Inverter Filter Design
Inverter Filter Design
net/publication/261944345
CITATIONS READS
9 13,903
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Ahmad Ale Ahmd on 29 April 2014.
86 PEITS2010
2010 3rd International Conference on Power Electronics and Intelligent Transportation System
3πm
H NL (ωs ) (7)
2000
If the inequality (7) is solved for m=0.95, the cut off
frequency of the LC filter (fr) must be less than fs/15 to
satisfy the standard limitation. So:
1
ωr ωs and k 15 (8)
k
Really, the attenuation due to the filter at the
fundamental frequency obtains as follow:
ω2
H NL (ω1 ) = 2 s 2 (9)
ωs -(kω1 )
Fig 2 shows the |HNL(ω1)| as a function of fs and k
where the k factor and switching frequency have been
changed from 15 to 20 and 3KHz to 10KHz,
respectively. These curves reveal that our first
assumption about the attenuation of the filter at the
fundamental frequency is not far from our expectation.
87 PEITS2010
2010 3rd International Conference on Power Electronics and Intelligent Transportation System
fundamental frequency, Q, can be obtained as a Where the VL(ω1) is the inductor voltage at the
function of inductor value, cut off frequency of filter, fundamental frequency, and it can be considered as a
output voltage and the load, as follow: fraction of output voltage:
Lω ω ω3 VL (ω1 ) =α Vo (ω1 ) (21)
Q= 21 - 12 + 1 4 VO2 (12)
R L Lωr Lωr Selection of α depends on the switching frequency and
To minimize the filter reactive power at the maximum maximum acceptable ripple current. However, Fig 3
load, the inductor value can be determined as follow: shows the ripple of inductor current in two conditions.
Q=0 (13) The maximum ripple occurs at ω1t=nπ±π/2. Usually,
So: the ripple current between 20% to 40% is acceptable. If
equations (20) and (21) are solved for α, the quantity of
R
L= Lm ω 2r ω12 (14) α is obtained for specified maximum ripple current at
ω2r different switching frequencies (Fig 4).
If the ωr is at least 3 times larger than ω1 then the
inductor value can be approximated by:
R
L Lm (15)
ωr
Also, the reactive power at the minimum load is
calculated as:
ω
Q(R L = ) PLm 1 (16)
ωr
where the PLm is the output power at the maximum
load. The equation (16) shows that to decrease the filter
reactive power at the minimum load, the cut off
frequency of filter should be selected as large as
possible (greater than the fundamental frequency of the
inverter).
Although, this approach improves the inverter Fig 3. The ripple of the inductor current at half of the fundamental
efficiency, it provides a very large inductor value. So, period.
it increases the cost and the size of filter. The large
inductor value increases the output impedance of
inverter too. It also causes a large over or under-shoot
voltage in the step load condition. All of these
evidences indicate that other criteria should be selected
to calculate the inductor value.
The main duty of inductor is the control of the
switching frequency of inverter ripple current. So, the
maximum acceptable ripple current and the switching
frequency of the inverter can determine the minimum
inductor value. The ripple can be estimated as:
V
I L = L t (17)
L
According to Fig 1, when the inverter switches are on: Fig 4. The quantity of α as a function of switching frequency for
VL =VDC -Vo =VDC -Vomsin(ω1 t) (18) maximum ripple current of 20% and 40%.
88 PEITS2010
2010 3rd International Conference on Power Electronics and Intelligent Transportation System
R Lm ω14
L= α2 - (25)
ω1 ω4r
1 ω12
C (26)
R Lm α 2 ωr4 -ω14
To obtain real answer for the equations (25) and (26),
the following condition must be satisfied:
ω
ωr > 1 (27)
α
or
k
fs > f1 (28)
α
Fig 6. The filter attenuation at the fundamental frequency in
Now at the full load condition, the magnitude of maximum load for fs =20KHz.
transfer function from Vi to Vo can be written as:
ω 2r III. PROPOSED LC FILTER DESIGN PROCEDURE
H FL (ω) = (29)
ω 2 2 4 4 The LC filter of an inverter can be designed in the
2 2 2
(ω r -ω ) +( ) (α ω r -ω1 ) following mentioned 4 steps:
ω1
1) Selecting the switching frequency.
And at fundamental frequency: High switching frequency aims to reduce the filter size,
ωr but the maximum frequency of solid state switches and
H FL (ω1 ) = (30)
their dynamic losses limit the switching frequency. It is
(1+α )ωr2 -2ω12
2
usually chosen between 3KHz to 15KHz for IGBT
Fig 6 and 7 show the |HFL(ω1)| as function of ωr and α based inverter and 10KHz to 100KHz for MOSFET
for fs equal to 3KHz and 20KHz, respectively. based inverter.
2) Selecting k factor.
The standard requirement will be meet, if k=15, but
lager k factor causes more attenuation at switching
frequency and little amplification at the fundamental
frequency. If the modulation factor is less than 0.95,
the minimum of k should be calculated by equations
(7) and (8).
3) Selecting α factor.
α completely depends on the switching frequency and
acceptable inductor ripple current. 20% to 40% is an
acceptable range for ripple current. So using the
equation (20) or Fig 4, this factor can be selected.
The inequalities (27) and (28) should be satisfied. If it
is not maintained, then the k and α factor should be
renewed and selected again.
Fig 5. The filter attenuation at the fundamental frequency in 4) Now using equations (8), (25) and (26), the
maximum load for fs =3KHz. necessary L and C can be calculated.
The figures 5 and 6 imply that if α is varied from 0.02
IV. A DESIGN EXAMPLE
to 0.2, the maximum attenuation of filter will only be
3%. So, this aims to optimize the size of inductor and To verify the algorithm, an LC filter is designed for an
capacitor . Another important result of these figures is inverter whose main characteristics are mentioned in
that, if the cut off frequency of the filter is decreased table 2.
below the 200Hz, the filter can amplify the
fundamental frequency. This is sometimes useful, but TABLE 2. INVERTER CHARACTERISTICS.
the filter size will be increased. Also, the stability of VDC 360V
the system will be very critical, because the phase VO 220VRMS
margin of system decreases when the cut off frequency Sout 5KVA
is decreased. fs 20KHz
f1 50Hz
89 PEITS2010
2010 3rd International Conference on Power Electronics and Intelligent Transportation System
40%, α factor should be more than 0.025 at fs=20KHz. The fig 9 (a) and (b) show the output voltage and its
This aims us the filter specification which is listed in spectrum at maximum nonlinear load. The current crest
table3. factor is 3. The THD is below the standard limitation.
b)
The inverter with designed output filter has been Fig 10 a) shows the inductor current. Also, fig 10 b)
simulated with Simulink Toolbox in MATLAB. Fig 8 a shows the ripple of inductor current in one-fourth of a
and b show the output voltage and its spectrum at period. As we have designed, the ripple is below 40%
maximum linear load, respectively. The THD of the and the maximum ripple is occured about 45 degree.
output voltage is below 0.5% and also the switching
frequency distortion is below 0.1%. So, it meets the
standard requirements for harmonics distortion.
a)
a)
b)
b)
Fig 8. a) The output voltage and current and b) The spectrum of Fig 10. a) The inductor current and its ripple.
output voltage in maximum linear load.
90 PEITS2010
2010 3rd International Conference on Power Electronics and Intelligent Transportation System
V. CONCLUSION
A complete algorithm to design output LC filter of a
single phase inverter is developed in this paper. To
meet the IEEE Std. 1547 requirements for attenuating
of harmonics distortion, a relation between cut off
frequency of the filter and switching frequency is
calculated. The inductor value is designed to limit the
high frequency ripple of switches current. This
algorithm is verified with simulation results for a
220V, 5KVA inverter. The THD of output voltage is
less than 0.4% and 1.1% at linear and nonlinear full
load, respectively. In both simulations, the HD of
switching frequency is lower than 0.15%.
VI. REFERENCES
[1] 1. Patricio Cortés, M., IEEE, Gabriel Ortiz, Juan I. Yuz,
Member, IEEE, José Rodríguez, Senior Member, IEEE, and M.
Sergio Vazquez, IEEE, and Leopoldo G. Franquelo, Fellow, IEEE,
Model Predictive Control of an Inverter With Output LC Filter for
UPS Applications. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL
ELECTRONICS, 2009. 56(6): p. 14.
[2] 2. JOSEP M. GUERRERO, L.G.D.V., and JAVIER
UCEDA, Uninterruptible power supply systems provide protection.
IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 2007. 1(1).
[3] 3. Hyosung Kim , S.K.S., Analysis on Output LC Filter for
PWM Inveter. IPEMC2009, 2009: p. 6.
[4] 4. J. Kim, S.M., IEEE, J. Choi, Member, IEEE, H. Hong,
Student Member, IEEE, Output LC Filter Design of Voltage Source
Inverter Considering the Performance of Controller. 2000: p. 6.
[5] 5. Pekik A. Dahono, A.P., Qamaruzzaman, An LC Filter
Degign Method for single Phase PWM Inverter. 1995: p. 6.
[6] 6. S. B. Dewan, P.D.Z., Optimum Filter Design for a Single
Phase Solid State UPS System. IEEE Transaction on Industrial
Application, 1975. IA-21(3): p. 6.
91 PEITS2010