Health Promotion Activities in Bandung Public Health Centre (Puskesmas)
Health Promotion Activities in Bandung Public Health Centre (Puskesmas)
Health Promotion Activities in Bandung Public Health Centre (Puskesmas)
Abstract
Background: Health promotion is one of Public Health Centre (Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat, Puskesmas)
essential health effort able to increase community health status. The purpose of this study was to describe
health promotion activities in Bandung Public Health Centre (Puskesmas).
Methods: This study was a cross sectional descriptive study using questionnaire as data collection
instrument. The questionnaires were distributed to 24 Puskesmas in Bandung that were selected randomly
using simple random sampling method. The process of questionnaire filling was performed by health
promotion officer after informed consent was done. The variables were basic health promotion strategies,
health promotion supports, health promotion in health facility and health promotion in community.
Results: Most of the Puskesmas showed that basic health promotion strategies, health promotion in health
facility and health promotion in community were already done. Support media that was mostly used was
printed media while lectures was the most used method. Human resources practitioner and coordinator of
health promotion were dominated by mid level health workers consists of midwife and nurse. This study
showed that the majority of health promotion coordinator had underwint training and certificate related to
health promotion. The availability of funds were possessed by 13 out of 24 sample. While, health promotion
guideline were possessed by less than half of the sample.
Conclusions: Health promotion is done in almost all sample. There is lack of health promotion support in
the form of the availability of funds and guideline of health promotion method. [AMJ.2016;3(3):460–8]
Correspondence: Siti Fairuz Nadya, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jalan Raya Bandung-Sumedang
Km.21, Jatinangor, Sumedang, Indonesia, Phone: 085316488993 Email: [email protected]
every citizen is entitled to (1) primary level self-administered by 24 officers from the
healthcare, consisting of general health aforementioned 24 Puskesmas.
care, (2) advanced level healthcare based Informed consent was collected by the
on referrals and (3) other forms of health healthcare officers prior to filling out of the
care as laid out by the Minister of Health. questionnaires. The same officers also filled
Promotive and preventive efforts form the out another informed consent form stating
bulk of primary level healthcare. Additionally, their willingness to participate in this study.
the nationwide health insurance adopts a Respondents with incomplete questionnaires
system of capitation based on the number of were later contacted. Data analysis were
applicants regarding to the type and number carried out using Microsoft Excel 2010.
of provided healthcare services. In order to
prevent medical personnels defaulting on the Results
capitation fees, health promotion becomes top
priority in an attempt to curb down costs on Data were collected from 24 Puskesmas in
curative efforts.8 Bandung. Four variables in this study and the
Therefore, this study on the degree of results for the first variable which was basic
health promotion done by various Puskesmas strategies of health promotion are presented
in Bandung in 2011 should help us to face in Table 1.
the era of nationwide health insurance with From four facets of basic strategy,
its own set of demands on health promotion, optimising the environment was practised
challenges on managing the limited capitation the least. Additionally, the questionnaires
fees and the relatively stagnant adoption of revealed that not all of the primary health
clean and healthy behavior by the people. The Centres exercised all four strategies and there
purpose of this study was to describe health were Centres practicing none.
promotion activities in Bandung Public Health Table 2 demonstrated that midwives
Centre. contributed the most in the implementation
of basic health promotional strategies while
Methods community health officers contributed the
least. The public formed the main target when
This was a cross-sectional descriptive study it came to empowerment and optimisation
which employed a simple randomized of the environment. Public organizations
sampling method by choosing 24 out of 73 were at the last of advocacy. There was not
Puskesmas in Bandung. Data collection were primary healthcare Centres picked political
carried out from September to November organizations as their targets of advocacy. In the
2014. meantime, partnerships with religious elders
This study had been approved by Health were commonly practised. Empowerment and
Research Ethics Committee of Faculty optimisation of the environment were done
of Medicine of Universitas Padjadjaran. mostly on a monthly basis.
Primary data were recorded using validated On the second variable, i.e. health
questionnaires based on the standardized promotion supportive instruments, there
protocol on health promotion in Puskesmas were 5 investigated subvariables. Table 3
published by the Ministry of Health Republic demonstrated that 6 Puskesmas utilized the
of Indonesia. The questionnaires contained guideline-directed individual, group and mass-
questions on health promotion strategies targeted approaches. Mass media also formed
in Indonesia, supportive measures of such the most widely utilized health promotion
strategies, and health promotive activites instrument.
both on healthcare centre premises and in Out of 24 Puskesmas, 13 had enough funds
the community. The questionnaires were to carry out health promotional programs
Hidup Bersih dan Sehat, PHBS). Even though working at various Puskesmas in Bandung
more than half of the participating healthcare focusing on public health. Health profile data
Centres have implemented the basic strategies in 2011 also stated that there was only one
of health promotion, the health profile of the public health officer for every 3 Puskesmas in
city of Bandung in 2011 only stated 65.64% Bandung.7
adoption rate of clean and healthy behavior by Data on table 3 shows that 23 Centres
the public and the rate was relatively stagnant have coordinators on health promotion who
for several years.7 previously has undergone training on health
This study also found that health promotion and 16 of the coordinators have a
promotional efforts are dominated by nurses certificate on health promotion. Most of these
and midwives classified as mid-level health coordinators were either midwives or nurses
workers. Such observation had also been and this observation was already in accord
confirmed by the 2011 Bandung health profile with the regulations on health promotional
data.7 Additionally, a study by Lassi et al.11 officers qualifications.9 A study by Yuniarti12
from 1973-2012 showed that there was no stated that the level of education, training,
difference in the degree of effectiveness of knowledge, skill and leadership capabilities of
health service carried out by mid-level health the officers influenced their performances.12
workers and higher level health workers.11 This study has revealed that more than half
Table 3 demonstrates that only 2 health of the participating coordinators have already
promotional officers have a degree in public fulfilled the criteria on education and training.
health. In 2011, there were only 74 people From table 3 it can be showed that on the
one hand, lectures are the preferred method Rahmawati15 in 2007 stated that mothers with
when approaching the groups and the masses. young children exhibited better improvements
Harsono13 lengthily explained that utilizing on knowledge and behavior after being taught
animations during lectures influenced the using audiovisual media than conventional
effectiveness of the lectures. Thus, health media (e.g., modules). Another study by
promotional officers should come up with Sweeney16 in 2012 also stated that technology
innovations on improving the dispersal of presents an ideal means for healthcare
health-related information. On the other hand, Centrees to improve public health status.
guidelines are the least favored method of Thus, healthcare officers should be familiar in
health promotion. using technology to promote health and better
The collected data demonstrate that mass disperse health information.
media dominates health promotion while Table 3 also states that the availability of
board medias are the least utilized. From 18 funds for health promotion-related activities
out of 24 participated healthcare Centres are only found in 13 Centres. Currently, there is
used electronic media. According to a study by no standard on the amount of funds allocated
Pramono14, knowledge on clean and healthy for such activities.9 A previous study stated that
behavior (is improved significantly by the universal health coverage can only be achieved
use of electronic media. Then, a study by if the government invests sufficient political
and monetary support for effective and wide- tentang Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat.
reaching programs.17 Such recommendation Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik
should be implemented in Indonesia, which Indonesia; 2014.
has only recently adopted a nationwide health 4. Howat P, Hallett J, Kypri K, Maycock B,
insurance, in order to achieve effective health Dhaliwal S, McManus A. Tobacco smoking
promotion. in an Australian university sample and
Table 4 indicates that out of the 24 implications for health promotion. Prev
participated Centres, health promotion in Med. 2010;51(5):425–6.
inpatients wards are practised the least. Such 5. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik
data are explained by the lack of such wards in Indonesia. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan
the Puskesmas.7 Republik Indonesia Nomor 585/MENKES/
According to table 5, health promotion in SK/V/2007 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan
the community focuses on the approaches to Promosi Kesehatan di Puskesmas.
individuals and families. Gogia and Sachdev18 Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik
explained that home visits in the name of Indonesia; 2007.
antenatal and neonatal care contributed to the 6. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Bandung. Profil
reduction in neonatal mortality in Southeast Dinas Kesehatan Kota Bandung Tahun
Asia. Besides that, health promotion in the 2011. Bandung: Dinas Kesehatan Kota
community focuses on the approaches to Bandung; 2012.
individuals and families can be the solution of 7. Presiden Republik Indonesia. Peraturan
barriers to health care access among elderly.19 Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 12
These further highlight the importance of Tahun 2013 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan.
health promotion in the community. Jakarta: Republik Indonesia; 2013.
This study has revealed that at least some 8. Hartono B. Promosi kesehatan di
form of health promotions had been done in Puskesmas dan Rumah Sakit. 1st ed.
most participating health Centres. The lack Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2010.
of public health officers is tackled by the 9. Rezeki S, Mulyadi A, Nopriadi. Strategi
presence of nurses and midwives who have promosi kesehatan terhadap peningkatan
undergone training and earned certification perilaku hidup bersih dan sehat individu
on health promotion. Limited funds and pada masyarakat perkebunan di wilayah
lack of established guidelines on health Puskesmas Sei Kijang Kabupaten
promotion form the primary shortcomings Pelalawan. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan.
of health promotional efforts. The limitation 2013;7(1):38–48.
of this study is primarily on the lack of 10. Lassi ZS, Cometto G, Huicho L, Bhutta
cooperations by the respondents in filling out ZA. Quality of care provided by mid-level
the questionnaires completely. Furthermore, health workers: systematic review and
this study has not gone as far as investigating meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ.
the quality of the health promotional materials 2013;91(11):824–33I.
presented both in the healthcare Centres and 11. Yuniarti Y, Shaluhiyah Z, Widjanarko B.
in the community. Further studies are required Kinerja petugas penyuluh kesehatan
to investigate the performance of the health masyarakat dalam praktek promosi
promotional officers. kesehatan di Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten
Pati. Jurnal Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia.
References 2012;7(2):165¬–73.
12. Harsono B, Soesanto, Samsudi. Perbedaan
1. Smith BJ, Tang KC, Nutbeam D. WHO health hasil belajar antara metode ceramah
promotion glossary: new terms. Health konvensional dengan ceramah berbantuan
Promot Int. 2006;21(4):340–5. media animasi pada pembelajaran
2. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik kompetensi perakitan dan pemasangan
Indonesia. Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan sistem rem. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik
Republik Indonesia Nomor 128/MENKES/ Mesin. 2009;9(2):71–9.
SK/II/2004 Tentang Kebijakan Dasar 13. Pramono MS, Paramita A. Peningkatan
Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat. Jakarta: pengetahuan anak - anak tentang Perilaku
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik hidup bersih dan sehat, dan penyakit
Indonesia; 2004. menular melalui teknik KIE berupa
3. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik permainan elektronik. Buletin Penelitian
Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Sistem Kesehatan. 2011;14(4 Okt):311–9.
Republik Indonesia Nomor 75 Tahun 2014 14. Rahmawati I, Sudargo T, Paramastri I.