Grade 1 To 12 Daily Lesson Log Session 1 Session 2 Session 3 Session 4 I. Objectives

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

School CESAR E.

VERGARA MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL Grade Level 12


Grade 1 to 12 Teacher MARK KEVIN A. VIDAR Learning Area Research in Daily Life 2
Daily Lesson Log Teaching Dates & Time January 7-11, 2019 (Week 8) Quarter Second
SESSION 1 SESSION 2 SESSION 3 SESSION 4
I. OBJECTIVES
The learner demonstrates understanding of:

1. the criteria in selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature


A. Content Standards 2. the ethical standards in writing related literature
3. the formulation of conceptual framework
4. the research hypotheses (if appropriate)
5. the definition of terms as used in the study
The learner is able to:
1. select, cite, and synthesize judiciously related literature and use sources according to ethical standards
B. Performance Standards
2. use sources according to ethical standards
3. present written review of related literature

CS_RS12-If-j-3
C. Learning Competencies & synthesizes information from relevant literature
Objectives CS_RS12-If-j-4
writes coherent review of literature

II. CONTENT Learning from Others and Reviewing the Literature


III. LEARNING RESOURCES
A. Reference/s
1. Teacher’s Guide pages
2. Learner’s Materials pages
3. Textbook pages
4. Additional Materials from
Learning Resources (LR)
portal
B. Other Learning Resources CG CG CG CG
IV.PROCEDURES
A. Reviewing previous lesson or
presenting the new lesson Recalling proper ways of Recalling proper ways of reviewing Recalling the previous topic of synthesizing Recalling the previous topic of
reviewing literatures. literatures. literature reviews. synthesizing literature reviews.
B. Establishing a purpose for the The teacher shall assign different The teacher presents a video presentation
lesson topics for each of the group on how literatures help one’s study and
assigned. At least four groups proper ways of synthesizing literature
shall be formed. They will be reviews.
asked to underline phrases,
sentences, or paragraphs which Another set of activity the same as the last
are appealing to them and can day in order to have mastery:
The teacher presents a coherent literature Finalization and refinement of literature
be used in their study.
review sample. review. The teacher facilitates the work.
The teacher shall assign different topics for
each of the group assigned. At least four
groups shall be formed. They will be asked
to underline phrases, sentences, or
paragraphs which are appealing to them
and can be used in their study.

C. Presentation of examples or The teacher presents a sample Through a powerpoint presentation, answer
instances of the new lesson task of what to do to guide the the question: What is a coherent literature
learners on the activity. review?
D. Discussing new concept and
practicing new skills #1 The groups present their works. The teacher critiques their work and facilitate Make a coherent literature review from a
E. Discussing new concepts and learning. minimum of five materials.
practicing new skills #2
Answering the following guide questions:
The teacher presents three research titles. From the title of literatures, students 1. Why do you consider your work is a
F. Developing Mastery (Leads to
shall choose which is the best literature for the title. A sort of matching type coherent one?
Formative Assessment)
assessment. 2. What makes the writing harder?
3. What makes it easier?
G. Finding practical applications
of concepts and skills in daily
living

H. Making generalizations and Steps in making a coherent literature review:


abstracts about the lesson 1. Review styles or guidelines.
To synthesize is to combine two or more elements to form a new 2. Decide on a topic.
whole. In the literature review, the “elements” are the findings of the 3. Identify the literature that you will review.
literature you gather and read; the “new whole” is the conclusion you 4. Analyze.
draw from those findings. 5. Summarize in table ot concept map.
6. Synthesize prior to writing.
Write.
I. Evaluating Learning Individual synthesizing shall be done from their group work. The previous task A comprehensive rubric shall be utilized in order to assess the final output and be graded
shall be forwarded to the next group. as a summative assessment.
J. Additional activities for
Look for random literature review of your chosen topic from the first
application or remediation
week. All the materials obtained from the previous lesson shall be No assignment day.
obtained.

V.REMARKS
VI.REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who earned
80% in the evaluation.
B. No. of learners who require
additional activities for
remediation who scored
below 80%.
C. Did the remedial lessons
work? No. of learners who
have caught up with the
lesson.
D. No. of learners who continue
to require remediation
E. Which of my teaching
strategies worked well? Why
did these work?
F. What difficulties did I
encounter which my principal
or supervisor can help me
solve?
G. What innovation or localized
materials did use/discover
which I wish to share with
other teachers?

Prepared: Reviewed: Checked: Noted:

MARK KEVIN A. VIDAR CECILIA J. MIGUEL, Ph.D. ROGELIO L. DOMINGO, JR. IMELDA D. SISON
SHS TEACHER OIC, Asst. SHS Principal Master Teacher I Principal I

You might also like