Verified affidavit and complaint by three

witnesses to acts of high crimes and

treason committed by:
Charles D. Baker, Lena Pinderton, and
M. Sean Brister.
And we demand their capture and prosecution.
In conformity with:
U.S.A. constitution, Article 3, Section 3 and Constitution of the State of
Arkansas, article one, section 14, Treason: Treason against the United States,
shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies,
giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the
testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
18 U.S. Code § 2382 Misprision of treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the
commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be,
disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United
States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty
of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than seven years, or both.
And…
18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a
court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known
the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the
United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three
years, or both.

We the three witnesses Vaughn Damon Wilson, William Hugh Wollman,

Ricky Dean Sharrah, all State Citizens, witness and attest to the following
facts.
William Hugh Wollman is a natural born State Citizen and God created
living soul of the Peoples Republic of California. He not a United States citizen or
other legal fiction. And he explicitly retains all of his rights at all times, places and
circumstances. He is not subject to admiralty, military, commercial or copyrighted
Page 1 of 15
law, including the Uniform Commercial Code (also see UCC 1-308) or any of its
nexus including the copyrighted Arkansas code annotated. Nor subject to the
courts established by the foregoing. He has not consented to any court, nor has he
knowingly and willingly entered any plea. His silence does not waive any rights
nor perfect any contracts. And he objects to Charles D. Baker’s efforts to force him
into his jurisdiction through threats, duress and coercion. And he objects to his
efforts to deny him his constitutional right to a common law court and other due
process. And he objects to his threats of jail and contempt, to deny him his right to
speak upon his own behalf. And he objects to not being provided with proof of
constitutional common law jurisdiction. And he objects to the concealment of any
and all bonds. Further, no contract exists and he denies any and all presumed
contracts, anyone thinks may exist. He does not waive any of his rights ever.
On April 12th, 2017 at 1:21 PM.
We the three witnesses were present at the commercial / admiralty / non-
constitutional Crawford County District Court (displaying the gold fringe flag)-
Van Buren Division. In fact, the DUNS number for the JUDICIARY COURTS
OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS IS 360709893.
William Wollman, stepped forward when his name was called. He was asked
by Charles D Baker (judge / trier of facts as per the UCC). Charles D Baker asked
how he pleads. William Wollman proceeded to say that he was a State Citizen and
does not waive his right to a common law court. Before he could finish his
statement of non-consent, Charles D. Baker (judge), raised his voice, cut him off
from speaking further. Charles D. baker, said “I have heard all of this before.” And
continued to threaten Wollman with jail. Wollman never entered a plea into the
court and never consented. Charles D. Baker continued to force Wollman into his
jurisdiction, and ordered Wollman a trial date of May 10th, 2017 at 1:00 pm.
William Hugh Wollman was never presented with proof of constitutional
jurisdiction, common law jurisdiction, any penal bonds, other bonds or any
contracts in admiralty or otherwise, that Wollman had signed and consented to.
Later the same day, April 12th, 2017 at 3:11 pm.
Again William Wollman, stepped forward when his name was called. He was
asked by Charles D Baker (judge). Charles D Baker asked how he pleads. William
Wollman proceeded to say that he was a State Citizen and does not waive his right
to a common law court. Again, before he could finish this statement of non-

Page 2 of 15
consent, Charles D. Baker (judge), raised his voice, cut him off from speaking
further. And again, Baker threatened Wollman with jail. And order a court date on
May 10th, 2017 at 1:45 pm.
Charles D. Baker never once stated his or the courts constitutional jurisdiction.
April 25th, 2017
I, Vaughn Damon Wilson made public record, William Hugh Wollman’s
Demand for discovery, information and jurisdiction, (a non-court document) and
also containing a certified mail number, on April 25th, 2017, at the Crawford
County Circuit Clerks office. Doc number 2017003785. It was addressed to Marc
McCune and Lena Pinkerton and Angie Haney
Crawford County Prosecuting Attorney
206 South 3rd
Van Buren, AR 72956
And: 1003 Broadway
Van Buren, AR 72956
Phone: 479-474-5000 Certified Mail Number: 70122210000075124254
It was mailed the same day, and was received on April 27th.

May 3rd, 2017

I, Vaughn Damon Wilson also made public record, William Hugh Wollman’s
Demand for discovery, information and jurisdiction, (a non-court document) and
also containing a certified mail number, on May 3rd, 2017, at the Crawford County
Circuit Clerks office. Doc number 2017004100. It was addressed to M. Sean
Brister, J.D., LL.M.
P.O. Box 1451
Alma, AR 72921
(479) 632-2446 Certified Mail Number: 70122210000075124161
It was mailed the same day and received by Brister on May 4th, 2017.

Page 3 of 15
No answer to proof of jurisdiction questions

Page 4 of 15
 We, Vaughn Damon Wilson, Ricky Dean Sharrah and William Hugh Wollman
witness that neither M. Sean Brister, J.D., LL.M., Marc McCune, Lena Pinkerton
nor Angie Haney, answered one of the 14 questions challenging jurisdiction. See…
“Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot
proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks
jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach
merits, but rather, should dismiss the action.” Melo
v. US, 505 F2d 1026

Bindell v City of Harvey, 212 Ill.App.3d 1042, 571

N.E.2d 1017 (1st Dist. 1991) ("the burden of proving
jurisdiction rests upon the party asserting it.").

"The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on

the record of the administrative agency and all
administrative proceedings." Hagans v Lavine 415 U. S.
533.

“Jurisdiction of court may be challenged at any stage

of the proceeding, and also may be challenged after
conviction and execution of judgment by way of writ of
habeas corpus.”
[U.S. v. Anderson, 60 F.Supp. 649 (D.C.Wash. 1945)]

“A judgment rendered by a court without personal

jurisdiction over the defendant is void. It is a
nullity.” Sramek v. Sramek, 17 Kan. App 2d 573, 576-7,
840 P. 2d 553 (1992) rev. denied 252 Kan. 1093(1993)

In regard to courts of inferior jurisdiction, “if the

record does not show upon its face the facts necessary
to give jurisdiction, they will be presumed not to have
existed.” Norman v. Zieber, 3 Or at 202-03

“Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts

related to the jurisdiction asserted.” Lantana v.
Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York 37 FSupp.

Page 5 of 15
150

“The law provides that once State and Federal

jurisdiction has been challenged, it musts be proven.”
Main v Thiboutot, 100 S Ct. 2502(1980)

“Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time,” and

“Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and
must be decided.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co. 395
F 2d 906, 910

“Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject

matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal.”
Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp. 478
So. 2d, 368 (Fla 2nd DCA 1985)

“Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it

must be proved to exist.” Stock v. Medical Examiners
94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 289

“There is no discretion to ignore that lack of

jurisdiction.” Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215

“the burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction.”

Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F2d 416

“a universal principle as old as the law is that a

proceedings of a court without jurisdiction are a
nullity and its judgment therein without effect either
on person or property,” Norwood v. Renfield, 34 C 329;
Ex parte Giambonini, 49 P. 732

Page 6 of 15
“jurisdiction is fundamental and a judgment rendered by
a court that does not have jurisdiction to hear is void
ab initio.” In re Application of Wyatt, 300 P. 132;p
Re Cavitt, 118 P2d 846

“Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of

the subject matter on which it assumes to act, its
proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of
the term.” Dillon v. Dillon 187 p27

“A court has no jurisdiction to determine its own

jurisdiction, for a basic issue in any case before a
tribunal is its power to act, and a court must have the
authority to decide that question the first instance.”
Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles, 171 P2d
8: 331 US 549, 91 K, ed, 1666m 67 S, Ct, 1409

“A departure by a court from those recognized and

established requirements of law however close apparent
adherence to mere form in methods of procedure which
has the effect of depriving one of a constitutional
right, is an excess of jurisdiction.” Wuest v. Wuest,
127 P2d 934, 937.

Loos v American Energy Savers, Inc., 168 Ill.App.3d

558, 522 N.E.2d 841(1988)"Where jurisdiction is
contested, the burden of establishing it rests upon the
plaintiff.”

Bindell v City of Harvey, 212 Ill.App.3d 1042, 571

N.E.2d 1017 (1st Dist. 1991) ("the burden of proving
jurisdiction rests upon the party asserting it.").
May 10th, 2017

Page 7 of 15
 We the three witnesses, Vaughn Damon Wilson, Ricky Dean Sharrah and
William Hugh Wollman were present at the commercial, non-constitutional
Crawford County District Court (displaying the gold fringe flag)- Van Buren
Division.
On May 10th, 2017 at 1:19 pm, we three were witness to the following. Charles
D. Baker called the name of William Hugh Wollman. Wollman came forward.
Baker read the charges and asked how Wollman plead. Wollman said “I do not
consent”. Baker then assumed jurisdiction without proving or stating jurisdiction.
He proceeded through the trial. Every time that Baker addressed Wollman,
Wollmans response was “I do not consent”. Baker towards the end sentenced him
to 30 days suspended, then one year suspended, then declared him in contempt of
court for his answer, that he did not consent. Then sentenced him to 18 days of
community service. (slavery/forced labor) Although Wollman never consented to
the proceedings. He was cuffed (taken hostage/prisoner) and was denied the
counsel of his friends. Note the picture below of William Hugh Wollman cuffed,
held prisoner and the gold fringe flag, non-constitutional court.

Later that same day May 10th, 2017 at 2:16 pm.

Page 8 of 15
 Baker again read more charges and asked Wollman how he plead. Wollman
plead the fifth (amendment without any counsel present). Baker without proof or
statement of constitutional jurisdiction, continued without Wollman’s consent.
Each time Baker addressed Wollman thereafter, Wollman’s response was, “I do
not consent”. Baker order Wollman to 17 days of community service
(slavery/forced labor). Wollman was then transported to the Crawford County jail
to be held for 24 hours.
May12th, 2017
I, Vaughn Damon Wilson only, attest to the following. In the morning of May
th
12 , 2017, I called the Crawford County District Court and asked if a fine
(ransom) could be paid in lieu of the community service (slavery) ordered by
Charles D. Baker. (Buy back from slavery / pay a ransom). I was told that I could
pay $1415 dollars, and that they would except cash only. However, lawful money
(dollars, gold and silver coin) does not exist. I brought them 1415 Federal Reserve
notes which they accepted as proven by the pictures and the receipt below.
Therefore, warring against the U.S.A. constitution article one section ten.

Page 9 of 15
Page 10 of 15
Page 11 of 15
 We the three witnesses Vaughn Damon Wilson, William Hugh Wollman, Ricky
Dean Sharrah, all State Citizens have witnessed and observed the following facts.
1. It is a fact: U.S.A. constitution, Article 3, Section 3: Treason against the
United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering
to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted
of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act,
or on confession in open court.
Also see… Constitution of the State of Arkansas, article one, section 14,
Treason.
2. It is a fact: Warring and treason is:
 Tucker’s Blackstone Vol. 1 Appendix Note B [Section 3] 1803 – "If
in a limited government the public functionaries exceed the limits
which the constitution prescribes to their powers, every such act is
an act of usurpation in the government, and, as such, treason
against the sovereignty of the people.”
 Black’s Law 6th Edition – "A breach of allegiance to one’s
government, usually committed through levying of war against such
government or by giving aid or comfort to the enemy."
 Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 1856- TREASON, crim. law. "This word
imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance. 4 Bl. Com.
75."
 Mirriam-Webster Learner’s: “Involved in war, conflict or
disagreement”
3. It is a fact: That an acceptance of a license, does not impose an obligation.
See… "The acceptance of a license, in whatever
form, will not impose upon the licensee an
obligation to respect or to comply with any
provision of the statute or with the regulations
prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution
of the United States." W. W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE
OF MINNESOTA, 180 U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S. 452
4. It is a fact: That the state cannot convert rights into a privilege. See…"If
the state converts a liberty into a privilege the
citizen can engage in the right with impunity"
Shuttlesworth v Birmingham , 373 USs 262
5. It is a fact: Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction in admiralty. Merrick
v. Avery, 14 Ark. 370; Doris >'. Mason. 44 Ark. 553.

Page 12 of 15
 6. It is a fact: That an action in REM cannot be against people. In Latin, in
rem means “against or about a thing”. It derives from the word “res”, which
means “the thing”.
7. It is a fact: The dejure Constitution of the State of Arkansas only establishes
common law and equity courts.
8. It is a fact: That the Arkansas Code Annotated is copyrighted commercial
law / law merchant.
9. It is a fact: That William Hugh Wollman was denied all constitutional
due process according to the U.S.A. constitution and the Arkansas
constitution. He was never charged with a common law crime. There was
no corpus delicti (injured people) , he was denied a common law bail, there
was no common law search warrant, there was no common law arrest
warrant, there was no grand jury indictment, he was denied a jury, he was
denied a common law court, he was denied his freedom, he was falsely
arrested and kidnapped, he was denied his choice of counsel (other than a
BAR attorney / Esquire / officer of the court), he was subjected to slavery /
forced labor, held for ransom and the court did not and does not use gold and
to claim is rights secured by both constitutions. Specifically, the right to free
speech as guaranteed by the First Amendment. All of which is waging war
against both the U.S.A. and Arkansas constitutions, which is warring
against our republic form of government and warring against “we the
people” who created it.
High Crimes and Treason
We the three witnesses Vaughn Damon Wilson, William Hugh Wollman,
Ricky Dean Sharrah, all State Citizens, witnessed and observed, in the foregoing,
the following acts of high crimes and treason committed by Charles D. Baker,
Lena Pinderton and M. Sean Brister all in collusion. They have all violated their
own oaths of office. And the constitutional threshold for treason has been met.
1. Filing false Charges / stacking charges / falsification of documents. A.C.A.
5-54-121. Tampering with a public record. (1) Makes a false entry in or
falsely alters any public record; or
2. Deprivation of rights under color of law. 18 USC 241
3. Conspiracy to deprive rights. 18 USC 242
4. False arrest. A.C.A. 5-11-103. False imprisonment in the first degree.
(a) A person commits the offense of false imprisonment in the first degree if,
without consent and without lawful authority, the person knowingly restrains
Page 13 of 15
 another person so as to interfere substantially with the other person's liberty
in a manner that exposes the other person to a substantial risk of serious
physical injury.
5. Kidnapping. A.C.A. 5-11-102. Kidnapping
6. Treason: That William Hugh Wollman was denied all constitutional due
process according to the U.S.A. constitution and the Arkansas constitution.
He was never charged with a common law crime. There was no corpus
delicti (injured people) , he was denied a common law bail, there was no
common law search warrant, there was no common law arrest warrant, there
was no grand jury indictment, he was denied a jury, he was denied a
common law court, he was denied his freedom, he was falsely arrested and
kidnapped, he was denied his choice of counsel (other than a BAR attorney /
Esquire / officer of the court), he was subjected to slavery / forced labor,
held for ransom and the court did not use gold and to claim is rights secured
by both constitutions. Specifically, the right to free speech as guaranteed by
the First Amendment. All of which is waging war against both the U.S.A.
and Arkansas constitutions, which is warring against our republic form
of government and warring against “we the people” who created it.
7. Piracy. Fraudulent use of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction on dry land,
against a State Citizen is robbery ashore, and / or also, to do so in a vessel
(Police car) outfitted for the purpose of piracy.
See 18 U.S. Code § 1661 - Robbery ashore. Whoever, being engaged in any
piratical cruise or enterprise, or being of the crew of any piratical vessel,
lands from such vessel and commits robbery on shore, is a pirate, and shall
be imprisoned for life.
Also see 18 U.S. Code § 1654 - Arming or serving on privateers

Page 14 of 15
 We the three witnesses Vaughn Damon Wilson, Ricky Dean Sharrah and
William Hugh Wollman, demand that Charles D. Baker, Lena Pinderton, and
M. Sean Brister be captured and prosecuted.
Nemo me impune lacessit.
Vaughn Damon Wilson

Signed ______________________ Date: ________ All rights explicitly reserved

Ricky Dean Sharrah

Signed ______________________Date: _________All rights explicitly reserved

William Hugh Wollman

Signed ______________________ Date: _________All rights explicitly reserved

Notary Public

State of Arkansas
County of Crawford

On this the ____ day of ________________, _____________, before me,

____________________________________, the undersigned officer, personally
appeared
Vaughn Damon Wilson, Ricky Dean Sharrah and William Hugh Wollman, known
to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the person whose name is/are subscribed to
the within instrument and acknowledged that he/she/they executed the same for the
purposes therein contained. In witness whereof I hereunto set my hand and official
seal.

_________________________________
Notary Public

Printed Name: _____________________

My Commission Expires: ___________________

Page 15 of 15