Journal of Engineering Science and Technology

Vol. 13, No. 10 (2018) 3263 - 3276

© School of Engineering, Taylor’s University

CORROSION RESISTANCE OF SELF-COMPACTING

CONCRETE CONTAINING CALCIUM STEARATE

AGUS MARYOTO1,*, BUNTARA STHENLY GAN2,

NOR INTANG SETYO HERMANTO1, RACHMAD SETIJADI3
1Department of Civil Engineering, Jenderal Soedirman University,

Jl. Mayjend Sungkono KM 5, Blater, Purbalingga, Central Java, Indonesia, 53371

2Department of Architecture, College of Engineering, Nihon University, 1-Nakagawara,

Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan

3Department of Geology Engineering, Jenderal Soedirman University,

Jl. Mayjend Sungkono KM 5, Blater, Purbalingga, Central Java, Indonesia, 53371

*Corresponding Author: [email protected]

Abstract
This study aims to determine the corrosion resistance of self-compacting concrete
(SCC) combined with calcium stearate (CS), Ca(C18H35O2)2. The concrete
qualities tested are 20, 30, and 40 MPa. The CS dose used ranges from 0 to 2.85%
of the cement weight. Two types of testing were performed in this study, namely
compressive strength and accelerated corrosion tests. The compressive test was
performed using cylinders 150 mm in diameter and 300 mm in height and
accelerated corrosion specimen was a prism 100 x 100 x 200 mm. The results
show the improvements of the compressive strength of SCC 20, 30 and 40 MPa
without and with CS are 28, 31, 28, and 37%; 16, 8, 10 and 3%; and 20, 14, 6
and -2% respectively, compared with conventional concrete. The corrosion attack
decreased by around 29, 46, 86 and 86% for SCC 20 MPa with CS content of 0,
0.28, 2.43, and 2.85% respectively; 23, 27, 34, and 65% for SCC 30 MPa with
CS content of 0, 0.24, 1.20 and 2.40% respectively; and around 7, 46, 62 and
63% for SCC 40 MPa with CS content of 0, 0.19, 0.93, and 1.86% respectively
compared with conventional concrete.
Keywords: Calcium stearate, Corrosion resistance, Self-compacting concrete,
Compressive strength, Accelerated corrosion.

3263
3264 A. Maryoto et al.

1. Introduction
SCC is a type of concrete that can consolidate itself without any external vibration.
This type of concrete is made up of cement, crushed stone, sand, water and
admixtures, which usually use a superplasticizer of a high-range water reducer type.
It was first developed in Japan in 1988 [1]. The admixture material is a
superplasticizer that serves to make fresh concrete more flow able, more viscous
[2] and easy to cast [3]. Then the concrete is recognized as SCC. SCC is very
suitable for use in concrete structures that have tight reinforcement. This is due to
its ability to solidify itself. Finally, more solid hardened concrete is obtained
without honeycomb. The porosity present in the hardened concrete is also
extremely reduced [4]. Another advantage is that the need to use skilled labour for
concrete compaction can be significantly reduced. Recent studies have found that
SCC is more resistant to acid attack [5], more difficult for segregation [6], and
suitable for casting on site and in precast concrete [7].
Increasing the superplasticizer dose, as one of the added ingredients in SCC,
increases the compressive strength of the concrete [8]. Although SCC has many
advantages over conventional concrete, the treatment methods affect its mechanical
properties [9, 10]. Practically, SCC can not only be made from Ordinary Portland
Cement (OPC) but can also be combined with the use of fly ash [11] and rice husk
ash [12]. The use of fly ash in the SCC endows the concrete with higher
compressive strength and bending capacity. More specific research has found that
the compressive strength of SCC is lower than that of conventional concrete at 28
days, but higher at 90 days [13].
In terms of its macrostructure, SCC is a very dense material. However, the
microstructure, although the SCC is very solid, still has capillaries. These capillaries
are formed during the cement hydration reaction process. Some of the unused water
in the hydration reaction of the cement evaporates and leaves the capillary pathways.
Corrosive ions, i.e., chloride and sulphate, can then enter through the capillaries [14]
to reach the concrete reinforcement surface in the concrete. Some researchers have
conducted studies on the corrosion progression and prediction of the corrosion rate
[15, 16] in reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete. Corrosion causes a decrease
in the compressive strength of the concrete [17, 18], reduces the volume of the
original reinforcement [19], and causes the loss of reinforcement capacity and
concrete bonds [20, 21], resulting in a decrease in the structural capacity, ductility
and service life of the reinforced concrete. These corrosion defect have resulted in a
rise in the cost of maintaining reinforced concrete structures [22]. When the concrete
cover begins to peel off due to pressure from corrosion products, degradation of
reinforced concrete structures occurs faster [23].
The penetration of liquids that carry corrosive ions into the concrete greatly
threatens the concrete structure with corrosion attack in the long term. The danger
of a corrosion attack on the concrete structure can be reduced by protecting the
reinforcement and increasing the properties of the concrete microstructure [24, 25].
Concrete reinforcement can be protected from corrosion using a coating system or
by increasing the anodic level of the reinforcement bar. Improved properties of
concrete microstructures can be obtained by increasing the hydrophobicity of the
hardened concrete [26, 27, 28]. Some researchers have used butyl stearate [29, 30,
31] and other compounds [32] to improve the properties of conventional concrete
and to protect concrete from corrosion attack. This study aims to determine the

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

Corrosion Resistance of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Calcium . . . . 3265

corrosion resistance of SCC containing calcium stearate. Corrosion attack is

simulated with artificial corrosion using chloride ion media. Because compressive
strength is an essential mechanical property of concrete, a compressive strength test
is also performed to determine the effect of the calcium stearate in the SCC on the
concrete quality of 20 MPa, 30 MPa and 40 MPa.

2. Methods
2.1. Material and equipment
The materials used in this study consist of cement (Portland Composite Cement
type, PCC), crushed stone, sand, water, superplasticizer (Viscocrete 1003), calcium
stearate, 3% sodium chloride solution, ammonium citrate solution and plain steel
bar 12 mm in diameter. The chemical content of the cement and calcium stearate
used in the study is shown in Table 1. Physical tests including specific gravity,
fineness modulus, volume weight, sieve analysis, and clay content were performed
on the materials of crushed stone and sand used. The specific gravity, fineness
modulus, volume weight and clay content are 2.65, 2.68, 1.49 ton/m3, 1.13% for
sand and 2.61, 6.47, 1.51 ton/m3, 0.75% respectively. The maximum aggregate
used is 20 mm. Table 2 shows the grading of fine and coarse aggregate. Three
concrete strengths were designed and used as shown in Table 3 and, for each of
these, three standard cylinder molds of 150 mm diameter and 300 mm height, and
three prism molds of 100, 100, and 200 mm were used.
Table 4 shows the variables used in this study. The designation C with two
digits indicates the concrete and its strength, SP means superplasticizer, the three-
digit number after SP represents the percentage contents of superplasticizer by
cement weight, CST is the abbreviation for calcium stearate. The three-digit
number after CST is the content of calcium stearate as a percentage of cement
weight. The calcium stearate contents for SCC 20 MPa are 0, 0.28, 1.43 and 2.85%,
for SCC 30 MPa are 0, 0.24, 1.20, 2.40%, and for SCC 40 MPa are 0, 0.19, 0.93
and 1.865% by weight of cement. A cylindrical specimen with diameter 150 mm
and height 300 mm is used for a compressive strength test at 28 days. Another type
of specimen used for the corrosion test is a beam with dimensions 100 mm x 100
mm x 200 mm. Three specimens each are used for the compressive strength and
corrosion tests.

Table 1. Chemical content of cement and calcium stearate.

Cement (PCC) Calcium stearate
Chemical compound Content (%) Chemical element Content (%)
Silicon dioxide (SiO2) 18.76 Calcium 6.60
Aluminium oxide (Al2O3) 5.54 Carbon 71.29
Ferro oxide (Fe2O3) 3.31 Hydrogen 11.55
Calcium oxide (CaO) 63.16 Oxygen 10.56
Magnesium oxide (MgO) 1.73
Sulphur trioxide (SO3) 2.06
Loss of ignition (LOI) 3.73
Free lime 1.53
Insoluble part 0.71
Alkali 0.44

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

3266 A. Maryoto et al.

Table 2. Sieve analyses of fine and coarse aggregate

Fine aggregate Coarse aggregate
Size of Passing (%) Size of Passing (%)
sieve sieve
Result Requirements Result Requirements
(mm) (mm)
9.50 100.00 100-100 38.10 100.00 100-100
4.76 95.00 90-100 19.00 97.50 95-100
2.38 87.50 85-100 9.50 47.30 30-60
1.19 78.30 75-100 4.76 8.50 0-10
0.59 50.79 60-79 2.38 0.00 0-0
0.279 20.09 12-40 1.19 0.00 0-0
0.149 0.29 0-10 0.60 0.00 0-0
Pan - Group III 0.30 0.00 0-0
0.15 0.00 Max. 20 mm
Pan 0.00

Table 3. Mixture proportions of self-compacting concrete.

Unit weight (kg/m3)
Material
20 (MPa) 30 (MPa) 40 (MPa)
Cement (PCC) 350 415 535
Sand 910 815 750
Crushed stone 910 920 870
Free water 175 187 180
Superplasticizer (lt) 0.88 1.04 1.34
Water cement ratio 0.5 0.45 0.34
(%)
Gmax (mm) 20 20 20
s/a (%) 0.5 0.47 0.46
Calcium stearate (% 0;0.29;1.43;2.85 0;0.24;1.20;2.41 0;0.19;0.93;1.86
of cement weight)
Table 4. Specimen designation.
No. of Specimen SP content CST content Concrete
code designation (%) (kg/m3 ; %) grade (MPa)
1 C20-SP0.00-CST0.00 0 0 ; 0.00
2 C20-SP0.25-CST0.00 0.25 0 ; 0.00
3 C20-SP0.25-CST0.28 0.25 1 ; 0.28 20
4 C20-SP0.25-CST1.43 0.25 5 ; 1.43
5 C20-SP0.25-CST2.85 0.25 10 ; 2.85
1 C30-SP0.00-CST0.00 0 0 ; 0.00
2 C30-SP0.25-CST0.00 0.25 0 ; 0.00
3 C30-SP0.25-CST0.24 0.25 1 ; 0.24 30
4 C30-SP0.25-CST1.20 0.25 5 ; 1.20
5 C30-SP0.25-CST2.40 0.25 10 ; 2.40
1 C40-SP0.00-CST0.00 0 0 ; 0.00
2 C40-SP0.25-CST0.00 0.25 0 ; 0.00
3 C40-SP0.25-CST0.19 0.25 1 ; 0.19 40
4 C40-SP0.25-CST0.93 0.25 5 ; 0.93
5 C40-SP0.25-CST1.86 0.25 10 ; 1.86

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

Corrosion Resistance of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Calcium . . . . 3267

The superplasticizer used in this study is Viscocrete 1003, as shown in Fig. 1.

Its chemical base is an aqueous solution of modified polycarboxylate copolymers,
its density is around 1.065 kg per litre, and the total chloride ion content is under
0.1% per weight of Viscocrete.
This superplasticizer enables the stable generation of free chloride, which does
not cause corrosion in concrete reinforcement. The colour of the product is
brownish and it has been developed to make the concrete flow, and to reduce
segregation and bleeding. This performance is possible, as stated before, because it
absorbs the surface of the cement particles and produces a sterical separation effect.
The self-compacting particles can be maintained for more than 1 hour at a
temperature of 30° C. Figure 2 shows the calcium stearate.

Fig. 1. Viscocrete 1003. Fig. 2. Calcium stearate.

2.2. Concrete mixing procedures

Fresh concrete is made by mixing cement, sand, crushed stone and water. Mixing
is done for 3–5 minutes until the fresh concrete becomes homogeneous. In this
process, the fresh concrete is expected to reach a slump of about 3–5 cm. The next
step is to add a superplasticizer into the fresh concrete, and the concrete mixer is
rotated again for 1 minute to produce a homogeneous mixture. The workability of
the fresh concrete can be measured using Abram’s cone, where the larger diameter
end of the cone is placed on the surface of the baseplate. The slump level is defined
by measuring the diameter of the fresh concrete after the Abram’s cone is lifted.
The compressive strength test specimens are made by inserting fresh concrete
into a cylinder in three layers. Each layer is compacted 25 times with a tamping rod
with diameter 16 mm and length 600 mm. The last stage of compaction is in the
form of external vibration by tapping the outside of the cylinder molding with a
rubber hammer 15 times [33].

2.3. Compressive strength of concrete

When the specimen is 1 day old, the molding is removed and the concrete is then
treated for curing the specimen by soaking it in fresh water at temperatures around
25 °C for 27 days. The compressive strength test specimen is lifted out of the curing
pond water and aerated to dry it at room temperature for approximately 6 hours.
Flattening of the cylinder surface is completed by applying a Sulphur capping. A
compressive strength test is carried out by placing the concrete specimens on a
UTM machine in a flat position. The concrete compressive strength value can be
calculated from the maximum load divided by the area.

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

3268 A. Maryoto et al.

2.4. Artificially accelerated corrosion

Before the fresh concrete is cast into a 100 mm x 100 mm x 200 mm prism mold,
a plain steel bar with diameter 12 mm and length 100 mm is positioned in the mold.
This steel bar is fitted with a cable at one end. This cable is useful for generating
artificially accelerated corrosion using an electrolytic medium by connecting it to
the power supply. This connecting cable is installed by soldering it to the steel bar.
The steel bar is weighed first (A) to obtain the initial weight. The molded specimens
are released when the specimen is 1 day old. Then the specimen is treated by
covering it with a wet mattress for 27 days.
The artificially accelerated corrosion treatment process begins when the
concrete is 28 days old. The existing cable attached to the reinforcement is
connected to the power supply. The power supply is used to generate corrosion in
four specimens of reinforced concrete beams. The corrosion process with the
electrical corrosion system can be seen in Fig. 3. The voltage used for the artificially
accelerated corrosion process is about 12 V. This artificially accelerated corrosion
process is observed daily to determine which specimens have started to generate
corrosion. The occurrence of corrosion can be identified by the presence of cracks
on the concrete surface, and the colour of the water with 3% NaCl becomes reddish.
The surface of the concrete becomes cracked because of the pressure of the
corrosion product, whose volume enlarges to 2–3 times the original steel volume
[34]. The artificially accelerated corrosion treatment was stopped after a crack
appeared on the concrete surface of the entire specimen.
The reinforced concrete test object is broken down to remove the reinforcing
steel embedded inside the concrete as shown in Fig. 4. The corrosion product on
the surface of the steel bar as shown in Fig. 5 is cleaned with a wire brush. To
completely clean off the rust, the reinforcing steel is immersed in ammonium citrate
solution for 24 hours. The steel bar is removed from the ammonium citrate bath
and dried with a cloth rag. The corrosion-free steel bar shown in Fig. 6 is weighed
and the weight after corrosion attack (B) is obtained. The amount of corrosion can
be calculated by the equation below.
𝐴−𝐵
Corrosion (%) = 𝑥 100% (1)
𝐴

Fig. 3. Artificially accelerated Fig. 4. Removal of embedded

corrosion process. steel bar in concrete.

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

Corrosion Resistance of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Calcium . . . . 3269

Fig. 5. Corrosion product on steel bar. Fig. 6. Corrosion-free

steel bar.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fresh concrete
Adding Viscocrete 1003 clearly enhances the concrete’s workability, as can be
detected in Figs. 7 and 8. Figure 7 shows the measurement of the fresh concrete’s
workability before Viscocrete 1003 is added. The value of concrete slump indicates
3–5 cm. The concrete looks very thick and not flowable, being difficult to cast. By
contrast, Fig. 8 shows the fresh concrete after adding Viscocrete 1003. The concrete
becomes very dilute and flowable without using vibrators. Testing of the value of
the fresh concrete’s slump shows its diameter to be about 70 cm. This shows that
concrete with the addition of Viscocrete 1003 meets the criteria for SCC. This
results in de-flocculation and dispersion of cement particles. The resulting
improvement in workability can be exploited in two ways: by producing concrete
with good workability or concrete with a very high compressive strength. SCC can
be produced without bleeding or segregation [35].

Fig. 7. Slump of conventional Fig. 8. Slump flow of SCC.

concrete.

3.2. Compressive strength of concrete

Table 5 reveals the results of the compressive strength test. The three categories of
concrete strength used are 20, 30, and 40 MPa. The effect of calcium stearate on
the compressive strength of SCC 20, 30 and 30 MPa can be seen in Fig. 9.
Figure 9 shows the relationship between the code number for concrete grades
20, 30, and 40 MPa and the compressive strength. Specimen number 1 represents

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

3270 A. Maryoto et al.

concrete without superplasticizer and calcium stearate, and code number 2 means
concrete with superplasticizer and without calcium stearate. Code numbers 3, 4,
and 5 are concrete with supplementary superplasticizer and calcium stearate in the
doses listed in Table 2.
Figure 9 shows that the compressive strength of SCC is greater than that of
conventional concrete. This is because the concrete mix proportions in SCC have a
lower water–cement ratio. The low water content causes low pore and capillary
values in the hardening concrete. The hardened concrete formed is denser and
contains fewer capillaries.
SCC with calcium stearate has a compressive strength that tends to be the same
for the 20 MPa quality concrete and tends to fall for the concrete qualities of 30 MPa
and 40 MPa when compared with the SCC concrete without calcium stearate. This is
caused by the formation of material from the reaction of the stearate and calcium
hydroxide. Calcium hydroxide is the residual reaction between C3S and water. This
reaction can be seen in the chemical equations/formulas (2) and (3). The result of this
reaction is a material that coats the capillary surface like a wax. This material has a
weak bond when compared with the calcium silicate hydrate bond. Finally, this
material leads to a decrease of the concrete’s compressive strength.
The compressive strength of SCC without and with calcium stearate is higher
than that of conventional concrete. The increases in compressive strength of SCC
20, 30, and 40 MPa with calcium stearate, compared with conventional concrete,
are 28, 31, 28, and 37%; 16, 8, 10, and 3%; and 20, 14, 6 and -2% respectively.
2C3S + 6H → C3S2H3 + 3Ca(OH)2 (2)
Calcium silicate hydrate
Ca(OH)2 + RCOOH → Ca+COOR- + H2O (3)
Calcium hydroxide(lime)+ stearate → insoluble calcium stearate + water [27].
Table 5. Results of compressive strength test.
Code Specimen Compressive Improved Concrete
no. strength (MPa) compressive grade
designation strength (%) (MPa)
1 C20-SP0.00-CST0.00 19.49
2 C20-SP0.25-CST0.00 24.98 28
3 C20-SP0.25-CST0.28 25.54 32 20
4 C20-SP0.25-CST1.43 24.98 28
5 C20-SP0.25-CST2.85 26.65 37
1 C30-SP0.00-CST0.00 29.75
2 C30-SP0.25-CST0.00 34.42 16
3 C30-SP0.25-CST0.24 32.01 8 30
4 C30-SP0.25-CST1.20 32.75 10
5 C30-SP0.25-CST2.40 30.72 3
1 C40-SP0.00-CST0.00 45.27
2 C40-SP0.25-CST0.00 54.32 20
3 C40-SP0.25-CST0.19 51.50 14 40
4 C40-SP0.25-CST0.93 48.10 6
5 C40-SP0.25-CST1.86 44.14 -2

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

Corrosion Resistance of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Calcium . . . . 3271

60

Compressive strength (MPa)

50

40

30

20
20 MPa
10 30 MPa
40 MPa
0
1 2 3 4 5
Code number
Fig. 9. Compressive strength of concrete 20, 30, 40 MPa.
From Fig. 9, it can be concluded that calcium stearate can be safely used in SCC
with a content of 10 kg per cubic metre of concrete. This can be seen from the fact
that the average compressive strength of concrete without superplasticizer and
calcium stearate was 19.49, 29.75, and 45.27 MPa, while for the SCC with 10 kg/m3
calcium stearate content the values were 26.65, 30.72, and 44.14 MPa for the
concrete qualities of 20, 30, and 40 MPa, respectively. The compressive strength
of SCC concrete with 10 kg/m3 calcium stearate content is still higher than concrete
without superplasticizer and calcium stearate.

3.3. Corrosion of steel bar in reinforced concrete

The corrosion results of the steel bar in the concrete are shown in Table 6. It can be
seen that the concrete without superplasticizer and calcium stearate undergoes a
greater corrosion attack than SCC without calcium stearate.
SCC with calcium stearate has better resistance to corrosion by chloride ions
than SCC without calcium stearate. The SCC’s behaviour with addition of calcium
stearate can be seen in Fig. 10. This figure connects the code number with the
amount of corrosion. Based on Fig. 10, it can be seen that the greater the percentage
of calcium stearate added to SCC, the lower the corrosion that occurs in the
concrete reinforcement. This trend occurs not only in 20 MPa quality concrete but
also in concrete with the quality of 30 MPa and 40 MPa. This behaviour is caused
by very fine calcium stearate particles, which are even finer than the cement grains.
This physical property causes the calcium stearate to fill smaller pores and smaller
spaces when the concrete becomes hard.
The reduction of the corrosion attack on SCC with calcium stearate may also be
caused by the formation of a wax-like compound [36-40]. The compound is formed
due to the reaction of stearate groups with calcium hydroxide. This wax-like
compound is hydrophobic. The positive effect of this hydrophobicity is that when
the surface of the concrete is in contact with water, the contact angle is very large.
The contact angle is between 90o and 120o [41]. Harald Justnes in 2008 [42] stated
that the greater contact angle between the water and concrete surfaces means that

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

3272 A. Maryoto et al.

water is not able to penetrate into the concrete capillaries without specific
hydrostatic pressure [43].

Table 6. Results of artificially accelerated corrosion test.

Code Specimen designation Corrosion (%) Concrete grade
no. (MPa)
1 C20-SP0.00-CST0.00 11.68
2 C20-SP0.25-CST0.00 8.26
3 C20-SP0.25-CST0.28 6.26 20
4 C20-SP0.25-CST1.43 1.64
5 C20-SP0.25-CST2.85 1.61
1 C30-SP0.00-CST0.00 10.90
2 C30-SP0.25-CST0.00 8.36
3 C30-SP0.25-CST0.24 7.99 30
4 C30-SP0.25-CST1.20 7.21
5 C30-SP0.25-CST2.40 3.85
1 C40-SP0.00-CST0.00 8.28
2 C40-SP0.25-CST0.00 7.73
3 C40-SP0.25-CST0.19 4.19 40
4 C40-SP0.25-CST0.93 3.16
5 C40-SP0.25-CST1.86 2.68

14
20 MPa
12
30 MPa
10 40 MPa
Corrosion (%)

0
1 2 3 4 5
Code number
Fig. 10. Corrosion of steel bar in concrete 20, 30 and 40 MPa.

4. Conclusions
The effect of using calcium stearate in SCC together with its compressive strength
and corrosion resistance have been discussed in detail. The findings can be
summarized as follows:

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

Corrosion Resistance of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Calcium . . . . 3273

 Calcium stearate used in SCC has a good effect on the compressive strength and
resistance to corrosion attack by chloride ions.
 SCC has better resistance to corrosion attacks by chloride ions compared with
conventional concrete.
 The corrosion attack declined by around 29, 46, 86 and 86% for SCC 20 MPa
with calcium stearate content of 0, 0.28, 2.43, and 2.85% respectively; by around
23, 27, 34, and 65% for SCC 30 MPa with calcium stearate content of 0, 0.24,
1.20 and 2.40% respectively; and by around 7, 46, 62 and 63% for SCC 40 MPa
with calcium stearate content of 0, 0.19, 0.93, 1.86%, respectively, compared
with conventional concrete.
 The improvements in the compressive strength of SCC 20, 30 and 40 MPa
without and with calcium stearate are 28, 31, 28, and 37%; 16, 8, 10 and 3%; and
20, 14, 6 and -2%, respectively, compared with conventional concrete.
 The use of 10 kg/m3 of calcium stearate in SCC 20 and 30 MPa is still structurally
safe because the compressive strength is still greater when compared with
conventional concrete with the same cement content. But in the SCC 40 MPa
with 10 kg/m3 calcium stearate, the compressive strength is a little lower than
that of conventional concrete.
 An investigation has been made of the effects of forebody and afterbody shapes
of a series of projectiles on the aerodynamic characteristics at Mach numbers
from 1.6 to 5. This is done using analytical methods combined with semi-
empirical design curves. Some concluding observations from the investigation
are given below.
Acknowledgements
This research is funded by Jenderal Soedirman University through a research grant
with the International Research Collaboration scheme year 2018. PT. Sika Nusa
Pratama Indonesia is grateful acknowledged for giving us the opportunity to use
Viscocrete 1003 as a superplasticizer in the concrete.

Nomenclatures

A Cross-section area of cylinder, mm2

P Force, N

Abbreviations
C Concrete
CST Calcium stearate
Lt Litre
SNI Standar Nasional Indonesia
SP Superplasticizer
s/a Sand per aggregate

References
1. Okamura, H.; Ozawa, K.; and Ouchi, M. (2000). Self-compacting concrete.
Structural Concrete, 1(1), 3-17.

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

3274 A. Maryoto et al.

2. Ponikiewsky, T.; and Golaszwekski, J. (2013). The rheological and mechanical

properties of self-compacting concrete with high calcium fly ash. Procedia
Engineering, 65, 33-38.
3. Dinesh, A.; Harini, S.; Jasmine, J.P.; Jincy, J.; and Shagufta, J. (2017).
Experimental study on self-compacting concrete. International Journal of
Engineering Science & Research Technology, 6(3), 42-50.
4. Bradu, A.; Cazacu, N.; Florea, N.; and Mihai, P. (2016). Compressive strength
of self-compacting soncrete. Buletinul Institutului Politehnic Din Iasi, 62(66),
59-68.
5. Dhiyaneshwaran, S.; Ramanathan, P.; Baskar, L.; and Venkatasubramani, R.
(2013). Study on durability characteristics of self-compacting concrete with
fly ash. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 7(3), 342-353.
6. Upadhyay, H.; Shah, P.; and George, E. (2011). Testing and mix design
method of self-compacting concrete, National Conference on Recent Trends
in Engineering & Technology, 1-4.
7. Goodier, C.I. (2003). Development of self-compacting concrete. Proceedings
of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Structures & Buildings, 156, 405-414.
8. Mittal, M.; Basu, S.; and Sofi, A. (2013). Effect of Sika Viscocrete on
properties of concrete. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(4), 61-66.
9. Yazicioglu, S.; Caliskan, S.; and Turk, K. (2006). Effect of curing conditions
on the engineering properties of self-compacting concrete. Indian Journal of
Engineering & Materials Science, 13, 25-39.
10. Calado, C.F.A.; Camoes, A.; and Jalali, S. (2013). Placing and curing self-
compacting concrete in hot climates. Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Minho, Portugal, 1-8.
11. Skazlic, M.; and Vujica, M. (2012). Environmentally-friendly self-compacting
concrete. Gradevinar, 64(9), 905-913.
12. Atan, M.A.; and Awang, H. (2011). The compressive and flexural strengths of
self-compacting concrete using raw rice husk ash. Journal of Engineering
Science and Technology, 6(6), 720-732.
13. Olafusi, O.S.; Adewuyi, A.P.; Otunla, A.I.; and Babalola, A.O. (2015).
Evaluation of fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete. Open
Journal of Civil Engineering, 5(2015), 1-7.
14. Lopez, T.P.; Canto, G.; Moo-Yam, V.M.; Perez-Quiroz, J.T.; and Genesca, J.
(2012). Analysis of the infiltration of chloride ions into concrete samples and
its role in the corrosion onset of embedded steel rebars. International Journal
of Electrochemistry Science, 7(2012), 426-436.
15. Sasaki, T.; Iijima, T.; and Kobayashi, K. (2004). Predicting concrete
deterioration due to chloride corrosion of reinforcing bar. QR of RTRI, 45(4),
216-221.
16. Boutz, M.M.R.; Wegen, G.V.D.; Roelfstra, P.E.; and Haverkort, R. (2008).
Service life design of concrete structures by numerical modelling of chloride
ingress. Tailor Made Concrete Structures, 2008, 59-64.
17. Kumar, V.; Singh, R.; and Quraishi, M.A. (2013). A study on corrosion of
reinforcement in concrete and effect of inhibitor on service life of RCC.
Journal of Material & Environment Science, 4(5), 726-731.

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

Corrosion Resistance of Self-Compacting Concrete Containing Calcium . . . . 3275

18. Loreto, G.; Benedetti, M.D.; Iovino, R.; Nanni, A.; and Gonzales-Nunez, M.A.
(2011). Evaluation of corrosion effect in reinforced concrete by chloride
exposure. Proc .of SPIE, 7983(2011), 1-11.
19. Carbone, V.I.; Mancini, G.; and Tondolo, F. (2008). Structural behaviour with
reinforcement corrosion. Tailor Made Concrete Structures, 2008, 277-282.
20. Vavpetic, P. (2008). Corrosion in concrete steel. University of Ljubljana,
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Physics, 1-16.
21. Ghods, A.; Sohrabi, M.R.; Miri, M. (2014). Effect of rebar corrosion on the
behavior of a reinforced concrete beam using modeling and experimental
results. Materials and Technology, 48(3), 395-402.
22. How, H.J.; and Rahman, A.A. (2004). Life cycle cost analysis case study on
corrosion remedial measures for concrete structures. Jurnal Teknologi, 40(B),
15-20.
23. Neville, A. (1996). Chloride attack of reinforced concrete: an overview.
Material and Structures, 28(1995), 63-70.
24. Singh, B.N.; Abhilash, P.P.; Kumar, B.; and Quraishi, M. (2009). Microscopic
examination of concrete with and without corrosion inhibitor. e-Journal Earth
Science India, 2(II), 94-100.
25. Meier, S.J.; and Bauml, M.F. (2005). Internal impregnation of concrete:
Experimental results and application experiences. 4th International Conference
on Water Repellent Treatment of Building Materials, Hydrophobe IV(2005),
133-144.
26. Atla, S.B.; Huang, Y.; Yang, J.; Chen, H.; Kuo, Y.; Hsu, C.; Lee, W.; Chen,
C.; Hsu, D.; and Chen, C. (2017). Hydrophobic calcium carbonate for cement
surface. Crystals, 7(371), 1-9.
27. ACI Committee 212, Report on Chemical Admixtures for Concrete ACI
212.3R-10, 46-50.
28. Buttner, T.; and Raupach, M. (2008). Durability of hydrophobic treatments on
concrete – Results from laboratory tests. 5th International Conference on Water
Repellent Treatment of Building Materials, Hydrophobe V (2008), 329-340.
29. Quraishi, M.A.; Kumar, V.; Abhilash, P.P.; and Singh, B.N. (2011). Calcium
stearate: A green corrosion inhibitor for steel in concrete environment. Journal
of Material and Environment Science, 2(4), 365-372.
30. Cellat, K.; Beyhan, B.; Kazanci, B.; Konuklu, Y.; and Paksoy, H. (2017). Direct
incorporation of butyl stearate as phase change material into concrete for energy
saving in buildings. Journal of Clean Energy Technology, 5(1), 64-68.
31. Na, S.H.; Kang, H.J.; and Song, M.S. (2009). Effects of stearic acid on the
water tightness properties of the cementitious materials. Journal of the Korea
Ceramic Society, 46(4), 365-371.
32. Lee, H.S.; Ryu, H.S.; Park, W.J.; and Ismail, M.A. (2015). Comparative study
on corrosion protection of reinforcing steel by using amino alcohol and lithium
nitrite inhibitors. Materials, 8(2015), 251-269.
33. SNI 2493:2011, Standar Nasional Indonesia, Tata cara pembuatan dan
perawatan benda uji beton di laboratorium.

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)

3276 A. Maryoto et al.

34. Lu, C.; Jin, W.; and Liu, R. (2011). Reinforcement corrosion-induced cover
cracking and its time prediction for reinforced concrete structures. Journal of
Corrosion Science, 53(4), 1337-1347.
35. Sobolev, K.; Nosonovsky, M.; Kurpenkin, T.; Flores-Vivian, I.; and Rao, S.
(2013). Anti-icing and de-icing superhydrophobic concrete to improve the
safety on critical elements on roadway pavements. Center for Freight and
Infrastructure Research and Education, USA, https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx/
id12845413
36. Maryoto, A. (2015). Improving microstructures of concrete using
Ca(C18H35O2)2. Procedia Engineering, 125(2015), 631-637.
37. Maryoto, A.; Gan, B.S.; and Aylie, H. (2017). Reduction of chloride ion
ingress into reinforced concrete using a hydrophobic additive material. Jurnal
Teknologi, 79(2), 65-72.
38. Maryoto, A. (2017). Resistance of concrete with calcium stearate due to
chloride attack tested by accelerated corrosion. Procedia Engineering,
171(2017), 511-516.Vukelich, S.R.; and Jenkins, J.E. (1982). Evaluation of
component buildup methods for missile aerodynamic prediction. Journal of
Spacecraft and Rocket, 19(6), 481-488.
39. Maryoto, A.; Gan, B.S.; Hermanto, N.I.S.; and Setijadi, R. (2017). On the
water absorption and corrosion rate of concrete using calcium stearate. Journal
of Engineering and Applied Science, 12(20), 5233-5238.
40. Maryoto, A.; Gan, B.S.; Hermanto, N.I.S.; and Setijadi, R. (2017). Protection
of corrosion attack in reinforced concrete due to chloride ion using calcium
stearate. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 12 (special issue 6),
7965-7970.
41. Neville, A.M. (1996). Properties of Concrete. England: Longman.
42. Justnes, H. (2008). Low water permeability through hydrophobicity. COIN
Project Report 1, SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, 1-36.
43. Rixom, R.; and Mailvaganam, N. (1999). Chemical admixtures for concrete.
London: Spon E and FN.Shahbhang, V.V.; and Rao, R.U. (1970). Normal force
characteristics of cone-cylinder & ogive-cylinder bodies at Mach number 1.8.
Technical memorandum No. TM-PR.235/69-70, National aeronautical
laboratory, Bangalore.

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology October 2018, Vol. 13(10)