ProQuestDocuments 2019-01-16
ProQuestDocuments 2019-01-16
ProQuestDocuments 2019-01-16
RESUMO (ABSTRACT)
Hillis (1921-1998) and the Chicago Symphony Chorus (CSO), which she founded and directed for 37 years, were
renowned for many outstanding performances of choral-symphonic repertoire. Insights into how her teaching
methods and philosophy evolved are offered along with a description of her rehearsal techniques. Following a
commentary on the foundation of the Hillis legacy, an exploration of similarities between the score preparations of
Margaret Hillis and Robert Shaw is offered. The general details of Hillis' rehearsal style are put into a specific
context. Photos, musical examples, and notes are included.
TEXTO COMPLETO
Cheryl Frazes Hill
p.9
beautiful chorus, and I was advised by my composition teacher to go study with him. So I went to Julliard, and I
sang in the chorus under him. I observed him, we had some lessons, but he was very busy at this time with his own
career; so the best that the students could do was to analyze his scores along with him, and observe him and try to
analyze what it was that he had in his ear, and how he went about getting the things that he did. 3
Hillis alluded to her observation of Shaw in an interview for the November
p.10
devoted to studying the score so that the composer's artistic intent could be realized and then communicated to
the performers through efficient and informed rehearsals.
As Margaret Hillis's assistant and associate conductor from 1985 until the end of her tenure with the Chicago
Symphony Chorus, I can attest to her commitment to score study and detailed rehearsal planning. As her
assistant, one could count on receiving a rehearsal plan for the entire rehearsal series of a work. The plan would
sometimes arrive six months prior to the first rehearsal. Additionally, when charged with the duty of conducting a
rehearsal, Hillis clearly stated the goals, and the assistant was accountable for every aspect of the rehearsal plan.
p.11
p.12
If the consonants are there, the sound comes through and the vowels do. If they mumble, nothing happens. I've sat
in on a couple of rehearsals where the chorus was prepared by other people, and the orchestra conductor kept
saying to the chorus, "Louder, louder!" And I thought, 'Oh, oh, oh, it's loud enough. It's just the diction is so lousy it
[the text] doesn't come through. 11
Hillis asked the chorus to speak the text rhythmically after a portion was sung on a neutral syllable. Often each
syllable was assigned rhythmic placement, down to the final consonants. Diphthongs, German text with double
internal consonants, and voiced consonants were carefully assigned their rhythmic placement. Italian and French
vowels and consonants were adjusted for authenticity. Russian and other less frequently performed languages
were given many extra hours of attention. A diction coach was present to correct
p.13
refer to it, was almost always followed by sectionals. The sectional was designed to deal with no more than one or
two complex issues: difficult intervals or dissonant pitches, improving unisons and intonation, rehearsing the
language, dealing with contrapuntal material, or tackling the most challenging rhythmic details. Correcting and
refining musical and textual elements within a section ultimately saved time in the full rehearsals that followed,
where these issues were then reinforced. This strategic process provided consistent results from the singers
because the learning process conformed to the rehearsal structure.
Tutti rehearsals were devoted to creating an artisitic musical continuity for the entire piece, which was done
methodically. Throughout the process, Hillis continued to establish her expectations for balance, dynamics, and
any issues of style and detail that a specific work required. Hillis's understanding of how the final product should
sound contributed to her ability to shape the piece. At any point in the rehearsal process, no matter what the
specific rehearsal goal, she always had the final product in her ear. Hillis's genius was in how she gradually
revealed her concept of the piece during the rehearsal series. She rehearsed by placing the building blocks of the
work in planned succession. As a result, the choral performance of the notes, rhythms, dynamics, articulations, and
the style, together with a structural understanding, made it a musically satisfying rendering of the work.
They don't know it because I don't tell them, but I prepare it [a work] in such a way that they feel the structure of the
piece so well that they just can't go wrong. 12
Since issues of good vocalism, avoidance of oversinging (a common malady in professional choruses), good
intonation, accurate color, a strong sense of phrase destination, and the ever-important issue of style, were
paramount for Hillis, she attended to these details in all rehearsals, using a variety of techniques. At the heart of
her rehearsals was the constant reminder to the chorus, "Listen." Describing how she achieved the "Hillis sound," a
term she disapproved of, she explained,
It's a sound I have in my ear and somehow get it transposed to their ears. Then I'm constantly cautioning them to
listen. And we'll be working away on something, I'll stop and say, 'That's not a listened
12
Benz interview, pg. 15.
p.14
p.15
details that follow. She emphasized these things each time she prepared the work. [The video can be accessed on
our Web site at [lang ]].] Movement One Color and Balance
Margaret Hillis's attention to detail began in the very first chords of the opening movement: Color was the priority
of the first choral entrances. The opening choral passage (mm. 15-17 and that which follows (mm. 19-27) helps
continue the mood set by the orchestral introduction [ Figure 1 ]. It is an exposed choral moment when the chorus
enters and therefore requires absolute attention. Hillis had the chorus rehearse the movement on a neutral
syllable, usually "loo." She desired a rich, dark color for the chorus's first entrance. For the word "Selig," Hillis
achieved the dark color by balancing the upper three voices to the bass voice. She often approached piano
balance in this way. She built the chord from the bottom up, stopping on each vocal entry. She insisted that the
entering voice balance the part that came before it in color and dynamic. She then guided the upper three voices to
function as an overtone to the bass voice. In this way, she achieved the beginning of her desired color, balance,
p.16
p.17
mm. 55-60 and again mm. 88-93 [ Figure 2 ]. The text in both of these places references "joy" or "Freuden." Hillis
sought a brighter color here, to represent the joy that followed the sorrow expressed in Psalm 126: 5-6. Intonation
Hillis addressed intonation issues early on, because once poor intonation is allowed to continue, it is difficult for
singers to undo the muscle memory that usually follows.
[Regarding the] intonation of this Chorus when I had it, the vowels matched, and all leading tones were
unreasonably high.... Most poor intonation is not an ear matter. It's a vocal matter. Instead of singing "Ah"
[brightly], they sing 'UH' [swallowed sound]. It goes down in the throat, it goes flat every time. But if the vowels are
where they belong, and are matched in the chorus, there's no problem with the intonation. Took me a long time to
learn that. 19
When Hillis attended to intonation problems, she often worked on the linear direction of each line and the color. In
this way, the chorus was given a series of tasks upon which to focus. She avoided focusing exclusively on
intonation, although it was always addressed and constantly improved by unifying or adjusting the vowel in
question.
The extension of the opening passage presents the first of many challenges for good intonation in the Requiem .
The intonation issue in the opening of the first movement was noted in the writings of Siegfried Ochs, a turn-of-the-
century German choral conductor who knew Brahms. Ochs spoke with Brahms about the Requiem , referring to the
challenges of intonation in this opening section. 20 One of the problems for good intonation is the perfect fourth
interval followed by a descending step, prominent in both the soprano and alto voices, mm. 20-21. In addition, the
p.18
over notes leading to the "a" were not oversung. Hillis was aware of the way the espressivo marking in m. 19
affected the crescendo beginning in m. 21. Hillis understood that this marking implied the crescendo should not
exceed mp . By keeping the approach lighter, the "a" had a better chance to be sung in tune.
The opening orchestral material, introduced in the first cello part, mm. 3-4, and the vocal material, first introduced
in soprano, mm. 15-17, present intonation challenges for the singers throughout the first movement. Ascending
and descending stepwise motion, along with leaps that resolve in a step up or down create pitch problems. The
added challenges of tessitura and dynamics create further stumbling blocks for good intonation. Whenever these
circumstances arose, Hillis would address them immediately.
Another issue contributing to faulty intonation was vibrato. Hillis insisted that individual vibratos be under control
so the section could achieve a unified sound. She suggested that extraneous "vibble vobble," as she called it, could
take the unison out of the section. She occasionally said "no vibrato" in a section, but she was never after straight
tone. She believed that professional singers had good control of their instruments, and this request for vibrato
control was reasonable.
It was rare for the chorus to hear from Hillis, and she rarely stopped a chorus without having a solution. Hillis was
not one to pound the podium in frustration. She is quoted as saying, "Some conductors yell at a chorus when it
makes a mistake. That's wrong. There's always a reason for the mistake. If there is some hesitation about an
entrance, I ask, 'Is it a rhythmic problem or a pitch problem?' and they tell me and we fix it. And if we fix something
in this chorus, it stays fixed! I worked hard to get that."' 22 This collegial approach was a unique characteristic of a
Hillis rehearsal. She accepted questions and interjections by her singers, assistants, and accompanists during the
rehearsal, sometimes to the point of distraction. Her mission, however, was to get things right and she generously
shared ownership in that process. In this way, she was democratic, though there was never a doubt about who was
in charge.
Dynamics
The next hurdle in the first movement involved controlling the dynamics. From the first choral entrance, it was
clear that the dynamic marking alone did not dictate the piano dynamic. Dynamics were dictated by the context in
which they occurred and by what was to come in the movement. The first choral entrance is a good example. If the
opening choral statement
22
Samuelson, pg. 194.
p.19
p.20
dynamic.
Diminuendi are even more difficult, and she made sure that there was equal care given to the pacing of these.
Color and dynamics were rehearsed together. The forte of the "Freuden" passages discussed earlier would be
louder than other forte passages of this movement because the color of the "Freuden" passages is bright. The
brighter color allows for the louder than forte dolce dynamic.
Phrasing
The next focus of the rehearsal process was Hillis's linear connection of each phrase in the movement. She would
joke, "Be like a good Presbyterian, and have a strong sense of predestination." By this she implied that every
phrase had a sense of direction and must be sung in that way. In the first choral entrance, Hillis insisted on a
legatissimo line, leading to the word "sind." Legato singing was always a priority, but it was surely reinforced by her
experience of preparing this work numerous times for Sir Georg Solti, who (when rehearsing this opening passage)
was adamant about a legatissimo "Selig sind." The extension of this passage, mm. 19-27 added the requirement of
extending the destination of the phrase beyond "sind" and ahead to the first syllable of "tragen." This detail was
addressed with the chorus, because it would not naturally occur. A chorus's tendency is to lose intensity after
"sind," mirroring the previous entrance. Hillis requested that the line sustain intensity. Extending the phrase to
"tragen" presents a particular challenge for the chorus because the contour of their lines is contrary to the
direction of the phrase. The word "tragen" sits on one of the lower pitches of their vocal lines, making it an
unnatural point of destination. However, once achieved, the linear direction to "tragen" became quite effective.
In places in which the phrase is truncated, linear connection was reinforced. In mm. 34-36, Hillis asked the chorus
to extend its sense of phrase over the rest in m. 34. She wanted the entrance on "Leid" to come in at equal intensity
with its counterpart in the previous bar. The phrase heads toward "tragen," and needs special intensity, given the
rest that interrupts it.
In places in which the temtation would be to "chop the line," reminders of singing legato would abound. An
example of this occurred in the second section of Movement 1, mm. 55-60. The eighth notes of "werden mit
Freuden" and the contour of the vocal lines do not naturally lend themselves to legato singing. Hillis instructed that
these passages remain connected. One way Hillis achieved legato was by rhythmically placing consonants.
p.21
Text
The translation of specific texts became a focus of later rehearsals. A reference was made earlier with regard to
the treatment of color surrounding the word "Freuden." In the first movement, the other text reference involved the
word "Tränen," [tears]. Beginning the middle section of this first movement, m. 47, the text "Die mit Tränen
saen," ["They who sow in tears shall reap in joy"] was referred to as the weeping motive. Hillis suggested that the
grouped quarter-note pairs, m. 47 in the tenor and bass, m. 49 in the alto, and recurring in mm. 51-53, implied
weeping. [ Figure 3 ]. In her masterclass video, she mentions that the orchestra weeps in a contrary motion to the
chorus. Although she does not spell out what choristers should do with this information, the result was a slight
stress on the first of each of these quarter-note pairs, subtly creating the illusion of weeping. This effect was not
overstated, but it was noticeable.
Hillis was always aware of text but she didn't take rehearsal time to address the meaning of text unless it directly
applied to the way the chorus would sing. She would mention a translation as she sought a specific color or
phrase direction. The opening segment, "Blessed are they who mourn" would be criticized if it was too bright. She
would say, "You're too jolly," when she was after the dark, warm color. She reminded singers of what they were
singing. Translations were provided for the singers, and she asked that the words be written into their scores. The
job of understanding the text was often left to the singers. Only in specific spots would rehearsal time be taken for
the meaning of the words.
Other First Movement Issues
Any other details specific to the movement being rehearsed would be handled where they appropriately fit into
Hillis's rehearsal plan. In the first movement, Hillis had particular interest in the E b that first occurs in m. 2 of the
second cello. It appears in the alto, m. 16, and
p.22
for the tenor, m. 19. In this rare instance, Hillis chose to work analytical details into the rehearsal. These E b s were
highlighted in Hillis's Requiem score. In one spot the Eb is marked with the word "color" above it.
Hillis emphasized that Brahms used this pitch as a color, insisting it not be stressed; the chorus should be aware
of its function as a significant musical moment. She pointed out the return of this E b in m. 66, second cello. It
occurs again in the recapitulation, m. 97, but in a transposed form (C b ) in the cello. The pitch returns again in the
alto line, m. 101, as (B [sharp ] ). The recapitulation material is first stated a major third below its original entrance in
m.100. This significant pitch is likewise a major third below its counterpart. The E b reappears in its initial key at m.
111, in the tenor voice, coinciding with the statement of the opening in its original key. Hillis emphasized "my score
p.23
impress everyone with her knowledge. We were clear that it was the basis for her rehearsals without her calling
attention to her scholarship. She once shared that if she wasted a minute of time and multiplied it by the one
hundred and twenty singers in the room, she would have wasted the equivalent of two hours of rehearsal time.
Counterpoint
The first movement reveals some interesting Hillis rehearsal strategies. She applied equally interesting rehearsal
techniques to polyphonic sections of the work. The techniques were developed as a result of Hillis's motivation to
aid her singers in recognizing their vocal function within a contrapuntal texture. She wanted them to understand
the way their parts related to other parts in the chorus, and sometimes to the orchestra. Hillis comprehended that
only when performers delivered these musical complexities with understanding, could the audience be better able
to discern them.
There were many techniques Hillis applied to the rehearsal of contrapuntal music. One technique involved Hillis's
assignment of contrasting articulations to subject and countersubject material, making these more
distinguishable within the complex countrapuntal texture. Another method was to isolate two or three voices
functioning together. In this way, singers could hear the relationships, that encouraged balance within the chorus.
Hillis would always rehearse fugal material by using the structural divisions as her starting points. Her detailed
approach may appear monotonous, but actually made fugal passages more accessible to the singers and
therefore more interesting to rehearse.
In the Requiem 's second movement, Hillis helped distinguish two significant themes by assigning them
contrasting articulations. The basses introduce the first theme upon which the counterpoint of the section is built.
Hillis asked that the music beginning with the text "Die Erlöseten des Herrn" (mm. 206-212) [ Figure 4 ] be sung in
a quasi- marcato style. To achieve this, she demanded strong consonants, strong glottals for words or syllables
beginning with vowels, and an overemphasis of the eighth notes that follow
p.24
p.25
p.27
p.28
p.29
p.30
smiles to those recalling her wonderful sense of humor, her pat expressions, her warm smile for a job well done,
and her pride in the members of her Chicago Symphony Chorus. Her praise for each member of the chorus
descending from the stage after every performance given at Chicago's Orchestra Hall and throughout the world
was testimony to her pride for the organization she helped create. She often said that she could not accomplish
anything without the hard work of her singers. However this gratitude is surpassed by the gratitude that is truly in
the hearts of those she taught. Margaret Hillis was a great teacher and scholar. These traits established her
incredible contribution to the field of conducting. She left us all a great legacy.
Cheryl Frazes Hill, associate conductor of the Chicago Symphony Chorus, has been a part of the Chorus for twenty-
seven years, beginning as a singer and appointed to the conducting staff by Margaret Hillis in 1987. She continues
her role today, sharing the associate conductor position with her longtime colleague, Dr. Don Horisberger. Both
conductors work under Chorus Director Duain Wolfe. * Dr. Frazes Hill is the chairman of music education and the
director of choral activities at Roosevelt University's Chicago College of Performing Arts.
Author's Note
I am deeply grateful to a number of people who helped make this article possible. I would first like to acknowledge
Frank Villella, in the Chicago Symphony Orchestra Archives, who greatly assisted in gathering materials for this
project. In addition, Mr. Villella has been a singer with the Chicago Symphony Chorus for many years, working
under Margaret Hillis. He helped organize Hillis's musical collection that is now a part of the Rosenthal Archives at
Symphony Center. I would also like to thank Jane Samuelson, an outstanding editor and a good friend for many
years. Marjorie Johnston, a member of the Chicago Symphony Chorus and a fine chorus librarian was of great
assistance in providing musical figures for this project. Finally, I wish to thank Carroll Gonzo, editor of the Choral
Journal and a friend of many years, for his editorial expertise.
*
The Chicago Symphony continues to grow and thrive today, under the direction of Duain Wolfe. Margaret Hillis
was proud to pass the baton to Mr. Wolfe, who has successfully continued the tradition of demanding and
p.31
Top of Page
DETALHES
Termo específico: Choral Music, Founders, Choral Directors, Repertoire, Rehearsal Techniques,
Teaching Methods, Music Teachers, Philosophy, Comparative Analysis
Título: The Rehearsal Techniques of Margaret Hillis: Their Development and Application to
Brahms "German Requiem"
Volume: 43
Edição: 3
Páginas: 9-32
ISSN: 0009-5028