Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R

European Aviation Safety Agency

Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC)

and Guidance Material (GM)
to
Annex II (PART-145)
to Commission Regulation (EU)
No 1321/20141

Issue 2 — Amendment 1

11.7.20162

1
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 of 26 November 2014 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical
products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks (OJ L 362,
17.12.2014, p. 1), as last amended.
2
For the date of entry into force of this Issue, please refer to Decision 2016/011/R in the Official Publication of the Agency.
Page 1 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
1) Table of contents is amended as follows:

‘CONTENTS
AMC 145.1 General

SECTION A — TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS

AMC 145.A.10 Scope
GM 145.A.10 Scope
AMC 145.A.15 Application
AMC 145.A.20 Terms of approval
AMC 145.A.25(a) Facility requirements
AMC 145.A.25(b) Facility requirements
AMC 145.A.25(d) Facility requirements
AMC 145.A.30(a) Personnel requirements
AMC 145.A.30(b) Personnel requirements
AMC 145.A.30(c) Personnel requirements
AMC 145.A.30(d) Personnel requirements
AMC1 145.A.30(e) Personnel requirements
AMC2 145.A.30(e) Personnel requirements
AMC3 145.A.30(e) Personnel requirements
AMC4 145.A.30(e) Personnel requirements
AMC 145.A.30(f) Personnel requirements
AMC 145.A.30(g) Personnel requirements
AMC 145.A.30(h) Personnel requirements
AMC 145.A.30(j)(4) Personnel requirements
GM 145.A.30(j)(4) Personnel requirements (Flight crew)
AMC 145.A.30(j)(5) Personnel requirements
AMC 145.A.30(j)(5)(i) Personnel requirements
AMC 145.A.30(j)(5)(ii) Personnel requirements
GM 1 145.A.30(e) Personnel requirements
GM2 145.A.30(e) Competence assessment procedure
GM3 145.A.30(e) Template for recording experience/training
AMC 145.A.35(a) Certifying staff and support staff
AMC 145.A.35(b) Certifying staff and support staff
AMC 145.A.35(c) Certifying staff and support staff
AMC 145.A.35(d) Certifying staff and support staff
AMC 145.A.35(e) Certifying staff and support staff
AMC 145.A.35(f) Certifying staff and support staff
AMC 145.A.35(j) Certifying staff and support staff
AMC 145.A.35(n) Certifying staff and support staff

Page 2 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
AMC 145.A.35(o) Certifying staff and support staff
AMC 145.A.36 Records of airworthiness review staff
AMC 145.A.40(a) Equipment, tools and material
AMC 145.A.40(b) Equipment, tools and material
AMC 145.A.42(a) Acceptance of components
AMC 145.A.42(b) Acceptance of components
AMC 145.A.42(c) Acceptance of components
AMC 145.A.42(d) Acceptance of components
AMC 145.A.45(b) Maintenance data
AMC 145.A.45(c) Maintenance data
AMC 145.A.45(d) Maintenance data
AMC 145.A.45(e) Maintenance data
AMC 145.A.45(f) Maintenance data
AMC 145.A.45(g) Maintenance data
AMC 145.A.47(a) Production planning
AMC 145.A.47(b) Production planning
AMC 145.A.47(c) Production planning
GM 145.A.48 Performance of maintenance
AMC1 145.A.48(b) Performance of maintenance
AMC2 145.A.48(b) Performance of maintenance
AMC3 145.A.48(b) Performance of maintenance
AMC4 145.A.48(b) Performance of maintenance
AMC 145.A.48(c) Performance of maintenance
GM 145.A.48(c) Performance of maintenance
GM 145.A.48(d) Performance of maintenance
AMC 145.A.50 Certification of maintenance after embodiment of a Standard Change or Standard
Repair (SC/SR)
AMC 145.A.50(a) Certification of maintenance
AMC 145.A.50(b) Certification of maintenance
AMC No 1 to 145.A.50(d) Certification of maintenance
AMC No 2 to 145.A.50(d) Certification of maintenance
GM 145.A.50(d) EASA Form 1 Block 12 ‘Remarks’
AMC 145.A.50(e) Certification of maintenance
AMC 145.A.50(f) Certification of maintenance
GM 145.A.55(a) Maintenance and airworthiness review records
AMC 145.A.55(c) Maintenance and airworthiness review records
AMC 145.A.60(a) Occurrence reporting
GM 145.A.60(a) Occurrence reporting
AMC 145.A.60(b) Occurrence reporting
GM 145.A.60(c) Occurrence reporting
Page 3 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
AMC 145.A.65(a) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
AMC 145.A.65(b) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
GM 145.A.65(b)(1) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
AMC 145.A.65(b)(2) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
AMC 145.A.65(b)(3) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
AMC 145.A.65(c)(1) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
AMC 145.A.65(c)(2) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
GM 145.A.65(c)(1) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
AMC 145.A.70(a) Maintenance organisation exposition
GM 145.A.70(a) Maintenance organisation exposition
AMC 145.A.75(b) Privileges of the organisation
AMC 145.A.80 Limitations on the organisation

SECTION B — PROCEDURE FOR COMPETENT AUTHORITIES

AMC 145.B.10(1) Competent authority — General
AMC 145.B.10(3) Competent authority — Qualification and training
AMC 145.B.10(4) Competent authority — Procedures
AMC 145.B.20(1) Initial approval
AMC 145.B.20(2) Initial approval
AMC 145.B.20(3) Initial approval
AMC 145.B.20(5) Initial approval
AMC 145.B.20(6) Initial approval
AMC 145.B.25(1) Issue of approval
AMC 145.B.25(2) Issue of approval
AMC 145.B.25(3) Issue of approval
AMC 145.B.30(1) Continuation of an approval
AMC 145.B.30(2) Continuation of an approval
AMC 145.B.35 Changes
AMC 145.B.35(1) Changes
AMC 145.B.35(2) Changes to the organisation
AMC 145.B.40 MOE amendments
AMC 145.B.50(a) Findings
AMC 145.B.50(b) Findings
AMC 145.B.55 Record-keeping

AMC TO APPENDICES TO PART-145

AMC to Appendix III ‘Maintenance Organisation Approval’ referred to in Annex II (Part-145)

APPENDICES TO AMCs TO PART-145

Appendix I to AMC 145.B.20(1) EASA Form 4
Appendix II to AMC 145.B.20(5) EASA Form 6

Page 4 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
Appendix III to AMC 145.A.15 EASA Form 2
Appendix IV to AMC 145.A.30(e) and 145.B.10(3) Fuel Tank Safety Training’

2) Point 6.5 in GM1 145.A.30(e) is added as follows:

‘GM1 145.A.30(e) Personnel requirements

6. Procedures, information, tools and practices
6.1. Visual Inspection
6.2. Work logging and recording
6.3. Procedure — practice/mismatch/norms
6.4. Technical documentation — access and quality
6.5. Critical maintenance tasks and error-capturing methods (independent inspection, reinspection,
etc.)’

3) GM2 145.A.30(e) is amended as follows:

‘GM2 145.A.30(e) Competence assessment procedure

(...)

Understanding critical maintenance task X X X X X

Ability to compile and control completed work cards X X X
Ability to consider human performance and limitations X X X X X
Ability to determine required qualifications for task
performance X X X
Ability to identify and rectify existing and potential unsafe
conditions X X X X X
Ability to manage third parties involved in maintenance
activity X X
Ability to confirm proper accomplishment of maintenance
tasks X X X X
Ability to identify and properly plan performance of critical
maintenance tasks X X X’

4) AMC 145.A.47(a) is amended as follows:

‘AMC 145.A.47(a) Production planning

1. Depending on the amount and complexity of work generally performed by the maintenance
organisation, the planning system may range from a very simple procedure to a complex
organisational set-up including a dedicated planning function in support of the production function.
2. For the purpose of Part-145, the production planning function includes two complementary
Page 5 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
elements:
— scheduling the maintenance work ahead, to ensure that it will not adversely interfere with
other work as regards the availability of all necessary personnel, tools, equipment, material,
maintenance data and facilities.;
— during maintenance work, organising maintenance teams and shifts and provide all necessary
support to ensure the completion of maintenance without undue time pressure.
3. When establishing the production planning procedure, consideration should be given to the
following:
— logistics,
— inventory control,
— square meters of accommodation,
— man-hours estimation,
— man-hours availability,
— preparation of work,
— hangar availability,
— environmental conditions (access, lighting standards and cleanliness),
— co-ordination with internal and external suppliers, etc.,
— scheduling of safety-critical critical maintenance tasks during periods when staff are likely to
be most alert.’

5) GM 145.A.48 is added as follows:

‘GM 145.A.48 Performance of maintenance

AUTHORISED PERSON
An ‘authorised person’ is a person formally authorised by the maintenance organisation to perform or
supervise a maintenance task. An ‘authorised person’ is not necessarily ‘certifying staff’.
SIGN-OFF
A ‘sign-off’ is a statement issued by the ‘authorised person’ which indicates that the task or group of tasks
has been correctly performed. A ‘sign-off’ relates to one step in the maintenance process and is, therefore,
different to a certificate of release to service.’

6) AMC1 145.A.48(b) is added as follows:

‘AMC1 145.A.48(b) Performance of maintenance

The procedure should identify the error-capturing methods, the critical maintenance tasks, the training and
qualification of staff applying error-capturing methods, and how the organisation ensures that its staff is
familiar with critical maintenance tasks and error-capturing methods.’

7) AMC2 145.A.48(b) is added as follows:

‘AMC2 145.A.48(b) Performance of maintenance

CRITICAL MAINTENANCE TASKS
Page 6 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
(a) The procedure should ensure that the following maintenance tasks are reviewed to assess their
impact on flight safety:
(1) tasks that may affect the control of the aircraft flight path and attitude, such as installation,
rigging and adjustments of flight controls;
(2) aircraft stability control systems (autopilot, fuel transfer);
(3) tasks that may affect the propulsive force of the aircraft, including installation of aircraft
engines, propellers and rotors; and
(4) overhaul, calibration or rigging of engines, propellers, transmissions and gearboxes.
(b) The procedure should describe which data sources are used to identify critical maintenance tasks.
Several data sources may be used, such as:
(1) information from the design approval holder;
(2) accident reports;
(3) investigation and follow-up of incidents;
(4) occurrence reporting;
(5) flight data analysis;
(6) results of audits;
(7) normal operations monitoring schemes; and
(8) feedback from training.’

8) AMC3 145.A.48(b) is added as follows:

‘AMC3 145.A.48(b) Performance of maintenance

ERROR-CAPTURING METHODS
(a) Error-capturing methods are those actions defined by the organisation to detect maintenance errors
made when performing maintenance.
(b) The organisation should ensure that the error-capturing methods are adequate for the work and the
disturbance of the system. A combination of several actions (visual inspection, operational check,
functional test, rigging check) may be necessary in some cases.’

9) AMC4 145.A.48(b) is added as follows:

‘AMC4 145.A.48(b) Performance of maintenance

INDEPENDENT INSPECTION
Independent inspection is one possible error-capturing method.
(a) What is an independent inspection
An independent inspection is an inspection performed by an ‘independent qualified person’ of a task
carried out by an ‘authorised person’, taking into account that:
(1) the ‘authorised person’ is the person who performs the task or supervises the task and they
assume the full responsibility for the completion of the task in accordance with the applicable
maintenance data;

Page 7 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
(2) the ‘independent qualified person’ is the person who performs the independent inspection
and attests the satisfactory completion of the task and that no deficiencies have been found.
The ‘independent qualified person’ does not issue a certificate of release to service, therefore
they are not required to hold certification privileges;
(3) the ‘authorised person’ issues the certificate of release to service or signs off the completion of
the task after the independent inspection has been carried out satisfactorily;
(4) the work card system used by the organisation should record the identification of both persons
and the details of the independent inspection as necessary before the certificate of release to
service or sign-off for the completion of the task is issued.
(b) Qualifications of persons performing independent inspections
The organisation should have procedures to demonstrate that the ‘independent qualified person’ has
been trained and has gained experience in the specific inspection to be performed. The organisation
could consider making use of, for example:
(1) staff holding a certifying staff or support staff or sign-off authorisation or equivalent necessary
to release or sign off the critical maintenance task;
(2) staff holding a certifying staff or support staff or sign-off authorisation or equivalent necessary
to release or sign off similar task in a product of similar category and having received specific
practical training in the task to be inspected; or
(3) a commander holding a limited certification authorisation in accordance with 145.A.30(j)(4)
and having received adequate practical training and having enough experience in the specific
task to be inspected and on how to perform independent inspection.
(c) How to perform an independent inspection
An independent inspection should ensure correct assembly, locking and sense of operation. When
inspecting control systems that have undergone maintenance, the independent qualified person
should consider the following points independently:
(1) all those parts of the system that have actually been disconnected or disturbed should be
inspected for correct assembly and locking;
(2) the system as a whole should be inspected for full and free movement over the complete
range;
(3) cables should be tensioned correctly with adequate clearance at secondary stops;
(4) the operation of the control system as a whole should be observed to ensure that the controls
are operating in the correct sense;
(5) if different control systems are interconnected so that they affect each other, all the
interactions should be checked through the full range of the applicable controls; and
(6) software that is part of the critical maintenance task should be checked, for example: version,
compatibility with aircraft configuration.
(d) What to do in unforeseen cases when only one person is available
REINSPECTION:
(1) Reinspection is an error-capturing method subject to the same conditions as an independent
inspection is, except that the ‘authorised person’ performing the maintenance task is also
acting as ‘independent qualified person’ and performs the inspection.
(2) Reinspection, as an error-capturing method, should only be performed in unforeseen
circumstances when only one person is available to carry out the task and perform the
independent inspection. The circumstances cannot be considered unforeseen if the person or

Page 8 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
organisation has not assigned a suitable ‘independent qualified person’ to that particular line
station or shift.
(3) The certificate of release to service is issued after the task has been performed by the
‘authorised person’ and the reinspection has been carried out satisfactorily. The work card
system used by the organisation should record the identification and the details of the
reinspection before the certificate of release to service for the task is issued.’

10) AMC 145.A.48(c) is added as follows:

‘AMC 145.A.48(c) Performance of maintenance

The procedures should be aimed at:
(a) minimising multiple errors and preventing omissions. Therefore, the procedures should specify:
(1) that every maintenance task is signed off only after completion;
(2) how the grouping of tasks for the purpose of sign-off allows critical steps to be clearly
identified; and
(3) that work performed by personnel under supervision (i.e. temporary staff, trainees) is checked
and signed off by an authorised person;
(b) minimising the possibility of an error being repeated in identical tasks and, therefore, compromising
more than one system or function. Thus, the procedures should ensure that no person is required to
perform a maintenance task involving removal/installation or assembly/disassembly of several
components of the same type fitted to more than one system, a failure of which could have an
impact on safety, on the same aircraft or component during a particular maintenance check.
However, in unforeseen circumstances when only one person is available, the organisation may
make use of reinspection as described in point (d) of AMC4 145.A.48(b).’

11) GM 145.A.48(c) is added as follows:

‘GM 145.A.48(c) Performance of maintenance

To minimise the risk of multiple errors or errors being repeated, the organisation may implement:

— procedures to plan the performance by different persons of the same task in different systems;
— duplicate inspection or re-inspection procedures.’

12) GM 145.A.48(d) is added as follows:

‘GM 145.A.48(d) Performance of maintenance — critical design configuration control limitations

(CDCCL)
The organisation should ensure that when performing maintenance the CDCCL are not compromised. The
organisation should pay particular attention to possible adverse effects of any change to the wiring of the
aircraft, even of a change not specifically associated with the fuel tank system. For example, it should be
common practice to identify segregation of fuel gauging system wiring as a CDCCL. The organisation can
prevent adverse effects associated with changes to the wiring by standardising maintenance practices
through training, and not through periodic inspections. Training should be provided to avoid indiscriminate
routing and splicing of wire and to provide comprehensive knowledge of critical design features of fuel tank

Page 9 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
systems that would be controlled by a CDCCL. Guidance on the training of maintenance organisation
personnel is provided in Appendix IV to AMC 145.A.35.’

13) GM 145.A.65(b)(1) is added as follows:

‘GM 145.A.65(b)(1) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
Appendix XI to AMC M.A.708(c) provides guidance on the elements that need to be considered for the
maintenance contract between the CAMO and the maintenance organisation. The Part-145 organisation
should take into account these elements to ensure that a clear contract or work order has been concluded
before providing maintenance services.’

14) AMC 145.A.65(b)(3) is deleted.

15) In GM 145.A.65(c)(1) rows are inserted or amended as follows:

‘GM 145.A.65(c)(1) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system

PARA Comment HANGAR ENGINE MECH AVIONIC

145.A.48 Yes Yes if appl if appl

2.14 MOE Yes Yes Yes Yes

2.23 MOE Yes Yes No if app No if app No

16) AMC 145.A.70(a) is amended as follows:

‘AMC 145.A.70(a) Maintenance organisation exposition

(...)
2.13 Maintenance documentation in use and its completion of same
(...)

Page 10 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
2.23 Control of cCritical maintenance tasks and error-capturing methods
(...)
L2.7 Line procedure control offor critical maintenance tasks and error-capturing methods
PART 7 FAA SUPPLEMENTARY PROCEDURES FOR A FAR PART-145 REPAIR STATION
This section is reserved for those maintenance organisations approved under Part-145 who are also
certificated as a FAA FAR Part-145 repair station.
The contents of this Part should be based on the Maintenance Annex Guidance (MAG) issued by EASA and
the FAA following the agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on
cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety.
The content of this Part reflects the differences between Part-145 and FAR Parts 43/145 which will change
over the time as harmonisation and experience with the FAA progresses.
FAA Advisory Circular 145-7A Appendix 2 contains details of the Part 7 contents.
PART 8 TRANSPORT CANADA CIVIL AVIATION (TCCA) SUPPLEMENTARY PROCEDURES FOR A TCCA
AM CAR 573 MAINTENANCE ORGANISATION
This section is reserved for those Part-145 approved maintenance organisations who are also approved as
aTCCA AM holding a CAR 573 approval maintenance organisation.
The content of this Part should be based on the Maintenance Annex Guidance (MAG) issued by EASA and
the TCCA following the agreement on civil aviation safety between the European Union and Canada.
The content of this Part reflects the difference between Part-145 and AM 573 and will change over the time
as harmonisation and experience with Transport Canada Civil Aviation progresses.
TCCA Aircraft Maintenance & Manufacturing Staff Instruction MSI 10 Appendix A contains details of the
Part 8 contents.’

17) Appendix II to AMC 145.B.20(5) is amended as follows:

‘Appendix II to AMC 145.B.20(5) EASA Form 6

Part-145 APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT EASA FORM 6

Part 1: General
Name of organisation:

Approval reference:

Requested approval rating/:

EASA Form 3 dated*:

FAA FAR 145 Cert No (if applicable):

Address of fFacility aAudited:

Page 11 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R
Audit period: From to

Date(s) of aAudit:

Audit reference(s):

Persons interviewed:

Competent authority surveyor(s): Signature(s):

Competent authority office: Date of EASA Form 6 Ppart 1 completion:

*delete where applicable as appropriate

Page 12 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R

Part-145 APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT EASA FORM 6

Part 2: Part-145 Compliance Audit Review

The five columns may be labelled and used as necessary to record the approval class and/or product line
reviewed. Against each column used of the following Part-145 points subparagraphs please either tick ()
the box if satisfied with compliance or cross (X) the box if not satisfied with compliance and specify the
reference of the Part 4 finding next to the box, or enter N/A where an item is not applicable, or N/R when
applicable but not reviewed.
Para Subject

145.A.25 Facility requirements

145.A.30 Personnel requirements

145.A.35 Certifying Staff and support

staff

145.A.36 Records of airworthiness

review staff

145.A.40 Equipment, Tools and

material

145.A.42 Acceptance of Components

145.A.45 Maintenance Data

145.A.47 Production Planning

145.A.48 Performance of maintenance

145.A.50 Certification of Maintenance

145.A.55 Maintenance Records

145.A.60 Occurrence Reporting

145.A.65 Safety and Quality Policy,

maintenance procedures and
Quality System

Page 13 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R

145.A.70 Maintenance Organisation

Exposition (see Part 3)

145.A.75 Privileges of the organisation

145.A.80 Limitations on
the organisation

145.A.85 Changes to the organisation

145.A.95 Findings

Competent surveyor(s): Signature(s):

Competent authority office: Date of EASA Form 6 Ppart 2 completion:

Page 14 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R

Part-145 APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT EASA FORM 6

Part 3: Compliance with 145.A.70 Maintenance organisation exposition

Please either tick () the box if satisfied with compliance; or cross (X) if not satisfied with compliance and
specify the reference of the Part 4 finding; or enter N/A where an item is not applicable; or N/R when
applicable but not reviewed.

Part 1 Management
1.1 Corporate commitment by the accountable manager
1.2 Safety and Quality Policy
1.3 Management personnel
1.4 Duties and responsibilities of the management personnel
1.5 Management Organisation Chart
1.6 List of Certifying staff, support staff and airworthiness review staff (Note: a
separate document may be referenced)
1.7 Manpower resources
1.8 General description of the facilities at each address intended to be approved
1.9 Organisations intended scope of work
1.10 Notification procedure to the competent authority regarding changes to the
organisation’s activities/approval/location/personnel
1.11 Exposition amendment procedures
Part 2 Maintenance Procedures
2.1 Supplier evaluation and subcontract control procedure
Acceptance/inspection of aircraft components and material from outside
2.2
contractors
Storage, tagging, and release of aircraft components and material to aircraft
2.3
maintenance
2.4 Acceptance of tools and equipment
2.5 Calibration of tools and equipment
2.6 Use of tooling and equipment by staff (including alternate tools)
2.7 Cleanliness standards of maintenance facilities
Maintenance instructions and relationship to aircraft/aircraft component
2.8
manufacturers’ instructions including updating and availability to staff
2.9 Repair procedure
2.10 Aircraft maintenance programme compliance
2.11 Airworthiness Directives procedure
2.12 Optional modification procedure

Part-145 APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT EASA FORM 6

Page 15 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R

PART 3: Compliance with 145.A.70 Maintenance organisation exposition

2.13 Maintenance documentation in use and its completion of same
2.14 Technical records control
2.15 Rectification of defects arising during base maintenance
2.16 Release to service procedure
2.17 Records for the operator
2.18 Reporting of defects to the competent authority/Operator/Manufacturer
2.19 Return of defective aircraft components to store
2.20 Defective components to outside contractors
2.21 Control of computer maintenance record systems
2.22 Control of manhour planning versus scheduled maintenance work
2.23 Control of cCritical maintenance tasks and error-capturing methods
2.24 Reference to specific maintenance procedures
2.25 Procedures to detect and rectify maintenance errors
2.26 Shift/task handover procedures
Procedures for notification of maintenance data inaccuracies and
2.27
ambiguities to the type certificate holder
2.28 Production planning procedures
Airworthiness review procedures and records for ELA1 aircraft not involved
2.29
in commercial operations
Development and approval processing for maintenance programmes for
2.30
ELA2 aircraft not involved in commercial operations
Part L2 Additional Line Maintenance Procedures

L2.1 Line maintenance control of aircraft components, tools, equipment, etc.

L2.2 Line maintenance procedures related to servicing/fuelling/de-icing, etc.
L2.3 Line maintenance control of defects and repetitive defects
L2.4 Line procedure for completion of technical log
L2.5 Line procedure for pooled parts and loan parts
L2.6 Line procedure for return of defective parts removed from aircraft
Line procedure for control of critical maintenance tasks and error-capturing
L2.7
methods

Part 3 Quality system procedures

3.1 Quality audit of organisation procedures

3.2 Quality audit of aircraft
3.3 Quality audit remedial action procedure
3.4 Certifying staff and support staff qualification and training procedures

Part-145 APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT EASA FORM 6

Page 16 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R

PART 3: Compliance with 145.A.70 Maintenance organisation exposition

3.5 Certifying staff records
3.6 Quality audit personnel
3.7 Qualifying inspectors
3.8 Qualifying mechanics
3.9 Aircraft/aircraft component maintenance tasks exemption process control.
3.10 Concession control for deviation from organisation’s procedures
3.11 Qualification procedure for specialised activities such as NDT, welding, etc.
3.12 Control of manufacturers’ and other maintenance working teams
3.13 Human Factors training procedure
3.14 Competence assessment of personnel
Training procedures for on-the-job training as per Section 6 of Appendix III
3.15 to Part-66 (limited to the case where the competent authority for the
Part-145 approval and for the Part-66 licence is the same)
Procedure for the issue of a recommendation to the competent authority
for the issue of a Part-66 licence in accordance with 66.B.105 (limited to the
3.16
case where the competent authority for the Part-145 approval and for the
Part-66 licence is the same)
Part 4
4.1 Contracting operators
4.2 Operator procedures/paperwork
4.3 Operator record completion

Part 5 Appendices

5.1 Sample Documents

5.2 List of subcontractors
5.3 List of Line maintenance locations
5.4 List of Part-145 organisations

MOE Reference: MOE Amendment:

Competent authority audit staff: Signature(s):

Competent authority office: Date of EASA Form 6 pPart 3 completion:

Page 17 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R

Part-145 APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT EASA FORM 6

Part 4: Findings — Part-145 Compliance status

Each level 1 and 2 finding should be recorded whether it has been rectified or not and should be identified
by a simple cross-reference to the Part 2 requirement. All non-rectified findings should be copied in writing
to the organisation for the necessary corrective action.

Audit reference(s): L Corrective action

Findings E
Part
2 or 3 V
Date Date
ref.erence Reference
E
Due Closed
L

Page 18 of 19
 Annex II to ED Decision 2016/011/R

Part-145 APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION REPORT EASA FORM 6

Part 5: Part-145 Approval or continued approval or change recommendation*

Name of organisation:

Approval reference:

Audit reference(s):

The following Part-145 scope of approval is recommended for this organisation:

Or, it is recommended that the Part-145 scope of approval specified in EASA Form 3 referenced
...................................................... be continued.

Name of recommending competent authority surveyor:

Signature of recommending competent authority surveyor:

Competent authority office:

Date of recommendation:

EASA Form 6 review (quality check): Date:

*delete as appropriate’

Page 19 of 19