Scribd
Upload
50 views2 pages

Hint To A8

The document contains summaries of several hypothesis tests with the following key details: 1) A one-sample t-test to compare a sample mean to a hypothesized population mean fails to reject the null hypothesis, as the observed t-statistic is less than the critical value. 2) A one-proportion z-test fails to reject the null hypothesis of a population proportion being equal to 0.48, as the calculated z-score is less than the critical value. 3) An independent two-sample t-test rejects the null hypothesis of no difference between two sample means, as the observed t-statistic is greater than the critical value.

Uploaded by

whatever152207
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
50 views2 pages

Hint To A8

The document contains summaries of several hypothesis tests with the following key details: 1) A one-sample t-test to compare a sample mean to a hypothesized population mean fails to reject the null hypothesis, as the observed t-statistic is less than the critical value. 2) A one-proportion z-test fails to reject the null hypothesis of a population proportion being equal to 0.48, as the calculated z-score is less than the critical value. 3) An independent two-sample t-test rejects the null hypothesis of no difference between two sample means, as the observed t-statistic is greater than the critical value.

Uploaded by

whatever152207
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

9.13 n = 10, x = 2,237.5, s = 109.36, df = 9,  = .05 critical t.05,9 = 1.

833
Ho: µ = 2,260
Ha: µ > 2,260
x   2,237.5  2,260
t =  = -0.65
s 109.36
n 10
Observed t = -0.65 < t.05,10 = 1.812, fail to reject the null hypothesis
9.25 Ho: p = .48,Ha: p  .48, n = 400, x = 174,  = .01 z.005 = +2.575
x 174 pˆ  p .435  .48
pˆ   = .435, z =  = -1.80
n 400 pq (.48)(.52)
n 400

decision is fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to
declare that the proportion is any different than .48.
10.13 Ho: µ1 - µ2 = 0, = .05, Ha: µ1 - µ2 > 0,df = n1 + n2 - 2 = 10 + 10 - 2 = 18 t.05,18 = 1.734
Sample 1 Sample 2
n1 = 10 n2 = 10
x 1 = 45.38 x 2 = 40.49
s1 = 2.357 s2 = 2.355
( x1  x 2 )  ( 1   2 )
t = = 4.64
s1 (n1  1)  s 2 (n2  1) 1 1
2 2


n1  n2  2 n1 n2

decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

10.15 Peoria Evansville


n1 = 21 n2 = 26
x1 = 116,900 x 2 = 114,000
s1 = 2,300 s2 = 1,750 df = 21 + 26 – 2

a) 90% level of confidence, /2 = .05 t .05,45 = 1.684 (used df = 40)

s1 (n1  1)  s 2 (n2  1) 1
2 2
1
( x1  x 2 )  t  =
n1  n2  2 n1 n2

(2300)2 (20)  (1750)2 (25) 1 1


(116,900 – 114,000) + 1.684  =
21  26  2 21 26
2,900 + 994.62

1905.38 < 1 - 2 < 3894.62


10.25 d = 1302.82, sd = 4938.22, n = 11, df = 10, = .01, t.005,10= 3.169

sd 4938.22
d t = 1302.82 + 3.169 = 1302.82 + 4718.42
n 11
-3415.6 < D < 6021.2
10.33 H0: pm - pw = 0,Ha: pm - pw < 0, nm = 374, nw = 481, p̂ m = .59, p̂ w = .70
z.05 = -1.645

nm pˆ m  n w pˆ w 374(.59)  481(.70)
p  = .652
nm  nw 374  481

( pˆ 1  pˆ 2 )  ( p1  p 2 ) (.59  .70)  (0)


z  = -3.35
1 1  1 1 
p  q   (.652)(. 348)  
 n1 n   374 481 
 

decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

You might also like