0% found this document useful (0 votes)
118 views12 pages

Limiting State Probabilities: Matrix Multiplication Method

This document discusses methods for determining limiting state probabilities and reliability metrics for systems with repairable components. It presents: 1) The matrix multiplication method for a 2-state repairable component system, showing how the limiting state probability equations are derived. 2) An example of applying this method to a 2-component parallel repairable system. Closed-form expressions for the limiting state probabilities are obtained. 3) An alternate frequency and duration based approach, using the concept that the frequency of encountering a state equals the probability of being in that state times the rate of departing from it. This also leads to the limiting state probability equations. 4) How reliability and availability can

Uploaded by

hanifalisohag
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
118 views12 pages

Limiting State Probabilities: Matrix Multiplication Method

This document discusses methods for determining limiting state probabilities and reliability metrics for systems with repairable components. It presents: 1) The matrix multiplication method for a 2-state repairable component system, showing how the limiting state probability equations are derived. 2) An example of applying this method to a 2-component parallel repairable system. Closed-form expressions for the limiting state probabilities are obtained. 3) An alternate frequency and duration based approach, using the concept that the frequency of encountering a state equals the probability of being in that state times the rate of departing from it. This also leads to the limiting state probability equations. 4) How reliability and availability can

Uploaded by

hanifalisohag
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Limiting State Probabilities

Matrix Multiplication Method:

λ
1 2
Up Down
µ
1 2
stochastic transitional probability matrix, P = 1 1 - λ.∆
∆t λ.∆
∆t
2 µ.∆ ∆t 1 - µ.∆
∆t

1 2
For limiting state probabilities evaluation, P = 1 1 - λ λ
∆t terms disappear during computation 2 µ 1-µ

limiting state probability vector, α = [P1 P2]

Using the equation αP = α ,

[P1 P2] 1-λ λ = [P1 P2]


µ 1-µ

The two matrix equations are:

P1.(1 - λ) + P2.(µ
µ) = P1 or - λP1 + µP2 = 0
λ) + P2.(1 - µ) = P2
P1.(λ or λP1 - µP2 = 0
If ∆t was used in the P matrix, then the two equations would be:
- λ∆t P1 + µ∆t P2 = 0
λ∆t P1 - µ∆t P2 = 0
since ∆t is finite & non-zero, it is cancelled out resulting:
- λ P1 + µ P2 = 0 The same equations as the case where
λ P1 - µ P2 = 0 ∆t was not used in the P matrix

These are identical equations that can be written as:


µ
P1 = P2 .. Eq. 1
λ

The other equation is P1 + P2 = 1 .. Eq. 2

Solving Equations 1 and 2,

µ λ
P1 = A = P2 = U =
λ +µ λ +µ
Limiting State Probabilities

System with two identical repairable components

λ
2λ λ
1 2 3
Both 1 Up Both
Up µ 1 Down µ
2µ Down

State Space Diagram


1 2 3
λ 2λ
1 1-2λ λ 0
stochastic transitional P = 2 µ 1-λ λ-µµ λ
probability matrix, 3 0 µ 1-2µ
2µ µ
2 µ.∆∆t 1 - µ.∆
∆t
limiting state probability vector, α = [P1 P2 P3]

Using the equation αP = α ,

λ 2λ
1-2λ λ 0
[P1 P2 P3] µ 1-λλ-µµ λ = [P1 P2 P3]
0 µ 1-2µ
2µ µ
2 µ.∆
∆t 1 - µ.∆
∆t
λ) + P2.(µ
P1.(1 - 2λ µ) = P1 λP1 + µP2 = 0 … Eq. 1
or - 2λ
λ + P3.(1 - 2µ
P2.λ µ) = P3 or λP2 - 2µ µP3 = 0 … Eq. 2
P1 + P2 + P3 = 1 … Eq. 3

Solving Equations 1, 2 and 3,

µ2 2λµ λ2
P1 = , P2 = and P3 =
(λ + µ)2 (λ + µ)2 (λ + µ)2
Limiting State Probabilities

Alternate Method:

λ
2λ λ
1 2 3
Both 1 Up Both
Up µ 1 Down µ
2µ Down

State Space Diagram

µ
Availability of each component, A=
λ +µ

λ
Unavailability of each component, U=
λ +µ

Using Binomial Expansion,

2 µ2
P1 = P(Both Up) =A =
(λ + µ)2

2λµ
P2 = P(1 Up, 1 Down) = 2AU =
(λ + µ)2

2 λ2
P3 = P(Both Down) =U =
(λ + µ)2
Limiting State Probabilities

Frequency & Duration

λ
1 1 2
Failure rate, λ =
m Up Down
µ
1
Repair rate, µ = Single Repairable Component
r

µ m m 1/λ f
Pup = = = = =
λ +µ m+r T 1/f λ

where, T = mean time between failures


f = freq of encountering the Up state = Pup . λ
Similarly, f = freq of encountering the Dn state = PDn . µ

In a 2-state system, fup = fDn i.e. Pup . λ = PDn . µ

Frequency of encountering State i


= P(being in State i) x (rate of departure from State i)
= P(not being in State i) x (rate of entry from State i)

This concept can be used to deduce limiting state probabilities


when the transition rates are known
→ Frequency Balance Approach
Limiting State Probabilities

Frequency Balance Approach

λ
1 2
Up Down
µ

Single Repairable Component

Frequency of encountering State 1


= P(being in State 1) x (rate of departure from State 1)
= P(not being in State 1) x (rate of entry from State 1)
λ = P2.µ
= P1.λ µ .. Eq. 1

Similarly, Frequency of encountering State 2


µ = P1.λ
= P2.µ λ .. Eq. 2

Eq. 1 and 2 are the same equations. The other equation is


P1 + P2 = 1 .. Eq. 3

µ λ
Solving Equations 1 and 3, P1 = and P2 =
λ +µ λ +µ

1
mean duration in State i, mi =
rate of departure from State i

1 1
m1 = MTTF = m2 = MTTR =
λ µ
Limiting State Probabilities

System with two identical repairable components

λ
2λ λ
1 2 3
Both 1 Up Both
Up µ 1 Down µ
2µ Down

State Space Diagram

Using Frequency Balance Approach:

Frequency of encountering State 1,


λ = P2.µ
P1.2λ µ … Eq. 1
Frequency of encountering State 2,
P2.( µ +λ
λ) = P1.2λ
λ + P3.2µ
µ … Eq. 2
Frequency of encountering State 3,
µ = P2.λ
P3.2µ λ … Eq. 3

Only two of the above 3 equations are independent.

The other equation is, P1 + P2 + P3 = 1 ... Eq. 4

Solving Equations 1, 3 and 4,

µ2 2λµ λ2
P1 = , P2 = and P3 =
(λ + µ)2 (λ + µ)2 (λ + µ)2
Reliability/Availability Evaluation
in Repairable Systems

λ
2λ λ
1 2 3
Both 1 Up Both
Up µ 1 Down µ
2µ Down

parallel system with 2 identical repairable components

Availability: probability of finding the system in the up state

A = P1 + P2 = 1 – U
λ2
Unavailability, U = P3 =
(λ + µ)2

Reliability:
- probability of staying out of the failed state
- failure states → absorbing states
- time dependent probability
- limiting state reliability = 0
- MTTF (average time before the system enters the
absorbing state) can also be calculated
o differential equations method
o truncated matrix method
Parallel System with 2 Non-repairable Components

1 λ
2λ 2 λ 3
Both 1 Up Both
Up 1 Down Down

The differential equations are:


λ P1(t)
P’1(t) = - 2λ --- Eq. 1
P’2(t) = λ P1(t) – λ P2(t) --- Eq. 2

P’3(t) = λ P2(t) --- Eq. 3

Solving the equations using Laplace Transform, we get


P1(t), P2(t) and P3(t)
Rs(t) = P1(t) + P2(t)

For non-repairable components, we can directly apply Product


Rule of Unreliability for a parallel system:
Qs(t) = Q1(t) x Q2(t) = (1 - e − λt ) (1 - e − λt )

Rs(t) = 1- Qs(t) = 2 e − λt - e − 2 λt


3
MTTF = ∫ R s ( t )dt =
0

Parallel System with 2 Repairable Components

λ

1 2 λ 3
Both 1 Up Both
Up µ 1 Down Down

The differential equations are:


λ P1(t) + µ P2(t)
P’1(t) = - 2λ --- Eq. 1
P’2(t) = λ P1(t) – (λ
2λ λ + µ) P2(t) --- Eq. 2
P’3(t) = λ P2(t) --- Eq. 3

Solving the equations using Laplace Transform, we get


P1(t), P2(t) and P3(t)

Rs(t) = P1(t) + P2(t)


3λ + µ
MTTF = ∫ R s ( t )dt = 2λ 2
0
MTTF using Truncated Matrix Method

In discrete Markov chain:


average # of time intervals before entering the absorbing state is
given by
N = [ I – Q ] -1
where,
I = identity matrix
Q = truncated matrix created by deleting row(s) and column(s)
associated with the absorbing states

In continuous Markov process:


Average time before the system enters the absorbing state (i.e.
MTTF) is given by
M = [ I – Q ] -1
where,
M = termed as the fundamental matrix
mij = average time spent in State j before being absorbed,
given that the process starts in State i
λ

1 2 λ 3
Both 1 Up Both
Up µ 1 Down Down

1 2 3
stochastic transitional λ 2λ
1 1-2λ λ 0
probability matrix, P = 2 µ 1-λ λ-µµ λ
3 0 0 1
2 µ.∆∆t 1 - µ.∆
∆t

1 2
λ 2λ
1 1-2λ λ
State 3 is the absorbing state Q = 2 µ 1-λ λ-µ
µ

M = [ I – Q ] –1

1 0 λ 2λ
1-2λ λ 1 λ+µ µ λ

={ 0 1 – µ 1-λλ-µ
µ
} -1 = 2λ 2 µ λ

3λ + µ
If the system starts in State 1, MTTF = m11 + m12 = 2

2λ + µ
If the system starts in State 2, MTTF = m21 + m22 = 2

If Series System:

λ]
States 2 and 3 are the absorbing states, Q = [ 1-2λ
1
M=[I–Q] –1
λ]
= [ 1 – 1 + 2λ –1
= 2λ

You might also like