System Requirements Review System Requirements Review
System Requirements Review System Requirements Review
System Requirements Review System Requirements Review
Aerospace
System Requirements Review
Zach Lovering
Tony Cao
Roman Sherbak
James Frechman
Manuel Sequerra
Aircraft Capabilities
Non-stop flight from Bangor, ME to San
Diego, CA
30 passengers for comfort and luxury
40 passenger economy
Cruise speed of Mach 0.8 (559 kt)
Cruise alt 35000 ft.
Range of 3000 miles
ConOps
Travel to Bangor ME. ~ 5 hours 4 min.
Travel to San Diego CA. ~ 5 hours 30 min.
6 hours of fuel available.
MTOW ~ 52921lbs
Uninstalled capable thrust ~ 17200 lbs.
using 2 Rolls-Royce AE3007 engines
39786 lbs of fuel
Daily Routine
2-3 flights in 24 hr. period
Derived requirements
Priority
Priority
Derived Requirements
Defines payload weight
Defines crew members needed
Affects fuselage size
Additional Requirements
Crosswind Landing
Affects Tail sizing
Icing management
Passenger luxuries
Pilot luxuries
Top Level Requirements Derived Requirements Priority
Payload weight
Total Weight
Fuel weight
Non-stop flight from
Bangor to San Diego
Defines Range
Thrust required
Cruise at minimum M
= 0.7 Engine type Fuel Consumption
Atmospheric Forces
Plane temp / pressure
Cruise no lower than
30kft Weather Conditions
Additional Requirements
WEIGHTS
STRUCTURES (Team)
(Zach Lovering) PROPULSION
(Roman Sherbak)
Iterative Approach •SFC match
•Number of engines
•Passenger weight •Engine placement
•Crew weight •BFL
•KSAN to KBGR
Wing Geometry
•Altitude
• Historical Data
• Jet Cruise W/S Estimation
• Lift Capability
• High Lift Devices
Engine Selection
Weight Calculation
•Vortex lattice lift estimate • Available Fuel
• Breguet Range Equation
•Enough lift for weight • T/W Estimation
• Piecewise Range Equation
•Drag estimates • Configuration
• General Buildup
•BFL • Thrust Capability
• Component Buildup
• Efficiency (SFC)
•Crosswind capability
•FAR 25 safety requirements
•Passenger capacity •Engine-out safety
Tail Geometry
Fuselage Sizing
• Historical Data
• Passenger Amenities
• Engine-out Safety
• Layout
• Crosswind Capability
• Length
• Stability Analysis
Weights
Guidelines:
• Low end of passenger weight defined by requirements
• Minimum crew size defined by FAR 25
• Fuel weight is affected by range and engine selection
• Avionics weight is affected by requirements
Assumptions:
• SFC
• Range
• Crew, payload, avionics weight
• L/D
Wing Geometry
120.0
Wing Loading: Historical vs. Maximum Jet Range
100.0
W πAeC D0
Wing Loading (lb/ft^3)
=q
80.0 S 3
60.0 W 1 π 8(0.8)(.0150)
(
= (.000678) 774.48 2
S 2
) 3
40.0
y = 0.0004x + 52.49
W lb
20.0 = 64.5 2
S ft
0.0
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000
W0 (lb)
12.00
Croot=15.55’ Ctip=3.89’
AR
6.00
4.00
ΛLE=30º Λc/4=27º
2.00
0.00
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000 100000
W0 (lb)
Wing Geometry
Engine Selection
T/W: Historical data suggest 0.32
0.600
0.500
0.400
T/W0
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000
W0 (lb)
Fuselage Engine
•Capacity •T/W
Weights
•Crew •Total Thrust
•Luggage •SFC
Tail
•Stability
•Controls Engine-out
safety?
Planning
Things that needs to be done
1) Define risk reduction experiment (due
next Tuesday)
2) Status report #2 (due next Thursday)
3) Trade studies
4) Finalize external dimension
Task & RE List