Unit 6 Strategic Supply Chain Management: Objectives
Unit 6 Strategic Supply Chain Management: Objectives
Unit 6 Strategic Supply Chain Management: Objectives
MANAGEMENT
Objectives
After reading this unit you would be able to:
• discuss the imperatives for supply chain, strategy development;
• be acquainted with the issues in supply chain domain and strategic decisions
in the supply chain;
• discuss supplier alliances;
• illustrate supplier quality management and related problems; and
• explain supply chain re-engineering.
Structure
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Supply Chain: Growth
6.2.1 Trends in SCM
6.2.2 Strategic Decisions
6.2.3 Strategic Supply Management Activities
6.3 Supply Alliances
6.3.1 Developing and Managing the Relationship
6.4 Supplier Quality Management
6.4.1 Problems of Quality
6.4.2 How to Find the Qualified Supplier?
6.4.3 Quantity Survey of Suppliers
6.5 Supply Chain Re-engineering
6.6 Summary
6.7 Self Assessment Questions
6.8 References and Suggested Further Readings
6.1 INTRODUCTION
After having seen the various models for SCM integration, integration of supply
and demand chain, let us now take a closer look at the strategic supply chain
management.
1
2Deshmukh & Mohanty in Essentials of Supply Chain Management, p 13
•
SCM
Transaction Elements: These are those variables involved directly in
physical distribution, i.e. product and delivery reliability.
• Post-transaction Elements: These are those aspects dealing with after
sales service, warranty, repair, customer complaints and replacements.
• Pressure for Quick Response: Customers today expect a better and
quicker response owing to the value added services being provided by the
manufacturers. This is mainly due to shortened product life cycles,
consumer’s drive and volatile markets, making reliance on forecasts difficult
and dangerous. The key to quick response is pipeline management, i.e. a
process where manufacturing and procurement procedures are linked to
requirements of the market. It seeks to meet the competitive challenges of
increasing the speed of response to the market needs.
• Impact of Globalization: Present global environment is forcing the
organizations to incorporate the world in their strategies and analysis. Certain
key factors like, economic trends, competitiveness, technological advances,
the firms today cannot ignore them. Companies therefore must identify and
analyse factors that differ across nations and determine the impact on the
operations functions. Transportation and distribution therefore assumes
greater importance in such scenario, and the companies have to rightfully
integrate and manage the facilities and markets available in this backdrop.
Logistics, therefore, assumes greater strategic significance.
• Organizational Integration: Organizations today need to be broad-based
integrators, inclined towards the achievements of market place successes,
based on managing systems and people that deliver the service. Generalists,
therefore, assume greater importance to specialists to integrate materials and
operation management with delivery. Today, IT is slowly proving to be a
great integrator for various functions, spanning from supplier to the
customers.
The following are the reasons propounded by Christopher (1992) for not following
the integrated supply chain:
• Few managers retain a grasp of a process from one end of the pipeline to
the other. As a result, the way things get done can reflect convenience for
doers, a desire to protect functional boundaries and a lack of understanding
the related consequences, both up and down streams of individual
processes.
• Initiatives of changes are functional in nature and seldom reflect the cost
of the system.
• Their custodians as a means of providing breathing space and as ways of
providing some hidden flexibility respond to protect lead times. The
individual functional lead times contain slack and where these become
embodied in a processing system, they are institutionalized.
Actually, companies that have benefited from integration are pacing ahead with
confidence, and IT as a whole have further aided in integration vigorously.
• Make versus Buy: The main organization focus today is on outsourcing of
non-critical components. These decisions are arrived at after considering the
factors like, capacity, leverage an organization gets and the quality and
confidence in working with the vendor. Make buy decision is a strategic
decision and the area that has to addressed in this is development of the
total cost model (Deshmukh & Mohanty). It has been seen that having a
supplier that can work in a simultaneous engineering way with the company
is the main aspect in order to avoid costs associated with unnecessary
design complexity. This may also mean having a supplier who can provide
the same support through IT rather than having an engineer in site, and
achieve the same result. The next consideration is the aspect of labour
3
Deshmukh & Mohanty in Essentials of supply chain management, pp. 20 5
elements. Here, once again the need for simultaneous engineering is required
mainly in those off-shore areas with low labour rates, over and above issues
like labour rate inflation and challenges of overseas sourcing. All these have
to be considered in a structured manner and not in isolation.
6.2.3 Strategic Supply Management Activities
As per Burt and Dobler, supply management focus on ten strategic activities:
• Environment Monitoring: Monitoring the supply environments to identify
threats and opportunities, is an important task of supply managements, to
include material shortages affecting both price and availability of purchased
materials and services. They can further be classified as:
• Changes in legislation: affecting the workplace. This can affect both
price and availability.
• Wars and conflicts that can affect availability of materials resulting in
price increase.
• Consolidation among suppliers: to the extent of monopoly. A firm should
change its strategy based on such changes.
• Integrated Supply Strategy: Supply management should develop and
manage the firm’s supply strategy based on wholesome integration strategy
and not in isolated strategies.
• Commodity Strategy: Must develop and update sound commodity supply
strategy. The following activities have to be performed to ensure
effectiveness of the strategies:
• Strategy Updating: Commodity teams must identify materials, items of
equipment and services that are strategic in nature or should formulate
a strategic plan for obtaining them.
• Technology Access Control: All supply management organization’s
develop and update technology road maps, which lists critical current
and future technologies to be pursued. Action should be at hand to
protect these technologies that yield a competitive edge and ensure are
not transferred to competitors.
• Supply Management Organization: The organization of the supply
management system must enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of
the system in attaining the primary objective.
• Risk Management: Actions should be taken to ensure minimum
disruption of supplies and price increase.
• Data Management: Supply management, accounting and information
technology must cooperate in the collection and application of supply data to
facilitate the strategic supply planning.
• Corporate Strategic Plan: Supply management should join the marketing
and operations as the key players in development of each of the firm’s
corporate strategic plan. Supply management provides input to the strategic
planning process on threats and opportunities in the supply world. It also
provides inputs on constraints that may affect strategic initiatives. Its
knowledge of the firm’s supply world may be a vital source of input for
strategic planning.
• Strategic Sourcing: The firm should manage and develop its supply base in
line with firm’s strategic objectives. Several actions that should be taken are:
• Periodic review of the active suppliers.
• Identification of the appropriate relationship (transactional, collaborative
6 or alliance) for each commodity class.
•
SCM
Optimization of supply base with coordination and combination
with several forces to increase the importance of the firm’s supply
base.
• Strategic Supply Alliances: Developing and managing the supply alliances
frequently are two of the most crucial and most strategic activities
undertaken by any firm. Institutional trust is a key prerequisite to supply
alliances. Rapid growth of American society of Alliance Professionals is a
testimony to the industry’s recognition of importance of these activities.
Activity 1
As seen above supplier alliances plays a key role in strategic supply chain
management activities across the board. Therefore in order to develop and
manage these relationship and alliances a firm has to continuously endeavor to
identify methods to facilitate these relations. Supplier is as important as the
customer and that has to be realised in the true sense.
Riggs & Robbins spelt out these relations in their book ‘The Executive Guide to
Supply Management Strategies’, they are:
• Annual Supplier Meetings: Annual supplier meeting is a common
phenomenon in maintaining direct relationship with the suppliers by the buyer
firm. It is used both as a teaching and learning platform as well as the
opportunity to distinguish one’s organisation as a supply management leader.
It dwells on the buyer’s management performance, learning and future goals.
The main objective being learning of key strategies to support the buyer’s
business. It requires extensive planning and is expensive, but it lays the
foundation of a buyer supplier relationship in the long run.
• Supplier Discussions: It’s an informal forum for gaining and sharing
learning, between the representatives, like the chief executive, chief
operating officer, and representatives from marketing, supply management
4
8 Fine, Clockspeed, p. 95.
Supply managers at all levels should ensure and tailor appropriate actions during
the planning and management of such alliances mentioned above. Like:
• Instituting a Cross-Functional Team: A team so designated should be in
place to handle such alliances, which is responsible for development,
integration, and develop and manage appropriate measures for the alliance to
be successful.
• Training: Teams from both sides as designated should undergo appropriate
training in being constructive team players, and also in cross-functional team
skills.
• Communication System: The teams should develop and integrate an
effective communication system responsive to the needs and requirements of
both the firms.
• Trust Building: Measures to improve trust between the two organizations
have to be developed and implemented too.
• Visits: Periodic visits by the respective team members to each others site
has to be resorted to for confidence building and co-location of key technical
persons.
• Specialized Training: Plans have to be evolved and developed for
specialized training involving variance of products, designing, value analyses,
engineering, cost analysis and cost management.
• Objectives: Certain objectives have to be established in areas, including
quality, cost and time aspects.
• Monitoring: Results have to be continuously monitored and reported to the
management level.
• Supportive: Inter-firm team members should realize the importance of such
alliances and support the alliance goal in letter and spirit. It’s in the interest
of both the firms to support each other’s operations and their respective
goals, ethics over expediency. 9
After having seen the supplier-buyer relationship, we will now see the quality
control aspects of supplier units. Quality management dates back to the 80’s,
wherein the Japanese companies developed a zero-defect program for their
products, primarily based on quality of the raw materials they procured. This was
resorted to by traditional methods of sampling of the incoming raw materials,
which implicitly inferred that there will be some non-conforming parts, that will be
used in the manufacturing operations resulting in lower material productivity and
higher manufacturing costs. This was never a full proof system and the lacunas
were too many, and resulted in longer lead-time to correct the specific problems
or adjustments to the operating systems. This would generally lead to longer
customer delivery time and cascading decrease in profits.
The main objective of this unit is to discuss the problems of quality and how to
generally overcome these issues. In every organization there is a wide diversity
of functions and structures for quality planning and control, and hence the first
step to quality assurance is a structural basis for the procurement system that
should be organic in character and reflect the concern for quality control in
developing the relationship of the interdependent organization throughout the
supply chain. With this as a preamble let us see the problems of vendor /
supplier quality.
The suppliers till late had been providing natural/semi-processed materials to the
manufacturers for their finished products. Under such circumstances, quality
control was never a problem since it was dependent on the quality of raw
materials. “The buyer and suppliers were almost quasi-independent and had little
interaction between them” (Deshmukh & Mohanty, 2004). Today things have
changed considerably and most of the companies are engaged in different type of
purchases and procurements, particularly very complex and highly engineered sub-
systems with critical interfacing with other components. Therefore, some key
features have to be evolved for a better buyer-supplier relationship and its effect
on the quality assurances on the whole (we have seen this in the last unit of
buyer-supplier relationship/alliances). However, for quality assurance, some
activities that are to be followed are:
• Mission: The company’s mission and policies on supplier quality relations
have to be spelt out clearly (as for ISO-9000).
• Identification: Identify and develop qualified and capable suppliers who can
assure of quality, and weeding out the lesser variants.
• Communication: Communicating essential and helpful information, designs,
and specifications and also engineering changes promptly.
• Development: Developing methods for detecting the deviations through
reproduction and trials.
• Assistance: Provide assistance to the supplier on quality related problems
and overcome them.
10
•
SCM
Review: Periodic review of the performance of the supplier through
supplies rating and follow up actions against poor suppliers.
These activities are not sacrosanct and depend on the following:
• Nature of goods being purchased
• Volume of the purchase
• Total suppliers
• Repeat purchase
• Research, design and subcontract management.
A very tedious process and action at hand by the buyer firm is to find a suitable
supplier who can generally meet the benchmark of the purchaser, i.e. ‘the best
from the best within the cost’, under ideal conditions of course. However the
following evaluation methods could be used to get the best from the best:
• Reputation: This is a variable factor and differs from company to company,
big and small. For a big company it is of significance and for a smaller
company it’s almost obscure. A detailed survey and market search will help
in identifying the best that can deliver the best within the cost per se. The
buyers’ generally maintain database on prior performance of these
companies.
• Database: Maintaining a database in financial function has been very
effective, however, it is in development stage for use in quality functions
(Desmukh & Mohanty, 2004).
• Surveys: The purchasing and procurement division of a company is carrying
out the selection of the appropriate supplier. Clarity of information is an
important factor in this selection process, and such information on the
supplier will provide the right weightage for the supplier selection.
• Trial & Error: Sometimes this procedure will also help in choosing the
correct supplier for the manufacturer. At times certain obscure suppliers
qualify to the requirements of the manufacturer and provide the goods as
required. The limiting factor is the right chance at the right time.
• Faith & Reliance: This is another aspect that will help in getting the right
supplier when the company requires the most. No supplier would like to
loose out/compromise on the aspects of faith and reliability that has been
bestowed on it by the buyer unit.
• Opportunity: This is another factor because of which many small suppliers
loose out on a buyer’s search radar. The buyer should carry out an in-depth
selection of the supplier and provide a fair opportunity to even the smallest
to prove its worth, sometimes, it does pay huge benefits in the long run.
It’s an evaluation process, which enables the buyer to select the appropriate
supplier conforming to the buyer’s requirements. Does the supplier have the
ability to respond to the buyer’s requirements? Does he require assistance in any
form? This and many, can be answered by help of visits to the supplier’s site by
a team of specialists or through a balanced questionnaire. The following are the
survey evaluation on the supplier:5
5
Assuring the Quality Procurement System in Essentials of SCM by Desmukh & Mohanty 11
• Facilities: These are related to tests and inspection that meet the quality
requirement of the purchased product. Samples are taken and checked with
the vendor and buyer’s gauge to compare the gauging systems. This kind of
checking reduces the risk to both the supplier and the buyer.
• Procedures and Actions: These are the procedures for handling quality
problems like gauge control deviations from existing specifications. The
aim of the survey is to determine whether the procedures are in vogue
or not.
For a new product line searching for a capable supplier is indeed a difficult task
and this can well spell the difference between success and failure of any new
product. Geographical location and close proximity is a reason to search for a
supplier closer home, without a rating of sorts, but selection for a long-term
supplier in high volumes is a tedious process and should start early. The
prospective suppliers can be located by any methods, but the pertinent questions
that should be addressed are:
• How well do the objectives of the quality program conform to the buyer’s
needs?
• How well the practices of the quality control program conform to the
objectives?
The objective of this evaluation is to arrive at a judgment of how well supplier’s
programme operates, neither to tabulate the efficiencies nor rationalize the
shortcomings. The areas for evaluation are:
• Quality
• Price
• Performance
• Production capabilities
A supplier survey is analogous to a profit and loss statement, that is, it speaks of
the status at any one point in time and will not guarantee of the status at any
other time. Therefore, the communication of the survey must continue for a long
time towards a good partnership.
12
Business structure is continuously changing from one phase to another, and today
has reached the stage of professionalism where it is revolving around customer
focus in a big way. These changes have shown remarkable improvement in
company performance measures such as quality, costs, services and lead times.
Hammer & Champy in 1993 identified these changes and improvements and
packaged these ideas into concept of ‘business re-engineering’, which was later
termed as ‘business process re-engineering’ (BPR).
The areas in common between BPR and SCM seems to be very few at a
cursory glance, but SCM is not a traditional improvement technique, but a
philosophy that helps in improvement not involved with functional reviews, as
highlighted by Stevens’ model of supply chain integration, which we have seen in
our earlier units. However, in an introspection of BPR & SCM reveals that there
is more than one common link between the two. Business transformation from
the concept ‘what we make we sell’ to a more flexible concept of ‘what the
market want us to sell’ can effectively be achieved after a competitive analysis
and a supply chain diagnostic review. It is well understood, that effective
transformation is only possible after a series of phased step involving
technological reorganization, attitudinal and organizational attribute, and integration
between the competition and customer demands.
The comparison between SCM & BPR is as shown in the table 6.1
Table 6.1 : As Adopted from Deshmukh & Mohanty, 2004 (Essentials of SCM)
Business (Process) Re- The fundamental rethinking and radical redesign of business
Engineering process to achieve dramatic improvements in critical,
contemporary measures of performance, such as cost, quality,
(Hammer & Champy, 1993) service and speed.
Supply Chain Management The management of material suppliers, production facilities, and
(Stevens’ 1989) distribution services and customer linked together via the feed
forward flow of material and the feedback flow of information.
From the above its evident that the first 9 steps are operational, step 10 is for
supplier side, and step 11 is for the customer satisfaction. Therefore, to attain this
step, if a radical redesign is taken, business process integration turns to business
process re-engineering, in the supply chain scenario. Side by side in the Stevens’
model step 3 moves to step 4, i.e. full integration is achieved. Therefore, this
integration involves extending the internal management to supplier focus and
customer orientation in order to create a strategic partnership, by reducing the
suppliers. Customer understanding will in a big way change the entire philosophy
from pushing products to selling goods as per customer requirements. Backward
integration is a very difficult process in supply chain integration, since; it involves
a change in inter-company attitudes from adversarial to that of mutual support,
which is in fact very crucial to a successful supply chain integration.
We should as a matter of fact, never lose sight of the fact that business in the
supply chain, is directly dependent on customer finances which enables the
continuity of the supply chain. Therefore, the strategies in the supply chain should
have common aim of improving the performance of the chain from the
perspective of the consumer/customer. Stevens’ integration, in stage 4 of the
supply chain is generally successful because of the financial position enjoyed by
the big companies. Such companies generally bend rules of supply chain
integration and manipulate smaller members of the chain to their financial ends, in
order to benefit the most. Therefore, backward integration is a contentious issue.
Both internal and external integration is required to be achieved for improving
performance in the supply chain management, under ideal conditions. Yet, internal
or external or a combination approach may be the goal depending upon product,
industry, market conditions or where advantage could be gained for the supply
chain. Though, Stevens’ model suggests that external integration, without internal
reorganization does not exploit all the benefits of true supply chain integration.
Therefore in spite of BPR being a later model, Stevens’ model is still valid in the
light of BPR concept, though more details of reorganization stages are required.
Therefore, cross-relationship between both the stages is to be highlighted more
vigorously. This can be achieved by examining the pre-requisites and techniques
used in integration stages of SCM and in virtuality, i.e. by philosophy.
Let us now see the various categories covering the parallels of essentials
between SCM & BPR, through this table:
14
Area for change BPR (Business Process Re- Supply Chain Management
engineering) Terminology
6.6 SUMMARY
This unit highlights the common foundations, which underlie both SCM & BPR
philosophies, which are indicative of the important difference between the two,
the drive for improved business operations. Those who follow the SCM
philosophy would have traversed the path as BPR after having re-engineered
own processes. The existing philosophies such as SCM (integrated) as mentioned
in this unit covers a large portion of the BPR ideas, yet a few ideas have to be
added to the model:
• Radical approach for internal integration.
• Continuity in step changeover improvements, and strategic placements of
these ideas on the marketplace.
The various points for learning in SCM re-engineering are:
• SCM is not a traditional improvement technique but that which facilitates
improvement, not associated with functional/departmental reviews that focus
internally.
• Transforming a business from inward looking to outward looking.
• Integration being the mainstay between the customers and competition.
• Inquisitiveness throughout the organization will facilitate re-engineering.
• This is applicable at the higher echelons as these positions give a wider
perspective, seeking core processes and creating leaner structures, a must
for SCM integration through re-engineering.
• The change management associated with re-engineering has to be handled
smoothly and skillfully.
Sustaining the spirit of re-engineering throughout the corporate culture is a big
issue that requires serious attention. Continual re-engineering allows a company’s
quality initiatives and re-engineering to be completely and effectively integrated,
with an added advantage of the involvements of the high teams for continual re-
engineering.
15
16