Catalogo Tecnoweld
Catalogo Tecnoweld
Catalogo Tecnoweld
Abstract
Paint and impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) systems are used to
control corrosion on many different types of structures. Since cathodic protection
(CP) systems were first applied, engineers have used experience and intensive
monitoring to optimise their design to prevent corrosion. Numerical methods and
in particular Boundary Elements Methods (BEM) have been widely used in the
cathodic protection field to simulate the performance of the CP system and to
predict the associated electric and magnetic fields.
Special care must be taken when a new structure is commissioned as
additional stray currents could alter the performance of existing CP systems. In
this work, the influence of the cathodic protection system of a ship on a dock is
predicted using computer modelling. The damage that the cathodic protection
system of the ship could cause to the structure is highlighted and possible
mitigation measures assessed using the optimisation features of the modelling
software.
The data requirements and practical application of computer modelling is
discussed and other possible applications highlighted.
1 Introduction
Boundary Element Methods (BEM) have been used to simulate the behaviour of
cathodic protection systems since the late 70’s [1]. As the name implies, the
method requires elements to be created, but only on the boundary (or surfaces) of
the problem geometry.
The advantages of boundary elements for CP analysis are many, for instance:
- The meshes are only on the surface, hence only surface elements are
required. Mesh generators can be used with confidence, and models can be
constructed extremely quickly and inexpensively.
3 Stray currents
Stray current corrosion can be caused by the systems used to protect ship hulls
and buried structures, by the DC electrical systems used to power trolley cars,
and by a number of other sources. Stray current corrosion is of immense
economic importance, since it has led to such problems as rapid failure of buried
natural gas pipelines and water mains, and costly repairs to ship structures and
piers.
Figure 1: Stray current corrosion of the ICCP system of the ship to the dock.
ship’s anode through the seawater to the ship hull encounters a resistance due to
the resistivity of seawater. If the sheet piling is closer to the anode than sections
of the ship hull, the current has an alternate path that it may follow. It can travel
through a much shorter seawater path to the piling, through the low resistance
steel of the piling until it gets close to the ship hull, then through another short
seawater path between the piling and the hull to complete the circuit. At the point
where the current enters the piling, the steel is protected from corrosion the same
way as the ship hull is protected by the cathodic protection system. Where the
current leaves the piling to enter the seawater, the opposite occurs. The corrosion
of the steel piling in this area is dramatically increased. The magnitude of the
resulting stray current corrosion depends on how much the cathodic protection
current takes the alternate path through the piling.
The behaviour of the cathodic protection system of a frigate in open sea and
its influence, interference on a steel made dock, is shown in the next sections of
this paper. In addition, a possible mitigation of the interference by placing a
sacrificial cathodic protection system on the walls of the dock is also shown.
15
1.75m
0.16
1.2
Figure 9: Zinc anode dimensions.
1st row
15
The anodes were distributed on the wall of the dock as it is shown in figure
10. When no ship is near the dock the potential distribution is as shown in the
Figure 12.
3m
5.5m
Figure 12: Cathodic protection of the dock when no ships in its surroundings.
Figure 13: Cathodic protection of the dock when the frigate is berthed.
In addition, the current supplied by anodes on the frigate is very similar to the
current supplied when no anodes were placed on the dock. In contrast to the case
with no sacrificial anodes, the dock is protected from corrosion and no anodic
areas are found.
-3200
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
-3300
-3400
-3500
-3600
A n od e I D
-3700
Normal Curr ent (No Fr igat e) Normal Curr ent (Fr igat e)
Figure 14: Current supplied by the anodes when there was and there was not a
ship berthed (1st row).
Norm al current supplied by the zinc anodes, 2nd row
-3200
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
-3300
-3400
-3500
-3600
A no de I D
-3700
Figure 15: Current supplied by the anodes when there was and there was not
ship berthed (2nd row).
Norm al current supplied by the zinc anodes, 3rd row
-3300
-3350 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
-3400
-3450
-3500
-3550
-3600 A n od e I D
-3650
Figure 16: Current supplied by the anodes when there was and there was not
ship berthed (3rd row).
The impressed anodes of the frigate still supply current to the dock and the
current returns back to the frigate near the propeller position. However, the
current returning back from the sacrificial anodes causes a higher consumption
of these anodes. Thus, it can be seen in Figure 14–Figure 18 that the current
supplied by the sacrificial anodes of the dock near the impressed anodes supply
less current to the dock when the frigate is berthed than when there is no ship
around. In contrast, the sacrificial anodes near the propeller supply more current
to the dock and to the frigate.
Norm al current supplied by the zinc anodes, 4th row
-3300
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
-3400
-3500
-3600
A n od e I D
-3700
Figure 17: Current supplied by the anodes when there was and there was not
ship berthed (4th row).
- 3300
- 3350 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
- 3400
- 3450
- 3500
- 3550
- 3600
- 3650 A nod e I D
Figure 18: Current supplied by the anodes when there was and there was not a
ship berthed (5th row).
8 Conclusions
Quantitative data on the behaviour of the cathodic protection system of a frigate
in open sea and its influence/interference on a steel dock has been shown by
using computer simulation software. A possible mitigation of the interference by
placing a sacrificial cathodic protection system on the walls of the dock was
attempted with the results that still there were stray currents coming from the
frigate into the dock and from the sacrificial anodes of the dock back to the
frigate. Thus, the sacrificial anodes of the frigate placed near the propeller of the
frigate will be consumed faster than the rest. In contrast, the sacrificial anodes
placed near the impressed anodes of the frigate will last longer since the frigate is
providing part of the current necessary to protect the dock. Anode consumption
rates were predicted by the computer model under various possible scenarios.
The simulation has been carried out using the BEASY boundary elements
package software [1] and the assistance of an optimisation tool was essential to
obtain a faster convergence of the problem. It could be observed that 3D model
enables the impact of small changes to the geometric design, coating condition,
location of anodes etc to be easily assessed.
References
[1] Brebbia C.A, Boundary Element Method for Engineers, Pentech Press.
London, 1978.
[2] Danson, D.J. and Warne, M.A. Current Density/Voltage Calculations
Using Boundary Element Techniques, Corrosion/83. 1983.
[3] Thomas, E. D., Lucas, K. E., and Parks, A. R., Verification of Physical
Scale Modeling with Shipboard Trails, Corrosion 90, Paper 370, National
Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, TX, 1990.
[4] V.G. DeGiorgi, A. Kee, E.D. Thomas. Characterization accuracy in
modelling of corrosion systems. Boundary Elements XV. Vol. 1: Fluid
Flow and Computational Aspect. Editors: C.A. Brebbia, J.J. Rencis. CML
Publications, Southampton, 1993.
[5] Gartland P.O, Bjoernass F., Osvoll H. Computer modelling of offshore CP
systems for 15 years: What have we learnt? Corrosion NACE Expo 99,
San Antonio Texas. 1999.
[6] Adey, R.A., Brebbia, C.A., Niku, S.M. Applications of Boundary
Elements in Corrosion Engineering, Chapter 3, Topics in Boundary
Elements Research ed. Brebbia, C.A. Vol. 7, pp. 34-64, Springer - Verlag,
Berlin and New York, 1990.
[7] Roe D. Stommen, Computer modelling of offshore cathodic protection
systems utilized in CP monitoring. Offshore Technology Conference,
Texas, May 3-6, 1982.
[8] John Morgan. Cathodic Protection. National Association of Corrosion
Engineers, NACE. 1987.
[9] J. Trevelyan and H.P. HackThomas, Analysis of stray current corrosion
problems using the boundary element method. Boundary Element
Technology IX. 1994.
[10] E Santana Diaz, R Adey. A Computational Environment for the
Optimisation of CP system Performance and Signatures, Warship
CP2001. Shrivingham. UK, 2001.
[11] Adey R A, Hang P Y, Optimum Design of Ship Corrosion Protection
Using Computer Simulation, Computers and Ships Conference, The
Institute of Marine Engineers, London, UK, May 1999.