0% found this document useful (0 votes)
317 views

Marginal Costing Notes

The document discusses marginal costing and absorption costing techniques. It explains that marginal costing only includes variable costs, while absorption costing includes all costs. It then compares the two methods and outlines how profits are calculated differently under each. The rest of the document provides details on calculating marginal costs, segregating semi-variable costs, advantages and limitations of marginal costing, and applications of cost-volume-profit analysis including calculating break-even points using different methods.

Uploaded by

md tabish
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
317 views

Marginal Costing Notes

The document discusses marginal costing and absorption costing techniques. It explains that marginal costing only includes variable costs, while absorption costing includes all costs. It then compares the two methods and outlines how profits are calculated differently under each. The rest of the document provides details on calculating marginal costs, segregating semi-variable costs, advantages and limitations of marginal costing, and applications of cost-volume-profit analysis including calculating break-even points using different methods.

Uploaded by

md tabish
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

Marginal Costing and Profit

Planning

Unit IV Chapter 4
Introduction
 Marginal (Variable) costing is a technique in which only
variable costs are taken into account for product costing,
inventory valuation and other management decisions.
 Absorption costing or „full costing method‟ absorbs all
costs necessary to produce the product and have it in a saleable
form.
 The two techniques are, however, not mutually exclusive and
are complementary in nature.
 Income statements for external reporting and tax purposes are
on a full cost basis.
 Variable costing is more useful for internal reporting purposes.
Marginal and Absorption Costing:
A Comparison
 Marginal (Variable)  Absorption
 Fixed costs are period  Fixed costs are product
costs costs
 Fixed costs are  Fixed costs are carried
expensed each year to next year as part of
(same year) cost of inventory

 Fixed manufacturing  Fixed manufacturing


expense is not a part of expense is a part of
product cost . product cost
Marginal and Absorption Costing:
A Comparison
 The profits under two methods would
be different.
 Illustration 4.3 on page 4.201
Marginal Cost
 Marginal Cost is Total Variable Cost because wihin
the capacity of the organization, an increase of one
unit in production will cause an increase in Variable
Cost only.
 Marginal Cost = Total Variable Cost
 Total Variable Cost = Direct Material + Direct
Labor + Direct Expenses (Variable) + Variable
Overheads ( Variable portion of Semi –
Variable Overheads)
 Total Cost = Total Fixed Costs + Total Variable
Costs
Segregation of Semi – variable
Costs
 High – low method: The two points are chosen – High cost
point and low cost point.
Example 5.1
Month Volume Costs
X Y
January 200 1,800
November 450 3,750
Y = a + b X
1800 = a + 200 b
3750 = a + 450 b

b = (3750 - 1800)/ (450 - 200)


b = 7.8
a = 1800 - 200 * (7.8)
a = 240
Therfore, Y = 240 + 7.8 X
Fixed Costs = Rs. 240
Variable Costs = Rs. 7.8
Segregation of Semi – variable
Costs
 Variable element = Change in amount of Expense/
Change in Activity or Quantity
 High – low method is statistically not desirable as it is based on
only two extreme observations, which may not be
representative of the whole population.
 Degree of Variability Method: You measure extent of
variability in this method based on how far cost varies with
volume.
 Example: Some mixed costs may have 40% variability.
 Total Cost = 170
 Variable cost = 170 * 40% = 68
 Fixed Cost = 170 – 68 = 102
Advantages of Marginal Costing
 Unlike absorption costing, problem of allocating fixed overheads
is not there.
 Over-absorption or under-absorption of fixed overheads is not
to be dealt with.
 Management finds it easier to understand as they are more
intuitive. Profit increases when sales increases.
 Impact of fixed cost is emphasized as they are deducted 100%.
 Helps in control function. Variable costs are controllable at every
level of management whereas fixed costs are controllable at the
top level of management.
 Helps in Profit Planning. Variable costing helps to arrive at the
correct profits for decision – making.
Advantages of Marginal Costing
 Variable Costing highlights the significance of key factors such
as scarce raw material, scarce labor.
 It provides contribution margin per unit which is the basis of
cost – volume – profit relationship.
 Variable costing ties on with such effective plans for cost control
as standard costs and flexible budgets. Many companies use
flexible budgeting.
Limitations of Marginal Costing
 Segregation of semi-variable costs into fixed and variable costs
is a difficult task.
 It carries a potential danger of encouraging a short-sighted
approach to profit planning at the cost of long-term view.
 It may give an impression that there are short-term profits
based on variable costs. But profits are there only when all
long-term fixed costs are recovered.
 In case of highly capital intensive industry with low component
of variable costs, it becomes difficult to apply.
 In construction industry, where amount of work-in-progress is
very high, it may give skewed results. It does not take into fixed
overheads into account.
COST VOLUME PROFIT (CVP)
ANALYSIS
 Profit planning is a function of the selling price of a unit
of product, variable cost of making and selling the
product, volume of the units sold and the total fixed
costs.
 The cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis is a management
accounting tool to show the relationship between these
ingredients of profit planning.
 A widely used technique to study CVP relationships is break-
even analysis.
 Break-even point is a point at which total revenues equal total
costs, yielding zero profits.
 Break-even point is “no profit, no – loss” point.
Break – Even Analysis
 Contribution Margin = Sales – Variable Costs
 Profit = Contribution Margin – Fixed Costs
 Fixed costs remain unchanged within a fixed range.
 Therefore, only relevant factor is Contribution Margin for
maximization of Profits.
 The short – term decision areas using variable costing are:
 Fixing Prices on special orders
 Optimal Sales mix
 Adding/Dropping a new product line
 Developing a production plan if certain input (material, labor) is in
short supply
 Making or Buying a component part
Break – Even Analysis
 The Break Even point can be determined by two
methods:
 Contribution margin approach
 Equation Technique
 Contribution Margin Approach:
 BEP (units) = Fixed Costs/ Contribution margin (CM) per
unit
 BEP (amount) = Fixed Costs/Profit Volume ratio (P/V ratio)
 P/V ratio = Contribution margin (CM) per unit/ Selling price per
unit
 P/V ratio = Total Contribution/Total Sales
Break – Even Analysis
 Contribution Margin Approach:
 P/V Ratio = (Sales – Variable Cost)/ Sales
 P/V Ratio = Change in Contribution/ Change in Sales
 Margin of Safety (M/S): The excess of actual sales
revenue over the break – even sales revenue is known as
margin of safety.
 M/S ratio = (ASR – BESR)/ ASR
 ASR = Actual Sales Revenue
 BESR = Breakeven Sales Revenue
 Profit = Margin of safety (amount) * (P/V ratio)
 Profit = Margin of safety (units) * CM per unit
Break – Even Analysis
 Equation Technique:
 Sales Revenue = Fixed Costs + Variable Costs +
Net Profits
 SP * S = FC + VC * S + NI
 SP = Selling price per unit
 S = Number of units sold
 FC = Total fixed costs
 VC = Variable costs per unit
 NI = Net Income
 SP * S = FC + VC * S + zero (At Break – Even)
Break – Even Analysis
 SP * S = FC + VC * S
 S = FC/(SP – VC)
 Equation method is like contribution margin
approach.
 But it is specifically useful in situations when selling
price per unit and variable cost per unit is not clearly
identifiable.
Cash Break – Even Point
 Cash Break Even point (CBEP) (in units):
 CBEP = Total Cash Fixed Costs/ Contribution margin per unit
 Total cash fixed costs exclude depreciation, amortization of
expenses and any other fixed expense which does not involve
cash outlay.
 Cash Break – even Sales Revenue (CBESR) (in Rs.):
 CBESR = Total cash fixed cost/ P/V ratio
Breakeven Analysis – Short Term
Decision Making – Key Factor
 If some key factor is in short-supply such as labor,
material, machine capacity, then contribution margin
per scarce factor is used.
 Contribution Margin/ Key Factor

 For example, labor is scarce, then:


 Contribution margin per labor hour is used to do production
planning.
 Products with highest contribution margin per labor hour will
be produced first (Priority given in descending order).
Break – Even Analysis
Applications
 Sales Volume (Value) required to produce Desired
Operating Profits:
 Sales (Value) = (Fixed Expenses + Desired Operating
Profits)/ P/V ratio
 Operating profit at a given Level of Sales Volume:
 (Actual Sales Revenue – Break even Sales Revenue)* P/V
ratio
 The required sales volume (revenue) to earn present
rate of profit on investment:
 (Present FC + Additional FC + Present return on investment
+ Return on new investment)/P/V ratio
Break – Even Analysis
Applications
 Determination of sales volume (Revenue) if there is a) change
in selling price or 2) change in variable costs:
 (Fixed Expenses + Desired Profits)/Revised P/V ratio
 CVP analysis and a segment of Business:
 (Direct FC + Allocated FC)/ P/V ratio
 This is used to cover all fixed expenses of the segment.
 Multi-product Firms (Sales – mix):
 If management produces products with higher P/V ratios, overall
profits of the firm is higher. Fixed costs need not be allocated or
apportioned between products.
 Example 15.3 (Page 15.10)
Assumptions of Break – even
analysis
 An enterprise cost are perfectly variable or absolutely
fixed over all ranges of operating volume.
 It is possible to classify total costs of an enterprise as
either fixed or variable. But in reality some costs are
semi – variable costs and they are difficult to
segregate into fixed and variable costs.
 Also it is assumed that selling price per unit remains
unchanged irrespective of the volume of sales.
Assignment
 Example: 2,3,4,5
 Illustration: 4.8, 4.10, 4.12, 4.13, 4.16
 Questions: 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15

You might also like