Human Resource Thesis
Human Resource Thesis
Human Resource Thesis
INTRODUCTION
research question, research objective, scope of the study, significant of the study,
design, data collection and preparation, data analysis, pilot testing, questionnaires
Henry Ford once said “You can take my factories, burn up my buildings, but give
me my people and I’ll build the business right back again”. The word people in the
assets and every profitable growth come from the power of this internal asset. Thus,
it has become a concern for employers nowadays to retain their valuable asset.
Recruitment activities have cost the employers huge amount of dollars and yet,
another additional one million dollar will be added to bear the losing cost of the
employees (Ramlall, 2003). In addition, total costs that associated with one
employee are a year and the amount is different based on the occupation grades. A
study conducted by C. Sinha and Sinha (2012) revealed that employee retention
matters are coming into existence as the most crucial workforce management
1
challenges in the near time to come and impending shortage of highly-skilled
of employee’s turnover intention and the answers obtained are varied from each
organization. Most of the published written reports have focused on the components
that influenced employees to stay longer with the organization (Zachariah & Roopa,
2012). Besides, other reasons that draw employer's interest in retention is that over
the next few years, the Baby Boomers (age 40 to 58) with 76 million population will
be retiring, and there are only 44 million people of Generation X (age 25 to 34)
available for work, shows a lot fewer people are available to work (Heathfield, 2005).
The latter statement has strengthened the importance of employee retention for the
organization.
Context (G. Khoury & Khoury, 2014) retention have been implemented in MALAK
function being implemented. There were voluntary turnover in MALAK and the
reasons were difficult to identify and articulate. Hence, the cofounder of the
organization had implemented HR practices to retain his talented staffs. Some of the
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) gained approval from the Cabinet on
11th June 1997. The university was formerly known as Kolej Universiti Islam
2
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM) in 2007. It has two campuses; the main
campus located at Nilai, Negeri Sembilan while the branch campus situated at
Pandan Indah, Kuala Lumpur. The branch campus is specialized for Faculty of
Medicine and Health Sciences (FPSK) and Faculty of Dentistry (FPg). USIM
students.
into the Malaysian education system. The language requirement used in USIM
are Arabic and English language as well as the national language. Up to today,
The academic programmes are developed with the idea that Islamic studies
should be taken as a base for all academic programmes and it should cover and
accounting. Through this unique approach, the university hoped that wider
opportunities for Islamic stream students could be opened and these graduates
undergraduate, and postgraduate students, 576 academic staffs, and 778 non-
Building of Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Nilai which consists of eight
departments:
Vice-Chancellor's Office
Department of Registrar
Bursary division
Table 1.1 presented below shows USIM’s employee mobility for the past six
years.
2008 19 15%
2009 19 15%
2010 28 22%
2011 23 18%
2012 21 16%
4
2013 19 15%
From Table 1.1, it indicates the employee mobility out from the university is
fluctuating from year 2008 until the year 2013. The highest numbers are during
2010 with a frequency of 28 people per year, while the least is with 19
frequencies for the year 2008, 2009, and 2013. Since the numbers are
fluctuating, it shows that the university is not able to retain its employees.
Therefore, the researcher has decided to study the factors that make the existing
employees stay with the university. Since there are many possible factors that
contribute to employee's intention to stay with the university, the researcher has
limited the factors to four Human Resource Practices (HRPs) only. The four
retention?
employee retention?
5
Is there a relationship between employee compensation and
employee retention?
employee retention?
There are two types of objectives in this research which are general objective
Negeri Sembilan.
Negeri Sembilan.
Negeri Sembilan.
Negeri Sembilan.
6
To investigate the relationship between employee empowerment and
Negeri Sembilan.
Building of Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Nilai. The title of the research
Sembilan. There will be five variables. Four independent variables which are
The research is significant for students that will be doing their thesis
paper during their final year. This is because the research could be as an
7
1.5.3 To the HR Practitioner.
Lastly, this study would bring significance to the organization. They will
appropriate action to retain their valuable human capital that will lead to profit
maximization.
1.6.1 Retention
Retention is about keeping the right people at the right job at the right place
at the right time for every organization (Schuler & MacMillan, 1984).
pools of human resources and ensuring that the resources are employed
1.6.3 Training
Kadirasan, 2012).
8
1.6.4 Appraisal System
al., 2012).
1.6.5 Compensation
1.6.6 Empowerment
9
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0 Introduction
This chapter explains the literature review of the dependent variable which is
2.1 Retention
Theoretically, retention is keeping the right people at the right job at the right
place at the right time for every organization (Schuler & MacMillan, 1984). In other
words, it is about keeping good people within the organization (Hassan, Hassan, Din
Khan, & Naseem, 2011). Hong et al. (2012) viewed retention as policies and
practices that a company used to prevent valuable employees from leaving their job
by considering the measures that could encourage its employees to remain in the
organization for the maximum period of time. Govaerts, Kyndt, Dochy, & Baert
(2011) outlined employee retention as the effort made by an employer to keep its
The definitions presented above show that employee retention is important for
the baby boomers generation are gradually retiring and will cause loss of knowledge
which urges the organization to retain the talent within the remaining employees
De Vos and Meganck (2008) that the HR practices that organizations develop could
However, the researcher has chosen only four HRP to be used in this research. The
HRPs chosen are employee training, appraisal system, employee compensation and
employee empowerment.
2.2 Training
Hytter (2007) in Retention Strategies in France and Sweden and Irshad (2011)
proved that training appear to have more direct influence for employee retention
that most people are agreeing employee training is the priority for the bank in
retaining its employees. Chapman (2009) also entails a human resource plan that
includes training, could help organizations improve their ability in retaining good
employees since most of the retention practice is focusing on training (De Vos and
Meganck, 2008). However Govaerts et al. (2011) has showed that training has an
11
2.3 Appraisal system
believe that it is necessary, but they don’t like to use it. Hong et al. (2012) define the
individual.
Mittar and Saini (2014) mentioned a fair appraisal system would give effect to
employee retention and has been supported in a study conducted by Miah and
with the organization. However, research conducted by Poon (2004) produced two
manipulated for rewarding purposes, the turnover intention was not affected.
2.4 Compensation
benefits that awarded by the employers to their employees (Hong et al., 2012).
Ghosh, Satyawadi, Joshi, and Shadman (2013) stated compensation package was
significant factors for employees to continue working with the company because
turnover. The latter is further supported by Shoaib, Noor, Tirmizi, and Bashir (2009)
that organization’s reward could affect the employees’ desire to remain employed
12
and correlates positively with employee retention. However, Sengupta and Dev
(2013) wrote in their study that the most significant retention predictors is not
Irshad (2011) that stated money satisfies the employee, but it is not sufficient to
retain them.
2.5 Empowerment
employee has in accomplishing his or her work (Companion Website, March 24,
2014). Authority is about pushing legitimate power down to lower levels for decision
commitment of employees to stay with the organization (Rahman, 2012; Sengupta &
Dev, 2013) and considered as one of human resource management critical success
elements (Jarrar & Zairi, 2002). Moreover, referring to Ntshangase and Parumasur
(2013) organization that lack with empowering culture will cause the talented
13
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
data, based on the research questions of the study (Sekaran & Bougie, 2013).
attempts to identify the relationship between Human Resource Practices (HRPs) and
employee retention.
14
3.2 Research framework
15
H4: There is a relationship between employee empowerment and employee
Sekaran and Bougie (2013) defined primary data, as data collected first-
hand for subsequent analysis to find solutions to the problem researched. The
data were obtained from questionnaire survey which had been distributed to
targeted respondents.
already exist and do not have to be collected by the researcher. The data used
in this research were obtained from online resources such as Emerald Library
Database of UiTM Seri Iskandar, Google Scholar website, and USIM’s intranet
3.5.1 Population
that the researcher's desire to investigate (Sekaran & Bougie, 2013). The
16
Building of Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Nilai which has 160
employees.
Sekaran and Bougie (2013) illustrate sample size as the actual number of
on Krejcie and Morgan (1970) table shown in Table 3.1 below, the sample sizes
17
3.5.3 Sampling frame
The sampling frame of this research was obtained from USIM’s databases
variable used to measure the quota is the size of the department in the
A close-ended question has been used in the questionnaire which allow the
respondents to make an option to the given statement. The researcher used a five
point Likert Scale to measure employee retention at Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
(USIM), Nilai.
The questionnaire was adopted and adapt from two resources which are Kabir
and Parvin (2011) and Hong et al. (2012). The questionnaire was separated into two
information of the respondents. It used nominal scale that allows the researcher to
18
assign subjects to certain categories or groups. Variables asked in Section A were
gender, age, race, marital status, and years of service. On the other hand, Section B
The variables were measured by using a Likert Scale that examines how strongly the
respondents agree or disagree with the statements. The Likert items used are 1=
Disagree.
The first step used in data collection and preparation is data coding that involves
assigning a number to the participants’ responses so that the data could be entered
into a data base (Sekaran & Bougie, 2013). The next step is data entry where the
data collected is saved in the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS 20)
and hypothesis testing. The researcher also used regression analysis to analyse the
19
3.9.1 Reliability test
consistency with which the instrument measures the concept (Bougie &
Sekaran, 2013).
α ≥ 0.9 Excellent
percentages for the value of an individual variable (Bougie & Sekaran, 2013).
20
3.9.4 Hypothesis test
the dependent variable. It provides a means for assessing the degree and
Retention 0.82
A pilot test has been conducted to determine whether the questions are able
to measure the dimensions of each variable. Based on Malhotra (2008) sample size
for pilot test is normally small, ranging from 15-30 respondents. Based on the Table
3.3, value of cronbach alpha of all variables presented are above 0.7. Thus, all the
21
CHAPTER FOUR
RESEARCH ANALYSIS
4.0 Introduction
Chapter four presented the results and finding of the research. The discussion
Referring to Table 4.1, 134 set of questionnaires has been distributed and
returned, but only 113 sets of questionnaires were completed. This is because,
the survey, not completed the questionnaires, having outstation and on leave.
22
4.2 Frequency analysis
Female 78 69.0
26-30 40 35.4
31-35 41 36.3
36-40 4 3.5
41-45 3 2.7
46-50 2 1.8
Others 1 0.9
Married 77 68.1
23
20 years above 1 0.9
The Table 4.2 displays result of frequency analysis for all the demographic
profiles asked in the questionnaire. Gender profile shows that most of the
participants are female with frequency 78 (69 percent). In terms of age, a group of
31-35 years old is the majority with a frequency of 41 (36.3 percent) followed by a
group of 26-30 years old with a frequency of 40 (35.4 percent). The Malays are the
majority respondents with a frequency of 112 (99.1 percent). There are 77 married
respondents with 68.1 percent. Lastly, 46 of the respondents have worked since 6-
Table 4.3 above explains on the descriptive statistics of all the independent
variables. There are 113 questionnaires distributed and Likert items used in the
and 5= Strongly Agree. Employee training has a minimum value of 1.60, the
24
maximum is 5.00 and the mean is 3.2372 with standard deviation 0.63389 which
shows most of the respondents chose somewhat agree. The second independent
variable is appraisal system which has a minimum value of 2.20, maximum value of
5.00 and a mean of 3.5947 with standard deviation 0.55771 that displays majority of
the respondents are agreeing with the variable. Third is employee compensation that
has a minimum value of 1.86, maximum value of 5.00, mean of 3.1138 with standard
deviation 0.60070 which means the respondents are somewhat agreeing with
of 1.80, maximum value of 5.00, and mean of 3.1097 with standard deviation
0.60651. The mean value proved that the respondents have somewhat agreed with
95.0%
Unstandardized Standardized
Confidence
Coefficients Coefficients
Model t Sig. Interval for B
25
Based on the result presented in the Table 4.4, the R value 0.710 which
Hypothesis 1:
Table 4.4 expressed the unstandardized B coefficients for employee training is 0.097
Since the significant value is 0.312 which more than 0.05, it means the null
Hypothesis 2:
26
As shown in Table 4.4, the unstandardized B coefficients for appraisal system is
Its significant value is 0.000 which less than 0.05. Thus, H2 is accepted and there is
Hypothesis 3:
The significant value of employee compensation is 0.508 which is greater than 0.05.
This indicates that the null hypothesis is accepted. Thus, there is no relationship
Hypothesis 4:
27
From Table 4.4, it shows that the unstandardized B coefficients is 0.397 with
Since the significant value is 0.000 which less than 0.05, the H4 is accepted. Hence,
28
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Conclusions
Malaysia (USIM), Nilai, Negeri Sembilan. After analysing the data obtained from the
survey, it shows that the majority of the administrative employees in the Chancellery
Building of USIM, Nilai have chose appraisal system and employee empowerment as
(USIM), Nilai.
(USIM), Nilai.
29
H3: There is a relationship between employee compensation
Not Supported
and employee retention at Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
(USIM), Nilai.
(USIM), Nilai.
Table 5.1 above presents the major findings of the research. There are four
hypotheses that had been proposed by the researcher but only two hypotheses are
supported which are appraisal system and employee empowerment while employee
conducted by Hong et al. (2012), there were three hypotheses that were supported
a) Scope of Study
There are many categories of public sector in Nilai but this research only
Islam Malaysia (USIM), Nilai. The scope is too narrow and could not be
30
b) Data Resources
Islam Malaysia (USIM) 2013 yearly report and database. The information was
last updated on 27th March 2013 and the data obtained is not updated with the
latest information.
5.3 Recommendations
5.3.1 University
training the researcher noticed that the employees have the opportunity to
determine the way they do their job and they perceived the university
appraisal system is fair. This culture has retained the employees with the
neglect the factors. This is because; the preference of the employees could
employees of the Chancellery Building of USIM, Nilai which means the result
31