Scribd
Upload
82 views6 pages

Definition of A Linear Program

The document defines key concepts related to linear programs (LPs) including: 1) A linear function and linear inequalities/equalities that define the constraints of an LP. 2) A linear programming problem involves maximizing/minimizing a linear objective function subject to linear constraints. 3) A feasible solution satisfies all constraints, and the feasible region includes all feasible solutions. 4) An optimal solution is the feasible solution that maximizes the objective function.

Uploaded by

Harsha Vardhan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
82 views6 pages

Definition of A Linear Program

The document defines key concepts related to linear programs (LPs) including: 1) A linear function and linear inequalities/equalities that define the constraints of an LP. 2) A linear programming problem involves maximizing/minimizing a linear objective function subject to linear constraints. 3) A feasible solution satisfies all constraints, and the feasible region includes all feasible solutions. 4) An optimal solution is the feasible solution that maximizes the objective function.

Uploaded by

Harsha Vardhan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Definition of a Linear Program

Definition: A function f (x1, x2, . . . , xn) of x1, x2, . . . , xn is a linear function if


and only if for some set of constants c1, c2, . . . , cn,
f (x1, x2, . . . , xn) = c1x1 + c2x2 + · · · + cnxn .

Examples:
• x1
• 5x1 + 6x4 − 2x2 + 1
•3

Non-examples:
• x21
• x1 + 3x2 − 4x43
• x1 x2
Linear Inequalities

Definition: For any linear function f (x1, x2, . . . , xn) and any number b, the
inequalities
f (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ≤ b
and
f (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ≥ b
are linear inequalities.

Examples:
• x1 + x2 ≤ 4
• 5x1 − 4 ≥ 0

Note: If an inequality can be rewritten as a linear inequality then it is


one. Thus x1 + x2 ≤ 3x3 is a linear inequality because it can be rewritten
as x1 + x2 − 3x3 ≤ 0. Even x1/x2 ≤ 4 is a linear inequality because it can be
rewritten as x1 − 4x2 ≤ 0. Note that x1/x2 + x3 ≤ 4 is not a linear inequality,
however.

Definition: For any linear function f (x1, x2, . . . , xn) and any number b, the
equality
f (x1, x2, . . . , xn) = b
is a linear equality.
LPs

Definition: A linear programming problem (LP) is an optimization prob-


lem for which:
1. We attempt to maximize (or minimize) a linear function of the decision
variables. (objective function)
2. The values of the decision variables must satisfy a set of constraints,
each of which must be a linear inequality or linear equality.
3. A sign restriction on each variable. For each variable xi the sign restric-
tion can either say
(a) xi ≥ 0,
(b) xi ≤ 0,
(c) xi unrestricted (urs).

Definition: A solution to a linear program is a setting of the variables.

Definition: A feasible solution to a linear program is a solution that


satisfies all constraints.

Definition: The feasible region in a linear program is the set of all possible
feasible solutions.

Definition: An optimal solution to a linear program is the feasible solution


with the largest objective function value (for a maximization problem).
Modeling Assumptions for Linear Programming

• Prportionality. If one item brings in a profit of x, then k items bring


in a profit of kx. If one item use y units of resource R then k items use
ky units of resource R.
• Additivity. The decisions made are independent, except as noted in
the constraints. So, if we sell more trains, this does not decrease the
demand for soldiers, in the Giapeto model.
• Divisibility. Decision variables can take on fractional values.
• Certainty. The values of various parameters are known with certainty.

Comments:
• Whether these assumptions hold is a feature of the model, not of linear
programming itself.
• They often do not hold.
• They may be close to holding, or may hold in the region we are about:
e.g.
– proportionally and additivity may hold in the feasible region
– divisibility may not hold, but the conclusions of the model will be
approximately sound anyway
– certainty may not hold, but we may have good estimates
Whenever we solve a model using linear programming, we should be
aware of these assumptions, and ask ourselves whether they hold, and
whether the solution makes sense.
Geometry Definitions

Definition: A set of points S is a convex set if the line segment joining


any 2 points in S is wholly contained in S.

Fact: The set of feasible solutions to an LP (feasible region) forms a


(possibly unbounded) convex set.

Definition: A point p of a contex set S is an extreme point if each line


segment that lies completely in S and contains p has p as an endpoint. An
extreme point is also called a corner point.

Fact: Every linear program has an extreme point that is an optimal


solution.

Corrolary: An algorithm to solve a linear program only needs to consider


extreme points.

Definition: A constraint of a linear program is binding at a point p if the


inequality is met with equality at p. It is nonbinding otherwise. (Recall
that a point is the same as a solution.)

You might also like