Module 3 Extended Assignment: Centre No:11256 Date of Submission: 4 June 2014
Module 3 Extended Assignment: Centre No:11256 Date of Submission: 4 June 2014
Panagiotopoulou Anthoula
Centre No:11256
1. Introduction.....................................................................................................4
1.4 Backwash...................................................................................................5
2. Needs Analysis................................................................................................9
2
4.3 Backwash.................................................................................................21
4.4 Evaluation.................................................................................................21
5. Conclusion.....................................................................................................23
6. Bibliography..................................................................................................25
7. Appendices....................................................................................................27
Further Appendices
Objective R2 (Reading)
3
4
1. Introduction
Because of the ‘significant effect on people’s lives and careers exams results
can have’ (Burgess/Head 2005:1) I feel that further study on this field would help
me become a better exams trainer and language teacher.
The main differentiating factor between exam preparation and general English
classes is the objective; in exam classes the objective is the examination itself,
whereas in general English classes it is the learning per se.
b) lesson pace: students are usually prepared for an intensive pace, typical of
such courses.
5
c) student rapport: they collaborate more willingly because ‘they usually
share the same aim’ (May 1996:4)
1.4 Backwash
6
a) The teacher uses exclusively (or excessively) practice papers to prepare
students, neglecting communicative and humanistic methodologies. He
basically uses all course time to test learners.
b) Even when the teacher uses other materials, there is an explicit focus on
exam-type activities or skills required for the exam.
d) Learners are not encouraged to take time to think; they are required to
produce answers fast.
e) The teacher is viewed as the supreme authority- he has all the right
answers and most of the classes are teacher-led and –centred.
7
However useful, testing should not be the focus of an exam course.
8
texts (spoken or written) for classroom use. With my learners, I do that through a
Facebook group I created, where they can share videos or articles they find
interesting.
9
2. Needs Analysis
I will take over this group in September 2014, in my own school, in Kerkyra,
Greece. It comprises 8 students:
all but one are multilingual. Most of them speak three foreign languages
(among English, French, Spanish, Italian, German)
their perceived level is C1-C2 and most of them share extrinsic motivation
(Harmer 2007:98) because they need to pass the exam for reasons related
to work or studies.
To conduct a needs analysis I used both objective and subjective analysis types
(Nunan 1988). the subjective type, in the form of a questionnaire, provided me
with learners’ personal details, their knowledge of the exam and their learning
styles and beliefs.
10
It is important to clarify that I have taught most of these learners myself in
previous classes and in preparation for their previous certificates.
find the Reading Comprehension and the Use of English part the most
difficult of all and Speaking the easiest one
learn grammar through studying and practising and lexis through keeping
a notebook and using new vocabulary
social problems
11
The diagnostic assessment, or task analysis is ‘employed to specify or
categorize the language skills required to carry out real-world communicative
tasks’(Nunan 1988:18), in this case, the CPE exam. Even though Hughes (2003)
suggests that indirect testing is more appropriate for diagnostic purposes as it
provides a more representative range of language, I chose to use a practice test
and administered it under exam-like conditions, because it would provide me
with details on learners’ time management, approach to exam conditions and
familiarization with the exam format.
I used Test 1 from Cambridge English Proficiency for the updated exam Book 1
(UCLES 2012) because it covered all task types. It was marked using the criteria
described in the same book.
The DA enabled me to see the degree to which some students had or did not
have difficulties with individual papers and to contrast their perceived needs and
strengths with their real ones.
A wider range of questions, especially regarding the Use of English part, would
have provided me with a better understanding of the learners’ level, as it is
specific items that are tested, but it would have been unrealistic to test
everything they know, so I felt that this part would provide me with enough data
for error analysis.
Speaking was the easiest part for the learners, followed by Listening and
Writing, so we are not going to focus on these papers on this course.
Antigoni, who is one of the learners who need to get a B (approximately 85%) ,
already hit her target in Speaking and was very close in Writing and Listening.
The other three learners who need a B grade, had satisfactory percentages,
Elisa, Giota and Panagiotis got 64.5, 66 and 70 respectively in the overall scores.
The DA confirmed what the learners replied in the NA: the Use of English and the
Reading parts are the most challenging ones for them.
12
Problems which lost students most marks Course Priorities
Affixation
Intensive reading
Reading speed
13
3. Course Proposal (Appendix 1)
This course is a 21.5-hour excerpt from the beginning of a longer course for CPE
preparation, which I will teach starting late September 2014. The group is
already closed so there will only be the participants whose needs have already
been analysed.
Lessons will take place from 10:00 to 14:00 on Mondays, Wednesdays and
Fridays, plus a 1.5 hour for a summative assessment on the second Friday and
some time for tutorials after the assessment.
Even though more work is required for most learners to achieve their desired
goals, I think an increase of 5% is a feasible goal for the two-week period.
14
R4 Improved their ability to understand text
organization, structure and cohesion
The course follows a mixture of a skills syllabus and a product oriented syllabus.
It is product-oriented in the sense that the syllabus was conceived with the
focus on the knowledge (lexical-objectives U2, U3) and skills (reading –objectives
R1, R2, R3, R4, U1) the learners should gain as a result of the teaching.
Tasks have been sequenced from simple (D1e, D3c) to complex (D4d) and on the
basis that some sub-skills (D1h) are required for following tasks (D4HW task 3)
Spiraling also takes place throughout the course. ‘This means that something
learned is reintroduced in connection with something else, so that it is both
‘reused’ and learned in more depth’ (Graves 2000:138). For example, learners
have been taught how to skim, scan and infer meaning in D1e and D3c which
they have to combine for a reading task in D5c.
15
Students’ motivation
Teacher’s role
Feedback plays a major role in the course and follows every activity. It is done
extensively and aims at clarifying errors and refining reading techniques. My
own positive attitude to exams will also contribute to learners responding
positively to the reading challenge. The tutorial on Day 6 also aims at giving
learners an opportunity to discuss personal thoughts on their progress, without
peer pressure.
Backwash
16
whether further teaching should take place and assigns another test for
homework. It would be unrealistic not to include testing in an exams class, as
learners expect it-so I made sure that teaching precedes it and learners are
focused on it.
Materials selection
Learner autonomy
Instilling good study habits was my main aim in this respect. This is the reason
why, my learners valuing private study, I chose to set homework every day, be it
skills practice (reading) or lexis work (keeping a vocabulary notebook).
Homework is limited to one hour per session because some learners mentioned
they could not dedicate more time. Keeping a vocabulary notebook will help
learners store lexis in a practical way and aid them with recalling it, as they said
they remember things better when they write them. Everyday reading practice
through www.spreeder.com, will help them see day-to- day progress and it is
something they can continue using after the end of the course.
17
Institutional constraints
18
4. Assessment and Evaluation
It is not only the teacher’s wish to assess learners; learners on exam courses
also expect to be tested regularly (Burgess/Head 2005:11), some of them even
expect the corpus of the course to be solely practice papers and are
disappointed if this is not the case. Responding to learners’ expectations,
formative assessment is one of the pillars of this course, as it is the basis for
constructive feedback and offers learners the opportunity to become more
aware and improve their performance.
Objectiv Assessment
e
19
activities.
All tests, except D4c and D5d, are from knowledgeable, reliable publishers and
UCLES, the examination body administering CPE exams, so have greater content
validity than self-made assessments.
‘Summative tests are administered at the end of courses and their objective is to
see if students have achieved the objectives set out in the syllabus’
(Harris/McCann 1994:28) The summative assessment for this course consists in
an entire Reading and Use of English CPE paper, done under exam conditions. It
will be marked objectively , with right or wrong answers (Hughes 2003:19). Even
though the focus of this course has been on Reading and only part of the use of
20
English tasks, the test may lack construct validity, but it will still provide the
teacher with an idea of learners’ progress.
4.3 Backwash
4.4 Evaluation
21
Formal ways include a questionnaire (Appendix 8) given to the students after the
end of the course based on the objectives of they course as they will have been
outlined on the first day. It is important that learners are aware of the objectives
and it is even more important to see whether they are able to link the course
content to them. The questionnaire will be distributed via the Facebook group so
learners may choose whether they want to return it handwritten or typed in the
school’s ‘Suggestions’ box.
Informal ways of course evaluation include informal interviews with the learners
and my own reflection notes (Richards 1990) which I will be taking throughout
the course so I can reformulate and adjust it to learners’ emergent needs and
wishes.
22
5. Conclusion
The course I propose provides my students with intensive practice in the one of
the skills that they are least confident in and some practice in language. It will
boost their confidence and take off some of the pressure, as Paper 1 weighs 40%
of the total marks for CPE and they are relatively strong in other papers.
The course encourages learners to develop good study habits, ones that will
accompany them after the completion of this course and during their future
studies, particularly the habits of reading to improve speed, dealing with
unknown vocabulary and finding a practical way of storing lexis.
Through objectives R2/R3/ R2, students become aware of the sub-skills required
in order to approach not only the reading comprehension part of the exam, but
several parts of the use of English and listening too. They also deal with a shared
problem: unknown lexis. Instead of feeding my students with long word lists, I
chose to train them in finding meaning through textual clues, a skill which is
transferrable not only to other examination types, but also to general English
reading. Honest, direct and constructive feedback is one of the main focuses in
lessons, as in this course learners will have to opportunity to actually learn why
they make mistakes and find ways around their issues.
Given the interests of the group in studying English, one can see their high
levels of motivation. I know most students because I have taught them before,
so I can advise them and help them handle the course pressure effectively.
The materials used are mainly published materials and remain exam-like, as
students expect. This will hep them feel safer and in control of their progress.
Course limitations
23
As the course designed is for 21.5 hours only, I chose to focus on reading skills
and affixation. This meant that I had to leave out of the course design other
areas of weakness, such as the entire use of English part and some aspects of
writing which were made obvious through the diagnostic assessment.
Not dealing with the entirety of the use of English paper may result in
demotivating students during the summative assessment but I am convinced
that they will see the progress they will have made in comprehension in all tasks
of the use of English paper, as they all require some degree of using reading
comprehension sub-skills.
On the whole, I feel the benefits outweigh the limitations, and that the course
will fulfil my students’ needs.
24
1.
6. Bibliography
Burgess, S. and Head, K. 2005 How to Teach for Exams Pearson Longman: Harlow
Graves, K. 2000 Designing Language Courses: A Guide for Teachers Heinle &
Heinle: Boston
Harlow
Cambridge
Cambridge
25
Materials for Classroom Activities
26
7. Appendices
Course Aim
Course Objectives
27
cohesive devices, understanding and using them to
retrieve information
28
The course is a 21.50-hour excerpt from a course, with a focus on reading skills and use of English. For the first two
week, five lessons take place on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, each lesson is four hours (four 50-minute
sessions) and takes place between 10:00 and 14:00. This will be followed by a one-hour-and-thirty-minute lesson on
the last Friday between 12:30 and 14:00, during which summative assessment will take place. Students are expected
to dedicate approximately one hour to their homework per session. Students are already members of
www.facebook.com (a social network) where homework tasks will be posted, having been given in class and which will
be used as a means of communication within members of the class. Students will have the option of handing in
homework through email. Unless otherwise stated, all web pages used will be printed.
Note: all assessment is underlined in the course proposal. Summative assessment is on Day 6. All other assessment
Week 1
Day Obj. Suggested activities and materials Time Topic(s)
D4 this class
a. Update (homework
on reading speed,tolearners
be assigned
shareby teacher, useful
experience 45
ways
Ss of
aretravel
introduced to www.spreeeder.com, showed its
functions
c. Ss visit and settings so they can use it for choose
http://www.alexrobertsontextor.com/, every one
R2, 40 Travel
session
blogpost and tell their partner about the place visited or
R3
tipsWholeclass
they read about. Whileabout
discussion reading, theytips
general canand
taketechniques
notes
andused
underline lexis they
when reading formay need to ask afterwards.
comprehension
R1 25 Arts,
Wholeclass
d. Ss take the textdiscussion: Why do
‘Imelda Marcos’ we travel? Is travelling
from people
easier nowadays? How?
http://www.examenglish.com/ and put it in spreeder,
Feedback.
Homework set:
section
(exam practice)
Feedback
U1 Feedback issues
10
g. Overview of course
30min
Frida
& time
y
for
tutori
als
7.2 Appendix 2: Needs Analysis and Diagnostic Test: collated
results
A. Personal Details
A1: Name
Kyriaki (Kiki)
Paraskevi
Elisavet(Elisa)
Antigoni-Maria
Maria
Margaret
Panagiota (Giota)
Panagiotis
A2: Nationality
18-25 6
26-30 2
over 30 0
A4: First language
University student 3
Graduate 3
Postgraduate student 1
Postgraduate diploma 1
holder
Other 0
Maria English
1-3 years 0
4-6 years 1
At a public school 0
Self-taught 0
Other 0
B1-B2 0
C1-C2 8
A10: How much time can you dedicate to homework on a weekly basis?
3-6 hours 2
Margaret December
Giota In 6 months
Yes 3
No 5
No 4
Other 0
B5: Which part of the exam do you want to work most on?
Reading 1
Use of English 4
Listening 1
Writing 2
Speaking 0
Yes 6
No 2
C. Reading Comprehension
2 1
3 5
4 2
I find it easy 5 0
Reading magazines 0 2 4 2 0
Reading newspapers 1 2 4 0 1
Kiki: Vocabulary
Elisa: Part 6
Antigoni: Concentrating
Margaret: Vocabulary
D. Use of English
I find it difficult 1 0
2 3
3 2
4 3
I find it easy 5 0
Practising online on 4 3 1 0 0
several websites
I find it difficult 1 0
2 0
3 4
4 2
I find it easy 5 2
Antigoni: study
Margaret: by studying it
Kiki: part 4
Maria: ---
Margaret:phrasal verbs
Giota: tenses
Panagiotis: no difficulties
Very poor 1 0
2 1
3 1
4 3
Very good 5 3
I find it difficult 1 1
2 3
3 0
4 4
I find it easy 5 0
I find it difficult 1 1
2 2
3 1
4 4
I find it easy 5 0
Elisa: I can not memorise iteasily and I cannot remember all the meanings at
once
Margaret:----
Giota: none
E. Listening
I find it difficult 1 0
2 1
3 2
4 3
I find it easy 5 2
Listening to music 0 0 0 1 7
Watching television/films 0 0 0 3 5
in English (no subtitles)
Margaret:----
Giota: none
F. Writing
I find it difficult 1 0
2 1
3 4
4 3
I find it easy 5 0
F3: How do you practise your writing skills outside class?
Margaret: grammar
Giota: syntax
G. Speaking
G1: Which statement applies to you?
I find it difficult 1 0
2 0
3 1
4 3
I find it easy 5 4
Speaking to friends(who 1 0 2 0 5
speak the same language
as me)
Kiki: vocabulary
Elisa: I feel stressed and even though I know how to express myself, I confuse or
forget the vocabulary
Maria: ---
Margaret:nothing
Giota: syntax
H. Topics, Interests
H1: Do you think you can speak/write about the following topics?
Travel, entertainment, 0 0 3 5
leisure
People, families, 0 0 4 4
appearances, feelings
Technology, computers, 0 4 3 1
space travel
Social problems 0 1 5 2
Environmental issues 0 4 3 1
Work, business 0 2 5 1
Education issues, 0 1 5 2
university life
Health, fitness, 1 3 3 1
medicine, sports
Economy, advertising 0 4 4 0
Media, journalism, 0 2 4 2
communication
Travel, 0 0 1 7 0
entertainment,
leisure
People, families, 0 1 2 5 0
appearances,
feelings
Technology, 1 3 1 3 0
computers, space
travel
Social problems 1 1 0 6 0
Environmental 1 1 2 4 0
issues
Work, business 0 3 2 3 0
Education issues, 0 1 1 6 0
university life
Health, fitness, 1 1 5 1 0
medicine, sports
Economy, 0 4 1 2 1
advertising
Media, journalism, 0 3 1 3 1
communication
I. Learning Styles
Working alone 2
Working in groups 2
No 0
Not much 1
A lot 3
Every day 4
Internet 8
Podcasts 2
Educational software 2
Educational TV programmes 2
I5: Check what applies to you (more than one may be possible)
I am good at maths 2
I am good at drawing/painting. 1
I do a lot of sport. 1
Kiki 14 40
Paraskevi 29 80
Elisa 17 47
Antigoni 23 64
Maria 20 56
Margaret 23 64
Giota 17 47
Panagiotis 25 70
1 B D, A Unknown lexis,
unknown
collocation
5 C D, B Unknown
collocation
Spelling
Kiki 14 39
Paraskevi 29 80
Elisa 20 55
Antigoni 29 80
Maria 16 45
Margaret 23 63
Giota 20 55
Panagiotis 23 63
51 C B, E, F Illogical answers.
Part 3: Writing
Kiki 21 52.5
Paraskevi 31 77.5
Elisa 21 52.5
Antigoni 28 70
Maria 25 62.5
Margaret 25 62.5
Giota 25 62.5
Panagiotis 27 67.5
Kiki 10 3 3 3 1
Paraskevi 18 5 5 4 4
Elisa 12 4 3 2 3
Minor errors
Antigoni 15 4 4 4 3
Minor errors
Maria 12 4 3 3 2
Minor errors
Margaret 13 4 3 4 3
Minor errors
Giota 12 4 3 3 2
Minor errors
Panagiotis 15 4 4 4 3
Minor errors
Writing Part 2
Kiki- letter 11 4 2 3 2
Exceeded Variety of
word count grammatica
l forms
Minor errors
Paraskevi- 13 4 3 4 3
review Points Communicates very well- uses a
relevant complex ideas organised range of
to the vocabulary
Holds target wide range
topic and less
reader’s of cohesive
common
Target attention devices
lexis
reader Fulfills used with precisely
fully communicativ complete uses a wide
informed e purpose flexibility range of
coherent simple and
complex
grammatica
l forms
Elisa- article 9 2 1 3 3
Antigoni- 13 4 3 3 3
report Points Communicates text is well- uses a
relevant complex ideas organised range of
to the vocabulary
Holds target coherent
topic and less
reader’s uses a
common
Target attention variety of
reader Fulfills cohesive lexis
fully communicativ devices precisely
informed e purpose uses a wide
range of
simple and
complex
grammatica
l forms
Maria- letter 13 4 3 4 2
Minor errors
Margaret- 12 4 3 3 2
report Points Communicates text is well- Range of
relevant complex ideas organised vocabulary
to the Holds target coherent Uses less
topic reader’s common
uses a
Target attention lexis
variety of
reader Fulfills cohesive Precise
fully communicativ devices most of the
informed
e purpose time
Variety of
grammatica
l forms
Minor errors
Giota- report 13 4 3 4 2
Minor errors
Panagiotis- 12 4 3 3 2
review Points Communicates text is well- Range of
relevant complex ideas organised vocabulary
to the Holds target coherent Uses less
topic reader’s common
uses a
Target attention lexis
variety of
reader Fulfills cohesive Precise
fully communicativ devices most of the
informed e purpose time
Variety of
grammatica
l forms
Minor errors
Part 4: Listening
Kiki 13 44
Paraskevi 29 97
Elisa 23 77
Antigoni 23 77
Maria 18 60
Margaret 23 77
Giota 25 77
Panagiotis 24 80
16 B C, A C- illogical answer
Total Scores
Students Percentage
Kiki 55%
Paraskevi 85%
Elisa 78%
Antigoni 83%
Maria 58%
Margaret 67%
Giota 74%
Panagiotis 70%
Overall scores
By Paper
By Learner