Assessment Criteria 1 Point 0.75 0.5 0
Assessment Criteria 1 Point 0.75 0.5 0
Assessment Criteria 1 Point 0.75 0.5 0
Assessment
1 point 0.75 0.5 0
criteria
Comprehensive, in- Up to date and relevant Relevant but not Little relevance/some
Knowledge depth and wide ranging comprehensive accuracy
Outstanding ability to High level of ability to Some ability to Minimal awareness that
grasp concepts and conceptualize essential conceptualize essential external concepts exist
Understanding
Relate theory to ideas and relate theory ideas and relate theory to
practice to practice practice
Assignment Most of the items At least ½ of the items Less than ½ of all items
All items attempted.
completeness attempted. attempted. attempted.
Responses or ideas
Responses do not
show clear
contribute new ideas.
connections to texts Few connections made.
Ideas or connections may Comments are limited
Connections we read, current Comments rehash or
lack some depth or detail. to “I agree” or “I
events, personal summarize other postings.
disagree” without
experiences, or prior
elaboration.
knowledge.
Assessment
2 point 1 0.5
criteria
Details and ideas are in logical Ideas are in random order and
Order Ideas are in logical order
order. not logical
Demonstrates basic
Demonstrates clear understanding Demonstrates adequate
Knowledge understanding of information
of information in the text. understanding.
in text.
The author uses vivid words and The writer uses a limited
The author uses vivid words and The author uses words
phrases. The choice and vocabulary. Jargon or
phrases. The choice and that communicate clearly,
Word Choice placement of words is clichés may be present
placement of words seems but the writing lacks
inaccurate at times and/or and detract from the
accurate, natural, and not forced. variety.
seems overdone. meaning.