App13A_SW_Brigham_778322_R2 12/24/02 5:14 AM Page 13A-1

13A

ILLUSTRATION OF THE THREE

Figure 13A-1 illustrates the three alternative dividend policy theories: (1) Miller
and Modigliani’s dividend irrelevance theory, (2) Gordon and Lintner’s bird-in-the-
hand theory, and (3) the tax preference theory. To understand the three theories, con-
sider the case of Hardin Electronics, which has from its inception plowed all earnings
back into the business and thus has never paid a dividend. Hardin’s management is
now reconsidering its dividend policy, and it wants to adopt the policy that will max-
imize its stock price.
Consider first the data presented below the graph. Each row shows an alternative
payout policy: (1) Retain all earnings and pay out nothing, which is the present pol-
icy; (2) pay out 50 percent of earnings; and (3) pay out 100 percent of earnings. In
the example, we assume that the company will have a 15 percent ROE regardless of
which payout policy it follows, so with a book value per share of $30, EPS will be
0.15($30)  $4.50 under all payout policies.1 Given an EPS of $4.50, dividends per
share are shown in Column 3 under each payout policy.
Under the assumption of a constant ROE, the growth rate shown in Column 4
will be g  (% Retained)(ROE), and it will vary from 15 percent at a zero payout to
zero at a 100 percent payout. For example, if Hardin pays out 50 percent of its earn-
ings, then its dividend growth rate will be g  0.5(15%)  7.5%.
Columns 5, 6, and 7 show how the situation would look if MM’s irrelevance the-
ory were correct. Under this theory, neither the stock price nor the cost of equity
would be affected by the payout policy—the stock price would remain constant at
$30, and ks would be stable at 15 percent. Note that ks is found as the sum of the
growth rate in Column 4 plus the dividend yield in Column 6.
Columns 8, 9, and 10 show the situation if the bird-in-the-hand theory were true.
Under this theory, investors prefer dividends, and the more of its earnings the com-
pany pays out, the higher its stock price and the lower its cost of equity. In our ex-
ample, the bird-in-the-hand theory indicates that adopting a 100 percent payout pol-
icy would cause the stock price to rise from $30 to $40, and the cost of equity would
decline from 15 percent to 11.25 percent.
Finally, Columns 11, 12, and 13 show the situation if the tax preference theory
were correct. Under this theory, investors prefer companies that retain earnings and
thus provide returns in the form of lower-taxed capital gains rather than higher-taxed
dividends. If the tax preference theory were correct, then an increase in the dividend

1
When the three theories were developed, it was assumed that a company’s investment opportunities
would be held constant and that if the company increased its dividends, its capital budget could be
funded by selling common stock. Conversely, if a high-payout company lowered its payout to the point
where earnings exceeded good investment opportunities, it was assumed that the company would repur-
chase shares. Transactions costs were assumed to be immaterial. We maintain those assumptions in our
example.

APPENDIX 13A ■ I L L U S T R AT I O N O F T H E T H R E E D I V I D E N D P O L I C Y T H E O R I E S 13A-1

Dividend Irrelevance, Bird-in-the-Hand,

Stock Price, P0
($)
40 Bird-in-the-Hand

30 MM: Irrelevance

20 Tax Preference

10

0 50% 100%
Payout

Cost of Equity, ks
(%)

22.50 Tax Preference

15.00 MM: Irrelevance

11.25 Bird-in-the-Hand

0 50% 100%
Payout

P O S S I B L E S I T U AT I O N S ( O N LY O N E C A N B E T R U E )
A LT E R N AT I V E
PAY O U T P O L I C I E S M M : I R R E L E VA N C E BIRD-IN-THE-HAND TA X P R E F E R E N C E

PERCENT PERCENT
PAYOUT RETAINED DPS g P0 D/P0 kS P0 D/P0 kS P0 D/P0 kS
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)

0% 100% $0.00 15.0% $30 0.0% 15.0% $30 0.00% 15.00% $30 0.0% 15.0%
50 50 2.25 7.5 30 7.5 15.0 35 6.43 13.93 25 9.0 16.5
100 0 4.50 0.0 30 15.0 15.0 40 11.25 11.25 20 22.5 22.5

NOTES:
1. Book value  Initial market value  $30 per share.
2. ROE  15%.
3. EPS  $30(0.15)  $4.50.
4. g  (% retained)(ROE)  (% retained)(15%). Example: At payout  50%, g  0.5(15%)  7.5%.
5. ks  Dividend yield  Growth rate.

13A-2 APPENDIX 13A ■ I L L U S T R AT I O N O F T H E T H R E E D I V I D E N D P O L I C Y T H E O R I E S

payout ratio from its current zero level would cause the stock price to decline and the
cost of equity to rise.
The data in the table are plotted to produce the two graphs shown in Figure
13A-1. The upper graph shows how the stock price would react to dividend policy
under each of the theories, and the lower graph shows how the cost of equity would
be affected.

APPENDIX 13A ■ I L L U S T R AT I O N O F T H E T H R E E D I V I D E N D P O L I C Y T H E O R I E S 13A-3