Patterns of Creactive Protein Ratio Response To Antibiotics in Pediatric Sepsis A Prospective Cohort Study

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Journal of Critical Care 44 (2018) 217–222

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Critical Care

journal homepage: www.jccjournal.org

Patterns of C-reactive protein ratio response to antibiotics in pediatric


sepsis: A prospective cohort study☆
Vanessa Soares Lanziotti a,b,c,⁎, Pedro Póvoa e,f, Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa a,d, Lucas Berbet Pulcheri g,
Ligia S.C.F. Rabello a,b, José Roberto Lapa e Silva b, Marcio Soares a,b, Jorge I.F. Salluh a,b
a
D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
b
Postgraduate Program in Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
c
Institute of Pediatrics and Child Care Martagão Gesteira, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro- UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
d
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
e
NOVA Medical School, New University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
f
Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal
g
Rios D'Or Hospital, Rede D'Or São Luiz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Keywords: Purpose: Evaluate sequential C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements and patterns of CRP-ratio response to
C-reactive protein antibiotic therapy during first 7 days in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of septic children.
Sepsis Methods: Prospective, cohort study of children (1 month-12 years) admitted at 3 PICUs, with diagnosis of sepsis
Biomarkers
with b72 h course. CRP-ratio was calculated in relation to D0_CRP value. Children were classified according to an
Children
Pediatric intensive care unit
individual pattern of CRP-ratio response: fast – CRP_D4 of therapy was b0.4 of D0_CRP; slow – continuous but
Outcome slow decrease of CRP; non – CRP remained ≥ 0.8 of D0_CRP; biphasic – initial CRP decrease to levels b0.8 of
D0_CRP followed by secondary rise ≥0.8.
Results: 103 septic children (age-median: 2 yrs; 54% male) were prospectively included (infection focus: 65%
respiratory, 12.5% central nervous system). Overall PICU mortality was 11.7%. 102 children could be classified ac-
cording to a predefined CRP-ratio response pattern. Time-dependent analysis of CRP-ratio and CRP course of the
different patterns were significantly different. Besides, PICU mortality rate was significantly different according
CRP-ratio response patterns: fast response 4.5%; slow response 5.8%; non-response 29.4%; biphasic response
42.8%.
Conclusions: In pediatric sepsis, CRP-ratio serial evaluation was useful in early identification of patients with poor
outcome.
© 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction pediatric sepsis [5,6]. However, the assessment of the response to treatment
is still based on clinical judgment which is frequently insufficient for an
Sepsis is a major cause of admission to pediatric intensive care units early recognition of outcomes in children with sepsis [1,2]. Thus, biomarkers
(PICU) [1,2]. In the last decade, a number of initiatives were implemented have been proposed to aid physicians in the clinical decision-making process
aiming to achieve a better understanding of sepsis concepts [3,4], as well as [7-9]. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a biomarker well acknowledged for its diag-
to improve morbidity and mortality, namely through higher diagnosis aware- nostic value in pediatric sepsis, with low cost, widely available and easy to in-
ness and early antibiotic therapy and specific guidelines for treatment of terpret [9,10]. However, there is still little evidence in pediatric patients on the
use of CRP as a surrogate marker of outcomes and most available studies are
limited to neonates [10,11], infants [12,13] and adults [14-16].
Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; CRPr, C-reactive protein ratio; ICU, Intensive
Care Unit; IEC, Institutional Ethics Committee; IQR, interquartile range; LOS, length of Since CRP has 1st order elimination kinetics, relative changes could
stay; MV, mechanical ventilation; PELOD, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction; PICU, be more informative than absolute. Using CRP-ratio, that is the relative
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. CRP changes in relation to its initial concentration, patients could be
☆ Financial support: Drs. Salluh & Soares are supported in part by individual research
classified according to different patterns of response that were shown
grants from CNPq (302963/2015-4 and 304240/2014-1) and FAPERJ (E26103.048/2012).
⁎ Corresponding author at: Rua Diniz Cordeiro, 30 – Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22281-
to be associated with different outcomes [15]. Besides, some studies
100, Brazil. had shown that despite its low specificity, CRP has unique characteris-
E-mail address: [email protected] (V.S. Lanziotti). tics that are advantageous for its use in critically ill patients- its

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.018
0883-9441/© 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Downloaded for Mahasiswa FK UKDW 01 ([email protected]) at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on January 10, 2019.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
218 V.S. Lanziotti et al. / Journal of Critical Care 44 (2018) 217–222

concentrations are not changed by immunosupression or use of system- range, IQR) according to data distribution. Comparisons between
ic corticosteroids (including in critically adult patients with sepsis and groups were performed using the unpaired and paired t-test, or the
neutropenia, for example) and frequent therapies or interventions, as Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (for comparison
renal replacement therapy for instance, as occurs with other biomarkers between 2 groups) and ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis test (for comparison
as procalcitinin [17-19]. between 4 groups) for continuous variables according to data distribu-
The aim of the present study was to assess serial CRP measurements tion. The Fisher's exact test was used to carry out comparisons between
and the outcomes associated with patterns of CRP-ratio response to categorical variables. Time-dependent analysis of CRP was performed
antibiotic therapy during the first 7 days in the PICU, in children with via General Linear Model (GLM) univariate repeated-measures analysis
sepsis. using a split-plot design approach. The SPSS version 20.0 software pack-
age (Chicago, IL, USA) and Prism 7.0 (Graphpad, USA) were used for sta-
2. Materials and methods tistical analysis. In all cases, statistical significance was defined as a two-
tailed test with an alpha of 0.05.
2.1. Study design, subjects and setting
3. Results
We conducted a prospective observational cohort study in three
PICUs at tertiary hospitals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Instituto de 3.1. Main characteristics of the study population
Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira- IPPMG- Federal University
of Rio de Janeiro, Copa D'Or Hospital and Rio's D'Or Hospital). Pediatric During the study period, 103 out of the 112 patients that fulfilled the
patients (1 month to 12 years) with sepsis diagnosis with b 72 h of hos- eligibility criteria were included (Fig. 1); 9 patients were excluded since
pital admission were consecutively included between July 2013 and July they had no sequential CRP measurements (Fig. 1).
2016. The present study was strictly observational and did not interfere The main characteristics of the studied population are depicted in
with clinical management or clinical decision-process. The Institutional Table 1. The median age was 2 years old, respiratory tract was the
Ethics Committees (IECs) approved the study (D'Or Institute for main site of primary infection (65%; 3% upper respiratory infections,
Research and Education IEC – No 178.663/December 2012 and IPPMG/ 62% lung), followed by central nervous system (12.5%) and abdominal
UFRJ IEC – No 190.152/January 2013) and as no interventions were (6.8%). 71% of the patients required vasopressors during PICU stay and
performed, the need for informed consent was waived. 69% required invasive mechanical ventilation. The overall PICU and
90-day mortality rates were the same (11.7%).
2.2. Definitions and data collection 14.5% (N = 15) of infections were microbiologically documented
(54% Gram-negative bacteria, 19%, Gram-positive bacteria, 19% virus
Sepsis was diagnosed according to the international pediatric sepsis and one Mycobacterium tuberculosis). Detailed data of microbiological
consensus definitions (3). Demographic, clinical, laboratory and documentation is shown in Table 2.
outcome data were prospectively collected, using standardized case re- Considering that our overall study population was very heteroge-
port forms, including age, gender, comorbidities, primary infection site, neous, in order to provide information in a more homogeneous sub-
presence of nosocomial infection, use of vasopressors, dialysis and me- group of patients, we analysed the 64 patients with lung infections.
chanical ventilation (invasive and non-invasive). Comorbidity was de- The results were comparable to those of the overall population. Data is
fined as the presence of underlying disease and/or chronic comorbid provided in the electronic supplementary material.
conditions, such as genetic syndrome, encephalopathy, heart disease
and immunodeficiency. Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) 3.2. C-reactive protein, organ failure course and CRP-ratio patterns of
score (20) was calculated daily using clinical and laboratory data response to antibiotic therapy in survivors and non-survivors
routinely collected during the first week of PICU stay. Empiric antibiotic
and supportive therapies were started upon PICU admission according Time course of CRP concentrations during the first week of antibiotic
to local guidelines and international guidelines for sepsis and septic therapy is shown in Fig. 2 A. Time dependent analysis of CRP values
shock (5).Patients were followed until death or hospital discharge. An from D0 to D6 between survivors and non-survivors showed a significant
additional follow-up for 90-day mortality was also performed for all decrease in survivors whereas it remained almost unchanged in non-
patients, after PICU or hospital discharge, through phone calls or survivors (P b 0.0001). As early as D2, this difference was already present,
checking hospital electronic data system. and by D4 of antibiotic therapy, this divergent evolution of CRP values was
CRP was sampled every other day from admission (D0) to D6 of PICU markedly different between survivors and non-survivors (P = 0.01).
stay (D0, D2, D4, D6). CRP-ratio was calculated in relation to the D0 CRP Time dependent analysis of the course of PELOD values from D0 to
value. Patients were retrospectively classified according to predefined D6 between survivors and non-survivors are shown in Fig. 2 B. PELOD
CRP- ratio patterns of response to antibiotics [15,16]: 1) fast response – score values were significantly different (GLM P b 0.0001) and the dif-
when CRP at D4 of therapy was ≤0.4 of D0 CRP concentration; 2) slow ference is marked since D2 of antibiotic therapy, with significantly
response – characterized by a continuous but slow decreased of CRP lower values in survivors. Patients included in the study were divided
(CRP at D4 N 0.4 and at D6 ≤ 0.8 of D0 CRP); 3) non-response – when according to the four patterns of the CRP-ratio course during antibiotic
CRP remained always N 0.8 of D0 CRP; 4) biphasic response – therapy, as previously described. Out of the 103 patients, 102 could be
characterized by an initial CRP decrease to levels ≤0.8 of D0 CRP followed classified: 43% were classified as fast response (N = 44), 33.5% as slow
by a secondary rise N 0.8 of D0 CRP. Comparisons between survivors and response (N = 34), 16.5% as non-response (N = 17) and 7% as biphasic
non-survivors and between the four different CRP-ratio patterns were response (N = 7). The time-dependent analysis of CRP-ratio of the four
performed. different patterns was significantly different (P = 0.023), as shown in
Fig. 3 A. The time-dependent analysis of PELOD values in the four differ-
2.3. Data processing and statistical analysis ent patterns of CRP-ratio response to antibiotics is shown in Fig. 3 B. We
observed that PELOD course on the first week of antibiotic therapy were
Data entry was performed by a single investigator (VSL) and consis- significantly different in the different patterns (P = 0.027). Patients
tency was assessed with a rechecking procedure of a 10% random sam- classified as fast response had a continuous and faster improvement of
ple of patients. Data were screened in detail for missing information, organ dysfunctions (decrease of PELOD value) as compared to patients
implausible and outlying values. Continuous variables were reported who were classified as slow response during the first week of antibiotic
as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (25% to 75% interquartile therapy. Patients classified as biphasic response had slightly increased

Downloaded for Mahasiswa FK UKDW 01 ([email protected]) at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on January 10, 2019.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
V.S. Lanziotti et al. / Journal of Critical Care 44 (2018) 217–222 219

Fig. 1. Study flow chart.

in PELOD values by D2, followed by a slight decrease. Patients classified and classified as responders (fast plus slow response) and with no CRP
as non-response had an initial increase in PELOD values (D2) followed decrease as non-responders (non-response plus biphasic) and performed
by later decrease in the values. a comparison between them (Fig. 4B) where we can observe a clear
We also compared the absolute PELOD changes during the first week graphic difference, with an evident negative and continuous PELOD vari-
of antibiotic therapy on the four different patterns of CRP-ratio response ation on responders. However, the curves were not significantly different.
that are shown in Fig. 4A. We grouped patients with initial CRP decrease CRP-ratio patterns of response presented significant different PICU
mortality rates (Fig. 5): 4.5% of mortality in patients with the fast
response; 5.8% in patients with slow response; 29.4% in non-response
patients and 42.8% in biphasic response patients (P = 0.001). When
Table 1
Clinical patients' characteristics and comparison between PICU survivors and non- we grouped the patterns of CRP-ratio response with good outcome
survivors. (responders- fast response and slow response patterns) and bad
outcome (non-responders–non-response and biphasic response) the
Characteristics All patients PICU survivors PICU P
(n = 103; (n = 91; 88%) nonsurvivors value⁎
mortality rate were, respectively, 5.1% and 33% (P = 0.0001). We also
100%) (n = 12; 12%) analyzed additional outcomes as ventilator-free days, hospital and
Age (years) 2 [0.5–5.2] 2[0,6–4.9] 0.75 [0,5–6.2] 0.602
PICU length of stay (21) in the different CRP-ratio response patterns to
Gender (male) 56 (54%) 49 (54%) 7 (58%) 0.999 antibiotics. Ventilator-free days median was calculated for each
PELOD score – D0 (points) 1 [1−11] 1 [1–10.5] 1.5 [1–11] 0.237
Sites of primary infection 0.541
Respiratory 67 (65%) 59 (65%) 8 (66%) Table 2
Central nervous system 13 (12.5%) 11 (12%) 2 (17%) Microorganisms from the 15 (14.5%) pediatric patients with sepsis.
Abdominal 7 (6.8%) 6 (6.5%) 1 (8.5%)
Microorganism N = 15 Isolated site
Urinary 4 (4%) 4 (4.5%) 0(0%)
Other 12 (11.7%) 11 (12%) 1 (8.5%) Gram-negative organisms N=8
Microbiological 15 (14.5%) 13 (14.3%) 2 (16.6%) 0.826 Escherichia coli N=4 Urine (N = 3); blood (N = 1)
documentation Neisseria meningitidis N=2 Blood (N = 2)
Comorbidity 34 (33%) 29 (32%) 5 (42%) 0.524 Acinetobacter baumannii N=1 Blood (N = 1)
Vasopressors 71 (69%) 59 (65%) 12 (100%) 0.016 Pseudomonas aeruginosa N=1 Cerebrospinal fluid (N = 1)
Dialysis 6 (6%) 1 (1%) 5 (42%) 0.001 Gram-positive organisms N=3
Non-invasive MV 38 (37%) 36 (40%) 2 (17%) 0.202 Streptoccoccus pyogenes N=2 Blood (N = 1); pleural fluid
Invasive MV 71 (69%) 59 (65%) 12 (100%) 0.016 (N = 1)
CRP (D0) (mg/dL) 6.9 7 [4.3–21.6] 5.5 [3.7–20.6] 0.751 Methicilin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus N=1 Blood (N = 1)
[4.05–21.6] Mycobacteria N=1
Mycobacterium tuberculosis N=1 Peritoneal fluid
Results expressed as median (25%–75% interquartile range) and number (%). Abbrevia-
Virus N=3 Nasopharyngeal aspirate
tions: CRP, C-reactive protein; PICU, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; PELOD, Pediatric Logis-
Respiratory syncytial virus N=2
tic Organ Dysfunction; MV, mechanical ventilation.
Bocavirus N=1
⁎ P value for comparison among patients PICU mortality.

Downloaded for Mahasiswa FK UKDW 01 ([email protected]) at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on January 10, 2019.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
220 V.S. Lanziotti et al. / Journal of Critical Care 44 (2018) 217–222

Fig. 2. 2A — C-Reactive Protein (CRP) of survivors and non-survivors pediatric septic critically ill patients. Time course of CRP concentrations (mg/dL) for survivors and non-survivors
pediatric septic critically ill patients during the first week of antibiotic therapy. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P b 0.0001). 2B — PELOD course of
survivors and non-survivors pediatric septic critically ill patients. Time course of PELOD values for survivors and non-survivors septic critically ill patients during the first week of
antibiotic therapy. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P b 0.0001).

different pattern and patients with fast response, slow response, non- in the slow response patients; 14 [9-18] in non-response patients and
response and biphasic response patterns presented a ventilator-free 13 [10-27] in biphasic response patients (P = 0.057).
days medians [IQR 25–75] of 22.5 [18.75–26.25]; 23.5 [13.75–27.5]; 16 We also analyzed the rate of nosocomial infections according to four
[0–20.37] and 19 [0–20.5], respectively, and we observed a gradient CRP-ratio patterns of response: fast response 11.3% (N = 5); slow re-
from responders to non-responders (P = 0.020). Regarding PICU length sponse 14.7% (N = 5); non-response 41.1% (N = 7); biphasic response
of stay (LOS) it was 9 [6–13.25] in the fast response patients; 10 [7–17.5] 42.8% (N = 3) (P = 0.02). Nosocomial infections rates were significantly
higher on the patterns with poor outcomes (non-response and biphasic
response). Analyzing specifically patients with biphasic response pattern
we found that the secondary rise of CRP was coincident with the day of
nosocomial infection (D4) in all biphasic patients who presented nosoco-
mial infection (N = 3).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we described the course of CRP in pediatric sep-


tic critically ill patients and observed an association between individual
patterns of CRP-ratio response and PICU mortality rates. Patients with a
substantial decrease in CRP values and with CRP-ratio patterns of fast
response and slow response presented a significant lower mortality
rate when compared to those patients with no decrease on CRP sequen-
tial values and with CRP-ratio patterns of non-response and biphasic
response.
These data suggest that persistently elevated CRP values are indica-
tive of poor response to antibiotic therapy. Although there are many
reasons for the unfavorable outcomes and the lack of recovery of
multi-organ dysfunction in sepsis, one of the potentially modifiable
reason is inadequate initial antibiotic therapy as well as the occurrence
of a nosocomial infection [16,22,23]. In those with biphasic response,
albeit very small absolute numbers, we observed that the 3 patients
that presented nosocomial infection (43% of 7 patients classified as
biphasic) during the first week of PICU admission had the secondary
CRP rise coincident with the day of diagnosis of nosocomial infection.
Future studies with larger number of patients should be performed to
corroborate this finding.
Fig. 3. 3A — Time-dependent analysis of CRP-ratio in different response patterns. Data are Several studies, especially in adults, have confirmed that sequential
presented as exactly means. Values of CRP-ratio in the different patterns were significantly
CRP measurements are a useful tool to monitor clinical course, evaluate
different (P = 0.023). 3B — Time-dependent analysis of PELOD in different response
patterns. Data are presented as means. PELOD values variation in the different patterns antibiotic efficacy and need for antibiotic changes, and mortality predic-
were significantly different (P = 0.027). tion [14-16], having better value as a prognostic predictor than using

Downloaded for Mahasiswa FK UKDW 01 ([email protected]) at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on January 10, 2019.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
V.S. Lanziotti et al. / Journal of Critical Care 44 (2018) 217–222 221

Fig. 4. Absolute PELOD changes during the first week of antibiotic therapy. 4A — Absolute PELOD changes during the first week of antibiotic therapy in different CRP-ratio response
patterns. 4B — Absolute PELOD changes during the first week of antibiotic therapy in patients with CRP decrease (fast and slow response patterns) and CRP no decrease (biphasic and
nonresponse patterns).

only the absolute values [24,25]. However, data using the sequential worse. This can be explained by the fact that the early reversal of
approach is scarce in pediatric sepsis. organ failure is directly related to the outcomes (26). Besides, the reso-
Considering that CRP is widely available in most of PICUs, with easy lution of the sepsis induced inflammatory response, assessed by CRP,
access and low cost and that it has been one of the best-known inflam- seems to be surrogate of the reversal organ failure. Moreover, we eval-
matory biomarkers used in clinical practice for many years, CRP can be uate the absolute PELOD changes during the first week of antibiotic
confirmed as a key biomarker of response to antibiotic therapy when therapy on the 4 different patterns of CRP-ratio response (Fig. 4A) and
dynamically analyzed. This is a relevant aspect to justify its wide imple- compared responders and non-responders (4B), trying to overcome dif-
mentation especially in low-resource settings. We also performed a ferences of PELOD values at PICU admission. Although the differences
time-dependent analysis of PELOD score variation in the different were not statistically significant, we could observe evident graphic dif-
CRP- ratio patterns of response. We found that in the patients with ferences on the curves, showing more evident negative variations of
CRP-ratio response patterns of fast or slow, PELOD score presented PELOD on the responders (fast and slow response pattern).
marked decreases. On the opposite, in biphasic response patients, Given the low mortality rates among critically ill children, alterna-
PELOD remained almost unchanged over the first 7 days of antibiotic tive endpoints such as ventilator free days, hospital and PICU length of
treatment. And, in patients with non-response pattern, we observed stay are being strongly recommended [21]. Besides the main outcome
an initial increase followed by a decrease in PELOD average value, al- (PICU mortality), we compared the secondary outcomes on the four dif-
though the CRP had no decrease and outcomes of these patients were ferent patterns of CRP-ratio responses and the patients classified as non-
response and biphasic response had less ventilation free days, longer
PICU length of stay and higher mortality rates (PICU and 90 day mortal-
ity). We could observe that PICU LOS was higher in patients with no de-
crease CRP (non-response and biphasic response). Although P value
was on the limit of the statistical significance (P = 0.057) for this com-
parison, considering that literature definition for long stay patients in
the PICU is longer than 12 days [27], we can include patients classified
as non-response and biphasic response patterns, with median PICU
LOS of 14 and 13 days, respectively, and higher mortality, as long stay
patients, which does not happen with the patients with substantial de-
crease of CRP (fast and slow response). Since literature has also shown
that patients with a longer ICU length of stay have higher mortality
[27,28], this finding must be considered, corroborating with the worst
outcomes in the nonresponder patterns that presented longer PICU
length of stay and higher mortalities.
The present study has some limitations. First, considering the rates
Fig. 5. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) mortality in the 4 CRP-ratio (CRPr) response
of events as mortality and nosocomial infections, we have a relatively
patterns. Mortality rate was significantly different according to the CRPr pattern (P = small sample size (N = 103). However, we believe that this limitation
0.001). could be attenuated, since we included secondary outcomes as

Downloaded for Mahasiswa FK UKDW 01 ([email protected]) at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on January 10, 2019.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
222 V.S. Lanziotti et al. / Journal of Critical Care 44 (2018) 217–222

alternative endpoints to better evaluate outcomes. The low percentage [3] Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A. International pediatric sepsis consensus confer-
ence: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care
of microbiological documentation (14.5%) is also a limitation. However, Med 2005 Jan;6(1):2–8.
as the positivity of cultures for hospitalized children with severe infec- [4] Kissoon N, Carcillo JA, Espinosa V, Argent A, Devictor D, Madden M, et al. World Fed-
tions presents a very wide range (from less than 5% of blood cultures eration of Pediatric Intensive Care and Critical Care Societies: global sepsis initiative.
Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011 Sep;12(5):494–503.
up to more than 70%), we position our data on the lower end of it [1, [5] The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric
23,27,29]. Recent multicenter studies that evaluate real world practices Subgroup*, Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, et al. Surviving
shows that blood cultures are collected in only a third of all patients and sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and sep-
tic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013 Feb;39(2):165–228.
is positive in 2,5% [29]. As our study was strictly observational and did [6] Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving
not interfere with the practice patterns, no specific protocol for microbi- sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic
ological work up was performed. There are some potential explanations shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017 Mar;43(3):304–77.
[7] Marshall JC, Reinhart K. Biomarkers of sepsis. Crit Care Med 2009 Jul;37(7):2290–8.
for our results. Automatic cultures were used on the 3 centers of the
[8] Kaplan JM, Wong HR. Biomarker discovery and development in pediatric critical
study. Unfortunately, we do not have data of all patients about use of an- care medicine. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011 Mar;12(2):165–73.
tibiotic prior to the cultures, specially because frequently, patients have [9] Póvoa P, Salluh JIF. Biomarker-guided antibiotic therapy in adult critically ill pa-
done first antibiotic dose at the Emergency room, ward or another hos- tients: a critical review. Ann Intensive Care 2012;2(1):32.
[10] McWilliam S, Riordan A. How to use: C-reactive protein. Arch Dis Child - Educ Pract
pital. Since antimicrobials are often used in the outpatient setting very 2010 Apr 1;95(2):55–8.
early on the process of care of these patients we cannot rule out that a [11] Patil S, Dutta S, Attri SV, Ray P, Kumar P. Serial C reactive protein values predict sen-
substantial percentage of them started oral antibiotics even before hos- sitivity of organisms to empirical antibiotics in neonates: a nested case–control
study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Nov 2016;101(6):F557–60. https://doi.org/
pital admission, reducing the yields of having positive cultures. Empiri- 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309158.
cal antibiotic therapy was used in all patients initially according to local [12] Hengst JM. The role of C-reactive protein in the evaluation and management of in-
guidelines and adjusted according to the cultures results. However, this fants with suspected sepsis. Adv Neonatal Care Off J Natl Assoc Neonatal Nurses
2003 Feb;3(1):3–13.
specific data was not collected for the present study, which is also a [13] Downes KJ, Weiss SL, Gerber JS, Klieger SB, Fitzgerald JC, Balamuth F, et al. A prag-
shortcoming. matic biomarker-driven algorithm to guide antibiotic use in the pediatric intensive
Moreover, in this study, we only evaluate one biomarker, CRP. Addi- care unit: the optimizing antibiotic strategies in sepsis (OASIS) study. J Pediatr Infect
Dis Soc 2017 Jun 1;6(2):134–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piw023.
tionally we have not evaluated markers to assess the immune status of a [14] Coelho LM, Salluh JI, Soares M, Bozza FA, Verdeal JCR, Castro-Faria-Neto HC, et al.
patient, namely immunoparalysis, however differently from cytokines Patterns of c-reactive protein RATIO response in severe community-acquired pneu-
or procalcitonin, there is substantial data demonstrating that monia: a cohort study. Crit Care 2012;16(2):R53.
[15] Povoa P. C-reactive protein as a marker of ventilator-associated pneumonia resolu-
immunesupression (e.g. use of steroids or presence of neutropenia)
tion: a pilot study. Eur Respir J 2005 May 1;25(5):804–12.
does not affect the course of CRP [16,17,19]. [16] Póvoa P, Souza-Dantas V, Soares M, Salluh JI. C-reactive protein in critically ill cancer
Despite limitations, this is the first study of this type of CRP analysis patients with sepsis: influence of neutropenia. Crit Care 2011;15(3):R129.
in pediatric septic patients and we believe it has shown relevant results [17] Salluh JIF, Soares M, Coelho LM, Bozza FA, Verdeal JCR, Castro-Faria-Neto HC, et al.
Impact of systemic corticosteroids on the clinical course and outcomes of patients
that could help pediatric intensive care physicians on the bedside clini- with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a cohort study. J Crit Care 2011 Apr;
cal decision-making process. 26(2):193–200.
[18] Dahaba AA, Rehak PH, List WF. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein plasma concen-
trations in nonseptic uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis. Intensive Care Med
5. Conclusions 2003 Apr;29(4):579–83.
[19] Salluh JI, Lisboa T. C-reactive protein in community-acquired sepsis: you can teach
new tricks to an old dog. Crit Care 2011;15(5):186.
In our study, the CRP-ratio pattern of response to antibiotics during [20] Leteurtre S, Martinot A, Duhamel A, Proulx F, Grandbastien B, Cotting J, et al. Valida-
the first week of therapy in septic critically ill pediatric patients could tion of the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score: prospective, obser-
be useful for the recognition of individual clinical evolution, namely vational, multicentre study. The Lancet 2003 Jul;362(9379):192–7.
[21] Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediatric acute respiratory
good or poor outcomes. In patients with persistently elevated or in- distress syndrome: consensus recommendations from the pediatric acute lung inju-
creasing CRP-ratio (non-response and biphasic response), physicians ry consensus conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed
should perform a thorough evaluation trying to identify a cause for Pediatr Intensive Crit Care Soc 2015 Jun;16(5):428–39.
[22] Povoa P, Coelho L, Almeida E, Fernandes A, Mealha R, Moreira P, et al. Pilot study
such an evolution. At a time where intensive care medicine is moving evaluating C-reactive protein levels in the assessment of response to treatment of
towards in a direction of personalized treatment aiming to improve out- severe bloodstream infection. Clin Infect Dis 2005 Jun 15;40(12):1855–7.
comes, we believe that these findings may be promising and feasible in [23] Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC, Balamuth F, Alpern ER, Lavelle J, Chilutti M, et al. Delayed an-
timicrobial therapy increases mortality and organ dysfunction duration in pediatric
low-resource settings.
sepsis. Crit Care Med 2014 Nov;42(11):2409–17.
[24] Póvoa P, Teixeira-Pinto AM, Carneiro AH, The Portuguese Community-Acquired
Appendix A. Supplementary data Sepsis Study Group (SACiUCI). C-reactive protein, an early marker of community-ac-
quired sepsis resolution: a multi-center prospective observational study. Crit Care
2011;15(4):R169.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi. [25] Póvoa P, Salluh JIF. Use of biomarkers in sepsis: many questions, few answers. Rev
org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.018. Bras Ter Intensiva 2013 Mar;25(1):1–2.
[26] Levy MM, Macias WL, Vincent J-L, Russell JA, Silva E, Trzaskoma B, et al. Early chang-
es in organ function predict eventual survival in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 2005
References Oct;33(10):2194–201.
[27] Marcin JP, Slonim AD, Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE. Long-stay patients in the pediatric
[1] Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC, Pappachan J, Wheeler D, Jaramillo-Bustamante JC, Salloo A, intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2001 Mar;29(3):652–7.
et al. Global epidemiology of pediatric severe sepsis: the sepsis prevalence, out- [28] Friedrich JO, Wilson G, Chant C. Long-term outcomes and clinical predictors of hos-
comes, and therapies study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015 May 15;191(10): pital mortality in very long stay intensive care unit patients: a cohort study. Crit Care
1147–57. 2006;10(2):R59.
[2] Ruth A, McCracken CE, Fortenberry JD, Hall M, Simon HK, Hebbar KB. Pediatric se- [29] Neuman MI, Hall M, Lipsett SC, et al. Utility of blood culture among children hospi-
vere sepsis: current trends and outcomes from the pediatric health information sys- talized with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatrics. Sep 2017;140(3).
tems database. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2014 Nov;15(9):828–38.

Downloaded for Mahasiswa FK UKDW 01 ([email protected]) at Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on January 10, 2019.
For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2019. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like