We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
FOUNDATION ANALYSIS AND
DESIGN
Fifth Edition
Joseph E. Bowles, P.E., S.E.
Consulting Engineer/Sofiware Consultant
Engineering Computer Software
Peoria, Mlinois
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
New York St. Louis San Francisco Auckland Bogotd Caracas
Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan Montreal New Delhi
San Juan Singapore Sydney Tokyo TorontoEXPLORATION, SAMPLING, AND IN SITU SOIL MEASUREMENTS 163
TABLE 3-4
Empirical values for ¢, D,, and unit weight of granular soils based on
the SPT at about 6 m depth and normally consolidated [approximately,
b = 28° + ISD, (+2°)|
Description
‘Relative density D, 0 ors 035 065 0.85
SPT Ni: fine 12 36 Ts 16-30 2
medium 23 “7 820 21-40 >40
coarse 36 +9 1025 6-45 as
fine Oy ee
medium 2-28 30323236 BHD <50
coarse 28-30 30-34 33-40 40-50.
* Excavated sl or material dumped from ack has a uit weight of {1 to 14 KN/n? and must be quite dense
to weigh much over 21 ENim* No exiting soil has aD, = 0.00 ne a value of 100. Common ranges ae ftom
ospo7
The following are several SPT N-value correlations for angle of friction . The top two of
Eq. (3-5) are from Shioi and Fukui (1982), who obtained them from the Japanese Railway
Standards:
b= f18Nj +15
= 0.36Na9 +27 G5)
= 4.5Nap + 20 (in general)
The top equation of this set is for roads and bridges, and the second is for buildings (refer
also to Table 3-4),
Arrelationship for N and D, was propesed indirectly by Meyerhof (1957) as
v
=A+Bp, (3-5a)
For this equation Skempton (1986), using a database of five different soils, found that A and
B are site-Uependnt with a range in A of 15 to about 54 and in B from 0.306 to 0.204 (using
the Njp base). This spread is such that using average valnes far A and R is somewhat risky:
however, using averages we obtain
= 32+ 0.288), (3-5b)
N
D
with pi in kPa, For an average unit weight y of 16 to 17 kN/m} and a depth of about 6 m
one obtains Njq/D? = 60, which was also used as a guide in designating the N values for
normally consolidated sands of Table 3-4. For overconsolidated sands (OCR > 1), Skempton
(1986) suggested the following adjustment:
= A+ BCocep), (3-5e)