Partial Discharge Detection by TEV Sensors and Signal Propagation Analysis in Transformer Model
Partial Discharge Detection by TEV Sensors and Signal Propagation Analysis in Transformer Model
Abstract: This paper deals with a detailed study on partial discharge (PD) generated in
transformers using transient earth voltage (TEV) detection method. Experiment and
numerical analysis are carried out using an iron box model which simulates a tank of an
actual transformer. In the test model, propagation properties of TEV signal caused by PD
occurring inside and outside of the transformer model are examined. Results reveal that
the electromagnetic waves generated by PD in the model can leak from the opening
window, having special frequency determined by the size of the opening window. It is also
found that TEV sensor placed on the surface of the tank detects a TEV signal originating
from the leaked electromagnetic wave. On the other hand, TEV signal by electromagnetic
waves generated by an external PD source is found to have a wider frequency band than
that by leaked electromagnetic wave. In addition, electromagnetic field and surface
current analysis are performed using finite difference time domain (FDTD) method and
simulated results are compared with experimental ones. As a result, it is shown that
leaked electromagnetic wave excites a surface current on the outer tank wall of the
transformer model. It is also found that there exists difference in the time required for TEV
signal to arrive at the inside and outside sensors. The results indicate that PD emitting
electromagnetic waves leaked from the dielectric discontinuities can be detected by the
TEV method. Furthermore, these results suggest a combination of the detected waveform
and its frequency band could lead to highly reliable diagnosis of the apparatus by TEV
detection method.
4 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
40
20 TEV_in
0
-20
-40
Voltage [mV]
40 TEV_out
20
0
-20
-40
300
200 CT
100
0
-100
-200
Figure 2: Experimental system to detect PD 0 50 100 150
occurring in transformer model tank Time [ns]
Figure 5: Detected waveform of external PD
-60 with inside and outside diameter 8 and 10 mm,
TEV_in
respectively, εr 5.9 on the top of the model
Signal intensity [dBm]
-80
-100 transformer tank. Figure 8 shows distribution of
-60
calculated surface current density when
electromagnetic waves have leaked from the
-80 TEV_out
bushing to excite the surface current flowing
-100
through the outer wall of the tank. Figure 9 shows
-40
waveforms of the inner and outer surface current in
-60
CT analysis. As can be seen in Figure 9, the surface
-80
-100
current excited in the outer wall is the order of
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1 × 10−6 times as much as that for the inner
Frequency [MHz] surface current. In other words, the surface current
can be excited to the outer tank wall although it is
Figure 6: FFT analysis of detected waveform
very small. Luo et al also have conducted a similar
given in Fig.4 for internal PD
experiment as the present one. Since the
propagation loss in the outer wall is ignored, there
-60
is almost no difference in the waveform of TEV
-80 TEV_in
signal detected by TEV sensors attached onto the
Signal intensity [dBm]
𝐶𝑜 2 2 2
𝑓𝑐 = √( 𝑚 ) + ( 𝑛 ) + ( 𝑝 ) (1)
2𝜋√𝜀𝑟 𝑊 𝐻 𝐷
-500
-1000
0.0010 Current_out
0.0000
-0.0010
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Time[ns]
6 CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
[1] Luo Guomin. Transient Earth Voltage (TEV)
based partial discharge detection and analysis,
March 2013. Available from
http://repository.ntu.edu.sg/handle/10356/5486
5, last accessed April 24, 2015.
[2] Y. Li, Y. Wang, G. Lu, J. Wang, and J. Xiong,
"Simulation of transient earth voltages aroused
by partial discharge in switchgears," in
International Conference on High Voltage
Engineering and Application (ICHVE), pp. 309-
312, 2010
[3] Liuhuo Wang, Haijing Wang, Lijun Wang, Hong
Lu, Wenjun Ning, Shenli Jia, Ji Wu:
“Experimental investigation of Transient Earth
Voltage and Acoustic Emission Measurements
of Partial Discharge Signals in Medium-voltage
Switchgears”, International Conference on
Electric Power Equipment (ICEPE),1-a-Q-3,
2013