2018.12.28. Answer To Counterclaim
2018.12.28. Answer To Counterclaim
2018.12.28. Answer To Counterclaim
AB
13th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
Valencia County
STATE OF NEW MEXICO 12/28/2018 8:28 PM
COUNTY OF VALENCIA PHILLIP ROMERO
THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CLERK OF THE COURT
Plaintiffs,
v. D-1314-CV-2018-01280
GARRETT GONZALES,
Defendant.
1. Mr. Otero admits the following paragraphs of the Counterclaim: 2-6, 15, 83-84.
2. Mr. Otero denies the following paragraphs of the Counterclaim:7-9, 13-14, 16-18,
Paragraph 1 of the Complaint, and therefore, denies the same: 10-12, 19-20.
conclusions or references to documents that speak for themselves, instead of averments as required
by Rule 1-008 NMRA: 1, 61, 65-66, 71-79, 81-82, 86-92, 96-104. To the extent a response is
5. Mr. Otero denies each and every factual allegation not expressly admitted herein.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
A. The Counterclaim fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
1
negligence, negligence per se, and/or wrongful or tortious acts of other third persons or parties
for whose conduct the Mr. Otero may not be held responsible, and any recovery against the
Mr. Otero, if any, must be accordingly reduced by the percentage extent of the fault of others
C. Defendant has failed to mitigate his damages and to that extent they are not
recoverable.
exclusions as provided within the binding agreements between the parties, and Defendant’
related to actual damages. An award of punitive or exemplary damages not reasonably related
to actual damages violates the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the
United States Constitution and Article II, Section 18 of the New Mexico Constitution.
J. Mr. Otero has not yet had the opportunity to conduct any discovery in this matter,
and so as not to waive any other applicable affirmative defenses set forth in Rule 1-008(C) NMRA
and Rul1-012(B) NMRA, which may be shown to apply by future discovery in this matter, all
2
CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, Mr. Otero respectfully requests that the
Court dismiss Defendant Gonzales’ Counterclaims against Mr. Otero as set forth above, and for
Respectfully submitted,