Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 21K views

    Satish Jain September 2012 Affidavit

    Uploaded by

    Tanvi Mishra
    In 2012, Satish Kumar Jain, a Chandigarh-based real-estate agent accused Surya Kant, then a sitting judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, of illegal property dealings involving undervaluation and cash transactions worth crores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved

    Satish Jain September 2012 Affidavit

    Uploaded by

    Tanvi Mishra
    21K views6 pages
    In 2012, Satish Kumar Jain, a Chandigarh-based real-estate agent accused Surya Kant, then a sitting judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, of illegal property dealings involving undervaluation and cash transactions worth crores.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    In 2012, Satish Kumar Jain, a Chandigarh-based real-estate agent accused Surya Kant, then a sitting judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, of illegal property dealings involving undervaluation and cash transactions worth crores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    21K views6 pages

    Satish Jain September 2012 Affidavit

    Uploaded by

    Tanvi Mishra
    In 2012, Satish Kumar Jain, a Chandigarh-based real-estate agent accused Surya Kant, then a sitting judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, of illegal property dealings involving undervaluation and cash transactions worth crores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    of 6
    ear! HARYANA 23AA 11411 \ b | | ‘ Affidavit 1, Satlsh Kumar Jain, S/o Late Sh. Shyam Lal Jain, Indian national of a sol { abouf60 years, resident of H No. 3439, Sector-27-D, Chandigarh, do solertty declye as under. 4. That the deponent is a businessman dealing in construction and real estate industry. . . \\ lertakes construction work on contract; it was ble Judge of the Punjab & Haryana ry Mr. Dinesh Gupta, to renovate the 4-10, 2. — That since the deponent . unde approached by Mr. Justice Surya Kant, Hon! High Court at Chandigarh, through his secretal } personal residence ‘of Honb'le Judge located at House No. 33, Sector ; Chancigarm ON ee That the said work was completed by the deponent at an expense of Rs. 11.70 lacs. That subsequently, the Honb'le Judge made the deponent undertake renovation for his 15 acre farm house located on Barwala Road near Panchkula, Haryana. That the said work was completed and a sum of Rs. 4.20 lacs spent by the deponent on the same. “That the deponent was made to spend a sum of Rs. 3.10 lacs by the ‘Honb'le Judge, for providing curtains and a new double bed in House No 277 Sector 16, Chandigarh. That the Honbile Judge did not pay even a single penny to the deponent against any of the works ie. two works at Chandigarh as well as one on Banwala Road, cumulatively amounting to Rs. 19.00 lacs, for a prolonged period said bill Dt. 15/04/11 is attached herewith. That the deponent waited patiently for the release of its requesting the Honb'le Judge through his secretary, Mr Din h release of the said amount. ade That the Honb'le Judge has made a payment against the said works executed by the deponent, on 12/09/12, Le. after filing of the complaint under reference, vide Cheque No. 070270 Dt. 12/09/12 and 070271 Dt. 12/09/12 drawn on HDFC bank, Sector-32-C, Chandigarh Branch, amounting to Rs. 5.00 laos and Rs. 1,00 lacs, respectively. An 4 ase That apart from the above mentioned transactions; the deponent was approached by the Honb'le Judge to dispose off a benami property consisting of a farm house on Nahan Road near Kumarhatti, HP. 10. 11. That the said property was sold through me to one Mr. HPS Deepak, a resident of Sector-27, Chandigarh for a sum of Rs. 2.32 crores, However, only a consideration of Rs. 12.00 lacs was shown in the sale deed and the balance Rs. 2.20 crores were received in cash, as instructed by Honb'le Judge, on his behalf since he was the actual owner of the said property. The said amount was handed over to the Honb'te Judge. 12, That subsequently, as instructed by the Honb'le Judge the deponent located and Short listed a house for him in Delhi, which he wanted to buy. The house was ; located in B block, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi and belonged to Princess Divya of Jaipur. 13. That the actual amount paid for buying the house was Rs. 3.50 corps sale deed projecting a consideration of only Rs. 1.50 crores was p 14. That the balance Rs. 2.00 crores were given in cash by the wife of ? Judge to the princess at her home located in Maharani Bagh, New Delhi. The sale deed for the house was signed and registered (for a sum of Rs. 1.50 crores) at the house of the princess in Maharani Bagh and not in the court, as required 15. That during the signing of the said deed, the deponent had accompanied the wife of the Honb'le Judge to the house of the princess in Maharani Bagh who had signed the documents, in its presence. =A bone

    You might also like