the almost universal requirement of approval
of administrative actions by the President of the Republic and by the
concomitant obligation that all actions, even the transfer of a charwoman
(servente), be published in the Diario Official or a Ministry's bulletin,
the DASP really functions as the right hand of the President, certainly
more so than our own Executive Office of the President. Such control

.. Henry Reining: "Department of Public Service of Brazil. Report on the Mission

10 DASP." April 29, 19#. adapted from. pp. 17,45-6·
176
can of course be murderously restrictive. But thus fur the DASP seems to
have been more life-giving than -taking, more interested in making con-
verts to the cause of public administration than in gaining power for its
own sake.

One should not suppose that Brazil is a totally systematized ad-

ministrative state or that Mexico is completely jefe-ridden. Each of
these nations, and indeed most Latin American countries, share some-
thing of both elements. Besides, intermediate features of tested
vintage in South America appear which may be more conducive to
the development of improved standards of public administration
than to the persistence of personal dictatorship by political man-
agers. For example, nationalization of resources or enterprises has an
interesting history in some Latin-American countries, and this condi-
tion seems to have been paralleled, if not partly caused, by adminis-
trative rationalization. Even in Mexico where personal influence pre-
vails, as described by Ebenstein, natural resources and some national
enterprises have been managed since the 1930'S under public owner-
ship and control, with some administrative advances. In countries
farther afield, such as Chile,"" similar tendencies are apparent.
Perhaps the outstanding Latin-American example of the public
administration of productive enterprise will be found in Uruguay.
Here, beginning with the administration of President Jose Batlle in
1903, there has been a steady emphasis upon the acquisition and
management of pubJicly owned and publicly operated corporations
in the utility field, in banking, and also in the meat industry, which
is the staple product of the country. These enterprises have been
rendering improved services, frequently at lower costs, and some-
times at a profit." Whether this factor is as much testimony to "state
management" as to the "managerial state," only closer study can
determine. In the course of the evolution of its political economy,
Uruguay passed through an experiment with a collegiate form of
executive, known as the National Council of Administration. The
Council was inspired by BatlIe's observation of the exemplary Swiss
form of the plural executive. It was especially designed to prevent
the recurrence of revolutions which Batlle felt had their chief roots
in the personal powers inherent in the Latin-American presidency,
the jefe tradition." 'The Uruguayan Council was abolished in 1938;
.. P. T. Ellsworth: Chile, An Economy in Transition. New York: The Macmillan
Company; 1945. See also William Ebenstein: "Public Administration in Mexico,"
p.l1l.
.. Simon C. Hanson: Utopia in Uruguay, Chapters in the Economic History of
Uruguay. New York: Oxford UniverSity Press; 1938, p. vi .
.. Percy A. Martin: "The Career of Jose Batlle. Ordonez." Hispanic American His·
torical Review, November '930, vol. 10, pp. 413-28.
177 COMPARATIVE ADMINISTRATION

but these oscillations in administrative machinery reflected the Latin-

American urge to nnd more stable forms of executive administration,
and were not only an expression of the revolutionary strain as is com-
monly supposed." Whether the particular constitutional changes
were wise or not, the continuing search for more effective executive
devices has helped make it possible for Uruguay to achieve the repu-
tation as "a chief laboratory for social experimentation in the Ameri-
cas and a focal point of world interest." .,

6. INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENT AND SUPER-NATIONAL

ADMINISTRATION

The World War II transition from the League of Nations to

the United Nations offered an excellent opportunity to the student
of administration to weigh the many lessons and studies available in
international organization and administration. An insight into the
major characteristics and principal problems of international gov-
ernment is offered by the work of:
(a) Donald C. Stone, whose career as an American administra-
tor of national and international affairs has already been presented.
His views concerning the transplantability of administrative knowl-
edge to the international field are presented below.
(b) Egon F. Ranshofen-Wertheimer, a German soldier of World
War I, a journalist who believed in the future of international gov-
ernment, and later an official of the League of Nations Secretariat
for ten years. Anticipating the need for selecting the soundest prin-
ciples of international organization, the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace employed Ranshofen·Wertheimer soon after
America's entrance into World War II as a special consultant and
research associate to analyze the League of Nations experience.

(a) DONALD c. STONE

"An Application of Scientific Management Principles to Interna-
tional Administration""
When we consider the problem of governments collaborating
through international organizations, we tend to think only in terms of
foreign policy and of issues involving conRict among countries. This is,
.. Russel H. FitzgJbbon (ed.): "Latin America Looks to the Future." American
PoJitical Science Review, June '945, vol. 39, pp. 48'-547 .
•, Hanson: Utopia in Uruguay, p. v.
.. Donald C. Stone: "An Application of Scientific Management Principles to Inter·
national Administration." American Political Science Review, October '948, volume 4%,
selected from pp. 9';-'7. Reprinted by permission.
178
of course, natural since these are the questions uppermost in tne news.
But there is another side to international collaboration. If international
organizations are to be sua:essful in dealing with world problems, the
policy organs through which negotiations are conducted and tne sec-
retariats which handle the administrative work must be properly organ-
ized and administered. Successful international administration depends
upon efficient organization and management, much like any govern-
mental or private endeavor depends upon them.
The organs of negotiation need special services and other adtnin-
istrative arrangements that are organized under what we know as iJlter-
national secretariats. Unless the secretariat of an international agency is
effectively organized and managed, the work of the policy and negotiating
organs is impaired, and the agency will tend to remain static and unpro-
ductive. Conversely, a dynamic secretariat can go far in helping the
representative bodies to reach agreement and to assure national im·
plementation. Within the secretariats of international organizations, we
encounter all the problems of administrative management found in any
national organization, and some others in addition.
Those of us who have worked in the field of administration know
that the principles of scientific management are generic in character. '!hat
is, they are applicable wherever organized activities are carried on. I }lave
found no support for the contention that international administration is
fundamentally different in nature from any other kind of administration.
It is always necessary, of course, in transferring administrative experience
from smaller to larger enterprises, from one level of government to an-
other, or hom one cultural environment to another, to interpret suc'n
experience in the light of different conditions. International administra-
tors need more flexibility-more ability to adjust-than do administr3tors
at any other level. They must attempt a synthesis of the best administra-
tive practices and management experience from all world cultures. They
must be aware of the administrative contribution that each country can
make, and of the fact that nations must recognize something familiar in
the structure, staff, and methods of an international organization in order
to feel a sense of participation in it.

(b) EGON F. RANSHOFEN-WERTHEIMER

The International Secretariat"
From a technical viewpoint, international administration uses
tne same media for the dispatch of its business as national adminiStra-
tion in the modern sense of the term, meaning those rational processes
of organization that have evolved since centralized government-and pro-

"Egon F. Ranshofen·WeItheimu: The International Set:retarillt. Selected from

pp. 7-10. Reprinted by pennission of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Copyright, '94;, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
fessional ciVIl service emerged in the eighteenth centuIy. Here any
analogies we might draw end, however. International and national ad-
ministration stand in a different relation to their policy-shaping organs.
National administration is part of the executive branch of government
and is under permanent control of the legislative branch of governmtnt.
The international Secretariat on the other hand is the only permanent
element in international organization. Its policy.shaping organs are not
legislatures but diplomatic bodies. There is nothing comparable to the
executive branch, to a cabinet or ministers executing the policies of an
electorate or a congress as in the case of the American representative sys·
tem of government, or of the parliament as under the parliamentary
regime. The head of the international administration is not comparablC! to
a cabinet minister, and failure to recognize this essential difference in
national and international administration must lead, and has frequently
led, to erroneous conclusions and unjustified criticism regarding the
working of the international Secretariat
Practically eveIything that has been said regarding the similarity
and difference between national public administration and international
public administration applies also to the human element. There are qllali.
ties and qualifications peculiar to the civil servant which both must
possess. A poor national official is in all likelihood also a poor inter·
national administrator. But a good national official will not necessarily
make a good international civil servant. The latter must possess nearly
all the qualifications needed for the discharge of important public work
in a national administration: the same combination of initiative and
meticuloome5s, the same devotion to aut]' .'lea accuracy of mim1, the
same synthesis of personal conviction and the faculty of putting il}di.
vidual views aside in order to execute orders. These qualities he must
possess to a greater degree than the national official, for his initiative,
steadiness, devotion to duty, and personal convictions will be tested more
severely than in a similar capacity under a national administration. While
the national official of comparative rank must have the raTe quality of
being able to think, and often. to act, contrary to all his political Qnd
social instincts, the international administrator must frequently think and
act contrary to his national instincts-the most severe test to which a
civilized person of the twentieth-century world can be subjected.

Despite the eclipse of the League of Nations, the shock of W ()rld

War II and its aftermath pointed to the necessity, if not the in·
evitability, of a supra·national organization. Was this organization
to be a ~ulti-lateral intemationalleague, an international federation
of the United Nations type, or a world government with powers
analogous to the national state? Whatever the answer, the essen~ of
this supra.national government, as both Stone and Wertheimer
pointed out, would not only be the strength of the organizational
180
structure but the determination of the international public service
to rise above the level of national representation. H. B. Butler, a
British administrator in the International Labor Office, recognized
this need as early as 1932..'° Similarly, C. Wilfred Jenks asserted dur-
ing World 'Yar II that the first need of the United Nations was "a
Chief Executiye who is the recognized spokesman of the World
community in the mind of the citizens in every land," and the key
problem was "that of building up an adequate administrative class
to fill the posts which involve influence upon policy." n Other na-
tional and international officials have played on the same theme: the
necessity not only of a sense of world citizenship but also of a re-
sponsible international management and world civil service operating
at the supra-uational level.72
The United Nations Charter itself saw fit to strengthen the
League of Nations Covenant in this regard by enacting as its famous
Article 100 the wording of the League of Nations' oath administered
to the Secretary-General. Article 100 provides: "In the performance
of their duties the Secretary-General and the staff shall not seek or
receive instructions from any government or from any other au-
thority external to the Organization. They shall refrain from any ac-
tion which might reflect on their position as international officials
responsible only to the Organization. Each Member of the United
Nations undertakes to respect the exclusively international character
of the responsibilities of the Secretary-General and the staff and not
to seek to influence them in the discharge of their responsibilities."
Considering international administration proper, the danger exists
of an adherence to a mixed national pattern rather than a genuine
international one. For example, experts in American administrative
management played a large role in the establishment of both the Of-
ganization and procedures of the United Nations Secretariat. Superior
as American administrative practice may appear to most American
and even many foreign observers, this has its dangers. American terms
like "administrative management," "position-classification," or
"budget allocation," do not always translate well into Hindustani,
Russian, Arabic. Americans have to learn to tread lightly in imposing

10 H. B. Butler: "Some Problems of an International Civil Service." Public A<f.

ministration, October 1931, vol. 10, p. 376-387.
n C. Wilfred Jenks: "Some Problems of an Internat,ional Civil Service." Public
Administration Review, Spring '943, vol. 3, p. 95.
72 Henry A. Wallace: "America', Part in World Reconstruction." Public Adminis-
tration Review, Winter 1943, vol. 3, pp. 1-6. Chester Pnrvis: The International A<f.
ministration ot an International Secretariat. London: Royal Institute of International
Affairs; 194;. Adrian Pelt: "Peculiar Characteristics of an International Organization.
Public Administration Review, Spring 1946, vol. 6, pp. 108-14.
181 COM'AlATIYI ADMINISTItA1'ION

their own administrative concepts on the management of interna-

tional affairs. The Anglo-American idea of executive responsibility
for administrative participation in policy-making is new to some of
the members of the United Nations. Overemphasis on selected na-
tional administrative patterns has already caused considerable com-
ment and some conflict in United Nations affairs.'lI The most effec-
tive administrative techniques will no doubt be universally adopted
one day, but the process cannot be imposed too suddenly by any
single large nation.
If the mission of the United Nations can be properly defined un-
der the Charter to cover those world problems beyond the unfinished
peace treaties of World War II (the original expectation of the or-
ganization), an abundant international experience and a respectable
body of international organization exists to support the hope that a
distinctive system of world government and an efficient system of
supra-national administration can be successfully established. Al-
though the saying is trite, the specialist in administration cannot
help but conclude, with reference to the possibility of managing
world peace: "Where there's a will, there's a way."

SUMMAR.Y

Whether or not it participates in world government or shares in-

ternational administrative experience, each nation will continue to
shape its own administrative destiny. National leaders may therefore
wish to seek lessons in the administrative experience of the foreign
countries analyzed here. For example, the British recognition of ad-
ministrative experts in relation to so-<:alled political amateurs may
well be a subject for more serious inquiry by Americans who feel that
the United States needs to assign a larger role to expertise in Ameri-
can affairs." Along with such a recognized status, a greater measure
of responsibility on the part of managers and administrators for the
broad results of their management as wen as the consequences of
their individual administrative acts, may be needed in America. Con-
sequently, a skilled public service may not be enough, just as the no-
tion of a non-partisan civil service did not prove broad enough.
Perhaps we will be called upon, like the British, ta find a formula for
a dynamic, yet restrained, expert management, private as well as pub-

.. Rowland Egger: "Road to Ceth_e." Public Administration Review, Winter

1946, vol. 6, pp. 71-78 .
•• A. Lawrence Lowell; "Expert Administraton in Popular Government." Ameri·
can Political Science Review, Februaty 1913, vol. 7. p. 45--6.·
182
lie, which will retain its non-partisan status without divorcing itself
from the social consequences of impartiality. American ~gersand
administrators who have carefully followed the study of foreign ad-
ministrative experience realize that they may not be able to con-
tinue to claim exemption from the responsibility of directing their
society toward sound objectives. If anything appears in foreign ad-
ministrative experience which can help us achieve this responsible
goal, we must give more heed to comparative administrative affairs.
A counter-tendency exists in America not to heed the managerial
experience of foreign countries. Leonard D. White has reported that
"trends in American administration do not seem to have been greatly
influenced by foreign experience." TO This tendency has probably been
a result of the sentiment that American administration has achieved
so large a combination of both democratic or popular government
and technologic or expert administration. Unfortunately not only
our democrats, but also our technocrats, close their eyes to foreign
managerial and administrative experience. Howard Scott, the leader
of the technocrats, asserted that "European culture and traditions
have nothing of worthwhile importance to offer . . . in solving the
operational problems facing America today." 10 Nevertheless, Wilson
insisted, in urging Americans to study the Prussian experience: "We
should not like to have had Prussia's history for the sake of having
Prussia's administrative skill; and Prussia's particular system of ad-
ministration would quite suffocate us. It is better to be untrained and
free than to be servile and systematic. Still there is no denying that
it would be better yet to be both free in spirit and proficient in prac-
tice . . . If I see a murderous fellow sharpening a knife cleverly, I
can borrow his way of sharpening the knife without borrowing his
probable intention to commit murder with it; and so, if I see a mon-
archist dyed-in-the-wool managing a public bureau well, I can learn
his business methods without changing one of my republican
spots." 11 Wilson's formula that "the cosmopolitan what-to-do must
always be commanded by the American how-to-do-it" was apparently
such good advice that two generations later Stalin and Lenin, re-
versing the flow of administrative experience, adapted it as their
slogan for Soviet Russia.
Following the stimulus given by Wilson and Taylor to manage-
ment, American administration began to assume its' maturity, and
the lessons of comparative administration began to flow from the

T. Leonard D. White: "Public Administration." Recent Social Trends in the

Urntcd St.tes. New York: McCraw·HiII Book Company, Inc.; 1933. p. 1'9':&.
7. Scott: Introdnction to Technocracy, pp. 43-44.
"Wilson: "Tbe Study of Administration," pp. '07. nO.
183 eoMPAlAnn ADMINISTUTION

United States to other countries. However, most of the foreign

adaptation of American experience consisted of the techniques of
industrial management, particularly the precepts of scientific man-
agement. Taylorism had swept Europe by the end of World War I.
Indeed, the European trend seemed to run so far ahead that after
World War I a specialist of the League of Nations in economic af-
fairs reported that "it would be easy to exaggerate" the progress of
stabilization and rationalization in the United States. T' In addition
to the deep interest demonstrated in scientific management in Soviet
Russia, and the intense program of industrial rationalization prac-
ticed in Germany, other European countries seriously devoted them-
selves to scientific management.T• Czechoslovakia had results from
the movement in terms of enhanced industrial exports and highly
increased efficiency in governmental administration. Similarly, the
Polish government was one of the first to invite American efficiency
engineers to make a comprehensive survey of its government-owned
plants."
From the standpoint of evolving a scientific and useful body of
administrative knowledge, considerable value is ~erived from careful
comparative study." It would be scientifically unwise and perhaps
nationally unstrategic for Americans to become sanguine and satis-
fied in the superiority of their system of administration and man-
agement. Harrington Emerson, one of the founders of scientific
management, complained as early as 1909: "The trouble with the
American is that as yet he is provincial, skeptical as to the value of
anything outside his own limited experience." Emerson seriously
recommended "ascribing to the English the efficiency of wise an-
ticipation and continuous persistence, to the French the efficiency
due to their innovations of supreme value and merit, to the Germans
the efficiency due to their perfections of organization, discipline, and
scientific minuteness, to the Japanese the efficiency due to open-
mindedness and marvelous power of assimilation, to the Americans
the efficiency due to individuality." ..
Nor do the countries analyzed in this chapter possess a monopoly
of useful ideas in the realm of administration. Wellsprings of ad-
ministrative genius are hidden elsewhere. One need name only

T8 David Houston: Memorandum on Rationalization in the United States. Geneva:

Lea""e of Nations; 19.6, p. 4.
-~See also L. Urwick.: The Meaning of Rationalization. London: Nisbet & Co.;
1929. Paul Devinat: Scientific Management in Europe.
.. Sian Spacek: "Experience in Interuatior.al Cooperation." Bulletin of the Taylor
Society. February 19'7. vol. 1>, pp. 316-.8 .
•, Robert A. Dahl: "The Science of Public Administration: Three Problems."
Public Administration Review. Winter '947. vol. 7,1" • L
"Hanington Emer8Oll: ElIiciency as a Basis tOl Uper"lion and Wages, pp. 47-48.
184 ADMINISTaATION

Sweden, Switzerland, and New Zealand," to mention three coun-

tries with a population no greater than the city of New York, which
relIect a type of managerial experience and administrative experimen-
tation worthy of more extensive study, and possibly emulation, by
larger nations .
.. Nils Herlitz: Sweden: A Modem Democracy on Ancient Foundations. Min·
neapolis: The University of Minnesota Press; 1939. Carl J. Friedrich and Taylor Cole:
Responsible Bureaucracy: A Study in the Swiss Civil Service. Cambridge: Harvard Uni·
versity Press; 1932. Leicester Webb: Government in New Zealand. Wellington: De·
partment of Internal Affairs; 1940. Leslie Lipson: The Politics of Equality. Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press; 1948.
 CHAPTER SEVEN

ADMINISTRATION AND BUREAUCRACY

INHERENT in any system of administration are elements of inflexi-

bility, impersonality, and unwieldiness. But these are selected and
stereotyped aspects of the concept of bureaucracy. The term has other
connotations, more constructive and more scientific as we shall see.
Bureaucracy, as both a problem and a process, is central to ad-
ministration. So far, we have treated administration as a recognized
art or a special discipline, as though it were a separable slice of human
existence. Administration is practiced, however, in a -broad social
setting in which human beings, including both the administrators
and the administered, are primarily interested in enjoying a satisfying
personal existence. Ordinarily, people have a tendency to resist ad-
ministrative limitations and regulations, and sometimes they even ob-
ject to guidance and aid. Unjustified though this reaction may be, it is
widespread and is the basis for the continuous attack against bureauc-
racy.
Bureaucracy will be examined in this chapter under the following
headings:
1. The widespread criticism of bureaucracy
2. Origin and extent of bureaucracy
3. Causes and cures of bureaucracy
4. Differences between government bureaucracy and business
bureaucracy.
5. Similarities between business bureaucracy and government
bureaucracy.
6. Relationship between bureaucracy and liberty
185
186
7. Types of bureaucrats
8. Social role of bureaucracy

I. THE WIDESPREAD CRITICISM OF BUREAUCRACY

For a long time man has scoffed at bureaucracy. Among the classic
criticisms of bureaucracy produced during the nineteenth century
are: (a) Honore de Balzac's satire, Bureaucracy, written in 1842, and
(b) Charles Dickens' novel of social protest, Little Dorrit, written
in 1857.
(a) HONORE PE BALZAC
Bureaucracy: or A Civil Service Reformer 1
Though Napoleon, by subordinating all things and all men to his
will, retarded for a time the influence of bureaucracy (that ponderous cur-
tain hung between the service to be done and the man who orders it), it
was pernlanently organized under the constitutional government, which
was, inevitably, the friend of all mediocrities, the lover of authentic docu-
ments and accounts, and as meddlesome as an old tradeswoman. Delighted
to see the various ministers constantly st:uggling against the four hundred
petty minds of the Elected of the Chamber, with their ten OI a dozen
ambitious and dishonest leaders, the Civil Service officials hastened to
make themselves essential to the warfare by adding their quota of assist-
ance under the form of written action; they created a power of inertia and
named it "Report."
After 1818 everything was discussed, compared, and weighed,
either in speech or writing; public business took a literary form. France
went to ruin in spite of this array of documents; dissertations stood in
place of action; a million of reports were written every year; bureaucracy
was enthroned I Records, statistics, documents, failing which France would
have been ruined, circumlocution, without which there could be no
advance, increased, multiplied, and grew majestic.

(b) C:HARLES DICKENS

Little Dorrit 2
The Circumlocution Office was (as everybody knows without
being told) the most important Department under Government. No pub-
lic business of any kind could possibly be done at any time, without the
acquiescence of the Ciu:umlocution Office. Its finger was in the largest
I Honore de Balzac: Bureaucracy: or A Civil Service Reformer. Boston: Roberts
Brothers; 18<}0. selected from Chapter 1. Translated by Katherine Prescott Wormeley.
• Charles Dickens: Little Dorrit. Selected from Chapter 10.
187 ADMtHISTIATION AND auauuclACY

publiC pie, and in the smallest public tart. It was equally impossible to do
the plainest right and to undo the plainest wrong, without the express
authority of the Circumlocution Office. If another Gunpowder Plot had
been discovered half an hour before the lighting of the match, nobody
would have been justified in saving the Parliament uatH there had been
half a score of boards, half a bushel of minutes, several sacks of official
memoranda, and a family-vault full of ungrammatical correspondence, on
the part of the Circumlocution Office.
Whatever was required to be done, the Circumlocution Office
was beforehand with all the public departments in the art of perceiving-
"HOW NOT TO DO IT." The Circumlocution Office was down upon
any m-advised public servant who was going to do it, or who appeared to
be by any surprising accident in remote danger of doing it, with a minute,
and a memorandum, and a letter of instructions, that extinguished him.
It was this spirit of national efficiency in the Circumlocution Office that
had gradually led to its having something to do with everything. Mechani-
cians, natural philosophers, soldiers, petitioners, memorialists, people with
grievances, people who wanted to redress grievances, jobbing people,
jobbed people, people who couldn't get rewarded for merit, and people
who couldn't get punished for demerit, were all indiscriminately tucked
up under the foolscap paper of the.~~:.umlocution Office.
There have been other telling attacks on bureaucracy: coming
from sources which are themselves regarded as highly bureaucratic.
Thus, vom Stein, who helped fashion the modern Prussian state in the
early 1800's, complained of the "paid, book-learned, disinterested,
property-less bureaucrats," who were "a ruin of our dear Father-
land," and who "in rain or shine . . . write in quiet corners in their
department, within specially-locked doors." • One might expect since
the popular attack on bureaucracy is almost exclusively directed
against government, that socialists would hesitate to criticize bureauc-
racy. On the contrary, Joseph Stalin, regarded as the master bu-
reaucrat of the Communist Party and of the socialist super-state of
Soviet Russia, complained in 1930: "The danger is represented not
only and not so much by the old bureaucrats derelict in Our institu-
tions, as particularly by the new bureaucrats, the Soviet bureaucrats,
amongst whom 'Communist' bureaucrats play far from an insig-
nificant role. I have in mind those 'Communists' who try to replace
the creative initiative and independent activity of the millions of the
working class and peasantry by office instructions and 'decrees,' in
the virtue of which they believe as a fetish. The task is to smash
• See, for example, the satirical play by George Courteline: Messieurs Les RoncJs.du·
Cuir (1893). Also, Herbert Spencer's essay on "Overlegislation." Essays: Scientific,
Political, and Speculative. New York: D. Appleton Company; 11191, vol. 3, p. 229
et seq .
• See Heinrich "om und zum Stein: Essay on Administrative Reform, 1806.
188
bureaucracy in our institutions and organizations, to liquidate bu-
reaucratic 'habits' and 'customs.' " •
Disparagement of bureaucracy and its identificatiou with govern-
mental inefficiency is also a typical pattern of thought in the United
States. Although we find increasing opinion to the contrary: sh11 an
elementary precept of a large segment of American opinion is that
"the handicaps in government management are so great that only a
limited degree of excellence is possible of attainment." 7 Indeed, this
is a mild statement of the more influential business opinion in the
United States. In 1940, an "American Primer" coutaining the fonow-
ing precept of the president of one of the country's largest manu-
facturing concerns was advertised in the Saturday Evening Post:
"Remember that government belongs to the people, is inherently in-
efficient, and that its activities should be limited to those which gov-
ernment alone can perform." • Some critics may regard these words
lightly, but they reveal the view that has been long entertained by a
preponderant majority of influential American business leaders.·
Again, we find exceptions. Henry S. Dennison, an American business-
man, explained as early as 1924: "The consideration given by citizens
as to the management of their government almost always starts with
the comfortable assumptions based only partially upon fact: (1) that
private undertakings are efficiently managed, free from internal poli-
tics, sudden changes of policy and incompetent ofliceholding; (2)
that governmental departments are full of incompetence and
loafers." ,.

2. HISTORY AND EXTENT OF BUREAUCRACY

Let us take a wider view of bureaucracy then, and look into its
extent and origin beyond the realm of government. Considerable
• Joseph Stalin: Leninism, vol. ~, p. 373.
• Seba Eldridge and Associates: Development of Collective Enterprise. Lawrence:
Unive"ity of Kansas Pr..,.; 194~. pp. 55<>-59.
7 Oswald Knauth: "Maxims of Management." Ad\'lll1ced Management, April-June
1945. vol. 10, p. 59. With regard to public enterprise see Warren M. Persons: Govern·
ment Experimentation in Business. New York: John Wiley &: Sons, Inc.; 1934. pp.
~33-34·
• Satnrday Evening Post, September 21, 1940. p. 38.
• Samuel O. Dunn: "The Practical Socialist." Nation's Business. November 1928,
vol. 16, p. 15.
1. Henry S. Dennison: "Basic Principles of Personnel Management in Government
Economy." The Annals of the American Academy of Politiial and Social Science;
19 2 4. vol. 113. "Competency and Economy in Public Expenditures," p. 328. See also
l\alph E. George: "Increased Efficiency as a Result of Increased Governmental Func·
tions." Ibid.; 1916, vol. 64. "Public Administration and Partisan Politics," p. 87.
John McDiarmid: "Can Government Be Efficient in Business." Ibid, November 1939,
vol. ~o6, "Government Expansion in the Economic Sphere," p. 160.
189 ADMfNIS'ftATION AND aURIAUCItACY

light is shed on this subject by the authoritative discussion of the

English professor, Harold J. Laski, in his contribution to the Ency-
clopaedia of the Social Sciences.

HAROLD J. LASKI
"Bureaucracy" 11
Bureaucracy is the term usually applied to a system of government
the control of which is so completely in the hands of officials that their
power jeopardizes the liberties of ordinary citizens. The characteristics
of such a regime are a passion for routine in administration, the sacrifice
of flexibility to rule, delay in the making of decisions and a refusal to em-
bark upon experiment. In extreme cases the members of a bureaucracy
may become a hereditary caste manipulating government to their own ad-
vantage.
Until quite modern times bureaucracy seems to have arisen as a
by-product of aristocracy. In the history of the latter a disinclination on the
part of the aristocracy for active government has in some cases led to
the transfer of power into the hands of permanent officials. In other cases
the origin of bureaucracy may be traced to the desire of the crown to have
a body of persoual servants who may be set off against the appetite of the
aristocracy for power. In the latter event the bureaucrats themselves may
have developed into an aristocracy, as happened in eighteenth century
France. Previous to the nineteenth century bureaucracies have always
sought, wherever possible, to become a privJ1eged caste. When they
have succeeded they have attempted to obtain for themselves either the
same powers as the aristocracy or access to that superior class.
The advent of democratic government in the nineteenth century
overthrew in the western world the chance of maintaining a system where-
by officials could constitute a permanent and hereditary caste. But for the
most part the new conditions which accompanied democracy made bu-
reaucracy possible in a new phase. It was essential to have a body of ex-
perts in charge of a particular service. And since democracy implied also
publicity, it was important too that there should be a uniform body of
precedents.
The tendency accordingly has been a certain suspicion of experi-
mentalism, a benevolence toward the "safe" man. There develops almost
insensibly an esprit de corps with canons of conduct, observance of which
becomes the test of promotion. Administrative codes grow up and are ap-
plied simply from the conservatism of habit. When rules have been long
in operation or when they have been made by men of considerable ex-
perience it is very difficult to resist their authority. Becanse they are old

11 Harold J. Laski: "Bureaucracy." Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, 1937 edi·

tion, vol. 2, selected from pp. 7<>-72. Reprinted by permission of The Macmillan Co.
Copyright 1930, The Macmillan Co.
190
It IS held that they embody necessary experienee; and ofticials Jl'e not easily
persuaded to abandon them. A bmeaucracy, moreover, because it is open
to pub1ic criticism in a democratic state is always anxious to secure a rep-
utation for accuracy. It prides itself on not making mistakes. It insists on
seeing questions from every point of view. This results not seldom in a
slowness in taking action a multiplication of paperasserie, in which the
negative side of some proposed course of action is eastly magnified as
against its possible advantages.
Under modem conditions these problems are magnified still
further. The scale of the modem state and the vastness of the services it
seeks to render make expert administration inevitable. Experts, moreover,
naturally tend to push the field they administer to its furthest confines;
the appetite for power grows by what it feeds on.
It should be pointed out that these undesirable characteristics
of bureaucracy are not in the least confined to the service of the state;
they operate wherever there is large scale organization. Trade unions.
churches, institutions for social work, great industrial corporations. all
these are compelled by the very size of the interests they represent and
by their complexity to take on the same habits of bureaucracy. The famili-
arity of officials with the technical details of their work involves the ac-
cretion of power in their hands. It is rarely difficult in a trade union
congress for the officials to "steam roller" the delegates into acceptance of
policies about which as individuals the majority may be dubious. A great
business corporation, as long as it earns a dividend, never has to bother
itself about its shareholders. It is the boast of the Roman Catholic church
that it has not changed since its foundation; and innovators have always
been driven either to schism or submission. Even in a comparatively new
state like the Soviet Republic the proceedings of the Communist party
are full of accusations of this kind against officials.

Laski thus admits that bureaucracy prevails in government. but he

takes issue with the traditional view that it is a characteristic of gov-
ernment alone.

3. THE MAIN CAUSE AND THE MAJOR REMEDY FOR

BUREAUCRACY

Another comprehensive analysis of bureaucracy in both govern-

ment and business waS presented by Marshall Dimock. A political
scientist by profession, Professor Dimock had ample opportunity to
discover the bureaucratic features of both fields: in government, as a
result of his service as Associate Commissioner of Immigration and
Naturalization in the United States Department of Justice, as As-
sistant Secretary of Labor, and as wartime Director of the Recruit-
191 ADMINISTRATION AND IUUAUCuc:Y

ment and Manning Organization of the War Shipping Administra-

tion; and in business, as a result of his research concerning public
corporations," and his observation of the work of private corpora-
tions."

(a) MAUMALL I. DiMOCK

"Bureauc:racy Self-Examined" ..
Bureaucracy is the state of society in which institutions over-
shadow individuals and simple family relationships; a stage of develop-
ment in which division of labor, specialization, organization, hierarchy,
planning, and regimentation of large groups of individuals, either lly
voluntary or involuntary methods, are the order of the day. There may be'
a question as to whether individuals prefer such a system or feel that their
chances of success and happiness are as good under it as under some
simpler system. Let us not deceive ourselves, however, as to the inevitable
conjunction between complexity and bureaucracy.
Complexity is the most general underlying cause of bureaucracy,
but there are also more specific institutional and administrative causes.
Size. There is likely to be a direct relationship between the size
of an institution and its bureaucratic tendencies. The larger it becomes the
more pronounced is the tendency toward red tape; the smaller the site,
the freer it is likely to be of inflexibilities. There are, of course, exceptions
to this general hypothesis, because some small ventures are stodgy where::as
some much larger ones are responsive.
Organization. Organization requires a bierarcbica1 arrangement ot
functions and persons. Paradoxically, organization releases energies but
also rigidifies them. There is in every hierarchy, therefore, the tendency
toward inflexibility.
Specialization. Specialization tends to restrict and narrow indi-
viduals just as hierarchy grooves institutions. Both are necessary and both
are efficient for certain social purposes, but both add to the total numper
of factors producing inflexibility and impersonality.
Rules and Regulations. These, like laws, set forth commands and
instructions which persons subject to them are forced to follow. The more
authoritative pronouncements there are, the more the individual is bound
and the greater is the degree of inflexibility. Government by law is the
12 Marshall E. Dimock: British Public Utilities and National Development. London:
G. Allen and Unwin; 1933; Government Operated Enterprises in the Panama Cadal.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1934. Developing American Waterways. Chi'
cago, University of Chicago Prell'; 1935.
18 Marshall E. Dimock and Howard K. Hyde: Bureaucracy and Trusteeship in Large
Corpnrations. Report of the Tempnrary National Economic Committee. Investig;ltion
of Concentration of Economic Power, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess., 1940, Monograph No. 11.
M Marshall E. Dimock: "Bureaucracy Self-Examined." Public Administration IW-
view, Summer 1944. vol. 4. adapted frOl1l Pl'_' 198-9. Reprinted by permission. TIllS
quotation lists only the first four of twelve • causes" listed by Dimock.
 192 ADMINISTRATION

most bureaucratic of all institutions because to a greater extent than other

institutions it feels bound by its own rules.
Bureaucracy is simply institutionalism written large. It is not some
foreign substance which has been infused into the life-blood of an in-
stitution; it is merely the accentuation of characteristics found in all. It is
a matter of degree, of the combination of components, and of the relative
emphasis given to them.

(b) MARSHALL E. DIMOCK

The Executive in Action"
Business institutions characteristically attempt to end up on the
black side of the ledger, not in the red, and ordinarily this is equally true
of government, schools, hospitals, and churches. Governments attempt to
serve the taxpayers who support them, as do all other institutions which
derive their support from the public. Any difference is one of emphasis,
not of kind. Nothing is wider of the truth than the belief that government
exists for service and business for profit. Each is interested in both.
The principal difference among institutions is one of bureaucratic
influence, that is, the difference between direct action and cumbersome
action, spontaneous service and niggardly service, an integrated mechanism
and a lumbering mechanism. But since bureaucracy is not limited to cer-
tain types of institutions but is found in all in some degree, even this
difference may become unimportant. Bureaucracy thrives particularly
when organizations achieve great size and become depersonalized and
automatic.
I believe that there is a limit to the size of our institutions be-
yond which society inevitably pays a heavy price in the form of lowered
efficiency and restricted individual opportunities. Call this, if you will,
the law of diminishing managerial returns, if we may take a leaf from the
economist's book. There is an optimum size in business organizations, gov-
ernment, religious institutions, schools and universities, hospitals, armies
and navies, beyond which efficiency suffers and both executives and em-
ployees are blighted. The larger the organization the more pronounced
the bureaucratic tendency becomes. Where formerly there was discretion,
now a rule is introduced so that eventually all of life within the institution
is regimented. Where face-to--face relationships were once possible an ex·
change of correspondence becomes necessary and routine. Where sub-
ordinates were formerly entrusted with a wide freedom of choice, the
number and variety of controls is multiplied. Where at one time the boss
knew every one by his first name, under increased size nobody knows
anybody and nobody cares.
When this stage is reached, executives must necessarily think in
------
Marshall E. Dimock: The Executive in Action. Selected from pp. 6-7. '58-60 •
1l!
• 64. Reprinted by pennission of Harper &: Brothers. Copyright. 1945. Harper &:
Brothers.
193 ADMINISTRATION AND IUUAUCitACY

terms of cosmic forces. They have no time to think of those who do the
work of the world-these are lost to sight. A billion dollars has no intrinsic
significance-it is just a neutral factor like the air one breathes. 'The
executive carrying a monstrons administrative load has no time to reflect
on or to appreciate the human and physical materials with which he works
because if he were to indulge such luxuries he would be unable to
manipulate the grand strategy of his organization. Money, employees,
materials-everything with which he works is reduced to the ABC of
getting a job done. In I:oncentrating upon his work and saving his own
store of nervous energy as he must, he has progressively less time and in·
terest for details and for the people who surround him. Bureaucracy makes
people callous. They do not lose interest in their fellow men because they
wish it, but because they lack the physical, mental, and spiritual stamina to
do otherwise. They were not made to be mere cogs in a machine, but if
the machine is to operate efficiently they must behave as though they
were.
1£ the managers of this nation should become aware of what we
are up against, they could take vigorous steps to put appropriate correc·
tives into effect. But let us not fool ourselves as to what is possible. We
can make a dent on this monster of our own creation but we cannot hope
completely to subdue him. For a country that has fostered one of the
greatest pioneering populations in the world's history, it is not exactly a
bright and promising morrow to which we may look forward.
These large aggregations of individuals which we call institutions
are for the most part the creation of the past fifty or one hundred years,
so far as Western European and American culture is concerned. From the
standpoint of the long historical perspective, therefore, it may be sug-
gested that urbanism and bureaucracy are but a passing interlude between
both a past and a future in which relationships are primarily natural and
social groupings much smaller in size than at present. May we anticipate
a speedy end to our monster and his giant corporations? Do social forces
ever reverse themselves? Or are we controlled by an inexorable process
which will create an even greater complexity out of that which we already
have?
Despite all the knowledge of institutional life, skillful manage-
ment, and the psychology of interpersonal relationships in complex social
situations, which the scholars and executives of this country have acquired
and now apply, a standardizing and deadening bureaucracy, cramping and
warping the lives of countless individuals, is the price we must expect to
pay for large size and its resulting specialization and standardization. We
must, therefore, further sharpen our principles and techniques of man-
agement if we are not to be completely confounded by the forces we have
created. We must understand these forces and learn how to control and
guide them. But we must also find the path back to simpler and more
natural ways of conducting our conective life if we are to retain the op-
portunity and the right to experiment and to be dUferent_ privilege OUt
194
pioneer ancestors enjoyed because they lived at a time when the country
was big but its institutions were still small.
According to Dimock, the major cause of bureaucracy is the im-
mensity and unwieldiness of modem government and business, while
the main cure is devolution and decentralization of administrative
power. Dimock reminds us, moreover, of the bureaucratic parallelism
of government and industry. This view has long been current in the
United States, despite the popular credo which restricts big bu-
reaucracy to government.'" This belief was vigorously stated by Pro-
fessor Charles Hynernan in 1945: "I prefer to say that bureaucracy is
a word for big organization. I don't think we need to argue about how
big an organization must be to be called bureaucratic. When it is big
enough that you have to make a search to find who is responsible for
its policies, or big enough that it has to have its principal policies
and procedures written out, or big enough that you think it takes
too long for one part to find out what another part proposes to do
-in any such case it is big enough to be called a bureaucracy." If

4. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY

AND BUSINESS BUREAUCRACY
Admitting that business and government are both bureaucratic
giants, most authorities take the view that an intrinsic difference
separates them. This position was expressed effectively by: (a) Pro-
fessor Wallace Donham, Dean of the Graduate School of Business
Administration at Harvard University; (b) Sir Josiah Stamp, an
English businessman and public servant; and (c) Professor Nathan
Isaacs, also of Harvard University.

(a) WALLACE 8. DONHAM

"Governmental and Business Executives""
Dimock makes the generalization that 90 percent of the char-
acteristics of public government executive management are identical with
'" Moorefield Storey: ''The Government of Cities." Proceedings of the National
Civil Service Reform League, 1891, p. 47 et seq. Clarence A. Dyhtra: "Public Ad·
ministration and Private Business." POOlic Management, April 193~, vol. 14, p. 117
et seq. H. W. Dodds: "Bureaucmcy and Representative Covernment." The Annals
of the American Academy of Political and Social &ience, January 1937, vo!. 1B9, "Im·
proved Personnel in Government Service," p. 16, et seq. Harvey Pinney: "Ad·
ministOClaCJ;' Incorporated." Social Forces, March 1941, vol. 19, pp. 40.-<>9. Paul H.
Appleby: B;g Dernocmcy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1945, p. 53.
11 Charles Hynenlan: "Bureaucmcy and the Democratic System." Louisiana Law
.Review, December 1945, vol. 6, p. 310.
" Wallace B. Donham: "Governmental and Business Executives." Public Adminis-
tr.moo Review, Spring 1946, volume 6, page 176. Reprinted by permission.
195
those of priwte executive management. In spite of large amIS of similarity,
I strongly dissent. I would place the percentage very much lower-whether
~o per cent or SO per cent lower, I shall not attempt to say.
I find from experience both with government agencies and with
priwte business that there are striking differences. One of those differences
is that, in government, there is more continnity and definition in the
mandate. The limits of action are often clearly defined. in many cases by
Congress. No such situation exists in large private business. Dimock says
bureaucracies are related, for example, to size. Yet he points out some
bearings on bureaucracies of the inadequacies in our federal civa service
system and the conflict of loyalties which arises out of it. This, he states,
he su(:ceeded in overcoming. I have had contact with several war agencies
made up mainly of businessmen. These men rapidly took on bureaucratic
characteristics radically different from their own behavior in private life.
The only close parallels I find in the areas of private business to the
deadening effects of the present civil service are, on the one hand, what
one of my old labor leaders used to call the "sonority" system and, on
the other, the very real problems faced by management in dealing with
labor which arise immediately out of the prolonged governmental support
for organized labor-which is in my judgment bad for labor.
To me, there are multifarious forces at work in government de-
partments which are different from those in private business; the responsi-
bility to and necessary interference of Congress, the responsibility to the
President, to defined over-all controls, have little parallel in private busi-
ness. The power politics of government departments are radically different
from the power politics of private companies. The existence of pipe lines
into Congress strengthens the bureaucracy against the chief executive of
the particular subdivision of government. It may strengthen it against the
President of the United States or Congress itself. Dimock himself points
out how easily government bureaucracies develop organized opposition
to policies involving change. This opposition may in substance, though
not in form, sabotage all change which appears to threaten the security of
the bureaucracy. Power politics, of course, exists in large private com-
panies; but the urge to expand functions and simultaneously to defend
what exists seems to me radically less in the case of well-run, large, private
industry than in the case of big departments of the government. The
quantitative difference becomes a qualitative change.
(b) JOSIAH C. STAMP
"The Contrast Between the Administration of BllSiness and Public
AH,irs""
If you will look into the functions of Govermnent, you will see
that as you get down to the people who are in contact with the public on
.. Josiah c. Stamp: "The Contrast Between the AdministIation of Business and
Public Alfairs." fournal of Public Administration, 1923, volume 1, selected from pp.
160, 16., 164-6;, 168-70. Reprinted by pennission.
196 ADMINISTUTION

the particular function in question, their discretion is finely limited. The

legislature can discriminate in its wisdom, or its un-wisdom, between
classes, but the administration cannot. Any discretion i\ has at aD has to
be exercised as.a distinction between cases evenly and smoothly over an
classes. Thus you have running down from the top to the bottom this
obligation to uniformity or principle of consistency. Now what about the
ordinary business; is there any such obligation resting upon business ad-
ministration? Well, except for businesses whose goodwill depends upon
the maintenance of an exact absolute standard, there is no compulsion
upon a business firm to render service except along the lines of least re-
sistance. It has not to bother about that consistency at all. The business
man will consider what the "traffic will bear" for a given price. He can be
quite inconsistent.
I have dwelt mainly on the principle of consistency. But I should
like to deal also with two or three more absolutely differential characteris-
tics. The second one is extraordinary financial control. From a constitu-
tional point of view, this is a control by one authority over other State
authorities, the principle of finance we know as the Treasury control.
What we call Treasury control has a certain cramping influence upon
Government departments which is not experienced in business. There is
no possibility of a Government department experimenting, shall we say
"going off the deep end," in anything requiring monetary expenditure, in
the same way as the business can. This differentiates sharply between the
two tasks of administration.
The third is the economic principle of the "marginal return." The
business, as every student of economics knows, pushes its expenditure
along a particular line as far as it is profitable to do it. It will say "So long
as I can spend a pound along that particular line and get a return of 305.,
it will do, bUt if that return is only 18s. it is time to stop," and the margin
of return along the different lines of expenditure is the unseen but effec-
tive governing principle of business transactions. But that is not the prin-
ciple of Government; it can never be. As a broad principle the marginal
return is the principle of business.
The fonrth is the principle of ministerial responsibility. It is so
well known that the least act of the most humble servant of the Govern-
ment can conceivably become a momentons political issue in the House
of Commons the next day! Everybody in the Government department is
supposed to have done every act in the sight of the supreme authority.
That is a little highly coloured, perhaps, but the fact remains that with the
principle of Ministerial responsibility there is the necessity for the Minister
to apologize for or to justify the acts of his department, and that fact must
have, and does have, an extraordinary influence upon the personnel and
whole character of administration. There is nothing at all analogous to
that in business.
197 ANllNlSTRAnON A"II BUREAUCRACY

(c) NATHAN ISAACS

"The logic of Public and Private Administration""
Of course, power, the goal of the politician, is comparable to
profits. the aim of the businessman; that is to say, the two types of con-
siderations have points of h1:eness as well as points of difference. Among
the points of likeness may be mentioned the necessity of understanding
one's clientele or constitnency and particularly of realizing that their re-
sponses are not necessarily logical-in fact, that they may be pre-
dominantly non-logical.
The resemblance between public and private administration goes
even deeper. In carrying on the business of the state, the public administra-
tor has exactly the same basic problems as beset the private administra-
tor: bringing together personnel, materials, and finance and keeping them
in operation to the accomplishment of prescribed ends. That he cannot
improvise a huge and effective civil service for vast undertakings should
be as obvious as tbat an army cannot be raised by the stamping of a foot.
In the acquisition of materials, likewise, public business en-
counters the difficulties of private business. Of course, the government
has greater buying power than even the greatest of private businesses. It
can ignore the profit motive; it can set out its own terms; it can exercise the
power of eminent domain; it can inspect and object to its heart's content;
no laches or statute of limitations or admission runs against it; and in the
last analysis it can repudiate its contracts. Still the government sometimes
has difficulty in getting bids or in competing with private business, or in
finding a ready supply of wbat it needs in any market tbat is open to it.
To get things done it adopts business methods, and it finds them limited.
With all these likenesses, there are still some major points of
difference, a few of which cut so deeply into problems as to suggest dif-
ferent modes of thinking.

As Professor Isaacs suggests, there are "different modes of think~

ing" in business and in government; as indicated by Stamp, these
differences may be related to the factors of administrative consistency,
financial control, marginal return, and public responsibility; and in
accordance with Donham's analysis, these dissimilarities may be
looked upon as "quantitatively" great enough to constitute a "quali-
tative" difference. In the field of public administration Professor
John Gans of the Harvard Graduate School of Public Administration
also regarded government activities as "different from that of private
organizations almost in kind as well as in scope." 21 Professor Paul
.. Nathan Isaacs: "The Logic of Public and Private Administration." M. P. McNair
and H. T. Lewis (eds.): Business and Modem Socidy. Adapted hom pp. 67-69. Re·
printed by permission of Harvard University Press. Copyright, 1938, Harvard University
Press.
21 John Gaus: "A Quarter Century of Public Administration." Advanced Manage-
ment, October-Decemlier 1940, vol. S, pp. 17-;-8·
198
Appleby pointed to the distinguishing element of "suspicious scm-
tiny" by the public." More usual among American political scientists
specializing in the field of public administration is the tendency to
distinguish between the "profit" motive, which they attribute to
business," while assigning the "service" motive to government."
Can we, however, establish an intrinsic and incontrovertible dif-
ference between business and government from the standpoint of the
issue of bureaucracy? L. Urwick, a British specialist in business af-
fairs, was dubious. "It remains to be seen," he stated, "how far the
special weaknesses to which public enterprises are proverbially sub-
ject, 'red tape: inter-departmental tribal warfare, inertia, refusal to
take responsibility, burcaucracy, are really due to the absence of the
money-making incentive." .. In order to fasten the charge of bureauc-
racy upon government, we must be sure that the bureaucratic dif-
ferences between government and business are greater than those
existing between various kinds of businesses or various kinds of gov-
ernments. May there not be more similarities between big business
and big government than there are, let us say, between a heavy in-
dustry manufacturing firm and a department store, or between the
Tennessee Valley Authority and the State Department?
Professor Dimock is not alone in answering this question af-
firmatively. Henry S. Dennison also denied, twenty years previously,
that the main differentiation was between government and private
business. Dennison asserted: "Men who have had a fair chance to
study both private and public activities, and who have open minds
to make the proper analyses and scientific comparisons, usually dis-
cover that the differences between the large organization and a small
one is much greater than the differences between a governmental
organization and one under private control; and that between gov-
ernment and private enterprises of comparable management and na-
ture there are more significant resemblances than differences.""

5. SIMILARITIES BETWEEN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT

BUREAUCRACY
One of the leading exponents of the analagous position of busi-
ness bureaucracy and government bureaucracy has been Harold D .
.. Paul Appleby: "Mministration in Big Business." Public Adminislllltion Review.
Summer 1945. vol. ;, p. '57 .
.. Harvey Walker: Public Mministration in the United States. New York: Farrar
" Rinehart, Inc.; 1937, p. 10.
.. John A. Vieg: "Democracy and Bureaucracy." Public Administration Review,
Summer 1944, vol. 4, p. ';0 .
.. L. Urwick: Management of Tomorrow. London: Nisbet and Co.; 1933, p. 16,.
II Henry S. Dennison: "Basic Principles of Personnel Management in Government
Economy," pp. 32~.
 ADMINISTRATION AND BUREAUCtACY

Smith. As wartime Director of the Budget in the United States,

Smith carried a heavy part of the responsibility for integrating the
activities of governmental administration and industrial management.
It was his task not only to control the flow of the national dollar
toward this end, but also to maintain an adequate system of adminis-
trative management on an unprecedented scale in both civil and
military agencies." Smith was, therefore, in a strategic position as
the war reached its end to comment on the questions of comparative
bureaucracy which we have discussed.

HAROLD D. SMITH
The Management of Your Government"
The prevailing criticism pictures bureaucracy as paralyzed by
inertia, bound by unnecessary procedural restrictions, and lacking in
imagination. On the other hand, there is a mounting criticism that the ad-
ministrator is aggressive, overambitious, all too eager to seize responsi-
bilities. In short, we are told that instead of being submerged in apathy
and dullness--the common accusation of the past-management now has
risen to such heights that it seeks a position of power which menaces
democratic society.
All the combined operations of government add up to by far the
largest business in the world. In its operations, government faces the same
problems as does any other business. It has suffered from like shortages
of man power and raw materials. It faces the same difficulties of organiza-
tion and system. In this connection I recall a recent public remark of a
leading businessman who served for a time as a high government official.
In discussing red tape in government he said, in effect, "We have the
same thing in business, only in business we call it 'system.' " Of course, the
larger and more complex the business, the more system is required.
The war tested the skills of both public and private management
as they had never been tested before. Everyone is familiar with the success
of private management in meeting the demands made upon it. Govern-
mental management certainly has met the challenge equally well, far
more ably than many people would believe. Perhaps in government we
had farther to go to begin with, but a strong case can be made that in
recent years government has progressed more rapidly in management than
has business. Already business can profit greatly from the experience of
government in this field. Private managers do not often recognize this im-
portant fact. However, if government continues its present rate of progress,
business before long will realize that it can learn from government many
valuable lessons in large-scale management.
'" See chap. 5, above.
.. Harold D. Smith: The Management of Your Government. Adapted from pp. s,
8-<}, .;-.6, 3'-3', 146-47. Reprinted by permission of McGraw·HiIl Book Conipany,
Inc. Copyright, 1945. McGmw-HilI Book Company, Inc.
200
One reason for this is that the vastness of governmental under-
takings provides a ground for experimentation in an sorts of management
techniques. Government is so huge and so complex that the probJetns it
presents to management are diHerent in both size and nature from those
confronting private management. In effect, government provides a tre-
mendous laboratory in which many variables can and must be tested to a
degree impossible in private industry.
Such differences as exist between public and private management
have been thrown into bold relief by the transfer of great numbers of
business managers to posts as public administrators. Probably the most
difficult problem in this transfer of management skills has not been in
connection with management narrowly considered. The techniques are
largely the same and are applicable in both fields.
The real difficulty is that private managers must greatly readjust
their thinking to understand the more complex objectives of public man-
agement. This complexity arises largely from the fact that whatever the
public manager does bears directly or indirectly upon everyone in the
nation.
Public Administration has profited greatly from the services of
private managers. Yet, in all frankness, there have been striking failures as
well as conspicuous successes. In some instances, private managers upon
whom the greatest hopes had been placed proved very unsuccessful in
public management because they failed to adapt their thinking to the
complex factors in government. In other instances, private managers of
lesser note were able to adapt themselves with greater effectiveness to the
needs of public administration. No doubt the same disparity of achieve-
ment has been noted in the transfer of governmental administrators to
industry.
The manager has a key place in the scheme of large-scale organiza-
tion, whether it be business or government. lt is the manager who takes
the products of the scientist's research, fits them into new patterns, and
then produces articles so cheaply and plentifully that more lives are en-
riched. It is the manager who takes over after the engineer has harnessed
the power of the waterfall and who directs the supply of electricity to
hundreds of homes never served before. In government, as in industry, the
men who do the planning and the organizing and the guiding are essential
cogs in the complicated mechanism of modem civilization, cogs that mesh
the gears of production to the drive shaft of human wants and needs.

Smith agreed with Dimock and Laski as to the common char-

acteristics of government and business bureaucracy, but he made a
stronger point than Laski about the greater opportunity for experi-
mentation in government. It has generally been assumed that in
contrast to the situation in government. "in business, because it is
201 ADMINISTRATION AND aUUAVCltACY

free, there is an opportunity for experiment."" Smith was joined

by other public servants like Morris L. Cooke in his views about the
great capacity of government for experimentation."

6. BUREAUCRACY AND LIBERTY

Even in its most constructive aspects, however, bureaucracy is

widely suspected of consuming our liberties. It is quite conceivable,
therefore, that in spite of its inevitability, bureaucracy in any form
may be inimical to the preservation of freedom. These relationships
between bureaucracy and liberty are descnbed below by: (a) Ram-
say Muir, British political scientist, writing in 1910, and (b) Charles
Merriam, American political scientist, writing in 1945.

(a) RAMSAY MUIR

"Bureaucracy in England" 11
Both the word bureaucracy and the thing have an evil savour in
the nostrils of most Englishmen. The word, a horrid hybrid of French
and Greek, deserves everything that can be said against it. As for the thing,
the average intelligent Englishman, without troubling to analyse it very
carefully, instinctively dislikes and despises it. He thinks it essentially "un-
English." He associates it with the rule of red tape, with the intolerable
insolence of the jack-in-office, with all sorts of pedantic invasions of the
freedom of action of the individual. He believes that it is to be seen in its
logical development in Russia, in the cold-blooded formalism of the
second-rate intelligences that submit to be the agents of despotism. He
resents with almost equal intensity the forms which it assumes in Ger-
many, where he has a vision of an inhumanly overeducated and priggish
set of officials meddling in every detail of private life-a whole nation for
ever suffering the discomforts of the parade-ground. He finds it rampant
even under the democratic government of France. That pleasant land
seems to him to bristle with petty officials, who behave as if they were
the masters, and not the servants, of the public. He is willing to admit
that a certain dreary efficiency may in some fields be produced by bureauc-
racy; but he believes it to be essentially hostile to the English idea of
liberty, and at the sacrifice of that even the highest efficiency would be
too dearly purchased.
.. L. Urwick: "Scientific Principles and Organization." 'American Management
Association, Management Series No. '9, 1938.
.. See Chapter .6, sec. 4 .
• at Ramsay Muir: "Bureaucmcy in England." Peers and Bureaucrats. Selected from
pp. J-4, ~. Reprinted by permission of Constable and Co. Copyright, 19'0, Con·
stable and Co.
202
Our average Englishman does not, perhaps, put the ~ as
clearly as this to his own mind. But he instinctively feels that bureauClllCY
is a more real antithesis to liberty than either monarchy or aristocr?CY·
That is the ultimate reason for his contentment with our habit of "mud-
dling through." He does not like muddling in itself, but he vaguely f~ls
that muddling is the price we have to pay for our freedom from drag(jOn-
ing, and it comforts him to think that in the end we do muddle thropgh
-that in the long run liberty works. This instinct, again, forms the leal
ground of the average Englishman's hostility to anything that calls it~elf
Socialism. He has no genuine prejudice against state action or municipal
action in themselves; he is quite ready to consider on their merits schernes
for municipal tramways or municipal milk, national telephone service ?r
national forests. But tell him that the results of any set of proposals ,1V11l
be to let loose upon him a horde of officials prying into his pri,:ate
concerns, and his alarm is at once aroused. In short, just when the EngliSh-
man is becoming most passionately alarmed about the danger of bureaUC-
racy, he is also becoming in practice more and more dependent on bureaUC-
racy.

(b) CHARLES E. MERRIAM

Systematic Politics ""

"Bureaucracy" is a term of ambiguous meaning. At times it is

used to describe an administrative system in much the same sense as ~he
't<e>Th "1>"\:'\'>.\:, "'~Th'>."'>."''u..,.'t'>.''>;:;: Th'>.%\:,'t ~ ,\~Wip\,\)'}~. h't '\)'t\:''';\ ""~ \'t ,~. "l.
smear word used to calumniate political opponents-the protest of ~he
outs against the ins. At other times it is employed to indicate opposipon
to a particular public policy which is being administered. At other tijIles
"bureaucracy" is used to designate an undesirable type of administration.
Bureaucracy may also be a type of occupational disease, a standard piob-
lem arising in almost any form of organization-poor organization, poor
delegation, and poor supervision, nnsound personnel policies, low mo(3le,
deadwood-the types of malaise which skilled probers diagnose and for
which they prescribe without great technical difficulty.
Bureaucracy is sometimes attacked, however, not because of the
quality of the administrators but by reason of the policy administe!ed.
For example, tax administrators may be assailed as such when the real ob-
ject of criticism is the particular tax which is being applied. Or regulaf~ry
administration may be assailed when the basic assault is upon the policy
itself. This led a prominent citizen of the United States to declare on one
occasion that the "best government is the worst," meaning that the nl0re

"Charles E. Merriam: Systematic Politics. Adapted from pp. ,65-66, 1 71. Re-
printed by permission of The University of Chicago Press. Copyright, 945. The
University of Chicago Press. '
 ADMINISTRATION AND IUREAUcaAev

efficient the regulators, the worse the system if based upon an undesirable
type of policy.
It cannot escape the notice of any careful observer that much of
the controversy over bureaucracy turns upon general theories of the scope
of governmental activity and especially the range of governmental action
in relation to industry. For those who wish to restrict 'the policy of gov·
ernment in any field, every case of administrative breakdown or weakness
is an argument against the extension of governmental powers, and espe·
cially so if the action is regulatory of any wide range of activity. Reason·
ing that collectivism can function only with sound administration, opposi.
tion may be made to the growth of such public administration. On these
premises there can, of course, be no serious discussion of bureaucracy, since
it is bad if it is good, and the better the worse.
It should be said, however, that this is not the characteristic at-
titude of communities generally but only of special groups, who may fail
to realize the meaning of government for the affairs of life.

Considering bureaucracy as virtually synonymous with govern-

ment, Muir, as contrasted with Merriam, leaned toward the invidious
connotation of the term. Regardless of the development of socialist
sentiment in Britain since his time, Muir's concept, rather than the
scientific implications of bureaucracy, pervades English thought. In
the United States, too, despite a growing confidence in governmental
institutions, it continues to be "part of OUI folklore to identify the
development of bureaucracy with the diminution of individual free-
dom."" Even during the New Deal, however essential aggressive
governmental administration proved to be in this period of relief, re-
covery, and reform, the fear persisted that bureaucracy would destroy
liberty. This combination of public administration and bureaucracy
was conveniently dubbed by Professor Guy Claire, administocracy,
"a vast bureaucracy ruling the country by rules and regulations,
having the effect of law, yet not passed by Congress." Professor
Claire added: "Widespread fear exists that powers given the execu·
tive will not be turned back to Congress and that the ancient liberties
of the people have been lost."" The necessary wartime continuance
of administocracy encountered some reaction and reversal in the
post-war period, but Americans approached the middle of the twen·
tieth century with the paradox of combining a growing trust in gov-
ernment with a persistent mistrnst of bureaucracy.
.. Reinhard Bendix: "Bureaucracy and the Problem of Power." Public Administra·
tion Rcwiew. Summer '945. vol. 5. p. 194. See also J. M. Juran:·Bureaucracy. A Chal·
lenge to Better Management. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1944; p. ix.
"Guy S. Claire: Administocracy. New York: The Macmillan Company; '934.
p. V.
204
While the view continued to be widespread that governmental
administration was inimical to personal h"berty and private business,
the weight of American sentiment among historians and social
scientists was different. Indeed, it was commonly preached in the
United States that large-scale business tended to destroy hberty and
that only government could save both. The halcyon days of political
graft may have experienced equal condemnation, but there was noth-
ing in the critique of government to match the epithets applied to
business in the quotations currently included in many American text-
books: "plundering" "merciless," "unprincipled," "extortiouate,"
"cruel," "greedy," "invisible and intolerable power," "detrimental to
the public prosperity, corrupting in [its Jmanagement, and dangerous
to republican institutlons." ..
As for the irresponsibilities attributed to government bureaucracy,
scholars like Professor Merriam undertook to expose the reason, if
not the ruse, of those who circulated disparaging criticisms of gov-
ernment. As Merriam indicated, those who attacked government
bureaucrats most vigorously and demanded "more business in gov-
ernment" were for the most part business bureaucrats whose real
interest was to see that there was "less government in business."
Although the sentiment appeared among some businessmen that
"what's good for government is good for business,"" American busi-
ness leadets went so far as to announce that "the best public servant
is the wotst one." The president of a large American concern to
whom this view was attributed was also quoted in the journal of the
United States Chamber of Commerce as saying: "A thoroughly
first-rate man in public service is corrosive. He eats holes in our liber-
ties. The better he is and the longer he stays, the greater the danger.
If he is an enthusiast-a bright-eyed madman who is frantic to make
this the finest government in the world-the black plague is a house
pet by comparison." I f
This remark was written before the depression of the late 1920'S,
but the attack on government was resumed as the New Deal ran its
course in the 1930'S; and in the 1940'S, in anticipation of the post-war
recovery, the attack became even more intensive though less invective.
Economists like Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises contributed
to the battle and their works were widely distributed." Von Mises
•• Stanley Pargellis: "The Judgment of History on American Business." A New·
camen Address, '943, pp. 9-". "Business Can't Escape Histmy." Natiou's Business,
M"t.,'944, vol. ,2, pp. 2s-.6.
See also M. S. Munson: "SaYing a City Is Good Business." Nation's BusineIs,
Match '941. vol. 29. pp. JS-36, 48.
11 Homer Ferguson: "A Plea for lndIiciency in Covermnent." Nation's Business.
November 192.8, Vol. ,6, p. :zo.
.. FortiaJek's position with ttpnl to pemmcnl3l planniPs, ICC Chapter .6.
 ADMINlSTRATION .....D BUIlIAUCItACY

admitted that "bureaucrat, bureaucratic and bureaucracy are clearly

invectives," but he reiterated the doctrine that government was by
definition bureaucratic, whereas "no profit-seeking enterprise, no mat-
ter how Jarge, is liable to become bureaucratic provided the hands of
its management are not tied by government interference." Von Mises
thereupon arrived at the following ingenious definition of bureauc-
racy: "Bureaucratic management is the method applied in the con-
duct of administrative offices, the result of which has no cash value
on the market." .. If this definition were accepted, there would be no
end to the charge that bureaucracy is synonymous with government
and antithetical to liberty, especially since the twentieth century
state had committed itseH more than ever to governmental control,
or to public enterprise, which rejects "cash value on the market" and
marginal return as the exclusive measure of value.
A baJanced summary of the controversy was presented by the
sociologist, Reinhard Bendix: "The popuJar identification of bu-
reaucracy with oppression cannot be taken lightly, since the extension
of governmental functions has frequently curbed and sometimes
obliterated freedom of the individual. Yet, there is also much evi-
dence to show that is has furthered the cause of freedom; and the
great critics of 'governmental interference' have often overlooked the
Jatter point." 4D

7. TWO TYPES OF BUREAUCRATS

If "the curse of bigness," which American refonr.ers h"ke Louis

Brandeis charged against business, has now assailed government,41
what difference does it make whether we are ruled by government
bureaucrats or business bureaucrats? Are they not impelled by similar
personal desires and guided by essentially the same social ideas? May
it not be true that the "economic royalists" of the American plutoc-
racy are matched by the "royal economists" of the American ad-
ministocracy? Some light is thrown on this question by a portrait
of (a) an American cabinet member, J. A. Krug, Secretary of the
Interior during the administration of President Truman, and (b) an
anonymous American business magnate of the same period.

• Ludwig von Mises: BUtealIC!lIC)'. New Hoen: Yale University Press; 19-44, pp. 1.
n. :~ Beodk: "BUtealIC!lIC)' and the Problem of Power." PnbIic .Adm.iuistJa.
tioD Review. Summer 1945. YOI. S, p. 194.
411.AMl1d:t S. Lyoa, M. w. WatkiDs, and VidIJr Abranuoa: Government and
~ Life. WaJUncton: BIookinp Iastitutioa, 19J9-40. vol" p. 4']0.
206 ADMIN1STM1JON

(.) ,. A. nuc
"Why I Wort for the Government" ..
I'll always remember the reaction of some of my friends to ~e
White House announcement that I had accepted a new government: Job
as Secretary of the Interior. Wires and phone calls poured in. ManY of
them said the same thing. Not just "Congratulations'" but "Haven't you
wasted enough years as a bureaucrat? Here you are with offers of Jobs
paying lots more than a cabinet-officer salary and you turn them aU dOwn
to retnrn to the government. Why?" .
Nobody is likely to get rich on government wages-but I cerhlmly
can live on it. And, what's more, important, I have yet to see the s;l~ry
which could buy the satisfaction I've had from being one of the 111red
hands of the people of the United States.
This is the time Americans must think hard about their govern-
ment and the people who run it. We fought a war to preserve our delnoc-
racy, but there are problems ahead. If we're to solve them, we must jlave
a government made up of the best brains, ability and character obtairulble.
We must have in government, as we have in private industry, the energy
and efficiency which has made Am~ica the envy of the world.
Let me say one thing right at the beginning: I'm no visionalY o_r
reformer. I think I am just as practical as any bank vice-president or "'~I­
nessman you ever ran across. Neither am I unusual in my view of pr1blic
service. I know many people who agree with me practically all the way.
~~ ),'1,e Dave 'i...')'~'t'na\, lreao o~ 't'ne l\l h, 111)0 )lm I1IJIle'Su\ c:,eue-~;
of the Navy. And most of the men and women who left their jol1S m
private industry to come down to Washington to help out during the
war.
Every day I get at least one wistful letter or phone call trom
somebody who, with peace, has gone back to a factory or bank or office.
Usually, it's somebody who originally had nothing but contempt for
what's called the bureaucratic mind and whose only previous experience
with government had been filling out an income-tax blank. But now he's
missing something. He doesn't know quite what it is. I think I do. And
it's the reason I'm still a bureaucrat.
I can teU him what he's missing: it's that feeling of satisfaction
which a $100,000 salary in private industry couldn't buy for me. And
which I now have because I'm in public service-the most direct mY of
doing something that contnbutes to human welfare. For most of us, there
are three things which can attract us to a. job. One is the feeling that the
job is worth doing. Another is providing security for our family and our-
selves. The third is the desire to accumulate wealth. The first two com-
_. J. A. Krug: "Why I Work for the Government." This Week Magazine, JulY 14,
1946, selected from pp. 4-5, 9. Reprinted by permis<ion of Mr. Jerry Mason from
This Weel: Magazine. Copyright, 1946, by the United Newspapers Magazine CofP01'l'
tion.
 ADMlHlSTRAnoN AND BUav.UCIlACY

bined are the motives which fit the majority of us. And there are plenty
of people I know in private industry who say: "We are interested in our
work because we too feel that we are doing something for the people. If
we work for a good railroad or make a good automobile or a good air-
plane, we are doing something tor the people-and it's something im-
portant."
That's true. I just happen to think the satisfaction of public serv-
ice is greater and more direct.
1 first became a "bureaucrat" almost i 5 years ago. And if any of
you feel that you should check me off by saying, "Who wouldn't be a pub-
lic servant if he could be a member of the Cabinet?" forget about it. For
years-beginning when 1 was 23-1 enjoyed work in government which
nobody but my colleagues ever heard about. And I would still enjoy work-
ing out if the spotlight of circumstances hadn't made me chairman of the
War Production Board and, ultimately, Secretary of the Interior.
1 feel that now is the time for straight talk about public servants.
Our government is so import.ant to us that we must draw into its service
the highest talents and greatest gifts that our people have to offer.
This last idea, incidentally, is the one that makes so much sense
to the men who stay on in government even though they could earn
more in private industry. My friends in TVA are good examples. In the
old days, the talk was that its fine staff was a phenomenon of the depres-
sion. It was said that good people were attracted because they couldn't
find other jobs. Just wait and see, they said. When there are plenty of jobs
again the whole staff will fall apart.
But that never did happen. Most of the good men and women
are still there. They're all underpaid. But because they have had a part in
the very great adventure of building something as magnificent and work-
able as TVA, of satisfying every man's urge to create something of lasting
value and importance, they have stayed on, even though almost all of
them could get two or three times the salary the government pays them.
I know of some TVA engineers who left to take much higher-paying jobs.
Later they returned and asked for their old jobs back. They missed the
satisfaction they got in having a part in an important project for the pub-
lic service.
Public service, working for the people in their government, hasn't
been appreciated nearly enough. Government is only the instrument of
our democratic system. There's been too much sneering talk about
"bureaucrats."

(b) "What Makes the Boss Work""

What makes the Boss work? Is it lust for money? The new office
boy thinks it is. He has seen the boss's richly furnished office, trod upon
.. "What Makes the Boss Work?" Fortune, April 1948, vol. 37, adapted from pp.
104-05. Reprinred by permission.
 the ~oft pile of its carpet, sniffed the wafted fragrance of the boss's per-
fecto. The boss works because he gets $350,000 a year plus a bonus just
as big or bigger. He gets a lot of stock slipped him under the desk, too.
He has some deal about everything's being in his wife's name, so that
what he pays the government he doesn't even feel. Who wouldn't work,
pulling down that kind of dough? The office boy regards the boss with
pure low·grade envy.
When the boss contemplates the office boy, the emotion is once
again envy. He must pay the little stinker $27.50 per week, in return for
which he gets nothing whatsoever, so that by the boss's mathematics, the
office boy's compensation is infinite. The boss has a tendency to turn
purple when confronted with an unusually convincing example of this,
for he remembers his own days as a young clerk, forty years ago, when old
Philander Wortis paid him $4 a week (six days of ten hours each), docked
him his pay for the week's vacation permitted, and gave him an extra dollar
at Christmas. For these rewards the boss was a happy and devoted servant
of industry. On them, he saved money, supported his mother, and married
for love.
Miss Blick, the boss's secretary, has a different view as to why the
boss works. She keeps his books. He gets $65,000 a year, minus withhold·
ing tax, minus his contribution to the company's complex annuity-and-
pension plan (which he helped devise), minus various other items de-
ducted by the payroll department with the electronic impartiality of
International Business Machines' computers. A little after the first of every
year a lot of the boss's close associates get fat-looking checks for their
participation in the company's profit-sharing plan-something carefully
worked out by the boss and his lawyers before the war, but in which
neither the boss nor his board chairman participates-because it wouldn't
"look good." So, there are three vice presidents in the company who
actually get more money than the boss does, and if you really want to
know how that affects him, it bums him to a crisp. Not that it really mat-
ters, income-wise. It takes Miss Blick about four days a month to keep the
boss's personal books straight; they include some income from dividends,
but the boss has too much of his own stock, and it wouldn't "look good"
if he sold any sizable fraction. Once a year Miss Blick has a heavy strug-
gle with the boss's personal income-tax accountant and from this she
emerges with the faintly stunned realization that the boss works for the
same reason she does: he has to. The decimal points in all the boss's ac-
counts are one or two places to the right of anything in her own check-
book, but still the startling fact remains: fiscally speaking, the boss is
slowly going down the drain. The 75 per cent surtax bracket, plus every-
thing else, is too much for him.
The boss chose a bad time to be born, as he looks at things now.
When he opened his infant eyes, in 1888, the young U. S. Republic was
at last recovering from the wounds of its Civil War, and new ideas were
bloomiRg everywhere. The &lUt tnmk-line miJroads were established, and
 ADMINISTRATION AND IUklAUCRACY

reticules of shorter lines were lacing the country. By the time he was
fifteen, electric light, power, and traction were changing the habits of
work, the capacities of industry, and the shape of cities. The automobile
was still a joke-but not to a man named Ford. Fifty feet of film could
run through a kinetoscope before it broke or caught fire, and there were
clearly some entertainment possibilities in it. Tom Edison's talking mao
chine had progressed from workshop to market. Enterprises were con·
solidating-look at the colossus of Big Steel now, put together by J. Pier·
pont Morgan, a man of vision, in l<)Ol. Hope was everywhere in America;
the future was bright and a young man of talent could seek a thousand
paths to a richly rewarded futme.
So the boss was wide-eyed with hope as he went through the days
of his late adolescence. His father could be heard cursing That Man
Roosevelt (Theodore, a Republican) during the trust.busting era, but
the boss himself was only twenty when Taft thrashed Bryan and the na·
tion was secure again. Unlike his father, he was not conscious that the
shadows were darkening on the spacious lawns in 1912., when a Democrat
was elected President. When the Sixty·third Congress promptly made
good on the Democratic promises of a Federal Reserve System and the
Personal Income Tax, the boss's father had a stroke, following a heavy
dinner. He died in 1914, two weeks after World War I began. "This coun·
try will never get drawn in," he said on one of his last coherent days.
The boss was twenty.six then and making $2.2..50 a week, on which
a man could marry. It was devastating to his young wife that he should
leave her and two children to go to the wars only three years after mar·
riage, but early in 1919 he was back unscathed. He was just the type for
the newly created job of Assistant to the President of his now rapidly ex·
panding firm, and there he was at age thirty·two, set to go in the grandest
race for the highest stakes that any nation, any world, any system had
ever offered a young man. .
The year 192.1 provided him with the first example of business
Depression of which he was ever personally conscious. He took a salary
cut from $6,000 to $5,000, but the whole experience just went to show
that really alert management could meet any situation if it was truly fast
on its feet. By 192.3, when he was thirty.five, all was well again, and he
was getting $9,000 in salary. What he was doing in Wall Street was no·
body's business but his own, but it made his salary look like peanuts. Five
years later he was a Vice President, his salary was $17,000 (on which the
Federal Income Tax was $440), and although he was careful to confide
in no one but his wife, to her he could not help reveal the incredible
secret that they were "worth" over a million dollars. But he stayed
prudent. On a salary of $17,000 he lived like a man making only $2.5,000,
i.e., like a king. The Directors crashed through with bonuses every De·
cember and sometimes these were a good deal in excess of the $25,000
that he now earned in salary as the Executive Vice President. The Execu·
tive Vice President took a month off every year, not so much because
210
he really wanted to as because some of the. older Directors insisted.
The Executive Vice President, in the bitter years between 1919
and 1933, took his licking like a man. When everything was totaled up
he was still on the rim of solvency. While his plants had to drop men
from the payrolls (only to confront them later turning up on the relief
rolls), a good many adjustments and economies were also made on
executive levels. And so one day in 1934 when the Executive Vice Presi-
dent came home, he flung his hat into a corner and announced to his wife
that the Directors had just made him "captain of the Wreck of the
Hesperus." His dejection was so complete that at first she thought he
was saying that he'd been fired; only after a moment did she realize that
he was telling her he had just been made President.
Those were the circumstances under which he finally became
"The Boss." He was forty-six years old; the times called for "young men,
who still had faith and courage." Over the intervening years-for it is now
1948, and he is sixty, with only five more years to compulsory retirement-
the boss has shown plenty of both. He has shown an awful lot of bad
temper, too, and his wife often wonders whether the trouble lies in ad-
vancing years, or whether People and Times and Things are really as dif-
ferent as they seem. To the boss's wife, something has happened to the
boss. To the boss, something has happened to America. If he lived to be
a hundred he couldn't ever make a pile again. The zing seems to have
gone out of the whole show.
Why did he work? He loved it. Power flowed from his finger tips.
His ideas tumed to gold. He gave his wife and children everything they
asked for, and still he needed a bigger safe-deposit box every year. He
bought a fine house, which meant pride to him and his family, a thirty-
two-foot sloop to "knock about in" occasionally. Business was the Ameri-
can genius and the American Corporation was unassailable in its strength.
Everybody's salary had gone up out of sheer good will, but almost every-
body (like himself) was faintly contemptuous of salary as being the
smallest and least important of the money rewards that came to people
living in a land overflowing with riches.
Incentives? The sales curve was the incentive. The sound of the
pneumatic riveter and the steam shovel were the incentives. The news
items in the daily papers-Warner Brothers would hereafter make all
their feature pictures with sound; regular scheduled service by airplane
would soon be established between New York and Washington; phono-
graphs now had electrical pickupr-all these were incentives. America
jtself was the incentive.

\Vhen one penetrates to the roots of individual motivation by

means of such personal portraits, it becomes difficult to prove a sub-
stantial difference between business and government bureaucrats. No
distinctive personal psychology or philosophy is strictly correlated
with one group or the other, despite divergent social, political, and
211 ADMINI$TL\TlON ANO IUREAUCRACY

economic ideas each may express in explaining his professional choice

as between government and business. The government administrator
confesses to the same incentive of "the desire to accumulate wealth
[and] providing security for our family and ourselves"; while the
business boss insists equally with the government bureaucrat that
"America itself was the incentive."
Bureaucrats of all kinds seem to resemble one another more than
they differ, and one of the major points of resemblance may well be
the dynamic urge to participate in any administrative bureaucracy
and to exercise some bureaucratic power. Even the British, who pro-
ceeded early toward municipalization and nationalization of public
enterprise, realized that "it is an administrative truth of the first im-
portance that men who get their hands on a big governmental ma-
chine become concerned to exploit its full potentialities."" As
Harold Laski admitted, "in an administrative bureaucracy the ap-
petite for power grows by what it feeds on." Neither the personal
urge of the bureaucrats nor their administrative behavior differ sim-
ply because they choose to operate in one type of institution or an-
other. Men and women will continue to seek what Fortune called
the "zing," or what J. G. Frederick called the "spring and zest" of
life, whether they engage in the Great Game of Business," the Great
Game of Politics," or an emerging admixture of both.

8. THE SOCIAL ROLE OF BUREAUCRACY

What, then is the actual significance of bureaucracy in modem

life? Max Weber, the German social scientist, has answered this
question by defining bureaucracy as a universal social phenomenon,
and by detaching from it the usual normative judgments of good or
bad.

MAX WEIER
"Bureaucracy" .,
Once it is fully established, bureaucracy is among those social
structures which are the hardest to destroy. Bureaucracy is the means of
.. lvor Jennings, Harold Laski. and William Robson (eds.): J\ Century of
Municipal Progress. 1835-1935. London. G. Allen and Unwin; 1935.
.. J. George Frederick: The Great Game of Business. New York: D. Appleton
Company; 1920, p. 61.
011" Frank R. Kent: The Great Game of Politics. Garden City: Doubleday. Doran
.. Company. Inc.; 1935.
"Max Weber: "BmeallCtllCJ'." Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills: From Max
Weber: Essays in Sociology. Reprinted by permission of Oxford UnivetSity Press.
Copy.right 1946, Oxford UnivetSity Press. Selected from pp. n8-~9, ')'-n.
212
carrying "community action" over into rationaDy ordered "societaJ ac-
tion." Therefore, as an instrument for "societalizing" relations of power,
bureaucracy has been and is a power instrument of the first order-for the
one who controls the bureaucratic apparatus. Under otherwise equal con-
ditions, a "societal action," which is methodically ordered and led, is
superior to every resistance of "mass" or even of "communal action." And
where the bureaucratization of administration has been completely car-
ried through, a form of power relation is established that is practically un-
shatterable.
The individual bureaucrat cannot squirm out of the apparatus
in which he is harnessed. In contrast to the honorific or avocational
"notable," the professional bureaucrat is chained to his activity by his
entire material and ideal existence. In the great majority of cases, he is
only a single cog in an ever-moving mechanism which prescribes to him
an essentially fixed route of march. The official is entrusted with specialized
tasks and normally the mechanism cannot be put into motion or arrested
by him, but only from the very top. The individual bureaucrat is thus
forged to the community of all the functionaries who are integrated into
the mechanism. They have a common interest in seeing that the mecha-
nism continues its functions and that the societally exercised authority
carries on.
The ruled, for their part, cannot dispense with or replace the
bureaucratic apparatus of authority once it exists. For this bureaucracy
rests upon expert training, a functional specialization of work, and an at-
titude set for habitual and virtuoso-like mastery of single yet methodically
integrated functions. If the official stops working, or if his work is force-
fully interrupted, chaos results, and it is difficult to improvise replace-
ments from among the governed who are fit to master such chaos. This
holds for public administration as well as for private economic manage-
ment. More and more the material fate of the masses depends upon the
steady and correct functioning of the increasingly bureaucratic organiza-
tions of private capitalism. Everywhere the modern state is undergoing
bureaucratization. But whether the power of bureaucracy within the
polity is universally increasing must here remain an open question.
The fact that bureaucratic organization is technically the most
highly developed means of power in the hands of the man who controls
it does not determine the weight that bureaucracy as such is capable of
having in a particular social structure. The ever-increasing "indispensa-
bility" of the officialdom, swollen to millions, is no more decisive for
this question than is the view of some representatives of the proletarian
movement thal: the economic indispensability of the proletarians is de-
cisive for the measure of their social and political power position. If "in-
dispensability" were decisive, then where slave labor prevailed and where
freemen usually abhor work as a dishonor, the "indispensable" slaves
ought to have held the positions of power, for they were at least as in-
dispensable as officials and proletarians are today. Whether the power of
213 ADMINISTaATION AND IUItEAUCIlACY

bureaucracy as such increases cannot be decided a priori from such

reasons. The thawing in of economic interest groups or other non-official
experts, or the drawing in of non-expert Jay representatives, the establish·
ment of local, inter·local, or central parliamentary or other representative
bodies, or of occupational associations-these seem to run directly against
the bureaucratic tendency. How far this appearance is the truth must be
discussed in another chapter. In general, only the following can be said
here:
Under normal conditions, the power positions of a fully developed
bureaucracy is always overtowering. The 'political master' finds himself in
the position of the 'dilettante' who stands opposite the 'expert: facing
the trained official who stands within the management of administration.
This holds whether the 'master' whom the bureaucracy serves is a 'peo-
ple: equipped with the weapons of 1egislative initiative: the 'referendum:
and the right to remove officials, or a parliament, elected on a more
aristocratic or more 'democratic' basis and equipped with the right to vote
a lack of confidence, or with the actual authority to vote it. It holds
whether the master is an aristocratic, collegiate body, legally or actually
based on self-recruitment, or whether he is a popularly elected president,
a hereditary and 'absolute' or a 'constitutional' monarch.

As Weber indicates, the administrative power of bureaucrats is

not necessarily identical with social domination by a bureaucracy.
Thus the crucial problem becomes one of balancing power groups,
not of restraining a powerfully established bureaucracy."

SUMMARY
Bureaucracy is generally used as an invective against government.
But when the concept is examined scientifically, we find that its real
components-inflexibility, unwieldliness, impersonality-are com-
mon to all large organizations: business, government, labor and social
institutions of all types. Moreover, the bureaucrats of these institu-
tions do not seem to differ materially from one another in personal
behavior or psychological incentive. Large-scale enterprise formerly
attributed only to business is beginning to characterize government.
There is less and less evidence, too, that governmental bureaucracy is
unable to experiment as successfully as business and in some fields
governmental experimentation is actually pointing the way to more
effective types of administration.
If size and unwieldliness leading to inflexibility and impersonality
are the main characteristics of bureaucracy, the .cure may lie in de-
volving work or possibly in zoning powers to smaller functioning
.. E. Pendleton Herring: Public Administration and the Public Interest. New York
and London: McGraw-Hili Book Company. luc.; 1936.
214
units. How this can be done without sacrificing the advantages of
large-scale organization and central coordination or unified planning
is one of the major problems of modem society. So far as the indi-
vidual administrative unit or bureau is concerned, there is a growing
appreciation that a simple organization kept as small as the functions
assigned to it will permit is prefemble under normal circumstances.
The effective administrator realizes more and more, as Marshall
Dimock has pointed out, that although organizational aggrandize-
ment may have tempomry attractions, "nothing will more quickly
dissipate the strength of his organization than the assumption of un-
necessary and unrelated activity." ..
Nevertheless, a modern community willing to preserve hberty
(not only freedom for the few but a genuine liberty for the many)
may have an urgent need for a strong administrative bureaucracy. A
machinery is necessary which will enforce the political accountability
and administrative responsibility of the bureaucmcy." A major dif-
ficulty in keeping government functioning, both democratically and
efficiently, may prove to be the public'S failure to give proper recog-
nition to its bureaucrats. Certainly, the prestige value of public em-
ployment has not been high enough to encourage the best public
servants in the United States, although there has been a decided favor-
able shift in sentiment between the 1930'S and the 1940'S.·'
At the same time, we must be vigilant in seeing that the prestige
of our business managers remains high enough to attmct the most en-
terprising yet socially responsible personnel-4:specially in the case
of our "big" corporations.·' On the other hand, we need not go to the
other extreme of establishing a state in which the government bu-
reaucmcy reigns supreme. A danger is apparent in what might be
called the bureaucratic state dominated by government officials, as
surely as we find a danger in the market state dominated by business-
men, or the garrison state dominated by the military. We must grant
.. Dimock: The Executive in Action, p. 53.
Ie Carl J. Friedrich: "Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsi·
bility." Public Policy J 940. Cambridge: Graduate School of Public Administratiou,
1940. Herman Finer: "Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government."
Public Administration Review, Summer '94', vol. 1, pp. 335-50.
I1Compare the Chicago surveys by Leonard D. White: The Prestige Value of
Public Employment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; '939. and Further
Contributions to the Prestige Value of Public Employment. Chicago: The University
of Chicago Press; '93%. with the two surveys made in Cincimtati and New York by
the Maxwell Graduate School of Citizenship and Public Affairs of Syracuse University.
Civil Service Assembly: Public Relations of Public Personnel Agencies. Chicago: CSA;
1941. C. Lyle Belsley: "Why Bureaucracy Is Belittled." Personnel Administration,
January 1947, vol. 9, p. 19 et seq. See also John J. Corson: "The Popular View of
Bureaucrats." lbid~ p. 15 et seq .
.. Eugene Hobrum: "TIle Public Responsibilities of Big Companies." Address to
the Economic Club of Detroit, Nov. 8. 1948.
21S ADMINISTRATION AND IURIAUCaACY

sufficient professional power to bureaucrats of aU institutions to

match the responsibilities assigned to them. Thus, the process of
identifying and controlling those administrators who really direct the
bureaucracy becomes a reasonable task.
Although considerable fear remains, fancied and well-founded,
that bureaucracy threatens freedom, it should be recalled that his-
torically bureaucracy flourished not as an attack upon liberty, but
as a method of displacing a feudal oligarchy. If our democracy can be
kept genuinely well-informed and responsibly led, we need have no
fear of our ability to organize or manage our administocracy or bu-
reaucracy. We will now tum to these more specific problems of or-
ganization and management in the remaining parts of this book.
 PART II

THE SCIENCE OF ORGANIZATION

 CHAPTER EIGHT

THE PROBLEM OF ORGANIZATION

THE MOST ELEMENTARY ASPECT of administration is organization-

the structure of social institutions and their constituent parts, the
composition of economic enterprises and their various branches, the
organization of governmental agencies and their numerous depart-
ments. As it is mainly a matter of structure, organization bears the
same rudimentary relationship to administration as does the science
of anatomy or skeletology to the field of medicine. An administrative
organization can be sketched and charted just as the human body can
be physically depicted. Apart from its graphic convenience and its
"teachable" quality, however, what intrinsic relationship does or-
ganization bear to administration?
The real importance of organization falls somewhere between
two extreme positions. One position was announced as early as 1733
by the poet, Alexander Pope, in his famous couplet: "For forms of
government let fools contest; whatever is best administered is best." 1
The other position magnifies organizational form, making it a super-
subject either parallel with or inclusive of the whole subject of ad-
ministration.' Neither extreme has many adherents among experi-
enced administrators. The typical view is a middle position which has
been generally accepted in the United States since its founding.
Quoting Pope's couplet, The Federalist, in 1788, refused to "acqui-
1 Alexander Pope: "An Essay On Man," Epistle III.
• Edwin O. Stene: "An Approaclt to a Science of Administration." Ameritan
Political Science Review, December 1940, vol. 34, pp. 1124-37. See the comments of
Waldo: The Administllllive State, p. 171; E. H. Anderson and G. T. Schwenn~:
The Science of Prodnetion Organization. New York: John Wiley 5: Sons, Inc.; 1938 .
219
220
esce in the political heresy of the poet" • and gave diligent but not
exclusive, attention to questions of governmental organization.
In this introductory chapter to the subject of organization, the
problem will be defined.' The first half of the chapter will examine
the subject from the top down by explaining the broad organizaticmal
issues which dominate contemporary thought, such as the relations
between governmental authorities and economic organizations. 1'he
second half of the chapter will explore the problem from the stand-
point of the individual in his relations to the groups and organizations
with which he works and lives; here we will seek the basic elem(.nts
out of which organizational units are constrncted. The broad qtJ es-
tions of social organization dealt with in the first half of the chaflt~r
and the more technical problem of organizing individuals and t}:!elI
daily jobs analyzed in the second half, may be regarded as dispaPlte
subjects; but they are distinctly related, as we shall see. All tl:I~se
aspects of organization can be studied sequentially from the ordeimg
of individuals or their specialized tasks to the composition of any en-
terprise or of social groups. The problem of organization is the pi?b-
lem of the one and the many, of relating individuals to their instItu-
tions, of fitting modern man and his activities into an impersonal
multi-group society.

1. GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION AND THE MODERN

ttO~OM'f

How to constitute the structure of the state in order to help and

yet harness the other organizations of society, such as the economic
institutions, has always been one of the foremost problems of society.
The nature of this problem in the highly specialized and technolo&ical
setting of modem society is here descnbed by (a) Charles Merriam,
whose biography has been previously sketched, and (b) Robert D.
Calkins, economist, labor mediator, business school dean, and, like
Merriam, an executive of a major educational fopndation, the Oen-
eral Education Board.
(a) CHARLES MERRIAM
Systematic Politics'
The technical apparatus of modem organization is far I1lore
complicated. elaborate. and scientific than that of preceding generations.
• The Federalist, No. 68.
• For a fonnal set of definitions, see "Some Common Definitions of Organization,"
prepared for tbe Org:!nization md Metbods Conference of the United States Burel'll of
the Budget, 1946.
• Chules Merriam: Systematic Politics. Adapted from pp. 1,0-51, 167-68, '70,
! 77-78. Reprinted by petmission of The University of Chicago Press. CopyPgbt,
'945. The Univmity of Chicago' Press.
221 THE PROBLEM OF ORGANIZATION

We now know how to produce, how to fight, how to administer social

affairs, public or private, on a massive scale; and no modern group is un-
mindful of the technical tools available for this purpose. Masses of men
and women-millions of them-now know more about organization, its
meaning and apparatus, than ever before in human history. Its cult is no
longer secret or magic. What now appears is a reasonable expectancy by
those concerned that under such and such conditions such and such an
outcome will follow, in an organizational pattern, of which they are parts,
and in which they share responsibility.
The earlier political thinkers used the term "organization" in
the broadest sense of the term, that is, with reference to the widest aspects
of the patterns of political forces in a given state. Thus a political society
might be organized as a monarchy, aristocracy, or democracy, as a city-
state, feudal state, a national state, imperial state, or a world state. Em-
phasis was also placed on the organs of organization. These came to be
standardized in the course of time under the categories of legislative,
executive, and judicial organs, the combination of which in some form of
balance was held to be the indispensable basis of sound organization.
Much attention has been given in recent years to what might be
called the ''higher organization" of the state, both in the practical ex-
perimentation of modem nations and in the domain of theoretical analysis.
In almost every country in the world there has been experimentation with
and discussion of the emerging evolution of political-economic forms and
forces, now everywhere challenging the peace and security of mankind-
technology, cartels, unions, business and agricultural associations, 3fI11ies,
professions, churches, schools. The problem of a socialistic or a mixed
economy has led to vigorous debate not only upon economic principles
but upon the whole political setting of economics.

(b) ROBERT O. CALKINS

"A Challenge to Business Education"·
Today the economy is a vast aggregation of private enterprises,
large and small, public enterprises, government economic agencies, labor
unions, business associations, and related institutions, all interlaced
through interdependent economic functions and all managed purpose-
fully. This institutional structure includes at its center some 6 million
farms and 3 million private business firms. These are flanke1 on one side
by 35 million households, representing the consuming entities served by
the rest of the system. On the other side are growing numbers of federal,
state, and local public enterprises, some exceptionally large. Above are
numerous government agencies, regulating, directing, influencing, re-
stricting, serving, and fostering the other elements of the economy. In
among these institutions are numerous labor unions, busiless associations.
• Robert D. Calkins: "A CbaIIenge to Business Education." Harvard BusinesB Re·
view, Winter 1944. vol. z~, p. 1']6. Reprinted by pennission.
222
and dubs of vanous types, dominated by economic motives and devoted
to inBuencing the conduct of business and related activities on the one
hand and public policy and public activities on the other hand.
The operating units, forming the central body of the economy, are
supplemented by numerous institutions, enterprises, and organizations
performing professional and other services of a more or less incidental
economic character. Altogether, they constitute a going concern, the most
intricate and complex institutional structure men have ever erected for
their mutual benefit. It functions largely on a voluntary basis through the
independent management of over 10 million separate enterprises and or-
ganizations.

In such a complex society, how are the crucial institutions, par-

ticulady those in the economic field, to be reconciled with the state
organization? As Merriam suggests, the old idea was that the different
social groups could be given weight or representation in the various
branches of the government, that is, its legislative, executive, and ju-
dicial branches; or in either of two houses of a legislature, one giving
some expression to the aristocratic and the propertied elements and
the other giving more recognition to the popular or laboring elements
of the community. The bicameral legislature itself, however, has
tended to become democratized in both its houses. In American ex-
perience, the Senate of the United States has been transformed by
constitutional amendment and political practice from an indirectly
elected body representing select and influential interests to a directly
elected body which is just as responsive to the popular will as the
House of Representatives. Moreover, the tripartite separation of
powers in the opinion of many observers is obsolescent!
In an attempt to achieve a rebalance of power, an alternative view
has developed to the effect that the basic elements now to be recog-
nized within the governmental structure are specific socio-economic
interests. These interests, it is felt, might be recognized through an
economic parliament, which gives some expression to a form of
"guild socialism,"· industrial representation or labor syndicalism.'
In accordance with this view, governmental organization, whatever
its branches or its departmental breakdown might be, has usually
been dominated in any case by some such power group, either in the
form of blooded royalty, landed aristocracy, ecclesiastical hierarchy,
military clique, wealthy planters, business owners, bureaucratic of-

1 Marshall Dimock: The FrontieR of Public Administration. Chicago: The Uni·

versity of Chicago Press; l<H6, Chapter 1.
• G. D. H. Cole: Guild Socialism. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Co.; 1921.
• See, for example, Robert A. Dahl: "Worken' Control of Industry and the British
Labor Party." .American Pulitical Science Review, October 1947. vol. 41, pp. 875--900.
 TIll PIlOBLiM OF OlGANl%A11OII

ficials, or even proletarian worlcers; ,. and, so this view runs, this fact
may as well be recognized in the state structure as well as in social
pmctiT·ce· ose cntics
o th . fa'Ith'm the power 0 f the poli'
. . Wh 0 put th en ticaI
community to override powerful and partisan interests, the foregoing
is not a promising picture, but it accurately reflects the dilemma of
contemporary organization. In 1946, it appeared to many leading
American scholars, who had convened on the occasion of the Bi-
centennial of Princeton University to discuss the subject of "The
Evolution of Social Institutions in America," that: "The Executive
has'come to exercise a vacillating control. ... The Legislature has
passed into decline.. '.. The Judiciary has ceased to be the bulwark
of the economy. . . . Actual government has drifted. . . . The
older establishment has lost its articulate and functional character;
the newer establishment has not yet fallen into patterns." 11 Is it
possible under such conditions to administer, to organize, to manage
a democratic commonwealth?

2. PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC ORGANIZATION

The situation should not cause despair, for the organizational

problem is not one of utter chaos. The irreconcilability of the conflict
between groups and organizations is by no means irremediable. In
past centuries, the crucial struggle was between church and state,
but an accommodation was worked out. At present, the contest has
been defined primarily as one between the state and the economic
institutions of society, and here, too, we shall find many promising
signs of accommodation. For some observers, this conRict, like the
controversy over bureaucracy," has become a doctrinaire one be-
tween private organization and public organization as a whole, be-
tween the individualistic conception and the collectivistic organiza-
tion of society. This view has been strongly asserted in the United
States, where high value has always been attributed to business
competence and where business leaders themselves have candidly as-
serted that they are "the most influential class in the country." 11
Two readings will present this point of view: (a) President Coolidge'S
address of 19:ZS to the Daughters of the American Revolution; and

I. See Albert S. Kiester: "Are Government and Business Separate Entities."

The Southern Economic Tournai, January 1936, vol. " pp. 3-12.
U Princeton University Bicentennial Conferences, Series I, Conference 4, p. 3 .
.. See Cbapteq.
'" Samuel O. Dunn; "The 'Practical' Socialist." Nation's Business, November 19~3,
vol. 16, p. -S.
224
(b) a definitive statement on capitalism and collectivism issued in
1939 by the Machinery and Allied Products Institute, an organiza-
tion devoted to the expansion of capital improvements in the United
States.
(a) CALVIN COOLIDGE
Address to the Daughters of the American lte¥oIution H
We are especially prone to call on the National Government to
take over our burdens, and with them our freedom. Through regulations
and commissions we have given the most arbitrary authority over OUI ac-
tions and our property into the hands of a few men. Some of this has been
necessary to prevent those who are weak from being overcome by those
who are strong. But it is a procedure fraught with considerable danger
and should only be adopted as a last resort. There is one field, however,
which belongs to the people, upon which they have uniformly insisted that
the Federal Government should not trespass. That is the domain of
private business. If the people are to remain politically free, they must be
economically free. Their only hope in that direction is for them to keep
their own business in their own hands.
Our theory of society rests on a higher level than Communism.
We want the people to be the owners of their property in their own right.
We recoguize that they are all capitalists by nature. We want them to be
all capitalists in fact. That result is being approached rapidly. Our system
is demonstrating by practice that it works.
The very essence of business is the expectation of a profit on the
part of those who conduct it. Government is conducted from an entirely
different motive. When business is in private hands, it is expected to be
run for the benefit of the owners. When the Government steps in, the
purchasers, users, and beneficiaries of what the Government undertakes
to supply insist that the concern should be conducted for their benefit. It
does not eliminate selfishness; it simply transfers it in part from the seller
to the purchaser. Under these conditions it ceases to be a real business,
becomes lacking in enterprise and initiative, and does not have any m0-
tive to provide improved service.
If it is desirable to protect the people in their freedom and inde-
pendence, if it is desirable to avoid the blighting effects of monopoly sup-
ported by the money of the taxpayer, if it is desirable to prevent the
existence of a privileged class, if it is desirable to shield public officials from
the infiuence of propaganda and the acute pressure of intrenched selfish-
ness, if it is desirable to keep the Government unencumbered and clean,
with an eye single to public service, we shall leave the conduct of our
private business with the individual, where it belongs, and not undertake
to unload it on the Government.
"April 16, 19:1.8, 37th Continental ~ of the D. A. R. at Washington, D. C.
Quoted in Nation', BuIiDess, July 19.8, vol:
16. p. 19. Reprinted by permission.
22S THI PlOIUM OF ORGANIZATION

(b) MACHINIItY AND ALLIED PlODUCTS INSTITUTE

Capital Goods and the American Enterprise System 16
Throughout the ages there have come down to us only these two
fundamentally different concepts of the organization of society:
The Individualistic Concept (Capitalism }-in which the indi-
vidual possesses the greatest possible freedom of personal conduct and
progresses as he may, by his own efforts and ability, with only such re-
strictious from the group as may prevent his efforts from interfering un-
reasonably with like efforts of other individuals, and with only such group
support as may prevent him from beipg submerged; the individual being
the supreme unit, the group functioning as a unit only to the extent
necessary for the common good, and then through delegated powers of
limited scope.
This form of social organization is characterized, in its economic
aspect, by the ownership and control of the facilities of production, distri-
bution and living by individuals or groups of individuals. It is based upon
three simple propositions: First, the voluntary division of labor, including
the right of the individual to seek the kind of gainful employment he
chooses; second, the free exchange of goods and services; and third, the
institution of private property which lnay be defined as the right of the
individual to acquire and own property and to enjoy its use so long as
such use does not interfere with the rights of others.
The Collective Concept-in which the social group, acting
through its governing medium, determines and controls the acts of each
individual within it, the individual being restrained or stimulated by the
governing medium as it may desire, to obtain the predetermined results,
the group being the supreme unit, the individual being subordinated to it
in every way.
This form of social organization, in its economic aspect, is char-
acterized by ownership or control by government of the facilities of pro-
duction and distribution. In its extreme form-communism-the facilities
of living also are owned and controlled by government. It substitutes for
the voluntary division of labor an assigned or allocated division of labor,
this being an essential concomitant of controlled production in that con-
trol of production necessarily carries with it the allocation of employment.
Thus the difference between individualism and collectivism lies
largely in the character of the ownership of property including the con-
trol of its use, particularly the facilities of production, distribution, trans-
portation, communication and commerce-capital goods. Ownership of
these facilities by individuals is made possible by the phenomenon of
private capital-that is, the accumulation of private savings and the forma-
tion of private capital is thus the keystone of individualism (capitalism).

10 Capital Goods and the American Enterprise System. Chicago: Machinery and
Allied Products Institute. April 1939, selected from pp. 2-5.
Anything that controls or limits these processes will eventually control
and limit private ownership and use of property, and will condition the
fundamental characteristics of the entire social order.

In accordance with this analysis, then, individualism is made

synonymous with private enterprise, private property and private or-
ganization, while the concept of collectivism_is attached to public
organization and governmental enterprise.

3. PUBLIC PLUS PRIVATE ORGANIZATION

This schism between private and public organization is not quite

so apparent in practice. When business "captured" government, dur-
ing the Coolidge era in the 192.0'S, it was asserted: "There is no
longer any real antagonism between government and business. Presi-
dent Coolidge and Secretary Hoover removed anything approaching
real antagonism and now Hoover as President will undoubtedly con-
tinue to be liberal and fair." 16 Likewise, when other economic in-
terests, like labor or farm groups, are satisfied with governmental
policy, their sense of antagonism between government and economic
interests disappears. Almost all types of private organizations accept
grants of authority from the state allowing them to exercise virtual
governmental powers themselves." This condition occurs in the case
of the power of certification exercised by the professions, including
law and medicine, but it is also true of some of the activities of busi-
ness and labor organizations.
Furthermore, private organizations and private enterprises com-
peting with one another constantly seek to encourage or thwart the
collective power of government: exporters versus manufacturers
over the tariff, shippers versus railroads over transportation rates,
timber interests against wood product manufacturers over forestry
regulations, construction material manufacturers versus real estate
interests over public housing, .brewers versus tavern keepers over
liquor licensing, butter producers versus oleomargarine producers
over excise taxation. Finally, the differences between individualism
and collectivism are particularly hard to enforce because government
subsidy of various legitimate interests is frequently sought, even by
those interests which react most strongly against government sub-
sidies in general. Bruce Barton once termed this system one of
,. Edward N. Hurley: "Government, Enemy or Ally of Business." Nation's Busi-
ness, April 19Z9, vol. 17, p. u.
" Lane W. Lancaster: ''The I..egaI Status of Private Organizatious Exen:isiug Gov-
ernmental Powers." Southwestern Social Science .Qnarterly, MaIeh '93', vol. IS. pp.
3zS-36.
"Gimme Govemment," .. and a leading industrialist writing during
the 1930'S put the matter frankly in the following terms: "The entire
blame does not rest with government. Business men and chambers of
commerce have gone to Washington and asked the government to
make navigable unnavigable rivers; to make farmable unfarmable
land; to build and maintain canals and railroads; to establish super-
fluous shipyards. Business men have flocked to Washington for as-
sistance from the Department of Commerce on problems which
were their own problems. . . . Business must change its position,
stand on its own feet and light its own light. It must realize that gov-
ernment can help one group only at the tlKpense of another." II
It remains to be demonstrated, however, if any group in an inter-
dependent economy can completely "stand on its own feet." Must
not private and public organizations exercise their powers in c0-
operation?
A number of authorities both within and outside governmental
circles recognize the possibility and the necessity of effective col-
laboration between private and public organization. The view that
we must have public plus private organizations, under conditions
that are favorable not only for secure private enterprise but also for
sturdy public organization, has been well stated by: (a) E. Pendleton
Herring, Professor of Government at Harvard University and sub-
sequently President of the Social Science Research Council; and (b)
Edwin G. Nourse, Professor of Economics at Brookings Institution
and subsequently Chairman of the President's Council of Economic
Advisers.
(a) E. PENDLETON MElllNe

"Logomachy and Administration""

To talk of government control versus private enterprise is to
create a deceptive dichotomy. For the "government to take over business"
at the present time would be equivalent to business taking over the gov·
ernment. "Government" is not something apart. Government control of
business means in essence that such interests as the consumer, the
worker, or the farmer now unrepresented in the marulgement of industrial
enterprise turn to political channels for securing a share of control. Popu·
lar government can not be said to exist in a society where the state pos-
sesses the outward forms of "free government" but where the daily actions
of men are dominated in fact by a churchly hierarchy, by an industrial oli·

.. Colliers, September 24, 1938.

.. C. C. Miller: "Business Fostered Bureaucracy." Nation's Business, February
'933, vol. 21, p .• 6.
.. E. PeudJeton Herring: "Logomaclty and Administratioo." ToumaJ of Social
PhiIosQplty. January 1937. vol.... Selected from pp. 99-101. Reprinted by pennissioo.
228
garchy, or by a political machine. The student of government has given
some attention to the first and last of these conditions, but the extent to
which human activities are falling under the influence of a sman group
of bankers and entrepreneurs can not be neglected. We are prone to re-
gard the controls imposed by the state through official channels as some-
how implicitly restrictive, while the control imposed by men upon cach
other in economic life is considered a part of the nature of things.
This contrast between the views toward official versus private
"government" has a solid historical background. Never since the rise of
modern statehood have there been such great power-areas dissociated so
clearly from social control. While pluralistic in the number of its control-
centers, the Middle Ages was yet dominated by an ideology of intellectual
universalism and a theology of Christian unity. The present age is one of
chaotic values and of disparate authorities. Authorities in the industrial
world acknowledge no value save their own power and expansion. They
determine what we shall eat, when we shall sleep, and even what we must
think. They challenge any effort at control. They use the forms and ideals
of responsible popular government for the protection of their own priv-
ileges.
Once government is recognized as not confined to agencies la-
belled official and political, we can search for means of obtaining a higher
sense of social responsibility on the part of business.

(b) EDWIN C. NOURSE

"Public Administration and Economic Stabilixation""
In its economic aspect the Employment Act [of 1946, establish-
ing the President's Council of Economic Advisers] re-affirms and in fact
makes more explicit and comprehensive than ever before the national
policy of adhering to a system of predominantly private enterprise. At
the same time, it states more explicitly and comprehensively than ever
before a policy of the national government to follow such lines of positive
action as the legislature may see fit to authorize under the leadership of
the Chief Executive or on its own initiative, subject to his veto powers.
This declaration of residual public responsibility on a fonndation of pri-
vate enterprise simply reaffirms as a matter of conscious policy the tra-
ditional course we have followed ever since Colonial times. This is the
"mixed" economy under which in federal, state, and local matters we
have been accustomed to operate. We of course have never had our socio-
politico-economic carburetor rigidly set to any particular mixture; but
neither have we ever undertaken to operate either on pure air or pure
gasoline.
I strongly suspect that we shaU continue these rather unsystem-
21 Edwin G. Nourse: "Public Administration and Economic Stabilization." Public
Administration Review, Spring 1947, vol. 7. Selected from pp. 86-87, 91-';l2. Reprinted
by permission.
 THE PROBLEM OF ORGANIDTION

atic practices under the Employment Act much as we have followed them
for a century or more before its passage. But in conjunction with-and in
a sense compensating for-this flexible and easygoing way of business life
we have at length enunciated a basic policy of economic action for the
federal government, coordinated-so far as they will permit-with state
and local governments. This policy is in no way to abrogate or interfere
with the embarking of the people in such private ventures as seem to
them promising. Nor does it propose any logical or ideological rule or
criterion for determining the line between private, publicly regulated, and
governmental activity, in the economic area.
Deep study and careful experimentation will be needed if we are
to develop democratic but efficient means for interlacing public and pri-
vate machinery to effect such stabilization of our economy as an intelli-
gent and well-intentioned people should be capable of achieving.

Twenty years previously, John Dewey, the philosopher of Ameri-

can pragmatism, had similarly declared: "The line of demarcation
between actions left to private initiative and management and those
regulated by the state have to be discovered experimentally." 22 Most
men search for "arrangements which are more utilitarian, more eco-
nomic and more systematic"; 2S they are not as frequently concerned
with differences in doctrine as might be expected. As a banker from
depressed but "conservative" Mississippi said when asked about the
famous "balance Agriculture with Industry" program of his state
(under which local government authorities constructed factories.
rented them for $1 per year to private enterprise, and could them-
selves operate these public "enterprises"): "The BAWI plan was
socialistic in tendency, but it worked." ,.
"Will the organization work" is thus a popular American test.
Under such pragmatic circumstances, the form of activity under-
taken by public organizations need not be socialistic. Government
ownership is only one of several alternatives. As the American in-
dustrialist, Owen D. Young, stated to the Senate Committee on
Interstate Commerce in the crucial days of 1929: "We must learn
how to regulate adequately our public service in private hands or
there will be no alternative but the government ownership of such

22 John Dewey: The Public and Its Problems. New York: Henry Holt & Co.: 19'7.
P·64.
,. Arthur G. Coons: "Government Expansion in the Economic Sphere." Annals of
the Anteric.n Academy of Political and SOCial Science, November 1939, vol. 206, pp.
2<>-'1. See also Frederick A. Cleveland: Organized Democracy. New York: Longmans,
Green & Co.: 1913, p. 448. "Business---and Government." Fortune, March 1938,
vol. 17, p. 69: June 1938, vol. 17, p. ;1 et. seq. Elton Mayo: The Social Problems 01
an Industrial CiviJi2ation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press: 1945, pp. 53-4·
.. Mississippts BAWl Plan. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 1944. p. 64
230
services." "In addition to organizations exercising the power of gov-
ernmental ownership, like the Tennessee Valley Authority. there
are agencies exercising prohibitive functions like the Federal Trade
Commission which attempt to prevent business practices in re-
straint of trade; the regulatory type like the Interstate Commerce
Commission which regulates railroad transportation; and the promo-
tIve type like the CivIl Aeronautics Board which renders air safety
services and subsidizes the operations of airlines. A British civil
servant, who in 194z anticipated the Labor Party program of 1945.
VIrtually described the system which was already creeping up on
Americans, when he predicted: "One industry may be owned by the
State and run like the Post Office, from Whitehall; another may be
operated by a public corporation; a third by private enterprise sub-
ject to public control of prices and profits; a fourth by a trade group
on which the consuming public is represented; while a fifth is left
to face competition unregulated by the state." ..
No doubt a choice of one type of public organization over another
will reveal a preference for the doctrinal extremes of individualism
or collectivism. One should realize, however, that pure types of
private organizations and public organizations are rare. Moreover,
the compromise types have not suddenly been superimposed upon
society; they have been a long time forming. In one of the earliest
decisions involving the regulation of business affected with a public
interest, Lord Hale stated in 16qO: "The matter changeth the custom;
the contracts the commerce; the dispositions, educations and tem-
pers of men and societies change in a long tract of time; and so must
their laws in some manner be changed, or they will not be useful
for their state and condition." 21

4. THE MANAGEMENT OF A MULTI-GROUP SOCIETY

Is twentieth century civilization merely drifting into accidental

forms of collective organization? In the long span of human evolu-
tion, man's conscious effort to bring order out of the chaos of his
social surroundings early expressed itself in various forms of collec-
tive and co-operative mechanisms such as the horde, the tribe, the

.. Senate, Interstate Commerce Committee, Hearings, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess.,

December 9, 1929. See also Robert R. Young: "A Strange Alliance for Monopoly."
Atlantic Moothly, December 1946, vol. 17&, p. 50 .
.. Alec Cairncross: "The Higher CiVl1 Servioe After tbe War." Public Administra·
tion, July-Septernber '94_, wI. 20, p. 61.
'" See Breck P. McAllister: "Lord Hale and Business Affected with a Public In·
terest." Harnud Law Review, March 19~ vol. 4;, pp. 759-9"
231 THE PROAEM OF OItCANI%ATION

family, the village, and the state." Among those scholars who have
analyzed this fundamental problem of history with an enlightenment
that brackets civilizations widely separated by time are (a) the
ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, and (b) the modem social
theorist Professor Robert MacIver of Columbia University.

(a) ARISTOTLE
Politics"
Every state is a community of some kind, and every community
is established with a view to some good; for mankind always act in order
to obtain that which they think good. But, if all communities aim at
some good, the state or political community, which is the highest of all,
and which embraces all the rest, aims at good in a greater degree than
any other, and at the highest good. As in other departments of science,
so in politics, the compound should always be resolved into the simple
elements or least parts of the whole. We must therefore look at the ele·
ments of which the state is composed, in order that we may see in what
the different kinds of rule differ from one another, and whether any
scientific result can be attained about each one of them.
In the first place there must be a union of those who cannot
exist without each other; namely, of male and female, that the race may
continue. The family is the association established by nature for the sup-
ply of men's everyday wants, and the members of it are called by Cha-
rondas 'companions of the cupboard: and by Epimenides the Cretan,
'companions of the manger: But when several families are united, and the
association aims at something more than the supply of daily needs, the
first society to be formed is the village. When several villages are united
in a single complete community, large enough to be nearly or quite self-
sufficing, the state comes into existence, originating in the bare needs of
life, and continuing in existence for the sake of a good life.
Hence it is evident that the state is a creation of nature, and that
man is by nature a political animal. Further, the state is by nature clearly
prior to the family and to the individual, since the whole is of necessity
prior to the part; for example, if the whole body be destroyed, there will
be no foot or hand, except in an equivocal sense, as we might speak of a
stone hand; for when destroyed the hand will be no better than that.
Our purpose is to consider what form of political community is
best of all for those who are most able to realize their ideal of life. Three
alternatives are conceivable. The members of a state must either have
( 1) all things or (2) nothing in common, or (3) some things in common
II Edward D. Jones: Business Administration, Its Models in War, StJIt~, and
Science. New York: The Engineering Magazine Co.; 1914, p. 27 .
.. Aristotle: Politics. Ricru.rd McKeon (ed.): The Basic Worts of Aristotle. New
York: Random House; '94', seIecIed from Book I, chaps. 1-4, Book II, chaps. 1, " S.
TranslakcI by Benjamin 1-. Reprinted by pennissinn of Oxford Unimsity Press.
232
and some not. That they should have nothing in common is clearly im-
possible for the constitution is a community, and mnst at any mte )1ave
a common place-one city will be in one place, and the citizens are t}tose
who share in that one city. But should a well-ordered state have all thiP~~,
as far as may be, in common, or some only and not others? For the CIti-
zens might conceivably have wives and cluldren and property in common,
as Socrates proposes in the Republic of Plato. Which is better, our pres-
e ,li condition, or the proposed new order of society? ,
I am speaking of the premise from which the argument of lSOC-
rates proceeds, 'that the greater the unity of the state the better.' Is it not
obvious that a state may at length attain such a degree of unity as tel ~
no longer a state?-since the nature of a state is to be a plurality, an(l m
tending to greater unity, from being a state, it becomes a family, and f(om
being a family, an individual; for the family may be said to be more than
the state, and the individual than the family. So that we ought not to
attain this greatest unity even if we could, for it would be the destrucpon
of the state.
Even supposing that the women and children belong to individ-
uals, according to the custom which is at present universal, may tl1ere
not be an advantage in having and using possessions in common? lluee
cases are possible: (1) the soil may be appropriated, but the produce
may be thrown for consumption into the common stock; and this is the
practice of some nations. Or (;;l), the soil may be common, and rna}' be
cultivated in common, but the produce divided among individuals for
their private use; this is a form of common property which is said to exist
among certain barbarians. Or (3), the soil and the produce may be :jlike
common.
When the hushandmen are not the owners, the case will be dif-
ferent and easier to deal with; but when they till the ground for tbem-
selves the question of ownership will give a world of trouble. If they do
not share equaJly in enjoyments and toils, those who labour much and
get little will necessarily complain of those who labour little and receive
or consume much. But indeed there is always a difficulty in men living
together and having all human relations in common, but especially in
their having common property. The partnerships of fellow-travellers are
an example to the point; for they generally fall out over everyday matters
and quarrel ahout any trifle which turns up.

(b) R.M. MACiVER

The Web of Government"
The relation of man to the many groups and forms of orlfni-
zation to which he is more nearly or more distantly, more deeply or I1lore
.. R. M. MacIver: The Web of Government. Selected from pp. 421-23, 4 26 , Re-
printed by permission of The Macmillan Company. Copyright, 1947, The Macnlillan
Company.
233 THE 'ROIUM OF OtGANIZATIOIt
superficially, attached is not solved by making one of these, whether the
state or any other, the sole or inclusive object of his devotion, the one social
focus of his being. There are other forms of order than the simple uni-
centered order. There is the order of the balance and inter-adjustrnent
of many elements_ The conception of the all-inclusive all-regulating state
is as it were a pre-Copernican conception of the social system. It appeals
to the primitive sense of symmetry. As we explore more deeply the social
universe we must discard it :md frame a conception more adequate to
social reality. In this exploration we learn, among other things, to under-
stand better the nature of the multi-group society of modern man.
We start from the fact that men have many different kinds of
interest, that some of these are universal, in the sense that they are pur-
sued by all men everywhere-all seek alike the satisfaction of certain ele-
mentary needs-while some are particular, making appeal to some men
and not to others. Now since organization conveys power men learn to
join with others so as to pursue their interests more effectively, each for
each as well as each for all. Some of these interests are purely distributive,
as are most economic interests. These we may speak of as like interests.
The benefits of organization then accrue to each separately, so that the
proceeds become private dividends, privately enjoyed by each. Other
interests are common, in such wise that what each receives does not divide
the product of the collectivity or lessen the benefits available to all the
rest. To this class belong our cultural interests, the advance of knowledge,
the exploration of art, of thought, of literature, of religion, and so forth.
While the individual explorer or creator may receive particular awards,
honors, or emoluments, the things that he explores or creates are poten-
tially for all men. The wells of knowle.dge and of inspiration are not less
full for the number who drink of them. When a man makes shoes it is
for private use. When he makes a work of art or literature it is generally
available, in one way or another, for the enjoyment of those who care
for it.
Thus we can distinguish two types of organization, according to
the nature of their product, leaving aside those that are intermediate or
that in some manner combine both functions. To satisfy this need men
weave manifold relationships with their fellows. These extend from the
give-and-take of love or comradeship through informal neighborly group-
ings for recreation, gossip, and so forth, up to the world-wide religious
brotherhoods.
Let us return, however, to our first conclusion, that the many
cultural organizations of society have not and cannot pave anyone focus,
cannot without losing their identity and their function be amalgamated
and absorbed as mere departments of the state. Now we face the question
of the inter-adjustment of all these organizations, and of the groups who
maintaUi them, within the ordered yet free life of the community_ Here
is the essential problem of our multi--group society.
234
And yet, in spite of the pluralistic nature of human society ~
its multi'group structure, one all-inclusive institution which manlAnd
has helped to fashion (we do not speak now of his divinely cr~ted
or divinely inspired church structure) is his political organizat'o~,
his government, his state. In this sense, Aristotle was correct in ~IS
conclusion that man is by nature a political animal. Some merl m
some states have gone so far as to concede infinite power to the state.
Is it necessary to go so far, or can modern life be carried on effectively
under a genuine multi-group organization? Indeed, is not the really
"pluralistic society," as advocated by MacIver, essential to the "good
llfe" which is the object of the Greek philosopher's all-powerful
state?

5. COLLECTIVE ORGANIZATION AND THE INDIVIDUAL

Let us suppose, however, that the present trend toward gov~~­

mentalization does continue or that a considerable measure of soclah-
zation does occur. Under such circumstances need individualism and
private enterprise be destroyed? A general feellng of resignation
exists that this may eventually occur and that man will become clay
in the hands of the modern Leviathan, the state. Actually we bave
no absolute guarantee that the modem state, once its collective power
is unleashed, will abstain from crushing individual initiative and
private enterprise. The experience of the British, with a legal and
philosophic background not unllke the American, is an interesting
effort to preserve both of these values while collectivizing part of
their economy.
Private business in England has had to reconcile itself, it is true,
to national socialism. Sir Clive Baillieu, President of the Federation
of British Industries, announced in 1946: "Whatever political views
it may hold, industry will not be obstructive; it will not adopt go-
slow tactics. . . . We recognize that the control of industry is no
longer-solely and exclusively-a matter for the propri~tors , . .
and that private enterprise will justify itself by its capacity to operate
profitably in its competitive sphere with due regard to social con-
siderations and national interests." At the same time, the British are
not surrendering their ultimate standards of private achievement and
individual competence, for Baillieu added: "We declare that all in-
dustry-whether under public ownership or private enterpri$C-
must justify itself by work and performance-not by protests and
promises." 81
81 Clive Baillieu: "Management and the Labour Government." Labor ano In·
dustry in Britain. February 1946. vol. 4. p. 'S.
 THE PIlOlLEM OF ORGANIZATION

Many British socialist leaders, have gone further in recognizing

that the crucial problem still remains one of individual effort even
after important segments of the economy are nationalized and the
state socialized. This recognition is demonstrated by the following
readings: (a) an official statement in Labor and Industry in Britain,
published in 1947 by the British Information Services, and (b) an
article on the nationalized coal industry written in 1947 by Jean Bird
for the Washington Post.

(a I "Creating a New Britain" S2

The industrial goal set by the new Britain is the highest possible
production per worker, since this alone will lead to increased living stand-
ards. In working towards this goal, many fundamental changes have al·
ready been made, or projected. This actual conduct of each nationalized
industry is left to a public corporation which has full freedom in the daily
conduct of its affairs, with the object of retaining the initiative and force-
fulness associated with private enterprise. The main differences, it is
claimed, will be that without the obligation to attend to private interests,
the new "owners," acting for the country as a whole, will be able to re-
plan ruthlessly; and, with the Government behind them, will have all
the capital they need. When all the proposed nationalization measures
have been carried out it is thought that about 20 per cent of industry
will be publicly owned, while the remaining 80 per cent will be left to
private ownership.
Is Britain, during all this planning, losing sight of the individual?
What of the individual's right to come and go, write, think, and speak
as he pleases? In no country of the world are these sacred, inalienable
rights of the individual more closely protected than in Britain. Indeed,
not only is every legal protection fully guaranteed and exploited, but the
whole emphasis in British planning is to create a society where no man's
freedom can be crushed through economic exploitation, and where no in-
dividual is held back through the "mass-production" techniques that are
found everywhere today in social life as much as in industry.
Far from crushing the individual, all thinking in Britain today
is concerned with releasing the individual from the homogenizing tend-
encies of the age. This release will come partly feorr, increased educational
and cultural opportunity, which is an outstanding feature of modern
Britain. It is seen also in the elaborate plans for reversing the flow to the
large cities, where the active citizen is lost in an endle~s suburbia. Impor-
tant, too, are the very conscious attempts to give the ordinary worker a
real representative interest in the work of his plant, so that he ceases to
be merely a machine-mindel.
so "Creating a New Britain." Labor and Indu,try in Britain, September-October
1947. vol. ), selected from pp. 16.-63. Reprinted by permission.
 (b) JEAN liD
"("lineer Is Mainstay of 'Socialized' Coal""
"Nationalization" sounds strange and menacing to the average
American. He associates it with "Socialism," and vaguely defines it as a
"taking over" by the government. Parlor pinks greet it with a loud huzzah
while Union Club members choke on their cliches about free enterprise,
but neither left nOT right usually bothers to take a look at the> human side
of nationalization or more important, the productive side. Just what is
nationalization? Who runs it? Does it mean more output? Do workers
benefit? Do they have more incentive?
For Americans, the best available laboratory for the answers is
Britain and its coalfields. In the 10 months since the blue flag of the
National Coal Board was run up over Britain's collieries, nationalization
has begun to take definite shape.
First, there is the former owner-the paradox of nationalization-
the 10neJiest and yet probably the most satisfied man in the nationalized
coal community. The goverument is giving him compensation which he
admits is fair. The exact sum is still not certain, but meanwhile he is
drawing an "interim income" roughly equivalent to half his prewar prof.
its. In the final settlement hell get accrued interest from the date of
nationalization.
The local big shot now is the "area manager." Before nationali·
zation, he was probably production manager for one of the largest coal
companies. Where he used to look after a group of mines with an annnal
output of some two million tons, he must now cover a field more than
twice as big. More important, he has added administrative responsibilities
for such things as finance and distribution. Frankly, he doesn't like it. It
is not his line of business and he feels that all the paper work prevents
him from being a good production manager. To add to his frustrations,
the Central Board has taken away his duties in some fields where he's
had a lifetime of experience, by creating departments in London to deal
with recruitment, welfare and labor relations.
But most technicians under the old regime are now local tech·
nicians of the area manager. Nationalization has more or less revolution-
ized their lives, too. Under private ownership a "good" technician was
often a man who forgot what he had learned at technical school, who
didn't waste his time reading what the foreigoer was doing, who didn't
pester stockholders for new capital. Now, suddenly, the Central Coal
Board expects him to produce vast plans to bring the British coal in-
dustry to the level of the best anywhere in the world. For some tech-
nicians this is an exhilarating experience. For others it is a challenge they
can't meet, and they are grateful for the opportunities nationalization
offers to pass the buck and get lost in form..fi1ling.
"lean Bird: "E1JlIineer Is Mainstay of 'Socialized' Coal" WubiagtoD PoIt,
November 9. 1947. p. 2B. Reprinted b1 permissioIL
 THE PROBLEM OF OIlCANIZA1'ION

Lower down in the hierarchy comes the man who supervises the
day-to-day running of the mine-the manager. He complains a little about
the new requests for information which come from above, but his chief
problem is not due to nationalization. As things are in the post-war world,
nationalization or no nationalIZation, the British miner knows he won't
be fired. Moreover, he feels there is not much point in earning a lot of
money. The $l2. a week he made before the war goes just as far now, and
there is little else to buy with the $2.0 to $48 he makes today.
The miners 'see the same faces peering over the same desks. They
still have to fight for every three-penny wage increase. They look at Some
of their leaders with suspicion, rejecting the explanation that union of-
ficials, many of whom must now accept responsibility for partial manage-
ment, know that nationalization is on trial as their government's great
experiment. The result is often a widening gap between the miners in
the pits and the men who represent them.
"We have left Geordie behind," one union official commented
unhappily. (Geordie is north country slang for manual worker.) "It is a
question of political education," said another. Since union headquarters
in most mining villages is Tammany Hall, the Elks Club and the YMCA
rolled into one, the lesson conceivably could be taught, but the unfortu-
nate fact is that too many union officials on the local level are not making
any attempt.
If this unhappy condition continues, the job of bringing up Brit-
ain's lagging coal production will fall solely on the already overburdened
shoulders of the technicians. "But," they say, "it will take us at least five
years to deliver." New machinery will be needed and new technicians to
help run it. The whole underground layout of the mines has to be re-
planned, and this is a major operation since the average British mine
runs 1000 feet deep compared with the average American mine at only
32.0 feet.
This still leaves one other major problem-administration. Nearly
everyone connected with British coal will admit that in dealing with labor
relations, encouragement of technicians and provision of new capital, the
old owners fell down on their job. They admit that nationalization is
likely to do better on these counts, though perhaps not for several years.
But in the case of administration there has been a great deal of criticism
that the government has not drawn from the existing pool of adminis-
trative ability. Many of the old owners had had a lifetime of experience
in running a coal business. They now find their talents wasted. In their
places are purely technical men or men selected because they are distin-
guished lawyers or accountants and hence politically neutral.

The emphasis in socialist Britain on the individual-the indi-

vidual worker, the citizen, the administrator, even the former OWner;
the solicitude for "retaining the initiative and forcefulness associated
with private1:lJtetprise"i the oflicial attention given to "the stimula-
 tion of individual enterprise and the development of flexible 'busi-
ness-like' administration in uationalized industries" "-all these ideas
sound strangely at variance with the collectivist philosophy. Do we
find here a case of British rationalization, or, paradoxical as it may
sound, is individualism really an essential-the British seem to say
the essential-ingredient of a workable collectivism?
If the answer to this question is a positive one, the pet theories of
many Britishers about private enterprise and public organization will
have to be revised. Already, Clement Davies, the leader of what re-
mained of the British Liberal Party in 1948, reconciled his liberal
philosophy with British socialism in these words: "Let us always re-
member that decision and action must be that of the individual or a
body of individuals. So in truth public enterprise must really mean
the enterprise of individuals clothed with the authority of administer-
ing the service or property or both, owned by the public." ..
Another way of asserting the emerging British point of view was
expressed by President WiJIiman of Uruguay when that country
started its program of industrial nationalization as early as 1911: "It
is certain that the state, lacking the intense motive of personal in-
terests, will never be able to compete with individuals in the matter
of vigilance and devotion to work, but the alternative to state action
in Uruguay is not the individual but the delegated management of
large corporations which are at a similar disadvantage in the lack of
personal interest."" The Uruguayans expropriated large foreign cor-
porations, while the British expropriated their own. But both coun-
tries preached individualism while practicing socialism, and seriously
insisted-and set out to demonstrate-that there need be no incon-
sistency between the two.
What the American position on this point is likely to be depends
on current developments, but that it will continue to emphasize the
role of the individual, whatever the form of the state, we can be quite
certain. The conservative Coolidge expressed the same notion as the
British Liberal-reconciled-to-Labor, Clement Davies, when in 1928
he defended the philosophy of individualism before the Daughters
of the American Revolution: "The fundamental characteristics of
humanity are not going to be changed by substituting government ac-
tion for private enterprise. The individual who manages the one,
with all his imperfections and his selfishness, will have to be em-

.. "Nationalization." Labor and Industry in Britain, September-October 1947,

vol. 5, p. 211.
so Clement Davies. "'The Administrator's Responsibility Towards a Free Society."
Public Administration. Autumn 1948. vol. 26, p.• 6l .
.. Simon G. Hanson; Utopia in Uruguay, p. '07. See Chapter 6.
 THE PROBLEM OF OltGANI%ATlON

ployed to manage the other." Frank J. Goodnow, American pioneer

in public administration and President of The Johns Hopkins Uni-
versity, pointed out what every American realizes about individualism
even while he finds it necessary to give his government more and
more powers; namely, that "the state attains its ends as well through
liberty as through government, as well through entrusting the care
of matters of public interest to individuals as through the mainte-
nance of public governmental services for their management." "
For those peoples who are experimenting with more power for
public organizations, there is, even under private enterprise, a danger
of a deadening collectivism, since large organizations may, and in
practice do, dominate the individual. Contra wise, in a collective
commonwealth, the challenge is still fundamentally a challenge to
the individual.

6. THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATION AND THE INDIVIDUAL

Therefore we return once again to the individual. We must be

cautious, for if the individual becomes the crux of organization why
concern ourselves with the structure or organization at all? This is a
very practical issue as well as a question of theory, as every adminis-
trator knows when he is faced with the prospects of discharging a
first-rate man because he does not "fit into the organization." Aside
from particular decisions of this kind, the problem is continually
faced in the field of administration, whether organizational structure
should be decided upon without regard for the individuals who are to
fill the positions to be established, or whether the individuals avail-
able should determine the organizational structure. The orthodox
answer is that the organizational structure should first be set up and
then the individuals sought to fill the positions established. Among
the writers who have taken a somewhat different position and have
warned that the obsession for organization should not stifle consid-
eration for people and their capacities, are: (a) Alexander Bogdanow,
an outstanding Russian philosopher and economist during the early
Soviet regime; as and (b) John D. Millett, Professor of Public Ad-
ministration at Columbia University, and an army officer who during
World War II handled organizational and management matters in
the Army Service Forces."
87 Frank J. Goodnow: Municipal Home Rule. New York: Columbia University
Press; 1906, p. 37-
BS See the article by J. F. Hecker in the Eneyc10pedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 1,
p.6'7 .
.. See Chapter 11.
240 ....1N1SftA......
<a) A. IOCItANOW

General Theory of Organization to

Mankind pursues the organization of things not merely by means
of technique but also by means of other human faculties, whereby men
themselves are organized to cooperate and carry out ideas. An experieuced
organizer is always able to organize his personnel-no matter what sphere
he may be active in, whether it is an economic undertaking or a govern-
mental authority or any industrial or political group-so that they will
complete and complemeut one another in the interests of the whole. If
necessary, he accommodates every man according to his training and ap-
prenticeship, that is he utilizes divergeut abilities to bring about the total
result desired. And he tries to use the very limitations and shortcomings
of the individual persons so as to facilitate the overall requirements of
the organization and at the same time be in harmony with the special
abilities of his personnel.

( b) JOHN D. MILLETT
"Working Concepts of Organization""
Unfortunately, organizational theory does not ordinarily recog-
nize the personality factor. In reality, this is apt to be an important if not
a controlling consideration in determining the organizational structure
of any agency. The desire or need to accommodate a certain individual
may lead to modification in structure simply for the benefit of that indi-
dual, or because consideration accorded him may secure more impOrtant
advantages. It has happened, for instance, that the entire field organi-
zation of a great agency was adjusted to one top man who insisted that
he could "work" only in a direct command relationship to field instal-
lations. Many a reorganization has been wrecked on the reef of person-
ality. The student in the classroom or the writer on organization may
pretend that personality factors are unimportant; the administrator, in
determining organizational structure may ignore them only at his own
peril.
We may hear someone say, upon looking at an organization
chart, "It may work; it all depends upon the individuals who are assigned
to run it." In the present state of our knowledge about public adminis-
tratiou, it is probably as sound to pick key individuals and build the or-
ganization around them as it is to establish the administrative structure
and then seek the individuals to fill the key posts.

•• A. Bogdanow: General Theory of Organization. Translated and adapted £rom

vol. 2, 1'1'. 28-9. Berlin: Organization V~ft, S. Hirzel; 1926. The ee..
man title is Allgemeine Organizationsle&..: 'i'e&oIogir:.
tl 101m D. Millett: "Working Concepts of Orgar&ization.~ Fritz Morstein Man;
{ed.): Elements of Public Admiaistllllion. Chap. 7. pt>, ........45. ~ by pel'
mission of Prentice-'HaII, loc. Copyript, 1946, ~.HaB, Iflc.
241 THE PR081.EM OF ORGANfDlT1OH

The practical answer to the question of structure versus person-

ality is a dual one. As Professor Dimock has explained, "the wise
executive realizes that good organization is made up in part at least
of the peculiar skills of individuals and in part of the functions to be
performed."" The importance of the personality factor is further
reflected in the fact that the same organization may, at different
stages of development, require quite different personnel types, as we
shall see." Even in the military field, where organizational units are
thought to be so many pawns of standard value which can be moved
from one part of the front to another and from one theater of opera-
tions to another, the individualities available frequently determine
organizational decisions. Thus, some of the most complicated lines
of authority during World War II between the newer air armies
and the older ground forces on the one hand or between the various
national high commands and the supreme allied command agencies
on the other, were worked out not purely by a priori consideration of
military hierarchy, but frequently by an intricate set of personal or
"political" relationships. The relationships between General Eisen-
hower and Winston Churchill or between AAF General Spaatz and
RAF Air Chief Marshall Tedder were interesting illustrations on this
point." The same practice was adhered to on other fronts and at the
more operational levels of the military organization.

7. INDIVIDUAL EXECUTIVES, PLURAL EXECUTIVES, COMMITTEES

AND COMMISSIONS

At the top or executive level of any organization, whether a whole

nation or an individual department, the administrative authority can
be either a single individual or a plural body. Early American admin-
istration tended to prefer the plural executive or committee system
both in government and in business. These committees actually ad·
ministered affairs." The Committees of Correspondence during the
American Revolution had more than mere deliberative powers." Per-
haps this was a necessary component in a colonial and revolutionary

.. Dimock: The Executive in Action, p. 79 .

.. See Chapter 14 .
.. See Captain Harry C. Butcher: My Three Years with Eisenhower. New York:
Simon and Schuster; 1946. Dwight D. Eisenhower: Crusade in Europe. Carden CIty.
New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc.; 1948 .
.. White: The Federalists, pp. 47>-73.
"R. G. Adams: Political Ideas of the American Revolution. Durham: Trinity
College Press; 19U. Philip Davidson: Propaganda and the American Revolution.
Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1941. C. H. Lincoln: RevolutlOmlfJ'
Movement in Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1901.
242
situation in which numerous interests had to be represented and pla-
cated.
The Constitutional Convention averted the plural executive for
the nation; in its stead a powerful Chief Executive was provided.
During the Federalist period premature presidential ambitions of the
strong cabinet secretaries, Hamilton and Jefferson, made American
leaders more conscious still of the need to curb executive pluralism.
Thus, President Adams wrote to Oliver Wolcott in 1797 that if the
plan to set up the position of the Secretary of the Treasury "as a rival
to that of the president" succeeded, we would have "a quintuple
or a centuple executive directory, with all the Babylonish dialect
which modem pedants most effect."" Jefferson himself explained
the failures of French Revolutionary experiments on the basis of
"those internal jealousies and dissensions of the Directory, which
will ever arise among men equal in power, without a principal to
decide and control their differences." ..
Some of the keenest understanding of the dangers and potential-
ities of the plural executive came from (a) Alexander Hamilton, who
was probably the most skilled American administrator during the
formative period, and from (b) Franklin Roosevelt, who, as Presi-
dent, violated the established American principle of the single exec-
utive as often as he applied it.

(a) Letter from Alexander Hamilton to 'ames DUlII\e (1780) ••

Lately, Congress have gone into the measure of appointing
Boards. But this is, in my opinion, a bad plan. A single man in each de-
partment of the administration would be greatly preferable. It would give
us a chance of more knowledge, more activity, more responsibility, and,
of course, more zeal and attention. Boards partake of a part of the incon-
veniences of larger assemblies. Their decisions are slower, their energy
less, their responsibility more diffused. They will not have the same abil-
ities and knowledge as an administration by single men. Men of the first
pretensions will not so readily engage in them, because they will be less
conspicuous, of less importance, have less opportunity of distinguishing
themselves. The members of Boards will take less pains to inform them-
selves and arrive to eminence, because they have fewer motives to do it.
All these reasons conspire to give a preference to the plan of vesting the
great executive departments of the State in the hands of individuals.
"The Worlcs of lohn Adams. Boston: Little Brown and Company; 1852. Letter,
October 20, 1797, vol. 8, p. 555 .
.. Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Monsieur Destutt de Tracy, January 26, 18H.
The Writings of Thomas TeJferson. Memorial Edition, 1904, vol. I), p. 1 S.
.. Letter from Alexander Hamilton to James Duane, 1780. Henry Cabot Lodge
(ed.): The Worlcs of Alexander Hamilton. Vol. 1, pp. 219-20. Reprinted by pet-
mission. of C. P. Putnam's Sons. Copyript, 1903. C. P. Putnam', SonS.
243 THE PROBLEM OF OIlGANIUTIPH

(b) The United States at War'"

The reorganization of machinery for defense, plainly necessPY
by the end of 1940, presented problems of statesmanship far more com-
plex than those concerning the administrative structure of the CovefIl-
ment. The issue in large measure was who was going to run the defer1se
program_ Given the strength of special interests in American society and
the shortage of leaders generally regarded as attached to the nati0l1al
interest, the issue of who was to control was posed sharply by the demand
for the appointment of a single defense czar. This snggestion clothecl a
variety of motives. Some people believed that such an arrangement was
absolntely essential but others advocated it in the hope that the Presid~nt
would abdicate a large part of his responsibility to some person more to
their liking. As it became clear that there would be a reorganization-a nd
that there was at least a chance for a defense "czar"- 3 desperate stru~!e
for position got under way. Industrial and financial groups sought to g?1D
control of the defense program. The War and Navy Departments in the
main were allied with them. Other groups, with equal zeal, fought to
retain their gains of the preceding years and to prevent domination of
the Government by industrial and financial interests. Mr. Knudsen, £)e-
fense Commission advisor on industrial production, and Mr. HilIm?n,
Defense Commission advisor on employment, came to be regarded as
spearheads of the industrial and labor groups respectively. Personally tJiey
were quite willing to accept whatever role the President assigned to them,
but others energetically promoted their candidacy for a dominant role·
h't a PlesS cOD'ierem:e oD'Decem'oer 20, "1940, 't'De 'heS)ben't ti ltL-
lined in general terms the structure of the new Office of Production Mjln-
agement, details of which were to be spelled out in an Executive or<ler.
In his. discussion with the press, the President ridiculed the notion t)lat
there could be found one "Czar," "Poobah" or "Akhoond of Swat" who
would embody all the characteristics necessary for handling -defense }flO-
bilization. In the President's analysis the problem had three e1emejlts,
that of the buyer and user combined and those of management and la!70r.
The Office of Production Management was to consist of these "three
elements, divided among four people-the Director, Mr. Knudsen, lind
the Associate Director, Mr. Hillman" and the Secretary of War and the
Secretary of the Navy.
The President's exposition of the positiollls of the Director-Gen-
eral and the Associate Director-General at his press conference of lan-
uary 7, 1941, gave no satisfaction to those who demanded a single-heaJed
administration of the defense effort.
I suppose the easiest way to put it is that these four
people-the Office of Production Management, Knudsen, HilI-

"'The United States at War. Washington: Committee on Record. of War Ad-

ministration; 1946, selected from pp. 51-55·
244 ADMINISTRATION
man, and the two Secretari~lix the policy and then Knudsen
and Hillman carty it out, just like a law linn that has a case; say
there are two partners, and they carty it out as a law finn. Any-
body that knows anything about management will realize that
that is the practical way to handle that kind of a matter, just like
a law linn with two main partners.
Q. Are they equals?
THE PRESIDENT. That's not the point; they're a
lirm. Is a firm equals? I don't know. See what I mean? Roosevelt
and O'Connor was a law firm in New York; there were just two
partners. I don't know whether we were equal or not. Probably
we might have disagreed in regard to a catch question of that
kind; but we never had a dispute or an argument.
Q. Why is it you don't want a single, responsible head?
THE PRESIDENT. I have a single, responsible head;
his name is Knudsen and Hilhnan.
Q. Two heads.
THE PRESIDENT. No, that's one head. In other
words, aren't you looking for trouble? Would you rather come
to one law firm, or two?
Q. I don't think that's comparable.
THE PRESIDENT. Just the same thing, exactly. Wait
until you run into trouble.
Q. I would rather avoid trouble.
THE PRESIDENT. I think they will. They think they
will-that's an interesting thing.
Oddly enough, they did avoid trouble. The partnership of a Dan-
ish immigrant turned assembly-line genius and a Lithuanian immigrant
who had achieved eminence in the labor movement worked much better
than the critics foresaw. It worked well enough so that each could con-
tribute his special talents at a time when they were most needed, when
mass production techruques had to be planned into an expanding muni-
tions industry accustomed to small-scale operation, and when government
policy had to take special account of the problems incident to the fitting
of masses of people into new jobs. At the same time the partnership sym-
bolized a domestic political coalition in the national interest.

Apparently Roosevelt did not in this case heed the advice given
by Francis Bacon in 1612, that "it is better to choose indifferent
persons than to make an indifferency by putting in those that are
strong on both sides." Roosevelt was not alone, however, in violating
the concept of single executive responsibility. This "principle" fre-
quently suffers when basic organizational decisions must be made
in complex administrative situations calling for the shrewd balancing
of powers and personalities. As a general principle, however, Amen-
245 THE PRGaLEM Of ORCANI%AnON

can administration follows the Hamiltonian distrust of plural exec-

utives or "operating" committees. Committees, councils, and boards,
when faced with executive problems, may deliberate thoroughly:'
but they operate with difficulty.
Describing his wartime experience as a member of the British
Cabinet's Military Coordinating Committee, Winston Churchill,
although he was Prime Minister and Senior Service Minister as First
Lord of the Admiralty, portrayed his fights with his other Service
Ministers. When the war was over, he confessed: "Alas, I must wiite
it; the central conflict had to be more like one ruffian blasting the
other on the snout with a club, a hammer, or something better.!' ..
A newer state like Soviet Russia has also experienced a change in the
employment of collegiate executives and of soviets, literally com-
mittees, which in the early days of the Revolution managed ev(!ry-
thing. In the 1930'S, factory management in Soviet Russia was trans-
formed from the "triangle" system of supervision by the party leacler,
the labor union leader, and the factory manager, to individual con-
trol by the latter. Stalin had argued in 1930: "We can no longer
tolerate our factories being transformed from productive organisms
into parliaments." os In the administrative organization of the com-
missariats or ministries, the collegiate system was restored, not for
"the performance of executive-administrative direction, but [for 1
systematic supervision of the execution of governmental decisipns
"l>\\<! ~v,'t~\."\\'& ""'P <:!>\\ \v,'t ~"l><!"-:''1, ,,\\ \v,-:."" 'P""l>~\;"<;:l.\ 'fI<:!>"\.:' ..
In recent years in the United States the committee has been em-
ployed as an instrument of co-ordination, although not always in an
operational or executive setting." During the war committees were
extensively used in the War Production Board, but their operational
activities were strengthened by the lise of strongly empowered c~m­
mittee chairmen and by an extensive co-ordinating secretariat wh~ch
served these committees constantly.'" Interagency committees durmg
the war and post-war periods, expecially those in. which State p~­
partment personnel carried the chairntanships, dealt with strategtc

01 One of the most thorough and effective forms of committee deliberation wag ~.
gaged in by the Atomic Energy Committee of the. State Department under the c~.,r.
manship of David E. Lilienthal in 1946. See "Two Lessons in Group DynamICS."
Educators Washington Dispatch, January 1948, Supplement.
•• Winston Churchill: The Gathering Storm. Boston: Honghton Mifflin Ciom.
pany; 1948, p. S87 .
.. Stalin: Report of the Central Committee to the Sixteenth Congress of the
Communist Party, June 27, '930. Leninism, vol. 2, p. 376.
M Julian Towster: Political Power in the U.s.S.R., 1917-1947, p. 29%. .
.. Mwy Trackett Reynolds: Interdepartmental Gummittees in the NatioruJ) AdJDm·
istratiou. New Yor);: Columbia University Press; '939 .
.. Robert L. Hubbell, "Techniques for Making Committees Effective." Public Ad·
miuistr:rtioa .Review, Autumn 1946, pp. 348-51.
246
;md diplomatic matters on a high order;" again, these committees
seldom had administrative functions. In business as wen as in gov-
ernment we notice a continual use of committees and plural or joint
executives. The "executive vice-president" is not always the power-
ful individual executive he is supposed to be, and the plural form of
executive persists in practice. Industrial management bas continued
the use of the committee system, as in the case of the General Motors
Corporation, sometimes for administrative and planning functions
as well as for policy making purposes.
In American government examples of the strong plural executive
are still found in the commission type of city government and in the
powerful and independent administrative boards or commissions in
the federal and state governments. In some states these boards con-
sist of the governor, together with other ex-officio members who are
independently elected cabinet members and whose administrative
or executive powers are exercised in a collegiate relationship to the
governor. In a state like Florida, for example, there were in 1945,
thirty-eight ex-officio administrative boards, of which thirty-two con-
tained cabinet members. The governor served on twenty-four of
these boards, the treasurer and attomey-genera) on twenty-one each,
the Secretary of state on fifteen, and other cabinet members on fewer
boards. Under such a system, the governor is merely one among
equals in a plural executive." While this illustration is exceptional
it is not unusual to find various other departures from the American
principle of the single executive.
The American answer to this problem of the single versus the
plural executive is therefore still a dual one. Primarily, the urge has
been to assign a single executive who is responsible for action; but
there has been a continual concession to the need for balancing dif-
ferent skills and representative interests.

8. THE PURPOSE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION

The main purpose of organization remains that of fitting together

individuals and their tasks as productively as possible. In describing
this rudimentary purpose of organization, helpful contributions were
made by (a) Luther Gulick, and (b) Roy F. Hendrickson, a civil
servant who had extensive experience in personnel and organiza-
tional matters in the United States Department of Agriculture.
01 House of Representatives, Subcommittee of Committee on Appropiiations, 80th
Cong., 2nd Sess., "Department of State Appropriation Bill for 1949," pp. '7-19.
os Florida: Report of the Special Joint Economy and Efficiency Committee, March
1945, pp. 2'. .
247 TIlt HOIUM OF OItCANI%ATION

(a) LUTHtR CULlCfC

"Notes on the Theory of Organization" 59
Why Divide Work? Because men differ in nature, .capacity and
skill, and gain greatly in dexterity by specialization; because the same man
cannot be at two places at the same time; because one man cannot do
two things at the same time; because the range of knowledge and skill is
so great that a man cannot within his life-span know more than a small
fraction of it. In other words, it is a question of human nature, time, and
space.
If subdivision of work is inescapable, co-ordination becomes man-
datory. There is, however, no one way to co-ordination. Experience shows
that it may be achieved in two primary ways. These are:
1. By organization, that is, by interrelating the subdivisions of
work by allotting them to men who are placed in a structure of authority,
so that the work may be co-ordinated by orders of superiors to subor-
dinates, reaching from the top to the bottom of the entire enterprise.
2. By the dominance of an idea, that is, the development of
intelligent singleness of purpose in the minds and wills of those who are
working together as a group, so that each worker will of his own accord
fit his task into the whole with skill and enthusiasm.

(b) ROY F. HENDRICKSON

"Organization" ..
Everyone in an organization should know who's who. Everyone
should know where he fits into the organizational pattern. He should
know his superiors and his proper relation to them-not so he will know
when and where to kotow, but so he will know to whom he may go for
advice and counsel, to whom he must look for supervision, and to whom
he may turn if necessary to find access to still higher authority. Some
times an organization in which lines of authority are hopelessly confused
rationalizes by explaining that clear-cut lines are unnecessary because
everyone is so cooperative: it is just "one big, happy family." But men
cannot do their best, Il.oating aimlessly about in a sea of ill-defined "co-
operation." Good intentions or mere cooperation is not enough. To be
effective, cooperation must be directed. It must follow some pattern or
. plan.

In short, organization is the means of informing each participant

where he fits and of assigning to each those elements of the total
administrative process for which he is to be responsible.
'9 Luther Gulick: "Notes on the Theory of Organization." Luther Gulick and
L. Urwick (ed•. ): Papers on the Science of Administratio.n. Selected from pp. 3, 6.
Reprinted by permission of Institute of Public Adininistration. Copyright, 1937, Insti-
tute 01 Public Administration .
.. Roy F. Hendrickson: "Organization." Personnel Bulletin, United States Depart-
ment of Agriculture, OIIiee of Personnel, July '940, vol. I, p. 3.
9. THE BASIC elEMENTS Of ORGANIZATION

How can these elements be identified in such a way that they can
be properly distributed and assigned? Can these basic elements be
handled as standard units, which are capable of grouping and re-
grouping under the various departments of an organization? Some
of the most refined analytical work so far carried out in the attempt
to describe the basic elements of organization was that done by (a)
Frank Gilbreth; he was ably followed by a number of specialists in
industrial management, including (b) Professor E. H. Anderson of
the University of Alabama and Professor G. T. Schwenning of the
University of North Carolina.
A contemporary of Frederick Taylor, Frank Gilbreth was one of
the most brilliant minds in the scientific management movement. As
an engineer, Gilbreth perfected the techniques of time and motion
study, which provided the truly quantitative, measurable, and scien-
tific roots of the entire movement. He started his research in what
was thought to be the pedestrian technique of bricklaying,61 but kept
applying his techniques to more activities and to more complicated
industrial processes and managerial problems. Gilbreth was always
testing, demonstrating, and criticizing the most established methods
of accomplishing even the simplest tasks, such as the process of shav-
ing. In the scientific field of time and motion study, Gilbreth was
the inventor of the micromotion and chronocyclegraph process for
the photographic and chronometric recording of the fundamental
elements which constitute physical acts.

(a) FRANK I. CILBRETH

"The Classification of Work""
The literature of scientific management abounds with examples
of units of work improperly called "elements," which are in no sense
elements. A classification for finding The One Best Way to Do Work,
must deal with true elements, not merely with sub-divisions that are arbi-
trarily called "elements." "Elements" should be taken for what they
really are, namely, sub-divisions and not elements, and not confused with
., Frank B. Gilbreth: Bricklaying System. Chicago: Clark Publishing Co.; 1909.
Motion Study. New York: Van Nostrand Co.; 1911. Primer of Scientilic Manage-
ment. New York: Van Nostrand Co.; '912. "The Economic Value of Motion Study
in Standardizing the Trade." Industrial Engineering and Engineering Digest, Apn1-
September, 1910.
.. Frank B. Gilbreth: "The Classification of Work." Reducing the Cost of Busi·
ness. Report of proceedings of the Society of IndlJSll;ial Engineers. Chicago: A. O. Hom
Co.; 1924. Publications of the S.I.E., September '924, vol. 7, selected from pp. 10S-O<).
Reprinted by permission of Ll11ian Gilbreth. •
 THE ROBU!M OF OIlCANI%ATION
true elements, or fundamental units which cannot be further sub-divided
[therlbigsJ.
The science of Motion Study consists, therefore, of finding The
One Best Sequence of therlbigs for each kind of work and the science of
management consists of deriving, installing and enforcing the conditions
that will permit the work to be done repeatedly in The One Best Way.
This classification for finding The One Best Way to Do Work
is applicable to all kinds of work. It was used by the author while serving
as ranking officer in the field under the training committee of the General
Staff, standardizing the methods of The One Best Way to Do Work for
teaching the five million men and officers in the world war. It has also
been used in analyzing the work of the surgeon, nurse, hospital manage-
ment, large department stores, selling, a great many kinds of manufac-
turing, accounting, office work in general, and many other kinds of work.
The classification of all work of any and all organizations, for the
purpose of finding The One Best Way to Do Work may be visualized
as follows:
1. A complete organization, which consists of
2_ Processes, such as
A-Financing H-Manufacturing
B-Advertising I-Planning
C-Marketing J-Teaching
D-Distributing K-Charting
E-Selling L-Maintaining
F-Accounting M-Filing
G-Purchasing
These processes consist of
3. Operations, which consist of
Cycles of motions, which consist of
Sub-divisions, or events, or therlbigs of a cycle of motions
which consist of
A-Search K-Pre-position for Next Operation
B-Find L-Re1ease Load
C-Select M-Transport Empty
D-Grasp N-Rest for Overcoming Fatigue
E-:Transport Loaded O-Other Periods of Unavoidable
F-Position Delay
G-Assemble P-Avoidable Delay
H-Use Q-Plan
I-Disassemble
J-Inspect
It is conceivable that sometime in the future an eighteenth and
possibly more therlbigs will be found. and we seem near to their discovery
at the present time. The discovery of additional therlbigs pertaining to
the phenomena of skill and automaticity seems inevitable.
Under 1, a complete Olgllnization, are included all kinds of organi-
zations, including financial, industrial, commercial, professional, educa-
tional and social. Under z, processes, it should be noted that all processes
are divided in the same my from a Motion Study analyst's standpoint,
regardless in which department or in which function they are found. Un-
der 3, operations, the operations include mechanical as well as physiologi-
cal,-and mental as well as manual.
The reasons for these inclusions are: (a) From the Motion Study
standpoint there are not always clean dividing lines between the operations
of devices and the mental and manual operations of the human being, for
they are often mutually interchangeable, sometimes in part and sometimes
in whole. (b) Records of many and probably all mental operations can
now be obtained by the chronocyclegraph and micromotion photographic
methods, and each year such photugraphic records can more and more be
deciphered and used to practical advantages. Enough can already be read
and used to serve our present needs. Careful examination of all our old
micromotion and chronocyclegraph films taken under conditions of actual
practice show that they are literally full of examples of such records of
mental process.

(b) E. H. ANDERSON AND C. T. SCHWENN INC

The Science of Production Organization·s

The final factor in industrial work to be considered, and no doubt

the most important of all, is what may be designated as creative, or purely
intellectual, work. Such a factor has largely evaded all attempts of scientific
analysis, except, to some extent, at the hands of the psychologists and
metaphysicians. Of course, much has been learned about such a factor, the
conditions affecting such work, etc., but it still remains inextricably as-
sociated with certain individual persons in the form of skill, artistry, edu-
cation and training, common sense and good judgment, or understanding
of human nature, and so on. The therlbigs Plan and Decision are mere
pauses to allow for, perhaps, eye focus or reaction time; they do not in-
volve creative thinking of a high order. It is hardly conceivable that the
human mind will in tae near future, if ever, be able to analyze completely
its own process and reduce it to the terms of any sort of standardized
elements. This factor must probably always remain the great illimitable
reservoir of unexplored forces.
Thus, routines and systems are merely forms of organization of
work. The principle is the same here as elsewhere, namely, that every
individual performance should be reduced to its elements, be these ele-
.. E. H. Anderson and C. T. Schwenning: The Science of Production Organization.
New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1938. Selected from pp. 71, 83. Reprinted by
permission of E. H. Anderson and C. T. Schwenning.
 TNt ,.OIUM OF ORGANIZATION

ments therlbigs or items of technical knowledge, and that these elements

should then be tI)lUbined with others, to form convenient units of work,
and the lmits so combined that the entire work of the enterprise is
thoroughly integrated and organized. Even the work of management itself
is suscepb"ble of the same scientific process of analysis and synthesis. It too
may be routinized, charted, and codified under the general headings of
principles and pQlicies.

If the system of analysis by Therlbigs is, as Anderson and Schwen-

ning suggest, applicable to intellectual, administrative, and manage-
rial functions, we have bere a device for determining standard
elements which can be grouped or regrouped into almost endless
combinations and permutations, for the purpose of organizing any
series of people and activities into any set of departments and di-
visions.

10. PRINCIPLES OF ORGANIZATION

Gilbreth's minute analysis of organization in terms of its most

elemental units has been matched by an attempt to synthesize hu-
man organizational experience under certain general principles .
. Tames D. Mooney, who was one of the first observers to make such
an effort, was both an experienced industrial manager and a keen
student of the science of organization. As an engineer-adminis-
trator who became vice-president in charge of the overseas opera-
tions of the General Motors Corporation, Mr. Mooney was respon-
sible for a vast commercial organization. He also participated in
military organizational matters. In World War I he was an Army
officer and in World War II he served on the staff of the Chief of
Naval Operations. His treatise on organization, which was first pub-
lished in 1931 in collaboration with his colleague, Alan C. Reiley,
reflects Mooney's historical and church studies as well as his com-
mercial and military experience.

JAMES MOONEY
The Principles of Organization ..
While nrany brilliant writers and speech makers have been
battling passionately about communism, fascism, socialism, and democ-
racy, our studies of how governmental organizatjons actually function have
forced us to the conclusion that there is little significance to these t=s.
Indeed, it has been our general observation that not only in different
.. James Mooney: The Principles of Organization. Adapted from pp. 14-1;, 94-95.
Reprinted by pennission of Harper & Broth.... Copyright, 1947, Harper & Brothers.
countries, but from generation to generation men go on organizing their
governments and earning their living in much the same manner. Nota-
ble changes and improvements can be credited from time to time to
the scientists and engineers, and in general to improved technology, but
throughout history economic laws and the processes of production and
distribution display an utter contempt for changes in the political com-
plexion of government. In appraising the many experiments in govern-
mental organization that are being tried currently throughout the world,
it is important that we should not be thrown off the track by the circum-
stance that the various revolutionary movements or changes in government
have adopted different symbols around which to rally supporters. The vital
point is the plain fact that, once the controlling group gets into power,
the practical circumstances of the situation force the new leaders to or-
ganize the government according to principles of organization that are as
old as the hills.
The scalar principle is the same form in organization that is some-
times called hierarchical. But, to avoid all definitional variants, scalar is
here preferred. A scale means a series of steps, something graded. In or-
ganization it means the grading of duties, not according to different func-
tions, for this involves another principle of organization, but according to
degrees of authority and corresponding responsibility. For cono;enience
we shall call this phenomenon of organization the scalar chain. The com-
mon impression regards this scale or chain merely as a "type" of organi·
zanon, characteristic only of the vaster institutions of government, army,
church, and industry. This impression is erroneous. It is likewise mis-
leading, for it seems to imply that the scalar chain in organization lacks
universality. These great organizations differ from others only in that the
chain is longer. The truth is that wherever we find an organization even
of two people, related as superior and subordinate, we have the scalar prin-
ciple. This chain constitutes the universal process of coordination, through
which the supreme coordinating authority becomes effective throughout
the entire structure.

Other attempts to identify the principles or organization have

been made by students like Russell Robb and Alvin Brown," but
none has been so definite or doctrinal about having discovered the
universal principles, as Mooney in expressing his scalar or hierar-
chical view. Influenced by the Mosaic hierarchy, which, he points
out, was governed through "rulers of thousands, rulers of hundreds,
rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens," and impressed also with his stud-
ies of the church hierarchy, which, along with the army, he regarded
as "the most efficiently organized" in comparison with state and in-
dustry, Mooney elaborated his concept of scalar organization into a

.. See Chapters 9, 10.

 THI! HOIUM OF ORGANIZATION

scholastic set of doctrines." By means of this logical analysis, he

progressed by triads and arrived at a total of nine principles of or-
ganization. L. Urwick, another recognized authority in the field of
administrative organization, has accepted Mooney's analysis. Al-
though this approach offers a systematic presentation of organiza-
tional doctrine, it is typical of the in-breeding of ideas in this field.
For his convenient triad-type combination of organizational prin-
ciples Mooney cites Urwick as his authority (apart from his citation
of the medieval mystic, Dionysius the Areopagite); 61 and Urwick
cites Mooney."
There is more agreement, as we shall see, upon the practical pre-
cepts of organization and reorganization, such as the need for "unity
of command" or the requirement that "authority should be com-
mensurate with responsibility-precepts which are distinctly related
to the scalar principle. As for universal principles, which, like the
scalar, would apply to organizations of all types and under all con-
ditions, there has been little agreement. Rather than enter into the
controversy over principle, we here accept the view that there are
several useful approaches to a basic study of organization. One of
these is the scalar or hierarchical approach which has been intro-
duced in this chapter; another is the staff-and-line approach (Chap-
ter 10); and a third is the spatial or geographical (Chapter 12.).
\Vhile the scalar, staff-and-line and spatial approaches may represent
basic phases of administration, there are other enlightening ways to
approach the subject of organization. Thus illustrative types of or-
ganization may be studied (Chapter 9); regardless of doctrine, the
organization may be studied in actual operation and practice (Chap-
ter 11); and the process of reorganization may be analyzed (Chapter
13)·

SUMMARY

Organization is more than a matter of the structure of an indi-

vidual enterprise or a department of government. It involves as its
basic elements the physical acts of production and management or
the intellectual acts of management and administration; and its main
.. Mooney: TI,e Prulciples 01 Organization,. pp. v, 20, 47. Anthropologists have de·
scribed other cultures which have, apparently mdependently, developed admm,stralive
pyramids silnilar to the Mosaic. P. A. Means: Ancient Civilization 01 the Andes. New
York: Charles Scribner's Sons; 1931, p. 292.
87 Mooney: The Principles 01 Organization, pp. 45-6, '04. See both the 1939
and the 1947 editions of Mooney .
.. L. Urwick: The Elements 01 Administration. New York and London: Harper &
Bros.; '943, pp. 4'-3.
object is to secure an eHective grouping of these elements or acts and
of the human beings who perform them: Consequently, there are
besides such technical organizational matters as ad~inistrative de·
partmentalization or time-and-motion study, broader organizational
issues concerning the relations between men and groups in a multi-
group society. However, these broad issues and the technical ques-
tions converge as we try to fit individual men or women into jobs or
activities, jobs or activities into agencies or departments, and agencies
or departments into economies or governments. And the point at
which they seem to converge is the position of the individual in re-
lation to his group or multi-group society.
So far as the individual is concerned there is something in the
organizational habits that have grown up in the United States since
its founding which points to a preference for the single responsible
executive despite-indeed because of-the forces pullipg in the other
direction and demanding a plural or even a "representative exec-
utive." Under a relatively flexible democratic setting and a pragmatic
administrative system like that which prevails in the United States,
vigorous deliberating committees or boards and powerful operating
commissions along with forceful individual executives will always be
necessary. This necessity embraces the relations of the President to
Congress as it does the relations of any organization executive to his
board. We have not yet finished with congresses, commissions and
committees, although, paradoxically, we are growing more and more
dependent upon single responsible executives.
No sooner does one start to study these higher problems of or-
ganization, than one encounters the debate between individualism
and collectivism, between capitalism and socialism. Long before the
British launched their post-war program of nationalization, L. Ur-
wick, relatively moderate in his point of view, stated: "No man what-
ever his political complexion, who has any practical experience of
administration today, really pretends to himself that a mere shift
of ownership in the means of production, or in the right to its sur·
plus, will make any fundamental difference in industrial relations.
Whatever the ownership of industry the real hardships will cOntinue
unless there is a fundamental change in organization and meth-
ods."" If this statement proves to be true, the problem of organi-
zation will resolve itself into something other than the conflict
betwe¢n capitalism and collectivism or between public organization
and private organization.T•
There are some observers who are less hopeful about this issue,

to L. Urwick: Management of ToJlWttow. London, Nisbet 6: Co~ 1933, pp. 143-#.

... See Chapter 1, sec. 6.
 THE PROhEM Of OIlCANtZATtON

which Bertrand Russell has termed Freedom Versus Organization.n

. Protesting aganst the.anti-individual effects of modern organizational
technology as a whole, the German liberal, Friedrich Georg Juenger,
complained in 1948: "The technician himself does not grasp theSe
consequences and does not understand them. . . . True enough,
the machinery he has developed is ingenious down to the last screw.
But the last screw is where the technical genius ends; for what lies
beyond he has no thoughts." 12
The technician who sets out to master the science of organization
today concerns himself with much more than the perfect chart or
the last screw. He understands, contrary to contemporary critics like
Juenger, that organization, even in its depressive connotations, is as
old as mankind. He knows from his reading of human experience
that organizations cannot be dispensed with, but they can certainly
be effectively used and responsibly controlled, providing they are
properly constructed and operated. This will take a knowledge that
exceeds anyone aspect of organizational science: departmental or-
ganization, single versus plural executives, congressional or com-
mission forms, parliamentary and presidential systems, capitalist
versus collectivist organizations.
There is need to test and to apply some of the simplest lessons,
not merely the theoretical doctrines, of private and public organi.
zations. This includes the lesson that among the basic elements of
organization are not only the micro-motions produced by time-and-
motion studies of physical acts or the "psycho-motions" of the intel-
lectual and non-physical activities involved in administration, but
also the individual men and women who are acting or being acted
upon as total personalities. When the individual is more fully recog-
nized as a basic unit in the emerging science of organization, it will
become more apparent that the static subject of organization is a
vital force in a dynamic society.
n Bertrand Russell: Freedom Versus Organization. New York: W. \Y. Norton &
Company, Inc.; 1934.
12 Friedrich Georg Juenger: The Price of Progress. The Human Affairs Pamphlets;
1948, No. 33, pp. 20-21. See also The Failure of Technology: Perfection Without
Purpose, Hinsdale, lliinois: Henry Regenery Co.; 1948.
 CHAPTER NINE

TYPES OF ORGANIZATION

IN ANY GOVERNMENT, economy or society, we notice a number of

possible combinations of responsibilities, activities, and individuals,
into groupings, departments, or bureaus. Theoretically, this possibil-
ity offers an almost endless choice among types of organization. Gen-
erally, however, this choice is restricted by the practical requirements
of the institution concerned and by the established organizational
patterns of the society involved. It is difficult, therefore, to arrive at
a standard classification of organizational types. Nevertheless, we can
describe a variety of types by drawing from the vast body of social
experience with regard to organizational structure. In this chapter,
the following illustrations have been selected:
1. Organization in the Greek city-state
2. German departmental organization
3. Soviet administrative organization
4. Organization of American executive departments
5. The government corporation
6. Congressional organization
7. American political party organization
8. International organization
9. American labor organization
10, Industrial and other types of organizations
Selection of these types for presentation in this chapter should
not imply that they offer the only useful organizational experience.
Other prevalent and fruitful types of organization in goverument
and business will be presented in greater detail in subsequent chap-
ters.'
1 See Chapters 12 and 13.

256
 T'tPIS OF ORGANIZATION

I. ORGANIZATION IN THE GREEK CITY-STATE

The Greek city-state was a nation of municipal or provincial pro-

portions, but the Greeks also experimented with a league of city-
states, that is, a form of international organization under the Am-
phictyonic Council. Although Aristotle's Athens consisted of some
40,000 citizens, besides women and children, some 24,000 aliens and
about 100,000 slaves, it was not a simple structure in terms of the
departments of its government. Possibly because of the organiza-
tional problems facing Greek politics, Aristotle made a thorough
comparative study of organization, bringing together much of the
experience of the known world. The great Aristotelian scholar, Wer-
ner Jaeger, reports in his chapter on "The Organization of Research"
that Aristotle used a collection of 158 constitutions in his compara-
tive analysis of governmental structure; and he reports further that
for the gathering of this organizational data, the ancient philosopher
"must have employed a very large number of researchers . . . while
he was head of a great school within which he could train fellow
workers suited to his purpose." 2 Aristotle's description of the alloca-
tion of functions among the "magistracies" of his contemporary state
is revealing because of the similarities with modern types of organiza-
tion despite differences in emphasis and terminology.
ARISTOTLE
The Politics 8

For without the indispensable magistracies a state cannot exist,

while without those that contribute to good order and seemliness it can-
not be well governed. It must therefore be kept in view what kinds of
magistracies it is desirable to combine and what kinds to keep separate.
First among the indispensable services is the superintendence of
the market, over which there must be an official to superintend contracts
and good order; since it is a necessity for almost all states that people shall
sell some things and buy others according to one another's necessary re-
quirements. Another superintendency connected very closely with this
one is the curatorship of public and private properties in the city, to secure
good order and the preservation and rectification of persons' estates, so
that disputes may not arise about them, and all the other duties of super-
intendence similar to these. An office of this nature is in most states en-
• Werner Jaeger: Aristotle, Fundamentals ot the Hmory of His Development.
Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1934, p. 3'7.
8 Aristotle: The Politics. Translated by H. Rockham. New York: G. P. Putnam'.
Sons; 193>. Selected from Book VI, CItop. s. Reprinted by permissioo of Harvard
University Press. Copyright, 193~, lIamIrd University Press.
258
titled that of City.-controller, but it has several departments, each of which
is filled by separate officials in the states with larger populations, for in-
stance Curators of \Valls, Superintendents of Wells, Harbours-guardians.
And another office also is indispensable and closely akin to these, for it
controls the same matters but deals with the country and the regions out-
side the city; and these magistrates are called in some places Land Control-
lers and in other Custodians of Forests.
These then are three departments of control over these matters,
while another office is that to which the revenues of the public funds are
paid in, the officials who guard them and by whom they are divided out
to the several administrative departments; these magistrates are called
Receivers and Stewards. Another magistracy is the one that has to receive
a written return of private contracts and of the verdicts of the law-courts;
and with these same 'officials the registration of legal proceedings and their
institution have also to take place. In some states this office also is divided
into several, but there are places where one magistracy controls all these
matters; and these officials are called Sacred Recorders, Superintendents,
Recorders, and other names akin to these. And after these is the office con-
nected with it but perhaps the most indispensable and most difficult of
all, the one concerned with the execution of judgement upon persons
cast in suits and those posted as defaulters according to the lists, and with
the custody of prisoners. This is an irksome office because it involves great
unpopularity, so that where it is not possible to make a great deal of profit
out of it men will not undertake it, but it is necessary, because there is no
use in trials being held about men's rights when the verdicts are not put
into execution.
These magistracies therefore must be counted first as supremely
necessary, and next to them must be put those that are not less necessary
but are ranked on a higher grade of dignity, because they require much ex-
perience and trustworthiness; in this class would come the magistracies
concerned with guarding the city and those assigned to military require-
ments. And the officers of this sort are entitled Generals or War-lords. And
moreover if there are also cavalry or light infantry or archers or a navy,
sometimes a magistracy is appointed to have charge of each of these arms
also, and they carry the titles of Admiral, Cavalry-commander and Taxi-
ardl, and also the divisioual commissions subordinate to these of Captains
of Triremes, Company-colllmanders and Captains of Tribes, and all the
subdivisions of these commands. But the whole of this sort of officers
constitllte a single class, that of military command.
Inasmuch as some of the magistracies, if not all, handle large
sums of pnblic money, there must be another office to receive an account
and subject it to audit, which must itself handle no other business; and
these officials are called Auditors by some people, Accountants by others,
Examiners by others and Advocates by others. And by the side of all these
offices is the one that is most supreme over all matters, for often the same
magistracy has the execution of business that controls its introduction, or
 'FYt'ES OF ORGANIZATION

presides over the genetal assembly in places where the people are supreme;
for the magistracy that convenes tbe sovereign assembly is bound to be
the sovereign power in the state. It is styled in some places the
Prelirninazy Council because it considers business in advance, but wbere
there is a democracy it is more usually called a Council.
This more or less completes the number of the offices of a politi-
cal nature; but another kind of superintendence is that concerned with
divine worship; in this class are Priests and Sacrificial Officers and Temple-
guardians and Stewards of Sacred Funds. And connected with this is the
office devoted to the management of all the public festivals which the law
does not assign to the priests but the officials in charge of wbich derive
their bonar, from tbe common sacrificial hearth, anti these officials are
called in some places Archons, in others Kings and in others Presidents.
Peculiar to the states that have more leisure and prosperity, and
also pay attention to public decorum, are tbe offices of Superintendent of
Women, Guardian of the Laws, Superintendent of Children, Controller
of Physical Training, and in addition to these the superintendence of
athletic and Dionysiac contests and of any similar displays that happen to
be held. Some of these offices are obviously not of a popular character, for
instance that of Superintendent of Women and of Children; for the poor
having no slaves are forced to employ their women and children as serv-
ants.

The city-state of Greece had thus deVeloped a comprehensive

type of governmental structure, comprising the major modern de-
partments, with the addition of agencies supervising the entire range
of social affairs from religion to gymnastics. From the standpoint of
departmental organization, Aristotle regarded the army and navy as
constituting "a single class, that of military command," whereas, as
we shall see,' this integrated conception is not yet completely ac-
cepted in more modern states like our own.

2. GERMAN DEPARTMENTAL ORGANIZATION

A more highly integrated type of organization is that of the

modern German state, for the German preoccupation with rational
and efficient administration extends into the organizational sphere.
The German type, as it existed during the National Socialist era
under Hitler, is described below by Professor James K. Pollock,
teacher of political science at the University of Michigan for a quar-
ter of a century; consultant to federal agencies such as the Depart-
ment of Labor; War Department adviser on military government in
Germany following World 'War II; and a member of the Commis-
• See Chapter 13.
sion On Organization of the Executive Br-mch of the Govemmc:nt.
the so-called Hoover Commission, appointed in 1947 to reconsider
the administrative structure of the Federal government.
JAM"S K. POLLOCK
The Government of Greater Germany'
By way of summarizing the nature of the German administrative
organization, a number of important characteristics should be pointed
out. First of all, the central administration is the organizing authority for
subordinate administration, thus being free to plan its own machirlery
and to develop as much flexibility or rigidity in administration as it IJes.
In the second place, all special agencies of public administration with the
exception of those at present directly under the Fuhrer are placed und~r
the jurisdiction of some department. German practice does not perllllt
boards, commissions, agencies, offices, or public corporations to have an
independent position. They must all be subordinated to, and supervised
by, some appropriate department. In this way it is possible for adequate
control to be exercised over every single government activity. Third, the
German administrative machine is hierarchical in organization so that
every agency and authority is subject to the supervision and control of ~e
next higher authority. This organization has produced the strong adminIS-
trative control which is one of the important featurcs of the German sys-
fern. Such system tends to be very complex and to develop "red tape." j3ut
;.\_ ,0;, ~''b~\,,) ~'i!i<:..'~~\_, 'l.~~ '!.."~'~o;, \_~~ \~~w::l!1, '!..~~ ''''';'<:lb~1Q.'i.'\_'~ ~~,<:..~ 'l.If'_
so noticeable in the United States.
Fourth, administrative authorities are given powers equal to the
tasks imposed upon them. Consequently, they may take whatever meas-
ures are necessary to carry out orders. Fifth, with the elimination of the
former Germau states, a unified command over all of the authoritie' of
the whole Reich has been established. Although the form of this territOrial
control has not yet been permauently fixed, a unitary organization has
supplanted a federal one. This fact when taken together with the str~ng
discipline which has always existed within the ranks of the civil serVIce,
gives Hitler a better organization for the carryIng out of his program t)1an
has ever before been possessed by a German leader. Sixth, one should tlo~e
that there has been on the whole a logical grouping of functions wifhin
departments. Seventh, in important areas of administration, advisory co~n­
cils d experienced citizens are associated in an honorary capacity "'l~
administrative authorities, in order to give the latter the benefit of tjlelf
special knowledge, and also to keep administration close to the pulse of
the people. Finally, at the present time, due to the uncertain status of the
regular administrative courts in the leader-state, the former judicial ~n-
• James K. Pollock: The Goverument of Greater Germany. Pp. 102-04. ReprU'ted
bypermiSsion of D. Van Nostrand Company. Inc. Copyright, un8, D. Van NostP"'d
CompanY. Inc.
 TYPES Of ORCANI%ATION

trol over administrative acts, which was the basis for much admiration of
the German administrative system, is no longer of prime importance. In a
word, German administration is organized in a very eflieient manner, and
has developed lin admirable system of supervision and control which
eliminates much of the looseness and ineffectiveness in administration
which is noticeable elsewhere.

Will this precise Prussian-like pattern of organization survive the

defeat of two world wars and the precariousness of Germany's central
European position during the post-war period? Or can the rigid
organizational habits of the Germans be influenced by considera-
tions other than the system of logical and rational structure to which
German culture has been accustomed?

3. SOVIET ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION

Less integrated in form, but perhaps more severely co-ordinated

in control, is the Soviet economic state. Professor Jl.'lian Towster of
the University of Chicago objectively described in 1948 the Soviet
departmental organization in the following terms:

JULIAN TOWSTER
Political Power in the USSR •
The Ministries-formerly the Commissari:its. By the summer of
1946 this central system of organs of the Council of Ministers consisted
of 55 ministries, less than a dozen committees and councils, and about half
a dozen chief administrations, as well as anum ber of other organs at-
tached to it. The ministries of the USSR are two kinds: all-Union and
Union-republic. The all-Union ministries direct the branches of state
administration entrusted to them throughout the territory of the USSR
either directly or through organs appointed by them, while the Union-
republic ministries of the USSR do so, as a rule, through corresponding
ministries of the Union-republics [Ukraine, White Russia, etc.], adminis-
tering directly only a limited numbel of enterprises in accordance with a
list confirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR. The
following are all-Union ministries at present: Foreign Trade, Railways,
Communications (Post, Telegraph, and Telephones), Maritime Trans-
port, River Transport;Coal Indnstry of the Western Areas, Coal Industry
of the Eastern Areas, Oil Industry of the Western and Southern Areas,
Oil Industry of the Eastern Areas, Power Stations, Electrical Industry,
Ferrous Metallurgy, Non-Ferrous Metallurgy, Chemical Industry, Aviation
• Julian Towster: Political Power in the USSR. Pp.•80-8 •. Reprinted by per.
mission of Oxford University Press. Copyright 1948, Oxford University Press.
Industty, Shipbuilding Industty, Agricultuml Machine-Bmlding Industry,
Armaments, Heavy Machine-Building Industry, Automobile Industry,
Machine and Instrument Building, Agricultural Stocks, Construction of
Heavy Industry Enterprises, Construction of Military and Naval Enter-
prises, Cellulose and Paper Industry, Machine-Tool Industry, Rubber In-
dustry, Construction of Fuel Enterprises, Road and Construction Ma-
chine Building, Transport Machine Building, Geology, Medical Industry,
Communications Industry, Material Reserves\ Food Reserves, and Labor
Reserves.
The Union-republic ministries are: Armed Forces, Foreign Af·
fairs, Food Industry, Fish Industry-Eastern Areas, Fish Industry-West-
ern Areas, Meat and Dairy Industry, Light Industry, Textile Industry,
Timber Industry, Agriculture, Finance, Trade, Internal Affairs, State Se-
curities, Justice, Public Health, Building Materials Industry, State Control,
Higher Education, Cinematography, Gustatory Industry, and State Farms.
As the process of breaking up ministries into several new units and trans·
forming committees, councils, and chief administrations into ministries
continues, these lists of ministries can be expected to undergo further
changes.
The Committees, Councils, and Chief Administrations. The
Council of Ministers now has committees on: Arts, Radio, PhYSical Cul-
ture and Sports, Measures and Measuring Instruments, Geological Mat-
ters, Standards, Defense, and Architecture. It has councils on Collective
Farm Affairs, Affairs of the Russian Orthodox Church, and Affairs of
Religious Denominations. And it also has chief administrations of: Civil
Aviation, Forest Guarding and Forest Planting, Geodetics and Cartogra-
phy, the Hydro-Meteorological Service, the Northern Sea Route, Pro-
ducers and Consumers Co-operatives, Military Construction, and the
Sulphate-Alcoholic and Hydrolytic Industry. Also there are other bodies
attached to the Council of Ministers: State Arbitration Commission, the
Migration Administration, the Main Committee on the All-Union Agri-
cultural Exhibition, the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, and the Tele-
graph Agency of the Soviet Union (TASS). The machinery of the com-
mittees and chief administrations follows mostly the all-Union ministry
type of structure.
Supervisory-Auxiliary Organs. In addition to all these bodies, the
Council of Ministers has a number of organs of a supervisory-auxiliary or
of a preparatory nature: the Economic Council, the State Planning Com-
mission, the [Bureau of] Administrative Affairs, and the Secretariat_

This structure is an unconventional type of organization, but

considering the objectives and circumstances of the Soviet state, not
an unnatural one. In true Marxian style, the all-Union or national
departments are almost exclusively industrial or economic in nature.
And for reasons of international politics, the SOviets have dared,
 TYPES OF ORGANIZATION

nominally ana temporarily, to decentralize crucial functions like de-

fense and foreign relations.

4. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS

One hundred and fifty years previously, the new American gov-
ernment, faced with a different set of crises, laid the pattern of a
departmental organization less dominated by economic considera-
tions. However, the Federal departmental organization was modified
by continuing reorganizations after the 1930'S, which took into ac-
count intervening social and economic developments.' The broad
framework of the executive departments of the United States was
described in the following terms by the President's Committee on
Administrative Management in 1937.

PRESIDENT'S COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT

"The Executive Branch Today'"
At the beginning, in 1789, there were but four departments: State,
War, Treasury, and the Attorney General. The General Post Office was
permanently established in 1794, and 4 years later, the Navy Department
was created. Thus, by 1800 there were six departments, all of them directly
under the President in accordance with the constitutional principle of
the separation of powers. For the next 50 years there was no change. Then
came the creation of the Department of the Interior in 1849, of Agricul·
ture in 1889, and of Commerce and Labor in 1903, from which the Depart-
ment of Labor was separated in 1913. Two new kinds of governmental
agencies made their appearance in the generation after the Civil War.
They were, first, executive agencies under the President but not connected
with any department, such as the Civil Service Commission (1883); and,
second, independent regulatory agencies, such as the Interstate Commerce
Commission (1887) which were neither placed under the President nor
connected with any department. Many additional agencies of these types
appeared in subsequent years.
During the [First] World War a large number of new agencies
were established. These were chiefly councils, boards, commissions, ad-
ministrations, and govermental corporations, and though nGt legally con-
nected with the regular departments, they were definitely within the
Executive Branch and under the President. During the recent depression
similar need for emergency action has resulted again in the establishment

'See Chapter 13.

• President's Committee on Administrative Management: "The Executive Branch
Today." Administrative Management in the Government of.the United States. 1937,
selected from pp. 31-32.
 ADMINISTRATION

of a large numbt)r of new agencies. These include administrations, boards,

commissions, committees, governmental corporations, and authorities.
The novel elements in this period are the extended use of the {government
corporationJand the introduction of the "authority." Most of these agen-
cies have been placed in the Executive Branch and under the President
but in the main they have not been connected by law with the regular
departments.
As a result of this long development, there [grew up] in the Gov-
ernment of the United States over 100 separately organized establishments
and agencies presumably reporting to the President. Among them are the
10 regular executive departments and the many boards, commissions, ad-
ministrations, authorities, corporations, and agencies which are under the
President but not in a department There are also a dozen agencies which
are totally independent-a new and headless "fourth branch" of the Gov-
ernment.
The Executive Branch of the Government of the United States
has thus grown up witbout plan or design like the barns, shacks, silos, tool
sheds, and garages of an old farm. To look at it now, no one would ever
recoguize the structure which the founding fathers erected a century and
a half ago to be the Government of the United States.

A more planned and integrated executive structure did begin to

form, however, partly as a result of the work of agencies like the
President's Committee on Administrative Management and its suc-
cessors. Thus, although there was no immediate action on the
Committee's recommendations for the addition of a Department of
Public Welfare and a Department of Public Works, a Federal Secu-
rity A~ency and a Federal Works Agency were established in the
1930'S. To these agencies were transferred virtually all of the activ-
ities that would normally be assigned to well-integrated departments
under similar names.' At the state and local government level, the
structure of organization has been undergoing a similar development.
Although some cities and states still retain the vestiges of uninte-
grated departments and ex officio boards, many have adopted a
completely simplified pattern which is even more integrated than
that of the Federal government.'· American organization may not
be as logical as the German form or as comprehensive as the Soviet
type, but it possesses an element of practicality and flexibility that
is a true reflection of the pragmatic American outlook toward gov-
ernment.

• See Chapter 13.

,. A. E. Buck: The Reorganization of State Governments.in the United States.
New York: The Column'.. University Press; 1938. National Resources Committee,
Supplementary Report of the Urbanism Committee: Urban Government. Vol. 1, part
I, sec. 5; see Chapter 8.
265 TYPES OF OICANIZATION

5. THE GOVERNMENT CORPORATION

One of the mechanisms for achieving greater flexibility in the

American structure is the government corporation, a borderline de-
vice between the government department and the economic enter-
prise. After a traumatic experience with the incorporation of canal
and banking enterprises under the state governments in the nine-
teenth century, the United States resumed the use of the government
corporation at the national level previous to World \Var 1." This
type of organization is here described by two authorities: (a) Herbert
Emmerich, an administrator of governmental banking and housing
corporations, and subsequently director of Public Administration
Clearing House; and (b) Charles Abbott, a professor at the Harvard
Graduate School of Business Administration, who had some ex-
perience in the governmentally owned War Shipping Administra-
tion.

(al HERBERT EMMERICH

"Government CorpOrations and Independent Supervisory
iAgencies" 12

For convenience in describing the various kinds of Government

corporations and to determine the appropriate degrees and kinds of gov·
ernmental supervision, they may be divided into two broad categories:
Fede,;!l "business corporations" and Federal "governmental corpora-
bons.
Federal "business corporations" is the term used here to designate
corporations which are federally chartered and in which private rights are
represented by stock ownership and board representation. Federal busi-
ness corporations are usually authorized as a part of a permanent national
system and have been engaged principally in the field of banking and
credit. The introduction of private ownership and representation creates
an element of contractual relationship which necessarily limits subsequent
arbitrary rearrangements of their fiscal structures by the Government. As
of October 1, 1936, there were approximately 14,000 Federal business cor-
porations, in contrast to about 90 Federal governmental corporations.
Federal business corporations are usually institutions serving either a local
community or a region. The localized group includes national banks

11 Reginald C. McGrane: Foreign Bondholders and American St.te Debts. New

York: Harper & Brothers; 1924. Harold Van Dam: Government Owned Corporations.
New York: Alfred A. Knopf; 1926.
12 Herbert Emmerich: "Government Corporations and Independent Supervisory
Agencies." President's Committee on Administrative Management: RepOrt with
Special Studies. 1937, selected from pp. 3<>0-<>1.
266 ADMINISTaATION

(numbering 5,374), national farm loan associations (5,028), Fedetal

credit unions (1,739), joint-stock land banles, in liqui~tion (47), Federal
savings and loan associations (1,183), and production credit associations
(554)·
Federal "governmental corporations" is the term used here to
designate corporations (whether incorporated under Federal or State
charter) which are federally owned and controlled. In these organizations
a majority of the stock is owned by the United States and no member of
the board of directors is elected or appointed by private interests Gov-
ernmental corporations number about 90. Certain of them were incor-
porated under State charters during the World War and are now inactive.
Others were created during the present emergency to carry on emergency
relief work or construction programs of various kinds. The Commodity
Credit Corporation and the Federal Surplus Commodities Corporation
are examples of this emergency type. There are certain older operating
services under State charter, such as the Panama Railroad and the Alaska
Railroad. The Inland Waterways Corporation was created under Federal
charter. The largest and most important corporations of the wholly owned
type, however, were federally chartered by the Congress during the present
emergency.

( b) CHARLES A880TT

"Federal Corporations and Corporate Agencies" 111

No governmental development since the World War (I] contains

consequences more far reaching and more important for the people of
the United States than does the multipli(;ation and proliferation in the
last six years of those bodies known to the lay mind as "alphabetical" or
"government corporations" and commonly designated in the statutes deal·
ing with them as "agencies" or "instrumentalities" of the Federal Govern-
ment. A few of the amazing multitude of corporate agencies that currently
festoon the Federal Government date from the war period or from the
twenties, but the great majority have come into being since 1932.. Al-
though many of these agencies were originally created as temporary bodies
designed to meet au emergency, others-such as the Tennessee Valley
Authority-were not; with the passage of time the pretense of transient
existence has, in the case of many of the emergency bodies, been aban-
doned, so that these corporations, collectively if not individually, now
represent a permanent element in American society. .
These bodies achieve their importance partly because of the vast
sums of money at their command and the burdens which they place on
the Federal finances, partly because of the great variety of their under-
takings and the different portions of society their operations affect, partly
U Charles Abbott: "Federal Corporations and Corporate Agencies." Harvard Busi-
ness Review, Summer, 1938, vol. 16, selected from pp. 436-37. Reprinted by per-
mission.
 TYPIS OF ORGANIZATION

because of the number of their employees and the tremendous financial

and political power concentrated in the hands of the small number of men
who control them. The direct financial interest of the government in
these bodies can be estimated only with great difficulty, but it appears to
be upwards to five billions of dollars, and the indirect interest is of much
greater proportions. The American Telephone and Telegraph Company,
the country's largest private corporation, has assets valued at slightly more
than three billions of dollars, and an equity of about two and one-third
billions.
The activities of these bodies range from loans to individuals as
small as $10, made by the Emergency Crop and Feed Loans division of
the Farm Credit Administration, to single loans amounting to millions
of dollars extended by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. Their
operations comprise such diverse undertakings as the insurance of mort-
gages, as large as $5,000,000 on a single piece of property, by the Federal
Housing Administration, the manufacture of rum and the raising of
chickens and tomatoes by the Virgin Islands Company, and the operation
of the Alaska and Panama Railroads. Their enterprises include the con-
struction and operation of vast hydro-electric undertakings by the Ten-
nessee Valley Authority and the Boulder Dam, Bonneville, and Grand
Coulee projects, as well as the financing of consumer purchases of do-
mestic electrical appliances, such as stoves and refrigerators, by the Elec-
tric Home and Farm Authority. The list of their activities could be
extended almost interminably, and their directors, officers, and employees
are to be numbered in the tens of thousands. But the real control of these
corporations rests in the hands of perhaps a hundred men. What the
ultimate effect of this vast superstructure of corporate and semi-corporate
entities will be on American life, on wage-earners and businessmen, on
banking and agriculture, on the behavior of the trade cycles and the
standard of living of the common man, it is impossible to foresee.

Of all the structural devices available to public administration

for the achievement of the closer integration of the productive
economy and the governmental machine," the public corporation
may turn out to be one of the most promising. Although its flexi-
bility offers a number of possibilities hitherto unavailable to govern-
mental organizations, it will have to be integrated with the existing
governmental structure, as Abbott implies. In England, where there
has been a somewhat longer experience with this type of organiza-
tion," the stock of the public corporation is not wholly owned by
the government nor is the governing board wholly made up of
officials, but the corporation is governmentally controlled by means
of its statutory subordination within a governmental department. If
1< See Chapter 8 .
.. William A. Robson: Public Enterprise. London: C. Allen and Unw,n; 1937·
this form of corporative integration should occur in the United
States, however, the corporation device, which lias been so successful
in building up the private and productive business structure of the
country, may have a more stimulating effect on some of the govern-
ment departments than the traditional administrative departrrl ent
would have on the public corporation.

6. CONGRESSIONAL ORGANIZATION

A more typical governmental mechanism in American demod~CY

is the popular and representative legislative body. If one is wilhng
to cross the rigid line which separates the legislative and the execu-
tive branches of American government, one can observe signifi(:ant
lessons for the science of organization in the structure of the Arr~eri­
can legislative system. The congressional machinery of the Unj~ed
States is described below by George B. Galloway, engineer-econonnst,
public official, and popular publicist.

GEORCE B. CALLOWAY
"Congressional Machinery""
For the conduct of its business each House of Congress has de-
vised three types of machinery: an administrative organization, a commit·
tee system, and a political structure.
The administrative machinery of Congress has grown up like
Topsy since 17&]. From the beginning each House has elected a secretary
or clerk, a sergeant-at-arms, and a chaplain, and the lower chamber has
also chosen a doorkeeper and postmaster. Each of the officers of the House
and Senate has a staff appointed largely on patronage by the party in
power. But many employees of Congress have been so long in its seiVice
as to constitute the nucleus of a permanent career staff. Leslie C. Bime,
popular secretary of the Senate, has served Congress continuously in
various capacities since 1909. Men like John C. Crockett, sonorous chief
clerk of the Senate, Charles L. Watkins, its able parliamentarian, Ed-
ward 1- Hickey, journal clerk, Guy E. Ives, printing clerk, James D.
Preston, versatile veteran of many posts, and Carl A. Loeffier, secretat}' to
the minority, have served the Senate for upwards of half a CeIltury.
The administrative structure of Congress continues today sub-
stantially the same as it was a half century ago, the chief innovation in
the interim having been the establishment of the Office of Legisllltive
Counsel in 1919 with bill-drafting and legal duties. But the size of the
18 George B. Galloway: «Congressional Machinery." Congress at !be Crossroads.
Selected from pp. 85-94, WI, 105-<>8. llO-13, 115, "7. Reprinted by pennissWn of
Thomas Y. Crowell Company. Copyright, 1946, Thom.. Y. Crowell Company.
 TYPES OF OIGANI%ATION

administrative staff has multiplied tenfold since 1900, rising in 1945 to

426 Senate officers and employees and 57:: on the House side, plus 887
on the permanent force of the Architect of the Capitol, the latter being
concerned with the construction, operation, and maintenance of the
Capitol buildings and grounds. If to these be added the clerks to members,
L"Ommittee employees, and various special and minority employees, the
entire congressional staff (exclusive of employees of the Architect) com-
prised 2,987 persons as of June, 1944.
For the performance of its legislative, liscal, supervisory, and
housekeeping functions both houses of Congress have organized them·
selves into a system of committees that is unique a~lOng national repre-
sentative assemblies. All bills and resolutions introduced in Congress are
lirst referred to these committees, considered and screened by them, and
those that win favor are then reported back to the chambers with recom-
mendations for action. In the beginning Congress referred its business to
a legion of select committees. For every bill and every petty claim a
separate special committee was set up. At least 350 such committees, for
example, were raised in the Third Congress. But as time went on the
number of select committees rapidly declined. As a result of this evolu-
tionary process, responsibility for legislative action wag. scattered in 1945
among no less than 81 "little ministries," as Wilson once called them:
48 in the House and 33 in the Senate. Not more than 12 or 15 in each
House were major committees dealing with public problems of national
significance. As V-Day dawned over the land most observers of the con-
gressional committee system, both within and outside that body, agreed
that it was over-ripe for revision,
Committee clerks are appointed on patronage by the chairmen
as one of the perquisites of office, subject only to the nominal approval
of the committees. When a Senator becomes chairman of a standing
committee, his clerks and assistart clerks become ex-officio clerks and
assistant clerks of the committee. Thus their tenure is exposed to all the
political and mortal hazards surrounding the lives of their chairmen,
Some of the abler committee clerks, however, have served terms ranging
from live to twenty-five years, John Carson was clerk of the Senate Inter-
state Commerce Committee from 1929 to 1934 and E. J. tayton has
served as clerk of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Com-
merce since 1921. But by and large there are all too few qualified tech-
nicians on committee staffs. Lindsay Rogers has estimated that perhaps
200 congressional employees (including committee and legislative clerks
and the parliamentarians) are in positions to influence policy-making, But
few of them would claim to be top-notch specialists in the subjects under
their committees' jurisdiction. Their forte, rather, is in handling the
routine administrative work of their committees, compiling the calendars,
doing research, drafting reports, and handling public relations,
For advice OIl proposed legislation and aid in bill drafting, con-
gressional committees have long looked also to administrative agencies.
270 ADMINISTIlATIOfiI .

This practice is a desirable one not only because much modem legislation
is COn<:erned with public administration, but also because administrative
officials are, on the whole, more familiar than legislators with the concrete
conditions to which the statutes are to be applied. Since 1932, however,
there has been an increasing tendency for executive officers to go beyond
giving advice on legislation in response to congressional solicitation, and
to embody their proposals in the form of fully ilrafted bills, and to have
these bills introduced in Congress by administration supporters after they
have been approved by the legislative reJerence division in the Bureau of
the Budget. This growing practice of sending tailor-made "must" legisla-
tion to Capitol Hill has aroused the ire of legislators jealous of their
constitutional prerogatives.
Another important cog in the legislative machine is the Legisla-
tive Reference Service in the Library of Congress. Created in 1915, this
agency now furnishes a variety of general information, digest, abstract,
index, legal, research, and other services to the members and committees
of Congress. During 1945-1946 it had an appropriation of $198,300 and
a staff of 79 persons, of whom 58 were at the professional level.
Many of the congressional commissions and joint committees
have had staffs, usually on a temporary or part-time basis. In recent times,
for example, the Temporary National Economic Committee ( 1939-
1941), a mixed commission whose membership included three Senators
and three Representatives, had a staff of 186 persons at the peak, while
the Joint Committee on the Organization of Congress (1945-1946) had
only two persons on its staff. The outstanding example of joint staffing
is afforded by the Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation (1926)
whose permanent staff of 17 includes its chief of staff, Colin F. Starn, an
assistant chief of staff, executive assistant, technical assistant, two attor-
neys, two statisticians, three economists, and six clerks. Created by statute
and appointed on merit, this joint staff has rendered invaluable service to
the members of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Com-
mittee on Ways and Means.
To complete our picture of the machinery of Congress, it remains
to consider the political party mechanisms that operate behind the legis-
lative scenes. What the Democrats call a "caucus" and the Republicans
style a "conference" is the cornerstone of the party organization. It is com-
posed, as we have seen, of all the party members in the chamber. As an
instrument of party control the caucus has waxed and waned with the
passing years. Under Cannon's regime as Speaker of the House (1903-
1911), the Speaker was omnipotent and the majority party caucus was
rarely needed or used. But after "Czar" Cannon was shorn of his power
in the parliamentary revolution of 1910, the majority caucus became the
dominant factor. The Democrats, who captured control of the House in
the congressional elections of that year, promptly. erected on the ruins
of Cannonism a new political structure based on the secret caucus. In a
vi\~d account of the party battles of the 6:md Congress, an astute eye-
271 TYPES OF ORCANI%AT,ON

witness descn'bed this shift from "Czar" Cannon to "King CauClu."

In each house both major parties also have a Committee on Cmn-
mittees. In addition to organizing the House, electing its officers, the
chairmen of all standing committees and a majority of their members
the party in power controls the patronage through its Patronage Comtnit:
tees. Another tool in the congressional political kit is the steering comtnit-
tee. In the House the Democratic Steering Committee has been Cl)m-
posed since 1933 of the Speaker, the maJority Boor leader, the chairmal) of
the caucus, the party whip, the chairmen of Ways and Means, Appropri_
ations, and Rules, and one representative from each of the 15 zones into
which the country is divided for party purposes, each such representative
being elected by the Democratic delegation from the zone. The Boor
leaders-two in each chamber-are chosen by their respective party <:au-
cuses, act as party leaders on the Boor of the house, and have no stanqing
committee assignments in the lower chamber. The party whips, who are
selected by their Boor leaders, keep the party membership and leadership
informed of each other's wishes, and round up party members for im-
portant divisions.
Last but far from least in the political hierarchy is the HQuse
Committee on Rules whose jurisdiction and powers make it an effective
instrument of majority party control of legislative action. By the exercise
of these powers the Rules Committee can sift the business corning hom
t..'le other 47 committees of the House and decide which bills shall have
the right of way to consideration on the Boor and the order in which they
shalT be taKen up. By amending tlieir measures as a condition of giVing
them a "green light" to the floor, Rules can substitute its own judgment
for that of the great legislative committees of the House on matters of
substantive policy. It can also determine the duration of debate 0u a
controversial measure and restrict the opportunity to amend it, thus ex-
pediting or delaying a final decision. Three kinds of special rules are
handed down by the Rules Committee: (1) "gag rules" limiting amend-
ment of pending measures; (2) rules permitting certain favored legislation
to come before the House; and (3) rules which make certain bills the I\ext
order of business in order to obstruct others which otherwise would CQme
up for consideration via the usual calendar route.
No account of the political machinery of Congress would be
complete without a description of that outstandiag figure-the SP~ker
of the House of Representatives. Although the Speaker lost his power in
the revolution of 1910-11 of appointing the standing committees of the
House, he still appoints the select committees, the House mernber~ of
conference committees, and the chairman of the Committee of the
Whole. Despite the overthrow of Cannonism, the speakership thus C:on-
tinues to be the most powerful office in Congress.

The Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 did much to reduce

the number and merge the functions of the powerful congressiOnal
272
committees descnDed by Galloway. The act increased congressional
salaries, e,tablished a retirement system, strengthened congressional
staff and research services, reduced the burden upon Congress in the
handling of private claims, and corrected the system of registering
lobbyists. On the other hand, procedures and devices which make
possible the minority stranglehold upon majority ~gislation were
not modernized." Nor were other recommended processes to speed
up congressional action, such as the use of voting machines, ac-
cepted. What may happen to con~sional organization and pro-
cedure, if the meetings of Congress are popularized over the radio
or by television, is a problem that may be decided in the near future.

7. AMERICAN POLITICAL PARTY ORGANIZATION

In a democracy like the United States the organization is a term

frequently reserved for the political party. The technique of political
party organization and control is now no secret to Americans, but
many years of study by keen observers and considerable candid re-
porting by practical politicians were necessary before the inner work-
ings of this unique type of organization were fully divulged. Below
are the contributions to the subject by (a) Moisey Ostrogorski, a
Russian observer of the end of the last century, who wrote a classic
work on the American political system in 1902; and (b) Emily
Blair, vice-chairman of the Democratic National Committee, who
wrote the incisive little manual in 1924 quoted below.
Ostrogorski's work was worthy of a warmer response than it
received, for it was not only a scientific piece of analysis but a fasci-
nating human record of the organizational base of American de-
mocracy. Had Ostrogorski chosen to extend his exhaustive study of
political party organization to the entire American governmental
system, he would probably have won the fame of de Tocqueville
whom he had carefully studied, and of Lord Bryce, who had carefully
studied him. In fact, Ostrogorski's series of studies preceded Bryce's
classical work on The American Commonwealth, but Ostrogorski's
studies were first written and published in French,'· and only later
were they translated and published in book form in America. Like
de Tocqueville, Ostrogorski had a patriotic purpose of his own. He
17 House of Representatives: Legislative Reorganization Act of '946. Hearings
Before the Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments, United States
Senate, 80th Cong., ,nd Sess., February 1948. Estes Kefauver and lack Levin: A
Twentieth·Century Congress. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce; 1947· Joseph P.
Harris: "The Reorganization of Congress." Public Administration Review, Summer
1946, vol. 6, p. ,67-8 •.
10 Annales des Sciences Politiques, 1888-8c).
 TYPES OF O!te.ANIZ."ON

too had worked in his country's Ministry of Justice and was particu-
larly interested in how and why the Am~rican democratic. system
really worked, since he was anxious to see a greater measure of
democracy introduced into his own country. In fact, he served as a
Constitutional Democrat in the first Russian Duma in H}o6, which
if not a fully democratized legislative body itself, probably repre-
sented as important a break with some of the monarchical, oli-
garchical, and aristocratic traditions of Czarist Russia as did the
Soviet Revolution a decade later." Some of these suppressed Russian
urges for democratic expression reflect themselves in Ostrogorski's
colorful description of the American political party system.

(a) MOISEY OSTROGORSKI

Democracy and the Organi%ation of Political Parties '"

The body of the Organization of American parties contains the
following three essential organs: the primary assembly of the membels of
the party from which all the powers of the Organization emanate; the
committee of the party which is the controlling power within it; and the
conventions of the delegates who choose the candidates for elective offices
on behalf of the party.
The primary assemblies of the members of the party bear the
name of "caucuses" in New England and in certain States of the \Vest,
and that of "primaries" or "primary elections" in the rest of the Union.
They meet in each city ward or rural district, at tolerably frequent in-
tervals, to make direct choice of the candidates of the party for the local
offices assigned to the ward, but especially to appoint delegates to the
various party conventions, who select caudidates for public functions on
all the other steps of the hierarchical ladder. In principle, the primaries
are composed of all the adherents of the party. In a few large cities,
the followers of the party are grouped into associations, or permanent
clubs, and all those who are members of them are allowed to sit in the
primaries. The discre1:ionary right of admission or exclusion possessed by
these associations, or clubs, has too often made them close bodies. In New
York especially the political monopoly of the associations has been one of
the factors of the power which the "Machine" has acquired there. But
whether the admission to the primaries of the adherents of the party is
beset with more or less extensive restrictions, in practice the great majority
of the voters keep away from these assemblies. The lists presented at the
primary are generally prepared behind the scenes, where the politicians
«make up the slate," as is said in their slang. Provided with the slate, the
,. Samuel N. Harper: The Russia I Believe In. Chicago: The University of Chi·
cago Press; 194$, Chapters $ and 6.
11& Moisey Ostrogotski: Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties.
Selected from Vol. z, pp. Z07-o8, 210-12, Z2$-29, Z44-4;. Reprinted by pennission
of The Macmillan Company. Copyright, 19C2, The Macmillan Company.
274
presiding ofticets of the primary make the meeting adopt it by a series of
movements regulated with the precision of a military parade. These move-
ments are executed with such rapidity and such ensemble that the good
citizen does not know what to make of it. If he ventures to intervene, he
is easily silenced by means of the niceties of the procedure. In one way or
another the programme is carried, point by point, in the form in which
it was settled beforehand behind the scenes. The good citizen is reduced
to playing the part of an involuntary dummy amid involuntary dummies
of the "ring," which manages the local Organization.
The stronghold of this "ring" is the local committee of the party.
Each political subdivision, the rural town or the city ward, or even the
ward precinct, has its committee, appointed annually at the primary of
the party. Above this committee of first instance there are, in the local
Organization, one or two more committees: the ward committee in the
cities, which is generally composed of the members of the precinct com-
mittees; and the county committee, which is the central committee for
the county with its towns and villages, or the city committee in the large
cities which have a central independent Organization. The members of
the county committee are appointed by the committees of the wards and
of the towns or by the respective delegates of these territorial units to the
county convention; the city committee is formed in a similar way. The
local committee, which is the permanent representative of the party Or-
ganization, of the primaries and of the local conventions, is supposed to
be their executive organ, with the duty of exerting itself, especially duting
election time, to ensure the success of the candidates of the party within
its jurisdiction. In reality it manages, it manipulates the whole Organiza-
tion, and in particular during the stage which precedes the election, that
of the nomination of candidates. Generally, it is the committee which
makes up the slate, and it forces. it on the primary because it wields a
predominant power there. It is the committee which convenes the pri-
mary, which selects the date and place of the meeting to suit its own
convenience, which settles its procedure, which presides over the assembly
until the officers are elected. Very often it is the committee, again, which
appoints the "inspectors of election," who have to receive and count the
votes; and if it selects inspectors who are hostile to a particular candidate
and are unscrupulous, that candidate is a lost man.
In any event the role of the party member, whether more or less
unreal and delusive, ends in the primaries: as soon as he has, or is supposed
to h~ve, recorded his vote for the delegates he disappears from the p0-
litical stage; he no longer has any power as a party member. Political
activity is now transferred to the larger stage of the conventions, with a
new set of actors.
The convention system is extremely complicated, and at first
sight, even somewhat confused. Composed of representatives of the
people assembled in party meetings, the conventions are invested with
the mission of pointing out to the general body of the party the candidates
 TYPES OF ORGANIZATION

for whom they may vote. The first complication comes from the federa-
tive system of the American Government, with its double set of parallel
functions in the State and in the Union. A State sends to Congress ten
or twenty representatives, and a hundred or a couple of hundred members
to the legislative assembly of the State, and, consequently it is divided,
with a view to the federal elections, into ten or twenty districts, and into
one hundred or two hundred for the legislative elections of the State.
Hence the necessity of holding two conventions of delegates: the one
composed of delegates from all the primaries of the congressional district
which will elect the candidate for Congress; and the other containing
delegates from the primaries of the much smaller district which has ttl
return a member to the local legislative assembly. However, the legislative
offices are not the only ones which are filled up by election: the judiciary
and the principal executive offices are so as well, not to mention those
connected with local self'government, the municipal offices and others.
But thcir jurisdictions do not tally with any of the districts carved out
for the various legislative elections, and they cannot possess an identical
party representation. Consequently, each public office to which a particu-
lar territorial subdivision is assigned requires a special convention of
delegates to settle the candidature on behalf of the respective party.
The composition of the conventions from the standpoint of the
moral, intellectual, and social character of their members, is a somewhat
motley one, for although they are managed by professional politicians,
they are not recruited exclusively in their circles. No doubt, a considerable
proportion of each convention consists of office-seekers or office-holders,
and, in general, of mercenary politicians. The convention is for them a
sort of stock exchange, where they sell and buy political influence, payable
in places or money, or, at all events, get to know each other, put in their
claims, and form connections which they will tum to account later on.
The politicians are not oblivious of the maxim that you must cut your coat
according to your cloth, but one and all, in their respective spheres, are
there, according to the expressive slang of the Machine, "not for their
health, but on business." In the same category of delegates are often found
persons who are simply agents for big private concerns, for railroad com-
panies, and other societies which want to introduce their garrisons into
the political fortresses. Finally, there is a category of obscure, humble
delegates, free from the cant of these respectable personages, and sincerely
desirous of discharging their mission for the public good.
The choice of candidates for the highest executive offices of the
Union, for the Presidency and the Vice-Presidency of the Republic, while
following, in its main outline, the procedure and the preoccupations
which govern the selection of candidates for the State offices, is always
invested with exceptional importance. The stake is enorrnous; it includes
the highest prize to which the ambition of an American citizen can aspire.
The attention of the whole country, excited to the highest pitch by the
great periodical duel, centres on these assemblies so as to make them a
216
uilique institution, and their working under· the eyes of the whole fever-
stricken nation a unique spectacle. The citizen who pays no heed to the
affairs of his State and of his city, which, however, concern him so nearly,
fires up on the approach of the national conventions. This great gathering
appeals rather to the American elector's naturally excitable temperament
·than to his publiC spirit. The formation of the national conventions is,
therefore, left to the professional politicians. There are, no doubt, a cer-
tain number of delegates whose sole aspiration is to lend a hand in the
great work of the party, out of devotion to its cause, or from mere vanity
which courts opportunities for coming forward. But the great majority,
and they may be estimated at nine-tenths, are occupied exclnsively with
their own interests at the convention. In the crowd of politicians who
flock to the conventions all ranles are represented: Senators of the United
States, State Governors, and so on down to aspirants to modest places;
and each of them has an "axe to grind."

(b) EMILY NEWEU BUIR

"Organization Prime," zt
"Organization," according to the dictionary, "is the work of con-
necting interdependent parts so that each has a special function, act,
office, or relation to the whole." As used in politics, "Organization" is
getting people to work together for the common purpose of winning an
election. The people who do this work are known as "The Organization."
The precinct is the smallest unit of organization. It is the section
of the county (or town) within whose bounds the machinery of elections
is set up for the convenience of the people. It comprises the territory that
is served by one voting place. It is usually determined by the number of
voters, the average precinct containing between 250 and 300 voters. In
large cities the precinct may include but a few blocks. In the country,
where there are but few voters, it may be several miles in extent. Success
for the party depends upon the work done in the precinct.
The leader of the precinct is usually called the precinct commit-
teeman. His work is the most important that falls to a party worker. There
should now be also a precinct committeewoman. She should, first of all,
confer with the precinct committeeman. They should go over the situa·
tion in their precinct and decide upon the division of the work between
them. Sometimes the precinct committeewoman finds herself left with
all the detail work while the precinct committeeman makes all the plans.
This' will not bring good results. While the precinct committeewoman
may not know as much about political organization work as the precinct
committeeman, she knows more about women and has her own con-
tribution to make to the plans and should insist on being heard.
f1 Emily Newell Blait: "Organization Primer." Stuart Lewis (ed.}: Readings in
Party Pnnciples and Practical Politics. Selected from pp. 3'7-'9. 33'. Reprinted by
permissIOn of Prentice·HalI, Inc. Copyright. 19.8. Prentice-Hall. Inc.
 1TPU OF ORc:.t.NI%ATION

It is customary for each political party to malce a house-ta:house

canvass of the voters in each precinct, noting down the voter's political
party and address. This Jist of voters is sometimes kept in a book, com-
monly called a "poll book." A "poll" is usually taken 60 days before an
election; and another, 30 days before an election. Long before election
day the precinct committeewoman should have all her plans made for
working on that day. These plans should include:
1. Telephone squad-Women who cannot leave their homes but
who each promise to remind a certain number of women that they must
vote.
z. A motor squad-Women with machines ready to bring voters
to the polls (where the law permits it) and to take workers from place
to place.
3. A checking squad-Women who will stand with poll book for
a certain number of hours each, checking off the women as they vote.
4. 'General Workers-Women to stand as near the polls as the
law permits 'lInd talk to the undecided or indifferent voter in an attempt
to persuade her at tbe last moment.
,. The eleventh-hour work-Two hours before the polls close
the checkers should be able to report all the Democratic or committed
women who have not voted. A captain in charge of that work should
assign a certain number of names to each motor and these voters should
then be brought to the polls.

Since the Ostrogorski and Blair statements, many of the details

of American political practice have changed, American party prin-
ciples have moved to the left, and American political affairs have
really begun to reflect the fact that politics is the art of "who gets
what, when and how." 22 But the party system, analyzed a half cen-
tury ago by Ostrogorski's classic and by Emily Blair's manual for the
door-bell-ringing-and-get-out-the-vote type of political organization,
is still the backbone of the American political system, regardless of
party."" Will this system survive the apparently increasing polariza-
tion of the American political spectrum and the im~ending tendency
to "convert party politics into party government"?· Most American
ob~ervers expect and trust that the system will, since the system of
party organization is a vital American mechanism which serves not
only the popular pastime of politics, but is a decisive device for the
balancing of powerful national political interests.
"'Harold D. Lasswell: Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Mc·
Graw·HiIl Book Co.; 1936. V. O. Key: Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New
York: TholIDlS Y. Crowell Company; '947, p. 1.
.. For a simple sketch of the Republican party organization, see: "How the Party
b Organized." The Republican, June 1940, pp. 2;-25·
.. E. E. Schattschneider: "The Struggle for Party Government." Program in
American Civilization, University of Maryland, 1948, p. 29·
278

8. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

Donald C. Stone, whose experience in international organization

has been previously reviewed, and Walter H. C. Laves, who served
as a professor of political science at the University of Chicago, as a
member of Stone's staff in the Division of Administrative Manage-
ment of the United States Burcau of the Budget, and as Assistant
Director of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Organization, describe the organization of the United Nations in the
following extracts.

(al DONALD C. STONE

"Organizing the United Nations""
Let us look at the UN structure. The Charter drafted at San
Francisco provides for six principal organs. One is the General Assembly,
a deliberative body representing the fifty-one member states. It meets an-
nually in September and on special call. It is the nearest thing to a legis-
lative body in the UN.
The Security Council, partly an executive and partly a judicial
organization, consists of five permanent members and six others elected
for two-year terms by the General Assembly. It is primarily responsible
for maintaining international peace and security and is in continuous ses-
sion. A military staff committee advises the council on military require-
ments for the maintenance of peace and security, the employment and
command of forces of the UN, the regulation of armaments, and possible
disarmament. The chiefs of staff of the permanent members of the Secu-
rity Council-U. S. A., U. S. S. R., United Kingdom, China, and France
-make up the military staff committee.
The Economic and Social Council, with specialized functions re-
lating to economic, social, cultural, educational, and health problems and
the promotion of respect for human rights and freedoms, is a representa-
tive organ consisting of eighteen members elected by the General As-
sembly. Much of its work will be carried out through subsidiary com-
missions. From an operating standpoint, further complications arise in the
UN structure from the fact that the work of "specialized agencies," such
as the Food and Agriculture Organization, and the United Nations Edu-
cational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, have to be coordinated
with the UN through agreements made with them by the Economic and
Social Council and approved by the General Assembly.
The Trusteeship Council, which under the aegis of the General
Assembly wI1l guide the international trusteeship system provided in the
.. Donald C. Stone: "Organizing the United Nations." Public Administration Re-
view, Spring 1946, vol 6, adapted from pp. 11;-16. Reprinted by permission.
 TYPES OF OIlCANIZATlON

charter, consists of an equal number of members who administer trust

territories and members who do not.
The International Court of Justice is the judicial arm of the UN.
Membership in the UN carries with it adherence to the statue establish-
ing the court. It consists of fifteen judges elected jointly by the Security
Council and the General Assembly. Its seat will be at The Hague. The
sixth principal organ established by the Charter is the Secretariat.

(bl WALTER C. LAVES AND DONALD C. STONE

"The United Nations Secretariat""
The Secretariat of the United Nations is the mortar in the or-
ganizational arch composed of the United Nations and the specializ~d
agencies built on the foundation of sovereign national states. The Secre-
tariat of the United Nations is the only place where problems, programs,
and policies can be consistently viewed in United Nations terms. It is
therefore the only place where the many parts of the world's governmental
machinery can be geared together. The provisions of the United Nations
Charter regarding the powers of the Secretary-General and his Secretariat
are brief but at the same time broad in scope. Article 97 establishes the
Secretary-General as head of the Secretariat and provides that he shall
be the chief administrative officer of the organization. The Secretary-
General is appointed by the General Assembly on the recommendation
of the Security Council. By Article 98 he is designated as Secretary-Gen-
eral of the General Assembly, of the Security Council, and of the Trus-
teeship Council. He appoints the staff of the Secretariat under regulations
established by the General Assembly (Article 101). In addition, Article
99 empowers him "to bring to the attention of the Security Council any
matter which in his opinion may threaten the maintenance of interna-
tional peace and security." The highly important Article 100 guarantees
the international character of the entire Secretariat.
Given the inevitably unsettled after-war relations among the
United Nations and the natural tendency for the spotlight to shift from
problems of world organization to issues of the peace settlement, it is en-
couraging that the United Nations has proceeded vigorously with the
development of its organization. The task is far from complete, and only
years of energetic operation will determine the ultimate character and
role of the UN.
The Executive Office consists of an Executive Assistant and sev-
eral other assistants who help the Secretary-General for the most part in
a personal capacity in many of his relationships with Members, with the
Organs of the UN, with Specialized Agencies, and in coordinating the
activities of the Secretariat affecting such relationships. This work involves
.. Walter C. Laves and Donald C. Stone: "The United Nations Secretariat."
Foreign Policy RepOrts. October IS, 1946, vol. 2>, selected from pp. 18~-83, 191-92.
Reprinted by permission.
280
handling such matters as protocol, cummunic;ltions with governinents,
preparation of agenda of the General Assembly, and assistance on reports
and other formal actions which the Secretary-General must take.
The Administrative and Financial Services (budgeting, adminis-
trative planning, personnel, and finance) are organized under an Assist-
ant Secretary-General in Charge of Administration and Finance (John
Hutson of tile United States) into three bureaus: the Administrative
Management and Budget Bureau, the Personnel Bureau, and the Comp-
troJler's Bureau.
The Assistant Secretary-General in charge of Conference and
General Services (Adrian Pelt of the Netherlands) makes arrangements
for meetings of the General Assembly, the Councils, commissions, com-
mittees, and special conferences. The Bureaus under him provide trans-
lating, documentation, secretariat, publish official records of meetings
and take care of supplies, transportation and housing. This department
now has the largest staff. Branch offices of the United Nations, of which
there are at present two temporary ones-in London and Geneva-are
linked primarily to this Department.
. . The Department" of Security Council Affarrs (Assistant Secre-
tary-General Arkady Sobolev of the U. S. S. R.) is responsible for the
principal activities, technical services, and programs administered by the
Secretariat. It obtains information and prepares reports on questions that
come before the Security Council, notably the maintenance of interna-
tional peace and security, the pacific settlement of disputes, the security
aspects of trusteeship agreements for strategic areas, the political aspect
of military agreements, the size of armaments, and so on. While the De-
partment primarily serves the Security Council, it, like every department,
renders help to other departments of the Secretariat and to other organs
concerning matters in its field.
The Department of Economic Affairs (Assistant Secretary-Gen-
eral David K. Owen of the United Kingdom) must work very closely with
the Department of Social Affairs in providing assistance to the Economic
and Social Council and its commissions and committees which it serves,
especially in the fields of finance, transportation, communications, em-
ployment, economic rehabilitation, statistics, and economic affairs gener-
ally.
The Department of Social Affarrs (Assistant Secretary-General
Henri Laugier of France) .also assists the Economic and Social Council
and its commissions and committees in the fields of science, education,
culture,. social questions, demography, human rights, refugees and dis-
placed persons, narcotic drugs, and public health. Since both the Eco-
nomic and Social Departments are cuncerned with relationships between
UN and Specialized Agencies; the Director of the Division of Relations
with Specialized Agencies reports to the Assistant Secretaries-General for
Economic and Social AffailS.
The Department of Trusteeship and Information from Non-Self-
281 TYPiS OF OIlCANI%ATIOtf

Governing Territories (Assistant Secretary-General Victor Hoo of China)

is' responsible for all matters concerning problems and developments in
the trusteeship and non-self-governing territories field. Since the states
concerned have not completed agreements with respect to the adminis-
tration of trust territories and the Trusteeship Council has therefore not
yet been established, this Department is performing merely preparatory
work in the trusteeship field; it has already received and is analyzing re-
ports from member nations on self-governing territory.
The Department of Public Information (Assistant Secretary-
General Benjamin Cohen of Chile) assists the Secretary-General in for-
mulating and carrying out the information policies and programs of the
United Nations.- It maintains facilities and services for the press, radio,
films, and other information media, prepares exhibitions relating to the
UN and fnrnishes background information and material for educational
gronps.
The Legal Department (Assistant Secretary-General Ivan K-erno
of Czechoslovakia) advises and assists the Secretary-General, various de-
partments of the Secretariat, and the organs of the United Nations on
legal questions, assists in drafting treaties and conventions, and is respon-
sible for encouraging the progressive development of international law
and codification. The Department maintains liaison with the Interna-
tional Court of Jusfice with respect to legal functions of the Court.

The United Nations organization is not strictly a new creation

of the post-war period, for back of it lies the large body of organiza-
tional experience of the League of Nations. However, there are some
distinctive features of the United Nations_ These are: (1) a more
pragmatic recognition of the strength of the large nations repre-
sented in the Security Council rather than an adherence to national
sovereignty regardless of size of the various member nations repre-
sented in the Assembly; (2) an attempt to segregate social and
economic functions and organizations from political and strategic
functions and organizatiC¥ls, so that independent progress can be
mac{e at the international level in the less controversial and more
coilcrete subject-matter of the former; and (3) a strengthening of
the secretariat as the key IItTganization for the whole structure of
international government.

9. AMERICAN LABOR ORGANIZATION

An emerging mechanism of political and economic strength in
the United States is the labor union. Union membership rose from
21
about 2,900,000 members in 1933 to 15,600,000 in 1948. The
27 United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics: Directory 01
Labor Unions in the United States, June 1948, Bulletin No. 937, p. 5
 ADMINI$TIIATION

organizational structure of the labor movement during this period

was rarely appreciated by Americans, except for some of the active
members and officers of the unions, labor economists, and social
scientists specializing in labor relations. One of the outstanding
specialists on the subject was Florence Peterson, Director of the
Industrial Relations Division of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of
the United States Department of Labor, who carefully described in
1945 the organization of American labor unions.

FLORENCE PETERSON
"Structure and Internal Government of Labor Organizations ....
The constituent and autonomous units which make up the bulk
of organized labor are the National and International unions. Most of
these unions are affiliated with either the American Federation of Labor or
the Congress of Industrial Organizations although there are important
exceptions. The major functions of the federated organizations, both the
American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organi-
zations, are to promote the interests of workers and unions before the leg·
islative, judicial and administrative branches of government; to expand
union organization, both directly and by assisting their International
unions; to provide research, legal and other technical assistance to their
members; to publish periodical journals and other literature dealing with
economic problems and general matters of interest to labor; to represent
and promote the cause of labor before the general public; to determine
the jurisdictional boundaries of their affiliated nnions and to protect
them from dual unionism; to serve as spokesman for their unions on inter-
national affairs, especially international labor movements.
The American Federation of Labor was organized in 1881 by a
group of trade unions for the purpose of mutual aid and protection. His-
torically and structurally the Federation is an agent of its constituent
organizations, having only such powers, and engaging in only those activo
ities, which have been assigned to it by its affiliated unions_ It has no
direct authority over the internal affairs or the activities of any of its mem-
ber unions so long as they do not impinge upon the jurisdiction of another
affiliated union. While it exerts a great deal of influence over its members,
its only actual power is the power of expulsion from membership in the
Federation. The annual conventions of the Federation are held the first
Monday in October except in presidential election years when iliey are
held ilie iliird Monday in November. Each city central, state federation,
and directly affiliated federal labor union is entitled to one delegate. Each
International has one delegate for less tllan. 4,000 members, two dele-

os F10rence Peterson: "Structure and Internal Government of Labor Organizations."

American Labor Unions. Selected from pp .•P-45, ~C)-SS. Reprinted by permission of
Harper & Brothers. Copyright, 1945, Harper & Brothers.
 TYPES OF ORGANIZATION

gates for 4.000 or more, three for 8,000 or more, four for 16,000 or more,
five for 32,000 or more, and so on. In a roll call vote, held upon demand
of one-tenth of the delegates, each International delegate casts one vote
for every 100 members or major fraction thereof which he represents_
The Executive Council is composed of the President, Secretary-
Treasurer and fifteen Vice-Presidents elected annually by the conven-
tion. By custom, the Vice-Presidents are selected from among the officers,
usually the Presidents, of the Internationals, who continue to hold their
offices with their respective unions. The Executive Council carries out the
decisions of the convention and submits a report to each convention on
the activities of the Federation and recommendations for further action.
During the interim between conventions the Executive Council may take
any action which "may become necessary to safeguard and promote the
best interests of the Federation and of its affiliated unions."
In its office at Washington, D. C., the Federation maintains a
staff of economic and legal advisers and assistants who prepare data to be
used at Congressional hearings and work in close co-operation with the
various governmental agencies concerned with labor matters. A major
activity of the Washington staff is the preparation of the Federation
publications. While a large share of the work of organizing. the unor-
ganized is performed by the Internationals within their various jurisdic-
tions, the Federation also employs about 175 organizers to assist them
and to carry on organizing activities in the industries and trades not in-
cluded within the jurisdiction of any of its affiliated unions.
In November, '944, there were 102 International and National
unions, 50 state federations, 749 city centrals, and 1,625 federal labor
unions affiliated with the American Federation of Labor. The '907 con-
vention of the American Federation of Labor declared that "For the
greater development of the labor movement, departments subordinate
to the American Federation of Labor are to be established from time
to time." During the two years subsequent to this declaration, four
departments, were established: the Building and Construction Trades
Department, the Metal Trades Department, the Railway Employees' De-
partment, and the Union Label Trades Depaitment. Many of the In-
ternational unions of the AFL are outside the jurisdiction of any of these
departments while some are affiliated with several departments.
The Congress of Industrial Organizations is an outgrowth of a
division within the American Federation of Labor over the issue of craft
versus industrial unioni~m. In 1935 eight AFL unions created the Com-
mittee for Industrial Organizations and membership was later augmented
by several other AFL unions and factions of unions as Well as newly or-
ganized unions. Structurally, the Congress of Industrial Organizations
is not unlike the American Federation of Labor with the exception that
the CIO at present has no departments.
The annual convention is the supreme authority of the CIO, be-
ing held during October or November. Each directly affiliated local (that
 AOMINISTUTION

is, local industrial union) and each city and state industrial council is
entitled to one delegate. Each International union havin~ up to 5,000
members is entitled to two delegates; over 5,000 members, to three dele-
gates; over 10,000, to four delegates; over %5,000, to five delegates; over
50,000, to six delegates; over 75,000, to seven delegates; over 100,000
membership to eight delegates for the first 100,000 and one additional
delegate for each additional 50,000 or majority fraction thereof. In a roll
call vote, held upon demand of 30 per cent or more of the total votes,
each International union and each local industrial union is entitled to
one vote for each member, a~d each city and state industrial council has
one vote. .
The officers of the CIO, consisting of a President, nine Vice-
Presidents and a Secretary-Treasurer, are elected by majority vote at each
regular convention. The Executive Board is composed of these officers
and "a duly qualified officer" from each affiliated International. Between
boarli-sessions, held at least twice a year but subject to call by the Presi-
dentor a majorityvot~e Board, the President has full power to di-
rect the affairs of the Organization.
In its office at Washington, D. C., the Organization main-
tains 'a sl;:!£f of economic and legal advisers to assist its affiliated bodies
and to work in close co-operation with the various governmental agencies
concerning labor matters. The Organization issues weekly and monthly
publications as well as pamphlets dealing with trade unions matters. It
employs about 180 organizers to assist its member unions, as well as to
conduct organizing' campaigns in plants 'and industries not included
within the jurisdiction of its affiliated unions.
In 1944.the CIO was composed of 40 International unions (in-
cluding several Branches which are largely autonomous); 36 state indus-
trial councils; 232 city, county and district industrial councils, and 292
directly affiliated locals.
About half the unions covering railroad workers are affiliated
with the AFL, including some unions which are confined solely to rail-
road workers as well as those covering workers of the same craft in other
industries. The four train service unions, commonly referred to as the
"Brotherhoods," as well as several other of the important railroad unions,
have always remained outside the AFL. There is some overlapping of
jurisdiction between the AFL affiliates and the independents, as well as
among the independents themselves. Some of the dualism is due to the
fact that Negroes are ineligible to membership in some of the unions
and hilVe formed organizations of their own. Unlike most other industries,
there is extensive organization of supervisory personnel in the railroad
industry. Some foremen and supervisors are organized into unions of their
own, such as the Yardmasters Union and the American Railway Super-
visors Association which takes in shop foremen. In the other branches of
the industry, foremen are customarily members of the same unions as the
men whom they supervise.
285 TYPES OF ORCANIZATION

A more continuing organization for united action is the Railway

Labor Executives Association which was formed, soon after the passage
of the Railway Labor Act in 1926 for the purpose of "cooperative action
and to obtain and develop constant interpretations and utilization of all
the privileges of the Act." At present twenty union~ are affiliated with
the Association. These include all the AFL railroad unions. Two of the
large unions, the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen and the Brother-
hood of Locomotive Engineers, do not at present belong to the Railway
Labor Executives Association.
Locally, there are the city centrals which are affiliates of all AFL
local unions within the city, and city industrial councils to which CIO
locals belong. On the state level are the AFL state federations and the
CIO state industrial councils, The city organizations are composed of
representatives from all the member local unions while the state organi-
zations include delegates from the city organizations as well as all the
affiliated local unions within the state, If a local resigns or is expelled
from its International, it automatically loses its membership in the city
and state organizations. The state federations and state industrial coun-
cils are concerned chiefly with legislative and educational matters. They
hold annual conventions where programs of general interest to all the
workers in the state are formulated, initiate legislation and appear before
state legislatures, and in various ways promote organized labor's interests
before the public.
Labor unions are "organization conscious" not only insofar as
their membership dpves are concerned. They show an increasing
tendency to study, criticize, and perfect their own techniques of
union organization and administration. The organizational struc-
ture of American labor unions has produced some of the nation's
most revealing comparative experience regarding popular and demo-
cratic control by mass membership, along with technical policy
guidance by executives and experts.

10. INDUSTRIAL AND OTHER TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONS

Organizations representing financial, indastrial, and commer-

cial enterprise, such as the American Bankers Association, the Na-
tional Association of Manufacturers, and the Chamber of Commerce
of the United States, have functioned for a long time in this coun-
try.'"' A rich store of knowledge for the comparative study of or-
ganization is found, as we shall see, in numeroUll local firms and in
many corporations operating on a national and international scale.'·
.. See Harwood L Childs: Labor and Capital in National Politics, Columbus:
Ohio State University Press; 1930.
• 0 See Chapter 12.
Some generalizations concerning the organizational experien~ of
industrial and other institutions are presented below by Russell Rpbb
in a treatise he prepared on comparative organization in 1910.

RUSSELL ROBI
Lectures on Organization .,
In the popular mind, perfect organization usually is associ?ted
with the army. Military organization has contributed much to' all other
types of organization through its example of the value of discipline, ~he
usefulness of definite procedure, and the effectiveness in administra hon
of placing responsibility, but it has been the cause of mistakes in buil(ll~g
up other organizations, through the forcing into prominence of the n1aln
features of a military organization when the end that is sought is much
more influenced by other factors, when the necessity for control is less
than for specialization of effort and for the coordination of diffefe.nt
kinds of action. This becomes plainer when one considers, for In-
stance, an industrial organization depending for its success very lar~ely
upon the ability with which the principles of division of labor are appjIed.
There are many examples. The success or failure of the watch-industry
would not depend upon instant obedience, upon definite evolutionS. of
men, upon predetermined movement in emergency, upon a definite hne
of succession in authority; it would depend upon such things as study and
care and economy in purchasing materials, upon the development of proc-
esses to make the most of each worker's special skill and ability, the saVIng
of time in the handling of the product, the working of the plant to save
interest and rent, the discovery of consumers, and the prompt deliVery
of the product. The main purpose is different from the main military
purpose, and the organization must vary accordingly.
The construction of the great irrigating reservoirs in India, where
a few years ago during the famine so many of the natives were employed,
furnishes a good example of the variation in organizations according to
the material one has to work with. One can imagine approximately ",hat
sort of an organization would be necessary in most other places to un~er­
take the vast excavations necessary to form reservoirs in great irrigating
works: there would be a large mechanical equipment of steam-shovels,
with the minor organization of drivers, mechanicians, and superintend-
ents, the systems of records, of fuel-supply and repairs; the placing of
equipment; the orderly procedure of the work; the great numbe! of
workmen to direct and supervise; the system of pay, shelter, commis,ary,
sanitation-all would have to be molded into a great comprehensive or-
al Russell L. Rubb: Lectures on Organization. Quoted in Leon C. Marshall: l3u~­
ness Administmtion, selected from pp. 779-83- Reprinted by permission of The Un~·
versity of ChiCllgo Press. Copyright, 1921, The University of Chicago Press. R"bb s
original manuscript was privately printed in '9'0.
281 TYPES OF ORGANIZATION

ganization. In India there were no steam-shovels, mechanicians, fuel-sup-

ply, repairs, shelters, or commissary. The excavation was done directly
by hordes of natives in gangs of twenty or thirty, each with. his or her
basket, and one with his little "scooper" or koiti. When the basket was
filled, it went on the worker's head and was carried to the dump, where
the native received a small tag that entitled him to payment for one
basketful of excavation. The workers consisted of gangs, over which were
the foremen who furnished the laborers for the work. There was no system
of housing, for there were no shelters: all slept on the ground in the open.
There was no commissary organization, for the workers "found them-
selves," and in any case would have refused any food prepared for them,
because of caste prejudice. The payment of workers required no elaborate
system of pay-rolls and receipts, because each worker cashed in the. tags
he had received. No doubt those in charge of these Indian excavations
had their problems of organization, but they were different from our
problems, and probably the most of our approved systems would have
been of about as much use as an American typewriter to a Chinese mer-
chant.
There are all kinds of industries, and one is perbaps as good as
another for the purpose of illustrating organization. If one is credibly
informed, the organization of some of the patent-medicine companies
differs considerably from that of other manufacturing companies, and
yet they are still ably organized. There is at least one where two or three
rooms in a large building are devoted to the manufacture of the medicine,
a minor function in the organization. The remainder of the building is
largely devoted to a printing establishment for the preparation of adver-
tising matter, to advertising departments, correspondence-clerks, and ste-
nographers. Here we have a manufacturing establishment, but the pur-
pose and conditions require special attention to the office-system. The
accomplishment of the purpose is not greatly affected by attention to
manufacturing methods and details, but is very greatly affected by skill
in advertisement and system in the departments where the real effort and
most of the expense lie.
It will be unfortunate if the emphasis given here to the diversity
of conditions and to the difference in the purposes of undertakings should
be construed as an argument that no general principles can be applied to
organization. It is intended simply to show that there is no "royal road,"
no formula that, once learned, may be applied in ali cases with the assm-
ance that the result will be perfect harrnony, efficiency, and economy, and
a sure path to the main purpose in view. This is not an imagined difficulty.
We all are inclined to get a bit twisted toward some favorite panacea,
and if one is to attempt to better a business organization, it helps greatly
to be able to approach the problem with an open mind, and not to have
a special predilection toward a factor tbat one has somewhere found ad-
mirable.
288 ADMINISTaATfON

In Robb's opinion, an organization is a specialized tool of limited

application and not an end in itself. For that reason there is ~o
"royal road" to the discovery of the principles of organization In
either business or government.

SUMMARY

Organization in government, as in business or in social institu-

tions generally, grows out of practical need and established custpm
as well as approved organizational doctrine. For a new nation cpn-
fronted with the need to preserve its newly won independence and
to bolster its shaky fiscal system and its infant economy, it was jlot
unnatural for the United States to establish as its first three dep;1rt-
ments, the Departments of State, War and Treasury. If the tif~es
of Soviet executive departments sound like the index to an industrial
directory, one can recall that in Brazil there was a Department of
Coffee; and in ritualistic China there was a Department of Rites a~d
Ceremonies. Even the Labor-dominated London County CouncIl,
following the normal British adherence to tradition, has maintair~ed
a Ceremonial Office. In its heyday of municipal graft, New York qlty
felt the need to establish a Department of Investigation; and during
its reform days Chicago found it convenient to create a Research
lJ1VlSlOn as par't 01 one ot 'l'tS major oepar'tmen'ts. ))uimg 'tDe ~.1'1
General Motors Corporation found it necessary, under the press~re
for new inventions, to establish as one of its most important agenCieS
the New Departure Division. Thus, there is available a large bOdy
of experience with various types of practicable organization. Some of
these types are diffused and unintegrated in their departmerJ.ta1
framework. Others show a high degree of integration. However, as
a comparison of American, German, and Soviet organizational ,ys-
terns suggests, genuine co-ordination, control, and integration of
administrative operations may depend upon more than just irJte-
grated departmental structure. We shall continue our search for
useful organizational precepts in the next chapter, devoted to staff-
and-line organization.
 CHAPTER TEN

STAFF AND LINE ORGANIZATION

IN THE REALM of organization, one of the most frequently used con-

cepts is that of staff-and-line. By means of this concept administrators
supplement their idea that personnel and positions are organized in
a vertical hierarchy of authority with the horizontal concept that at
any given level of authority, departments or branches cluster around
two major modes of organization, namely staff and line.
Before defining this term, we should realize that in actual ad-
ministration activities do not always fall recognizably into the cate-
gories of staff or line. Like other technical usages in this field, these
are convenient terms which make it easier for students and prac-
titioners of administration to "talk shop" and also to manipulate and
improve the various parts of their organization. Even these specialists
do not all agree on the definition or the conception of staff-and-line.
In any organization, as we shall see, an individual employee, or a
single branch, or a given activity may and frequently does perform
both line and staff functions. Administrators are generally interested
in getting a job accomplished without stopping to label one part line
and the other part staff. Nevertheless, the development of the staff
idea as differentiated from line activity has been called "the chief
element of progress that we have made in the science of management
during the last 3000 years." 1 After making a searching study of the
principles of organization and after numerous listings of the various
"phases" or "modes" of organization, Alvin Brown arrived at the
1 Edgar W. Smith: "Executive Responsibility." The Society for the Advancement
of Management TournaI, January 1938, vol. 3, p. 32·
289
conclusion that "the utmost that can be said is that there are two
modes in most organization: line-which executes; and staff-which
plans and renders many other incidental services." 2

1. THE STAFF-AND-LINE CONCEPT

The staff-and-line concept is best understood by way of illustra-

tion. The major function of the engine plant of an automobile manu-
facturing concern may be said to be the line function of producing
engines; but within the plant, the staff functions required to keep
the assembly-line moving may absorb the efforts of as many men as
those on the line. At any single point on the assembly-line itself, the
major line task may be a specific duty like bolting the engine block;
but the staff work required to get bolts, blocks, tools, and men to-
gether at the proper time and place is enormous. The State Depart-
ment of the United States must maintain embassies, legations, and
consulates abroad to conduct its foreign relations. That duty is its
line function. At home its research, fiscal, and training divisions
perfornl crucial staff services. A detective bureau and a traffic bureau
are major line agencies within a municipal police department, but
the police department officials must keep these line bureaus ade-
quately staffed and supervised by means of a personnel bureau and
other staff bureaus within the police departments. Even staff agen-
cies, such as a budget agency, have to establish internal housekeeping
or staff services of their own; and from this standpoint, the main
job which a budget agency performs for related agencies is sometimes
looked upon by its own employees as its line function, even though
it is a staff agency.
These distinctions between staff and line have been defined in
numerous ways.' A definition proposed in 1911 by C. B. Going, a
leader in the scientific management movement, is presented below.
As editor of the Engineering Magazine before World War I, Going
had a wider view of the efficiency movement than most of his col-
leagues, since he related scientific management to the broader social
issues of conservation, public health, and public welfare;' and he
expressed the same flexibility in his technical discussions and defi-
nitions.

• Alvin Brown: Organization, A Formulation of Principle. New York: Hibbert

Printing Co.; 1945. p. '78.
• Anderson and Schwenning: The Science of Production Organization, p. uS et
seq.; Emerson: Efficiency, Chapter 4.
, See Chapter ;.
291 STAFF AND LINE OItGANIZATION

C. B. GOING
"Principles of Industrial Organization"·
There are two great principles in organization commonly known
as line and staff, or, to use the terms preferred by some industrial engi-
neers, "military" and "functional."
Line organization is essentially simple, mathematical subdivi-
sion. An army under a major-general is divided into brigades under briga-
dier-generals; each brigade is divided into regiments, under their colonels,
and each regiment into battalions under lieutenant-colonels or majors;
each battalion is divided into companies under captains; each company is
again subdivided under its lieutenants, and so on down to the corporal
with his squad. Promotion is step by step upward; the private may hope to
be made a corporal, a sergeant, a lieutenant, a captain, a major, a colonel,
a general. The lines of authority and responsibility run continuously
through the whole body from top to bottom, as the veins of the leaf
gather to the stalk, and many leaf stalks to the twig; and many twigs to
branch, and many branches to the trunk; and veins and stalk and twig
and branch and trunk have practically similiar duties to perform in the
life and growth of the tree.
Staff organization is a division according to functions-division
by which one military department does all the engineering work for the
whole army, another supplies all clothing, or rations, etc. It is the division
by which the roots absorb moisture and salts from the earth, the leaf cells
make chlorophyll, the sap carries the products of these laboratories to the
cell-building processes of the tree. Staff functions are co-ordinate and c0-
operative, but they do not stand to one another in any order of ascending
and descending scale. The captain, simply as captain, ranks and commands
the lieutenant; that is a line relation. But the engineer, as engineer, does
not command the quarter-master; the quarter:master does not rank and
command the surgeon; the leaf doeS not rank the root; that is a staff re-
lation.
The functions of staff and line are, therefore, not antagonistic;
they are not alternative and rival systems of organization, between which
we may choose and say we will adopt this or that and refuse the other.
Line organi7.ation is essential to diSCipline and essential to the continuous
existence of the whole body. If the general retires there must be a colonel
to succeed him; if the captain is killed in action, the lieutenant must
take command of the company, or the men are scattered and lost. Staff
organization is essential to efficiency, each branch of it in its own partic-
ular function. If the commissary fails and there is no food for the troops,
the engineer cannot make up for the deficiency by vigorously building

• C. B. Going: "Principles of Industrial Organization." Principles of I,!dustrial

Engineering. Selected from pp. 41-43. Reprinted by permission of McGmw·Hill Book
Company, Inc. Copyright, 1911, McGraw·Hill Book Company, Inc.
292 ADMfNISTaATION

bridges. Each staff must have a line organization within itself for dis- .
cipline and continuity; but every complete organization must embody
the principles of both line and staff if we are to secure the best results,
the staff supplying expert functional guidance, applied through the line's
direct control.

As Going warns, staff and line are complementary rather than

antagonistic features of any organization. Administrative work, how-
ever, is not always carried on in such doctrinaire compartments.
These terms, therefore, must be used flexibly if they are not to ob-
scure the real issues.

2. ORIGIN OF THE GENERAL STAFF CONCEPT

That line and staff are more related than separable is revealed by
the fact that the military profession, which is conceded to have
originated the line concept of organization, was also the first to de-
velop the staff idea. Although the staff principle is generally thought
to have been perfected in Prussian military circles during the eight-
eenth and nineteenth centuries, a conscious emphasis upon staff
work has been traced as far hack as the seventeenth century cam-
paigns of Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden.· Among the basic formula-
tions now available of the so-called "general staff" idea are those by
(a) the Prussian General Bronsart von Schellendorff, writing in
1875, and (b) the American Secretary of War, Elihu Root, writing
in 1902.

(a) B.ONSART YON SCH£LLENDORFF

The Duties of the Gene~1 Staff T

The General Staff forms an essential part of modern Army organ-
ization. The General commanding a large body of troops cannot, at least
in war, encumber himself with minor details, though their consideration
and proper order may be often of the highest importance. Apart from the
fact that the mental and physical powers of one man are not up to such a
task, the general supervision of all the fighting forces under the General's
Command would be lost sight of. He should consequently have assistants.
These assistants form his "Staff." Officers of the General Staff are invested
with no military command. But even, without having any command, they
can make themselves extremely useful in an engagement by carrying out
6 BIOWU: Organization~ p. ~77.
'Bronsart von Schellendorff: The Duties ot the General Staff. Selected from pp. 1,
4. Translated from the Gennan by Lt. Col. W. A. H. Hare, of the British Royal En·
gineers, from the third edition, dated 1893. London: 1895.
 STAFF AU UNE ORGANI%ATlO"

any special and important duties that may be entrusted to them by tile
Gener.ll commanding, in addition to devoting themselves to their geneI\i1
duties. Their usefulness in this respect will be found to depend not only
on their fitness and ability, but on their tact and discretion as well, in
rightly appreciating the position they hold both as regards General aQd
troops. The conditions to fulfill this, however, are not entirely one-sideli.
Troops very soon find out, indeed, especially in war, whether the dutil':S
of the Gener.ll Staff are in good hands.

(b) ELIHU ROOT

"Report of the Secretary of War'"
We have a personnel unsurpassed anywhere, and a populati<ln
ready to respond to calls for the increase of personnel in case of necd. We
have wealth and a present willingness to expend it reasonably for the pro_
curement of supplies and material of war. We have the different branch\!S
of the military service well organized, each within itself, for the perform_
ance of its duties. Our administrative staff and supply departments, as a
rule, have at their heads good and competent men. But when it comes to
the coordination and direction of all these means and agencies of warfare
so that all parts of the machine shall work together, we are weak. Our s)'s:
tem makes no adequate provision for the directing brain which evety
army must have, to work successfully. Common experience has shown th<lt
this cannot be fumished by any single man without assistants, and that it
requires a body of officers working together under the direction of a chi~
and- entIrely separate tram and-Independent of tlie adrmrnstrahve stalf ()f
an army (such as the adjutants, quartermasters, commissaries, etc., eaCh
of whom is engrossed in the duties of his own special department). This
body of officers, in distinction from the administrative staff, has COlTte
to be called a general staff.
The duties of such a body of officers can be illustrated by takitlg
for example an invasion of Cuba, such as we were all thinking about a few
years ago. It is easy for a President or a general acting under his directioh,
to order that 50,000 or 100,000 men proceed to Cuba and capture Havana.
To make an order which has any reasonable chance of being executed tie
must do a great deal more than that. He must determine how many men
shall be sent and how they shall be divided among the different arms of t4e
service, and how they shall be armed and equipped, and to do that he mUst
get all the information possible about the defenses of the place to be cap-
tured and the strength and character and armament of the forces to l>e
met. He must determine at what points and by what routes the place sha.ll
be apprOllChed, and at what points his t_roops shall land in Cuba; and t(lr
this purpose he must be informed about the various harboIS of the islal1d

• Elihu Root: "Report of the Secretary of War." Annual Reports of the W at

Department, 1902, vol. I, selected from pp. 4>-46.
 and the depth of their channels; what classes of vessels can enter them;
what the facilities for landing are; how they are defended; the character of
'the roads leading from them to the place to be attacked; the character of
the intelVening country; how far it is healthful or unhealthful; what the
climate is liable to be at the season of the proposed movement; the temper
and sympathy of the inhabitants; the quantity and kind of supplies that
can be obtained from the country; the extent to which transportation can
be obtained, and a great variety of other things.
All this information it is the business of a general stall to procure
and present. It is probable that there would be in such case a number of
alternative plans, each having advantages and disadvantages, and these
should be worked out each by itself, with the reasons for and against it,
and presented to the President or general for his determination, This the
general stall should do, Then at home, where the preparation for the ex-
pedition is to be made, the order must be based upon a knowledge of the
men and material available for its execution; how many men there are wbo
can be devoted to that purpose, from what points they are to be drawn.
what bodies of troops ought to be left or sent else where, and what bodies
may be included in the proposed expedition; whether there are enough
ships to transport them; where they are to be obtained; whether they are
properly fitted up; what more should be done to them; what are the avail-
able stocks of clothing, arms and ammunition, and engineers' material,
and horses and wagons, and all the immediate supplies and munitions
necessary for a large expedition; how are the things to be supplied which
are not ready, but which arc necessary, and how long a time will be re-
quired to supply them.
All this and much more necessary information it is the business
of a general staff to supply. It is then the business of the General Stall to
see that every separate officer upon whose action the success of the move-
ment depends understands his share in it and does not lag behind in the
performance of that share; to see that troops and ships and animals and
supplies of arms and ammunition and clothing and food, etc., from hun-
dreds of sources come together at the right times and places. It is a
laborious, complicated, and difficult work. which requires a considerable
number of men whose special business it is and who are charged with no
other duties.
It was the lack of such a body of men doing that kind of work
which led to the confusion attending the Santiago expedition in the sum-
mer of 1898. The confusion at Tampa and elsewhere was the necessary
result of having a large number of men, each of them doing his own spe-
cial work the best he could, but without any adequate force of officers
engaged in seeing .that they pulled together according to plans made be-
forehand. Such a body of men doing general staff duty is just as necessary
in time of peace as it is in time of war.
 IT"" "MD \,INI OIlCANI%ATIOM

Without obeisance to an entrenched general staff corps of the

Prussian type, American military organization has followed Secre-
tary Root's prescription. Forty years after this plea for the creation
of a general staff, a top military headquarters was opened at the
Pentagon Building in Arlington which, at the height of World
War II, housed a total of 32,000 staff personnel. Only a few hundred
were officers of the General Staff Corps, but the remainder, never-
theless, served in a number of staff capacities.

3. SPECIAL, GENERAL, AND OTHER TYPES OF STAFF

We find, therefore, all kinds of staff agencies backing up the

line aside from tbe so-called general staff. There is always "a man
behind the man behind the gun," and this phrase applies to the
endless chain of staff agencies behind the industrial assembly line as
well as those behind the military front line." The phrase refers also
to the administrative mechanisms of society. Here the term staff has
corne to be used in various ways, but a frequent differentiation is
one which has been used in military parlance; namely, the difference
between special staff and general staff. Its further adaptation to busi-
ness and government is seen below in readings from (a) L. Urwick,
who described the application of the dual staff idea to business, and
(b) Leonard D. White, who described its adaptation to government.

(a) L. URWICK
"Scientific Principles and Organization" 1.

Business thought on this subject has been much confused by the

fact that in the United States army, from which the term was borrowed,
the word "staff" is used in two senses. It is applied to both specialist or
functional authorities, engineers, supply corpfl [quarter-master} and the
like, and, with the appellation "general staff," to officers who assist the
commander in carrying out his functions of command. Now, the duties
of these two groups and their relations with their commander and his
subordinates aTe fundamentally and diametrically different. The general
staff officer is not a specialist. He is primarily an assistant for coordination.
He has no authority of his own and no responsibility of his own; he exer-

• Ordway Tead. for example. derives the term line from the conception of "clear
line of authority." "The Importance of AdministIation in International Action." In-
ternatioruJ! Conciliation, Janua,/, 1945. No. 407, pp. 1<>-11.
,. L. Urwick: "Scientific Principles and Organization." American Management As·
sociation; Institute of Management Setie5. No. 19, 1938, selected from pp. 14-15. Re-
printed by permission.
cises the authority of his commander, who takes fun and direct resp0nsi-
bility for his actions. He is not "over" his commander's principal subor-
dinates, who are usually considerably his superiors in seniority and in
status. He issues instructious to tbem over his own signature, but they are
not his instructions; they are his commander's. He has usually no sub-
ordinates responsible to him except, poSSIbly, one or two junior staff of-
ficers aud a few clerks.
Now, this staff principle is duplicated at every level in rmlitary
organization. And the fact that at each level there are officers whose
principal duty is to see that the wheels go round, that what commanders
have decided in the broad is in fact carried out in detail without friction,
does in my experience greatly increase speed of action and relieve execu-
tives in charge of groups and units of an enormous amount of work. Staff
officers at different levels deal directly with each other in ascertaining
that functions serve the line and that the line uses functions. Where the
authorities cross, it is their business to see that adjustments are made and
to go to their chief only when all resources for dealing with the obdurate
have been exhausted. Being comparatively junior officers who are not in
competition with each other's chiefs for promotion and who are judged
by their success in avoiding friction, they are unlikely to stand on their
dignity. In short, you have your diagonal lines, a third estate specially set
up to deal directly with your problems of coordination. And, as a business
man, I have a conviction that when a problem is recognized it is usually
best to appoint someone to deal with it directly.
As I have already indicated, "staff organization" as that term is
used in business is a confusion between two concepts. Functional special-
ists are not staff officers. It is the multiplication of such specialists which
makes staff officers necessary.

(b) LEONARD D. WHITE

"Some General Aspects of Organi:z:ation" u

In the not remote past, each major department or establishment
was a self-contained unit. Each assumed full responsibility for all of its
primary and secondary operations. The United States Department of
Agriculture not only enforced interstate plant quarantines and conducted
research, it also kept its own accounts, made its own disbursements, sub-
mitted its own budget to the House Appropriations Committee, purchased
its own supplies, hired its own personnel, aud rented its own quarters.
Every department jealously guarded its own operating self-sufficiency and
went its way without paying much attentiou to its neighbors.
Gradually, over a long period -of years, the "major purpose" de-
partments have been losing part of their responsibility for carrying on
11 Leonard D. White: "Some General Aspects of Organization.» Introduction to the
Study of Public Admmistration. Selected from pp. 'P-43. Reprinted by permission of
'The Macmillan Company. Copyright, 1939, The Macmillan Company.
 STAfF AND LINE OI.CANIZ4TIOM

their auxiliary or secondary services. These services, responding to the

pressure of specialization and presumed economies, have been separately
organized partly outside, partly inside the line departments. The work
specialized outside the departments is usually organized directly under
the chief executive, but is sometimes attached to a central finance depart-
ment. Thus we now find central purchasing offices, central personnel agen·
cies, central disbursing offices and others, independent of any department,
and corresponding subordinate offices inside the departments.
No standard terminology has yet been accepted for this class of
administrative agencies. Willoughby called them the institutional or
housekeeping services, terms which have merit but which have not been
generally adopted. They are often erroneously called staff services, a
confusion which should be avoided. Caus suggests "auxiliary technical
staff services," a useful suggestion. In order to propose a terminology
which is not liable to confusion, I suggest and in this volume shall use the
term, auxiliary services. This term is used in continental countries.
The staff function and the function of the auxiliary services are
therefore different and ought not to be confused. The auxiliary services
are operating agencies, the staff is a thinking, planning and advisory agency.
The auxiliary agencies are concerned with the maintenance of an existing
organization, and are not concerned with major substantive policies; the
staff is concerned with the revision of organization as new needs may dic·
tate, and with the reformulation of major policies. In actual practice, nat-
urally, the allocation of functions does not always sharply recognize these
logical categories; usually staff work is not clearly segregated; the work of
the auxiliary services may only partly be placed in special organs; and auxil-
iary agencies may also perform genuine staff functions owing to lack of
sharply exclusive differentiation of work.

Thus, staff organization is not limited to one or two types. Three

business specialists, Paul Holden, Lounsbury Fish, and Hubert
Smith, found after their thorough survey of the top management of
twenty-six American business concerns, that there were fOUl types of
staff agencies:. control, service, coordinative and advisory." As Urwick
and White have shown, however, the preference has been for the
distinction between the advisory type on the one hand and service
type on the other. This dual classification is roughly comparable to
the general staff and special staff in the military field, or the terms
staff and auxiliary services in public administration.
However, this distinction between the advisory type of staff and
the service type of staff, like the general distinction between staff

" Paul Hadden, Lounsbury Fish, and Hubert Smith: Top-Management Organiza-
tion and Cont.mI. Palo Alto: Stanford University Pres:r, 1941, pp. 38-44. See also
E. J. Coil: "Admini$trative Orpni:zation fox PoIi<:y Planning." Advanced Management,
January 1939. vol. 4- p. u.
and line, is not uniformly accepted; and in both business and publiC
administrati~n the terminology is uncertain and confusing. profes~r
W. F. Willoughby, from whom Professor White adapted the "ser(-
ice" concept, used institutional or housekeeping to contrast with
what he called the functional or line activity. Unfortunately, Frecl-
erick Taylor, who is the parent of most of the basic terminology in
industrial management, used the term functionalism to designare
the staff or service activities. As for Willoughby's housekeeping serl'-
ices and White's auxiliary services, neither has become standard
terms in public administration for this special type of staff activitf·
Professor John Gaus arrived at a merger of terms: auxiliary technic;!l
staff services.
As to the actual meaning and content of all this terminologf,
specialists in public administration and political science frequently
agree on one main point: that the more purely termed staff activifY
involves only the advisory function, whereas the auxiliary or hous;-
keeping or service or special staff function involves such services ~s
budgeting, personnel, and planning activities. However, even th~S
terminological agreement in the field of public administration IS
marred by the fact that Donald Stone, who has recently had sonie
rewarding experience in the field of organizational management,
includes under general staff such functions as "budgeting, prograrn
planning, personnel, organization and methods," and has classified
<l>.1;l..Q<!.,- i:..\\.<!. <::~k't<;'" <;( <;'<!''>'(\<:'<!' (),'- ~<l>.'{it\~", (<l>.1;l..<:.i:..\.<;~<;. <;.w:.\\. ...<:.i:..i..'{\.i:..\.<:.<;. is-
"statistical, procurement and other office services." Stone takes we
position, however, that such functions as "accounting and legal serV-
ices" are "more akin to the service units than they are to the geneJ1l1
staff divisions." 18
The distinction between general staff and special staff has begv.n
to outlive its usefulness even in military organization. After a basIC
study of the American geneIlilI staff, General Otto Nelson, proposed
in 1946 the substitution of two new major concepts in military or-
ganization in addition to the line or combat element; these wefe
service and command. Although this terminology recognized t}le
virtually independent status given certain service units during World
War II, changes in the practice and theory of military organization
moved so fast during the air and atomic phases of the war that even
more drastic deviations from existing organizational structure ha>,e
been made. For example, the main breakdown that developed in t}le
post-war American Air Forces organization was between operatio(lS
and administration." This development incorporates, under t}le
wider designation of administration, a merger of both general staff
U Stone: New Horizons in Public Adminisll'ation, p. 71.
,. See Chapter 13.
 STAFF AND LINE OIlCANIZATION

and special staff agencies; and it is obviously a return to the simpler

differentiation between the two major modes of organization-staff
and line. In this basic phase of organization, it appears to be literally
true that plus ~a change, plus c'est la meme chose.

4. STAFF SPECIALIZATION AND FUNCTIONALISM

The staff concept, in this combined sense, is by no means reo

stricted in its application to the military headquarters or the ad·
ministrative office. Under the general term, functionalism, conceived
by Frederick Taylor, the concept reached its perfection in the factory.
How far the scientific management school was willing to use staff
specialization to back up an equally specialized production line is
indicated by the following selections from Frederick Taylor and
Frank Gilbreth.

(a) FREDERICK TAYLOR

Shop Management"
All possible brain work should be removed from the shop and
centered in the planning or laying·out department, leaving for the fore-
man and gang bosses work strictly executive in its nature. Their duties
should be to see that operations planned and directed from the planning
room arc promptly carried out in the shop. Their time should be spent
with the men, teaching them to think ahead, and leading and instructing
them in their work.
Throughout the whole field of management the military type of
organization should be abandoned, and what may be called the "func-
tional type" substituted in its place. "Functional management" consists
in so dividing the work of management that each man from the assistant
superintendent down shall have as few functions as possible to perform.
If practicable the work of each man in the management should be con-
fined to the performance of a single leading function.

(b) FREDERICK TAYLOR

Harvard Lectures 16
You realize, of course, that the military type of management has
been here entirely abandoned, and that each one of these functional fore-
15 Frederick Taylor: Shop Management. Pp. 9S--<t9. Reprinted by permission
of Harper & Brothers. Copyright, 1911, Harper & Brothers. A 1947 edition is
published in a volume which includes Scientilic Management.
.. Frederick Taylor: Harvard Lectures. Quoted by Frank Copely: Frederick W.
Taylor. Vol. 1, p. 290. Reprinted by permission of lIarper & Brothers. Copyright, 1913,
Harper & Brothers.
men is king over his particular function; that is, king over the particulaf
cla$S of acts which he understands, and which .he directs; and that Dot
only all of the workmen throughout the place obey the orders of ~
functional foreman in his limited sphere, but that every other functional
foreman obeys his orders in this one respect.
Thus we have a radically new, and what at first appears exceed-
ingly confusing state of things, in which every man, foreman as well ~
workman, receives and obeys orders from many other men, and in the cast¢
of the various functional foremen they continually give orders in their owtl
particular line to the very men from whom they are receiving orders ir
other lines. For this reason the work of the Planning Department repre-
sents an intricate mass of interwoven orders or directions, proceedin~
backward and forward between the men in charge of the various function,
of management.

(c) FUNK B. GILBRETH

"Units, Methods, and Devices of Measurement under Scientifi<=
Management" "
It will be noted that the worker receives orders directly from
eight different foremen. One might suggest, on observing this, that it h~
often been said that no man can serve two masters. This holds good today,
even in scientific management. But under scientific management ttw
worker does not "serve eight masters" nor eight functional foremen, but,
on the other hand, he receives helF from e~ht different foremen or teach-
ers.
The four functions in the planning department are represente&
by (1) route man and or<ier-of·work man; (2.) instruction cards; (3) time
and cost; (4) disciplina#an. Of the performing department we have fout
functions represented by (5) gang boss; (6) speed boss; (7) repair boss;
(8) inspector. These functions, like those of the planning department,
are represented by as many men as the nature and amount of work justi-
fies. All such representatives deal, directly both with aU individuals in the
planning department, and with each individnal worker.
Route man.-The duty "Of the route man is to determine anJ
plan in advance the path of each piece of material, worked and unworked,
as it passes through the shop.
Instruction-card.-It is the duty of the instruction-card functimt
to wade out in detail and to devise and construct an instruction cari!
describing the method of least waste for each element of the route sheetS
which are made from the route charts.

"Frank B. Gilbreth: "Units, Methods, and Devices of Measurement undejl'

Scientific Management." Journal of Political Economy, July 19'3, vol. a., se1ecte;l
trom pp. 6%O-l•."Reprinted by pennissioo.
301 IT... AND LINE ORGANIZATION

Time and cost.-After the worker has performed his work, a

return of the time that it took him to do his work, together with its cost,
goes to the time and cost clerk who calculates the pay-roll, including the
bonuses, and the costs of each piece or subdivision of the work.
Disciplinarian.-The disciplinarian must be a broad-gauge man,
who is able to keep peace in the organization, to anticipate and prevent
many misunderstandings before they actually occur, and to arbitrate or
judge fairly such disagreements as do take place.
Gang boss.-The gang boss under scientific management is not
the "strong arm" type of man. Instead he is a man who knows of the meas-
uring methods of motion-study and time-study, and who can teach the
worker the methods shown on the instruction card.
Speed boss.-Regardless of the popular impression as to his
duties, the speed boss does not speed up the men. His duty is to see that
the machinery moves at the exact speed called for on the individual in-
struction card.
Repair boss.-His duties consist principally in seeing that all ma-
chines are kept clean and in proper condition, and in carrying out repairs
and overhaulings.
InspectoI.-Many times, under traditional management, the in-
spector comes around after the work is done, condemns it, and walks
away, leaving it to others to see that the work is replaced to his satisfaction.
Under scientific management the inspector is required to stand near the
worker when he is handling a new piece of work for the first time, in order
to see that the worker thoroughly understands his work as it progresses.

In the evolution of organization for modern mass production

and large-scale management, the division of labor thus elaborated
the tasks of staff agencies. Despite the insistence of Taylor and Gil-
breth that this proliferated staff served but did not rule the line, an
increasing feeling was apparent that functional organization had
become unduly complex.

5. REACTION AGAINST FUNCTIONALISM

The reaction against functionalism appeared (a) in the 1920'S
in the United States as seen in the comments below of W. J. Donald,
later director of the National Electrical Manufacturers' Association;
and (b) in the 1930'S abroad, particularly in Soviet Russia, as re-
vealed in the report of Professor Samuel N. Harper of the University
of Chicago, America's foremost scholar of the Soviet society pre
ceding World War II.
3~ A*WmUmm
(3) W. J. DONALD
"Theories and Types of Organization" 18
If we have any particular curse in an organization today, it is in
the cross currents of authority, the division of authority, the fact that a
foreman hardly knows who is boss, hardly knows to whom he should go
for instruction. My first principle of organization, whether it be in gov-
ernment or business, is undivided and locatable responsibility. Here we
have in business today all sorts of cross currents of authority-production
control, personnel departments that are supposed to control, industrial
engineers that encroach on the functions of the line organization, training
departments that take entirely away from the foremen the function of
training, and personnel departments that at one time said they could
compel the foremen to take men whom they did not want to take, and
compel them to keep men that they did not want to keep. Functionaliza-
tion ran riot over the last twenty years, approximately.

(bl SAMUEL N. HARPEIl

"Soviet Functionalism" ,.

A general reorganization of the apparatus of administration of

both the Soviets and the Party in 1934 was an outstanding instance of the
fight against the evils of bureaucratic control; it also represented the tend-
ency toward decentralization as part of this struggle. The new Commis-
sions of Control-of Soviets and Party-were the product of this reorgani-
zation. What the Soviet leaders and writers called "functionalism" in
administration was to be eliminated. The apparatus of administration in
both the Soviets and the Party had till then been organized on the basis
of the functions performed, and in this way any given enterprise was sub-
ject to a whole series of inspections and directives with respect to each of
its functions. All institutions have had, in varying measure, political, eco-
nomic and cultural functions, and it was necessary to organize administra-
tion on this so-called principle of functions in order to promote all of
them as part of the building of the new order. This functional form
of administration was one of the factors responsible for the inefficiency of
management-red-tapism and dispersal of responsibility. Here was one of
the causes for the failures to meet the schedules of production, for ex-
ample. Qne Soviet leader, in describing the results of "functionalism" in
administration, suggested that it meant one authority when a hand was
to lift food to the mouth, another when it was to write a report and still
18 W. J. Donald: "Theories and Types of Organization." Selected from Donald's
address to the Conference of Production E:tecutives Division, American Management
Association, Niagara Falls, lune 1928.
'" Samuel N. Harper: "Soviet Functionalism." The Government of the Soviet
Union. Pp. 10<]--10. Reprinted by permission of D. Van .Nostrand Company, Inc.
Copyright, 1938, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
 STAFF AND LINE ORGANIZATION

another when it had to hit somebody in the face, and thus for all hands
everywhere.

Harper used somewhat stronger language than Donald used in

criticizing American functionalism. His opinion represented, how-
ever, the growing consensus in Russia during the 1930'S that the
authority of staff agencies had to be limited if there was to be re-
sponsible administration by individual managers and effective opera-
tions by workers and technicians operating on the line."

6. STAFF VERSUS LINE

The staff and line controversy also raged with intensity in the
fi,eld of public administration. Public administrators recognized tbe
significance to modern management of such staff services as: (~)
budgeting and finance, (2) personnel, and (3) planning, whi(:h
Louis Brownlow has called the "non-delegable functions" of the
executive; 21 and of additional staff functions involving (4) research,
reporting, and public relations, (5) legal services, and (6) other
management procedures." Yct the question of subordinating I:lr
transcending the line activities in relation to these staff functiol1s
remained unanswered. Below are the alternative points of view pre-
sented by (a) Professor Willard N. Hogan, a former member of tbe
statf of the Federal WorKs Agency and Frofessor of FOlibca[ S"cien(;e
at Berea College, and (b) O. Glenn Stahl, who taught politiCal
science at New York University and also had extensive experien(;e
as a personnel officer with the Tennessee Valley Authority and wit:h
the Federal Security Agency.

(a) WILLARD N. HOCAN

"A Dangerous Tendency in Government""

Housekeeping services are usually regarded as routine functiol1s,

subject only to the principles of efficient management and without sig_
nificant relation to policy control and to the larger affairs of public ad-
ministration. This view, however, is not realistic. Whoever controls tIle
mechanics of administration is in a position to influence its policy and its
20 Gregory Bienstock, Solomon M. Schwarz and Aaron Yugow: Management in
Russian Industry and Agriculture. London and New York: Oxford University Pre,s;
'944, pp. 7, 14, 15·
2! Louis Brownlow: "The Executive Office of the President." Public Admjnist{a~
tiun Review, Winter 1941, vol. 1# p. 105. See below, chaps. 14, 1;, 16.
.. See Chapters '7, ,8, 19.
'" Willard N. Hogan: "A Dangerous Tendency in Government." Public Administra_
tion Review, Summer '946, vol. 6, selected from pp. 135-39. Reprinted by permissiGn.
function. This is true because the ruechanics, or the housekeeping services,
provide the physical means for implementing policy and administration.
The allocation of space may dignify or embarrass an ofIicial in
the bureaucratic rivalry. The opinions (perhaps unconS¥ous) of the space
control officer as to the relative importance, desirability, and permanence
of various activities have a great inftuence. Any reasonably close observer
of the Washington scene must be impressed by the battles for desirable
office space that occur even at Cabinet level. The communications center.
or mail room, is a key spot in the administration of a government agency.
The authority to release mail, the priority and dispatch with which mes-
sages are handled, and the information about an agency's operations which
may be gleaned at this spot are the major factors in the influence which
control of communications exerts on administration and policy. The
maintenance of central files and records and the use of stenographic pools
also permit the managers of the housekeeping services to influence the
course of administration by the priority and degree of cooperativeness
with which they serve the various operating units depending on them.
The person deciding the method and order of meeting requests for files
and records is in a position to influence the work of the operating units.
Influence with a minor supervisor to get one's batch of work slipped in
near the top of the heap counts for a lot in meeting deadlines and ill
winning for oneself a reputation for efficiency. Supervisioll of mime-
ographing and similar services brings a definite possibility of influencing
operations. Priorities determine in what order backlogs of work will be
handled. More important, however, ate the requirements often established
by the service unit for standardizing terminology. It is not unknown for
the manager of the duplicating services to insist upon an editorial pre-
rogative that affects content.
A more direct, and even more significant effect of centralized
services is found in personnel and budgetary controls. An operating
executive in the federal government is now faced with the civil service
system which, in safeguarding merit and tenure practices, has built up a
huge body of rules and a professional terminology that leave the operating
executive no alternative but to depend heavily upon a career specialist for
personnel matters which lie at the very etux of management.
Centralization of major budgetary functions of the federal gov-
ernment in the Bureau of the Budget has been paralleled by the forma-
tion of a specialized budget staff or unit within each federal agency. Often
this arrangement results in a conflict of interests and functions between
those officials who are primarily interested in performing a certain task
and those who are primarily interested in operating at the lowest possible
cost. Control of the amount of money requested and spent lies at the
heart of management. With the personnel "ceilings" administered by the
central budgetary agency, two of the fundamental ingredients of operation
(manpower and 1l10ney) are put largely in the hands of a set of officials
who have no direct responsibility for performing the operating taslcs.
 STAFF ANO LIN! ORCANIZATJON

Centralized 5eMces and budgetary and personnel controls are

giving us a bad case of organizational schizophrenia as the control of me-
chanics becomes dissociated from. and builds up competing interests
with, policy direction. Management tends to become mere management.
The policy director tends to become a back-seat driver and the bureauc-
racy develops an immunity to policy. changes at the top. Excessive pre-
occupation with budgets, limitations, and controls of various sorts puts a
premium on negativism in public administration. Sound administration
requires that, so far as possible, responsibility for coordination and plan-
ning be placed in the operating line. This is consistent with the basic
management principle of allocating definite functional responsibility with
corresponding authority.

(h) O. CLENN STAHL

"Straight Talk About label Thinking" ..
To assail certain management controls in government administra-
tion as interferences with "operating" programs is one of the fashions
of the day that matured during the War. The complaints and attacks (and
occasionally even the fears) center in varying degrees on budget, per-
sonnel, accounts and audits, management planning or analysis, and
housekeeping services, which are deplored as unwarranted "obstructions"
to authority and responsibility for carrying out programs successfully.
What is "service" at one point may be "control" at another.
These management people are directly responsible to the top executive.
They "serve" him. Nevertheless, the top executive is a very busy man. He
expects his management people to be broad gauged and program con-
scious. Therefore, he asks them to represent him and act for him in vary-
ing degrees on personnel, budgetary, and comparable matters. When they
are in contact with program officers at any point below the chief execu-
tive, they are either advising, providing the "know how," or controlling
administration. To some extent, they are acting as line officials in their
respective fields of spechlization. And what is so frightening about this?
They are no more "specialists" than the various program officials them-
selves. It is the only way by which the busy top executive can maintain
the controls he must maintain if he is to exercise real leadership and in-
fluence in the organization. To assume that a personnel, budget, or other
management specialist should jump through hoops at every wish or whim
of every program official at any point down the line is not so much a
recognition of the proper "service" relationship of these management
people as it is a denial of the authority of a superior level in the line-the
level in the hierarchy above the program official and to which he is reo
sponsible-the level at which the management specialists are employed

.. O. Clenn Stahl: "Straight TaJlc about Label Thinking." Public Administration

Review, Autumn 1946. vol. 6, selected from pp. ~62-65. Reprinted by permission.
expressly lor the purpose of informing, guiding, helping, and, if necessary;
restraining him, for the good of the program and by the general order or
delegation of the superior officer.
Of course, these specialists are often wrong in degree or in direc-
tion at any time or in the case of any individual. But so are «program"
men! They are all human beings. The program that grows out of the zeal
of expert interest and specialization is not solved by insisting on the ex-
clusive rights of various specialties within a program to operate without
substantial outside management controls, but by preparing specialists and
experts of all stripes to be generalists and executives.

A number of public officials and students of public administra-

tion have contributed their views to this issue in an attempt to answer
the question whether the staff mechanism was "the last bad hope
of sound administration" or "the indispensible right hand of the
efficient executive.""

7. STAFF PLUS LINE

Marshall Dimock, emphasizing the importance of the line rather

than the staff agencies, here presents a formula for the reconcilia-
tion of both.

MARSHALL DIMOCK
"The Meshing of Line and Staff""
The staff officer must be kept in his place. But this does not mean
that he must be kept down, that he must be discouraged, that his initiative
and imagination must be checked. On the contrary, all these character-
istics should be encouraged. The important question is, through what
channel are they to be directed? They should, of course, Bow through the
responsible operating executive, not around him.
This process may be described in terms of the following sequence:
the staff official makes a recommendation; it is approved by the responsible
executive who, in his authoritative capacity, announces to those below
him in the hierarchy that the recommendation is going to be adopted.
Tbereafter there 3re many details in connection with putting it into effect
that can be carried out more effectively by the staff official than by the line
25 George W. Bergquist: "Coordinating Staffs-Are They Really Dangerous." Pub-
lic Administration Review, Summer 1947, vol. 7, pp. 179-83. Felix A. Nigro: "Some
Views on the Staff Function." Personnel Administration, November 1947, voL 10, pp.
10-13, .
.. Marshall Dimock: "The Meshing of Line and Staff." The EXe<!utive in Action.
Sdecled from pp. 10'-04. Reprinted by permission of Harper & Brothers. Copyright,
1945. Harper & Brothers.
 STAPF AND UN! ORGANIZATION

official and with a saving of time to the latter. So long as the subordinates
in the hierarchy are aware that this delegation is authorized and that the
staff officer is not acting independently, unification of managerial re-
sponsibility is not impaired and there is no loss of influence and responsi.
bility {)n the part of the executive.
Just as the chief executive is aided by staff officials in the carrying
out of his program, so also do subordinate line executives establish normal
and continuous relationships with staff officials in the development of their
work. If the line official cannot satisfy the staff assistant as to the necessity
of his proposal, then the door of the executive's office must be open to
him and he should be free to state his recommendation, explain any points
of difference he has with the staff assistant, and leave the decision to his
superior. As a general proposition also, if the decision is close, the chief
executive should decide in favor of the line official, since presumably he
knows his own needs better than any staff assistant because he is closer
to them and is responsible for results. If the chief executive fails to back
him up then he is bound to feel tbat his judgment is in question. This
injures his initiative and self-confidence-as well as his confidence in his
superior-and is to be avoided if possible. Ordinarily, however, if both
line and staff men are competent, they will be able to reach an agreement
and make a unified recommendation. Close decisions are rare when all
the facts are known.
In some organizations where staff assistance is overemphasized,
from the standpoint of both the influence and the number of staff
officials, the chief executive is likely to be cut off from his department
heads. An executive should never lose sight of the fact that his closest
contacts must be with the heads of the operating departments, and that
it is upon them more than any others that the success of the program de-
pends. If he permits himself to become cloistered because of the more
favored position of the staff officials, the morale and driving force of the
program will be impaired.

Dimock's advice, not to overemphasize staff against line, repre-

sents an emerging pattern of thought in both government and busi-
ness. 21 The chief danger in preferring staff is not merely one of
neglecting the line's crucial operating experience, but the related
possibility of falling into the habit of channelizing decisions and
activities from all agencies through some selected staff agency, which
becomes virtually the "boss's pet." In some military headquarters,
for example, the operations section or the planning staff is selected
as the commander's main channel to the consternatwn of the rest
of the organization. In some industrial concerns, major decisions and
many services may be filtered through the industrial engineering divi-

., Henty H. Farquhar: "The Modem Business Staff." Administrative Management.

May 1939, vol. 4, pp. 60-6,.
sion,- Certainly, there is a need in civilian as well as military admin-
istration for a clrief of staff or secretariat through which decisions to
be put before the chief executive may be filtered. But to select oPe
among various specialized staff agencies to perform this function may
seriously endanger the performance of other staff as wen as line agen-
cies.
To be sure some staff aide or staff agency must do this sort of
channelizing. The designatiou, however, of that aide or agency is a
delicate matter. In the case of the Federal government, there has
grown up a tendency to treat the Bureau of the Budget as the major
staff agency. Thus, many personnel decisions, particularly those in-
volving increases in expenditures, are cleared through the BureaU,
and no doubt properly so. There have also been added to the Burau
of the Budget administrative management functions. Although tpe
assignment of these functions may be in accordance with approv,ed
practice, the addition of other functions, such as the clearance
through or approval by the Bureau of the Budget of all legislative
proposals of the executive departments, raises serious questions of
competition between staff and line agencies at the highest level of
the Federal government. Some topside staff machinery for clearipg
and co-ordinating high-level policy decisions of this kind must be
designated. Should it be the staff agency whose central mission is tpe
more specialized fiscal field? Whatever the answer, the fact is thaf a
specialized staff agency frequently and inevitably finds itself plac,ed
a\ 'fue '101\ex o't fue li'tleam o't anmllilS'nanon, funs'lealimg to con'fi$Cl
not only with line agencies generally, but also to competition with
related staff agencies.

8. THE STAFF SKILL .

What is required, therefore, is not only a sound structural set·up

of staff agencies, but also a sagacious staff skill on the part of tMse
who man these agencies. Although staff skill is an important factor
in most administrative posts, particularly posts in service or auxiliJry
staff agencies dealing with finance, personnel, and planning, the sV'ff
skill is an exceptionally important requirement for the general stllff
type.
This need is well demonstrated in the following reading by Pfa-
fessor John M. Gaus of the Graduate School of Public Administra-
tion at Harvard University, and Leon Wolcott, who was a memve r
of the United States Department of Agriculture.
.. John B. Thurstan: "Managerial Conltol Through Industrial Engi~."
U. S. Bureau of the Budget, Conference on Organization and Methods Work, f'it$t
Series, June 4, 1946. •
 STAFf AND LINE ORCANIZATloat

Professor Gaus is one of the deans of American political scien~

and, during his long teaching career at Amherst College and the Uni·
versities of Minnesota and Wisconsin, stimulated a generation of
students in the field of public administration. Intermittently, hI!
carried on a program of research and consultation in Federal anti
international agencies. His study of the Department of Agriculture!,
carried on jointly with Leon O. Wolcott, is quoted below.
JOHN M. CAUS AND LEON O. WOLCOTT
"Purpose of the General Staff""
By necessity most, if not all, line matters directed to the SecretarY
must clear through the general staff. There were insufficient hours in the
day to permit the Secretary to give adequate attention to all or even to the
most important questions. Countless orders, memoranda, letters, anP
other papers required his signature; records or hearings and budget recoU<-
mendations were subject to his review; and questions of policy and o{-
ganization needed his attention. In addition, the demands on the Secr~­
tary's time by the President, the Congress, his party, interest grOUP?'
organizations, and individuals were extensive. The general staff acted to
reduce these pressures on the Secretary: it reviewed practically everything
directed to the Secretary; it evaluated each matter in the light of all reI?·
tionships, of departmental functions and policy; it determined the merit:S
of each case and passed it on to the Secretary with a recommendation--
based upon Its analysis-for action.
General-staff personnel should be generalists. This does not prc-
c1ude their also being specialists; but for specialists to he good staff men
they should also be generalists. It is much more important that they knoW
enough about everything so that interrelationships will at aU times pe
clear. Specialists are necessary in each field; the generalist must see th~t
all efforts add up to a positive program and do not cancel each other. The
specialist may make his greatest contnbution through knowing everythi]1g
about his particular subject; the generalist must know enough about each
segment to guide its integration into the whole.
General-staff personnel should also be self-effacing. They should
be unambitious in a narrow personal sense but thoroughly ambitious to
get the job well done, to get problems solved and results achieved. TheY
have no authority of their own except the authority of ideas, which de-
pends upon their competence and their effectiveness in winning consent.
A tbird important qualification of a good staff man is that he lil'e
people. This is not an absolute requirement and may be offset by excel-

.. John M. Gans and Leon O. Wolcott: "Purpose of the General Staff." PubJic
Administration and the United States Department ot Agriculture. Selected from pl"
296, 298-301. Repriuted by permission of Public Administration Service. Copyrigl1t,
1940, Public Administration Service.
310
lence at other points; but it is always desirable and valuable, and certainly
be must not dislike people. With such a trait one finds it easier to get
along with and win the confidence of others. We do not refer to super-
ficialities but to a deep, though diSCriminating, affection toward others.
Based upon sincerity and understanding, it smoothes the way to winning
consent. General staff personnel must respond generally to all sorts and
all conditions of men.
In addition to these special qnalifications and others that might
be added, a good general-staff man should possess something more, a
certain "plus" that is as real as it is intangible. No single word adequately
describes this quality. Integrity connotes much of the content, if integrity
is thought of in a positive sense and as being based on wisdom. It is the
quality that insures the public interest in governmental action and is
present only in those who have a real understanding of the public interest.
It derives, therefore, from real ability, wide knowledge, and firsthand
experience. Dangers of faulty staff work can be overcome if the staff man
will go out "to see for himself what the battlefield is like."

Something in this view reflects Brooks Adams' belief that the

generalizing capacity of the administrator represents the "highest
skill of the human mind."" Professor Laski has commented simi-
larly about British society: "The wisdom that is needed for the
direction of affairs is not an expert technique but a balanced equilib-
rium. It is the knowledge of how to use men, a faculty of judgment
about the practicability of principles. It consists not in the possession
of specialized knowledge but in a power to utilize its results at the
right moment and in the right direction." 81 This is a requirement to
some degree of every man down the line. For, in some of his relations,
every administrator has to be a generalizer or a staff officer. However,
this is especially the case, as Gaus and Wolcott point out, of the
general staff man.
Perhaps the main type of flexibility required of the staff man is the
ability to comprehend the theory and practice of staff and line with-
out permitting his hands to be tied by staff-and-line doctrine. For
example, many military and civil administrators insist that a staff
officer may recommend or request, but he must never order or com-
mand. However, no staff man, general or special, is doing his duty if
he cannot deliver an order and make it stick. Moreover, the very first
time a staff officer makes a recommendation to a line officer which is
not taken or is reversed, then the influence and authority of that staff
officer begins to wane. Paradoxically, therefore, the staff officer must
learn to command by the power of his recommendations, whether

•• See Chapter 1.
11 Harold 1. Laski: "The Limitations of the Expert." Fabian Tract, No. 235, p. 9.
an STA'" AND LINE ORGANIZATION

they take the form of advice tiJ his chief or requests to his chief's sub-
ordinates. When Paul Appleby, for example, was Assistant to the
Secretary of Agriculture, he had only one formal "power" actually
delegated to him. This was the "power" to sign the secretary's name
on requisitions for noiseless typewriters, which were in critical short-
age at the time. Yet Appleby, as a consequence of the informal dele-
gation of power from the secretary, exercised final authority in the
great majority of the decisions (by bulk if not by significance) that
were made in the Department of Agriculture. A major test of the
staff man, as of the general administrator himself, is whether he can
convert requests into orders and recommendations into commands.

9. THE EXECUTIVE STAFF IN THE WHITE HOUSE

Although the staff problem may be felt at all levels of authority, it

is seen most dramatically and its effects are most damaging if the
problem is not solved at the top of the executive structure. The
attempts to organize the White House staff have enlisted the con-
tinuous efforts not only of specialists in public administration," but,
as the three readings below indicate, of American Presidents as polit-
ically divergent as Franklin Roosevelt and Herbert Hoover:
(a) Some of these problems were explored during the interval
between the depression period of the 1930'S and the World War II
period of the 1940'S, when the President's Committee on Admin-
istrative Management took the first major steps toward the solution
of the problems in its famous report of 1937. The Committee con-
sisted of Louis Brownlow, Luther Gulick, and Charles Merriam.
(b) Corrective legislation incorporating some of the committee's
recommendations was passed, but political scientists continued their
studies of overall administrative staff organization for the Federal
government. Some of their ideas are reflected in the report of the
Conference on the Organization of the Executive Branch of the
Government held at the University of Michigan in 1948, which was
convened at the instance of Professor James K. Pollock.
(c) Professor Pollock was a member of the fifteen-man Commis-
sion on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government,
appointed in 1947 jointly by the President, the Speaker of the House
of Representatives, and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate.
Under the chairmanship of Herbert Hbover, the Commission made
a series of reports in 1949.

so Fritz Morstein Marx: The President and His Stall Services. Public AdministIa·
tion Service, No. 98.
 (a} PItU'DENT'S COMMi1TH ON ADMJNISTItATI¥E
MANACIMENT
"The White House Staff" II
The President needs help. His immediate staff assistance is C1-
tirely inadequate. He should be given a small number of executive ass~t­
ants who would be his direct aides in dealing with the managerial agencies
and administrative departments of the Government. These assistants,
probably not exceeding six in number, would be in addition to his prese~t
secretaries, who deal with the public, with the Congress, and with tloe
press and the radio. These aides would have no power to make decisions
or issue instructions in their own right. They would not be interpo~
between the President and the heads of his departments. They would not
be assistant presidents in any sense. Their function would be, when aPY
matter was presented to the President for action affecting any part of tpe
administrative work of the Government, to assist him in obtaining quictly
and without delay all pertinent information possessed by any of the exeCu-
tive departments so as to guide him in making his responsible decisioylS;
and then when decisions have been made, to assist him in seeing to it that
every administrative department and agency affected is promptly i{;-
formed. Their effectiveness in assisting the President will, we think, . e
directly proportional to their ability to discharge their functions with {e-
straint. They would remain in the background, issue no oIders, make
decisions, eruit no public statements. Men for these positions should,
k
~~'} ~~~ '<&~ ~'-~~~'-~~~~'» ...'»~ ~'<&=., '<&~ ~,,~­
ment. They should be men in whom the President has personal confidetl ce
and whose character and attitude is such that they would not attertlpt
to exercise power on their own account. They should be possessed of high
competence, great physical vigor, and a passion for anonymity. TIley
should be installed in the White House itself, directly accessible to the
President. In the selection of these aides the President should be free to
call on departments from time to time for the assignment of persons wVo,
after a tour of duty as his aides, might be restored to their old positio(ls.
This recommendation arises from the growing complexity a(l?
magnitude of the work of the President's office. Special assistance IS
needed to insure that all matters coming to the attention of the Presid~nt
have been examined from the over-all managerial point. of view, as well
as from all standpoints that would bear on policy and operation. It also
would facilitate the flow upward to the President of information upD~
which he is to base his decisions and the flow downward from the Pr~I­
dent of the decisions once taken for execution by tlIe department or tie-

as President's Committee on Administrative Management. "The White Ho"'"

Staff.» Administrative Management in the Government of the United States. 19~7,
""leeted from pp. 5-6.
313 STAFF AND L1N£ ORGANIZATION

partments affected. Thus such a staff would not only aid the President
but would also be of great assistance to the several executive departments
and to the managerial agencies in simplifying executive contacts, clear-
ance, and guidance.

In addition to this assistance in his own office, the President must

be given direct control over and be charged with immediate responsi-
bility for the great managerial functions of the government which
affect all of the administrative departments, as is outlined in the
following sections of this report. These functions are personnel man-
agement, fiscal and organizational management, and planning man-
agement. Within these three groups all of the essential elements of
business management are comprehended.
The development of administrative management in the Federal
government requires the improvement of the administration of these
managerial activities, not only by the central agencies in charge, but
also by the departments and bureaus. The central agencies need to
be strengthened and developed as managerial arms of the chief execu-
tive, better equipped to perform their central responsibilities, and to
provide the necessary leadership in bringing about improved prac-
tices throughout the government.
The three managerial agencies, the Civil Service Administration,
the Bureau of the Budget, and the National Resources Board, should
be a part of the executive office. Thus, the President's three man-
agerial institutions, whose work and activities would affect all of the
administrative departments, report to him directly.

(b) Conference on the Organization of the Executive Branch of

the Government"
With respect to the organization of central staff services at the
presidential level, three alternatives were discussed. One was the grouping
of such functions as budgeting, accounting, personnel, and purchasing in
a Department of Administration, the head of which would be a member
of the Cabinet. The second was the grouping of these services in a central
staff unit within the Executive Office of the President without giving
Cabinet rank to the head and without making the unit comparable to a
regular executive department. The third suggestion was to leave these staff
services to be dealt with separately in units more or less loosely attached
to the Executive Office of the President with perhaps some reorganization

.. Conference on the Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government:

Report of Proceeding>. Pp. 3-5. Sponsored by the Institute of Public Administration
of the University of Michigan in co-opemtion with the Carnegie Corporation of New
York; Ann Arbor, Michigan, April 2<1-26, 1948.
in· the severnl units. The proponents of all of these views agreed that the
attitude of the President was a more significant factor than the ex;Ict
structural arrangement decided upon.
In favor of a new Department of Administration, the succesJul
experience of the State of Minnesota with a Department of Adminisfra-
tion was pointed out. A good deal of stress was put on the prestige which
the granting of Cabinet rank would provide for the head of such a tie-
partment. On the other hand, numerous arguments were discussed agait'lst
the establishment of a Department of Administration. There was smne
fear that other department heads would resent and fail to accept as an
equal the head of a department without an operating program of its ovf!l.
Experience in the armed forces was cited as indicating that the official
responsible for such control activities as budget and personnel should riot
be on the same level as the heads of operating agencies if he is to function
effectively. In contrast to this was the view that Cabinet recognition
would attract to the headship of the department a type of person w~o
would be politically oriented rather than well qualified in administratIVe
problems and that such a department headed by such an individual mi~ht
become an independent center of power challenging the position of rhe
President, provoking schisms in the administration, and tending to p~
come more responsive to Congress than to the President. In addition, t!us
department might be able to undercut the Cabinet as a policy body of
importance by subordinating the other department heads to the head of
thi.. ~ttro..e.qt ",I;o,_Q 'l«l\!..td. l;)e. ;"\l.. tl;o,_e. r...;"!iq,\l.. q,f.. ~ o;Att q,f.. "'be.=l \.Wn-
ager" of the government. It might emphasize the control t~ndencies of
central staff units and minimize the service tendencies. It would lead to
excessive standardization. It would enhance congressional control at PIe
expense of presidential powers unless there was a great deal of statutory
reform in the laws now on the books dealing with such matters as fiscal
and personnel administration. Opponents of the creation of a Department
of Administration also pointed out that the Bureau of the Budget at p(es-
ent fills the same role to a considerable extent and yet is not as prominent
a target as a central Department of Administration would be.
In view of these doubts about the desirability of a Department
of Administration, the consensus of the group was against it, with a prefer-
ence indicated for retention of these services in units of a purely sf;3~
capacity, with improvement of their working relationships with the PresI-
dent. The burden of proof rests upon those who favor adding additiopal
burdens to the load of central service agencies. It appeared to be PIe
consensus that service functions should not be placed in a central jld-
ministrative agency for the primary purpose of reducing the span of
control of the President; nor need such functions be attached directly to
the Executive Office of the President to be operated effectively. Efficient
working arrangements are the goal, requiring adjustments to permit cen-
tral concern temporarily when required.
315 STAFF AND LINE ORCANt%ATION

(C) Report of the Commission on Orgaaization of the Executive

Branch of Government"
No executive, public or private, can manage a large and complex
establishment without staff assistance. Despite improvements during the
past decade, these staff agencies are still less effective than they should
be. The President's personal staff now comprises three secretaries; an
assistant to the President; six administrative assistants; a special counsel
to the President; the executive clerk; and Army, Navy, and Air Force
aides. At the present time, the President's immediate executive staff (aside
from the heads of departments and agencies) consists of:
a. The White House Office
b. The Bureau of the Budget
c. The Council of Economic Advisers
d. The National Security Council
e. The National Security Resources Board
The Commission recommends the following additions to the
Executive Office: An Office of Personnel, headed by a director who should
also be chairman of the Civil Service Commission, [and] a staff secretary
in the White House Office, as described later. The Commission also
recommends certain further expansion in the work of the Bureau of the
Budget. The Council of Economic Advisers was established as a part of
the President's Office by the Employment Act of 1946. Just as the budget
is the responsibility of the President and not of the Office of the Budget,
the annual economic report is the report of the President, not of the
Council. Like the Office of the Budget, the Council should advise the
President as a professional staff agency and should not take public leader-
ship on issues of policy in its own right. The Commission recommends
that the Council of Economic Advisers be replaced by an Office of the
Economic Adviser and that it have a single head. The National Security
Council and the National Security Resources Board, with their respective
staffs, should be made, formally as well as in practice, a part of the Presi-
dent's Office.
At present there is no one place in the President's Office to which
the President can look for a current summary of the principal issues with
which he may have to deal in the near future; nor is a current summary
of the staff work available on problems that have been assigned to his
advisers, his staff agencies, or the heads of departments and agencies. To
meet this deficiency, the Commission proposes the addition of a staff
secretary. He would not himself be an adviser to the President on any
issue of policy, nor would he review (in a supervisory capacity) the sub-
stance of any recommendation made to the President by any part of his
.. "General Mallagement of the Executive Branch." A Report to Congress by the
Commission on Organization of the Execlltive BranCh of the Government, February
1949. Selected from pp. 5, 13, 16, 17, %1-%3·
316
staff.· The Commission believes that this recommendation will facilitate
teamworlc among the President's staff, the agencies of the President's
Office, and any Cabinet or interdepartmental committees which are study-
ing problems for the President. If possible the staff secretary, like the
executive clerk. should be a cateer public servant. The staff secretary
should keep the President corrently informed of work which has been
undertaken by various parts of the President's Office, by the Cabinet
committees, or by interdepartmet1tal committees or special advisory com-
mittees. He should inform the l'resident of any difficulties which have
arisen because of the overlapping of assignments or contiicts of policy.

The Hoover Commission also recommended an Office of General

Services, subject to the Pre,sident's direction, which would conduct
the following "housekeeping" activities of the Federal government: .
( 1) supply, (z) records man:Jgement, (3) operation and mainte-
nance of public buildings, and (4) Federal relations with govern-
mental institutions in the District of Columbia." The Hoover Re-
port thus gave recognition to the long-range American trend toward
the integration and strengthening of Federal staff agencies. The
implications of this trend for efficiency and economy were apparent,
but there was some doubt that these measures would leave the line
agencies all the freedom they needed to perform adequately vital
public functions. Economical gnd efficient managemet1t represet1ted
only one side of the America:n administrative pattern, as we have
seen. The other, and to many critics the more important, aspect of
American administration was the democratic urge, which favored a
dynamic, even though lavish, Federal man:Jgement in times of social
change, international tension, and economic transition. Unless the
integrated Federal staff aget1cies could demonstrate their ultimate
relationship to the broader objective, rationalization of the nation's
staff organization would be stronger in theory than in practice.

10. EXECUTIVE CABINET ANt> KITCHEN CABINET

The desire to rationalize staff organization for the sake of ad-

ministrative improvement does not blind Americans to the impor-
tance of the policy or "political" functions of the executive staff.
The ''kitchen cabinet" is an American organizational mechanism
which is found at levels of administrative responsibility other than
the White House, as indicated by the following comments of:
(a) David Cushman Coyle. an engineer whose technical specialty
.. Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch, "OIlice of Ceneral
Services,» February 1949.
311 STAFF AND UNf O&CANIZATION

was stresses and strains in skyscrapers, but who also showed an in-
terest in the pressures and problems of public administration and
governmental planning; and (b) Professors Arthur W. Macmahon
and John Millett, political scientists from Columbia University with
extensive experience as consultants to Federal governmental agencies.

(a) DAVID CUSHMAN COYLE

"Essentials of Public Management" 17
Executives have generally felt the necessity of more assistance
than their cabinets were prepared to supply and have established a kitchen
cabinet of some kind. The executive office staff is definitely a part of the
kitchen cabinet, although not usually so rated; for executive policies have
been influenced by the king's barber and the President's secretary since
men have had kings and presidents. The recent reorganization measures
also provide for what an irreverent commentator has called "six vestal
virgins to fan the presidential brain," the new presidential assistants "with
a passion for anonymity."
Whether provided by law or not, there is bound to be a group of
planners surrounding the executive. With a considerable amount of over-
lapping, the planners may be classified as "political" and "technica1."
Political planners give advice on what the legislature can be persuaded
to accept, on what the voters will say while the proposal is under discus-
sion, and on what the voters are likely to think if such-and-such results
were to appear at a later date. Technical planners advise on the policies
that would achieve certain desired effects. They are essentially professional
specialists, dealing with laws of cause and effect and the application of
physical and social forces. They include today the ranking officials in our
career services.
The common characteristic of kitchen-cabinet members is a rela-
tive inconspicuousness, even though some of them may enjoy headlines
proclaiming their importance in the executive entourage. Many of their
proposals are significant and some eventuate in valuable policies of state.
The point to be emphasized, however, is that the executive's circle of in-
timates is the advisory body par excellence. For good or ill they are part
of his personality. A man is legitimately judged by his friends, and the
voters, when they are paying proper attention to their duties, recogni",e
that in electing a chief executive to office, they elect all his friends to the
office of kitchen-tabmet memher. All formally established advisory bodies
are subject to the necessity of penetrating to .the executive through his
circle of friends and secretaries. To disregard this obvious fact is to render
any such body futile .

.. David Cushman Coyle: "Essentia& of Public Management. n Fritz Morstein-

Man: (ed.): Public Management in the New DemocIacy. Mapted from pp. 48-49.
Reprinted by permi$sion of Harper &: Brothers. Copyright. 1940. Harper &: Brothers.
a:16 ADlIIMISTUTtON

(b) AATtIUt MACMAHON ANO JOliN MILLITT

Federal Administrators ..
Departmental leadership has two phases, political and administta-
tive. It must be implemented for both. Departments in the past have had
neither political nor administrative coherence. Administratively there is
need in each department for a focal personality who will direct the flow
of command and integrate the work of a flexIble group of supervisors. But
the political head of the department must be equipped for the formula-
tion of policy and its popularization. There is also need, therefore, for
aides who serve at the will of the Secretary, free from routine responsibil-
ity. The first group are the core of management. The second group are
advisory but they are so complementary to the first that they may be
spoken of as an ingredient of management. Without a headquarters per·
sonnel disposed in these two organs and suited to their purposes, depart-
ments can have no real existence.

In their book Macmahon and Millett described the professional

careers of federal administrators who could roughly be classified as
"general managers" or "business managers," and as "advisory aides"
or "supervisory aides." In actual practice the "administrative" type
of staff aide and the "political" type are not readily distinguishable.
Sometimes both functions devolve upon the immediate staff assistant
to the chief executive. In other situations, more than two top aides
are advisable. At the '\¥hite House level, there has always been a
kitchen cabinet of several political advisors and personal representa-
tives outside the regular executive hierarchy, but more powerful."
Since the report of the President's Committee on Administrative
Management in 1937, the pattern of national executive organization
has matured, and in the '\¥hite House a half-dozen recognized as-
sistants to the President were established. Their prescribed function
of "fanning the Presidential brain" is not a wholly unapt metaphor.
They have been assigned an increasingly effective authority to sift,
cull, and select for the President's attention or decision many issues
coming up from line and staff agencies in the government, from the
public, trom the Cabinet and the politicians. Though not immedi-
ately apparent there may (}evelop a tendency for the various presi-
dential assistants to fall into the two main groups indicated, some
of .them concentrating on mmagement problems and some on more
purely political problems.
IS Arthur Macmahon and John Millett: Federal Administrators, p. vii. Reprinted
'by permission of The Columbia Univetsity Press. Copyright, 1939, The Columbia
University Press.
a. Homer Durham: "Cootdinatioo by Special Representativ~ of the Chief Execu-
tive." Public Adminisbation Review. Summer 1"148, vol. 8, pp. 176--80.
319 STA" AMO LINE OItGANIZATtON

The problem, however, both at the chief executive level and at

all departmental levels below him, is not the strict demarcation be-
tween the two staff types as much as it is to balance both "admin-
istrative" and "political" considerations. Some cabinet secretaries and
other executives aware of this need for balanced management are,
therefore, beginning to surround themselves, apart from their estab-
lished network of staff and service agencies, with (I) an assistant who
tends to concentrate on management or administrative problems,
and (z) an assistant who emphasizes the program or policy prob-
lems. The former is generally regarded as the "ma:Jagerial" type while
the latter has been colorfully regarded as the "hatchet man" whose
major duty is to prod the established organization in terms of the
newer policies of the department head, and, if necessary, contrary to
existing managerial procedures.
For that reason, members of the kitchen cabinet sometimes fall
out among themselves. They may both be loyal to the executive and
his program; but their orientation and their responsibilities differ,
and thus they clash at times. Problems frequently remain unsolved
until the executive is faced with these conflicts in such a manner that
he can identify and attack the incongruities in his program. Poten-
tially, one of the main incongruities is that between the political and
the administrative forces, and one way to bring these forces and their
differences out in the open is for the administrator to have a vigorous
"political" staff and an equally vigorous "administrative" staff. In a
limited sense the executive must have conflict in his kitchen if he is
to keep order in his parlor.
This bi-focal solution to the top staff problem is not the only way
to "untangle the confusion in thought which surrounds the upper
brackets of the American Administrative Service."'" The British
combine management powers and staff functions in a single Under
Secretary who is the top advisor to the minister on both administra-
tion and policy. Similarly, the Canadian Deputy Minister has the
dual function of acting as general manager of his department and of
translating political decisions into administrative reality. In the
United States, the Hoover Commission in its 1949 report also fa-
vored an "Under Secretary (or equivalent officer) . . . who can
undertake general supervision of the department." But while the
Under Secretary was to be "a kind of chief of staff," there were to
be at least three "assistant secretaries" in each department who were
to act as "the immediate associates to the Secretary and Under Secre-
tary," and there was also to be an "administrative assistant" or "ad-
ministrative assistant secretary" to act as "the top administrative
.. L. D. White: Government Canoer Service. Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press; 1935, p. 2~.
official of 11 department." Professor Millett was one of the authors
of this proposal, indicating the continuing search for an effective aild
standard type of top staff man:.tgement."
The way in which the necessary staff functions to discharge these
responsibilities are organized and manned is one of the most impOr-
tant decisions the administrator has to make. In spite of the standard
staff structure recommended by the Hoover Commission, the CO]1l-
mission also proposed that "each department head should determille
the organization and be free to amend it."" If the pattern of dual
staff organization, "administrative" and "political," has any advan-
tage, it may lie in its fiexibUity; that i~, in the possibi.lity of shifting
the emphasis from the political staff to the managerial staff and back
again as circumstances dictate. There has been a historic tendency for
American executives at various levels of government to emphasize the
political. More recently, however, the technical development of
public administration has made it seem wise to inject managerial
staffs and staff agencies at a high level under the executive and chief
executive. The Hoover report Jeans definitely in this direction. Per-
haps that position is too high--so high that disappointment over the
achievement of policies and programs may endanger the status of
these newer mechanisms of staff control and public managemeIlt.
Like so much else in the field of administration, it is balance we seek,
and balance in staff organization requires flexibility especially on the
part of the executive, who, under American conditions, combines in
his own position and personality the responsibility for both admin-
istrative management and policy formulation.

SUMMARY

In the technical jargon of the field of organization, line agencies

are defined as those which have as their primary mission the perfonn-
ance of the subject-matter function which the organization is sup-
posed to perform; while the main mission of the staff agencies is to
conduct the managerial or "housekeeping" services whereby the sub-
stantive function or the end-product is achieved. Although histori-
cally the emphasis on the line type of organization may have corne
hom the mi.\itaty wbete "tbe \i1\<!" is aU-i.mpmtant, it was the milit-z.ty
profession which helped originate, perfect and proliferate the staff
type of organization.
While concepts like staff aod line are useful organizational ter]1lS
""General Management of the F;$ecutive BllIIIch," p. 37. "Departmental Man·
agement" (Appendix E), pp. 1", 14.
.. "Cerierif Management of the EzeCutive Branch," p. 37.
321 ITAFF AND UNE ORGANIZATION

for the assignment of detailed duties and for the location of specific
responsibilities, administrators can follow them too rigidly. A staff
man who does not give commands to the line is ineffectual; and a line
man who does not understand and exercise a modicum of staff func-
tions is a failure. Military personnel have learned from bitter ex-
perience in World War II that the old distinctions between staff
and line, the newer differentiations between service and combat, and
the emerging demarcations between administration and operation,
are too readily insisted upon.
The dynamics of a changing society make it essential that ad-
ministrators experiment with such tools of modem organization
which can help executives manipulate their resources and meet their
responsibilities. Among these are: the bi-modal concept of organiza-
tion, that is, staff-and-line; the dual type of staff organization, that
is, the general and the special staff or the advisory and the auxiliary
staff; and the bifocal form of top staff aid, that is, the "policy" or
"political" staff and the "management" or "administrative" staff. In
the use of these promising mechanisms of organization the major
need is balance. Particularly, administrators must recognize that staff
and line are co-ordinates, operating not in a hierarchical relation of
staff over line, but on a horizontal plane of authority and responsi-
bility under the chief executive.
 CHAPTER ELEVEN

THE ORCANIZATION IN PRACTICE

AN OllCANIZAnON is frequently far different in practice than it appears

on the organization chart or in the organization manual. Books about
organization can enlighten. but they reveal more if they go behind
the structure and explore political realities, social motivations. and
human drives. In this chapter some of the practical forces and ad-
ministrative devices which energize the organizational structure will
be presented.

1. THE PLACE Of THE TOP EXECUTIVE

The chief executive who occupies the top of the organizational

hierarchy is usually conceived to be the deus ex machina. but how
much does he actually do or decide? Two views are presented: that
of (a) Donald C. Stone, and (b) F. F. Beirne.
(a) DONALD STONE
"The Executive's Role" 1
The executive is often seen as the man sitting af the top of the
organization possessed of a dangerous amount of authority. hiring and
firing at will, whose every suggestion or order is responded to promptly
and completely. This view refiects one of the greater misconceptions about
1 Donald Stone: "The Executive's Role." New Horizons in Public Administration.
Adapted from pp. 49-50. Reprinted by permission of Unjyersity of Alabama Press.
Copyright, 194;, University of Alabama Press.
322
 THE oaCANlZATtON IN .RACTtU

the nature of executive work. The bedrock fact is that the executive must
rely on his staff for the achieventent of his objectives. Most issues in his
organization will be settled without ever reaching him. And on those
that do reach him his choice will generally be a restricted one. By the time
a report or instruction has been developed, worked over, revised, reviewed
level by level, what finally remains for the executive to say in most cases
is "OK." He may be inclined to make some changes, but he will soon
learn that something else will demand his attention before he is through .
.Unless what comes to him involves an issue of great importance, he will,
therefore, frequently, have to accept what he considers to be an inferior
product. When the issue is a crucial one for the organization's program
and involves a hig~ level judgment on the consequences o!: a given course
of action, the executive may be called upon to choose among two or three
alternative solutions, but secondary questions are likely to have to go by
the board. Consequently, unless the executive's objectives are wholeheart-
edly accepted by his organization, the chances that they will be achieved
are problematical.

(b) F. F. BEIRNE
"An Executive Has Nothing to Do" 2
As everybody knows, an executive has practically nothing to do.
That is, except to decide what is to be done; to tell somebody to do it; to
listen to reasons why it should not be done, why it should be done by
somebody else, or why it should be done in a different way; except to
follow up to see if the tbing has been done; to discover that it has not been
done; to listen to excuses from the person who should have done it and
did not do it, except to follow up a second time to see if the thing has
been done; to discover that it has been done but done incorrectly; to
point out how it should have been done; to wonder if it is not time to get
rid of a person who cannot do a thing correctly; to reflect that the person
in fault has a wife and seven children, except to consider how much
simpler and better the thing would have been done had he done it bim-
self in the first place, but to realize that such an idea would strike at the
very foundation of the belief of l1ll employees that an executive has noth·
ing to do.

These are contrary but not necessarily conflicting points of view,

since few administrators would deny that the top executive is oiten
both master and victim of his organization. What good executive has
not experienced the deadening frustration of being unable to get
things done the way in which he himself would, but cannot, heClluse
of pressure of other responsibilities, limited time, and rapidly moving
events? The most capable heads of the most powerful organizations

• Quoted in The Covington News (Andalusia, Alabama), December 18, 1947.

may ~ caught in the vortex of events beyond the effective grasp of '
mankind and its mechanisms. Tolstoy has described how Napoleon
in his "victorious defeat" at Borodino in 1812., "with sickly uneasi-
ness awaited the end of this action in which he considered himself
the prime mover, though he could not have stopped [it}.'"
Even when an undertaking is more in tune with historical events,
the most capable top executives in charge of the most efficient or-
ganizations cannot make all the major decisions. Yet there is often a
tendency on the part of executives to try to do too much, with the
result that they get too little done. Despite all the initiative that is
latent in American democratic society, Morris Cooke has pointed out
that there is still an "excessive and growing dependence on the top
executive whether it be the President of the United States, a governor
of a state, a county commissioner, the head of a union, or the fore-
man of a road gang." • From the point of view of the administrator,
one of the main decisions he must learn to make is what to select
for decision from the endless demands on his attention and his au-
thority, and what not to decide himself but delegate to others. As
Chester Barnard has wisely concluded, "the executive is primarily
concerned with decisions which facilitate or hinder other decisions." •

2. THE DANGER OF CHARTISM

This deduction suggests that the scalar habit of thought and the
traditional use of hierarchical charts have their practical limitations.
The danger of chartism has been described by Herbert Emmerich,
Director of Public Administration Clearing House.

HERBERT EMMERICH
"Administrlltn. Normalcy Impedes Defense'"
"Chartism" is another habit that the administrator might well
forget. The current emergency and our efforts to meet it frequently cannot
be disposed of by a neat diagram in two dimensions. Organization charts
of large and complex agencies are self-defeating because they are taken
seriously. If they are organized effectively, they defy charting by any dis-

• Leo Tolstoy: War and Pe:u:e. New York: The Modem Library; 19~1, Book X,
Chapter 3&.
• Morris Cooke: "The Early DaY' of the Rural Electrification Idea, 1914-1936."
American Political Science Review, June 1948, vol. 4>, pp. 433-34.
• Chester 1. Barnard: The Functions ot the Executive. Cambrid&e: Harvard Uni·
versity Press, 1938, p. 211.
• Herbert Emmerich: "Administrative Normalcy Impedes Defense." Public Ad·
ministration Review, Summer '94', vol. " PP' 320-21. Reprinted by permission.
covered tedlnique. It is one thing to define responsibility and authority,
either orally or in writing, and another thing to be so preoccupied with
oversimplified kindergarten drawings on a formal organization chart that
we overlook the realistic setup by which a living organization functions
and the complex of interplays that a group organism represents.
A chart of a large organization cannot be realistic because there
are too many lines connecting its various branches to be depicted in a
single scheme. There are the lines of the administrative hierarchy, usually
determined by the power to hire and fire; the lines along which formal
orders may be given, determined often by statutory definition; the lines
along which information and advice are transmitted; the various sets of
lines by which papers and documents, the outward evidence of work being
accomplished, flow from person to person; the various lines of administra-
tive and technical supervision; and the shifting lines of unofficial pressures
and influences, often more important in administration than any of the
formal connections. These are some of the lines within a single agency,
but the important agencies today do their most important work through
other lines, often to totally different levels of government or outside the
government altogether. The organization chart is an invitation to forget
all but a single set of lines of interdependence, and rarely will two persons
agree on just which set the chart is meant to depict. Drnw charts if you
must, but then file them away in a locked box until the war is over. They
are usually out-of-date before the drawing ink is dry anyway.

Resourceful administrators who agree with Emmerich's realistic

criticism of chartism nevertheless continue to post charts and use
them. The formal chart of authority does have some pedagogical
value for a new staff or for the administrator when he is in a didactic
mood with his existing staff. Moreover, in a questionable situation in
which the authoritative lines of communication withm his organiza-
tion are at stake, the administrator can always appeal to the accepted
formal hierarchy as it appears on the chart.

3. THE SOURCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHOlIlY

To Mary P. Follett, the whole conception of final authority at

the apex of the hierarchy is an illusion. Mary Follett's career ranged
fmm her position as a social settlement worker in Boston to that of
a consultant to industrial organizations in Britain.' Before she trans-
feIted the scene of her professional activities tb England, she left her
mark on American democratic thought in The New State, a work
published in 192.0 and well known to Americans of that period who
adhered loyally to Woodrow Wilson's "New Freedom." It was not
, Urwick and BTech: The Making oJ Scientific Management, vol. I, Chapter 5.
SUIplising that a democratic political philosopher like Mary FoUett
should convert hef ideals of inter-personal relations into the organi-
zational theories contained in the following essay.

MA.RY P. ,OLLETT
"The Illusion of Final Authority"·
When writers on business management speak of "ultimate au·
thority," and "supreme control" as two of the functions of administration,
I think that expressions are being used which are a survival of former Oays.
These expressions do not seem to me to describe business as conducted
today in many plants. Business practice has gone ahead of business theory.
So much goes to contribute to executive decisions before the part which
the executive head takes in them, which is indeed sometimes merely the
official promulgatiotl of a decision, that the conception of final authOrity
is losing its force in the present organization of business. This is as true
of other executives gS of the head. Here, too, final decisions have the form
and the force which they have accumulated. I have seen an executive
feel a little self-important over a decision he had made, when that decision
had really come to him ready made. An executive decision is a morllent
in a process. The growth of a decision, the accumulation of authority, not
the final step, is what we need most to study. I know a man in a factory
who is superintendent of a department which includes a number of sub-
departments. He tells me tnat in many cases be says to tbe bead of a sub-
department, that is, to a man in a subordinate position to his, "With your
permission I do so and so." This is a decided reversal of the usual method,
is it not? In the old hierarchy of position the head of the sub-departrtlent
would be "under" the superintendent of the department; the "lower"
would take orders from the "higher."
A moment ago I used the word "under." Perhaps it may seem
advisable sometime to get rid of the words "over" and "under." Two years
ago my nurse in the hospital said to me, "Did you notice that operating
nurse? Didn't she look black? I wonder what has happened this momitlg?"
I innocently said, "Perhaps one of the surgeons has reprimanded her for
something." To which my nurse replied, "Why, he couldn't. The doctors
are not over us. They have their work and we have ours." At first I did
not lib this, it seemed like chaos indeed. I thought the old way much
better-'-Of the doctor's having full responsibility, of his giving all the
orders and seeing to it that the nurses obeyed his orders. But I asked sev-
eral doctors about it, and they told me that there is a marked tendency

• Mary Follett: "The Illusion of Final Authority." Bulletin of The Taylor Society,
lC}26,vol. 11, selected from pp. 243-46. Reprinted by permission.
327 THE OItCANIXATION IN PltACTICE

now in this direction, and while it obviously has drawbacks, there may
be a good side to it; it may indicate on the part of the nurses a greater
interest in their work and a willingness to take more responsibility.
"Delegated authority" assumes that your chief executive has the
"right" to all the authority, but that it is useful to delegate some of it.
I do not think that a president should have any more authority than goes
with his function. Therefore, I do not see how you can delegate authority
except when you are ill or taking a holiday. And then you are not exactly
delegating authority. Someone is doing your job and he has the authority
which goes with that particular piece of work. Authority belongs to the
job and stays with the job.
If we trace all that leads to a command, what persons are COll-
nected with it, and in what way, we find that more than one man's ex-
perience has gone to the making of that moment-unless it is a matter
of purely arbitrary authority. A political scientist writes, "Authority co-
ordinates the experience of man," but I think this is a wrong view of au-
thority. The form of organization should be such as to allow or induce
the continuous coordination of the experience of men. Legitimate au-
thority Hows from coordination, not coordination from authority.
It is a matter of everyday knowledge to business men that their
heads of departments pass up to them much more than mere facts. They
give interpretation of facts, conclusions therefrom, judgments, too, so that
they contribute very largely to final determination, supreme control, even
to what has been called administrative leadership. In fact, both as to the
information and the conclusions handed up from the executives, it is often
not possible for the head to take them or leave them. These conclusions
and judg:nents are already, to a certain extent, woven into the pattern,
and in such a way that it would be difficult to get them wholely out.
Hence, while the board of directors may be theoretically the governing
body, practically, as our large businesses are now organized, before their
decisions are made there has already taken place much of that process of
which these decisions are but the last step. Instead then of supreme con-
trol, ultimate authority, we might perhaps think of cumulative control,
cumulative authority.
That business men are facing this undoubted fact of pluralistic
authority, that modern business organization is based to some extent on
this conception, is very interesting to me, for I have been for many years
a student of political science. In the last book I read on government, a
recent one, the writer speaks of a "single, ultimate centre of control," but
I do not find that.practical men are much interested in ultimates. I think
that with political scientists this interest is a survival from their studies
in sovereignty.

Mary Follett's theory virtually turns the hierarchy of administra-

tive authority upside down. Her views are paraUeleti by those of
328
business leaders h"ke Hemy Dennison and Alfred Sloan, and Me being
increasingly recognized by sociologists, economists, and political
scientists who ate beginning to depart fwm their static theories of
social and administrative structure"

4. CO-OR01NATING AND CROSS-CHANNELING IN AN AD-

MINISTRATIVE HIERARCHY

If one insists that the vertical lines of authority or responsibility

do after all follow the hierarchical ladder, one should recognize that
the horizontal lines of collaboration or co-ordination may be just as
significant to organizational practice." This view is thoroughly pre-
sented by Fayol in his discussion of the "administrative ladder."

HENIlI FAYOL
"The Hierarchy" U
The hierarchy is the series of officials which runs in order of rank
from the supreme authority to the lowest employee. The hierarchic chan-
nel is the road which aU communications leaving or addressed to the
supreme authority follow in passing through all the ranks of the hierarchy.
The need for this channel arises both from the need for safe transmission
and from unity of command but it is not always the quickest channel,
and in very big enterprises, the State in particular, it is sometimes disas-
trously long. As, however, there are many operations whose success de-
pends on rapid execution, we must find a means of reconciling respect for
the hierarchic channel with the need for quick action. This can be done
in the following way:
Let us suppose that it is necessary to put function F in communi-
cation with function P, in an undertaking whose hierarchy is represented
by the double ladder G-A-Q. In order to follow the hierarchic channel,
we should have to climb the ladder from F to A and then go down from

'WilIis Wissler: Business Administration. New York: McGraw·HilI Book Com·

pany, Inc.; 1931, pp. 789""'}0. Horace S. Fries: "Some Democratic Implications of
Science in Scientific Management," Advanced Management, October-December 1940,
vcl. 5, pp. 147--48. Charles S. Ascher: "Otganization (Mercat"r', Projection)." Public
Administration Review, Autnmn '943, vol. 3, pp. 360-64. Harliegh B. Trecker: Gronp
ProceSs jn Administration. New York: The Woman's Press; 1946, foreword. Philip
Selznlck: "Foundlition of the "Theory of Otganlzation." American Sociolugical lI.e-
view, February 1948, vol. 13, pp. 2S-3S.
1. See also T. N. Whitehead: "Leadership Within Industrial Otganization."
Harvard Business Review, Winter 1936, vol. '4, p.•68.
11 Henri Fayol: "The Hierarcby." Industrial and General Administr4tion. Pp. 28-
29· Translated from the Fteneh by J. A. Conrbrougb for the Intemational Manage.
ment Institute. Reprinted by permission.
 THE OItCANI%ATtON tN I'AACTI«

A to P, stopping at each rung, and then repeat this journey in the opposite
direction in order to get back to our starting point
A
B L
C M
D N
E 0
F ........ P
C Q
It is clearly much simpler and quicker to go straight from F to
P by using the "bridge" F·P, and this is what is most frequently done.
The hierarchic principle will be safeguarded if E and 0 have authori~ed
their respective subordinates, F and P, to enter into direct relations, and
the situation will, finally, be perfectly in order if F and P immediately tell
their respective chiefs what they have agreed to do. So long as F and P
remain in agreement and their actions are approved by their immediate
supervisors, direct relations can be continued, but as soon as either of
these conditions ceases to exist, direct relations must stop and the hier.
archie channel be resumed.
The use of the "bridge" is simple, swift, and sure; it allows the
two employees F and P, in one meeting of a few hours, to deal with a
question which by the hierarchic channel would go through twenty trans·
mi,,<;jons, jnconvenience many people, entail an enormous amount of
writing, and waste weeks or months in arriving at a solution. It seems
impossible that such practices, which are as absurd as they are disastrous,
should be in common use, but, unfortunately, there is no doubt that they
are used in matters connected with State services. It is generally agreed
that the chief cause of this is the fear of responsibility, but I person~lIy
believe that it is due rather to lack of administrative ability among the
men who are in charge. If the supreme authority A made his assistant:; B
and L use the "bridge" and saw that they made their subordinates C lind
M use it too, the habit of taking responsibility would be established and
the courage to accept it developed at the same time as the use- of the
shortest route.
It is a mistake to leave the hierarchic channel without good tea·
son, but it is a much greater one to follow it when doing so will harm the
undertaking; in certain circumstances, this can be a very serious misl:;Jke
indeed. WheR an employee has to choose between the two methods of
procedure and cannot get the advice of his immediate ~nperior, he must
have sufficient courage and feel himself free to adopt the one which the
common good demands. In order that he may be in a suitable state of
mind to do this, he mllst have been prepared beEotehand for sllch a sit.Wl-
tion by the example of his snperiors, for example must always come from
above.
 ADMINISTIlATlON
As a result of the increasing complexity of contemporary organiza-
tion, Fayol's hierarchical bridge is coming to be recognized as an
essential to dynamic daily administration. The effectiveness of this
system of organizational communication may depend upon subordi-
nate conformance with superior policy when clearly established; and
when the subject under consideration is breaking new ground, the
success of the system may depend upon subordinates keeping superi-
ors informed of all relevant negotiations being carried on across
hierarchical channels. Still, it is frequently more important for re-
lated administrators or "opposite numbers" from different depart-
ments to clear with one another than for the top executives of
different departments to do so. Without such co-ordination at the
operational level, strange anomalies of administration may occur and
unusual though such instances may be, embarrassing consequences
ensue. Thus, it was once reported that because of the lack of clear-
ance between two Federal bureaus in the same department, the gov-
ernment was bidding against itself for options on the same land. In
another instance, state highway engineers had planned a road, with
its right-of-way passing across the site reserved for a state forest
ranger's tower. In each case a system which would obviate future
conflicts of this sort was established, but the arrangement involved
additional machinery, not only the cultivation of the co-ordinating
habit across the hierarchical ladder.
In the same hierarchy, upper levels of authority may occasionally
be skipped, but such authorities should be informed of these essential
breaches of administrative etiquette. Thus in the 1920'S, Sir William
foynson-Hicks, a popular cabinet minister who was Secretary of the
British Home Office, and who had a great zest for detail, frequently
without dearing with his Permanent Undersecretary, Sir John An-
derson, called in Arthur L. Dixon, Assistant Secretary of the Home
Office in charge of British police affairs, for an interview on specific
matters. Dixon, however, would inform his immediate superior, An-
derson, of Joynson-Hicks' wishes. A wise superior, Anderson would
encourage Dixon to deal directly with Joynson-Hicks, but he always
expected to be kept informed of what happened. And Dixon, a wise
subor4inate, never disappointed him." It is, therefore, practical to
skip up and down the administrative ladder, as well as across; but the
way in which the skipping is done is important.
A sound executive in a superior position welcomes such initiative
on the part of his subordinates, even to the point of encouraging
them to depart from existing procedure, but preserving always the
"right of access" rather_ than invariably enforcing the hierarchical

,. I am indebted to Professor Leonard D. White for this illustnltion.

331 THE OacANIZATION IN PRACTICE

relationship. As Paul Appleby has pointed out: "It is circumvention

that makes the transaction of business possible; it is the chart that
makes the transaction of business responsible." 11

S. DUAL SUPERVISION

Assuming that subordinate employees or agencies can bridge

separate departments, can separate departments supervise the same
subordinate agency? John Millett here demonstrates from his ex-
perience as an administrative officer in the Army Service Forces that
dual supervision is not only possible and proper, but that under the
requirements of modem administration it is essential and inevitable.

JOHN D. MILLETT
"Field Organixation and Staff SuperviSion" 14
Only gradually are administrators and students coming to realize
that technical relationships within an agency are just as important in their
sphere as the so-called "normal" lines of command. It was this fact which
led Macmahon and me to propose a theory of dual supervision. We felt
that it was time to recognize and accept this reality.
I should like to illustrate these generalizations by an example
from the Army Service Forces. One of the staff officers of the Command-
ing General, ASF, is the Surgeon GeneraL He is the principal medical
officer in the ASF, and in the Army as a whole. Yet the general hospitals
of the War Department are administratively under the commanding gen-
erals of service commands and station hospitals are under post com-
manders. Certainly hospitals, and medical care, represent a very highly
specialized field of activity. Why should not all hospitals be run then
wlely by the Surgeon General?
A general hospital is a military post. As such it has problems
common to all military posts. For example, it must have a post engineer,
a post exchange, a message center, food facilities, all kinds of supplies,
and a disbu~ing office. Not so long ago I sat down with the commanding
officer of a large general hospital, and the problems he was worried about
included guards for the prisoners of war doing maintenance work around
the hOSpital, the discharge procedure for soldiers who had received maxi-
mum medical care, and recruitment of civilian personnel. These are prob-
lems of other military posts besides hospitals, and service commands exist
to help post commanders in meeting them.

U Appleby: Policy-Making: and AdministlJl.tion, Chapter 4.

14 John D. Millett; "Field Organization and Staff SupeMsion." New Horizons In
Public Administration. Selected from pp. 108-11, 115-16. Reprinted by permission of
University of Alabama Press. Copyright, 1945, University of A1ahama Press.
332
For similar reasons the station hospibll at a mi1ihuy post is under
the post commander. The latter oflicer does not pretend to ten the hos-
pital under what conditions to use penicillin, or when to administer blood
plasma, or when to operate. Those are decisions only the medical per-
sonnel can make. The post commander does have authority over storage
arrangements for supplies used by the hospital, the hours for civilian
employees, the conditions under which prisoners of war may be used on
the hospital ground, trash and garbage collection, arrangements for the
pay of the enlisted men employed in the hospibJ as orderlies, and similar
aspects of post administration.
The post commander does not try to determine whether the hos-
pital medical personnel is competent in the field of surgery or internal
medicine. Nor does he determine the part that physical therapy is to
play in medical treatment. The role of occupational therapy is another
problem that the post commander does not decide. The medical compe-
tence of a post hospital and of a general hospital is determined in the
first instance by the chief surgeon of the service command. He is a staff
officer of the commanding general. It is his job, however, to inspect medi-
cal care as such. If he finds something wrong, he can correct it in the name
of the commanding general of the service command. Finally, the Surgeon
General decides whether service commands and posts are doing compe-
tent medical jobs. He supervises training, he inspects, he calls for reports,
he prescribes methods of treatment, he experiments with new types of
therapy or drugs at particular hospitals. In the medical field, the Surgeon
General is boss. In the administrative field, he is part of a larger organiza-
tion.
In other words, the Surgeon General is a typical staff officer to
the Commanding General, ASF. In his specialty he develops programs
and plans-he is the final authority on matters medical. His judgment
about DDT, or malaria control, must be and is accepted. But on questions
of supply, construction, use of prisoners of war, pay, discharge, transporta-
tion of wounded, and similar subjects the Surgeon General works with
others, and disagreements must be .referred to the Commanding General
for decision. The Surgeon General, as I have remarked, is a staff officer,
but that does not mean that he makes no decisions or exercises no super-
visory authority. The Surgeon General deals directly with the chief sur-
geon of service commands and in tum with post surgeons. When a new
chief surgeon is desired by a service commander, he turns to the Surgeon
General for advice and actual selection. This is what I mean when I speak
of "dual supervision."
There have been instances during the war when commanders
of troops have been relieved of their command because they refused to
accept the advice of their own specialists on certain technical matters.
The specialists in tum were acting on the advice of superior technical
specialists. It is not enougb to say the instructions should have foHowed
command channels. General policies and directions should, certainly, but
 THE OIlG»HZAT1OII IN PllACTICI
many details may be handled more infonnaUy. They are still commands.
I grant it is not easy to draw the line between general supervision
and technical supervision. I have tried to indicate broadly the distinction.
What we need now is to undemand that there is such a thing as dual
supervision, and to try to harmonize the two.

Dual supervision or joint command is possible despite the organi-

zational tradition that no man can serve two masters. Command
in military as in other forms of administration consists in practice
not only of (1) simple command, to which the essential power to
hire and fire is attached, but also (2) "technical command," which
involves giving specialized dire~tions outside the sphere of the rec-
ognized commander's competence though within his command
jurisdiction. The fact that this non-hierarchical conception of organi-
zation can be enforced in the military sphere, where hierarchy and
authority are so rigidly enforced, is a tribute to its validity.
Dual supervision is widely practiced in civil administration as
well. Holden, Fish, and Smith discovered in their study of business
organizations that many agencies "are directly responsible to the line
executive whom they serve and functionally responsible to the cen-
tral staff office," and, they concluded, "this arrangement can be made
very practicable and effective despite the dual responsibility feature."

6. MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

The essential controls may not be handed down from above nor
need they originate from below; they may emanate from various
points of the organization, particularly from "middle management."
This aspect of the organization in practice was explored in a study
by Mary Cushing Niles, an observant office manager, who gained her
experience in the insurance business.

MARY CUSHINC NILES

Middle Management ,.
Coordination is the central problem of management and the
junior administrators are key people in achieving it, since through them
top management carries out its coordinative responsibilities and since they
affect and in turn are affected by the three-way movement of coordinative
forces, upward, downward, and sideways throughout the organization.

"Holden, Fish, and Smith: Top-Management e>rg.nizatwn anr1 Cnntrol, p. 40.

11 Mary Cushing Niles: Middle Management. Adapted from pp. ix, "7, >47. Re·
printed by pennission of Harper " Brothers. CoP.yright, '941, H~" Brothers.
 Leadership belongs not alone to top management but to the middle fank
as well.
The senior officers are often sufficiently removed from day-t(tday
activities that they may take well-coordinated functioning for grarl ted .
Middle management is vitally concerned in the coordinative probl~ms,
since its members occupy just that middle position between their supeflo_rs
and subordinates, They often share in the difficulties of their superiors l~
arriving at decisions and they necessarily take part in the efforts of f}1elr
subordinates to carry out policies. They transmit orders, decisions, .and
guidance downward; they also take problems, difficulties, and suggest10ns
upward. The lines of communication meet in them, Just as the senior of-
ficers see, hear and analyze problems outside the scope of internal a~­
ministration, so do the junior administrators see, hear, and in the rIlam
deal with the problems vital to internal operation. Middle managedlent
has not recognized its position or its responsibility sufficiently. But t~e
great importance of the middle position is increaSingly apparent and wIll
certainly be more recognized in the future.
The junior administrator occupies the coordinative position be-
tween the higher officers and those immediately charged with the runping
of the work, namely, the supervisors and the rank and file. He intelligently
carries out the policies of the higher management; and when pos~ible
gives suggestions for improving and implementing them. He furnishes
his superiors with information as to the working of their plans and the
progress of both work and personnel; and he assists them as far as he can
to bring about a successful, efficient and happy organization.
To his subordinate supervisors he is a leader as well as a bos5. As
the link between the top management and themselves, he is respllflsi-
ble for transmitting an accurate interpretation of policy and for inspiring
them with a will to carry it loyally into effect, Contrariwise, he is theIr
spokesman in carrying upward suggestions, information, needs and deSires.
He is one of the focal points in the meeting of minds which goes to dlake
up a happy working group,

Professor Leonard D. White has adapted this idea of middle Dlan-

agement to the intermediate and some of the higher positions. of
public administration, such as the bureau chief, the section c1uef,
and other supervisory officers." Charles P. McCormick, Presiden,t of
the McCormick Extract and Spice Company, has extended the Idea
to include a system of "mnltiple management" in which the miMIe
managers serve as a junior board of trustees of his company." In
11 White: Introduction to the Study of Public Administration, third eJition
(1948), Chapter 7. .
.. Charles P. McCormick: Multiple Management. New York: Harper !It Brothers;
193fl. Jobn Lear: "House of a Hundred Bosses.» Saturday Eve~ Post, September
Jl8, 19.46, "Multiple Management a Tool to Stimulate Productivity. ' Factory Ma1Iage-
ment and Maintenance, Octoher 1946,
335 THI OAGANIZATlON IN .IACTlCI

American administration, the utilization of middle management and

junior executives for responsibilities at higher levels of organization
is more widely practiced than preached.

7. TOP MANAGEMENT

The top levels of large corporations and business firms, where ef-
fective and standard organizational usage is said to prevail, also re-
veal blurred lines of demarcation between one level of authority and
another. Top management in business usually falls into three zones:
the "trusteeship function" of the board of directors; the "general
management function" at the chief executive level; and the "depart-
mental or divisional management function" at the operationallevel. lO
Even when more conveniently classified into directors and execu-
tives, top management overlaps in practice, as is shown by the man-
agement studies of Professor John Calhoun Baker of the Graduate
School of Business Administration at Harvard University.

JOHN CALHOUN BAKER

Directors and Their FUlI<:tions 20
Except for the corporate "housekeeping chores" that must be
legally validated by form:!.l board action, there seems to be little uni·
formity in the division of duties between directors and executives. The
president of an outstanding COmpany, who has had broad experience as
a director of many different boards, concluded that directors have three
functions: (1) to find and suppOtt or discharge the president, (2) to have
independent ideas, and (3) to stop action on questionable projects. The
chief executive of a large company concluded his discussion of directors
by giving a list of problems they ought to be considering; this included
public relations, selection of management, organization changes, capital
expenditures, and labor relations. He, too, emphasized the importance of
directors' being qualified to ask questions and check management through
having a sound philosophy and concept of the management function. He
defined his qualifications for directors as consisting of an understanding
of what good organization ought to be, recognition of the right men for
the right executive positions, skill in analyzing plans, and mastery of the
technique of managing by exCeptions to established policies.
Most functions at the top management level call for both ad-
ministrative skill and the trusteeship point of view, with variations in
,. Holden, Fish, and Smith: Top·Management Organization and Control, p. 15.
"John Calhoun Baker: Directors and Their Functions. Selected from pp. 14-17.
Reprinted by permission of Harvard University Press. Copyright, 1945, Harvard Uni-
versity Press.
cmllhasiS. 'The ·drivc fclt profits in top management in most companies
puts sufficient emphasis on the administrative point of view, but fie-
quently the trusteeship obligations are not fully appreciated and are
sometimes almost eompletely overlooked. Directors should be conce:rned
with the administrative aspects at problems and should check to see th;lt
executives secure results. Yet the board should not be preoccupied with
day-to-day administrative operations. Directors need to give their atten-
tion to a large number of management duties calling for a keen sense of
trusteeship which are becoming increasingly prominent: for example.
deciding labor policy, voting dividends, acting on stockholders' com-
plaints, making plans for succession, checking the results of officers, atid
making decisions which might involve conflicts of interest.
Study of the procedures followed by active and successful boards
of directors led to the conclusion that there are at least four major varia-
tions in the way effective boards function on different questions. O,le
procedure has been for the board of directors to take jurisdiction of 1m
issue, to deliberate, and to decide. Usually the board restricts this ptG-
cedure to those areas in which it cannot delegate responsibility. Examples
are the selection of a president, determining his compensation, or makil1g
a radical change in the objective of a business. In dealing with this type
of problem, the board may initiate investigation; in any event, as a grotlp
it goes through the process of deliberating, determining a course of action,
settling or adjudicating conflicts, and coming to a decision. A secortd
type of board procedure relates to its action on decisions made by execu-
tives "subiect to a1,?l?roval by the board." Illustrative of such matters are
the settlement of law·suits, selection of banks, and determination of pro-
grams. Here the board questions and checks on executive proposals. Effec-
tive directors, because they understand business administration, ask dis-
cerning questions. They probe the thoroughness with which executives
diagnose problems and plan proposals. The board, after questioning,
confirms, authenticates, and validates the executive decision; in rare cases
it refuses confirmation. A third procedure by which board members act
is in initial stages of policy formation. When a new line of products is
under consideration or changes in executive organization are contetn-
plated, for example, executives frequently discuss these questions with
board members who counsel, advise, encourage, and guide executives, Of
gives words of caution. A fourth way that boards function is to keep
abreast of executive acts by review of reports and inspection of facilities.
By receiving reports, the board tacitly approves, or at least accepts, the acts
of executives.

Professor Baker's conclusion that directors should decide, con-

firm, counsel, and review, offers a useful basis for a reconsideration
of the frequent practices (by boards in business or legislative bodies
in government) of delving too deeply into operational activities_ So
adjustable must the administrative structure be in practice that even
 THE oaGANIZATION IN PRACTICE

Professor Baker's flexible formula is subject to constant exceptions.

As many responsible administrators haveJearned, a presumably mi·
nor decision delegated downward in the hierarchy sometimes be-
comes a crncial matter for the attention of a superior authority."
American administration follows the formula of constant delegation
to subordinates by higher authorities, but as. Dean Appleby has ex-
plained, when details tum out to be decisive, such authorities reason,
"whenever we are much disturbed about something we are dele-
gating, we shall suspend the delegation." .. An administrative culture
like the Soviet, which makes a more decided effort to concentrate
all crucial decisions, whether major matters or minor details, in an
agency of topmost management like the Politburo, finds it discourag-
ing to organizational initiative to practice such top.level interference
in managerial operations. Yet, as Professor Julian Towstcr has dem-
onstrated, the Politburo continues to "busy itself with the details of
a decision," '" and not without success in the struggle to maintain
determined and dictatorial lines of policy in a complex world.

8. OPERATIONAL SUPERVISION
At the operational levels of the hierarchy, the section chief, the
buck sergeant, and the supervisory foreman occupy 'one of the most
difficult positions in the organization. The foreman is hired for his
ability to carry on effective supervision and to smooth relations with
the men, but actual research shows that here the practical aspects of
organization vary drastically from the expected pattern. In a decade
of extensive studies at the Hawthorne plant of the Western Electric
Company, some of the most revealing data were furnished concern-
ing the dynamics of modern industrial organization." These studies
were carried on largely by F. J. Roethlisberger of the Harvard Grad-
uate School and William J. Dickson of the Western Electric Com-
pany, whose summary volume on the subject is quoted below.
F. J. ROETHLISIEIlCEa AND WILLIAM ,. DICKSON
Management and the Worker"
Examination of the attitudes and behavior of the employees to-
ward the different supervisors did not reveal a simple, sharp dichotomy
21 See Chapter 19 •
.. Appleby: Policy and AdministIation, p. 20.
U Towster: Politic.l Power in the U.s.s.R., p.• 88.
"T. N. Whitehead: The Induttrial Worm, 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard UnJ.
wrsity Pre$$; 1938•
.. F. J. Roethlisberger and William J. Dicbon: Management and the Worker.
Seleeted hom pp. 456-58. Reprinted by permission of Harvard University Press. Copy·
right, 1939, Harvard University Press.
338
between supervisor and employee. Most of the employees looked upon
the group chief very much as one of themselves. They did not regard him
as possessing much authority and they thought nothing of disobeying
him. Although they recognized the section chief as possessing more au-
thority. they did not always obey him either and they frequently argued
with him. But toward the assistant foreman their attitude was quite dif-
ferent. They never disobeyed him or argued about his orders. Their be-
havior when he was in the room was much more restrained than when
only the section chief was present. Toward the foreman they were still
more apprehensive. They not only obeyed him with alacrity but also when
he was present refrained from doing anything that was not strictly accord-
ing to rules. The difference between their attitude toward the group chief
and toward the foreman was well illustrated by the fact that a mild
caution from the foreman was regarded as a "bawling out," but the group
chief would have had to lecture them very severely before they would
have felt that they were being "bawled out."
It has been pointed out that the chief function of the super-
visory organization was to maintain order and control, and, furthermore,
that to maintain control it had to perform two functions: first, orders had
to be transmitted downward essentially as they were given, and, secondly,
accurate information about what happened on the working line had to be
transmitted upward. Examination of the facts showed that both of these
functions fell short of their technical fulfillment. Orders, in the natrow
sense, were carried out. But if orders include the way in which a person is
supposed to execute them and the way he is supposed to conduct himself,
the actuality fell far short of the ideal. Those rules and regulations which
related specifically to conduct were, on the whole, disregarded by the
employees.
The foreman had little opportunity to find out what the situation
was for himself. When he entered the room, the behavior of the men
underwent a sudden change; they acted as they were supposed to while he
was present. The group chief and section chief sided with the men and
did not dare to give the foreman an objective account of the facts. It is
even doubtful if they could have done so; their own hopes and fears were
too much involved. The outcome was that the departmental performance
records became distorted and the foreman remained ignorant of much
that was going on. There was something in the relation between subordi-
nate and superior which inhibited the free upward passage of facts neces-
sary for intelligent control.

Here is a key level of the productive organization of the economy,

where organizational authority apparently is not exerciserl as logically
as is expecterl." For the solution of some of these problems, more
attention to the foreman level of the organization seems essential.
.. F. J. Roethlisbetger: Management and Morale. Cambridge: Harvard University
Press, 194'. See also below, Chapter 14.
 THE ORCANIZATION IN PRACTICE

One of the main difficulties arises from the fact that the foreman's
statns is a difficult and a changing one, especially during a period of
transition in "the politics of economics," such as the period of rapid
industrial unionization during the 1930'S. In his own union circles
the foreman is constantly plagued with the question, "Am I a man-
ager, or am I a worker?" >1

9. SUPERVISING THE BOSS

The orthodox conception of organization is taxed most severely,

when, in many instances, the boss himself has to be supervised by his
subordinates. The anonymous essay which follows demonstrates this
unique process.
"Managing the Boss" ..
Bosses have not only the same failings as their subordinates, but
a whole series of failings peculiar to bosses. All these put them more in
need of being managed than any other members of a large industrial
organization. Boss Management begins in our early youth with the man-
agement of oUI parents. This, however, is Boss Management which can
hardly be described as- "scientific." The true art consists in leading the
boss to your opinion by causing him to think it is his own.
There is the over-enthusiastic boss, for example-most valuable
to any organization when well managed by his subordinates, most dis-
astrous when unmanaged or unmanageable. When a promising plan is
suggested his vigorous imagination, leaping over obstacles, grasps at once
the possibilities. The over-enthusiastic but unmanaged boss may involve
the company in much loss by rushing into unproved ideas on too large a
scale, but the greatest danger of loss, strange to say, is from failure to
utilize sound ideas; for over-enthusiasm is followed in such a temperament
by excessive discouragement. In this difficult phase of Boss Management
it would seem desirable that the first trials of any new idea should be
carried out sub rosa. Preliminary trials should take place in the presence
of those qualified to give practical suggestions only. All bosses should be
rigidly excluded.
A somewhat related boss is the impetuous type, who disregarm

.., Herbert R. Nnrthrup: "The Foreman's Association of America." Harvard Busi·

ness .Review, 1944-45. vol. '3. p. 187. Fritz J. Roethlisberger; "The Foreman; Master
and Victim of Double Talk." Harvard Business Review, vol. '3. p. ,83. Sumner H.
Slichter. Robert D. Calkins, and Willism H. Spohn: ''1De Changing Position of
Foremen in American Industry." Advanced Management. Deoemher 1945, vol. 10,
PP·155-61 •
.. Anonymous; "Managing the Boss." Harper's Magazine. Deoember 19,6, vol.
154, selected from pp. 121-24, 126. Reprinted by permission.
 all system and is impatient of detail_ Such a boss is invaluable for handling
a few larger atfairs-hope1ess for attending to the many routine matters.
The impell.tous boss needs above all else a faithful, sympathetic, hard-
working, but finn assistant. This assistant will "mop up" after his boss,
taking the troQble to find out what has been done, then taking the neces-
sary action to keep the records straight. Smaller matters he will carefully
prevent from ever coming to his boss at all. His assistant needs to be very
firm with him and to insist that the boss shall confine himself smetly to
his own proper field. Unless the assistant has the courage to manag>! his
boss with an irOll hand, constant trouble will arise.
Another type of boss-the bully-needs but little discussirm. The
only way to manage such a boss is to tell him plainly that he must speak
like a gentleman or not speak at all. Such a man generally lcarns quickly
whom he can revile with impunity and whom he must handle more care-
fully.
The most irritating type is the timid boss-he who is always afraid
to take an important step. He encourages investigations and new ideas
and takes an intelligent interest in their progress, but as the moment for
final action arrives he hesitates. "Let us get further information before
deciding," or, "Let us wait and see what Mr. Jones thinks about it," etc.,
etc., anything but, "Let us make our final decision on this at once." So
a project hangs fire indefinitely, never put out of the way by final rejection,
yet never put into operation. The only way to manage a boss of this kind
is for the subordinate to supply the courage which his boss lacks. He must
force the decision and take the responsibility on himself. The result of
this is, if the new idea b.irns out well, the boss takes all the credit; if it
fails, the subordinate gets the blame. However, one who is unwilling to
face this situation is unworthy of a position of responsibility as boss-
manager.
First cousin to the timid boss is the lazy one. Such a boss may
be a man of considerable ability with an attractive personality and excel-
lent judgrnent.,-capable of accomplishing much for the business if he is
properly managed. While the manager of such a boss can remedy the
sitnation somewhat by extra labor to make up for the small amount of
work turned out by his boss, this does not entirely solve the difliculty.
There are some things which only the boss himself can do-some people
that he must see personally, some letters that only he can write. Here
again, an assistant wen versed in the science of Boss Management can in-
crease the output of his department by fifty or a hundred per cent by
skll1ful management. He must goad his boss into action. At times, he win
have to make himself very disagreeable and state things very plainly in
order to overcome the torpor of his chief. He can have the satisfaction
of knowing that his chief will be seeret1y-almost patheticaUy-grateful.
One of the greatest privileges in life is to WOI:k under a boss whom
one can admire and respect-a man who is a real leader, who gives his
own best effort to his WOI:k and exacts the best from those under him_
Such a man may be a hard taskmaster, he may be impatient of incom:
petency, but his subordinates never want to leave him for a boss who will
accept sloppy work. It is tbe greatest stimulus, the greatest inspiration to
work under such a boss.
Too often, however, we must build with the tools at hand. We
must work with the bosses whom fate sends us. In such cases, we can
perform a great service by an intelligent practice of the Science of Boss
Management.

A small but growing body of knowledge is being formed about

such supervisory methods.'" If we are to round out our understanding
of practical organization, these experiences need to be studied even
though they tum prevailing conceptions of organizational hierarchy
upside down.

]0. INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL PROBLEMS IN STRATEGIC

AFFAIRS

The actual lines of organizational authority become especially

blurred as a result of intra-organizational differences .when such dif-
ferences go beyond personal and procedural relations within the hier-
archy, and when they begin to infringe upon matters of policy and
principle. As applied to such important questions as military affairs
and national strategy, the following two selections concerning Rus-
sian history are revealing: (a) Tolstoy'S description of Alexander II's
staff during the Napoleonic wars; and (b) a Canadian Royal Com-
mission report on the case of the Soviet Embassy clerk, Igor
Couzenko, who, after World War II, handed over secret documents
to the Canadian authorities divulging the operations of Russian in-
telligence agencies in their efforts to secure information about the
atom bomb.

1a ) LEO TOLSTOY

War and Peace"

There was in attendance on the Tsar personally not a com-
mander-in-chief's staff, but the staff of the imperial headquarters. The
chief officer of the imperial staff was General-Quartermaster Volkonsky,
and it contained generals, aides-dc-camp, diplomatic officials, and an im-
.. See also R. H. Walton: "How to Get Ideas Accepted by Men Higher Up."
Primer's Inlc, December 21, '94~·
.. Leo Tolstoy.: War and Peace. Selected from pp. S95-99. Reprinted by permission
nf The Modern Library. Copyright, '911, The Modern Library.
342
mense number of foreignets, but it was not a militaIy staff. In this ftSt,
brilliant, haughty, and uneasy world, among aU these conflicting voices,
[there could be] detected the following sharply opposed parties and dif·
ferences of opinion.
The first party consisted of Pfuhl and his followers; military theo-
rists, who believe in a science of war, having its invariable laws-laws of ob-
lique movements, out-Banking, etc. Pfuh] and his adherents dematlded
that the army should retreat into the heart of the country in accord:mce
with the exact principles laid down by their theory of war, and in every de,
parture from this theory they saw nothing but barbarism, ignorance, or evil
intention. To this party belonged Woltzogen, Wintzengerode, and others
-principally Germans. The second party was in direct opposition to the
first. As is always the case where there is one extreme opinion, representa-
tives had come forward of the opposite extreme. This party had ulged
an advance from Vilna into Poland regardless of all previous plans. This
party, while advocating bold action, consisted of the representatives of
nationalism, which made them even more one-sided in their views. 1'hey
were Russians: Bagration, Yermolov, whose well-known joke was much
quoted at the time-a supposed petition to the Tsar for promotion to be a
"German." The members of this party, recalling Suvorov, maintained that
what was wanted was not reasoning and sticking pins into maps, but fight-
ing, beating the enemy, preventing the enemy from getting into Russia,
and keeping up the spirits of the army. To the third party, in which the
Tsar was disposed to place most confidence, belonged the courtiers, who
tried to el'iect a compromise between tbe two contenaing siaes. '1'be mem-
bers of this party-to which Araktcheev belonged-were mostly not mili-
tary men. and they spoke and reasoned as men usually do who have no
convictions, but wish to pass for having them. They admitted that a war
with such a genius as Bonaparte did undoubtedly call for the profoundest
tactical consider~tions and thorough scientific knowledge, and that on that
side Pfuhl was a genius. But, at the same time. they acknowledged that it
could not be denied that theorists were often one-sided, and so one should
not put implicit confidence in them, but should listen too to what Pfuh},s
opponents urged, and also to the views of practical men who had experi-
ence, and should take a middle course.
The largest group, numbering ninety-nine to every one of the oth-
ers, consisted of people who were eager neither for peace nor war, neither
for olfensive operations nor defensive camps; who did not take the side of
Barclay nor of the Tsar, nor of Pfuhl, nor of Bennigsen, but cared only for
the one thing most essential-their own greatest-gain and enjoyment. In
the troubled waters of those cross-currents of intrigue, eddying about the
Tsar's headquarters, success could be attained in very many ways. All the
members of this party were on the hunt after roubles, crosses, and pro-
motions; and in that chase. they simply followed the scent given thw by
the fluctnations of imperial favour. As soon as they saw the imperial
weather-cock shifting to one quarter the whole swarm of these drones be-
gan buzzing away in that direction, making it more difficult for the Tsar
to shift his coune back again.
(b) Report COlICemiag the Sc.viet Embassy at Ottawa, Canada"
It seems that several parallel under-cover ""sterns, or networks,
existed in Canada under the direction of members or the Soviet Embassy
but independent and distinct from Zabotin's [Red Army Intelligence}
organization. Gouzenko testified that there was a five-man committee in
Moscow which passes on Soviet officials who are being sent to foreign
countries. This committee consists of representatives of the N. K. V. D.,
the Military Intelligence, the Naval Service, the Commercial Service and
the Diplomatic Service. However, Gouzenko said:-"Each of them send
their own men and they try to put on more of their own men. Intelligence
tries to put more of their own men; Commercial Service tries to put more
than the Diplomatic, and so on with the other representatives."
In rooms of this secret wing the cipher clerks of the various
branches of the Soviet Mission in Ottawa were located. They numbered
five in al1:-The N. K. V. D. [Soviet Secret Police], the Embassy proper,
the Political Section, the Commercial Section, and the Military. The
N. K. V. D. Section sent its messages to the N. K. V. D. Headquarters in
Moscow; the Embassy, the messages of the Ambassador and his staff, to
the Commissariat for Foreign Affairs; the Political Section, which was
under Goussarov, communicated directly with the Central Committee
of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union; the Commercial Section,
headed by the Commercial Counsellor Krotov, sent its messages to the
Commissariat for Foreign Trade; and the Military Section, headed by
Colonel Zabotin, the Military Attache in Ottawa, communicated with
the director of Military Intelligence in Moscow. All these cipher clerks
operated independently and each one used a different cipher which was
unknown to the others.
The evidence before us is that these members of the Embassy,
who were engaged in improper and inadmissible activities, operated in
special sections of the Embassy, the operations of which were quite dis-
tinct from the official" and legitimate activities of the Soviet Embassy,
and that the Soviet Ambassador, representing in Canada the' Government
of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, had no part in them. Thus
Gouzenko has testified before us that the Soviet Ambassador had no right
of access to the secret rooms in the special wing on the second floor of the
Embassy. Moreover, according to Gouzenko, the Soviet Ambassador had
no right of access to the secret telegrams sent to and received from Mos-
cow by Zabotin, Pavlov and Goussarov, the heads of the military espionage,
N. K. V. D., and "political system" sections respectively.
at The Report of the Royal Commission of Canada to Investigate the Communi·
cation of Secret and Confidential Information to Agents of a Foreign Power, June
'7, 1946, adapted from pp. 12, '9, 87, 638.
 Gouzenko says that in the Embassy, tbl: fact that the Soviet
Union was preparing for a third world war was freely talked about ..He
says there were two schools of thought there. 'Those who were not really
tied in with the Communist Party feared another wor1d war, while those
who were ardent Members of the Party and its subsidiary organizations
really wished for it, because they thought that to be part of the process
leading toward a general upheaval throughout the world which would
result in the establishment of Communism.

The Gouzenko case had some drastic consequences on American

diplomacy, but its significance lay not in the mechanics of espionage
nonnally engaged in during this period, hut rather in the ample evi-
dence that there were significant intra-organizational conflicts con-
cerning strategic policy among the various Soviet authorities them-
selves.

11. INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL PROBLEMS IN INTERNATIONAL

AFFAIRS

Even the reputedly more regulated relations within the American

government have produced evidence of intra-organizational conflicts
over international affairs." This was especially evident at the Cabinet
level where powerful Secretaries carried on internecine struggles in
order to influence the direc~on of foreign policy. The American gov-
ernmental system had to face such organizational conflicts from the
time of its origin. Below are the letters and documents which trace
two such conflicts: the Hamilton-Jefferson feud during President
Washington's administration,.which occurred mainly over American
relations with Revolutionary France; and the Bymes-Wallace feud
during President Truman's administration, which was occasioned by
American relations with Soviet Russia.
(a) Letter from George Washington to Thomas Jefferson, August
23,1792 33
I believe it win be difficult, if not impracticable, to manage the
Reins of Govemment or to keep the parts of it together: for if, instead
.of laying our shoulders to the machine after measures are decided on, one
pulls this way and another that, before the utility of the thing is fairly
tried, it must, inevitably, be tom asunder. And, in my opinion the fairest

at See Chapter 3. .
II F'ttzpatrid:: Letter from George WasbingtOll to Tholnas Jelferson, August 'l,
179'. The WritiDpd George Washington, vol. 3', pp. 13<>-131.
345 THE OltGANIZATION .N 'RACTICE

prospect of happiness and prosperity that ever was presented to man, will
be lost, perhaps for ever!
I do not mean to apply these observations, or this advice to any
particular person, or character. I have given them in the same general terms
to other Officers of the Government; because the disagreements which
have arisen from difference of opinions, and the attacks which have been
made upon almost all the measures of government, and most of its Exec-
utive Officers, have, for a long time past, filled me with painful sensations;
a.'1d cannot fail I think, of producing unhappy consequences at home and
abroad.

(b) Letter from Thomas Jefferson to George Washington,

September 9, 1792"
That I have utterly, in my private conversations, disapproved of
the system of the Secretary of the Treasury, I acknowledge and avow. Has
abstinence from the department, committed to me, been equally observed
by him? To say nothing of other interferences equally known, in the case
of the two nations, with which we have the most intimate connections,
France and England, my system was to give some satisfactory distinctions
to the former, of little cost to us, in return for the solid advantages yielded
us by them; and to have met the English with some restrictions which
might induce them to abate their severities against our commerce. I have
always supposed this coincided with your sentiments.
Yet the Secretary of the Treasury, by his cahals with members
of the Legislature, and by high·toned declamations on other occasions,
has forced down his own S'jst::!m, which was exactly the reverse. He under-
took, of his own authority, the conferences with the ministries of those
two nations, and was, on every consultation, provided with some report
of a conversation with the one or the otht:r of them, adapted to his views.
These views, thus made to prevail, their execution fell, of course, to me;
and I can safely appeal to you, who have seen all my letters and proceed-
ings, whether I have not carried them into execution as sincerely as if
they had been my own, though I ever considered them as inconsistent with
the honor and interest of our country. That they have been inconsistent
with our interest is but too fatally proved by the stab to our navigation
given by the French. So that if the question be by whose fault is it that
Colonel Hamilton and myself have not drawn together? the answer will
depend on that to two other ques-tions, whose principles of administration
best justify, by their purity, conscientious adherence? and which of us has,
notwithstanding, stepped farthest into the control of the department of
the other?
.. Letter from Thom.. Jd!erson to George Washington. September 9. 179•.
Andrew A. Lipscomb (ed.): The Writings of Thomas Je!ferson. The Thomas Jd!erson
Memorial Association: 1904, vol. 8. selected from pp. 39;-<J9.
 AOMIIftSTIA_

(c) Letter from Alexander Hamiltolt to Georce WaslMgtoa.·

SepteInIIer 9, 1192"
I cannot conceal from you, that I have had some instrumentality
of late in the retaliations which bave fallen upon certain public characters,
and that I find myself placed in a situation not to be able to recede for the
present.
I considered myself as compelled to this conduct by reasons public
as wen as personal, of the most cogent nature. I know that I have been an
object of uniform opposition from Mr. Jefferson, from the moment of his
coming to the city of New York to enter upon his present office. I know
from the most authenic sources, that I have been the frequent subject of
the most unkind whispers and insinuations from the same quarter. As long
as I saw no danger to the government from the machinations which were
going on, I resolved to be a silent sufferer of the injuries which were done
me. I determined to avoid giving occasion to any thing which could mani-
fest to the world dissensions among the principal characters of the govern-
ment; a thing which can never happen without weakening its hands, and
in some degree throwing a stigma upon it.
Nevertheless, I pledge my honor to you, sir, that if you shall here-
after form a plan to reunite the members of your admini$ation upon
some steady principle of cooperation, I will faithfully concur in executing
it during my continuance in office, and I will not directly or indirectly
say or do a thing that shall endanger a feud.

Id) Message from James F. Byrnes to Harry S. Truman.

September 18. 1946"
If it is not possible for you, for any reason, to keep Mr. Wallace,
as a member of your Cabinet, frolll speaking on foreign affairs, it would be
a grave mistake from every point of view for me to continue in office, even
temporarily. Therefore, if it is not completely clear in your mind that Mr.
Wallace should be asked to refrain from criticizing the foreign policy of
the United States while he is a member of of your Cabinet, I must ask
you to accept my resignation immediately. At this critical time, whoever
is Secretary of State must be known to have the undivided support of your
administration and, so far as possible, of the Congress.
I shall, of course, remain here [at the Paris Peace Conference}
until my successor arrives. In case you are not ready to make that appoint-
ment promptly, you can, of course, appoint someone other than the Sec-
retary of State to head the United States delegation at the Peace Cenfer-
ence.
.. Frederick C. Prescott (ed.); A1exandet Hamilton and Thomas ldkrson. SeJected
from pp. '32-4. Reprinted by pennission of the American Book Co. Copyright j934,
American Book Co. •
.. Message from James Byrnes to Hany Truman, September 18, 1946. J. F. Byrnes:
Spealing FrmJ:Jy. P. 240. Reprinted by permission of Harper 6: Brothers. Copytight.
1947, Harper 6: Brothenl.
 THE ORGANIZATION IN PRAClICI

{el Stltemeftt of Harry S. Trallllll to the Press,

September 21, 1946 aT
I have today asked Mr. Wallace to resign from the Cabinet It
had become clear that between his views on foreign policy and thosl: of
the administration-the latter being shared, I am confident, by the great
body of our citizens-there was a fundamental conflict. We could not
permit this conflict to jeopardize our position in relation to other C<lun-
tries. I deeply regret the breaking of a long and pleasant official association,
but I am sure that Mr. Wallace will be happier in the exercise of his right
to present his views as a private citizen.
(f) Henry WaHaee's Letter to Harry S. Truman,
September 21,1946 38

As you requested, here is my resignation. I shall continue to fight

for peace. I am sure that you will join me in that great endeavor.

Although such conflicts may take the form of personal feuds be-
tween departmental executives, they are actually a means of cleating
conflicting policies within an organization. At the lesser leveh of
most organizations, the issues seem to be less momentous, but the
process of intra-organizational adjustment is fully 'as intense.

Organizational activity and power do not always follow formal

lines of responsibility and authority. It is unrealistic either to jUdge
an organization or to operate it according to the chart. Once the
dogma of final authority is abandoned, it becomes clear how adminis_
tration can be conducted across hierarchical cgannels without C:on-
stant appeals to the top executive. Among the' practical means for
making the formal or hierarchical organization work more effectively
is greater use of dual supervision, (which combines technical control
with formal command) and middle management (which enlists the
skill of those closest to the problems encountered by the organiza_
tion) . For its part, top management contributes to more, effective or-
ganizational practice by concentrating on confirmation and revie", of
administrative policy and procedure, and by reducing to a minim 11m,
but not abandoning, its interest in operations. The foreman level,
where operational supervision has its most direct effect, is increas-
IT Statement of Harry S. Truman to the Press, September u, 1946. New fork
Times, September 21, 1946, p. 3
.. Henry WaIJace's letter to Harry Truman, September 21, 1946. New York Times,
September 21, 1946, p. 3.
ingly recognized as a crucial poiDt in the administrative $I:ructure.
Contrary to existing ot:gani2ational tradition is the fact that "boss
management" is frequently practiced by capable subordinates and
not unwillingly accepted by sagacious superiors. Issues of major pol-
ity cannot be wholly avoided even in such fields of administration as
national strategy or international relations as a result of the intra-
organizational conflicts which becloud all hierarchical relations. In
practice, therefore, organizations conducting all types of functions
are faced with the necessity of adjusting their formal structure to the
dynamics of daily administration.
 CHAPTER 1WELVE

THE CEOCRAPHY OF ORGANIZATION

Another phase of organization which lends itself to concrete and

graphic analysis is the spatial or geographical. What the chart reveals
about scalar or the vertical hierarchy, and about staH-and-line organi_
zation or its horizontal structure, the map can demonstrate about the
spatial phase or the geography of an organization. In business admin-
istration, it is possible thus to depict the central office and its branch
.n'b'lll.ni:r.at.inp .nr .t.h!- .!'.n'il'maMP .~U\~U' ..at0 .it· .n1\t~'!iW -'iltb-
sidiaries, factories, and enterprises in the field. In American public
administration, organizational geography deals with the overlapping
Federal, state, and local governments; or with the regional distri(~ts
of Federal departments, the administrative areas of state agencies
and the wards and precincts of municipal authorities. Theories and
generalizations involving the relations between administrative al-ea
and administrative authority constitute a sparse body of literatUre
although the problems of administrative geography are probably a~
old as human organization. These problems have become more in-
tensified, and in some respects more manageable as a result of mC)d_
ern communication and transportation.'

1 Am<mg the basic and comprehensive theoretical discussions are: H. C. Wells:

"Anticipations." Fortnightly Review, vol. 7S, Apnl, May. and June 1901. pp. 747-60
9zS-38, "04->1. Harold 1. Laski: The Problem of Administrative Areas. NO'th:
hampton: Department of History of Smith College; 1918. Smith College Studies in
History, vol. 4. October 1918. James Fesler: !\rea and Administration. Tuscal<JGsa:
University of A1ahama Press; '949.
349
350

1. CENTRALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

The primary issue is one of centralization versus decentralization,

which are two extremes of geographically organized administrative
activity. These alternatives are explained below by two nineteenth
century writers; (a) Walter Bagehot, a versatile English banker and
economist, literary critic, social scientist, and author of the popular
treatise Physics and Politics, written during the Darwinian scientific
vogue; and (b) Alexis de TocqueviIle, the French observer of Amer-
ican democracy.

(a) WALTER BACEHOT

"Despot and Satrap'"

In early times, when a despot wishes to govern a distant province,
he sends down a satrap on a grand horse, and other people on little horses;
and very little is heard of the satrap again unless he sends back some of the
little people to tell what he has been doing. No great labour of superin-
tendence is possible. Common rumour and casual report are the sources
of intelligence. If it seems certain that the province is in a bad state, satrap
NO.1 is recalled, and satrap No. 2. sent out in his stead. In civilized coun-
tries the process is different. You erect a bureau in the province you want
to govern; you make it write letters and copy letters; it sends home eight
reports per diem to the head bureau in St. Petersburg. Nobody does a sum
in the province without some one doing the same sum in the capital, to
"check" him, and see that he does it correctly. The consequence of this is,
to throw on the heads of departments an amount of reading and labour
which can only be accomplished by the greatest natural aptitude, the most
efficient training, the most firm and regular industry.

(b) ALEXIS DE TOCQUEV1LLE

Democracy in America •

Centralization is a word in general and daily use, without any

precise meaning being attached to it. Nevertheless, there exist two dis-
tinct kinds of centralization, which it is necessary to discriminate with
accuracy. Certain interests are common to all parts of a nation, such as the
enactment of its general laws, and the maintenance of its foreign relations.

2 "The Character of Sir Robert Peel." The Works ami Life at Walter Bagebot,
Mrs. Russel Barrington, ed .• 856, vol. 1, p. 193. Reprinted by permission ·of Long-
mans, Green and Co., Inc. Copyright, 191;. Longmans, Green and Co., Inc.
• De T ocqueviHe: Democracy in America, selected from vol. I, pp. 86, 94. 9;.
Reprinted by permission at Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. Copyright, '94;, Alfred A. Knopf,
Inc.
JSl THI GIOCaAPHY OF GaGANI%ATION

Other interests are peculiar to certain parts of the nation, such, for in-
stance, as the business of the several townships. When the power that
directs the former or general interests is concentrated in one place or in
the same persons, it constitutes a centralized government. To concentrate
in like manner in one place the direction of the latter or local interests,
constitutes what may be termed a centralized administration.
It is not the administrative but the political effects of decentrali-
zation that I most admire in America. In the Umted States the interests
of the country are everywhere kept in view; they are an object of solicitude
to the people of the whole Union, and every citizen is as warmly attached
to them as if they were his own. He takes pride in the glory of his nation;
he boasts of its success, to which he conceives himself to have contributed;
and he rejoices in the general prosperity by which he profits. The feeling
he entertains towards the State is analogous to that which unites him to
his family, and it is by a kind of selfishness that he interests himself in the
welfare of his country.
I believe that provincial institutions are useful to all nations, but
nowhere do they appear to me to be more necessary than among a demo-
cratic people. In an artistocracy order can always be maintained in the
midst of liberty; and as the rulers have a great deal to lose, order is to them
a matter of great interest. In like manner an aristocracy protects the pcople
from the excesses of despotism, because it always possesses an organized
power ready to resist a despot. But a democracy without provincial insti-
tutions has no security against these evils. How can a populace unaccus-
tomed to freedom in small concerns, learn to use it temperately in great
affairs? What resistance can be offered to tyranny in a country where each
individual is weak and where the citizens are not united by any common
interest? Those who dread the license of the mob and those who fear
absolute power ought alike to desire the gradual development of provincial
liberties.

Ancient administration was not always as despotic or decentral-

ized as Bagehot believed.' Nor was the American form of decentral-
ization as completely beneficial as de Tocqueville implied. De
Tocqueville himself was hesitant about some of the "dIfferent effects"
of American decentralization and at one point admitted: "The Amer-
icans seem to have overstepped the limits of sound polIcy, in isolating
the administration of the government; for order, even in secondary
affairs, is a matter of national importance."· Yet Bagehot's descrip-
tion of centralization and de Tocqueville's analysis of decentralization
• See, for example, the communi<:ations between the Roman proYindal governor
Pliny and the Emperor Trojan, which concerned detailed decisions on such subjects
as provindal justice, taxation, public works, and local religiOIlS afiairs. Letten, Plinins,
CaeciIius Secundus. Tmnslated by William Melmotb. New York: 'The Macmillan
Company; 191 S.
• De Tocqueville: Democracy in America, vol. 1, pp. 88--8<).
 3$2
present the two general patterns along which organizational systems
tend to develop geographically.

2. THE CI1IZEN'S VIEW OF GOVERNMENTAL GEOGRA'HY

The spatial pattern of American government has not, during the

twentieth century, remained as decentralized nor as democratically
responsive as de Tocqueville found it. From the individual citizen's
point of view, the problem of administrative areas, local and national,
is of growing concern. Citizen reaction to the problem is sympathet-
ically presented in the following readings by: (a) James Fesler,
Professor of Political Science at the University of North Carolina,
whose experience with the Federal war production agencies put him
into close contact with a central program designed to encourage local
initiative; and (b) Ferdie Deering, an Oklahoma journalist and radio
reporter interested in both agricultural and business affairs.

(a) JAMES FESUR

Area and Administratiott •

The questions growing out of the vertical distribution of authority
can be appreciated only from what I call, with no disrespect, the worm's
eye or under-all view of the ordinary citizen. We are accustomed to phrase
the problem as if the national government is the unity, from which lines
fan out to 48 state governments, from each of which in tum lines diverge
to hundreds or thousands of counties, cities, towns, and special districts.
Instead of this theistic view, with government as the god-center of the uni-
verse, the humanistic view starts with tbe individual citizen as the point
from which to gain sound perspective. It is on him that all governmental
activities converge. Unless they make sense at the point of convergence,
no mechanical harmony at each of the governmental centers from which
these impulses originate can be accepted as an index of sound statecraft.
From his under-all position the citizen looks upward through the
many layers of government that minister to his needs, regulate his freedom
of action, and demand his financial support. Unless he is in a rural area,
he is a citizen of a town or city, a county, a state, and the nation-four
levels of general government. In addition, he can hardly avoid falling
within a school district that, independently of the general govemments,
educates his children and obtains some of his money for taxes. Quite
possibly. especially in rural areas, he will also be within the jurisdiction
of two or more other types of special district.
What does this citizen ask for in this complex of governments?
-::-:----:=--:--
• James Fesler: Area am! Administratioa. Pp. 9-11. Reprinted by permission of
University of Alabama Ptcss. COpyright. 1949, University of Alabama P,_,
353
Certainly, that functions wholly allocated to one or another layer shall be
so allocated as to be efficiently performed, cost the least money per unit
of service, and be subject to effective democratic control by himself and
bis feI1ow-citizens; that in the case of functions shared by two or more
layers of government there shan be adequate methods of collaboration be-
tween such layers; that the multiple-layer system shall not be so canonized
and further complicated as to elude his comprehension, for without such
comprehension democratic control languishes; that layers of government
whose areas have ceased to be adequate for their original functions shall
either be abolished outright or be expanded or contracted to more ap-
propriate dimensions. These are not unreasonable demands.

(b) FERDIE DEERINe:

"When to Sow and When to Reap'"
The two long lines of waiting farmers shifted restlessly, edging a
step nearer the long counter where two teen-age girls were busily trying to
to answer their questions. Another farmer paused in the doorway, studied
the queues momentarily, shook his head, and then hurried away. There was
no levity in the county office of a branch of the United States Department
of Agriculture that morning. Greenbugs had all but wiped out the winter
wheat crop in the section, and farmers were in no mood for fun. The foggy
atmosphere outside penetrated the gloomy courthouse corridors and
seemed to intensify the ever-present odor of strong disinfectants. As each
farmer, or farmer's wife, approached the counter, those in the line behind
craned their necks slightly, perhaps not so much out of curiosity concerning
their neighbors' business as to relieve the utter boredom of waiting. Finally,
the shy little man in the yellow slicker and muddy rubber boots reached
his turn. He was about forty-five years old, lean and slightly stooped, but
appeared fully capable of doing a fuJI day's work on anybody's farm. He
was what most persons would call "just an ordinary farmer."
"I live about fifteen miles west of here," the man in the slicker
said, after he had told the girl bis name. "The greenbugs ate up my wheat
crop, and I want to plow it up and plant a feed crop. I want to know if
that's all right." The girl rustled through a couple of drawers in the file
cabinet and returned with a folder bearing the man's name and containing
a sheaf of official-looking papers. She thumbed through them, studying
first this one and then that one. Apparently failing to find anything that
would answer the farmer's question, she stepped into au adjoining room to
confer briefty with a man who seemed to be in charge of a corps of girls
working at huge stacks of papers and aerial photographs on the desks there.
As she came back to the counter, the farmer watched her with hopeful,

'Ferdie Deering: "When to Sow and When to Reap." USDA, Manager of Amer·
ClIIl Agriculture. Pp. 3-,. Reprinted by permission of Oniversity of Oklahoma Press.
Copyright, 1~45, University of Oklahoma Pless.
354
questioning eyes. It was late in the season, and the ground bad to be br0-
ken SOQn if any kind of crop was to be grown. But he wanted to "co-oper.
ate" with the prograJD, he had told her, and he thought he had better
check up before he did anything about planting. He did not want to lose
out on the crop insurance the government had on his wheat, either. "We
don't seem to have that information," the girl told him. "'They're still
working on the new program, and we haven't received it from the state
office yet. I'm sorry, but unbl we get it, we don't know what to tell you.
We'd rather not teU you anything than to tell you wrong. Mr. Smith
thinks the information will be here by the first of next week, and if you'll
come back then, we probably will have the information on the new pro-
gram." She turned to the next farmer, or "co-operator," as program em-
ployees refer to individual farmers. Some branches of the Department of
Agriculture call the farmers they deal with "clients," and to others they
are sometimes known as "demonstrators." Occasionally they are called
"farmers," but most of the time they are spoken of as "co-operators" or
nonco-operators," according to the attitude they take toward government
farm programs.
The shy man in the yellow slicker shuffled out of the room, to
drive back home on his thin tires, wondering. Should he wait another
week before getting ready to plant his crop? Should he risk the displeasure
of the program compliance officers by going ahead in planting the crop?
Could he afford to lose another day next week and burn two gallons more
of his rationed gasoline to come back again for the information he needed?
Whatever course he chose, he obviously was puzzled by the "guv'ment
program" that kept him from making decisions about the operation of
his farm and yet delayed making the decisions for him until it was dan-
gerously late.
Thus the heavy hand of regulatory government bears down upon
American farmers, traditionally the world's freest people. In this common-
place instance and in a thousand other ways the force of laws and regula-
tions and rules and directives issued by authorities of a centralized govern-
ment are being felt by farmers directly, and indirectly by industrial
workers, white-collar employees, merchants, manufacturers, processors,
and consumers throughout the nation and throughout the world.

Undoubtedly, the changing geography of American administra-

tion gives evidence of greater complexity and increased remoteness
from the standpoint of individual citizens. Is it possible, however,
that although centralized administration is less democratically respon-
sive, it may nevertheless be more democratically responsible in prop-
ping up the national economy and in providing services essential to
maintain individual security? Controversial as some of these central-
izing solutions may be, in few countries of the world do we find so
much solicitude for retaining local powers and state rights, even to
 TIlE C£OQRAPIfY OF ORGANIZATION

the point of endangering the national program, as in the United

States. This fact is revealed in the extensive administrative arrange-
ments for local units of government, Federal grants-in-aid, and even
the newer regional agencies.

3. UNITS OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES

The overlapping structure of local, state, and Federal government

has been thoroughly studied by Professor William Anderson, chair-
man of the Department of Political Science at the University of
Minnesota, who has been a leader in American research and teaching
in the field of public administration. Professor Anderson's compre-
hensive views and constructive recommendations concerning the
local units of American government are presented below.

WILLIAM ANDERSON
The Units of Government in the United States 8

In the United States we generally recognize the following tiers

or levels of units of government: .
A. Units of central government
1. The nation
2. The states
B. Units of local government
3. The counties (and parishes {in Louisiana)
4. Cities, villages, boroughs, incorporated towns, towns, and town-
ships
5. School districts
6. Other special districts

COMPARISON OF THE NUMBER OF UNITS OF GOVERNMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES IN 1930-33 AND IN 194'
'930-1931 1941
The nation.......... .. ........ .
The states .......... .... .. ......... .
Counties (in 46 states) and parishes (in 1 state) .......... . 3,050
In~~:\ p~. :cities'. ~il~ges'. ~tc: •. ~nd.the. ~is:ri~. o~.. 16,366 16,:62
Towns (as in New England) and organized townships (in a
total of 23 states) ...... , 20,.62 18.998
School districts ....... . .. , ' , , , ... , . ... 127.108 118,308
Other units ........ ' .. , . . . 8.,80 8.382
TOTAL ...................................... 175.418 .65,049
• William Anderson: The Unin of Government in the United States. Adapted
from pp. l, n, 18-'9. 44-47. Reprinted by permission of Public Administration
Service. Copyright, 1945, Public Administration Service.
 The units enumerated in Table 1 fall naturaUy into two main
groups--central and local. 'The distinctions between these classes are not
based upon differences in size of area or population. There are many
counties in the West with areas larger than some eastern states, and there
are a number of cities and counties with populations larger than those of
some states, both East and West.
Students of local governments are well aware of certain regional
differences in the pattern of local government in the United States. 'The
New England states emphasize the town and city, and thus can get along
with relatively few counties, school districts, and other special districts.
The South Atlantic and South Central states center general local govern-
ment in their counties, have proportionately few incorporated places, and
no organized townships, but do indulge a penchant for special districts
for school and other purposes. 'The Mountain and Pacific coast regions
have systems much like those in the South, but have proportionately
more incorporated places and special districts. In the Atlantic and East
North Central regions in addition to a layer of counties there is usually
a fairly complete layer of minor divisions (incorporated places and or-
ganized townships) as well as a layer of school districts, plus a number of
other special districts. In the West North Central region this three-level
system is repeated and brought to its highest peak so far as numbers in
proportion to popUlation are concerned. When individual states are con-
sidered Illinois still leads the nation with 15,629 local governmental units.
We have, then, several questions to answer. First, is it desirable in
rural as in urban areas to have only a single important administrative unit
in each defined area? 'This certainly seems to be the case. In the same
county area there may be one board for general county business, and an-
other for administering school affairs, but that the areas should coincide
and that budgets and debt questions should somehow be settled in com-
mon for the area can hardly be disputed. It is assumed, of course, that
cities and villages within the county will have their own separate govern-
ments for local urban purposes.
Second, assuming the county to be the main administrative unit
in rural areas, what factors should determine its size? Topography, dis-
tance, and population density cannot he wholly ignored, but so far as
possible the administrative efficiency and economy of the more expensive
functions should control. 'These functions are roads, schools, and welfare
work, as a rule.
. Third, when one of these services (roads) calls for a really large
unit, and the other (schools) could be handled by either a somewhat
smaller unit or equally well jf not better by the same large unit, which
size unit should be selected-the larger or the smaller? The answer is
obviolls. 'The larger is to be preferred, since it involves no financial or
other loss, whereas the choice of the smaller size of unit would involve
loss. It must always be remembered, also, that the larger units generally
attract abler men both to their boaJds and to positions under them, and
357 TIll GIOCIAPIIY OF 0itGAN1ZATIOH

that the tax burden is more widely and evenly distributed when units ale
large.
Fourth, will there not be some loss due to increased expense jn
other departments? Our studies in Minnesota suggest the opposite.
When counties are ranged according to population, we find that tIle
ordinary county expenses per capital, including overhead, decrease very
noticeably as we advance from the least populous to the more pOpUl0l1S
counties.
If the conclusions tentatively reached in the preceding discussion
be now applied, what would be the units of local government in. tile
United States? About how many would there be? The approach, be it
remembered, is mainly from the viewpoints of administrative efficien~y
and fiscal economy. Thus qualified, the conclusions are as follows:
First, there would be no separate school districts in the country
whatsoever. Under state control and supervision the several counti~S,
cities, larger towns, and larger villages would administer the local schools
within their limits. Advisory and even administrative school boards migjlt
exist in many places, but not separate corporate school districts.
Second, practically all other special districts would also disappear
through the application of our principle. In metropolitan districts sonle
exceptions might be made in order to create larger units for certain pllr-
poses. A drainage system involving parts of several cOUl:tties would be a
case coming within the exception, but an ad hoc federation of the counties
and municipalities concerned would be a more logical solution and would
i)"\ i)ttl:S,~\",\-e \b-e ~'ta\~= ,,'i ",i) ",~~~\:'ml"'\ "'i):'\.
Third, townships in most of the Middle Western and sevefal
Middle Atlantic states would cease to exist as important governing units,
but might continue as areas to the extent needed for the local adminisUa-
tive and election purposes of the county.
Fourth, the towns of the New England states are in general in a
different position from that of the township. Many of them are urlfon
and industrial, and are more like the cities and villages than are the town-
ships of the Middle West [and] have useful functions to perform.
Fifth, for the more local and urban purposes, cities, villages,
boroughs, incorporated towns, and many of the towns of New Englafl d
would remain as they now are, although many of the smallest villages have
little reason for separate corporate existence.
Sixth, in the main urban centers there would be the city-<:ourJty
type of unit, like the county-borough in England, handling all the fmlC-
tions of a city, a county, and a school district.
Seventh, in rural areas, and in areas partly urban and partly rural,
the county would ·be the main unit for performing services of state-wide
importance, including education, and also for providing the rural local
services. It might also take over water supply, street maintenance, alld
street lighting for the smaller villages. The number of cOlmties would,
however, be reduced.
358
These eliminations and consolidations would result in the follow-
ing numerical arrangement of local units:
A RATIONALIZED SCHEME OF LOCAL COVERNMENT
UNITS FOR THE UNITED STATES
UNITS
City-Counties (each having a central city of at least ;0,000
population) ......... _......................... _......... . %00
Counties (rum.I and part-rural) ................................ . 2,100
Incorpomted Places (including the larger towns in New England) > . , . 15.000
MisceDaneous Units ......................................... . 500
TOTAL ............................................ . 17,800

The total here is approximately one-ninth of the number of units

now in existence. The average state, instead of having nearly 3,500 local
units, would have about 370.
The difficulties involved in bringing about such sweeping changes
in local government as are here suggested should not be forgotten. Forty-
eight different states must act. Forty-eight constitutions must be amended.
Forty-eight legislatures must be induced to legislate. [Yet] it is a goal
dictated by the need for greater efficiency and genuine economy in a
system of local government that must meet the needs of life in the
twentieth century, instead of clinging blindly to the forms of a bygone
age. A strong and efficient system of local government is a necessity for
the progressive development of real democracy and the maintenance of
economical and effective publiC services.

This complex map of American governmental authorities has

thus been undergoing a slow modification. Still, without sweeping
legislation, some of the lesser units have already shown a tendency
"to atrophy and ultimately to disappear." • Nor is the effect of the
existing duplication as serious as it appears. In addition to the com-
mon democratic heritage which even such structuxal confusion Can-
not destroy, the American political party system furnishes a loose
form of integration for this overlapping and decentralized system of
local units. From the standpoint of the specialized services rendered,
moreover, an inventory of actual governmental activities performed
by overlapping units shows that for certain classes of authorities the
duplication is more apparent than reaPo Yet we may expect the
trend toward reduction and integmtion of units of government,
noted by Anderson, to accelexate under the pressure for governmental
economy and efficiency. The result may be achieved not merely by
legal disestablishment of some of these classes of governmental units,
• Anderson: Units of Government in the United States, p, ...
10 CarlH. Chatters and Marjorie L, Hoover: "An ~ of Covetnmental
~ in the United States." ChicagO: Municipal Ymam::e 08icm Association;
1947·
 THE CEOGIIAPHY OF OItCANIZATION

such as the "deotganization" of local governments in various sections

of the country, but also by intergovernmental contracts and co-oper-
ative anangements which leave the units independent in name only."

4. MUNICIPAL AND METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT

It is in the metropolitan areas of the country that the existing

governmental structure is most chaotic. Here too the overlapping and
special governmental authorities mentioned by Professor Anderson
have flourished in the hope of solving the constantly emerging ptob-
lems of urban life. Thus an independent "mosquito abatement dis-
trict" had to be created in the Chicago area; and in Los Angeles
county a special "air pollution control district" was required. The offi-
cial report which follows describes the metropolitan problem in the
United States during the 1930'S.

UItBANISM COMMITTEE
"Urban Areas and Authorities" "
There are in the United States 175,000 independent units of local
government, but the chaos of authorities is most pronounced in the large
urban areas and particularly in the ¢ metropolitan districts. Occupying
only 36,578 square miles or 1.2 percent of the total land area of the coun-
try, these districts contain not only 54.754,000 people or 45 percent of the
total population, but the most profuse and confusing bundle of independ-
ent local jurisdictions to be found the world over. The complexity of local
government in urban areas is the result of two factors: First, the accumu-
lation of independent suburbs and satellite cities adjacent to the central
metropolitan city; and second, overlapping these cities and suburbs of the
metropolitan districts are several layers of different sized, bewilderingly
bounded governmental areas with separate legal and fiscal identities-
counties, townships, school districts and special districts of all kinds, in-
cluding sanitary, sewer, library, health, park, forest preserve, street light-
ing, utility, water and even mosquito abatement districts. More than
17,000,000 of our 55,000,000 metropolitan inhabitants, or one-third of our
total population, are submbanites who either spend most of their waking
day in the central city or depend on it as a place of livelihood, shopping,
or culture. On the other hand, the residents of the central city depend
upon the suburban area for their business and recreation.
While metropolitan life overflows the artificial network of urban

U Judith N. Jamison: "Neighboring Areas Join Hands." National Municipal Re·

view. March 1946. vol. 35. pp. "'-14.
12 Urbanism Committee: "Urban Areas and Authorities." National Resources Com·
mittee: Urban Government. Vol. 1. '939. selected from pp. n, ~9-30. 3$·
 boundaI}' lines, each little bailiwick of government preserves its iJldepend-
ent island of authority, with odd results. Urban planning, highway con-
struction, transport facilities, parks and recreational preserves too fre-
quently must await the pleasure of minor suburbs which may have some
special reasons for blocking needed improvements. Equally serious is the
political indifference and neglect arising from the retirement into the
suburbs of large blocs of urban citizenI}' who, merely because they cast
their ballot in suburban towns, lose all civic concern in the city governing
the core of their urban community and who, if they have any progressive
interest in local government at all, must content themselves with pro-
grams of governmental reform in their own little suburban settlements.
Metropolitan government is not only cumbersome in form; it is costly in
practice.
Cities are engaging in extra-State activity because, as we have
seen, almost one-fourth of the metropolitan areas of the United States
containing over 25,000,000 people straddle State lines, and cities cannot
therefore restrict their daily administrative activities or their legal rela-
tions to anyone State. It is quite possible that the gap between the city
in its local and in its national setting can be filled only by Federal arrange-
ments of the kind which are slowly developing in the field of Federal-city
relations and services. It was the Federal Census of 1880 which first
officially gave expression to the metropolitan concept for the New York
Region; it was the Federal Statistics of Cities of 1890 which first at-
tempted to measure the suburban movement in terms of transportation
data; it was the Federal financial statistics which in 1Sw first gave realistic
expression to the city not as a city corporate but as a bundle of overlapping
jurisdictions; and it was the Federal Bureau of the Census which during
the decade 1910--1920 developed a nation-wide uniform definition of
metropolitan districts. It may be there is no satisfactory alternative to
special treatment for our urban and metropolitan districts, unless it ex-
. presses itself in such a continuing set of interests on the part of the Fed·
eral Government.

This description of the complexities of urban government came

from an official report of a Federal agency which should theoretically
not concern itself directly with local governmental problems gener-
ally reserved to the states. Yet the problem of supporting urban
government was so pressing during the economic crisis of the 1930's,
for example, that the mayors of large cities circumvented their state
authorities and dealt directly with the Fede.ral government on the
harassing problems of relief and recovery. Unless the states, in the
future, adopt a more constructive policy toward the urban problem,
strategic and other emergency considerations may again encourage
the metropolitan districts to by-pass the States. The result may be a
Federal program of direct services to cities, as only through such
361 THE CEOCItAPHY Of ORGANIZATION

drastic means may "the maze of urban areas and authorities be mas-
tered." ..

5. STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

There has also been a tendency to administer Federal agricultural

services in direct contact with county authorities and individual
farmers, as in the case of soil conservation and other rural programs.
On the whole, however, Federal administration of such services has
been kept within the existing framework of Federal-state relation-
ships largely by means of the American system of Federal grants-in-
aid to the individual states. The position of the state in relation to
the Federal government is a more important problem than Federal-
local relations. Theoretically in possession of sovereign governmental
powers but practically handicapped in many cases by inadequate
fiscal resources, the states are the crucial units on the evolving govern·
mental map of the United States. This situation has been thoroughly
demonstrated by the studies of Professor V. O. Key, Jr., of the De-
partment of Political Science at Johns Hopkins University. Professor
Key's research on the American political party systelp, together with
his work as a staff member of several Federal agencies, has enabled
him to give a balanced evaluation of the many political and adminis-
trative factors which influence the American system of Federal-state
relations.

V. O. KEY, JR.
The Administration of Federal Grants to States"
A perennial problem in the American federal system has been to
make the most appropriate assignments of jurisdiction to the states and
to the national government. The question whether a given function
should be undertaken by the federal or by the state govern~ents recurs
constantly. Because of the difficulty of altering the constitutional distribu-
tion of powers, expedients have been sought to overcome constitutional
obstacles to nationwide action. The belief has gradually arisen, although
it has not been stated in rigorous theoretical form, that the problem need
not necessarily be solved in terms of national or state administration. A
middle ground exists in which the machinery of federal and state govern-
ment may gradually be interwoven to approach the unitary form without
sacrificing the essential virtues of federalism. In some quarters the grant-
U National Resources Committee: Urban Government, p. 3;.
,. V. O. Key, Jr.: The Administration of Federal Grants to States. Adapted from
pp. 6-7, 380-83. Reprinted by permission of Public Admiuistratioll Service. Copyright
19J7. Public Administration Service.
 in-aid, as one of the most signilicant of the methods for interlocking the
various levels of government, is viewed as a sort of panacea, a device by
, which most national problems may be coped with, thereby avoiding both
C<lnstitutional difficulties and the problems' supposedly inherent in na-
tional administration.
The grants of land beginning with the Northwest Ordinance
established a pattern of relationships to serve as a precedent for money
grants to the states. It was but a short step from one to the other, and
involved no new principle. In 1837 Congress relieved the federal treasury
of an embarrassing surplus which it distributed to the states in the form
of loans with no expectation of repayment. It was considerably later, how-
ever, before the money grant developed into its characteristic form. In
1887 Congress provided money grants to the state agricultural experiment
stations, and in 1890 inaugurated grants for instruction in the land-grant
colleges. The state forest services received subsidies in 1911; in 1914 agri-
cultural extension work was added to the list. Congress soon recognized
the national interest in highways (1916), vocational education (1917),
and vocational rehabilitation (1920). The decade 1921-1930 was marked
by the expansion of the older aided activities, but no new functions of
fiscal importance were added. Since 1930 services of great significance has
been undertaken by the grant-in-aid method. The temporary grants for
unemployment relief involved extremely large sums, and important per-
manent additions to the grant-in-aid system were made by the Social
Security Act of 1935.
The grant has been used principally for functions of a "service"
character rather than for regulatory activities. In these service activities,
considerable cash outlay for materials, personal services, or gratuities is
necessary; and, on the whole, private rights have not been affected ad-
versely. The federal grant is usually large enough to bring about state as-
sumption of the function. It is Significant, however, that the grant has
not been used in an attempt to achieve any important national policy in-
volving the regulation of private conduct Furthermore, the grant-in-aid
appears to be most useful in those "service" activities carried out accord-
ing to policies which may be applied independently in each state with
little reference to what is being done in the same field in other states.
Extremely difficult prpblems arise when tasks are undertaken which re-
quire either considerable correlation of activity among states or a plan-
ning of the undertaking with a range of vision broader than state areas_
The achievements of direct federal administration are not so striking
as to make federal assumption an inviting alternative to the grant system.
The governance of a nation of continental proportions is a matter for
which no simple blueprint aod specifications are. available. The grant
system builds on and utilizes existing institutipns to co~ with national
problems. Under it the states are welded into national machinery of sorts
and the establishment of costly, parallel, direct federal services is made
unnecessary. A virtue of no mean importance is that the administrators
 THE ClOCIAPHY OF ORCANIZATION

in actual charge of operations Temain amenable to local conUol. In that

way the supposed formality, the regularity, and the cold-blooded efficiency
of a national hierarcby are avoided. The grant system is admittedly an
expedient_ It must be judged, however, not by the ideal, but by its con-
crete achievements. In all probability, the functions promoted by it would
not have been performed on the same scale or with the same degree of
effectiveness bad the federal-aid scheme not been devised.

It has been apparent for some time under the Federal grant-in-aid
program, that our system was no longer "an indestructible union of
indestructible and immutable states." " One of the main arguments
for the retention of state sovereignty has been the capacity of the
states to experiment with solutions for social problems as they arise;
but in experimenting with solutions to such problems, states have
been showing a decreasing vigor. \Vhen the Interstate Commerce
Commission Act for the regulation of the railroads was passed by the
Federal government in 1887,'8 over half the states had already set up
systems for the intrastate regulation of railroads; but by the time the
Federal social security system and the national planning agencies were
established in the 1930'S, only a few states had previously enacted
social security or planning laws. It is quite possilJ!e that our inter-
dependent economy makes state legislation less feasible, but it is also
true that the states have learned to stand by and wait for Federal aid.

6. FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE AREAS

Increased national functions have also resulted in the elaboration

of the Federal administrative machinery throughout the country.
Complaints against the centralized Federal government must be con-
strued in the light of the fact that 90ro of the employees of Federal
departments and agencies operate from approximately 2000 Federal
field offices located in 200 American cities outside of Washington."
This regional administrative network of the Federal government was
fully described in a report of the National Resource Committee in
1935·

15 John W. Burgess: "The American Commonwealth." Political Science Quarterly,

Marcb, 886, vol. ',p. 34.
1. Rohert E. Cushman: "The Problem of the Independent Regulatory Commi,·
sions." Report of President's Committee on Administrative Management, '937, p.
209·
11 Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of tbe Covernment:
"Ceneral Management of the Executive Branch," February '949, p. 42. Report of
Presidents Committee on Civil Service Improvement. Washington, 1941. House Docu-
ment No. 118, i7th Cong., 1St Sess., p. 10.
 ADMINlST&ATWIiI

COMMmEE ON RECIONAL PLANNING

"Regional Organization for Administration" 11
Approximately 74 Federal agencies, of bureau status or higher,
have designed sets of regions for defining the jurisdiction of their field
agents. All told there are approximately 108 separate regional schemes
employed by Federal administrative agencies. The number of regions in
each scheme ranges from 1 to 307. The Tennessee Valley Authority and
several agencies of the Department of the Interior confine their activities
to a single regional area. At the other extreme is the Works Progress Ad-
ministration, which employs 307 districts in its administrative procedure.
These extremes, however, are not representative. If one eliminate from,
consideration those few regional schemes which do not embrace the whole
country-as one must to avoid distortion of the results-it will be found
that over half the regional schemes use less than 10 regions. Except for an
expectably strong clustering about the choice of 48 regions (coterminous
with the States), less than 20 schemes possess more than 17 regions each.
In other words, the adoption of regional schemes has probably been moti-
vated in the main by the desire to administer areas fewer and larger than
individual States. While this would not necessarily mean the simple
grouping of States into regions, it would mean that the present subdi-
visional units, the States, had been found both too small and too numer-
ous for efficient discharge of the Federal functions.
A scheme of 12 regions is the most popular, and is used by agen-
cies of such major importance as the Federal Reserve System, the Farm
Credit Administration, and the Employees' Compensation Commission.
Certain bureaus of the Treasury, War, and Navy Departments also use
12 regions. Next below 12 regions, schemes of 7 and 9 regions are the most
frequently used. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the National
Recovery Administration are among the agencies using 7 regions, while 9
regions are used by the War Department in its Corps Areas, by the Forest
Service, Agricultural Adjustment Administration, and Federal Emergency
Relief Administration.
Regional boundaries adopted by the several agencies show very
little correspondence. Except in the case of the supply arms and services
of the War Department, each agency has chosen its boundaries with
slight knowledge of or concern for the boundaries already chosen by other
bureaus. Some of the bases on which boundaries were drawn may, how-
ever, be enumerated. S.tate lines, physiographic features, politics, the lo-
calization of the objects of administration, transportation convenience, and
the desire to equalize the burden of work among the regions have all at
one time or another played their part. The least frequent influences of
those enumerated are probably politics and physiographic features.
18 Committee on Regional Planning: "Regional Organization for Administration."
National Resources Committee: Regional Factors in National PJanning and Develop·
ment. December '935. selected frOUl pp. 71-72, 82.
 THE CIOGRAPHY OF OR(;ANIZATION

Most regionalizing agencies have not only drawn boundaries for

their regions but have also selected a headquarters city for each region.
Out of the approximately 100 regional schemes now in use, only 7, such as
the Bureau of the Census and the Office of Education, have regions with-
out regional headquarters. The 81 regional schemes which cover the whole
country have a total of 1,300 regional offices distributed among 195 cities.
Outstanding among this group of cities are San Francisco (in-
chIding Berkeley and Oakland), New York, and Chicago. San Francisco
is chosen by 73 schemes, New York by <l9, and Chicago by 66. Boston,
New Orleans, Denver, Atlanta, and the Twin Cities are very important
as regional centers. New Orleans and Atlanta are alternatively headquar-
ters for the whole South, or else they are both used in single regional
schemes for two halves of the South. The prominence of Boston suggests
the frequency with which New England, or a portion of it, is granted
regional status even in a scheme with few regional units. Denver is head-
quarters for the Mountain States and draws its territory from regions oth-
erwise served by San Francisco and Chicago. The Twin Cities (St. Paul
being generally preferred over Minneapolis) draw almost entirely on the
territory otherwise allotted to Chicago. There is a group of 13 cities, indi-
cated On the map by the third largest circles, each of which is the head-
quarters for over 20 regional schemes. In the order of their frequency,
these are, Seattle, St. Louis, Portland, Baltimore, Kansas City, Washing-
ton, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Los Angeles, Detroit, Cincinnati, Pitts-
burgh, and Omaha.
In conclusion, it may be pointed out that the amount of territory
over which a regional office can conveniently carry on its activities, the
number of regional offices which Washington can easily supervise, the
importance of State lines in drawing regional boundaries and the methods
of subregional division are all problems which have been faced by Federal
agencies and solved, however imperfectly and shortsightedly, after years
of dealing with the matter. Most of the divisions employed are no
more than regions by designation. At present new tasks are devolving
upon the Federal Government, and these entail new methods of solution
and execution. Economic, social, and physical factors are thrusting them-
selves into the picture, and these will no longer give way wholly to ques-
tions of administrative convenience or established modes of procedure.

One of the main lessons derived from a study of Federal admin-

istrative areas is the significance of the selection of regional centers.
In drawing administrative areas on a national scale, it seems advisable
to concentrate on the selection of headquarters or regional centers
for the "natural" or ecological areas. Difficulties will doubtless occur
in marginal cases under any system of area boundaries." But so im-

10 See also "Federal Field Offices." Senate Miscellaneous Documents; 1943, 78th
Cong. 1St Sess., No. ~2.
portant is the question of the center in comparison with the boundary
of governmental areas, that a number of counties and some states
have maintained duplicate county seats or state centers for their ad-
ministrative offices.
Regardless of these technical questions that c,?mplicate the estab-
lishment of administrative areas, a highly significant growth of decen-
tralized Federal administrative areas has begun to appear. Decentral-
ized federal functions have probably outweighed the intensified
program of governmental activities undertaken by the equally bur-
dened states and cities. In the 1930'S, a popular national contest was
conducted for the redrawing of state lines and the substitution of
regional boundaries.'" While this suggestion has not been repeated
since the revival of states' rights sentiment during the 1940'S, no one
can safely underwrite the existing political map as long as the habit
remains of treating governmental geography pragmatically in transi-
tional or critical periods.

7. REGIONAL AUTHORITIES AND THEIR lfMITATIONS

The most prominent illustration of regionalism in the United

States is the Tennessee Valley Authority. Far from displacing the
authority of the states, however, this regional government corpora-
tion has noticeably strengthened state and local administration, just
as it has helped to strengthen the resources and the economy of the
Tennessee Valley states. Professor C. Herman Pritchett of the Uni-
versity of Chicago, who has studied the TVA "experiment" in the
light of his more general research in American public law and public
administration,21 has arrived at the following conclusions concerning
the further application of regional government in the United States.

C. HERMAN PRITCHETT
"The Transplantability of the TVA""
Most people are now prepared to admit that the Tennessee Val·
ley Authority has been a success. It is hard to dispute that since 1933,
the whole face of the region in which the TVA operates has been changed
for the better. The energies of its streams have been harnessed, and their

20 Chicago Tribune, January 5, 1930. The contest was won by Professor Saam,
who proposed eleven city·states as a basis for the regional reorganization of the country.
21 C. Herman Pritchett: Tennessee Valley Authority. Chapel Hill: The University
of North Carolina Press; 1943. The Roosevelt Court. 1937-]947. New York: The
Macmillan Company; 1948.
"C. Hennan Pritchett: "The Transplantability of the TVA." Iowa Law Review,
January 1947, vol. ;>, adapted from pp. 317-.9, 337-38. Reprinted by pennission.
 THE GEOGItAPlfY' OF ORGANIZATION

destructive potentialities largely brought under control. A "Creat Lakes

of the South" has been created with tremendous possibilities for recrea-
tional development of the area. The immense amounts of power made
available at low rates have been responsible for new industries, new pat-
terns of IUral living. Edncational and demonstration activities have re-
sulted in materially transforming an exploitative agricultural system into
one which conserves and promotes both natural resources and human
values.
From one point of view, indeed, the TVA may have been too
successful. One might well ask, after watching the scores of bills which
have been dropped into the congressional hopper since 1933 seeking the
creation of similar regional authorities for almost every river valley in the
United States, whether the authority device had not been oversold. How
many of these bills, one may wonder, have been based on a real under-
standing of the authority plan? To how many people is the TVA more
than a slogan? It was against an unthinking overenthusiasm for trans-
plantation of the Tennessee Valley formula to other areas that Secretary
Ickes was fulminating in 1944 when he warned that problems of regional
development could not be solved "merely by lighting a candle and in-
toning, 'TVA, TVA, TVA'."
The authority differs in several important ways from the regular
pattern of federal departmental administration. The basis on which de-
partments afe normally established is that of major purpose or function.
They are given a single major function to perform, and a wide jurisdiction
in which to perform it. The result of the functional plan of organization
is that in each geographical area such action programs as the federal gov-
ernment may determine to undertake are in the hands of separate federal
bureaus or agencies, each concentrating upon its own field of specialized
interest and sharing no responsibility for the program or operations of
its neighbors, with whom, in fact, its relations may be those of competi-
tion or rivalry rather than cooperation. The approach to regional problems
is thus uncoordinated, piecemeal, and segmented. It is precisely this char-
acteristic of the federal government's action programs in the Missouri
Valley, which have been entrusted to such bitter antagonists as the Army
Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, that has led to the demand for
a Missouri Valley Authority. For the regional authority reverses the nor-
mal departmental pattern. It is a multiple-purpose agency with jurisdiction
limited to a particular geographical area, within which it has broad powers
to plan and operate a comprehensive and unified program of resource de-
velopment. Instead of land and water and forests and minerals and trans-
portation being split up among separate agencies, each jealous of its own
domain, the authOrity can include and interrelate all these elements in
its plans. Thus it avoids and ignores the lines which regular federal agen-
cies must draw.
The more closely this organizational problem is examined, the
more it appears that there is no entirely satisfactory method of blending
 omnicompetent regional organizations in with single-purpose units 1)1-
ganized on a national basis. William Pincus has recently suggested the
possibility of gathering together on a national scale the scattered fUIle-
tions and activities concerned with uatural resources development aroulld
the nucleus of the primary tools which Congress placed in the hands of
the TVA-water use and control and incidental power development~
and placing them in a revamped or new federal department. Such an I)r-
ganization, Pincus suggests, "might avoid the necessity for exposing t4is
nation to all the problems which the uncoordinated development of vari-
ous regions would inevitably create in both the administrative and ~
nomic fields." Another suggestion along this same line comes from Charles
McKinley, who proposes that existing federal water and power agenCIes
could be brought together in a reconstituted Department of the Interil)r,
thus preserving the traditional functional pattern of national administta_
tion, but with the department so set up as to give "as large a degree of
regional autonomy to its field representatives as the need for regiol\al
variation, celerity of design and construction, and efficient operatil)n
might require." Even under this plan, however, he recognizes that te-
lated regional functions would still be in the charge of other departments,
such as the Department of Agriculture, so that a consistent and compte-
hensive regional program would still need to be fused and put into effl;ct
against the familiar jurisdictional obstacles to cooperative administrative
operations.
Departmental reorganizations of this more heroic sort will be
correspondingly hard to engineer, so that attention must also be given to
experience wiUi various coordinative oevices empfoyecf under existing cle-
partmental arrangements. But until the tide for departmental reform he-
gins to run more strongly than it has in the past, the short-cut to regioI\a1
integration offered by the valley authority will remain a strong one. >\s
one advocate of the device has said: "The valley authority reaches into
Washington and puts a big piece of the whole federal government right
down into each regional area." It is the most readily available and i1n -
mediately promising method of breaking through the compartmentali_
zation of federal resource development programs and producing a unifit:d,
dynamic attack on regional problems.
There is a price to be paid, however, for its speed and its eGn-
centration. There is a real chance that regional autonomy will be achieved
at the expense of national control. Regional concentration can devel'.>p
into a narrow sectionalism. The administrative freedom claimed for a re-
gional authority may extend so far as to undercut executive responsibility.
Ways must be found to prevent the valley authority from developing the
defects of its virtues, for these are the real limits on the transplantabil!ty
of the TVA.

Clearly, the imposition of regional government onto the alrC34:ly

overburdened map of overlapping authorities had its dangers. Nevc:r-
 Till CIOCUPHY OF ORCAN1ZAT1OM

theless, the regional authority was regarded by a growing number of

Americans as a pragmati<: political device invented during one of the
most serious economic crises in American history. Other observers
consider it a dramatic model for international application. At the
height of World War II, President Roosevelt reflected: "When I
get througb being President of the United States and this damn war
is over, I think Eleanor and I will go to the Near East and see if we
can manage to put over an operation like the Tennessee Valley Sys-
tem that will really make something of that country." 23 Actually,
TVA engineers and TVA ideas had penetrated into the Near East
and Far East in the pre-war period; and, ridiculed though it was dur-
ing the unsettled post-war period, Henry Wallace's proposal for the
application of the TVA idea to central Europe gripped the imagina-
tion of some Americans who continued to search for constructive
bases in the relations between East and West. From the standpoint
of rational domestic organization, the canopy of Federal departmen-
talization might be expected to fall upon TVA and other regional
deVelopments. If it does, there will still remain a pattern of regional
planning which has already left its imprint upon the map of the
United States and other countries.

8. AREAL ADMINISTRATION IN THE ATOMIC AGE

The prospect of modernizing administrative areas arises not so

much from the attractiveness of newer governmental inventions such
as the Tennessee Valley Authority, as from the changes inherent in
modern technologies such as hydro-electrical power and atomic en-
ergy. The Atomic Energy Act of 1946 had declared: "The effect of
the use of atomic energy for civilian purposes upon the social, eco-
nomic and political structures of today cannot now be determined
... It is reasonable to anticipate, however, that tapping this new
source of energy will cause profound changes in our present way of
life."" One of the major changes may be the geographic structure of
American enterprise and administration. It was no accident of Amer-
ican managerial talent that the first chairman of the Atomic Energy
Commission should be the chairman of the Tennessee Valley
Authority, which had successfully introduced the newer regional
dimension of administrative geography in the United States.
In the Atomic Energy Act, the United States committed itself
to a program of: exclusive government ownership of plutonium, ura-
.. Fl2Ilces Perkins; The Roosevelt I Knew. New York: The Viking Press, 1946,
page 8<) •
.. 79th Cong., 2nd Sess., Public Law 585, Chapter 724·
370
nium 235, or other fissionable materials capable of releasing substan-
tial quantities of energy through the nuclear chain reaction; govern-
ment control of the source materials for such atomic energy;
government ownership or control of the manufacture and use of
atomic energy; and overall governmental direction of atomic energy
research, development, and distribution. In accordance with the pre-
vailing American standard of "strengthening free competition in
private enterprise," however, the enterprises and operations involved
were to be carried on largely by commercial contractors and private
institutions. It is interesting to note that when the United States
Atomic Energy Commission took over control of the war-time
atomic energy projects in 1947, the Commission's program and organ-
ization was described mainly in terms of an elaborate network of
plants, offices, and laboratories, thus introducing a new element of
administrative decentralization on the map of the nation. Richard
O. Niehoff, Special Assistant to the General Manager of the Atomic
Energy Commission and a former member of the staff of the Tennes-
see Valley Authority, described the organization of the Commission
in 1948 as follows:

RICHARD O. NIEHOFF
"Organization and Administration of the United States Atomic
Energy Commission" ..

Responsibility for supervising the operations of the Atomic

Energy Commission is delegated to the managers of five highly decen-
tralized field offices which are organized on the basis largely of functions.
All of these managers report directly to the general manager. They are
responsible for the supervision of the AEC field organizations which ne-
gotiate contracts and provide policy direction, control, and assistance
within the broad framework of commission policy to research, engineer-
ing, production, construction, and other contractors who do almost all of
the actual operational work of the commission. Managers of directed
operations have varying authority, depending upon the functions being
carried out under their direction, to enter into contracts ranging from two
to five million dollars for each contract on programs which have been ap-
proved by the general manager. They are obliged to bring only those
operational problems to the attention of the general manager which raise
new policy problems of a very complex nature or which are likely to affect
the work of the entire organization.
In addition to their authority to contract, managers have broad
delegations of authority to: (a) Establish positions and make appoint-
.. Richard O. Niehoff: "Or2llnization and Administration of the United States
Atomic Energy Commission." Public Adminirtratioll Review, Spring 1948, vol. 8,
selected from pp. 94-<}S. 97-98, 10,-02. Reprinted by permission.
371 THE GEOCUPIIY OF OIlGAN1%ATlON

ments, subject to general security restrictions. (b) Issue certificates and

licenses where appropriate, develop instructions, and take all other ad·
ministrative actions necessary for the performance of the assigned func-
tions unless clearly inconsistent with the limited number of the directives
and instructions of the general manager. In general, the organization of
each of the offices of directed operations parallels closely, but not uni-
formly, the organization of the Washington office, thus making it possible
to conduct the business of the commission with a minimum of organiza-
tional complications or barriers.
In addition to their responsibility for direct supervision of the
operations of the commission, managers of directed operations are con-
sidered to be members of the general manager staff in absentia and as
such share responsibility for the development of commission policy and
the effective and economical administration of directly administered and
contract activity. A brief sketch of the program of each of tIle offices of
directed operations follows.
New York. The office of New York directed operatious was estab-
lished on June 9, 1947. This office, under the direction of the manager of
New York directed operations, is authorized to administer the following
principal functions: (1) Receive and warehouse source material and pro-
cure other material as required. (2) Direct all phases of the commercial
production of uranium and thorium metals, and certain compounds and
special materials for AEC installations in accordance with approved AEC
programs. (3) Negotiate and direct the administration of tile contract
provisions of all construction and related contracts entered into or as-
signed to the New York office. (4) Administer research contracts, in-
cluding that of the Brookhaven National Laboratory. (5) Locate and
negotiate with contractors for the development and manufacture of cer-
tain special materials and engineering equipment for use at other AEC
installations. (6) Administer the system of source material licensing es-
tablished by the commission.
Oak Ridge (Tennessee). The office of Oak Ridge directed opera-
tions was established on September 15, 1947. The principal functions of
this office are to: (1) Direct the operation and maintenance of plants and
facilities for the production of fissionable and related materials. These
plants and facilities are located at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Miamisburg,
Ohio, and elsewhere. (2) Direct and design the construction of plants
and facilities as may be required. (3) Administer research and develop-
ment contracts including the Oak Ridge Institute for Nuclear Studies.
(4) Administer the AEC program for the production and distribution
of radioactive and stable isotopes. (5) Direct the construction, mainte-
nance, and administration of housing and community faCllities for the
town of Oak Ridge which has a population of approximately 36,000
persons.
Chicago. The office of Chicago directed operations was estab-
lished on August 31, 1947. The principal functions of this office are to:
172
( 1) Administer research and· development contracts for work. performed
at the Argonne National Laboratory. The work of this laboratory is fOCU8ed
chiefly on problems of reactor development, with fundamental supporting
research on relevant problems in chemistry, physics, metallurgy, medicilte,
and biology. (2) Direct the contractors responsible for the design and
construction of buildings and facilities authorized for the new Argonne
National Laboratory and other authorized buildings and facilities. (3)
Administer research and development contracts for work perfomted at
Iowa State College. (4) Administer research and development contratts
for work at the University of California at Berkeley concerned with re-
search in nuclear physics, high energy accelerators, chemistry, biolo~,
and medicine.
Sante Fe (Los Alamos, N. M.). The office of Sante Fe directed
operations was established as of July 2,1947. This office manages contra~ts
for atomic research, for developmental engineering, and for the constf\tc_
tion and maintenance of facilities for the production of atomic weapons.
One of the more important facilities is the town of Los Alamos which
has a population of approximately 8,600 persons.
Hanford (Richland, Washington). The office of Hanford di-
rected operations was established as of September 1, 1947. The princillal
functions carried out under the authority of this office are: (1) The m~n­
ufacture of plutonium and other products at Hanford and at other loca-
tions directed from Hanford. (2) The administration of research cctn-
tract activities at Hanford. (3) The construction of new and the opera-
tion and maintenance of existing production, research, and community
facilities at Hanford. (4) The direction of research activities at the KnOlls
Atomic Power Laboratory and other research at Schenectady, New YO~k.
Most of this work is administered by the same prime contractor which
administers the work at Hanford. (5) The construction of new and the
operation and maintenance of existing laboratory and other facilities for
the Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory at Schenectady, New York. (6) The
managenlent of the town of Richland, Washington, which has a pOpUla-
tion of approximately 17,000 persons.
Eniwetok Proving Ground. The commission is developing a pT<)V-
ing ground for atomic weapons in Eniwetok Atoll in the South Pacific.
To meet these operational demands, the commission has chOSen
to combine wide delegation of authority for operations with an alert alld
sensitive centralized staff organization. The continned workability of the
organization as now conceived will be tested by: (1) The continued ba~ic
soundness of the commission determination to have all or almost all of
the operations of the AEC carried on by contractors; (2.) The continUed
effectiveness of the field organization to give useful direction to the WOrk
of contractors; (3) The continued and quickened development of b~ic
program and management policies and standards by Washington divisiOns
and offices to guide the operational direction of contractors by the AE;c
field staff; and (4) The continued effective integration of program policy
373 TIlE CEOGaAPHY Of ORGANIZATION

and opeIlltional needs at the level of the geneIlll manager and the com-
mission-incorporating at this level the advice of top military, congres-
sional, and scientific bodies.

National strategy was not the only reason for this decentralized
system of research and production. The potential peacetime applica-
tion of the newer energy forms and the possibilities of power trans-
mission across vast distances intensified the dispersive tendencies.
Added to this dispersion was the fact that the government contracted
out the bulk of the atomic energy operations to private enterprises
and research institutions scattered over the nation. In the background
was the added complexity of an impending international system of
control under the United Nations"·
By the middle of the twentieth century a prospective geographical
devolution had appeared in American life. With technolpgical dis-
persion and administrative decentralization combined, the existing
organizational map was not likely to remain unshaken.

9. BUSINESS ORGANIZATION-LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL

The older structure of private trusts and corporations in the

United States continued to undergo a similar geographical prolifera-
tion. An interesting case study is offered by Standard Oil Company
of New Jersey. Nominally limited to the state of New Jersey as a re-
sult of the American "trust-busting" era of the 1&)0's, this company
did not cease its expansion domestically, while internationally it was,
by 1946, doing half its business abroad, producing crude oil in 11
countries, operating refineries in 13, marketing its products in 115
different nations and dependencies, and doing 17% of the total
oil business of the world ..'

An Introduction to the Standard Oil Company"

In 19(16 the Federal Government filed suit, under the provisions

of the Sherman Anti-trust Law, against Standard Oil Company (New
Jersey). On May 15, 1911, after nearly five years of litigation in various

.. United Nations, Department of Public Information: Scienti6c and Technical

Aspects of the Control of Atomic Ene.gy, 1946. United Nations, AtonIic Energy Com-
mission: Ollicial Record, Third Year. No.1, Fifteenth Meeting, May 7, 1948.
JI7 See note .8, p .•.
.. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey: .. An Introduction to Standard 011 Com.
pany." Selected from pp. 4-8, 1()-.6, .8-20.
374
courts, the Supreme Court affirmed a decree which enjoined the Com-
pany from voting the stocks of, or exerting any control over, 33 separate
subsidiaries. The decree made it impossible for the old Standard Company
to continue in business as a singJe unit. The Jersey Company, for example,
retained several large refineries on the East Coast and most of the foreign
business, but it had very little crude oil production, practically no pipe-
line transportation, no tankers, and limited domestic rnatkets. The situa-
tions thus created were to find solutions in a period of new expansion in
the oil industry. This expansion resulted mainly from two factors: the
automobile and the first World War.
While strengthening its domestic positions, the Company was
also expanding abroad. Affiliates obtained concessions in Peru in 1914 and
in Colombia in 1920. In 1921, another affiliate, Standard Oil Company of
Venezuela, began oil exploration in that country. Through the purchase
from Standard Oil Company (Indiana) of its stock interest in Pan Amer-
ican Foreign Corporation, came control of the Aruba refinery in the
Netherlands West Indies, which has since been developed into one of
the largest and most modern refineries in the world. Today Jersey affiliates
operate in all but two of the Latin American countries, Bolivia and Mex-
ico, in both of which Jersey had extensive interests until its properties, to-
gether with those of other foreign oil companies, were expropriated by
the governments of those countries in 1937 and 1938. The search for oil
was also extended to the Far East. A large refinery was completed at
Palembang, Sumatra, in 1926. Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc. had
developed important markets in the Far East, supplying them largely
with oil products exported from the United States. As Jersey's new Far
East crude oil supply was a natural contributor to these markets, the Com-
pany joined its producing facilities there with the marketing operations of
Socony-Vacuum in 1933 to form the jointly owned Standard-Vacuum Oil
Company, operating in Asia, Africa, and Oceania. In 1928 Jersey, togetr.er
with other United States companies, obtained an interest in the poten-
tially rich oil lands of the Middle East.
How this came about sheds interesting light on the world oil
situation following the first World War. The collapse of the Ottoman
Empire and Central Powers had made it possible for greater western
participation in the development of the Middle East oil lands. In advanc-
ing its open-door policy, the United States Government encouraged
American oil companies to extend their activities to this area. Turkish
Petroleum Company (now known as Iraq Petroleum Company) was be-
ing recognized and, following long negotiation, a group of United States
oil companies obtained an interest in it. American, British, French, and
Dutch interests shared 95 per cent of the stock equally, and the remaining
5 per cent was owned by an independent promoter, Calouste- Sarkis Gul-
benkian. The American share (23% per cent) was owned in 192.8 by five
American oil companies, but three of these later sold their interests to
 THI CIOGUPHY OF ORCANIZATION

Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) and Socony-Vacuum Oil Comp;my,

Inc., who today participate equally in the venture now known as Near
East Development Corporation.
As European needs for petroleum products increased, Jersey's
European affiliates extended their activities. Anglo-American Oil Com-
pany, Ltd., an affiliate in England, became one of the major suppliers of
oil products to the United Kingdom. Deutsch-Amerikanische Petroleum-
Gesellschaft in Germany, Romano-Americana in Rumania, Societa Halo-
Americana pel Petrolio in Italy, and Standard Francaise des Petroles
(jointly owned with other oil companies) in France figured importantly
in the economic growth of their respective countries. Other Standard 5ub
sidiaries grew to prominence in Denmark, Finland, Holland, Belgium,
Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary. At the out-
break of the second World War, the Jersey Company was represented in
19 European countries and in Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, French Morocco,
and Egypt. The activities of its affiliates extended to Iceland and the
Azores, and to the southeast coast of Africa.
Meanwhile the oil industry was developing rapidly in the United
States as motoring and wide-scale mechanization created unprecedeIlted
demands for petroleum products. The Company's domestic affiliates be-
came important in producing, refining, and distribution in many parts of
the country. [These included] Humble Oil & Refining Company, with
headquarters in Houston, Texas, and operating in the South and South-
west from Florida to New Mexico, (andl the Carter Oil Company, with
headquarters in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and operating in the Middle West,
Southwest, and Rocky Mountain states.
In 1927 Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) divested itself of
its operating functions. The management of its tanker fleet was trans-
ferred to Standard Shipping Company. (It was returned to the Jersey
Company in 1944.) A new affiliate, Standard Oil Company of New Jelsey,
incorporated in Delaware and known to Jersey people as the "Delaware
Company," was formed to carry on all other operating activities until then
conducted by the parent company. Today Standard Oil Company of New
Jersey operates large refineries at Bayonne and Linden, N. J., Baltimore,
Md., and Baton Rouge, La., as well as smaller plants in Jersey City, N. J.,
and Charleston, S. C. It markets in New Jersey, Delaware, Maryhlnd,
Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Arkansas, Louisiana, and the District of Columbia. In addition, it owns
Standard Oil Company of Pennsylvania. Another of its subsidiaries is
Penola Inc., marketer of industrial lubricants, process oils, and specialties.
Colonial Beacon Oil Company, another domestic affiliate, operates a
modern refinery at Everett, Mass. Stanco Incorporated was organized in
1927 to manufacture and market insecticides, [Flit]. Gilbert & Barker
Manufacturing Company makes oil burners and service station equip-
ment. It has been a Jersey affiliate since 1884. Ethyl Corporation, jointly
376 ADMINISTRATION

owned with General Motors, was formed in 1924 to manufacture and sell
tetra-ethyl lead, anti-knock compound.
The story of the contributions by the Jersey Company and its
affiliates to the defense of the nation in the second World War cannot be
told without reference to the results of a momentous meeting in 1925. In
that year several officials of the German I. G. Farbenindustrie visited the
Jersey laboratories while on a tour of United States industry. In conver-
sations with them, Jersey scientists learned of the progress German scien-
tists were making in hydrogenation and other processes of great potential
value to the oil industry. Jersey experts thereupon visited Germany to
study these new developments, and in 1927 the Jersey Company arranged
to purchase from I. G. Farben the rights to numerous German patents
and processes dealing with oil. The volume manufacture of l00-0ctane
aviation gasoline, the synthesis of toluene from petroleum, and the vast
wartime production of synthetic rubber were important results of proc-
esses based in part on original German data.
Like the operations of any major industrial organization, those
of the Jersey Company and affiliates involve many thousands of firms and
individuals not directly connected with these companies. For example,
Jersey's domestic producing affiliates lease land from over 60,000 land-
owners, who receive a rental fee and, when production begins, a royalty
on every barrel of oil taken from their land. Over 20,000 independ~nt
service stations, in addition to resellers and jobbers, provide the principal
retail outlets for Jersey's domestic products.
In all its relations with its affiliates, the Jersey Company stresses
decentralized management, believing that a system of independent, self-
reliant companies gives maximum encouragement to growth and the
development of leadership. Each separate operating company has its own
officers and board of directors, who are responsible to their stockholders.
In this way the fullest opportunity is afforded for the expression of indi-
vidual judgment and authority by the men who are most familiar with
local problems.

On the principle of "centralized control and decentralized opera-

tion," 29 other business corporations, such as the General Motors
Corporation, were able to create a similarly widespread system for the
production and distribution of their products.·o The retention of the
state as a mere domiciliary basis for the national and international
expansion of American enterprise is an interesting legal fiction which
even some government corporations utilize, as we have seen. Appar-
ently similar area devices are selected for the management of all kinds
of institutions. Thus, the ecclesiastical government of the Protestant
.. Col. R. J. Rees: "Army and Business Organization Compared." American Man·
agement Association, General Management Series, 1915, p. ;.
so See Chapter 2. Paul B. Coffman: "Testing for Ability in Management." Harvard
Business Review, 1931-32., vol. 10, p. 170.
377 THE GEOGRAPHY OF ORGANIZATION

Episcopal Church in the United States has a history that centers

around the use of state boundary lines to define the diocesan areas."

10. POLITICAL CENTRALIZATION AND CULTURAL

DECENTRALIZATION

The possibility of combining economic and social decentraliza-

tion with a high degree of political centralization has been demon-
strated by Soviet Russia. Aaron Yugow, a Russian-trained scholar
who had occasion to make first-hand observation of the Soviet system
in its earliest years, here compares the centralizing trends of Czarist
Russia with the regional decentralization of Soviet Russia.

AARON YUGOW
Russia's Economic Front for War and Peace 82

Old Czarist Russia was a country with a comparatively well-de-

veloped center of industry and poorly developed outlying regions. Ninety
per cent of all industry was concentrated in three regions: around St.
Petersburg, around Moscow, and in the Ukraine. In the rest of Russia
industrial development took place slowly in spite of the presence of raw
materials and fuel in various regions, since the policy of the government
was to treat the outlying regions-particularly those in the North, the
Caucasus, the Crimea, the Middle Asiatic possessions, and the Far East
-as colonies. Their task was to furnish raw !Ilaterials and agricultural
products to Central Russia. This policy governed the building of railroads,
the determination of railway freight rates, the building of canals, the estab-
lishment of banks, the organization of fairs, etc.
In looking back over the Soviet government's policy in this re-
spect, it is well to bear in mind two considerations by which it was guided
in formulating its plan of distributing among the regions the productive
forces of the Union. The first consideration was that of economic
expediency, of establishing the factory near the source of raw materials,
the development of agricultural centers for raising industrial crops in
regions best suited to them by climate, the utilization of natural sources
of fuel, of electric power, water transportation, and so on. The second
consideration was the economic and cultural improvement of the out-
lying regions. The reawakened republics of the various nationalities aimed
not only at the development of the natural wealth of their regions, but
., Samuel D. McConnel: History of the American" Episcopal Church. M.i1waukee:
The Young Churchman Co., 1916, pp. 264..:.87; U. S. Census, Religious Bodies, 1936
vol. 2, pt. 2, pp. 1492-95.
"Aaron Yugow: Russia's Economic Front for War and Peace. Selected from pp.
'49-52, ISS-57. Reprinted by permission of Harper & Brothers. Copyright, 1942.
Harper & Brothers_
378 ADMINISTaATION

displayed great activity and initiative in seeing that all the key industries
be developed in their republics. Lately, as the menace of war loomed
nearer, a new consideration entered into the question of the geographic
distribution of Soviet industry. First, the government, wishing to prepare
for all eventualities, decided to distribute its key war industries in such a
mauner that they would be subject to the least danger of systematic aerial
attacks; and second, to create in the Ural Mountains, in Siberia, and in the
Far East independent, self-contained industrial centers.
The Third Five-Year Plan proposed the creation of self-contained
industrial centers in the Caucasus and in the Far East. The greatest
changes have taken place in industry. The ratio of the Leningrad, Moscow,
and Ukraine regions to the total industry of the country was reduced from
90 to 60 per cent. In the various republics attention was first centered upon
extractive industries and those branches of agriculture best adapted to
local natural conditions; at the same time industrial enterprises were estab-
lished for the utilization of local raw materials. The industrialization of
these republics, as well as of the outlying territories, has brought about not
only material inprovements but cultural advancement. There has been a
rapid expansion of general as well as technical education. Local schools
and scientific institutions sprang up, newspapers and books published ,in
the language of the local population multiplied.
The direction of all these activities is concentrated, in the con
stituent republics, in the hands of the representatives of the Central
government, and of Communist organizations. Any deviation from the
instructions of the Central Committee of the Communist party has
brought severe punishment time and time again, even to the sentencing
to death by shooting of the President of the Supreme Soviet of the re-
publics. All business undertakings of the slightest consequence are under
the centralized management of the federal authorities, who permit no
deviation, except when meeting local conditions, customs, and traditions
does not in any way involve a sacrifice of the principles or directions laid
down by the Central authorities. However, an objective study of the facts
leads to the conclusion that the Central government, guided by considera-
tions of national interest, has on the whole in these constituent republics
followed an economic and cultural policy which has brought about a
rapid advance of these formerly backward parts of the country. On the
other hand, there have been not a few mistaken attempts to create indus-
trial giants in regions bordering on wilderness; there have been local
discords and friction between nationalities. Many billions of the people's
money have been squandered. But on the whole, from the point of view
of the interests of the entire Soviet Union, the policy of decentralization
of industry has been carried through thoughtfully and has given positive
results. The natural wealth of the Soviet Union has been utilized, as a
result of this policy, in a more complete and rational manner. Industrial
centers have been distributed more evenly over the country and nearer to
sources of cheap power. Rapid industrial and cultural advances have
379 THE GEOGRAPHY OF ORGANIXATION

been achieved in the new regions. Discord and friction between national-
ities have to a great extent been allayed. The needs of national defense
have been taken into account in the creation of new industrial centers
and in the location of defense industries.

Other European countries, especially France," have attempted

to carry out decentralizing policies but have had less conspicuous
success. The economic and strategic advantages of the Soviet experi-
ment in decentralization are obvious, and the results of Soviet cul-
tural devolution also look promising. However, we have no decisive
evidence as to the degree of cultural freedom which is genuinely ex-
perienced in independent regions and republics operating under the
highly centralized Soviet political dictatorship.

11. AREA AND FUNCTION IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF FOREIGN

AFFAIRS

Organizations frequently have departments based both on area

and function. Professor Arthur W. Macmahon of Columbia Uni-
versity discusses below the attempt at "reconciliation of the conflict-
ing claims of functional and areal divisions" in the conduct of the
foreign relations of the United States.

ARTHUR W. MACMAHON
"Function and Area in the Administration of International
Affairs" ..
The traditional subdivision of foreign offices has been geograph-
ical. Through 1<)44, four regional offices are provided [in the Department
of State]: European Affairs, Near Eastern and Mrican Affairs, and Far
Eastern Affairs, under one of the assistant secretaries; and American Re-
public Affairs, under the general oversight of another assistant secretary.
Within each of these four offices is a varying number of "divisions" re-
sponsible for particular countries, for several adjacent countries, or (in the
case of the Division of British Commonwealth Affairs) for a system of
states. At the heart of the scheme is the ideal of what is still significantly
called the "country desk"-the focus at the working level of the depart-
ment for matters that affect a partieular country. Note the dilemma which
.. R. K. Gooch: Regionalism in France. New York: The Century Company, 1931.
The University of Virginia Institute for Research in the Social Sciences. Monograph
No.12 .
.. Arthur W. Macmahon, "Function and Atea in the Administration of Inter·
national Affairs." New Horizons In Public Administration. Selected from pp. "9,
121-'4, 126, 128-29, 13'-36. Reprinted by permission of University of Alabama
Press. Copyright, 1945, University of Alabama Press.
380 ADMINISTRATION

in an imperial world attends the attempt to organize regional groups of

"country desks" for the handling of the flow of diplomatic and other busi-
ness_ The Office of European Affairs has jurisdiction over the Far Eastern
and Pacific possessions of European nations, qualified by the direction that
such primary jurisdiction be exercised jointly with the Far Eastern Office.
Even with shared jurisdictions and the will to collaborate, it may matter
which unit first receives papers for action, thereby gaining almost auto-
matically the opportunity to initiate a decision.
But the main impact comes from the functional side. In the
Department of State, as in other foreign offices, a growing number of
units deal on a world-wide basis with particular subjects or processes,
mainly economic, on the one hand, and informational, on the other. The
growth of the economic staff was evident in the fact that, at the beginmng
of 1945, there were three economic offices (Financial and Development
Policy, International Trade Policy, and Transportation and Communica-
tions) with thirteen divisions and about five hundred persons on the rolls.
The last figure may be contrasted with slightly over two hundred persons
in the four geographical offices. Within the year 1944, the quickening
recognition of information as an aspect of foreign affairs was signalized,
first, by the creation of an office (Public Affairs) that included divisions
on cultural exchange, international information, and public liaison, and,
second, by assignment of an assistant secretary to this complex of activities.
It is useful to note the tendency of the latter to subdivide internally on an
areal basis. Thus the division that administers cultural relations was re-
shaped geographically in 1944. Within the economic divisions there was
subordinate recognition of regional factors in handling commercial policy,
monetary and investment matters, and labor relations.
Thus far the discussion has dealt with the interplay of area and
function at headquarters. It is timely to pass to conditions in the field. The
Department of Commerce had developed a system of foreign agents under
appropriation items dating back to 1905. The scheme was formalized by
the act of March 3, 1927. The "Commerce and Foreign Service" was estab-
lished thereby in the Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce "con-
sisting of officers to be graded in the following order and to be known as
commercial attaches, assistant commercial attaches, trade commissioners,
and assistant trade commissioners." Future selections were to be made
by examination held by the department and Civil Service Commission in
coordination. The salary range was to be roughly comparable to that in the
Foreign Service. Analogous recognition was given to agricultural reporting
by a companion measure, approved June 5, 1930. The pressure for special-
ized staffing abroad has been rellected in the overseas personnel of agencies
other than the State Department. An estimate in the summer of 1944
indicated that nearly ninety per cent of the increase had been outside the
Foreign Service. Nearly fifty agencies had representatives abroad. The
Office of War Information was credited with slightly above one thousand;
the Foreign Economic Administration (including the United States Com-
381 THE GEOGRAPHY OF ORGANIZATION

mercial Company, its trading arm) with nearly that number; the Shipping
Administration and the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs, with about
300 each; the Office of Censorship, with 61. Among the government cor-
porations, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation proper was repre-
sented abroad by 25 agents; the Defense Supplies Corporation by 137;
and the Rubber Reserve Company by 134. The Department of Agriculture
had 105; the Federal Communications Commission, 24; the Civil Aero-
nautics Administration, 21.
Two avenues of development are open in the future. One method
would permit various federal agencies to project themselves abroad but
would strive for union at each foreign capital under the hegemony of the
diplomatic establishment. The other method would seek to absorb the
increasing functional pressures within an enlarged Foreign Service.
Wartime experience has been suggestive as to arrangements. Il-
lustrative are the terms of the "agreement between the Department of
State and the Foreign Economic Administration concerning economic
programs abroad" signed by the two agencies in November, '943. On the
ticklish question of communications, it was said that "all FEA cables will
be transmitted through State Department cable facilities unless otherwise
determined, e.g., as in the case of military operation." Copies of all com-
nmnications to and from FEA were to be given to the State Department
and its principal field representative. .
In the practical conduct of business with other governments the
agreement sought to preserve the paramount position of the Foreign Serv-
ice, while permitting ancillary operating contacts. "In a country Or area for
which he is responsible," it was stated, "the principal State Department
representative will initiate with foreign governments general economic ne-
gotiations pertaining to operations of the FEA only after prior consulta-
tion with the latter's chief representative, who will be taken into the nego-
tiations." After the conclusion of general negotiations resulting in master
or country agreements for the development or procurement of commod-
ities, for example, it was promised that the FEA representative would
have wide latitude to conduct negotiations "for the purpose of imple-
menting such general agreements or programs," including allnegotiatiolls
with private firms or individuals. The State Department representative
would have the privilege of accompanying him. In the case of disagree-
ment in the field, each representative might communicate with his hOllle
agency, preferably in a consolidated document as the basis for consultation
in Washington.

Both geographical and functional subdivisions are essential in an

organization of this kind. Little doubt exists that at the headquarters,
either central or field, they should parallel one another directly undcr
the department head. The main question is, which subdivision should
predominate, especially at the operating levels? The priority of
geographical considerations in the individual embassies or legations
382 ADMINISTRATION

is more necessary than the assignments of such a high priority to the

"country desks" in the State Department headquarters, since in
Washington an integrated functional policy on a world-wide basis
is as essential as a consistent "political" policy toward the individual
nations. This interchange in emphasis between area and function
is, as Macmahon pointed out, a constant and universal problem of
organization and "the degree to which the consequent dilemmas are
resolved and conflicts minimized is a prime test of organizational
success." II

12. DEMOCRACY AND DEVOLUTION

A theory of centralization and decentralization in America has

been presented by David E. Lilienthal, who has had extensive ex-
perience with regionalism and decentralization as a device for public
management in a democracy."

DAVID E. LILIENTHAL
T.V.A.-Democracyon the March"
. "Centralization" is no mere technical matter of "management,"
of "bigness versus smallness." We are dealing here with those deep urgen-
cies of the human spirit which are embodied in the faith we call "democ-
racy." It is precisely here that modem life puts America to one of its most
severe tests.
Overcentralization is, of course, no unique characteristic of our
own national government. It is the tendency all over the world, in business
as well as government. Centralization of power at our national capital is
largely the result of efforts to protect citizens from the evils of overcen-
tralization in the industrial and commericallife of the country, a tendency
that has been going on for generatious. Chain stores have supplanted the
comer grocery and the village drug store. In banks and theaters, hotels, and
systems of power supply-in every activity of business-local controls
have almost disappeared. To be sure, business centralization has brought
advantages in lower unit costs and improved services. The paying of the
price came later when towns and villages began to take stock. The profits
of local commerce had been siphoned off, local enterprise was stiHed, and

8$ Macmahon: "Function and Area..'~ p. 119 •

.. Josephus Daniels: "Breakfast with a Democrat." Saturday Review of Literature,
April 23, 1938, pp. 6-8. "David E. Lilienthal." Current Biography, June '944, pp.
4'3-'5. United States Senate, Joint Committee on Atomic Energy. Hearings, '947,
80th Congo 1St Sess .
•, David E. Lilienthal: T.v.A.-Democracy on the March. Selected from pp.
139-42, 147-48, 1 ;0. Reprinted by permission of Harper & Brothers. Copyright, '944,
Harper & Brothers.
 THE CEOClA'HY OF ORCANIUTION

moribund communities awoke to some of the ultimate penalties of remote

control. When a major depression struck in 1929, business centralization
made us more vulnerable than ever before to the disruption that ensued.
Power had gone to the center, decisions were made far from the people
whose lives would be affected. Cities and states were powerless to meet
the evils that were bred; the federal government had to act. The tendency
to centralization in governmetlt was quickened.
It was ironic that centralized businesses should become, as they
did, eloquent advocates of the merits of decentralization in government.
From their central headquarters they began to issue statements and bro-
chures. And a wondrous state of confusion arose in the minds of men:
they ate food bought at a store that had its replica in almost every town
from coast to coast; they took their ease in standard chairs; they wore
suits of identical weave and pattern and shoes identical with those worn
all over the country. In the midst of this uniformity they all listened on the
radio to the same program at the same time, a program that bewailed the
evils "regimentation," or they read an indignant editorial in their local
evening papers (identical with an editorial that same day in a dozen other
newspapers of the same chain) urging them to vote for a candidate who
said he would bring an end to centralization in government.
I am not one who is attracted by that appealing combination of
big business and little government. I believe that the federal government
must have large grants of power progressively to deal with problems that
are national in their consequences and remedy, problems too broad to
be handled by local political units. I am convinced, as surely most realistic
men must be, that in the future further responsibilities will have to be
assumed by the central government to deal with national issues which
centralized business inevitably creates. The war has advanced this trend.
The people have a right to demand that their federal government provide
them an opportunity to share in the benefits of advances in science and
research, the right to demand protection from economic abuses beyond
the power of their local political units to control. But they have the further
right to insist that the methods of administration used to carry out the
very laws enacted for their individual welfare will not atrophy the human
resources of their democracy.
In the case of TVA, Congress did enact a statute which permitted
a decentralized administration. Had not Congress created that opportu-
nity, the TVA could not have developed its administration at the grass
roots. An area of manageable proportions-the watershed of a river as its
hase-was the unit of administration. Decisions could be made and re-
sponsibility taken at a point that was close to the problems themselves.
That is the test of decentralization. It is not decentralization to open
regional offices or branches in each state, if decisions have to be made in
Washington and the officers in the field prove to be merely errand boys.
Neither is it decentralization when bureaus or departments are moved
out of crowded Washington. It may be necessary and entirely wise-but
384 ADMINISTRATlDN

it is not decentralization. You do not get decentralization as we know it

in the TVA unless you meet two tests:
First, do the men in the field have the power of decision?
Second, are the people, their private and their local public institutions,
actively participating in the enterprise?
Remote control from Washington [is] not greatly to be preferred
to remote control from a holding company office in New York.

Within both the Tennessee Valley Authority and the Atonlic

Energy Commission, Lilienthal has attempted to practice what he
has preached. He has constantly emphasized devolution of responsi-
bility and decentralization of power to "area managers" of 1VA and
"managers of the offices of directed operations" of the AEC, to avoid
making these officials "merely office boys with imposing titles." ..

SUMMARY

The ancient Greek democracy was founded on the assumption

that a single nation could be welded out of as many men as could hear
the sound of one voice. Plato's ideal state contained 5040 citizens,
since that was the number who could be addressed in the Agora, the
market-place assembly of the Greek city-state. As Lvman Bryson bas
pointed out, however, "a change from the Agora at Athens to a micro-
phone in a broadcast network in America is just such a change of
scale as makes a difference in character." ••
These transitions of political geography have produced some
harsh experiences. In 1798 Winthrop Sargeant, the governor of Mis-
sissippi Territory, complained at Natchez of "the very Melancholy
consideration, that my Public and private communication with the
Atlantic States is so extreme difficult and tedious." 40 One hundred
and fifty years later the speed of communications had increased so
drastically that, far from concerning itself with a domestic outpost
on the Mississippi River, the Federal government was inclined to
restrict itself to the most essential duties of conducting its overseas
commitments and controlling its domestic economy. Faced with
national and international problems of unprecedented proportioilS,
the nation might be able to shake off responsibility for details of local,
state, and regional affairs, but it could not divest itself of the duty of
sa Lilienthal: T.V.A.-Democracy on the March, p. 1,0•
•• Lyman Bryson: "Technology and Freedom," Wellsprings of the American Spirit,
edited by F. Ernest Johnson. New YOlk and London: furper and Brothers; 1948,
p. ,67·
.0 Mississippi Territorial Archives, vol. 1, p. 117. Quoted by White: The Feder-
alists, p. 373.
385 TtlE CEOCRAPtlY OF ORCANIZATIC1N

providing a system for proper conduct and devolution of these affaifS.

By mid-century, the nation had experimented with direct service to
urban and rural communities, but seemed to lean rather toward ad-
ministration within a framework of Federal-state relations and Fed-
eral grants-in-aid to states. Federal administrative areas also had a suc-
cessful growth during this period. Contrary to expectations, the ,e-
gional type of Federal authority stimulated rather than curtailed state
administration. If there are any casualties of the regional experimeut,
they are not the states, but the regional authority's sister departments
in Washington. The forces of Federal departmentalization thrC<1t-
ened to stop the development of regional authorities outside of the
TVA, dramatically pointing up this problem.
It is a technological discovery like atomic energy, as well as a
governmental invention like the regional authority based on hydro-
electrical power, that is likely to have the most dispersive effects on
the nation's administrative map. Devolution and decentralization are
equally urgent for American corporate organization and for Soviet
economic organization. The reconciliation of area and function and
the balance between centralization and decentralization constitutes
a continuing challenge to, and a major test of, effective organization.
 CHAPTER TIIIRTEEN

THE PROCESS OF REORGANIZATION

THE STRUCTURE of modern institutions is constantly in flux, and the

precepts of reorganization are therefore as important as the so-called
principles of organization. Within an administrative organization,
departmental reorganization can consist of a drastic overhauling of
structure or a number of mild adjustments. In any case, anomalies
of organization are likely to appear in the best regulated institutions
and to require constant readjustment or reorganization.
By some curiosity of public administration, for example, the bear
population of Alaska was at one time supervised in accordance with
the following assignment: the brown bear, regarded as a game animal,
was under the Department of Agriculture; the black bear, considered
a fur·bearing animal, was under the Department of Commerce; and
the white polar bear, although ignored by the law as res nullius of the
bruin family, was claimed by the Department of the Interior. But
the black bear cub is, by nature, brown in color, and on one occasIOn
a customs officer, representing the Department of Treasury, was em-
barrassed by the conflicting claims of the Department of Agriculture,
and the Department of Commerce. This problem was not as difficult
as that of supervising local street-sweeping in England. Although
the Ministry of Health is responsible for passing by-laws on the
subject, it was discovered on one occasion that "paper and banana-
skins, in the sometimes strange allocation of duties, are for the Home
Office." 1
'I. G. Gibbon: "The Ministry of Health." Public Administration, July 19.6,
vol. 4, p. 247·
386
387 TNI ...OCISS OF REO.CANIZATlON

Marginal subjects between one agency and another will always

exist, as will borderline cases between one area and another. Are
there, however, some standards or guides which can be universally
followed in grouping or regrouping functions or in organizing and
reorganizing an administrative strudure?

I. ALTERNATIVE BASES FOR ORGANIZATION AND

REOIlGANIZATION

Whether such standards ever appear, we have, nevertheless, cer-

tain basic organizational factors from which a selection can be made
to guide the process of reorganization. Luther Gulick has presented
these factors as follows.

LUTHlR CULICK
"Notes on the Theory at Organization" •
In building the organization from the ,bottom up we are con-
fronted by the task of analyzing everything that has to be done and deter-
mining in what grouping it can be placed without violating the principle
of homogeneity. This is not a simple matter, either practically or theo-
retically. It will be found that each worker in each position must be char-
acterized by:
1. The major purpose he is serving, such as furnishing water, con-
trolling crime, or conducting education;
2. The process he is using, such as engineering, medicine, car-
pentry, stenography, statistics, accounting;
3. The persons or things dealt with or served, such as immigrants,
veterans, Indians, forests, mines, parks, orphans, farmers, au-
tomobiles, or the poor;
4. The place where he renders his service, such as Hawaii, Boston,
Washington, the Dust Bowl, Alabama, or Central High
School.
Where two men are doing exactly the same work in the same
way for the same people at the same place, then the specifications of their
jobs will be the same under 1, 2, 3, and 4. All such workers may be easily
combined in a single aggregate and supervised together. Their work is
homogeneous. But when any of the four items differ, then there must be
a selection among the items to determine which shall be given precedence
in determining what is and what is not homogeneous and therefore com-
binable.
• Luther Gulick; "Notes on the Theory of Organization." Papers on the Science of
Administration. Selected from pp. '5, 31-3'. Reprinted by permission of The Institute
of Public Administration, Columbia University. Copyright, '937, Institute of Public
Administration. Columbia University.
 388 ADMINISTRATION

A few illustrations may serve to point the problem. Within the

City of New York, what shall be done with the doctor who spends all
of his time in the public schools examining and attending to children in
the Bronx? Shall we (1) say that he is primarily working for the school
system, and therefore place him under the department of education?
(z) say that he is a medical man, and that we will have all physicians in
the department of health? (3) say that he is working with children, and
that he should therefore be in a youth administration? or (4) say that he
is working in the Bronx and must therefore be attached to the Bronx
borough president's office? \Vhichever answer we give will ignore one or
the other of the four elements characterizing his work.
Students of administration have long sought a single principle of
effective departmentalization just as alchemists sought the philosophers'
stone. But they have sought in vain. There is apparently no one most
effective system of depllrtmentalism. Each of the four basic systems of
organization is intimately related with the other three, because in any
enterprise all four e1ments are present in the doing of the work and are
embodied in every individual workman. Each member of the enterprise
is working for some major purpose, uses some process, deals with some
persons, and serves or works at some place.
If an organization is erected about anyone of these four charac-
teristics of work, it becomes immediately necessary to recognize the other
characteristics in constructing the secondary and tertiary divisions of the
work. For example, a government which is first divided on the basis of
place will, in each geographical department, find it necessary to divide
, by purpose, by process, by clientele, or even again by place; and one di-
vided in the first instance by purpose, may well be divided next by
process and then by place. While the first or primary division of any
enterprise is of very great significance, it must none the less be said that
there is no one most effective pattern for determining the priority and
order for the introduction of these interdependent principles. It will de-
pend in any case upon the results which are desired at a given time and
place.
An organization is a living and dynamic entity. Each activity is
born, has its periods of experimental development, of vigorous and stable
activity, and, in some cases, of decline. A principle of organization ap-
propriate at one stage may not be appropriate at all during a succeeding
stage. In any government various parts of its work will always stand at
different stages of their life cycle. It will therefore be found that not all of
the activities of any government may be appropriately departmentalized
neatly on the basis of a single universal plan. Time is an essential element
in the formula.
Another variable is technological development. The invention of
machines, the advance of applied science, the rise of new specializations
and professions, changes in society and in the way men work and move
in their private life must be continually reflected in the work of govern-
389 THE PllOCESS OF IEOllCANIZATIOM

ment, and therefore in the structure of government. Before you organize

a statistical division there must be statistical machinery and statistical
science, but as soon as there are such machinery and science, any large or-
ganization which fails to recognize the fact in its organization may greatly
lessen its utilization of the newly available tools and skills.
A further variable influencing the structure of any enterprise is its
size, measured not so much by the amount of work done as bv the number
of men at work and their geographical dispersion. A drug store is an excel-
lent illustration of the problem encountered. It must have a prescription
department with a licensed pharmacist, no matter how small it is, because
of the technological requirements involved. But it does nat need to have
a separate medicine and supply department, refreshment department,
book department, toy department, sporting goods department, cigar de-
partment, and delivery department, each with a trained manager, buyer
and sales force, unless it is a big store. In the small store, the pharmacist
may even be the manager, the soda jerker, and the book dispenser. If the
business is big enough, it may be desirable to have more than one store
in order to reach the customers, thus introducing geographical subdivi-
sion. Similarly, in government the nature of the organization must be
adapted not only to the technological requirements but also to the size
of the undertaking and the dispersion of its work.

Gulick's factors of purpose, process, person, and place, have been

employed with varying degrees of emphasis by earlier experts who
have written on organization.' Even Aristotle inquired in his Politics:
"Should one person keep order in the market and another in some
other place, or should the same person be responsible everywhere?
Again, should the offices be divided according to the subjects with
which they deal, or according to the persons with whom they deal:
I mean to say, should one person see to good order in general, or
one look after boys and another after women, and so on?" • Attempts
have been made in modern administration to arrive at a more basic
formulation of the principles of reorganization: Little has been
added, however, beyond Gulick's conclusion that there are alter-
native factors on which to base an organization, that one bas to
make a "unifunctionaI" choice among them, and then adapt the rest
of the organization to that factor."
• Thomas R. Jones: "Theories and Types of Organization." Training Manual Work-
ers. American Management Association; 1928, pp. 8-9. Holden, Fish, and Smith: Top·
Management Organization and Control, p. 30. SomeIVeJl: "Management," pp. 257-
5S.
1,.
• Arirtotle: Politics, Book IV, Chapter McKeon: Works of Arirtotle, p. 1229·
• C. E. Knoeppel, "How to Organize for Graphic Control." Industrial Management,
November 1915, vol. 56, p. 383. Herbert A. Simon: "The Proverbs of Administration."
Public Administration Review, Winter 1946, vol. 6, pp. 53-67. See also Chapter 8.
"See also Miriam E. Oatman and William H. Gilbert: "Federal Field Offices."
7Sth Congo 1St Sess., '943, Senate Document No. 22, pp. 1-2
390 ADMINISTRATION

The main task is to choose a major factor that is intrinsic to the

main objective of the organization, and then to see that the uni-
functional choice is carried out as consistently as possible. In 1935,
Secretary of Agriculture Henry A. Wallace appealed to the test of
"growing things" in defending the assignment of functions to the
Department of Agriculture. But Secretary of the Interior Harold L.
Ickes sardonically asked whether "roads grow," thus questioning the
continuance of the Bureau of Public Roads in the Department of
Agriculture, an assignment which, until the establishment of a sepa-
rate works agency or department, had been a contentious question of
Federal reorganization.'

2. BRITISH DEPARTMENTAL REORGANIZATION

British experience reveals both a desire for a logical and unifunc-

tional structure and a persistence of organizational anomalies arising
out of tradition. Two case reports will reveal these opposite tenden-
cies: (a) the reorganization of Queen Victoria's household, and
(b) the reorganization proposals of the Ministry of Reconstruction
as contained in the so-called Haldane Report following W orId War I.

(a) LYTTON STRACHEY

Queen Victoria·
The control of the [royal] household, it appeared, was divided
iu the strangest manner between a number of authorities, each independ-
ent of the other, each possessed of vague and 6uctuating powers, without
responsibility, and without co-ordination. Of these authorities, the most
prominent were the Lord Steward and the Lord Chamberlain-noblemen
of high rank and political importance, who changed office with every
administration, who did not reside with the Court, and had no effective
representatives attached to it. The distribution of their respective func-
tions was uncertain and peculiar. In Buckingham Palace, it was believed
that the Lord Chamberlain had charge of the whole of the rooms, with the
exception of the kitchen, sculleries, and pantries, which were claimed by
the Lord Steward. At the same time, the outside of the Palace was under
the control of neither of these functionaries-but of the Office of Woods
and Forests; and thus, while the insides of the windows were cleaned by
, House of Representatives, Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Depart.
ment: "Change of Name of the Department of the Interior to Department of Con·
servation and Works." 74th Cong., 1st Sess., '935, pp. 40,83. Joint Committee on Re·
oIganization: "Reorganization of Executive Departments." 68th Cong., 1st Sess., 19'4.
8 Lytton Strachey: Queen Victoria. Selected from pp. ,8,-S7. Reprinted by pet.
mission of H:lrcourt, Brace and Company. Copyright, 19", Harcourt, Brace and
Company.
391 THE PROCESS
, OF REORCANIZATION

the Deparbnent of the Lord Chamberlain-or possibly, in certain cases,

of the Lord Steward-the Office of Woods and Forests cleaned their out-
sides_ Of the servants, the housekeepers, the pages, and the housemaids
were under the authority of the Lord Chamberlain; the clerk of the
:kitchen, the cooks, and porters were under that of the Lord Steward;
but the foobnen, the livery-porters, and the under-butlers took their orders
from yet another official-the Master of the Horse_
Naturally, in these circumstances the service was extremely de-
fective and the lack of discipline among the servants disgraceful. They
absented themselves for as long as they pleased and whenever the fancy
took them; "and if," as the Baron put it, "smoking, drinking, and other
irregularities occur in the dormitories, where footmen, etc., sleep ten and
twelve in each room, no one can help it." As for Her Majesty's guests,
there was nobody to show them to their rooms, and they were often left,
having utterly lost their way in the complicated passages, to wander help-
less by the hour. The strange divisions of authority extended not only to
persons but to things. The Queen observed that there was never a fire in
the dining-room. She enquired why. The answer was, "the Lord Steward
lays the fire, and the Lord Chamberlain lights it"; the underlings of those
two great noblemen having failed to come to an accommodation, there
was no help for it-the Queen must eat in the cold.
A surprising incident opened everyone's eyes to the confusion
and negligence that reigned in the Palace. A fortnight after the birth of
the Princess Royal the nurse heard a suspicious noise in the room next to
the Queen's bedroom. She called to one of the pages, who, looking under
a large sofa, perceived there a crouching figure "with a most repulsive
appearance." It was "the boy Jones." This enigmatical personage, whose
escapades dominated the newspapers for several ensuing months, and
whose motives and character remained to the end ambiguous, was an
undersized lad of 17, the son of a tailor, who had apparently gained ad-
mittance to the Palace by climbing over the garden wall and walking in
through an open window. Two years before he had paid a similar visit in
the guise of a chimney-sweep. He now declared that he had spent three
days in the Palace, hiding under various beds, that he had "helped him-
self to soup and other eatables," and that he had "sat upon the throne,
seen the Queen, and heard the Princess Royal squall." Every detail of the
strange affair was eagerly canvassed. The Times reported that the boy
Jones had "from his infancy been fond of reading," but that "his counte-
nance is exceedingly sullen." It added: "The sofa un_der which the boy
Jones was discovered, we understand, is one of the most costly and mag-
nificent material and workmanship, and ordered expressly for the accom-
modation of the royal and illustrious visitors who call to pay their respects
to Her Majesty." The culprit was sent for three months to the "House of
Correction." When he emerged, he immediately returned to Buckingham
Palace. He was discovered, and sent back to the "House of Correction"
for another three months, after which he was offered four pounds a week
392 ADMINISTIIATtOM

by a music hall to appear upon the stage. He refused this olier, and
shortly afterwards was found by the police loitering round Buckingham
Palace. The authorities acte~ vigorously, and, without any trial or process
of law, shipped the boy Jones off to sea. A year later his ship put into
Portsmouth to refit, and he at once disembarked and walked to London.
He was re·arrested before he reached the Palace, and sent back to his ship,
the Warspite. On this occasion it was noticed that he had "much im·
proved in personal appearance and grown quite corpulent"; and so the
boy Jones passed out of history, though we catch one last glimpse of him
in 1844 falling overboard in the night between Tunis and Algiers. He was
fished up again; but it was conjectured-as one of the Warspite's officers
explained in a letter to The Times-that his fall had not been accidental,
but that he had deliberately jumped into the Mediterranean in order
to "see the life-buoy light burning." Of a boy with such a record, what
else could be supposed?
After much laborious investigation, and a stiff struggle with the
multitude of vested interests which had been brought into being by long
years of neglect, Prince Albert succeeded in effecting a complete reform.
The various conflicting authorities were induced to resign their powers
into the hands of a single official, the Master of the Household, who be-
came responsible for the entire management of the royal palaces.
(b) United Kingdom Report of the Machinery of Government
Committee'

Upon what principle are the functions of Departments to be de-

termined and allocated? There appear to be Gnly twG alternatives, whkh
may be briefly descn"bed as distribution according to the persons or classes
to be dealt with, and distribution according to the services to be per-
formed. Under the former method each Minister who presides over a
Department would be responsible to Parliament for thGSe activities of
the Government which allect the sectional interests of particular classes
of persons, and there might be, for example, a Ministry for Paupers, a
Ministry for Children, a Ministry for Insured Persons, or a Ministry for
the Unemployed. Now the inevitable outcome of this method ot organisa-
tion is a tendency to Lilliputian administration. It is impossible that the
specialised service which each Department has to render to the com-
munity can be of as high a standard when its work is at the same time
limited to a particular class of persons and extended to every variety of
provision for them, as when the Department concentrates itself on the
provision of one particular service only, by whomsoever required, and
looks beyond the interests of comparatively small classes. We are satisfied
that the present existence of Departments designed to minister to par-

• United Kingdom: "RepOrt of the Machinery of Governmcmt Committee." Min·

istry of Reconstruction; 19.8, Cd. 92;0, selected from pp. 4, 7-9, 16.
 THE PROCESS OF REORGANIZATION

ticular classes of persons greatly increases the complexity of such problems

by introducing cross-divisions into the main division by services which
ought to prevail. We think that if the functions of Departments could be
distributed among Ministries organized mainly on the other principle it
would be easier to determine the allocation to its appropriate Department
of any particular function.
We suggest that, if this were done, all decisions to concentrate
functions in particular Departments should, subject to the main principle
of allocation by services, be governed by the extent to which particular
functions conduce to the primary end of that Department's administra-
tion. This distinction between dominant and subordinate interests in a
given piece of work cannot be absolute or irrevocable. It must be drawn
for practical purposes, and the decisions which follow from it will rightly
be reversed if in process of time a subordinate interest becomes, even
temporarily, a dominant one.
H the principle which we have suggested be accepted, the busi-
ness of Government would fall into one or other of the following main
divisions:-
I.-Finance.
II. and IlL-National Defence and External Affairs.
IV.-Research and Information.
V.-Production (including Agriculture, Forestry, and Fish-
eries), Transport, and Commerce.
VI.-Employment.
VII.-Supplies.
VIII .-Education.
IX.-Health.
X.-Justice.
I t does not necessarily follow that there would be only one Minister for
each of these branches. Some of them would undoubtedly require more
than one.
It will be noticed that in certain cases the two principles of dis-
tribution which we have contrasted, namely, that of allocation according
to the class of persons dealt with, and that of allocation according to the
nature of the service rendered to the community, may lead to an identical
concentration of functions. Thus, the great service of National Defence,
which (whether given to one, or to two or to three Ministries) is essen-
tially distinct from the function of the other Ministries, is also marked off
by dealing, principally and specifically, with the large number of persons
employed by the Government in all the various branches of the naval,
military, and air services. In like manner, if the railways and canals should
be nationalised, it would be necessary to make the administration of this
great service of National Transport a separate Department, whether we
had regard to the nature of the service thus rendered to the community,
or to the dealings with so extensive a staff as would have to be employed.
 AOMINlSTIAnON

We may conclude that where any great enterprise is nationalised-in the

sense of being carried out, in the main, by persons in direct Government
employment-as is the case with regard to National Defence and the
Postal and Telegraph service and as may possibly be the case with regard
to railways and the coal supply, such an administration must form the
sphere of a separate Ministry or Ministries.

The anticipations of the Haldane Report were realized thirty

years later when, following World War II, the British established
such government corporations as the National Coal Board, British
Transport Board, British Overseas Airways Corporation, British Elec-
tricity Authority, and Central Land Board. Most of the new min-
istries or departments created in the decade after the beginning of
World War II were concerned mainly with the ministerial directIon
of these public corporations. These new ministries included, besides
the already established Ministry of Transport, the Ministries of Fuel
and Power, Civil Aviation, Supply, and Town and Country Plan-
ning.'· This program represented an integrated approach, but the
anomalies of British departmental organization continued especially
in non-nationalized functions. Thus, British housing, while princi-
pally under the control of the Ministry of Health, which traditionally
supervised local government affairs, was also under the direct in-
fluence of the newer Ministries of Town and Country Planning,
Works, and Supply." The situation was somewhat similar to that
after World War I, when both the British Admiralty and the War
Office were determined to control the administration of pensions for
their respective veterans. The problem was thought to be solved
when an independent Ministry of Pensions was established, but con-
flicting claims were then put forward by the Ministry of Labor, which
was responsible for the employment of veterans, and by the Board
of Education, which was concerned with their retraining.
The structure of British ministries after World War II in no way
resembled the integrated ten-fold classification recommended after
World War 1. The possibility might have been to regroup the min-
istries under the ten categories of the Haldane Report; but without
a genuine reallocation and consolidation of functions under fewer
cabinet members with superior authority over ministries or sub-
ministries, this procedure would constitute no more effective re-
organization than the more crystallized proposal made by Leon Blum

,. William A. Robson: "The Administration of Nationalized Industries in Britain."

Public Administration Review, Summer 1947, vol. 7, p. 161-69.
11 "Parliament and Whitehall." Labor and Industry in Britain, Felnuary 1946,
vol. 4, pp. 30-32.
395 THE PROCESS OF REORCANIZATlON

for France after World War I: Military Affairs, Diplomatic Affairs,

Economic Affairs, Political Affairs."
The likelihood was not apparent that after World War II a "Boy
Jones" incident would result in the reorganization of the vaster Brit-
ish government as it did in the reconstruction of Queen Victoria's
household. Nevertheless, the price of success of British nationaliza-
tion may be a drastic structural rationalization, no matter how uno.
suited to British tradition.

3. AMERICAN DEPARTMENTAL REORGANIZATION

Somewhat more rational in form, American departmental or-

ganization has suffered from a similar resistance to reorganization.
Even the academicians, who are generally eager concerning structural
rationalization, have been skeptical about the actual accomplish-
ments of reorganization, especially at the state level of government."
At the Federal level, there was a series of reorganization plans ~nd
surveys extending over a period of two generations and culminating
in (a) President Roosevelt's Committee on Administrative Man-
agement in the late 1930'S, and (b) the Hoover Commission on the
Organization of the Executive Branch of Government in the late
1940 's.

(al THE PRESIDENT'S COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE

MANACEMENT

"A Plan for Reorganization""

Any large industrial or commercial enterprise with plants, stores,
or services scattered over a continent would, for the sake of good man-
agement, organize the business on the basis of the separate services,
plants, or areas. Each one of these divisions would then have a manager,
and there would be over all a president or general manager who would
direct the whole enterprise, working through 8' to 10 executive assistants

12Leon Blum: La Reforme Gouvernmentale. Paris: Grasset; 1918, Chapter 6.

13F. W. Coker: "Dogmas of Administrative Reform." American Political Science
Review, August 1922, vol.. 16, pp. 399-411. W. H. Edwards: "The State Reorgani.
zation Movement." Dakota Law Review, January 19'7, vol. 1, pp. '3-30; April ','7,
vol. 1, pp. '5-4'; Febmary 19.8, vol. 2, pp. 17-67; May 19.8,. vol. 2, pp. 103-3~.
C. S. Hynernan: "Administrative Reorganization: An Adventure into Science and
Theology." TournaI of Politics, February '939, vol. 1, pp. 62-75.
,. The President's Committee on Administrative Management: "A Plan for Re·
organization:' Administrative Management in the Government of the United States.
1937; pp. 33-34.
396 ADMINI$TIIATION

in accordance with the policies determined by the stockholders and the

board of directors. This is in general what we propose for the Government
of the United States, making allowance for the differences in method and
purpose of the Government as a servant of the Nation.
No man can manage, coordinate, or control more than 100 sepa-
rate agencies, particularly when in some of them responsibility to the
Chief Executive is not definitely placed. The number of immediate sub-
ordinates with whom an executive can deal effectively is limited. Just as
the hand can cover but a few keys on the piano, so there is for manage-
ment a limited span of control. In the Army this has been said to be 3
subordinates; in business it has frequently been set at 5 or 6; and some
students of government have placed the limit at 10 or 12. Obviously the
number is not the same for all work or for all men, nor can it be deter-
mined mathematically. But one thing is clear: It should be the smallest
possible number without bringing together in any department activities
which are unrelated or in con6.ict with each other.
It is thus necessary to determine what are the new major fields
of activity of the National Government and to make a place for them.
These are disclosed in the multitude of new agencies and laws of the past
25 years. As we view them they seem to fall in live great categories: Public
Welfare, public works, public lending, conservation, and business controls.
These are the great thrusts which have come to the surface in the last
generation, not only in this country, but in all countries, though in dif-
ferent ways. Certain phases of these activities may not be permanent, but
the major purposes are apparently here to stay, and deserve appropriate
departmental homes.
An examination of the existing executive departments shows that
there is no adequate place in the present structure for two of these new
developments: Public welfare and public works. We therefore recommend
that new departments be set up by law to cover these two fields, and that
there be assigned to these departments by the President not only the
appropriate new activities in these fields but also the old activities closely
related thereto. The remainder of the new activities, which have to do
with lending, regulating, and conservation, may be assigned to existing
departments without altering their fundamental purposes.
In the case of conservation, however, it would seem desirable to
establish a Department of Conservation, which would take over most of
the activities of the present Department of Interior. The name "conserva-
tion" should be among the departmental titles because it represents a
major purpose of our Government today. We therefore recommend that
the name of the Department of Interior be changed to Department of
Conservation. In accordance with these recommendations the operating
divisions of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government would be
as follows: Department of State, Treasury, War, Justice, Post Office,
Navy, Conservation. Agriculture. Commerce, Labor, Social Welfare, and
Public Works.
3'17 THE PROCESS OF REORCANI%ATlOH

(b) Report of the Commission on Organization of the Executive

Branch of the Government"
As a result of depression, war, new needs for defense, and our
greater responsibilities in the foreign field, the Federal Government has
become the most gigantic business on earth. In less than 20 years the
number of its civil employees has risen from 570,000 to over 2,100,000.
The number of bureaus, sections, services, and units has increased four-
fold to over 1,800. Annual expenditures have increased from about
$3,600,000,000 to over $42,000,000,000. The national debt per average
family has increased from about $500 to about $7,500. Such rapid growth
could not take place without causing serious problems_ Organizational
methods, effective 20 years ago, are no longer applicable.
At the present time there are 65 departments, administrations,
agencies, boards, and commissions engaged in executive work, all of which
report directly to the President-if they report to anyone. This number
does not include the "independent" regulatory agencies in their quasi-
judicial or quasi-legislative functions. It is manifestly impossible for the
President to give adequate supervision to so many agencies. Even one
hour a week devoted to each of them would require a 65-hour work week
for the President, to say nothing of the time he must devote to his great
duties in developing and directing major policies as his constitutional
obligations require. Therefore, we recommend that these various agencies
be consolidated into about one-third of the present number.
With the complicated activities of the Federal Government, it
is not possible to arrive at perfection in carrying out these principles. An
agency may of necessity have work related to that of other agencies not in
the same group. The determination of the major group in which such an
agency shall be included becomes a matter of over-all judgment. The
Commission recommends that such authority should be given to the
President and that the power of the President to prepare and transmit
plans of reorganization to the Congress should not be restricted by limi-
tations or exemptions. Some of the recommendations contained in the
volumes of our report, which we plan to file from time to time betweco
now and the expiration of the life of the Commission, can be put into
effect only by legislation. Others can be accomplished by executive action.
But many of the most important can probably be accomplished only if
the Congress reenacts and broadens the power to initiate rcorganization
plans which it had previously granted to the President under an act which
expired on March 31, 1948.

The Federal executive structure thus seemed well on its way to

reducing the burden on the President's "span of control" from -one

10 "General Management of the Executive Branch." A Report to Congress by the

Commission on Organization of the Executive Bilinch of the Government, February
'949· Adapted from pp. viii-x, 3 S-6. ,
398 AOMINISTRATION

hundred independent departments, agencies, and commISSIons in

1937, or sixty-five in 1949, to a more manageable number. Moreover,
the long-advocated integrated defense agency and independent
agencies for public welfare and public works seemed finally to be
emerging. 16 111ere were no signs that the dream of limiting the Chief
Executive's span of attention to as few as ten subordinate depart-
ments would be realized; nor was there complete agreement as to
which of the individual bureaus to subject to thoroughgoing integra-
tion under the department and which to subject merely to a form
of holding-company departmental controL"
A major difficulty in national reorganization is the entrenched
position of the individual bureaus, some of which are older than their
own departments and are charged with vital Federal functions
which override considerations of departmental organization. Bureau
heads responsible for such functions build up a "clientele" among
the public they serve and among Congressmen representing districts
and constituents interested in the independence 01' such functions
from departmental domination.
Perhaps the principal issue of Federal reorganization is the ques-
tion of who should be given the power to carry out the process of
reorganization. The system evolved in the late 1930'S. after the Presi-
dent's Committee on Administrative Management had reported,
provided for a congressional veto over presidential reorganization
orders. But such congressional intervention was regarded as a barrier
to an effective reorganization program.'" Even before he became
President, Herbert Hoover had insisted that while Congress should
lay down the departments on the basis of "major functions," presi-
dential initiative was essential in the allocation or reallocation of
bureaus and in the detailed follow-up required to make any reorgani-
zation effective."
Personalities and personal interest, too, playa decisive part and
indeed, an essential role in the supposedly objective process of re-
organization. William H. Holmes of the United States Geological
]0 See Chapter 9. An early reorganization propnsal incorporating the idea for a

"Secretary of Public \Velfare" was contained in C. E. McGuire: "A Program of Ad·

ministrative Reform at Washington." The Harvard Graduates' Magazine. June '920,
vol. .8. p. 578.
"Schuyler C. Wallace: Federal Departmentalization. New York: Columbia Uni·
versity Press; '94', Chapler 4. Arnold Brecht and Comstock Glaser: The Art and
Technique of Administration in Cerman Ministries. Cambridge: Harvard Umversity
Press; 1946. Chapter 2. John D. Millett: "Departmental Manageinent in Practice."
Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of Government, Appendix E,
"Departmental Management," January '949, p. '7 el seq.
18 Feuel Heady: "A New Approach to Federal Executive Reorganization." Ameri-
can Politic.1 Science Review. December 1947. vol. 41, pp. 1118-26.
1. Joint Committee on Reorganization: "Reorganization of Executive Departments,"
1924, p. 35 0 •
 THE PROCESS OF REORCANI%ATlON

Survey, disappointed in not becoming the head of that agency, in-

tensified his services to his special clientele, the mining interests and
miners, and joined them on the "Hill" in securing the necessary
legislation to establish the Bureau of Mines. Harry M. Daugherty,
in his capacity as a prison adviser before he became Attorney General,
advocated that the adntinistration of prisons be established in a na-
tional welfare department and removed from the Department of
Justice_ As Attorney General, however, he was "indoctrinated" by
his bureau heads and changed his mind. As a consequence of intra-
organizational politics of this kind, Herbert Hoover testified before
the Joint Congressional Committee on Reorganization in 1924:
"Cabinet heads necessarily take color from their subordinates . . .
If you want to reorganize you've got to hand down from on high." ..

4. THE STRUGGLE OVER MILITARY REORGANIZATION

The most serious case of internecine departmental warfare is

found in the war agencies. The following official excerpts show that
(a) Pearl Harbor had crystallized the nation's determination for
military reorganization; but despite a rich wartime experience with
joint and combined operations, the passage of (b) the National Se-
curity Act of 1947, proved merely a lukewarm attempt at co-ordina-
tion and was actually converted into a means of preventing military
integration until another crisis would bring about a genuine integra-
tion of the armed services.

(a) fOINT CONCRESSIONAL COMMITTEE

Pearl Harbor Attack 21
Effective utilization of the military power of the Nation is essen-
tial to success in war and requires: First, the coordination of the foreign
and military policies of the Nation; and, second, the coordination of the
operations of the Army and Navy.
The responsible commanders in the Hawaiian area, in fulfiIlment
of their obligation so to do, prepared plans which, if adapted to and used
for the existing emergency, would have been adequate. In the circum-
stances the responsibility of these commanders was to confer upon the
question of putting into effect and adapting their joint defense plans.
These commanders failed to confer with respect to the warnings and
orders issued on and after November 27, and to adapt and use existing
.. I::int Committee on Reorganization: "Reorganization of Executive Depart-
ments, 19'4, p. ;So.
21 Joint Congressional Committee: Pearl Harbor Attack. 79th Cong., 1St Sess.,
Hearings, Part 39, 1946, selected from pp. 19-21.
400 ADMIN1STIlATtON

plans to meet the emergency. Had orders issued by the Chief of Staff and
the Chief of Naval Operations November '1.7, 1941, been complied with,
the aircraft warning system of the Army should have been operating;
the distant reconnaissance of the Navy, and the inshore air patrol of the
Army, should have been maintained; the antiaircraft batteries of the Army
and similar shore batteries of the Navy, as well as additional antiaircraft
artillery located on vessels of the fleet in Pearl Harbor, should have been
manned and supplied with ammunition; and a high state of readiness of
aircraft should have been in effect.
None of these conditions was in fact inaugurated or maintained
for the reason that the responsible commanders failed to consult and co-
operate as to necessary action based upon the warnings and to adopt
measures enjoined by the orders given them by the chiefs of the Army
and Navy commands in Washington. The failure of the officers in the
War Department to observe that General Short, neither in his reply of
November 27 to the Chief of Staff's message of that date, nor otherwise,
had reported the measures taken by him, and the transmission of two
messages concerned chiefly with sabotage which warned him not to resort
to illegal methods against sabotage or espionage, and not to take measures
which would alarm the civil population, and the failure to reply to his
message of November 29 outlining in full all the actions he had taken
against sabotage only, and referring to nothing else, tended to lead Gen-
eral Short to believe that what he had done met the requirements of the
warnings and orders received by him. The failure of the commanding
general, Hawaiian Department, and the commander in thief, Pacific Fleet,
to confer and cooperate with respect to the meaning of the warnings re-
ceived and the measures necessary to comply with the orders given them
under date of November 27, 1941, resulted largely from a sense of security
due to the opinion prevalent in diplomatic military, and naval circles, and
in the public press, that any immediate attack by Japan would be in the
Far East. The existence of such a view, however prevalent, did not relieve
the commanders of the responsibility for the security of the Pacific Fleet
and our most important outpost.
In the light of the warnings and directions to take appropriate
action, transmitted to both commanders between November 27 and De-
cember 7, and the obligation under the system of coordination then in
effect for joint cooperative action on their part, it was a dereliction of
duty on the part of each of them not to consult and confer with the other
respecting the meaning and intent of the warnings, and the appropriate
measures of defense required by the imminence of hostilities. The atti-
tude of each, that he was not required to inform himself of, and his lack
of interest in, the measures undertaken by the other to carry out the
responsibility assigned to such other under the provisions of the plans
then in effect, demonstrated on the part of each a lack of appreciation of
the responsibilities vested in them and inherent in their positions as
commanders in chief, Pacific Fleet, and commanding general, Hawaiian
401 THE PROCESS OF RIORCANIZATION

Department. The Japanese attack was a complete surprise to the com-

manders, and they failed to make suitable dispositions to meet such an
attack. Each failed properly to evaluate the seriousness of the situation.
These errors of judgment were the effective causes for the success of the
attack.

(bl NATIONAL SECURITY ACT OF 1947

"Declaration of Policy" 22

In enacting this legislation, it is the intent of Congress to provide

a comprehensive program for the future security of the United States; to
provide for the establishment of integrated policies and procedures for
the departments, agencies, and functions of the Government relating to
the national security; to provide three military departments for the opera-
tion and administration of the Army, the Navy (including naval aviation
and the United States Marine Corps), and the Air Force, with their
assigned combat and service components; to provide for their authorita-
tive coordination and unified direction under civilian control but not to
merge them; to provide for the effective strategic direction of the armed
forces and for their operation under unified control and for their integra-
tion into an efficient team of land, naval, and air forces.

There were many aspects to the inter-service controversy which

raged after World War II, but when it was realized at the end of the
1940'S that the Navy had plans for as large an air arm as the Air
Force, there was no doubt in the minds of most Americans where
the key problem lay. In the recurrent controversies over military re-
organization since World War I,2B there had always been inter-service
rivalries. Some of the problems arose over Army-Navy football or
over competition between the Marine and the Army bands." There
was, it is true, a legitimate doctrinal difference over the role of air
power, first with regard to coastal defense and later with regard to
naval carrier versus land-based aircraft." However, in an age of atomic
energy, supersonic speed, jet propulsion, pilotless aircraft, guided
missiles, and radar controls, laymen as well as experts began to dem-
22 National Security Act of '941: "Declaration of Policy." 80th Cong., 1St 8ess.,
Public Law 253, chap. 343·
28 There were a balf·dozen major investigations, including the United Air Service
hearings in 1919, the Brown Report to tile Joint CongresSional Committee on Re·
organization in '920, the Air Service Unification hearings in 192;, the 1926 congres-
sional hearings on a Department of Defense, the Baker Board report in '934, and the
1945 congressional hearings on a Department of Defense .
.. Drew Pearson: More Merry-Go-Round. New York: Liveright Publishing C0rpo-
ration; 1932, pp. 260-73 .
.. F. Eberstadt: Report to James Forrestal, Secretary of the Navy, "Unification of
the War and Navy Departments and Postwar Organization for National Security."
Senate Committee on Naval Affairs, 79th Cong.. 1St Sess., 1945.
402 ADMINISTRATION

onstrate their impatience with service loyalties that turned out to be

service jealousies inimical to the national security.
American history on this point could conveniently be combined
with a more contemporary perspective. In 1798, the American Min-
ister at Lisbon, William Smith, wrote to Secretary of War McHenry:
"I find you are at length likely to have some Symptoms of a Navy-
and that there is to be a Navy Department, but I don't learn which
way your propensity inclines, whether to the Army or Navy; as you
are subdivided into two parts, I wish to know with which part the
Soul remains; with the Navy part or the Army part? are you to be
Mars or Neptune? are you to wield the Truncheon or the Trident?
God prosper you in whatever capacity; you have an arduous task and
Sad Devils to deal with." ,.
Perhaps Professor Arnold Brecht and Comstock Glaser are right
in concluding: "The government of a democratic country can only
be thoroughly reorganized at psychological moments when the po-
litical mood is one of reform, and vested interests, governmental as
well as private, are at the weakest." 27 Nevertheless, those observers
who were confident of the American capacity for public management
hoped that on vital questions of organizing for national security :.md
international peace, the nation would not have to stand by for the
crisis which existing organizational habits would !>e insufficient to
deal with.

5. PRECEPTS FOR REORGANIZATION

Admitting that politics sometimes complicate reorganization, are

there any tested precepts that can be followed once an opportunity
for reorganization arises? Considerable guidance may be obtained
from the experience of business administration, as explained below
by (a) the management engineer, Harry A. Hopf, and (b) the busi-
ness research expert, Lounsbury Fish.

(a) HARRY A. HOPf

"Organization, Executive Capacity and Progress" ..

Implicit in all the considerations advanced are certain principles

which demand acceptance and observance if the process of organization
,. June '3, 1798, quoted by Bernard C. Steiner: "Correspondence of William
Smith, American Minister to Portngal." Sewanee Review, January 1906, vol. 14, p. 96.
27 Arnold Brecht and Comstock Glaser: The Art and Technique of Administrnoon
in German Afinistrres, p. 13 .
.. Harry A. 1I0pf: "Organization, Executive Capacity and Progress." Advanced
Management, Jnne 1946, vol. ll, p. 40. Reprinted by permission.
403 THI PROCESS OF REORCANI%ATION

is to be soundly accomplished and its product, the structure, is to be made

responsive at all times to the yarying requirements imposed upon it. Some
of the more important of these principles are here set forth:
1. The organizational structure should be divided into the small-
est number of levels consistent with effective distribution of authority
and responsibility;
2.. Subdivision of activities should proceed to the point where spe-
cific duties are commensurate with the capacities of those engaged in
. their performance;
3. The power of decision should be placed as closely as possible
to the point where action originates;
4. Reliance should be based primarily on individual action and
authority, and group action and authority should be resorted to only where
clearly required for purposes of co-ordination;
5. Detailed information should be converted as rapidly as possible
into control information as it moves upward through successive organiza·
tionallevels;
6. The ultimate design of organizational structure should invari-
ably bring to expression definite distinctions among the major levels of
administrative, managerial and operative performance.

(b) LOUNSBURY S. FISH

"Organization-Foundation of Management" 29
Let us review, for a moment, the considerations which should
guide this basic division and subdivision of the total undertaking into
components which will meet these exacting requirements-which will
permit Management to delegate and decentralize its burdens without
sacrificing essential coordination and control.
Each should comprise a logical, separable field of responsibility-
a natural subdivision of the total task, whose scope and jurisdiction can
be clearly defined. These may be relatively distinct subenterprises such as
product or regional divisions or subsidiaries; functional divisions, like
manufacturing, marketing, accounting; geographical outposts, such as re-
gional, district or branch offices or plants; or staff aspects of the manage-
mentjob.
Each should represent a clear-cut "contract" for which a properly
qualified executive, supervisor, or staff man can be held squarely respon-
sible and accountable.
Each should have easy, workable relationships with other associ-
ated components, with a natural, definable basis of division between them.
It should be clear where one responsibility "leaves off" and the next
begins .

.. Lounsbury S. Fish: "Organization-Foundation of Management." Advanced

Management, June 1946, vol. 11, selected from pp. 52-;4. Reprinted by permission
404 ADMINISTllATION

Each should represent a relatively homogeneous and cohesive

field of responsibility, made up of elements which are compatible, related,
having some common bond. The responsibility for any single undertaiing
should not be divided.
Each should contain all elements which afe parts of a closely
related group, which "belong" together, which comprise a complete
entity. Conversely, it should not contain incompatible or "foreign" ele-
ments which are more properly parts of other assignments.
Every effort should be made to keep the number of management.
levels at an absolute minimum in order to facilitate administration and
avoid delay, multiple handling and red tape. The number of levels is
dependent upon the number of primary components requiring executive
coordination, and the number of these which it is feasible to group for
such coordination at a higher level. Obviously, the minimum number of
management levels will result where each proprietary executive (or super-
visor), in ascending order, has a jurisdiction embracing "all he can SlItis-
factorily manage."
As a final test of organizational adequacy in support of any execu-
tive office, let us visualize The Executive, sitting at his desk, faced with
the many responsibilities and obligations of management. Let us, for a
moment, consider that each of his problems or "worries" is reduced to
writing-not only the matters that have been referred to him for decision,
but also the many plans, actions and lines of endeavor that he himself
should be initiating, in the interests of good management-and that these
papers are stacked in an impressive pile, upon his desk. The Executive's
task is to divide up and delegate the bulk of these worries among the
members of his staff (who, we will assume, are represented by baskets on
his desk), reserving for himself those primary obligations which he as
chief must personally assume. If he is able to go through this pile and,
without hesitation, sort and toss each of his delegable worries neatly and
clearly, into one of the staff baskets with confident expectation that it
will be properly taken care of-then he has a good organization both as
to plan and people.

Concerning the several proposed lists of "principles," Hopf be-

gins and Fish ends with the warning that the "levels of control"
should be as few as possible. Despite its inter-service conflicts, mili-
taty organization, too, has made some progress. Traditionally, the
commander had, besides his field units which reported to him di-
rectly from the line, a general staff level and a special staff level of
control. If officers from each level were to report directly to the
commander, his normal span of control would be seriously exceeded
and his responsibilities would be overwhelming. The question there-
fore arose if more of the line problems and also the special staff prob-
lems could be subsumed under the general staff sections which would
 THE PROCESS OF I.EOIlGAJfIZATION

occupy most of "the right of access" to the commander. This repre-

sents a very different conception of the general staff than had origi-
nally been contemplated. In the interests of effectively commanding
a highly complex program, in an air force operation for example,
there has been a tendency to substitute the "deputy commander"
role for that of the "general staff" officer, with a recent tendency to
reduce the number of deputies in direct contact with the commander
to as few as two, one for "operations" and one for "administration." '"
Obviously, this adjustment does not mean that the chief execu-
tive is to be closed off from other staff officers or from technical sub-
divisions or field units in his organization. On the contrary, an execu-
tive who has thus learned to curtail his span of control is left with
more time and opportunity to get out into the field and make more
personal contact with technical operations. For, paradoxical as it
may seem, the decision to cut oneself off from duplicating "levels of
control" means that one is more available to effectuate control at all
the various levels of an organization. Effective reorganization is a
personal and psychological process which can be carried on in the
mind of an administrator as well as imposed upon the organization
chart.

6. THE COMMON SENSE OF REORGANIZATION

Some of these more simple and yet more subtle aspects of re-
organization are revealed by two professors of public administration:
(a) Lent D. Upson of Wayne University, and (b) Marshall E.
Dimock.

(a) LENT D. UPSON

"Letters on Public Administration" S1

Fix up your organization on a "unifunctional" basis, which means
give every sub-administrator some like things to do, which means put
people and activities into neat compartments or pigeonholes. After you
have your activities carefully allocated into neat little cubby-holes, there
will be no way by which the fellow in one pigeonhole can know what the
other fellow is doing. That is how it happens that street paving sometimes
gets laid before water mains and sewers, and in these days, the artiIlery
gets shells that are a couple of sizes too big or too small, There is no real
cure for this trouble that the textbooks have thought up yet. But staff

so See Chapter 10.

31 Lent D. Upson: "Letters on Public Administration." Selected from pp. 21,
'3-2;. Detroit: National Training School for Public Service; 1947·
 ADMfNlSTIIATlON

meetings help and there is talk nowadays about "staff officers" to do

nothing but "coordinate."
Also, occasionally, you can shuffle the cubby-holes around or pull
out the partitions between a few of them. This process is called "integra-
tion." Akin to this difficulty of coordination is the fact that two services
sometimes have to work together although they are under different bosses.
This arrangement permits the janitor of the school to thumb his nose at
the principal because he, the janitor, reports to the business manager
downtown. There is no cure for this trouble either, although the authori-
ties on administration have thought up a lot of reports for one or the
other injured persons to fill out which gives him some mental relief and
keeps him from blowing a fuse.
Also, so-called "streamlining" is the process of jerking "service"
functions out of each of the principal activities and consolidating them
into general overhead units. That means in low-brow language, that you
take the jobs of personnel management, budgeting, accounting, purchas-
ing, maintenance of facilities, and sometimes clerical work including
stenographic, statistical and drafting servi~and centralize these in a half-
dozen main auxiliary departments. This kind of business is supposed to
make for economy and efficiency and also makes some sub-administrators
mad as hops and they can argue from here to Sunday on how their work
is hampered, hindered and mayhemed by the process. Sooner or later, the
department heads wrangle some of these services back into their depart-
ments, clandestinely entering bookkeepers and statisticians on the payroll
as cmv.f.feurs or iJoorKeepers. No answer to this one either except that
staff functions are in the constant process of centralization and decent~ali­
zation and/or integration or disintegration which keeps everybody on
edge as to whether or not he is going to have a job next year.

(b) MARSHALL DIMOCK

The Executive in Action·2
The opposition of some executives to formalized organizational
analysis stems in part from a reaction against the too zealous advocacy
of organization as the universal panacea of all management ills. These
executives correctly understand that organization is not the whole of
management any more than personnel or budgeting or public relati<)Us.
Organization analysis, therefore, is not properly the periodic pursuit of the
expert; rather, it is the continuous responsibility of the executive. His
clue ,is found in malfunctionings; not in the blind following of precon-
ceived stereotypes.
Management experts can do much harm simply by being qoc-
trinaire when, because of some customarily accepted formula, they tear

.. Dimock: The Executive in Action. adapted from pp. 53-;4. 79, .64, .6;, .68.
Reprinted by permission of Harper and Brothers. Copyright. 1945. Harper and Brot4ers.
407 THE PROCESS OF REORCANIZATION

apart established ways of doing things even though the existing structure
is producing satisfactory results. They evidence a form of professional
conceit-not confined to them by any means-which contributes in-
variably to the bad opinion which many successful executives hold of the
management expert. It is a serious thing to operate on a going concern,
because an institution is made up of people with established ways of doing
things; people who, in consequence, develop certain institutional attach-
ments which are an important part of institutional success. They are like
the traditions of a family. Men take pride in them.
It takes time for an organization to settle into a groove. An ef-
ficient enterprise must work in a groove because a groove is the smooth
way of doing things. Here, again, misunderstanding is frequent because
too often it is assumed that the groove is a rut which must be avoided at
all costs. The urge is to reorganize out of it, to consolidate and divide and
shake up, simply to prevent the groove from becoming established. But
this is shortsighted and unrealistic. The groove is essential. It is not the
groove that should be prevented but the too deep grooving which be-
comes a rut and eventually militates against flexibility, fresh outlook, and
adaptability to change. The person inexperienced in organizational mat-
ters may argue that there is a narrow dividing line between the groove,
which leads to efficiency, and the rut, which leads to retrogression, and
decay. That is partially true. The solution to the dilemma lies in the
awareness of the executive, and those associated with him, of the dangers
as well as the benefits inhering in the situation. They can then take the
positive steps which will prevent a rut from developing.
Consolidation does not necessarily increase efficiency. It may
assist the chief executive in his supervisory function, but at the same time
it creates the problem of trying to blend oil with water. To put so many
agencies together that each loses its initiative and its drive is a serious
matter. Since the purpose of management is to satisfy those who rely upon
the service, then obviously administrative convenience and reducing the
number of units to an apparently more manageable group of packages are
academic pursuits which should be viewed with some skepticism. An un-
natural blending of activities forced into the same vat may result in a
colorless and insipid brew. A sound organization is built around operating
units possessed of a life, a vitality, and an inner drive of their own.
The only wayan executive can be certain that any failure to per-
form effectively is his own is to assure himself in the first place that all the
elements necessary for a unified administration are in his hands. He cannot
afford, however, to stop dead in his tracks in order to iron out the prob-
lems of a limited jurisdiction, nor to clarify the relationships between his
own organization and those which have the power to d<:tract from its full
effectiveness and efficiency. The work must go forward. But if he has a
clear idea of what is required of him in getting his job done, if he knows
precisely what his objectives are and can identify and be on guard against
the hazards to survival that surround him, then he will have constantly
408 ADMINISTDTIOII

on the border of his mind those steps which are necessaI}' to round out
his jurisdiction and protect the future of his program. It becomes a sort
of sixth sense with him, always present but scarcely ever conscious. It is
this sixth sense which, when unexpected opportunities arise, causes him
unhesitatingly to move into a position where his enterprise can avail itself
of the chance to complete its powers. Thus does the executive enter the
arena of power relationships.
There is a difference between aggrandisement which merely looks
to greater financing, more employees, and increased power and prestige,
and that which is an integral part of the strategy of performing a unified
and rounded function. It is easy to rationalize the one into the other. The
executive, therefore, must honestly examine his own thought and motives
so as to make sure that his desire for a unified authority is not in reality
an avid, if disguised, thirst for power. Nothing will more quickly dissipate
the strength of his organization than the assumption of unnecessary and
unrelated activity. Similarly, nothing is more indispensable to success than
the proper juxtaposition of related parts so that his machine may operate
smoothly and with no cylinders missing.
The wise executive never looks upon organizational lines as being
settled once and for all. He knows that a vital organization must keep
growing and changing with the result that its structure must remain
malleable. Get the best organization structure you can devise, but do not
be afraid to change it for good reason: This seems to be the sound rule.
On the other hand, beware of needless change, which will only result in
upsetting and frustrating your employees until they become uncertain as
to what their lines of authority actually are.

Professor Dimock recognizes that this need for flexible organiza-

tion arises from the simple fact that in modern administration,
"There is no such thing as dead center. Life is constantly moving
and so is an organization. " ..

7. THE PROCESS OF CONTINUING REORGANIZATION

Should administrators make reorganization a continuous process?

Some specialists in business administration, think this plan is neces-
sary and furthermore believe a special organization or department
responsible for the process of reorganization must be established.
Professor Paul E. Holden and his research associates at Stanford Uni-
versity, Lounsbury S. Fish and Hubert L. Smith, are among the
scholars who favor the continuous process.

as Dimock: The Executive in Action, p. 18.

 THE NOCESS OF REORGANIZATION

HOLDEN, FISH, AND SMITH

Top-Management Orpni:ution and Control ..
Maintenance of a logical and effective plan of organization is not
a matter of chance, of '1etting nature take its course." It requires con-
tinuous study, development, adjustment to changing conditions, and
review of actual practice to see that the plan is properly understood and
working effectively. Control over this important activity is usually effected
through:
Organization Planning Initiation and Approval of
Organization Changes
Organization Charts Periodic Review of Organi-
zation Practice
Job Specifications Organization Training
Control Specifications Staff Agency Required
Organization Manual
While some companies recognize the need for a general over-
hauling and clarification of their organization plans, very little is done
about it, first, probably because they lack a well-qualified staff agency to
do the work, and, second, because any needed major changes might im-
pinge upon some of the major executives or their ideas. In this connec-
tion, several of the participating companies have in mind the development
of an ultimate or "ideal" plan of organization-not as it is, but as it
should be-to serve as a guide to the gradual strengthening and clarifica-
tion of the structure, as it becomes opportune to make changes, through
retirements and other eventualities. Thus, when changes are made, they
will be made in the right direction and in the course of time a clean-cut,
rational plan or organization can be achieved without any major disruption
of personnel.
Preparation and maintenance of the organization manual is a
natural function of a staff organization department working in close col-
laboration with the executives concerned. It is probably unnecessary to
emphasize the importance of clear thinking and expression and the avoid-
ance of all unnecessary detail in the preparation of such a manual. It is
generally conceded that the plan of organization, establishing as it does
the pattern of management, warrants the attention of men of the highest
caliber. In some companies even the president or chairman devotes an
appreciable share of his time to this important work. In short, it is a job
for management, not a clerical assignment.
Two [out of 31 companies studied] have done a splendid job of
organization clarification through what they term the "consultative plan
.. Holden, Fish, and Smith: Top-Management Organization and Control. Selected
from pp. 91-91, 99-100. Rej>rinted by permission of Stanford Univel"Sity Press. Copy-
right 1941. Stanford UnivetSlty Press.
410 ADMlN1STRA1'iON

of management." Under this plan executives meet frequently with their

subordinates and staff assistants to consider and discuss the problems of
management, such as organization structure; propet allocation of func-
tions, responsibilities and authority; long-term objectives; measures of ac-
complishment; and procedure. Out of these discussions evolve the best
possible plans for the solution of these management problems. The plans
thus derived constitute the organization manual. This process of "self-
determination" has been found to be very stimulating and effective in
clarifying viewpoint and understanding, and in contributing to the train-
ing and development of the key personnel who participate. It is believed,
however, that such a program is a logical supplement to, rather than a
substitute for, an able staff agency concentrating on organization matters.
Such an agency, responsible for developing the general pattern of organi-
zation and for guiding, co-ordinating, and assisting the efforts of divi-
sional executives within this field, should contribute materially to the
speed and effectiveness of the program for clarifying organization.

Public administration as well as business is becoming more aware

of the need for deliberate machinery of this kind. Some of the pio-
neer work in this field is being conducted by the Division of Ad-
ministrative Management of the United States Bureau of the Budget,
and the Organization and Methods Division of the British Treasury.

8. A PRACTICAL CHECKLIST FOR REORGANIZATION

C. Dwight Waldo is one of the most incisive American critics of
the overemphasis on administrative mechanics and at the same time
a pragmatic analyst of organizational affairs. He is a former Federal
administrative employee, professor of political science at the Uni-
versity of California, and author of the stimulating survey of the
theory of American public administration, The Administrative
State." Professor Waldo lists the following specific questions as a
means of solving the problem of organization and reorganization:

C. DWICHT WALDO
"Organizational Analysis: Some Notes OR Methods and Criteria""
. 1. Is the problem "organizational" or "procedural"? Organiza-
tional studies are undertaken as a result of some sort of irritation in the
•• Compare the review by Arthur W. Macmahon: "The Administrative State,"
Public Administration .Review, Summer 1948, vol. 8, pp. 20,!-1l, with that by
James W. Fesler: "The Administrative State; a Study of Political Theory of American
Public Administration." American Political Science RevieJV. August 1948. vol. 42.
PP·782- 83.
.. C. Dwight Waldo: "Organizational Analysis: Some Notes on Methods and
Criteria." Public Administration .Review, Autumn 1947. vol. 7, seJected from pp. ,.......
43. Reprinted by permission.
411 THE PROCESS OF REORGANIZATION

body politic. It may be, however, that the irritation is procedural rather
than organizational in origin and nature. A change in procedure, as the
less drastic remedy, is nearly always to be preferred. In general the organi-
zational component is greater in the "higher" aspects of administration.
the procedural component greater in the "lower" aspects of administra-
tion. If the problem that is posed is one of executive manageability or
functional unity, therefore, it is unlikely that procedural remedies will
be adequate. But if the problem involves such a matter as cooperative
use of personnel or equipment, an eye should be kept cocked for the
procedural remedy which, being less drastic than the organizational, is
nearly always to be prescribed. It is a safe generalization that measurable
economies can be shown much more easily and frequently through pro·
cedural than through organizational changes.
2. Will executive control, policy coordination, and functional
coherence be facilitated? The analyst must be constantly alert to the
problem whether a proposed change will or will not facilitate executive
control. If executive control appears an important factor in the total
problem, the analyst will probably wish to inquire carefully into the types
of executive control involved and the various alternative means for their
realization. Is it necessary that an executive personally "make policy" for
a given agency? Or is it sufficient if he exercises only general surveillance
over its making? Is it desirable that the executive manage "housekeep-
ing" functions in the area in question as well as control policy formula-
tion?
3. Is there need for autonomy or "independence" and will this
need be served? Since the arguments for decentralization-functional and
territorial-are common coin among students of administration they need
not be rehearsed here. One form of the question of integration that has
escaped discussion will, however, be noted. Different organization units
operate according to different standards of administrative morality and at
various levels of efficiency. In the case of a merger of two units with
varying standards, what is likely to be the resulting set of standards? Is
there an administrative Gresham's law which will dictate the adoption of
the lower standards? If there will be a tendency iii this direction how can
it be arrested?
4. Will manpower or materials be saved? The problem here is
primarily the familiar one of eliminating unnecessary "duplication and
overlapping." There is no more persistent motif in the study of public
administration than the attainment of "economy," and all students unite
in its praise though conceptions of its dictates vary tremendously. Will
consolidation of two organizational units permit a reduction in the total
number of typists, or accountants, or entomologists? Will a transfer of
Bureau X to Department Y release a set of expensive scientific instruments
for use of Department Z? These are the types of questions the analyst
must seek to answer-in terms of dollars and cents, if possible; otherwise,
in general terms that will bear close scrutiny. And having demonstrated
412
an economy, he must then weigh it in the balance against any tangible
or intangible losses.
5. Will cooperation be facilitated? Irrespective of whether two
organizational units have a "common purpose" is there an advantage in
bringing their personnel together for consultation or a joint effort? Irre-
spective of the existence of "common purpose" are there advantages in
sharing or pooling equipment and supplies? If one organizational unit
"services" another wt1I any demonstrable purpose be served by bringing
the two into closer organizational relationship? Or conversely, by termi-
nating the service and arranging for another source of supply?
6. Will clientele, beneficiary, ward, or employee convenience,
welfare, or satisfaction be served? The direct convenience, welfare, or
satisfaction of the persons with whom the government deals may in some
cases be easily measured, but more often it is not. The organizational unity
of certain related services may demonstrably save travel, time, and money
on the part of users of the services. On the other hand, in the more com-
mon case in which intangibles are important the conscientious analyst will
spend some sleepless early morning hours trying to decide whether the
welfare of a certain group will be advanced by an organizational change.
Should employee convenience and satisfaction be weighed? I feel the
answer is an indisputable "Yes." This reply need not be based upon
humanitarian or democratic grounds, though no doubt it could be. It can
be based upon the simple fact that employee convenience and satisfaction
are translated rather directly into employee morale and efficiency. An un-
happy employee is an inefficient employee. If, for example, an organiza-
tional change involves a physical move that meaus that families must
move and find new homes in less desirable locatious, this fact should not
be disregarded.
7. Are personal factors involved that must be considered? This
heading need not detain US long. I am aware that there is a school of
thought which holds that personal factors should be disregarded in favor
of "sound principles" of organization. Nevertheless, I hold it to be a
self-evident truth that personal factors cannot be (or, what comes to the
same thing, will not be) ignored in dealing with organization. Perhaps
they should be minimized.
8. Should the factor of tradition or esprit de corps be considered?
In three types of organization the factors of tradition and esprit de corps
may be especially important-scientific research organizations, military
and seinimilitary organizatious, and organizations in which the element
of professionalism is strong. The destruction of a tradition or the breaking
up of a group with a strong corporate spirit should not be done for "light
and transient reasons." On the other hand, tradition and corporate spirit
may by virtue of their very strength impede the accomplishment of large
objectives, and organizational change may be desirable to reduce their
eftect.
413 THE PROCESS OF REORCANIZATION

Not all students of public administration agree with Professor

Waldo about the need to reconsider or restrain organizational
changes in the light of personality or procedural factors. Like Waldo,
however, many other American administrators who have had a rich
opportunity to participate in and observe the administrative process
during the crisis of the 1930'S and 1940'S IT are seeking a sound \>al-
ance between procedural change and reorganized structure.

SUMMARY
There are several useful and tested precepts of organization or
reorganization. These principles might include the concepts of unity
of command, requiring every member of an organization to be re-
sponsible to only one superior, following the theory that man cannot
serve more than one master; delegation of responsibility, requiring
a dear-cut assignment of duties to subordinate individuals or subordi-
nate levels in order to avoid overlapping or duplication of work, lmd
a grant of authority commensurate with the responsibilities assigned;
and span ot control, restricting the levels of authority or the number
of a superior's immediate subordinates to a number small enough to
be effectively directed and co-ordinated by one man. Some writers
have included with these principles the more descriptive phases of
organization, such as the scalar hierarchy, the staff-and-line mo(ies,
and the spatial or geographic mechanics of organizational struCt\lfe.
In reorganization, it is possible to select from the alternative factors
of purpose, process, person, and place, one such factor for '\mi-
functional" emphasis, always remembering, however, that supse-
quent subdivisions will require an appeal to the rejected factors.
One of the most advisable precepts of reorganization may be the
compliance with more of the practicalities of personality and politics,
without, however, sacrificing the more "rational" objectives of the
organization. Thoughtful students of management have advised a
continuing mechanism for reorganization so ftexibly conceived that
structural changes may be made without waiting for crises which fre-
quently make reorganizations futile. No one best type of organization
for a given institution can readily be found, and unless such tested ex-
perience in the field of organization is utilized, organizational st~c­
ture will interfere with managerial procedure and administrative
accomplishment. The manner in which management procedure, in-
cluding personnel management, weaves in and out of the organiza-
tional structure and stimulates or suppresses the administrative
process, is the subject of the final part of this book.

IT See, for example, David D. Levine: "M......-t Planning in Covemm~t."

rcf=ed to in Chapter '9. D. "0.
 PART III

THE TECHNIQUE OF MANAGEMENT

 CHAPTER FOURTEEN

PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

MANAGEMENT involves the concrete practices and the observable

techniques of administration. Frequently the term management is
used synonymously with administration, and it is invariably assumed
that a good manager is a good organizer. All of these usages are justi-
fied in the general terminology of administration, but in its mDre
specialized sense management refers to the following specific tech-
niques:
1. Personnel management (Chapter 14)
2. Budgeting and financial control (Chapter 15)
3. Planning and programming (Chapter 16)
4. Research, reporting and public relations (Chapter 17)
5. Legal procedures (Chapter 18)
6. Other management procedures and practices (Chapter 19)
These functions may be exercised directly by managers or execu-
tives who are primarily responsible for carrying out subject-matter
functions, such as sales in business, production in industry, invest-
ment in banking, or welfare in government; or they may be delegated
to staff members or service agencies specializing in these managerial
functions. As Luther Gulick has demonstrated in his analysis of
POSDCORB,' these managerial activities constitute the bulk of the
day-by-c1ay routine, the common body of knowledge, and the techni-
cal know-how of all forms of administration.
Among these managerial functions, personnel management is
generally regarded as primary. Indeed, among many students of ad-
ministration, it is the prior importance of personnel that makes
1 See Chapter 2..

417
 418
management a more significant subject than organization. Many
administrators, of course, emphasize structural organization and man-
agerial mechanics alone, but increasingly American administrative
thinking subordinates the offices of government and the machinery
of business to the intellectual and technical qualities of incumbents.
The popular expression, "That's a fine organization," generally
means, "That organization is staffed by excellent people." Early in
, the nation's history there was a distinct recognition of the prior sig-
nificance of personnel over organization in the United States. At the
time of the adoption of the Constitution in 1789, a writer in The
American Museum declared: "Good government manifestly depends
much more on the goodness of the men who fill the public offices
than on the goodness of the form of government, constitution or
even laws of the state . . . and one principal thing which makes one
form of government better than another is that there is a greater and
more natural chance of the appointment of suitable men to public
offices in the one than in the other." 2

1. EXECUTIVE RESPONSIBILITY AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Personnel management has been largely identified in the United
States with the problem of employing qualified personnel in business
or government under a system of merit selection or civil service as
opposed to the practice of business nepotism or spoils politics. Both
the democratic philosophy and the technical strain in American ad-
ministration account for this conclusion. The first factor resulted in
wide-scale participation of all groups, including the unqualified, in
government and administration, while the second emphasized the
element of qualification as a technical corrective to mass participa-
tion. This concern for careful selection and recruitment as a means
of protecting both business and government from unqualified per-
sonnel represents only the corrective and negative phase of the sub-
ject. As Marshall Dimock shows in the following reading, effective
administration calls for a much broader conception of management
and a more positive approach to personnel management.

MAItSHALL DIMOCK
The Executive in Action a
The executive in every walk of life, whether he knows it or not,
directs social forces and determines the destiny of countless people, not
2 Quoted by White: The Federalists, p. ,68.
• Marshall Dimock: The Executive in Action. Adapted from pp. 1, 3-4, 11--9, '7,
1 ;0. Reprinted by permission of Harper & Brothets. Copyright, 1945, Harper &
Brotners.
419 PERSONNEL MANACEMENT

only those who work in his immediate organization but among the larger
pnblic as well. He should comprehend this and recognize his responsibility.
The role of statesman is thrust upon him by the nature and demands of
the position he occupies. To fulfill it he mnst be a philosopher. But he
cannot be a successful philosopher unless he nnderstands the inherent life
of institutions, the reasons why people in institutional situations behave
as they do. This knowledge is the philosophy and technique of manage-
ment.
Management is not a matter of pressing a button, pulling a lever,
issuing orders, scanning profit and loss statements, promulgating rules
and regulations. Rather, management is the power to determine what
shall happen to the personalities and to the happiness of entire peoples,
the power to shape the destiny of a nation and of all the nations which
make up the world. Executive work, therefore, is statesmanship and the
techniques which the executive employs are only incidental to the forces
which he sets in motion and helps to direct. It is no exaggeration, there-
fore, to say that the management of the nation's large institutions, both
in business and in government, determines the fate of millions of indi-
vidual lives as well as the lives of generations unborn.
These institutions, which by some inherent process seem always
to expand, create the environment in which most of us live. If we do not
use sufficient intelligence, if management is narrOW-Sighted and stupid,
we will find ourselves in a vise. The knowledge needed consists in part of
broad principles, such as the rule that authority should usually equal
responsibility, or that individual functions and responsibilities must be
clearly defined if the most effective use is to be made of organization and
personnel. But in addition to these broad principles there must be an
understanding of human nature and the techniques which secure ready
assent, co-operation, morale, and institutional drive. The job of manage-
ment is simply an attempted response to a social need requiring action.
What had to be done was the important thing, while the organization,
the budget, the title, and all else of the kind was merely detail. But it was
important detail, too. The divisions within our administrative structure,
for example, would be efficacious or foredoomed to futility depending
upon how closely their functions coincided with the social need to be
filled.
Management is not an isolated process, a mere game at which
grown boys play. Management is what people do in response to situations
as diverse as society itself. Each situation is different and hence each man-
agement problem is different. Running throughout all of them, however,
are certain general factors and common requirements. The executive who
knows what these are and has sufficient native intelligence to fold them
into his organization possesses the combination that usually wins the
struggle. Throughout the organization, the level of performance can never
rise higher than the capacity of the man in the position carrying the great-
est authority, prestige, and influence. Competent individuals are seemingly
420
unable to function at their best when, over long periods of time, they are
frustrated and held down by weak leadership. A serious and common mis-
take among executives is to assume that a weak man in a pivotal position
can be bolstered by surrounding him with one or more persons of capacity,
making it necessary for several to do what the top man should be able
to accomplish alone. Almost without exception this makeshift fails. One
reason is that the executive who is not fully qualified for his position
seems to be secretly aware of his shortcomings as well as openly aware
of his power, and hence he attempts to cover up in ways injurious to the
efficiency and morale of those who work under him. The weak person is
usually the last to admit his deficiencies, however, and because lacking in
self-confidence, feels that he must compensate by putting up a front. No
executive who puts up a front can hope to have the wholehearted co-
operation and respect of those who work for him.

According to Dimock, therefore, the essential ingredient of suc-

cessful administration and effective management in modem society
is an efficient system of personnel management, including a de-
veloped self-awareness on the part of the managers concerning their
personal capacities and deficiencies.

2. THE UNIVERSAL SEARCH FOR COMPETENT PERSONNEL

Management of others in addition to self-management calls for

a level of maturity and competence among administrative leaders
that is difficult to attain. From the chief executive to the section
chief, whether in the United States or the USSR, the plea is con-
stantly for more competent personnel. This fact is demonstrated by
the following selections from (a) James Bryce, the British com-
mentator on the American government, (b) Walter Lippmann, the
American columnist writing on world affairs, and (c) Joseph Stalin,
now cast in the role of Russian critic of Soviet administration.

(a) JAMES BRYCE

"Why Great Men Are Not Chosen Presidents'"
Europeans often ask, and Americans do not always explain, how
it happens that this great office of President, the greatest in the world,
unless we except the Papacy, to which anyone can rise by his own merits,
is not more frequently filled by great and striking men. In America, which
is beyond all other countries the country of a "career open to talents," a
• James Bryce: "\\'hy Creat Men Are Not Chosen Presidents" The American
Commonwealth. New York; The Macmillan Company; 1889, vol. I, selected from
pp.73-5.
421 PlISOMNEL MANAGEMENT

country, moreover, in which political life is unusually keen and political

ambition widely diffused, it might be expected that the highest place
would always be won by a man of brilliant gifts. Several reasons may be
suggested for the fact, which Americans 3re themselves the first to admit.
1. One is that the proportion of first·rate ability drawn into poli·
tics is smaller in America than in most European countries. This is a
phenomenon whose causes must be elucidated later: in the meantime it
is enough to say that in England, where many persons of wealth and
leisure seek to enter the political arena, while burning questions touch the
interests of all classes and make men eager observers of the combatants,
the total quantity of talent devoted to parliamentary or administrative
work has been larger, relatively to the population, than in America, where
much of the best ability, both for thought and for action, for plamling
and for executing, rushes into a field which is comparatively narrow in
Europe, the business of developing the material resonrces of the country.
2. Another is that the methods and habits of Congress, and
indeed of political life generally, give fewer opportunities for personal
distinction, fewer modes in which a man may commend himself to his
countrymen by eminent capacity in thought, in speech, or in admini~tra·
tion, than is the case in the free countries of Europe.
3. A third reason is that eminent men make more enemies, and
give those enemies more assailable points, than obscure men do. They
are therefore in so far less desirable candidates. It is true that the eminent
man has also made more friends, that his name is more widely known,
and may be greeted witb )ouder cbeers. Otber tbings being equa), the
famous man is preferable. But other things never are equal. The famous
man has probably attacked some leaders in his own party, has supplanted
others, has expressed his dislike to the crotchet of some active section,
has perhaps committed errors which are capable of being magnified into
offenses. Hence, when the choice lies between a brilliant man and a safe
man, the safe man is preferred. An eminent Amt:rican is reported to llave
said to friends who wished to put him forward, "Gentlemen, let there be
no mistake. I should make a good President, but a very bad candidate."
Now to a party it is more important that its nominee should be a good
candidate than that he should turn out a good President.

(b) WALTER LIPPMANN

"The Cult of Incompetence"·
It has high symptomatic value that first·rate men are not in
charge. For those who are genuinely in the know there are much surer
tests. Perhaps the chief reason why they are not applied sternly is that we
have gotten along quite well in this country without havillg to insist upon

• Walter Lippmann: "The Cult of Incompetence." Today and Tomorrow, March

u and June '5, '94'. Adapted and ,eprinted by permission.
422 ADMINISTRATION

the very highest standards of excellence in the public service. Honesty,

a fair amount of industry, some public spirit have seemed gqod enough:
we have pursued excellence elsewhere where the rewards were greater
than in public life.
Thus, when the fate of the Nation and the lives of millions are
at stake, we find that our standards of judgment are soft and complacent.
A "man, known by everyone to be altogether inadequate to his task, can
be indulgently tolerated just because he is where qe is, and it is such an
infernal nuisance to remove him and find someone better.
The cult of incompetence is one of the fatal diseases of modern
life: it will be the ruin of us if we do not look out. What is more, this will
not be the century of the common man, or in any event it will be a ghastly
century, if we do not sober up from being drunk with quantity and set up
for ourselves standards of quality, where not the mass of things but ex-
cellence is the objective.
The struggle is not between isolationists and interventionists,
radicals and conservatives, old dealers and new dealers, capital and labor,
the administration and the public. It is a struggle of energetic men against
passive men, of the alert against the inert, of the live-wires against the
deadwood, and it is being waged inside every department and agency of
the government. What the public has been hearing in the way of criticism
of Washington is in the main not the back-seat driving of self-appointed
critics but the reflection, sometimes confused and even distorted but
genuine, of the struggle of the effective men in the government service
to break through the obstruction of the ineffective men.

(C) JOSEPH STALIN

''Speech to the Graduates of the Red Army Academies"·
What is needed for the new method of leadership? It is necessary,
first of all, that our business leaders should understand the new state of
affairs that now exists, that they should study concretelY the new condi-
tions of development of industry and change their methods of work to
conform with the new conditions.
I recall an incident in Siberia, where I was at one time in exile.
It was in the spring, at the time of the spring floods. About thirty men
went to the river to pull out timber which had been carried away by the
vast, swollen river. Towards evening they returned to the village, but with
one man missing. When asked where the thirtieth man was, they un-
concernedly replied that the thirtieth man had "remained there." To my
question, "How do you mean, remained there?" they replied with the
same unconcern, "Why ask? drowned, of course." Thereupon one of them
began to hurry Qway, saying, "I have got to go and water the mare." When
• Joseph Stalin's Credo. Edited by M. R. Werner, adapted from pp. 93-94, 98-
100, 139. Reprinted by permission of Crown Publishers. Copyright, 1940, Howell,
Soskin, PUblishers, Inc. -
423 PERSONNEL MANACEIIofENT

I reproached them for having more concern for animals than for men, one
of them, amid the general approval of the rest, said, "Why should we be
concerned about men? We can always make men. But a mare-just try
and make a mare!"
Here you have a case, not very significant perhaps, but very char-
acteristic. It seems to me that the indifference shown by certain of our
leaders to people, to cadres, and their inability to value people, is a sur-
vival of that strange attitude of man to man displayed in the episode in
far-off Siberia just related. And so, if we want successfully to overcome
the famine in the matter of people and to provide our country with suf-
ficient cadres capable of advancing technique and setting it gOing, we must
first of all learn to value people, to value cadres, to value every worker
capable of benefiting our common cause. It is time to realize that of all
the valuable capital the world possesses, the most valuable and most de-
cisive IS people, cadres. If we have good and numerous cadres in industry,
agriculture, transport and the army-our country will be invincible. If we
do not have such cadres-we shall be lame on both feet.
In this connection there is too much talk about the merits of
chiefs, about the merits of leaders. All or nearly all our achievements are
ascribed to them. That, of course, is wrong, it is incorrect. It is not merely
a matter of leaders. The point is that we have factories, mills, collective
farms, Soviet farms, an army; we have technique for all this; but we lack
people with sufficient experience to squeeze out of technique all that can
be squeezed out of it. That is why the old slogan, "Technique decides
everything," which is a reflection of a period we have already passed
through, a period in which we suffered from a famine in technical re-
sources, must now be replaced by a new slogan, the slogan, "Cadres decide
everything." That is the main thing now.
Can it be said that our people have fully understood and realized
the great significance of this new slogan? I would not say that. Otherwise,
there would not have been the outrageous attitude towards people, to-
wards cadres, towards workers, which we not infrequently observe in
practice. The slogan, "Cadres decide everything," demands that our lead-
ers should display the most solicitous attitude towards our workers, "little"
and "big," no matter in what sphere they <Ire engaged, cultivating them
assiduously, assisting them when they need support, encouraging them
when they display their first successes, advancing them, and so forth. Yet,
in practice we meet in a number of cases with a soulless, bureaucratic and
positively outrageous attitude towards workers. This, indeed, explains why
instead of being studied, and placed at their posts only after being studied,
people are frequently flung about like pawns. People have learned how to
value machinery and to make reports of how many machines we have in
our mills and factories. But I do not know of one instance when a report
was made with equal zest of the number of people we have developed in
a given period, how we assisted people to grow and become tempered in
their work. How is this to be explained? It is to be explained by the fact
424 ADMINISTUTION

that we have not yet learned to value people, to value workers. to value
cadres.
And so, our task is to see to it that the working class of the USSR
has its own industrial and technical intelligentsia.

Stalin was not always so solicitous for individual Soviet per$onnel,

and by his own admission was "obliged to handle some of these
comrades roughly." T Nevertheless, the Soviet search for competent
administrators and "businessmen" has continued into the post-war
period.' This search has its counterpart even in the United States
where we find a more' highly respected form of industrial manage-
ment and business administration. However, the assumption that
American management has shown a greater degree of competence in
business and industry rather than in politics and government is being
increasingly challenged. Students of administration are aware of the
rising criticism of the predominance of "average" men as business
executives, the shortage of "doers" in our large enterprises, and "the
insufficient competence of men to manage and improve the eco-
nomic institutions they operate.'" The complaint still is heard in
government that our domestic and especially our international affairs
are "handled by little men," ,. and Bryce's criticism of our top leader-
ship in government has been partly confirmed by more recent
analyses. In 1948, Arthur M. Schlesinger, professor of history at Har-
vard University, taking as his guide the evaluation of fifty-five fellow
historians, produced the following rating: six out of twenty-nine
American Presidents were rated "great," four "near great," eleven
"average," six ''below average," and two "failures." U
Assuming that insufficient talent has been attracted to govern-
mental administration, perhaps the major explanation is the inade-
quate recognition of public personnel, and particularly insufficient
salaries. As early as 1797, Alexander Hamilton complained that "the
pecuniary emolument is so inconsiderable as to amount to a sacrifice
to any man who can employ his time with advantage in any liberal
profession." 12 Timothy Pickering, when he was Secretary of State,
T Ibid. The Soviet Union '9H •• Symposium. New York: International Publishers;
1935. p. 6.
,S Solomon M. Schwarz: "The Industrial Enterprise in Russia." Harvard Business
Review. Spring '945, vol. '3, pp.•65-76.
• Robert D. Calkins: "A Challenge to Business Education." H=d Business Re-
view, Winter '944, vol. '3, p. 118. Peter F. Drucker: The Concept of the Corporation.
New York: The John Day Company; 1946, pp. 3S-39. Anonymous: "Is Big Business
a Career." Harper's Maguine, JanualY 1926, vol. 15', p. :1.1 5.
" The Christian CentulY, March .6, '9'7.
n Life, November 1, 1948, pp. 6S-74.
12 Letter, May., 1797, The WOl'lcs of AleDnder Hamilton, vol. 10, p. 259. Quoted
by Lynton K. Caldwell: The Administrative Theories of Hamilton " feffetsoD. Chi-
cago; The University of Chicago Press; 19440 p. 85.
425 PERSONNEL MANACEMENT

had to refuse a dinner invitation extended by the British Minister

because, he explained, "Congress do not allow persons holding
executive offices under the United States (unless they possess private
fortunes) to have any convivial intercourse with foreign ministers;
and scarcely admit of it with the most intimate of their fellow citi-
zens." Plaintively, he added: "It is deemed honor enough for execu-
tive officers to toil without interruption for their country and indul-
gence enough to live on mutton, mush and cold water." 18
Governmental salaries have climbed slowly especially in the mid-
dle and top brackets, but even after the increases following World
War I and II, pay in public posts still lagged behind remuneration
awarded in comparable positions of responsibility in commercial and
professional life."

3. THE ULTIMATE PERSONNEL FUNCTION-HIRING AND FIRING

In the last analysis, practically every administrator has to struggle

with insufficient salaries and resources, but despite these factors, he
will be judged by the capacity and contributions of the men with
whom he surrounds himself. Consequently, the power to hire and
fire is not only the key power of the executive; the way in which the
executive exercises this power will be a major determinant of his own
success or failure. This conclusion was clearly understood by such
great leaders as (a) Abraham Lincoln and (b) Napoleon Bona-
parte."

(a) Letter of Abraham Lincoln to Major General Hooker,

January 20, 1863 ,.
I have placed you at the head of the Army of the Potomac. Of
course I have done this upon what appears to me to be sufficient reasons.
And yet I think it best for you to know that there are some things in
regard to which, I am not quite satisfied with you. I believe you to l» a
brave and skillful soldier, which, of course, I like. I also believe you do nbt
mix politics with your profession, in which you are right. You have con-
,fidence in yourself, which is a valuable, if not an indispensable quality.
18 Pickering Papers, vol. 8, p. '04. Quoted by White: The Federalists, p. '97.
"William E. Mosher and J. DoniiTd Kingsley: Public Personnel Administration.
New York: Harper II: Brothers; 194', pp. 443-49.
U D. O. Lumley: "Napoleon Bonaparte as an Administrator." Journal of Public
Administration, 1923, vol. 1, pp, 127-35.
1. Letter of Abraham Lincoln to Major General Hooker, J;muary .6, ,863.
Roy P. Basler (ed.): Abraham Uncoln.: His Speeches and Writings. Pp. 693~.
Reprinted by permission of The World Publishing Company. Copyright, 1946, The
World Publishing Company.
426
You are ambitious, which, within reasonable bounds, does good rather
than harm. But I think that during Gen. Burnside's command of the
Army, you have taken counsel of your ambition, and thwarted him as
much as you could, in which you did a great wrong to the country, and to
a most meritorious and honorable brother officer. I have heard, in such a
way as to believe it, of your recently saying that both the Army and the
Government needed a Dictator. Of course it Was not for this, but in
spite of it, that I have given you the command. Only those generals, who
gain successes, can set up dictators. What I now ask of you is military
success, and I will risk the dictatorship. The government will support you
to the utmost of its ability, which is neither more nor less than it has
done and will do for all commanders. I much fear that the spirit which
you have aided to infuse into the Army, of criticizing their Commander,
and withholding confidence from him, will now turn upon you. I shall
assist you as far as I can, to put it down. Neither you, nor Napoleon, if
he were alive again, could get any good out of an army, while such a spirit
prevails in it. And now, beware of rashness.-Beware of rashness, but with
energy, and sleepless vigilance, go forward, and give us victories.

(b) Letter of Napoleon to M. Fouche, June 3, 1810"

I am aware of all the services you have done me, and I believe
in your attachment to my person, and your zeal in my service; nevertheless
I should be failing in my duty to myself if I allowed you to remain in
office. The position of Minister of Police demands absolute and entire
confidence; and that confidence can no longer exist, since you have al-
re::ady, in certain important circumstances, endangered my peace, and that
of the state, by conduct which is not excused in my eyes by the correctness
of your motives. Your singular conception of the duties of a Police Min-
ister cannot be reconciled with the good of the state. Though I have no
doubt of your attachment, or of your fidelity, yet I am obliged to be con-
stantly on the watch: it tires me out, and I cannot be tied down to it.
This supervision is necessitated by the number of things you do on your
own responsibility, without finding out whether they may not be contrary
to the whole trend of my policy. The result has been a complete upset of
my international policy, and (if I were to overlook your conduct) a re-
flection upon my character which I cannot and will not endure. I wanted
to tell you myself my reasons for depriving you of the Ministry of Police.
r can see no hope that you are likely to change your way of doing things,
because, for some years past, neither signal examples nor repeated state-
ments of my displeasure have produced any effect, and because you are
so sure of the purity of your motives that you refuse to recognise that the
path of Hell is paved with good intentions. In spite of all, my confidence
11 Letter of Napoleon to.M. Fouch~, June 3, 1810. Napoleon 'Self-Revealed. TraIlS·
lated and edited by J. M. Thompson. Adapted from pp. 211-72. Reprinted by per.
miaion of Houghton MillIin Company. Copyright, 1934, Houghton Miftliu Company.
 PUSONNEI. MANAClMINT

in your talents and your fidelity is unimpaired, and I am only anxious to

find an opportunity to prove the one, and to employ the others in my
service.
It is apparent that in order to obtain the necessary talent, execu-
tives sometimes must run the risk, as did Lincoln, of selecting men
who think they are too big for their jobs. But at the same time they
must always be on the alert, as was Napoleon, to discharge such men
whenever they exceed the bounds of propriety. No measure of such
limits can be predetermined. The test of whether an executive is big
enough to manage his job depends on his ability to hire and hold on
to men who may be more competent than he in certain fields.

4. SELECTION OF PERSONNEL
These cases are significant and at the same time exceptional. The
preponderance of personnel problems in modern administration are
handled en masse by a formal system of competitive examinations
and other established procedures. This personnel system itself is not
of modern origin. In The Republic, written 2500 years ago, Plato was
equally concerned with proper procedures for selecting and training
the "guardians" of the Greek city-states; and he established more
drastic tests, involving the severing of all family ties and a rigorous
training in music, literature, and gymnastics.'· The founders of the
American republic were unwilling to entrust public management to
such elite guardians, but there was nevertheless some element of
aristocracy in the early American system. Washington put consid-
erable emphasis on community standing as an element of fitness,"
a selective element that has prevailed to this day. More democratic
was the ancient Chinese system of examination and recruitment
described below by Hu Shih, Chinese ambassador to the United
States, from 1938 to 1942. This system offers an interesting contrast
to the American system as does the European practice also presented
below by the German-American administrator and scholar, Arnold
Brecht.
(a) HU SHIH
"Historica. Foundations for a Democratic China""
About the year 12.0 B.C., the Prime Minist&, Kung-Sun Hung, in
a memorial to the throne, said that the ooicts and the laws which were
,. Plato: The Republic. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. New York: The Colonial
Press, l,,901.
,. White: The Federalists, p. 2S9
.. Hu Shih: "Historical Foundations for a Democratic China." Edmund J. Tames
Lectures on Government, 2nd Series. University of Illinois Press; '94'. Reprinted by
permission.
428 ADMINISTRATION

written in elegant classical style were often not understood even by the
petty officers whose duty it was to explain and interpret them to the pe0-
ple. Therefore, he recommended that examinations be held for the selec-
tion of men who could read and understand the classical language and lit-
erature and that those who had shown the best knowledge should have the
first preference in appointments to offices requiring the use of the written
language. His recommendation was adopted and marked the beginning of
the civil service examinatjon system.
Ts'ao Ts'ao (d. 219 A.D.), one of the greatest statesmen of the age,
worked out a system of classifying men into nine grades according to their
ability, knowledge, experience, and character. When his son became Em-
peror in 220 A.D., this system of nine-grade classification was officially
adopted for the selection of men for government service. Under this sys-
tem, the government appOinted a special official for each administrntive
area, who was called "Chung Cheng" (the Impartial Judge) and whose
duty it was to list all possible candidates for office and all men of good
family, and, on the basis of public opinion and personal knowledge, grade
them into nine grades according to their deserts. This system, known in
history as that of "Nine-grade Impartial Judgment," naturally involved
much subjective opinion, family influence, and political pressure. It was
humanly impossible to find an objective standard for the nine degrees of
grading. After being tried out for fully four centuries, it was finally abol-
ished under the Sui Dynasty, which re-unified the country in 589, after a
long period of division, and instituted the Government Examination for
civil service in 606.
From the beginning of the seventh century to the beginning of
the twentieth century, for 1300 years, the main system of selection of men
for office was by open and competitive examination. Roughly speaking,
this system has undergone three stages of evolution. The first period, ap-
proximately from 600 to 1070, was the age of purely literary and poetic ex-
amination. There were other subjects, such as history, law, the Confucian
dassics and others, in which examinations were regularly held. But some-
how the purely literary examinations came to be the only highly prized
and universally coveted channel of entrance into public life. The best
minds of the country were attracted to this class of examinations and
the successful candidates in these literary examinations usually attained
the heights of governmental power more rapidly than those who took the
other more prosaic examinations. The reasons for this peculiar pre-em-
inence of the literary and poetic examinations are not far to seek. While
the other examinations required book knowledge and memory work, this
class of ching shih (advanced scholars) was expected to offer creative
poetic composition. These original compositions, required wide reading,
wealth of knowledge, and independence of judgment_ For these reasons
the ching shih came practically to monopolize the civil service for almost
four centuries, and great statesmen and empire builders came out of a
system which, though fair, seemed completely devoid of practical training.
429 PERSONNEL MANACEMI!NT

The second period of the civil service system may be called an age
of transition. The purely literary examination had been severely critici~ed
on the ground of its failure to encourage the youths of the nation to pre-
pare themselves in the practical and useful knowledge of morals and gov-
ernment. In the year 1071, the reformer-statesman Wang An·shih ~uc·
ceeded in persuading his Emperor to adopt and proclaim a new system of
examinations, in which the poetic compositions were entirely abolislled
and the scholars were required to specialize in one of the major classics as
well as to master the minor classics. Under the new system the scholars
were also asked to write an essay on some historic subject and to answer in
detail three questions of current and practical importatlce. This new system
was naturally severely attacked by the sponsors of the old poetic examina·
tions. For two hundred years the government wavered between the two
policies. The prose classical examination was several times discarded :md
again re·established. Finally the government compromised by offering a
dual system placing the poetic composition and the prose classical ex·
position as two alternate systems for the candidates to choose.
Then came the third period during which the prose classical ex·
amination finally became the only legitimate form of civil service exam ina..
tion. The Mongol conquest of North China, and later of the wholt: of
China, had brought about much interruption and dislocation of Chinese
political life, including the abolition of the civil service examination sys-
tem for many decades. When the civil service examinations wtre revived
in 1314, the classical scholars had their way in triumphantly working out
an exam\m.t\<m system ent\~ely ~ente~\ng amund tl\e CQnfudan dassk...
In order to make it more attractive to the creative minds, a special forUl of
prose composition was gradually evolved which, though not rhymed, was
highly rhythmic, often running in balanced sentences, and so rich in ca·
dence that it could be often sing-songed aloud. All candidates were illso
required to write a poem on an assigned theme as a supplement to every
examination paper. These new developments seemed to have satisfied both
the desire for original poetic expression and the more utilitarian demand
for a mastery of the Confucian classics which were supposed to be the
foundation of the moral and political life of the Chinese nation. So this
new examination system lasted from 1314 to 1905 with comparatively few
radical changes in the general scheme.

(b) ARNOLD BRECHT

"The Relevance of Foreign Experience" 21
In Great Britain less than 100 out of all those receiving salaries in
the national service are exempt from merit selection. This figure includes
the prime minister, the cabinet members, the parliamentary undersecre-
21 Arnold Brecht: "The Relevance of Foreign Expetience." Public Management
in the New Democracy. Edited by Fritz MOIStein Marx. Selected from pp. 108-11.
Reprinted by permission of Harper & Brothers. Copyright, 1940, Harper & Brothers.
taries, the junior lords in the Treasury, and everyone else who can be called
to office, or recalled, on the basis of. his political affiliations. All other sal-
aried employees in the national service are subject to merit qualifications,
legally or practically. And the British mean it. In Germany the number of
officials exempt from the merit principle in 1932, the last year of the dem-
ocratic regime, was less than 70 in the federal service. This figure included,
in addition to the ministers, all undersecretaries (11) and ministerial di-
rectors (36). In France the number of positions in the central government
that had not been subjected to merit qualifications either by law or prac-
tice could be said to be definitely below 300, including the parliamentary
undersecretaries, the members of the cabinet du ministre in eaclI min-
istry, and part of the members of the Conseil d'Etat.
In the United States the number of exempt poSitions runs up to
hundreds of thousands. In the federal service the proportion of exempt
positions lies at present between about one-fifth and one-third of the total.
If one deducts the postal service with its large civil-service force, the ratio
of exempt positions would rise to one-half. In the great majority of the
states and counties the merit principle has not yet been established. The
large cities are more advanced; thus in New York City less than one per
cent were exempt in 1937. But despite such progress in individual cases,
not far from 1,000,000 public employees in the United States (297,000
federal, about 150,000 state, and 500,000 local) were not yet under civil
service in 1939.

(C) ARNOLD BRECHT

"Civil Service" 22
Great Britain, the United States and France have developed the
open competitive examination as the ideal implement of the merit prin-
ciple.ln the American literature the terms merit principle and competitive
examination are used almost as synonyms. In Prussia, however, although
it was the first modern power to develop the merit principle, the method
of open competitive examination has never been known either as a fact
or as an ideal. Instead two pass examinations of a high standard, separated
by a probationary and training period of several years, have served as the
basis for admission to the higher categories. These divergent trends in
method deserve closer consideration.
The system of open competitive examinations seeks out recruits
for more or less specified vacancies in more or less specified agencies. It
rests on the hypothesis that it is poSSible to establish an exact order of rank
among competitors on the basis of an examination, so that the administra-
tion may duly be forced to. accept the best rated candidate, In contrast,
the German or rather Prussian method (for some southern German states

.. Arnold Brecht: "Civil Service." Social Research, May 1936, vol. 3, selected from
pp. "05-06, :117. Reprinted by permission.
431 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

had a kind of competitive examination) does not believe in a detailed

order of rank disclosed by examination, but after a difficult pass examina-
tion admits a great number of applicants to coordinated probationary p0-
sitions and later after a second pass examination gradually absorbs them
into the more specialized posts.

One should not immediately conclude that the ancient Chinese

or the modern European system are as clearly superior to the Ameri-
can practice as these writers imply. The Chinese examination was for
the most part restricted in scope to classical poetry; at the same time
it suffered from the most inventive forms of cheating imaginable and
called for an expensive and by no means a foolproof system of proc-
toring."" Among other civilizations it is possible that the Mayan of
Central America had developed a system of examinations for the
public service more effectively attuned to their relatively advanced
economy and techniques.""
With due credit to its fine achievement, the modern British civil
ser/ice system was long in the making. In 1726, Jonathan Swift
satirized the intrenched British system of recruiting inexpert person-
nel. In Gulliver's Travels he described the "unhappy people" of
Laputa, who believed in "choosing for employments persons quali-
fied to exercise them."" During the nineteenth century, when men
like Macaulay were struggling to plant the seeds of a national civil
service by setting an example in such a remote and semi-governmental
department as the Indian Service,"" the English counties, boroughs,
and parishes were suffering under an incapable and corrupt body of
officials and employees. 27 It is true that the British developed their
system of recruitment to a point where the Civil Service Commission
could, after World War II, afford to spend the bulk of its time per-
sonally examining the applicants for the small number of annual
openings in the British administrative class; but even the British are
not certain that their system produces the necessary competence in
23 Pao Chao Hsieh: The Government of China. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins
Press; 1925, chap. 6.
:u Sylvanius G. Morley: The Ancient Maya. Stanford University: Stanford Univer-
sity Press; '940, p. 162.
25 The Works of Jonathan Swift. Edited hy Sir Walter Scott. Edinburgh: Archi-
bald Constable & Co.; 1824, vol. ll, p. 237. See also Richard Hayes: Estimate of
Places for Life. London; 1728. Emmeline W. Cohen: The Growth of the British
Civil Service, '780-'939. London: George Allen and Unwin; 1941.
""This project was finally accomplished as a result of Macaulay's efforts in 1837.
In 1854, tbe so·called Macaulay Report advocated the use of examinations for entrance
to the British Civil Service; see Cbapter 20, above. In 18SS, the first Order-in-Council
was issued relating to departmental examinations and to the Civil Service Commission.
21 Sydney and Beatrice Webb: English Local Government_ New York: Longmans,
Green and Company, Inc.; 1906, ; vols.
432 ADMINISTIlATION

their administrative class to meet the crises of post-war British so-

ciety." In the clerical and manipulative classes too, the British realize
they cannot continue to recruit, as they did in the 1910'S, on the
basis of examinations containing such exercises as, "Descn"be some of
the ways on which large sums of money may be raised for charity."
Practical performance tests and short-answer examinations used in
America have been adopted in England.
In the United States, the spoils system represents something
deeper than a negative form of personnel selection. Contrary to the
traditional view, it originated during the aristocratic period of Fed-
eralism rather than during the period of Jacksonian populism," and
it has since outlived the most persistent efforts to professionalize
completely the public service. The most intense period of civil service
reform following President Garfield's assassination was thought to
have reached its culmination in 1896, when an American commen-
tator spoke of "the final transfer of the whole federal service includ-
ing 85,200 places, to the merit system." so But fifty years later, the
number of federal patronage or "exempt" positions, that is, those
not subject to either civil service or a formal merit system, was as
large as the old estimate. Yet there was much less popular feeling
or expert assurance that patronage appointments were wholly bad
under the peculiar American conditions of alternating political
parties, or wholly avoidable with the sudden expansion of govern-
ment functions. The most reform-minded of our chief executives-
federal, state, and local-have found that they could not entirely
dispense with patronage. Professor Wilson loudly declaimed against
spoils, but he finally resigned himself to the number of appoint-
ments requested by Postmaster General and Party Chairman Burle-
son and merely asked, "Where do I sign?" Sl
Merit selection has nevertheless made steady progress in the
United States, not only under formal civil service systems, but also
under the impetus of a better system of education, so that in actual
fact "men of intelligence may readily qualify themselves" and thus
meet Jackson'S prescription originally announced to justify his
"spoils" appointments. When to the one million "spoils" appoint-
ments are added over a half million Americans occupying elective
office for which only few have formal training or qualifications, the
American personnel system takes on more realistic proportions.
28 D. N. Chester: ''The Efficiency of the Central Government." Public Adminis·
tration, Spring 1948, vo). .6, pp. '0-1; .
.. White: The Federalists. pp. 47. '7>-7;, ,,88-91. 310-11. See our Chapter ; .
.. Edwin L. Godkin: "Problems of Modem Denlocracy." Atlantic Monthly, July
1896, vol. 78, pp. 308-10.
Il Ray Stannard Baker: Woodrow Wilson: Lite and Letters. Garden City: Double·
day. Page & Co.; '927-39. vol. 4. p. 47·
433 PlItSONNEL MANAGEMENT

These pmgmatic practices of American personnel selection will no

doubt persist along with formal civil service selection. And within
the approved system of civil service examinations, continued experi-
ments may be expected. Thus, such devices as group performance
tests .. to measure individual capacities in social and administrative
situations, may supplement the traditional written tests or individual
interviews as a measure of competence.

5. THE WORK OF THE CENTRAL PERSONNEL AGENCY

Selection of specialized and qualified personnel is only one of a
large number of elements that make up the centralized and com-
prehensive type of personnel management," not only in government
but also in business and industry." As it refers to government, this
personnel system has been analyzed by William E. Mosher, the first
dean of the Graduate School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at
Symcuse University; and J. Donald Kingsley, professor of political
science at Antioch College and a public official responsible for gen-
eral duties on the White House staff and for specialized functions
in Federal welfare and security agencies.
WILLIAM E. MOSHER AND ,. DONALD KINCSLEY
Public Personnel Administration so
Taken as a group, our public agencies are far and away the largest
employers in the United States and are carrying on functions that overtop
all others in their importance. The essential work of government is being
conducted today by some 175,000 separate political jurisdictions which, in
January, 1940, were employing over 12 per cent of all the gainfully occu-
pied persons in the country. This great army of public servants totaled ap-
proximately 4,500,000 persons excluding relief workers. They were dis-
tributed among the major types of jurisdictions in the follOWing manner;
NUMBER OF. EMPLOYEES
Federal ................................. 1,296,000
State. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. ... 535,000 to 545,000
City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 915,000 to 965,000
County, Township and minor units. • . . . . . . .. 500,000 to 615,000
Public education ......................... 1,208,000
T eta! ............................. 4>4 54,000 to 4,629,000
--":--:W-al-ter~G-:el=:-lhom and William Brody; "Selecting Supervisory Mediators Through
Trial by Combat." Public Administration Review, Autumn 1948, vol. 8, pp. 259-66·
.. Henry F. Hubbard: "The Elements of a Comprehensive Personnel l'rogram."
Public Personnel Review, July 1940, vol. 1, pp. 1-17, ,
.. Paul Pigors and Cbarles A. Myers: Personnel Administration. New York:
MeGraw.Hill Book Company, Inc.; '947. .
.. William E. Mosher and J. Donald Kingsley: Public Personnel Administratioo.
Selected. from pp. 38-40, 89-100. Reprinted by permission of Harper " Brothers. Copy-
right, '94', Harper " Brothers.
 ADMIMISTaA1'ION
The range and variety of public employments are almost as COm-
prehensive as a dictionary of human occupations. In the federal depart-
mental service alone, a description of the 1,700 different classes of posi-
tions occupied over 800 pages of a report published in 1920, while the Per-
sonnel Classification Board needed over 1,300 pages to deseribe the more
than two thousand different classes of positions in the federal field service
in 1928.
The scope of public employment may also be measured in terms
of payroIls. Various studies show that about one-half of the operating
public expenditures goes for wages and salaries. The aggregate amount on
this single item exceeded $3,898,000,000 in 1926 according to the estimate
made by Mosher and Polah. Despite the nation·wide drive for retrench·
ment in governmental expenditures, this item increased to $6,095,000,000
by 1940.
The conception of the personnel agency as first and foremost a
"politics eliminator" is one which belongs to the horse-and-buggy age.
Gradually, it is giving way in a few of the more progressive jurisdictions to
a view which envisages the personnel department as engaged in developing
incentives, stimulating morale, administering the classification and Com-
pensation plans, rating the service value and efficiency of employees, and
generally promoting policies and methods that make for greater efficiency
and better esprit de corps. Taken all together [these functions1constitute
a comprehensive and up-to-date employment program both for public
Jllld for private enterprises.
1. Classification-Jurisdictional. One of the basic function~ of
the civil service commission is the determination of which classified posi-
tions-i.e., positions subject to the commission's control-shall be filled
by competitive examinations and which exempted therefrom.
2. Classification-Duties. This second type of classification con-
sists in the grouping of positions as to similarity of duties, qualific.ati<ms,
and experience necessary .to fill the given position.
3. Recruiting. Obviously, the development of sources of supply
for promising candidates is a regular duty of a civil service commission.
4. Selection and Certification. There are a number of ste~ in
the performance of these functions, not all of which need to be considered
at this point. Foremost among them, however, is the determination of the
best qualified in terms of particular tests of fituess. The next step in the
selection process is certification: the submission to the appointing ofllcer
of one, to five names, depending upon the jurisdiction. In the final st:ep,
the appointing officer transmits his decision to the civil service commis-
sion, which erIters the name, date of appointment, and other personal
data on its employmerIt records or roster.
5. Probation. Although the standard provision for three months
to one year of probation in the new position is theoretically considered an
integral part of the selective process, affording an opportunity for the
supervisory official to try out the new appointee on the job, the probation
period is almost universally ignored.
6. Service Ratings. An effective system of service or efficiency
ratings is of great importance in personnel administration. It comes into
play in connection With salary advances, promotions, layoffs, transfers, reo
movals, aud the like.
7. Transfers. A satisfactory transfer policy calls for contact on
the part of the central agency with supervisors and individual emploYte5.
8. Promotions. Many commissions have the authority to give ex-
aminations covering promotions from a lower to a higher class, thus Ilro-
viding that opportunity for growth which should be the common right of
all workers.
9. Reinstatement. The practice is well established for comItJis-
sions to determine the order of reinstatement of employees who have been
laid off for one reason or another.
10. Training and Education. Two types of training are generally
accepted as functions of a modem personnel division. One is training for
the position occupied; the other, training for promotion.
11. Attendance. The term "attendance" is used to cover tatdi-
ness, absenteeism, and leaves. As it is customary to grant discretion to the
administrative heads with regard to matters of attendance, a considerable
variety of policies appears within one and the same jurisdiction.
12. Separations. It is in the interest of the service that a central
agency have responsibility in connection with any type of separation, on
the ground that each and every employee represents an investment which
ought, if possible, to be conserved.
13. Discipline. Disciplinary action necessarily originates with the
administrative and supervisory officials. The extent to which the comlQis_
sion may influence such action will depend upon the co-operative re1ati(:ms
existing between the supervisory staff and the staff of the commission.
14. Appeals. It is not unusual for appeals to be taken to the C(\m-
mission either with regard to the standing of candidates as a result of ex-
aminations or classifications or with respect to disciplinary action initiated
by the supervisory staff.
15. Compensation. There are few aspects of public employm\:nt
policy where the lack of central supervision has been more injurious tilan
with regard to the wage and salary policy. The reasons for a lack of stand-
ards are more or less obvious. Appropriating bodies are generally acc,us-
tomed to make appropriations for salary purposes with reference to titles,
but when positions have not been classified on a duties basis, as they h\ive
not been in many jurisdictions, one and the same title may denot~ a
dozen or more types of positions.
16. Checking of Payrolls. The checking of payrolls on the part: of
the civil service commissions is an important safeguard against abuses ~nd
one that is incorporated in the text of civil service laws of several states itnd
municipal organizations.
436 ADMINISTRA1ION
17. Superannuation. Some method of pensioning superannuated
employees is essential in a permanent organization such as the gO\'em-
ment, particularly when so large a body of workers devote their whole lives
to its service.
18. Grievances and Suggestions. The establishment of a sy~tem
whereby the employees may have easy access to their superiors, relieving
themselves of grievances and permitting suggestions that will facilitate
their work, improve efficiency, and the like, is recognized as a vital part of
a modem personnel program.
19. Health, Recreation, and Welfare. The health and welfaie of
the workers are presumably the concern of the heads of the operating
units. But with some exceptions the latter seem to give little thougbt to
this phase of their duties. So far as the personnel agency concerns itself
with welfare and recreation it will serve in an advisory and stimulating
capacity.
20. Work Environment. Judging by the type of working condi-
tions which one finds in many government buildings-the state of toilets,
hallways, drinking facilities, illumination, and the like-one would assume
that responsibility for them is left to the discretion of the janitors. Bere,
again, the function of the personnel division is more one of stimulation
than of taking responsibility for actual supervision.
21. Co-operation of Employees. With the creation of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board a new status for workers has been assured as
the law of the land. Quite apart from the implications of the New peal
program, employee representation is oeserving 01: tbe attention 01 ex-
ecutives because of the substantial benefits that may be derived from giv-
ing the workers a recogltized status in connection with the public eilter-
prise with which they are identified. It opens a channel of communication
between the working force and management and leads to increased Urlder-
standing and co-operation.
22. Co-operation of Executive Personnel. Let the head of the
personnel staff have as broad a grasp of suitable functions as you please,
the success of his efforts will still depend upon the understanding and
good will of those actually engaged in carrying on the work of the e;tab-
lishment-that is, the line officials.
23. Rules and Regulations. The setting up of rules and reGUla-
tions .for carrying out the provisions of the general civil service law is
normally assigned to the civil service commission.
24. Investigation of Operation of the Law. To make the rules and
regulations and the provisions of the basic law effective, the commission
should be and usually is authorized to make such investigations as it sees
fit.
Z5. Research. Until the problems of personnel are satisfactorily
solved and the whole field has been explored, no personnel agency m~y
rest on its oars. If one glances through the functions discussed above it will
 PERSONNEL MANACEMINT

be apparent that a continuous policy of research is called for on practically

every item from classification to investigations of the operations of the law.
l6. Public Relations. In addition to the usual annual and periodic
reports and newspaper releases of the personnel agency which reports its
own activities and policies, it will be suggested in a subsequent chapter
that the agency may properly concern itself with the problem of training
all those officials who come into contact with the public.
With three or four exceptions the functions listed above are com·
man to some public and private employment departments but by no
means to all. With such exceptions all of them are actually being per-
formed by the personnel division in enlightened private concerns, where
they have passed through the experimental stage and are accepted as a
matter of course and justified in the name of good business.

Of all of these specific functions, position classification and com-

pensation schedules have, in addition to the process of recruitment,
consumed an unusual amount of attention on the part of personnel
administrators. This emphasis probably arises from the importance
in American democracy of the theory of "equal pay for equal work."
The enforcement of such a principle requires an objective basis for
determining what jobs or positions constitute "equal work" in terms
of comparable duties and responsibilities. Moreover, a classification
of positions containing a detailed description of duties, training,
experience, knowledge, and abilities required for each job is a pre-
requisite to the elaborate recruiting and testing system in both gov-
ernment and industry. In the Federal government alone, the resulting
classification system is an elaborate schedule of services ("P" or pro-
fessional, "C-A-F" or clerical-administrative-fiscal), grades (from 1
to 16), and classes (junior, senior, or principal), to which al1 indi-
vidual positions are allocated"" Some critics feel that intricate struc-
ture and complex terminology in the Federal classification is useful
as a means of enabling conscientious congressmen to explain to their
constituents why it is difficult to qualify for civil service as well as
a means of arriving at the American idear of equal pay for equal
work.
Classification systems and the periodic reclassifications required
by the changing duties and functions of government is a continuous
and costly process in many state and local jurisdictions as well as in
Federal departments. American industry, which preceded govern-

a. White: Introduction to the Study of Public Administration, '948, chap. '5.

Ri.~d ';'I. Coo_per: "Position Classification in the War I?rogram." Personnel Ad-
llUuistration, April, '942, vol. 4, pp. 1-.0.
438
ment in perfecting the process of personnel classification," also finds
itself constantly grading and regrading positions. The whole system
is characteristically American. These elaborate classification plans,
constant reclassifications, and highly paid classification experts are
relatively unknown in European personnel management. The British
have used a broad classification involvin& (1) the administrative
class, (2) the executive class, (3) the clerical class, and (4) the
writing assistant class, IS but their entire mechanism of civil service
classification and administration is less formalized. Except for British
pension legislation, there are n6 parliamentary statutes dealing with
the civil service comparable to the American civil service or classifica-
tion laws." On the other hand, neither the American nor the British
system will appear so unique to modem enthusiasts of personnel
administration if they study the details of ancient systems. Aristotle's
description of the Athenian constitution, for example, contains the
data of a combined modern administrative manual and a personnel
classification plan."
The mechanical approach to personnel management reached its
height with the installation of punch cards, sorting, and grading
machines to enable central agencies to handle the burden of civil
service recruitment and examinations as well as payrolls and other
personnel procedures!' These devices were undoubtedly helpful and
advisable aids to the enforcement of the merit system, but despite
the progress of mechanical devices and electronics, the automatic
human application of selective judgments is a remote possibility."
The dehumanizing dangers of formal personnel controls have
been apparent in other personnel procedures. In order to systematize
absentee privileges, one agency supplied employees during the 1930'S
with booklets containing a supply of detachable "annual and sick
leave" coupons, ranging from "15 minute" to "liz day" coupons.
Dominated by the function of filling the great mass of clerical, ma-
nipulative, and minor administrative positions under a fair and ob-
jective system of selection, the central civil service agencies of the
17 The city of Chicago was the first governmental jurisdiction to establish a com·
prehensive classification. Three years previous to the Chicago elCample, in '909, J.
Shirley Eaton reported that "the railroad was the first industry in point of time to
assemble great bodies of men highly organized in grades as well as kinds of services."
Education for Efficiency in Railroad Service. U. S. Bureau of Education Bulletin No.
10, whole No. 420.
• .. CivIl Service National Whitley Couucil Reorganization Committee: "Report
of the Joint Committee on Reorganization (Reclassificatiou)," February 17, 1920 .
.. See n. 25 .
.. Aristotle: The Athenian Constitution. Translated by H. Rockham. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press; 193>.
"Reuben Horchow: "Machines in Civil Service Recruitment.» Civil Service As·
sembly Pamphlet No. 14, -October 1939 .
•• Norbert Wiener: Cybernetics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1948.
 PERSONNEl. MANAGEMENT

United States have assumed the function of "processing a multitude

of personnel transactions" rather than the overall management of
personnel and staff problems."

6. DECENTRALIZED AND DEPARTMENTAL PERSONNEL

MANAGEMENT

The operating departments or agencies, in contrast to the civil

service commissions or central personnel agencies are less directly
concerned with overall standards of personnel selection and ad-
ministration. But they too have a major stake in personnel manage-
ment since it is their responsibility to initiate, supervise, process, and
terminate the employment of their personnel. The operating de-
partment's point of view about fitting in with the detailed controls
of the central civil service agency is presented below by two men
who have been operating officials: (a) Oliver C. Short, an official
of the Department of Commerce; and (b) John Fischer, an editor
and writer with extensive wartime service as a federal official.

(a) OLIVER C. SHORT

"The Functions of a Departmental Personnel Officer" ..
There is a transmitting end and a receiving end to the line of this
thing called personnel administration. The significance of this statement
is not always recognized by personnel administrators. A department of
government is created to carry on some work that the unit of government
has undertaken. It may be a large department made up of several com-
ponent parts, or it may be a small one. It has a function, technical and ad-
ministrative. It has a responsibility. It is charged with a duty to perform.
It is expected to carry these responsibilities and to perform these duties
creditably and effectively. It cannot escape the responsibilities nor pass the
duties to anyone else. Yet it is not independent. It is responsible to higher
authority. Individual as the several departments !lre, this responsibility to
the same higher authority synchronizes all of them into one composite
whole. The synchronizing of the several departments into a composite
whole gives a basis for the creation of a central personnel department with
responSibility over the personnel problems; the greatest common factor of
all the departments.
But this constitutes only the transmitting end of the line. A well-
rounded, complete, and properly functioning personnel program compre-
os The Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government,
"Personnel Management." Feb. 1949, p. 9·
.. Oliver C. Short: "The Functions of • Departmental Personnel Officer." Proceed-
ings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Civil Service Assembly of the United
States:md Canad•. 1936, selected from pp. 96--97. 99. Reprinted by permission.
hends the receiving end as wen as the bansmitting. And I am convinced
that just as well qualified, technically bained, professional personnel ad-
ministrators are required at the receiving ends as at the transmitting end.
Whenever a cenbal personnel agency by an assumed place as a super or
extra governmental agency, by a dogmatic, dictatorial attitude, by a too
strict adherence and enforcement of too rigid tiJles and regulations, en-
deavors to dictate a complete personnel program, and to take over the ad-
ministration of a large number of the personnel problems that reasonably
belong to the individual departments, friction and resentment are bound
to result. And in such conflicts the central agency has been in the past,
and properly should be, the loser.
The departments have technical and administrative duties to
perform, and that part of the personnel program that develops skills, in-
dustry, effiCiency, loyalty, integrity, and contentment, belongs, in the
greatest degree, to the department. If handled effectively, it will not only
result in superior performance, it will also lessen the tendency for workers
to seek outside influence and backing. YetI would not do all or any of
these things in defiance of, in opposition to, or even without a central per-
sonnel agency. I would still. fit them all into a well-rounded personnel
program for the whole unit of government with the Civil Service Com-
mission and its part of the personnel program (between that which be-
longs to the central office and that which belongs to the departments
there is no sharp line of demarcation) as the hub.
If I should return at any future time to the field of central per-
sonnel control, I would strive, in the light of my present experience and
convictions to establish such a decentralized yet coordinated system of
personnel administration, and would endeavor to set the pace, shape the
structure, stimulate the performance, and coordinate the results of a com-
plete, well·rounded and comprehensive program; but would not strive to
be the sole operating agent.

( b) JOHN FISCHER

"Let's Go Back to the Spoils System" ..

What's gone wrong with Civil Service is easy enough to find out.
You can get the stoty, in almost identical terms, from anybody who has
ever held an executive job in Washington.
First pf all, it's too slow. If you were an administrator in urgent
need of a new assistant, you might hope to get somebody on the job-
with luck and infinite finagling-in six or eight weeks. (He wouldn't be
the man you want, of course.) In wartime the pace was a little faster-
there were even cases in which a man was hired within a week-but even
then par for the course.was at least a month. If you wallted to beat that,

.. John Fischer: "Let's Go Back to the Spoils System." Harper'. Magazine, October
1945, vol. 191, seIected from pp. 362-64. Reprinted by permission.
441 PElttoNNEL MANAGEMENT

you bad to "hand process" the appointment, personally carrying the sheaf
of papers through the maze of the agency personnel office and the Civil
Service Commission, and mobilizing all the pressure you could, including
telephone calls from the applicant's congressman.
When you want to fire a man, the procedure naturally is more
tedious. In theory, it is as easy to get rid of an incompetent in the govern-
ment service as it is in private industry; in practice, the ordeal may drag on
for six or eight painful months. If you are an experienced administrator,
you will never try to fire anybody-you will foist him off on some unsus-
pecting colleague in another bureau, or transfer him to the South Dakota
field office, or reorganize your section to abolish his position.
I once spent a whole winter trying to "terminate," as Civil Service
puts it, an elderly female clerk who had become so neurotic that no other
woman could work in the same room with her. This involved written
charges, interviews with my tearful victim, protests from her senator, in-
dignant union delegations, and formal hearings before a panel of personnel
experts. In the end I gave up and arranged for her transfer, with a raise in
pay, to the staff of a trusting friend who had just joined the government.
She is there to this day, chewing paper clips, frightening secretaries, and
muttering to herself as she misfiles vital documents; I think of her every
time I pay my income tax. My friend, who no longer speaks to me, is try-
ing to get her transferred.
Even worse than the Civil Service Commission's leisurely gait is
its delight in harassing the operating officials who are responsible for run-
ning the government. The typical administrator may spend as much as a
third of his time placating the commission and the hordes of minor per.
sonnel specialists who infest Washington. He draws organization charts,
argues with classification experts, fills out efficiency ratings, justifies the al-
location of vacancies, and listens to inspiring lectures on personnel man-
agement until he has little energy left for his real job. He may search for
hours for those magic words which, properly rer.ited in a job description,
will enable him to pay a subordinate $4,600 instead of $3,800. (The phrase
"with wide latitude for exercise of individual initiative and responsibility"
is nearly always worth $800 of the taxpayers' money; but it took me two
years to find that out.)
No bureaucrat can avoid this boondOggling. If he fails to initial a
Green Sheet or to attach the duplicate copy· of Form 57, the whole ma-
chinery of his office grinds to a halt. If he deliberately flouts the established
ritual, or neglects to show due respect for the personnel priesthood, his
career may be ruined and his program along with it. In a thousand subtle
ways the personnel boys can throw sand in the gears. They can freeze ap-
pointments and promotions, block transfers, lose papers, and generally be-
devil any official who refuses to "co-operate.". If they bog down a govern,
ment project in the process, that is no skin off their backs-nobody can
ever hold them responsible.
Nor can the administrator escape the Civil Service investigators,
442 ADMINISTRATION

who drop in once or twice a week to question him about the morals, drink-
ing habits, and possibly treasonable opinions of some poor wretch who
has applied for a federal job. These investigators often are amusing fellows.
I got well acquainted with one who formerly had been a small-town private
detective; he had an uncommonly prurient mind, which led him to handle
every case as if he were working up adultery charges for a divorce suit.
Nearly all of them operate on the theory that anybody willing to work for
the government must be a scoundrel, probably with Communist tend-
encies, who could never hold a job anywhere else. They have a boundless
appetite for gossip, and they waste a lot of other people's time. What pur-
pose they serve is obscure, becalISe their investigations often are not com-
pleted until five of six months after the new employee starts work. If he
actually were as villainous as they seem to suspect, he would have plenty of
time to sell the country's secrets to a sinister foreign power before the in-
vestigators caught up with him.
These are minor indictments, however. The really serious charge
against the Civil Service system is that it violates the most fundamental
rule of sound management. That rule is familiar to every businessman:
when you hold a man responsible for doing a job, you must give him the
authority he needs to carry it out. Above all, he must be free to hire his
own staff, assign them to tasks they can do best, and replace them if they
don't make good.

Frederic C. Howe similarly complained in 192,: "America has

paid a heavy price for its permanent classified service. In Washington
at least it would be better if we had the spoils system, with all of its
evils, in those offices that have it in their power to shape policies, to
control executive action, and to make the state a bureaucratic
thing."" Certainly it is true that more recent Federal functions, such
as emergency public works under the Public Works Administration
or regional power administration under the Tennessee Valley Au-
thority, were exempted from the Federal civil service laws. Neverthe-
less, these agencies were able to conduct a model merit system of
their own. The United States Civil Service Commission, however,
also made some basic adjustments. Not only did the merit system
survive the intense demands of speed and specialization called for by
war and emerg~ncy conditions; a substantial amount of personnel
administration was effectively decentralized to the regional offices
of the Commission." The Commission continued its mass examina-

.. Frederic C. Howe: Confessions of a Reformer. New York: Charles Scribner's

Sons; 19'5. p. '56 .
., Gladys M. Kammerer: "An Evaluation of Wartime Personnel Administration."
Journal of Politics, February 1948, vol. 10, pp. 49-72. F10yd Reeves: "Civil Service
as Usual." Public Administration Review, Autumn '944, vol. 4, pp. 328-33.
443 PERSONNEL MANACEMENT
tions involving service-wide classes of positions, but some seven hun-
dred departmental examination boards were established in both
Washington and in the field. The rigidities concerning dismissals
which John Fischer pointed out may have continued in the Federal
service, but a study of this problem in 1946 in the state and local
jurisdictions showed that the individual department's or supervisor's
decisions to dismiss were reversed in only five percent of the cases."
Undoubtedly, the American personnel system had become too
negative, formalized, and centralized; but after the lessons learned
during the period of economic readjustment and emergency admin-
istration in the 1930'S and 1940'S, a reaction set in, and a more
positive, flexible, and decentralized system of personnel management
began to evolve.

7. PERSONALITY AND MANAGEMENT

The positive change manifested itself in the growing recognition

of personality and individuality. Before and during World War I a
slow growth of psychological research and the applied techniques in
such fields as testing was evident. In the late 1920'S, Professor Leon-
ard D. White began his studies of prestige in public administration,
which gave a similar emphasis to some of the less tangible but more
powerful impulses to public service"· Among the most fundamental
researches in the 1920'S and 1930'S which contributed to the newer
understanding of personnel management were:
(a) The Western Electric Company experiments at its Haw-
thorne Plant in Chicago and Cicero, Illinois. This company supple-
mented in the 1920'S its employee welfare and recreational program
with a set of on-the-job experiments designed to determine the cir-
cumstances accompanying increases and decreases in production.
The experiments were carried on in collaboration with the staff of
the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, including
Professors Elton Mayo and Thomas N. Wliitehead, and under the
direct supervision of F. J. Roethlisberger of Harvard and William J.
Dickson, Chief of Employee Relations for Western Electric." After
years of experiments with such factors as changes iIi workshop light-
ing or changes in wage rates, Roethlisberger and Dickson concluded

.. Barbara Brattin: "The Dismissal Pattern in the PUBlic Service." Public Personnel
Review, October 1947, vol. 8, pp. 211-1S·
... Ste Chapter 7, n. 51.
.. F. J. Roethlisberger and William J. Dickson: Managemel and the Worker.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1941, Preface and Introduction.
that among the most important factors were the social-psychological
considerations indIcated below."'
(b) The clinical studies of Harold D. Lasswen. Professor Lass-
well started his clinical observations of political leaders and admin-
istrative personalities in the 1930'S at the University of Chicago.
Although his studies centered mainly on pathological personalities
and traumatic circumstances, his findings also cast light uJ?on the
non-logical behavior of workers under the normal adminlStrative
situations.
(a) F.,. ROITHLISBERCER AND WILLIAM J. DICKSON
Management and the Worker ..
Why is it, then, that sometimes logical plans do not work out as
intended? The answer would seem to lie in the fact that frequently plans
which are intended to promote efficiency have consequences other than
their logical ones, and these unforeseen consequences tend to defeat the
logical purposes of the plan as conceived. Let us consider some of these
possible non-logical consequences.
First, technical innovations make for changes in the worker's job
and through the job may have profound consequences to the employee.
For in so far as his job is changed, his position in the social organization,
his interpersonal relations, his traditions of craftsmanship, and his social
codes which regulate his relations to other people may also be affected.
Secondly, the worker must frequently accommodate himself to
changes which he does not initiate. Many of the systems introduced to
improve his efficiency and to control his behavior do not take into account
his sentiments. Because of his position in the company structure, at the
bottom level of a well-stratified organization, he cannot hold to the same
degree the sentiments of those who are instituting the changes.
Thirdly, many of these same systems tend to subordinate the
worker still further in the company's social structure. For instance, some
of the incentive schemes and the procedures connected with them-job
analysis, time and motion studies-apply for the most part only to the
shop worker.
That jobs are SOCially ordered is a fact of the greatest importance.
For it will be seen that in so far as this holds true, any change in the job
may very likely alter the existing routine relations between [various J pe0-
ple within the factory. The following incident illustrates how important

6' See also Elton Mayo: The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization.
Boston: Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration; 1946. Thom .. North
Whitehead: The Industrial Worker. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1938,
2 vol.. •
"'F. J. Roethlisberger and William J. Dickson: Management and the Worker.
Adapted /rom pp. 544-46. Reprinted by permission of Harvard University Press. Copy.
right, 1941, Harvard University Press. .
 PERSONNR MANACEMENT

such small things become in situations permeated with social significance.

The personnel of one of the departments interviewed was moved
from one building to another. In the new location, because of lack of
space, it was found necessary to seat four people across the aisle from the
remainder of the group. It happened that there were three women in the
department who were given desks across the aisle so that their going
would not necessitate a rearrangement of desks. The fourth person, a man,
was given a desk there simply because there was no other place for him to
sit. In choosing the fourth person, the supervisor was undoubtedly influ-
enced by the fact that he was older than the rest of the group and was well
acquainted with the three women. But, beyond that, nothing was implied
by the fact that he was chosen_ Now see how this employee interpreted
the change in his seating position. He felt that his supervisor evaluated
him in the same way in which he evaluated the women. The women were
being transferred to other types of work; consequently, he felt that he too
would be transferred before long. Two of the women were being returned
to jobs in the shop. He felt that he himself might be transferred to the
shop; and there was nothing he dreaded more. Having dwelt on specula-
tions like these for a while, the employee recalled with alarm that his name
had been omitted from the current issue of the house telephone directory.
This omission had been accidental. The house telephone directory, how-
ever, constituted a sort of social register. Names of shop people below the
rank of assistant foreman were not printed unless they were employed in
some special capacity requiring contacts with other organizations. With
the exception of typists and certain clerical groups, the names of all office
people were listed. The fact that his name had been omitted from the di-
rectory now took on new significance for the employee. It tended to re-
inforce his growing conviction that he was about to be transferred to a
shop position. He became so preoccupied over what might happen to him
that for a time he could scarcely work.

(b) HAROLD D. LASSWELL

Psychopathology and Politics's

Some administrators are full of ideas and others are seldom at-
tracted by novelty. Some do their best work under a rather indulgent chief;
others fall to pieces unless there is strong pressure from above. There are
administrators who derive their influence over subordinates from the au-
thority of their positions rather than from the authority of their personali-
ties. There are some who may be depended upon for the conscientious
performance of detailed tasks, while others neglect details and think in
terms of general policy.
Very original and overdriving administrators seem to show a fun-
oa Harold D. Lasswell: Psychopathology and Politics. Adapted froro pp. 78-79,
1%7, 151-52.. Reprinted by permission of The University of Chicago Press. Copyright,
1930, The University of Chicago Press.
 ADMINISTRATION
damental pattern which coincides with that of the agitators. From the
standpoint of the administrative mind, we may say that an agitator is one
who exaggerates the difference between one rather desirable social policy
and another, much as the lover, according to Shaw, is one who grossly ex·
aggerates the difference between one woman and another. The agitator is
willing to subordinate personal considerations to the superior claims of
principle. Ever on the alert for pernicious intrusions of private interests
into public affairs, the agitator sees "unworthy" motives where others see
just claims of friendship. Believing in direct, emotional responses from the
public, the agitators trust in mass appeals and general principles. Relying
upon the magic of rhetoric, they conjure away obstacles with the ritualistic
repetition of principles. They become frustrated and confused in the
tangled mass of technical detail upon which successful administration de-
pends. Agitators of the "pure" type, when landed in responsible posts,
long to desert the official swivel for the roving freedom of the platform.
Another group of administrators is recruited from those who have
passed smoothly through their developmental crisis. They have not over-
repressed powerful hostilities but either sublimated these drives or ex-
pressed them boldly in the intimate circle. They display an impersonal
interest in the task of organization itself, and assert themselves with firm-
ness though not with overemphasis, in professional and in intimate life.
They can take or leave general ideas without using them to arouse wide-
spread effective responses from the public. Tied neither to abstractions
nor to particular people, they are able to deal with both in a context of
human relations, impersonally conceived.

Lasswell's forays into the field of psychoanalysis were more

relevant than they appeared to some critics. His formulations have
subsequently been used in applied political science and political
economy. For example, his agitator types were recognized as being
more useful as administrative leaders during the founding stages of
organizations like labor unions and during the promotional stages of
public agencies such as departments performing newer governmental
functions. At the same time, it was also recognized that the balance
and maturity of the purer administrative type of personality would
be required for the more routine or advanced management of suc-
cessful concerns and established departments."
Nevertheless, psychological technique and tests in personnel
management have run the risks of fadism. There has been a danger of
.. F. H. Harbison: "Leadership in Labor Unions." Bulletin of the Society for
Social R=b. November ~6, 1940. Dimock: The Executive in Action, pp. 14-16.
See also Gabriel A. Almond and Harold D. Lasswell: "Aggressive Behavior of Clients
Toward Public Relief Administmtors." American Political Science Review; August
1934. vol. • 8, pp. 64J-SS. .
447 HISONNEL MANACEMtNT

overemphasis or oversimplicity in this as in other creative approaches

to administration. Just as some writers have criticised POSDCORB,
so have they attacked glib formulae proposed for personnel manage-
ment, such as ULOPODA ("ultimate limit of the possibility of de-
veloping abilities").·' But the influence of modern psychology upon
administration and particularly personnel ma'lagement has neverthe-
less been noticeable. The therapeutic aspect alone was officially recog-
nized by the President's Committee on Civil Service Improvement
when it recommended in 1941 that "effective psychological and
psychiatric services . _ . be provided upon request for all agencies
either by the U. S. Civil Service Commission or the U. S. Public
Health Service." 56

8. HUMAN RELATIONS AND MANAGEMENT

Employee benefits, such as gifts, bonuses, health, and welfare

services are an old series of devices designed to improve management-
employee relations in industry. These devices date back at least to
Robert Owen, "the pioneer of personnel management" of the British
Industrial'Revolution." Upon them a newer sense of participation
by employees has been superimposed that goes far beyond the old
conception of management-employee relations. The newer view is
demonstrated in contributions from: (a) Henry Ford, speaking from
the cumulative experience of three generations of automobile manu-
facturing, and (b ) John J. Corson, a social security administrator
during the 1930'S and the 1940'S, and President of the American
Society of Public Administration in 1949.

(a) HENRY FORD

"Challenge of Human Engineering""
There is a whole vast area in which we are only beginning to make
significant progress-what we might call the field of human engineering.
Machines alone do not give us mass production. Mass production is
.. This term was coined by Herman H. Young. J. L. Rosenstein: Psychology of
Human Relations for Executives, New York: McCraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.; 1936,
p. 1,6, Chapter 31.
.. This was the so-called Reed Committee. House of Representatives, Doclllllent
nO. 118, 77th Cong., lSt Sess., p. 7.
61 Urwid: and Brech: The Making of Scientilic Management, vol. 1, Management
in British Industry, Chapter 4, p_ n. Sheldon: The Philosophy of Management,
Cha~3.
Henry Ford: "Challenge of Human E~lleering." Advanced Management,
June 1946, vol. 11, selected from pp. :,8-5>- Repnnted by permission.
448 ADMINISTUTION

achieved by both machines and men. And while we have gone a very long
way toward perfecting our mechanical operations we have not successfully
written into our equations whatever complex factor represents MAN, the
human element. I am suggesting, therefore, that we try to rewrite the
equations to take into account the human factor. If we can solve the prob-
lem of human relations in industrial production, I believe we can make
as much progress toward lower costs during the next ten years as we made
during the past quarter century through the development of the ma-
chinery of mass production.
In approaching the complex problems of human relations, I be-
lieve that management must take the initiative for developing the relation-
ships between labor and management. Labor has a great opportunity to
achieve stature through assuming greater responsibility. But I consider
that management is in charge, that management must manage, and that
the test of management is whether or nol it succeeds. I assume, for ex-
ample, that aU of us agree that Labor Unions are here to stay. Certainly,
we of the Ford Motor Company have no desire to "break the Unions," to
turn back the clock to days which sometimes look in retrospect much
more attractive than they really were. The truth of the matter is that the
Unions we deal with rose out of the very problem we are discussing-the
human problems inherent in mass production. We do not want to destroy
the Unions. We want to strengthen their leadership by urging and helping
them to assume the responsibilities they must assume if the public interest
is to be served.
It is clear, then, that we must look to an improved and increas-
ingly responsible Union leadership for help in solving the human equation
in mass production. Union leaders today who have the authority to affect
industrial production on a vast scale enjoy a social power of enormous pro-
portions. If they are going to be real leaders they must accept the social
obligations that go with leadership. What is needed today is industrial
statesmanship-from both labor and management. There is no reason, for
'example, why a grievance case should not be handled with the same dis-
patch as a claim for insurance benefits. There is no reason why a union
contract could not be written and agreed upon with the same efficiency
and good temper that marks the negotiation of a commercial contract be-
tween two companies. Communication between management and em-
ployees in large mass production plants is another important field in which
we can work. In any large group of people working together it is a basic
requirement that good lines of communication exist. There will always be
plans and estimates, information about new styles and new engineering,
and other data, which management mnst guard closely because they are
the very elements on which tough competition is based. But information
about company objectives and accomplishments should be made available
to all. People want to know what the other people they work with are do-
ing and thinking. They want to KnOW what "the Score" is.
449 PERSONNEL MANACEMlIIIT

(b) JOHN,. CORSON

"Management-Tongue-tied, Deaf and Blind?""
The problem of how, when, what and why management talks or
writes to its employees, and how and what it learns from its employees is
no new one. Yet the problem has grown apace as the size of establishments
has grown, particularly while erstwhile small plants mushroomed during
the war. Even when two people work together, each must understand
what the other is trying to do and how. They may talk to each other,
write to each other, or, if they are deaf mutes, make signs with their hands.
However they do it, they must get their ideas from one to the other, and
vice versa. They must achieve some common understanding. In this sim-
ple sense the process of communication is the basic problem of manage·
ment. It is amazing that students of management have given as little at-
tention to questions as to how to get ideas and orders across to employees;
how to learn what is on their minds; and how to get them to talk back
freely and frankly-in short, how to enable both workers and management
to know "what the score is." Dr. Kettering of General Motors spoke a
decade ago of having remarked to a group of shop workers that it required
a whole year for a decision of the board of directors to find its way down
to application in the shop. A worker sarcastically rejoined: "And how long
does it take for an idea of one of the men in the shops to find its way up
to the board of directors?"
The average worker wants to matter. The lowliest manual worker
glows with pride when he is complimented because he has dug his ditch
with straighter sides than his fellow workers. The clerk takes pride in
knowing that the routine statistical report she prepares is read by the boss
himself. Just a few days ago a fellow said to me: "You know there is some-
thing more important to work for than money. 111 work as hard as any
man as long as I'm interested in the job, as long as it seems worthwhile.
But I'll spit in the face of any man, no matter how much he wants to pay
me, if he expects me to work blind, to plug ahead like a machine at some·
thing unimportant and uninteresting." Yet too few employers try to com-
municate to employees an understanding of those objectives and plans
which would reveal no competitive secret~ and would make them feel that
their part is essential to the success of the enterprise. Managements fre·
quently overlook the simple psychological fact that workers want to know
what is going on. They want to know why they are doing what they are
doing~ they want to feel a part of the team. If they are made to feel they
belong, they will be more productive workers. If these facts are accepted,
what then are the mistakes to be avoided in perfecting organizational com-
munication?
.. John J. Corson: "Management-Tongue·tied, Deaf and Blind?" Advanced
Management, September 1946, vol. 11, adapted from pp. 101, 103-<>4- Reprinted by
permission.
450
Management hires the best experts there are to advise how to
tell consumers the excellences of its products. But how often do manage-
ments hire specialists to advise how to phrase orders to employees, bow
and what should be told employees of the firm's plans and its progress and
how, in turn, to get back employees' reactions to what it says and does?
Most firms have an audit made each year of their financial position; it
might be well if management would audit each year what employees think
of their jobs, of their bosses, their company and what they know of the
firm's plans as to how workers should do their work. Their minds and the
ideas that reside there are rather important to management.
People interested in management-business executives, particu-
larly-must recognize the importance of communication to and from em-
ployees. It is the phase of management in which lie the greatest dollars
and cents savings of the next decade. And they must not delegate this
phase of the job to their industrial relations people and forget it. Effective
communication cannot be established by a house organ to sweeten the
workers up or an annual report to employees to keep them happy. It must
be accepted as an important continuing part of the job of management.
Secondly, management must see that their spokesmen, the fore-
men, recognize the importance of effective twa-way communication and
are capable of expressing themselves and of relaying the views of their
workers. Brpad general policies may be communicated through bulletins,
addresses at mass meetings, or by radio or even newspaper advertiSing. But
the important day-ta-day interpretation of these policies is by the foremen.
Top management cannot be out in the plant continuously and in the
meantime the foreman is the funnel through which it communicates to
all workers.
And thirdly, effective communication cannot be left to chance.
MalJagement will find it economical to appraise its communication job
periodically and see just where it stands. Meanwhile, day in and day out,
some major executive should have the responsibility for communication-
and be expected to work at it.
An this will payoff. It will be reflected in increased production
resulting from awakened incentives. It will be reflected negatively in less
strife between management and employees. But it will also reflect a solid
democratic appreciation of the worth of each worker, of each human be-
ing.

One of the newer devices for humanizing employee-management

relations is the assignment of trained personnel officers to depart-
ments, bureaus, and subordinate units. These specialists may have
duties, in addition to routine personnel functions, ranging from the
counselling of employees (as in the case of the personnel "counsel-
lors" of many Federal departments) to the rendering of advice on
general management problems (as in the case of the personnel "gen-
451 PEHONNEL MANAGEMENT

eralists" of the Tennessee Valley Authority). The constructive work

done by such specialists has contributed to both effective manage-
ment and employee morale. Paying tribute to one personnel officeE
in the Department of Agriculture, The Government Standard, the
news organ of the American Federation of Government Employees,
editorialized: "In the long run there is no substitute for a warm,
sincere interest in human problems and a desire to do the personnel
job not only efficiently but in a manner that takes into account the
many superficially minor but actually vital factors that make up
sound policy in employee relationship." eo Although these sentiments
express some of the simpler values of administrative life, they have
been assimilated by students of management under the more impos-
ing title of "Humanizing Public Administration." .,

9. UNIONS AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT

The preoccupation of the public with craft and industrial unions

has cloaked the fact that clerical unions in business and public em-
ployee unions in government have steadily increased their member-
ships, bargaining powers, and other interests. The position of public
employee unions is here discussed by A. J. T. Day, a British civil
servant who approaches the problem from the standpoint of the
comparative experience of several nations, including the United
States.
A. J. T. DAY

"The Participation of Officials in Administration"·o

The position of the staff associations or unions can only be as-
sessed by considering four questions. First: What is their status-what
limitations, if any, are imposed? Secondly, what scope are they allowed in
discharging their primary function-the function for which they were
created-of protecting and promoting the occupational interests of their
members? Thirdly, above and beyond this primary function, what freedom
have they to contribute to the solution of those problems of day-ta-day ad-
ministration, other than staff administration, on which the knowledge and
experience of the rank and file can usefully be brought to bear? And lastly,

.. "The Proper Function of a Personnel Office." The Government Standard,

November 28, 1941.
•• C. Spencer Platt: "Humanizing Public Administration." Public Administl1ltion
Review, Summer '947, vol. 7, pp. '93-99 .
.. A. J. T. Day: "The Participation of Officials in Administration." Public Adminis·
tration, Summer 1948, vol. .6, selected from pp. 110-11, 113-.8. Reprinted by per-
mission.
 452
is there room for them to express staff opinion, helpfuny to the administra-
tion, on issues of high policy as distinct from the day-to-day execution of
- policy?
In some of the countries from which reports have come, one finds
complete freedom of association among public servants themselves, and
equally complete freedom of combination with other workers if they so
desire. But the freedom is differently based. In France, for example, it is
affirmed by law, as though it were something to be enjoyed only jf the
State, by a positive act, conferred it. In the United States and in England,
on the other hand, it rests on no law but is tacitly assumed as one of the
basic freedoms which the law can take away but cannot confer. To put it
differently, this freedom is in the one case explicit and in the other im-
plicit. The result is apparently the same, but the approach to it is different,
probably because of differences in national habits of mind.
The significant thing about a strike is not the right to engage in
it, but the power to do so. This power is inherent: it is, quite simply, the
power to stay at home. All that the law can do is to declare that if they de-
cline to work certain consequences will follow, in particular that the com-
bination responsible will be proscribed and suffer certain penalties. The
employer, whether Government or private person, may also say that dis-
ciplinary or even vindictive penalties will be visited on those who strike.
All these deterrents would certainly militate against a strike of officials in
a service where striking had been declared illegal. But they would not-
and this is the important point-have taken away a power which, like
freedom of association, is a natural possession and not a gift. For if I be-
lieve in the basic right to strike-as I do in the basic right of freedom of
speech-I believe no less firmly in the moral obligation not to use that
right. I believe, too, that nowhere is that obligation more fully recognised,
in general, than among public servants.
I tum to the second of my four questions, as to the scope afforded
to staff associations in dealing with the pay and other conditions of service
of their members. Here, it is evident, there are two general tendencies:
one towards an extension of the range of matters on which the associations
can bring their influence to bear; the other, towards the creation of fuller
development of standing machinery for the joint consideration of these
matters where before there were contacts only as occasion required. It is
now more than a quarter of a century since such machinery-probably the
first of its kind-was established in the English Civil Service under the
name of Whitley Councils, Mr. Whitley having been the chairman of a
Government committee by which the idea was suggested primarily for
application in industry. These Councils, existing at the national and
departmental levels, afford the fullest possible opportunities to the staff
associations, in combination, to discuss all staff questions of common
interest with representatives of the Administration, from pay and hours
and leave to disciplinary procedure and the principles of promotion. In
France the est<tblishment of somewhat similar Councils, Commissions and
 NtISON"EL MA"ACUIINT

Committees by statutes of 1945 and 1<W> wIll accord the staff associations
liberal facilities for sharing in the settlement of an questions affecting their
constituents. The CivI1 Service Commission in the Federal service of the
United States, which is responsible for such staff questions as hours, leave,
pensions, discipline, promotion policy and so on, makes it a practice to
secure the co-operation of the staff associations, through its labour-manage-
ment advisory service, in the formulation of basic policies on these mat-
ters, and in some Departments and agencies of Government the associa-
tions are afforded opportunities of collaborating in the departmental
application of these policies.
It is in the sphere opened up by my third question-the sphere of
day-to-day administration in matters not of self-interest to the staff-that
the difference between advisory or consultative £Unctions and the POW(l1"
of joint decision takes on a special importance for the Administration. ~n
Belgium and France joint management is the declared aim of the staff
organizations. They seek the same participation in executive decisions as
is accorded to joint working committees in private industry (and in France,
incidentally, in the workshops of the Ministry of War). In both these
countries, and elsewhere, the range open for discussion on a consultative
or advisory basis is already considerable. The labour-management advisory
committee of the Civil Service Commission in the United States, for
example, can initiate discussion and recommend pOlicies on all aspects
of the effective utilisation of personnel. In one of the largest agencies of
Government in the same country there are systematic joint conferences
for co-operation in the elimination of waste; conservation of materials,
supplies and energy; improvement of workmanship and services; education
and training; correction of conditions making.for grievances and misunder-
standings; encouragement of courtesy; S3feguarding health; prevention of
hazards; betterment of conditions and strengthening of morale. In Eng-
land the Whitley Conncil system permits of the joint discussion of such
matters as recruitment, the education and training of officials for higher
work, the economical use of man-power, the issue of working instructions,
accommodation, the layout of offices, the improvement of the organiza-
tion and equipment of offices and the efficiency of the service generally.
Here, as in respect of cOnditions of service, agreements can be reached to
become operative forthwith. One 0ISilnization in England-the Union of
Post Office Workers-has actual joiot control of the Post Office as one
of its declared aims, but there is no sign, even under a -Labour Government,
of any willingness on the part of the Administration to consider such a
policy.
In J\:ngland-to come to my fourth and last question-there
have been a few matters of high policy on which, by reason of their special-
ised character, the staff concerned have felt cOlnpetent to formulate views
for submission to the Administration;and these views have not been with·
out their influence on the official decisions eventually taken. But so far
there has not appeared to be much scope in my country for stall interven-
tion in policy questions. In FJ:lI1lce, it is the ambition. of the asociations
to take part jn the reform of public administration, of teadting, and of the
magistrature, and they already enjoy. representation on oIicial committees
concerned with the reform of official publications and the cost of and
production figures for the public services.
From this an too hurried review of the position .lIS it is in the
various countries reported on, and as the associations there would like it
to be, I reach these conclusions: The day of casual conbict:s between repre-
sentatives of the staff and of the Administration is past. Public services
are now so large and so diversilied, their staff problems sO complex. their
staffs so well organized and so conscious of their right to,be heard and the
tempo of staff administration so rapid, that only by the maintenance of
standing machinery, providing for the most intimate and expeditious
consultation between the management and the staff, can their points
of view be harmonised from day to day and the staff be given the desirable
feeling that they are being governed as far as possible with their own
consent.

Perhaps the most controversial question raised here relates to the

right of public employees to strike and the right of unions to engage
in organized political activity. After World War II, there was an
attempt in the Taft-Hartley. Labor-Management Relations Act to
prohibit strikes by public employees and to curtail the political ac-
tivities of unions." Although public employees seldom exercised the
right to stn1ce (in fact, they generally imposed a no-strike clause in
their own constitutions) more union political activity was noticed
after the Taft-Hartley Act was passed than ever before, despite the
criminal penalties imposed by the Act."
The failure of coercive legislation of this type was also confirmed
by the British experience after World War I." Whatever approach
is adopted for the solution of these critical problems," it is interesting
to note that as early as 1910, John R. Commons, one of America's
foremost labor economists, pointed out: "In this country, with uni-
versal suffrage the workingman in public employment does not need
to strike. He forms a clique and goes in with the politicians. He has
the suffrage. We cannot get away from organization. These em-
ployees wm organize in ont: way or another. The real solution is not
to destroy the organizations, but to give them official recognition, to
.. Public Law No. 101. 80th Cong., 1st Sess. The Taft-Hartley Act was passed
in 1947 and under reconsideration in '949 .
.. Edwin F. Witte: "An Appraisal of the Taft-Hartley Act." Papezs and proceed·
ings of the American Economic Association, December '947.
"Trade Disputes and Trade Union Act ('929), '7 and ,8 GeOfF V, Chapter 22,
especially clause V relating to civil service unious_
"See Leonard D. White: "Stn'kes in the Public Service." Public Personnel Review.
January 1949, vol. 10, pp. ,-10.
4SS PEUONNlL MANACEMIINT

give them a part in the administration of the department and then

to hold them to that responsibility." '" The "guild socialist" or "syn-
dicalist" solution of officially recognizing employee responsibility for
administration has not won favor even among the socialists in Brit-
ain," and it would probably be rejected in the individual enterprise
setting in the United States. We can expect, however, a shift in
emphasis on the part of employees from pressure for better condi-
tions of work to the sharing of responsibility for improved administra-
tion in the future.

10. PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT AND DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP

These issues go far deeper than the immediate problems of per-

sonnel management. The manner in which we treat our public
employees is at once a consequence and a cause of some of the
crucial problems facing the American democracy. Since public of-
ficials are regarded as specially responsible citizens, it is sometimes
unavoidable to find them subjected to harsher tests of public re-
sponsibility. This expOsure also has depressing consequences. The
witch hunts and loyalty tests following World War I and World
War II curtailed the enthusiasm and initiative of many public serv-
ants and would-be government employees. On one occasion Chancel-
lor Robert Maynard Hutchins of the University of Chicago publicly
announced that he could no longer conscientiously advise faculty
members and college graduates to enter the government service.
Government employees, he pointed out, "have in too many instances
become second-class citizens, humiliated and demeaned by the very
government they attempted to serve.""
On the whole, the inducements to government employment have
steadily improved,70 and the remaining defects here are actually the
shortcomings of the political and legislative leadership of American
government. The decisive role of effective leadership in the public
administration of a democracy is disCussed below by Ordway Tead,
who enjoyed a long career in New York City as an industrial con-
sultant and business executive, as a lecturer on personnel administra-
tion, and as Chairman of the Board of Higher Education .

., John R. Commons: "Unions of Public Employees." Quoted in John M. Caus:

"R~nSlbility." Frontiers of Public Administration, p. "".
See above, Chapter 8, n. 9·
.. See Harry T. Kranz: "The Current Dilemma in Federal Public Administration."
Address before the Fourth Federal Conference on Personnel Management, San Fran-
cisco, May 13, 1948.
10 Paul H: Appleby: "A Reappraisal of Federal Employment as a Career." Public
Administration Review, Spring 1948, vol. 8, pp. 85~o.
456 ADM'NISTaA1'ION

(a) ORDWAY TEAD

"The Importallce of Administration ill lllteraational Action" n
Any notion that good administrative structure works by itself
will now be seen to be a fiction. One is reminded here of the unreal dis-
tinction often made as between a government of laws and a government
of men. All administration is a matter of some more or lcss,legal or ex-
plicit body of regulation; it is a matter of creating structural working re-
lationships among groups; and it is finally a matter of infusing the ongoing
of the necessary machineries of procedure with a will to operate. It is this
last requirement which leadership supplies. There has to be stimulation,
energizing, guidance, effort toward integration, renewal of clear vision
about aims. All of this is the leadership role. And all of this, also, has to be
carried on, not merely at the level of top administration but all the way
down through the managerial hierarchy.

(b) ORDWAY TEAD

"Democracy in Administration""
Look with me in imagination at the life and the work of a mail
sorter in the Post Office Department, a file clerk in the Federal Civil Serv-
ice Commission, a cable splicer in the New England Telephone' and
Telegraph Company, a grade-school teacher in Harlem, a foundry helper
in a plant of the United States Steel Corporation, a sales clerk in the
A. & P., a seaman on a tanker of the Standard Oil Company. AIl these
present to those concerned with the quality of the good life for all persons
in a democracy a common problem. That problem is: How shall individ·
uals feel and know that they are real, growing, thriving persons who can
call their souls their own as they plod on through the day's work? How can
personality be fulfilled in and through the tasks of modern large-scale
agencies-corporate or public? How, in more abstract terms, are personal
freedom and economic productivity to be reconciled in today's society?
To put it in other words, I ask how we propose to face up in a
democracy to' conflicts of group interests and blocs, to a growing sense of
bureaucratic stultification, to the need of stimulating in all individuals
initiative up to the top of their powers. Again, I ask how we are to prevent
the usurping of social power (econamic, political, educational, or other)
by those with overdeveloped power lusts; how are we to face up to the
11 Ordway Tead: "The Importance of AdministIation in International Action."
International Conciliation, January 1945, vol. 401, p. 30. Reprinted by pennission.
7! Ordway Tead: "Democracy in Mministration." World Order: Its Intellectual
and Cultural FOlindations. Edited by F. Ernest Johnson. Selected from pp. 118, 190,
195· Reprinted by permission of Harper .. Brothers. Copyright. 1945, Institute for
Religious Studies.
457 PlISONNR MANACEMENT

tardiness of legislative bodies in laying down just and necessary rules of

orderly human relations; how we can overcome the false belief that cor-
porate groups by pursuing their own self-interest are somehow automati-
cally advancing the interests of us all.
I believe all of the characteristic aspects of administration, add up
to the view that at its dynamic best administration includes the task of
personality creation. Administration in its wisest manifestations makes an
appeal to wider, less selJish loyalties, to fuller creative release, to broader
knowledge of and agreement to purpose, method, and fact, to co-operative,
associated, responsible conduct in and through which individuals find
themselves redeemed-brought to meaningful life and endeavor through
associated effort. For myself I am led to conclude that in and through their
work relations lies a valid approach to the way in which human lives are
served by serving.

(cl ORDWAY TEAD

The Art of Leadership 1a
The leader will appreciate that organizations are always means
to an end, agencies to help achieve what people want. It is the human
beings themselves who are the ends.
Compare the attitude, the alertness, initiative and enthusiasm
of the ordinary manual worker at his job by day, with his attitude toward
his lodge, his labor union meeting, his church vestry, his singing club or
his political clique. He may be a tractable follower in the latter mediums.
He may have acquired habits of submission and passivity which lessen his
assertiveness. But at the very least he is conscious in these groups of a right
to stay or leave, to vote "yes" or "no," to "grouse" or commend-all of
which privileges he fails to find in anything like the same degree at his
job-unless, of course, he is fortunate enough to work for a company
where he can participate in some truly autonomous and effective organi-
zation of workers in joint dealings with the corporate management.
The followers require more than this, if they are really to come
into the fold. They require-often unconsciously to themselves-to be
made partners and sharers in the determination of what the group is trying
to do. Only so do they have that kind of. experience which alone brings
loyalty.
What has proved true in religion, in armies, and in politics has
to be made true in the other kinds of corporate efforts. People require the
leader to help show them the experience which convinces them that their
loyalty to the group is a good thing for them. .
The truth is that in a democratic society the opportunity for
13 Ordway Tead: The Art of Leadership. Adapted from pp. 13, 59,78,171,268-69,
271. Reprinted by permission of McGraw·Hill Book Company, Inc. Copyright, '935,
McGraw·Hill Book Company, Inc.
458 ADMINISTRATION

leadership multiplies enoI1llOUSly, once Jeadership is undersfood in its

psychologically sound essentials.
The danger. in OUT own country is that too little praise is given
rather than too much. It is the rare leader today of whom it could be
said that he "slops over" in telling his foIJowers how well they are doing.
Of coorse too much praise, or praise uncritically given, loses its tonic value.
Judgment and good sense must be exercised. But' individuals properly
crave the assurance and the confidence which come from knowing that
they stand well as members of the groups to which they belong. The teal
danger in a democracy is the danger of mediocrity and uniformity, of
popularly imposed standards of right and value. The danger is lack of
guidance, 'of direction and of spiritual excitement.
The opportunity to lead fairly shouts aloud for its chance in every
organization and institution which bring the citizens of a democratic
community together. For in every area of action people are seeking to
fulfill themselves. They deeply want to rise above a nominal or legal
equality to an assertion of their own intrinsic superiorities of capacity and
achievement. But to do this they have to be led. They have to be brought
into dective group relationships which are certainly not spontaneous, but
the creation of those in the vanguard. Such relationships in a complex
society are the necessary condition of self·release and indeed of self-being
for everyone but geniuses and prophets. The leadership predominantly
required is not that of such supermen, valuable though these rare individ-
uals are in creating new reaches of human vision and aspiration. The de-
mand is, rather, for a multiplicity of leaders in many fields. Leadership
must be at work in every common, workaday situation where one person
directs others. It is not alone concerned with important causes and large
movements.

This democratic philosophy of management was also shared by

Mary Follett, Morris Llewellyn Cooke, and by other American stu-
dents of industrial management." This philosophy was expressed
even more positively by Hugh M. Shafer in 1944 when he urged that
"respect for human personality should be placed above all other
considerations [and that 1efficiency should be established and main-
tained first with respect to human factors and secondly with respect
to material or inanimate things."" We thus revert to the basic and
historic issue concerning democracy and efficiency in American ad-
ministration. T.
,. See Morris Uewellyn Cooke: "Who is Boss in Your Shop? Individual versus
Group Leadership and Their Relation to Consent and Ideals of Democracy." Bulletin
01 the Taylor Society. August 1917. vo!' 3. pp. 3. 7.9. See also J. George Frederick:
The Great Game at Business. p. 61.
,. Hugh_ M. Shafer: "Principles of the Emerging Science of DemOcratic Adminima-
tion." Advanced Management. '944, vol. 9. pp. 12.7-28.
•• See Chapter S.
 PERSONNEL MANACEMINT

SUMMARY

Personnel management has been struggling to find a balance be-

tween two extremes: (1) mass recruitment and procedures which
would retain the formal guarantees of the merit system of employ-
ment in both government and business; and (2.) selective treatment
of positions and problems which would give personnel management
a necessary measure of flexibility in individual situations. The first
factor has led to an emphasis on mechanics by central personnel
agencies; the second factor to the new search for more effective hu-
man and personal relations in management. Both ideas have been
useful under the conditions of growth of American employment,
public and private. However, neither consideration is as significant
as the overriding search for mature leadership capable of scientific
self-management as well as the management of others. The most
effective personnel managers are those who are as free as possible
from insecurity and who possess greater assurance (which they can
transmit to their subordinates) of the social goals and the humani-
tarian principles of a democratic society.
 CHAPTER FIFTEEN

BUDGETING AND FINANCIAL CONTROL

FINANCIAL RESOURCES and fiscal controls offer another managerial tool

parallel in importance with competent and mature administrative
personnel. It is not only because men are attracted by money, either
for their own compensation or for adequate resources with which
to pursue their administrative work, that ruakes the subject of finance
so important. It is rather because money is the main measure by
which the essential resources of men and materials can be allocated
for the accomplishment of almost all administrative jobs.
In effect a financial budget is a work program with a dollar sign
before it. There are, of course, other and perhaps better measures of
administrative accomplishment in particular fields, but the most
common denominator in modem management is the monetary.
Business and industrial managers are certainly aware of this fact. For
them "budgeting is synonymous with management since both are
concerned with systematic, intelligent planning and control." 1 But
governmental and public administrators are equally concerned with
budgeting and financial control, as the following readings clearly
demonstrate.

1. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND FISCAL CONTROL

The scope of financial management in government and business
is virtually the same. Leonard D. White, professor at the University
1 Asa S. Knowles and Robert D. Thompson: Industrial Management. New York:
The Macmillan Company; 1944, pp. 1-2.
460
461 BUOCETINC AND FINANCIAL CONTI.OL

of Chicago and a public administrator, and Leon C. Marshall, who

was Dean of the College of Commerce and Administration at the
same institution, fully agree on this point.

(a) LEONARD D. WHm

Introduction to the Study of Public Administration •
Finance and administration are in fact inseparable. Every ad·
ministrative act has its financial implications, either creating a charge on
the treasury or making a contribution to it. Nothing can be done without
the expenditure of money, at the very minimum for the payment of the
salary or wage of the official or employee who acts. Available financial
resources set a maximum limit on administrative a<:tivity as a whole and
on each of its separate parts. The management of finance is therefore one
of the first and one of the inescapable responsibilities of administrators,
Fiscal management includes those operations designed to make
funds available to officials and to ensure their lawful and efficient use.
Fiscal management includes as its principal subdivisions budget making,
followed by the formal act of appropriation; executive supervision of ex-
penditures (budget execution); the control of the accounting and report-
ing system; treasury management and revenue colle<:tion; and audit. To
carry on those activities a considerable organization is required, part of
which lies within the major operating departments, part of which is out-
side, consisting of budget officers, directors of finance, comptrollers, ac-
countants and auditors.

(bl LEON C. MARSHALL

Business Administration·
There is no telling what one will find in the "financial depart-
ment" and no telling what titles its functionaries will bear. Usually there
is a "treasurer." His duties may range from those connected with occa-
sional consultation on financial policies or those connected with being
little more than a custodian of cash to those involved in drawing a budget
and handling all financial and accounting matters. Sometimes there is a
"comptroller." He may merely have charge of the accounting, or he may,
at the other extreme, be responsible for the original budgeting of the
business aud then for such supervision as may be necessary to carry out
the budget, or his duties may be arranged in some other way. There may
be an "auditor," a "<:redit man," and others. It is apparent that we shall
• Leonard D. White: Introduction to the Study of Public Mministration. Adapted
from pp. 201-<>3. Reprinted by permission of The Macmillan -Company. Copyright,
1939, The Macmillan Company.
• Leon C. Marshall: Business Administzation. Selected from pp. SU-13. Reprinted
by permission of The University of Chicago Press. Copyright, 1921, The University of
Chicago Press.
 ADMINISTRATION
gain little from digesting either the Iiterllture or the current practices of
business in our study of the "set up" of a business for financial administra-
tion. There is, however, certain common-sense material which is worth
surveying.
If we picture an organization in which the financial department
has reached such large development as to have at its head a "vice-presi-
dent in charge of finance" it is clear that it may be charged with the follow-
ing responsibilities (and if it is not charged with them tbey must be cared
for elsewhere in the organization). (1) The vice-president in charge of
finance should, in consultation with the president and general manager,
draw up a plan of the ways by which the financial needs of the business
may be met. In some business organizations this includes the responsibility
of preparing the budget which forecasts these financial needs. (:z.) Within
this plan he must work out the details of institutions and devices which are
to be utilized and the details of how and when to utilize them. (3) He
should carry out the operations necessary to bring these detailed plans to
accomplishment. (4) He is of course the custodian of receipts and the
agency through whom payments of funds are to be made. These are his
routine duties as "cash custodian." It is not unusual for the entire account-
ing of the concern to be under the direction of such a vice·president in
charge of finance.

Under different departmental titles the same range of financial

responsibilities are thus carried out in all types of institutions.

2. THE BUDGET AS THE MAJOR TOOL OF MANAGEMENT

The major managerial instrument in the fiscal field, and accord-

ing to some administrators the main tool of modem management,
is the budget. That the budget is a much more useful and versatile
device than is popularly assumed is demonstrated below by Stephen
Story, Comptroller of the State of New Hampshire.

STEPHEN STORY

The Budget as a Tool of Administrative Management-

The executive budget is one of the principal tools of financial
administration. It is the basis upon which several other tools depend. It
may, for the basis of illustration, be compared to a lathe or to a drill press
which can perform the major operations upon wood or metal stock but
which operations may be amplified or improved by attachments of other
tools to accomplish further operations.
• Stephen Story: "The Place of the Budget in Fiscal Planning and as a Tool of
Administrative Management." Paper presented before the Finance OIIicers School,
University of Connecticut, June 1947, selected from pp. I-S.
 BUDCETINC AND FINANCIAL CONTIlOL

The budget as a complete machine or tool goes through several

processes before it becomes II usuable tool or instrument. Generally these
processes begin by submission of requests by the various departments or
agencies of government. These requests are lined up and correlated by
someone-usually the financial officer or budget director and, after analy-
sis, are submitted to and studied by the responsible central executive offi-
cer, be he governor, mayor, city manager, superintendent or what not.
This individual usually confers with the heads of the submitting depart-
ments or holds departmental hearings upon the requests (usually of a
public nature as a safety valve to give taxpayers a chance to express them-
selves relative to budget requests). Following such conferences or hearings
the executive makes such changes in the budget requests as he deems
consistent with the needs of his administration and the best interests of
the government and the taxpayers.
The budget officer has to develop a sort of sixth sense to detect
the department requests which are padded in expectation of being cut
down and to recognize those which are budgeted honestly. Somehow we
manage to discover the difference because there are certain well known
costs which are common to almost all departments. If these vary from a
well known average, we begin to look for further signs of inflation and
from then on that particular budget rates a more careful scrutiny than the
ones which submit sincere estimates.
The executive's recommendation, with respect to the depart-
mental request is submitted to the appropriating body and forms the basis
for its appropriations. Usually the executive submits a draft of a legislative
act embodying the appropriations needed to carry out the budget he
recommends. If the appropriating body is large, it may have an appropria-
tions or finance committee to which the budget and the draft of the
appropriation act are sent for consideration or, if the membership of the
legislative body is small, it may sit as a committee of the whole and con-
sider the budget directly. A series of additional hearings usually ensues
and these again are usually of a public nature in order to provide the
safety factor. Finally the budget is considered in executive session and
decision made as to the amounts to appropriate. The culmination of all
this procedure is the passage of the appropriation act and the making
available at some definite date of the determined appropriations. Follow-
ing this, the fiscal or financial controlling officers are able to set up their
books indicating the amounts which are appropriated and available for
expenditure.
The budget reaches its highest usefulness when accompanying
devices are employed which make it effective. After appropriation accounts
are opened and the appropriations are on the books, the recording of ex-
penditures against these appropriations is a common procedure. However,
the mere bookkeeping function does not bar the creation of an [unjusti-
fied] obligation chargeable against an appropriation. So we seek means by
which financial control may be exercised more closely. One step is that of
pre-auditing bills. This makes a part of the financial procedure the exami-
nation of statements rendered to determine their accuracy and to deter-
mine whether or not payment can be legally accomplished. Once the
conditions for pre-audit are satisfied, the warrant for payment is issued by
the auditing agency to the treasury for payment.
The pre-audit function, while bringing us up to date a bit ntore,
still lacks suflicient promptuess, so we resort to the procedure of enc:um-
bering expenditures before an obligation is entered into.- The process in-
volves setting up an encumbrance ledger in which each contemplated
expenditure is encumbered against the appropriation. This requires that
all orders for equipment, supplies and services and all contracts must be
validated by posting to the encumbrance ledger before they are issued.
This prevents the entrance into obligations beyond the appropriated
amounts because the validating agent has orders not to validate bil~ be-
yond the exhaustion point of an appropriation.
Needless to point out that the encumbrance method has its pi.~­
culties because in these days there is often considerable difficulty in aubcl-
pating final cost when an order is placed. Many sales are conditioned bxlay
upon escalator clauses which give the vendor a legitimate chance ripon
delivery to charge a higher price than quoted before delivery. Because of
this divergence in delivered prices from encumbered prices it is necWary
from time to time to reconcile encumbrance ledgers with the accounting
records to correct variations.
The next step in assuring up to the minute financial control is ~e
establisbment of a system of allotments wbic"h is designed to time the
expenditures so that exhaustion of appropriations will take place onty at
the correct time, namely, the end of the fiscal year. An allotment pllln is
essentially simple and usually arrived at by dividing appropriations into
quarters, sixths or twelfths and setting up arbitrary fractional harriers
beyond which expenditures or encumbrances are not permitted. As experi-
ence shows seasonal variations, a corrected allotment arrangement should
be divised. For instance, snow clearing puts emphasis on expenditures
during the winter months and is non-existent in the summer. Asphalt re-
pairs are done only in the summer; brush and forest fire fighting only in
the dry season; street lighting costs are less in the summer than in the
winter and so on.
There is a further quirk which I might point out which I ftave
tried on one occasion with success. This consists of making an allotDlent
schedule on either a straight monthly or a percentage monthly basis. '(hen
the chief administrator actnaIly allots for expenditure only 95% of ~ch
allotment. If a department proposes to expend beyond the 95% it must
get approval of the chief administrator before the funds retained in the
5% are freed. This is, if you will, a system of enforced saving. Its advantage
is that it prOvides a possible budgetary surplus or creates 5% budgetary
cushion against emergencies at the end of the year_
The final step in assembling the tools of financial administration
46S auDGETINC AND FINANCIAL eotml-OL

is the preparation of a work program based upon the budget and the
pricing of the work program on a unit cost basis to determine the efficiency
of operations. This is a refinement in procedure which frequently is not
followed although from a governmental theory standpoint it is sOlmd
procedure. It involves a rather expensive record keeping system and the
end result is a method of currently checking costs of operation as a t~st
which the chief administrator may apply to his departments to detem1 me
whether or not they are improving their techniques and, of course, rnay
be used by department heads as a check upon their own operations. To
operate this system requires a system of reporting work accomplished by
units of measurement such as gallons of water pumped, square yard~ of
street swept, tons of garbage collected, number of bills posted, etc. Tllese
units are then divided into the costs of doing them and unit costs deter-
mined. A wide variation from normal average costs becomes a signal for
administrative check up.
However, the work program principally applies to things or ac-
tions which are frequently repeated. There are a whole series of operatiOns
of government which relate to people and not to things and most of what
we do to and for people is not measurable. Who can measure the v~lue
of a life saved by vaccination or by the sterilization of a milk bottle? What
yardstick can you apply to the arrest of a hit and run driver? By what
standard of measurement can we gauge the incarceration of an insane
person? Of course, we can measure vaccinations by numbers, or arrest~ by
numbers, or numbers of persons maintained in an institution and fix the
<:.w,,\ <;:." 'A -i!.'A'f'l> u."i't., 'v'U\ \'v~ 'A'I.'t. "U<;:'\ "i'Utl.'l>'U"it> <;:." \,'U't. "';'l>,\'U't. 'l>'l> 'v'U,'2an.
relations can't be scaled or figured on a dollar and cents basis. So as a
measure of true efficiency a work program has its defects.
Thus we have a fair layout of tools for financial administration.
All of them trace their usefulness back to the budget as a basic tool for
the accomplishment of a now indispensable factor in govemment~the
control of expenditures so that they conform to a financial plan. Some of
these tools are sharp, some are complicated; they are all interdepenJent
and they require judgment, experience and skill on the part of the work-
men using them.

There are of course numerous technical problems in the budget-

ing process not covered by this analysis. Should the iterns in the
budget be "lump sum" or highly specialized "line items"? It is ob-
vious, for example, that in the early days of one city's "budgeting"
experience, an item like the following had little value for control
purposes: "Hay for Police Department horses and Police Department
typewriters." A more complete analysis of the budget might incl?de
the primary question of raising the funds and providing the pecunIary
and material resources for the organization; but in terms of StOry's
emphasis upon the expenditure side of management, there is S()me
 ADMINISTRATION

accuracy to the characterization of the budget as the executive's

"stethoscope." •

3. BUDGETING IN BUSINESS

The process of budgeting is comparable in business, whether it

is carried on under private enterprise or public control. Illustrations
from the procedures of (a) The General Motors Corporation and
(b) a Soviet manufacturing plant produce interesting evidence in
this respect.
(a) HARVARD CRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRA-
TION
Harvard Business Reports·

The General Motors Corporation was formed in 1<)08 to act as

a holding company for the stock of several automobile manufacturing
companies. In 1916 the corporation was reorganized and assumed the
functions of directing the management of the subsidiaries. Each individual
company or division, however, retained its identity as a complete financial
unit in that it received its own income, and made its own expenditures,
and effected its own borrowing. The nature of the control by the General
Motors Corporation was that of advice without definite, applicable means
of enforcement of such advice. Future plans for each company were drawn
up on conferences with the executives of the General Motors Corpora-
tion, but in actual practice they conducted affairs of that division as they
deemed wise. Thus, the control policy was one of decentralization. The
results of this policy later proved to be unsatisfactory in respect of inven-
tory accumulation, and a system of adequate central control, therefore,
seemed to be essential. The company's problem was to devise a method
of control so centralized that the mismanagement of 1921 might not be
repeated. At the same time, however, it was necessary to allow the chief
executives of the different divisions adequate responsibility and freedom
of judgment.
The following method of inventory control was devised and
adopted in 1922. At the beginning of every year, the chief executives of
each division were to prepare forecasts of sales for the coming year and
detailed estimates of the working capital required to finance the expected
production. The forecasts were to be threefold: first, an optimistic fore-
cast, or estimate of the largest sales that might be obtained; second, a
• "The Mayor's Stethoscope." Municipal Reference Library Notes, New York
Public Library. April 16, 1941, vol. 21, pp. 2,-6.
• Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration: Hamud Business Reports.
Se1ec1etl from pp. 21, 29-30. Chicago: A. W. Shaw Co~ 192;. Reprinted by per.
mission.
 IUDGITING AND FINANCIAL CONTROL

conservative forecast, or estimate of the sales really expected by the execu-

tives; third. a pessimistic forecast, or estimate of the sales under the worst
conditions that might exist. These forecasts were sent to the president and
to the finance committee, to serve as a background for the interpretation
of subsequent detailed reports.
Assistants in the president's office prepared the data for use. The
foregoing estimates wen: summarized in one forecast for the General
Motors Corporation as a whole, to include inventory, stock-tum, pro-
duction, sales, finished stock on hand, and commitments. Continuous
comparisons of all estimates with actual results for an eight months' period
were made at the end of each month for each division. These provided a
basis for interpreting current forecasts in the light of their accuracy during
the preceding four months. The divisional comparisons then were sum-
marized in one general comparison which was submitted monthly by the
president to the finance committee. To stimulate accuracy in making fore-
casts, the corporation sent monthly to aU divisions a sheet on which was
listed each division in the order of its percentage of accuracy.

(b) IIENSTOCK, SCHWARZ AND YUGOW

Management in Russian Industry and Agriculture 1
S. M. Kirov, one of the most vigorous Soviet economic leaders,
characterized as 'a real piece of socialism' the tekhpromfinplan of a plant
(i.e. its technical, industrial and financial plan), and Molotov [called it]
'one of the best socialist methods of struggle for our tempo.' As a matter
of fact, this element of the Soviet planning machinery is in many ways
quite similar to the planning of production by the individual capitalist
entrepreneur.
On the level of a single plant the impulse to planning is given by
directives issued by a People's Commissariat or by a Trust. 'Directives'
cover: (1) approximate production in quantity and money value; (2) vol-
ume and kind of new capital investment; (3) amount of working capital;
(4) number of workers and desired increase in labor efficiency; (5) 'wages
fund' (annual pay roll and planned increase in average earuings; (6)
planned reduction in the cost of production; and (7) planned reduction
per unit of product in the use of fuel, electric power, and raw materials.
Next, these directives must be adjusted in detail to the plant's
concrete technical potential. The result is the plant 'production program:
worked out by the plant management; in large plants it is based on de-
partmentalized 'operating programs: Active participation of engineers and
workers in the formulation of programs is encouraged. As a rule, plant
management is supposed to specify qualities and quantities of particular
commodities to be produced for sale or internal use, keeping within the
t Bienstock, Schwarz, lIDd Yugow; Management in Russian Industry and Agricul-
ture. Selected from pp. 53-;4. New Ymk: Oxford University Press; '944. Rep!inted
by permission of CorneD University Press.
figure of aggregate output set in the directives. Management may, h0w-
ever, propose to higher agencies a change in the aggregate figure. At one
time, so-called 'counter-plans,' usually instigated by the Communist or-
ganization in the plant or by Stalchanovites, were cOmmon.
Further elaboration transforms a 'production program' into a
plant tekhpromfinplan. Subject to approval by higher ~cies whenever
their directives are transgressed, there are added to production figures
( 1) an estimate of the required number of workers; (2) an estimate of
pay roll; (3) a plan for lowering cost of production; (4) an estimate of
fuel, electric power, raw materials, semi-finished products, and equipment
to be acquired; (5) a plan for utilizing plant equipment; (6) proposed
organization of all plant resources ( orgtekhplan ); and finally, ( 7 ) the
financial plan, i.e. a balance-sheet to be aimed at by the management.
Other important items usual in a tekhpromfinplan are distribution of
products, introduction of new processes, auxiliary production, details of
capital investment (expansion), co-operation with other plants.
When the tekhpromfinplan is finally approved by the higher
authorities, it becomes law for the plant management. As a matter of fact,
however, the plant plan, hlce those of other economic agencies, including
that of Gosplan itself, is subject to repeated changes in process of applica-
tion, because of changes in general economic conditions or alterations in
Party policy.

It would be difficult to discover better proof that the budget is a

uDiversally valid instrument of management control and administra·
tive planning than these two illustrations from. the American and
Soviet economic systems.

.... PRINCIPLES OF BUDGETING

In addition to the steady refinement of budgetary techniques, are
there any other broad principles of budgeting that responsible execu-
tives can follow? Several general guides for this purpose are offered
below in the analysis of (a) Federal budgeting experience by Har-
old D. Smith, and (b) municipal budgeting experience by an anony-
mous specialist of public management.

(a) HAROLD D. SMITH

The Budget .S.II IlIStrumettt of Executi¥e M.nagement·
Any attempt to summarize budget principles or rules of executive
management must, therefore, be of a tentative chaneter. At tbe same
8 Harold D . ..smith: "The Budget as an Instrmnent of LtgisIative Control and
Executive Management." Public: Administration .Review, Sum_ 19440 ,,01. 4, pp.
114-85. Reprinted by pennission.
469 BUDCETINC AND FINANCIAL CONTROL

time, the principles themselves must be dynamic. I submit such a tentative

set of eight principles, referring particularly to budgeting in the federal
government. .
1. Executive Programming. The budget, as recommended, re-
Hects the program of the chief executive. When enacted it becomes the
work program of the government, reflecting all government responsibilities
and activities in their political, economic, and social aspects. Budget
formulation, therefore, must be geared closely and directly to the formula·
tion of the chief executive's program as a whole. Budgeting and program-
ming are the two sides of the same coin; both must be under the direct
supervision of the chief executive. This principle holds tme for all gov·
ernments-federal, state, and local.
2. Executive Responsibility. The appropriation ordinarily au-
thorizes, it does not direct, an agency to spend money. The executive
branch is directed to fulfill the function established by law or implied in
the language of the appropriation measure. In other words, the appropria-
tion is not a mandate to spend, nor does it establish a "vested right" of an
agency. The agency is responSible, under the direction of the chief execu-
tive, for executing the intent of the legislation in the most economical
manner. The chief executive, for his part, has the responsibility of seeing
that the agency programs are brought into accord with legislative intent
and are executed with the greatest possible economy.
3. Reporting. Preparation of the budget, legislative action, and
budget execution must be based on full financial and operating reports
Rowing up from the administrative units of the government. Current in-
formation should be furnished the executive as well as the legislative
branch on the progress of work with respect to the various programs and
projects, obligations incurred, expenditures made, revenues received, in-
dividuals employed, objectives accomplished, and other relevant facts.
Budgeting without such reporting is blind and arbitrary.
4. Adequate Tools. Executive budget responsibility requires ade-
quate administrative tools. The chief executive must have under his direct
supervision a properly staffed budget organization. In addition, certain
powers must be available to the executive in' order to assure the most
economical execution of legislative intent. These include, among others,
authority to make monthly or quarterly allotments of appropriations and
to set up reserves out of appropriations.
5. Multiple Procedures. Modern government includes very dif-
ferent types of operatipns. Functions of every-day administration; long-
run construction and developmental projects; quasi-commercial opera-
tions, such as purchase and sale of goods, or banking operations-these
require varying procedures for effective management. Although all gov-
ernment functions, without exception, should be reflected in the budget,
the methods of budgeting may vary for different types of governmental
activities. The budgeting of quasi-commercial operations may therefore
differ from the budgeting of administrative activities.
470
6. Executive Discretion. Effective and economical management
may be hindered if appropriation items are ton narrowly defined. The
budget document must contain a great amount of deI:aJ1 for the informa-
tion of the legislature and the guidance of the executive. It is desirable,
however, that the appropriations be made for broadly defined functions
of an agency, or subdivisions of an agency, in harmony with legislative
determination of the current objectives of government. To the executive
branch should be left the determination of the precise means of operation
to achieve the purposes set forth by the law.
7. Flexibility in Timing. The budget should contain provisions
which permit immediate adjustment to changing economic conditions
with which fiscal policy must cope. Flexibility in timing can, for example,
be accomplished if the legislature appropriates funds for certain construc-
tion and developmental programs for an extended period, say, of five years.
Timing of the program can then be adjusted by the executive in accord
with economic necessities.
8. Two-way Budget Organization. Although budget preparation
and budget execution must be directed by the chief executive, efficient
budgeting requires the active cooperation of each agency and its major
units. There must be in each agency a budget office with functions for
that agency similar to those of the government-wide budget office. The
budgeting and programming work of the agency must be interrelated
under the direct responsibility of the agency head. The established budget
officer assists his superior in the administrative control of the subdivisions
of the particular agency; he also transmits the agency's views and pro-
posals to the central budget bureau. Budgeting is not only a central func-
tion but a process that should permeate the entire administrative structure.
Traffic between the central office and the agency offices responsible for
budgeting and programming should move on a two-way rather than a
one-way street.

(b) "It's Always Budget Time'"

Along about this time of year in a majority of American city
halls, lights are burning later, the clatter of adding machines is more
frenzied, and there is an unmistakable feeling of tension in the air. It's
budget time again.
Just ahead looms another fiscal year, demanding that new plans
be made, that new taxes be levied, that new balances be struck between
revenues and expenditures. Before that new fiscal year is ushered in,
custom has decreed that a document must be published, a document that
. with perennial stubbornness insists that the 365 days next to come be
anticipated by long columns of figures, code numbers, and dollar signs.
Once that document -has been drafted and its last decimal point ham-

• "It's Always Budget Time," Public Management, October 1940, vol. "", pp .
.z8cr9o. Reprinted by permission.
471 BUDGETING AND FINANCIAL CONTROL

mered home, all hands can relax once more. This concept of the budget
prevails in most city halls. In few cities is a real job of budgeting being
done. By and large we have not learned to make effective use of budgeting
as a tool of management. A clearer understanding of the entire process
is needed.
Hrst of all, we have placed too much emphasis on dollars and
far too little attention on activities and the work to be done. If budgetary
programs are to be something more than carefully predicted expense ac-
counts, expenditures must be related to objectives. Unit costs need to be
calculated, but they have little meaning unless they are related to units of
achievement. It is not enough to know how much it will cost to have a
visiting nurse make 20 calls per day for a year. We also need to know
what these calls can be expected to produce in terms of reduced mortality
and morbidity rates. Proposed police expenditures need to be related to
their effect on crime rates, traffic accident rates, and so forth. It is true
that satisfactory measurement devices are still lacking for many municipal
activities, but this does not minimize the necessity for keeping major ob-
jectives foremost in the whole budgeting process. This is our plea to
municipal officials-make the budgeting process a continuous job and not
just a presentation and paring of estimates. Rather than basing the new
budget primarily on past expenditures, require a work program outlin-
ing the changes in conditions affecting the department's work, estimates of
the volume and character of work, and other information showing what
the department head intends to do with the money and why he needs it.
In this way the planning of finances is made dependent upon the planning
of municipal operations.
In the second place, there is a tendency to exaggerate the
"gadgetry" of budgeting. The forms, the classification. and the number
of columns are important details, but they are only details. A budget is
not, or should not be, just a document. It is a plan or a program in terms
of work to be done and of service to be provided to the public. The budget
should represent a continuous and rigorous scrutiny of operations, policies,
facilities, and work methods. The budget process should challenge the
entire basis of operations, suitability of policies, efficiency of methods,
economy of equipment and facilities, reorganization of departments-in
short nothing should be taken for granted just because it has been done
in such and such a way in the past. The fact that a department or activity
received a certain amount last year means little. All factors affecting de-
partmental operations and costs should be subject to a most searching
and critical analysis by the chief administrator with the assistance of the
department heads.
A third weakness in the budget philosophy of some local officials
is the tendency to think of budgeting exclusively in terms of the fiscal
year. Custom has established the year as the time span of most budgets,
but this is really an arbitrary choice. There is nothing inherent in munici-
pal problems that makes it possible for the human mind to see clearly one
472 ADMIfUSTRATfOIf

year, and only one year, into the future. When it is recognized that
budgeting is essentially the planning or programming of municipal serv-
ices, it must be admitted that a year is too long a span for some plans and
too short for others. On the one hand, the annual budget needs to be
broken down into monthly or quarterly work programs and allotments.
On the other hand, it needs to be fitted into a three-year, a five-year, or a
ten-year plan. Daily schedules, monthly programs, annual budgets, and
long-term plans are not isolated problems to be met one at a time. They
are all parts of the planning function of management, and they all need
to be fitted into a coherent but flexible program for attacking municipal
problems. It's always budget time.

Other writers, like ProfessQr Augustus Hatton of Northwestern

University, have gone further in praising the budget as "the most
potential instrument of democracy." 10 Without going so far, it is
possible to recognize that in the budgeting device there are latent
some of the most powerful techniques of a socially responsible man-
agement, providing these techniques are applied with the pragmatic
and flexible philosophy advocated above.

5. AUDITING AND OTHER FISCAL CONTROLS

Before the perfection of the technique of budgeting, the audit

was the main instrument of fiscal control; and indeed, independent
audits or separate auditing staffs are found in practically all sizable
commercial or governmental agencies, while independent budgeting
staffs are lacking even in many modern business corporations.l1 As
the following readings show, there are besides the audit, other man-
agerial techniques related to the fiscal process, such as centralized
purchasing controls.
(a) Auditing is an ex post facto management technique, since
it comes into play after an administrative transaction is virtually
completed rather than before as in the case of budgeting. The so-
called post-audit is here described by Professor Harvey Walker, a
teacher of public administration at Ohio State University and
Secretary-Treasurer of the American Political Science Association.
(b) Centralized purchasing is a device that is utilized earlier in
the fiscal process and is employed widely by business and by many
governmental authorities." A colorful report of New York City's
,. Lent. D. upson: Letten on Public Administration. Detroit: National Trnining
School for Public Service; 1947, pp. 31-3%. See also Charles A. Beard: Introduction
to Rene Stomm: The Budget. New York: D. Appleton Company; 1917.
11 Holden, Fish, and Smith: Top-Management Organization and Control, p. 4;.
11: Ibid.
413 tUDCmNG AND FINANCIAL CotcnOL

purchasing system is presented below from the weekly magazine,

The New Yorker.
(a) HARVEY WALKER

"Accounting and Auditing" ..

The postaudit comes at the end of the appropriation period. It

is primarily concerned with the honesty and legality of financial trans-
actions. Postauditing may well be done by an agency not intimately con-
nected with the administration, preferably one responsible to the legisla-
tive body. The postaudit is of value and impOrtance to the public because
it is a final endorsement or indictment of the financial integrity of the
administration. Postauditing may be done by either of two methods. The
first is known as a detailed audit. It involves the checking of every trans-
action which has been completed by the agency or unit being audited.
The other is known as a balance sheet audit. In this plan each item in the
balance sheet is verified, usually by making a careful and complete exami-
nation of assets and liabilities. If the work has been properly done and all
the documents are available, the auditor may safely select at random hom
among the documents in the file a sample of the accounting transactions
of the period and check them through the accounting records to make
sure that they have been honestly and properly entered. Since the account-
ing office has no way of knowing which transactions will be selected by
the auditor, if a large enough sample is taken -any wholesale fraud or
dishonesty can be detected. This is called test checking.
Auditing done by an agency which is intimately connected with
the administrative side of the government may be prejudiced in favor of
the administration and fail to report minor infractions of good practice.
If the chief administrator controls the activities of the auditor he can
prevent the detection of serious irregularities over a considerable period
of time. On this account it has been considered proper that auditing
should be done by officers who are independent of the administration.

(b) "City Purchases""

One of the junior members of the City Club has pallsed on to

us what he calls the frivolous by-product of recent civic work he has been
doing as a member of a sub-rommittee of the club investigating certain
phases of municipal expenditures. It's a marked-up copy of a late report
of the Dq>artment of Purchase, with some puzzling purchases checked.
Such as: 200 100. wild-cherry bark @ 9Y2;, 112 vigorous rhesus monkeys

U Ham.y Walker: Public Admfuistr.rtion in the United States. Adapted from pp.
256-8. New York: Farrar and Rinehart, Inc.; 1937. Reprinted by permission of Harvey
Walker .
.. New Yorker: "City Purchases." December 4, '937, vol. 13, pp. ~,..~6. Re-
printed by permission.
474 ADMINISTIATION

@ $4.95. 7400 tons inorganic dust @ $,.39 a ton. Well, the explanation
is that the wild-cberry bark is made into cough medicine to be handed
out at free medical clinics, the monkeys are used by the Department of
Health in infantile-paralysis research, and the inorganic dust is something
that goes into asphalt paving.
The city bought 135,000 diverse items last year, our City Club
man tells us, at a cost of about twenty-five million. They included, to
go further down the list, zoo yards of moleskin (for binding books at the
Hall of Records), four completely dressed dummies at $,0 each (for the
firemen to rescue), 47,500 mice (for anti-pneumonia and obstetrical work
in hospitals), and 108 handsaws. This last didn't seem such an odd item
until the City Club began investigating it and found that the purchase
was made for the Bronx Terminal Market. This was certainly peculiar on
the face of it, but the explanation proved the purchase quite legitimate
and, in fact, ingenious and praiseworthy. There were two million pounds
of fish at the market for distribution to people on home relief. The fish
were large, frozen solid, packed in ice, tightly crated, and highly perishable.
The trick was to dispose of them in usable portions and avoid spoilage.
Somebody thought of handsaws; the purchase was approved and men
went to work. slicing up the crates, ice, and fish all at once. The poor
people went off with chunks of fish in ice-and-wood frames and not a
complaint was received.
The city is very cautious in the matter of buying such things as
bulbs and Bower seeds, our man reports. It takes nothing for granted. No
pay without results. If the Parks Department buys a couple of thousand
bulbs for fall planting, the bill is held up until the following spring, when
an inspector goes around and counts shoots, making sure also that the
plants are what they were represented to be and no onions among them.
One Item the Department of Purchase wasn't able to handle had to do
with the entertainment of Mrs. Roosevelt. She was to preside at a park
opening last spring, and one of the deputies thought she should be pre-
sented with some Bowers. He rushed into the florist shop in the Savoy·
Plaza and after some fast talking got two dozen American Beauty roses,
$24, charged to the city. The bill was sent to the Parks Department, which
O.K:d it and passed it along the line. At the Comptroller's office it was
disapproved as contrary to Sec. 39 of the city ordinances, which says that
all c:xpenses of municipal celebrations or ceremonies must be authorized
by a three-fourths vote of the Board of Aldermen. In the end, the deputy
made good, after some heated correspondence.

Thus, materiel management, which in its broadest senSe includes

storage and maintenance, consumes a large part of the budget of
most institutions and enterprises. Next to expenditures for personnel,
which in government accounts for some 60 per cent of total operat·
ing budgets, purchases of materials and equipment represents the sec·
475 BUKETING AND FINANCIAL CONT\OL

ond major item of expenditure;'" by 1948 the Federal Government

alone was spending one billion dollars per year for these non-military
materiel services, including rent and utilities. Consequently pur-
chasing control, materiel management, equipment maintenance, qnd
such associated subjects as space supervision, office lighting, and air
conditioning are coming to be staff or service specialties of high
managerial importance.

6. REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES IN PUBLIC MANAGEMENT

Whether consumed for personnel or purchases, public funds

come from several sources and are spent for a variety of specific
functions. A graphic presentation of this subject was made by the
United States Treasury before World War II; but "Felix the Cat,"
as the financial chart presented on page 476 has been properly
dubbed, is just as alive today as he was then.
With newer national responsibilities after World War II which
embraced world affairs, the magnitude and proportion of these
figures have changed. Instead of a total Federal expenditure of Only
$7,691 millions in 1938, the estimated Federal expenditures for
1950 mounted to $41,858 millions. Of this amount, the national
defense bill was $1+268 millions, or twice the size of the total lln8
Federal budget. Economic and other aid to foreign countries was
almost as large ($6,709 milIions). The cost of veteran's services imd
interest on the public debt ran close behind ($5,496 millions ~nd
$5,450 millions, respectively). For social welfare, health, and se-
curity, $2,358 millions were allocated.'·
Vast expenditures of this kind raise the problem of relating ~ov.
ernmental fiscal management to private economic enterprise.

7. TREASURY CONTROl AND COMPREHENSIVE FISCAL MANAGE_

MENT

A major problem under such circumstances is that of keeping

the fiscal threads together, of establishing a comprehensive system
of financial management. If governmental budgets and other fiilcal
transactions are to be interrelated, comprehensive financial conttols
18 Mosher and Polsh: "Extent, Costs and Significance of Public Employment in
the United States." National Municipal Review, Tan .• 19~2, vol 28, pp. 51-75· The·
Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government. "0fIice of
General Services--Supply Activities," Feb. '944, p. 1.
UI BwJcet Message of the President, January 3, '949. The Bodget of the Ul\ited
Slates GoVernment for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1950, p. M 13.
 ESTIMATED Ft..ON
OF FEDERAL. STATE. AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNDS.
FISCAL YEAR EHDING IN 1938
Sourc•• fI R.c.ipta ~ Purpo.n of Expenditu.... for
r - II MIW_ or DO&.LAM)
Gener., GcNwnmctt
So ... r~.. of Receipte

_
_v_
-- ..,.
....... , 4n

~
'- ,.,
sa
- -
...... $1.,
..... ""
.- '....
.!:':.i!::.
......, "-",
........
T.... '" Ut11 ,...
.....
,.... 'A'
......
...... , ...
I. lla
:u
SoIoo_
0Il00<_
.......
........
s-.
Total
, ,.,
717

''-

,....,. In

,...... , I_
. . . . . . . ' .. 10
'- 12

- ... ,..,.. • 260

LoaI
, ....
Jl0
1.61U
s..
Loc.I
T_
II •
."'''
,...13

-.
.=::::'
._...... '1.-n
.....
'-I '.at'
-.., ...
..... ,1.
.....
,......cos - -
....... ,
.........
,....
-
... ........
""'
U'I
.....
_--......
._...... , I:IS

' .... m
OS
.... 0It00r
....... , ,.
.....
,.... ,

"""Po...
..... 01 Eltp.ndiWr ••
..............................
,...... .,.,...... .,...,......--..
.. .................
......... ........
" .,
................................ ........ -,... ............ -",
477 .UDGmNG AJiID nNANCJAL CONTJ'OL

beyond the traditional fonns of treasury and auditing control or e*'en

budgetary control are required. This requirement would seem to be
essential at least at the crucial Federal government level, where
powers and activities have a constant impact on the national ecOn-
omy. The first step in this development in the United States was the
assignment of a broader-than-usual fiscal mission to the Bureau of
the Budget. How this assignment occurred between World W;1f I
and World War II is revealed by (a) a Ieport by Professor W" F.
Willoughby and W. W. Willoughby of the Brookings Institut~on
and Professor Samuel Lindsay of Columbia University concern,mg
the findings of an American survey of the British Treasury practlC~S
in this connection, and (b) a report of the program as developed 1D
the United States Bureau of the Budget, by the Budget Dire(01:or
James E. Webb, later Assistant Secretary of State.

(a) WIUIAM F. WILLOUCHBY, WlnEL W. WIUOUCHBY,

AND SAMUEL M. LINDSAY

The System of Financial Administration of Great Britain 17

The commission entered upon its study of the financial systea1 of
Great Britain with a fair appreciation of the fact that to the Treaiury
Department was given large powers of control in respect to the forma-
tion of the estimates that were to be submitted to Parliament. Onli_as
it prosecuted its inquiries into the details of the manner in which the
Treasury exercised its powers did it come to a realization that, impor{:Bnt
as is this power of the Treasury in respect to estimates, it constituted but
one feature, one manifestation, as it were. of the far broader power that
the Treasury has to supervise and control, not only all matters re1atin~ to
the financial operations of the Government, but practically all matterS of
acquiring funds and property and all matters of incurring obligatio!15-
which may be called the bnsiness functions as distinguished from th~
public service activities of the Government. More and more, as its inves~l­
gation proceeded, the commission had borne in upon it the fact that m
the Treasury the British Government had a great organ of general ad-
ministrative control; that upon it fell the duty and responSibility for the
final determination of what form of organization the several departments
of the Government should have, what personnel was needed, what cam-
pensation should be paid, what new undertakings should be authori~ed,
what changes should be made in the employment of funds as provisiovaUy
allotted by Parliament, what new grants Parliament should be askeJ to
make, wh!jt the works program of the Government should be, etc.; that

"William F. Willoughby, Westel W. WiIIo~. and Samuel M. LinJaay,

The System of Financial Administration of Great Bntaio. Selected from pp. 1711-81 •
Reprinted by pennission of Brookings Institution. Copyright, "1'9. Brookingi In·
ltitution.
478 ADMINISTRATION

in dischaJ:ging this function it was its duty to keep itself thoroughly in-
formed regarding the conditions and needs of the several services and use
its utmost endeavor to see that the Government operations were con-
ducted with the maximum of efficiency and economy; that, in a word, the
Treasury was the one authority to which Parliament and the public looked
to see that public affairs were administered in an economical and ef-
ficient manner.
The investigation also brought out another fact which the com-
mission is sure has never been adequately appreciated by foreign students,
namely, that these broad powers of the Treasury, instead of being exerted
once a year when the estimates are brought under consideration, are
exerted from day to day throughout the year. Still more important, the
fact was developed that not only had the Treasury this important duty
of acting as a general organ of administrative control but this duty con-
stituted practically its exclusive function. It is difficult to overestimate
the importance of this fact. Until it is appreciated one totally miscon-
ceives the place of the Treasury in the British administrative system.
Misled by the name, the commission began its inquiries under the im-
pression that the British Treasury corresponded to the Treasury Depart-
ment of the United States Government, that to it was entrusted, as its
primary duty, the management of the national finances, the collection,
custody, and disbursement of the public revenues, and that its powers in
respect to the framing of estimates were, so to speak, incidental to this
duty.
Nothing is further from the fact. It cannot be stated too emphati-
cally that the British Treasury is, properly speaking, not a public service
department at all. It has no public service duties of its own. Its functions
are entirely auxiliary and controlling-restricted to looking after the finan-
cial and physical measures, and to the supervision and control of the
activities of other departments. It thus stands in a class by itself as a
service superior to, and in no sense coordinate with, the departments
which render services direct to the public, properly speaking. In fact, it
does not deal with the public; it does not collect the public revenues-this
is done by the SCK:alled "revenue" departments; it does not have the
custody of the public funds; it does not audit public expenditures-that
is done by the Comptroller and Auditor General; it does not administer
the public debt-that is performed by a separate organ, the National Debt
Commissioners.
It is hardly necessary to point out how fundamental it is that this
principle of organization should be understood by anyone who may ad-
vocate the principle of treasury control over estimates and expenditures
for OUI own political system. Once we grasp the fundaroental status of
the British Treasury and the principle upon which its powers rest, all
difficulty in the way of understanding why the British system works so
smoothly disappears. Until Congress is prepared both to accept the prin-
ciple involved in having the financial affairs of the administrative services
479 BUDGETtNC AND FINANCIAL CONTltOl.

subjected to a superior supervision and control, and to provide for the

creation of a proper organ through which this power shall be exercised,
it will not be possible for the United States to have incorporated in its
system of government that feature of the British Government which more
than anything else is responsible for the efficiency and economy with
which the details of Governmental operations are conducted.

(b) ,AMES E. WEBB

"Business Organization of the Government" 111
It is generally known that the Bureau of the Budget is one of the
key agencies of fiscal management in our government. Less well under-
stood is the extent to which the Bureau's responsibilities extend into the
entire administrative process. The Bureau's work involves a great deal
more than preparing the Federal Budget.
Estimates work, it is true, absprbs a large portion of the time of
the staff. This work is carried on by the Estimates Division, the largest
unit in the Bureau. However, this is only one phase in a continuing
analysis focused on the evaluation of departmental programs and the ef-
ficiency with which they are administered. When the Congress has voted
the annual appropriations, it remains for the Budget Bureau to allocate
the available funds. Through its quarterly apportionments the Buteau
determines the spending tate appropriate to the execution of the programs
Congress has approved and to the conduct of administrative operations
throughout the next twelve months.
In addition, it is necessary for the President to review the various
Federal activities in the perspective of the Government program as a
whole. The fiscal program he proposes to the Congress in his annual
budget message is formulated in the light of general business conditions.
Analysis of the various programs and of economic developments, together
with studies of cost factors, is the main task of the Fiscal Division. When
organization is weak and administration is floundering, no estimate of
financial needs can have much validity. For this reason the founders of the
national budget system specifically directed the Bureau of the Budget to
give careful attention to problems of adrnini~trative structure and opera-
tions in order to rerommend improvements. The Administrative Manage-
ment Division in the Budget Bureau is designed to give specific answers
to such questions. The preparation of Executive orders and analysis of
legislative proposals are performed by the Legislative Reference Division.
The Division of Statistical Standards is charged with the setting of
standards and the integration of fact-collecting activities of governmental
agenCies.

18 James E. Webb: "Business Organization of the Government." Address before

the Federal Council of Administrative Management of Metropolitan New York; New
York City, October ll, 1946, adapted from pp. "'-4, 6-7.
480
Budget agencies at the state and local levels of government exer-
cise less comprehensive financial powers and are restricted to more
strictly outlined budget duties. Furthermore, the state and local gov-
ernment income or revenues are under less direct control of their
respective revenue agencies. The system suffers from the effects of
rigidly earmarked funds, locally shared taxes required under state
law, independent fee charges and collections by separate depart-
ments, and overlapping revenue sources for state, local, and Federal
taxes. These practices make comprehensive financial planning and
control almost impossible at the state and local levels of government.
However, as a result of the evolving network of Federal grants-in-aid
or subsidies to states and cities and the growing maturity of the over-
all fiscal policy of the Federal government, some regularization of
state and local revenues and fiscal controls may be anticipated. The
co-ordination of some phases of Federal and state income tax ad-
ministration is already a step in this direction.

8. THE LIMITS OF FINANCIAL ECONOMY

The immediate object of fiscal co-ordination and control is

financial economy as well as social efficiency. How is real economy
achieved and what are its limitations? Significant comment on this
question comes from a variety of sources: (a) British statesman Ed-
mund Burke, (b) Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin, (c)
American businessman Henry S. Dennison, and (d) the President's
Committee on Administrative Management.
(a) letter of Edmund Burke to the Duke of Bedford, 1796 1.

His Grace is pleased to aggravate my guilt, by charging my ac-

ceptance of his Majesty's grant as a departure from my ideas, and the
spirit of my conduct with regard to economy. If it be, my ideas of economy
were false and ill founded. But they are the Duke of Bedford's ideas of
economy I have contradicted, and not my own. In saving money I soon
can count up an the good I do; but when by a cold penury I blast the
abilities of a nation, and stunt the growth of its active energies, the ill
I may do is beyond all calculation. Whether it be too much or too little,
whatever I have done has been"general and systematic. I have never en-
med into those trifting vexations, and oppressive details, that have been
falsely and most ridiculously laid to my charge. Mere parsimony is not
economy. It is separable in theory from it; and in fact it may or it may not
19 Letter of EdJnu1Id Burite to the Duke of Bedford. 1796. Letter To A Noble
Lord. Edited by Albert H. Smyth. Boston: Giml and Company; 1898, selected from
pp. 9. 21, 24·
481 BUDGETING AND FINANCIAL CONTIlOt.

be a part of economy, according to circumstances. Expense, and great

expense, may be an essential part in ttue economy. If parsimony were to
be considered as one of the kinds of that virtue, there is, however, another
and a higher economy. Economy is a distributive virtue, and consists, llot
in saving, but in selection. Parsimony requires no providence, no sagacity,
no powers of comhination, no comparison, no judgment. Mere instinct,
and that not an instinct of the noblest kind, may produce this false econ-
omy in perfection. The other economy has larger views. It demands a
discriminating judgment, and a firm, sagacious mind.

(b) Letter of Albert Gallatin to Thomas Jefferson, 1801'"

You will also see that I lay less stress on savings on the civil list
than you do. Some may be made, but the total amount cannot be great.
The new judiCiary, the commissioners of loans, the mint, the accountants
of the Navy and War Departments, seem to be the principal, if not the
only, objects of reform. Of the clerks I cannot yet say much: those of the
Comptroller and Auditor are less numerous and paid less in proportion
than those of the Register and two accountants. Transcribing and com-
mon ones are easily obtained; good book-keepers are also everywhere to
be found; it is difficult to obtain faithful examining clerks, on whose cor-
rectness and fidelity a just settlement of all the accounts depends, and still
more difficult to find men of talent. My best clerk next to the principal,
and who had twelve hundred dollars, has left me to take one thousand in
Philadelphia. Under the present circumstances of this place. we must cal-
culate on paying higher all the inferior officers, principally clerks, than in
Philadelphia. Coming all new in the Administration, the heads of Depart-
ments must obtain a perfect knowledge of all the details before they can
venture a reform. The number of independent officers attached to the
Treasury renders the task still more arduous for me. I assure you that it
will take me twelve months before I can thoroughly understand every
detail of all those several offices. Current business and the more general
and important duties of the office do not permit to learn the lesser details
but incidentally and by degrees. Until I know them all I dare not touch
the machine.

(C) HARRT S. DENNISON

"Competence and Economy in Public Expeaditure" 1I1

It is well known in private industry that it is possible to be penny

wise and pound foolish; to make economies of a negative sort that in tinal
"Letter of Albert Gallatin to Thomas Jefferson, ,Sol. Writings of Albert Call.tin.
Edited by Henry Adams. Philadelphia: 1. B. UppiDcott Company, 1879, vol. 1, pp.
7 1-72.
1I1 Harry S. Dennison: "Competence and Economy in Public Expenditure." Annals
of the American Academy of Political and Social Science; 19%4. vol. 113, pp. )28-29.
482 ADMINISTRATION

cost outrun the wildest extravagances; that it is possible to be too extrava-

gant in overhead but also to save so many dollars in overhead that for
every one saved there is a loss of ten under foot. A department running
fairly well can always get along without a part of its management for a
short time, but it won't continue to run as well with part of its leadership
cut off. Here is an insidious source of false economies, because so few
people can resist the appeal of the next few weeks in favor of the months
far beyond.
There is hardly a branch of private industry or of the Govern-
ment in which important true economies cannot be made if worked out
thoughtfully and in a constructive frame of mind, rather than noisily and
superficially. But there is no branch in which extravagant false economies
are not showy and easy to make-where meat-axe economizing cannot
lose more than years of good management can recover.

(d) PRESIDENT'S COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE

MANAGEMENT
"Conclusion" 22
It has been demonstrated over and over again in large organiza-
tions of every type in business and in government that genuine savings in
operation and true economies are to be achieved only by the provision
of adequate managerial machinery which will afford an opportunity for
central executive direction to pursue day after day and year after year, in
season and out of season, the task of cutting costs, of improving the serv-
ice, and of raising the standards of performance. It cannot be done by
arbitrary percentage cuts, arbitrary dismissal of employees, arbitrary con-
solidation of agencies. It is an operation that must be performed, but for
its successful performance we must requisition the skill of the surgeon
and his scalpel and not be tempted to call in the butcher with his cleaver.

What constitutes paring on the one hand or genuine economy

on the other has remained a controversial question even during the
comprehensive discussions of the governmental reforms advocated
by the Hoover Commission in the late 1940'S.23 The only warning
that one can issue is Dennison's: beware of false economies. One
should recognize, however, that the potentialities of both concrete
economies and general improvements are almost endless in the field
of management. As Burke points out, financial economy is largely
a question of priority of effort based on the wisest sense of judgment
that a statesman can apply.
23 President's Committee on Administrative Management: "Conclusion." Ad-
ministrative Management in the Government of the United States; 1937, p. 51.
23 Remarks of Henry Cabot Lodge; Congressional Record. 80th Cong., 1st Sess~
vol. 93, part 9, p.. 11455.
 aUDGETING AND FINANCIAL CONy1l0L

9. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PUBLIC ECONOMIES

Whether the tool used to enforce savings is the cleaver or the

scalpel, a broad policy of governmental economy has frequently !Je:Cn
undertaken by the national administration. Seldom was this policy
more vigorously enforced, however, than during the "return to por-
malcy" of the 192.0'S under United States Budget Directors (a)
Charles G. Dawes and (b) Herbert M. Lord.

(a) CHARLES CATES DAWES

Govemmental Budgeting and Business-like Economy"
At my request the President called a meeting of the busines~ or·
ganisation of the United States Government, consisting of Cabinet Heads
of Departments, and 1,200 to 1,500 bureau chiefs and others representing
the routine business operating staff. This meeting, besides visualisinli for
the first time in our history the business organisation of the United Sfates
Government, gave the president and myself, as his agent, opportunitY to
appeal for co-operation in the effort to reduce government expense.
In closing my speech, I said: "Fellow Bureau Chiefs, are y~u
WIlling, after hearing what I have said, that I should now represent yoU In
addressing myself directly to the President of the United States witll an
a-sm,aYlc\:: m"y\)'U, c~a't'ltIn 'In 'n'rs itll'U1:St 'im a ,eO.'Ut:Uon tir. 'go--;'lm·-
mental expenditures? If you so agree, if you are willing, will you indicate
it by standing?" (The entire audience arose. The President of the UI1ited
States arose, followed by applause. The Cabinet and other Officer; on
the platform also arose.) "I wish to say to you, Sir, that the men b<f~re
you realise the cares and perplexities of your great position. They realIse
that at this time the business of our country is prostrated, that meD are
out of employment, that want and desperation stalk abroad, and that you
ask us to do our part in helping you to lift the burden of taxation trom
the backs of the people."
To which the President of the United States responded: "1 tllank
you all for your presence and your commitment to this great enterprise.:'
At the time of this first meeting, 29th June, of the routine lmSl-
ness system of the United States, presided over by the President, the heads
and bu{eau chiefs of the forty-three departments, and independent ~tab­
lishments of the Government there represented had been authotised
through appropriation alxeady made by Congress to spend for the fiscal
year 1922, upon which they would enter two days later, the sum of $1,~34.-
865;7(>2.01. As a result of this appeal to them as a united organisation lifter
.. Remarks of Cbarles Cates Dawes to Federal bureau chiefs and others, Jun,: 29,
1921. Quoted by Josiah Stamp: "Departmentalismand Efficiency." Public AdfflWistra·
non, Jiily 1932, vol. 10, selected from pp. 226-28.
Reprinted by permission.
484 AllMINtSTUTION

Jess than three weeks of consideration and revision of what they had for-
merly regarded as their necessities, they had promised to save $u1,511.-
618.31 out of their appropriations. In other words, of the amount appro-
priated for them to spend in 1911, as a result of the new system they
saved 7-8/lOthS per cent in the first eight months of its operations. We
afterwards estimated and itemized in an official report to Congress, cov-
ering 170 ordinary book pages, the final savings for the year as amounting
to $15°,134,835.°3.

(b) H. M. LORD
"The Budget System and Economy""
It has been said by some one that the Director of the Bureau of
the Budget in carrying out the executive policy of retrenchment should
have the hide of a rhinoceros and a backbone of steel. He should also
have a heart of flint to withstand the appeals of eloquent advocates of
great national projects urging favorable recommendation to the President
for colossal sums for reforestation, good roads, rivers and harbors, public
buildings, reclamation, research, and the like. The Director of the Buteau
of the Budget yields in point of national pride and public spirit to no
person in the Federal service or out of it. He has vision to see the broad
slopes of our denuded hills and mountains again clothed in the glorious
majesty of stately forests; he has vision to see the hamlets, villages, towns,
and cities of our country bound together by broad ribbons of faultless
highway, over which rumble the ponderous trucks of commerce and over
which speed the limousines of the rich and the flivvers of the more mod-
erately circumstanced; he has vision to see imposing public buildings
adorning the public squares of our populous communities; he has vision
to see our bays and rivers bearing unvexed on their placid bosoms the com-
merce of this and other countries, pointing to the last word in river and
harbor construction; he has vision to see every last arid foot of land con-
verted into an Eden oJ: productive fertility; he has vision to see this won-
derful country 'by the expenditure of Federal billions transformed into a
Utopia of comfort, convenience, and beauty; he has vision to see all this,
and then some one hands him a Treasury statement and he wakes up.
These important Government projects must be provided for, but only to
the extent that the condition of the Treasury and the plight of the tax-
payers will warrant.
I am not speaking in any spirit of complaint or criticism. In the
consideration of estimates the sympathy of the Director of the Bureau
of the Budget is generally with the executives, who in most cases support
2. H. M. Lord: "The Budget System and Economy." Address delivered before
Sixth Regular Meeting of the Business Organization of the Government, Washington,
January 2J, J924. Quoted by Rodney L. Mott: Materials I1lustrative of American Gov-
ernment, pp. 16';-66. Reprinted by pennission of The Century Co. Copyright, 1925,
The Century Co.
485 ItIDCETfNG ANO FINANCIAL CONTltOL

their requests fur appropriations so ably and earnestly as to challenge his

admiration. He faces across the table experts from the many bureaus of
the Government-able, trained men, loyal to the particular Government
interests they represent, and convinced of the supreme importance and
prime necessity of the services and projects for which they so eloquently
plead. In this financial arena he encounters personal friends with whose
great abilities, professional and scientific attainments, and devotion to
duty he is thoroughly familiar. To deny their requests, to chill their en-
thusiasm, and to defeat their cherished plans, which the executive policy
of economy at times demands, is not a pleasant duty.
Some months ago I made the statement that when the Director
of the Bureau of the Budget became popular he should be immediately
dismissed. My experiences the past few months have confirmed the wis·
dom of that conclusion .... I have stated often and emphasized reo
peatedly that the Director of the Bureau of the Budget has no financial
policy of his own. He endeavors, impartially and impersonally, to have
reflected in the Budget the financial policy of the Chief Executive, which
should be and must be the policy of the personnel who make up the
administration, from the char·women who mop the office floors to the
distinguished statesmen who sit in august dignity around the Cabinet
table. If in applying that executive policy he does not have due regard to
the rights of all Federal agencies, it is from fault of judgment and never
from lack of intent to be fair and just. He earnestly desires the friendly
regard of the services, but if he cannot have their friendship he must have
their respect.

Department heads and their subordinates conformed with these

budgetary policies and did not, as was sometimes the custom in sub-
sequent administrations, violate the presidential injunction not to
exceed budgetary requests in testimony before congressional commit-
tees." There was thus a Spartan philosophy of public administratIOn
behind the vigorous budgetary practices of the Coolidge era.

10. PUBLIC BUDGET AND PRIVATE ECONOMY

This idea represented but one of the alternative theories of Amer-

ican budget-making. The relationship of the public budget to private
enterprise is a controversial issue of the American political economy
which is explored below by Beardsley Rum!. Dr. Ruml has had ex-
tensive administrative experience and has held the following posts:
Dean of the Social Science Division at the University of Chicago,
Federal Reserve Bank Director"and Treasurer of Macy's department
.. See v. o. .Key: "Legislative Control." Elements of Public Administration, edited
by Marx, p. no.
store in New York City. An instigator of many progressive fiscal
ideas, such as the withholding system of income tax administIlltion,
Ruml has advocated a more aggressive Federal fiscal policy in relation
to private business.
BEARDSLEY RUML
Balallced Bud,et v. Compen"till, Fiscal Policy IT
Fundamentally, all possible Federal fiscal and monetary policies
are variants of one of two opposite policies. These may be designated
brieBy as (1) The balanced budget policy and (z) the compensatory
fiscal policy.
The essence of the balanced budget policy is of course so to
manage Federal fiscal operations that, over all, receipts and disbursements
balance. The purpose of this policy is to remove or to neutralize the
effect of national budgetary operations, as such, on the private economy.
If expenditure balances income, the net effect on dollar purchasing power
in the hands of the public is presumed to be zero. Under these circum-
stances, the private market place can function. It is argned that price so
determined is the best method of assuring that desired goods and services
are supplied, that initiative is stimulated and rewarded, that prices are
fair, that quantities are right, that the correct balance is maintained be-
tween savings and consumption and that all who want to work shall have
employment.
The essence of the compensatory fiscal policy is very different.
It argnes that, in the absence of demand, the market place cannot func-
tion, because the factors of production-capital, management, labor, and
agriqlture-will not permit prices to fall to the point where full produc-
tion \\vould be maintained. Accordingly, for the reasonable maintenance
of d~and, and therefore of production, the intervention of the Federal
government is required from time to time to provide purchasing power
in the hands of the public.
The balanced budget policy requires that ideally the Federal
budget should be in balance every year; the compensatory policy requires
that ideally the Federal budget should be related to the activity of private
business and therefore should show either a deficit or a surplus of some
amount. It is also clear that between these policies an absolute choice
must be made if we are to have any fiscal policy at all. The policies are
opposite and do not permit of any compromise or intermediate position.
The arguments in favor of a balanced budget policy are of three
general kinds, economic, political, and psychological. The economic argu-
ment states that any policy other than that of a balanced budget will

lIT Beardsley Ruml: "The Business Man~s Interest in National Fiscal Policy." Ad-
vanced Management, Fall 1939, vol .... selected from pp. 123-.... Reprinted by per-
mission.
487 BUDGETING ANI» FINANCIAL CONTROL

disturb the free competitive markets and will prevent supply and demand
having their natural effect on prices of goods and services, and therefore
on production, distribution and consumption. The political argument
states that any policy other than a balanced budget policy puts too much
power in the hands of the controlling political party. The prevailing
[psychological] beliefs that are relevant to fiscal policy are, first, no indi-
vidual, corporation or state can live beyond its income indefinitely; second,
debts contracted must be paid, and honor requires that no debt should
be contracted unless there is intention and possibility of repayment; third,
you can't get something for nothing; fourth, irredeemable paper currency
in the end becomes worthless.
The fundamental argument for such a [compensatory fiscal]
policy rests on two separate but related considerations. First, we have in
this country a private, competitive capitalist system. This system is based
on the private and voluntary use of debt, credit and savings by individuals
and corporations. The operation of this system involves necessarily from
time to time increases and decreases in aggregate purchasing power with
no corresponding increase or decrease in potential production. The con-
sequences are distorted price relationships, boom and depression, and
persistent under-employment. Such instability is morally and politically
destructive. Therefore, for these changes in aggregate purchasing power,
arising from the very nature of private capitalism as we know it, the
national state must compensate in the management of its fiscal and
monetary operations.
Second, the effect of the application of science and technology
to production is to increase potential production. The mere creation of
this increase in potential production does not of itself insure either (a)
that there will be corresponding increase of purchaSing power, or (b) if
there be such increase of purchasing power that it will be spent on con-
sumption or invested in new plant. Accordingly, to maintain reasonably
full employment and full production, the Federal government must be
prepared to provide from time to time necessary additional purchasing
power through the management of its fiscal and monetary operations.
A compensatory policy is not new to American experience. The
powers of the Federal Reserve System with respect to open market opera-
tions, reserve requirements and rediscount rates have been established
with compensatory action in the monetary field in mind. The extension
of this policy to the management of the budget and of taxation would
supplement existing compensatory devices. It is argued that this extension
is now made necessary by the violence of recent swings in business ac-
tivity.

Ruml did not stand alone in his preferen<:es for the compensatory
fiscal system nor was the system merely a creation of the Roosevelt
New Deal or a European theory borrowed from the influential British
481 ADMIMtmA1'JON

eConomist John Maynard Keynes." As early as 1934, Ralph E. Flan-

ders, head of the Society of Industrial Engineers and later Republican
senator from Vermont, sutprised some of his colleagues in the Ameri-
can Management Association when he suggested "that we consider
the possibility that the government budget shall be based, not on the
fiscal year, but on the whole period of the business cycle, and that we
consider whether it is not possible to find, in the course of the busi-
ness cycle, a time when it is advisable to borrow, a time when it is
advisable to repay loans, a time when it is advisable to expand public
works, a time when it is advisable to contract them." ..

11. BUDGETARY PlANNING AND ECONOMIC CONTROL

By the end of the 1940'S, the cumulative policy of the New Deal,
World War II, and the post-war recovery years had clearly set the
national government on the course advocated by the compensatory
fiscal theorists. The philosophy of the newer fiscal policy was clearly
expressed by President Truman in his report to Congress in 1947.

HARRY $. TRUMAN
"The £Conomic Report of the President""

It is obvious that Government trnnsactions, which-including

Federal, State, and local government-total more than a fourth of our
national product, profoundly affect the whole economy. An analysis of
the economic impact of Government expenditures is facilitated by a
break-down of the totals according to the type of recipients and character
of the payments. Federal payments to the public are classified along lines
of economic significance [as shown in the table on the following page1.
While Federal cash expenditures are expected to decline by
about 6 billion dollars from calendar year 1946 to calendar year 1947, State
and local expenditures are expected to increase by approximately 1 billion
dollars, largely because of a probable increase in expenditures for .public
works, veterans' bonuses, and an increase in pay rates.
On the plus side of the P.COnomic ledger we possess a fabulous
wealth of resources. Our iodustrial plant is larger and, in many cases, better
than ever before. Funds for business expansion are ample and pront in-
.. John Maynard Keynes: The End of Laissez-Faire. London: L. V. Woolf; 1927.
John Maynard Keynes: The Means to Prosperity. New York: Harcourt, Brace and
Com~f; 1933·
... Ralph E. Flanders: "The Mana2emcnt Point of View on Economic PlanIling."
American Management Association, General Management Series; 1932, No. u8, pp.
6-8.
.. Harry S. Truman: "The Economic Report of the Ptesident." The President's
Economic Report 10 Congl=, January 8, 1947, selected from pp. 11-30.
 BUDGETING AND FINANCIAL CONTROL

centives are high in most lines. Our labor force has greatly increased its
number of semiskilled and skilled workers. The spending power of con-
sumers, as a whole, is much higher thau it ever was before the war. Con-
sumer desires are fortified by a backlog of unsatisfied wants, particularly

FEDERAL CASH PAYMENTS (INCL. NET LOANS)

TO THE PUBLIC
[Billions of dollars]
CALENDAR. YEAIl
PAYMENTS TO-- i--'-94-C6:-O--'-9-4-7-l CHANCE

1. Active: .Federal personnel:

CiVIlian ..•.................................. 5.2 4·3 -0·9
Military .................................... 6.1 3.6 -'·5
11-.4-+--+--
Total ..................................... 1-- 7·9 -3·5

2. Individ?,,1s (other than active Federal personnel) :

ClVihan ..................................... 4.1 3·7 -0·4
6.5_+-__
Military ..................................... f-7_._8+ _ -1.3

Total..................................... 11.9 10.2 -'·7

3. Fanners (IncI. food subsidies) ....................
~+===t===
1.0 1.2 +0.2
4. Business ...................................... 1.8 1.0 -0.8
5. Holders of the Federal debt (interest payments) ...... 3.9 3·7 -0.2
6. State and local governments ...................... 1.0 1.5 +0.5
7. International organizations, foreign governments and
U. S. exporters .............................. 2.1 3·9 +1.8
8. Producers of goods & services, transportation &
miscellaneous .......................•........ 11.6 9·7 -1·9
Total .................................... 44.7 39·0 -S·7

for housing, commercial construction, automobiles, household appliances,

furnishings, and other durable goods. There are long-deferred and needed
public works-Federal, State and local. There is a strong and sustained
foreign demand.
While these favorable factors in our economic situation are funda-
mental, it is more practical and profitable to examine weaknesses that need
corrections than to congratulate ourselves upon the blessings which we
already enjoy. Chief among the unfavorable factors is the marked decline
. in real purchasing power of great numbers of coqsumers, resulting from
the large price increases in the second half of last year. Weakening of
the activity of investment might operate also as an obstacle to maximum
employment, production, and purchasing power. If industrial and com-
mercial construction slackens, and prices for residential construction re-
main high as compared with incomes of laborers and white-collar workers,
ollr maximum employment objective might be threatened this year or
$OOIl thereafter. Labor-management strife. with severe work stoppages.
remains a possibility. This would directly interfere with production or em-
ployment by creating or intensifying shortages of materials, parts, or equip-
ment. Through creation of uncertainties about demand or supply and
costs of materials, it might lead to reductions in business outlays for plant,
equipment, and inventories.
During this year, the underlying favorable factors are strong
enough to maintain high prosperity. But this year brings us face to face
with maladjustments and unfavorable possibilities which, if not corrected
or prevented, could cause a recession in production and employment.
The Government will watch this situation and be prepared for action if
needed.

Financial control, budgeting, and fiscal control had thus in-

creased in importance from paring and planning individual items of
governmental expenditure to inHuencing private enterprise and di-
recting the social affairs of the country. The question was not merely,
as was said to Alice in Wonderland, that "budgets are just the op-
posite of midgets and are getting bigger and bigger"; administrators
realized that budgets were an intrinsic part of an interdependent
system of private enterprise and public management instead of de-
vices for mere governmental accounting. E. Pendleton Herring ex-
posed the basic forces that were now at play in fiscal management
when he stated in 1948: "The formulation of fiscal policy lies at the
dead center of democratic government. It is the very essence into
which is distilled the conHict between the haves and the have-nots
. . . When the government uses its legal controls of economic af-
fairs in order to attain social ends, purely financial standards are in-
adequate." 81
SUMMARY
Some of the most dramatic strides of modern management have
been made in fiscal and budget administration. The broad trend was
recently described by Edwin C. Nourse, chairman of the President's
Council of Economic Advisers: "A quarter of a century ago we be-
gan to develop machinery for a coordinated financial program for
the federal government through the Bureau of the Budget. Belatedly
we have now launched a parallel agency to aid in developing national
economic policy on :it similarly comprehensive basis." 82 Perhaps no
instrument of modern management is more powerful or more pre- .
tentious than fiscal control and public budgeting, and at the same
time genuinely related to the common welfare. When an adminis-'
., E. Pendleton Herring: "The Politics of F'...cal Policy,» The Yale Law TouruaJ,
M;o:ch 1938, vol. 47. pp. '2.8, 730 .
.. Edwin C. Nourse: "Public Administration .lIDd Economic Stabilization." Public
AdmiDimation Review, Spring 1947, vol. 7, p. 91.
491 IUDOttlNG AND FINANCIAL CONTROL

trator, manager, or executive in government, business, labor, or social

organization makes fiscal decisions Of engages in financial transac-
tions, he is utilizing the resources of the public budget. The individ-
ual's misjudgments afe not readily discernible, but the cumulative
wisdom of such decisions is the key factOf in making the community,
the modern state, and the world society efficient.
 CHAPTER SIXTEEN

PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

ANOTHER IMPORTANT managerial function is planning, programmmg,

or program planning. The average administrator or manager rightly
believes that he is already doing a considerable amount of program
planning as part of his budgeting function, since budgeting may be
defined as monetary planning. Administrative programming and the
planning function, however, go beyond budgeting. In fact, the term
planning has so many connotations that it has become one of the
most controversial terms in the technical field of public administra-
tion. One student of administration, although generally sympathetic
to planning as a managerial technique, has criticized planning as "one
of those tools in the use of which there is a lot of Ho and very little
Heave." 1
An ideological suspicion adheres to the concept of economic
planning, social planning, or the planned society. Even the idea of
administrative planning frightens many administrators who have lost
faith in the power of prevision. Nonetheless, planning or program-
ming as a managerial device has been widely accepted in contempo-
rary society; and to a degree that acceptance has also produced a dis-
position toward more comprehensive forms of govemmenta~ eco-
nomic, and social planning.
The variety of accepted usages of the planning concept is sug-
gested by the following outline of materials covered in this chapter:
1. Conceptions and definitions of planning

1 Upson: "Letters on Public Administration," p. ;1.

492
493 PLANNING AND NOCtAMMINC
2. Local and state planning and programming
3. State and national planning, conservation, and development
4- Regional planning
5. National planning to prevent waste
6. National planning, democracy, and liberty
7. Planning, capitalism, and socialism
8. The stages of planning
9. Program planning and administrative planning
10. Planning and budgeting
11. The planning process
u. Planning and research

1. CONCEPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS OF PLANNING

Harold D. Smith, United States Director of the Budget, pre-

sented the concept of planning in simple and understandable temts.
His definition, and that of the National Resources Committee, an
official Federal planning agency of the late 1930'S, are quoted below.
(a) HAROLD D. SMITH
"Administration and Planning'"
A'!y discussion of .plannin_g is obscure and confused because of
the great number of meanings of the term itself. A city plan at one time
meant something fairly definite, but now even the city planners argue at
length about "what is planning?" To an economist, planning may mean
the exercise of administrative choices in the utilization of resoUIces.
Planning, to an administrator, may often mean the development of de-
tailed estimates of work loads. In other instances, planning is that v~ue
activity carried on by a division or a bureau of research, a process regarded
by the administrator as a "good thing," but often neither well understood
nor adequately utilized.
A special language of planning, often intelligible only to the
initiated, seems to have been invented. Furthermore, the words of that
special language seem to mean different things to different people. 'The
word "planners" itself tended, during the past ten years, to become a term
of opprobrium. During a major portion of that period, planning was
likely to be linked primarily with social and economic theory, often ..,f a
radical nature. It was associated much of the time with the idea of I<)llg-
haired professors or wild-eyed thinkers who removed themselves from the
• Harold D. Smith: ..Administnttion '".'d Planning." Address before the Societf for
the AdV1lJlCelDellt of Mantgement, Washmgton, D. C., Chapter; February 17. 1944.
~ from pp. 1-4.
course of everyday life where planning was a natural thing. theorists who
shut themselves in ivory towers to develop their own schemes for the
complete salvation of man. Planners came to be considered as persons
possessed of special powers of clairvoyance. This tended to set them apart
from ordinary mortals. As a consequence, they were misunderstood and
suspected.
Fortunately for the future of planning-particularly in administra-
tion-the ill repute in which planning has recently been held is rapidly
disappearing. Today we find heads of corporations pleased to be called
planners. We find labor leaders devoting much of their time frankly and
proudly to planning, appraising the problems of the future and seeking
solutions. We find within government a growing acknowledgement of
the role of planning. We find the public less suspicious toward the word
and the process, more understanding of the need of it. Although we still
have far to go, we are definitely progressing in our understanding, ac-
ceptance and support of planning.

(b) NATIONAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE

Progress Report·
Continuous planning is needed for the conservation and wise de·
velopment of our national resources-both natural and human. With
new inventions, new ideals, and new discoveries, no fixed plan or policy
will suffice; for any rigid mold or blueprint plan, if strictly adhered to, may
restrict our freedom rather than enlarge it. If we adopt as our constant
objective to hand down to our children an unimpaired physical inheritance
in the natural wealth of this continent, then we must constantly make
new plans to meet new conditions.
The National Resources Committee is concerned with a kind of
planning which is a peculiarly American custom, based on an enthusiastic
belief in the ability of a democracy to utilize intelligence. We all plan-
we try to look ahead, to think of eventualities for ourselves, our families,
OUT business, and for our common welfare. We get an "estimate of the
situation," as our military friends put it, involving more or less conscious
research and appraisal of the facts. We think we might do this, or we think
we might do that to meet a given situation. That is rudimentary planning.
We develop a plan or alternative plans. If we are wise, we look before we
leap.

The numerous expressions of the planning technique fall into

two broad types: (1) the kind which involves governmental inter-
position in the economy;' and (2) the less controversial type of
• National Resources Committee: Progress Report. October 19)7; selected from
pp.1->.
• Carl Landauer: Theory of National Economic Planning. Berkeley and Los
Angeles: University of California Press; 1<}#.
 PLAHtfrHG AHO Pl:OCItAMMlNG

planning in both business and government which concerns internal

policies and administrative procedures requiring prevision and fore-
sight by executives.

2. LOCAL AND STATE PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

One concrete form of planning and programming which has been

widely recognized by business men as well as by governmental ad-
ministrators is city planning and the related functions exercised by
state government. The development of the planning function at this
level has been described by (a) George B. Galloway, already quoted
in his capacities as engineer, economist, and Federal consultant;'
(b) Lewis L. Larwin, who has been a teacher of economics at Co-
lumbia University, Wellesley College, Beloit College, and the Uni-
versity of Montana, and an economist employed by the Federal
government; and (c) and (d) the reports of the Federal Works
Agency.

(aI) GEORGE B. CALLOWAY

Planning for America •
The American planning movement was indigenous in origin,
antedating both the Five-Year plans of Soviet Russia and the Four-Year
plans of Nazi Germany. Indeed, the totalitarian states have borrowed
many of their techniques from American industry, science, and statecraft
and have adapted them to undemocratic ends. American planning stems
from at least four native American sources: from the planning movement
in American cities; from the conservation movement in natural resources,
which dates back to the early years of this century and owes its inception
to the efforts of Theodore Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot; from the
scientific management or industrial engineering movement in American
industry fathered by Frederick W. Taylor; and from the contribution of
the social sciences to an understanding of human institutions, values, and
activities. Thus the intellectual paternity of American planning is not of
foreign importation, but is found in the gradual collaboration and syn-
thesis of domestic theory and practice under the exigencies of depression,
unemployment, and war. American city and regional planners, architects,
engineers, builders, conservationists, and social scientists have cooperated
with public-spirited citizens to create the American planning movement
and have fused their skills and techniques in a joint attack upon their
common problems.
• See Chapter 9.
-George B. Galloway: ~lanni~ lor America. P. 5. Reprinted by permission of
Henry Holt and Coropany. I.:opyrigbt, 1941, Henry Holt and Company.
496 IdIMINIS1'1tATIOM
(b) LEWIS L. LOnfIN
r_ for Planning f

We shall consider first the development of city planning. In a

sense, this movement may be traced back to Jefferson's planning of the
University of Virginia, to L'Enfant's planning of the city of Washington,
to Alexander Hamilton's attempt to have L'Enfant layout a plan for
Paterson, New Jersey, and to the plan of Manhattan in 18n. In its modern
phase, city planning came into being in the middle of the nineteenth
century as a reaction against the rapid and disorderly growth of cities with
their ugly and unsanitary features. In its origins, city planning was imbued
with a democratic concern for the social welfare of the people, regardless
of the fact that some of the enterprises carried out under its flag reeked
with corruption.
For about fifteen years after the Chicago World's Fair in 11l<}3,
city planning was diverted from its original ideas. Taking as its slogan
"The City Beautiful," it aimed largely at an external aestheticism which
had little relation to the economic and social realities of municipal life.
In 1909, the movement experienced a revival which was in harmony with
the growing social consciousness of the times. That year was marked by
three significant events: the preparation of a plan for the city of Chicago;
the beginning of a democratic effort in city planning in Dallas, Texas:
and the holding of the first National Conference on City Planning in
Washington, D. C. convened by a New York cmnmittee on congestion
of population. From that year to 1917, city planning grew in scope and
content. It laid the foundations of some of its techniques-such as sur-
veying, mapping, and especially zoning, i.e., the establishment of districts
within a city for the purpose of regulating the use of property. During
these years the movement also established organizations to promote its
ends. In 1910, the National Conference on City Planning became a
permanent organization. In 1911, the National Housing Association held
its first conference. In 1917, the American City Planning Institute was
formed as a section of the National Conference on City Planning.
These years also witnessed the first steps in state organization
and in legislation favorable to city planning. In 1911, the Massachusetts
Homestead Commission was formed as an experiment in state aid to
housing: its functions were shortly enlarged to include the encouragement
of local planning boards and the gathering of information on city and
town planning for the use of these boards; in 1913 the commission initi-
ated annual planning conferences, out of which grew in 1916 the Massa-
chusetts Federation of Planning Boards. In 1913, the City Planning .As-
sociation of Los Angeles was organized, and a year later the first state
conference on city planning was held in California. At the same time,

f Lewis L. Lorwitt: Time tor Planning. Selected hom pp, 104-06. U9. R.eprinted
by permission of Harper «< Brothers. Copyright, 194 s, Hlttper «< BJ:OtheB.
voluntary associations were formed in different cities to promote and
educate the public for the support of city planning.
A large part of the city planning before 1917 was impl1lCticable
and vitiated by inadequate consideretions for social need and financial
possibilities but it gave the first stimulus to a larger consideration of aims
and methods. With the passage of the New York Zoning Ordinance of
1916, it had achieved the recognition of the economic and social validity
of one of its major techniques. City planners in this period, and to an
even more marked extent subsequently, were forced to extend the scope
of their activities. The city emerged from their studies as part of a region.
The facilities which they were planning were seen to be functions of the
f{lrm of social life. Thus a school building program was meaningless apart
from a definite policy with reference to the period of education and the
nature of the curriculum. Recreational programs determined the plan-
ning of open spaces. The transportation facilities conditioned the nature
of urban concentration or decentralization. The vanguard of the city
planners began to regard compasses and T squares as accessories, and to
concentrate attention upon the nature of the social life they were building.
City and regional planning had a steady development after 192.0
and became an accepted aid in municipal government. By 1930, there
were 850 communities in the United States which had zoning plans and
ordinances and over 300 planning agencies at work on general city plans.
Between 192.9 and 1932., land planning also assumed a new amplitude and
importance.

(C) FEDERAL WORKS AGENCY

"Public Works Planning"·

For the first time in United States history State and local public
works projects are being planned in all their technical details in a period
of near-peak ernployment and on a Nation-wide scale far in advance of
construction. Federal, State and local governments are participating in
this planning program, and a considerable volume. of completed plans
should be ready for contl1lCt letting in the event another general business
depression is threatened. A large part of this plan preparation by State and
local governments is being financially assisted by the Bureau of Corn-
munity Facilities under the authority granted in Title V of the War
Mobilization and Reconversion Act of 1944. But some State and local
governments also have been able to complete a sizeable volume of plans
without Federal assistance, although the greater volume of this unassisted
planning is concentrated in a few of the larger cities in Jive or six States,
principally New York.
Public-works construction as a means of providing employment

• FedemI Works Ageacy; "Public Works Planning." Seveotll Annual .Report ot

FedemI Worb Ageacy; 1946. selected from pp. ,-S.
 ADMINISTIlATlON

when job opportunities narrow in private business has been used by gov-
ernments from time immemorial. The pyramids of Egypt, though of no
utilitarian value except as tourist attractions and memorials to dead kings,
are thought to have been conceived as projects upon which hundreds of
thousands of otherwise jobless men could be put to work. The ancient
Romans created jobs by building roads that laced the empire, aqueducts,
bridges, and other public works. Technological advances during the last
century, however, have imposed new conditions relating to public works.
Because of these advances structures of al1 kinds have become increasingly
complicated. They require meticulous advance planning before construc-
tion operations can begin to assure that the myriad separate elements
which are to compose them will fit together in a unified and useful whole.
This preliminary work must advance through several stages: a site, or
right-of-way, must be selected, the title cleared and possession obtained,
sometimes through the tedious and time-consuming process of condemna-
tion. Engineering surveys must be made and working drawings prepared.
Specifications must be written, financing arranged, and contract docu-
ments drawn up.
An attempt.to use public works construction as a means of reliev-
ing unemployment was made during the depression of the 1930'S. In 1933
Congress authorized in the National Industrial Recovery Act a Nation-
wide program of Federal, State, and local public works and made an
initial appropriation of $3,300,000,000 for the purpose. Some 35,000 useful
projects resulted from this program, but the dearth of completed plans
that could be put into operation quickly diminished the usefulness of the
program for its primary purpose. A Public Works Administration was
created and a modest beginning was made upon a few Federal projects
for which plans had been sufficiently advanced to permit the start of some
construction. State and local governments were invited to apply for loans
or grants to assist in financing projects, but few of these authorities had
plans either completed or underway. So many delays attended the be-
ginning of the program that 18 months later only 100,000 men had been
put to work on non-Federal construction. To that extent the program
failed to give the needed initial impetus to the revival of the construction
industry, an impetus which might have diminished the later necessity
of turning to made-work projects 2.~ an alternative.

(d) FEDERAL WORKS ACENCY

Report on Plan Preparation of State and Local Public Works·

The Advance Planning Program of the Bureau of Community
Facilities [of the Federal Works Agency] has been in operation since
May 1945. Over that period, appropriations totaling $65,000,000 have been

• Federal Works Agency: Report on Plan Preparation of State and Local Public
Works. Uecember 31, 1946; selected from pp. 1-%, 4.
 PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

made for this program; and, after setting aside administrative expenses,
$62,917,000 was available for apportionment among the States as planning
advances. Planning advances have been approved to various State and
local public bodies in a total amount of $46,606,']63, as of December 31,
1946, leaving available for further advances the sum of $16,310,237. At
this date there were applications under review for planning advances
totaling $33,(j¢,518. The advances thus approved by the Bureau are for
the plan preparation of proposed public works having an estimated con-
struction cost of $1,529,:211,000. The total volume of public works that
can be planned with the 65 million dollars thus far appropriated is esti-
mated at about 2.1 billion dollars in terms of £,onstruction costs.
The primary purpose of these advance planning activities is the
creation of a reserve of public works, fully planned and ready to be put
under construction as economic conditions warrant. The reserve should
consist of those useful public works that are necessary for the safety, health
and welfare of our communities. There is no occasion to tum to works
of doubtful usefulness in building up a reserve. Our communities must
make up for deficiencies due to the postponement of normal public im-
provements during the war and in the early post-war period; they must
quite generally extend, modernize or replace existing public works and
must in many instances construct works of newer types, in order to meet
the expanding needs of their populations under changing conditions. No
brief burst of public construction activities will suffice to meet the existing
community need for varinus types of public works; construction must
necessarily be distributed over a period of years. Advance planning that
to any considerable extent approaches the known volume of need now
existent will provide a reserve of public works for many years ahead.

Major L'Enfant and Alexander Hamilton were not the only his-
toric names associated with American city planning. George Wash-
ington was also concerned about the architectural and land-use de-
tails of the new Capitol: "Ought there to be any wood houses in
town?" he inquired in 1791, directing his question to Jefferson who,
as Secretary of State, was regarded as the responsible cabinet member
for the Capitol city's plan. Washington asked further: "Ought not
stoups and projections of every sort and kind into the streets, to be
prohibited absolutely?" ,. Concerned with more urgent affairs of na-
tional security, General Uriah Forrest commented to Secretary of
War McHenry that "General Washington is . . . singularlyatten-
tive to • . . the Federal city (being rather a Hobby Horse of
his)." U

1·George Washington: Letter to the Secretary of State, August 2~, 1791. The
Writings of Washington, vol. 31, p. 3;2.
U Publications of the Southern History .Association; "'06, vol. la, p. 33. Quoted
in White: The Federalists, p. 106.
500 ADMINISTItA110N

The idea of public works planning in the cities and states and the
subsequent system of "advance planning grants" administered by
the Federal Works Agency has a long history in the United States.
The public improvements controversy which reached its height under
President John Quincy Adams in the 182.0's was, as we shall see, an
early manifestation of this movement. In 1888, the newly formed
American Economic Association studied The Relation of Modem
Municipalities to Quasi-Public Works, and during the depression of
18<}3-94 several American cities experimented with a relief program
which emphasized a public works program." It was not until World
War I that the first American state, Pennsylvania, established an
Emergency Public Works Commission to administer such a pro-
gram. A Federal Emergency Public Works Board with an appro-
priation of $100,000,000 for the use of state, local, and Federal
agencies, was also considered by Congress at the end of World War I.
However, even though supported in the depression year of 192.1
by the American Association for Labor Legislation and Secretary
of Commerce Herbert Hoover, a national public works policy for
states and cities was not adopted until after the "Hoover depression"
of the late 1920'S." Meanwhile, American cities were formulating
their detailed master plans and public works programming tech-
niques. For example, during the reform administration of Mayor
LaGuardia in New York City in the 1930'S a comprehensive system
of planning, programming, budgeting, and administering the city's
vast public works outlays and capital improvements was instituted
under the City Planning Commission.
The advance planning system administered by the Federal Works
Agency grew out of the program of the National Resources Com-
mittee, or the National Resources Planning Board, as it was later
known, for the development of a Federal "Public Works Reserve"
as a device for creating a "shelf" of local and state public works plans
for slack times." Public works surveys were conducted in numerous
cities, some of which drafted and adopted "six-year programs of mu-
nicipal improvements" resembling the capital budget program of the
. ~'Report of the Committee on Finance. Publications of the American Economic
Association, Monograph no. 6. Vernon A. Mundt: Prosperity Reserves of Public
Works. Annals of the Americao Academy of Political and Social Science, May '930,
vol. '49 and supplement.
18 Ibid. Secretary Hoover was also instrumental in the drafting and distnbution
through the Department of Commerce of the first Federally sponsored model city
planning act.
" For an earlier reference see N. 1. Stone: "A National Employment Reserve for
Lean Years and Seasons." The Survey, June '3. 191;, vol. 34. p. 44', et seq. The
NRC published in 1938 its basic anaJysis in this field, Division of Costs and Re·
sponsibility for Public Worb, and in '94' the NRPB published its procedural mannal
on Long·Range Programming of Mnnicipal Public Worb.
501 PLANNINC AND 'ROCRAMMINC

New York City Planning Commission. The movement found fertile

ground among the city planning agencies throughout the country.
By 1948, more than 600 cities-almost three-fourths of the American
cities of over 10,000 inhabitants-had created such planning agen-
cies, and a number of them had seriously embarked upon long-range
public works planning and programming. Actual construction was
slowed up by the economic pressures during the war and immediate
post-war period. However, a newer impetus to city planning appeared
in the sizable proposals made and the experimental projects launched
in the field of governmentally subsidized private housing, munici-
pally managed public housing, state-aided slum clearance, and fed-
erally assisted urban redevelopment.
As the country entered the second half of the twentieth century
this program of urban, metropolitan, and "rurban" reconstruction
and replanning pointed to more potential changes in public planning.

3. STATE AND NATIONAL PLANNING, CONSERVATION, AND

DEVELOPMENT

The American states, aside from acting as (1) a formal channel

for Federal planning funds and services to the cities, have (2) pro-
grammed and planned their own public works, and have ( 3) empha-
sized the functions of industrial planning, economic development,
and conservation of resources. The conservation and development
aspect of the planning movement, like the state and local public
works phase, received a major impetus from the Federal government.
Nevertheless, the role of the Federal government here has raised
several controversial issues which date back to the administration of
President Theodore Roosevelt.

(a) THEODORE ROOSEVELT

The New Nationalism"
It is time we should wake up the country as to the need of using
foresight and common sense as regards our natural resources. We of this
generation hold the land in part for the use of the next generation, and
not exclusively for our own selfish enjoyment. We have passed the time
when we will tolerate the man whose only idea is to skin the country lmd
move on. As it is with him, so it is with the nation. These resources must
be kept for the whole people and not handed oVer for exploitation to any
single individual or group of individuals. We do not intend to discourage
,. Theodore Roosevelt: The New Nationalism. Selected from pp. ,1-53, ;;, 57-
s8, 78--79. New York: The Outlook Co.; 1910. Reprinted by permission.
502 ADlllfNISTUT10N

individual entetprise by diminishing unwisely the reward for that enter-

prise.
In the matter of Conservation, I heartily approve of state action
where, under our form of government, the state, and the state only, has
the power to act. But by actual experience in ~he East we have found to
our cost that the nation, and not the several states, can best guard the
interests of the people in the matter of the forests and the waters; and I
am at this moment doing all I can to increase in the East the power of the
national government at the expense of the power of the several state gov-
ernments of the eastern states, because we have found by bitter experience
that only thus can we adequately protect our natural resources.
Take the question of the control of the water power sites. The
enormous importance of water power sites to the future industrial de-
velopment of this country has only been realized within a very few years.
Unfortunately, the realization has come too late as regards some of the
power sites; but many yet remain with which our hands are free to deal.
We should make it our duty to see that hereafter the power sites are kept
under the control of the general government for the use of the people as
a whole.
Now, my friends, America's reputation for efficiency stands de-
servedly high throughout the world. We are efficient probably to the full
limits that are permitted any nation to attain by the methods hitherto
used. The average American is an efficient man who can do his business;
and it is recognized throughout the world that this is so. Through a prac-
tically unrestrained individualism, we have reached a pitch of literally
unexampled material prosperity, although the distribution of this pros-
perity leaves much to be desired from the standpoint of justice and fair
dealing. But we have not only allowed the individual a free hand, which
was in the main right; we have also allowed great corporations to act as
though they were individuals, and to exercise the rights of individuals,
in addition to using the vast combined power of high organization and
enormous wealth for their own advantages.
This development of corporate action, it is true, is doubtless in
large part responsible for the gigantic development of our natural re-
sources, but it is not less responsible for waste, destruction, and monopoly
on an equally gigantic scale. The method of reckless and uncontrolled
private use and waste has done for us all the good it ever can; and it is
time to put an end to it before it does all the evil it easily may. We have
passed the time when heedless waste and destruction and arrogant mO-
nopoly are longer permissible. Henceforth we must seek national efficiency
by a new and better way, by the way of the orderly development and use,
coupled with the preservation, of our natural resources, by making the
most of what we have for the benefit of all of us, iflstead of leaving the
sources of material prosperity open to indiscriminate exploitation. These
are some of the reasons why it is wise that we should abandon the old
 'l.ANNINC AND PROCRAMMINC

point of view, and why Conservation bas become a great moral issue
in becoming a patriotic duty.

(b) FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT

Looking Forward 18

We cannot review carefully the history of our industrial advance

without being struck by its haphazardness, with the gigantic waste with
which it has been accomplished-with the superfluous duplication of
productive facilities, the continual scrapping of still useful equipment,
the tremendous mortality in industrial and commercial undertakings, the
thousands of dead-end trails in which enterprise has been lured, the
profligate waste of natural resources. Much of this waste is the inevitable
by-product of progress in a society which values individual endeavor and
which is susceptible to the changing tastes and customs of the people of
which it is composed. But much of it, I believe, could have been pre-
vented by greater foresight and by a larger measure of social planning.
The country needs and, unless I mistake its temper, the country
demands bold, persistent experimentation. It is common sense to take a
method and try it; if it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But above
all, try something. The millions who are in want will not stand by silently
forever while the things to satisfy their needs are within easy reach.
The power issue, where vigorously handled in the public interest,
means abundant and cheaper power for American industry, reduced rates
and increased use in millions of urban and IUral homes-to say little of
the preservation of our waterpower resources in coordination with flood
control, reclamation and irrigation. The American people have a vital
stake in the proper handling of this issue. Electricity is no longer a luxury;
it is a definite necessity. It lights -our homes, our places of work, our
streets; it turns the wheels of our transportation and our factories. It can
relieve the drudgery of the housewife and lift a great burden from the
shoulders of the farmer. It has not done so yet. We are backward in the
use of electricity in our homes and on our farms. In Canada the average
home uses twice as much electric power per-family as we do in the United
States. What prevents us from taking advantage of this great economic
and human agency?
It is not because we lack undeveloped waterpower or unclaimed
supplies of coal and oil. The reason we cannot take advantage of our own
possibilities is because many selfish interests in control of light and power
industries have not been sufficiently far-sighted to establish rates low
enough to encourage widespread public use. The price you pay for your
utility service is a determining factor in yonr use of it. The new deal for
,. Franklin D. Roosevelt: Looking Forward. Selected from pp. 43-44. 51. '39.
147-48"50, '53-;4. Reprinted by permission of The 101m Day Company. Copyright,
1033, The John Day Company.
504 ADMtNISTRA,,",N

the American people can be applied very definitely to the relationship

between the electric utilities on the one side and the consumer and in-
vestor on the other.
State-owned or Federal-owned power sites can and should prop-
erly be developed by government itself. When so developed, private
capital should be given the first opportunity to transmit and distribute
the power on the basis of the- best service and the lowest rates to give a
reasonable profit only. The nation, through its Federal Government, has
sovereignty over vast waterpower resaurces in many parts of the United
States. As an important part of this policy, the natural hydroelectric power
resources belonging to the people should remain forever in their posses-
sion. This policy is as radical as American liberty, as radical as the Con-
stitution of the United States. Never shall the Federal Government part
with its sovereignty and control over its power resources while I am
President of the United States.

(c) NATIONAL RESOURCES BOAR.,

"Development of State Planning" IT

Looking backward over the last 50 years, we can easily see that
lack of planning has caused appalling losses in our American States. Enor-
mous and incalculable damage has been brought about by Hood, erosion,
drought, stream pollution, ineffective land use, waste of timber and min-
eral resources such as oil, much of which might have been avoided by fore-
sight and planning; human wastage from lack of proper health plans, from
bad working and living conditions, from lack of adequate educational and
recreational facilities, insecurity and distress from lack of plans for social
welfare. This tragic loss of human and natural resources, with the human
suffering involved, might in large measure have been prevented by sound
planning in our American States.
The fact is, however, that from time to time some of our States
have been dominated by exploiters who were interested in wealth but not
always in the commonwealth. These interests were planning while the
public slept. The American State need not be a twilight zone in which an-
archy prevails but may become an organized and effective force for pro-
tecting and developing the resources of the common weal and helping to
make the great gains of our civilization an actual fact in the daily lives of
our people.
The present movement is a unified State attack on the problems
of waste and loss which have been so costly to the taxpayer and the citizen.
This is an effort to combine all of our forces in a constructive movement

1T NatieDaI ll.esaurces Board: "Development of State Planning." State Planning.

lteview of Activities and Progress, June 1935. selected from p. 1.
50S 'LANNINC AND PROCaAMIIiIINc:

for better use of our State resources and for the attainment of higher stand-
ards of American living. Much has already been done in many places by
conservation and other movements of various sorts, but much remain~ un-
done. Progress may be achieved by bringing together the many scattered
agencies in our States and uniting them in a well-planned development
of all of the assets of the State-human and natural-and for the better
utilization of these resources for the welfare of the whole people of the
States.
Not everything can be planned by the States alone, for some prob-
lems are national in scope and require the arm of the Nation. Others are
local and can best be dealt with by the city or other locality. Others require
the cooperation of several States or parts of States. Still other plans will be
formulated by individuals and by voluntary associations as in industry,
agriculture, labor, education; but it is vital that the State planning agencies
be organized and ready to extend a hand to the locality, the Nation, SOme
sister State or some voluntary association in organized cooperative plan-
ning for flood control, land use, stream pollution, working and living con-
ditions, and social welfare.

The National Resources Board implemented this philosophy with

the machinery of state planning. By 1935, when the Board wrote the
above report, all but two of the forty-eight had under its sponsorship
created planning boards, commissions, or councils. lbese orgalliza-
cram- were largely research agencies, but they alsa sen'iced and ad-
vised public work agencies, other planning agencies, and operating
departments of the state, local, and Federal governments. How(!ver,
by 1943, the New Deal planning philosophy seemed to have rUi] its
course, and the National Resources Planning Board was abolished.l8
Simultaneously, the states shifted the emphasis in their planning pro-
grams and by 1947, at least half of the state agencies were converted
from "planning" to "development," "industrial," or "economic"
boards, commissions, or councils. ,. The change was regarded by ITlany
planners and businessmen as a transformation largely from "theoreti·
cal planning" and research to "practical planning" and development;
but it was not clear whether the industrial and business development
which did occur was a consequence of the shift from planning to de-
velopment or a result of the immediate post-war economic reCOvery.
By the end of the 1940'S the comprehensive state planning move-

18 The original Federal planning agency established in .1933 was the National
Planning Committee. Its title was changed first to the National Resources Board, then
to the National Planning Board, and 6naJly to the National Resources Planning Board.
,. Association of State Planning and Development Agencies: "An Analysis of the
Legislation of State Planning and Development Agencies." August 1941.
 ADMlNlSTIATiON

ment bad been curtailed and some of the public works programming
activities of the states and of their local subdivision~ had also been re-
tarded. Many planners and economists began to doubt whether the
stimulus of the Federal advance planning program of 1944-46 would
have a sufficiently cumulative effect, to maintain an up-to-date state
and local shelf of public works which could immediately take up the
slack when the anticipated economic slump m~terialized. The main
lesson derived from local, state, and national public works planning
in the 1930'S and 1940's was not only the need to interrelate the plan-
ning policies of the three levels of government but also the need to
implement the system administratively. Effective national, state,
and local planning required the existence of continuing planning and
budgeting agencies, adequately financed and well-trained planning
staffs, and concrete administrative procedures designed to carry out
the programming and blueprinting of public works projects.

4. REGIONAL PLANNING

The idea of public works planning on a local, state, and national

basis is readily grasped, if not always agreed upon by administrators.
The more inventive idea of regional resources planning has been less
recently recognized. One of the most vigorous examples of regional
planning in the United States has been the Tennessee Valley Au-
thority, which is based on the dual idea of developing (1) a key phys-
ical resource like hydroelectric power, along with (2.) the regional
management of related resources and governmental functions.
The TVA development of the 1930's and 1940'S and the attempt
to transplant the project elsewhere in the 1940'S and 1950'S is de-
scribed by (a) Arthur E. Morgan, first Chairman of the Board of the
Tennessee Valley Authority; (b) The Federal Act establishing the
TVA in 1933; (c) Morris L. Cooke, one of the early advocates of
municipal public power during the progressive reform period pre-
ceding World War I, an administrator of the rural electrification
program. of the New Deal," and an advocate of regional power man-
agement by government corporations like the TVA; and (d) John
M. Drabelle, a private power company administrator in the Middle
West, an advocate of the retention by private management of power
resources, and an opponent of the extension of regional planning
beyond the Tennessee Valley.

.. Morris L. Cooke: "The Early Days of the Rural Electrificatioa Idea: 1914-36."
American Political Science.ReView, June 1948, vol. 41, pp. 431-47.
5(J1 I'LANNINC AND PIlOGRAMMINC

(a) ARTHUR E. MORCAN

"Regiou! Planning-The T. V. A. an Example""
Regional planning is not new. It is the very stuff of which civ-
ilization has been made. Go wherever you will to one of the cradles of
civilization and you will lind that it was born because in those particular
conditions individual men could not survive alone, but were compelled to
work together and plan together. The lands of Egypt could not be irri-
gated by individual men working alone. Necessity compelled men to plan
and work together. Their.; was regional planning, and a great civilization
was born out of that planning. It is interesting that most great civiliza-
tions originated, not in well watered lands, but in the desert or waste
places, where co-operation and planning on a large scale were compelled,
as in Mesopotamia, India, Mexico, and Peru. The most advanced of our
American Indians were those who were compelled to plan together for
irrigating desert lands. In my engineering work in the west I have followed
and enlarged irrigation ditches which have a traditional history running
back to four hundred years before Columbus.
Regional planning to prevent great Boods helped develop the
great civilization of China. On the rocky and forbidding coasts of Scandi-
navia the sheer necessity for communities to plan and work together to
build and man community ships that would weather the open seas, was a
compulsion to civilization. It was a choice of planning and working to-
gether, or of starving. Out of that compulsion of necessity and that plan-
ning came the far-Bung dominance of the Norsemen. Rome held together
the greatest empire in history by planning. The Roman roads, well planned
and built, reached north to the very borders of Scotland, eastward almost
to India, and westward to the furthermost point of the Spanish peninsula.
Regional planning is a characteristic of all civilizations, and, in
general, the greater the civilization the more extensive the planning. Re-
gional planning is not some vague theoretical process carried on in some
high-brow and mysterious way. It is simply the effort to meet prflising
problems in the most effective possible manner, on a large enough scale to
get the best possible results, and with an eye to the future as well as the
present.

(b) Tennessee Valley Authority Law'"

An act to improve the navigability and to provide for the Bood
control of the Tennessee River; to provide for reforestation and the proper

:n Arthur E. Morgan: "Regional Planning-The T.V.A. an Example." N. B. C.

Broadcast: "You and Your Government." January ~8, 1936, pp. 43-44. Reprinted
by permission.
IITennessee VaJJey Authority Law. U. S. Public Law, No. '7, 73rd Congress,
193}, Amended by PnbIic Law, No. 412, 74th Congress, 1934, Sections 1, n, ~3.
508 ADMINISTRATION

use of marginal lands in the Tennessee Valley; to provide for the agri-
cultural and industrial development of said valley; to provide for the na-
tional defense by the creation of a corporation for the operation of Gov-
ernment properties at and near Muscle Shoals in the State of Alabama,
and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and Honse of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled, That for the purpose of
maintaining and operating the properties now owned by the United States
in the vicinity of Muscle Shoals, Alabama, in the interest of the national
defense and for agricultural and industrial development, and to improve
navigation in the Tennessee River and to control the destructive flood
waters in the Tennessee River and Mississippi River Basins, there is hereby
created a body corporate by the name of the "Tennessee Valley Au-
thority."
To aid further the proper nse, conservation, and development of
the natural resources of the Tennessee River drainage basin and of such
adjoining territory as may be related to or materially affected by the de-
velopment consequent to this Act, and to provide for the general welfare
of the citizens of said areas, the President is hereby authorized, by such
means or methods as he may deenl proper within the limits of appropria-
tions made therefor by Congress, to make such surveys of and general
plans for said Tennessee basin and adjoining territory as may be nseful to
the Congress and to the several States in guiding and controlling the ex-
tent, sequence, and nature of development that may be equitably and
economically advanced through the expenditure of public funds, or
through the guidance or control of public authority, all for the general
purpose of fostering an orderly and proper physical, economic, and social
development of said areas; and the President is further authorized in mak-
ing said surveys and plans to cooperate with the States affected thereby, or
subdivisions or agencies of such States, or with cooperative or other or-
ganizations, and to make such studies, experiments, or demonstrations as
may be necessary and suitable to that end.
The President shall, from time to time, as the work provided for
in the preceding section progresses, recommend to Congress such legisla-
tion as he deems proper to carry out the general purposes stated in said
section, and for the especial purpose of bringing about in said Tennessee
drainage basin and adjoining territory in conformity with said general
purposes (1) the maximum amount of flood control; (2) the maximum
develOpment of said Teanessee River for navigation purposes; (3) the
maximum generation of electric power consistent with flood control and
navigation; (4) the proper use of marginal lands; (5) the proper method
of reforestation of all lands in said drainage basin suitable for reforestation;
and (6) the economic and social well-being of the people living in said
river basin.
 PLANNING AND PltOCOaAMMING

(c;) MO...I$ L C;C)C)1tI

"'..in Talk About a Missouri Valley Authority" sa

Most of the il)fluences that now weigh down the Missouri Valley
can be removed, others minimized by establishment of an autonomous
valley authority comparable to 1VA. With the situation in the Missouri
Valley as grave as most indices suggest and with the promise of relief
through an MYA "just around the comer" one wonders why nothing is
done about it.
Some of the most effective opposition to an MYA comes from
federal officeholders-perhaps because they fear that its creation will in
some way curtail their own authority. There are [also] 57 varieties of
private interests in opposition to unified watershed developments. The
lzaik Walton League, for instance, opposes virtually all dam building be-
cause (1) such structures are apt to interfere with upstream "cold-water
fishing," i.e., for trout and bass, and (l) that the constant shift in water
levels above the darns makes the shore lines difficult nesting and feeding
grounds for game ducks. To make this opposition effective the League on
occasion teams up with the private power interests who always oppose
public dam building as leading toward public ownership of the power
industry. It has happened more than once that quasi-public lobbies such
as those who work on the Congress on behalf of bureaus and departments
of the government have actually teamed up with these private lobbies.
That the National Association of Electric Companies takes its lobbying
seriously is indicated by the fact that its representative in Washington,
who is registered under the LaFollette-Mulroney Act as a lobbyist, re-
ceives a salary of $65,000 per annum on a long-term contract. He seem-
ingly earns his salary for at a recent hearing on REA legislation it is re-
ported that the presidents of twenty-five private utility companies were in
attendance. Such a showing is apt to impress ail but the most stout-hearted
legislators.

(d ) JOHN M. DRABELLE
"A Critical Review of the Proposed Missouri Valley Authority""
The issue involved in the consideration of a Missouri Valley Au
thority is clear and may be briefly stated. It is whether Congress will per
mit the nationalization of the public ub1ity industry under the guise of
flood-control, irrigation, recreation, navigation, reforestation, and similat
.. Morris L. Cooke: "Plain Talk About a Missouri Valley Authority." Iowa Law
Review, January '947, vol. 32, selected from pp. 36<}, 379, 38,-82, 384-8" Re-
printed by permission .
.. John M. Orabelle: "A Critical Review of the Proposed MisS(}uri Valley Au-
thority." Iowa Law Review, January 1947, vol. 32, selected from pp. 391, 39,-<;>6,
398-w. Reprinted by permission. .
510 ADMINISTIATION
projects. Sooner or later the members of the Congress of the United States
will have to stand up to be counted as to whether they favor the continu-
ation of private enterprise in these United States or the operation of busi-
ness of every kind by various bureaus and departments of Government in
Washington.
The amounts of money to be expended in this area under a Mis-
souri Valley Authority defy delimitation. The Bureau of Reclamation
alone originally proposed expenditures of $1,257,645,700. Based on new
price levels of materials and labor it is safe to say that the projects' cost to
taxpayers would be doubled and more. Nor are advance estimates for Gov-
ernment projects noted for their accuracy or adequacy to cover expendi-
tures actually made.
The river authorities are of course associated with so-called social
benefits. Before the Rural Electrification AuthOrity commenced the elec-
trification of farms in the United States, The Tennessee Valley had 8.7%
of its farms electrified as compared with 10% of the farms electrified in
the Missouri Valley area. In 19# the number of electrified farms in TV
was '1.7-1 % compared to 31 % in MY. As to farm ownership and mortgages
of farms, the TVA has not brought horne the virtues of New England
thrift. Before TVA in that area there were 514>737 mortgaged farmsteads
in the year of 1930, and ten years after the efforts of Mr. Lilienthal to im-
prove the social standing of the people under his administration the num-
ber of mortgaged farms had increased to 57'1.,210 in 1940. In the same
period of time in MY, the mortgage decrease was from 533,728 in 1930 to
447,7;8 in 1940. As stated by Senator Overton, "In other words, they did
better in the Missouri Valley without assistance."

Despite these objections, regional planning took a firmer grip

than was realized upon the imagination of the political leaders and
the public as well as the technical planners and the public adminis-
trators. President Roosevelt speculated on the prospects of devoting
his post-war efforts to the TVA type of regional planning abroad,"
and Vice-President Henry A. Wallace also recommended that in-
ternational TVA's be established, but this idea was dismissed as
"globaloney" or as a form of international "boondoggling." Roose-
velt's successor, Harry S. Truman, advocated that the country "apply
the lessons of our Tennessee Valley experience to our other great
river basins," and as the final keystone of American foreign policy he
also proposed in lieu of the "imperialism" of earlier times, "a bold
new program [to make Jthe benefits of Our scientific advances and in-
dustrial progress available for the improvement and growth of under-
developed areas [and to J foster capital investment in areas needing
development. " Actually TVA-trained ellgineers and planners were
•• Ftallcis Perkins: The Roosevelt I Knew. New York: The Viking Pless; 1946,
p.89.
SI1 PLANNINC AN. ptOCRAMMINC

already operating in river valleys in Brazil, India, Palestine, Peru, and

elsewhere. If the more formal proposals of the President were to
materialize, was it possible that the application of the regional re-
sources planning device on an international basis would slow up or
eliminate world-wide competition and international conflict, and halt
the march toward world war?

5. NATIONAL pLANNING TO PREVENT WASTE

The dramatic leap from regional to international planning evades

the crucial question of the feasibility of national planning. Contro-
versial as this subject may be, many administrators agree that national
plans can be drawn up to prevent waste and economic inefficiency.
This possibility is demonstrated in the reports of (a) Secretary of
Commerce Herbert C. Hoover, the philosopher of American Indi-
vidualism, .. and (b) the National Resources Committee, established
by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

(a) HE"ERT HOOVER

"Progress in Elimination of Waste"..,

The high standards of living enjoyed by the American people are

the result of steadily mounting per capita productivity. There is only one
way to further advance these standards, and that is by improved methods
and processes, by the elimination of waste in materials and motion in our
production" and distribution system. Just as 20 years ago we undertook
nation·wide conservation of our natural resources, so we must to-day even
more vigorously sustain this campaign of better nation-wide utilization of
our industrial resources and effort. More especially is this the case in view
of the many complex forces which have arisen from the war, and par·
ticularly the difficulty of maintaining our situation as against the competi-
tion of a world of lower standards overseas.
The term "elimination of waste" is subject to some objection as
carrying the implication of individual or willful waste. In the sense used in
these discussions elimination of waste refers wholly to those wastes which
can be eliminated solely by cooperative action in the community. They
do not refer to any single producer, for in the matters here discussed he is
individually helpless to effect them. Nor do they imply any lessening of
fair competition or any infringement of the restraint of trade laws. In fact,

.. Herbert C. Hoover: American Individualism. New York: Doubleday. Page and

Cu.; 1912.
.., Herbert Hoover: "Progress in Elimination of Waste." U. S. Department of
Cummen:e: 7'hirteentb AnnUal Report of ~ Secret;il}' of Commerce, 1925, pp. :0-3.
512 AIIMtNISTIATION

the most casual investigation of the working progress will show that its
accomplishment establishes more healthy COQlpetition. It protects and
preserves the smaller units in the business world. Its results are an asset
alike to worker, farmer, consumer, and business man.
It may be worth while repeating the major directions of this effort
as they were outlined by the department at the beginning of this under-
taking four years ago. (1) Elimination of waste in railway transportation
by the provision of adequate facilities and better methods. (2) Vigorous
improvement of our natural interior water channels for cheaper transporta-
tion of bulk commodities. (3) Enlarged electrification of the country for
the saving in fuel, effort and labor. (4) Reduction of the periodic waves of
unemployment due to the booms and slumps of the "business cycle." (5)
Improved statistical service as to the production, distribution, stocks, and
prices of commodities, both domestic and foreign, as a contribution to
the elimination of hazard in business and therefore of wasteful specula-
tion. (6) Reduction of seasonal employment in construction and other in-
dustries, and intermittent employment in such industries as bituminous
coal. (7) Reduction of waste in manufacture and distribution through the
establishment of grades, standards of quality, dimensions and performance
in nonstyle articles of commerce; through the simplification in dimensions
of many articles of manufacture, and the reduction of unnecessary varieties;
through more uniform business documents such as specifications, bills of
lading, warehouse receipts, etc. (8) Development of scientific industrial
and economic research as the foundation of genuine labor-saving devices,
better processes, and sounder methods. (9) Development of cooperative
marketing and better terminal facilities in agricultural products in order to
reduce the waste in agricultural distribution. (10) Stimulation of com-
mercial arbitration in order to eliminate the wastes of litigation. (11) Re-
duction of the waste arising from industrial strife between employers and
employees.

(b) NATIONAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE

The Strudure of the American Economy"
It is inevitable that such a complex organization of human activity
should fail to function perfectly. Resources are wasted or used ineffectively
as material resources are unused, and as the most effective teclmology is
not used or its use is prevented. The waste of natural resources through
misuse, or ruthless exploitation, is thoroughly familiar. Equally important,
but less often thought of as a waste of resources, is the idleness of men and
machines that could be productively employed.
The power of individuals to produce is a resource like unharnessed
water power. It is gone if it is not employed. It cannot be stored. If 10 mil-

.. National Resources Committee: The Structure of the American J1:conomy. Part

I, June '939, selected from pp. 1-3.
513 PLANNINC AND PROCUMMINC

lion men are able and willing to work, but are forced to be idle for a year
by lack of jobs, the community has wasted the valuable resources of man-
power. And because of idleness, the individuals are likely to suffer a loss
of skill and a breakdown of morale. The Nation is poorer both by the
goods that could have been produced and by the frustration and loss of
morale of the unemployed individual.
Idle machinery may also involve a waste of resources. When ma-
chinery is idle and accumulating rust or losing usefulness through becom-
ing obsolete, when idle men are available to operate it and when its prod-
uct would be useful to the community, its idleness is likely to constitute
ineffective use of resources.
Waste is also involved when obsolete equipment uses more man-
power and materials in doing a particular job than would be required if
improved techniques were employed, or when production is divided
among so many plants in an industry that no plant can have enough vol-
ume to run efficiently. In all of these cases, failure to use the best-known
technology consumes manpower or materials that might be released to be
used elsewhere.
The waste of resources from these three sources, ruthless exploita-
tion, idleness of men and machinery, and failure to use the most effective
known technology, all combine to give a tremendous total of wasted re-
sources. How great this waste is it is impossible to estimate, but some sug-
gestion of its magnitude can be given by estimating a single item: the de-
pression loss in income through idleness of men and machinery during
the last 8 years. The figures suggest that this loss through nonproduction
was in the magnitude of 200 billion dollars worth of goods and services.
Even in the nondepression years there was extensive idleness of
men and machines which could have been used had there been adequate
organization. The Brookings Institution has estimated that in the peak
year 1929 both production and national income could have been increased
19 percent by merely putting to work the men and machines that were idle
in that year even without the introduction of improved techniques of
production.

Despite a continuing clamor about gcwernmental inefficiency,

there was thus considerable agreement that serious waste was also
occurring in industry and commerce, and that the elimination of
waste required public planning. The complaint about economic waste
was heard even before the economy went from boom to bust." In
1910 the leading American industrial engineering journal had edito-
rialized: "In many caseS the business of private individuals and of
corporations is suffering from leaks due to incorrect methods of ad-
ministration, nearly, if not quite, as great as those which affect public

28 Stuart Chase: The Tzagedy of Waste. New York: Crossett &: Dunlap; 19%7·
514 ADMINISTIA't'ION

business."" Moreover, at this time a rising sentiment prevalled

among a vigorous minority of American students of management,
like Dexter S. Kimball,"' that the carefully planned production or the
financial successes of individual firms did not necessarily make for
effective distribution of goods or for national efficiency. Professor
Willard E. Hotchkiss of the School of Commerce of Northwestern
University announced in 1913: "Business efficiency must be inter-
preted to mean not only the ability to earn dividends but likewise
economical use of the materials and instrumentalities through which
production is carried. This means conservation-conservation of re-
sources and conservation of men-a field in which the public, the
social, and the business activities ought to converge."" By the 1920'S
and 1930'S there was a greater consensus among business men, regard-
less of political philosophy, that in order to eliminate disastrous waste
American business required the assistance of governmental planning.

6. NATIONAL PLANNING, DEMOCRACY, AND LIBERTY

The controversy continued to rage over the wisdom of planning

other phases of the national economy. The alternative philosophies
were presented in the United States by:
(a) Professor Arthur N. Holcombe, who began teaching govern-
ment at Harvard University in 1909. After practical experience on
the staff of the United States Bureau of Efficiency during World War
I Holcombe returned to Harvard as a professor of government. Here
he produced textbooks and treatises on American government and
politics, including The Middle Classes in American Politics sa and
Government in a Planned Society. The latter book, quoted below,
also emphasized the importance to a "planned democracy" of a
skilled "body of public business administrators" and of "middle
class statesmanship.""
(b) Professor Frederick A. Hayek, an Austrian-trained economist,
who became known after World War I for his historical and theo-
retical treatises. Hayek spent many of the inter-war years lecturing
at the London School of Economics and Political Science, where his
laissez-faire economics contrasted sharply with the economic opin-
so "An Industrial Waste and a Proposed Retnedy." Industrial Engineering and the
Engineerill{l Digest. March 1910, vol. 7, p. 213·
.. See Chapter ; .
.. Willard E. Hotchkiss: "Northwestern University School of Commerce." Journal
of Political Economy, March 1913, vol. 21,p. 208.
as Arthur N. Holcombe: The Middle Class in American Politics. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press; '940 .
.. N. 36 below. Loc. cit., pp. 136-37.
515 PLANNINC AND paOCItAMMIHC

ions held by most of the faculty at that institution, including its

director, Sir William Beveridge, the author of some of the British La-
bor Government's welfare and employment programs." Toward the
end of World War II, with the British trend toward nationalization
and socialization, Hayek tmnsferred his activities to the United
States. Here he continued his work as a professor of economics at the
University of Chicago, where he completed and published The Road
to Serfdom.

(a) A. H. HOLCOMBE
Government in a Planned Democracy"
The great depression has revealed with shocking clarity the un-
soundness of an economic system which leaves the adjustment between
the output of goods and the wants of mankind to the unregulated or
casually regulated operations of industrial leaders motivated by a desire
for profits. The utilization of the human resources of the nation cries
aloud for better planning. But comprehensive economic planning on a
national scale is an exacting task. It calls for a national government with
power to command the services of the ablest thinkers and organizers in
the country, with power to obtain copious and exact up-to-date informa-
tion concerning all the wants of the people and the means of supplying
them, with power to direct the energies of businessmen and workers into
the proper channels, and to force the postponement of to-day's pleasures
for the sake of a more adequate provision for distant needs; in short, with
power to organize the thought, the will, and the happiness of a nation.
One of the outstanding phenomena of the great depression has
been the rediscovery by the American people of the value of the experi-
mental attitude in politics. In a period of profound depression a bold as-
sumption of the experimental attitude by the President of the United
States was a sensational development. Mr. Roosevelt's frank avowal that
many of his proposals for recovery were experiments, to be set aside, if un-
successful, for others more promising, caught the popular imagination.
Unfortunately there are many difficulties in the way of applying the ex-
perimental method to the improvement of the structures and processes of
government and to the development of its power. The ordinary method
of experiment in the field of human relations must be by what we com-
monly call trial and error. In the improvement of material things, if the
experiment goes wrong and the experimenter spoils his material, he can

"William Beveridge: Full Employment in a Free Society. New York: W. W

Norton &: Company, Inc.; '94;' Great Britain: Report of Interdepartmental Commit-
tee on Social Insurance and Allied Services (American ed.). New York: The Mac-
millan Company; 194' .
.. A. N. Holcombe: Government in a Planned Democracy. Adapted from pp. 17.
21-23, 29-Jl, J9-40, 164-67. Reprinted by permission of W. W. Norton &: Com-
paoy, Inc. Copyright, '935. W. W. Norton &: Company, Inc.
$16
throw it away and start afresh. But in the field of human relations he can-
not throw away spoiled material. In democratic countries the material is
much more likely to throw the experimenter away, for the material con-
sists of the experimenter's fellow-citizens. The man who carries the ex-
perimental attitude into public life hazards his political career upon the
outcome of each experiment. If he is a prudent man, he is likely to agree
with former Governor Alfred E. Smith, who wrote in The New Outlook,
"I am for experience as against experiment." There are many persons who
would subscribe unreservedly to Governor Smith's statement in its most
literal interpretation. Unsanguine by temperament, and not greatly dis-
contented with their condition, they set themselves resolutely against all
experimentation in the field of human relations, especially where their
own interests are immediately concerned. Others, more discontented with
the weakness and incapacity of our present political institutions and more
sanguine by nature, put more faith in the possibilities of political inven-
tion. They do not flinch from the prospect of deliberate experimentation
based upon the systematic and purposeful study of existing political struc-
tures and processes. Instead of the casual democracy, which is the product
of a century and a half of political experience in the United States, they
look towards the gradual development of a planned democracy.
By a planned democracy they do not mean a finished arrangement
of governmental forms and practices, that has to be established once for
all time and thereafter preserved inviolate, nor an ideal to which reality
must be made to conform as closely as may be practicable. They under-
stand by a planned democracy a political system by means of which the
American people can maintain the continuity of their organized existence
between the present state of affairs and subsequent states of affairs.
Planned democracy cannot be the creation of abstract theorists. It must
spring from the actual premises under the guidance of statesmen endowed
with insight and imagination. We stand on the threshold of great changes
in human relationships, especially in the relationships between govern-
ment and business. The ultimate test of a competent administrative organ-
ization for a planned democracy will be its capacity to produce new ideas.
A great merit of the capitalist system has been the impetus which it has
given to the production of new ideas. Indeed, the extraordinary flow of in-
ventions has been the most striking phenomenon in the rise and growth
of modern capitalism, and it is probable that the continuance of that flow
is an essential condition of the maintenance of the capitalist system in a
profitable form. But the increasing scale of business operations and the
growing separation of the management from the ownership of capital
diminishes the inventor's ability to exploit his inventions on his own ac-
count and reduces his prospect of profit. The inventor tends to become a
salaried employee of a business corporation and the production of inven·
tions a function of organized rather than individual enterprise. For the or·
ganization of thought in those fields in which the products of new ideas
are not patentable or otherwise susceptible of exploitation for profit, gov-
511 PLANNINC AND PROGRAMMINC

ernment bureaucmcy seems to be clearly superior to corporate. There is no

reason to suppose that the growing importance of government bureaucracy
constitutes a threat to the flow of new ideas. On the contrary, government
bureaucracy commands the best facilities for the efficient organization of
thought in the realm of human relations. Its growing importance gives the
strongest security for the production of valuable new ideas concerning the
structure and processes of government in a planned democracy.

(b) FRIEDRICK A. HAYEK

The Road to Serfdom "
The assertion that the complexity of our modern industrial civ-
ilization creates new problems with which we cannot hope to deal effec-
tively except by central planning is based on a complete misapprehension
of the working of competition. Far from being appropriate only to com-
paratively simple conditions, it is the very complexity of the division of
labor under modern conditions which makes competition the only method
by which such co-ordination can be adequately brought about. There
would be no difficulty about efficient control or planning were conditions
so simple that a single person or board could effectively survey all the
relevant facts. It is only as the factors which have to be taken into account
become so numerous that it is impossible to gain a synoptic view of them
that decentralization becomes imperative. But, once decentralization is
necessary, the problem of co-ordination arises-a co-ordination which
leaves the separate agencies free to adjust their activities to the facts which
only they can know and yet brings about a mutual adjustment of their re-
spective plans. As decentralization has become necessary because nobody
can consciously balance all the considerations bearing on the decisions of
so many individuals, the co-ordination can clearly be effected not by "con-
scious control" but only by arrangements which convey to each agent the
information he must possess in order effectively to adjust his decisions to
those of others. And because all the details of the changes constantly af-
fecting the conditions of demand and supply of the different commodities
can never be fully known, or quickly enough be collected and disseminated,
by anyone center, what is required is some apparatus of registration which
automatically records all the relevant effi:cts of individual actions and
whose indications are at the same time the resultant of, and the guide for,
all the individual decisions.
This is precisely what the price system does under competition,
and which no other system even promises to accomplish. It enables en-
trepreneurs, by watching the movement of comparatively few prices, as an
engineer watches the hands of a few dials, to adjust their activities to tho~e
of their fellows. The important point her!! is that'the price system will
IT Friedrich A. Hayek: The Road to Serfdom. Selected from pp. 48-50, 6,-62.
67, 70. Reprinted by permission of the University of Chicago Press. Copyright, '944,
the University of Chicago Press.
518 ADMINISTIIA1IOM

fulfil this function only if competition prevaIls, that is, if the individual
producer has to adapt himself to price changes and cannot control tbern.
The more complicated the whole, the more dependent we become on
that division of knowledge between individuals whose sepamte effortll are
co-ordinated by the impersonal mechanism for tmnsmitting the relei'3Ut
information known by us as the price system.
It is no exaggemtion to say that if we had had to rely on conscious
central planning for the growth of our industrial system, it would never
have reached the degree of differentiation, complexity, and flexibility it
has attained. Compared with this method of solving the economic prob-
lem by means of decentralization plus automatic co-ordination, the Jftore
obvious method of central direction is incredibly clumsy, primitive, and
limited in scope.
It is not difficult to see what must be the consequences when
democmcy embarks upon a course of planning which in its executioil re-
quires more agreement than in fact exists. The people may have agreed on
adopting a system of directed economy because they have been conviilced
that it will produce great prosperity. In the discussions leading to the de-
cision, the goal of planning will have been described by some such ter11l as
"common welfare," which only conceals the absence of real agreement on
the ends of planning. Agreement will in fact exist only on the mechailism
to be used. The effect of the people's agreeing that there must be ceiltral
planning, without agreeing on the ends, will be rather as if a group of
people were \0 commi\ \'nemselves \0 m\te a journey \oge't'ner wi\'p{lU\
agreeing where they want to go: with the result that they may all have to
make a journey which most of them do not want at all.
It may be the unanimously expressed will of the people that its
parliament should prepare a comprehensive economic plan, yet neither
the people nor its representatives need therefore be able to agree on any
particular plan. The inability of democratic assemblies to carry out what
seems to be a clear mandate of the people will inevitably cause dissatis-
faction with democratic institutions.
Yet agreement that· planning is necessary, together with the in-
ability of democratic assemblies to produce a plan, will evoke stronger and
stronger demands that the government or some single individual should be
given powers to act on their own responsibility. The belief is becoJfting
more and more widespread that, if things are to get done, the responsible
authorities must be freed from the fetters of democratic procedure. The
clash between planning and democracy arises simply from the fact that the
latter is an obstacle to the suppression of freedom which the direction of
economic activity requires.

Holcombe and Hayek were accompanied by several other authors

writing on the same subject,." but The Road to Serfdom remained
.. Barbara Wootton: Plm or No Plm. New York: Farrar and Rinehart; 1935. John
Jewkes: Ordeal by Plalllling. London: The Macmillan Company; 1941. Lnd~ von
519 PLANNINC AND PltOCItAM",INC

one of the most widely read economic treatises in the United States
during the 1940'S. The book was also quoted extensively by publi-
cists and business executives who had previously preached Hayek's
thesis that the price mechanism was not only superior to the.planning
mechanism, but that one segment of society could not be planned
without interfering with other segments and ultimately with political
democracy and private liberty. It is difficult to estimate how many
converts were made by the warnings contained in The Road to Serf-
dom. Judging by political events at the end of the decade, many ob-
servers aptly marked that so far as President Truman's philosophy
of economic planning was concerned, President Roosevelt has been
re-elected for a fifth term.

7. PLANNING, CAPITALISM, AND SOCIALISM

In reviewing some of the literature of planning, Edwin G. Nourse,

Chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers, referred
to the alternative proposals of British socialism and Soviet commu-
nism. He concluded: "Whether a majority of our people might be
prepared to accept these means at the bottom of a depression in the
50'S that would shame the 30's-as to that, I venture no guess:'·'
The idea of national planning involving some measure of collectiVism
has had certain roots in American economic thinking. Alexander
Hamilton's Report on Manufacturers, and his advocacy of Federal
public works have already been cited as examples.'" It was the sup-
posedly more radical Jefferson who objected to nationalization in
this form and blocked his fellow partisan, James Madison, when in
1796 the latter suggested a national survey of post roads running from
Maine to Georgia!' Similarly, Andrew Jackson, although not hostile
to state-owned banking or state transportation enterprises, opposed
John Quincy Adams's Federal plan for public improvements.
Members of the Adams family have taken an advanced positiO)l
on the subject of national planning. Brooks Adams, the grandson of
President John Quincy Adams, was probably the most radical of the
family. He was an outright collectivist, although he refused to be
Mis.. : Bureaucracy. New Haven: Yale University Press;·'944. Carl Landauer: Theory
ot National Economic Planning. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1944. Herman
Finer: Road to Reaction. Boston: Little Brown and Company; '945. Batbara
Wootton: Freedom Under Planning. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press;
1945·
.. Edwin G. Nourse: "Serfdom, Utopia and Democratic Opportunity?" Public
Administration Review, Spring 1946, voL6, p. 187 .
.. Lynton K. Caldwell: The Administrative Theories of Hamilton and Tetletson.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 1944, pp. '71-7'.
'I White: The Federalist, p. 487.
520 ADMINISTRATION

identified with European socialists like Karl Marx. When during the
depression year of 1&}3 Brooks gave his more conservative brother
Henry the task of criticising his manuscript of The Law of Civiliza-
tion and Decay, Henry wamed: "It will cost you dear. The gold-bugs
will never forgive you. You are monkeying with a dynamo . . . The
wisest thing you can do for your own interests now or hereafter is to
hold your tongue. I shall hold mine for I do not intend to mix in any
political scrape of yours."" Brooks responded: "I had rather starve
and rot and keep the privilege of speaking the truth as I see it than of
holding all the offices that capital has to give from the presidency
downward."" Actually Henry was proud of his brother's intellect
and courage and helped him get the book published. Theodore Roose-
velt read and reviewed the book," and did not remain untouched by
Brook's radical doctrine when he was elected President.
Despite his acid comments on American economic and political
trends, Brooks was proud of the heritage of the United States. He
made some astounding predictions and issued some significant warn-
ings about its potential enemies. He adored and constantly quoted
his grandfather, John Quincy Adams, not because he had attained
the American Presidency, but because Brooks admired President
Adam's attempt to make a rational contribution to American gov-
ernmental life by means of a system of "internal improvements,"
which then represented the radical expedient of national planning
and economic collectivism.

(a) Letter of John Quincy Adams to Rev. Charles W. Upham,

February 2, 1837"
I fear I have done and can do little good in the world. And my life
will end in disappointment of the good which I would have done, had I
been permitted. The great effort of my administration was to mature into
a permanent and regular system the application of all the superfluous rev-
enue of the Union to internal improvement which at this day would have
afforded high wages and constant employment to hundreds of thousands
of laborers, and in which every dollar expended would have repaid itself
fourfold iri the enhanced value of the public lands. With this system in
ten years from this day the surface of the whole Union would have been
.. Charles A. Beard. Introduction to Brool:s Adams: The Law of Civilization and
Decay. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc .• 1943 •
.. Charles A. Madison: "Brooks Adams" in Critic:; and Crusaders: A Ceotwy of
American Protest. New York: Henry Holt and Company; 19411. p. 291.
.. Theodore Roosevelt: "The Law of Civtliz.ation and Decay." The Forum, January
1897, vol. 22,P1' ;15-89.
.. Letter of ohn Quincy Adams to Rev. Charles W. Upham, February 2, 1837.
Henry Adams: he Degradation of the Democratic Dogma. pp. 24-';. Reprinted by
permission of The Macmtllan Company. Copyright, 1919, The Macmillan Company.
521 PLANNINC AND Pl.o(;RAM"'INC

checkered over with railroads and canals. It may still be done half a cen-
tury later and with the limping gait of State legislature and private ad-
venture. I would have done it in the administration of the affairs of the
nation. I laid the foundation of it all by a resolution offered to the Senate
of the United States in 1806, and adopted under another's name (the
Journals of the Senate are my vouchers). When I came to the presidency
the principle of internal improvement was swelling the tide of public
prosperity. With me fell, I fear never to rise again, certainly never to rise
again in my day, the system of internal improvement by means of national
energies. The great object of my life therefore, as applied to the admin-
istration of the government of the United States, has failed. The American
Union, as a moral person in the family of nations, is to live from hand to
mouth, and to cast away instead of using for the improvement of its own
condition, the bounties of Providence.

(b) BROOKS ADAMS

America's Economic Supremacy"

Perhaps the best example of the success of the collective method

is the centralization of Germany and the organization of Russia. From its
very birth, the Prussian Kingdom has been subjected to a pressure seldom
equaled. Under this pressure the people consolidated in a singuiarly com-
pact mass, developing a corporate administration powerful enough to suc-
ceed very generally in subordinating individual to general interests. It is to
this qnality that Prussia has owed her comparative gain on England.
All agree that the industrial success of Germany is largely due to
the establishment of cheap and uniform rates of transportation, through
state ownership of railways; while the industrial progress of Russia would
have been impossible had not the Government been both railroad and
mine owner, besides being banker and money-lender, and ready at any
moment to promote industries, such as iron works, whenever individuals
could not act advantageously. (What a social revolution in Russia would
portend transcends human foresight, but probably its effects would be felt
tllfoughout the world. )
England, on the other hand, has oe1d her own neither as a manu-
facturer, as an exporter, nor as an agriculturist. Whereas in 1873 her ex-
ports amounted to £255,000,000, in 11197 they reached only £234,35°,000.
The loss on her agriculture has been estimated at $250,000,000 yearly. It is
probably larger. The British adverse trade balance is chiefly due to the
importations of food which might be raised at home. That adverse balance
has grown from £60,282,000 in 1873 to £157,055,000 in 11197·
Applying the same measure to th~ United' States, the same weak
spot appears. The national characteristic is waste, and each year, as the
.. Brooks Adams: ./\merica's Economic SUpIemacy. Adapted from pp. 100-04, 191-
Repriilted by permission of Harper & Brothers. Copyright, 1947, Harper & Brothers.
The lirst edition was published in 1<}OO.
522 ADMIMISTIlATION

margin of profit narrows, waste grows more dangerous. Under an exact ad-
ministration one corporation will prosper, while its neighbor is ruined by
Slight leakage; and what holds true of the private enterprise holds equally
true of those greatest of human ventures called governments.
Our national corporation was created to meet the wants of a
scanty agricultural population at a time when movement was slow. It bas
now to deal with mass~s surpassing, probably, in bulk, any in the world. In
consequence it operates slowly and imperfectly, or fails to operate at all.
The Pennsylvania Railroad might as reasonably attempt to handle the
traffic of 18<)8 with the staff of 1860 as the United States to deal with its
affairs under Mr. McKinley with the appliances which barely sufficed for
Jefferson or Jackson. We have just seen our army put on the field without
a general staff, much after the method of 1812, and we have witnessed the
consequences. We know what would have happened had we been opposed
by a vigorous enemy. We wonder daily at our Treasury struggling with
enormous banking transactions, without banking facilities; while our for-
eign service is so helpless, in its most important function of obtaining
secret information, that the Government relied on daily papers for news
of the Spanish fleet.
In short, in America there is no administration in the modern
sense of the word. Every progressive nation is superior to us in organiza-
tion, since every such nation has been reorganized since we began. That
America has prospered under these conditions is due altogether to the
liberal margin of profit obtainable in the United States, which has made
extreme activity and individuality counterbalance waste. This margin of
profit, due to expansion caused by the acquisition of Louisiana and Cal-
ifornia, carried the country buoyantly until, under the pressure of English
realization, it was stimulated into producing an industrial surplus. The
time has now come when that surplus must be sold abroad.
Parsimony is alien to our habits, and would hardly become a na-
tional trait under pressure less severe than that under which Germany
slowly consolidated after Jena, or under which France began to sink after
Moscow. But if we are not prepared to reduce our scale of life to the Ger-
man or perhaps the Russian standard, if we are not prepared to accept the
collective methods of administration with all that they imply, we must be
prepared to fight our adversary, and we must arm in earnest.

(C) H. s. HItSON
"Planned Execution-The Issue of Scientific Management" ..
Only in the Soviet Union can there be said to be national plan-
ning-i.e., social-economic planning on the national plane and scale with
the perspective and processes of a national institutional mind created for
., H. S. PetSOn: "Planned Extpltion-The Issue of Scientific Management." Ad-
vanced MallllJ:elllent, December 194;, vol. '0, selected from pp. 135-36, 1$8. Re-
,printed by permission.
 PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

the particular function and continuous in its processes. In this connection

it may be well to note parenthetically that in U. S. S. R. experience it has
b-!en necessary to extend the reach of the fingers of the planning agencies
into the areas originally assigned to executing agencies. Among other na-
tions probably the United Kingdom comes nearest to experiencing some
of the advantages of national planning without possessing the institution,
because of the parliamentary system in which legislative and executive are
so closely related that there is common perspective and integrated process-
ing-almost an institutional mind. The United States perhaps is farthest
from possession of anything resembling a national institutional mind be-
cause of the federal form of government in which the powers are divided
between the federal and state governments, and within the federal govern-
ment among legislative, executive and judiciary under a system of checks
and balances. But it may be-there are signs pointing in that direction-
that the very rigidity and inflexibility of our form of government, which
makes it practically impossible for the Government itself to become the
equivalent of a national institutional planning mind, is making it neces-
sary for the Government to create for its own guidance and assistance
something in the nature of a specialized national institutional planning
mind.
Prior to the depression of 1929 the concept of national planning
had not found a place in American thinking. Of course, the planning in
the Soviet Union was given some attention, but it was observed to be the
product of an anti-capitalist revolution, and therefore generally presumed
to be inherently both anti-capitalist and anti-democratic in nature. Within
a few years after the depression of 1929 the circumstances generated a
flash flood of pamphleteering on the subject apparently quite independent
of the Soviet precedent. In 1932 Hugo Haan of the International Man-
agement Institute, Geneva, made a survey of official, semi-official and
private planning proposals in the United States and found nineteen
worthy of listing. For various reasons this pamphleteering died out; prob-
ably because of the then public intolerance of the word planning, too
closely associated with the Soviet Union, because of a vast new subject-
matter for public attention and discussion offered by the national program
identified with the term New Deal, and possibly because mistakenly some
citizens thought the New Deal was an Amencan adaptation of planning.
Under the influence of our participation in World War II such
pamphleteering has been resumed, and along the same line essentially,
but generally, with avoidance of the term planning. It is less doctrinaire,
and more in terms of practical problems arising 'out of the war and its
effects, such as maintenance of full employment. If Hugo Haan were now
to revise his list he could add proposals of the United States Chamber of
Commerce, the American Manufacturers' Association, Fortune Magazine,
the League for Industrial Democracy, others of a similar occasional nature,
and especially the publications of the National Planning Association, an
organization that maintains a constant campaign of education and con-
524
tinues to carry the word planning in its own name, although now seldom
in the titles of its notable reports. The value of such pamphleteering
should not be underestimated. It is of course not planning, but it is a great
educational force that acquaints citizens with the problems that call for
planning, gradually accustoms citizens to the conoept of planning, in-
fluences citizens to action that brings the day of organized planning nearer,
and in some measure helps to predetermine the direction that eventual
planning is to take. ,
On the whole there is ground for optimism. The pressure of
events is a powerful ally of those who believe in national economic plan-
ning in principle. The people of the United States have learned a great
deal since the desperate days of 1932; during the early part of the period
in respect of the control and regulation of the domestic economy, and dur-
ing the later part of the period in respect of the impact of world problems
on the domestic economy. They perceive that the United States must
share with two other powerful nations the direction of world affairs for a
considerable period; a direction that involves harmonizing domestic econ-
omies with world economy. They perceive also that the other two nations
sharing this responsibility are planning nations; one because of its organ-
ized planning, the other because of the accident of its form of government.
The people of the United States will perceive the functional necessity, and
functional necessity in the long run prevails.

Person depended upon practical experience as a planner with the

National Resources Board in the 1930'S to enforce his arguments.
Since 1919, he had been Director of the Amos Tuck School of Ad-
ministration and Finance at Dartmouth College and of the Taylor
Society, where his ideas had been discussed in expert conferences
representing business administration and public management. Some
familiarity with planning concepts of this kind had also been enjoyed
by American management during the politically progressive period
before World War 1." As to the collective enterprises and plan-
ning advocated by Brooks Adams, a rising interest in government
enterprise in particular was apparent then," although there was little
in the way of a heavily supported program of American socialism,"

~ Herbert Croly, The Promise of American Life. New York: The Macmillan
ComJ'any; '909, Chapter 12.
Warren M, P.lllons: Government Experimentation in Business, New York: John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1934, Seha Eldridge: Development of Collective Enterprise,
Lawrence: University of Kansas Press; 1943. Max Lerner "The Burden of Govern·
ment Business," Public Management in the New Democracy. Fritz Morstein Marx,
ed., pp. 9-10. Caus and Wolcott: Public Administration in the United States De-
partment of Agriculture, p, .81._
.., Richard -T. Ely: Recent American Socialism, Baltimore: The Johns Hnpkins
Press; 1884, Studies in History and Political Science, 3rd series, vol. 4. Norman M.
Thomas: America's Way Out: A Program for Democracy. New York: The Macnu1lan
Company; 1931.
525 PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

and indeed, suspicion of foreign socialism continued. Nevertheless,

as part of the international aid program to European countries after
World War II and as a defense against communist dictatorship, the
American policy apparently was "to grant the plausibility of de!?l0-
cratic socialism in Western Europe as well as of democratic capitalism
in the United States."·'
American business proceeded with its planning of indiviJual
enterprises and accumulated unprecedented earnings throughout the
1940'S." American government for its part adhered to the ide:# of
private profit and a price control system along with planning ex~~i­
ments. Nowhere was this paradox so apparent as in the most dramatic
development of the decade and possibly of the century-atomic en-
ergy. As we have seen, the Atomic Energy Act of 1946 committed the
government to public ownership, national control, and governmeptal
supervision of all of the atomic energy resources, production, research,
and distribution. Yet one of the objectives of the act was that of
"strengthening free competition in private enterprise."" Up to this
point, therefore, the prevailing notion in the United States was that
governmental planning could preserve, rather than threaten, liberty
and democ:racy.

8, THE STA.GES OF PLANNING

Whatever the form of the national economy and however re-

stricted the degree of planning that may be undertaken, most autho~­
ities agree that the technique of planning will require refinemerlt If
it is to be an effective tool of management. The first technical ques-
tion relates to the various "stages" of the process of planning. The
stages of planning are listed here by (a) the British Labor pllrty
leader, Sir Herbert Morrison; and (b) John D. Millett, a professor
at Columbia University.

(a) HERBERT MORRISON

"Economic Planning""
Planning can be divided logically into five stages. The first, with-
out which none of the others can happen, is making up one's mind to
01 National Planning Association: "Suategic Coals 01 American Foreign Policy."
December 22, 1948 .
•• Floyd H. Rowland: Business Planning and Control. New York: Harper &
Brothers, >947.
51 See Chapter 12 •
.. Herbert Morrison: "Economic Planning." Public Administration, Spring ,947,
vol. "5, p. ;. Reprinted by permission.
S26
plan and gmsping what planning means. The second is assembling the
necessary facts and forecasts to make sure that the plan can be put on a
sound practical basis. The third state is actually devising alternative plans
and seeing what they each offer and what they cost in terms of resources
and disadvantages. The fourth is the taking of decisions between alterna-
tive plans, including the decision what is to be planned and what is to be
left unplanned. The fifth, and by far the most extensive stage, is carrying
out the plans in practice. I suggest that the first and vital stage was when
the British people made up their minds to plan.

{b} )0'1'1" D. MILLnT

"National Policies and Planning"
What do we mean by national policies or policy formulation?
How does a policy differ from a plan? Are the two terms simply to be ac-
cepted as synonymous?
There is a vital difference between policies and plans, even if the
difference is sometimes difficult to perceive. Policy formulation is probably
the more important, for basic policy decisions under most circumstances
must precede the preparation of plans. From the point of view of the ad-
ministrator, operating plans are of first importance. The most important
single factor in achieving maximum output from the resources employed
is careful planning. Under ordinary circumstances the more detailed and
thorough the advance preparation, the less waste will result from poorly
utilized manpower or materials. In other words, we must have planning
for our existing governmental programs. A growing management pro-
fession in the last forty or fifty years has constantly emphasized this fact.
Perhaps it is too much to hope that in the use of the word "plan-
ning" writers and students will refer only to operational planning. There
is no doubt that planning must be closely related to all other phases of
management. This very need is illustrated by the' frequent reference we
find in much of our management literature to such terms as "administra-
tive planning," "program planning," "organizational planning," and
"budget planning." In spite of their use of the word "planning," all of
these terms refer to the process of carrying out an approved course of ac-
tion rather than to the actual process of preparing that course of action.

it may not only be desirable to distinguish, as does Professor Mil-

lett, between the policy-making and the operational planning stage;
but, as John R. Steelman, Chairman of the President's Scientific Re-
search Board, suggested in 1947, plans "must be broken down into
programs, each program must be subdivided according to pro;ects,

55 John D. Millett; "National Policies and Planning." The Process and Organization
of Government Planning. Adapted from pp. ll, '4-';, 86. Reprinted by permission
of Colmnbia University Press. Copyright, 1947, 'Columbia University Press.
 PlANNINC AND PROCRAMMING

each project must be analyzed as to operations involved, and each

operation must be studied to determine the specific steps required." ..
In administrative practice, no such standard terminology prevails.
The term planning is applied indiscriminately to the policy stage,
the program stage, the project stage, and the procedure stage.

9. PROGRAM PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE PLANNING

Most administrators find it convenient to' make a broad two-fold

distinction between planning their program of work and planning
their administrative facilities. This distinction was analyzed by Don-
ald C. Stone during his service with the United States Bureau of the
Budget.

DONALD C. STONE
"Planning as an Administrative Process""
Inasmuch as the problems which the administrator must resolve,
or propose recommended solutions for are of every conceivable kind, it is
obvious that planning must deal with a wide variety of subject matter.
Two types of subject matter, however, may be distinguished:
( 1) Substantive or technical subject matter with which the
agency is dealing; planning, in this area is variously termed resource plan-
ning, program planning, technical research, et cetera. City planning falls
here.
(2.) The second class of subject matter is concerned with the de-
velopment of sound organization, the method of staffing the organization,
the procedures and practices to be followed, and the direction and co-
ordination of operations. Planning in respect to snch matters is often re-
ferred to as administrative or management planning.
Let us look at a few examples of these two types of planning. City
officials considering whether or not police protection should be increased,
a sewage disposal plant built, or a revision made in the local school cur-
riculum, are engaging in program planning. When they consider whether
district police precinct stations should be closed in favor of central 0p-
eration, or whether the director of public works should be given .the addi-
tional responsibility for the superintendence of the sewage disposal plant,
or whether the business manager of the school system should be responsi-
ble to the superintendent of schools or directly to the school board, these
officials are engaging in administrative planning. And it is quite likely to

.. John R. Steelman: "Administtation for Research." Science and Public Policy.

October 4, 1947, vol. 3, p. 30. The terms ale not underlined in the original.
lSt Donald C. Stone: "Planning as an Administrative Process." Presented to the
National Conference on Planning, May n, 1941, selected from pp. ~-3.
528 ADMINISTRATION

be the same officials who are doing the two kinds; in fact, they may be
studying the program and its method of administration at one and the
same time.
A State health department engages in program planning when it
analyzes the infant mortality rates and causes of death in the various
counties of the State in order to decide the steps which might be taken,
in conjunction with the county health officers, to bring about a decrease in
such deaths. But when the State health commissioner ponders over the
extent of authority that he has or desires over the county health officers,
he is doing some administrative planning. If the matter is a question of
the efforts required to reclaim mined soil, the building of a dam for power
and navigation purposes, or the computation of the funds required to
finance the old.age assistance program, then program planning considera-
tions are paramount. At the same time, administrative planning is re-
quired to determine how to organize best for carrying out the program,
what personnel and equipment are required, how the field activities can
be effectively directed and coordinated, and the procedures which will in-
sure speedy handling of the work.
The line between program planning and administrative planning
in many cases is very faint. This is one reason why the meap;ng and con-
tent of administrative planning has not been as clearly understood as it
might be. It is also one of the reasons why the two types of pJanni.ng are
in many instances inseparable.
As the administrator, for the sake of administrative convenience,
differentiates policy-making from policy-execution, so he tends to
distinguish between program planning and administrative or manage-
ment planning.

10. PLANNING AND BUDGETING

Planning may be exercised as a specialized function or it may be
employed as a general point of view by management or staff special-
ists who are not specifically charged with planning duties. Thus
planning is a particularly useful.ancillary tool for the budgeting officer.
The relations between planning and budgeting are explored below
by Robert A. Walker, who has served a~~ Federal administrative offi-
cer and a professor of government.

ROBERT A. WALKER
"The Relation of Budgeting To Program Planning" ..
Among those who call themselves "planners"-i.e., those who be-
long to the professional planning organizations, attend planning confer-
os Robert A. Walker, "The Relation Of Budgeting to Program Planning." Public
Administration Review, Spring 1944, vol. 4, selected from pp. 97-102. Reprinted by
permission~
 PLANNINC AND PROGRAMMING

ences, and so forth-{X)ncem with budgeting has been restricted almost

entirely to the capital improvement or public works program. This situa-
tion probably arises from the fact that professional planners have been
interested primarily in planning physical features, and the public works
program is usually a budgeting of major public construction enterprises for
the ensuing several years. Consequently, one finds in the literature of
planning and in the proceedings of the annual national planning confer-
ences that discussions of the relation between budgeting and planning are
cast almost entirely in terms of long-range capital improvement programs.
The planners have largely ignored the annual budget process. In so do-
ing, they have neglected the growing importance of the budget as a plan
of future action and have overlooked an opportunity to make their work
effective.
A budget is indistinguishable from the planning process. Future
needs must be studied and put in terms of definite plans of action. These
in turn are translated into estimates of financial requirements, and justifi-
cation of these estimates often constitute excellent statements of an
agency's long-time program. The net result is a program for the next year
or two, parts of which are frequently presented as segments of a more
complete pIan. To be useful at the time budgets are being prepared, plans
must be sufficiently tangible to be related to financial requirements when
a particular budget is under consideration. A rarefied vision of the future,
however inspiring, is of little assistance to a hard-pressed budget officer.
Recommendations should be specific and the material on anyone subject
brief. I have heard planners criticized more frequently for vagueness than
for any other fault, unless it be the length of their reports. While such
criticism is not always justified, it points up the importance of stating defi-
nitely when a proposed program should be undertaken, how long it will
take to complete it, how much it will cost, why it is in the public interest,
whether it involves commitments for continuing expenditures, and the
like. '
The other side of the problem of bringing planning into budget-
making is cultivating an interest in programs within the budget offices. I
have stated that forward-looking budget officers will make nse of material
on long-time objectives and future programs if it is given them in a form
they can use. This is true, but it begs the question of whether there are
many forward-looking budget officials-as the planners will hasten to
point out. A budget office more interested in forms and accounts than in
the programs being financed is not likely to encourage planners to provide
the kind of material and assistance suggested above. Budget officials can
do much to facilitate the valuable contnlmtion which the planners can
make to their work by taking an active interest in the planning program
and by requesting aid on particular problems.
The budget is itself a plan of work. In the federal government,
and in many other jurisdictions, it outlines a program for the ensuing two
S30 ADMINISTRATION

years or more. Thus there is no sharp line of demarcation sepamting "plan-

ning" and "budgeting."

In this manner the major management processes, budgeting and

planning, complement each other in administrative practice.

11. THE PLANNING PROCESS

In what respect, therefore, is the planning process unique as a

management device? An answer is found in the following list of basic
planning propositions formulated by E. J. Coil, Director of the Na-
tional Planning Association.

E. J. COIL
"Administrative Organization for Policy Planning""
Proposition 1: A planning staff must do more than merely indi-
cate the alternate lines of policy; it must make recommendations by indi-
cating priorities. It is the function of a planning staff to gather the facts,
organize them, interpret them, indicate the alternate policies, and rank
the potential policies in accordance with the staff's judgment as to their
relative suitability and desirability. A planning staff must be willing to
state its judgment; it must be willing to £It facts into working formulae.
Unless it takes this initiative of interpretation and selection, the planning
staff will probably become impotent. A body which seeks to avoid offend-
ing anyone, soon loses its power to say anything. It is proposed here that
the staff should formulate policies, because that is in keeping with its
function and authority; the staff should not determine policy, because
that is the executive's function of command.
Proposition 2: It is the function of the administrative staff to ad-
vise and not to propagandize the organization or the public. The question
arises as to where policy persuasion ends and policy selling begins. In
private enterprises the answer is not difficult: there is no public announce-
ment until policy has been determined. In public and semi-public organ-
izations, however, this functional problem is more difficult. Once a policy
has been determined, it certainly seems that the findings and interpreta-
tions should be made public documents so that the policy can be ade-
quately understood. Or, it may be that a policy needs explana?on prior.to
adoption and execution in order to generate public support. In a detpo-
cratic society, popular understanding of objectives and the reasoning there-
for is essential. But is it always for the executive to decide whether and
when such support should be sought? A democracy seems to require that
.. E. 1- Coil: "Administrative Orgaruzation for Policy Planning." Advanced Man-
agement, January 1939, vol. 4, selected from pp. U-17. Reprinted by permission.
531 PLANNINC AND I'tQCIA...... INC

the findings and recommendations of a staff automatically be made public

property-the staff should not decide but should obey the pUblic desire
in the matter. In a democracy, the electorate and their legislative rep-
resentatives need guidance. Should Congress have its own research staff or
should legislative proposals be referred to the planning staff for analysis
before debate takes place? This problem of relationship between the plan-
ning staff and the legislative body is not so difficult in England where the
execotive is a member of Parliament, but in the United States no satis-
factory solution has yet been advanced. It should be borne in mind that
in a democracy the electorate is the ultimate po'licy.determining executive.
As far as the executive is concerned, however, an administrative staff can-
not be supreme in publicizing what it thinks should be done in matters of
policy. The staff is an aid to the executive and not a substitute for him. It
is an institution for administrative planning and not a rostrum for spec-
tacular "brain-trusting."
PropoSition 3: It is the function of the administrative staB, as a
part of policy planning, to consider the broad ways and means of attaining
desired objectives. No one would deny that although an executive may
seek the most admirable objectives, his success is often determined in part
by his organizational machinery. There are some who hold, however, that
problems of organization do not come within the jurisdiction pf a policy
planning staff. It is not possible to accept this view because how to get
there seems to be an inherent part of the problem of deciding where one
wants to go. Over-all policy planning must consider the broad problems of
organizational structure. In gathering and analyzing information to formu-
late policies, a staff invariably begins to foresee the organizational rela-
tions involved Understanding the work to be done, it begins to create the
organizational framework which can be entrusted with the performance
of the task.
Proposition 4: It is the function of the administrative staB to ex-
ercise an over-alI co-ordinating influence on the administrative plane, and
to work in close relationship with the management staB. It has been indi-
cated above that after policy has been determined and the relatively broad
ways and means approved, the job of control and co-ordination passes to
the management staff. The management staff then works out the details
and sees that the departments and operating officials are informed of their
respective parts in the general scheme. This c;livision of work does not im-
ply. however, that the administrative planning staff has no further interest
in matters of co-ordination and policy fulfilment. Planning is a continuous
process, and to make policy studies without continuous observation of
~rmance is frequently futile. Although it is the function of the man-
agement staff to check details of perfom13nce and efficiency, it is the func-
tion of the administrative staff to follow fulfilment and to plan continu-
ously the administrative adjustments of policy and integration of the
various branches of the enterprise or of the economy_ Although the ad-
ministrative staff is primarily concerned with planning, and the manage-
532
ment staff with co-ordination, the function of co-ordination and super-
vision is actually shared, but with distinctly different emphasis. Unless
the distinction is made, it is pobabJe that the dewled co-ordination of
the current flow of work will get the most attention and planning and
over-all co-ordination for controlled adjustment to change will be danger-
ously minimized.
Proposition 5: The administrative staff must maintain continuous
relations with all sub-staiIs within the total organization. Planning cannot
be effective on the administrative level unless there is planning within de-
partments and divisions of the organization. The staff concept is not con-
fined solely to the plane of the chief executive; operating executives should
have their respective staffs to assist them; To be effective, over-all planning
must be supplemented and supported by a "throughout" planning struc-
ture. With these sub·staffs the administrative staff-and the management
staff-must maintain continuous relations. Unless sub-plans pass inspec-
tion from an over-all point of view, the sub-staffs will distort the organiza-
tion's work by pulling in opposite directions. By examining the policy
plans of these sub-staffs, the plans can be related and integrated within
the total policy situation. Not only must there be opportunities for ad-
ministrative pre-views of policy and reviews of fulfilment, but the admin-
istrative staff must establish standards of methods and procedures. With-
out some standard forms and procedures, co-ordinative control is lost in an
anarchy of methodology.
Proposition 6: The administrative staH is directly responsible to
the chief executive. The administrative planning staff must be located di-
rectly adjacent to the top executive. POlicy planning has to be done under
the immediate control of the chief executive because he alone is responsi-
ble for seeing the over-all situation. It is he who has to compare one line of
policy with another, to judge the relation of present and future policy, and
to determine the general strategy. Only the executive has the power to
harmonize policy throughout the entire organization. If the administrative
staff is located within a department and placed under a functional man-
ager, its work is immediately distorted. It seems impossible for a staff to
maintain an over-all breadth of organizational vision if it is subordinated
to a particular function. In addition, the locating of a staff within one de-
partment invariably creates friction between departments and severely in-
terferes with the necessary inter-departmental co-operation. Experience
also shows that whenever an administrative staff is established the line
and functional managers always look on it initially with feelings ranging
from skepticism to hostility. If the stzff is to remain alive long enough to
prove itself, it has to be attached to the top executive.
Proposition 7: In being directly responsible to the chief executive,
tbe staB represents no special interests exeept the interests of the whole
organization. An administrative staff for policy planning is not a council
made up of representatives of those who have an interest in policy. As
their personal arm on policy matters, executives do not want an organized
533 PLANNING AND 'IOCRAMMINC
lobby. The executive wants and needs over-all, infonned, disinterested ad-
vice, and this can only be obtained from an agency which represents the
whole, rather than one which has allegiances to segments.
Proposition 8: Administrative staff work for policy planning is a
fun-time function. Although the administrative planning staff can well
utilize consultants and committees on a part-time basis, the members of
the staff-including the chief-should work on a full-time basis. In any
large organization, it seems that part-time policy planners cannot follow
the work of the operating departments, cannot know what present policies
are, and what changes are occurring. The great advantage of staff-work is
group thinking. Through steady-not occasional-work, the staff pools its
resources,.and complex problems of policy yield to concerted attack.
Proposition 9: Administrative staff members should be "general-
ists," not specialists, although of course they utilize specialists. The very
concept of organization implies not only a division of labor but also a
synthesis of that labor. Although knowledge has been advanced by special-
ization, it has been discovered that specialization creates resistances to in-
tegration. The executive, who must cope with complex problems in a
comprehensive manner, frequently finds great reluctance on the part of
specialized personnel to bring the parts together again. A policy planner
must have the abilities of a generalist rather than those of a specialist.
Even though he has special technical training, his attitude should be that
of understanding relations. A generalist should possess a sense of per-
spective and proportion, should be able to divide problems into their sub-
parts and to give each its weight, and should analyze and diagnose. He
should be able to synthesize the data and produce a reasoned statement of
recommendation, a workable solution. A generalist has the capacity to dif-
ferentiate, to relate, to think through to a well-rounded judgment.
Proposition 10: Administrative staff members must be purpose-
fully trained for the function of policy planning. A real challenge to or-
ganization is the future of its personnel. Certainly, at present, the oppor-
tunities and methods for developing persons skilled in staff work are far
from adequate.

It is possible for the planning process to penetrate an organization

so that it embraces more than the functions described by Coil. Thus
the Planning Office of the Division of Placement and Unemploy-
ment Insurance of the Department of Labor of New York State was
given an ambitious and all-inclusive mandate which included among
other functions: "study of actual and potential problems in the fields
of programs, policies and procedures, and development of solutions;
design of systems implementing possible extensions of program, in-
cluding experimental procedures; prepa~ation and clearance of legis-
lation; control of issuance and reproduction of all statements of pol-
icy, procedures, manuals, training materials; forms, handbooks and
S34 ADMINISTRATION

information pamph1ets to insure adequacy, conformity with overall

Department and Division policy and to screen out unnecessary items;
control of all mailing and distribution lists of the Division; review
and analysis of reports; follow"up on decisions, projects, and develop-
ments, for the information of the Executive Director." eo
Useful as many of these control functions are, and desirable as
their co-ordinated exercise in One otfice may be, it is doubtful whether
the planning process can survive if its functions are so widespread. A
planning agency will certainly lose its effectiveness if it undertakes
too many staff and service functions.
The Tennessee Valley Authority, with an official mandate which
includes the function of planning physical and social resources, is by
no means convinced of the wisdom of establishing a separate plan-
ning department or unit. On the contrary, the TVA practice is gener-
ally "to couple administrative responsibility for execution with the
function of formulating plans for action." Gordon R. Clapp, Chair-
man of TVA, has explained further: "We find that the distinction
between those who plan and those who execute is by no means as
sharply drawn as would appear on the printed page. It is a line which
is vague and always shifting. We have undertaken to bring about the
widest possible diffusion of competence and responsibility for both
functions among all the departments in our organization. In practice
this means that the same individual, staff or department may fre-
quently participate at several stages in the planning, formulation and
execution of the same project." 61 Much of modern military exper-
ience confirms this procedure. While staff agencies for strategic plan-
ning are profitably employed, World War II experience demon-
strated that planning responsibility on the part of personnel who
were to carry out an operation was frequently essential if the oper-
ation was to be carried out "according to plan."

12. PLANNING AND RESEARCH

Research, like planning, is a management function. This subject

will be discussed in the next chapter, along with the related services
of reporting and public relations. Meanwhile, we can inquire into the
relations between research and planning.

.. Ne\9 York Department of Labor. Division of Placement and Unemployment

Insurance. Planning Office: "Planning in 1947." Introduction.
61 Gordon R. Clapp: "Some Administrative Aspects of Regional Planning in the
Tennessee Valley." Address to the American Political Science Association and the
American Society of Planning OIIicials. December 30, 1940.
S3S PLANNING AND PItOCRAMMING

H. S. PERSON
"Research and Planning liS Functions of Administration and Man-
H
ment 61!

The tenn research used in connection with planning means

primarily purposeful, ad hoc research, but it does not neglect fundamental
research. Of course, fundamental research is essential to the definition and
redefinition of an objective and to the discovery of new ways and means of
achieving it; but the great bulk of the research involved in day-to-day and
week-to-week planning is homely ad hoc research stimulated by a suc-
cession of specific problems arising out of the constant impact of variables
on the situations being managed.
Also we must be generous and pennit the term research to cover
some very simple fact finding-superficial, some scientists might say. But
we must be realistic; the purpose of research for planning is not primarily
to discover fundamental truths but to make each of the stream of acts
constituting management the best possible under the circumstances. A
problem arises in the morning in respect of which an executive must make
a decision before he leaves his desk for the day. That problem can be given
only six or eight hours of intensive study. But the best study of it that can
be made within the six or eight hours should be made. The time factor in
a dvnamic situation determines the nature and direction of the research.
Those investigations that have time limits of a day, a week, or a mOJlth
are functionally of the highest ranK in planning and should be given ap-
propriate recognition.
Planning expresses no preference for a particular mode of re-
search. It is concerned with variables; its problems vary, and therefore the
modes of research vary. Planning employs as required every known mode
of investigation. It draws on the techniques of all the sciences. The specific
problem and the time factor determine the type of research employed at a
particular moment. Planning tries always to be inductive, but at times it
may have to be deductive. It may inspect many units of observation Of it
may take samples. It may make superficial observations, or a vast array of
quantitative measurements. It may conduct a few tryouts, or it may em-
ploy truly scientific experimentation. Let us say that it strives to employ
in any instance the most pertinent and satisfying modes of research, but is
governed by the time factors of its dynamic environment. Whether an in-
vestigation is scientific is, after all, detennined by the investigator's mental
attitude and intent under the limiting circumstances, rather than by the
array of facilities and procedures. Otherwise, after one has visited General
Electric's House of Magic he would have to say that Faraday was not a
scientist.
At this point a distinction should again be made between the te-
-:::-:-:--:-:::---
.. H. S. Person: "Research and Planning as Functions of Administration and Man·
agement." Public Administration Review, Autumn 1940, vol. 1, selected from pp.
6;-66, 71. Reprinted by permission.
536 ADMINISTIATtON

search for planning and design of a plan, and the implementing or plan-
ning itself. The research must be detached and objective; and the pro-
cedures and standards established by it must be the best in terms of the
factors of the situation, and impersonal. The researchers for planning may
assume the attitude that they are through when they have established the
standards in terms of factors of the situation; but they soon discover that a
dynamic situation is always changing and they must always be on the jump
to keep up with circumstances which compel the modification of estab-
lished standards and the establishment of new ones. But they are through
once standards are established, in the sense that they are not- concerned
with the actual operations.

Research thus becomes a major phase of planning, although the

planning agency is not the only research unit in the organization.

SUMMARY

Planning is a tool of management that is used in business and

government at practically all levels of responsibility. Within govern-
ment alone, it may take various forms such as local master planning,
city and state public works programming, state or national conserva-
tion, resource planning on a regional basis, national economic plan-
ning, and administrative planning. Planning as a management func-
tion is also a mechanism which is continually used in business
administration. Vast differences are apparent between a city planning
its specific public works and a nation comprehensively planning its
business enterprise. However inadvisable it may be, the process of
planning can expand from administrative programming to compre-
hensive planning on overall management of the national economy.
The attitude of rational prevision and the technique of the deliberate
programming of related elements are the distinguishing features
which characterize all types of this dynamic, though occasionally
dangerous, tool of management.
 CHAPTER SEVENTEEN

RESEARCH, REPORTINC, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

PLANNING, personnel administration, and budgeti~ or financial con-

trol represent the three primary managerial techniques. Common to
all of these techniques is the process of fact-finding and fact -analysis
-that is, research-which is also regarded as a fourth technique of
management.
The importance of research has long been recognized in the nat-
ural sciences and in industry.' As a result of our military and atomic
energy experience, "research and development" in our industry and
economy has been sharply emphasized. From the experience of the
atom bomb development under tl)e "Manhattan Project,'" we have
learned how to m~nipulate energy in such a way as to change basically
our physical and social environment. By the public management of
modern research, we can also deliberately accelerate the rate of dis-
covery of epoch-making data and techniques.
Although popular recognition of the urgency for research in the
social sciences, particularly administration, is lacking,· research has
Io~ been recognized as an effective tOQI by efficient business and
public management. Related to research is the reporting of facts, for
'In the United States industrial research has ShOWD a rise from 100 laboraturies
employing 3,000 people in '9'S to ~,SOO laharatories employing 'H.SOO people in
1946. Stanford Research Institute: "Applied Research Center for the West,"
August z, 1948. 1
• H. D. Smyth: A Cenetal Account at the Development ot Methods ot Using
Atomic Energy for Military. Purposes under the Auspices of the U. S. Government
('940-1 945).
• The President's Scientific Research Board. Sciepce and Public Policy, Angust 2;,
1947, vol. 1, p. viii.
537
538 ADMINISTRATION

purposes of either administrative control or public information, and

the associated managerial technique of public relations. Although
these represent three separable, as well as related, subjects, they are
treated together in this chapter for the sake of convenience.

I. WHAT IS RESEARCH?

What is meant by the term "research"? Professor Lent D. Upson,

a staff member of one of the original government administrative
research agencies, the New York Bureau of Municipal Research'
gives one answer. Following his New York experience, Professor
Upson worked in other municipal research bureaus in which the
research programs were supported by private citizens and taxpayers.
In order to train the necessary research personnel for these organi-
zations, Professor Upson developed a curriculum at Wayne Univer-
sity in Detroit while serving as Director of the Detroit Bureau of
Governmental Research for thirty years. In 1944, he established the
National Training School for Public Service in Detroit. Here he con-
tinued to train administrative personnel by emphasizing research
techniques.
LENT D. UPSON
Letters on Public Administration •
The dictionary definition that research is "inquiry" is not enough
-the equivalent of saying that research is research. True research in the
social fields is to collect facts about a specific problem, to measure these
facts, to compare tllem with other f,!cts or generally accepted truths, and
to draw conclusions. Always in complete research there is more than the
collection of data which is mere inquiry; there is measurement, compari-
son, conclusion.
Whenever you make a decision, no matter how simple or unim-
portant, you do research. You collect the facts pertinent to alternate
courses of action-<:ompare the satisfactions or dissatisfactions involved
in one with the satisfactions or dissatisfactions involved with the other,
and make a choice. Nothing is good or bad, far or near, crooked or straight
except in comparison with something else.
There are instances in the social studies in which there is the col-
lection of facts "for truth's sake" and without comparison with other facts
and hence without conclusions. But that is partial or incomplete researcll,
• See Chapter ~.
• Lent D. Upson: Letters On Public Administration. Detroit: National Training
School lor Public Service; 1947. adapted from pp. 3'. 44. 46-49. Reprinted by per-
mission.
539 USEARCH, REPORTING, AND PUILIC RELATIOMS

the comparison and formulation of conclusions being left to some one

else. The collection of statistical data by governmental agencies (in par-
ticular) often faIls into this category of "incomplete research."
There is a human passion to collect and classify. So folks attempt
to put research into categories according to method although there is ac-
tually only one kind of research-statistical. All research has to do with
numbers-one or many millions. Often when we deal with one or a few
numbers we talk of a "case" study or "survey." When there are so many
cases that the facts they produce must be juggled statistically to tell the
whole truth, then we talk of "statistical" research. Sometimes, in the social
sciences, there is an opportunity to study conditions in a laboratory situa-
tion-where conditions are controlled-the victims of the study are hand
selected and compared with run of the mine data.
Good social research and good statistical methods involve, first,
the collection of the right kind of facts in the proper amounts and with
sense enough and experience enough to draw sound conclusions from the
comparisons which these facts make possible. If you collect facts accurately
-whatever they may be-the statisticians will say that the data have "re-
liability"; if these facts measure the things you started out to measure, then
they have "validity."
Most research begins with a hunch based on observance of iso-
lated "instances" or "cases." This hunch grows into a hypothesis, then a
theory, as more and more examples are examined until finally an inductive
conclusion appears warranted. This conclusion is called a truth simply be-
cause we don't know any better. But please remember that most research
gets its start as a hunch.
So the first injunction to the researcher in the social fields is to be
"hard boiled," to park his sentiments, his urges for "reform," and his so-
cial, economic, political, religious, and racial prejudices when he begins
putting people and their conduct into test tubes or looking at them
through a microscope. But probably this injunction will be wasted-so do
the next best thing-admit frankly these prejudices at the very outset as a
concession to intellectual honesty and attempt to weight the validity of
your conclusions with that admission constantly in mind. Incidentally, it
is remarkable that men and women who wouldn't steal your purse will
often without compunction steal your good opinion with crooked research.

Upson, like other teachers and writers specializing in research:

has pointed out that administrative personnel are engaged not only
in research into social, economic, and political questions, but fre-
quently they are also concerned with fact-finding or fact-counting
solely as part of the administrative process. This type of research
attempts to answer such questions as: what is the .administrative work
• John M. Pfiffner: Research Methods in Publ1c Administr.ltion. New York: The
Ronald Press Company; 1940, pp. 23-24. George A. Lundberg: Social Retearch.
New York: Lo:ngmans. Green " Co., 1942, pp. 397-412.
load, how much personnel is needed, how much needs to be budg-
eted, how can the work best be organized, what procedures would
be most efficient?

2. THE PROBLEM OF RESEARCH

Nevertheless, the most serious research questions are those a~­

ing the public interest in genClllI or a particular clientele or ~I
interest group. This situation is especially apparent in the collectIon
and analysis of data for the newer governmental functions, as de-
scribed by (a) Sir Herbert Morrison, a leader in the British Labor
government, and (b) E. Pendleton Herring, an American profdSor
of government and an executive of foundations devoted to reseaich.

(a) HERIERT MORRISON

"Economic Planning" T
The need now is for facts and figures to give all concerned_.~ot
only govemment-a clear up-to-date picture of what is happening .,.,Ith
the minimum of effort. Before planning decisions can be taken we have
to know what millions of business men, farmers, workers and others are
making or growing or distributing. Statisticians have to ascertain il.OW
manl( 12COQle there are in the countrl(, where thel( are, where thCl( live,
how many of them are of working age, how many of them are emplored ,
in what occupations and industries and grades and so forth. In the sjlIJle
way information has to be compiled on the amount of fuel and raw ma-
terial used in industry and the value of the products made and sold, to-
gether with the resulting earnings and profit. For many purposes the sur-
vey must be widened out to cover not only Britain but the world bIIck-
ground. All this information has to be available promptly and adequarely,
so that any changes can be picked out without delay. On this basis fore-
casts are prepared of what will happen to production, to incomes, to em-
ploymen.t and so forth if current trends continue. All this correspondS to
the work of IntelligenCe in the Armed Forces.

(bl E. PENI)LlTON HEIlRING

Public Administration and the Public Interest"
The Bureau of Home Economics was Cleated to assist the secre-
tary of Agriculture in investigating "the relative utility I!Dd economf of
'Herbc:rt Morrison: "Economic Planning." Public Aclmim'mation, Spring 19>47,
vol. 25, p. 4. Reprinted by permission.
S E. Pendleton Herring: Public Administmtion and the Public Interest. Adal'ted
from pp. 247-48. Reprinted by permission of McGraw-Hili Book Company, Inc. COPY-
right, 1936, McCraw·HilI Book Company, Inc.
541 RESlAACH, UPORTINC, AND PU8I.1C ULATIOMS

agricultural products for food, clothing and other uses in the home." The
bureau grew out of the department's effort to help the fanner and his fam·
ily. The fanner was looked upon as a producer. Only in very recent years
has the idea arisen that the government has a responsibility toward the
consumer as such.
In November, 1933, the Bureau of Home Economics issued Cir·
cular 2¢ on Diets at Four Levels of Nutritive Content and Cost. This
study recommended diets in which the average use of wheat ftour was
discouraged and fruits and vegetables were stressed as highly important
foods. A number of bakers and millers interpreted the pamphlet as an
"insidious campaign against bread consumption," and accordingly brought
strong pressure on the Secretary of Agriculture to bave it suppressed. The
Millers' National Federation and the National Food Bureau sent a delega-
tion to see the secretary. A conference of Sermtors from the wheat states
was called and the entire Kansas delegation in the House of Representa-
tives joined the protest. The fight was taken to the Appropriations Com·
mittee of the House. A resolution was introduced to the effect that no
federal appropriations should be used to pay an official who advocated the
reduced consumption of any wholesome agricultural commodity. A de-
fender of this resolution stated: "It serves notice on the bureaucrats, male
and female, in the Department of Agriculture that if they do not quit
meddling with the food aptitudes and appetites of the American people,
their salary checks will stop coming. It hits the would-be autocrats of the
breakfast table, the dinner table, and the supper table in the only place
where they are vulnerable. It threatens their meal ticket."
This agitation was directed by the so-called National Food Bu·
reau, an agency supported by forty millers and one baker. The pages of tbe
Nortbwestern Miller carried detailed news of each move that was made
during the early months of 1935. Here is a fully documented account of
pressure upon administrative officials. Congress did not yield to the de-
mands of this ;ninority group. The bulletin on diets reached many thou·
sands of people, but officials in the Department of Agriculture had to pay
heavily in tinle and trouble. For nearly two years they had to defend their
position through conferences, letters, and speeches. The issue attracted
much attention among the millers and bakers; it meant little to the bread-
eaters and breadwinners of the country. Such episodes are enough to in-
duce a cautious attitude on the part of officials. The Bureau of Home
Economics has been the favorite butt of senatorial sarcasm on various
occasions. These officials would be very unwise to provoke further congres-
sional disapproval. They have no specific statutory responsibility for guard-
ing the health or wealth of consumers.

The most extensive and perhaps the earliest research device in the
United States was the national census required by the Constitution.'

• Constitution of the United States, Art. I, See. 3.

 ADMINtSTIAnoN

From the beginlling the American census was considered a source of

social, economic, and political data rather than an enumeration of
inhabitants only. In 1790 Madison wrote to Jefferson about the pro-
posed census law: "It contained a schedule for ascertaining the com-
ponent classes of Society, a kind of information extremely requisite
to the Legislator and much wanted for the science of Political Econ-
omy. . . . It was thrown out by the Senate as a waste of trouble and
supplying materials to idle people to make a book." Nevertheless,
the Senate reconsidered and the bill was passed.'·
Objection on similar grounds to the gathering of social and
economic information has continued down to the present. Opposi-
tion lobbyists and legislators sometimes offer as much resistance to
the collection and analysis of data, regarding employment, welfare,
health, and housing, as they do to the regulatory laws concerned.
Yet research continues, in spite of resistance and ridicule," and the
range of government statistics and research is constantly being en-
larged."

3. STATISTICAL RESEARCH AS A TOOL OF MANAGEMENT

The collection of statistics as a basis for administrative operations
is not a recent phenomenon. Thus, demographic and agricultural
data were used by the Medes and the Persians in moving their popu-
lation and in controlling their crops. Statistics were used even more
efficiently by ancient Inca administrators, to whom a mature "sys-
tem of records involving highly developed statistical procedures" has
been attributed." A more contemporary illustration of the use of
statistical research by management is presented by John J. Corson."
JOHN J. CORSON
"Th. Use of Statistics in Management" III
Some years ago I saw John Barrymore play the role of a high-
powered government administrator. He portrayed the administrator as one
1. White: The Federalists, Preface, p. vii.
11 See, for example, "The Federal Nut Department." Editorial, Chicago Tribune,
April 5, '9p. James M. Beck: Our Wonderland of Bureaucracy. New York: The
Macmillan Company; 1913, Chapters 6 and 7.
U Key: The Administration of Federal Grants to S!2tes, 1'1'. 379-80. F. R. Cowell:
"Govemment Departments and the Press in the U. S. A." Public Administration,
April '93', vol. 9, 1'1'. 214-27. John A. Vieg: "The Growth of Public Administra·
tion." Elements of Public Administration, p. ,6.
1J Eliott D. Chapple and Carleton S. Coon: PrinCiples of Anthropology. New
York: Henry Holt and Company; 1942, p. 353. P. A. Means: Ancient Civilizations
of the Andes. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons; '931.
" See Chapter '4.
.. John J. Corson: "The Use of Statistics in Management." .AdvaDced Manage·
_t, April19#. vol. 9, selected from 1'1" 74-78. Reprinted by permUsioo.
 RISEARCH, REPORTING, AND rulUC RELATIONS

having power and authority who directed people unhesitatingly with short
inspired commands and, in rapid succession, made momentous decisions
without effort or apparent consideration. The movie created the impres-
sion that the administrator is a master-mind in a swivel chair who manages
vast affairs by some congenital genius. But is this version of the admin-
istrator an accurate one? It is accurate to indicate that during a day, the
man responsible for the management of any unit is called upon to make
decisions promptly and definitely. Yet are these decisions founded upon
some indefinable, intuitive genius? Are they founded upon "hunch"?
Here, in many enterprises, dependence upon statistically-arrayed
facts ceases and the reliance upon "hunch" commences. But there are in
government, as in private enterprise, exceptions to this generalization. The
administration of old-age and survivors insurance under the Social Secur-
ity Act is one. This job consists of three functions, each of which can be
measured in terms of a clearly identifiable work unit. The first function is
the maintenance of insurance accounts for each of 76 million men and
women who have obtained social security account numbers; those indi-
viduals, despite their normal human idiosyncrasies, are tangible work
units. The second function is the handling of the claims filed when these
men and women get old or die. About a thousand applkations a day are
being filed for old-age and survivors insurance payments. These constitute
tangible, substantially identical work units also. The third function is two-
fold-( 1) seeing that each of the 900,000 aged people, widows and or-
phans whose claims have been approved receive their payments promptly
each month, even though some change their addresses frequently; and (1)
seeing that the large number of beneficiaries who die, go back to work, or
do something else that disqualifies them, do not get checks to which they
are not entitled.
The volume of work for each activity within these broad functions
can be determined with reasonable accuracy a year in advance. Each op-
eration then can be planned, budgeted and scheduled. An example is pro-
vided by the relatively simple operation of changing the address of each
beneficiary. We estimate 987,800 beneficiaries on our rolls by June 30,
1944. Three years' experience has indicated that 1.5 per cent of these
beneficiaries change their addresses each month, making a monthly work
load of 14,800 and a daily load of 616. On the basis of the experienced
production rate of 66 cases per day for each clerk, it is determined that
nine clerks must be budgeted for this operation. Using an average of 75
square feet per clerical employe, our present work space will have to be
increased proportionately; three additional filing drawers for the change of
address form must be provided; and 16,280 copies of this particular form
must be provided to cover this need including wastage.
All activities which make up the administration of old-age and
survivors insurance are not so mechanical. For instance, in 435 field offices
social security account numbers are issued, claims for benefits are received,
beneficiaries return checks to which they are not entitled, employers are
 ADMINISTRATION

requested to correct inaccurately submitted tax returns, and general in-

quiries from the public are answered. The field offices, most of which bave
less than six employes, carry on these several activities in varying propor-
tions. To what exte.nt can the work of such offices be quantitatively
scheduled and controlled?
Some will contend that such methods of work planning and
analysis cannot be applied to many types of activities. Certainly the de-
velopment of financial and operating plans in quantitative terms for ac-
tivities in which the work cannot be defined so precisely, such as reseafCh,
legal counsel, and general policy formulation, requires more ingenuity aild
effort. To determine the work units by which such activities can be meas-
ured and to visualize and estimate the volume of work to be planned for
and the time that work will call for, requires more downright me1ltal
effort and will not yield as exact a result. Yet, the effort required to think
through the tasks to be performed, and to plan for their accomplishment
is as essential to the effective performance of work in the fields of reseafch,
legal counsel, or policy formulation as in other activities. There are those
who will answer this contention with the reply that you cannot schedule
and plan creative work. But must we accept that conclusion?
Consideration here of the "use of statistics in manageme1lt,"
means any form of quantitative thinking and not necessarily the use of
tabulated data or involved techniques of mathematical analysis. With this
concept, the professional statistician may be dissatisfied, but the profes-
sional administrator will agree. The administrator must review periodically
the agency's operating experience, take stock of successes and failures,
appraise the accomplishments of each functional activity, and restate the
agency's objectives. That is an analytical job requiring the "systematic
compilation and use of facts and data" which is Webster's definition of
statistics.

Administrative experience shows that the significance of statisti-

cal research can be readily grasped by administrative personnel. Dur-
ing the early days of scientific police administration, Professor
Charles Merriam was defending the use of traffic statistics before a
group of suburban police chiefs. One. of the participants finally came
to his support with the following argument: "The prof is right;
statistics is great; I use 'em to expiain, and they can't answer me
back, because I've got the dope." ,.
The manager who fails to keep constantly abreast of the latest
data by means of statistical techniques and systematic research, is
handicapping himself not only in his current operations, but also in
meeting emergencies and in planning for the future.

,. Charles E. Merriam: "The Development of Theory for Administration." A.d·

vanced Management, July.September '940, vol. S. p. 131.
 RESEARCH, REPORTING, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

4. RESEARCH TECHNIQUE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SURVEY

Administrative research, survey, or investigation _involves a series

of specialized techniques, and as the following reading shows,' also a
large measure of personal tact. The authors are Harold Seidman,
staff member of one of the foremost Federal research agencies, the
Division of Administrative Management of the Bureau of the
Budget; and Louis E. Yavner, Secretary of New. York City's Depart-
ment of Purchasing, which is also responsible for a continuous and
intensive fact-finding program."

HAROLD SEIDMAN AND LOUIS E. YAYNER

"Investigator and Investigatee" 18
Nobody loves the investigator. Harassed department heads who
periodically find their agencies turned inside out by zealous visitors £tom
budget bureaus, departments of investigation, divisions of administrative
management, and special investigating committees are not at all impressed
by the theoretical argument that investigation is fundamental to the
exercise of executive contro!. Whatever their value may be to the execu-
tive, investigators are all too often considered by line officers· to'be either
time-consuming nuisances or ignorant busybodies.
While not always justified, the investigatee's attitude is wholly
understandable. The very word "investigation:: although it can be prop-
erly used to describe management studies and administrative research as
well as criminal investigations, has come to have a sinister sound to many
public officials. Legislative investigations in particular have not always
been free from political motivation, and some have been nothing more
than out-and-out witch hunts. Furthermore, an investigation inevitably
disrupts normal office routine. Time must be taken out from seemingly
more important duties to answer hundreds of questions, many of them no
doubt foolish, and to locate and dig out records and files.
Already troubled waters may be further muddied by the investi-
gator himself. Some investigators share only one thing in common with
the subjects of their inquiries-a mutual dislike and distrust. To them
all administrators are either pompous stuffed shirts or inefficient hacks.
Starry-eyed young administrative analysts fresh from graduate schools of
public administration are all too prone to scorn the opinions of a veteran
bureau chief, however excellent his record of achievement may be, merely

1T See Chapter 1;.

'" Harold Seidman and Louis E. Yavner: "Investigator and Illvestigatee." Public
Administration Review, Summer 1944, vol. 4, selected from pp. 234-37. Reprinted by
pcnnission.
546 ADMINISTRATION

because he is unfamiliar with such terms as "span of control," "scalar

control," and the rest of the jargon of the trade.
Serious as the differences which separate the investigator and the
investigatee may be, experience has demonstrated that they are by no
means irreconcilable. As in so many human affairs, a fear of the unknown
is frequently the root of the difficulty. This fear can successfully be dis-
pelled by a little missionary work by the director of the division of ad-
ministrative management, department of investigation, or other staff
agency. Wherever possible, he should make it a point to explain the
nature of the investigative process and the function of his agency to his
colleagues at informal conferences. He should encourage them to bring
their serious administrative problems to him of their own volition and,
where the department is large enough to warrant it, assist them in setting
up their own investigating units to make management studies.
This policy has been followed with good results by the Division
of Administrative Management of the United States Bureau of the Budget.
On problems of interest solely to one agency, the division assists chiefly
by providing leadership and incentives which will stimulate the agency
concerned to analyze and work out its own problems. At the same time,
the investigator's talent for fact-finding and administrative analysis is
supplemented by the investigatee's technical skill and knowledge of the
problems of his own agency. While the investigator retains responsibility
for the planning and conduct of the study, the investigatee actively par-
ticipates in all stages of the inquiry and assumes joint responsibility for the
conclusions and recommendations.
An investigation's ultimate success must be judged by the effec-
tiveness of its recommendations. A muckraker is content merely to point
out errors; the constructive investigator wants to remedy them. Improve-
ments cannot be achieved, however, without the active cooperation of the
department which must implement the recommendations. This coopera-
tion will not be forthcoming if the recommendations are promulgated in
such a way as to cause the department head to "lose face" if he accepts
them. No one likes to confess publicly his own inadequacy.
An opportunity should be extended to the department head to
rectify the more glaring weaknesses of his department prior to the sub-
mission of a formal report to the chief executive. The Department of
Investigation [of New York City) frequently makes informal oral sugges-
tions or recommendations to the commissioner whose department is being
investigated during the course of an inquiry. More often than not these
suggestions are accepted. In these cases it is noted in the report to the
Mayor that the "recommendations set forth in this report have been dis-
cussed with the commissioner and have already been adopted." \Vherever
possible, it is highly desirable to go over all of the recommendations with
the department head before they are made public. Issuance of the final
report and recommendations does not end the investigator's job. The
operating department will often require assistance in translating paper
547 RESEARCH. REPORTINC. AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

recommendations into fact. New rules and regulations may have to be

written and new forms prepared. Employees may have to be instructed
in the use of np.w books, forms, techniques, and procedures. Necessary
advice and help should be provided by the investigator within reasonable
limits.
The investigator is playing an increasingly important role in pub-
lic administration. So great are the responsibilities imposed on the chief
executive in modern government, whether he be the president, a governor,
or the mayor of a large city, that he needs what one writer has described
as "mOte ears, mme eyes, al,d more hands to aid him in the formulation
of his policies." Without the indispensable staff assistance provided by
the investigator, the executive department is not able to function properly.
Intelligent administration must be founded on information, not on belief.

Research is therefore more than a matter of scientific ts:chnique.

No matter how scientific a survey may be or how detached an in-
vestigation, administrators are always faced with the problem of
interdepartmental jealousies or personal relations which may prevent
the facts from "talking for themselves." Even though research is
conducted under scientific titles like "management research," or
"management audit," ,. it remains a managerial device with policy
and political implicabons of the first order.

5. STATISTICAL REPORTING AS A TOOL OF MANAGEMENT

To be fully effective for management control, facts and statistics

must be not only collected and analyzed-that is, "researched"-but
they must also be reported in some current manner so that compara-
tive progress can be measured and key problems recognized by the
executive. As Director of the Statistics'Division of the Federal Pub-
lic Housing Authority, Joel Gordon here describes how operating
statistics are converted into progress reports, and how progress re-
ports in turn may measure program results.

JOEL CORDON
"Operating Statistics as a Tool of Management" 21)

Management in large·scale undertakings has to be able to see the

end results of its operation-the forest in spite of the trees. Masses of

,. William D. Carey: "Control and Supervision of Field Offices." Public Admin·

istration Review, Winter 1946, vol. 6, p. '0-'4·
20 Joel Gordon: "Operating Statistics as a Tool of Management." Public Ad·
ministration .Review, Summer 1944, vol. 4, selected from pp. ,8<r<f3, 195. Reprinted
by permission.
S48 ADMINISTRATION

detailed operations have to be reduced to intelligible fonn-to simple

quantitative measurements that can be grasped. Statistical measurement
has become essential to management. Intelligent decisions on broad
questions of management demand broad over-all facts which quantitative
measurement alone can supply. In response to this need, another new
profession has emerged-that of the operating statistician.
Operating research programs vary, of course, in spet..'ific subject
content, which is determined by agency functions. Basically, however, the
same types of problems constitute the core of the research program, and
similar techniques roay be applied to their solution. This is understand-
able, since management neerls the answers to the same broad funda-
mental questions, whatever the setting, namely: (1) How much of the
job has been done, and how much yet reDl3ins to be done? (2) How
efficiently is the job being done-in terms of staff, cost, and time? (3)
How effecJively are the end objectives of the program being achieved-in
terms of the services being rendered?
To provide answers to these questions, operating research must
encompass:
1. Progress Reporting and Progress Analysis. This is usually the
major activity of an operating statistics unit; unfortunately, it is often the
sole function. Progress is relative and can be evaluated by roanagement
only in relation to (a) past progress, (b) progress of other organizations
or units within the same organization carrying on comparable programs,
( c) est2blished goals or schedules. Progress-reporting systems, therefore,
must provide for comparisons of current progress against past and sched-
uled progress. Reasons for failure to achieve schedule must be established
as a basis for administrative action.
2. Statistical Measurement and Analysis of Administrative Per-
formance. Management wants to know not only what the organization
has done, but how well it has done the job administratively. Has the job
been done with minimum staff, at least cost, in the shortest possible time?
Operating statisticians have an important contribution to make in pro-
viding measurements of performance for self-evaluation. The quality of the
job done is not normally susceptible to statistical measurement and must
be left to professional judgment, but the speed and economy with which
it is done can be measured with reasonable accuracy. The operating re-
search program should provide for statistical analyses in the following
fields: (a) workload, (b) comparative unit costs, and (c) time require-
ments of administrative operations. Unit-cost analysis is a synthesis of ac-
counting and statistics; it involves application of statistical, as well as ac-
counting, techniques to financial data.
3. Statistical Measurement and Analysis of Program Results. The
final test of the effectiveness of any organization is the extent to which it
achieves the public purposes contemplated in its program. Evaluating
program results is probably the most difficult from a technical viewpoint.
Few instances of an effective job can be found in this area. Program ob-
549 USURCH, REPORTINC, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

jectives afe not always explicit. When they are vague and general, they
must be made concrete before they become susceptible to statistical
measurement and analysis. While it is not the responsibility of the oper·
ating statistician to establish program objectives, he may serve as a catalyst
in forcing clearer thinking through of objectives. Without agreed-upon
objectives, a satisfactory social research program is hardly possible.
Simplicity of presentation of data for the busy executive and the
non-statistically minded operating official is essential if the reports are to
be read and used. This may mean waiving some of the formalities of pres-
entation developed by professional statisticians. Abbreviated tabular pres-
entation limiting the number of facts shown should be used whenever
possible. The statistical tables should not require study and analysis. The
problem to which the analysis purports to give the answer should be stated
explicitly and expressed in terms in which the operating official thinks.
The statistical reports should be written for the consumer and not for
other statisticians. The presentation of one central idea in a single report
is a useful device for feeding information in pill form; management should
not be overwhelmed by lengthy reports. The two-page report is probably
the best report. The operating statistician who prepares reports for "pll b-
lication" will soon cease to playa vital role in operations.

The unit responsible for operating statistics and progress report-

ing should be, according to Gordon, "an integral part of the executive
office" jf it is to "have authority to establish agency-wide systems, to
produce necessary data and to provide independent interpretation of
the facts." 21 The importance of administrative reporting for modcrn
management was appreciated by the American philosopher of
"dynamic administration," Mary P. Follett. She insisted that execu-
tives should utilize records and reports to control current operations,
to compile and classify managerial knowledge and administrative
experience, and to transmit to the rank and file this experience in
the form of efficient scientific methods and measurable standards of
performance."

6. PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC REPORTING IN THE UNITED STATES

Operating statistics and administrative reports compiled for the

use of internal management may also serve to inform businessmen or
stockholders-or a body of citizens in the casc of government reports.
Popular documents independent of internal admin.istrative reports
may be drafted de novo for public reporting. This type of reporting
has developed in the United States along distinctive lines, as de-
21 Gordon: "Operating Statistics," p. 190.
22 Follett: Dynamic Administration, pp. "7, 129.
sso
sco1>ed below by Professor Hennall C. Beyle of the ~n Cradu-
ate School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Sytacuse University.

BIRMAN C. 8EYLE
"Developments in the Direction of Impnwed Iteportin(,-
Having in mind primarily the reporting done by the officials of
American municipalities, one should point first to the developments in
reporting that may be designated by the phrase, the census idea. That is
to say, the preparation and publication of reports presenting a more or
less comprehensive body of classified data composed of "non-administra-
tive" as well as of administrative or operative statistics.
A second development in the reporting done by American mu-
nicipalities is that which may be referred to as the idea of a fiscal audit.
By this is meant the development and improvement of reports giving an
account of the fiscal operations of the government and affording the tax-
payer an opportunity to learn what has been done with his money.
Closely associated with the idea of a fiscal audit are three other
ideas that have influenced reporting. One is the idea of economy in re-
porting. In particular, the practice of publishing bulky reports that few
citizens ever read was attacked and in many instances ended. While in
the main this movement was a negative one, it did result in some construc-
tive developments, principally the requirement of simplicity and uniform-
ity in governmental printing.
A second idea that developed with that of a fiscal audit is the idea
of a planned system of managerial reports, going from the various points
in the administrative organization to the controlling executive, as an aid
in the control and direction of the administration, and also reports going
from these same points to the official or officials responsible for the formu-
lation and enforcement of a budget.
The third idea that grew up with the developments looking to
provision for a fiscal audit is that of a business-like account of administra-
tive experience, an account, not of fiscal operation only, but of all signifi-
cant operations of an office or agency.
Next, mention should be made of the monograph idea in report-
ing. This is a phrase that may be used to designate the developments in
the way of reporting which presents an account or description of a single
class of data or of a particular problem met with the conduct of govern-
ment.
Finally, there are the developments that may be spoken of as the

23 Herman C. Beyle; "Developments in the Direction of Improved Reporting."

Government Reporting. Selected from pp. '3-.8. Reprinted by permission of The
University of Chicago Press. Copyright, 1928, The University of Chicago Press.
SSI IlISEAJlCH, UPOIlTINC, ANI) PUILlC IlELATtONS

idea of popularized reporting. This is the idea that reports should be pre-
sented in a form that gives some assurance that they will be read, and that
they should be presented by any and all media that afford an effective
approach to the citizen's interest.

One of the historic origins for the public report by executive au-
thorities in the United States is the constitutional provision requiring
the President "from time to time to give to the Congress Informa-
tion of the State of the Union."" By constitutional practice and
politic:d courtesy, this provision has been converted into the Presi-
dent's message to Congress. The message contains the policy pro-
gram of the only nationally elected political leader of the country
and is treated as l1n outline of the Administration's legislative recom-
mendations. As a result of the development of radio and television,
the President's message has become a critically important public re-
port. The American state governor, the municipal mayor, and even
the professionally appointed city manager, have similarly engaged in
public reporting by sending messages to their legislative bodies or by
submitting special reports to their electorate. The practice seems to
have affected the level of international government. The duty of the
Secretary-General of the United Nations to "make an annual report
to the General Assembly on the work of the Organization" (which
is now also published as a public report), plus his power to "bring to
the attention of the Security Council any matter which in his opinion
may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security" ..
(which has dramatic public relations value in the light of world
opinion), may establish on a world basis the same pattern of public
reporting and publicity that characterizes the American system of
executive management.

7. PUBLIC REPORTS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION

When Professor Beyle completed his study of governmental re-

porting in 1928, public reports were seldom, according to his stand-
ards, "presented in a form which gives assurance that they will be
read." The inadequate state of municipal reports at that time was
depicted by Wylie Kilpatrick, a specialist in public finance and sta-
tistics who served in various university and government research
positions.

.. Constitution of the United States, Art. II, Sec. 3.

.. Charter of tbe United Nations, Arts. 98 and 99·
552 ADM.NISTRATtOft

WYLIE KILPATRICK
Reporting Municipal Government"
"Though he did know the market price, inch by inch, of certain
districts of Zenith, he did not know whether the fOlice force was too large
or too small, or whether it was in alliance with gambling and prostitution.
He sang eloquently the advantages of proximity of school buildings to
rentable homes, but he did not know-he did not know that it was worth
while to know-whether the city school-rooms were properly. heated,
lighted, ventilated, furnished; he did not know how the teachers were
chosen; and though he chanted: 'one of the boasts of Zenith is that we pay
our teachers adequately' that was because he had read the statement in the
Advocate-Times. Himself, he could not have given the average salary of
teachers in Zenith or anywhere else." (From Babbitt, by Sinclair Lewis.)
The picture in Babbitt's mind of the city administration of Zenith
was a hazy muddle not because of unconcern with political affairs; the
stubs in his check book would have totalled a fairly large sum of donations
for civic organizations. Sinclair Lewis has it that "he did not know-he did
not know that it was worth while to know"-how the city hall was run.
But if Babbitt had known that the knowledge was worth while? A good
bet was overlooked by the author of Babbitt when he failed to put his
hero on the trail of the essential facts of city government. The vainness
of Babbitt's search would have added an illuminating touch to the pic-
ture of Zenith.
Where would George Babbitt have turned for that knowledge?
Public reports? A commendable shelf of ponderous tomes back of the
office safe. Civic organizations? A long list of Zenith organizations, it was,
to which he belonged, with dues, banquets, conventions-and dues. News-
papers? If the city hall reporter had the facility and persistence to dig out
facts from city officers ready to tell what they wanted to tell, and if the
city editor was ready to sacrifice space to print fact articles, Babbitt would
have tracked down some details, more or less related, of municipal admin-
istration.
And finally there is the club, organized or informal. We can with
assurance picture Babbitt discussing the mayor and city council in this
place. There he would pick up "inside" stories at the dinner table: there
he would pass on the tip regarding street paving. George Babbitt would
have found his answer in what those next to him told him. And those
next to him would have passed on to him what they had been told. In
brief, gossip is today the medium through which information about public
affairs is largely transmitted. It may be the private gossip of public business
in club, pullman smoker, or subway; it may be public men whispering
about themselves with a detonating board conveniently·near to broadcast

2. Wylie Kilpatrick: Reporting MuniCipal Government. Mllllidpal Administration

Service, 19.8, Publication NO·9. selected from pp. 7, 9. Reprinted by permission.
553 ItfSEARCH, ItfPOttTINC, AND PUBLIC ..ELATIONS

the gossip; it may be a newspaper willing to dignify, by a date line, the

reporter's half-hour cnbbing from a report. Whatever the method, the
unrelated or unweighted fact, the story compounded of half verified rumor
and ill considered data is the basis around which opinion takes shape.

A generation later, public reporting and annual or periodical re-

ports of municipal expenditures and functions had reached a higher
state of refinement." A tendency existed to overemphasize compli-
cated fiscal data, to reproduce over-specialized departmental sum-
maries, and to exaggerate accomplishments rather than failures in
performance. But one of the most dramatic administrative develop-
ments during this period was the successful publication of the facts
of management for the dual purpose of winning public understanding
and effectuating public control.

8. TECHNICAL REPORTING AND PUBLIC REPORTING

These advances in public reporting were not so readily reflected

in the special reports on complex public issues and the technical
reports on specialized subjects. The problem involved in this type of
public reporting is presented by David Cushman Coyle, engineer,
economist, and public official.

DAVID CUSHMAN COYLE

"Information" 28

The weakness of technical reports as an instrument of democratic

government needs to be understood. Probably the chief obstacles to their
effectiveness lie in the time element and in the failure to obtain effective
publicity.
The temporary committee customarily publishes a report, which
is available to the public and to the legislature and is therefore likely to
have some effect on public opinion as well as,on the policies of the execu-
tive. A committee takes time and while time. passes the crisis that led to
the appointment of the committee may have'subsided, leaving the under-
lying maladjustments still uncured, but allowing public concern to be
diverted to more pressing questions. Thus the committee's weighty COll-
clusions are launched into an air pocket and take a nose dive into oblivion.
21 Clarence E. Ridley and Herbert A. Simon; "Specifications for the Annual
Municipal Report." International City Managers' Association, 1948. Joseph S. Toner:
"How Good Is Your Annual Report?" Public Management, November ;948, vol. 30;
pp. 3·8-21 .
.. David Cushman Coyle: "Information," Public Management in the New De-
mocracy, ,Adapted from pp. 51-53. (Fritz Morstein Marx, ed.) Reprinted by per-
mission of Harper & Brothers. Copyright, 1940, Harper & Brother•.
The classic example is the series of investigations of the soft-eoaJ industry
since H}OO. Any chronic maladjustment that manifests itself in. periodic
spasms is likely to show this phenomenon of ineffective technical study
by committees that are appointed during the sp3sm and report during the
subsequent period of quiet.
One may suspect, without citing instances, that sometimes an
executive may TesOrt to the initiation of research projects in order to avoid
the unpleasantness of facing facts. Quite often it appears that enough is
known already to justify the application of a remedy, but to a reluctant
executive the propensity of scientists of the pure type for never coming
to a final conclusion, offers an escape from responsibility through an appeal
to the revered name of scholarship. To the scientists who are honored by
an invitation to serve on an adviSOry committee, the possibility that they
are being used merely to raise a cloud of dust would not be apt to occur
until a later date. It is, however, necessary to recognize that an executive
may be in no hurry for a report and may be content with a report so volu-
minous and dull as to begin gathering dust while it comes off the press.
The scientist with an academic standing is often contemptuous
of the vernacular and feels himself degraded if his name is attached to
statements in the comparatively inexact language of the common people.
The weight and solidity of his volumes testify to the validity of his Ph.D.,
but do not cause Congressmen to get letters from their constituents in
support of the scientist's conclusions. To be successful, therefore, a com-
mittee should include a number of practitioners of applied science or
other less virginal arts who are not ahove writing a plain summary for the
long-suffering newspaperman. The fact is that truth may be mighty but
this is a noisy world and if truth wants to prevail she has to "have what
it takes."

The American system of committee reports ranges from the

special legislative investigating committee to the expert committee
which in some ca~es presents the popular type of report advocated
by Coyle. With less publicity, the British have attempted to accom-
plish the same results by means of the "royal commission," an in-
vestigating body which combines dignity and expertise and which
avoids the American shortcomings of the "partisan" origin of the
investigating body or "the rivalry between the executive and legisla-
tive branches of the government." .. Despite these defects, American
investigating committees and commissions have. frequently con-
ducted research of a nigh standard and have issued objective reports
on many controversial public matters .

.. Harold F. Gosnell: "British Royal CommissiQnJ of Inquiry." Political Science

Quarterly, March 1934, vol. 49. p. 118.
5SS RESEAltCH, REPORTINC, ANI) PU8LIC RELATIONS

9. PUBLICITY AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

That publicity and a more popular form of reporting can obtain

the necessary public support for the administration of government is
an American idea. Businessmen, too, have concluded that "the prac-
tice of public relations, during the past two decades, has been slowly
evolving and crystallizing into virtually a new science of business." ••
Business management has gone so far as to establish public relations
staff agencies as part of their "top-management" structure." Origi-
nally associated with the municipal reform movement of this period,
the technique of public relations in public management has experi-
enced a reinarkable development as shown in the following readings:
(a) A statement regarded by Professor Beyle as "one of the best
discussions to be found on the subject of general governmental re-
ports and reporting,"" was made in 1919 by Morris L. Cooke after
the beginning of his public service career as Director of Public Works
of the City of Philadelphia. (b) A broader definition of administra-
tive public relations was presented a generation later by Professor
William E. Mosher, Dean of the Maxwell Graduate School of
Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University.

(a) MOII.IUS L. COOKE

"Publicity" ..

Publicity is the backbone of progress. Our largest and most suc-

cessful private corporations are more and more taking the public into their
confidence. 111is includes facts both about the commodity sold and meth-
ods of operation. If it is a well-recognized fact that publicity brings rich
returns to large private corporations the case is no different in its essen-
tials when the corporation is the city. The city caters to the same cus-
tomers as do our industrial corporations, the public utilities and the rail-
roads. It behooves the public official to use to the utmost the opportunities
at hand for educating and influencing public opinion to a favorable im-
pression of the concern he represents.
With the widening of the field of government it becomes in-

so Bronson Batchelor: Profitable Public Relations. New York: Harper & Brothers;
1938, p. ix.
"Out of one sample of twenty·six corporations studied i~ 1941, thirtee!, had such
separate staff agencies. Holden, Fish, and SmIth: Top·Managemellt OrgamzatlOn and
Control, p. 45 .
.. Beyle: Governmental Reporting, p. '7·
.. Morris L. Cooke: "Puhlicity." Our Cities Awake. Selected from pp. 193-95·
Reprinted by permission of Doubleday, Page & Company. Copyright, 1919, Double·
day, Page & Company.
556
creasingly difficult to instruct the people as to the uses to which their
money has been put as well as those objects for which it is proposed to
expend future sums. A man in private business frequently answers toot he
does not have to give his reasons; sometimes he even resents being asked
for them. But a public official should beg for widespread discusSion of
public problems, for only in this way can he' get the necessary public
support for those plans deserving support. Too frequently the public has
either half information or misinformation.
There is probably no question affecting the administration of
American municipalities to-day which is of greater moment than this one.
We have to get rid of the now old-fashioned idea that advertising is a
crime.

(b) WILLIAM E. MOSHER

"Public Relations""
The scope of public relations, as we conceive it, involves mnch
more than the mere dissemination of information. The term is here tlIken
in a most literal sense as covering all relations with the public_ The acts
of service, whatever they may be, as well as the bearing and behavior of
those performing them, should be satisfactory to the public. Satisfaction
is a subjective state. To determine its presence or absence calls for expres-
sion on the part of those served. An enlightened public relations policy
will, therefore, seek to discover the state of mind of the public concerned
-by facilitating the expression of suggestions and grievances, by attitude
and opinion investigations, and by other means that have been developed
by the more progressive commercial concerns interested in consumer re-
actions. This phase of public relations has been pretty generally neglected
by public authorities.

Among the "other means" mentioned by Professor Mosher is the

fuller use of advisory committees to channel information or programs
to special groups of citizens; that is, to the clientele served or regu-
lated by the agency concerned." In his definitive work, Government
Publicity, Professor James L. McCamy has pointed out the neces-
sity of using the public relations program to avoid unfavorable pub-
licity and to advance public understanding that would neutralize
unjustified attacks upon public agencies'" As Dean Appleby has
.. William E. Mosher: "Public Relations." Public Relations of Public Personnel
Agencies. Report of Committee on Public Relations of Public Personnel Agencies,
p. 4. Reprinted by permission of Civil Service Assembly of the United States and
Canada. Copyright, '94', Civil Service Assembly of the United States and Canada.
35 Leonard D. White and Maure L. Goldschmidt: "Making Our Government
Efficient." Problems in American Life Series, Unit No. 12, National Education As-
sociation, p. 33 .
.. James L. McCamy: Government Publicity. Chicago: The University of Chi·
cago Press; 1939, pp. 3'-34.
557 ItUEARCH. REPORTING. AND PUILIC RELATIONS

demonstrated, "the pounding of public criticism is so intense, that,

more and more, government officials break under it." ar

10. LOCAL AND STATE PUBLIC RELATIONS

That political and personal relations constitute a vital part of

administrative publicity is demonstrated in the detailed public rela-·
tions practices of municipal and state agencies. These practices are
here described by (a) Elton D. Woolpert, a Federal administrative
official with extensive municipal research experience as a staff mem-
ber of the International City Managers' Association; and (b) Har-
old P. Levy, Director of Public Relations of the Department of
Public Welfare of the State of Pennsylvania.
(a) ELTON D. WOOLPERT
Municipal Public Relations ,.

The importance of personal contacts between citizens and [mu-

nicipal] employees cannot be stressed too strongly. The city as an institu-
tion or the policies of cities as such do not make a very definite impres-
sion upon most citizens. It is not until the citizen has contact with some
representative of the institution in the administration of some policy that
the city government becomes a reality to the citizen. It must be remem-
bered that in every citizen-official contact the city employee is representing
the city. In the eyes of the citizens he is, for the time being, the city. What
he does and how he does it are therefore of vital importance to the public
relations program.
The clerks and cashiers who handle the majority of citizen callers
at the city hall have a big public relations load to carry. From a public
relations point of view, police officers hold a position of peculiar impor.
tance. In a sense the police officer personifies the city government, for his
work requires him at various times to represent the law and the regulatory
and service aspects of city government. Furthermore, his uniform and his
presence in all parts of the city make him a particularly conspicuous mu-
nicipal servant. The domineering, I-am-the-Iaw attitude of many officers
is undoubtedly responsible for the fear and hostility with which so many
members of the public regard the police. Training and discipline in police
courtesy is therefore an important part of the public relations program.
Although firemen have fewer personal contacts than police officers, their
number, their uniforms, and their presence in all sections of the city make

., Appleby: Big Democrncy, p. 37.

"Elton D_ Woolpert: Municipal Public Relations. SeJected from pp. 14. 16-'7.
Reprinted by permission of The InternationaJ City Managers' Association. Copyright.
'940, The International City Ivlanagers' Association.
558
them important public relations agents. In their actual fire fighting activi-
ties they are playing dramatic roles that have natural publicity and public
relations appeal. In addition to firemen on inspection duty, most cities
have a number of other officials who carry on inspectional activities in the
fields of health,"weights, and measures, building construction, etc. Here
again the considerations of appearance, manner of treating the citizen, and
the ability to explain the why of the service and to answer questions re-
garding the employee's own department and other city activities have a
direct bearing on public relations.
The engineers and laborers engaged on city construction projects
are seldom considered as having any public relations importance, but they
can be very useful contact employees. Construction activities hold a pe-
culiar fascination for many people, as is evidenced by the crowd that will
always gather to watch a steam shovel at work. Superintendents or fore-
men in charge of such projects are frequently questioned as to the nature
of the project, its purpose, its cost, and so forth. Furthermore, the con-
struction of such projects may often give rise to citizen complaints. Not
only the noise and dust which annoy neighboring householders but also
any infringement on private property rights may be the cause of com-
plaints. It is certainly in the interests of public relations to see that
superintendents and foremen are well informed and able to answer
questions and that they have a clear understanding of their authority and
limitations in handling complaints.

(b) HAROLD P. LiVY

A Study in Public Relations sa
Of all its separate publics none is more important to the Depart-
ment than the state legislature, The General Assembly of the Common-
wealth of Pennsylvania, for that body controls the destiny of the state
assistance program. The legislature meets in regular session biennially and
the subject of relief is always a major consideration. Therefore, the state
office gives all-out personal attention to each legislative session. The secre-
tary and public relations director alike cultivate good personal relations
with legislators and political leaders by being helpful. Over a period of
time they have come to be relied upon as experts in the subject of relief,
with which the lawmakers are so frequently concerned. Legislators call
upon them for advice, and it is not unusual for members of the House or
Senate to request factual information to incorporate in their speeches.
While greatly accelerated during legislative sessions, service to all mem-
bers of the General Assembly continues throughout the year_ The Depart-

sa Harold P. Levy: A Study in Public Relations. Adapted from pp. 58-6., 98---99,
113-'4. Reprinted by permission of Russell Sage Foundation. Copyright, '943, Russell
Sage Foundation.
 RESEARCH, REPORnNG, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

ment keeps them posted on developments in the assistance program with

copies of its monthly bulletins, weekly statistical reports, and selected
news releases which go to them routinely.
Despite its active participation in legislative affairs, the Depart-
ment carefully keeps out of the area of actual lobbying. It refrains from
"buttonholing" tacties. Rather, it endeavors to provide a kind of personal
service, confining its attentions mainly to the Welfare Committee of each
house where bills relating to public assistance undcrgo their legislative
"grooming."
Of the several well-kno\l<'I1 public-reporting media available to a
state agency-including newspapers, radio, exhibits, films, publications,
and the spoken word among others-the Department of Public Assistance
places greatest emphasis upon the press. The Department's news reports
fall generally into two classifications:
( 1) Routine releases, which, as the name implies, are reports
regularly issued about the public assistance program and the agency's own
operations. These are considered a public information standby.
(l) Special releases which differ from the routine type essentially
in timing and content. These may be used to report spot news. They may
be designed to correct misunderstandings or misstatements_ Or they may
be focused upon major developments which the Department wishes to
point up or feels it should bring to public attention. In a sense, therefore,
special releases may be' intended to build popular support for the assist-
ance program at the same time that they inform the public about it.
The cordiality established hy the chief of public relations with
the men of the news room works to their mutual advantage. Representa-
tives of the press depend upon him for news and background information
helpful or necessary in their work; he depends upon them to distribute
Department news throughout the state and to provide tips and leads from
behind the political scene. The public relations chief uses every oppor-
tunity to talk to wire service men off the record about the assistance
program and its problems. He studies the special interests of individual
men, and collects exclusive information for them on their specialties.

Governmental publicity has freely employed-some citizens think

too freely-the same devices used by commercial advertising, in-
cluding printed reports, public addresses, radio announcements,
motion pictures, exhibits, and tours.'· As Woolpert and Levy suggest,
however, in the long run no safer vehicles exist for effective public
relations than (1) smooth administrative service rendered daily to
the public, and (2.) candid and continual clearance of information
with the policy-making body .

.. Woolpert: Municipal Public Relations, p. 42- Council of State Governments:

Advertising by the States. Chicago: 1948.
11. A NATIONAL PROGRAM OF PU8UC INFORMATION

The formulation of public opinion by Federal bureaucrats has at

times alarmed Congress. In order to prohibit or curtail expenditures
for public relations personnel or publicity, Congress has often at-
tached prohibitory riders to appropriation bills."However, under the
guise of "information," "publication," "education," or "education
research," Federal public relations personnel and agencies have con-
tinued to thrive in certain departments and bureaus. Public relations
has thus become an inevitable and essential tool of administrative
management."" An outstanding example of governmental public re-
lations is the overall information agency evolved during domestic
crisis and world war. The rich propaganda experience of the United
States during World War I was extended during World War II,"
not only with reference to enemy propaganda, but even more elabo-
rately in domestic public information programs. The main admin-
istrative vehicle for this purpose was the Office of Government
Reports, established in 1939 as part of the Executive Office of the
President and directed by Lowell Mellett, one of the nation's leading
journalists.

LOWELL ME1.LETT

"The Office of Government Reports""

The need for machinery through which the citizen can get in-
formation about all departments of the government is one that has been
proved abundantly during recent years. In the current defense program,
as during the recovery program of 1932. and subsequent years, it was not
only the crank who looked for help of this kind. Businessmen seeking
information about purchasing and regulatory agencies, state and local
government officials wanting to know which departments were under·
taking work that impinged on their programs, and private citizens and
unofficial organizations of all kinds desiring guidance to the sources of
data that vitally affected their interests, all had a legitimate reason for
w-anting a single center of information to which to turn. The need for
clearance of infornl3tion between the federal government and the public,
however, was not altogether a private need. Federal agencies from the
President and Congress to bureau officials and research workers needed
.. Key: Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, pp. 7'4-'5.
<2 McCamy: Government PubliCity. p. 7 •
.. Harold D. Lasswell: Propaganda Technique in the World War.' New York:
Alfred A. Knopf; '927. .
.. Lowell Mcllett: "The Office of Government Reports." Public Administllltion
Review, Winter 1941, vol. I, selected from pp. 126-31. Reprinted by permission.
561 RESEARCH, REPORTING, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

to know what J:he public was thinking and doing about the various gov-
ernmental programs so that the programs could be founded on democratic
cooperation rather than on government fiat. Each federal agency, further-
more, needed to know what the others were doing, and it was obvions
that a central office to provide clearance for such information would save
a tremendous amount of time and work.
The first effort to set up machinery to meet these needs resulted
in the establishment of the National Emergency Council, of which the
U. S. Information Service was a part. There had been earlier and less
formalized efforts, of course, such as the preparation of the "YeHow
Journal," a daily collection of press clippings that "'3S compiled in the
White House in the days of Theodore Roosevelt. But the National
Emergency Council provided a more adequate system of exchange of
information. The functions are carried out through the three operating
divisions of the Office of Government Reports: (1) The Division of Field
Operations, with thirty-four state and regional offices which serve as cen·
tral contact points in the field for citizens and for representatives of
federal, state, and local governments; (2) the Division of Press Intelli·
gence, which maintains for distribution to government officials the only
permanent chronological press record on national affairs for the past seven
years; and (3) the United States Information Service, which provides in
Washington and New York a central clearing house for inquiries con-
cerning all branches of the government.
The headquarters office of the Division of Field Operations super-
vises the coordination, liaison, reporting, and informational activities
of its state directors. It informs federal agencies of problems reported by
state directors, and assists in the adjustment of these problems. It clears
legislation proposed by federal agencies for enactment by state legislatures,
and prepares for the information of federal agencies concerned reports on
state legislation which may directly or indirectly affect their operations.
It supplies state directors with information to enable them to serve as
central clearing houses through which individuals, organizations, state or
local governmental bodies, and the field offices of other federal agencies
may transmit inquiries and complaints and receive advice and information.
To assist the field offices to answer the maximum number of
questions with the minimum delay, the Washington office studies the
informational publications and releases of all federal agencies daily, and
selects and forwards to the field those which will be helpful. Because
many local papers do not carry an adequate presentation of federal news,
a daily "Information Digest" summarizing the preceding day's develop-
ment is sent to all field offices, and even in Washington it is useful enough
to be requested by a large group of ranking officials. "This Week in De-
fense," a weekly summary of defense developments, now goes to more.
than 2,500 officials in Washington and the field. \\lben state directors
report a particularly heavy demand by the public for information not
covered in regular publications of the various agencies. information is
prepared to meet the demand. Other publications of the office bring
together information and statistics which are available in'no one federal
agency. The Informational Handbook is a collection of statistics on sub-
jects of general interest to students and writers, covering national income,
public debt, farm income, employment, cost of living indices, and interest
rates of federal agencies. Activities of Selected Federal Agencies, 1933:-
~940, is a brief outline of the operations of the more important emergenCY
and recovery agencies.
Of equal importance is the function of reporting to the admin-
istration what citizens, groups of citizens, and state and local govern-
ment officials think of the work of federal agencies. To that end, during
the past year state directors prepared and the Division of Field Operations
summarized and analyzed twelve nation-wide reports and several hundred
special reports covering limited areas or problems, to keep the President
and other officials informed of public reaction to various federal agencies
and programs.
Another activity of the Office of Government Reports is the clear-
ance of bills proposed [by federal agencies] for .submission to state legisla-
tures, to enable state participation in federal programs. Proposed bills are
examined from the point of view of policies and objectives. Where there
appear to be duplications in proposals for the same state, the sponsoring
agencies collaborate in preparing composite redrafts; where proposals may
affect the operation of other federal agencies, the agencies concerned are
consulted and, if necessary, conferences are arranged to work out satis-
factory adjustments.
The field offices of the O. G. R. sponsor a series of broadcasts
entitled "U. S. Government Reports." This year fifty-one fifteen-minute
interviews have covered the activity of thirty-four agencies and bureaus,
and a series of fifteen electrical transcriptions on the national defense
program has been broadcast over some 2.50 stations throughout the United
States.
The Division of Press Intelligence provides for government of-
ticiaIs-executive, legislative, and judicial-a central clipping bureau
through which is available an accurate survey of editorials and news items
in the principal newspapers throughout the country. The Daily Bulletin
provides an index of news and editorial comment on public affairs. The
items are gathered from 350 daily newspapers of key cities throughout the
country. If an official wishes to see all comment on a certain subject over
a period of months or even years, the clippings, sometimes several hundred
or even several thousand, can be taken from the file and delivered to him
promptly. As an example of the scope of this service, during the first eleven '
months of 1<}40, 152.,799 clippings were sent to members of Congress.
Special research is provided upon request. In 1<}40, over l,900
requests for special research were filled. Magazine Abstracts, a weekly
summary of articles and editorials on government affairs from fifty weekly
and .monthly magazines, is distributed to over 1,200 members of Congress
 HSEARCH, ItlPORTINC, AND PUBLIC RELAnONS

and government ollicials. At the request of the State Department three

hundred copies are mailed each week to representatives in the foreign
~ervice to enable them to keep in touch with national affairs. Considerable
time and effort are saved government offices and the public by the publi.
cation of the United States Government Manual. Published by the Service
three times annually and sold by the Superintendent of Documents, the
manual is a reference book on the creation and organization, functions,
and activities of all branches of the government.
The special interest group can always maintain a skilled repre·
sentative to keep it acquainted with the aspects of the federal govern-
ment with which it is concerned. The general public, on the other hand,
looks to the President as the responsible Chief Executive of the federal
government, an official to whom it is appropriate to direct advice, com·
plaints, or request for information regarding any executive department or
agency. Likewise, only the President can appropriately provide for the
interchange of information among the various parts of the executive
branch. To enable the responsible Chief Executive to meet these needs,
the Office of Government Reports was established as a division of his
Executive Office; its experience, and that of the agencies whose duties it
inherited, have proved that it has a permanent and important function
to fulfill in the American system of government.

Supplementing this publicly administered system of public in-

formation was the govern..ment sponsored but privately managed War
Advertising Council. Although the Office of Government Reports
was discontinued, the Advertising Council's program continued into
the post-war period and publicized quasi-public campaigns for the
sale of savings bonds, the recruitment of student nurses, and the pre-
vention of accidents'"
The basic problem remains whether government, aside from
periods of national crises, should share more completely in the Ameri-
can system of "freedom of the press." The "founding fathers" were
less alarmed than some of their descendants by systematic public
information of this type. The original purpose of the entire system
of Federal post roads was frankly to provide a means of communi-
cation for the dissemination of laws, public documents, and even
"political information." Washington and his Secretary of State,
Timothy Pickering, thus distributed the unprecedented number of
10,000 copies of the American instructions and dispatches in the
XYZ affair in order to support their policy directed against revolu-
tionary France in 1798."
II Theodore S. Repplier: "Advertising Dons Long Pants." Public Opinion Quar·
terly, Fall 1945, vol. 9, pp. 269-78. J. H. R. Pimlolt: "Public Service Advertising."
Public Opinion Quarterly, SU\llmer 1948, vol. 12, pp. 208-'9.
"White: The Federalists, pp. 106, 175-76,482,508.
 ADMINISTRATION

12. THE HANDLING OF PUBLIC COMPLAINTS

In addition to its positive purpose, publicity has a preventive func-

tion in avoiding public misunderstanding or answering misstate-
ments or complaints. What is the best public relations policy to
follow in dealing with public complaints? A variety of administra-
tors' responses in such instances is illustrated in the following: (a) the
serious response, by Alfred H. Stone, Chairman of the State Tax
Commission of Mississippi and student of history and governmental
affairs; (b) the semi-serious response, by Earl H. Barber of the staff
of Electrical Utilities in Reading, Massachusetts, an engineer in-
terested in psychology; and (c) the humorous response, by Leon
Hornstein, who served the city of Chicago for many years as First
Assistant Corporation Counsel.

(a) Letter from the Mississippi State Tax Commission to Mr. John
T. Kimball, April 20, 1945"
We do not regard this Commission as a mere tax gathering ma-
chine, functioning without human impulses. We have sought, rather, to
breathe the breath of life into its operations, to humanize its functions,
to make of it an agency of useful social service to all the people with whom
we deal. We like to think that we collect taxes primarily FOR the people
of Mississippi, rather than FROM them. We believe that the taxpayers
should be given the benefit of the doubt, in matters wherein reasonable
differences of opinion arise. We believe that the confidence and the c0-
operative good-will of the taxpaying public are just as valuable assets to
the State of Mississippi, and to this Commission in its efforts to serve the
State, as customer goodwill is to a commercial business or to an industrial
enterprise. We believe that the continued faithful adherence to our
humanized policy of social service in tax administration will eventually
prove as materially valuable to the State as similar policies are in the
business world.

( b) EARL H. BARBER
"The Education of a Public Servant""
Undoubtedly I had the requisite technical knowledge, but was
that enough? Those who assigned me the task of dealing with such com-
n Letter from the Mississippi State Tax Commission to Mr. John T. Kimball,
April 20, 1945. "A SynopSis of the Tax Laws of Mississippi Relating to the Manu·
facturing Industry." Bulletin of the State Tax Commission, April 20, '945, p. 4 .
.. Earl H. Barber: "The Education of a Public Servant." The Tournai of Land and
Public Utility Economics, August 1936, vol. 12, selected from pp. '38-39. Reprinted
by permission.
 RESEARCH, REPORTINC, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

plaints against gas and electric companies as reached the State House
evidently thought it was, or at least hoped it might he. I hoped so too. But
a sense of bleak incompleteness came over me when I confronted my first
client.
She was a tall woman: taU, angular, and determined.
"Me bill is too big."
"What makes you think so?"
"The size of it."
"I know, but what makes you think it's oversize?"
"Here, look at it yourself, if you think I can't read!"
And that, according to her notion, was that. She had presented
her case, she had proved it with indisputable evidence; all that remained
was for me to execute judgment. She settled hack in her chair to supervise
the execution, and I, with what might pass for weighty consideration,
settled back into mine.
What could be done in a case like this? Tell a woman who wore
a hat like Queen Mary's that all gas meters were tested, sealed, and
recorded by the state before they were placed in service? Show her the
sustained accuracy that meters revealed, decade after decade, in check
tests made in response to thousands of complaints like hers? Tell her that
the law required gas to be sold by meter: that the meter was installed for
her protection? Tripe, baloney, and don't you think you're smart!
My bill is too big-There it is-Read it yourself ... Before that
dominating conviction what logic could stand?
None. None whatever. The mentality confronting me across the
desk was not susceptible to logic: it was simple, elemental. It was an
unreasoning, primal thing like one of nature's laws; existing, self-sufficient,
beyond reach of human rationalization.
And over in the offices of the gas company, across the river, was
just such another state of mind. She's used the gas: now let her pay
for it!
Between them there was little to choose. One, of course, had the
force of logic, but it was clear even to the technically trained mind that
the realm of logic had been left behind. What logic was there in a com-
pany's holding its work done when unfinished business, crude and ele-
mentary as this, remained to be handled at public expense?
I thought of the president of the cdmpany sitting in his paneled
office, precise and immaculate under the oil portrait of his predecessor,
push buttons bringing every department of the huge corporation at his
call. 1 thought of him, I thought of the tolerant grin he would bestow on
my predicament, and at the thought reached for the telephone.
That the president was peeved at the interruption did not bother
me in the least; I was peeved myself.
"One of our customers is here, Sir, with a bill that's too big."
"Well, what of it? My own bill is too big, but I can't do anything
but pay it!"
566 A.MINISTRATION

"That's where you're wrong. You ean do something. You ean

make a complaint to this office like anyone else. If you come right away
you can take care of this customer, too, without making a special trip for
the purpose I"
For .an appreciable time the telephone whispered phantom
sounds of its own devising. Then came a cautious inquiry.
"Is it a him or a her?"
"The latter, and how!"
"Where does she live?"
"Sullivan Street; Number 2.8; down by the docks."
"All right," came the response, eautious no longer, but hearty and
confident. "Ask her when I can see her at home. When it will be entirely
convenient for her. Be sure about that. Tell her I'll suit my time to hers."
And that night at the lodge room of the Mortar Mixers' and Hod
Carriers' Union, Patrick Finnegan would take a Partagas out of his pocket,
eye it critieally, and announce, "Well, boys, I guess I'll have me a smoke
ava real seegar."
"Where were ye after stealin' that?"
"It's one av thim give l' me by me friend Alton Wells,' the Presi·
dent av the Gas Company. . . . Me and him had a bit av business he
come l' the house l' see me about this noon."
Meanwhile what of the big bill, or what of the complaint that
had been such an impasse? Forgotten. Forgotten completely, or if remem-
bered at all, recalled in the roseate haze of an attention not to be reckoned
in terms of dollars and cents. It wasn't a big bill, really; it was just some-
thing to talk about in the absence of something more exciting.
So much then for my first big-bill complaint. But what of those
to come? Alton Wells couldn't spend all his time making pastoral calls.
But he wouldn't need to. When he returned to the office he would press
one of the buttons on his desk, and the head of the customers' bureau
would qualify as his substitute thereafter.

(c) Letter from Leon Hornstein to Hugo F. Arnold, June 8, 1931~

Your letter of June 1, 1932, addressed to Hon. A. J. Cermak,

mayor of Chieago, was referred by him to the law department for reply.
You state that the members of your association have read "with
interest and deep concern" the report carried in some newspapers to the
effect that the mayor, in discussing the school situation with certain
newspaper men, made some alleged disparaging remarks about sausages.
It is said that he associated dogs with sausages, and that while he probably
did not intend any reflection on this delectable article of food, said by you
to be one of the favorite items of the diet of the Ameriean people, such
Bippant renIarks about dogs and sausages have a tendency to raise doubts
.. Letter from Leon Hornstein to Hugo F. Arnold, Juue 8, '93%. City of Chicago:
Corporation Counsel's Opinions, vol. '44, p. 648.
 RESEAR.CH, R.EPORTINC, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS

in the minds of persons not well informed, especially children, as to the

materials that enter into the composition of a well-regulated sausage.
Your own letter was supplemented by one from Mr. \\T. H.
Gausselin, of the Institute of American Meat Packers, who says that "the
industry feels that the association of dogs and sausage is an unpleasant
one and one which is decidedly unfavorable to the use of .our product."
Thus, it appears that there were two formidable organizations that flew
to the defense of the sausage when slandered.
It may be stated most emphatically that the mayor had no in-
tention of making an attack designed to injure the reputation of even the
most insignificant and least understood sausage. He assures us that he has
made onslaughts on sausages, but that they were of a different kind, and
he found them pleasant and wholesome, so that he knows that with dogs,
as with humans, any association with sausages results from the sausages
being in the dogs instead of the dogs being in the sausages. Nor did the
mayor expect for a moment that what he said would add to the discussion
that has gone on about the contents of sausages from time immemorial, a
discussion which in more recent years has simmered down to a better
understanding of sausages, so that they are now playfully referred to on all
hands as "hot dogs," just as many well-liked individuals are sometimes
fondly called "sly dogs," "jolly old dogs" or "true blue dogs." The mayor
even said that he likes them so well that if he takes any stand on the
question at all it will be a hot dog stand. In the face of such a strong
affection as he now professes for sausages there is no need for further
vindication or retraction.
We hope this letter of explanation will have the effect of restoring
the public's confidence in sausages.

Administrators cannot always be so light-hearted. When serious

issues are at stake, when the complaint is unjustified, or when there
is misrepresentation of the facts by the complainant, a serious but
respectful answer is advisable. Reviewing his experience in this con-
nection one administrator explained: "Invective we could laugh off;
inaccuracies we felt obliged to answer." ••

SUMMARY

Research, reporting, and public relations are newer managerial

functions, necessary to the executive who appreciates the imp?rtance
of facts, of operational statistics, and of purposeful reportmg. So
important are these techniques for modern management that .m.ost
administrators conduct publicity functions through staff speCialists
or agencies attached directly to them rather than through a subordi-
5\) Dimock: The Executive in Action, p. 117.
 ADMINISTUl'ION

nate department head. The danger here is the usual one of the stall
agencies displacing the line when they are not qualified to do so.
Cases have been reported where powerful publicity offices have
changed the wording of public releases and thereby tampered with
the organization's policies. Dangers and defects are thus inherent in
the type of publicity that merely propagandizes or distorts the facts,
in routine reports that remain unread or unacted upon, in research
for the sake of research.
Mistakes in handling the primary management techniques such
as the budget, personnel, or planning functions accumulate more
slowly; but a serious enor in publicity or public reporting may strike
with sudden disaster. On the positive side, nothing can be of greater
assistance to the long-run success of an administrator than smoothly
conducted day-by-day relations with his clientele or public, and a
constant, frank sharing of information with the policy-making body
and electorate.
 CHAPTER EIGHTEEN

LEGAL PROCEDURES

IN ADMINISTRATIVE AFFAIRS, citizens and officials are constantlv in-

volved with regulations, orders, licenses, inspections, and othei ad-
ministrative devices. In the United States in particular, where the
search has always been for "a government of laws" and not merely
"a government of men," legal procedures pervade the whole admin-
istrative process. One political scientist has stated: "The real con-
tribution of modern democracy is not in the development of new
principles, or what the lawyer calls 'substantive' law, but rather in the
development of 'procedural' law-the implementation of broad
philosophical principles with concrete administrative machinery." 1
With the growth of government regulation of business and the in-
creasing public responsibility of private enterprise, legal procedures
have become as essential a part of business management as public
management. These legal procedures are both limitations upon ad-
ministration and instruments of effective management.

I. ADMINISTRATION AND LAW

The primary problem is the position Qccupied by the lawyer in·

an administrative agency. An answer to this question as it relates to
public administration is coutained in the report issued in 1941 by

1 David M. Levitan: "PolitiaJl Ends and Administrative Means." Public Adminis-

tIation Review, Autumn '943, vol. 3, p. 3;6.
569
570 ADMINISTIATION

the President's Committee on Civil Service Improvement, headed

by Supreme Court Justice Stanley Reed.

PRESIDENT'S COMMITTE!! ON CIVIL SERVICE IMPROVEMENT

"The Government's Lawyers" •
We have been forcibly impressed by the pervasive role played by
the lawyer in the administration of the American Government. Every
branch of the Federal Government proceeds under'specific statutory au-
thority, and every statute and every executive action is subject to the
limitations of the Constitution. There inevitablx arise a swarm of legal
problems around every officer charged with administrative responsibility.
Legislation must be construed; proposed acts or regulations must be
drafted; hearings must be held; legal opinions must be prepared; litigation
must be conducted. The lawyer, in contrast with the ordinary professional
employee of the Government, is inevitably throWIi into the heart of the
policy-making process and of necessity has an important, and often a
controlling, voice in the major issues of his department or agency.
The legal staffs have a great variety of functions to perform,
many of which require wholly different talents or capacities. Upon the
shoulders of one attorney or another fall the diverse functions of legal
research, negotiations with members of the public and other departments
or agencies, opinion writing, investigative work, the preparation of briefs
for litigation, the conduct of hearings, advice to administrative officers,
the argument of cases in appellate courts, and the drafting of regulations
and legislation. No man can have an aptitude for all of these functions; a
good lawyer must be proficient in many.
Of perhaps greater importance is the fact that none of these
duties is one which permits adequate performance by mechanical pro-
ficiency alone. To a greater or less degree, each task can be well done only
if the attorney brings to its solution not only the techniques of his trade
but also the imponderable qualities of imagination, judgment, and dis-
crimination. We do not suggest that the legal profession stands alone in
its dependence upon these qualities. But we do feel that the role of the
lawyer in our Government places an extraordinary emphasis upon the
need of these intangible abilities.

The pervasive role of the law and the lawyer has a distinct in-
fluence on the nature of the whole administrative process.

2. THE FUNCTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT

The nature of the administrative process from the legal point of
view was described in greater detail when the above report was issued
2 "The Government's Lawyen;." Report of President's Committee on Civil Service
Improvement. February '94', 77tb Cong., 1St Sess., House Document No. 118, p. 31.
571 LEGAL PROCEDURES

by the Attorney General's Committee on Administrative Procedure.

The chairman of the latter committee was Dean Acheson, later Sec-
retary of State; its director was Professor Walter Gellhorn of Co-
lumbia University Law School.

ATTORNEY CENERAL'S COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATIVE

PROCEDURE
"Some Characteristics of Administrative Agencies'"

Most administrative agencies are, of necessity, large organizations.

For example, the Interstate Commerce Commission has a personnel of
more than 2,500; the Securities and Exchange Commission, more than
1,200; the Social Security Board has some 9,000 employees in its Bureau
of Old-Age and Survivors Insurance alone.
The Interstate Commerce Commission receives, analyzes, and
files thousands of rate schedules, inspects thousands of locomotives and
safety appliances, receives thousands of applications to be allowed to do,
or to be excused from doing various things, receives complaints, conducts
investigations. The work of the Social Security Board is even greater. It
keeps literally millions of records, and will soon dispose of eight or nine
hundred thousand claims a year. The Grain Standards Administration
supervises over a million gradings of grain a year. These are perhaps strik-
ing illustrations, but they are not unrepresentative of the administrative
field.
Whether an agency is establishing the records or making the
decisions upon which claims will be paid, or regulating an industry, or
enforcing standards of conduct which cut across industrial divisions, it is
made up of a large number of people performing a variety of tasks which
have to be coordinated, supervised, and directed toward fulfilling the func-
tions prescribed by Congress. Out of this solid fact of size, in terms of
personnel, flow many of the problems of internal organization and delega-
tion of authority.
Every administrative agency is charged with administering or en-
forcing, in the field which Congress has marked out for it, provisions of
law which affect private interests. To do this requires the investigation and
decision of great numbers of particular cases. In most of these, resort may
be had to formal proceedings with t.estimony of witnesses, stenographic
record, briefs, arguments, and findings of fact or opinion. But despite the
fact that formal procedure is generally available, it is of the utmost impor-
tance to understand the large part played by informal procedure in the
administrative process. In the great majority of cases an investigation and
a preliminary decision suffice to settle the matter. Comparatively few cases

• Attorney Gener.tl's Committee on Administrative Procedure: "Some Character-

istics of Administrative Agencies." FinaJ Report of Attorney Generafs Committee on
Administrative Procedure, '94', adapted from pp. 18, 35·
572 ADMINISTRATION

flower into controversies in which the parties take conflicting positions

of such moment to them that resort is necessary to the procedure of the
courtroom.
In the field of taxation, for example, the Treasury receives mil-
lions of income-, estate-, and gift-tax returns each year-in 1939, 7,600,000.
Hundreds of thousands of adjustments are made in them. Yet in 1939
only 4,854 appeals were filed in the Board of Tax Appeals and 900 in the
courts. In labor relations one might expect a high percentage of contested
cases, yet in the first four years of itS existence the National Labor Rela-
tions Board closed 12,227 unfair labor practiCe cases, in only eight percent
of which were formal complaints issued and in only four percent of which
were formal decisions made. The Interstate Commerce Commission over
a period of ten years has arranged settlements in all but five of the 3,500
demurrage complaints filed with it. In the entire Department of Agricul-
ture, which administers over a score of regulatory statutes, the total pro-
ceedings under all statutes which have gone to formal hearing have in the
three years ended in June 1940, averaged 253 a year, and of these only 37
in the last year progressed to the stage of exceptions to the examiner's
report.

Dean Paul H. Appleby epitomized these statistics when he stated:

"Administrators make thousands of such decisions to one made by
the courts. They act with regard for what the courts have decided
and would be likely to decide, of course, but in considerable degree
the power of the courts over administration is a reserve power."·

3. DEVELOPMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RULE-MAKING

Legislative power over administration is also tending to become

a "reserve power." 5 This tendency arises from the growth of rule-
making by administrative authorities, as described here by Professor
James Hart of the University of Virginia.

lAMES HART
"The Exercise of Rule-Making Power'"
In the simpler days of the agricultural era it was assumed that
Congress would produce practically all the uniform rules required for the
operation of Government. The statutes were expected to be concrete•

• Paul Appleby: PoliCY-A!aking and Public Administration, p. ,.

5 Ibid_
• James Hart: "The Exercise of Rule-Making Power." President's Committee on
Administrative Management: Administrative Management in the Govemment of the
United States. 1937, adapted from pp. 313, 32>.
573 LEGAL PROCEDURES
specific, and detailed. This would reduce administration to a clerical
function.
But never in the history of the Federal Government has practice
completely conformed to this trdditional conception. As early as 1794
Congress authorized President \Vashington, during its recess, to lay an
embargo "\Vhenever, in his opinion, the public safety shall so require."
The act continued: "And the President is hereby fully authorized to ~ve
all such orders to the officers of the United States, as may be neces~ry
to carry the same into full effect." This was the broadest of the early dele-
gations; but the fact remains that delegations of one sort or another Jjave
been scattered through subsequent history. They are no recent novelty
in the Federal Government.
Delegation of rule-making powers reached maximums in four
periods of emergency. The first was 1789-1815, the period when the
United States was trying to defend its neutral trade against British on1ers
in council and Napoleonic decrees. The second was 1861-75, the pe,~od
of the Civil War and Reconstruction. The third was 1917-18, the pe-
riod of participation in the World \VaT. The fourth was 1933-35, the
period of the New Deal attack upon the depression.
The necessity for exceptionally broad emergency delegaticJns ,
however, should not obscure the general trend over many years in the
direction of an increase in the number of rules and regulations issued by
various Federal agencies in pursuance of delegated authority not con-
nected witb any emergel.1cy. The use 01: executive ru1es and regu1ati ons
has, in fact, long since become a normal method of government. .
At the center of the problem of administrative management III
the Federal Government stands the rule-making power, and this for two
reasons: First, there are no fewer than 115 Federal agencies that, U11der
964 statutory provisions and 71 Executive orders and proclamations, i,~ue
rules and regulations that affect the public. This means that rule-ma~mg
constitutes no inconsiderable part of the total function of administratIOn
for the supervision of which the President is responsible to the people.
Second, rule-making in the form of Executive orders is one of the pnn-
cipal techniques available to the President for the overall managen1 ent
not only of departmental rule-making but also of the service operatio[Js of
the Executive Branch.
The rule-making powers of these 115 Federal agencies find their
source in statutory delegations. Long experience teaches the unmistakJIble
lesson that, in a complex and rapidly changing modern economy, deleg~ted
rule-making is an indispensable feature of governmental regulatlOll.
"Nearly everyone concedes," said the 1934 Report of the Special Com-
mittee on Administrative Law of the American Bar Association, "that the
necessities of modern Government business require a certain amount of
such delegation."
It is possible conservatively to go further. This trend is not even
to be looked UPOll as a necessary evil. It is rather to be regaroed as a nojlTla!
574
and, if properly safeguarded, highly desirable development of the Ameri-
can system. For rule-making is a principal means by which, entirely within
the framework of the Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court,
the machinery of an eighteenth century Government has been adapted
to the requirements of twentieth century govemmental problems.
The rule of law demands that the basic poliCies of governmental
regulation be embodied in statutes; but it does not demand that the Con-
gress freeze into its statutes a mass of details. The ideal statute steers a
middle course between the Scylla of attempting to anticipate every pos-
sible situation and the Charybdis of expressing no policy except that in
an empty formula. It defines in general terms the policy that the ad-
ministrator is to pursue, the objectives that he is to seek, and the limits
within which he is to operate. It then authorizes him to translate that
policy into more concrete terms before applying it to particular cases. In
this view the mle-making power appears as a means of introducing the rule
of law at the administrative level.

Varying degrees of statutory delegation are apparent. Contrasting

the Interstate Commerce Act with the Securities Exchange Act in
this respect, James M. Landis pointed out: "Detailed regulative pro-
visions encumber the Interstate Commerce Act. . .. Hardly a con-
gressional session concludes which has not passed some amendment
of a minor or major nature to the Interstate Commerce Act. The
Securities Exchange Act presents a very different situation. There,
with broad rule-making powers vested in the Commission, amend-
ment becomes necessary only when the administration is faced with
primary problems affecting its power." 7 Clearly, statute-making and
rule-making are complementary, and the results are not always su-
perior when there is a larger volume of the first.

4_ ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS AND COMMISSIONS

Just as administrative rule-making or delegated legislation over-

laps with the purely legislative process, so do the ttaditional execu-
tive, legislative, and judicial processes merge in practice. This merger
is especially apparent in the functions exercised by administrative
commissions, boards, or tribunals. Sometimes these commissions are
appointed to exercise fiscal staff services or other managerial func-
tions. The civil service commissions and the planning boards of
municipal, state, or Federal government exercise such staff functions.
The more significant type of agency functioning in administrative

'James M. Landis: The Administrative Process. New Haven: Yale University

Press; 1938, pp. 68-!i9.
S1S LEGAl. PROClDVltIS

Jaw is the commission possessing regulatory powers over major eco-

nomic functions. This type of administrative commission has proven
particularly useful in American administr(ltion (1) when the func-
tion it administers is new and is still controversial; (:z) when the
technique involved has not been developed to the point of permit-
ting the delegation of the task to a single executive; and (3) when
broad differences. of opinions or interests are evident among the
public, thus requiring a balancing of representative interests on a
plural body rather than a single executive. The position of the ad-
ministrative commission is here stated by Professors Merle Fainsod
and Lincoln Gordon of Harvard University.

MERLE FAINSOD AND LINCOLN GORDON

Government in the American Economy'
No subtlety of analysis can classify every governmental action as
uniquely legislative, administrative, or judicial. Administrators and judges
invariably supplement legislation in applying statutes to particular cases.
Adjudication is an element of all administration which touches private
interests. The categories overlap in their very nature. In this connection,
the outstanding innovation in governmental machinery is the administra-
tive commission. Independent of the ordinary executive structure, en-
dowed with security of tenure for substantial terms, and acting under
broad grants of legislative authority, administrative commissions solve the
dilemma of the separation of powers by perfomling the functions of all
three traditional types. They serve as legislators in filling in the terms of
general statutory standards, as administrators in actively promoting on
behalf of the public the policies entrusted to them by Congress, and as
judges in applying those policies to particular cases. This fusion of func-
tions, together with the relative independence of the commissions from
Presidential Control, has occasioned alarm in some quarters.
It is evident that in setting up independent agencies with stag-
gered terms of five to seven years Congress hoped to introduce into ad-
ministration, in these special fields, a degree of continuity of policy
impossible under an all-embracing and unified system of Presidential re-
sponsibility. The influence of changes in public sentiment as reflected at
the polls is not wholly destroyed; in this respect the independent commis-
sion stands midway between ordinary departments and the courts. The
device produces in limited areas of the American administrative structure
a continuity of service and policy comparable to that derived abroad from
permanent terlUre of high-ranking civil servants.

• Merle Fainsod and Lincoln Cordon: Government and the American Economy.
Adapted from pp. 53-;4,70. Reprinted by permission of W. W. Norton &< COtllpany,
IDe. CopJrigbt, 1<}41, W. W. Norton &< Company, Inc.
576 ADMINISTItATION

Powerful administrative tribunals have appeared throughout his-

tory. The modem French system of administrative courts, for ex-
ample, springs from a long background of experience with administra-
tive tribunals. 9 Moreover, the merging of judicial and administrative
duties is not new although in the past such functions have been
assigned to courts rather than to administrative bodies. The admin-
istrative powers of justices of the peace and "county courts" are
vestiges of this system.w The British authority William A. Robson
has pointed out that now, as in the past, "there does not appear to be
any conclusive test by means of which judicial activities can be in-
fallibly distinguished from administrative activities." 11

5. ALTERNATIVE VIEWS TOWARD DELEGATED LEGISLATION

This overlapping of function, in the opinion of many authorities,
is a danger. The nineteenth-:eentury historian Barthold Niebuhr, an-
nounced that "liberty depends incomparably more upon administra-
tion than upon the constitution." " If the individual now depends
more for his liberty and security upon the rule-making of admin-
istrative officers and commissions than upon the law-making of his
representative legislative body, then democracy and freedom are in
different hands indeed. Here we encounter two points of view. (a)
One opinion was expressed by Gordon Hewart, who as Lord Chan-
cellor believed the British administrative system had become a
Frankenstein as a result of the development of administrative rule-
making. (b) The opposite point of view was presented by Congress-
man Sam Rayburn of Texas, later Speaker of the House of Repre-
sentatives.
(a) GORDON "EWART
The New Despotism 18
Attention has already been directed to a statute of the year 1925
(the Rating and Valuation Act, 1925) which contained the egregious
provision that the Minister might, if he thought fit, actually modify the
provisions of the Act itself. That provision was piloted through both
9 See, for example, John H. Mitchell: The Court of the Conn<itablie. New Haven:
Yale University Press; '947.
lOr. Roland Pennock: Administration and the Rule of Law. New York: Farrar and
Rinehart; 194', p. 23.
11 William A. Robson: Justice and Administrative Law. London: The Macnullan
Company; 19.8, pp. 10-11.
laQuoted l!y Wilson: "The Study of AdmUiistration," p. Ul.
ta Cordon Hewart: The New Despotism. Selected from pp. 53-55, 57-58. Re·
printed by permission of Ernest Benn, Ltd. Copyright, 1929, Ernest Benn, Ltd.
 LECAL PROCEDUJtES

Houses of Parliament. But it did not escape remark. On the contrary, since
it became law, it has on many occasions been the subject of criticism,
not only in public speeches and writings, but also in the Law Courts.
It might have been thought that the amateurs of the new
despotism, unless they regarded public opinion with complete indiffer-
ence, and unless they were also satisfied that they could count upon perfect
complaisance or utter inattention in both Houses of Parliament, would
avoid, at any rate for a time, the repetition of that particular revelation
of themselves. But what followed? In the early part of 1929 a new Local
Government Bill was introduced which contained a clause (originally
clause 111) in the following terms: "If any difficulty arises in connection
with the application of this Act to any exceptional area, or in bringing
into operation any of the provisions of this Act, the Minister may by
order remove the difficulty, or make any appointment, or do any other
thing which appears to him necessary for bringing the said provisions into
operation, and any such order may modify the provisions of this Act so far
as may appear to the Minister necessary or expedient for carrying the
order in to effect."
Here, then, was another proposal to enact that the Minister, if
he thought it necessary, or even expedient, might by order "modify the
provisions" of the enactment. A storm, or at least a sort of storm, arose,
and the Minister found it expedient, or even necessary, to promise amend-
ment. But the amendment, when it came, was something quite wonderful.
After a good deal of criticism, the amended clause, polished and pruned,
was added to the Bill, and emerged from the House of Commons, in the
following form (the clause now being numbered 120): "If any difficulty
arises in connection with the application of this Act to any exceptional
area, or in bringing into operation any of the provisions of this Act, the
Minister may make such order for removing the difficulty as he may
judge necessary for that purpose, and any such order may modify the
provisions of this Act."
The sequel is not without interest. When the measure reached
the House of Lords, the first part of the clause, giving power to make
orders modifying the provisions of the Act, was allowed to remain in the
form in which it had come from the House of Commons. But the second
part of the clause by the combined result of more than one amendment,
was altered so as to read in the follow:ng way: "Every order made under
this section shall come into operation upon the date specified therein in
that behalf, but shall be laid before Parliament as soon as may be after
it is made and shall cease to have effect upon the expiration of a period of
three months from the date upon which it came into operation, unless
at some time before the expiration of that period it has been approved
by a resolution passed by each House of Parliament." It is in that form
that the clause now appears as section 130 of the Local Government Act,
1929. From all 9f which it will be seen that the power to modify, by de-
partmental order, the provisions of the Act, remains.
578
It may be observed that The Times, in a leading article in its
issue, dated the 16th February 192<), said with refeIence to this clause,
enabling the Minister by Order to modify the provisions of the statute:
"The true precedents, it has been pointed out, must be sought furtheI
back than 1888. They are the pretensions to the dispensing powers nndeI
the Stuarts and the Statute-obsequiously passed by both Houses-which
declared that anything enacted by King Henry VIII, or by Order in
Council should have the force of law."

(b) SAM RAYBURN

"Congress and Commissions" "

For some years, gradually and experimentally, the Congress has
been wisely delimiting the field of effective legislative action. It has been
confining itself more and more to laying down definite standards of legisla.
tive policy and leaving the detailed application of these standards to
administrative agencies with technically equipped staffs. This procedure
enables the Congress to debate broad matters of policy without being
lost in a mass of technical detail. And it does not take from the Congress
the power to amend or supplement legislation of this character at any time
that it finds that legislation is not being applied and enforced in accord-
ance with Congress' own understanding of its declared policy. Far from
undermining the constitutional authority of the Congress, delegation of
authority to administrative agencies is one of the surest safeguards. It is a
procedure which conserves the vital powers of the Congress for vital
matteIs. It removes rather than creates the danger of dictatorship by pro-
viding the means of making democracy work under the complex condi-
tions of modem life.
The Interstate Commerce Commission is an agency of the Con-
gress. The Interstate Commerce Commission does not perform any act
that the Congress has not the power and the authority to perform itself.
Members of Congress are. toq busy with other duties, among them fixing
great legislative policies, to take the time to go into finer technicalities of
a rate structure or granting the right to a railroad to issue new securities,
whether in the form of stocks or bonds. Congress therefore delegated this
authority to a commission of eleven men with trained experts to work
out the details for them. The same might be truly said of every board and
every other commission formed in the government.
Legislation does not spring full grown from the head of Zeus.
Legislative ideas may come from some unknown administrator keenly
conscious of his own bureau's inability to meet legitimate demands made
upon it. But a legislative program requires technical competence to insure

1< Sam Rayburn: "Congress and Commissions." Address at Dallas, Texas, December
10, 1941. Quoted by Paul H. Appleby: Big Democr.ocy, pp. 160--61. Reprinted by
pennission of Alfred A. Knopf. Copyright, 1945, Alfred A. Knopf.
 LECAL PROCEDUtES

that its objective is effectively accomplished. A great national legislature

cannot safely rely upon the technical assistance and advice which private
interests, sometimes selfishly and sometimes unselfishly, are willing to
provide.

Lord Hewart precipitated a further parliamentary investigation,"

but delegated legislation in England, like administrative rule-making
in the United States, continued to flourish.

6. THE PROBLEM OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION

Nevertheless, mounting criticism of both delegated legislation

and administrative adjudication came from lawyers, economists, busi-
nessmen, political scientists, and public officials. A critical analysis
of the subject by Professor Robert F. Cushman of Cornell Uni-
versity was also published in the report of President Roosevelt's Com-
mittee on Administrative Management.

ROBERT E. CUSHMAN

"The Problem of the Independent Regulatory Commissions" ,.

The first danger to the neutrality of the independent commission
lies in the fact that it must combine its judicial work with work of policy-
determination. Courts protect themselves by refusing to do nonjudicial
work. The indepeudent commissions cannot so protect themselves. They
must add to the duties of the judge those of the law-maker and the ad-
ministrator. This is not inadvertent or accidental; it is inherent and in-
escapable. It is true that the commissions have some duties that are pretty
clearly legislative, some that are purely administrative, and others that are
quite definitely judicial. These may be separate and distinct. But the vast
bulk of the duties given to independent commissions are "mixed" func-
tions. They contain, in varying degrees, the qualities that are associated
with legislation, administration, md adjudication. The best example of a
"mixed" function is the application by an administrative body of "stand-
ards" to the conduct of individuals or business. The method is to incor-
porate in a statute a "standard" that is to be applied by the commission
to concrete cases. "Unfair competitive trade practices" is such a standard;
"just and reasonable rate" is another. The application of such a standard
is an interesting process by which the commission at the same time de-

10 Report of the Committee on Ministers Powers, 1932, Cmd. 4060.

10 Robert E. Cushman: "The Problem of the Independent Regulatory Conunis-
sions." President's Committee on Administrative Management: Administrative Man-
agement in the Government of the United States. 1937, selected from pp. 22'-'3.
 termines policy and prosecutes violations of that policy. It is performing in
the same act the duties of laWmaker, prosecutor, and judge.
This merging in the commission's work of elements thai: are dis-
cretionary with elements that are judicia! subjects the commission to
pressures from many sources. It is not objectionable to try to influence
policy by honest and open methods. But when policies are being deter-
mined by a body also doing judicial work, it is impossible to influence
policy without danger of demoralizing the impartiality of the judge. In
most of the cases in which "pressure" has been brought to bear on the
independent commission the purpose has been to influence the discretion
of the commission rather than the judicial part of its duty. On occasion
the President has exerted pressure when the commission's policies have
impinged upon his own. Private interests have exerted pressure, sometimes
directly, sometimes through the intervention of members 'of Congress, and
this pressure has not always been confined to commission policy but has
sometimes sought to influence adjudication. The commissions are being
asked to perform judicial tasks interwoven with determinations of policy
which at times are the subjects of acute partisan controversy or economic
class antagonisms. This is not the atmosphere in which the rights of in-
dividuals ought to be judged. It is a vital and inherent weakness of the
independent commission system that it makes this necessary.
A second danger to the neutrality of the independent commission
lies in the fact that in handling some of its most important work it acts
both as prosecutor and as judge. This not only undermines judicial fair-
ness; it weakens public confidence in that fairness. This unfortunate
situation exists in the work of the Federal Trade Commission. An im-
portant part of the Commission's job is to ferret out unfair competitive
trade practices and issue cease-and-desist orders against them. There is a
first stage in the proceeding in which the Commission, with the aid of its
staff, makes an investigation and draws up a complaint. The second stage
is a formal hearing before the Commission in which it decides whether
the charges in the complaint have been proved and either issues a cease-
and-desist order or dismisses the action. The temptation for the Commis-
sion to decide that it has proved its own case must be very strong, and the
business-man not unnaturally resents having his rights settled by an "in-
terested" tribunal. One of the reasons why the Supreme Court paid such
scant respect to the Commission's findings of fact is because the records
showed a disposition in many of the Commission's cases to "build up" a
record that would support its orders.
This double role of prosecutor and judge is played by the Federal
Communications Commission in deciding whether to renew a broad-
casting station license. Refusal to renew such a license is not a criminal
penalty, but may be much more serious to the station owner. Here again
the proceeding that may result in denying a license is conducted by the
Commission in the role of investigator. Later the Commission decides
581 UCAl. tltOCIDURIS
whether it·hU ~ out a good enough case to justify refusing to renew
the lieenBe.
It .~ therefore, that the independent commission, as an
institution or technique, obstructs effective administrative management
by giving important poJicy-determining functions to independent bodies.
It also appears that this same combination of functions imperils the
judicial neutrality of the commissions. It appears further that the diffi-
eulty is inherent, since the same functions are at once policy-determining
and judicial.

These dangers seem to point to the need for procedural guaran-

tees, and it is this approach that the critics of the administrative
process have pursued.

7. REfOiM OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PR.OCESS

The answer has been again to "judicialize" the administrative

process, as described below by Professor Vincent M. Barnett, Chair-
man of the Department of Political Science at Williams College.

V'NCIl!IT M. BARNETT, JR.

"Judicialization of the Administrative Process""
The attempt to "judicialize" the administrative process proceeds
on the assumption that all administrative actions are really "legislative"
or "indicia!" in character, that all actions can thus be placed by definition
into one or the other of these categories, and that the formal procedures
by which these actions are taken can be made in general to conform to the
familiar pattern of adversary justice characteristic of a court of Jaw. Out of
t}1e mass of literature on this subject, two major criticisms of the admin-
istrative process have been repeated again and again: that, so far as the
public is concerned, the process is secret, mysterious, unstandardized, and
unknowable; and that, so far as individual determinations are concerned,
the procedures in many instances do not guarantee the minimum funda-
mentals of fairness and justice. The Federal Register Act of 1935 was
aimed at partially correcting the first; the federal courts were to be relied
upon to assure the second under a broad interpretation of the reqUire-
ments of "due process of law."
Under the close surveillance of special committees on administra-
tive law of the American Bar Association, beginning as early as 1933,
11 VinCent M. Barnett, lr.: "ludicializatiOll 01 the Administrative Process."
Adapted from Public Administration Review, Spring 1948, vol. 8, pp. 121)..27. Re·
printed by pennission.
 th~ safeguards were discovered to be insufficient. The Ilow of informa-
tion in the Federal Register was found to be less than completely en-
lightening. And the. trend of federal court decisions, especially Supreme
Court decisions, since 1937 was deemed to indicate an undue deference
to administrative determinations in both their procedural and substantive
aspects. Under these circumstances, renew~ efforts were made to correct
the alleged mystery and irresponsibility of the regulatory agencies through
additional legislation. The American Bar Association sponsored legislation
which took the form of the Walter-Logan bill, passed by both houses of
Congress in 1940 but vetoed by the President. In 19# the same group
returned to the problem by submitting another bill, upon which no
action was taken. With some revisions, a similar measure was introduced
. in 1945 as the McCarran-Sumners bill and emerged eventually as the
Administrative Procedure Act, signed by the President in June, 1946.
A vital question for all those interested in administration is the
extent to which this act will reshape administrative procedures and affect
the efficiency, speed, and fairness of the administrative process.

Whether the Administrative Procedure Act represented a perma-

nent step in the direction of legal formalism in the administrative
process or whether it was merely a part of the immediate post-war
reaction against "govemmentalization" remains to be seen. Mean-
while, a "model state administrative procedure act" was drafted and
adopted in some states, although there was admittedly little Or no
"public agitation on the matter" at this level.'·

8. CONSEQUENCES OF JUDICIALIZATION OF THE ADMINISTRA-

TIVE PROCESS
What are the results of subjecting administrative decision-making
to a greater degree of procedural formalism? Two years after the
passage of the Administrative Procedure Act, Frederick F. Blachly
and Miriam E. Oatman, Federal consultants and staff members of
the Brookings Institution who had long been associated in research
in public law and administration, made the following analysis a~d
prediction.
FREDERICK F. BLACHLY AND MIRIAM E. OATMAN
"Sabotage of the Administrative Process""
The Administrative Procedure Act [of 1946] makes important
changes in every basic factor of the administrative process: organ~tion
1ll State of Alabama, Legislative Reference Service: "Quasi.Legislative and Quasi.
Judicial Functions of Alabama State Administrative AgenCles," June 8, 1946.
,. Frederick F. Blachly aud Miriam E. Oatman: "Sabotage of the Administrative
Process." Public Administration Review, Summer 1946, vol. 6, selected from pp. uS-
20, %'3-'4, 2.6-27. Reprinted by permission.
 LICAL PROClDvalS
and .relationships, procedure, forms of action, enforcement methods, sanc-
tions, and review and controls_ The chief changes in organization and
relationships affect the relationships of the hearing officers to the ad-
ministrative authorities and the relationships of the administrative authori-
ties (and the President of the United States) to the courts.
In effect, the act removes hearing officers from their former posi-
tion as agents of the administrative authorities and gives them much of
the status of judicial officers. It does so by providing: (a) that their com-
pensation is to be set by the Civil Service Commission, rather than by
the agency; (b) that they may not be subject to the direction or super-
vision of any officer, employee, or agent engaged in the performance of
investigative or prosecuting functions of the agency; (c) that they shall
perform no duties except the duty of examination; (d) that no hearing
officer shall consult any person or party on any fact in issue unless upon
notice and full opportunity for all parties to participate; (e) that, subject
to certain exceptions, the same officer who presides at the reception of
evidence shall make the recommended or initial decision; (f) thllt 1I
hearing officer shall withdraw from a case if he feels himself disqualified;
and (g) that hearing officers may be removed only for good cause, lifter
trial before the Civil Service Commission, according to the rules of pro-
cedure laid down by the act.
The act appears to assume that practically all administrative
hearings, except those of an ex parte type, are judicial in nature and are
oonl:e1ned with plosecution by the govemment-and, consequently,
should be held before a person who has all the attributes and protections
of a judge. It overlooks the fact that the hearing officer, unlike a judge, is
not a final determining authority, but is merely securing by a judicialized
procedure the information upon which the responsible administrative au-
thority is to act. The function of mllking administrative determinations
is in only a few instances judicial in nature. Such instances are: the issuing
of cease and desist orders; the issuing of other disciplinary orders, such
as the refusal, suspension, or revocation of a license, or the refusal to renew
a license or like authorization, for cause; or the making of a reparation
award.
There is no genuine judicial determination of the rights of ad-
verse parties, despite the fact that there may be a judicialized procedure,
when an agency holds hearings before issuing rules and regulations. In
none of these cases is the administrative authority itself acting in t.he
position of a court, nor are its subordinates acting as judges in assisting it
to obtain information. Both agency and subordinates are acting in a
legislative capacity, as agents of Congress itself. The fact that the informa-
tion upon which they act is obtained by a proceeding rather judicial in
form does not make them judicial authorities. They remain Ildministrlltive
authorities obtaining information so that they may make the best use of
their discretionary powers. Further, to judicialize this process will involve
~ot only great expense but also faulty organization and ineffective opera-
 .~.

tioo by the authorities .chaiged with ptOteeting the pub1ic welfare by

carrying out the laws. 1'he most significant: thing in respect to these lIets
whiCh are defined as rules is the fact thatthe procedure in respect to them
is exactly the same as for true adminisbative adjudication: a determination
"on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing. . . ." In other
words. the S<Kalled rule-making function is subjected to the same ]:)10-
cedural requirements as is the adjudicatory function.
One of the most far-reaChing and harmful effects of the new law
results from the changes in the established forms of administrative action.
The act places all activities of governmental agencies, other than a few
especially excepted, into two classes: (l) the rule and (::I) the order.
According to the act: " 'Rule' means the whole or any part of any agency
statement of gen~l or particular applicability and future effect desiglled
to implement, interpret, or prescribe law or policy or to describe the or-
ganization, procedure, or pmctice requirements of any agency." There
are thus lumped together as "rules" not only substautive rules and regula.
tions implementing and supplementing the law, but statements of or-
ganization, administmtive interpretatious, and many actions which for-
merly were taken by the order. Instead of confining the use of the order,
as has been customary, to situations where the government forces, COm-
pels, withholds, punishes, or otherwise takes compulsory action, the Ilew
law enlarges its scope in a seemingly haphazard way to include even situa-
tions where the government acts in a favomble way toward the individual,
IN in fffl1i'1ting ~SNmS, lemling llN>J1e}~ gil'ing bene.5ts, gmnting .rubfidies,
providing insumnce, making parity payments, granting permits, and so
on. At the same time, the fixing of wage and rate schedules is defined Qs a
rule or regulation. The purpose of the changes, in addition to a desire
for "simplification" which has resulted in a wild confusion of catego~ies,
was obviously to extend to its utmost boundaries the subjr-ct mattel: of
judicial review. The Administmtive Procedure Act, [is] based upon the
desire of lawyers to have the maximum opportunity to participate in the
process of administmtion, to block administmtive action, and to subject
the administmtive process to judicial methods and judicial control~ at
every point. The cost to the taxpayer of this new system will be great; the
confusion and uncertainty that will result will be enormons; the benl!fits
to the individual (other than the law-breaker) will be a minus quanijty.
Two rays of hope shine through this darkness. The first is the
hope that when Congress understands the act and its implicatious, as
certainly was not the case when it passed the bill withont hearings, it will
either repeal the law or make dmstic amendments. It should be the nmc-
tion of political scientists, students of poblic administmtion, and all per-
sons interested in sound administration to see that Congress is urge<l to
take snch action. The second hope for the further development of the
administrative process along sane and scientific lines is. that the COI:!rts,
which have the final word in such matters as judicial review, will adhere
 LEGAL PIt:OCEOUUS

to the distinctioll$ that they have always stated to be constitutionally

controlling in taking or refusing to take jurisdiction.
--
Professor Barnett's later studies confirmed some of these fears.
Two years after the Blachly and Oatman analysis, Barnett wrote:
"There is much exaggeration in the literature on both sides as to the
effect of the act. It does not deserve to be called 'the Magna Carta
of administrative law' any more than it is accurately described as a
'legislative strait-lacket' for the administrative process. On balance,
despite some desirable results, it is in tone and intent an unfortunate
piece of legislation. . . . There is a vast amount of confusion, even
among able and experienced lawyers here represented, as to just what
the act means in many of its most important provisions. . . . There
is little question that the act is basically anachronistic in spirit and
intent, if not in effect." 20

9. ADMINISTRATIVE PROBLEMS WITHIN THE COURTS

Lawyers and judges have had to face so much criticism regarding

the administration of their own household that some critics have
wondered at their willingness to assume the added burden of admin-
istrative judicialization. In his basic work on the Principles of
Judicial Administration, W. F. Willoughby concluded in 1929 that
"of all branches of public administration that of the administration
of the law is the most defective." 21 The problem of judicial admin-
istration has been not only to reform the serious defects of judicial
procedure and legal practice which obstruct individual justice, but
also to apply the standard procedures of American management by
efficiently executing services to the public. Roscoe Pound, former
Dean of the Harvard Law School and father of the American concept
of "sociological jurisprudence," l!2 criticised judicial administration as
seriously as he did administrative adjudication. In 1940 he indicted
American judicial development in the following terms: "Looking at
the system as a whole, as it stood in the last century, the conspicuous
defects are waste of judicial power, waste of time and money of
litigants and public time and money because of hard and fast juris-
dictional lines ill defined and frequently changed before judicial
20 Barnett: "Judicialization of the Administnltive Process," po '33.
" W. F. Willoughby: Principles of ,udiciJJl Adllj)nistration. Washington: Brook-
ings Institution; 1929, p. 3.
l!2 Roscoe Pound: "Need for a Sociological Jurisprudence." The Greetlbag. October
1907. vol. 19, PI'. 607-15. Julius Stone: The Province and Function of Law. Sydney,
Australia: Associated General Publications, 1946, Chapter 1,.
586 ADMINISTRATION

decision could draw clear bounds, hard and fast terms raising un·
necessary technical questions and wasting the time of the courts,
piece-meal handling of single controversies simultaneously in differ-
ent courts, and general want of cooperation between court and court
and judge and judge in the same court for want of any real admin-
istrative head.""
The problem continues although experimental reforms have
been in evidence since the beginning of the century. At the local
level, a beginning was made in 1C)06 with the establishment of the
consolidated Municipal Court of Chicago." At the state level, the
judicial council movement has flourished since the 1920'S and has
furnished a slight element of management in state court administra-
tion.'" Beginning in the 1930'S the Federal courts became cognizant
of their administrative problem as shown below by (a) Judge Wil-
liam Denman, a judge of the United States Circuit Court, who had
had extensive administrative experience during his career as a munici·
pal reformer in San Francisco and as World War I chief of the
United States Shipping Board and Emergency Fleet Corporation;
and (b) Henry P. Chandler, who had observed the experiments and
failures of municipal judicial reconstrnction .. while he was a Chicago
attorney, and who later became the first Director of the Administra-
tive Office of the United States Courts.

(a) JUDGE WILLIAM DENMAN

"Critical Study of United States Trial Courts" If
It is a proper analogy with industry to regard the court as a
processing plant and the judges as its machines. On one side is stored the
mw material of the evidence. This deteriomtes mpidly as memory fades,
witnesses disperse, and real exhibits are lost. On the other side is an in·
tense consumer demand for the machine's product, that is, for justice.
As an industrial processing, the product of the judicial mechanism is
defective where made from deteriomted and decaying mw material. Also,
as in the industrial process, where the machine is overloaded the product
is defective. Often the consumer is compelled to take this product, since
the cost of claim and rejection, technically called "appeal," is beyond his
means .
.. Roscoe Pound: Organization of Courts. Boston: Little. Brown and Company;
1940, pp. %;1-' .
.. Hiram T. Gilbert: The Municipal Court of Chicago. Chicago, 19%8.
B Pound, Organization of Courts, p. '90.
.. Albert Lepawsky: The Indicial System of Metropolitan Chlcago. Chicago: 'The
University of Chicago Press; 1932.
If ]udgt: William Denman, "Critical Study of United States Trial Courts:' Joumal
of the American Judicature Society, December 1937, vol. 2.1, selected from pp. 117->9,
as. Reprinted by pel'Dli$$ion. •
587 LEGAL PROCEDURlS

There are other ~inent analogies, such as the malingering of

the workers and the sappmg of the court's and client's time in stipula-
tions for continuances by laggard attorneys. In theory they are officers
under the command of the court, but the exercise of that command, in
compelling the prompt preparation of the material, that is in getting the
cases at issue, is so neglected by the commander that the functiu,\ seems
completely atrophied. .
These evils arise primarily from the failure to supply judges com·
mensura~e in number with the rapid increase in federal litigation and the
complete absence of modern management of the huge federal judicial
enterprise. Few realize the size of the federal judicial establishment. There
are 85 district courts scattered over the 48 states' and the District of C0-
lumbia. They have upward of 14'5 district judges. Above them are ten
circuit courts of appeals and the Court of Appeals of the District of
Columbia, having altogether 44 circuit judges. In the fiscal 'y¢ar 1936,
that-is long after prohibition litigation had ceased, there were filed up-
ward of 78,000 cases in the lower courts, 78,000 in one year, exclusive of
bankruptcies. In that year in the circuit courts of appeals upward of 3,52.0
cases were docketed. 1hat is so vast a business' that its regulation wOl.lld
challenge any administrator's constant daily effort in its management.
The constitutionally coordinate power of the judiciary with the
legislature and executive and the majesty of the judicial function in so-
ciety are extolled by passionate orators within and without the congress.
Yet it is not only without any management commensurate with our in-
dustrial genius, but has no continuous management at alL.Like any other
unmanaged enterprise, public or private, it bas become bankrupt in its
failure to meet its obligation of prompt justice.

(b) HENRY P. CHANDLER

"The Place of the Administrative Office in the Federal Court Sys-

tem" 28

There were two principal aims in the creation of the Administra-

tive Office of the United States Courts. First, there was a purpose to put
the business management of the courts in an officer of their own choosing
instead of in the Department of Justice where it had been. It was thought
to be inappropriate that the federal courts should have to look to the
Attorney General, representing the Government of the United States
which is the principal litigant before thern, for the material means es-
sential to their existence. The second purpose in the creation of the Ad-
ministrative Office was to furnish the courts, as already indicated, with a
source of information and statistics concerning the state of their business .

.. Henry P. Chandler: "The Place of the Administrative Office in the Federal

Court System." Cornell Law Quarterly, April 1942, voL 27, selected from pp. 364-
67, 369-71. Reprinted by permission.
 The debii1ed provisions of the statute spring 'from "l'8ese objec-
tives. The Act creates an esbiblishment to be known as the.Adnlinlstrative
Office of the United States Courts, and provides for a Dinictor and As-
sistant Director who shall be appointed by the Suprem¢ Court and hold
office during the pleasure of the court. The office is organiz!!d at present
under four divisions: the Division of Business Administration, the Di-
vision of Procedural Studies and Sbitistics, the Division of Probation, and
the Division of Bankruptcy. It is the object of the Division of Business
Administration to furnish the courts with all the facilities possible in the
way of material and assisting personnel for the eflicient handling of their
work. The office is concerned with the quarters for the courts.
The Division of Procedural Studies and Sbitistics is the part of
the office which is directly concerned with gathering information 'con-
cerning the work of the courts and making recommendations looking
toward increased efficiency and expedition in the dispoSition of the cases.
This division compiles and reports statistics and supplements them by
visits to the courts and observation of their methods on the ground. It is
called upon from time to time to make studies of different phases of
judicial administration for the courts. Matters which have received such
study are the system of jury selection, the use of pre-trial procedure in
the federal courts, and the provisions for reporting court proceedings in
the various states.
General supervision of the fiscal matters of probation officers,
including the regulation of their salaries within the appropriations and
other applicable statutes, falls upon the Administrative Office. The proba.
tion officers are appointed by the judges of the courts which they serve
and their primary responsibility is to the judges. The Administrative Office
is often consulted by judges with reference to persons whom they are
considering for appointment as probation officers, and the office endeavors
in all appropriate ways to suggest the importance for the success of the
service of appointing only persons who are specially qualified. In connec·
tion with the auditing of accounts of officers of the courts and the visits
to the conrts, the Administrative Office is concerned with the bankruptcy
administration. The importance of the bankruptcy proceedings in the
work of the federal courts, affecting as they do the welfare of large num-
bers of investors and the public generally, warrants the establishment of a
bankruptcy division in the Administrative Office.

These are strong beginnings. By Federal example or even Federal

aid the earlier reforms in local and state judicial administration may
be restimulated. But critics of judicial administration still fear, with
Dean Pound, that "there is danger that, whereas but yesterday the
courts played the chief role in the practical conduct of affairs, to-
monow, there will be nothing of any real moment left to them."
 LECAL PIlOCEDUaES

These leaders feel that a major need "is a business organization and
a business administration of all the courts." "In this reform admin-
istration may be able to accomplish more for adjudication than
judicialization has done for administration.

10. THE LAWYER'S ROLE IN PUBLIC "DMINISTlATION

The rapprochement of judicial and administrative tribunals may

in the last analysis depend upon the changing role of the individual
lawyer in relation to management. What has been and what should
be the attorney's position in a typical administrative agency, public
or private? An interesting analysis and answer has been offered by
Philip M. Glick, a student of legal theory and public affairs, and a
civil servant who has served as the general counsel of Federal agencies
in agriculture, housing, and international affairs.

PHILIP M. CLICK
"The Role of the Lawyer in Management""
What role should lawyers play in management? The question is
particularly urgent in the field of public administration, although our
conclusions should be applicable to the parallel problem facing manage-
ment in a private enterprise. We may, therefore, for present purposes,
rephrase our initial question, to ask: What role should the lawyer play
in a Government agency?
The work of the lawyer in an operating Government agency may,
from the point of view of the immediate administrative tasks involved,
be classified into three major types of activity. He will be called upon,
first, to interpret the statutes which the agency is administering. Questions
will arise daily as to the scope of the authority granted to the administra·
tor, the situations to which the Jaw is intended to apply, the precise
boundaries of the limitations or procedural requirements the statutes may
contain. A second activity will be the preparation of legal instruments of
various sorts: contracts, deeds and leases, administrative orders, regula-
tions and notices, bills to amend the statutes under which operations are
being carried on. A third activity will be the conduct of litigation in which
the agency is involved. The three types of activity have a characteristic
in common which it is important to note. In pursuing each of them, the
.. Arthur F. Kingdom: "Outline for a Single Court with Jurisdiction Extended to
So·Called Administrative Law." 10uInal of the American Judicature Society, June
'940, vol. 24, pp. 11, .6.
80 Plulip M. Glick: "The Role of the Lawyer in Management." Advanced Manage.
ment, April, May, June, '940, vol. 5, selected from pp. 6S-71, 8S. Reprinted by per.
mission.
 ADMINISTRATION

lawyer is perfuming a single important job: He is trying to anticipate

the decisions of judges.
Since as long ago as the fifth century JI.C~ in ancient Greece, two
major theories of the nature of the legal and judicial process have been
contending for acceptance. The theory that came to receive rather general
acceptance during the development of. the Roman Empire, and has can·
tinued to be the dominant view until relatively recent times, is the view
that the law is a body of interrelated fundamental principles and rules
which are firmly rooted in the nature of things. The law, this view
maintains, is organically related to the eternal principles of "natural law."
It is in a significant sense self.contained, in that it is independent of the
changing foibles and biases and wishes of the generations of men. It is
implicit in this view of the nature of the legal proc.ess that lawyers and
judges are the instruments rather than the creators of the .law. When a
judge decides a case it is not he that speaks but the law that speaks
through his mouth. In a particular case the decision of a court may st:;em
harsh but, it will be said, "the law is the law." Better to endure specific
instances of hardship and some injustices than to destroy the authority of
the law.
At least from the days of the Stoics a contrary view of the law
has been persistently maintained. This is the view that found relatively
recent expression in Mr. Justice Holmes' denial that the common law is
"a brooding omnipresence in the sky." When the present Chief Justice
of the United States [Justice Hughes) was Governor of New York he said,
':We are under a Constitution but the Constitution is what the judges
say it is." The layman has recently become even more ready than the
lawyer to accept this second view of the law, and George Kaufman and
Moss Hart have expressed the layman's view in their musical comedy
"Of Thee I Sing," when the nine Supreme Court Judges are made to
announce, "We have powers that are positively regal; Only we can take
a law and make it legal." This second view-sometimes referred to as the
position of the judicial realists or of sociological jurisprudence-maintains
that lawyers and judges have an important creative part that they have
always played and must inescapably play in the functioning of the law.
When the judge decides a case, under this view, he makes law.
Must we conclude, however, that there is, therefore, no law ex·
cept the varying, shifting whims and fancies of individual judges and
lawyers? No one who has carefully read a competently drafted legal
opinion or listened to the presentation of arguments before an appellate
court can satisfy himself that this is so. Lawyers and judges are trained in
a legal discipline. They are the practitioners of a set of techniques. They
are sharers in an historic tradition. It is this tradition, these techniques,
this discipline that provides the compelling framework of the law. Prin-
cipJes of growth, of adaptation and change, are themselves parts of the
disCipline and the tradition. Lawyers and judges, as the specialized car-
591 LEGAL PROCEDURIS

tiers of an important part of the total culture pattern, pass on from one
generation to the next the body of the law, and in the act of passing it on,
reinterpret, refashion, recreate it, so it may continue to be an effective,
living part of the ever-changing culture of an ever-changing society.
This brings us directly to the question of the finality which should
attach to the opinions and judgments of the legal officers. If the classical
position were strictly adhered to it would seem to follow that when the
responsible law officer has stated that the statute does not permit action
A, requires action B, or in another situation permits choice only between
actions C and D, then the administrative officer has no alternative but
to act accordingly. If it is the law that speaks through the mouths of
lawyers, how can an administrative officer disregard or overrule the oracle
of the law? The generally established, and sound, theory of relationship
is, however, that the lawyer is an advisory officer to the administrator. He
expresses his judgment as to what the courts will probably decide in a
given situation. It is for the administrative officer then to determine on
his administrative responsibility what action should be taken. To make
the judgments of the legal office conclusive upon the administrator is in
essence to transfer the ultimate administrative power from the admin-
istrator to the lawyer. Such a transfer cannot be justified if the administra-
tor is to retain responsibility for the quality of performance.

Most lawyers and some political scientists would probably take

issue with Glick. Law to them is a test and touchstone, not a tech-
nique and instrument, of administration; and lawyers are the guard-
ians of this tradition.81 In the light of the strengthening role of man-
agement, it is not certain, however, that their view will prevail. A
large number of American administrators belong to the school of
legal realism and prefer to apply utilitarian and humanitarian consid-
erations along with the precedent and procedure of pure law." In
this respect they seem to have the political support of a pragmatically
minded American public. These administrators and managers are not
anti-legal; as administrative officials or as business executives they
cannot afford to be. They are rather a-legal, preferring to temper legal
provisions within a framework of administrative convenience. Many
managers know the practice, if they do not use it, of maintaining a
staff of both "hot-running" and "cold-running" lawyers; that is,
lawyers who always conclude "it can be done" and those who always
conclude "it is impossible." The managers assign their controversial
problems to either group, depending on the conclusion they already
favor.
11 Fritz Morstein M""" "The Lawyer's Role in Public Administration." Yale Law
Journal, Apn1 1946, vol. 55, pp. 498-5>6. Marx also questions the prevailing opinion .
.. Waldo: The Administrative State, p. 78 .
592

SUMMARY

Legal procedures constitute another instrument of management.

Law pervades the executive process, and administrators are constantly
applying laws. But lawyers sometimes dictate to managers in both
goverument and industry, and although the administrative process
does not. and need not, always follow legal and formal procedures,
such procedures are often insisted upon by some lawyers, their
clients, ordinary citizens, and special groups. Constant pressure to
convert administrative procedures into more purely legal procedures.
to formalize administrative rule-making, and to judicialize admin-
istrative decision-making is always on hand. Such legalisms have, for
example, been the object of the Federal Administrative Procedure
Act of 1944. The act subjects administrative tribunals, departments,
and officers to legal procedures which have probably done more harm
to public justice and. less good to private rights than the previously
evolving system of administrative enforcement. In business admin-
istration, the Administrative Procedure Act is not applicable, but the
same issue may be expressed there in the form of a domineering legal
staff. The problem is not always solved by management's selective
use of the so-caned "hot and cold-running" lawyers.
In government the problem has become mote intense with the
growth of powerful administrative commissions exercising quasi-
legislative and quasi-judicial powers. Exercising even greater discre-
tionary powers of administrative enforcement than normal admin-
istrative departments, and proceeding by methods that are frequently
strange to the bench and bar, these administrative tribunals have
excited the suspicions of both lawyer-clominated legislatures which
create the tribunals and procedure-conscious courts which hear their
appeals.
Are administrative rule-making and administrative adjudication
distinct dangers to substantive public justice? Are they tlueats to
procedural guarantees in individual cases? A large group of lawyers
and business men· think they are, while public administrators gen-
erally lean in the other direction, although the latter admit the
defects of administrative procedures in individual cases. Some ad-
ministrators go further, and, viewing the overall contnbution of ad-
ministrative tribuuals, point out that members of administrative
commissions generally tend to represent the interest of their special
publics rather than the interests of the general public; that, in any
case, they subject themselves to the restrictions of legal procedures
since they decide matters "on the record» in private cases more than
they do "on the findings" in comprehensive public investigations;
 UGAL PROCIDIIRIS
'imd that on ba1ance they neglect their statutory responsibility for
the public interest mote often than they violate private guarantees in
particular proceedings.
Nevertheless, legal procedures by either administratots or ad-
ministrative tribunals cannot be dismissed as a merely opportunistic
technique. They constitute a fundamental instrument of responsible
management which supplements other management controls like
the budget. The main problem revolves about the ability of the
manager to use the lawyer without being abused by the law, and the
willingness of the lawyer to serve rather than supplant responsible
leadership and modem management. The lawyer may be ready to
serve effectively if he learns to place jurisprudence in proper relation
to other recognized disciplines of society, such as HIe social sciences,
which include the administrative sciences; and to recognize legal pro-
cedures as only one class of procedures whereby a society and its in-
stitutions can be managed. Many other administrative practices and
management procedures supplement the law. To these we now tum
in the next chapter.
 CHAPTER NINETEEN

MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

EVERY INSTITUTION HAS, besides a body of legal procedures imposed

by superior authority, an individual set of management procedures or
practices. Without these internal procedures, the work program bogs
down; with it operations are systematized. Yet few phases of modern
management incur more popular disapproval. Even able administra-
tors sometimes regard procedures as a form of managerial rigmarole
and often avoid discussion of the subject. Most administrators, how-
ever, are aware that effective management is contingent upon system-
atic procedure. As E. J. Coil has pointed out, we find in modern
management "no all-wise, inner voice which tells each individual what
he should do and when. Rather the interrelationships between spe-
cialized activities must be established by designing arrangements,
preparing schedules, issuing instructions, interpreting duties, and
checking performance." 1 Dreary though these details may be, they
constitute one of the most essential techniques of management.

1. THE IMPORTANCE OF PROCEDURE IN MANAGEMENT

Although a critic of formalism in the administrative process;

Professor Dwight Waldo here defends the importance of procedure
in administration.

1 Coil: "Administtative Organization for Policy Planning," p. 11.

• See Chapter 5.
594
 MANAGEMENT PRACT1C1S

C. DWIGNT WALDO
"Governmellt by Procedure'"
It is procedure that governs the routine internal and external re-
lationships-between one individual and another; between one organiza-
tional unit and another; between one process and another; between one
skill or technique,md another; between one function and another; between
one place and another; between the organization and the public; and
between all combinations and permutations of these. It is by means of
procedure that the day-to-day work of government is done-mail sorted,
routed and delivered; deeds recorded; accounts audited; cases prosecuted;
protests heard; food inspected; budgets reviewed; tax returns verified; data
collected; supplies purchased; property assessed; inquiries answered; orders
issued; investigations made; and so forth endlessly.
Procedure, properly applied, allows specialization to be carried
to its optimum degree and effects the most efficient division of labor.
Procedure not only divides labor; it also divides-and fixes-responsibility.
Procedure thus is a means of maintaining order and of achieving regu-
larity, continuity, predictability, control, and accountability. It is a means
of maximizing control of the subjective drives of an organization's memo
bers, of assuring that their official actions contribute-and, if possible, that
their private loyalties conform-to the organization's objectives. From '
a general political angle, procedure ensures equality of treatment-a value
of great significance to the citizen.
Procedure is not a unique feature of public administration. It
is a concomitant of all organized activity, and many procedures are equally
usable by private administration or public administration. Private as well
as public "red tape" can be time-consuming and annoying to those af-
fected, as anyone can testify who has tried to exchange a purchase without
a sales slip or to cash a check without "proper identification."

Frequently the duty of formulating and perfecting procedures is

delegated to a special managerial staff established for that purpose.
Specialists in procedure and protocol are as old as organized society
itself. Procedure is what Confucius had in mind when he advised
ancient Chinese administrators: "As to matter of bowls and dishes
leave such things to those who are charged with the care of them." •
Students of modern scientific management have been particu-
larly insistent upon the specialized and virtually independent position
that should be assigned to those administrators responsible for pro-
cedure. At the height of the scientific management movement in
• C. Dwight Waldo: "Government by Procedure." Elements of Public Administra-
tion, Fritz Morstein Marx, ed. pp. 38,-82. Reprinted by permission of P,entice-Hall,
loc. Copyright, 1946, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Confucius: Analects, Book VIII.
1914 American railway managers explained: "The experience neces-
sary to lay down these lines (or procedural directions] is, contrary to
the common belief, quite distinct from that necessary to pass upon
the subject matter of all directions. The phases of all such directions
are much alike, as are the principal phases of all organizations. 'lIDs
is almost incomprehensible to those whose chief study has been that
of the subject matter, but it is nevertheless true. The specialist in this
work, therefore, finds much less difficulty in devising a proper rontine
for almost any business than the specialist in anyone line would find
in devising a routine for the business with which he is most fa-
miliar." •
Under different titles in business and government, such special
staffs dealing with procedures and methods have been widely estab-
lished. In the United States Bureau of the Budget, for example, the
Management Improvement Branch of the Administrative Manage-
ment Division concentrates on the improvement of management
practices in the executive departments and agencies.

2. ROUTINE AND MECHANIZATION

The constant tendency to rationalize business or systematize

society "has progreSSively transferred individual discretions to
mechanizations; some of them routines, some of them machines." •
The mechanical aspect is the more dramatic. Most critics believe
that nowhere has the process of mechanizing management procedure
moved faster than in America; but other countries are following close
behind. Here is the report of a British postal executive, Myra Curtis,
following her search for the newer forms of managerial mechanics in
the United States.

MYRA CURTIS
"American Office Management"·

The wonderful people known as "efficiency engineers" who in

American novels and magazines walk into an office, draw a numbet' of
diagrams for "routing" the wo,rk, cut down the legs of the typists' b;lbles

• H. F. Stimpson. L. W. Allison, J. S. Sheafe. and C. J. Morrison: "ApplicatillD of

Scientific Management to a Railway Shop." Railway Age Gazette. vol. 51. p.
seq. Quoted by Clarence B. Thompsen: Scientific Management. Cambridge: Harvard
,3 et
Univen;ity Press; 1914. p. 607.
• Willis Wissler: Busir.ess Administration. New York: McCraw·Hill Book Com·
pany. Inc.; 193-1, foreword to Chapter .6.
'Myra Curtis: "American Office Management." Public Administllltiml, FebtWUY
193". vol. 10. selected from pp. 179-82, 19(>-<}1, 193-94. Reprinted by pennissillD.
 MANACEMENT PRACTICES
and tear down an partitions that obstruct anyone's view of anyone else,
leaving behind them after a few weeks' work a scene of marvellous
modernity and efficiency would, I thought, be very interesting to meet
in the flesh. It was unlikely, but it was at least possible, that they would
be able to ?and over ~ me a ~de of Jaws, the application of which to my
own domain would bnng to light whole areas of imperfection which had
hitherto escaped my notice.
I must say at once that nothing of that kind happened. So far
from instructing me how to improve my office the efficiency engineers
whom I met showed a tendency to be impressed by what they heard about
it which was unexpected, though of course gratifying. They seemed to
regard their own work as that of pioneers in a trackless forest, and except
for a few fimls (the same firms were mentioned by everybody) did not
consider that America had anything to show that they would be prepared
to recommend as a model. It is quite possible that we have as many com-
mercial fimlS in the forefront of progress in this country, and our public
offices are in many respects ahead of those in the United States.
There is perhaps one side of the subject on which the Americans
have got ahead of us-they do regard it as a subject. They have taken the
idea of "scientific management" from the factory into the office, and by
introducing a standard terminology have done something to systematise
thought about it. There are certain principles of office management which
every manager of a large office finds out as he goes along; they are in fact
the ABC of his job. In the really advanced American offices there is al-
ways someone who has read the text-books, if he has not actually taken
a University course in their contents, and there is a decided tendency to
entrust him with a good deal of responsibility for putting the ideas in them
into execution. Probably he is a very young earnest person-but youth is
no handicap in American offices; on the contrary. I found one or more of
these young specialists, male or female, installed in a special Systems or
Methods Branch, invested with a considerable decree of authority over
the executive heads of the operating branches as regards the use of me-
chanical devices and other time-saving methods. The Federal Government
itself has in Washington a "Bureau of Efficiency" which was recom-
mended for our imitation by the Tomlin Commission on the Civil Serv-
ice. It is an expanded version of the Investigation Branch at the British
Treasury, but covers a wider field and has considerably more power to en-
force its recommendations. .
The most powerful of these Methods Branches, I should say, is
that of the American Telegraph and Telephone Company, the parent of
telephone companies all over the country, ~hich has rea~ly s~died w!th
great effect the problems of seating, lighting a~d ~am":lUlatl~g whIch
arise on the various mechanical or semi-mechamcal Jobs III then offices.
The results of this research are conveyed to the daughter companies by
way of suggestion, not command, but appear to be attended to, wit.h the
consequence that one sees in towns as far apart as New York, DetrOIt and
598
Chicago, tea~ of machine operators sitting at the same billing machines
in the same formation using the same fingers for picking up the bills and
the same holder for the various documents from which they copy. Even
the sorters sort the telephone tickets with the same movement, a rhyth-
mical motion with both hands in which one hand takes up a ticket while
the other lays one down, the whole process going at the rate of 4.000 an
hour for sortation by each digit. I have been able to introduce this mefhod
of handling on some of the sortation at the [Post Office] Savings Bank,
and can thorQughly recommend it for any process of sorting into a small
number of easily memorable heaps, where the sorter can learn not to fol-
low with her eyes the document she is laying down. It does not look more
rapid than the ordinary method of Bicking up with the right hand the
corners of the documents held in the left hand, but since it eliminates all
useless movements it actually is more rapid.
It is on the lines along which such rapid progress is not being
made in this country-the only difference is that much that is still new
here is taken for granted there. This is, no doubt, partly due to the fact
that the office machinery firms mainly manufacture in America and have
exploited the home market first, but it is also attributable to a certain ad-
venturousness in the American temper, which leads them to adopt a de·
vice while it is still unproved, and to scrap it as soon as something a shade
better appears on the market. There is a tendency to do nothing by hand
or head which a machine will do for you. A desk calculator stands on
nearly every table and is used for adding even when the sum could be done
as quickly in the head. Many clerical desks are equipped with side tables
on which stands a typewriter which the clerk turns to when she wants to
write. Americans will soon lose the use of the pen. They never write notes;
they telephone; and to write anything with their own hands which they
might dictate would seem unforgivable waste of time. Ledger posting by
hand already seems a fantastic piece of antiquarianism. The banks, retail
stores, public utility companies, stock holding companies, and other large
concerns all use one or the other of the various types of bookkeeping ma-
chine which, when the old balance in the account is picked up and the
transaction is entered, throws out automatically the new balance. For sav-
ings accounts the banks are beginning to use a machine which does this in
the passbook and the ledger at the same operation, slowing down the
cOunter work a little, but eliminating the possibility of discrepancies. The
punched card system is invading the bookkeeping field.
In .Chicago things had moved a good deal farther, and there were
several offices in which the work was "Fordized," as people call it-that is,
was carried by moving bands from the clerks performing one process to
those performing the next. In one big bank two rows of cheque listers and
endorsers sat facing each other at their machines, and between them along
the table ran a band, discharging on to another band which ran along the
wall the whole length of the room. As each bundle of cheques was dealt
with, the machinist threw it on the band and saw it no more. All the
 MANACEMENT PRACTICES

bundles ~und t~eir way to the end of the room, and thence by chute to
the provmg section on the floaT below. The bands were so unobtrusive
that one could be in the room for several minutes before realising that
part of the tables was in motion.
. In co~clusion you w~lI perhaps be glad to hear that if the descrip-
hon I have given of the Chicago offices sounds a little like the horrible
visions of playwrights and novelists in which the soul of man is destroyed
by his own inventions, the reality did not give that impression at all.
Humanity, as Dr. Johnson'S friend might have said, keeps breaking in;
and except for the parcel weighers, whose job I admit did chill my blood
a little, the general effect was still of man working machines and not of
machines working man.

After comparing the electrical tabulating system of the twentieth

century census with the ,ecording system used in the Domesday
Book 1,000 years ago, Professor Leonard D. ~ite concluded: "Tech-
nology, in short, has made such strides that the process of administra-
tion seems almost to have changed in kind as well as in degree; and
it is only upon technological improvements that administration of
the intensity and continuous power of the modern state can rest." •
The mechanics of modern management have undoubtedly brought
about notable administrative changes, but the managerial art, as a
human activity dependent upon systematic or scientific procedures
is not a modem accomplishment. The procedural details of the
Medieval Exchequer, as described by Richard Fitz-Neal, Treasurer
of England, were no less related to the administrator's mission and
no less exacting to the manager's span-of-attention in the Middle
Ages than the managerial procedures and mechanisms of our own
day. Fitz-Neal argued, it will be recalled, that it was necessary to
definitize and record the intricate Exchequer procedures in order "to
explain humble things which will be of profit to the eagles them-
selves." •

3. PROCEDURAL PRACTICES OF CHIEF EXECUTIVES

At one of the highest levels of executIve responsibility, the Ameri-

can presidency, the "eagles" have appreciated .from the beginning the
importance of procedures and othe~ managenal practices. (\s a result
of his apprenticeship under Washmgton, Jefferson dlstnbuted the

• Leonard D. White: "Public Administration." Encyclopedia of the Social Science.,

1937, vol. I, p. 441.
• See Chapter 4.
 ADMtNtsTUTtON

fopowing instructions to his department heads when he became

President in 1801. .

THOMAS JEFFERSON
"Circular to the Heads of Departments" 10
Having been a member of the first administration under Gen.
Washington, I can state with exactness what our course then was. Letters
of business came addressed sometimes to the President, but most fre-
quently to the heads of departments. If addressed to himself, he referred
them to the proper department to be acted on: if to one of the secretaries,
the Jetter, if it required no answer, was communicated to the President,
simply for his information. If an answer was requisite, the secretary of the
department communicated the letter & his proposed answer to the Presi-
dent. Generally they were simply sent back after perusal, which signified
his approbation. Sometimes he returned them with an informal note, sug-
gesting an alteration or a query. If a doubt of any importance arose, he re-
served it for conference. By this means, he was always in accurate posses-
sion of all facts and proceedings in every part of the Union, and to whatso-
ever department they related; he formed a central point for the different
branches; preserved an unity of object and action among them; exercised
that participation in the suggestion of affairs, which his office made in-
cumbent on him; and met himself the due responsibility for whatever
was done. During Mr. Adams' administration, his long and habitual ab-
sences from the seat of government, rendered this kind of communication
impracticable, removed him from any share in the transaction of affairs,
and parcelled out the government, in fact, among four independent heads,
drawing sometimes in opposite directions. That the former is preferable to
the latter course, cannot be doubted. It gave, indeed, to the heads of de-
partments the trouble of making up, once a day, a packet of all their com-
munications for the perusal of the President; it commonly also retarded
one day their despatches by mail. But in pressing cases, this injury was
prevented by presenting that case Singly for immediate attention; and it
produced us in return the benefit of his sanction for every act we did.
Whether any change of circumstances may render a change in
this procedure necessary, a little experience will show us. But I cannot
withhold recommending to heads of departments, that we should adopt
this course for the present, leaving any necessary modifications of it to
time and trial. My sole motives are those before expressed, as governing
the first administration in chalking out thO' rules of their proceedings;
adding to them only a sense of obligation imposed on me by the public
will, to meet personally the duties to which they have appointed me. If
this mode of proceeding shall meet the approbation of the heads of de-
,. Thomas Jefferson: "Circular 10 the Heads of Departmeots." The Writings Of
Thomas 1eliersoa, Andrew A. Lipscomb, ed. The Thomas JeJferson Memorial Associa·
tion; 1904, vol. 10, pp. 2.89-91.
601 MAHACEMENT PRACTICES

!t
partments, may go into execution without giving them the trouble of
aD answer; If any other can be suggested which would answer our views
a~d ~dd less to their la~r:" that will be a sufficient reason for my prs:fer-
nng It to my own proposition, to the substance of which only, and not the
form, I attach any importance.

Je~erson, the so-called "vi~ion~ry. theo~st," :ecognized, as did

Washmgton, that there was an mtnnslC relatIOnship between routine
procedure and national policy." Washington particularly was suc-
cessful in encouraging his subordinates to handle as much work as
lay. within their competence, but his procedure was always such as
to msure that all matters would, be put before him which required
"the agency or sanction of the President." ..

4. PROCEDURAL PRACTICE IN COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT

This practice has been termed "the exception principle" by Fred-

erick Winslow Taylor, exponent of scientific management. In apply-
ing this principle to American business and industry, Taylor
explained: "The manager should receive only condensed, sum-
marized, and invariably comparative reports, covering, however, all
of the elements entering into the management, and even these sum-
maries should be careful1y gone over by an assistant before they reach
the manager, and have all the exceptions to the past averages or to
the standards pointed out, both the especially good and the especially
bad exceptions." 13 In regard to reports, complaints, correspondence,
conferences, and problems of all kinds, the executive at each level
<>f responsibility should be acquainted with only the exceptional
cases, "both good and bad." This course implies that there is also a
reasonable procedure for handling the mass of routine or non-excep-
tional situations.
Every factory, firm, and office develops a type of procedural prac-
tices for its routine business. What is suitable or sound for one
business, however, may not be for another. On a subject so technical
and varied, thorough and detailed experience in anyone system is a
good teacher. Here, for example, is a description of ?ne set of. p;o-
cedures as applied by A. F. Hagedorn, a Chicago busmess speclahst,
who'installed the "block system" of procedure for handling the How
11 See Chapter 5. The extent to whkh J<:ffer~on performed in ace,,,?anee. with ~is
administrative theories is a subject of mqulty 1D Leonard D. WhIte s forthcOJIlIng
sequel to The Federalists. .. .
.. Letter to the Secretary of War, August 13, 1790. WntingS of George Washing-
ton, vol. 31, p. '91.
:18 Taylor: Shop Management, p. 126.
602 ADMINISTRATtON

of orders and shipments of Bauer and Black, the drug division of the
Kendall Company. It is interesting to note that Henry P. Kendall,
the president of this company, was at one time president of the
Tay'lor Society and one of the earliest exponents of the application of
scientific management to business organizations as we]] as to indus-
trial plants.

(a) A. F. HAGEDORN
"Production Planning for the Large or Small Office" 1<
Planning production, an idea borrowed from factory management,
is an integral part of the job of the office manager. To put it concretely, the
planning of production in the office means the intelligent distribution of '
the daily volume of incoming work, so that in spite of peak loads and
slumps, it is executed economically and on schedule.
What does the office manager need to know before he can begin
to plan production? He must have some knowledge of the volume of work,
that is, the number of incoming orders, checks, letters to be answered, in-
voices to get out, letters to be mailed, checks to be written, and all the
other routine items that are significant parts of the daily work. He should
know with reasonable accuracy the time required to accomplish the dif-
ferent elements of work, such as order editing, pricing, extending, billing,
and the writing of letters and checks. It is desirable that he know the best
way to dq, each job; and that the employee be taught this method. Sched-
ules should be established so that the office manager doing the work will
be in a position, at any time during the day, to determine how much time
may be allowed for completing any unfinished work. A system of simple
reports or inventories of unfinished work should be set up.

(b) A. F. HAGEDORN
"How the Block System Controls Order Work" "
To explain the block control of orders, as we have developed it at
Bauer & Black, let us start with the schedule. The first column of the
schedule shows how the working hours of the week are divided into equal
periods of time, and each such period of block is given a number as shown
in the second column. In the next colnmn we show when blocks are due
out of the Order Department-allowing 5V, office hours for completion.
Time when blocks are due out of the Shipping [Department) are shown in
the fourth column-based on factory working hours. The last column

,. A. F. Hagedorn: "Production Planning for the Large or Small Office." N.oM.A.

Forum, June 193~, vol. 10, selected from p. 19. Reprinted by permission.
to A. F. Hagedorn: "How the Block System Controls Ord.. Work." Business
Management, Febmary 1946, vol. 14, selected from p. 9. Reprinted by pennission.
 MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
shows when orders are due out of the Billing Section of the Order De-
partment. Here we allow 30 I1Iinutes to prepare the invoice for mailing.
Every hour another block enters the Order Department, and at the same
time ~ block ~ust be ready to leave. Therefore, in any period of 5Y, con-
secutive workmg hours five or more blocks of orders are being worked on.
Theoretically, orders received up to 7: 30 a.m. for regularly cata-
logued and stocked items are to be put in Block 1 by writing the number 1
on them in coloured pencil; those received between 7:30 and 8:30 in
Block 2., and so on. But we receive 500 or more orders in the first mail on
Monday, while for the remainder of the day we receive less. Obviously a
schedule cannot be maintained if the amount of work assigued is six or
seven times that which can be done in a certain time. Therefore we assign
perhaps 80 orders, more or less, to each Block. As soon as the clerk num-
bering the orders has handled 8o-if that is the number established for
each block that day-she fills in the Block Sheet, showing date, Block
number, first and last numbers of the block, total number of orders, and
the hour it is due to be completed in the Shipping Department as well as
the Order Department. This Block Sheet is passed on to the Order De·
partment, and when work is completed on the last order of the block and
sent to the Shipping Department, the sheet is signed by the head of the
department, the hour of completion entered, and sent on to the Shipping
Department. It will be returned to the Order Department, duly signed and
time stamped, when the last order in the block has been packed and
shipped.
If an order in Block 2. has not yet been handled in the Order De-
partment, that department is charged with Blocks 2 to 8-if 8 is due out-
even though the only open order is the one in Block 2. The Shipping De-
partment will also be charged with Block 2, because they should have
finished with it by 12:00 noon Tuesday. Thus we encourage the Shipping
Department to get after the Order Department if orders are not going
through promptly.
The exact situation is brought to the attention of the persons reo
sponsible for the conduct of the business by means of the Block Report,
which is issued four times a day. This is compiled by reference to a file of
Block Sheets kept by the service clerk. It is a simple matter to examine the
schedule and determine the number of blocks late in any department.
Thus in an eight hour day, the departments cannot get more than two
hours behind schedule without management being aware of it and bring-
ing pressure to correct it. A report will not show all clear if the perform-
ance has not been 100%.
If stocks of frequently called for items are running low, the Ship-
ping Department, to avoid falling behind schedule, wi~1 b.ring pressure to
bear on the Planning Department where rests responslblhty for adequate
stocks. The Order Department is allowed 5Y, hours to get orders to the
Shipping Department; the Shipping Department is all?w~ 6 Y, ho~rs to
assemble, pack and ship; finally the Order Department IS gIVen 30 mmutes
to date invoices, add tmnsportation charges. etc., and deliver them to the
Mail Desk. Total lapse of time on regular ordm is 1l~ bon1S.

(c) A. F. HAc.aDOltN
"llock System Control of Order Work" ..
We write the complete order and invoice in one openttion on a
nine part [copy) form. One of these [copies] is used immediately for sta-
tistical information; five [copies] are filed by Block number in serial num-
ber order in a file kept by the Service Clerk. When the shipped order is
returned by the Shipping Department, these five [copies} are removed,
shipping date perforated on all copies, transportation charges added, the
[copies] separated and distributed. Thus the Invoice File at anyone time
represents the unshipped ordm or carry over of the business. The three
[copies] of the order form, which have not yet been explained, are sent to
the Shipping Department: one is the shipping order which is returned to
the office after proper handling; the second is the packing list which is put
in one of the shipping cases; the third is filed in the same way invoices are
filed in the office and removed to a semi-permanent file when the order
has been shipped. This file functions as a control of orders out in the
Shipping Department for assembling and packing.
It is surprising how the block control may be manipulated in the
interests of better service. Afternoon blocks, due to light mail, may have
only a few orders in them-perhaps none at all. It is possible to hold open
the last two blocks of the afternoon until the following morning and as-
sign to them some of the orders then received. Of course this shortens the
schedule a little, but if done judiciously does no harm. When we went on
the five day week, we recognized that orders received Friday morning
would not be shipped until Monday. So we immediately made it a rule
that orders received Friday morning were to be assigned to Thursday after-
noon blocks which were held open for that purpose. To prepare all depart-
ments for that set-up we went so far as to put some Thursday orders in
Wednesday blocks. Thus we maintained, practically unimpaired, the
service we have been giving previously.
All these operations become part of the control. It does not make
the prompt shipment of orders automatic, but it does make automatic in-
formation to the management four times a day that progress is, or is not,
being made. As a result, just as the Division Superintendent of a railroad
stmightens out traffic jams, the management can stmighten out any con-
gested condition $hown by the .Block Report.

The "block system" is coming to be widely used throughout gov-

ernment and business administration. It is interesting to note, for

1& A. F. Hagedorn: "Block System Control of Order Work." B~ Management,

March 1946, vol. 14. selected from pp. 7, u. Reprinted by permission.
60S MANACEMINT .RACTICIS

example, its similarity to the "batch system" .of handling tax returns
in official revenue agencies such as the Kentucky Department of
Revenue.
~me students of administration see little purpose in magnifying
the Importance of procedural particulars of this kind. With their
characteristic sense of humor, the British have ridiculed the special-
ist's obsession by specifying the obvious step-by-step procedures in
elaborate but humorous essays on "How to Dispose of an Incendiary
Bomb" or "How to Run a Bassoon Factory." Although thesc detailed
and sometimes obvious procedures are like the "bowls and dishes"
that Confucius urged his administrators to leave to others, the
manager who neglects the problem of procedure will find himself
doubting his effectiveness as a "real" administrator or "able" man-
ager.

S. PROCEDURE IN FEDERAL ADMINISTRATION

Although the Hoover Commission in its 1949 report on "Gen-

eral Management of the Executive Branch" reported that "the
growth of skills and methods in private organization has long since
outmoded many of the methods of the Government," 11 this criticism
was probably more applicable to organizational rather than pro-
cedural defects. For, under the stimulus of a Federal agency like the
Management Improvement Branch of the United States Bureau of
the Budget, a large number of governmental agencies are constantly
engaged in correcting and eliminating procedural bottlenecks. The
method of streamlining procedure constantly changes, but the fol-
lowing reading is one example of the management practice of "work
simplification. "

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SERVICE

"Work Simplification" ,.
The federal government writes 300,000,000 checks, audits Bo,-
000,000 vouchers, and sends 1,530,000,000 letters in a single year. These
figures spell big business-business which must be transacted with dis-
patch. Government must be "tooled up" to handle them, too. .
A priceless story is told involving a couple of federal agencies
which needn't be named. It seems that some of the staff of one of these
agencies felt that the other agency should be informed about decisions on

11 P. vii~ix.
'" Public Administration Service: "Work Simplification." Publication No, 01,
1945, adapted from pp. 1-4. Reprinted by permission.
 ••MIM'STUTtOil

certain topics. Therefore, wheaever this agency reached a decision on one

of these topics a memorandum describing the decision was prepared in
duplicate. The carbon was sent to the second agency and the original was
thrown in the wastebasket. Finally, someone took the trouble to scrutinize
this peculiar procedure. In the course of his study he called agency number
two to see what was done with the carbon. They threw the carbon in the
wastebasket. Thus by tradition and by default, "through-the-looking·g13ss"
foibles of management get little attention. Yet many people who are
familiar with the state of administrative management in the government
today feel that the fundamental problem is one of dealing with these
chronic and, individually, minor problems, commonly known as "red
tape."
It was [therefore] decided to concentrate on Work Simplification,
that is, streamlining paper work, as one of the first steps in the Burcau of
the Budget Program. In this program, operating agency people who have
been instructed in the plan, train agency firstline supervisors to study and
solve the basic problems of their own units. Therefore, improvements
grow from the "grass roots," and management obtains results which cannot
be achieved in any other way. Supervisors are taught to gather relevant
facts quickly, to organize them in simple chart form, and to interpret
them properly. Then supervisors take action on improvements within
their own units. Proposals for improvement affecting wider areas of the
organization are referred to their superiors. When the supervisor masters
the methods, he can continue to use them as a matter of course in solving
his everyday work problems.
From the standpoint of the Bureau of the Budget, Work Simpli-
fication is part of a training program, but it is more than that: It is an ac-
tion program as well. It is a program for imparting skill in the use of three
techniques of the specialist:
1. The Work Distribution Chart-a device for analyzing division
of labor.
2.. The Process Chart-a device for analyzing flow of work.
3. The Work Count-a device for interpreting the facts about
volume of work in terms of their bearing on method.
Charting Work Distribution. At the very first session the trainee
is plunged into the subject of work distribution charting. A work distribu-
tion chart is not difficult to construct. It is a simple tabulation of the vari-
ous tasks performed by the several employees of an organization unit classi-
fied according to a listing of the major activities of that unit. Time spent
by employees on each task is indicated. When this chart has been com-
pleted it is therefore possible to add up the total man hours spent on each
major activity. Sometimes the result comes as quite a surprise to a super-
visor and he immediately discovers any misdirected effort.
The function of the work distribution chart is to probe the sound·
ness of the existing division of 13bor. It shows up failures (0 delegate, for
instance, and cases of waste of critical skills through assignment of routine
 MANAGEMENT .UCTICIS

duties to professional employees who never seem to have time to get their
important j~bs done. It detects those jacks-of-all-trades who, through no
fault of theIr own, work themselves to death yet fail to make any im-
pressIOn on the work piled high in front of them. And it shows who is
overworked and who is underemployed.
. . Process Charting. The process chart is a device for tracing and
hlghhghtmg work flow. To make such a chart it is first necessary to identify
an offic~ procedure involving a number of steps in sequence. Usuallv a
form, a paper, a case or other office medium is selected to be follo~ed
through the several steps in processing it. In either event the steps are re-
corded in order on a special form which is provided for the purpose. Tbis
form is divided into two sections. The right hand section provides space
for entry of a brief description of each step. In the left hand section a set
of symbols is printed. These symbols assist the charter to see at a glance
just what steps are taking place during a work process. They are the sign
language of process charting. [1] In the use of this form, when something
is being changed, created, or added to (a letter typed, for example) a large
circle is used to show that an action or an operation is taking place. [1.J
When something is moved from one place to another, such as a letter
carried to another desk, a small circle is used to show transportation. [3]
When something remains in one place waiting further action, such as a
letter in an "outgoing" box, a triangle is used to indicate storage.{41 When
something is checked or verified but not changed, as in proofreading a
letter, a square is used to denote an inspection. A master process chart is a
part of the visual aid material on this subject. It contains examples of
duplicated effort, backtracking, and other work flow difficulties.
Work Counting. The work count presents the most difficult
problem of all. Attention is" given to the fact that both the work distribu-
tion chart and the process chart point to activities with respect to which a
work count should be made. For example, a long storage time or delay at
one step in a procedure will be highlighted by a process chart. Perhaps a
work count at this point will reveal a volume situation which requires that
additional manpower be used to expedite the flow. Or it may reveal that
the volume is not excessive and the delay is due to poorly trained em-
ployees. The work distribution chart may raise a questi~n about the de-
sirability of specialization in handling a certain piece of work. Here, too,
the facts about volume will provide a sound basis for decision.
A final session is held after all discussions and practice periods are
past. At this time the supervisors use all three of the ~ools to wo~k out an
installable improvement of some phase of the operatIons of theIr offices.
They are encouraged to postpone coming to any conclusions about the
practicability of a potential improvement until they have seen the results
obtained through the use of all three devices, for each tends to shed addi-
tionallight on the basic problem. Hence, improvement based on ~ll three
analytical approaches is bound to be sounder and more far reachmg than
that based on only one or twL. In the final session the trainer gives each
 ADMINISTU1101t

supervisor what help he can. In every case, however, he must assure him-
self that each supervisor has been able to formulate a definite improve-
ment which, perhaps after refinement, win be installable.

With their rapidly growing burden of administrative manage-

ment, governmental agencies have been forced to engage in such
procedural programs. The American social security system, for ex-
ample, involves some fifty million old-age insurance accoupts re-
quiring periodic entries. Even with the perfection of the photo.
electric cell, which makes it possible to discard punch.cards with false
entries, the system cannot be completely automatic. Since almost a
half-million Smiths must be accounted for under the American social
security system, for example, tangles are inevitable. For administra-
tors to see that the proper work is done and the necessary corrections
made is more than a question of mechanics. The situation requires
an appreciation of the relationship between procedure and policy-
an awareness of the meaning of converting the decisions of govern-
ment into the procedures of a bureaucracy. As Karl de Schweinitz,
an American public welfare expert, has said in reference to the social
security system, the object of sound public management is "to trans-
late a law into a check."

6. PROCEDURES FOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OF THE ECON·

OMY

Whether the government or a private firm engages in insurance

or "handouts" does not affect the problem of managerial procedure.
As a matter of fact, modern management, public or private, seems to
be completely without inhibitions about applying systematic and
routine controls upon major segments of the economy. The following
description ofwar-time production management by David D. Levine,
staff member of the Office of Procedures of the War Production
Board, will illustrate this point.

DAYID D. LEYINE
"Administrative Control Techniques of the W,r Production
Board""
The control of industry by preference ratings is one of the basic
administrative techniques utilized by the War Production Board. Stated
simply, a preference rating gives priority to the delivery of materials or
10 David D. Levine: "Administrative Control Techniques of the War Production
Board." Public Administtation Review, Spring '9-44, vol. 4, selected from pp. '}0-94.
Reprinted by permi$siou.
 MANAcrMENT PlACTIGES

products in accordance with the relative urgency to the war effort of the
use of such materials or products. This priority-or order of preference-
is governed by the provisions of Priorities Regulation No. I, which requires
that purchase orders must be accepted and filled in the sequence of the
ratings assigned. Thus, an order bearing an AA-l rating must be accepted
and filled before one with a rating of AA-'2, and an AAA rating must be
given p~rity over any other rating assigned. Exceptions to this principle
are permitted, however, to prevent the disruption of established produc-
tion schedules within a particular plant. For example, a producer may re-
fuse to accept an order with an AA-I rating if its acceptance would disturb
a production schedule established to fill other high-rated orders (AA-l to
AA-5) within fifteen days.
The use of preference ratings was supplemented, furthermore, by
a variety of other controls. The rapid growth of our military machine of
necessity resulted in increasingly greater demands upon our resources of
materials, productive facilities, and manpower. We were no longer a na-
tion of "unlimited" resources and capacity. The pinch of war requirements
had to be shifted to those civilian items which were not essential to the
war effort. Two basic administrative techniques were devised to perform
this task: (1) limitation orders, commonly known as L orders, and ('2)
conservation orders, known also as M orders. Limitation orders are among
the most drastic devices employed in the control of industry. In their ex-
treme form, they say that a specified product can no longer be produced.
Conversion of plants to war production was a direct outcome of the use of
limitati.on orders. For example, the production of passenger automobiles
for civilian use and for export was progressively curtailed and eventually
stopped by a series of orders beginning with 1-2, issued on September 13,
1941, and concluding with 1-2-g, issued on January 21, 1942. Conversion
orders, likewise, served to divert increasingly scarce materials into the pro-
duction of more essential war items. The method of approach utilized in
the M order was to prohibit or otherwise restrict the use of certain ma-
terials in specific products. Thus, Order M""9-C, issued on October 15,
1941, stopped the production of copper ash trays, candlestick holders,
andirons, and a variety of other copper knickknacks.
One of the simpler devices for conserving material employed by
the WPB is the control of production through the establishment of pr,?,
duction quotas. This administrative control technique is used when it IS
desirable to conserve materials but not esseptial to maintain a rigid control
over each transaction by producers within the industry. Production quotas
generally are of two types, namely, one which curtails the use of material
for the production of a specified item or one whic~ curtails the total out-
put of the product in terms of the number of umts which may be pro-
duced.
In order to accomplish this detailed control of industry, the WPB
has instituted the device of specifically authorizing individual transactions
or activities. Several methods for securing the specific authorization of the
610 ADMItUSTRATION

WPB have been devised. The particular method or procedure to be used

in administering any given priority order depends upon the degree of con-
trol necessary, the particular buying and selling practices of the industry,
llnd the anticipated number of requests for authorization_ The simplest
method of regulation requires a producer (or supplier) to file a list or
schedule of his proposed shipments for approvaL Thus, the principle of
controlling an industry at the point requiring the smallest operating work.
load for the WPB is given practical application. By a more complex varia-
tion of this method, a processor requests authorization to acquire certain
material, to pllt it into process, and to make delivery of the product.
The extent to which the device of scheduling operations should
be adopted for a particular industry is a problem of major unpod:aace to
the WPB. A decision of this nature depends upon the importance to the
war effort of the item being produced and the disparity between essential
requireUlents and the available supply of materials, compoaent parts, la-
bor supply, and plant facilitie~. Thus, the basic scheduling order of the
\VPB, 1\1-293, as amended Febrllary 10, 1944, establishes two basic pro-
cedures. If it is necessary to assure general continuity of production of a
specified item, the manufacturers of the item must file a periodic report
of their individual shipping schedules. The WPB can then make over-all
adjustments among similar plants in terms of balancing the requirements
for the item with the industry's capacity to produce. If, however, the pro-
duction of a particular essential item is limited and its distribution must
be strictly controlled, the \VPB may require that it must approve each
pmdlase onier before it is accepted by the supplier. When the two sched-
uling procedures are used in combination, they result in one of the strict-
est forms of control exercised by the \VPB. Under both procedures, pro-
vision is made for "freezing" the shipping schedule of a producer. This
provision enables such a producer to set his production machinery in mo-
tion without fear of serious disruption. No change can be made in this
"frozen" shipping schedule except by specific direction of the WPB.
The great administrative workload involved in production sched-
uling, both for industry and for the WPB, necessitates careful analysis of
proposed priority orders, first, to make sure that there is a need for sched-
uling and, second, to determine the least burdensome scheduling method
that will satisfy the requirements of essential war production. Complete
governmental control of our industrial economy would be possible by the
general use of the scheduling device alone. That it is not so used is"testi-
mony of the desire of the people and the government to impose upon
themselves only those restrictions which are essential to the successful
prosecution of the war.

After making detailed administrative case studies in this field,

Levine has further described the procedural ligaments that tie the
topmost political policies with the most routine management prac-
tices. To a "procedural analyst" with such experience, planned man-
 MAKMlIMINT .ItACTlCIS

agement of industry does not seem forbidding under emergency

con<!itions; nor do the "industrial analysts" who have to apply the
specific procedures seem to have any ideological qualms on the
subject .. One of the~e "analysts," for example, a former employee of
a chemIcal prodUCtion plant, had the duty of reviewing applications
for authority to deliver and use chemicals in short supply. Specifically
the "procedures" he utilized involved (1) an analysis of the "essen-
tiality" of the application, (2) a check of the applicant's "demand"
against the known national "supply," (3) a comparison of the
amount of materials requested against the applicant's production
capacity, (4) adjustment of demand in terms of total available sup-
ply, and (5) preparation of supporting papers including a "ledger
sheet" of the transaction. Throughout all of these procedures, the
"industrial analyst" must be and generally is "conscious at all times
that an essential segment of war production is dependent upon the
proper exercise of his judgment." so The application of management
procedures thus may impinge upon the "making" of major national
policies.

7. PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS IN INTERNATIONAL ADMINISTRATION

Procedures may be equally significant in our contemporary ex-

perience with international government. On the economic side, the
domestic allocation procedures described above were not far different
from the international requisitioning procedures developed under
Lend-Lease during World War II or the export licensing system
under the post-war European Recovery Program." In the field of
international government, the following quotation from Professor
Norman L. Hill of the University of Nebraska will illustrate the im-
portance of certain procedures utilized before World War II by the
League of Nations.
KORMAN L. HILL
International Administration ..
The [League of Nations] Council has defined a procedure in ac-
cordance with which petitions may be sent to it dealing with the rights of
.. David D. Levine: "Management Planning in Government." Unpublished manu-
script, 1945, p. 44·
21 "Operations Under Lend·Lease Act." Message from the President, Senate Docu-
ment No. S5 77th Cong., 1St Sess., '94', p. 1 S, Exbibit 2. See also Bureau of the
Budget M~ent Improvement Branch: "The 'Special Export License' Branch."
eonlerence on Organization and Methods Work, Second SerIes, December 1946 .
.. Norman L. Hill: International Adllllmstr.boD. Adapted from pp_ 93-94. Re·
printed by permission of McGraw-Hi1I Book Company, Inc. Copyright, 1931, McGnw-
Hill Book Company, Inc.
612 ...tJlfSrU1'IOII
minorities as defined by. existing treaties. By this pm<:e<iure either im;li-
vidual states or the millorities themselves are entitled to dispatch petitions
to the Secretary-Ceneral of the League, requesting tfutt they be turned
over to the Council for consideration. The Secretary-General is expected
to send copies of the petitions to the states concerned and to the President
of the Council. The President asks either two or four members of tbe
Council to assist him in examining petitions. Any of these officials; or'!!\iY
other member of the Council, may place the substance of the petitions on
the agenda of tbe Council if the preliminary examination discloses condi·
tions which seem to them to justify such action.
Upon the receipt of copies of petitions from the Secretary-GeneraI
by the states concerned, explanations may be given in writing. These ex-
planations, ttlgether with copies of the petitions, are sent to all of the
states which are repr.esented on the Council. In the event that the Council
arranges hearings, the states concerned may have representatives present;
no arrangement has been made, however, for the representation of the
complaining minorities.
In actual practice the Secretary-General [of the League of Na-
tions] receives a large number of petitions annually. Many of them are not
examined by a council committee for the reason that they do not comply,
either in form or in content, with the rules which have been laid down,
and a still smaller proportion of them are considered by the Council as a
whole. The OBic:ial Journal, July, 1930, gives the following records for the
period beginning June 13, 19~9, and ending on May 31,1930: 57 petitions
were received of which 2.6 were rejected because in form or content they
did not conform to requirements.

Form and protocol, of course, have always played a large part

in diplomatic affairs, but it is only with our more recent attempts to
refine the machinery for international peace and security that specific
administrative or quasi-judicial procedures have become decisive in
world affairs. For some administrators the main hope for channelling
controversies which may lead to war into justiciable questions to be
brought before the International Court of Jnstice, or into technical
administrative questions to be put before the mediators and experts
of the Secretariat of the United Nations, lies in the development of
procedure. The attempt is not always successful in view of the tend-
ency of nations to disagree on procedural and substantive questions.
It remains to be seen, for example, whether the United Nations'
attempt to eliminate the international veto from Security Council
decisions on "procedural matters" can be successful." Paradoxical as
.. Charter of tbe United Nations. Art. 27. See also Crmnwell Adams Riches: The
Unanimity Rule and the League of Nations. Baltintore: The Johns Hopkins University,
1933. The Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Pabful Science. New
Series No. 20. Wellington Koo Jr.: Voting Procec:bues in InteruationaI Polltical
Otganizations. New York: Columbia University; '947.
613 MANAGEMINT ,umen
it may seem, however, the main hope of achieving aims of such
magnItude as the peaceful settlement of international disputes is in
sharpening the simplest tools of procedure.

8. .CODES OF PROCEDURE

Procedures ca.n become so complex that large institutions in gov-

em~ent and b_usmess often definitize their routines and practices by
p_uttmg them mto proce?ural. codes which are constantly being re-
YIsed. Rules ~n.d re~ulatlOns Issued for the public are matched by
mternal admmlstrative manuals which instruct the staff where to
route papers and how to keep the work moving. Moreover, an entire
protocol on procedures themselves has developed in management.
The systematic habits of German administration offer one case study
of this kind. The authors of the reading presented below are Pro-
fessor Arnold Brecht, a former German civil servant, who teaches
at the New School for Social Research, and his colleague, Comstock
Glaser.

ARNOLD BRECHT AND COMSTOCK CLASER

The Art and Technique of Administration in German Ministries"
It i~ on\)' 1eCeI\t\)' that the details 0\ administrative ptocedme
have aroused interest in America as a subject worthy of theoretical in-
vestigation. They have been given casual descriptive treatment by writers
who have noted that things are done one way in Office A and another way
in Office B and Office B is more efficient. There are a few "tricks of the
trade" to be had for the asking and more than a few salty case histories.
But there is no established theory or practice regarding procedure which
can be accepted as standard. Traditions run differently in the various de-
partments and administrative planners are faced with the problem of
building a body of thought from the ground up, and even of framing a suit-
able terminology.
The fact that in a country of such high administrative traditions
and standards as Germany the Ministries laid down rules of procedure a
number of years ago, tried them and found them good, and have held to
them ever since should be of vital interest. Although the experience of
the German Mi~istries may not be completely relevant to American condi-
tions, it is possible to derive from it observations of immediate theoretical
value and potential practical usefulness. In the 'twenties the senior aut~?r
of this volume, then in charge of the Division for Constitution, AdmIn-
.. Arnold Brecht and Comstock Glaser: The Art and Technique of Administr~tion
in German Ministries. Adapted from pp. 3-5, ,6-19 .. Revrinted by permission of
Harvard University Press. Copyright, '940, Harvard Urnvel'Sltv Press~
istration and Civil Service in the Reich Ministry of the Interior, succeeded
in obtaibing the passage ~f a Code of Administrative Procedure for all the
German national Ministries. He was not aware, then, that the code might
be significant except as a technical instrument for internal administration.
He was surprised when, soon afterward, German professors, authorities in
government and public law, told him that the code with its exact descrip-
tion of intra-office technique had for the first time made them really un·
derstand German executive government, its elliciency, and its spirit of
work. Discussions with English, French, and American professors sub-
stantiated this unintentional documentary value of the compilation. Even
more significant to the author was the failure which met his attempt to
find similar codes in other countries, for the purpose of gaining a like in-
sight into their administrative work. Such comprehensive and exact man.
uals were not in existence.
It may be surprising to learn that the Code of Administrative
Procedure, which was set up by the [German] democratic regime, has con-
tinued in force under the totalitarian state. This, however, is only a new il-
lustration of the fact, long known to good administrators, that different as
are the political aims and means of various rulers, the technical problems
in administration are very much the same under any regime. The French
democracy received much of its administrative technique from Napoleon,
the German Fuhrer state conversely from monarchy and democracy.
The Code of Administrative Procedure was passed without even
a question (September 2,1926). Each minister had been advised to con-
sent by his representative on the drafting committee, who had pointed otit
to him the efficiencies in operation to be gained through the Code, and
the escape clause which permitted deviations. As had been anticipated the
escape clause was rarely used and then only for special reasons.
[One] illustration [occurred] amusing in its triviality. It had al-
ways been customary in German Ministries for the lower officials not to
use colored pencils in the shades used by the Minister, Secretary, and Di-
vision Directors, in order to avoid confusion as to the authorship of mar-
ginal notations, underscorings, etc., and to draw attention to these of the
higher officials. This device is simple and efficient. But the color habits
changed, and it was not always easy to determine who had made the
notations on older papers. It was suggested in the committee that the
Minister should use a green, the Secretary a red, the Division Director a
blue pencil. The representatives of some Mirtistries objected that this
was "unbearable," they being accustomed to the Minister's using a blue
pencil, etc. No one scheme was inherently better than any other. But a
majority was obtained for the proposed set of rolors, lind the minority
were reminded that by invoking the escape clause they could use other
schemes if they cared. After the Code came into elfect no Ministry cared
to alter the rule, which has been in general effect ever since. It became so
well established that a few years later a Secretary, who had been commis-
'1'5 MANACENENT PRACTICES

~oned?y the.President of the R~ub~ic to serve as acting Minister for an

mdefimte penod, asked whether m thIs capacity he was supposed to use a
green or a red penciL The advice jocularly given was that he had better
rontinue to use red pencil, because then he would not have to surrender
his pencil with the office in case some day a Minister should he appointed
and wield the green pencil again. He followed this suggestion.

In spite of criticisms of the obsessive practices of German man-

agement, the idea of the procedural code has also taken root in
American management in the form of "procedure manuals" or
"standard operating procedures." ..

9. CORRESPONDENCE, FILES, AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT

One of the heaviest burdens of large-scale management involves

the use and disposal of papers, files, and records." These duties are
often regarded as forbidding, until one looks at the records man-
agement problem comprehensively and creatively. Terry Beach, who
managed the records of such organizations as the Southern Railway,
the Federal Security Agency, and the Atomic Energy Commission,
examines this question below.

TERRY BEACH

"Why Manage Records?" ....

This interest [in records1got its greatest impetus when, in the fall
of 1941, Archibald MacLeish, acting for the Committee on the Con-
servation of Cultural Resources, found that there were 6,875,31i9 cubic feet
of records in the custody of the Federal Government-in the District of
Columbia alone! This astounding mass of records presented several serious
problems. Space occupancy, the tying up of irreplaceable equipment, and
the use of hard-to-get personnel were some of the physical problems alo~e.
Several developments contributed, at least in part, to the solutIon
of some of these problems:
1. A Records Administration Central Committee was set up un-
der the Training Division of the Civil Service Commission. The Commit-

.. "Alfred P. Sloan Jr. Chairman." F.?rtune•. April 19.38. ~ol. 17•. p. 11'. Ray
Miller: "A Wartime Procedure Manual. PublIC AdmlDlstratlOn ReVIew. Summer
1946, vol. 6. pp. 228-34. ,,' C i s " Man
... United States Bureau of the Budget: Reeord. Retirement and ontro. .
agement Bulletin. January '94)· . .
.., Terry Beach: "Why Manage Records?" Personn.el Admimstratlon. January '947.
vol. 9. selected from pp. 31-34. Reprinted by pemlisslOn.
616 ADMINISTlATION

tee membersbip was comprised of fifty or more representatives of Federal

departments and agencies.
z. The National Archives, under the direction of Dr. Pbilip C.
Brooks, undertook a records administration program which included ex-
panding the facilities and advice made available by the National Archives.
3. Dr. Pendleton Herring was made available to the Bureau of the
Budget, to give his attention to the maintenance of suitable records of the
administrative development of war agencies. At the request of the Presi-
dent, this program was expanded.
It was found that the most successful way to solve these problems
and to prevent their recurrence was to fix the responsibility for the vari-
ous phases of records administration on a staff office located at or near the
top of an agency. And so there sprang up, here and there, records manage·
ment ofIices having over-all authority and control of the records of their
respective departments or agencies. Since the desperate urgency of the
war years, there has been a steady growth in the number of records man-
agement offices. The Federal Security Agency has probably the most re-
cently established office of this kind. And all of these offices exist today be-
cause of the fundamental importance of records.
We should make quite certain that there is no misunderstanding
of the term "records management." Some people, when they hear the
term "records manager," think of a doddering old fellow, shuffling musty
old papers and, with trembling hands, placing them in neat piles-to be
thrown away. Others, perhaps, have a vague notion that a records manager
is a kind of local representative of a paper salvage committee, a sort of
glorified trash man I Such, I hasten to say, is not the case. Records man-
agement is divided into three parts: (1) Corre~pondence Management,
( 2) Current Records Management, (3) Non-current Records Manage-
ment. I like to think of these as being comparable to the life span of a
human being. For example:
CORRESPONDENCE This has to do with the creation of records;
MANAGEMENT- the seeing that only necessary records come
into being and that they are born as speedily
as possible and with a minimum of birth
pangs.
CURRENT RECORDS This deals with records that are current and
MANAGEMENT- vigorously active. It sees that they are well-
housed and useful servants, ready when
needed.
NON-cuRRENT RECORDS This concerns the twilight and old-age of
MANAGEMENT- records. It sees that inactive records are dis-
posed of gracefully or preserved for posterity.
The stenographer busily typing a letter is not aware perhaps, that
she is participating in the birth of a record. Nor is it h"kely that the person
6t7 MANACEMENT PRACTICES
who dictated that letter was aware that he was causing a record to be born.
Nevertheless, most records today come into being to the accompanying
beat of typewriter keys and the flourish of signatory pens. This is the best
point, then, at which to solve the problem of unnecessary duplicate rec-
ords. The best way to solve that problem is not to create them. Also,
through studies which show how many carbon copies are being prepared
and where they are going, and eliminating those which are not necessary.
You have heard it said that files are the memory of an organiza-
tion. Whether that memory is good or bad depends on the soundness of
filing systems, the ability and interest of the human beings who run them,
the quality and fitness of equipment and supplies, and the cooperation of
those who ask for files. Unfortunately, once filing systems are installed
and started on their way, there is no assurance that they will thenceforth
and forevermore run smoothly and satisfactorily on their allotted course.
Sooner or later a renovating job is necessary. Current records management,
therefore, includes the installing or reorganizing of mail and file systems,
the conducting of in-service training courses on records management in
collaboration with personnel offices, and the review of requisitions for
filing equipment and special supplies to determine if the most appropriate
kind is asked for, if the amount is in proper ratio to needs, and if suitable
equipment or supplies can be furnished from surplus stock.
This is a brief general outline of the normal activities of a records
management office. They are centered in such an office because it has been
found that these things somehow just don't get done if left solely up to
local offices. The records management office exists to furnish agency-wide
planning, stimulation, and technical direction. It does not attempt to en-
gage in the details of mail and file activities. "Records Officers" are some-
times designated in most of the staff and operating offices of an agency.
Tbese are the people who are most intimately acquainted with local prob-
lems and conditions, and the records management office should work
through them. It must also coordinate its efforts with offices engaged in
other management activities.
It is perhaps fitting to conclude with a moment of silent pr~yer
that the dread specter of skeletonized appropriations will not permIt a
Frankenstein monster akin to those earlier 6,875,36<J cubic feet of records
again to overwhelm our Federal offices.

This prayer was not immediately answered. The Hoover C~m­

mission found that in 1948 the hoard of Federal records was growmg
at the rate of 18,000,000 square feet per year, and t~at there existed
government records to "fill six buildings each the size of the Penta-
gon." 2. The problem is not restricted to modern mass management.

.. Commission on Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government. "Of·

fice of General Setvices."
618 Al:IMINISTUTtON

Pliny, the Roman colonial administrator operating in Greece, had

to appeal to the Emperor Trajan directly for copies of essential
edicts lfIld letters, and had to explain: «I imagine the true copies are
preserved in your Record Office."" Roman records were still hard
to trace in spite of the fact that the emperors had an elaborate set of
specialized records offices. In addition to a Chief of Greek Cor-
respondence they retained a Chief of Memoranda, a Chief of
Correspondence, and a Chief of Documents." An administrative
genius like Napoleon:' or Colbert or Talleyrand,·· was not unaware
of the crucial importance of record keeping.

10. SIMPLIFICATION OF PROCEDURES AND CORRESPONDENCE

As Terry Beach suggests, the best way to solve these procedural

problems is to reduce the amount of written material and to avoid
formalizing management procedures as much as possible. Formal and
official correspondence have their elements of essentiality, of course.
The British statesman Lord Haldane understood the importance of
official correspondence when, as head of the War Office, he had to
assume the additional duties of Home Secretary. He had recently
addressed an official request to the Home Office and one of his first
duties as Home Secretary was to write himself a memorandum re-
fusing his own request as Secretary of War.
Many executives, however, make a fetish of the written word.
Memoranda call for answers, and the time of some organizations is
consumed by the necessity of following up on written communica-
tions that should never have been written. Administrators realize
especially in times of national emergency the dangers of verbosity, as
revealed below in (a) the circular issued by the British Treasury, and
(b) the hypothetical instruction issued by Maury Maverick, who has
served as Mayor of San Antonio, Representative from Texas, and
Chairman of the Smaller War Plants Corporation.

"William Melmoth: Pliny Letters. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1915.
Letter No.6" vol. "-, p. 36,.
.. Pierino Belli: A Treatise on Military Matters and Warfare. Part 1, Chapter 15.
Translated in Classics of International Law, James Brown Scott, ed., No. .8, vol. %,
p. 35. Oxford: The Clarendon Press; 1936.
81 Napoleon Self·Revealed, J. M. Thompson, ed. Boston: Houghton Milliin Com·
pany; 1934, pp. 81, 129.
"Charles Woolsey Cole: Colbert and a Century of French Mercantilism. New
York: Colwnbia Univcmity Press; 1939, pp. 299-300, 320. Cmne Brinton: The Lives
of Talleyrand. New York; W. W. Norton &, Company, Inc~ 1936, pp. U9-30.
619 MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
(a) IRITISH TUASURY
Circular to Departmental Officials"
Sir,-:-I am directed by the Lords Commissioners of His Majesty's
Treasury to mform you that the Prime Minister had directed that it is es-
sential in present circumstances that all Departments and all branches of
the Service should take every possible step to avoid administrative delays,
to accelerate decisions and to expedite executive action.
Since the war there has been a noticeable speeding up of public
business, but to-day's needs demand that more must be done; I am to ask,
therefore, that this matter may be given further urgent consideration as
regards business both within Departments and between Departments.
The following possibilities should, in particular, be explored:
Simplification of procedure, e.g., in putting to tender and placing
of contracts, accounting methods, etc.
Further development of oral discussion in place of written min·
utes, the final conclusions alone being recorded.
Expedition of action when agreement on policy has been reached,
e.g. on the strength of oral instructions, subsequently confirmed in writing
if necessary.

(hI MAURY MAVERICK

"Goobledygook" ..
Be short and use Plain English
Memoranda should be as short as clearness will allow. The Naval
officer who wired "Sighted Sub-Sank Same" told the whole story.
Put the real subject matter-the point-and even the conclusion,
in the opening paragraph and the whole story on one page. Period! 1£ a
lengthy explanation, statistical matter, or such is necessary, use attach·
ments.
Stay off gobbledygook language. It only fouls people up. For the
Lord's sake, be short and say what you're talking about. Let's stop "point·
ing-up" programs, "finalizing" contracts that "stem from" district, regional
or Washington "levels." There aTe no "levels"-local government is as
hi:;h as Washington Government. No more patterns, effectuating, dy-
namics. Anyone using the words "activation" or "implementation" will be
shot.

In a war-time speech, Winston Churchill put the polite objec-

tions of the British Treasury into almost as colorful a statement
.. British Treasury: Circular to Departmental Officials. Quoted by Herman Finer:
"Civil Service in War·Time Britain." Public Personnel Review, July 1941, vol. 2,
selected from p. 191.
.. Maury Maverick: "Gobbledygook." Publii Administration Review, Spring 1944,
vol. 4, p. 151. Reprinted by permission.
~ UM~~~
which criticised the "full-dress reports," the ''wooly phrases." and the
"mere padding" of official communications." One method of han-
dling some of this paper work in modem management is to can to
the attention of the next level of decision-making, that is, "the boss,"
only the essential part of the material he needs for his decision. An
effective practice is for subordinates to divide the material they put
before their superior into two broad classes: (1) the subordinate's
summary of the pending issue, together with the recommended an-
swer, course of action, or the alternative courses of action, and the
reasons therefor; and (2.) the supporting papers including related
reports or previous correspondence on the subject, together with a
selected body of material from the files, and, if necessary and con-
venient, the entire file of the subject.
With regard to paper work other suggestions include: (1) Use
of the follow-up memo after a conference or a telephone conversa-
tion, addressed to all officials concerned and outlining the division of
work. (2.) Use of carbon copies of correspondence addressed to all
interested parties other than the addressee who may be concerned,
the copy to be marked either for "information" or for "action," and
possibly checked or underlined where the document most concerns
the person receiving the copy. (3) Use of routing forms containing
the names of all staff members who generally receive such data,
checked in order to limit the routing only to those officials concerned
with the particular circumstances, and containing also alternative
instructions to be written in or checked, such as: "Information
only," "Follow up and report to me by --," "Prepare answer for
my signature," "Consult with and jointly prepare answer for my sig-
nature," "Answer this yourself," etc. (4) Periodic checking of cor-
respondence, especially of new or partly-trained subordinate staff
members, so that subordinates will understand that this procedure
is being followed as a means of informing superiors about tlle han-
dling of routine matters and of discovering whetller subordinates are
carrying out the exception principle in the light of the superior's
conception of what constitutes exceptional circumstances.

11. PROCEDURAL MISTAKES AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES

Unnecessarily complex procedures may cause confusion among

business clients or ordinary citizens, just as routine forms and prac-
tices may sometimes lead to errors among employees and staff per-
sonnel. These bureaucratic mistakes are not the monopoly of any
particular culture. Below is (a) a Soviet citizen's complaint by Yefin
.. Finer: "Civil Service in War·Time Britain," p. 191
621 MANAGEMENT 'RACTIC:ES

Uxzhumsky, and (b) an American army document, in a similar vein,

by General Ben Lear.

(a) YEFIN URZHUMSKY

"The Problem of Diapers in Russia" ..
Creat joy was mine-my wife had borne a son.
What does the human animal need when, having arrived in this
world at a Maternity Hospital, he is ready to leave for home?
Obviously, diapers.
First of all a certificate had to be made out by the Maternity
Hospital to the effect that the boy was born alive.
"You'll get his diapers in the Women's Consultation Room,"
they told me.
In the Consultation Room they said: "You'll have to have a cer-
tificate of residence from the management of the house you live in and
also an authorization to receive the diapers."
"Who is to authorize me?" I asked in surprise. "The baby?"
"Authorization comes from the mother," was the answer.
And so I went to the house management, and then to the Ma-
ternity Hospital, collecting certificates.
Back in the Consultation Room I was given, in exchange for my
three certificates, a new certificate.
"Present it at your wife's place of work," 1 was graciously advised.
At my wife's place of work, my son was entered in a record.
Armed now with records and certificates I went to the District Bureau of
Produce Cards, and obtained an order for diapers.
I held in my hands the small green card, and wondered: What
would all these kindly kibitzers be doing if somebody had thought up the
brilliant idea that diapers, or at least orders for diapers, might be supplied
directly by the Maternity Hospital?
On the seventh day of his life my son, in his new diapers, was
"written out" into the world.
"Here's your soap certificate," they said in parting, and handed
me a scrap of paper.
The young man was well into his second month before that soap
certificate transformed itself into a cake of soap.
It had not been lying idle, either. The certificate traveled first to
the house management. From there it was directed to the Women's
Consultation Room; thence to the Child's Consultation Room; then back
to the house management. After that it trotted over to the "place of work
of the mother"; from there to the District Bureau of Produce Cards;

.. Yefin Urzhumsky: "The Problem of Diapers in Russia." Quoted hom Krolrodil

(Moscow) hy Reader's Digest, January 1946, vol. 48, pp. 29-30. Reprmted by per.
mission.
thence to the "place of work· of the father"; then once more to the Bureau
of Produce Cards, and 6.nally back to the Matemity Hospital.
But it did not travel to all these places by itself. Oh, no-Daddy
went with it. That's what daddies are for.
On the back of the certi6.cate appears the following pronounce-
ment: "All coupons for soap should be received directly in the Matemity
Hospital. President of the District Bureau of Produce Car~ A. Kuznet-
rov." Immediately under that we read: "In the first instance, cards for
soap are to be received, upon presentation of this certificate, at the office
where all other produce cards are received. (Signature illegible.)"
I did get the soap-finally .
But I am keeping the certificate, and when my son grows up and
goes to work I am going to show him this bit of paper and say: "Tear this
up, son, and try never in your life to issue such papers or write such pro-
nouncements. Try to treat your fellow man as a human being."

(b) letter from General Ben lear, October 6, 1937 11

A copy of your paragraph 4, Special Orders :110, ordering Sergeant
Peter Nelson (R-2283026) to proceed to San Francisco for transportation
on the 6.rst available transport to Fort Bliss, has been received and noted
with great interest and no little perturbation. A perusal of the transport
sailings on file in this office fails to show any transport scheduled from San
Francisco to Fort Bliss. In the absence of this information this head-
quarters assumes that the trip will be made up the Gulf of California and
then either via the Colorado and Rio Grande Rivers or the Gila and Rio
Grande Rivers (See Incl. No. I-Map of Suggested Route). Either route,
it appears, would provide a most interesting adventure for both the crew
and passengers. Of course, the difficulties of portage between the head·
waters of the rivers and Over Boulder and Elephant Butte Dams would
provide situations to titillate the imagination of the engineers.
This headquarters wishes to cooperate fully in every possible way.
In this respeet these questions come to mind reference the trip:
a. The possibility of an international incident if the southern
half of the Rio Grande is used.
b. The possibility of arousing the natives and navies of the States
of Arizona, Utah, Colorado and New Mexico respectively and progres-
sively, in the event the interior route is chosen.
c. The necessity of salutes.
d. Whether or not the trip, by either route, would be publicized
or kept _secret.
The exact date of arrival of the transport at this station would be
aT Letter, Commanding General, Fort B~, TelIlIS to Commanding OIIicer, Letter-
man General Hospital, San Fmncisco, California. Quoted in The Army Medical Bu1Je.
tin, April 19~8, vol. 44.
 MANACEMENT 'IlACTlCES

ap~ted, as the personnel of this command and the local townspeople

are In a fiesta mood and plan a big reception. If sufficient time intervenes,
it may be possible to arrange for the Quartermaster General to attend the
~emoni~. This would be a very a~propriate gesture on his part; espe-
Cially so smce there has been nothmg greater than a prairie schooner
through here in lo! these many years.
This headquarters and the Ordnance Department appreciate
deeply this unusually noble expenditure of effort to get Sergeant Nelson
to us, and openly marvel at the ingenuity of the Medical Department in
planning such a vastly radical departure from the humdrum routine of
ordinary transport travel. Should further innovations ill transport service
be simmering in your executives offices, it is requested that we be notified
promptly upon their adoption.

Even the most efficient system of procedural forms may produce

errors such as the use of "transport" for "transportation." Nor can
modem records management or scientific correspondence filing avoid
all of the bureaucratic complexities that might arise. TIle subject
classification of the War Department correspondence file at one time
contained the item "Civilian Employees," under the file number
°46.3. But upon consulting the number classification it was found
that the following subject was numbered °46.3: "Interior Depart-
ment, Government Hospital for the Insane (Admission of Civilian
Employees) ."
Every well-regulated administrative family deserves some margin
of error. But the pinch of mistaken management practices is felt most
seriously when those persons outside the organization suffer from
defects in procedures and routines of the kind referred to by
Urzhumsky and Lear. The administrator must be as foresighted as
possible and hope that he will not be faced with the dilemma of the
income tax administrator who had printed on one section of his
carefully prepared income tax form the instruction, "Don't write
here," only to be answered by the irate taxpayer, "I write where I
- - - - - please." Yet without such forms, form letters, indexes,
routine practices, and standard pro'~edures, organizations face even
greater managerial embarrassment and administrative confusion.

12. THE BURDEN OF UNDELEGATED ADMINISTRATIVE ROUTINES

What may be a routine problem at one l~el of, auth?rity ~a~ be

a discretionary problem at a lower level. While thiS vanable d1Stl~C­
tion is not definite enough to earmark a matter for procedural routme
624
rather than discretionary action, it emphasizes the constant ill)por-
tance of even "routine" decisions in administration. In any case, the
attempt shOuld be at all levels of responsibility to delegate constllntly
downward as many decisions as possible. Without the continual dele-
gation of routine activities to others, administrative duties bec:ome
intolerable. This situation is especially evident at the higher levels
of executive responsibility as shown in the following readings from
(a) George Washington, (b) Governor Alfred E. Smith, an!! (c)
Chester 1. Barnard, President of the New Jersey Telephone COm-
pany.
(al Letter from George Washington to David Hum,,~reys,
February 7, nSS"
In my last, by the Marquis de la Fayette, I gave you reason to be-
lieve that when I was more at leizure, you should receive a long letter
from me; however agreeable this might be to my wishes, the period it is to
be feared, will never arrive. I can with truth assure you, that at no period
of the war have I been obliged to write half as much as I now do, from
necessity. I have been enquiring for sometime past, for a person iIi the
character of Secretary or clerk to live with me; but hitherto unsuccessfully.
What with letters (often of an unmeaning nature) from foreigners. En-
quiries after Dick, Tom, and Harry who may have been in some part, or at
JO\1Z\~l~\~ ..1~? t.1u: COlyA'I?d,W311 ,reI.T~~e. Lette... §'~. 6\'" -certikcUes ol.k."'Mri.,~ lar
those who want to go out of their own State. Introductions; applications
for copies of Papaer; references of a thousand old matters with which I
ought not to be troubled, more than the Great Mogul, but which mUst re-
ceive an answer of some kind, deprive me of my usual exercise; and with-
out relief, may be injurious to me as I already begin to feel the weight, and
oppression of it in my head, and am assured by the faculty, if I dQ not
change my course, I shall certainly sink under it.

(b) ALFRED It. SMITH

"How We, Ruin Our Governors""
How long would any great corporation live if the man diretting
its affairs was compelled to spend 75 per cent of his time doing cl<:rical
work, signing papers, listening to reports that might well be directed to a
competent subordinate? Theoretically the governor is the head o~ the
government. He is supposed to plan the broad administrative policy. Peo-
ple think that he deals with large affairs. As a matter of fact his energy is
3. Letter from George Washington to David Humphreys, February 7, 1785. The
Writings of Washington, John C. Fitzpatrick, ed., vol. ~8, pp. 6S-66 .
.. Alfred E. Smith: "How We Ruin Our Governors.» National Municipal Rtview,
May 1921.' vol. 10, selected from pp. 277-80. Reprinted by pennission.
 MANACIMENT PIACTtCIS
consumed by trivial details of a clerical or subordinate nature. There is
lIttle time and strength left for the high functions of his office. In addition
to the reorgani~~on of adminis~rative ~epartments to give him easy con-
trol and supetVlSlon over executive affaIrS, the governor must be relieved
from scores of petty duties which demand his attention at serious detri-
ment to his work for the people.
. The most annoying duty that is placed upon the governor is his
chaIrmanship of the trustees of public buildings. The state makes hun-
dreds of leases in various cities for branches of the different state depart-
ments. Even for the small gas testing station required by the public service
commission, the rental of which may be only twenty dollars a month, the
governor and other trustees must sign three copies of each lease. Before
part payments can be made for contracts for repairs to the capitol the
trustees must approve, although the determination of the matter is nat-
urally in control of the state architect. If a room is to be painted in the
capitol or a new strip of carpet is to be laid, there must be a meeting of
the trustees, and the work cannot progress until the governor lays aside
his other duties and takes up for consideration the question of a few pots
of paint.
The law requires that the governor sign all the parole sheets be-
fore men are liberated from the various prisons of the state, even after they
have completed the minimum time for which they were sentenced. All
applications for notaries public--'llnd there are some 65,000 of them in
the state-are sent to the executive chamber, making necessary a whole de-
partment in the governor's office for the handling of the applications.
There is a provision of law which requires the governor to sign all con-
tracts for repairs and betterments in the state hospitals-not only sign
the contract, but also the architect's blueprints. He knows nothing about
it and signs them usually upon the recommendation of the state architect.
There is another important matter that deserves serious attention,
that might be easily remedied. It would require only legislative actio~,
either by amendment to the rules, or if not, by amendment of the legiS-
lative law, to prevent the dumping of a large number of bills into the ex-
ecutive chamber, giving the governor only thirty days to consider them. At
the last session of the legislature I had 856 thirty-day bills. That meant
that I was given only thirty days to consider 856 bills. My experience at
the close of the last session showed me that the large number of bills left
with me could not be intelligently di5posed of unless I worked from 9:3 0
in the morning until 1 or:2 o'clock the following. morning. It is too m?ch
of a strain to put on the governor, and leaves him useless for some time
after.
The total net result of a New York governor's too-plentiful duties
is that the great, big, prominent questions that aff~t tile welfare of a
commonwealth of over 10,000,000 people are subordInated to the small,
tiresome and irritating tasks that are put upon the governor by statute.
 (C) CIfISTD I. IWtNAtD
The func;tions of the Executive ..
The line art of executive decision consists in not deciding ques·
tions that are not now pertinent, in not deciding prematurely, in not mak-
ing decision that cannot be made effective, and in not making decisions
that others should make. Not to decide questions that are not pertinent
at the time is uncommon good sense, though to raise them may be un-
common perspicacity. Not to decide questions prematurely is to refuse
commitment of attitude or the development of prejudice. Not to make de-
cisions that cannot be made effective is to refrain from destroying au-
thority. Not to make decisions that others should make is to preserve
morale, to develop competence, to fix responsibility, and to preserve au-
thority.
From this it may be seen that decisions fall into two major classes,
positive decisions-to do something, to direct action, to cease action, to
prevent action; and negative decisions, which are decisions not to decide.
Both are inescapabJe; but the negative decisions are often largely un-
conscious, relatively nonlogical, "instinctive," "good sense." It is because
of the rejections that the selection is good.

The American manager traditionally has been conscious of this

need to develop the "fine art of executive discretion"; that is, the
art of administrative delegation. In 1798 Hamilton warned Secretary
of War McHenry when the latter was "plunged in a vast mass of
details": "It is essential to the success of the minister of a great de-
partment that he subdivide the objects of his care, distribute them
among competent assistants, and content himself with a general but
vigilant superintendence." n The tendency to delegate disturbing
details has sometimes been criticised, in army parlance, as "passing
the buck" down the chain of command without actually making an
effort to apply any foresighted managerial skill at the higher levels
of responsibility and authority. There is probably nothing wrong in
"passing the buck" providing it is divided before being passed on
in such a way that the job is organized and managed in accordance
with a definite procedure. Too many executives make the mistake {)f
the British customs officer who, whenever he was confronted with a
matter beyond his capacity, passed it on with the following order:
"Let the proper officer take the proper action." ..

.. Chester l. Barnard: The Functions of the Executive. P. 194- Reprinted by per-

mission of Harvard University Press. Copyright, 1938, Harvard Univemty Press.
" Letter, Alexander Hamilton to Secretary of W .. McHenry, July 30, 1198. The
Works of Alexander Hamilton, vol. 6, p. 484:
. ':,Stamp: "The Contrast between the Administration of Business and Public Af·
ialIS, p. 161.
 MANACEMfNT NACTtClS

~ffective admini~t:ators real~e that it is the procedure, routine,

detad that the administrator falls to foresee which causes him the
~eatest <:mharrassment. The !'ederalist Postmaster Timothy Picker-
Ing descnbed ~he early Amen<:an postal service in these terms: "In
detail ~e busmes~ .seems to be I?i~d~ing; all its emoluments arising
from tnfles; altho In the whole It IS Important; each trifle therefore
demands a .patien~ atten_tion."·' A sill,lilar warning was issued by
Joseph ~talln to hiS Soviet man~gers: 'It is further necessary that
our bUSIness leaders control theIr enterprises not 'in general,' not
'in th~ air,' but concretely and objectively; . . . that they study the
techmque of the given matter and enter into its every detail and
'trifle: for it is on 'trifles' that our great cause is now being built." ..

13. PRACTICAL PRECEPTS OF MANAGEMENT

AIe these managerial techniques subject to standard enumeration

or are they rule-of-thumb practices that can be accumulated only by
experience? This is an interesting pedagogical question reserved for
the next chapter. Meanwhile, in one of his essays, written as early as
1600, the British philosopher, Francis Bacon, gives us his recom-
mendations for efficient management procedures and practices.

la) fRANCIS lACON

"Of Dispatch""
Affected dispatch is one of the most dangerous things to business
that can be: it is like that which the physicians call predigestion, or hasty
digestion, which is sure to fill the body full of crudities, and secret seeds
of diseases; therefore, measure not dispatch by the time of sitting, but by
the advancement of the business; and as in races it is not the large stride,
or high lift, that makes the speed, so in business, the keeping close to the
matter, and not taking of it too much at once, procureth dispatch. It is the
care of some, only to come off speedily for the time, or to contrive some
false periods of business, because they may seem men of dispatch; but it
is one thing to abbreviate by contracting, another by cutting off; and busi-
ness SO handled at several sittings or meetings goeth commonly backward
and forward in an unsteady manner. I knew a wise man that had it for a
byword, when be saw men hasten to a conclusion, 'Stay a little, that we
may make an end the sooner: On t~e other side, ~e dispatch is a ric?
thing; for time is the measure of busmess,.as mon~ IS of wares; and buSl'
ness is bought at a dear hand where there IS small dispatch .
.. Pickering Papers, vol. 6, p. 43. Quoted by White! The Federalists, pp. 178-79·
.. Joseph Stalin! Stalin's Credo. New York: Howell, Soskin and Co.; 1940 , p. 139·
")i'nmcis Bacon! "Of Dispatch." Bacon's Essays, Richard Whately, ed. Boston:
Lee and Shepard; 1874, Essay 2S, p. 267·
Q8 ADMINlSTlATIChI

(b) FUNCJS lACON

"Of Great PIle." ..
The vices of authority are chiefly four: delays, corruption, rough-
ness, and [pliancy]. For delays, give easy access; keep times appointed: go
through with that which is in hand, and interlace not business but of ne-
cessity. For corruption, do not only bind thine own hands or thy servants'
hands from taking but bind the hands of suitors also from offering; for
integrity used doth the one, but integrity professed, and with a manifest
detestation of bribery, doth the other; and avoid not only the fault, but
the suspicion. Whosoever is found variable, and changeth manifestly with-
out manifest cause, giveth suspicion of corruption; therefore, always, when
thou changest thine opinion or course, profess it plainly, and declare it,
together with the reasons that move thee tc change, and do not think to
steal it. A servant or a favorite, if he be inward, and no other apparent
cause of esteem, is commonly thought but a by-way to close corruption.
For roughness, it is a needless cause of discontent: severity breedeth fear,
but roughness breede.th hate. Even reproofs from authority ought to be
grave, and not taunting. As for [pliancy], it is worse than bribery, for
bribes come but now and then; but if importunity or idle respects lead a
man, he shall never be without.

(cl FIANCIS BACON

"Of Negotiating" or
It is generally better to deal by speech than by letter, and by the
mediation of a third than by a man's self. Letters are good, when a man
would draw an answer by letter back again, or when it may serve for a
man's justification afterwards to produce his own letter; or where it may be
danger to be interrupted, or heard by pieces. To deal in person is good,
when a man's face breedeth regard, as commonly with inferiors; or in
tender cases, where a man's eye upon the countenance of him with whom
he speaketh may give him a direction how far to go; and generally, where
a man will reserve to himself liberty, either to disavow or expound.
In choice of instruments, it is hetter to choose men of a plainer
sort, that are like to do that that is committed to them, and to report back
again faithfully the success, than those that are cunning to contrive out of
other men's business somewhat to grace themselves, and will help the
matter in report, for satisfaction sake. Use also such persons as affect the
business wherein they are employed, for that quickeneth much; and such
as are fit for the matter, as bold men for expostulation, fair-spoken men
for persuaSion, crafty men for inquiry and observation, froward and absurd

.. Francis Bacon: "Of Great Place." Bacon's Essays, Essay 11, pp. 100-0,.
" Fr.mcis Bacon: "Of Negotiating." Bacon's Essaya, Essay 47, selected from pp.
451-52;·
 MANAClM£NT l'ItACTIC"
men for business that doth not well bear out itself. Use also such as have
been lucky, and prevailed before in things wherein you have employed
them;. fo~ that breeds confidence, and they will strive to maintain their
prescnption.
It is better to sound a person with whom one deals, afar off, th3n
to fall upon the point at first, except you mean to surprise him by sonle
short question. It is better dealing with men in appetite than with those
that are where they would be. If a man deal with another upon conditions,
the start of first perfonnance is all. If you would work any man, you must
either know his nature or fashions, and so lead him; or his ends, and so
persuade him; or his weakness and disadvantages and so awe him. In delll·
ing with cunning persons, we must ever consider their ends to interpret
their speeches; and it is good to say little to them, and that which they
least look for.
In all negotiations of difficulty, a man may not look to sow and
reap at once, but must prepare business, and so ripen it by degrees.

Effective management thus requires attention to detail. Bacon

was well aware, for example, of the importance of "tables and chairs"
as well as "bowls and dishes." With reference to the management
of commissions or committees he advised what every good conference
executive or chairman knows today: "A long table and a square
table, and seats about the walls, seem things of form but are things
~f soubstance; f~'i at. a \~ng t.\\bk, a feVi at. t.he out-pet eouu, in effect, sVia'!
all the business; but in the other form there is more use of the coun-
sellors' opinions that sit lower. A king, when he presides in council,
let him beware how he opens his own inclination too much in that
which he propoundeth; for else counsellors will but take the wiJld
of him, and instead of giving free counsel, will sing him a song of
placebo.""

14. THE DANGER OF OVEREMPHASIZING PROCEDURES

Mastery of the practical methods suggested by philosophers like

Francis Bacon is not enough to make management truly efficient.
In 1937, the President's Committee on Administrative Management
cautioned: "Administrative efficiency is not merely a matter of paper
clips, time clocks, and standardized economies of motion. These are
but minor gadgets. Real efficiency goes n:uch d~per do~n. It rI?-l.Ist
be built into the structure of government JUst as It IS bUIlt mto a piece
of machinery."" Emphasizing this idea, Harold D. Smith points out
.. Francis Bacon: "Of Counsel," Bacon's Essays, Essay '0.
.. The President's Committee on Administrative Management: Mministrative
Management in the GovetDment of the United States, p. 3·
below that neither organizational techniques nor systematic pro-
cednres are enough for completely efficient management.
","OLD D. SMITH
The Mana,ement of Your Govemmeat ..
This brings me to my main thesis, the preoccupation of the tnan-
agerial profession with techniques, methods, and means. In OUI society,
characterized by big business and big government, considerable attention
must be paid to techniques and methods in order to keep organi~tion
functioning. But this is a snowballing process. As the further refinement
of managerial methods permits the construction of larger organizations,
they, in turn, require more attention to managerial techniques.
. The truly able mallagers are the ones who-by intuition, by
hunch, by observation, by rule of thumb-can see and sense matters that
do not yield to purely scientific gauges of management. They call evaluate
objectives, they can stimulate the spirit of an organization-all without
much reliance upon the tools of management.
Large organizations, both industrial and governmental, by their
very size tend to stifle the creative and innovative drive of the indivi1ual.
The rigidness of the rules, the routine methods themselves, plaee baITiers
before those who would be innovators. In part, this condition results from
the fact that management techniques are so highly developed. With the
remaibbk: s}'Stems canml'CG by the management experts it is poSSible,
within limits, to guide and control the work of thousands of individuals.
The techniques for conformity and uniformity, for standardization and
specialization, are so formidable that the minds of only a relatively few
persons in a great organization may actually be used to capacity. It is easy,
under conditions of the most advanced management, to have within an
organization a wholesale under-utilization of brain power. And that may
come about because of the very excellence of management mechanisms
for formulating procedures and communicating instructions.
Apart from these problems of internal management, which may
vex us in particular business enterprises or governmental departments, we
ought to keep in mind the bearing on our entire way of life of the fact
that we do have a highly organized society. The average person spen<ls so
many of his waking hours at work that the way of working is virtually a
way of life. Organization, particularly large organization with its inlpeT-
sonal relationships, has in it potentialities of tyranny. A way of life that
is governed minutely by prescn1>ed procedures, by establisbed routines,
and by detailed rules fixed by someone else can easily become a pnrposeless
and dull existence. Moreover, it discourages the exercise of initiative and
.. Harold D. Smith: The Management of Your Government. Selected ~ pp.
:08-39, 33-35. 37. Reprinted by permission of McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
Copyright, 1945, McCraw-Hill Book CompouJy, Inc.
631 MANAC(MENT PRACTICES

may reward unthinking conformity. This situation may make it easy for
the managers but dull or even unbearable for the managed. And one must
always remember that in the last analysis managers exist at the tolerance
of the managed.
The major weakness that I have pointed out is the tendency to
lose sight of the main objectives by overconccntration on procedures and
forms. This concentration has caused a rigidity of approach that stifles
initiative and innovation; it may affect. the outlook of the mass of indio
viduals in great organizations and thus have a wide social significance.
Furthermore, this emphasis on procedures, both in training and practice,
has been one cause for the scarcity of top managers. From all this one must
conclude that a fresh approach is called for, that new vision is essential.

This need is a national one and is not readily answered. A well-

managed society is both a systematic society and a sympathetic so-
ciety, but we cannot always attain both objectives simultaneously.
Moreover, a basic psychological difficulty may be apparent here in
the type of mind required for the modern manager. As Paul Pigors
has pointed out, the administrator, in carrying out his function of
"stabilizing society," sometimes shuns "innovations."" He adopts
a "love of system" as his "most saJient characteristic." Pigors de-
scribes the administrator's state of mind in these terms: "This
discriminating respect for details as constituent parts of a whole is
expressed in his own conduct, a carefully co-ordinated system of
habits adapted to his purpose. Because they are important to his
whole scheme of life, he insists for himself and for others on such
apparently trivial details as punctuality, neatness, unhurried ef-
ficiency, accuracy, and finished performance." 02 Can such minds
make the transition, which Smith is seeking, from a preoccupation
with managerial procedures to the "fresh approach" an~ the "ne,:"
vision" required to answer the unfulfilled needs of a society that IS
constantly aspiring to a better way of life?

SUMMARY

The paradox of contemporary administration is this: As we ask

our society to undertake larger and larger programs, 'Ye are co~~elled
to concern ourselves with smaller and smaller routmes. This IS the
fate not only of management procedure;> ~ut of m.anag~me~t tech-
niques as a whole. We have noted a sllmlar proliferation m legal
., See Chapter 1 .
.. Pigors: Leadership or Domination, p. 259·
632 AOMINISTU.11ON

procedures, research, reporting, and public relations techniques, ad-

ministrative planning, budgeting and financial controls, and person-
nel management. We may be able to extend the boundaries of human
effort and raise the hopes of people everywhere, but only at the ex-
pense of deepening our interests in the humbler questions of manage-
ment technique.
 CONCLUSION

THE STUDY OF ADMINISTRATION

 CHAPTER TWENTY

THE STUDY OF ADMINISTRATION

THIS BOOK has dealt with the subject of administration, but can one
study about administration and thereby learn to administer? Profes-
sor George A. Graham, an American authority on training for
administration, has rightly warned those concerned about educating
our administrators: "It is one thing to instruct the spectator, and an-
other to coach the rider." 1
Before we can determine if administration can be taught or the
administrator trained, we must first establish administration as a
professional field of knowledge or as a recognized science. Readers
who are acquainted with the controversies now raging among educa-
tors as to whether certain established fields-medicine, engineering,
law, business, teaching, the ministry-are professions or vocations,
trades or skills, arts or sciences, will recognize in this question a major
issue. But by the same token those readers who are familiar with the
history of thought and the vocations will not be overwhelmed by
these controversies. The children's rhyme-"Rich man, poor man,
beggar man, thief; doctor, lawyer, merchant, chief'-was properly
irreverent in grouping together all of these situations, including that
of the "chief" or administrator. Nothing is more assuring about edu-
cation in this field than the fact that the recognized professions have
all had questionable scientific origins; and, as any attendance at the
professional conventions of even the most "scientific" of the profes-
sions, such as medicine, will demonstrate, scientific uncertainties and
pedagogical conflicts still harass these more established fields.
1 George A. Graham: Education fot Public Administration. ChicagO: Public Ad·

minisbation Service; 1941, p. 17·

635
1. SCIENTIFIC ASPIRATIONS OF ADMINISTRATION

The defense of administration' as a science, orat least as an emerg-

ing science, comes from various sources. Here is a statement on the
subject by Reginald E. Gillmor, whose career has combined several
"professions." Mr. Gillmor was trained as a naval officer at Annapolis,
has had experience in engineering and industrial management as
president of the Sperry Gyroscope Company, and has been employed
in the field of public administration as Vice-Chairman of the Na-
tional Security Resources Board.

REGINALD I, GILLMOI
"The Ultimate Science" a
The science of which I speak has no name although it has occu-
pied men's thought since the dawn of history. It is not yet a true science
although everything that has been done in all the sciences, arts and philos-
ophies has contributed to it. Its objective is order: order among men; or-
der which win permit their free co-operation and the release and utiliza-
tion of all their varied talents and skills; order which will make possible the
realization of the great potentialities for good that their progress toward
order has already created, potentialities that will be mnltiplied beyond
present comprehension by the attainment of higher degrees of order. The
instruments of this potential science of order are now known by such
vague and unsatisfactory terms as government, management, organization
and administration. Administration is the broadest of these terms and can
therefore be used to include aU the others. It is the more suitable because
its origin implies that it should be a ministry to bring order into the re-
lations of man.
Administration is at present a very approximate art. It has no laws
which have been verified by exact observation. The principles, or more
correctly precepts, which have been evolved by students of the subject are
not generally accepted or even known to the great majority of admin-
istrators. Society does not recognize any profession of administration or
the desirability of establishing any qualifications for administrators. Be-
cause of some other powers or qualifications, men often arrive in im-
portant administrative positions with little knowledge of administrative
principles and frequently without administrative experience or aptitude.
Will administration ever be a science and if so what will be the
general character of that science and its resultant effect on mankind? The
lack of general agreement on administrative principles is comparable to
the absence of agreement several hundred years ago on many of the laws of
• ReIinaId E. CiUmor: "The Ultimate Science." Advanced Management. June
1947, vOl. 12, adapted from pp. 53-55. Reprinted by permission.
637 THE STUDY OF ADMINISTaATION

P?ysics. Extrem~y rapi~ progresS ~ been made in physics by the tech-

mque of separating va~bles, measunng each with precision and proving
all ~enets by repr~u~lble ~eriments. No corresponding technique is
available for establishmg a SCIence of administration. It must not be for-
~tt~, ~owev~, that all the sciences had their beginning in faith and
nnagmatIon Without proof, and that to those whp held that faith, progress
must have seemed very slow. Judged historically, the art of administration
has progressed very rapidly and is now progressing with an increasing ex-
ponent. It seems to me that this progress is an extension of fundamental
phenomena of progress which justify the prediction of an ultimate science
of administration.

At least two objections can be raised at this point: first, here is a

recognized admission that the status of administration as a field of
study is a confused one since it is termed interchangeably "art,"
"science," "skill," and "profession"; and secondly, administration
cannot stand alone as a recognized field of knowledge but must de-
pend upon "all the sciences, arts and philosophies" and upon "varied
talents and skills." Without engaging in the unrewarding process of
distinguishing and defining all of these terms, we must point out
that the more established professions, such as engineering or medi-
cine, are recognized by their practitioners as being simultaneously
"science," "art," "profession," and even "business.'" Moreover, the
recognized professions consist of a mixture of other disciplines or
sciences. Some of their related sciences, such as psychology in medi-
cine or management in engineering, are not so much scientific sub-
divisions of these professions as derivatives from the very field of
"administration" or "social science" whose scientific or professional
status is being questioned.' Sometimes the recognized professions
or sciences are in reality a mixture of many specialties. The physician
and the psychiatrist, for example, exercise techniques and utilize
bodies of data which differ more drastically than medical science
differs from social science or engineering from administration.
It may properly be asked whether there is a major scientific core
• Clement C. Williams: "The Profession of Engineering." Essays in Science and
Engineering, Franz Montgomery and Lutb~ N .• .BeCJdund~ ed•. New York: Farr~
and Rinebart; 1938, pp. '9'-92. Albert J. Hlffies: The Englfieer and HIS ProfesslOll.
Engineering as a Career F. H. Newell and C. E. Drayer, ed•. New York: D. Van
Nostrand Company, Inc~ 1916; pp. 1-'. J. A. L. Waddell: ."Th~ Relations of Civil
Engineering to Other Branches of Science." Addresses to Engmeermg Students. Kansas
City, Mo.; 1912, pp. 257-60·
"Richard Harrison shryock: The Development of Modern Medicine: An Inter·
pretation of the Soci.l and Scientific FactolS Involved. New Y.ork: Alfred A. Knopf;
1947, p. viii. Harvey Cushing: The. Medical Career; Boston: Little, Brown and ~.
pany; 1940, pp. 3-10, 1 5S-<i4. William H. Welch: 'The Inter~ependence of ~e
and Other Sciences of Nature." Medical Research and Education, J. McKeen Catten,
ed. New York: The Science Press; 1913, pp. 140-4S·
to this field of administration, The answer may apn be found ill a
comparison with tiJe recognized professiOJ:l$. In medicine, the core
subjects may be said. to include biology or physiology and chemistry
plus a subject like psychology. In engineering, the subjects include
physics and mathematics in addition to chemistry and managemtnt
or administration. In administration, the core subjects are psychology
and other socia}· sciences plus statistics or mathematics. Analyzed in
this manner, the contents of these professional fields represent a
chain reaction of core subjects or intellectual disciplines. Nevertbe-
less, the core is more readily recognized in the established professions
as compared with administration.
Perhaps the best way to discover the core content of administra-
tion is to ask how administrators have been trained in the past, since
the history of administration suggests that it is an older "vocation"
than some of the professions that supersede it in the recognized
scale of employment." Five recognized fields, singly or in combina·
tion, seem to have constituted the core ,subjects of administration:
( 1) the classical studies or humanities; (:z.) the legal studies; (3) p0-
litical science or public administration; (4) economics or business
administration; (5) the social sciences, including psychology and
social statistics.

2. CLASSICAL STUDIES AND ADMINISTRATION

The classical studies, including the arts and literature, seem re-
mote from administration, but they have been regarded throughout
history as important subjects for training administrators, if not ,for
teaching administration. It will be recalled that Plato's curriculum for
the "guardians" of the Greek city-state included music· as well as
gymnastics, mathematics, and philosophy. In the Middle Ages, the
arts along with the "superior faculties" (in effect, the professional
schools) of theology, law, and medicine, constituted the univerSity
curriculum; 1 and Of these, law and theology along with the arts, such
as literature, furnished the higher training for the clerks and admin-
istrators who managed the society of that day. To excel in literature
was in fourteenth century England a good means of obtaining a
sinecure or a responsible post in the kiug's service, as was the case
with Geoffrey Chaucer," author of The Canterbury Tales. In the
• See Chapter 4 .
.. See ClIapter 14. ,
f HastiD£s R.tshdall: The Universities of Europe ill the Middle Age$. Osford:
Clarendan l'rC$S; 19}6, ""I. 1, pp, 7, 241, 3n:
• ~ Frederick Tout: "Literature and Learning in the E~ CiYi1 ~
ill the Fourteenth Century." Speeoium, October 19"9. vol .... pp. 363-70.
 THE STUDY OF ADMINI$TIATION

United States, by contrast, we recall only exceptional cases like that

of Nathaniel Hawthorne, who in 1846 accepted the post of United
States Customs Officer at the port of Salem, where he conceived :,tnd
wrote the American classic The Scarlet Letter.·
'I!te English have long continued to emphasize and employ the
classics for the education of their administrators. Their views on
administrative studies were well stated by (a) the British historian
a~d parliamentarian Thomas Babington Macaulay in 1833; :,tnd
reiterated by (b) a Royal commission in 1914, and (c) a TreasUry
Committee in 1917.

(a) THOMAS BABINCTON MACAULAY

Proposals for the Training of Civil Servants ,.

It is said, I know, that examinations in Latin, in Greek, ana in

mathematics are no tests of what men will prove to be in life. I am per·
fectly aware that they are not infallible tests: but that they are tes~s I
confidently maintain. Look at every walk of life, at this House [Q)m-
mons], at the other House [Lords], at the Bar, at the Bench, at .the
Church, and see whether it be not true that those who attain high distJn~­
tion in the world were generally men who were distinguished in tpelr
academic career.
W\l,.<:!!l-<:h ~~<:. ~'l..'b\.is,~ "'$"~<IA'l.. Q,,( <:.<i\\.~~Q,,'l.. ~ 'b~ Q,,~ ~<i is, not
now the question. Perhaps I may think that too much time is given to the
ancient languages and to the abstract sciences. But what then? Whatever
be the languages, whatever be the sciences, which it is, in any age or
country, the fashion to teach, the persons who become the greatest pro-
ficients in those languages and those sciences will generally be the flower
of the youth, the most acute, the most industrious, the most ambitiouS of
honorable distinctions. If the Ptolemaic system were taught at Cambridge
instead of the Newtonian, the senior wrangler (honor student] would pev-
ertheless be in general a superior man to the wooden spoon [mediocre
student]. If, instead of learning Greek, we learned Cherokee, the man ",ho
understood the Cherokee best, who made the most correct and melodiOUS
Cherokee verses, who comprehended most accurately the effect of the
Cherokee particles, would generally be a superior man to him who ~
destitute of these accomplishments. If astrology were taught at our ~rm­
versities, the young man who cast nativities best would generally turn out
a superior man. If alchemy were taught, the youug man who showed Illost

• Nathaniel Hawthorne: "The Customs House," Introduction, Hawthorne had

also served as weigher and gauger at the Boston Custom. office between 1839 and l~'P.
lOThomas Babington Macaulay: Critical ~ f!istorical Essays, Mi~ie$, W· 1,
teIected from pp. 1 ~4-s6. Reprinted by pennlSS10n of Houghton MifHin Company·
Copyright, l<}OO, Houghton MilIIin Company.
activity in the pmsuit of the philosopher's stone would generaDy turn ont
a superior man.

(b) aeport of the Roy~1 Commission on the Ciyil Service U

The best education taken in conjunction with the training and
formative influences of University life produces the best type of public
servant. This conclusion is confirmed by a consensus of opinion on the
part of those witnesses who appeared before us having administrative and
ministerial experience, and by some interesting evidence as to the increas-
ing value attached in the commercial world to University training and
education.
We accept the conclusion as just in the main. Instances have oc-
curred in the past, and doubtless will occur again, of the recruitment,
through the Class I examination, of men who, without the advantage of
University training, have proved distinguished public servants. But they
are the exceptions. Experience shows that as a rule the best University
training ripens natural ability and develops administrative capacity; and
it is for this reason that we have urged above that facilities should be pro-
vided for the most promising boys of the primary and secondary schools
of the country to get to the Universities and enjoy the advantages of their
teaching. We cannot too earnestly repeat that it is not by lowering the
educational standard of the highest ranks of the Civil Service, but only by
enabling the clever sons of poor parents to benefit by University training,
and thereby enter the Civil Service, that the interests of democracy and of
the public service can and ought to be reconciled.

(e) Report of the Committee of the Treasury"

The existing scheme has been condemned on the ground that it

gives an excessive advantage to candidates chiefly trained in the learning
of ancient Greece and Rome. Some no doubt would wish us to put the
Classics at a disadvantage, or to exclude them altogether from the ex-
amination. We are not inclined, nor do we think it to be our duty, to put
any handicap on the widest, the most systematic, and the most consistent
humanistic education that at present exists in this country. We shall make
the attempt to put similar and equivalent learning to modem peoples on
an equal footing with c1assicallearuing. But we cannot thereby alter exist-
ing conditions, though we may assist by our action the improvement and
development of a consistent and continuous education in the language,
literature, and history, of the most important European nations. We can-
not expect forthwith to find many candidates thoroughly trained in the

11 United Kingdom ParJiamenlmy Papers: Fourth Report of the Royal Commission

on the Civil Service, 1914, Cd. 7338.
" United Kingdom Parliamenlmy Papen: Report of the Committee appniDted by
the Lords Commissionen of His Majesty'. TteasUIy, 1917. Cd. 86S7.
641 THE STUDY OF ADMINISTItATlON
language, the scholarship, the thought, the social and economic history
even of France, as men are now trained in the like learning that appertains
to.Greece. To teach th~ Classical learning and develop Classical scholar-
shiP. ~here w.lS at w~Ik m 1911 a great band of scholars equipped by the
tradition, the orgamsed learnmg, and the experience, of four hundred
years. We cannot create for the Modem Langyages an equivalent stalt ot
teachers by altering an examination. A large proportion of the most able
students have gone in the past to the Classics, and we cannot alter the
·national habits, the prepossessions, and the system, that have caused the
most gifted among literary students to follow the ancient studies. But we
can give an equal opportunity to modem studies; the schools and U niversi-
ties must do the rest; if the nation desires enlightenment and sound train-
ing to proceed from modern studies it will no doubt in course of time ob
tain what it desires, provided it is prepared to use the requisite means.

The intervening years have seen the introduction of modern and

"professional" courses for the training of British administrators and
also the admission of more members to the administrative class who
do not wear "the old school tie." Nevertheless, the British have con·
tinued to favor general classical or "cultural" training. Their examina-
tion and training systems reflect this preference. When the American
type of short-answer or yes-and·no question was introduced in the late
1920'S, it provoked "an uproar of criticism."" Although the British
have discovered that their post-war requirements call for more ex-
pertly trained managers, they still seek to develop as their top admin-
istrators men broadly educated in the "historical and humanistic"
fields, including "present.day knowledge." U
American educators interested in training administrators would
refer to "present-day knowledge" as the social sciences. In contradis-
tinction to the British they would, as we shall see, give more weight to
these sciences in the training of administrators, without, llOwever,
wholly deserting the classical studies or the humanities.

3. ADMINISTRATIVE TRAINING AND LEGAL EDUCATION

A strong influence upon the American study of administration

has been the tradition of legal education derived from the later Ger-
man educational system, as well as the earlier British impact upon
American legal institutions. The German or continental system of re-
lating legal education to administrative training is described below by
(a) Professor Carl J. Friedrich of Harvard University and (b) Pro-
fessor Arnold Brecht of the New School for Social Research.
'" Curtis: "American OfIice ~ent." p. 186.
.. Arnold Brecht: "Civil Service.' Note 16, 1uba., p. 21 7.
 (, ) CARL ,. FRIIDlttCH
The Continental Tradition U
Frequent references are made to tJ.te "continental tradition of
legal training for governmental service." Sometim~, though not ~ft~
such remarks are offered in support of the contention that legal tramIng
of the kind offered in American law schools would be the most acceptable
preparation for general administrative work. In conjunction with the fact
that lawyers are frequently found in key positions in the federal and state
services and dontinate in the legislatures, it is argued that the highly suc-
cessful administrative services of Germany and other European countries
are built around legally trained men, at least in the higher ranks.
It is customary, even in Europe, to assume that legal training of
public officials was adopted as soon as regularized training commenced.
This is quite incorrect. Indeed, the courses in political theory, in philos-
ophy of law, and in economics are older, as prerequisites of trained gov-
ernment personnel, than the more elaborate legal training offered today.
Training requiremenb for administrative officials in Prussia and Austria
(and they are broadly characteristic of the continental practice) centered
around a subject known as carneralia. Cameralism was primarily a kind of
descdptive economics, built upon the principles of mercantilism. Public
nnance and governmental expenditures, as well as practical principles of
administrative management, stood in the center of this subject. Political
theory and administrative science were thus intimately intertwined, and
both were bent toward the practical task of training governmental ot-
ficials.
Neither in Austria nor in Prussia (with which we shall here be
primarily concerned) is this transformation from cameralist to legal train-
ing marked by explicit enactments. It was a gradual process. In 1780 a
compreherISive program for legal studies was adopted at Vienna. It c0m-
prised four years and offered, during the first year, natural law and the law
of nations and constitutional law (Staatsrecht), criminal law, and Ger·
mao legal history; during the second year, Roman law and ecclesiastical
law; during the third year, feudal land law. German constitutional law.
and Austrian private law; and. duting the fourth year, political sciences
and statistics. The change was completed in the reign of Francis II of
Austria before 180<; when in all administrative braoches legal training was
required by law for officials in the higher-rank groups. In Prussia it came
about somewhat later, after the reforms of Baron Stein, who himself still
favored a different mioing for administrative than for judicial oiliciaJs.
In conclusion it may be well to call attention onoe more to the
fact that the "legal" training in continental Europe is the clnld of a highly
.. Carl 1. Friedrich: ''The Contiaental Traditioa of TtaiaiaC ~ in
Law and Jurisprudence.» JOUlJf1I1 of Modem Histozy, June 1919. .01. 11, acIapkld &om
pp. 129-::11, 135-::16, '44-'45. 147-48. RepriJlIed by penDiIsiiaa.
 THE STVOY OF ADMINISTItAT.ON
centralized administrative system, such as was built by absolute monarchy
in the course of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In France,
where the trend had been different, the revolution and Napoleon brought
about what the Pntssian and Austrian princes had accomplished just two
generations earlier. All other European countries are found to follow this
tradition sooner or later, so that by the middle of the nineteenth century
there exists a fairly uniform pattern. Only England, of the great countries,
had retained a semi-feudal traditiou, which after 1850 she refashioned
with startling drive along wholly particular lines.
Training in the law is a striking expression of the modern empha-
sis Qpon law as the foundation of government. But it should never be
forgotten by those who cite this background and experience that the word
"law," or rather "jurispntdence," possesses a breadth which is essential
to its meaningful employment in this connection. It comprises a very
considerable part of the social sciences, more particularly political science
and theory, economic theory and history, and administrative science.

(b) ARNOLD BRECHT

"Civil Service" "

It is a mistake to consider legal practice as the salient point in
the German system [of training administrators]. Two other aspects of the
training period call for more attention in other countries. One is the
systematic transfer of the young aspirant, (Referendarl who may be sup-
posed to be of an age between :1.l and 26, from one office and place to
another for about four yeats. Starting in a small court in a country place
he has to pass to a district court, perhaps in a middle sized town, subse-
quently to the office of a state attorney, then to that of a lawyer in private
practice, further to a big lower court in a city, and to a court of appeals.
Some of the stages may be spent instead in lower or higher administrative
agencies, national, state or local. This systematic training conveys to the
aspirant much more than legal knowledge, that is, an insight into the
conditions and needs of large and small places, of townsmen and country-
men, of manufacturers and farmers; of workers and entrepreneurs, of
large and small agencies, and it gives him also a knowledge of many types
of superiors, comrades and methods of work.
During this period the most valuable subject of the training itself
is in my opinion not the legal routine but the art of offering clear reports
in writing and orally. The young Referendar is required to present reports
clearly and objectively so as to supply any board or commission with an
unbiased basis for decision. The art of writing such reports has been devel-
oped through centuries to a very high degree, sometimes overreaching

.. Arnold Brecht; "Civil SeMce." Social Resean:h, M2y "136, vol. 3, selected
tro.n w- 21 ....16. Reprinted by permission.
itself. There is no fun in it. It is necessary to be objective and exhaustive.
nevertheless extremely terse and brief. The non-controversial parts of any
dispute are to be sharply severed from the controversial parts, both in tum
from the evidence, and all three from the opinion_ For some hundred
years the chief test for the training period was the Proberelation (test Ie>
port) a paper consisting of a report, an opinion and a draft for the ruling
to be passed, with very strict requirements for the differences in form and
style appropriate to each of the three parts.

Independent of the continental experience, legal education in

the United States has flourished from the beginning as a background
for both public service and private management. Thomas Jefferson'S
advice, written in 1787 from Paris to young Thomas Randolph, is
still freely given to the great number of Americans who go to law
school without intending "merely to practice law": "I have proposed
to you to carry on the study of the law with that of Politics and
History. Every political measure will forever have an intimate COll-
nection with the laws of the land; and he who knows nothing of these
will always be perplexed and often foiled by adversaries having the
advantage of that knowledge over him. Besides it is a source of in-
finite comfort to reflect that under every change of fortune [change
of political party1we have a resource in ourselves from which we may
be able to derive an bonourable subsistence."" A decade before, Pres-
ident Ezra Stiles of Yale had tried unsuccessfully to found a law
school, at New Haven and had argued: "The Professorship of Law is
equally important with that of Medicine; not indeed towards educat-
ing Lawyers or Barristers, but for forming Civilians_ Fewer thpn a
quarter perhaps of the young gentlemen educated at College, enter
into either of the learned professions of Divinity, Law or Physic:
The greater part of them after finishing the academic Course return
home, mix in with the body of the public, and enter upon Commerce
or the cultivation of their Estates," ..
The persistence of lawyer-dominated legislatures in America and
the large numbers of lawyers occupying policy positions in both gov-
ernment and business administration attest to the correctness, if not
the soundness, of the recommendations of Jefferson and Stiles,"

"Letter from Thomas JelferSOll to Thomas Randolph, July 6, 17117. The Worb
01 Thomas Jefferson, vol. 6, p. 167.
18 Ezra Stiles: "Plan 01 an University," December 3, 1777. Quoted in Cbarle;
Wanen: A History 01 the American Bar. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1911.
appendix. .
,. Esther Lucile Brown: Lawyers, Law Schools and the Public Setrice. New l"ork:
Rllssen Sage FoundatiOll; 1948, Chapter 1.
4. TRAINING FOR ,'UIUC AOMINISTRATION

The American approach to administrative studies has come to be

a more direct one. Reilecting the pragmatism of American thought,
a favored educational theory emerging in this country for the training
of administrators has been to introduce them directly to those sub-
jects they encounter in their daily jobs; in other woids, the way to
train administrators is to teach them administration. It is significant
that while American law schools were recognized as among the ear-
liest "schools" of public administration, the first president of the
United States was not a lawyer. He rose to his position from the more
practical fields of civil and military engineering, land management,
and plantation administration. George Washington at seventeen ap-
pli~d to the College of William and Mary for a course in land survey-
ing. His "appointment" thereto was regarded as "the equivalent of
a degree in civil engineering." 20 Basing his career on this training,
Washington became successively surveyor of the public lands on
the Virginia frontier, military commander and emissary to the
French in the frontier area, colonizer of and trader in western lands,
commander-in-chief of the Virginia forces, commander-in-chief of
the Continental armies, and finally the first Chief Executive of the
United States.
(a) This urge for more practical and concrete education in public
administration since the early days of the Republic has been demon-
strated by the historian and political scientist, Herbert B. Adams, in
his brilliant history of the College of William and Mary, written in
1887.
(b) This early attempt to establish professional training for pub-
lic administration in the American universities was not immediately
rewarded with success. It was not until the early part of the twentictl1
century that the American universities seriously undertook to educate
directly public administrators in the subject-matter of their field. The
current system of American education for public administration, pat-
terned after the successful program of research and training developed
by the New York Bureau of Municipal Research and the New York
Training School fOf Public Service, was outlined as early as 1915 by
Professor F. F. Blachly. Professor Blachly wrote largely for British
readers, who by this time had become interested in emulating certain
elements of the American system.

"Herbert B. Adams: The College of William and Mary. Infra, R. >1, p. 30.
 (.1 If_IT., ADAMS
The College of William ami Ma,,"
The College of William and Mal)' and the town of WiDiamsbIlrg
grew and ftourished together, the one aiding the other in a thousand WYS·
The college appreciated what the General Assembly called "the c0nven-
iences of a town," and the whole colony quickly learned to value educa-
tional privileges for its ambitious sons. "At the lirst Commencement ~
the College, in 1700," says Campbell, one'of the historians of VirgiJl~
"'there was a great concourse of people; several planters came thither In
coaches, and others in sloops from New York, Pennsylvania. and MaI)'tand.
it being a new thing in that part of America to hear graduates ~
their exercises. The Indians had the curiosity, some of them, to v1S~t
Williamsburg upon that occasion; and the whole count!)' rejoiced, at If
they had some relish of learning." It is greatly to the honor of the fouPd-
ers and builders of the College of William and Mal)' that they applied so
early in the eighteenth centul)' the idea of education in a social, municifll.
and political environment. Williamsburg was the lirst exponent of a noble
educational policy, to which this count!)' will sooner or later return.
In colonial Virginia there was an entente cordia Ie between the
college, the church, and the state. The clergy held their conventions in
the college buildings, and, before the capitol was built, the House of
Burgesses used to assemble in the academic halls. The head of the coll;ege
was the head of the church in V~nia, and there was a reqresentative of
the college in the House of Burgesses down to the Revolution. NeVer
before or since in this count!)' was there such a constant object lesson for
students in the art of government and in the constitution of society. '(he
College of William and MaI)'. almost from its original planting, ms a
unique seminal)' of bistol)' and politics-of histol)' in the vel)' making,
of politics in the praxis. The young Virginians did not study text-boOks
of bistorical and political science. They observed the real things. The pro-
ceedings of their fathers at the capitol were to the sons analogous to ~
living processes of nature that are observed under the microscope in the
modem biologicallaboratol)'.
Probably one of the vel)' best types of the early professor in the
College of William and Mal)' is the Rev. Hugh Jones [who] was appOinted
to the chair of mathematics. Professor Jones was not altogether satisPed
with the existing system of education at the College of William ~d
Mal)'. He proposed that one of the six professorships be devoted to the
subject of histOl)'; but what is more surprising, he actually proposed ~
the college should be recognized as the training school for the civil sentce
of the colony. The following are the professor's own words {written in

., Herbert B. Adam!;: The College of WiUiaJD _, MlIl}'. lhUIJ:d Slates BuPD

of Education: CireuIat of Information, No, 1, 1887. Adapted &om pp. 21, :6->%8,
3'-)9.
647
17241 "The Charter mentions six masters or professors, but does riot
specify the professions; it directs to the making of statutes and founding
scholarships, but the plIrticuJars are left to the discretion of the manag6TS;
and some such establishment as this here mentioned may not be improper,
especially if for greater encouragement the surveyors of each county w~re
to be appointed by the president and masters, out of such as have talcer! a
Bachellor of Arts degree there; and if the Governor and Council were to
elect a certain number of Bachellors for clerics into the Secretaries office;
out of which clerics attending and writing there at certain times, the
county clerics should be appointed.
Jefferson's interest in the cause which William and Mary origi-
nally represented to his mind was doubtless strengthened by the mllre
successful part which he took in remodelling the scholastic curriculum of
the college in the interest of modern studies, of which he was the first
American champion. "On the 1St of June, 1n9," he says in his autobipg-
raphy, "Being elected also one of the visitors of William and Mary Coll~
a self-electing body, I effected, during my residence in Williamsburg tllat
year, a change in the organization of that institution, by abolishing the
grammar school and the two professorships of divinity and oriental I:m-
guages, and substituting a professorship of law and police, one of anaton1Y,
medicine, and chemistry, and one of modern languages; and the charter
confining us to six professorships, we added the law of nature and nations
and the fine atts, to the duties of the moral professor, and natural history
..~ ~~ ~{ ~ \\'l~e;~ ~{ w.'!"M.W:l.'ri.~ ."W! 'M.w"....,,\ "r~~\~~'J:' 'Th'JS.
Jefferson introduced the first distinctively modem currents in~ the cur-
riculum of William and Mary. Police was much the same as the modern
science of administration, which is just beginning anew to creep into ()tII
university courses in America. What the German would ¢l}1 Polizehfis-
senschaft, was taught for nearly a century at the College of William and
Mary under the head of "police." That name would probably suggest
nothing but constabulary associations to most college faculties in these
modem days.

(b) FIlEHIUCK F. BLACHLY

"£ducational Training for Admillistration ill America""
In both England and the United States, contenJporary opiniolJ is
divided as to the proper educational foundation for persous who expect
to enter the public service. The discussion seems to range about the ques-
tion, whether a mind trained in the classical and literary tradition of Ple
older universities is better fitted to deal with administrative problems and
details than a mind with less of this training, but a certain equipment of
dind: study of comparative political and administrative theory. The
.. Frederick F. Blacbly; '"Educational T •• for Administlalion in J\meriGIl."
Public AdmiDistzation, 192" WIl. 3, pp. 159-~ted by pennissioD.
548··
number of eourses in the various branches of polftical. science Which have
been introduced into our American universities during the past ten or
fifteen· years are strong evidence that in general our educational leaders
believe in special and direct edncation for adminisnators.
At the outset it should be understood that in no university are
sueli courses offered as a substitute for a general education. Practically all
our schools require every student to take «:rtain courses which are con-
sidered indispensable to a man or woman living in the ~ld today, ~d
permit him to choose, in addition to these courses, a subject of malor
interest to which most of his remaining time is given. The aim is to give
every student a broad general edncation and a special knowledge of one
subject. The courses in administration are never offered to beginners; and
there is a growing tendency, which the writer believes to be a wise one,
to confine them to mature students and to develop the more specialized
ones as post graduate work.
To acquire indirectly a thorough and correct lmowledge of the
principles of administration may require many years, whereas if the study
is organized, a year or so of intelligent work may acquaint the student
with practically all the problems involved and the methods that have been
found best for their solution. One would hardly trust a physician today
whose entire knowledge was the result of practical experience, even though
he were a university graduate in the classics. Similarly, a public servant
should at least know the experience of the race in administration, in the
same way that a doctor knows the results of the universal experience in
medicine, before he enters on the practice of his profession.
Strong positive reasons for adopting the direct method of teaching
administration are also presented. The first of these is, that there is
prohably no study which develops the qualities of mind needed by an
administrator more than the study of administration. Such problems as
the following must be considered: What should be the relationship of
the central authority to the local authority? Should general or detailed
examinations be given to civil servants? Why is the merit system more
effective in securing a good personnel than the patronage system? What
factors make the English budget system better than the Canadian or
French budget system? Should civil servants be allowed to strike? What
part should civil servants have in the determination of their wages, hours
of employment, conditions of work, pension systems, and so on? These
questions and a thousand like them must be discussed in the study of ad-
ministration. Nothing involves a keener analysis, a more careful logic, a
greater ability to understand human nature, to make significant c0mpari-
sons, and to hold many facts in mind at the same. time for the purpose of
making significant deductions than soch study. Both the historical and the
comparative methods are used in American COurses in administration, as
it is felt that no administrator can understand the governmental organi-
zation with which he is dealing, except in the light of its own historic
development, and of the institutions of other countries.
 THI STUDY Of ADMIMISTI.ATfON
The :second reason why administration is emphasized as a uni-
versity subject is the already laq:e and rapidly growing methodology.
which should be mastered by one who holds any responsible position in
public service. This methodology involves the knowledge of general ac-
counting, cost accounting, the ability to look up cases in law reports, and
the ability to prepare charts and diagrams in order to present statistical
material so that it can be readily understood. In fact these are the tools of
a modem administrator. With a knowledge of the large principles govern·
ing administration and a good understanding of the methods by which
administrative knowledge is gathered, collected and made significant, the
young administrator should be able to go into his work with a preparation
which it would take long years in the service to acquire, and the whole of
which he probably would never acquire outside the univerSity.
The study of administration, moreover, is not confined to the
universities. Municipal and governmental research bureaus some of which
are closely affiliated with universities, are aU making careful and scientific
studies of special problems in governmental administration, and several
of them are offering specialized courses of study to students selected for
maturity and ability. The city officials of manye states are grouped into
state municipal leagues eagerly attacking their administrative problems;
a city managers' association holds annual conventions and discusses care-
fully problems of city administration; and national and regional political
science associations meet to discuss the same kind of problems.

Indeed, so "practical" did the American system of educating for

public administration become that it encouraged "internship" in ad-
ministrative office as a part of the curriculum, with the same serious-
ness as the German system of training referendal. Charles A. Beard,
as Director of the New York Training School for Public Service,
urged in 1916 the granting of "academic credit for the practical work"
of this kind, and he made such "laboratory work" an integral part of
his school's curriculum." The development of administrative intern-
ship has been a slow one, but by 1948, out of 117 American colleges
and universities offering educational preparation for public admin-
istration, more than forty provided internship programs and thirty
others otIered field or 1aboratory courses for students." The curtent
system includes internships administered by several state universitie<
in conjunction with state and municipal departments, as well as the
internships administered under Federal agepcies such as the United
States Civil Service Commission or the Tennessee Valley Authority .

.. Charles A. Beard: "Training tor Efficient Public Service." Annals of the Ameri·
am Academy of Political and Social Science: "Public A&rinistration and Partisan
Politics," 1916, vol. 64, pp. zn-Zl .
.. Tabulated from Joseph S. Toner: Educatiooal Preparation for PubUe Atlminil·
tration, .948--49. Cbic:lgo: Public Administration Clearing House; 1948.
 ADMINISTIATION

Along with a growing interest in post-entry or in-service training for

public officials, administrative internship is potentially a most fruit-
ful opportunity for the development of American education for pub-
lic administration. If successful, it promises to revive the abortive rec-
ommendations of Professor Jones at William and Mary two centuries
ago.
Jefferson did not realize his hopes of developing at the College of
William and Mary or at the University of Virginia the field of police
or administration as part of the course in law, even though he re-
peated his efforts as late as 1825.'" The established claim of public
administration as a recognized professional branch of the American
university's curriculum did not appear until Woodrow Wilson pre-
dicted in 1886: "The time will soon come when no college of respect-
ability can afford to do without a well-filled chair of political sci-
ence. . . . A technically schooled civil service will presently become
indispensable." '" The movement, when it did start, was not entirely
indigenous. Between 1880 and 1<)00 most of the leading American
scholars in public law, political science, and public administration
pursued their graduate studies in Germany." Not all of those scholars
trained at German universities specialized in administration, but they
all held a healthy respect for German Verwaltungswissenschaft or
administrative science. Consequently, the field of public administra-
tion came to be accepted as a major field in American university de-
partments of political science, along with the other specialized fields
such as public law, political philosophy, politics, and later interna-
tional relations.28
By the late 1940'S,'" public administration had become a leading
field of study at the graduate level in university departments of polit-
.. Ernest V. Hollis: Toward Improving Ph.D. Programs. Washington: American
Council on Education; 1945. p. 5
.. Wilson: "Tbe Study of Administration." pp. 215-16.
21 This group included Professors Herbert B. Adams. Frank J. Goodnow, John W.
Burgess, Edmund 1. James. Ernest M. Freund. Paul S. Reinsch. William B. Munro,
aud Charles E. Merriam, It did not include such outstanding men as A. Lawrence
Lowell or Woodrow Wilson. For general references to the inHuence of the "Herren
Dnktoren" froin the Gerrnan universities. see Anna Haddow: Political Science in
American Colleges and Universities, 1636--1900. New York: D. Appleton-Century
Company; 1939. pp. 171-2. 175. 229 .
.. For the details of this development, see Haddow: Political Science in American
Colleges and Universities. Part IV. See also Beard: Public Policy and General Wel-
fare. p_ 1,2 .
.. For the intervening development, see Graham: Education for Public Adminis-
tration. Joseph E. McLean: The Public Service and University Education. Princeton:
Princeton University Press; 1949- United State. Bureau of Education: "University
Training for Public Service" Bulletin No. 30, 1916. Public Administrative Service:
''Training for the Public Service." Pamphlet No. 49, 1935. Princeton University:
"University Education and the Public Service." Bicentennial Conference Series .'I.,
Conference 1. 1946.
651 THE STUIIY OF ADMIMISTIl.ATION

ica! science, preceded only by the number of candidates for Ph.D's in

international affairs, a field which also dealt with the problem of ad-
ministration. At the undergraduate level, too, the development of
public administration had become institutional as well as curricular
and was beginning to resemble the growth of more recognized pro-
fessional fields like business administration. Of the 117 colleges or
universities with a public administration program in 1948, almost one
hundred offered a bachelor's degree for major concentration in pub-
lic administration; more than eighty offered master's degrees in the
same field, several calling the degree by the new title of "Master of
Public Administration"; and thirty-five offered the degree of doctor
of philosophy for students in public administration, several terming
the degree that of "Doctor of Public Administration."
A few universities now have separate colleges or schools of public
administration which, like the independent professional schools of
law, business administration, and engineering, segregate the under-
graduate and graduate curriculum in administration from the arts and
sciences. Nevertheless, public administration lags far behind as a rec-
ognized professional or scientific field as com pared with the other
established professional fields with their widely-recognized inde-
pendent colleges of law, medicine, engineering, business administra-
tion, education, and even theology. There are five million govern-
mental employees in the United States, and although only a minority
of these engage in the substantial duties of managerial or administra-
tive responsibility, the number of public administrators is certainly
larger than the number of lawyers, doctors, engineers, teachers, or
ministers, and is tending to become as large as the number of the
nation's business managers. Yet a comparison of university enroll-
ment in public administration with business administration or the
other professional pursuits will demonstrate the less extensive public
and professional esteem accorded this type of training. Although this
lack of appreciation does not necessarily reflect upon the social or
scientific significance of the field, many students of public adminis-
tration who are trying accurately to assess the educational future of
this phase of administrative education were not surprised when Louis
Brownlow, at the founding of the School of Public Administration at
the University of Puerto Rico in 1945, stated: "Public Administra-
tion, in my opinion, is one of the most important things in the world;
but it has little sex appeal." .0 Brownlow meant to imply what every
enthusiastic college student of public administration sooner or later
so Louis Brownlow: "The Art and Science of Public Administration." Puerto Rico
and Its Public Administration Program. Proceedings of the Public Administration
Conference, October-November '945, p. 191. As early as 194' the Legislature of
Puerto Rico bad created a "CoUeg,:: of Public Administration."
learns, namely, that when he announces at home that be has finaUy
found the subject he wants to "major in," his family does not really
know wrutt he is talking about, and urges him to .take somethiflg
"regular" like law or medicine, engineering or business.

5. TRAINING fOR BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

If a nation's professional interest can be measured by the output

of its colleges and universities, then the largest group of administia-
tively trained persons in the United States, by the middle of the
twentieth century, were being educated in the field of commerce or
business administration." For a nation oriented toward business en-
terprise and industrial management, this development is not unc.x-
pected. The significance of this fact for the present and fnture of
administration, as a profession which goes beyond business, cannot
be underestimated. In business administration the United States
finds a major source of specialized training for a large number of
graduates who eventually manage not only private enterprise but
also public enterprise.
The program of education in business administration has devel-
oped over a long period, the span being represented by the followiflg
excerpts from: (a) the prospectus of 1 T~6 prepared by Thomas
Watts, a proiessor at mathematics, and (b) a report in 1945 prepared
by the faculty of the Harvard Graduate School of Business Admin-
istration.

(a) THOMAS WATTS

An Essay on the Proper Method for Forming the Man of Businesf."
I here present you with those Sentiments on the Subiect of
Forming the Man of Business and Employment
First, Whoever would be a Man of Business, must be a Man of
Correspondence; and Correspondence can never be so commodiously,
or at all to the Purpose maintained, as by the Use of the Pen: So tbat
WRITINC is the First Step, and Essential in furnishing out the Man of
Business. Plain, Strong, and Neat Writing, as it best answers the Design
f<lt Use and Beauty; so it has most obtain'd among Men of Business; with

"The President's Commission on Higher Education, "Resource Data," sec. s·

H. G. Wright: "Eleventh Biennial Survey of Universities Offering Oiganized Courses
in Commerce and Administration." Chicago: Dellll Sigma Pi; 19048.
•• 'Thomas Watts: An Essay on the Proper Method of Forming the Man of BtlSi-
ness. Ad!Ipted and repril)ted by permission of Harvard University Graduate School of
Business Administration. Copyright, 1946, Harvard University Graduate ScbooI of
Business Administration.
whom an alfected Flourishes, and quaint Devices of Birds and BuU-Beg-
gars, are as much avoided, as Capering and Cutting in ordinary Walking.
Secondly, The mutual Intercourse and Dependence of Mankind
upon each other, from whence arises a Variely of Affairs for Computation,
makes ARITHMETICK the next necessary Qualification for the Man .of
Business.
Thirdly, MERCHANTS ACCOUNTS is the third Qualification. TIle
UnskiJI'd often confound this and Arithmetick together; insomuch
that 'tis sometimes taken for Arithmetick; and so, he that is a good Arith·
metican is erroneously judg'd a good Book.Keeper: But Book-Ket'ping is
a distinct Art; and is the Business of Reason to determine the just and
proper Debitors and Creditors; of Art to methodize om Results, and of
Arithmetick, only to answe,' the several Questions of Computation arising.
The Italian Method of Book·keeping by Double Entry. as now practis'd
by you Gentlemen of Commerce, may truly be allow'd to comprehend all
Excellencies in Accounting. And I'm persuaded, if this Method was
follow'd, and each Professor qualify'd to perform it, we should not find so
many Youths on their first Entrance on Business so much Strangers to it:
but the Instructing Compting·House might produce as accomplish'd
Clerks as the Merchants or Publick Offices, provided the same Application
was made use of.
Fourthly, The several Parts of the MATHEMATICKS are of that
extensive Use and Benefit to Mankind, that hardly any thing is to be
done without them; Consequently the Man of Business can have no small
Share in these Sciences: Country Gentlemen, Stewards of Estates, and all
concern'd in Land, Building, or Farming, should by all Means uuderstand
Surveying and Measuring: and indeed, for the Nobleman, or Gentleman's
Steward, these Parts of the Mathematicks seem to be Essential Qualifica-
tions. I shall only just mention the peculiar Excellency of two Parts more,
as Accomplishments worthy the prime Man of Business, the Merchant;
that is, GEOGRAPHY and NAVIGATION.
Fifthly, To accomplish the Man of Business, 'tis requisite he
should be Master of the Propriety of Expression, and yet, according to
the common Method of fitting Young Gentlemen for Business, a Style
in Writing is what they seldom or never hear of; and the Masters generally
take themselves to be no farther concern'd, than that their Scholars should
write a fair Hand, without considering how monstrous and ridiculous
their Conceptions may appear.
And now I am shewing how necessary for the carrying on Busi·
ness bappily, II proper Style is: let me not part with my Charge, till I
recommend to him the Knowledge of the Modem Languages. But, to
shorten my Young Gentleman's Pains, 'twill be sufficient for him to make
himself Master of the FRENCH TONGUE; which will answer in a great
Measure for the rest. For, at present, it seenlS to be the Universal
Language.
But, Sir, I forget that there's nothing requir'd to Form the Man
of Busines, but wfutt may be learnt with greater Advantage. from ~
Practice, than from anything I ean offer. Only pardon me, Sir, whilft I
observe, that tho' my Young Gentleman should be ffttnish'd with all theBe
Qualifications I have instanc'd in. he's still deficient in the main .Afti,C1e.
if he has not imbib'd the Knowledge of lIELIGION and GOOD ~
along with 'em.
(b) HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION
"Objectives and Gene.." Pnwisions....
The Master of Business Administration Program {of the Ha~td
Graduate School of Business Administration] could have been prepared
only if all concerned had constantly kept in mind the objectives of ~he
School and had been in substantial agreement on the skills and trainmg
at which we aim. The objectives used were not very diHerent from those
presented for discnssion by the former Subcommittee on Objectives:
( 1) Ability to analyze business situations, recognize problemS
and determine issues, seek pertinent facts, develop alter-
natives, and reach reasoned decisions.
(2) Ability to organize.
( 3) Ability in oral and written communication.
(4) Ability to deal with people.
(5) Ability to select and train subordinates.
\ b) }\'tiUlty to use bgures eYrectlvely 'tor aamlnlsnaove purpWCS·
(7) Ability to establish standards and to control and judge rer-
formance.
(8) Ability to execute effectively selected operating tasks, includ-
ing those involving severe time pressures.
( 9) Considerable knowledge of business techniques in one or
more areas.
(10) Acquaintance with sources of business information.
(11) Understanding of the general framework of business rela-
tionships. functional and institutional.
( 12 ) Understanding of the useful generalizations of political ec~n­
omy and ability to develop at least the beginnings of an m-
tegrated social and economic philosophy.
( 13) Understanding of ethical considerations as an integral .,m
of business administration and ability to develop an ijl~e­
grated set of ethical concepts for personal guidance in adnJIn-
istration.
( 14) A spirit of vigorous and cour3geous enterprise.
II Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration: "Objectives and GetI"fal
Provisions." Donald K. David: "The Objectives of Professional Ed_non." EduclItion
lor Prolession.1 Responsibility. Report of Proceedings of the later·Professions ~.
ence, Bud: Hill Falls. Pennsylvania, April .., 1948. Selected from pp. 9-H. R.eprillted
by permission of Carnegie Press. Copyright. 1948, Carnegie Press.
 TIll STlJOY OF ADMtNISTMTtON
The Master of Business Adrninisttatiou 'PmgIam now proposed
r~ts 11 real shift of emphasis. As compared with the prewar cur-
~lum, more emphasis is placed upon getting action through human
beings, tasks and duties of operating executives, and public responsibilities
of enterprise. Throughout the committee discussions much use was made
of such concepts or slogans as managerial control, communication, ad-
ministtation, carrying out of policy, how-to-do-it, sizing up the situation,
enterprise, the role of the administrator in the community, recognizing
social change, raising the level of professional education in business, and
raising the professional standards of businessmen.

Such are the types of skill desired for other fields of administra-
tion, including government." While this fal::t will be readily recog-
nized by the reader of this book on general administration, it raises
an interesting question concerning the system of administering, or-
ganizing and managing administrative education. For example, the
Harvard Graduate School of Public Administration was established
in order to provide "a broad fundamental training in economics and
government rather than a narrower and more specialized training in
what might be called public administration per Sf." as True to this
purpose, the Harvard courses and seminars on public administration
have centered around such questions as business regulation and pub-
lic finance. Similarly, Robert D. Calkins, the former Dean of the
College of Commerce at the University of Ca1ifornia and of the
School of Business at Columbia University, advocated in 1948 "truly
professional schools of administration intent on preparing men not
for business alone, but instead for the administration or management
of economic affairs through whatever agencies these affairs are to be
conducted." .. Thus schools of public administration are interested
in business administration, and schools of business administration be-
come interested in training public administrators. Of more than ~ 50
universities with separate commerce schools or organized curricula
in business administration, many offer major fields of concentration
in public administration, and some offer either bachelor's or mastt;r's
degrees in that field. Indeed, independent but combined schools of
"Business and Public Administration" 81 are developing throughout
the country.
.. See "Tlaining fOl Municipal Administtation." Report of the Committee of Inter·
""tiona! City Managers' Association, '936.
"Harvard Gtaduate School of Public Administration: "Annual Report," 1945-
46. p. 1 •
.. Robert D. Calkins: "Aims of Business Education." Education for ProfessiOnal
.Responsibility, p. 48. See also "/I. Challenge to Business Education." Harvard Busi_
Review. Winter 1944. vol. 23. pp. 174-. 86.
.. CotneII University: "School of Business and Public AdministJation." January t •
•94lI.
 Thit combination of educational .facilities for business and gov-
ernmental administrafion is not new in America. When the Whar-
ton School of Finance and Economy at the Uoiversity of Pennsyl-
vania was established in 1881 as the first collegiate school of business
in the United States, it was designed to provide "special means of
training and of correct instruction in the knowledge and in the arts
of modem Finance and Economy, both public and private."" Since
then the Wharton School has continued to show an interest in train-
ing for public administration. 'The second school of business, that of
the University of Chicago, established in 1898, was more boldly en-
titled the "College of Commerce and Politics" and its program cov-
cred such fields of public administration as "the consular service." ..
Perhaps the educational and ideological cleavages that have de-
veloped between business and government in the United States
would have been fewer had this original trend continued. In any
event, the task of administrative training in all categories is stiIl a
challenge to specialized professional schools and mixed institutions of
learning. When one realizes that even in this field educational facili-
ties may still be inadequate, as measured by the burden of profes-
sional college enrollments, the unfulfilled load of formal college
training for administration is overwhelming. While some forty per
cent of American college graduates were entering business after
World War II, less than ten per cent had any educational prepara-
tion in that field beyond a course or two in economics." 'The Presi-
dent's Commission on Higher Education predicted in 1947: "'The
administrative occupations in which 3,700,000 were employed in
U}40, are expected to require between 5,300,000 and 5,800,000 by
1()60." " Whatever the specialized professional point of view may be,
wh~ther it is busines management or public administration or indus-
trial management, it seems clear that the fOffilal education of Ameri-
can administrators is a major task of the twentieth century.

6. INTRINSIC QUALITIES OF ADMINISTRATORS

From the educational viewpoint, the main question is not one

c;i quantity but rather the quality of teaching and learning, first with
as The Wharton Sclwol: Its First Fifty Years, 1881-1931. Philadelphia: 1931, p. 8
.. Leon C. Marshall: "The College of Commeree and Administr.lti<m of the Uni-
versity of Chicago." Toumal ot Political Ecouomy, 191" vol. n, pp. 97-102 •
.. Society for: the Advancement of Management. Committee on Relations with
Colleges and Universities: "Managerial Education," Mfldem Management, November
1948, vol. 8, p. ;.0•
.. Presideitt's CommiBsioo OIl Higher Education: "Establishing the Goals." Higbc:r
Education for: Amerialll Democracy. vol. 1, p. 76.
.regard to the instructional methods used by teachers of administrll-
tion and the intellectual achievements of their students, and secondly
with regard to the content of the curriculum and the subject-matt;:r
of the courses. Despite all the discussions among educators concertl-
ing these questions, they do not fully agree as to what can be or shouJd
be imparted to students of administration. With all of the available
courses covering the minute details of management, despite the ric:h
experience of internship training, the promising experiments wifh
courses emphasizing principles or theories, the stimulating use of tll~
"case method" for training purposes, many of the educators respon~l­
ble for teaching both business and public administration are modest
about the results achieved in teaching administration.
Evaluation of results in the teaching of administration depen~S
upon what qualities it is mainly intended to develop. Answers to tJjls
question have been offered in summary but incisive form by (1-)
Professor Dan Throop Smith of the Harvard Graduate School pf
Business Administration, and (b) Louis Brownlow, founder arid
first director of Public Administration Clearing House.

(a) DAN THIOOP SMlTII

"£cI1ICatioa for AdmiaistratiOll""
\.\. ~~~ ~ ~\. ~ ~,,~~ <$.. ~~\.;"<l.~ <::!..~ ~<l. ~<l. ~,,~ \.\l,..p1_
make a man aware of the need for making decisions and taking acti(1n,
and of the advantages of doing 50 wisely and with good judgment. But
even that, though it can be expressed in a sentence, is manifested in ~
many different ways that its full development and the appreciation of It
may be a lengthy process. Can a formal educational process assist studejlts
to develop facility in making and implementing wise decisions in ~.
ministrative matters? There are many aphorisms about the advantages of
self-education, the dangers of the theorist with his learning and lack of
common sense, and the value of experience as the best teacher. Certainly.
it is difficult to match, with formal education, the wisdom that coules
hom experience. It may be noted, however, that experience may lead b? a
lack of mental flexi1»1ity in meeting new situations; an experienced ~t
opinionated man is as ineffective as one with a formalized doctrinaJfC
approach.
Though it is possible to develop varions principles of adminisfOl-
tion by generalizing hom particular cases, the resulting abstractions seem
to have little significance. The process of administration involves actiPn,
requiring the application of any given principle in infinitely varying acfIl3I
situations. In brief, administration is an art requiring skill, practice, and

.. Don Throop SoUth: ''Education for Administration," Harvard Business Revit"'.

Spring "945, vol. 'J. adapted from pp_ J6:>-63, 36&-70. Reprinted by penndsion.
judgment, However much it can be analyzed.in the absttact, it bec:omes
manifest only in specific cooctete situations. In fact,. the best adminiSfJa-
tors may have difticqJty in reItting their actions w explicit principles;
the fully developed skill will most often lead to guasi-intuitive action
without a consci:oos frame of reference or check list of points w be con.
sidered.

(b) LOUIS BROWNLOW

"What Is an Administrator?" ..
I am going to give you for what it may be worth what I think
are some of the qualifications a public administrawr should have. I have
tried to think of it in terrns of personality, of training, of experience, and
in none of those terms have I been able to discover what to me is a satis-
factory answer. And no doubt the one thing that does satisfy my searching
is susceptIble of being termed as an oversimplification, but as I have looked
about for administrators over a quarter of a century, I think I have dis-
covered' one thing that characterizes those that have been successfttl in
many administrative positions of different types. It characterizes those
that have been successful so far as their administrative work is concerned
in the position of Presidents of the United States and Governors of states
and Mayors of cities. It characterizes equally those that have been success-
ful as the head of a finance department, the head of a unit of the health
department, the head of a minor division in the police department, and
the foreman of a garbage collecting gang. That is, w be a successful ad-
ministrator one must have' a catholic curiosity,
The successful public administrawr is curious about. everytning.
Perhaps you don't see just why it is that a public administrator should go
about continually askiDg ~ons of everything and everybody about
him. Well, let us take one functional phase of public administration in a
municipal government.
One of the best administralDrs that I ever knew had a great curi-
osity about garbage. He was the head of the refuse disposal department
of the District of Columbia. He asked all sorts of questions of the garbage
cans and the ash cans and trash· barrels, because in that city we impOSed
upon the householders a three way system of refuse removal. You couldn't
put your trash and your garbage and your ashes all in one container, you
had to have three containers, and also, at that particular time, the col-
lectors were divided into three different crews. So this man with this
curiosity made a study of what he found in the rubbish cans, and the
results <If that study were plotted on a map, and as the result of the study
of that map the routings were rearranged, the whole system of garbage
collection was rearranged; not only of collection, but of disposal.
.. Louis Brownlow: "What Is an AdministIator?" Remarks at Gmduate Political
Science Club of the University of CfUcago, JaDlIIIlY 2]. 1'}36. SeIocted fumI pp. 6-'7, 12.
 THE STUDY OF ADMINISTItATION

And what (else} did we discover? We discovered that it was ex·

ceedingly profitable to get garbage from large parts of the town; that
garbage was rich in grease and in sugar. And we took it to the reduction
plant and. we turned that grease into a very acceptable and delightful
non-odorous product wbkb you a little later bought in the form of soap.
Another thing, it seems to me, is a by-product of this catholic
curiosity, that is the aMity to loaf. You can't be an administrator, a good
successful administrator, and not know how to loaf. Because if you are
industrious all the time and tend to your job, there is always more work
than you can possibly do in a day, and if you tend to that job all the time
you will be going right on in a routine, you will become morc an~ more
specialized, you will become more and more analytical, you will become
more and more interested in what you are particularly charged with doing,
and progressively less and less generalized in your outlook, less and less
interested in what the other fellow is doing. And the only way you can
compensate for that, of course, is to loaf, to loaf whole-heartedly wbenever
and wherever possible, and with whomever, because the only way that you
can find out what are the questions in the minds of these people you
have got to loaf with them to find out the truth about how they feel.
Now, of course, you can't loaf with all the individuals, but you
have to loaf with a great many of them, and you have to know how to do
it, and you know you won't like to do it unless you have a catholic
curiosity, not only about things that I've been talking about, but about
petsons.

The essential aptitudes of the administrator can be summarized

in other ways. Herbert Emmerich, for example, lists first, the ability
to direct staff effectively and, second, the ability to command consent
and secure agreement. The objection may properly be raised that all
of these are innate characteristics rather than acquired. Can they
therefore be transmitted or strengthened by formal education? In
answer to this question, one university frankly informed its prospec-
tive students: "It sbould be emphasized that no training program
win produce a finished administrator. In an important measure, ad.
ministration is an art that can be learned only in years of practical
experience. But it has been demonstrated in this field as in so many
others that education . . . will make one more adept in the practice
of the art and will shorten the road to the goal of competency.""
Few educators of the other established professions would claim mote
for the schooling, no matter how elaborate, offered in their respective
fields .
.. Symcuse University Bulletin: "Graduate Courses in Public Administration,"
September >5, 1947, p. 5·
"(. ADMfNlSTMTJON AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCfS
Just as the humanities have been historically regarded as fit sub-
jects for the broad training of administrators, so a more recent inter-
est bas developed in tbe social sciences-political science, economics,
sociology (including social statistics), and psychology. Some edu-
cators rate administration itself as a social science even th0ugb they
admit that it draws heavily on the content of other fields'" Many
educators are skeptical about making a social science out of adminis-
tration or employing the already recognized social sciences for the
training of administrators. The problem here is basic, since even some
"social scientists" hesitate to regard social science as scientific. Jacob
Viner, Professor of Economics at Princeton University, has stated
that "no one knows better than the occupants of the social science
chairs that their diSCipline is so fallible and erratic that to persist in
the term scientific is an open invitation to ridicule."" Other econo-
mists are more hopefn}." It is a significant reflection of the national
state of mind on this point that the President's Scientific Research
Board, reporting in 1947, excluded social science from its national
survey because there were "no firm boundaries to knowledge, no air-
tight compartments which can contain it"; although the Board did
recognize the existence and the significance of individual social sci-
ences"·
Among the leading educators who have persisted in regarding
administration as a social science have been Charles A. Beard, who
had been Director of the New Yark Training School for Public Serv-
ice; and Wallace B. Donham,'" Dean of the Harvard Graduate School
of Business Administration.
(a)
"PhilosophY. Sc_.
CHAIU.ES A. lEAD
and Art of Public AcImiJlistratioll" ..
The word science of administration has been used. There are
many who object to the term. Now if by science is meant a. conceptual
,.. Herbert A. Simon: "A Comment on the 'Science of Public Administration:"
Public A.dmini&tration Review, Winter 1947, vol. 7, pp. 201-<>3. See also AleJamder
~ton: The Governing of Men. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1945, p. S.
"See also Morris R. Collen: ''Scientific Method," Encyclopedia of the Social Sci-
- , 1937, vol. S, pp. 3119-95~
,or Stuart Chase: The Proper Study 01 Manlind. New York: Halper " Brol:bers;
1948 .
.. "A Program for the Nation." Science and Public Policy. Vol. I, p. viii.
.. See abo Wallace B. Donham: Education for RespoOsib1e Living. Cambridge:
Hamrd Um.emty Pms; 1945.
• .. Charles A. Beard: "Philosophy, Science and Art of Public Administratioa."
~ed from an addleSS delWered before The Annual Conference of. the Govemmcnllll
Research Association, Princeton, New Jersey, ~ber 8, 1939.
6151 Till S1'UOY OF A.MINISTRATION
scheme of things in which every particularity coveted may be assigned a
mathematical value, then administration is not a science. In this sense
only astro-physics may be called a science and it is well to remembet
that mechanical laws of the heavens tell us nothing about the color ;;lnd
composition of the stars and as yet cannot account for some of the dis-
turbances and explosions which seem accidental. If, on the other hand,
we may rightly use the term science in connection with a body of CJi'lct
1m<?w1edge, derived from experience and observation, and a body of ndes
or axioms which experience has demonstrated to be applicable in conciete
practice, and to work out in practice approximately as forecaSt, then we
may, if we please, appropriately and for convenience, speak of a science
of administration. Once, when the great French mathematician, Poinc;lre,
was asked whether Euclidean geometry is true, he replied that the question
had no sense but that Euclidean geometry is aud still remains the most
convenient. The Oxford English Dictionary tells us that a science is,
among other things, a particular branch of knowledge or study; a recog-
nized department of learning.
The administrator is more like the engineer who construcfS a
power plant, that is, he is concerned with the realization of consciOUS
human purposes by the conscious use of human beings and materials. It
is true that the mere student of administration may be just an observer,
but he does not merely observe natural, unconscious, and autom;ltic
operations. He observes the formulation of human purposes, consci0l1sly
and deliberatel,\" and oqerations des~ned to effect ~I/en results, And he
sees calculations of results in advance realized later in practice with a
high degree of approximation. The degree of approximation between ad-
vance calculations and results is not often, if ever, as exact as in the case
of a hydro-electric plant, but it is constantly exact enough for practical
purposes,
In other words, there are in administration things analogous to,
if not identical with, the mechanical tracts or deterministic sequence, of
physics. If, for example, it is decided by government to accomplish the
purpose of providing compensation at given rates for men and worflen
employed in industry who sustain injuries in .connection with their oc-
cupations, the administrator can, like the engineer, estimate in advance
the probable cost of such a design, indicate the types of officers and ern-
ployees necessary to administer the design, and the administrative pro-
cedures appropriate to the whole process from beginning to end. And, as
in the case of the hydro-electric engineer, the administrator, later sees the
results of his operations and can compare them with his advance estimlltes .
There are more variables and incalculables in human affairs than in hydro-
electric affairs, but even so administration achieves pre-determined results
with an approximation which is often amazing for its exactness. If ad-
ministrative designs and estimates were not realized in practice with a
high degree of exactness, both industry and government would collapse·
And if the experience of natural science is any guide, then as the
science of administration advances, :we may reasonably ~ it to take
on an increasingly deterministic character. &. research, sCientific societies,
and the exchanges of knowledge aod hypotheses by natural scientists have
advaoced the exactness of kno:wledge in the domain of natuml sci~
so :we may expect research, administrative societies, and the exchanges
among administrators to advance the exactness .of knowledge in the do-
maill of administration.
Already, :we may truly say, :we have an enormous body of exact
and usable kno:wledge in the domain of administration. It :would be easy
to list thousands of volumes and articles on the subject, from the hands
of high competence. I have seen this body of literature gro:w from a few
items in 1898 to an enormous mass in 1939. During this period I have
seen the number of research workers increase from a mere handful to
hundreds. This is a fact also, at least for informed and competent persons.
During this period the opportunities for life work in administration have
multiplied many times. I dare say, though I shall not try to prove it, that
the body of exact literature in administration is many times larger than
the body of exact literature in natural science when Bacon, Galileo, and
Newton, began the revolution in natural science three hundred years ago.
During this same period I have seen the number of societies and organiza-
tions among administrators, local and general, increase from nothing to
fifty or sixty.
This body of administrative literature can be taught to young
men and women; perhaps also to the aged, if they are not hopeless. And it
is possible by tests to discover whether or how far the process of com-
municating and imparting administrative knowledge has been successful,
[although] not precisely in all cases. Moreover, and this is highly impor-
tant, young men and women who have more or less mastered the prin-
ciples, maxims, and axioms of administrative science can now, by :what is
called in-training, fortify their formal knowledge by living experiences in
and with administration. There is, then, a science of administration, in
the sense in which I have used the term, and it can be tanght, learned,
and used.

(b) WALLACE B, DONHAM

"The Theory and Practice of Administration" 111

In the sooial sciences there has been a serious gap, except :where
administration is involved, between the theorist and the man who must
act. As a result our social science theory continues to be detached from
reality. There is great need for a new social science, nanlely, the Science
of Administration, where social theory and action must meet. Administra-
tion as conceived in this paper is, therefore, a social science with its own
OJ. WaIJace B. Donham: "'The Theory and Practice of Adminlstration." Harvard
~usill<iss Review, vol. '4, Summer 1936, selected from p. 409. Reprinted by pemtis-
$1011.
 THI STUDY 01 AIIMI"ISTMTtON
techniques, its own al>str.tctions clustering around the concept of action
through human organizations, and its own problems of theory. It is
vitally concerned in integrating other sciences, physical, biological, psycho-
logical, and social, at the point where action is involved. Its social impor.
tance is great. Indeect if our civilization breaks down, it will be mainly
a breakdown of administration, both private and public.

(el WALLACI B. DONHAM

"Traillin, for Leadership in a Democracy" I I
At this point water-tight compartments of university spe<:ializa..
tion and theories founded on the selected isolatiolil of facts easily break
down. Specialized thinking is rarely a sufficient foundation for concrete
decisions involving action. The social scientist cannot often form sound
administrative judgments solely on tbl' basis of elements which he has
picked out simply because they relate directly to his particular specialty.
The present emphasis on artificial subdivisions of knowledge and on
specialized thinking and teaching in universities, technical schools, and
colleges and tbe relative neglect of administrative problems involving
action have a dangerously narrowing effect on graduates of these institu·
tions. While we may and frequently do arouse the intellectual interest
of students in a considerable variety of subjects intimately related to the
civilization of which they are a part, we pay almost no attention to the
web of cross ties among these subjects.
As a result our graduates leave us without having formed the habit
of seeking wide generalizations related to diverse variables in the social
situations which surround them. Because they lack both habits and meth-
ods which lead them to seek generalizations, they become, after they
leave us, Spe<:ialists themselves and make decisions without the guides to
action within their special fields which wider viewpoints might give. To
develop them as we must, the artificial dividing lines between social
sciences must in large measure be broken down. Specialized training
must be both counteracted and supplemented by training which brings in
the widest social implications. Otherwise men will not be trained to meet
the problems faced by public and private administrators.
The only way these things can be attempted in our universities
without resulting in a vast amount of sheer unrealistic sentimentality is,
I believe, by paying more attention to the great intellectual field of ad·
ministration.

On its own merits as a field of knowledge, administration is thus

classified by Charles Beard as a social science. Dean Donham also
urges the recognition of administration as a social science, since this
.. Wallace B. Donham: "Training for Leadership in a Democracy." Harvard Busi·
_ Review, vol. 14, Spring 1936, adapted from pp. ,.6S-~70. Reprinted by pennis-
IioD.
 ADMfNISTRATION

acceptance might help to integrate the other social science. Like

Brooks Adams, he believes that "if our civilization breaks down, it
will be mainly a breakdown of administration."
This emphasis upon the social sciences in the United States ap-
pears to be a stronger current than the earlier interest in the classics
and the humanities as a preparation for administrative responsibility.
However, the two strains were closely related. The educators who at-
tended the Princeton Conference on University Education for the
Public Service in 1946 disagreed about "the precise role of the hu-
manities and the social sciences"; but the predominant view seemed
to be that the education of administrators "must include the social
sciences, which, however, are not yet completely satisfactory as a
vehicle for general education and cannot entirely replace the classical
training." In any case, they too were impressed with "the need for
generalists and for broad general training" as a means of answering
"the universal demand for a synthesizing ability that is desperately
needed if man, his world and his civilization are to survive." os

8. THE POSITION OF ADMINISTRATION AMONG THE SCIENCES

Administration may possess scientific qualities, but does it have a
sufficiently coherent body of knowledge to justify recognition as an
independent discipline which may stand side by side with the major
sciences? This issue constitutes in itself a technical problem in episte-
mology. However, the student of administration who wishes to estab-
lish his field of study as a scientific discipline or as a recognized pro-
fession will soon wish to inquire into this question. The broad answer
seems to be that few epistemologists or philosophers consider admin-
istration as worthy of recognition as a separate science.
Professor Glenn Negley of Duke University is an exception.
Regarding all of the sciences not as airtight compartments or sub-
ject-matter categories but rather as methods and techniques to help
integrate the knowledge and experience of the world around us, Pro-
fessor Negley considers administration a legitimate science of ranking
importance in the total organization of knowledge.
GLENN NEGLEY
The Organization of Knowledge"
Administration is an activity which demands correct analysis and
accurate orientation with relation to other sciences. To analyze and
63 See n. 29, supra, p. 26. .
.. Glenn Negley: The Organization of Knowledge. Adapted with the assistance
01 the author from pp. (rll, 43-49, 149, 153, 158-159, 187-188. Reprinted by per.
mission of Prentice·Hall, Inc. Copyright, 194>, Prentice· Hall, Inc.
665 THE STUDY OF ADMINISTRATION

through analysis to understand and through understanding to make pos-

sible the final fruition of rational and creative action-this is the highest
end which man can conceive for himself. The primary problem of ra-
tional activity is one of method, of organization. If society is to be ordered
intelligently, the intelligence which is to serve as the ground of order
cannot itself be without organization. Our knowledge must have some
order, some method, or its application in ordering activity will be hap-
hazard. It is often said that "man's reach exceeds his grasp"; but in regard
to the knowledge contributed by research and analysis, it seems at present
rather more appropriate to say that man's grasp greatly exceeds his reach.
The pressing problem for most of us is not so much the acquisition of
more knowledge as the more adequate employment and organization of
the knowledge we already have.
Any pattern of analysis or any system of categories for the classi-
fication of knowledge is simply a suggestion for the arrangement of the
data of experience. An analysis of this experience can be made in terms
of certain points.<Jt-view, categories and sciences (including Administra-
tion) as shown on the following chart:

~--------------------~:::~I_------------------~

~----------------------~~. ----------------------~
~ ___________________ Ar' ..., ..... _ ____________________- - '

A pattern of analysis requires, first of all, a determination of the

point.<Jt-view which will be fruitful in making the analysis. 11,e possible
points-ot-view seem to be three: (1) the individual who is fa9ing the
problem being solved or analyzed, (2) the material world in which the
individual is functioning, and (3) the methods or the tormal system of
tools and procedures available in working with the material world.
Another element of analysis is the category under each point-of-
view; not the traditional category like quantity and quality but categories
that can be utilized under each point of view in the effort to exert control
 over experience and action. Under the'fiJst or individual point-of-view,
there are (1) the physical man, (2) the social group, and t~) the social
personality (II' person. Under the second or material point-<Jf-view. there
are (1) the objects of nature, (2) the institution of property, and (3) the
State. And third, among the procedural methods or formal tools available
3re (1) mathematics or logic, (2.) language, and (3) law. A final element
of analysis in addition to the point-of-view and the category, is the scientific
framework in which we decide to organize OUT experience and data.
It seems that the best method of utilizing the sciences for pur-
poses of analysis-and this would include the science of Administration-
is to conceive of them as concentrating upon the relations existing between
categories rather than as describing particular categories themselves. The
various sciences or fields of investigation are not distinguished because
they investigate different kinds of facts or subject matter; they differ be-
cause they have developed a specialized technique for observing different
aspects of the same subject matter. A rock is an adequate subject of ob-
servation for any science whatsoever. What geology does, for example,
is to restrict its observations to certain aspects of the rock; economics may
look at the rock from another point-of-view, chemistry from still another,
and so on through the entire range of science, Geology cannot break from
the rock a fragment which is of geological interest only; the sciences are
distinguished according to the viewpoint taken by each in observing the
rock, not by a specific difference in content in the rock.
The most comprehensive analysis of any subject matter will at-
tempt to coordinate all that is said about the sub;ect matter by all sciences.
The most comprehensive category of each point-of-view is an integrating
concept of the Individual, the Material or the Formal; and categories of
Person, State and Law are the terms in which our analysis of the problem
of experience can finally become formulated. It is apparent that the most
comprehensive concept of relations between the material and formal
points-of-view will include both the Physical and the Vocational Sciences.
The coordination of these two functions is what we ordinarily mean by
control. Control is in general the area in which an emphasis is made upon
the attainments of order or Law in the State when State is the organiza-
tion of institution. Another term which is more specific is Administration
and I think we may say that the fiual function in reJating the Material
and Formal is the science of Administration.
Administration is, then, the area of activity which emphasizes the
maintenance of control, a problem which arises mainly in terms of relating
the Formal and Material points-of-view in experience. The administrator
is one who maintains the relation between the categories of Law and the
State. In specific terms, this would describe the duties of executive and
Judiciary within our system of government. But. this is only the more re-
stricted, or perhaps more formal, sense of Administration. It is apparent
that the most important element of Administration is the adjustment to
voc:ational and industrial functions, 'Of distripution and consumption,
 TM $T1JDY 0. ADMINISTRATION

which are the instruments of whatever order may be given to the Material
aspect of experience. These are the activities and functions which the
executive and the judge must reduce to order. Thus, we do not expect
the administrator to act with the remarkable precision of the physical
scientist, nor yet maintain the degree of agreement brought about by the
vocational scientist; but we must demand that his activity be directed
toward the maintenance of order in relation to material institutions. This
order wm take the form of Law.
This reasoning, of course, suggests that the customary distinctions
between administrative, executive and adjudicative functions are distinc·
tions of degree rather than of kind. Here we have considered them to-
gether under the general science of Administration. More specifically, the
executive function might be described in terms of direction and coordina·
tion of Administration. The function of the executive branch of govern·
ment is literally the basis of order in the State, and order is made poSSible
by the various administrative agencies which alone can control the rna·
terial process of experience.

American theorists of administration like Dwight Waldo have

also characterized administrators as "specialists in generalization." ..
British philosophers of management like Oliver Sheldon have like·
wise pointed out that management, as "the coordination, organiza.
tion, and direction of sciences, is itself a science."" But Glenn Neg·
ley is the rare philosopher of knowledge who has with equal convic-
tion elevated the study of administration to the highest position in
the scientific hierarchy.

SUMMARY

The study of administration, insofar as it can be taught and

learned; represents a long-standing field of knowledge which is in·
creasingly being regarded as a professional discipline. If administra·
tion is not always conceded to be a science in its own right, still it has
many of the elements of the recognized sciences and established pro-
fessions.
The feasibility of making an independent discipline, scientific or
professional, out of administration is not only a question of educa-
tional theory, but also an intensely practical question of how to 0[-
ganize knowledge in the modem world. From this point of view the
main problem is not whether training for administration should em-
phasize classical subjects or social sciences, or whether administration

II Waldo: The Administrative State, p. 10% •

.. SheIdo>l: The PhHosopby ol Management, pp.49-;o.
 itself should be Tegatded as a .social science. or what precise $Ubi~'
matter should be inj~ed into courses in adrninisttation, but tather
where to locate administtatiou in the educational system; in short,
how to organize, how to manage, how to administer the training sys-
tem for administration itself.
From the standpoint of our universities, the main problem seems
to be that administration as a general subject has as yet acquired no
. position, no "school" or "college" within the university structure.
The situation is different with medicine and engineering, teaching
and theology, law and business, which have their independent col-
leges attracting large enrollments. Should the subject of administra-
tiou be entrusted to one of these schools such as the engineering
schools, the law schools, or the schools of business administration,
which have in the past shown an interest in administrative studies?
In part, this practice is already being followed, since so many mem-
bers of these professions assume administrative responsibility in so-
ciety. However, a significant minority of students is training for gov-
ernment or public administration, and we have only a few separate
schools or colleges operating under the name of "Public Administra-
tion." Most of the work in public administration is carried on in the
departments of government or political science within the general
"liberal arts" divisions or colleges of the universities. To establish
more securely the educational, scientific, and professional status first
of public administration and finally of administration generally is the
main task now facing the study of administration.
Many students of administration argue in favor of the continna-
tion of the present scheme. The desirability of studying a responsible
discipline like public administration or even private management in
a broad setting of the sciences and humanities, rather than in the
more narrow framework of a single profession, appeals to many in-
formed laymen as well as experts. Another consideration is the fear
that one becomes overspecialized and biased by technical knowledge
which may be better acquired, if it can be acquired at all, on the job,
in an internship, or an in-service capacity. The opposite Qanger of
theoretical studies in the non-technical curriculum is counterbalanced
by the salutary influence of making general courses in administration
available not only to future administrators and managers but also to
students concentrating on other pursuits. All citizens should be given
some appreciation of the importance of administration as one of the
high skills required for the survival of modern civilization. Above all,
the more general training avoids the risk of producing too many
"bureaucrats" suffering from the "trained incapacity" criticized by
Thorstein Veblen, or more technicians of the kind regarded by A. J.
 TltE STUDY Of ADMINISTRATION

Toynbee as morally irresponsible, though "negatively responsible"

"monsters become masters." '
Thus we comprehend the main risk of which the practitioners of
administration must beware. Their very professional perfection n)ay
intensify the atomism and specialism of modem life. On the otber
hand, by subscribing to humanitarian principles and sound vah~es,
they can become one of the most cohesive forces of modem civiliza_
tion. .

U,{i',tRSlTY Of A,E!C~, TUR\L SCIEI,GES

U:I!\~" :11'i Utl::.RY C~~i~f~LOBE,

Ddtt~ ''''' ......... ,.. ..................... .

 INDEX OF NAMES

Abbott, Charles, .65, .66-67 (reading) Arnold, Hugo F., 566

Abbott, Roger S., 700 Ascher, Charles S., 328n
Abramson, Victor, .05D Astell, Joe, p
Acheson, Dean, 571 Augustus, Emperor, 89
Adams, Brooks, 3, 10-11 (reading), 18,
133, 310, 519, 5'0, 521-22 (read· Babbage, Charles, 103, 104, 159, .65
ing), 524, 664 Bacon, Francis, .60, '44, 6'7 (read.
Adams, Herbert B., 64;, 646-47 (read· ing), 6.8-29 (reading), 66.
ing), 650n Bagehot, Walter, 3;0 (readiug), 351
Adams, Henry, 10, 48m, 520 Bagration, General, 34'
Adams, James Truslow, 144 Baillieu, Sir Clyde, '34
Adams, John, 10, '42, 600 Baker, John Calhoun, 600, 335-36
Adams, John Quincy, 10, 500, 519, (reading)
)20-21 (reading) Baker, Ray Stannard, 43.n
Adams, R. G., 24m Balzac, Honore de, 186 (reading)
Agard, Walter R., 85-86 (reading) Barber, Earl H., 564-66 (reading)
Albert, Prince, 39Z Barclay, General, 34'
Allen, William H, 130 Barker, Ernest, 96, 10m
Allison, L. W., 596n Barnard, Chester I., 3'4, 6.4, 6.6
Almond, Gabriel, 446n (reading)
Ander.son, E. H., 219n, '48, 2;0-51 Barnett, Vincent M., Jr., 581-8. (read-
(reading), '9On ing), 585
Anderson, H. W., 14Bn Barrington, Mrs. Russel, 3son
Anderson, Sir John, 158 Barton, Bruce, ..6
Anderson, William, 355-58 (reading), Batchelor, Bronson, 555n
359 Batlle. Jose, 176
An-shih. Wang, 429 Baynes, Nomtan H., 16<}n
Beach, Terry, 615-17 (reading), 6.8
Appleby, Paul H., 12, 470, 57-00
(reading), 74, 1940, 198, 311, 33 1 ,
337, 455n, 556, 5570. 57', 578n
Beard, Charles A., 3, .6. '7-.8 (read.
ing), 22, S7, 91n.t 103, 130. 47zn,
Araktcheev, General, 34' 5'00, 649, 660-6. (reading), 663
Aristotle, preface, 85, 88, 94, 231-3' Beard, Miriam, 141D
(reading), .57-59 (reading), 389, Beck, James M., 54.n
438n Bedford, Duke of. 480-81
if .•.ItlOIX. . . . . . . .
l!eime, F. F., 3U, 32) (reading) Burke, Ednlnnd, 4$0-8) (~Ilf)'
BelhImy, Edward, '34 48. ,
Belli, Pierino, 618n Burleson, Albert S., 43%
Belsley, G. Lyle, >14n BUIDharn, James, ;, 1%-14 (reading'. J8
Bendix, Reinhard, 2.o}n, 205 Bury, ]. B., 88n
Bennett, H. S., 95n Butcher, Harry C., %4'
Bennigsen, General, 342 Butler, H. B., ISo
Bergquist, George W., 3060 Byrnes, James, 69, 344, ~46 (reading)
Berle, A. A., '4n
Caesar, Julius, SQ
Betts, Edwin Morris, 120n
Beveridge, Sir William, ,1,
Beyle, Herman C., 550-51 (reading),
Caimcross, Alec, : 30n
Caldwell, Lynton K" 4'4n, 519n
5>5 Calkins. Robert D .• 210. Zll->l (iead.
Bienstock, Gregory, 56n, 303n, 467...ol! ing), 339n, 4'40, 655
(reading) Cannoo, Joseph G., 270, '71
Biffle, Leslie C., 268 Carey, William D., 5470
Bingham, Walter Van Dyke, 60, 6.jl Carson, fohn, '69
Bird. Jean, 235, 236-37 (reading) Cassiooorus, Aurelius, SQ, 90 (reading)
Blachly, Frederick F., 58.-85 (reading), Casson, Herbert N., '540
645,647-49 (reading) Cato, 1050
Blair, Emily, 272, 276-77 (reading) Catto, Lord, 157
Blum, Leon, 4, 394, 395n Cave, Roy C., 9.0
Boak. ArthUI E. R., 89, 9<>-9' (r""d. Cect1, Robert, 148n
ing) Chamberlain, Austen, 63 (reading), 64,
Bogdanow, Alexander, 239, 240 (read· 65
ing) Chandler, Henry P., 586, 587-88 (,ead.
Bonaparte, Napoleon, .6., .64, 3'4, ing)
4>5, 4.6-27 (reading), 618 Chapple, Eliott D., 54'0
Bonnin, Charles Jean, 51n Cbardon, M., ,6,
Boone, Joel T., 147n Charlemagne, 92
1)rano"", Loti.s'D., "'"2, n)-"2;, \_~. ~"".."w.l;a;, "',"
ing), 126~ Il8, 130, 131, 138, 14 1 , Chase, Stuart, 135n, 5130, 660n
148, '51, 20; Chatters, Carl H., 3580
Brattin, Barbara, 44 3n Chaucer, Geoffrey, 638
Breasted, Charles, 7Sn Chester, D .. N., '59n. 4320
Breasted, James H., 78 Childs, HarWllOd L., :85n
Childs, Richard S., 750
Brech, E. F. L., 104, 116, "7", 159 n ,
Chow, 82, 83 (reading)
,69n, 32;0, 447" Christie, Charles, 640
Brecht, Arnold, 74n, 169n, 398n, 402,
Chrysler, Walter P., '44
427, 429-3' (reading), 613-,'5 Churchill, Will!ton, 241, 245, 619
(reading), 641, 643-44 (reading) Cicero, Marcus Tullius, 8Q-9O (read.
Brinton, Crane, 6.8n ing), 158
Bristed, John, 14ID Claire, Guy S., 139n, 203
Brody, William, 433n Clapp, Cordon R., 534
B~, Al~, 252, .SQ, 29On, 292n Cleveland, Frederick A., 130, nQt1
Brown, Donaldson, 28, 60 Coates, N. P., 6,n
BroWl1, Esther Lnctl1e. 644n Coffman. Paul B., 376Il
BroWl1low, Louis, preface, 34n, l09n, Cohen, Benjamin. .8J
303, 311, 65'1, 657, 658-59 {reading} Cohen, Emmeline W., 431n
Bruere, Harry, 130 Cohen, Morris L., 660n
Bryan. William Jennings, 209 Coil, E. J~ 297n, 530-33- (reading),
Bryce, James, 27', 4.0-%1 (reading), 594
424 Coker, F. W., 3950
Bryson, Lyman, 3B4 Colbert, Jean Baptiste, 618
Buck, A. E., 2¥ Cole, Charles Woolsey, 611ln
Buller, Charles, 67 Cole, G. D. H., 64, "nn
ButgeQ, John W., 36;n, 6500 Cole, Taylor, 960, 1840
 INDEX OF NAMn
Conimap:r, Henry Steele, 114 Dixon. Arthnr L., 330, H7-38 (read.
ComInons, Joim R., 454, 4550 ing)
Confucius, lh, 83, 84, S95 Dodds, H. W., '94n
Cooke, Morris Llewellyn. nl. 122, Donald. W. J., 30', 30. (reading), 303
125, 145n, 201, ;'4; 458. 506, 509 Donham, Wallace B., 11, '94-95 (read.
(reading), SS5-S6 (reading) ing), '97, 660, 66,-63 (reading)
Coolidge, Calvin, '2.3, 124-.6 (read- Dorfman. Joseph, '33n, '35n
ing),2.38 Drabelle, John M., 506, 509-.0 (read-
Coon, Carleton S., 54.0 ing)
Coons, Arthur G., 7'1, U, 2l9n Draper, Warren F., '47n
Cooper, Richard W., 437n Drucker, Peter F., 4'40
Copley. Frank B., 1170, '2 tn, 122n Drury, Horace B.• 39n, u.n
Corson. John J., 214D, 447, 449-50 Duane, James, 241
(reading), 54'-44 (reading) Dubinsky, David, '47'1
Corwin, Edward S .• 84 Duncan, James, 125
Cotton, G. F., 32 Dunlap, James E., 90n
Coulomb, 104, 165 Dunn, Samuel 0 .. 144n, 1880, 2l3n
Coulson, Herbert H., 92n Du Pont, Pierre, '7
Courbrongh, J. H., 328n Durant, William C., '7
Courteline, George, 187n Durham, G. Homer, 6" 3.8n
Cowell, F. R., 54.n Durham, John, 67
Coyle, David Cushman, 316, 317 (read· Dzhugashvili, Yosip Visarionovitch
ing), 553-54 (reading) (joseph Stalin), 170
Crockett, John C., 268
Croly, Herbert, '34, 524n East, Robert A., 110n
Crowe, Sir Eyre, 66 Eaton, Dorman B., 129n~ 1 S4n
Cursiter, Stanley, 32 Eaton, J. Shirley, 60, 438n
Curtis, Myra, 591h}9 (reading) Ebenstein, William, '73, '74-75 (read-
Cushing, Harvey, 637n ing). '76
Cushman, Robert E., 363n, 579-lh Eberstadt, F., 401n
(reading) Edison, Thomas A., 209
Edwards, W. H., 395n
Dahl, Robert A., .60n, .83n, 22.n Egger, Rowland, .810
Daugherty, Harry M., 399 Einzig, Paul, ';4, '57-58 (reading)
David, Donald K., 654D Eisenhower, Dwight D., 24'
Davidson, Philip, '410 Eldridge, Seba, .88n, 5140
Davis, Clement, • 38 Elsworth, P. T., '760
Dawes, Charles A., 483-84 (reading) Ely, Richard T., 5'4n
Day, A. J. T., 45'-54 (reading) Emerson, Harrington, 12.:, 123, 12,S,
Deering, Ferdie, 352, 353-54 (reading) 1300, 16sn, 183, 290n
Denman, William, 586-87 (reading) Emmerich, Herbert, .65-66 (reading).
Dennison, H. R., '59n, 198 324-25 (reading), 659
Dennison, Hertry S., '4, 39, 50, 188, Epimenidos, 23'
328, 480, 48.-8. (reading)
Debet, Dorothy. 53" Fagan, James 0., 125
Debet, Karl W., 3' Fainsod, Merle, 575-76 (reading)
Devinat, Paul, 16,.n, .83n Fairfax, John, 116
Dewey, John. 229 Farnham, Dwight T., 138, '39n
Dickens. Charles, '540, .86-87 (read- Farquhar. Henry H., 307n
ing) Fay, Sidney Bradshaw. 66n
Dickson, William J.• 337-38 (reading), Fayo), Henri, 3, 4-7 (reading, 8, .8,
44;' 444-45 (reading) 22, 37, '59, .64, 3.8-'9 (reading),
Dimock, Marshall E., 24, ;6, 190, 33 0
191-94 (reading), 195, 196. 200. Feldman. Herman, '480
.14, '%2.0, 241. 306-7 (reading). Ferguson, Homer, 2040
405. 406-8 (reading). 4.8-.0 (read- Fesler, James W .• 349n, 352-SJ (~
ing), 4460, 567'1 ing).41on
lAthmar, Justus, 101 FiJipetti. George. 1730
 .......... tJiil'S.
Flna, J.ImQn, ~14D. Sl~ 6l~ Gudkin, ~ .,;. "3D . ad-
~~, ·,oIm. ,m, <l4'i""'42 (reading), .
GOing, C. ~ 37B, ;90, ~,,.,:& (it·.
) .

~, Maurel.., 5568
. 40
Fish. ~JIUI\mIy, .97.333, USn, 389n.
, ,·40"· .403-4 (~), 408, 4O'}-10 Gomberg, WilIiaIn, 147B.
. (tUt:Iing), 47;B, SiSD Gooch, k. K•• 16;n, 379D
Fisher, N'onnan FenwiCk Wanen, • s8 Goodfriend, ArthIJ!, Inn
Fitzgibbon, 1:\ussel H.. 177ft Goodnow, Fnmk J;, 440 ", s6. .1'9,
Fitz..Neal. Richard, 92. 93-94 (read· 6,on
. iJJg). 9;, 96. 100. 599
FIandel!i, Ralph E~ 14, uon, 1540. ~:~~5_~l
.u
Fletcher. F. T. H., 6;n
Gordoo, Robert A., 60n
-CoIneD, Harold F., SS4D
FIoud, Ftancls L. C., 154, 1;6-57 Goussarov, 343
(reading), 158n Gouzenlro, Igor, 341 , 343, 344 110
Follett, Maxy P., 148. 3';. 3.6-"7 Ctaham, Catherine Macaulay, 109,
(reading), 458, 549 Craham, George A., 63;'
Ford, Heruy, 209 Crey, EdwMd, 66
Ford, Heruy, II, 447-48 (reading) Culbenkian, Calooste Sarkis, 374 240
Fom:st, Uriah, 499 Gulick, Luther, 21, 22-3 (reading),} 6
Forrestal, JaDies V., 206, 401n 38, 54-5 (reading), 56, 60, 74, .~'
Fouche, 426-27 247 (reading), 311, 387-89 (~ .
Fmnkfurter, Felix, '48 ing), 417
Fr.anklin, Benjamin, 119 Custavus Adolphus, King. 29'
Frederich William I, 97, 167
Frederick, J. George, 211, 4S Sn Hsan, Hugo, 523
Freeman. Douglas Southall, '09n Haddow, Anu, 6500 )
Freund, Ernest M., 6;on Hagedorn, A. F., 601, 60'-4 (readum
Friedrich, Carl I., 96n, 'OlD, 1 84D, Halda.ne, ruchard, 390, 394, 6.8
21411, 641. 64'-43 (readingl Hale, Lord, 2}0 ~
"Piles, )\omce 'l>., 321m 'i"l~m1nun, ~~, ~t>;, l~ V~4;:
Fuller, Walter D., 35 109), 110, , " , 119, 151, "w)
(reading), 344, 345, 346 (read,ra ,
CaIi1eo, 66. 4'4, 496, 499, 519, 6.6
CaUatin, Albert, 480, 481 (reading) Han, Emperor, 84
Calloway, George B., .68-71 (reading), Handlin, Mary Flog, 114D
:7', 495 (reading) Handlin, Oscar, 114D
Cantt, Henry L., 119, 12', uS Hankey, Sir Maurice, 65 5n
Cameld, James A., 43, 432 Hanson, Simon C., '760, 1770, 23
Gasser, Simon, 101 H2rbison, F. H .. 4460
Cans, John M., n, 197, ;97. 298, 30S, Hare, W. A. H., '9%n
309-10 (reading), 45;n ;'4D Harper, Robert GoudIoe, uon ;
Gausselin. W. H.. ;67 Harper, Samuel N., '73n, 301, JI' -9
GclIhom, Walter. 433n, 571 (reading)
Cenl:ge. Ralph E .•• sSn Harriman, Edward H., 130U
Gerth, Hans H., 79n, 1300, .211n Harris, A., 27m

GilbIrt, f.-
Gibbon, Edward, 9ln '
Gt1>lIon, I. C .• 386n
W., 88n, 159
Gilhert, Hiram T., ;86n
Gilbert, William H., 389n
Hamson, Fairfax, 105n
Hart, James, l09n. 57;0-74
Hart, Moss, S90
Hartley, Fred A. 454
Hatton, Angustus, 47'
(readiJ
)

GiIhtetlI. Frank B.. 119, 1U, 248-;0 Hawtbome, Nathaniel, 639 ·8

(reading). ';1, 2<)9, 3<>0-1 (reading) Hayd:, Friedrich, 204, ;14. 51.5, ;s1'""
GiIImor, Reginald E~ 370, 636-37 (reading), S19
(reading) Hayes., Richard, 43J.1l
CIaIer, Comstock, J98n, 4010. 613- 1 5 Heady, Ferrel,.398&
. . (leading) Hecker, J. F., 2390
Cti, Philip M., ~I (reading) Hendezson, Ernest F., 93ft
v
Hepdricboa,
. )
aoy F., ~. 241 (m;ad. Hyde, Howard K.. 191n
Hyneman, Charles, '94, 3950
Hea~. Walter of, 95, lOS
He!uy 11, 93 kkes, Harold L~ 390
He!uy vm. 518 fIf, filya. 139, 14<>-4' (reading), 1·42,
Heditz, Nils, 18.pl 'SI
Herring, E. Peodleton, 56, 213n. 227-.8 IngeooH, Robert H~ 35
.. (reading), 490, 54<>-41 (readi~) ) Isaaes, Nathan. '94, 197 (reading)
Hewart, Cordon. 576-78 (reading, Ives. Guy E., .68
579
Heyse, Johann, 100 Jackson. Andrew, 114, 129, 432, .19,
Hickey, Edward J.••68 5U
Hill, Norman L., 611-1. (readinc) lames, Edmund I., 6;00
Hillman. Sydney, '43, 244 Jamison, Judith, 359n
Himes. Albert J., 6310 Jeffersoo, Thoma.. 58, 119, no, '~1,
Hinrienthal, H., l~n 24', 344-45 (reading), 346, .4 1,
Hitler. Adolph, 74> 166. 168 (reading), 496, 'P9, 522, S42, 599, 6<."'"'1
1~, 259, .60 (reading), 644, 647, 650
Hoate, Sir Samuel, 66
Jegger, Warner, 257
Hogan, Willard, 303-5 (teadinc) Jenks, C. Wilfred, 180
Holcombe, Arthur L~ 514, 515-17 Jennings, Ivor, .2.11n
(reading), 518 Jennings, William, 81n
Holdeo, Paul, '97. 333, 3350, 3890,408, Jewkes, John, 518n
409-10 (reading), 47"0, 5550 Johnson, Andrew, 47
Hollis, Ernest V., 6500 Johnson, Ernest F., 4s6n
Holman, Eugene, "40 Jones, Edward D., 7n, 24, 2pn
Holmes, William H., 398 ones, Hugh, 646, 65 0
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, 590 ones, Thomas R., 389n
Holtby, Wioifred, po
Hoo, Victor, 181 f~Qwett, Ben~amin,
oynseo·Hicks, Sir William, 130
'>,In
"Boom, )osepn, 4.;-.b \ reaQlog) Juencer, Friedrich Georg, 2;;
Hoover Herbert, SI, ~, •• 6, 311, 398, Julius Caesar, B9
399:48',500, 511-12 (teading) , 605, Jurand, J. M., 203n
617 Just, St., 16, ead
Hoover, Marjorie L., 3580
Tusti, Jobann von, 97, 99-100 (t •
Hopf, Harry A., 40'-3 (reading), 404 jng,101
Hopkins, Fraok Snowden, 67, 68-69
(reading)
Horchow, Reuben, 438n Kammerer, Gladys M., 442D
Hornstein, Leon, 564, 566-67, (read- Kaufman, George, 590
ing) Kefauver, Estes, 27.n
Kendall, Henry P., 602
Hotcbkiss, WiIlard E., uS, S14 Kent, Frank R., 211D
Houston, David, 183n Kerensky, Alexander, 17
Howard, Earl Dean, 1480 Kemo, Ivan, 181
Howe, Frederick C., 442
Hoxie, Robert F., 1'9n, uS K!ttering, Charles F., 449 1-63
Hsieh, Pao Chao. 43'0
Key, V. 0., Jr., vii, nR, 6" 36
Hsii, Leonard Sbihlien, 8., 83-84 (reading), 485n, 442n, ;60n
(reading) Keynes, Jobn Maynard, 488
Hubbard, Henry F., 4330 Kiester, Albert S., "3n
Hubbell, Robert L., '450 Kilpatrick, Carrol, 70 d
Hughes, Charles Evans, S90 Kilpatrick, Wylie, 551, ;5'-53 (tea·
Hull, Cordell. ~
Humphreys, David, 6'4 Kim~H, Dexter S., 126, 127-.8 (read.
Hurley, Edward N~ 22.60 ing), 134, 141, 151, 514
Hotcbius, Robert Maynard, 455 Kimball, John T _, S64
Hutson, lohn, :.80 "ing, Rufus, l11n
Hutton, • T., 32 Kingdom, Arthur F., 5890
•
Kingsley; J.
(JelIdinJ! )
Donald, 6 •• ~ra50. 4)1-37
ftIHlC 01' ·MMIES·
LiplIeomb. Andrew, 34sn
Lipson, Leslie, .840
Kirov, S. M., 467 Locke, lolnt, ';;
JCIyce, Mrs. Scudder. us Lodge, Henry Cabot, 41
Knauth, O$wald, 1880 Lodge, Henry Cabot. 1r.,. 48.0
K1IOep!lCl, C. E., 3890 Loeffler, CIWIes A., 268
Knowles. &a S., 4600 Loewenstein, Karl.• 166, 16, (reading)
Koudsen, William S~ '43. '44 Lord, H~ M~ 48;, 4B4-BS (lead-
Koo; Wellington, Jr., 612U ing)
Kosok, Paul, 1660 Lorwin, Lewis L., 495, 496-97 (read-
Kmntz, Hany T., 4SSo ing)
Krotov, 343 Louis XlV, 16,
Krug. J. A., 205••06-10 (reading) Lowell, A. Lawrence, 670, 1SMS
(reading), 1580, 18m, 6,00 .
La Follette, Robert, 1 U Ludwig, Peter von, 88, 100
La Guardia, Fiorello, 500 Lumley. D.O., 42,n
Lamond, Elizabeth, 9;0 Lunt, William E., 96n
Lancaster, Lane W., 2.6n Lybyer, Albert Howe, 8m
Landauer, Carl, 491U, 5190 Lyon, Leverett S., 205n
Landis, lames M., 574
Laski, Harold J.. 65-66 (reading), '59n, Macaulay, Thomas Babington, 431,
,89-90 (reading), 200, 211, 310, 639--40 (reading)
;490 McAllister, Breck P., 230n
Lasswell, Harold D., 2170,444. 445-46 McB:in, Howard Lee, 51, 52-$3 (lead-
(reading), 560n ing),74
Laugier, Henri, 280 McCamy, James L., 556, 560n
Laval, Pierre, 66 McConnel, Samuel D., 377n
Laves, Walter H. C., 278, '7cr8' McCormick, Charles P., 334
(reading) McDonough, Thomas Joseph, 96n
Layton, E. 1., .69 McGrane, Reginald, 265n
Lear, Ben, 6.1, 62>-23 (reading) McGuire, C. E., 398n
Lear, John, 334n McHenry, James, 40', 499, 6,6
Leflingwell, W. H., 37n Maciver, Robert, 231, '3'-3; (read·
Leighton, Alexander, 660n ing), 234
Lenin, Nikolai, '3, '7, '70-7' (read· McKeon, Richard, %31D, 3890
ing), '72, ,8. McKinley, Charles, 368, 522
Lepawsky, Albert, 586n McLean, Joseph E., 650n
Lepawsky, Rosalind Almond, preface MaL'IIlahon, Arthur W., 317, 318 (read·
Lerner, Max, 524n ing), 331, 379-81 (reading), 38,
Leven, Maurice, uSn 4 10n
Levin, Jack. 27"n Madison, Charles A., 134n, 5,on
Levine, David D., 413n, 608-10 (read- Madison, James, 61, 6.n, 519, 542
ing),6110 Mannheim, Karl, 7'--7' (reading), 73,
Levitan, David M., 700, 569n 166, 168-69 (readme), 170
Levy. Harold P .• 557, 558-59 (read· Maria Theresa, Empress, 97
mel Marshan, George C., 69
Lewis. Joho L., 147
llIewis, Sinclair, ;5'
Marshall, Leon C., 38, 7,n,
461-6, (reading), 656n
.860.
Lief, Alfred, 1230 Martin, Perey A~ 176n
~.W.M?14Sn Martin, Roscoe C., preface
:Lilienth;d, David E.. 14, 206, 24,0. Marx, Fritz Morsteiu, '4n, SOD 2400,
,8>-84 (reading), 510 3un, 3170, 4290, "50, 5530, 5910,
Lineoln. Abraham, ;1, 58, 425-.6 595
(reading),4'7 Marx, Karl, 520
Lincoln. C. M., 24tn Mason, Alpbelfs Thomas. u6n, 131n
Lindsay. Samuel, 477-79 (reading) Mason, Edward S~ ;60
~ Walter, 420, 42t-%.O (read- Matrosov, VassiIi, 1'i'J
DliY Matthews, John M., 46n
Wi '"DB 01' IWifIS
Maverid:, Mallty, 618, 611) (reading) Northrup, Herbert R., 3;gn
Maximilian I, 100 >
Nourse, Edwin G., 128n, ln, 1'S.':og
Mayo, Elton, 11<;ln, 443n, 444 (reading), 490, 519
Means, Gardiner C., ~4n
Means, P. A., 54.n . Oatman, Miriam E., 389n, 58 ••-85
Mellett, Lowell, 560-63 (reading) (reading)
Meknoth, William, 35m, 6'll1n O'Leary, M., I I I
Meriam. Lewib 7, >3. 34, 48, 2<ll Osse, Melchoir von, 97, 98 (reading),
Meniam, Clulrles E.. preface. 3. 14, 101 .
1S'-16 (reading) 18, 22, 39n, 51, Ostrogorski, Moisey, .7', 273-,6 (read-
6, ••02-3 (reading), 204, 220-11 ing).277
(reading), Ul, 311, 544, 650ft Overton, John H .• 510
Metcalfe, Henry, 1170 Owen, David K.•• 80
Micbaud, Humbert, 1640 Owen, Robert, 159, 447
Micius, S. (reading)
Miller, G. C., 227n Parsons, Wairen N., 5.40
Miller, Ray, 61;n Paul, St., 88
Millett, Jobn D., 14n, 13~0 (read· Pargellis,' Stanley, .04n
ing), 317'-18 (reading), 3'0, 331-33 Pearson, Drew, 69n, 401U
(reading), 398n, 525-.6 (reading) Peel, Sir Robert, 350n
Mills, C. W rigbt, 79n, 1 30n, .,ID Pekelis, Alexander H., 145n
Pelt, Adrian, 180n, .80
Mirabeau, Honore de, 161
Mises, Ludwig von, 204, 205, 519n Pennock, J. Roland, 576n
Mitchell, Jobn H., 576n Percy, Eustace, 64
Molotov, Viacbeslav M., 17', 467 Pericles, 85 (reading)
Montesquieu, Charles, 55, 6. Perkins, Frances, 369n, ;10n
Mooney, lames D., .51-5. (reading), Perronet, 104, 165
·53 Person, Harlow S., 39n, 56, 104, ,,5n , ..
Morgan, Artbur E, 134n, 506-7 (read· "70. 522-24 (reading). 535.-36
ing} . (reading)
M01JIIII, J. Pierpont,
209 1'ersons, "Warren )\l)., 1~~n
Morley, Sylvanius G., 431n Peterson, Florence, 28.-85 (readjng)
Morris, William Alfred, 950, 960 Petrov, Eugene, 139, '40-41 (readijlg).
Morrioon, C. J., 596u 142, 151
Morrison, Sir Herbert, 63-64 (reading), P6Hner, John M., 24n, 48, 49-50 (read.
6;, 5.5-.6 (reading), 540 (reading) ing), 539n
Morrison, Theodore, 154, 155-56 (read· Pfubl, General, 342
ing) . Philips, William, 110n
Mosher, William E., 4'50, 433-37 Pickering, Timothy, 424, 563, 6'7
(reading), 475u, 555-56 (reading) Pigors, Paul, 3, 9, (readi1lg), 10, 18,
Mott, Rodney L., 4840 433n, 631
Moulton, Harold G., 1l8n PimJott J. H. R., 563n
Moir, Ramsay, 6.D, 158n, '01-2 (read· Pinchot, Gifford, 495
ing), .03 Pincus, William 368
Mundt, Vernon A., SOOO Pinney, Harvey, 194n
Monro, William B., 650n Pius XII, 33, 38
Munson, M. S., 2;04D Plato, 85. 86n, 94, 384, 427, 638
Murray, Philip, 145 (reading), 146, 15. Platt, C. Spencer, 451R
Mussolini, Benito, 66 Pliny, 3510 .
Myers, Charles. 4330 Poincare, Raymond; '7, 66,
Polab. Sophie, 434, 4750
Negley. Glenn, 170, 66.r67 (reading) Pollock, James 1(., ,6gn, 159, ,I)(r-61
Net'lsOn. Nellie, 95D (reading), 311
Nelson. Otto, '98 Pope, Alexander, 219
Newman, C. J., IS9R Pound, Roscoe, 39n, S85, 586n. ;68
Neibuhr, B;utbold, 5,6 Prentice. William Keny, lion
Nlehof, Richard 0., 37<>-73 (reading) Prentis. Henning Webb, 14>, 141-44
Niles, Mary Cushing. m-34 (reading) (reading), 147n, 151
 . . .Of . . . .
~,,~.~ Sarpant. WIII8Imp, 384 . "
1'teston, J - D., .61 SdIiIiIe, AI&ert, 6111, 70. 71 .(~}
Jlric;e, DOn K., 1 SBn. ~,E.E.. i77D
l'ritchdt, C. Herman, 366-68 (reading) SchtIIendorIf. ikMwt. _. 292-93
l'ums, Cbater, 180n (reading) ,
SehIesinger; ArtImr M.. 434
Rackham. H., 4lSn Schulze, J. William, '34. ". ~~'J7
llanclolph, Thomas, 644 (reading). 18, 39D
Rall5hofen·Wertheimer, Egon P., 177, Schwarz, R. p.. l~h, 16~ (~)
178-19 (reading) Schwarz, Solomon M., s6n, 3030. 4"40,
Rashdall, Hastings. 63Bn 467-68 (reading)
Ratbenau, Walter, 169 Schwelnitz, Karl de, 608
Raybum, Sam, 576, 578-79 (readi~) Schwenning, C. T .. uqn, "48, 2,0-51
Redfield, William C •• a5-'7 (reading), (reading), 29011
32., ~8t 121 Seott. Howard. 134, 13S. 137"',8 (read-
Reed, Plulip D .• 1 $9 ing), 141, 151, 182
Reed. Stanley, S70 Seott, Sir Walter, 431n
Ri:es. R. I., 3700 Seckendorft, Lndwig von, 101
Reeves. Floyd. 44.n Sedgwick, Theodore, 6.
ReIley, Alan C., 251 Seidel, Emil, ~1
Reining, Henry, 174, 175-76. (reading) Seidman, Harold, 545-47 (reading)
Reinsch, Paul S., 650n Seligman, Edward, 43n
Repplier, Theodore S., 563n Selznick, Philip, 3~8n
Reuther, Walter, '45-46 (reading), Shafer, Hugh M., 458
147n, 148, 151 Sharp, Walter Rice, 1600. 161, 162-61
Reuther, Victor, 159 (reading), 165n
Reynolds, Mary Tuckett, '45n Shaw, A. W., 1170,446
Richelieu, Cardinal, 161 Sheafe, J. S., 596n
'Riches, Cromwell Adams, 611n Sheldon, Oliver, 8, 34, 35-36 (reading),
Ridley, Clarence E., 553n 37. 38, 1 04, lOS, 4470, 667
Robb, Russell, 252, .86-87 (reading), Shepard, Walter J., '49
.88 Shih, Hu, 84, 4'7-~9 (reading)
Robespierre. MaDmilien Marie Isidore Shils, Edward, 168n
.de, 161 Short, Oliver C., 439-40 (reading)
Robson, William A.• 2un, .670, 394n. Short, Walter Campbell, 400
576 Shryock, Richard Hanison, 6370
Rockefeller, John D., Jr., 14Sn Siegfried, Andre, 114, 164
Roethlisberger. F. J.• 337-38 (reading), Simon, Herbert A., 61, 38qn, SHn,
3390. 443, 444-45 (reading) 660n
Rogers, Lindsay, .69 Stichter, Sumner H., 339n
Roosevelt, Franklin Delano, 15, 22, 48, Sloan, Alfred p ~ Jr., ~7, ~8-'9 (read·
1:J4, 149, '42, 244, 3 11 , 36q, 395, ing), p, 38, '470, 61 SO
487, 503-4 (reading) 510, SU, 515, Small, Albion W., 88n, 98, 100 (read·
5'9 ing), lOIn
Roosevelt. Theodore, 10, 1 S, 118, 120, Smith, Alfred E., 516, 6:z.r'5 (read.
..... 134, '09, 495, 501-3 (reading), ing)
po. 561 Smith, Dan Throop, 7, 8. 23, 657-;8
Root, Elihu, 292.. 2.9'3-94 (reading), (read' }
2 95 Smith. ~ W" :>89n
RoseII5tein, .1- L.. 4470 Smith, Harold D., 149-;0 (reading),
RosftWtielf, Michael, 78. 80 (reading) 152, '99-200 (reading), 201, 468-70
llowJand, Floyd H., 52Sn (reading). 493-94 (reading). 62.9,
Rum!, BealdsIey, 485. 486-87 (reading) 630-)1 (reading)
Russell, Bertrand. 25S Smith, Hobert L., '97. nt, 335n.
389n, 408, 409-10 (reading), 47 2n•
Hsn
Smith. John Thontas, :08
Smith, T. V~ "so.
lJl
Smith, WiIIiua, 40' .,.8. 295, 29')-300 (reading). 301,
Smyth. Albert Hq ,.3oIi: 495. 601
SmYth. H. D .. J3711 .' Taylor. Henry, 40
S®ollw, Arkady, .80 Taylor, Edmond, .6411
Socrata, psd'ace, 85, 86-&8 (reading), Tesd, Ordway. 1I9sn. 4SS, 4f6-S8
ala (reading)
Somit, Albert, 1140 Tedder, Arthur W., '41
Swn~,LouUe, lOIn Thomas, Elbert D., 8.n
Somervel1, Brehon. 711, J89n Thomas, Norman M~ S2411
Sminenfds, Josef _, 101 'I'hompsoo, Clarence B., 596n
Spaatz, Carl, '41 ThOmpson, J. M .. 426n
Spacek, Stan, 183n Thompson, Robert D.,.oon
Spencer, Herbert, 18,.. TburstOll, John B., 3080
Spohn, William H., 339n Tocqueville, Alexis de, 111-13 (read·
Stahl, O. Glenn, 303, 305-6 (reading) ing), 114, 12.1, 1%9, 130, 151, 172,
Staklwwv, AIexi, 173 35<>-51 (reading), 35'
Stalin, Joseph, preface, 13, '40, 170, Tolmao, William H.; 390
171-7' (reading), 182, 18" 188n, Tolstoy, Leo, 3'4, 341-43 (reading)
245, 4'0, 4%2-2<1 (reading), 6'7 Toner, Joseph S., SHO, 649n
Stam, Colin F., '70 Tout, 'thomas F., 960, 6380
Stamp, Sir Josiah, ISS, 194, 195-96 Towne, Henry R., 103, 115-.6 (read·
(reading), 197, 4S30, 6.6n ing), 1%-2, 123-, 129, 138, 139, 147.
Steelman, John R., 5.6, 52,.. 151
Stein, Heinrich vom, 187 Towster, Julian, 173, ~45n, .61-6.
Steiner, Bernard C., 4O.n (reading), 337
Stene, Edwin 0., .190 Toynhee, Arnold J., 95n, 66g
Stephen, Leslie, 1 ;40 Tracy, Destutt de, 24.0
Stevenson, Geo.ge H., 1580 Trecker. Harliegh B, 3.8n
Stickney, Albert, ..,. . Trajan, EmperOl, 35.0
StIles, Ezm, 6..,. Truman, Harry S., 150. '05, 344. 346.
Stimpson, H. F., 5960 347 (reading) , 4118-90 (t$ding)
StOlle, Alfred H., 564 ;10, 519
Stone, Donald C., 3<>-31 (reading) , Ts'ao, Ts'ao, 4.8
38, 177-78 (reading), 179, '78-81 Tuck, Amos, 524
(reading), '98, 322-'3 (reading), Tungpo, Su, 84
5'7-.8 (reading)
Stone, Julius, 58;0 Ulvaoov, Vladimir Dyich (Nikolai
Stone, N. I., ;000 Lenin), 170
Storey, Moorefield, '940 Upham, Charles W., 5.<>-21
Story, Stephen, 46...65 (reading) Upsoo, Lent D., 40;-6 (reading),
Stourm, Rene, 47.0 47.n, 49'0, S38-39 (reading)
Sl:r2Chey, Lyttoo, 39<>-9' (re>ding) Urwick, L., 104. 1160, 11711, 1S9n,
Stubbs, William, 960 16qn, 183D, 198 J %'OlU, 24~, ~S~t
Suvorov, Alexander, 342 254, '95""96 (reading). '97, 3'Sn ,
Swift,1onathan, 431 4470
UrzhtnnSky, Ye6n, 621-n (reading),
Taft, Robert A.. 454 623
Taft, William Howard, 129, 1300, 131-
33 (reading), 15', 209 Van Dom, Harold, ~65n
Taine, Hippolyte Adolphe, .6.-6. Van Hoek, Kees, n (reading)
(reading), .66n
Varro, Marcus, 105n
Veblen, Thorsteio, '33, 134. 135-37
Talleytand, Charles de, 6.8 (re>ding), 138, 14', 146, 147, lSI,
Taylor, Edmond, .6411 668
Taylor, Frederick Winslow, 103, .04- Vieg, John A., so, '980, 54.11
.OS, "5, 117, 118-19 (reading), Viner, Jacob, 660
120. 121, 122, J%S, 126, 128, 12(},
'30, 138, '48. '5', 1.59, 171, lIb, W3dde1J, J. A. L .. 6370
k,
W1ikki, DWight, 18, til, "OD, ~ n, WmDnan, ~
....... __
-38·
4 1O-U ftCading), 413, 59111, 594- W~ TlHisnas, .uoD
9~ {~), 66; WilIoUglsby. W. F .. 45-47 (rea.tmg).
WaIk1Ir, a.
II, 3~ 411, 51, $3, .73, '~, 4~ f--
.WaIk1Ir. Harvey, 480. 1980, 172, ~}._s8, '
4'13 (reading) . WillOughby. W. W OJ 417-79 (~)
WaIk1Ir, Jtohert A., S2t4Q (reading) WiIsou, Eugene E., 142 (R.adiIlg~, lSI
Wallace, HelllY A., 57.. 1800, 144, Wilson, WtlOdrow, pmface, 2S. ,4t, 42-
346, 347 (readDIg) , 360), 390, 510 43 (R.adiIlg). 44. 4S. 4'7, 48, So, ,1,
Wallace. Schuyler C., 92, 94-95 (Itad· 55, 73, ,Ioi (teadiIIg). 103, 1~, 129,
iIIg). 104n, 3980 130, 134, 1112, .60), 3.25, 43', s?(ia,
Wallace, Sherman Leroy, 800 6son
n'irA\m, R. H., UL<1 Wm~, Fenmr-I Mr, ~
Wang, Ansbih, 84 Wirth, Loui,s, ,680
Warburton, Clark, 1280 Wi$sIer, Willis, 3.80. 596n
Ward~ Paal W., ,39D Witte, Edwin F., 454D
Wash~, George, 109, 1l0, ~16, Wolcott, t - 0, 1%11, 308, 309-10
>,1, 344-45 (reading), 346, 127, (teaclmg)
499, 5n, S99JI, 601, 6'4 (readiJIg), Wolcott, <'>liver, 242" 524D
645 . Woltzogen, Justus. 342
Watkins, Charles L., .68 Woodho_, C. M., 66, .60
Wallin&, M. W, 20sn Woolf, L. D.,488n
Watt. James, 159 Woolpert, Elton D., 55'7'-58 (reIIding)
Watts, Thomas, 6~-S4 (reading) 559
Webb. Beatrice, 6., 960, 431D W_on, BatbmI, 5180, 51911
Webb, James E., 477, 47')-80 (readiug) Wormeley, Katherine Prescott, 1860
Webb, Leicester, IILin Wright, H. C., 65.D
Webb, Sidney, 62" 960, 431D Writbt, Waller Livingston, 81D
Weber, Max, 720, 78, 7')-80 (readiJIg), Wrong, E. M., 670
130, 170, 211-1, (reading)
Wechsler, J - A. 1<t8n Xenophon, 8tn, 88
Wekl>, wrnwun H, 6370
Wells, H. C .• ,49D Yavner, Louis E., 545-47 (reading)
W~, Victor, 159D Yennolov, CeneraI. 34'
WIiite, "Leonard D, preface, 8, 37,
24D, YOUIIg, Herman H., 4470
41D, 47D, so, SlO, 7Sn, 109Dt lto, Young, Kimban, 1011
130, ISo" lSI, 18%, 214Jl, 14.1n, YolDlg. Owen D~ U9
295. 296-.n (reading), 298, 319n, Young, Robert R., '3011
nOll, 334, 31Lin, 4 18D, 4'70, 4"D, Yugow, Aaron, 56n, 30 3n, 377-79
437n, 443, 4540, 460-6. (~), (reading), 46?~ (reading)
499D, 51 9D, 54Z1l, S56n, 563D , 599 YubIng. Lin, 14
White, Percival, '4
Whirehead, T. N .• ;280, 3370. 143, Zabntin, Colonel. 343
Zenon,So
W:. Notbert. 4380 Zitde, Georg, 97, ~ (re&ding}.,
Willard, J- Field, 9SD. C)6n 101
Williams, Clement C., 6370 Zink, Harald, 10611
 INDEX OF SUBJECTS

Abilities, administrative, 6, 53, 657-59 Administration (continued)

Accounting, 16, 116, 132-33; in the me- versal importance of, 4-8, 668; and
dieval Exchequer, 93-4; in ancient universities, 635, 638-41, 6'!2-~3,
Greece, 258 , 645-56,668
Administration: American, 37, 47, 101, AdministratiVt; functions. 4. 21, 24, ~o,
107, 111-14; art of, v, 19; in atomic 37, 39; of cabinet members, '4-7; 01
age, 369-73; British, 153-00; com- city managers, 33-4; common to all
(!S.Tt.'o.,., ',f; at tkc cr:=t§, ,3,.../k;; t}'p:Ifat~ 4,3', N,86-.8,
definition of, v, 3, 5. 9, :2.1, 22-4, enfQrcement of, 570-'72; and judic:ial
34-<), 45, 71, 101, 647; ends and functions, 576; in relation to organi<a-
means in, 3, 16,61,669; French, 100- tion, 387; of Pope, 3-3; contrasted wlth
66; German, 166--70; history of, 7, substantive or suhject-matter fUllc_
77; 01 households, 7, 87--8, 390; and tions, 8, '1; contrasted with technital
human welfare, 106, 669; interna- functions, 'I, 8
tional, 153, 177-So, 611-13; in Latin Administrative management. 408-'0.
America, 173-'77; and law, 101, 641- 605; President's Committee on, '18.
44; and legislation, 46, 49, 51, 53, 61, 395-<)6
102, 159; in relation to management, Administrative surveys, 408-10, 545-'17;
preface, 9, 37, 3911; in relation to or- by committees, 553-54
ganization, V, 9, 37; in relation to Agriculture, .67. 36.; administration of.
operations, 405; origin of term, 91, 109. }53-54; administration of, in 1m-
100; police, as original term for, 99; cient Rome, 105D; Department of.
political, 44, 71; role 01, in modern 353-54, 368, ;81, 451; Federal lid-
society, 13; role of lawyers in, 5~, ministration 01, 353
644; Russian, 170-3; sabotage in 74; Air Forces, American, 298, 401
and science, 137. 635, 664; science 01, American Bankers Association, .85
17. 35, 102, 113,635-38; science 01, American Federation 01 Govern~t
American disinterest in, 102; science Employees. 451
01, European origins 01, 102; as a sep- American Federation 01 Labor, 125, 117,
atate !mmch 01 government, 45, 48; .83-84
significance 01, 1, 3; mreIatioo to s0- American Revolution, 241
cial tcieoce, 101, (i6o--(4; study 01, American Society « Mechanical Engi-
633. 6n; demand for trained peuoos - . 103-04. llJ-17
ill, 656; training for, 49. 65. 635; uai- Anthropology and adminisb:ation, .5ln
xi
xii
Apc$tolie administnltioP. !}Ii ~
...............
(CI)JItinQed)
Appmltit;et, .u: see Interns. administra- definition of. ISs. ifl9. 194, .0S; . ,
tive demo<ncy••119; ~ 0£, ·94·
AreDaeolo&Y, 78 in ancient Egypt, 80; French, ·,6••
Areas, adminl$batjve, 349, 359-66; and ~86; Gem.an. 166, >60; governmenta1,
""ministrative boundaries, ,65-66: compared with bqsiness, 194-'U,
and administJative centers, ;65-66: 213-' S: British, 186. '95-96. 198.
and oVerlapping adminiStrative levels. 201-0.. .ao,; and liberty, 2OS-1 s;
352-'59 PJussian, 187; RVOIutionary,14: Rus-
Aristocracy. "., 2%2 sian. 11. 187. 6U-%2; social role of,
Army, United States, 399-40% .11-13; in the United States, 202
Anny Service Forces, 331-32 Business. _ Bosiness administJation
Athens, ancient, ""ministration in, 77; Business administration, 3, 7, 8, 13. 24,
democratic 2liministJation in 85-8: or- 27~ 109, 1lS-16, 124, 1~1-~9, 130,
pnization of. 251 13}-1S. 143, 204, 224.227.335.349.
Atom bomb. 341 }82-83. 417; American, comp2red
Atomic age. administration in, 369-7. with European. 138; American, British
Atomic energy. 525: management of, reaction to, 141n; American, Soviet re-.
37~73: Commission. 24sn. 369 action to, 14-0-41; associations in, 221;
Auditing. 47': and IICCOIInting, 473: and British budgeting in. 466-68; bureauc-
accounting in the medieval Exchequer. racy in. 188, 194-98, 205-11, 214; and
93-4: in ancient Greece. 258 class consciousness, 144; conllicts with-
AU$trla. 78; administJation in. 101-03; in, 2:6; in relation 10 government•• 6,
Camemlism in, 97; history of 2dminis- SS, 59•• 67; and governmental tid
tIation in, 97-100 policy. 486-87; history of, in United
Anthority and responsibility, 321. 328, States, 110; incentives in, 142-45,
341 U~l1; and labor management, 148;
organization in, 327; procedures in,
601-05; training for. 6;2-56
Banking, .6,. 4 7
Bankers, 11, 13
.6,
Banks, national, ' Business management, see Business ad-
ministration
Boards of directors, 2liministJative func- Byzantine Empire, 81
tions of. 136: relations of executives
10,335 Cabinet: administrative activities of. 24-
Bolshevism, 136, 170 27; American. 3 13. 314, 344, 346;
Branches of government, 2dministration, British, 1 s6; ollicial and kitchen cabi-
as one of, 45. 48 net, 316-.0
Brazil•• 88; 2liministration in, 17S-76 Cameralism, 88, 97, 103, 105. 16,. 6,.2;
Budget. Bureau of. 278, ,08. 313, 314. and origin of administrative terminol-
479 ogy, 100
Bndgeting, 23. '3'-33, 180. 303. 4 7. Can2da, 319. 343-44
460; iii business. 466-68; and eco- ' Capitalism. 11, 12-13. 14. '7, 18, '%4,
nomic ~ning, 4BB-90: as ~ony­ 2S~, 519; and the problem of organi-
mOllS WIth mmagement. 460: munici- zation, 2S4
pal. 468: in relation to planning S.8- Cartels. 77
30; principles of. 468-70 effect on pri- Catholic Church, 15. 33, 95; bureauc-
vate eConomy. 48S: proeess of, 478- racy in, 190
Bo; shQl'tcomings of. 470-7#; signlIi- Census. B_n of, 360; as a form of re-
Cance of, 49~ 1; in Soviet Russia, seareb. 541
467-68; in state and 1lx:al g<lYerDDlent. CentralWltion, 80, 350--52, 376-77,
480; technique of. 468-72; as a tool of ,82-83. ,8S; in France•• 6S; see also
mmagement, ,.6.-66; in terms of
units of administrative achievement, Decentralization
411 Chamber of Commerce of the United
B_ucracy, '42. 1$2, 160, ISs: and States,28;
_"administocracy/; 203. 2) 1; business,- Chicago. 288. 4,80
compared with governmental b.-.o- ,Chief executive, '1.
22, ~1-', 61, uS-
1IICy, 19.... 11, 113-15:_·0£, 191; a9, 242. 318-19; ~ ConcIlp-
xii
0Uef ~ (coatmuedl Communism, 12,18,136,139, U4. US.
tion of, 109; dependeaee upon. 32.4; 344, 51 9. 5:05; in ancient Greece, '31l
role of, ~:oa-%4: uae of bud&et by. ,,69 Communist Party, 378, 468
Chlna. "5. 288; ancient. .administration
in, 81-8.j; ancient. PU~ adlJlinistra-
Compensation: of employees, 435; of
business managers, 103-oc}; of man-
tion in, 82...s,., lOS; - t , Civil serv- agement, 135
ice in, 84; ancient, reliability ~ ad- Control,s
ministrative liter.tture in, 8.n; regwnal
Competence and incompetence, admin.
planning in, 507; New Deal in. B4; istrative, 42>-23
personnel recruitment in. <1'"7-29; s0-
cialism in. l4 Complaints. handling of, 5~-67
Conferences and interviews, ;2, 38, 39;
Chureh administration, 6, 8, IS, 33, 95, - by Pope, 33; by city manager, 34
96. 122, 376-77; training for, 6)8 Congress of Industrial Organizations,
Cities: b~ in, "7<>-7'; relation- 147, >8., .84-85
ship to Fe<leraf government, 360; man-
Congress of United States, 53, 58; inves-
agement of, 32-3"; ~lanning of, 495-
501; effect of revolution on.,,114n; re-
tigation of Taylor system by, 121; or-
lationship to states, 360 ganization of, 268-72
Conservation and planning, 501-03
City manager: functions of, 33-3"; as Conservatism, 10, 18, 74
general manager, 53; system. 41-4>, Constitution: of Greek city-states. "S71
7S of the United States, 6,. 6.
Civil service, 2)3. 313; British, 6., 65, Coordination,S, :02, 333-34; in practice,
67, 155-56. 159, 431-32, 45 -5>, 330
639-41; and business m>nagement, '
Corporations, 14; and nati0n21 plannillg,
136-37: in ancient China, 84; com-
parative, 18,; French, 16.-63, 186, S0'; public, .65; role of, 214
452-54; German, 74. ,66, 169, .60; Correspondence, '5, 3', 34, 38, 39. 13>,
615-18; simplification of, 6,8-'0
intem>tional, 180; Jacksonian concep-
Courts, see Judicial administration
tion of, 11,,; personnel, contras_ted
Curia Regis, 96
with political personnel, 60; PllISSUIn,
167; reform of, 41, 43, 114, 129-30;
in United States 129-30. 206, 447 Danghters of the American Revolution,
Civil Service Commission, 440-43
Class consciOlISDess: absence of. in Amer- ~trali2ation, 350-5., 377. 38., ,85;
ican administration, 112; and business in atomic energy administration, 171,
m>nagement, 144; of technicians, 136 376; of economic power, 518i of ~­
Classi6cation of personnel and positions, sonnel management, 439-43; In SOViet
18, 75, 434, -.u8 Russia, .63
Clergy: functions of. 116; training of, Decision-m>king, 61, 74. 3.6, 5,0-7'.
63 8 6.6; by chief executive, 3'4; and de-
centraliutioD, 383
Colonial affairs, 67
Delegation, '4. 311, 327, 337: of legisla-
CoUect:ivism, .2.23, '2.4, 2.2S, 2.34; see tive power, 57.-74, 576-79; of reo
also Socialism
sponsibility, 4' 3
Command, 5, 3"" military, 32-3;
unity of, 413 Democracy. 129-30, 136, .'~9, 1~3, 150-
52, 47', 5'5; and admmlS~~, 14-
Commerce, ~ent of, 380 15, 18, 70, I l l , 133-:44: traiDlng of
Commission on Organization of Execu- administrative leadershIp In, 663; and
tive Branch of the Government, 319- American administration, 53, 107-14,
20,397,48 • 351; in ancient Athens, 85-88; and
Commissions, administrative, 574-76, bureaucracy, 189, .01; and decentral-
579-81 6 -.._:-:~ti ization, 38>; in relation to elJiciency,
Committees, >41-4 ; """"'..,... ve Sut- "59; in ancient Greece. 384; French
veys by, ")-'4 .._ 16,,· and personnel management, 455-
Communication, 79; a!lIi admInistration 58; 'and planning, 514; aDd procedure,
in early American history, ,84; be- $69; and scientific m>nagement, 12.,
tween ~t and empro,ees, 12 5
"49-SO Dictatorship, 14
.
~,
tion, & •
Direction, 22
DUeCtl_, '>7'
.68" 173;, iald ~ ~t:atioIl;,.m~ ~o.
363lin~ SlS: in~
ntent and ~
.... 199-~,
~

'

District of Columhi;o, J16 Factory ~ 104-'>S, 117. 245 •

Doctors, training of, 637-38; -., . • 250" .
Medical administration .' Farms, cqanization of, 22.1
Fanners, 13. 31r-54
Economic m,ganizatioD;. 2;<), :lU. %29 - Fascism, 14 . .
~mi<: planniltg ,and pro¢edll1'e. 6oi- Fedetai functions in relation to ~
n ~$02 .
Economics. 3:08; of German ~1ism, Fedetai systeni Of the United Sl'"tes,
99-100; as influence upon organiza- ,61-63 ' . •
tion, :062; of Ptolemaic EJM)t, 80 . Federal Works Agency, ...~
Economy, 221-22, 358, 4SO:S5; Com- Federalist era, 107-11, 242
mission ~ 129, 130-1, 1..33, lSI; in Filing, !iQ, 1;2,615-18, 623 .
federal administration, 48;-8;; see Financial controls, 37, 417. 460; of city
also Efficiency, Financial waste managers. 33; scope of, 461-62 '.
Educatiooal administration, 6, 12% Financial fUQctioIjs; see' alSo Finapcial
Efliciency, 48, ;1, 110; 114, 120-24, , oontrols ' , ,
12.5, u7-28, 129-30, 131, 133-35, Financial waste, 48, 5'1," ;o~, 5,,-14;
139, 1;0-52, 188, 204, 316; in rela· see also Economy, Efficiency ,
tion to democmcy, 459: French, 163- l"iscal management, 97
6,.; German, 168, 261; and indli· Ford Motor Company, 447-48
el!mcy, 421-:>2; and organization, 407; Foreign Economic Administration, ~81
and, planning, ;02; in Soviet Russia, Foreign policy, 67,344, 348. adminlstra•
171-72 tinn of, 177, }44-47, 379"-8-
Egypt: ancient, administration in, 77, Foreign Service of the United stlttes.
78-81, 10,; bureaucracy in, 50: ceo·
trali2ation in, 50: despotism in, 8.; fi8:-9
FOretgn trade, 37J-?6
'
economi<: planning in, 8p; revenue ad· Foremen, ;4.1', administrative dutW of,
minlstmllon In, 79: watelWay a<urun)s. 6; functions of, 338; in relation'" la-
tration in, 79 bor unions, 338
Ends and means in administmtion, 3, 16, France, 350; administration in, 7, 31' 77,
61,669 102, lH, 164;' bureaucracy in, ~6;Z'
Engineers, 13, u;, 1~6, '39: adminis; 186, cabinet ministe. in, as adn',nlS-
trative 'duties of~;: and American ad· ~, 27; Center of Administrative
ministration, 645; training of, 637- Studies in, 4: oentrali2ation in, 16;;
38 civil Service' in, 16:0, 163, 186, 4~2,
Episcopal Church" 377 454; democmcy in" 16.; ellicienc)' Ill,
Estate lOIIliagenlent, n; in medieval En- 163-64; labor syndicalism in, 164;
rope; 9 2 military administration in, 4, 1~5;
Evolution, managerial, 14-16 nin*'mth·ceotury adlninistratioll Ill,
Executive: American, 10&-09: plural, 4, 160-66; organization in, 394";9;;
241-46; types of, 339-4' personnel recrnltrnent in, 430; ration·
r.xecuti~ functions, V, u-4, 49, 61, 32;, alization in, 16,.; revolution in, 1 H
41,: and executive staff, 317: and Functionalism, '99-J03 •
organization, 264, 404-05: and per. Functions, administrative, see AdJilinis,
'SOnnel lIlIIIlIIgeDIent, 418; in re1afioJ, trative functions
to budfleting, 469; in tdation to pm-
gtammlllg, 469 General Motols Corpomtion. %r~2.
Exeeutive 0IIice of the PJesi4ent, 313, 246, 2.88, 466
31 4' Generalists in adminimlltion. 11, .310,
ElIeCUtive power, 12'2, 22,3; differenti· 4S 1 ; training of, 66,-68
. lIted &om administration, 47 GeoJosil:al ~, '98-99
ElI!lbVOluet~~,'OIl of. in !I1eCfie. OennIiuy: administration in, 78, 10J'"'!3.
v.il EngI!lnd. 93-4> 100 'sJ; 166-70. 183l, '~..,,_~
El<penditu1es, public, 475-76 166, :&60; CamenWsm JIl, 971 .,....
.
Germany. (colllinued)
.mce in, 7S, "'l,.o:o, i66, 169. :060,
IMDIX· OF sv.JECTI
Harwnl Um.emty (continued)
654: Craduate School of Public Ad.
430..3'1, 64:0..,....· dIiclency in, 168; ministration. 654-55
:t'hird Reich, ~t in, 167. 169; Highway administration. 121
1tisf0l}' ilf administration in, 97-100; Homes, see Households
orgamzation in, .60....111; procedural Households: administration of, 7. 87-8,
codes in, 613-l5; railroads in, 168; ra· 390; organi:oation of, 2>1 -
tionalization in, 169; traiDiDg for civiJ Housing: administration of. 32. 146; and
$elVice in, 64....44 planning, 501; prefabricated, 146.
Govemment: functions of. U4' bureauc. 1470
racy, comparison with business bu. HIlIIlan engineering. 39n >

reaucracy, .88, 194-98, 205-11 Human relations in administration, 447-

Governor. as general manager. 53; r0u- SI
tine functions of, -624 Hwmm wdbre and administration, 106,
Grants-in-aid to the states, 361-63 6-69; see ~&O Values, social -
Creat Britain: 32S. 3S0; administration
in. }2, 37. 41, 62, 74. 77, 153, 158, Inca administration: organizational hier.
167, 183; administrative class in, 63.
640-41; bureaucracy in, .86, 195-96, archy in, 253n; use of statistics in, ~42
198, 201-03;. business administration India: inigation in, 287; reform of per-
sonnel in, 431
in, 234: cabinet system in, 156, 245;
civil service in, 62, 65, 67, 155-56, Individual. role of, in modem organiza.
159, 43', 451-52: managentent (If tion, 25$
coal industry in, 235-37: colonial ad· Individualism, 223. 225, 234, 239; and
ministration in, 67: Conservative party organization, :u.o
in, 6'4: delegation of legislative power Industrial management, 6, 15, 25. 37,
in, 576-78: financial administratiOll l03~ 10;, 11 5, 127-28, 134, 139, 145,
in, 477-79; foreign policy administra· 4 1 7; British, 154; cbaracteristics of.
tion in, 66; government corporations in common with public ~dministra.
in, 267; Home Office, 330; jodicial tion, 8; in Soviet Russia. 467-68
administration in, 155; Labor party in, Industrial organization, 291i-97, 325
64-6, 154, %30, '3;, 237; medieval IndUltriai psychoJogy, 9, 443-45. 447-
administration in, 9'; medieval E". SI
chequer administration of. 93-4, 10(), Industry: American, 519; organization
599; nationalization in, 158; organiza· in, ,87; """"reh in. 537u; see Indus·
tion in, 392-94; parliamentary govern· trial management
ment in. -1;S; personnel classification Inspection, 39; sanitary. 32
in, 438; personnel recruitment in, Interior, Derrtment of, 368
429-;0; planning in. 235; police ad· In"",ationa administration, 8, 153.
ministration in. 330; politicians in. 177-8 •• 373,456
160; politics and administration in. 6.; International Congress of Administrative
pUblic administration in. 1 56; public Sciences, 4
enterprise in, 394: rationalization in. International Labor Office, 180
169; royal commissions in. 554: scien. International Ladies Carment Worl:ers
tific managentent in. 1 59; socialism in, Union, 147
6;-6, 160, 235, 23?-;8; technicians lntems, administrative, 649-50
in. 160; traming for pohlic $elVice in, • Interstate commerce. 574; regulation of,
65; Treasury, 477-'78; Treasury Organ.
ization and Methods Division in, 410; 36 3
union of public employees in. 453 JJrlgation: in India, ::&87; in Chim. 507
Creece, ancient: administration in, 77,
85-8. 9~n, 1:'5; civil service in, ~13; Jndiclal administration, s8s-89; and ad·
oomtnuntSDl m, 2-~%O; democracy Ut, ministrative functions, in Creat Brit·
384: organization in, ::&31. 257; perIOIl- ain.155
nel recruitment in. 427 Justice. Department of, 399
Kitchen cabinet u a type of staIf agency.
1 16-20
 - -.., svtJIC11
Uboi: ..lIJ14 'biIIitIess ~ 148- ~ . {CC'lrIfiaaI!d)
.f9; .Department of, 190: P.arty: of 21, 34'-9; of eucUtives, 339-41,.348;
Qeat Britain, 1~4J W h'be!ty,: l4,: functions of, :u: and human we).
_ , 106; itn~ of procedure
, aoQ mamagetneI1t. ~ of, 447-
'1; reaction of, to icientific IfIIIDlIge- in, 60;-08; in relation to liberty, 10;
·meot, 1:10-21; syndicallsm, 164 middle, 333-35, 3470 role of, in mod-
Labor unions, 123-34. 221, 448; admin· ~ society. 13, 14: in relation to or·
istration of, ~: leadmhip in, 4460: ganization, v, 9, 37; in relation to
foremen, ill relation to, 338: and man· politics. 143-44: practices and pr0ce-
agement, 145-48: organization of, dures of, 417, 469. 627-29; procedures
:>81-85: of public ~~, 451-H: and economic emetgeneies, 608-11;
ill relation to scientibc ·management. public relations as a form of, 56.,...68:
1.>3-34 . reporting as a form of, 56.,...68; te-
Latin America, administration ill, 1n, search as a form of, 56.,...68: research
173-77 as a tool of, 537: techniques of, V,
Law, administrative, 51ig, 581-85: and '1, 82, 415; in United States, 134J
administnrtion, 101, 641-44: among see also Administrative managentent
Gennan Cameralist$, 97 Managerial abilities, see Abilities, admin·
Lawyers: ill administration, slig, 644J in istrative
government, 570: in management, Managerial revolution, 12-14: oontrasted
589-91: mining of, 641-44 with managerial evolution, 14-16; and
Leadership: administrative, 9, 334, 4;10, "managerism," 14-
455-58: and followership, 9, 3.6: in Managers, administrative duties of, 6:
Gennany, ,.60: in labor onions, 446n types of, 318
League of Nations, 179-80, 183, ,.81 Manorial administration, 95
Legal administnrtioo, 12 5, 303, 417, Materiel management, 474-75
581-85, s85"'n, 592 Mayor, as general manager, 53
~ education and administrative train· Medical administratinn, 6, 3~6, 331-3~;
mg. 641-44 training for, 637-38
Legislation, 46, 49, 51, 53, 61, 102, 159 Medieval period, 228; administration in,
9'~; administration in, under Charle-
Legislature, :23, 336: ill an~t ~tbens,
86: functions of, 75: orgzruzalinn of magne, 93; administration of English
bicameral, u: powers of, :>:2 Exchequer ill, 93-4; manorial admin·
Liberallsm, 10, 18
istration in, 95
Liberty, Z04: and bureaocraey, 201, 205, Meehaniutiou of administratinn, 596-
215: and labor, 145: and management, 99
143: and organization, 255: and plan. Medea, ancient lISe of administrative sta·
ning, 51 4 tistics by, W
Library of Congress, ",0 Mercantilism, 97
!JghthOdSell, management of, 2.6 Messenger, :u
Line, '98 Mettopolitan areas, 359-60
Line and staff, 289; de&nition of, 29<>- Mexico, administration in, 174-76
9Z: reIatlonship between, 306-08 Military administration, 6, 7, 57, 109,
J..obl>viIII!, admiDistrative, 53 12.1, 199, 241, ;~1, 311-32, l-99-
Local,adininistration, 1 t 2, 131 402, 405, 622-~3; French, oil German,
Local govemment areas, lS 5-59; reduc. 167, llig; in ancient Greece, 86-8;
tion in, 357-58 medieval m modem, 95
Militaty organizations, l41, '92, ~9S-
London, :>88
Loyalty. administrative, ,00 96, 298, )21; in ancient Creece, 258-
S9, and reorganization, 399-40:0
Magistrates, ill ancient Greece, "58 Militaty production: German, 166; in
Maliillg, 13" United States, 243-46 •
Maillterumce services, 474-75 ~,J04
Management: in relation to administra· MinistiY; See Church administration
tiOn; V, 9, 37, '9R; American, 626; Minnesota, Deputmeat of Administra-
badgIet as a tool of, 462-66; in reIa· tion of, 314
tion to bodgeting, 460, 490: _pe' Minorities, prooedun: for. pmtectinn of
teoCe of, 141, 143; ddiDition 4£, v, JigIlts of, 611-13
 INDIX 01' SVIJICTS
Organization (continued)
indnstrial, :087; international, '78; of
knowledge concerning administration,
664-68; lepJative, ..:>; and liberty,
255; in relation to management, v, 9,
3'7; modes of, .89-90; in • multi·
group society, 210, '30, '13; optimum,
size of, 19'; in relatinn to personnel,
National Association of Manufacturers, '39-41; 411-13. 418; of state govern-
285 ments, 246: in practice, 3>2, 338;
National Institute of Public Administra- principles of, 251, 403-0;: private and
tion, 22 publiC, >26, z 30, '; 5: in relatinn to
National Resomces Board, 313, 363, procedure, 410-13: purpose of, '47;
limitatinns upon science of, 'SS; sci-
soo,504-05 ence of,. V, 2.1, 81, 217; of science,
Nationalization: ~erican, suggestions 664-67; of society, 2U; in Soviet
for, 145-146; British, 158,394; of in- Russia, .61-63; of the state, u,;
dustry, 236; in Uruguay, 176-77 survey of, 54>-47; theory of, 2.0;
Navy, United States, 399-40. theory and practice of, 387; types of
Nazi Germany, 169 '56; in United States, .63, 39S-40~
Nazism, 12., 70, 2.59 Ottoman Empire, 81
Neutrality, administrative, 70
New Deal, 13, ;4-5, 60, 74, 203, '04; Papacy, see Pope
in Ancient China, 84; fiscal policy of, Parish administration, 96
488;. and planning, ;'3 Parliamentary government in Great Brit-
New Freedom, • S ain, 1;;
New Nationalism, ;01 Pearl Harbor, 399-401
New Yor!:: Bureau of Municipal Re· Persia, use of administrative statistics in.
search, 16, 104, 130, 645 54'
New Yorle City, .88; centralization in, Personality, 443-47
383; organization of, 388; planning Personnel, n, 303, 477; classification of,
and zoning in, 497, 500 ISo, 434, 438; compensation of, 4'5-
New York Training School for Public .6, 435; competence, in United
Service, 16, 22, 57, 645 States, 418, 4.0-21; competence, in
New Zealand, administration in, 184 Soviet Russia, 4>1-21; counsellors,
NUisances, removal of, 31 450; importance of, 142.; incentives of,
'0;, 449-50; in relation to organiza.
Office manager, 21, 3; tion. 411, 418; patronage, 440-4';
Office of Government Reports, ;6<>-6; procedure, dominance of, 438-39;
Office of Production Management, 24 ~ public, nmnber of, 433; public p_
Office space, 474-7;; administration of, tige of, 2140; selection of, 4'''''';
30 4 separation of, 4';-'7, 435
Organization, 22, '19, 477; in relation to Personnel management, 113, 417; by
administration, V, 9, 37; American, city manager, 33; functions of, 4, 33-
contrasted with German and Russian, 39; and social values, 444-4;
..64; and Methods Division of British Philosophy of administration and man-
Treasury. 410; charts, 3'4-';, 240; agement, u, 1&-18, 35
conlIicts. within Soviet Russia, 344; Physicians, see Doctors
control, devices for, 409; as a fonction Physiocrats, 97
of l't~ cu\tll'le, 2S8; <le!miti<m of, Plann~ 55, 57, 103, 36" 49'; admin·
v, 21, 14, 39, 420; and efficiency, 407; istrative, ", 34, 56, 1}3, 527-.8; ad-
elements of, 24S-S1, 403-0;; factors vance, 499, 506; in relation to budg-
in, 387-89; in France, 394-9;; fonc- eting, 466-68, 5.8; and conservatinn,
tions of, 21; ~phy of, 349, 388; 50'-503; and corporations, 50'; defi-
in Great Bntain, 392; of ancient nition of, 22, 49', 493~5, 536; and
Greece, '57-;9; hieraJx;hy of, 25 1-53. democracy, 514; economic. 'H. 49';
3)8-3'; hierarchy of, among Incas, economic, and budgeting, 4aS-S01,
'53D; bieraJX:hy in~. 3.6, 341, econODlic, in ancient Egypt. 80; ec:o-
347. 348; and the individual, 239-.fOl nODlie, Jintitations of, 518; economic,
1Wiij ..
- - ., SUIJIiCII.
l'!a1Inilig
_ ~ . '~l~-.. 608-i~;'. '~;";":1S
P"~.8 ...
fiCOIIQIlIlc, ...4 _ ' " S4Q; _ , - , prime, so6; pu1>Iic. .~
_ ic. in Vnited. State., S=4;' foac. 5~1l •. ... IJnI..
of........
.1iotIs,. S3O'''U;' and industry. Si4: in-
dustrial,· in Soviet Russia, 468; Ilmita-
ticm$ fIf. ?33-34; lit a ~
~1 *'
PR!Sident; onpt al term, 'It;
see also President of UJ"-
cIcMce, 49"; militaty. 294: mUnicipal President of United State., 313, 316; lie-
agencies for, 497; and ~ fonna· cess to. 59; lIS chief legislator. 52; Jl!"D'
tioo. ;,,6; in felatioo to pollcies and petence of, .20-21, .24-2S: fUneI100s
operations, 57, li9; politic3J and tech· of.109; -.ageriaI ftmctions ofl :z:t,
nical, 3i 7; to prevent financial _ , IJ'; routine flJnctions of, 624; as a
511-14; to prevent national waste, &eneml~, SI; message of,"!·
PI; and internal improvements, 5:00; form of public ~. S51; lit ~IJ
process of, 510-33; progmn, 5",?-,,8; maket, 58; compaied with Presidi:irt m:
and public housing, 501; and public Bra2il, 175; power of. in relatioll to
power, 50,; public works, 497. 520; executive organization. 264; p~.
public works and relief programs, 500; dures applied by. 600-01; and White
regional, 50;>-10; regional, in China, HoUse staff, 312-U .
507; regional, foreign, 511; regional, President's Committee on Adminjs!ra-
potentialities of, 511; in relation to tive Management, 263. 264. 318. 398 ,
research, 54 5-.¢; and scientific I11l1D- 480
agemeot, S"'~; social, 492; sta!kno- President's Counell of Economic Ad·
33; stages of, 525; stzte, 504; mteand visers, 22?-28 '
local, 495; technique of, 506; as a tool President's Scientific Research ~,
of management, 533-36; types of. 5.6
493.494-95 Prestige Of public personnel. 114n f
Pluralism, 228-34 Price system as contrasted with .ysteil' 0
Polarity between administtation aod pol.
economic planning, 517
icy, 71 -3. 75-6 Princeton University, 223
Police, as term for public adminlsttation.
Prison adminlsttation. 399
~,>",~"'? Private enterprise, 221, 224, 226, 2211.
Policy: and adminlsttation, 40; con· 370, 373. S25: see Private prolit, {rolit
trasted with adminlsttative rationaliza· motive
tion, 72; in relation to procedure, 601;
Private profit, :007-10; in relation to pub-
see also Politics lic service, 206-11; see Private enter.
Policy·making: in adminlsttation, 37,40, prise, Prolit motive
SIn., 53-4, 61-2, 6«}, 70, 71, 72, 75;
and planning, 526 Procedures, 29, 75, 110, 132, 150, ~71-
12, 595-96; and administrative ro_u'
Political duties of administtative staff. tines, 72, S96, 599, 623-27: in Bnt·
:118-1 9 ish medieval Exchequer, 599: busjlle8S.
Political parties. organization of. 272.-77 601-OS; code of, 613-1;; and d~'
Political science and administtation. 15. racy. 5li9; in Federal administrah~,
327, 32 8, 64S-47 60S-II; importance of. 6"7; mecjlaD1'
Politicians and adminlsttators: in United ""tion of. 596-99; mistakes in. 620-
States, 41, 44; in Grell!: Britain, 160 =4; in relation to ulglInization, 410;
Politics: and business management, :109; overemphasis on, 6'9-31; O'VereRIpha·
in relation to adminlsttation, 40, 42, sis on, in field of personnel, 459; per.
320, 49, 56, 58,62. 111 •• 68; in re1a- sonnel, .34; in relation to policy, 601;
tion to management, 143'""44; non· for protection of minority rights. pu-
iational. cimttasted with administta· 13; rationalization of, 596-99. 60,-
live, 71-2; precinct, organization of,
%'16-071; progressM:. 134; and ration· o&; reforot of, ;81-8;, 592-93; ~
aWlation. 12; science of, '11, .. " .68; of, 631-:32; in Russia, 627; ~
in Soviet Russia, 3411 role of. in the cation. of. (jl8-;o; in United StlItes.
United States. %'1'1 611
Pope: ~ve ~ of. '3; Ptofc:aioa, administtatioIt as a, ?S. 635,
~ adminismttion of, 9fin 667-69
Xix INHX OF SUBJEt11

,ProIit motnoe:. in ~ and ~. ltCOlgllllization, '40: of Congres1, .71-

meat, 196-97; in relation to ........ 72; factors in, 387-ll9. 413; limitations
meat, 14", ~'(>-11; see Private profit, of, 407; military, 399-40.; principles
Private enteJyrlSe 9f, 403-05; ptocess of, 386, 4°5-1 3;
Program plmnmg, 4~" ftt:On\memlations by Commission on
Programming, 4~, S.6-.7 Organization of the Executive Branch
Prussia, 292; adlninistration in, 101-03, of Government, 397-99; by Presi·
16:;, 18.; bureaucracy in, 187; civl1 dent's Committee on Administr1llive
service, 167; military administration in, Management, 395-96: tecbniques ~,
167 4 10-13
Public administration, v, 2.00, ;49, 417: Repnrting, 23, 132, ;0;, 4'7, 469
and other forms of adlninistration, 8, Reports, 517: of administrative progress,
;o-s 1 n; Camenllism as a form of, 548; by British royal commissions, 554;
97; in Ancient China, 80; definition municipal, 55'; public, 549-54; pub-
of, 42, 49-50; in Creat Britain, 156; lic, evolution of, 550-51; need for
police as original term fur, 99; com· simplicity of, 549; Statistical. as • tool
pored with priwte administration, 87. of management, 547-49; technical,
133; teclmHjues of, 130; origin of term; 533; governmental, in the United
99, 101, 647; training fur, 645-52, States, ;60-63
647, 651, 65' Records, 61 5-18
Public Administration Clearing House. Researcb, 3°3, 417, 537: administrative,
vii 538: in form of the census, 541-42;
Public ownersnip, 228: see aloo Power, defiIIItion of, 538; economic, 540; in
bIic indUstry, 537n; and management, 537;
Putlic personnel: number of, 433: pres· in relation to personnel, 436-37' in
tige of, "4n ' relation to planning, 534-36; social,
Public relations, 303, 417, 537, 538, 539; techoiques of, 545-47; as a tool
555-59; in personnel management, of management, 53 5-36
437; state and local, 557-59 Resources administration, 506
Public service, .00-07; incentives to, Responsihl1ity: and authority, 327, p8,
,08, 211; in relation to private profit 347: delegation of, 413
206-11 Revenue administration, 8; In ancient
Public works, 520-21: in relation to un· Egypt, 79; papal, ¢o
employment, 500 Revenues, publiC, 475-76
Publicity, 555-59; govenunental, 558- Revolution, 54, 251; American, 114;
59, 563: and information, ¢0-63: a French, 16), 165-66; management,
national program of, 560-63; stall 12.-4; Russidn, 17, 111; socia1, 10, l~
agencies fur, 555n effect on state and local goveroment,
Purchasing, tecbniques of, 413-75 114n
Psychology, 445-47 Ronte, ancient: administration in, 77,
B9, 105, 158; administration onder the
Qualifications of adlninistratots, see Abil· Empire of, 91;' adlninistration under
ities, administrative the Repu~ <$, 91, 9:m; ap:o~
administration HI, 1050; magistratea m,
90 .
Rule-making in. administtation, 57'-74
Russia, Czarist, 341; experiments with
democmtic administration in, ~13
Russia, Soviet, 66, 341; administration
In, 153, 1,0-73, 18.; boreaucracy in,
187, 190, 621-23; busloeas methods
in, 140: Central Council of Scientific
Organization of Labor, Production and
Administration, 172-73; cenlTaIization
in, 317-79: decentralization In,
79: elIiciency of, 172-73; five.year
,,7-
plan, 172; factory management in, 245;
Iimctioulism in, 30J--<>l; industry in,
Sabotage. administrative, 74
SaIIlbuy~, J2
Scalar princ:tple of organization, ,.,1-53
Sclwat administration, see Educotional
1I~
Science and IIdministration, 17, }S, 101,
1<'/2., U3. 137,635-38, 660--6.4,~-
67
Scientific distribution and scientific man-
agement, 1 %6-.. 8
Scicutific lIllIIllIgement, lIS, 134, 183,
"?O; aud American democracy, 1%>-
%6; efIiciency aspects of, 116-22; in
Great Briblin, 1 59; in international
administration, 1,8; origins of, 103-
oS, llS-17, 1%>-%3n; and planning,
495; in Soviet Russia, 17o-"J%; and
scientific distribution, 126-%8
Securities control, 574
Separation of powets, administration in
relation to, 4 S
Service functions, importance of, 304
Social change. 10
Social engineering, 39n
'lioa.) organlzaDon. 219, 223; ailmlnJs-
tration of, 3
Social security, 362, 363
Social science, and administration, 101
Social values, 76; and budgeting. 465,
4?o; and elficient administration, 660;
and personneJ. management, 444-45.
459
SociaIistn, 18" 31, 1S4, 157, 170, 2.02,
.:11,. 2.2.2.. 2.35, 2.'55, ;19; British, l60,
394; in ancient China, 84; democratic,
;2 s; guild, %22; and the problem of
organization, .. 54; see also Collectivism
Society for the Advancement of Man-
agement. 1%5
Society of Industrial En&in<=, 488
So¢iolOgy, 328; in relation to adminis-
QIItinn, 98
Socony,Vacuum Oil Company, 374-75
~,of control, 397-98,404,413
specialization In administration, 10; in
Great BribIin, 156, po
SpeciaIiItJ. 41$
Staf; ~, .:1.97> .general, 29%, %97;
.~ in industry, 136; general, qual-
~ for, 309-10; -~ in
UaIW Statet, %93-95; kitc\en cabinet
 .".0: OF SUlJiCTS
T18ining for adminirttal:ion (COIItinutd) United States (continued)
of internship. 64HCI; in public and ization in, U3; personnel tt(!TUftPlent.
btWness administration, 6S 5-56; ....t in, 430-33; public informatiOIi in,
the social sciences, 660-64 560-63; resources of, 138; training for
Treasury: British. 410. 478; Secrelmy of. administration .in universities, 644-5~
Ul; of the United Slates, 47S. 480 University and ~ traini?!! feR ad·
ministration, 9; in Creat Britain. 65.
Unemployment. planning to prevent. 500 639-41; in United States, 647-'5 2
UnionS 01 public employees. 451; British. Urban ~t, 3S9-00
453 Uruguay, natiOtlllli:otion in, 1 ~1; s0-
Unit costs, .6 cialism. 238
United Mipe Workels, 147
'Unites'! Nations. 17cr-80, ~7B-79, 1m; Valoes, social, 76; in personnel manage-
organization of' 278-lh ment, «<I-'H; see also Human wel·
Uninn of Socialist Soviet Republics. see fare and administration
Russia, Soviet Virginia, colonial, training for public ad·
United States, 139. 350-52; administra· ministration in, 646
tion in, 37,47, 101, 107, 111-14; ad~
ministratinn, lack of class consciousness War Department. 331
in, 112, administrative procedure in, War Production Board. .06
6oS-11, bureaucracy in, 2.02; charac· Washington, 227; centralization in, 38,;
teristic type of organization in. ,63, decentralization of federal empjoyees
~64. 395-402; chief executive in, 109; from, 36,; planning of, 496, 499
competence of management in. 141; Water power, 506; and planning, ,P,·04
delegation of legislative powers in. Waterways, administration of, 79
578-79; executive in, '09; industry in. Western Electric Company, 337..... 3
519; management in, 134.626; organ· Workmen, 13; administrative duties of. 6
 " NOTE ON THE TYI'.

This book was'set in E~tn4 a Linotype faeedesigned by

W, A. Dwiggins. This face cannot be classified as either
modem or old-style. It is not based on any historical model,
,por does it echo any particular period or style_ It avoids
the extreme contrast between thick and thin elements that
marks most modem faces, and attempts to give a feeling
of fluidity, power, and speed. The book was composed,
printed, and bound by Kingsport Press, Inc" Kingsport,
Tennessee. Typography by Sidney R.Jacobs; binding de-
sign by W. A. Dwiggins.
 UNIV. OF AGRIL,..,sCIENCES
UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, BANGALORE.S60024

This book should be retumed on or before

the date menh_,led below; or else the
Borrower will be liable for overdue charges
1177
as per rules from the DUE DATt€..:
C1. No. 3$1) , LG.f A~O.
)

2"1 9CT 1978

77/7/
6 NOV 1978
7 CZ/11-.f
r;;~ ~;~ rf~!
~ -r it... ~
iUIl3
4. w

\>obl\{.,
t 6 f"JArt ,DDt
Dur)t\

a.it. V J'to.. Library

UAS LIBRARY GKVK

G-1177
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '1' ' 1' ' 111'' ' '"