Excerpt PDF
Excerpt PDF
Excerpt PDF
AL
The primary purpose of this assessment is to provide you with a sense of your 13. Team members ask one another for input regarding their areas of responsibility. score by the number indicated below the total for each column.
team’s unique strengths and areas for improvement. For a more accurate and holistic 14. When the team fails to achieve collective goals, each member takes personal responsi-
RI
analysis, we encourage your entire team to complete the Assessment. While the bility to improve the team’s performance. TRUST CONFLICT COMMITMENT ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS
assessment itself provides an interesting perspective, its most important aspect is the 15. Team members willingly make sacrifices in their areas for the good of the team.
TE
discussion it may provoke around specific issues. 16. Team members are quick to confront peers about problems in their respective areas of 1. 2. 11. 8. 3.
MA
responsibility.
INSTRUCTIONS 17. Team members acknowledge and tap into one another’s skills and expertise.
6. 4. 19. 16. 9.
• Please assign a rating to each statement. It is essential to the accurate scoring of 18. Team members solicit one another’s opinions during meetings. 10. 5. 24. 20. 14.
this instrument.
ED
19. Team members end discussions with clear and specific resolutions and calls to action.
• Please evaluate the statements honestly and be as objective as possible. Be 20. Team members question one another about their current approaches and methods. 13. 7. 28. 21. 15.
thoughtful about your responses, but don’t agonize over each response. Your
HT
21. The team ensures that poor performers feel pressure and the expectation to improve.
initial “gut feel” is usually best. 22. Team members willingly apologize to one another. 17. 12. 30. 26. 25.
• Use the scale below to indicate how each statement applies to your team. Please 23. Team members communicate unpopular opinions to the group.
IG
remember to use the entire scale (1–5) to represent your most accurate response. 24. The team is clear about its direction and priorities. 22. 18. 34. 35. 29.
• The assessment should not take more than 15 minutes. When you have completed
R
25. Team members are slow to seek credit for their own contributions.
the Team Assessment, please transfer your ratings to the scoring page. Tear off that 32. 23. 38. 36. 31.
PY
26. All members of the team are held to the same high standards.
scoring page and return it to:
27. When conflict occurs, the team confronts and deals with the issue before moving to
__________________________________________ 33. 27. 37.
CO
another subject.
__________________________________________ 28. The team is aligned around common objectives.
Thank you. 29. The team consistently achieves its objectives.
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
30. The team is decisive, even when perfect information is not available.
÷8 ÷8 ÷7 ÷7 ÷8
The Rating Scale: 31. Team members value collective success more than individual achievement.
1—Never 2—Rarely 3—Sometimes 4—Usually 5—Always 32. Team members are unguarded and genuine with one another.
33. Team members can comfortably discuss their personal lives with one another.
1. Team members admit their mistakes. AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
34. The team sticks to decisions.
2. Team members are passionate and unguarded in their discussion of issues.
35. Team members consistently follow through on promises and commitments.
3. Team members are quick to point out the contributions and achievements of others.
36. Team members offer unprovoked, constructive feedback to one another. Note on Group Scoring
4. Team meetings are interesting and compelling (not boring).
37. Team members place little importance on titles and status. (A high score on this state- To determine the average team score for each fundamental add the individ-
5. During team meetings, the most important—and difficult—issues are discussed.
ment indicates that titles and status are NOT important to team members.) ual’s total scores and divide by the number of participants. You can use the
6. Team members acknowledge their weaknesses to one another.
38. Team members support group decisions even if they initially disagreed. grid on the back of this page to interpret the results.
7. Team members voice their opinions even at the risk of causing disagreement.
Copyright © 2007 Patrick Lencioni. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2007 Patrick Lencioni. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2007 Patrick Lencioni. All rights reserved.
BASED ON THE NEW YORK TIMES BEST-SELLER THE FIVE DYSFUNCTIONS OF A TEAM
SCORING INTERPRETATION
FIVE
Average score of Average score of Average score
3.75 and above 3.25 – 3.74 3.24 and below
Trust
Your team has
created an environ-
ment where vulnera-
bility and openness
Your team may need to
get more comfortable
being vulnerable and
open with one another
Your team lacks
necessary levels
of openness and
vulnerability about
The
are the norm. about individual strengths,
weaknesses, mistakes and
needs for help.
individual strengths,
weaknesses, mistakes
and needs for help.
DYSFUNCTIONS
of a TEAM
Your team is comfort- Your team may need to Your team is not
able engaging in learn to engage in more comfortable engaging
Copyright © 2007 by Patrick Lencioni.
Conflict unfiltered discussion unfiltered discussion in unfiltered
around important around important topics. discussion around Published by Pfeiffer
topics. important topics. A Wiley Imprint
989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741 www.pfeiffer.com
Your team is able Your team may struggle at Your team is not able
to buy-in to clear times to buy-in to clear to buy-in to clear No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of
Commitment decisions leaving little decisions. This could be decisions, leaving
the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the publisher, or authorization through
room for ambiguity creating ambiguity within room for ambiguity payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA
and second-guessing. the organization. and second-guessing. 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the publisher for permission