Algebra Tiles PDF
Algebra Tiles PDF
Kitt
(c (d)
Fig. 6
Four models for +6
(a)
(a) (b)
Fig. 9
Rectangular formations of algebra tiles for x 2 + 3 x + 2
(b)
x + –8 = + 6
x + –8 = + 6 + –8 + + 8 (x + 2)
x – –8 = +6 – –8
+ –8 x = + 6 + + 8
+ –8x = +14
(c)
(x +1)
Fig. 7
Algebra-tile solution of x + –8 = +6,
using the subtraction property of equality
Fig. 10
Algebra-tile arrangement showing
12 factors of x 2 + 3 x + 2
1
6 Drawing a
2
mental representations of the tiles as they progress sketch helps
4 toward using only symbolic techniques. Drawing a
sketch helps students solve problems when they do students
3
not have tiles, and the explanation helps you deter- solve prob-
mine whether they understand the process. lems when
Fig. 8
Factors of 12 After students have discovered that subtracting
+
6 is equivalent to adding –6, have them form a rec- they do not
tangle with the tile pieces representing x2 – x – 6. have tiles
Students cannot form a rectangle using only these
+1x, +2. Answering these questions gives the pieces. Additional zero pairs of x tiles must be
dimensions (x + 1) and (x + 2). Therefore, the added to the collection, requiring an alternative
expression x2 + 3x + 2 factors into (x + 1)(x + 2). way to model x2 – x – 6. Figure 11 shows three pos-
This factorization can be shown with algebra tiles sibilities. A rectangle cannot be formed using the
by placing x tiles and unit tiles outside the bars on pieces from figures 11a and 11b. Have students
the workmat. See figure 10. arrange the pieces in figure 11c into a rectangle
A complete solution to this problem should on their workmat. They should find the factors of
include not only the factorization (x + 1)(x + 2) but x2 – x – 6 by placing x tiles and unit tiles outside
also the sketch of the final tile arrangement, as the bars on the workmat. Caution students that
shown in figure 10, and an explanation. Require pieces placed outside the bars must multiply to
students to draw the sketch to help them build form a + 1x2, –3x, +2x, and –6, as shown in figure
the variable. Fourth, agree that we would have it no other way. No teach-
±2 –12 ± 2 ± 2x –12 when forming the rect- ing manipulatives, tools, or techniques will totally
(d) (g)
angle, students must eliminate that challenge. The challenge partly con-
group like-colored tiles. sists of the perpetual need to look for ways to
Fig. 12 Fifth, when zero pairs improve our instruction, improve students’ learn-
2
Using the box method to factor x + 4 x – 12
of tiles are needed to ing, and reach all students—even the ones who
complete the rectangle, (Continued on page 520)
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Davis, Suzanne, and Denisse R. Thompson. “To
Encourage ‘Algebra for All,’ Start an Algebra Net-
work.” Mathematics Teacher 91 (April 1998):
282–86.
Lawson, Dene R. “The Problem, The Issues That
Speak to Change.” In Algebra for Everyone, edited by
Edgar L. Edwards, Jr., pp. 1–6. Reston, Va.: Nation-
al Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1990.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School
Mathematics. Reston, Va.: NCTM, 1989.
———. Professional Standards for Teaching Mathe-
matics. Reston, Va.: NCTM, 1991.
Patterson, Anne C. “Building Algebraic Expressions:
A Physical Model.” Mathematics Teaching in the
Middle School 2 (February 1997): 238–42.
Picciotto, Henri. The Algebra Lab High School. Sunny-
vale, Calif.: Creative Publications, 1990.
———. The Algebra Lab Middle School. Sunnyvale,
Calif.: Creative Publications, 1990. ¿