Value Chain Analysis For Australian Grass - Fed Beef Production Executive Summary
Value Chain Analysis For Australian Grass - Fed Beef Production Executive Summary
Value Chain Analysis For Australian Grass - Fed Beef Production Executive Summary
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Value
Chain
Analysis
for
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Production
Executive
Summary
This
paper
is
aimed
to
give
an
insight
into
the
potential
opportunities
and
challenges
within
the
grass-‐fed
beef
industry.
Increased
global
demand
for
protein,
especially
with
increased
wealth
in
Asia
provides
opportunities
for
the
Australian
beef
industry.
The
disease
free
status
and
traceability
of
Australian
beef
along
with
efficient
production
methods
and
the
clean
green
image
of
Australian
agriculture
provide
opportunities
to
add
further
value
to
the
Australian
beef
industry.
Grassfed
beef
has
the
potential
to
be
marketed
as
healthier,
tastier
and
more
environmentally
friendly
beef
and
this
study
aims
to
examine
how
that
value
can
be
captured.
This
paper
will
especially
focus
on
the
physical
supply
chain,
communications
and
collaboration,
governance
and
where
value
is
generated.
Traditionally
high
levels
of
opportunism
by
both
processors
and
producers
have
categorised
the
Australian
grass-‐fed
beef
industry
with
the
uncertainty
created
by
the
constant
threat
of
drought
in
Australia
exacerbating
the
negative
impact
of
opportunism
on
the
industry.
A
lack
of
collaboration
and
communication
amongst
value
chain
participants
has
led
to
opposing
boom
and
bust
cycles
for
producers
and
processors.
The
Australian
beef
industry
has
long
production
lead
times,
price
uncertainty,
low
margins
and
a
highly
variable
supply
and
quality
of
primary
inputs
(pasture)
providing
valuable
opportunities
for
participants
prepared
to
collaborate.
The
benefits
of
improved
collaboration
are
visible
when
looking
at
a
number
of
companies
who
have
development
higher
value
premium
products
such
as
certified
grass-‐fed,
organic
and
breed
specific
beef.
These
companies
have
created
greater
value
and
reduced
price
and
climatic
uncertainty
throughout
the
value
chain
through
better
integration
and
communication
from
producer
to
consumer
through
both
collaboration
and
vertical
integration.
In
addition
these
innovative
companies
have
focused
on
creating
value
from
the
entire
animal
and
not
just
the
prime
cuts.
Background
of
the
Australian
Beef
Industry
Australia
is
the
seventh
largest
beef
producer
in
the
world
and
the
third
largest
exporter
behind
the
USA
and
Brazil.
Australia
has
26.7
million
cattle
run
over
more
than
77,000
properties.
In
2014
8.3
million
head
will
be
slaughtered,
67%
for
export,
at
an
average
carcass
weight
of
276kg/head.
A
further
1.13
million
cattle
are
forecast
to
be
live
1
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
exports.
Australian
cattle
are
virtually
all
bred
and
grown
on
pasture.
In
2013
67%
of
marketed
cattle
in
Australia
were
grass
fed
with
just
33%
fed
grain.
Only
a
small
percentage
of
grass-‐fed
cattle
are
marketed
as
certified
grass-‐fed.
The
Australian
beef
industry
is
valued
at
$12.3
billion
annually.
The
Australian
cattle
industry
operates
in
a
liberalised
environment
where
producers
often
have
to
compete
in
the
international
market
against
subsidised
producers.
Efficient
production
processes
as
well
as
producing
a
superior
quality
product
allow
Australian
producers
to
compete
successfully
on
these
terms.
The
Australian
cattle
industry
is
divided
into
two
primary
regions,
north
and
south.
The
northern
industry
is
more
extensive,
accounting
for
75%
of
the
land
area
and
50%
of
cattle
numbers.
Northern
cattle
are
typically
lower
quality
due
to
both
the
higher
percentage
of
tropical
or
Bos
indicus
breeds
in
the
north
and
variable
nutrition.
Northern
cattle
are
usually
sold
through
the
live
export
trade
or
transported
south
where
they
are
finished
on
grain.
The
southern
industry
is
more
intensive
and
typically
produces
higher
quality
beef
from
British
and
European,
Bos
taurus,
breeds.
Southern
cattle
are
finished
both
on
grass
and
grain.
Southern
producers
are
more
likely
to
be
smaller
and
family
owned
whereas
northern
producers
are
larger
and
often
corporate.
Australians
beef
cattle
properties
are
generally
large
and
geographically
isolated
with
significant
distances
to
processors
and
consumers.
This
distance
is
even
greater
for
the
67%
of
Australian
beef
that
is
exported.
This
greater
distance
acts
a
barrier
to
effective
and
efficient
communications
and
exchange
of
information
between
the
producers
and
processors
at
one
end
of
the
value
chain
and
the
consumers
at
the
other
end.
The
distances
involved
also
limit
producers
selling
options
as
additional
freight
costs
often
outweigh
any
price
premium
they
may
receive
from
a
different
processor.
Regular
droughts
throughout
Australia
have
a
major
impact
on
beef
production
and
cattle
numbers.
Farmers
generally
build
up
herds
during
periods
of
good
rainfall
then
reduce
cattle
numbers
during
periods
of
drought.
Cattle
marketed
during
good
seasons
tend
to
be
heavier
than
those
marketed
for
slaughter
during
droughts.
Droughts
also
increase
the
numbers
of
cattle
traded
unfinished,
both
creating
a
cattle
market
between
producers
and
adding
lower
quality
beef
onto
the
market.
The
unpredictability
of
where
and
when
droughts
will
occur
and
how
severe
they
will
be
carries
through
to
an
unpredictability
of
the
supply
and
quality
of
cattle
being
marketed.
Market
prices
also
tend
to
follow
the
drought
pattern
with
higher
prices
during
wet
periods
and
low
cattle
prices
during
droughts.
2
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Droughts
generally
affect
different
geographic
locations
and
cattle
are
regularly
traded
from
drought
affected
areas
to
areas
that
have
had
good
rainfall.
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Production
Grass-‐fed
beef
is
one
of
the
more
complex
value
chains
that
exist
in
contemporary
agriculture.
The
production
process
aims
to
produce
a
consistent
product
from
a
continually
varying
source
of
inputs.
Pasture
quality
and
quantity
is
continually
changing
with
pasture
growth
rates,
quality
and
quantity
varying
with
stage
of
growth,
soil
moisture,
season,
hours
of
sunlight,
temperature,
soil
nutrient
levels,
species,
altitude
and
grazing
management
amongst
other
factors.
Producers
have
limited
control
over
much
pasture
growth
variation,
especially
in
the
rain
fed
production
systems
that
make
up
most
of
Australia’s
grazing
land.
Managing
pasture
and
cattle
to
regularly
and
consistently
supply
a
market
with
high
quality
beef
remains
one
of
the
greatest
challenges
for
producers.
Grass
fed
cattle
are
also
kept
in
open
paddocks
where
they
are
exposes
to
weather,
pests
and
diseases
all
of
which
can
effect
production
and
add
to
the
challenge
of
producing
a
regular
supply
of
high
quality
beef
from
a
continually
varying
production
system.
In
contrast,
with
housed
or
lotfed
animal
production
systems
there
is
much
greater
control
of
the
animals
nutrition,
environment
and
animal
health
making
the
growth
rates
and
the
production
process
much
more
predictable.
The
cycle
time
to
grow
and
fatten
beef
cattle
is
much
longer
than
other
animal
protein
production
systems.
The
average
age
at
slaughter
for
Australian
cattle
is
15-‐22
months
and
female
cows
will
produce
their
first
calf
at
two
year
of
age.
Breeding
cows
only
produce
one
offspring
per
year.
This
results
in
a
three
to
four
year
lead-‐time
for
producers
to
increase
production
which
is
too
slow
for
producers
to
adapt
to
the
Australian
recurrent
drought
cycle
and
hence
the
availability
of
pasture.
This
means
that
many
cattle
farmers
often
have
the
wrong
stocking
rate
for
the
current
climatic
conditions.
Cattle
growth
rate
is
determined
largely
by
nutrition.
In
feedlots
nutrition
and
growth
rates
are
tightly
controlled
and
monitored
to
optimise
efficiency
and
growth
rates
are
highly
predictable.
This
means
producers
can
time
production
to
meet
market
demand.
In
grass-‐fed
situations
animal
nutrition
is
determined
by
the
quality
and
quantity
of
available
pasture,
which
is
continually
changing.
This
means
that
growth
rates
are
variable
and
it
is
much
more
difficult
to
manage
production
to
meet
market
demand.
Beef
competes
on
the
market
with
other
animal
proteins
many
of
which
convert
feed
into
meat
more
efficiently
than
cattle.
The
feed
conversion
ratios,
how
much
feed
is
required
to
produce
1Kg
of
live
weight,
are
higher
for
beef
(5.5-‐15)
than
for
pigs
(3.0-‐
4.0)
and
poultry
(1.7-‐2.0).
However,
pigs
and
poultry
compete
with
humans
for
feed
3
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
grain.
Grass
fed
beef
has
a
competitive
advantage
in
that
it
is
produced
from
pasture,
which
is
indigestible
by
humans
and
hence
doe
not
compete
with
people.
Cattle
often
graze
land
that
is
unsuitable
for
other
crops
so
that
beef
production
is
an
important
source
of
food
produced
from
otherwise
unproductive
land.
While
finished
cattle,
ready
for
slaughter,
are
the
primary
source
of
income
for
many
cattle
producers,
they
also
sell
store
cattle
as
well
as
cull
cows
and
bulls.
The
store
cattle
market
allows
producers
to
manage
seasonal
and
climatic
variability
in
pasture
production
by
changing
stocking
rates
to
meet
pasture
growth.
The
cull
cow
and
bull
market
is
a
source
of
cheaper,
lower
quality
beef
that
is
largely
used
for
processing.
Revenue
from
store
and
cull
cattle
sales
form
an
important
part
of
farm
income.
Cattle
producers
have
many
systems
available
for
selling
their
livestock.
Prices
paid
will
be
based
on
carcass
weight,
liveweight
or
per
head
depending
on
the
system
used.
Traditionally,
cattle
were
sold
through
auction
in
saleyards
which
involved
the
producer
transporting
cattle
to
the
saleyards
and
then
the
buyers
transporting
cattle
on
to
be
processed,
adding
an
additional
link
to
the
chain
and
ensuring
producers
are
price
takers.
Increasingly
cattle
are
sold
direct
to
the
processor,
in
these
cases
producers
are
paid
on
a
carcass
weight
basis.
However,
saleyard
auctions
are
still
widely
used
today.
The
direct
marketing
of
cattle
provides
producers
much
better
feedback
on
the
carcass
value
of
their
cattle,
enabling
them
to
adjust
management
practices
to
provide
a
higher
quality
product.
Saleyards
provide
very
limited
feedback
on
the
carcass
traits
to
producers.
Another
disadvantage
of
saleyards
is
quality
of
the
final
product
is
likely
to
be
affected
due
to
increased
stress
and
time
off
feed.
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Processing
Large
corporations
dominate
the
Australian
beef
processing
industry.
These
corporations
often
use
their
substantial
market
power
to
ensure
most
producers
are
price
takers
and
their
economies
of
scale
make
it
difficult
for
smaller
processors
to
compete
which
limits
selling
options
for
many
producers.
In
2011
the
top
five
processors
accounted
for
over
50%
of
the
market
with
the
four
largest
either
owned
or
in
joint
ventures
with
multi-‐national
companies.
Individual
abattoirs
are
generally
primarily
for
domestic
or
export
and
as
the
different
markets
are
governed
by
different
standards.
These
large
producers
all
have
grass-‐fed
or
organic
brands.
However,
the
majority
of
their
brands
are
either
undefined
or
grain
fed.
Grass-‐fed
is
seen
as
a
premium
brand
along
with
organic,
which
is
also
grass-‐fed,
and
premium
grain-‐fed
or
brands
based
on
specified
high
quality
breeds
such
as
certified
Angus
or
Wagyu.
Smaller
processing
companies
are
also
competing
in
market
niches
such
as
certified
grass-‐fed
and
organic.
4
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Beef
processors
increasingly
purchase
cattle
direct
from
the
producers
and
producers
are
generally
able
to
lock
into
contracts
4-‐6
months
in
advance.
However,
this
time
period
falls
well
short
of
the
18-‐24
months
it
takes
to
grow
and
finish
cattle
and
the
additional
two
year
lead
time
required
to
increase
breeding
female
numbers.
Many
large
beef
processors
also
own
and
run
beef
feedlots.
The
slaughter
and
processing
stage
of
the
beef
value
chain
has
the
potential
to
greatly
reduce
value
if
not
done
properly.
Excellent
hygiene,
maintenance
of
the
cold
chain
and
stress
free
handling
of
cattle
prior
to
slaughter
are
all
required
to
prevent
contamination,
spoilage
and
loss
in
meat
quality.
Poor
boning
will
also
lead
to
a
lower
percentage
of
prime
cuts
and
a
greater
percentage
of
lower
value
trim.
Whilst
value
can
very
easily
be
lost
during
processing
it
is
difficult
to
add
value
during
this
stage.
Beef
processors
sell
whole
carcasses,
boxed
beef
as
well
as
all
the
other
parts
of
the
animal.
The
most
obvious
product
produced
from
beef
cattle
is
meat.
Cattle
carcasses
will
typically
be
48-‐56%
of
live
weight
depending
on
age
sex,
fat
score
and
time
off
pasture.
The
yield
of
meat
from
a
carcass
is
typically
in
the
range
of
67-‐77%.
This
means
meat
forms
between
and
32
and
43%
of
the
live
animal.
Processors
sell
all
parts
of
the
animal
and
the
contribution
of
the
non-‐meat
parts
of
the
animal
such
as
bones,
skins,
offal
and
tallow
are
crucial
to
a
processors
business.
See
figure
1
below
for
what
products
are
produced
by
beef
cattle.
The
meat
component
of
a
carcass
is
also
divided
into
prime
cuts
and
trim
with
the
prime
cuts
having
a
higher
value
than
the
trim.
When
producers
are
paid
on
a
carcass
weight
basis,
which
is
increasingly
the
case
there
is
a
misalignment
between
how
processors
pay
growers
and
how
processors
make
money.
Figure
1:
Products
produced
when
cattle
are
slaughtered
5
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Prime cuts
Carcass Trim
Bones
Skin
Offal
Tallow
6
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Other
cuts
5%
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Wholesaling
and
Retailing
In
the
domestic
market
the
two
major
supermarkets
dominate
the
retail
trade
in
Australia.
Beef
is
also
sold
through
butchers,
other
supermarkets
and
grocery
stores,
wholesalers
as
well
as
restaurants
and
cafes.
The
export
market,
which
accounts
for
67%
of
Australian
beef
production,
consists
of
over
150
Australian
beef
exporters,
all
with
their
own
brands
and
competing
against
each
other
as
well
as
other
international
suppliers
according
to
MLA.
There
is
an
increasing
presence
of
smaller
boutique
beef
brands.
Beef
is
primarily
consumed
at
home
rather
than
in
restaurants
making
supermarkets
and
butchers
the
major
sellers
of
beef
to
consumers.
In
the
USA
65%
of
beef
is
consumed
at
home
with
35%
consumed
in
away
from
home,
(Lowe
&
Gereffi,
2009).
All
beef
is
initially
graded
according
to
a
number
of
Australian
and
international
standards
as
set
out
in
the
Handbook
of
Australian
Meat
published
by
Aus-‐Meat
Limited.
These
standards
grade
beef
according
to
a
number
of
quality
related
traits
including
the
cut,
age
and
sex
and
fat
depth.
These
standards
also
specify
the
labelling
requirements
including
the
tractability
information,
country
of
origin,
date
processed,
weight
and
company
who
packed
the
product.
Aus-‐Meat
has
also
developed
further
quality
standards
that
include
Pasturefed
Cattle
Assurance
Scheme
(PCAS)
to
guarantee
grass-‐fed
production
and
the
Meat
Standards
Australia
(MSA)
certification
that
guarantees
eating
quality.
MSA
beef
carcasses
are
graded
on
the
proportion
of
Bos
indicus
breed,
maturity,
marbling,
meat
colour
and
pH
and
fat
distribution.
Producers
of
MSA
beef
are
required
to
certify
cattle
are
handled
to
minimise
stress
prior
to
slaughter
as
pre
slaughter
stress
has
a
negative
impact
on
meat
eating
quality.
Producers
can
obtain
the
MSA
grading
for
their
animals
by
viewing
them
online.
A
number
of
companies
have
their
own
individual
certifications.
Teys,
Australians
second
largest
processor,
is
paying
a
premium
for
PCAS
certified
cattle
whereas
JBS,
Australia’s
largest
processor
has
their
own
grass-‐fed
certification
for
their
Great
Southern
brand.
All
these
different
certifications
makes
it
much
more
difficult
for
producers
to
supply
multiple
processors
with
certified
beef
as
they
require
multiple
certifications
and
audits.
Organic
certification
is
the
strictest
and
most
difficult
to
obtain
as
it
is
a
three
year
process
and
there
are
different
certifications
for
different
markets
such
as
the
USA
and
EU.
7
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
These
standards
and
certifications
add
value
to
the
beef
that
is
produced
through
them.
Consumers
pay
premiums
for
certified
beef
and
producers
receive
premiums
for
producing
certified
cattle.
Opportunism
in
the
Beef
Industry
Grass
fed
cattle
production
has
traditionally
been
a
highly
opportunistic
industry
for
both
producers
and
processors
with
climatic
variables,
especially
rainfall,
being
a
large
driver
of
this
opportunism.
Producers
plan
to
capitalise
on
good
years
to
make
enough
money
to
carry
them
through
the
years
of
drought.
Producers
often
shop
around
and
sell
to
the
processor
with
the
best
price,
which
limits
the
building
and
maintaining
of
relationships
between
producers
and
processors.
In
wet
seasons
producers
maximise
weight
gains
from
pasture
and
build
up
breeding
numbers,
which
results
in
selling
fewer
and
heavier
cattle.
Because
all
producers
are
following
this
strategy
there
are
fewer
cattle
in
the
market
and
prices
are
generally
higher.
An
abundance
of
pasture
also
drives
up
demand
for
store
cattle
to
utilise
this
pasture
further
pushing
up
prices.
Processors
struggle
during
these
times,
as
fewer
available
cattle
drive
up
processing
costs
and
those
available
are
more
expensive.
In
dry
times
these
fortunes
are
reversed
with
processors
traditionally
doing
well
and
producers
struggling.
Producers
destock
as
pasture
growth
declines
resulting
in
a
higher
volumes
of
cattle
on
the
market
at
lower
prices.
This
provides
an
abundant
supply
of
cheap
cattle
to
processors.
Whilst
producers
and
processors
are
heavily
reliant
on
each
other
to
run
their
businesses
they
frequently
see
the
other
as
an
adversary.
It
is
not
uncommon
to
hear
or
producers
booking
cattle
into
a
number
of
processors
weeks
in
advance
then
calling
around
the
day
before
shipment
to
see
which
offers
the
highest
price.
Likewise
as
processors
have
the
market
power
and
set
prices
they
will
reduce
prices
when
market
conditions
allow,
often
forcing
producers
to
sell
at
very
thin
margins.
These
practices
further
erode
trust
between
producers
and
processors.
With
over
77,000
beef
producers,
around
100
processors
throughout
Australia
and
the
options
of
trading
through
saleyards
there
is
an
abundant
supply
of
alternative
buyers
and
suppliers.
The
adversary
between
producers
and
processors
limits
communication
and
collaboration.
During
good
seasons
producers
are
trying
to
make
sufficient
profit
to
8
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
ensure
they
can
survive
the
next
dry
period
and
during
dry
seasons
processors
are
concentrating
on
making
sufficient
profit
so
they
can
survive
the
next
wet
season.
Consumer
demand
for
beef
and
the
other
products
from
cattle
is
not
highly
dependant
on
these
climatic
fluxes.
Domestic
and
international
consumers
of
Australian
grass-‐fed
beef
are
very
removed
from
the
cyclical
drought
cycle
Australian
farmers
have
to
manage
with
the
geographic
isolation
of
cattle
properties
increasing
the
lack
of
connection
between
producers
and
consumers.
A
company
that
behaves
opportunistically
to
increase
short-‐term
unilateral
gain
can
often
erode
long-‐term
potential
gains
for
both
parties.
The
three
mechanisms
to
mitigate
opportunisms
are
ownership,
investment
in
transaction
specific
assets
and
relational
exchange
(Brown,
Dev
&
Lee
2000).
In
the
beef
industry
the
opportunities
to
reduce
opportunistic
behaviour
are
primarily
in
ownership
and
relational
exchange.
Governance
in
the
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Beef
is
a
supply
driven
and
buyer
dominant
market
with
market
power
concentrated
in
the
large
processors
and
retailers
that
dominate
the
industry.
Beef
producers
have
traditionally
been
price
takers
rather
than
price
setters.
Producer
power
has
been
limited
to
the
occasional
times
of
scare
supply.
Traditionally
producers
have
also
been
fiercely
independent
and
resistant
to
sharing
resources,
information
or
innovative
production
practices.
This
has
resulted
in
beef
production
becoming
a
production
push,
commodity
focused
industry
rather
than
a
market-‐focused
consumer
driven
industry
with
little
vertical
integration
or
coordination.
Producers
operate
with
a
high
degree
of
uncertainty
and
high
input
costs.
Producers
often
have
a
lack
of
information
and
knowledge
on
current
market
trends
and
the
power
imbalance
with
processors
and
retailers
leads
to
opportunistic
behaviour.
(Uddin,
Islam
&
Quaddus,
2011)
The
saleyard
auctions
markets
have
the
lowest
level
of
coordination,
and
vertical
integration
the
highest
with
direct
sales
and
contract
sales
in
between.
The
auction
market
is
characterised
by
self
interest,
short
term
relationships,
opportunism,
limited
information
sharing,
independence
and
flexibility.
Vertical
integration
is
characterised
by
mutual
interest,
long
term
relationships,
shared
benefits,
open
information
sharing,
interdependence
and
stability.
(Uddin,
Islam
&
Quaddus,
2011).
Vertical
coordination
is
increasing
in
the
industry
with
greater
use
of
short
and
long
term
contracts
for
supply.
Vertical
coordination
is
also
increasing
in
a
number
of
innovative
companies
supplying
premium
products
such
as
certified
grass-‐fed,
organic
and
breed
specific
beef.
Power
Structures
9
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Power
in
the
beef
industry
is
asymmetrical
with
power
concentrated
in
the
retailers
and
processors.
Australia’s
two
largest
supermarkets
dominate
the
domestic
industry
to
an
extent
that
they
can
dominate
market
prices.
The
large
export
processors
dominate
the
export
market
providing
some
competition
to
the
supermarket’s
power.
Producer
power
is
traditionally
low
and
limited
to
periods
of
insufficient
supply.
Increased
vertical
coordination
is
a
possible
means
of
creating
more
value
for
producers
as
can
producing
niche
products
such
as
grass-‐fed,
high
value
breed,
organic,
HGP
and
antibiotic
free.
Supply
Chain
Relationships
Uddin,
Islam
&
Quaddus
(2011)
found
that
amount
of
mutual
investment
and
interdependence
among
supply
chain
partners
in
the
Queensland
and
Western
Australian
beef
industry
was
very
low
and
the
levels
of
trust
and
commitment
were
moderately
high.
In
the
domestic
market
retailers
have
the
highest
switching
capacity
where
they
maintain
multiple
wholesale
sources
of
supply
and
purchase
on
price.
The
successful
development
and
marketing
of
higher
value
products
such
as
grass-‐fed,
organic,
Angus
and
Wagyu
require
better
relationships
and
improved
cooperation
within
the
value
chain.
Consumers
are
prepared
to
pay
premiums
for
these
higher
value
products
and
expect
regular
availability
and
consistent
quality.
Producers
have
relationships
and
trade
store
cattle
with
many
other
producers.
These
store
cattle
trades
can
be
either
direct
sales
or
through
the
saleyards
and
are
generally
based
on
adjusting
stocking
rates
to
meet
available
pasture.
Most
producers
also
have
relationships
with
a
number
of
processors
to
whom
they
sell
cattle
either
directly
or
through
the
saleyards.
Hundreds
of
producers
will
supply
most
processors
and
this
is
a
buyer
dominant
market
where
the
producers
have
very
little
bargaining
power.
Domestic
processors
will
generally
supply
the
two
major
supermarkets
that
dominate
the
domestic
beef
market.
Export
processors
will
then
supply
a
limited
number
of
export
customers.
A
smaller
number
of
specialty
processors
exist
whom
supply
specialty
retailers.
These
specialty
processors
are
often
the
ones
who
process
the
higher
value
customers.
Figure
3
shows
the
high
concentration
of
processors
and
retailers
in
the
beef
industry
and
how
many
producers
supply
a
limited
number
of
processors
who
supply
a
limited
number
of
retailers.
Figure
3:
Schematic
of
relationships
within
the
beef
value
chain
10
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Producer
Woolwoths
& Coles
Producer Domestic
Processor
Producer
Saleyards
Specialty Other Retailers
Producer Processor
Producer
Export
Export Customers
Processor
Producer
Information
Sharing
in
the
Beef
Value
Chain
A
significant
difference
in
information
sharing
exists
between
producers
and
processors
and
between
processors
and
retailers.
Processors
collect
and
utilise
greater
amounts
of
data
about
their
products
such
as
origin,
genetics
and
meat
quality
characteristics.
Producer
and
retailer
market
and
customer
information
is
much
less
likely
to
be
shared
due
to
the
short-‐term
opportunism
that
exists
in
the
low
cost
conventional
marketplace.
The
Value
of
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Consumers
are
increasingly
seeing
grass-‐fed
beef
as
a
healthier,
tastier
and
more
environmentally
friendly
option.
Grass-‐fed
beef
is
leaner,
has
a
healthier
fat
profile
and
is
produced
in
a
more
natural
and
animal
friendly
way
than
grain-‐fed
beef.
Animal
welfare
is
considered
by
consumers
to
be
better
for
grass-‐fed
cattle
than
lot-‐fed
cattle.
Many
consumers
are
willing
to
pay
premiums
for
improved
taste,
health,
environmental
and
animal
welfare
conditions.
Grass-‐fed
beef
is
generally
marketed
organic
grass-‐fed
or
certified
grass-‐fed
beef.
Organic
grass-‐fed
beef
is
produced
on
a
certified
organic
farm,
that
is
without
any
chemical
fertilisers,
antibiotics,
hormone
growth
promotants
(HGP)
11
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
and
other
non
organic
inputs.
It
takes
a
minimum
of
three
years
for
a
farm
to
obtain
organic
certification.
The
Pasturefed
Cattle
Assurance
Scheme
(PCAS)
is
the
Australian
grass-‐fed
certification.
PCAS
certification
includes
two
additional
modules
for
being
antibiotic
and
HGP
free.
PCAS
certified
beef
guarantees
consumers
that
cattle
have
not
been
fed
any
grain
or
grain
by-‐products.
A
number
of
other
certified
grass-‐fed
schemes
exist.
Many
consumers
see
certified
grass-‐fed
as
a
means
of
obtaining
many
of
the
benefits
of
organic
without
having
to
pay
the
high
premium
prices
for
organic
beef.
In
contrast
grain-‐fed
production
systems
generally
involve
cattle
being
kept
in
feedlots
with
no
opportunities
to
graze.
Antibiotics
and
HGPs
are
also
widely
used
in
feedlots.
Premium
labels
and
beef
products
are
increasing
being
sold
in
the
domestic
market.
In
April
2014
Woolworths
introduced
premium
grass-‐fed
beef
into
its
stores
prompting
Australia’s
second
largest
beef
processor,
Teys
Australia,
to
announce
premiums
for
certified
grass-‐fed
cattle.
Teys
also
started
locking
in
contracts
for
cattle
four
months
in
advance
(McKilop,
2014).
JBS
has
developed
its
own
brand
of
certified
grass-‐fed
beef
under
it’s
own
accreditation
scheme.
Premiums
Paid
for
Domestic
Grass-‐fed
and
Organic
Beef
The
prices
shown
in
Table
1
are
the
premiums
consumers
are
willing
to
pay
for
grass-‐fed
and
organic
beef
over
the
standard
products.
Consumers
are
paying
premiums
for
grass-‐
fed
and
organic
beef
for
both
high
value
cuts
and
lower
value
products
such
as
mince
and
stirfry.
The
prices
paid
and
premiums
for
organic
are
similar
for
both
major
retailers.
Consumers
are
willing
to
pay
even
higher
premiums
for
beef
purchased
through
specialty
retailers.
The
prices
below
were
sourced
form
the
shop
online
webpages
of
the
three
retailers
listed
below
which
were
viewed
online
on
25
November
2014.
Table
1:
Premiums
paid
for
grass-‐fed
and
organic
beef
Coles
Woolworths
Harris
Farm
Yalandra
Fine
Foods
Organ Grass-‐fed
Standard
Organic
Grass-‐ Standard
Belmore
Argyle
ic
fed
Organic
Eye
fillet
45.99
45.00
41.00
45.99
N/A
41.79
55.99
47.99
54.99-‐
online
65.99
Mince
16.00
N/A
5.00-‐ 14.99-‐ N/A
5.00-‐ 19.99
14.99
13.00
online
14.00
19.98
online
14.00
Rump
28.00
19.00
17.00
25.99
N/A
15.99
N/A
28.99
23.99
online
online
12
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Stirfry
19.00
18.00
17.00
18.99
N/A
17.35
N/A
N/A
14.99
online
online
online
Porterhouse
35.00
32.00
27.00
N/A
N/A
22.99
44.99
N/A
N/A
online
online
online
online
The
Value
Chain
The
flow
of
materials
through
the
grass-‐fed
beef
value
chain,
as
outlined
in
Figure
4,
is
linear
with
the
exception
of
the
store
cattle
market,
which
is
used
throughout
the
industry
to
help
manage
climatic
and
seasonal
pasture
growth
variations.
The
non-‐beef
products
that
are
produced
from
cattle
also
create
value
for
processors
but
are
frequently
not
directly
paid
for
when
cattle
are
sold
on
a
carcass
weight
basis.
As
with
many
agri-‐food
products
beef
has
been
a
production
push
commodity
where
producers
have
been
price
takers.
Value
for
consumers
was
determined
by
the
cut
of
beef
they
purchased
rather
than
the
method
of
production.
Beef
is
a
functional
product
that
requires
an
efficient
value
chain
and
whilst
certified
grass-‐fed
and
organic
beef
is
a
more
innovative
product
it
still
essentially
requires
an
efficient
supply
chain.
Figure
4:
Material
flow
in
the
grass-‐fed
beef
value
chain
tGenetics-cattle (V) tLand (N) tIntake (N) tIntake (N) tPurchase & store
tGenetics-pasture (V) tBreeding (N) tSlaughter (N) tStore (N) tConsume
tFertiliser (N) tPasture manage- tBoning & tFurther processing (V) tWaste
ment (N) trimming (N)
tChemicals (N) tAccreditation (V)
tSupplementary feed tGrowing (N) tGrading (N) tPackaging (V)
(N) tFinishing (V) tChilling (N) tPromotion (V)
tAnimal Health (N) tPackaging (V) tWaste (W)
tAnimal welfare tDispatch (N)
(V)
tAccreditation (V)
tAccreditation (V) tWaste (W)
tIrrigation (N) Export
13
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
V
-‐
Creates
Value
N
-‐
Essential
but
does
not
create
value
W
-‐
Waste
To
capture
grass-‐fed
beef
value
an
efficient,
consistent
and
reliable
supply
chain
need
to
be
built
to
provide
a
regular
supply
of
well-‐finished
high
quality
beef
to
consumers.
The
areas
where
value
is
added
to
the
chain
are:
• Cattle
genetics
• Pasture
genetics
• The
natural
grazing
and
production
system
free
of
antibiotics,
HGPs
and
grain
feeding
• Improved
animal
welfare
• Certified
production
process
• Further
processing
of
lower
value
trim
• Packaging
and
marketing
There
is
significant
potential
to
lose
value
with
the
essential
but
non
value
adding
links
in
the
chain
and
these
tasks
need
to
be
carried
out
efficiently
and
effectively
to
produce
a
high
value
product.
Cattle
genetics
The
genetics
of
the
cattle
influence
the
eating
quality
of
the
meat
including
tenderness,
juiciness,
level
of
marbling
and
flavour.
Genetics
also
play
an
important
role
in
the
cattle’s
ability
to
adapt
to
and
produce
high
quality
beef
under
Australian
grazing
conditions.
Pasture
genetics
The
pasture
cattle
graze
will
affect
the
flavour
and
fat
colour
of
the
meat.
The
natural
grazing
and
production
system
free
of
antibiotics,
HGPs
and
grain
feeding
Consumers
value
food
they
know
is
safe
that
has
been
produced
in
a
natural
way
without
additives,
hormones
and
antibiotics.
Many
consumers
see
grain
feeding
as
being
unnatural.
Improved
animal
welfare
Many
consumers
value
the
way
animals
have
been
treated
prior
to
slaughter
and
believe
cattle
should
be
out
grazing
pasture
and
walking
around
freely
rather
than
housed
in
feedlots.
14
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
15
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
suppliers
is
one
of
Arcadian’s
key
focuses.
Arcadian
is
supplying
the
domestic
market
and
exporting
to
North
America
and
Asia.
Arcadian’s
aim
is
to
produce
high
quality
sustainable
beef.
Arcadian’s
business
has
consistently
be
growing
by
over
30%
each
year
and
they
are
constantly
looking
for
more
producers
so
they
can
satisfy
existing
customer
demand.
Arcadian
has
attributed
its
success
to
two
major
factors.
Cooperation
within
the
value
chain
both
up
stream
and
down
stream
and
marketing
as
much
of
the
animal
as
possible
for
the
organic
premium.
When
Arcadian
started
selling
organic
beef
they
easily
found
markets
for
the
prime
cuts
but
struggled
to
obtain
the
premium
paid
for
organic
meat
for
the
trim
and
other
parts
of
the
animal.
Physical
Chain
Arcadian
sources
all
its
organic
beef
from
certified
organic
producers
located
in
Queensland
and
Northern
NSW.
Arcadian
natural
beef
is
sources
from
grazing
properties
in
Tasmania.
All
cattle
are
processed
on
contract,
packaged
and
shipped
to
domestic
and
export
retailers.
Arcadian
supplies
the
major
Australian
supermarkets,
specialty
retailers
and
restaurants
domestically.
The
USA
is
Arcadians
most
important
export
market
where
they
supply
customers
such
as
Wholefoods,
Applegate
Natural
and
Organic
Meat
and
Costco.
Arcadian
also
exports
to
Asia.
Different
cuts
of
meat,
trim
and
the
non-‐carcass
parts
of
the
animal
are
all
marketed
to
where
they
obtain
the
greatest
value.
Arcadian
beef
comes
from
a
variety
of
breeds
all
of
which
have
been
bred
to
produce
high
quality
beef
and
perform
well
under
the
local
climatic
conditions.
Having
the
right
breed
for
local
conditions
is
especially
important
for
organic
production,
as
producers
are
not
able
to
use
artificial
chemicals
to
control
pests
and
diseases
and
enhance
growth.
Communications
&
Collaboration
Arcadian
has
strong
relationships
with
all
its
suppliers
and
works
closely
with
them
to
manage
cattle
supply
so
they
can
meet
customer
demand.
Producing
a
regular
supply
of
well-‐finished
high
quality
cattle
is
one
on
the
greatest
challenges
with
grass-‐fed
beef
and
having
a
regular
supply
to
meet
customer
expectations
is
vital.
To
manage
supply
Arcadian
facilitates
the
sale
of
store
cattle
between
its
supplies
and
uses
the
geographic
distribution
of
suppliers
farms
to
help
stabilise
production.
Producers
with
excess
pasture
are
put
in
contact
with
producers
with
insufficient
pasture.
Arcadian
does
not
charge
for
this
service
but
views
it
as
a
means
of
managing
short
term
and
long
term
16
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
supply.
Short
term
in
that
cattle
already
on
the
ground
are
grown
and
finished
efficiently
and
long
term
in
that
Arcadian
relies
on
network
of
profitable
producers
to
supply
the
company.
Arcadian
also
provides
technical
assistance
and
advice
for
potential
suppliers
going
through
the
three-‐year
organic
accreditation
process.
Down
stream
Arcadian
works
closely
with
customers
to
ensure
their
products
are
meeting
expectations.
Arcadian
is
careful
not
to
over
promise
and
undersupply
its
customers.
Currently
demand
for
organic
beef
outstrips
supply
and
Arcadian
can
sell
all
the
product
it
can
source
and
is
actively
looking
for
additional
producers.
However,
the
company
is
very
aware
that
reliability
of
supply
is
critical
to
the
value
of
its
brand
and
the
businesses
of
its
customers.
Therefore,
Arcadian
is
very
proactive
in
keeping
its
customers
well
informed
about
any
potential
changes
with
the
supply
of
their
products.
Arcadian
has
limited
direct
contact
with
consumers.
However,
Arcadian’s
primary
customers
with
whom
they
have
strong
relationships
do
have
direct
contact
with
consumers
and
the
trust
built
between
these
customers
and
Arcadian
means
that
important
and
relevant
information
is
shared
throughout
the
value
chain.
Governance
In
accordance
with
rural
Australian
tradition,
Arcadian
works
on
handshake
agreements
with
it
suppliers.
Their
philosophy
is
that
building
trust
is
the
key
to
good
relationships.
Formal
contracts
exist
with
customers
and
contract
processors.
However,
the
same
philosophy
of
building
trust
applies.
Arcadian
pays
their
producers
premiums
for
supplying
organic
cattle
and
also
provides
their
suppliers
much
more
price
certainty
than
they
would
get
through
traditional
cattle
marketing
systems.
This
gives
producers
the
confidence
they
need
produce
the
regular
supply
of
high
quality
well
finished
cattle
Arcadian
need.
Increased
price
certainty
reduces
opportunistic
selling
behaviour
by
producers.
Where
Arcadian
builds
value
The
organic
and
natural
certification
builds
significant
value
for
Arcadian,
as
consumers
are
willing
to
pay
premiums
for
organic
and
naturally
reared
grass-‐fed
beef.
Proactive
management
of
the
entire
chain
and
collaboration
with
suppliers
and
customers
is
how
Arcadian
captures
this
value.
The
development
of
reliable
export
sales
to
US
customers
for
trim
and
non-‐prime
cuts
has
enabled
Arcadian
to
obtain
the
organic
premium
for
more
to
the
animal.
Applegate
Organic
and
Natural
Meat
17
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Applegate
Natural
and
Organic
Meats
is
a
US
meat
further
processor.
Applegate
produces
and
sells
natural
and
organic
burgers,
hot
dogs,
sausages
and
other
further
processed
meats.
Applegate
states
is
mission
as
to
change
the
way
we
eat
meat
and
markets
its
products
as
a
healthy
way
to
eat
meat
where
you
aren’t
afraid
to
read
the
ingredients
list.
Applegate
focuses
on
value
adding
the
lower
value
parts
of
the
carcass,
which
is
primarily
trim.
Arcadian
is
a
major
supplier
of
organic
and
natural
beef
to
Applegate.
Physical
Chain
Applegate
purchases
organic
and
natural
beef
to
be
further
processed
into
burgers
and
hotdogs.
Applegate
is
unable
to
source
sufficient
grass-‐fed
and
organic
beef
from
domestically
in
the
US
and
relies
on
the
export
market
to
provide
the
shortfall
with
the
majority
of
its
beef
coming
from
Arcadian
in
Australia
and
Uruguay.
Wholefoods
is
Applegate’s
largest
customer
and
Applegate
is
actively
looking
for
suppliers
to
meet
increased
demand.
Applegate
produces
an
organic
and
a
natural
range
of
products.
Communications
&
Collaboration
Communication
is
key
to
Applegate’s
success
and
they
have
strong
relationships
with
both
suppliers
and
customers.
Applegate
regularly
visits
all
suppliers
and
work
with
them
to
manage
supply.
Applegate
has
collaborated
with
smaller
US
processors
who
are
unable
to
compete
to
move
to
organic
production
where
they
are
competitive.
Applegate
has
a
strong
relationship
with
Arcadian
and
they
constantly
work
together
to
manage
supply.
Applegate
regularly
has
teams
in
stores
running
demonstrations
to
introduce
their
products
and
connect
with
consumers.
Relevant
consumer
information
is
then
past
back
down
the
chain.
Governance
Applegate
has
a
12-‐month
commitment
with
all
suppliers.
Applegate
now
has
formal
contracts
with
suppliers
and
customers.
However,
for
the
first
20
years
the
company
operated
on
handshake
agreements.
Where
Applegate
builds
value
Applegate
selects
trustworthy
suppliers
to
provide
them
with
a
reliable
supply
of
trim,
the
lower
value
parts
of
the
carcass
which
processors
often
struggle
to
find
a
premium
market
for.
Applegate
then
further
processes
the
trim
to
add
value
and
then
sells
it
into
premium
organic
and
natural
markets.
Braemar
Investments
Pty
Ltd
18
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Braemar
run
5,000
breeding
cows
and
up
to
13,000
head
of
cattle
across
six
properties
centred
around
Blackall
in
Western
Queensland.
Braemar
has
been
organic
certified
for
the
last
12
years.
The
extensive
cattle
operation
Braemar
were
running
was
almost
organic
and
they
believed
in
the
organic
principles
so
gaining
organic
certification
was
relatively
straightforward.
Organic
certification
has
had
minimal
impact
on
production
levels.
The
geographic
diversity
of
the
six
properties
provides
Braemar
with
some
drought
protection.
The
long
term
trusting
relationship
Braemar
has
established
with
Arcadian,
which
includes
much
greater
price
certainty
and
an
organic
premium
has
given
Braemar
the
confidence
to
expand
their
business,
maintain
production
during
dry
times
and
then
capitalise
on
times
of
good
pasture
growth.
The
long-‐term
trust
ultimately
gives
Braemar
the
confidence
to
better
manage
Australia’s
unpredictable
wet
and
dry
climatic
cycles.
Physical
Chain
Braemar
is
an
organic
beef
cattle
producer
who
breed,
grow
and
finish
cattle
on
extensive
grazing
properties
in
Western
Queensland.
Braemar
purchase
supplementary
feed
in
times
of
drought
for
which
they
pay
an
organic
premium.
Braemar
also
purchases
organic
certified
store
cattle
and
Bulls.
Braemar
stock
Droughtmaster
cattle
bred
to
perform
under
local
conditions.
Braemar
sell
over
95%
of
cattle
either
directly
through
Arcadian
or
as
store
cattle
to
other
Arcadian
suppliers.
Arcadian
processes
the
cattle
and
sells
the
beef
to
its
domestic
and
export
customers.
Communications
&
Collaboration
Braemar
is
in
regular
contact
with
Arcadian,
at
least
once
a
week,
to
manage
supply
and
any
other
issues.
Forecasts
of
when
cattle
will
be
finished,
the
pasture
availability
and
Arcadian’s
need
for
cattle
are
all
discussed
and
any
required
changes
to
production
agreed
upon
mutually.
Other
issues
are
discussed
openly
and
dealt
with
collaboratively.
The
trust,
loyalty
and
regular
contact
between
Braemar
and
Arcadian
is
fundamental
to
the
success
of
the
business.
Arcadian
organises
field
trips
and
dinners
with
its
customers,
which
provides
value
feedback
to
producers
such
as
Braemar
and
further
builds
trust
within
the
value
chain.
Governance
There
is
no
formal
contact
between
Braemar
and
Arcadian
and
according
to
Ian
Scholes,
Braemar’s
owner
this
actually
helps
build
trust.
19
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
20
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
(McKilop,
2014).
Teys
buys
the
majority,
94%,
of
their
cattle
direct
from
producers,
which
requires
a
much
stronger
relationship
and
better
communication
than
the
traditional
purchase
through
the
saleyards.
Teys
usually
offers
100
day
contracts
for
the
supply
of
cattle.
However,
due
to
increased
demand
Teys
initially
offered
4
month
forward
contracts,
which
have
now
been
extended,
to
6
month
for
PCAS
certified
cattle.
Governance
The
major
incentive
for
producers
to
supply
Teys
is
the
$0.5-‐1.0/Kg
premium
paid
to
PCAS
certified
producers.
Teys
uses
this
premium
to
manage
cattle
supply.
Teys
does
not
directly
partner
with
producers
to
obtain
PCAS
accreditation,
rather
they
refer
potential
suppliers
to
the
Cattle
Council
of
Australia
or
agents.
Teys
invests
significant
resources
in
researching
and
predicting
future
Australian
beef
herd
numbers
and
maintains
a
data
bank
on
the
expected
numbers
and
grading,
including
the
geographic
locations,
throughout
the
industry.
Where
Teys
Builds
Value
Teys
is
a
very
efficient
and
effective
beef
processor
and
marketer.
They
have
access
to
a
wide
geographically
dispersed
network
of
potential
suppliers
to
source
cattle
from
and
a
wide
network
of
domestic
and
export
customers
to
market
to.
As
Australia’s
second
largest
beef
processor
Teys
has
significant
market
power,
which
it
uses
to
manage
cattle
supply
from
producers
and
sales
to
customers.
Teys
has
been
involved
in
the
PCAS
accreditation
process
from
the
beginning.
Argyle
Prestige
Meats
Argyle
Prestige
Meats
started
processing
and
marketing
their
beef
in
2006
following
frustration
at
constantly
being
a
price
taker.
Prior
to
this
Argyle
was
a
beef
producer
and
Angus
Stud.
Argyle
has
vertically
integrated
their
supply
chain
to
capture
the
value
of
their
Angus
genetics.
In
December
2013
Argyle
formed
a
50/50
joint
venture
with
The
Manildra
Group,
which
involved
expanding
their
operation
with
additional
land
and
a
larger
processing
plant
on
the
NSW
South
Coast,
adding
greater
capacity
and
geographic
diversity
to
their
production
system.
Argyle
markets
their
beef
as
MSA
accredited,
grass-‐
fed,
Angus,
antibiotic
and
Hormone
free
as
these
provide
a
distinct
point
of
difference
in
the
market
and
satisfy
the
majority
of
consumer
demands
for
organic
production
with
less
restrictions,
cost
and
regulations.
Argyle
recently
announced
a
deal
with
Coles
to
supply
branded
beef.
Physical
Chain
21
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
The
vertically
integrated
production
process
has
bought
the
majority
of
Argyle’s
supply
chain
under
their
own
control.
Argyle
breeds,
grows
and
finishes
their
own
Angus
cattle
on
their
own
properties.
A
Manildra
owned
abattoir
processes
cattle
and
then
Argyle
markets
the
beef
directly
to
restaurants,
butchers,
specialty
retailers,
Coles
and
export
customers
as
a
premium
product.
As
with
all
grass-‐fed
production
the
greatest
challenge
is
producing
cattle
of
consistent
quality
throughout
the
year.
Communication
and
Collaboration
The
vertically
integrated
structure
Argyle
chose
has
initially
limited
the
need
for
other
partners
in
the
value
chain.
However,
demand
for
the
company’s
beef
has
has
grown
beyond
what
they
can
produce
on
their
own
farms.
To
meet
this
increased
demand
Argyle
has
leveraged
existing
relationships
with
long
standing
stud
bull
customers
to
provide
additional
cattle.
Argyle
has
regular
contact
with
retail
customers
who
manage
relationships
with
consumers.
Argyle
also
regularly
uses
in
store
chefs
to
raise
awareness
amongst
consumers
of
their
products
and
gather
consumer
feedback.
Governance
Vertically
integrating
and
taking
control
of
the
value
chain
limits
the
need
for
governance
with
external
partners.
Argyle
pays
a
premium
to
suppliers
and
is
highly
selective
whom
they
choose
to
partner
with
selecting
long-‐standing
stud
customers
and
extended
family.
Where
Argyle
Builds
Value
Argyle
builds
value
through
the
Angus
genetics
of
their
cattle,
the
natural
production
process
that
is
almost
organic,
providing
a
consistent
supply
of
high
quality
beef
to
customers
and
the
branding
of
their
product
as
premium
high
quality
beef.
The
rest
of
the
production
process
activities
are
essential
steps
that
need
to
be
done
effectively
and
efficiently
for
Argyle
to
capture
the
value
it
has
built.
Mulawarra
Export
Pty
Ltd
Mulawarra
has
been
exporting
premium
Australian
beef
since
1997
and
the
company
aims
is
to
provide
the
best
quality
product
in
each
meat
category.
Mulwarra
does
not
supply
the
domestic
market.
In
2006
Mulwarra
started
supplying
certified
grass-‐fed
beef
to
customers
in
Asia
and
the
Middle
East.
However,
grass-‐fed
beef
is
only
10%
of
Mulwarra’s
business.
Mulwarra
has
developed
its
own
accreditation
scheme,
which
is
100%
traceable
to
birth
with
suppliers
audited
annually.
Mulwarra’s
premium
products
are
Premium
Grass
Fed
Black
Angus
and
100-‐120
day
Grain
Fed
Beef.
22
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Physical
Chain
Mulwarra
has
built
strong
relationships
with
its
suppliers
and
customers
and
limits
its
direct
involvement
in
the
value
chain
to
direct
suppliers
and
customers.
Mulwarra
sources
its
beef
from
six
processors
in
Queensland,
NSW
and
Victoria
who
processors
purchase
and
process
cattle
on
Mulwarra’s
behalf.
Mulwarra
does
not
commit
to
the
whole
carcass
and
only
purchases
selected
cuts
from
processors.
These
premium
cuts
are
sold
directly
to
hotels
and
restaurants
in
Asia
and
the
Middle
East.
Maintaining
consistency
of
supply
with
grass-‐fed
beef
has
been
a
constant
challenge,
especially
during
the
winter
as
most
of
their
grass-‐fed
product
comes
from
southern
Australia
where
winter
pasture
growth
is
limited.
Mulwarra
is
increasing
working
with
customers
to
have
their
beef
branded
on
restaurant
menus.
Communication
and
Collaboration
Mulwarra
has
developed
very
strong
relationships
with
the
processors
who
supply
their
beef.
They
believe
the
old
model
of
trying
to
do
everything
is
no
longer
applicable
and
have
selected
processors
to
work
with
whom
they
have
complete
trust
in.
This
trust
enables
Mulwarra
to
rely
on
the
processors
to
purchase
and
process
cattle
on
their
behalf.
Mulwarra
works
consistently
to
build
strong
relationships
with
their
customers
to
ensure
they
are
getting
the
high
quality
beef
they
require.
Mulwarra
actively
works
with
customers
to
obtain
feedback
from
consumers.
Relevant
information
is
widely
shared
up
and
down
the
value
chain
with
feedback
provided
all
the
way
back
to
processors
when
relevant.
To
maintain
trust
Mulwarra
is
careful
not
to
overcommit
to
customers.
Governance
Mulwarra
pays
premiums
to
ensure
they
remain
the
premier
supplier
of
Australian
beef.
They
also
have
close
and
well-‐established
relationships
built
on
trust
that
they
used
to
manage
supply.
Mulwarra
provides
excellent
service
to
their
customers,
the
company
spends
a
lot
of
time
working
with
customers
and
quickly
resolves
any
issues
that
may
arise.
Where
Mulwarra
Builds
Value
Mulwarra
sources
the
best
cattle
from
the
best
farms
and
the
quality
of
the
cattle
processed
for
Mulwarra
is
a
key
area
where
value
is
added.
The
trust,
cooperation
and
partnerships
Mulwarra
establishes
with
both
processors
and
customers
and
the
high
levels
of
customer
service
is
how
Mulwarra
captures
that
value.
Gralyn
Santa
Gertrudis
23
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Gralyn
run
250
breeding
cows
and
around
500
head
of
grass-‐fed
cattle
in
the
high
rainfall
Lower
Hunter
Valley
of
NSW
including
a
stud
herd
of
100
cows.
As
a
small
producer
Gralyn
have
fewer
options
with
limited
bargaining
power
for
selling
their
commercial
cattle.
Gralyn
is
MSA
certified
and
has
considered
obtaining
PCAS
certification
but
is
yet
to
do
so.
Gralyn
does
not
consider
organic
production
a
viable
option
due
to
their
high
stocking
rates
and
the
presence
of
liver
fluke.
Physical
Chain
Gralyn
breeds,
grows
and
finishes
cattle
on
their
improved
pastures
when
seasons
allow.
They
have
a
number
of
dams
they
can
irrigate
from
as
well
as
the
river.
Finished
cattle
are
sold
direct
to
Nipponham
owned
Wingham
Beef
Exports
and
store
cattle
through
local
saleyards.
Alternative
direct
selling
options
are
the
recently
acquired
JBS
abattoir
in
Scone
and
the
Teys
abattoir
in
Tamworth.
Stud
bulls
are
sold
to
commercial
and
stud
producers
across
Eastern
Australia.
Communication
and
Collaboration
Gralyn
operates
in
a
position
of
high
buyer
power.
Wingham
emails
the
cattle-‐
purchasing
grid
whenever
prices
change.
However,
the
Wingham
buyer
never
visits
the
property
to
view
cattle
and
at
times
cattle
can
only
be
booked
in
weeks
in
advance.
Wingham
provides
basic
feedback
on
each
beast
slaughtered
and
the
MSA
gradings
are
all
available
online.
Gralyn
tries
to
maintain
a
good
relationship
with
Wingham
Beef
Exports
by
not
pulling
cattle
out
at
the
last
minute.
Governance
As
a
small
producer
Gralyn
is
essentially
a
price
taker
with
few
options
but
to
accept
the
prices
on
offer.
Wingham
govern
their
supply
chain
primarily
through
price
by
upping
prices
to
encourage
producers
to
sell
more
cattle.
In
dry
times
there
can
be
a
6-‐10
week
wait
to
get
cattle
processed
at
Wingham,
when
cattle
are
booked
in
this
long
in
advance
there
is
no
committed
price.
Where
Gralyn
Builds
Value
Gralyn
produce
high
quality
cattle
that
are
well
finished
or
sold
as
store
cattle
when
pasture
is
not
available.
However,
as
a
small
producer
Gralyn
struggle
to
find
a
point
of
difference
in
the
market
that
they
can
exploit.
The
stud
herd
has
been
where
Gralyn
has
seen
its
ability
to
add
value.
As
a
small
producer
Gralyn
also
has
greater
challenges
collaborating
with
processors.
Yalandra
Fine
Foods
24
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Yalandra
Fine
Foods
run
1100
breeders
in
Southern
NSW
and
North
Eastern
Victoria.
Yalanra’s
herd
consists
of
900
full
blood
Wagyu
cows
and
200
first
and
second
cross
Angus
Wagyu
cows.
The
herd
has
been
especially
bred
to
produce
highly
marbled
beef
from
Australian
grazing
land
to
be
sold
into
the
domestic
and
export
markets.
Yalandra
combines
a
number
of
strategies
to
generate
value
for
the
business.
Yalandra
finishes
some
cattle
on
a
supplemented
grazing
production
system
where
cattle
are
fed
grain
out
in
the
paddocks
along
with
pasture,
combining
the
animal
welfare,
taste
and
natural
production
advantages
of
grass-‐fed
with
the
increased
growth
rate
and
predictability
of
grain
fed
production.
Yalandra
has
also
vertically
integrated
some
of
its
production
by
processing
and
retailing
beef
while
the
remainder
is
supplied
to
feedlots
for
the
export
market.
Physical
Chain
Cattle
are
bred
and
grown
on
Yalandra’s
properties
in
and
around
the
Victorian
High
Country.
Steers
are
sold
off
to
be
grain
finished
and
then
sold
on
the
export
market.
Non-‐pregnant
heifers
are
finished
on
a
pasture
supplemented
with
grain
to
supply
Yalnadra’s
retail
arm,
a
butcher
shop
in
Albury.
All
cattle
for
the
shop
are
kept
until
at
least
two
and
a
half
years
of
age
to
ensure
sufficient
marbling.
Cattle
finished
for
the
butcher
shop
are
contact
slaughtered
the
carcasses
are
hung
for
at
least
14-‐28
days.
Around
20%
of
Yalandra’s
production
is
sold
through
the
butcher
with
the
remainder
going
to
the
export
market.
Communication
and
Collaboration
Yalandra
manages
the
entire
chain
of
the
vertically
integrated
butcher
shop
side
of
the
business
themselves
to
eliminate
the
communication
and
collaboration
issues
within
the
beef
industry.
Yalandra
has
a
solid
relationship
with
the
feedlot
is
sells
steers
to.
Governance
Vertically
integrating
and
taking
control
of
the
value
chain
limits
the
need
for
governance
with
external
partners.
Where
Yalandra
Builds
Value
Yanadra
builds
value
through
the
genetics
of
its
cattle,
which
have
been
especially
bred
to
optimise
marbling
from
their
pasture
based
production
system.
Wagyu
is
a
premium
breed
that
commands
a
significant
market
premium.
Value
is
also
build
through
the
vertical
integration
of
the
retail
side
of
the
business.
The
natural
production
process
that
is
almost
organic,
providing
a
consistent
supply
of
high
quality
beef
to
customers
and
the
branding
of
their
product
as
premium
high
quality
beef
also
adds
value
as
does
the
aging
of
the
carcass.
25
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Meat
and
Livestock
Australia
Grass
fed
production
has
been
and
continues
to
be
the
major
production
system
in
Australia.
However,
grass-‐fed
has
not
been
seen
traditionally
as
a
premium
product.
Increasingly
producers
and
processors
are
using
grass-‐fed
and
the
animal
welfare,
health
and
environmental
aspects
of
it
as
a
point
of
differentiation
to
attract
market
premiums.
The
largest
markets
for
grass-‐fed
beef
are
Europe,
North
America
and
the
Australian
domestic
market.
Grass-‐fed
is
less
of
a
point
of
difference
in
Japan,
Korea
and
the
Middle
East.
EU
quotas
limit
access
to
the
European
market
for
Australian
producers.
Certified
grass-‐fed
is
not
necessarily
a
higher
quality
product
or
more
consistent
than
uncertified
grass-‐fed
beef.
However,
the
certification
and
marketing
give
consumers
the
confidence
to
pay
a
premium
for
certified
beef.
Cooperation
between
farmers
and
processors
in
the
Australian
beef
industry
has
been
limited
and
is
a
potential
area
for
improvement.
There
is
generally
limited
trust
between
processors
and
producers.
Conclusion:
Improved
cooperation
and
communication
with
value
chain
partners
has
the
potential
to
increase
value
for
participants
in
the
grass-‐fed
beef
value
chain.
The
Australian
grass-‐
fed
beef
industry
is
characterised
by
long
production
lead
times,
price
uncertainty,
low
margins
and
a
highly
variable
supply
and
quality
of
pasture,
the
primary
input.
The
companies
analysed
in
this
paper
show
that
collaboration
and
communication
can
create
value
and
reduce
uncertainty
in
the
grass-‐fed
beef
industry
through
helping
value
chain
participants
to
better
manage
the
climatic
and
price
uncertainty
that
characterises
the
Australian
beef
industry.
Value
can
be
created
through
improved
collaboration
between
producers
and
processors
as
well
as
vertical
integration.
A
market
focused
consumer
driven
approach
is
more
prevalent
with
high
value
premium
products
such
as
grass-‐fed,
organic
and
breed
specific
beef,
where
the
requirement
for
a
consistent
product
to
meet
consumer
demands
require
better
integration.
Greater
trust
and
collaboration
between
processors,
retailers
and
on
to
the
consumer
is
needed
to
capture
the
value
generated
through
certified
beef
production.
This
is
especially
so
for
creating
value
from
the
entire
animal
and
not
just
the
prime
cuts.
Improved
communications
and
high
levels
of
trust
are
vital
for
collaboration
to
be
successful.
26
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
References:
Applegate
Natural
&
Organic
Meats,
viewed
25
October
2014,
http://www.applegate.com/
Arcadian
Organic
&
Natural
Meat
Company,
viewed
15
September
2014,
http://www.arcadianorganic.com.au/
Argyle
Prestige
Meats,
viewed
6
November
2014,
http://argylemeats.com.au/
Aus-‐Meat,
2005,
Handbook
of
Australian
Meat,
7th
Edition,
Aus-‐Meat
Australian
Beef
Association,
2014,
Balance
of
power,
viewed
25
November
2014,
http://austbeef.com.au/2014/05/24/balance-‐of-‐power/
Boxgum
Grazing,
viewed
6
November
2014
http://www.boxgumgrazing.com.au/boxgum-‐beef
Brown,
J.,
Dev,
C.
&
Lee,
D.,
2000,
Managing
marketing
channel
opportunism:
The
efficacy
of
alternative
governance
mechanisms,
The
Journal
of
Marketing.
Certified
Pasture
Fed,
viewed
22
November
2014,
http://www.certifiedpasturefed.com.au/
Cornell
University,
Yields
and
dressing
percentages,
2014,
viewed
30
October
2014
http://smallfarms.cornell.edu/2012/07/10/yields-‐and-‐dressing-‐percentages/
Ferry,
J,
and
Parton,
K.,
2009,
Analysing
beef
supply
chain
strategy
in
Australia,the
United
States
and
the
United
Kingdom,
University
of
Wollongong,
viewed
29
October
2014,
http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=gsbpapers
Great
Southern,
viewed
3
December
2014,
http://www.greatsouthernfarms.com.au/
JBS
Australia,
viewed
3
December
2014,
http://www.jbssa.com.au/
Keogh,
M.
2014,
Opinion,
Supermarkets
can’t
have
it
both
ways
on
the
competition
laws,
Beef
Central,
viewed
25
November
2014,
http://www.beefcentral.com/news/opinion/opinion-‐supermarkets-‐cant-‐have-‐it-‐both-‐
ways-‐on-‐competition-‐law/
27
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
Lowe,
M.,
and
Gereffi,
G.,
2009,
A
value
chain
analysis
of
the
US
beef
and
dairy
industries,
Center
on
Globalization,
Governance
&
Competitiveness,
Duke
University,
viewed
6
November
2014
http://www.cggc.duke.edu/environment/valuechainanalysis/CGGC_BeefDairyReport_2-‐
16-‐09.pdf
McKiernan,
B.,
Gaden,
B.
and
Sundstrom,
B.,
2007,
Dressing
percentages
of
cattle,
NSW
DPI,
viewed
on
4
November
2014,
http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/103992/dressing-‐
percentages-‐for-‐cattle.pdf
McKilop,
C.,
2014,
Woolworths
beef
deal
brings
grassfed
premiums
to
producers,
ABC,
viewed
6
November
2014,
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-‐04-‐01/woolworths-‐beef-‐
deal-‐brings-‐grassfed-‐premiums-‐to-‐producers/5359142,
Meat
and
Livestock
Australia,
Australian
cattle
industry
projections
-‐
cattle
slaughter
and
beef
production
,
viewed
5
October
2014,
http://www.mla.com.au/Prices-‐and-‐
markets/Trends-‐and-‐analysis/Beef/Forecasts/MLA-‐Australian-‐cattle-‐industry-‐
projections-‐2012/4-‐Australian-‐cattle-‐industry-‐projections-‐cattle-‐slaughter-‐and-‐beef-‐
production
28
Effect of market consolidation on the red meat processing sector
Submission 1
Ashley
Sweeting
University
of
Tasmania
Australian
Grass-‐fed
Beef
Value
Chain
Analysis
systems
of
Western
Australia
and
Queensland,
Department
of
Agriculture
and
Food,
Western
Australia,
Curtin
University
of
Technology,
viewed
6
November
2014,
http://archive.agric.wa.gov.au/objtwr/imported_assets/content/amt/supply_chain_for
mance_australian_beef_industry_.pdf
Weber,
C.,
2013,
Upping
the
steaks:
How
grass-‐fed
beef
is
reshaping
ag
and
helping
the
planet,
Grist,
viewed
6
November
2014
http://grist.org/food/upping-‐the-‐steaks-‐
how-‐grass-‐fed-‐beef-‐is-‐reshaping-‐ag-‐and-‐helping-‐the-‐planet/
29