9.hypothesis Testing For The Mean and Variance of A Population

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 70

9.

Hypothesis Testing For The


Mean and Variance of a
Population

Adapted From :
Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists, 8th Ed.
Walpole/Myers/Myers/Ye (c)2007
Introduction to Business Statistics, 5e
Kvanli/Guynes/Pavur (c)2000
South-Western College Publishing
Statistics for Managers
Using Microsoft® Excel 4th Edition

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-1
Chapter Goals
After completing this chapter, you should be
able to:
 Formulate null and alternative hypotheses for
applications involving a single population mean or
proportion
 Formulate a decision rule for testing a hypothesis
 Know how to use the critical value and p-value
approaches to test the null hypothesis (for both mean
and proportion problems)
 Know what Type I and Type II errors are

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-2
What is a Hypothesis?
 A hypothesis is a claim
(assumption) about a
population parameter:

 population mean
Example: The mean monthly cell phone bill
of this city is μ = $42
 population proportion
Example: The proportion of adults in this
city with cell phones is p = .68
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-3
The Null Hypothesis, H0

 States the assumption (numerical) to be


tested
Example: The average number of TV sets in
U.S. Homes is equal to three ( H0 : μ  3 )

 Is always about a population parameter,


not about a sample statistic

H0 : μ  3 H0 : X  3

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-4
The Null Hypothesis, H0
(continued)

 Begin with the assumption that the null


hypothesis is true
 Similar to the notion of innocent until
proven guilty
 Refers to the status quo
 Always contains “=” sign
 May or may not be rejected

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-5
The Alternative Hypothesis, H1
 Is the opposite of the null hypothesis
 e.g.: The average number of TV sets in U.S.
homes is not equal to 3 ( H1: μ ≠ 3 )
 Challenges the status quo
 Never contains the “=” , “≤” or “” sign
 May or may not be accepted
 Is generally the hypothesis that is believed
(or needs to be supported) by the
researcher

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-6
Hypothesis Testing Process

Claim: the
population
mean age is 50.
(Null Hypothesis:
Population
H0: μ = 50 )
Now select a
random sample
Is X 20 likely if μ = 50?
If not likely, Suppose
the sample
REJECT mean age Sample
Null Hypothesis is 20: X = 20
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Reason for Rejecting H0
Sampling Distribution of X

X
20 μ = 50
If H0 is true
... then we
If it is unlikely that
reject the null
we would get a
sample mean of ... if in fact this were hypothesis that
the population mean… μ = 50.
this value ...
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-8
Level of Significance, 

 Defines the unlikely values of the sample


statistic if the null hypothesis is true
 Defines rejection region of the sampling
distribution
 Is designated by  , (level of significance)
 Typical values are .01, .05, or .10
 Is selected by the researcher at the beginning
 Provides the critical value(s) of the test

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-9
Level of Significance
and the Rejection Region
Level of significance =  Represents
critical value
H0: μ = 3 /2 /2
H1: μ ≠ 3 Rejection
Two tailed test 0 region is
shaded
H0: μ = 3 
H1: μ > 3
Upper tail test 0

H0: μ = 3

H1: μ < 3
Lower tail test 0
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-10
Errors in Making Decisions

 Type I Error
 Reject a true null hypothesis
 Considered a serious type of error

The probability of Type I Error is 


 Called level of significance of the test
 Set by researcher in advance

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-11
Errors in Making Decisions
(continued)

 Type II Error
 Fail to reject a false null hypothesis

The probability of Type II Error is β

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-12
Outcomes and Probabilities

Possible Hypothesis Test Outcomes

Actual Situation
Decision H0 True H0 False
Do Not
No error Type II Error
Reject
Key: (1 -  ) (β)
Outcome H0
(Probability) Reject Type I Error No Error
H0 () (1-β)

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-13
Type I & II Error Relationship

 Type I and Type II errors can not happen at


the same time
 Type I error can only occur if H0 is true
 Type II error can only occur if H0 is false

If Type I error probability (  ) , then


Type II error probability ( β )

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-14
Factors Affecting Type II Error

 β when the difference between


hypothesized parameter and its true value

 β when 
 β when σ
 β when n

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-15
How to choose between Type I
and Type II errors

 Choice depends on the cost of the error


 Choose little type I error when the cost of rejecting the
maintained hypothesis is high
 A criminal trial: convicting an innocent person

 The Exxon Valdise: Causing an oil tanker to sink

 Choose large type I error when you have an interest in


changing the status quo
 A decision in a startup company about a new piece of
software
 A decision about unequal pay for a covered group.

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-16
Hypothesis Tests for the Mean

Hypothesis
Tests for 

 Known  Unknown

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-17
Z Test of Hypothesis for the
Mean (σ Known)
 Convert sample statistic ( X ) to a Z test statistic
Hypothesis
Tests for 

σ Known σ Unknown

The test statistic is:

X μ
Z 
σ
n
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-18
Critical Value
Approach to Testing
 For two tailed test for the mean, σ known:
 Convert sample statistic ( X ) to test statistic (Z
statistic )
 Determine the critical Z values for a specified
level of significance  from a table or
computer
 Decision Rule: If the test statistic falls in the
rejection region, reject H0 ; otherwise do not
reject H0
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-19
Two Tailed Tests
H0: μ = 3
 There are two
H1: μ  3
cutoff values
(critical values),
defining the
regions of /2 /2
rejection
3 X
Reject H0 Do not reject H0 Reject H0

-Z 0 +Z Z

Lower Upper
critical critical
value value
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-20
Review: 10 Steps in
Hypothesis Testing
 1. State the null hypothesis, H0
 2. State the alternative hypotheses, H1
 3. Choose the level of significance, α
 4. Choose the sample size, n
 5. Determine the appropriate statistical
technique and the test statistic to use
 6. Find the critical values and determine the
rejection region(s)

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-21
Review: 10 Steps in
Hypothesis Testing
 7. Collect data and compute the test statistic
from the sample result
 8. Compare the test statistic to the critical
value to determine whether the test statistics
falls in the region of rejection
 9. Make the statistical decision: Reject H0 if the
test statistic falls in the rejection region
 10. Express the decision in the context of the
problem

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-22
Hypothesis Testing Example
Test the claim that the true mean # of TV
sets in US homes is equal to 3.
(Assume σ = 0.8)
 1-2. State the appropriate null and alternative
hypotheses
 H0: μ = 3 H1: μ ≠ 3 (This is a two tailed test)
 3. Specify the desired level of significance
 Suppose that  = .05 is chosen for this test
 4. Choose a sample size
 Suppose a sample of size n = 100 is selected

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-23
Hypothesis Testing Example
(continued)

 5. Determine the appropriate technique


 σ is known so this is a Z test
 6. Set up the critical values
 For  = .05 the critical Z values are ±1.96
 7. Collect the data and compute the test statistic
 Suppose the sample results are
n = 100, X = 2.84 (σ = 0.8 is assumed known)
So the test statistic is:
X μ 2.84  3  .16
Z     2.0
σ 0.8 .08
n 100
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-24
Hypothesis Testing Example
(continued)

 8. Is the test statistic in the rejection region?

 = .05/2  = .05/2

Reject H0 Do not reject H0 Reject H0


Reject H0 if
Z < -1.96 or -Z= -1.96 0 +Z= +1.96
Z > 1.96;
otherwise
do not Here, Z = -2.0 < -1.96, so the
reject H0 test statistic is in the rejection
region
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-25
Hypothesis Testing Example
(continued)
 9-10. Reach a decision and interpret the result

 = .05/2  = .05/2

Reject H0 Do not reject H0 Reject H0

-Z= -1.96 0 +Z= +1.96


-2.0
Since Z = -2.0 < -1.96, we reject the null hypothesis
and conclude that there is sufficient evidence that the
mean number of TVs in US homes is not equal to 3
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-26
Pre-selecting  vs. using a P-Value
 In classical hypothesis testing, we typically pre-select 
to be .05 or .01 and then determine the critical region.
 We can then reject the hypothesis with that level of significance.
(Remember that in a 2-sided test, with  = .05, for example, the critical
region would have .025 in either tail.)
 The alternative is calculating the P-value, or probability
of obtaining the calculated result if H0 is true. The P-
value provides more information than just that the
hypothesis was rejected or not.
 If rejected, the P-value may be much less than .05 or .01, giving us additional
confidence in our decision.
 If not rejected, the P-value may be very close to .05 or .01, allowing us the
option of rejecting at a slightly reduced level.
 The judgment of the experimenter is used to interpret the calculated P-value
result.

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-27
P-Value Approach to Testing

 p-value: Probability of obtaining a test


statistic more extreme ( ≤ or  ) than the
observed sample value given H0 is true
 Also called observed level of significance

 Smallest value of  for which H0 can be


rejected

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-28
P-Value Approach to Testing
(continued)

 Convert Sample Statistic (e.g. X ) to Test


Statistic (e.g. Z statistic )
 Obtain the p-value from a table or computer
 Compare the p-value with 
 If p-value <  , reject H0
 If p-value   , do not reject H0

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-29
P-Value Example
 Example: How likely is it to see a sample mean of
2.84 (or something further from the mean, in either
direction) if the true mean is  = 3.0?

X = 2.84 is translated
to a Z score of Z = -2.0
/2 = .025 /2 = .025
P(Z  2.0)  .0228
.0228 .0228
P(Z  2.0)  .0228
p-value
=.0228 + .0228 = .0456
-1.96 0 1.96 Z
-2.0 2.0
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-30
P-Value Example
(continued)
 Compare the p-value with 
 If p-value <  , reject H0
 If p-value   , do not reject H0

Here: p-value = .0456 /2 = .025 /2 = .025


 = .05
.0228 .0228
Since .0456 < .05, we
reject the null
hypothesis
-1.96 0 1.96 Z
-2.0 2.0
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-31
Connection to Confidence Intervals

 For X = 2.84, σ = 0.8 and n = 100, the 95%


confidence interval is:
0.8 0.8
2.84 - (1.96) to 2.84  (1.96)
100 100

2.6832 ≤ μ ≤ 2.9968

 Since this interval does not contain the hypothesized


mean (3.0), we reject the null hypothesis at  = .05

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc.


One Tail Tests

 In many cases, the alternative hypothesis


focuses on a particular direction

This is a lower tail test since the


H0: μ = 3
alternative hypothesis is focused on
H1: μ < 3 the lower tail below the mean of 3

H0: μ = 3 This is an upper tail test since the


alternative hypothesis is focused on
H1: μ > 3
the upper tail above the mean of 3

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-33
Lower Tail Tests
H0: μ = 3
 There is only one H1: μ < 3
critical value, since
the rejection area is
in only one tail 

Reject H0 Do not reject H0


-Z Z
0

μ X

Critical value

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-34
Upper Tail Tests

H0: μ = 3
 There is only one
critical value, since H1: μ > 3
the rejection area is
in only one tail 

Do not reject H0 Reject H0


Z Zα
0

X μ

Critical value

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-35
Example: Upper Tail Z Test
for Mean ( Known)
A phone industry manager thinks that
customer monthly cell phone bill have
increased, and now average over $52 per
month. The company wishes to test this
claim. (Assume  = 10 is known)

Form hypothesis test:


H0: μ = 52 the average is equivalent to $52 per month
H1: μ > 52 the average is greater than $52 per month
(i.e., sufficient evidence exists to support the
manager’s claim)

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-36
Example: Find Rejection Region
(continued)
 Suppose that  = .10 is chosen for this test

Find the rejection region: Reject H0

 = .10

Do not reject H0 Reject H0


0 1.28

Reject H0 if Z > 1.28

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-37
Review:
Finding Critical Value - One Tail

Standard Normal
What is Z given  = 0.10? Distribution Table (Portion)
.90 .10
Z .07 .08 .09
 = .10
1.1 .8790 .8810 .8830
.90
1.2 .8980 .8997 .9015
z 0 1.28
1.3 .9147 .9162 .9177
Critical Value
= 1.28

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-38
Example: Test Statistic
(continued)

Obtain sample evidence and compute the test


statistic
Suppose a sample is taken with the following
results: n = 64, X = 53.1 (=10 was assumed known)
 Then the test statistic is:

Xμ 53.1  52
Z    0.88
σ 10
n 64
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-39
Example: Decision
(continued)
Reach a decision and interpret the result:
Reject H0

 = .10

Do not reject H0 Reject H0


1.28
0
Z = .88

Do not reject H0 since Z = 0.88 ≤ 1.28


i.e.: there is not sufficient evidence that the
mean bill is over $52
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-40
p -Value Solution
(continued)

Calculate the p-value and compare to 


p-value = .1894

Reject H0 P( X  53.1| μ  52.0)


 = .10
 53.1  52.0 
 P Z  
0  10/ 64 
Do not reject H0 Reject H0
1.28  P(Z  0.88)  1  .8106
Z = .88
 .1894
Do not reject H0 since p-value = .1894 >  = .10
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-41
Z Test of Hypothesis for the
Mean (σ UnKnown)
 Convert sample statistic ( X ) to a t test statistic
Hypothesis
Tests for 

σ Known σ Unknown

The test statistic is:

X μ
t n-1 
S
n
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-42
Example: Two-Tail Test
( Unknown)

The average cost of a


hotel room in New York
is said to be $168 per
night. A random sample
of 25 hotels resulted in
X = $172.50 and H0: μ = 168
S = $15.40. Test at the H1: μ  168
 = 0.05 level.
(Assume the population distribution is normal)

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-43
Example Solution:
Two-Tail Test

H0: μ = 168 /2=.025 /2=.025


H1: μ  168

  = 0.05 Reject H0 Do not reject H0 Reject H0


t n-1,α/2
-t n-1,α/2 0
 n = 25 -2.0639 2.0639
1.46
  is unknown, so X μ 172.50  168
t n1    1.46
use a t statistic S 15.40
 Critical Value: n 25

t24 = ± 2.0639 Do not reject H0: not sufficient evidence that


true mean cost is different than $168

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-44
Connection to Confidence Intervals

 For X = 172.5, S = 15.40 and n = 25, the 95%


confidence interval is:

172.5 - (2.0639) 15.4/ 25 to 172.5 + (2.0639) 15.4/ 25

166.14 ≤ μ ≤ 178.86

 Since this interval contains the Hypothesized mean (168),


we do not reject the null hypothesis at  = .05

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc.


Hypothesis Tests for Proportions

 Involves categorical values


 Two possible outcomes
 “Success” (possesses a certain characteristic)
 “Failure” (does not possesses that characteristic)

 Fraction or proportion of the population in the


“success” category is denoted by p

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-46
Proportions
(continued)
 Sample proportion in the success category is
denoted by ps
X number of successesin sample
 ps  n  samplesize

 When both np and n(1-p) are at least 5, ps


can be approximated by a normal distribution
with mean and standard deviation
 μps  p p(1 p)
σ ps 
n
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-47
Hypothesis Tests for Proportions

 The sampling
distribution of ps Hypothesis
is approximately Tests for p
normal, so the test
statistic is a Z
value: np  5 np < 5
and or
ps  p n(1-p)  5
Z n(1-p) < 5
p(1  p)
Not discussed
n in this chapter

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-48
Z Test for Proportion
in Terms of Number of Successes

 An equivalent form
to the last slide, Hypothesis
but in terms of the Tests for X
number of
successes, X:
X5 X<5
and or
X  np n-X  5 n-X < 5
Z
np(1  p) Not discussed
in this chapter

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-49
Example: Z Test for Proportion

A marketing company
claims that it receives
8% responses from its
mailing. To test this
claim, a random sample
of 500 were surveyed Check:
with 25 responses.
Test at the  = .05
n p = (500)(.08) = 40

n(1-p) = (500)(.92) = 460
significance level.

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-50
Z Test for Proportion: Solution
H0: p = .08 Test Statistic:
H1: p  .08 ps  p .05  .08
Z   2.47
p(1 p) .08(1 .08)
 = .05
n 500
n = 500, ps = .05
Critical Values: ± 1.96 Decision:
Reject Reject Reject H0 at  = .05
Conclusion:
.025 .025
There is sufficient
-1.96 0 1.96 z evidence to reject the
-2.47 company’s claim of 8%
response rate.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-51
p-Value Solution
(continued)
Calculate the p-value and compare to 
(For a two sided test the p-value is always two sided)

Do not reject H0
Reject H0 Reject H0 p-value = .0136:
/2 = .025 /2 = .025
P(Z  2.47)  P(Z  2.47)
.0068 .0068
 2(.0068)  0.0136
-1.96 0 1.96

Z = -2.47 Z = 2.47

Reject H0 since p-value = .0136 <  = .05

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-52
Other Example : Z Test for Proportion

H0: p = .8 Test Statistic:


H1: p  .8 ps  p .741  .8
Z   2.086
p(1 p) .8(1  .8)
 = .1
n 200
n = 200, ps = .741
Critical Values: ± 1.645 Decision:
Reject Reject Reject H0 at  = .1`
Conclusion:
.05 .05
There is sufficient
z evidence to reject the
-1.645 0 1.645
-2.086 company’s claim of
80%
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-53
p-Value Solution
(continued)
Calculate the p-value and compare to 
(For a two sided test the p-value is always two sided)

Do not reject H0
Reject H0 Reject H0 p-value = .0376:
/2 = .05 /2 = .05

P(Z  2.09)  P(Z  2.09)


.0188 .0188
0,4812  2(.0188)  0.0376

-1.96 0 1.96

Z = -2.09 Z = 2.09

Reject H0 since p-value = .0376 <  = .1

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-54
Chapter Summary

 Addressed hypothesis testing methodology


 Performed two tailed Z Test for the mean
(σ known)
 Discussed critical value and p–value
approaches to hypothesis testing
 Performed one-tail and two-tail tests . . .

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-55
Chapter Summary
(continued)

 Performed t test for the mean (σ


unknown)
 Performed Z test for the proportion
 Discussed pitfalls and ethical issues

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-56
EXERCISES
Problem 1
The Daytona Beach Tourism Commission recently claimed that the average
amount of money a typical college student spends per day during spring break
is over $70. Based upon previous research, the population standard deviation
is estimated to be $17.32. The Commission surveys 35 students and find that
the mean spending is $67.57. Is there evidence that the average amount
spent by students is less than $70 at  5% ?

Problem 2
The manufacturer of a new product claims that his product will increase output
per machine by 29 units per hour. A line manager adopts the product on 15 of
his machines, and finds that the average increase was only 26 with a standard
deviation of 6.2. Is there evidence to doubt the manufacturer’s claim at  5%?

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-57
EXERCISES
Problem 3
The supervisor of a production line believes that the average time to assemble an
electronic component is 14 minutes. Assume that assembly time is normally
distributed with a standard deviation of 3.4 minutes. The supervisor times the
assembly of 14 components, and finds that the average time for completion was 11.6
minutes. Is there evidence that the average amount of time required to assemble a
component is something other than 14 minutes at  10% ?

Problem 4
The manufacturer of a certain chewing gum claims that four out of five dentists
surveyed prefer their type of gum. You decide to test their claim. You find that in a
sample of 200 doctors, 74.1% do actually prefer their gum. Is this evidence sufficient
to doubt the manufacturer’s claim  10% ?

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 8-58
Hypothesis Testing for Differences/Changes in the
Variance of a Population

The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance

Intended to determine whether a change has


occurred in the dispersion of a population, as
measured by the variance of the data; or
 Whether it is reasonable that a sample with a
particular s2 value could have been randomly drawn
from a population with a hypothesized value of X
Hypothesis Testing for Differences/Changes in the
Variance of a Population

The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance


 Employs the 2 family of distributions
 The specific distribution to be employed depends
on the degrees of freedom (df ) for the test
 The 2 distribution originates at 0, and is
positively skewed, but becomes normal as df
increases
The Chi-Square Family of
Distributions

df = 1
df = 4
df = 6
df = 10

0 2 4 6 8  2
12 14 16
The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance
Underlying Assumptions

 The population is normally distributed with a


mean of  and a standard deviation of 
 The sample was randomly drawn from the
population associated with the hypothesis
test / experiment / study
The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance
Sample Problem # 1

 A management professor has given


careful thought to the design of
examinations. In order for him to be
reasonably certain that an exam does a
good job of distinguishing the differences
in achievement shown by the students, the
standard deviation cannot be too small.
On the other hand, if the standard
deviation is too large, there will tend to be
a lot of very low scores, which is bad for
student morale. Past experience has led
the professor to believe that a standard
The professor just gave an exam
deviation of 13 points on a 100-pt exam
indicates that the exam does a good job of to his class of 31 students. The
balancing these two objectives. mean score was 72.7 and the
standard deviation was 15.9.
Does this exam meet his criterion
At  0.1 ?
The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance
Sample Problem # 1

Summary of Data:
H0  13 <---- hypothesized value of standard deviation
s  15.9 <--- sample standard deviation
n  31 <----- sample size

1. H0: 2  169 2.   0.10


H1: 2  169
The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance
Sample Problem # 1

 Step 3: State the Associated Test Statistic (2)

2 = (n  1) s 2

2

• Step 4: 2 = 2 (n-1) df if H0 is True


The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance
Sample Problem # 1

Step 5: Determine the critical values of 2


2 1 2, df = 2 1  0.10/2, n  1
= 2 0.95, 31  1
= 2 0.95, 30
= 18.493
2 2, df = 2 0.10/2, n  1
= 2 0.05, 31  1
= 2 0.05, 30
= 43.773
The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance
Sample Problem # 1

Step 5: Determine the critical values of 2


2 1 2, df = 2 1  0.10/2, n  1
= 2 0.95, 31  1
Acceptance
= 2 0.95, 30 Region
/2
= 18.493 = .05 of
2 2, df = 2 0.10/2, n  1 area

= 2 0.05, 31  1
0 18.493 43.773
=  0.05, 30
2

= 43.773
The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance
Sample Problem # 1

 Step 6: Calculate the Value of the Test Statistic (2)

(n  1) s 2 (31  1) 15.9 2
2 = =
2 13 2
(30)(15.9) 2
=
(132

= 44.88
The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance
Sample Problem # 1
 Step 7 :
Do Not Reject H0 region

/2 Sample 2
/2
.05 of of 44.88
.05 of
area area
p-Value
0 18.493 43.773

DECISION : reject Ho
Conclusion : The exam didn’t meet the professor’ criterion
The Chi-Square (2) Test of Variance
Sample Problem # 2 : Self-Review
 Precision Analytics manufactures a wide line of
precision instruments and has a fine reputation
in the field for quality of its instruments. It will
not release an analytic balance for sale unless
that balance shows a variability significantly
below one microgram when weighing
quantities of about 500 grams.

 A new balance has just been delivered to the


quality control division from the production line.
It is tested to weigh the same 500-gm standard
weight 30 different times. The sample
standard deviation turns out to be 0.73
microgram. Should the balance be sold at 
0.1 ?

You might also like