This document provides an overview of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in 3 chapters. It discusses the lawyer's role in promoting ADR, the fundamentals and principles of ADR including party autonomy and efficiency. It also outlines the objectives and benefits of ADR such as speedy justice and reducing court caseloads. Various forms of ADR are defined including arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and neutral evaluation. The key differences between arbitration and mediation are highlighted.
This document provides an overview of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in 3 chapters. It discusses the lawyer's role in promoting ADR, the fundamentals and principles of ADR including party autonomy and efficiency. It also outlines the objectives and benefits of ADR such as speedy justice and reducing court caseloads. Various forms of ADR are defined including arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and neutral evaluation. The key differences between arbitration and mediation are highlighted.
Original Description:
Alternative dispute and resolutions chspter 1 to 6
This document provides an overview of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in 3 chapters. It discusses the lawyer's role in promoting ADR, the fundamentals and principles of ADR including party autonomy and efficiency. It also outlines the objectives and benefits of ADR such as speedy justice and reducing court caseloads. Various forms of ADR are defined including arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and neutral evaluation. The key differences between arbitration and mediation are highlighted.
This document provides an overview of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in 3 chapters. It discusses the lawyer's role in promoting ADR, the fundamentals and principles of ADR including party autonomy and efficiency. It also outlines the objectives and benefits of ADR such as speedy justice and reducing court caseloads. Various forms of ADR are defined including arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and neutral evaluation. The key differences between arbitration and mediation are highlighted.
CHAPTER
1
-‐ Pre-‐causal
consent:
parties
to
a
contract
INTRODUCTION
stipulate
that
any
dispute
that
will
arise
from
the
contract
shall
be
resolved
by
arbitration.
LAWYER’S
ROLE
(P2AB)
-‐ Present-‐causal
consent:
parties
to
an
existing
1. Contribute
to
the
promotion
of
ADR;
controversy
voluntarily
submit
themselves
2. Assist
the
courts
in
encouraging
the
parties
to
either
to
arbitration
or
mediation.
avail
of
alternative
means
of
dispute
resolution;
4. ADR
avoids
court
trial;
and
3. Explain
the
benefits
of
ADR
System
to
their
5. ADR
usually
involves
the
participation
of
a
clients;
and
neutral
3rd
party.
4. May
play
the
role
of
ADR
provider
or
practitioner.
FORMS
OF
ADR
1. Arbitration
Lawyers,
in
view
of
his
excellent
communication
skills,
-‐ Voluntary
dispute
resolution
process
in
which
probity
and
legal
foresight,
can
be
appointed
as
an
one
or
more
arbitrators,
appointed
in
arbitrator,
mediator,
conciliator
or
neutral
evaluator.
accordance
with
the
agreement
of
the
parties,
or
rules
promulgated
pursuant
to
the
ADR
act,
CHAPTER
2
resolve
a
dispute
by
rendering
an
award.
FUNDAMENTALS
OF
ADR
2. Mediation
-‐
Voluntary
process
in
which
a
mediator,
ALTERNATIVE
DISPUTE
RESOLUTION
(ADR)
selected
by
the
disputing
parties,
facilitates
-‐A
system,
using
means
and
methods
allowed
by
communication
and
negotiation,
and
assists
law
and
approved
by
the
parties,
for
the
purpose
of
the
parties
in
reaching
a
voluntary
agreement
resolving
or
facilitating
the
resolution
of
disputes
and
regarding
a
dispute.
controversies
between
them,
in
an
expeditious
and
3. Conciliation
speedy
manner,
without
resorting
to
court
adjudication.
-‐
The
adjustment
and
settlement
of
a
dispute
in
a
friendly,
unantagonistic
manner.
PRINCIPLES
OF
ADR
4. Neutral
or
Early
Neutral
Evaluation
1. Promotion
of
party
autonomy
and
self-‐ -‐
Process
wherein
the
parties
and
their
lawyers
determination
in
the
resolution
of
disputes.
are
brought
together
to
present
summaries
of
-‐ Parties
are
give
the
freedom
to
choose
the
their
cases
and
receive
a
non-‐binding
form
of
ADR
they
desire
to
avail
of,
they
also
assessment
by
an
experiences
neutral
person
have
the
discretion
to
prescribe
the
procedure
with
expertise
in
the
subject
or
in
the
to
govern
the
ADR
process.
Party
autonomy
substance
of
the
dispute.
extends
to
the
choice
of
ADR
providers
or
5. Mini-‐Trial
practitioners,
the
venue
and
the
terms
of
the
-‐
Structured
dispute
resolution
method
in
which
concluding
agreements.
the
merits
of
a
case
are
argued
before
a
panel
2. Recognition
of
ADR
as
an
efficient
tool
and
an
composed
of
senior
decision
makers,
with
or
alternative
procedure
for
the
resolution
of
cases.
without
the
presence
of
a
neutral
3rd
person,
3. Enlisting
of
private
sector
participation.
after
which
the
parties
seek
a
negotiated
settlement.
OBJECTIVES
&
BENEFITS
OF
ADR
6. Any
Combination
1. Speedy
and
Impartial
Justice
7. Any
other
ADR
form
2. Declogging
of
court
dockets.
-‐
Any
arrangement
agreed
upon
by
the
parties
-‐ Decongestion
of
court
dockets
is
the
ultimate
that
satisfies
the
requisites
of
ADR
objective
of
ADR.
ARBITRATION
VS
MEDIATION
FEATURES
OF
ADR
ARBITRATION
MEDIATION
1. ADR
as
a
means
used
to
resolve
a
dispute
or
An
arbitral
tribunal
or
The
parties
to
the
controversy;
arbitrator
evaluates
controversy
are
convinced
-‐ To
resolve
or
facilitate
the
resolution
of
a
evidence
and
the
merits
of
by
a
mediator
to
settle
dispute
or
controversy
in
a
speedy,
amicable
the
case
and
renders
and
their
controversy
through
a
and
inexpensive
manner.
arbitral
award
based
on
his
voluntary
agreement
2. ADR
utilizes
means
and
methods
allowed
by
law;
appreciation
thereof.
executed
by
the
parties
3. ADR
is
contractual
in
nature;
themselves
called
-‐ In
line
with
the
policy
of
the
law
to
actively
“mediated
settlement
promote
party
autonomy,
the
parties
to
a
agreement.”
dispute
are
given
the
freedom
to
agree
to
Arbitral
award
is
rendered
Voluntary
agreement
resolve
their
dispute
and
decide
on
the
by
the
3rd
party
arbitral
executed
by
the
parties
procedure
therefor.
ADR
and
its
procedures
tribunal
or
arbitrator.
themselves.
are
contractual
in
character.
CLASSIFICATION
OF
FORMS
OF
ADR
Notes
by
Geraldine
L.
Yu
1
Alternative
Dispute
Resolution
AUSL
2018-‐2019
As
to
the
number
Bilateral
Multilateral
or
Following
issues
are
not
susceptible
of
ADR:
of
parties
Multi-‐party
1. Civil
Status
of
Persons
As
to
the
number
Simple
Complex
2. Validity
of
Marriage
or
any
ground
for
legal
of
issues
involved
-‐Only
a
single
issue
is
-‐2
or
more
issues
separation
involved
involved
3. Jurisdiction
of
the
Courts
As
to
the
extent
of
Complete
Partial
4. Future
Legitime
conclusion
-‐All
the
issues
-‐Only
1
or
some
5. Criminal
Liability
involved
are
of
the
issues
6. In
general,
those
which,
by
law,
cannot
be
resolved
involved
are
compromised.
resolved
As
to
the
role
of
Evidentiary
or
Non-‐ SEAT
&
VENUE
OF
ADR
evidence
in
the
Merit-‐based
evidentiary
or
-‐
The
seat
of
ADR
is
the
jurisdiction
under
whose
law
the
proceedings
-‐Arbitration
Non-‐merit
proceeding
is
conducted.
based
-‐
The
venue
or
place
of
ADR
is
the
actual
site
where
the
-‐Mediation
arbitration
is
being
conducted.
As
to
the
pendency
Case-‐related
Independent
-‐
It
is
possible
for
the
venue
or
place
of
arbitration
to
be
in
of
a
court
case
-‐Conducted
in
-‐Conducted
a
country
different
from
the
country
where
the
connection
with
or
irrespective
of
arbitration
has
its
seat.
as
a
pre-‐requisite
to
any
pending
trial
court
case
BASIC
CONCEPTS
involving
the
1. Concluding
Acts
or
Agreements
issue
-‐ ADR
proceedings
are
completed
upon
the
As
to
the
Ad
hoc
Institutional
execution
of
a
concluding
act
or
agreement.
permanence
of
the
-‐Existence
of
the
-‐Existence
of
the
These
may
take
the
form
of
a
mediated
ADR
provider
or
ADR
practitioner
is
ADR
provider
is
settlement
agreement
or
a
compromise
practitioner
only
temporary
for
permanent
in
agreement
in
the
case
of
mediation,
a
the
purpose
of
a
character
and
is
judgement
based
on
compromise
in
the
case
of
particular
dispute
or
not
dependent
a
court
annexed
mediation,
or
a
waiver
or
controversy
on
any
dispute
quitclaim
in
case
of
conciliation.
They
make
or
controversy
take
the
forms
of
arbitral
award,
award
on
As
to
the
Domestic
International
Foreign
agreed
terms,
consent
award
or
award
based
applicable
-‐Parties’
-‐Parties’
places
of
-‐If
it
is
on
compromise
in
case
of
arbitration.
law
places
of
business
are
in
conducted
2. ADR
Providers
and
Practitioners
business,
different
states;
or
outside
-‐ The
arbitrator
is
unquestionably
authorized
place
of
the
place
of
the
PH.
to
render
a
binding
resolution
of
the
dispute
arbitration,
arbitration
is
between
the
parties
and
is
bound
to
consider
place
of
outside
the
PH,
the
merits
of
the
controversy.
performanc place
where
a
-‐ The
mediator
is
precluded
from
discussion
e
of
the
substantial
part
of
the
merits
of
the
controversy
and
cannot
obligation
the
obligation
is
to
render
a
binding
assessment
of
the
dispute.
involved
be
performed
are
located
outside
the
PH,
or
By
nature
of
their
functions,
ADR
providers
and
in
the
PH.
the
parties
have
practitioners,
including
arbitrators
and
mediators,
act
in
agreed
that
the
quasi-‐judicial
capacity.
They
are
quasi-‐judicial
agencies
or
subject
matter
of
instrumentalities.
the
dispute
relates
to
more
than
one
Theirs
decisions
or
awards
are
generally
reviewable
in
a
country.
special
civil
action
for
certiorari
under
Rule
65
of
the
1997
Rules
of
Civil
Procedure
as
amended.
COMPONENTS
OF
ADR
1. Contending
Parties
OFFICE
FOR
ALTERNATIVE
DISPUTE
RESOLUTION
2. Dispute
or
Controversy
(OADR)
3. Form
of
ADR
The
ADR
Act
of
2004
created
the
OADR,
which
is
an
4. ADR
Provider
or
Practitioner
attached
agency
of
the
Department
of
Justice
(DOJ).
It
is
headed
by
an
Executive
Director
appointed
by
the
SUBJECT
MATTERS
OF
ADR
president
upon
the
recommendation
of
the
Secretary
of
All
adversarial
disputes
and
controversies
can
be
the
Justice.
subject
matter
of
ADR,
except
those
which
by
law
or
reasons
of
public
policy
are
declared
not
capable
of
being
Objectives,
Powers
and
Functions
of
the
OADR:
subjected
to
ADR.
Notes
by
Geraldine
L.
Yu
2
Alternative
Dispute
Resolution
AUSL
2018-‐2019
1. To
promote,
develop
and
expand
the
used
of
ADR
Mediation
shall
be
closed
and
concluded:
in
the
private
and
public
sectors
through
1. By
the
execution
of
a
settlement
agreement
by
information,
education
and
communication;
the
parties;
2. To
assist
the
government
to
monitor,
study
and
2. By
the
withdrawal
of
any
party
from
mediation;
evaluate
the
use
by
the
public
and
private
sectors
or
of
ADR,
and
recommend
to
Congress
needful
3. By
the
written
declaration
of
the
mediator
that
statutory
changes
to
develop,
strengthen
and
any
further
effort
would
not
be
helpful.
improve
ADR
practices
in
accordance
with
world
standards;
Advantages
of
Mediation
3. To
act
as
an
appointing
authority
of
mediators
The
following
assurances
are
provided
for
the
parties
in
when
the
parties
agree
in
writing
that
it
shall
be
order
to
maintain
the
confidence
of
the
mediation
parties
empowered
to
do
so;
and
in
the
mediation
process
and
encourage
them
to
avail
of
4. To
compile
and
publish
a
list
or
roster
of
ADR
mediation
as
a
mode
of
settling
their
disputes:
providers/practitioners,
and
to
compile
a
list
or
1. Confidentiality
in
the
mediation
process;
roster
of
foreign
or
international
ADR
providers
2. Prompt,
economical
and
amicable
resolution
of
or
practitioners.
disputes;
and
3. The
decision-‐making
authority
rests
in
the
CHAPTER
3
parties.
MEDIATION
UNDER
THE
ADR
ACT
OF
2004
CONFIDENTIAL
AND
PRIVILEGED
NATURE
OF
MEDIATION
IN
GENERAL
MEDIATION
COMMUNICATION
The
ADR
Act
of
2004
maintains
the
confidentiality
of
Mediation
is
a
voluntary
process
un
which
a
mediation
process
by
declaring
that
all
information
mediator,
selected
by
the
disputing
parties,
facilitates
obtained
through
mediation
proceedings
are
privileged
communication
and
negotiation,
and
assists
the
and
confidential
in
character.
parties
un
reaching
a
voluntary
agreement
regarding
a
dispute.
(Definition
under
the
ADR
Act
of
2004)
One
way
by
which
the
ADR
Act
of
2004
is
enforcing
and
guaranteeing
this
privilege
is
by
declaring
certain
Excluded
from
the
coverage
of
ADR
Act
are
the
court-‐ information
as
confidential
and
therefore,
not
capable
if
annexed
mediation
(CAM),
conciliation
conducted
by
being
disclosed.
Another
way
of
ensuring
the
privilege
is
lupong
tagapamayapa
and
pangkat
ng
by
declaring
the
privileged
information
inadmissible
in
tagapagkasundo
and
the
judicial
dispute
resolution
evidence.
(JDR).
Confidential
Information
includes:
(not
exclusive)
Classification
of
Mediation
1. Communication,
oral
or
written,
made
in
a
-‐Mediation
is
non-‐evidentiary
or
non-‐merit
based.
dispute
resolution
proceeding,
including
any
Mediation
focuses
on
the
facilitation
of
memorandum,
note
or
work
product
of
the
communication
and
negotiation
between
the
parties
neutral
or
non-‐party
participant;
in
order
to
encourage
them
to
voluntarily
settle
their
2. An
oral
or
written
statement
made
or
which
dispute.
occurs
during
the
mediation
or
for
purposes
of
considering,
conducting,
participating,
initiating,
Place
of
Mediation
continuing
or
reconvening
mediation
or
retaining
-‐To
promote
party
autonomy,
the
parties
are
given
a
mediator;
and
the
freedom
to
agree
on
the
place
of
mediation.
In
the
3. Pleadings,
motions,
manifestations,
written
absence
of
such
agreement,
the
place
of
mediation
statements
and
reports
filed
or
submitted
in
shall
be
any
place
convenient
and
appropriate
to
all
arbitration
or
for
expert
evaluation.
parties
(default
venue).
Legal
Effects
of
Confidential
and
Privileged
Nature
Stages
in
Mediation
1. A
party,
mediator
or
non-‐party
participant
may
1. Opening
statement
of
the
mediator;
refuse
to
disclose
and
may
prevent
any
other
2. Individual
narration
by
the
parties;
person
from
disclosing
confidential
information.
3. Exchange
by
the
parties;
2. Confidential
information
shall
not
be
subject
to
4. Summary
of
issues;
discovery
and
shall
be
inadmissible
in
any
5. Generalization
and
evaluation
of
options;
and
adversarial
proceeding
whether
judicial
or
quasi-‐ 6. Closure.
judicial.
The
foregoing
process
is
not
obligatory
and
the
parties,
3. In
an
adversarial
proceeding,
persons
involved
or
under
the
principle
of
party
autonomy
may
choose
the
previously
involved
(party
or
non-‐party)
in
procedure
that
will
govern
their
mediation.
mediation
may
not
be
compelled
to
disclose
confidential
information
obtained
during
mediation.
Notes
by
Geraldine
L.
Yu
3
Alternative
Dispute
Resolution
AUSL
2018-‐2019
4. The
protection
under
the
ADR
Act
shall
continue
1. Where
the
mediation
occurred
or
has
to
apply
even
if
a
mediator
is
found
to
have
failed
terminated,
or
where
settlement
was
reached;
or
to
act
impartially.
2. As
permitted
to
be
disclosed
under
Sec.
13
of
the
5. A
mediator
may
not
be
called
to
testify
to
provide
ADR
Act,
i.e.:
disclosure
of
known
facts
that
information
gathered
in
mediation.
would
likely
affect
the
impartiality
of
the
mediator.
Exceptions
based
on
Agreement,
Nature
of
Proceedings,
Crime
or
Social
Justice
Waiver
of
Confidentiality
The
privilege
does
not
attach
to
or
exist
in
the
ff
The
protection
of
confidentiality
and
privileged
nature
of
communication:
mediation
communication
is
susceptible
to
waiver.
1. Those
contained
in
an
agreement
evidenced
by
a
record
authenticated
by
all
parties
to
the
Waiver
can
either
be
expressed
or
implied:
1.
By
failing
to
agreement.
timely
object
to
an
objectionable
question
propounded
2. Those
available
to
the
public
or
made
during
a
during
a
trial,
or
to
a
document
being
offered
in
evidence,
session
of
mediation
which
is
open,
or
is
required
or
2.
By
testifying
or
presenting
a
witness
to
testify
on
by
law
to
be
open
to
the
public.
confidential
and
privileged
information.
3. A
threat
or
statement
of
a
plan
to
inflict
bodily
injury
or
commit
a
crime
of
violence.
THE
MEDIATOR
4. Communication
intentionally
used
to
plan,
A
mediator
who
refuses
to
act
may
withdraw
or
may
be
attempt
to
commit,
or
commit,
a
crime,
or
conceal
compelled
to
withdraw
from
the
mediation
proceedings
an
on-‐going
crime
or
criminal
activity.
under
the
ff
circumstances:
5. Communication
sought
or
offered
to
prove
or
1. If
any
of
the
parties
requests
the
mediator
to
disprove
abuse,
neglect,
abandonment,
or
withdraw.
exploitation
in
a
proceeding
in
which
a
public
2. The
mediator
does
not
have
the
qualifications,
agency
is
protecting
the
interest
of
an
individual
training
and
experience
to
enable
him
to
meet
protected
by
law.
the
reasonable
expectations
of
the
parties.
6. Communication
sought
or
offered
to
prove
or
3. Mediator’s
impartiality
is
in
question.
disprove
a
claim
or
complaint
of
professional
4. The
continuation
of
the
process
will
violate
an
misconduct
or
malpractice
filed
against
a
ethical
standard.
mediator
in
a
proceeding.
5. Safety
of
any
one
of
the
parties
will
be
7. Communication
sought
or
offered
to
prove
or
jeopardized.
disprove
a
claim
or
complaint
of
professional
6. Mediator
is
unable
to
provide
effective
services.
misconduct
or
malpractice
filed
against
a
party,
7. In
case
of
conflict
of
interest.
non-‐party
participant,
or
representative
of
a
8. Other
instances
provided
for
under
the
IRR.
party
based
on
conduct
occurring
during
mediation.
Duties
&
Functions
of
Mediators
1. Prior
to
mediation
Exceptions
based
on
Public
Policy
a. On
Competence-‐
should
maintain
and
For
reasons
of
public
policy,
the
privilege
cannot
be
continually
upgrade
his
professional
invoked
for
evidence
that
is
shown,
before
a
court
or
competence
in
mediation
skills;
ensure
administrative
agency,
after
a
hearing
in
camera.
There
is
that
his
qualifications,
training
and
a
need
for
that
evidence
that
substantially
outweighs
the
experience
are
known
to
and
accepted
interest
in
protecting
confidentiality.
by
the
parties.
1. A
court
proceeding
involving
a
crime
or
felony;
b. On
Impartiality-‐
mediator
should
make
2. A
proceeding
to
prove
a
claim
or
defense
that
an
inquiry
that
is
reasonable
under
the
under
the
law
is
sufficient
to
reform
or
avoid
a
circumstances
to
determine
whether
liability
on
a
contract
arising
out
of
mediation.
there
are
known
facts
that
are
reasonable
individual
would
consider
Privilege
of
the
Mediator
likely
to
affect
his
impartiality.
-‐The
mediator
himself
is
bound
by
the
confidential
and
2. During
the
mediation
privileged
nature
of
mediation
communication.
He
is
a. Confidentiality
required
to
keep
in
utmost
confidence
all
confidential
b. On
consent
and
self-‐determination-‐
shall
information
obtained
in
the
course
of
mediation
process,
exert
reasonable
efforts
to
ensure
that
and
to
discuss
issues
of
confidentiality
with
the
mediation
each
party
understands
the
nature
and
parties
before
beginning
the
mediation
process.
character
of
the
mediation
proceedings.
c. On
promotion
of
respect
and
control
of
A
mediator
may
not
be
compelled
to
provide
evidence
of
a
abuse
of
process-‐
mediator
shall
mediation
communication
or
testify
in
such
proceeding.
encourage
mutual
respect
between
the
He
may
not
make
a
report,
assessment,
evaluation,
parties.
recommendation,
or
other
authority
that
will
make
a
ruling
on
a
dispute
that
is
the
subject
of
mediation
except:
Notes
by
Geraldine
L.
Yu
4
Alternative
Dispute
Resolution
AUSL
2018-‐2019
Mediator’s
Costs
and
Fees
The
ADR
Act
and
its
IRR
govern
voluntary
arbitration.
In
an
ad
hoc
mediation,
the
parties
are
free
to
make
their
own
arrangements
as
to
mediation
costs
and
fees.
International
Arbitration:
In
an
institutional
mediation,
mediation
costs
shall
Parties’
place
of
business:
Is
in
different
include
the
administrative
charges
of
mediation
states
institution,
mediator’s
fees
and
associated
expenses.
Place
of
arbitration:
Outside
the
PH
Place
where
a
substantial
part
of
the
Outside
the
PH
If
the
mediator
withdraws
from
the
mediation,
he
shall
obligation
is
to
be
performed:
return
any
unearned
fee
and
unused
deposit.
Parties
have
expressly
agreed
that
the
subject
matter
of
the
arbitration
agreement
relates
to
more
than
1
country.
MEDIATED
SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
-‐It
is
the
concluding
document
in
a
successful
mediation.
Domestic
Arbitration:
Parties’
place
of
business:
In
whatever
form
it
may
be,
the
concluding
agreement
has
Place
of
arbitration:
the
effect
of
res
judicata
and,
therefore,
binding
upon
the
Place
where
a
substantial
part
of
the
parties
whether
or
not
it
has
been
submitted
to
the
court
obligation
is
to
be
performed:
Located
In
the
PH
for
approval.
Place
where
the
subject
matter
of
the
dispute
is
mostly
connected:
ROLE
OF
COUNSEL
IN
MEDIATION
1. Collaborate
with
the
other
lawyer
in
working
International
Commercial
Arbitration
(ICA)
vs
Foreign
together
towards
a
common
goal
of
helping
their
Arbitration
clients
resolve
their
differences
to
their
mutual
ICA
FOREIGN
advantage.
Seat
is
with
the
PH
even
if
Seat
is
outside
the
PH
even
2. Encourage
and
assist
the
client
to
actively
the
place
of
arbitration
is
if
the
place
of
arbitration
is
participate
in
positive
discussions
and
cooperate
outside
the
PH.
in
the
PH.
in
crafting
an
agreement
to
resolve
their
dispute.
3. Assist
the
client
to
comprehend
and
appreciate
OBJECTIVES
OF
ARBITRATION
the
mediation
process
and
its
benefits,
as
well
as
The
basic
objective
of
arbitration
is
to
provide
speedy
and
the
client’s
greater
and
personal
responsibility
inexpensive
method
of
settling
disputes
by
allowing
the
for
the
success
of
mediation
in
resolving
the
parties
to
avoid
the
formalities,
delay,
expense
and
dispute.
aggravation
which
commonly
accompany
ordinary
4. Confer
and
discuss
with
the
client
the
mediation
litigation,
especially
litigation
which
goes
through
the
process
and
substance.
hierarchy
of
courts.
CHAPTER
4
ARBITRATOR
ARBITRATION
IN
GENERAL
An
arbitrator
is
the
person
appointed
to
render
an
award,
alone
or
with
others,
in
a
dispute
that
is
the
subject
of
an
CONCEPT
OF
ARBITRATION
arbitration
agreement.
Arbitration
is
a
voluntary
dispute
resolution
process
in
Voluntary
arbitrators,
by
the
nature
of
their
functions,
act
which
one
or
more
arbitrators,
appointed
in
accordance
in
quasi-‐judicial
capacity,
such
that
their
decisions
are
with
the
agreement
of
the
parties
or
rules
promulgates
within
the
scope
of
judicial
review.
A
voluntary
arbitrator
pursuant
to
the
ADR
Act,
resolve
a
dispute
by
rendering
has
been
characterized
as
a
quasi-‐judicial
instrumentality.
an
award.
(Definition
under
the
ADR
Act
of
2004)
ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT
ARBITRATION
MEDIATION
-‐The
agreement
of
the
parties
to
submit
to
arbitration
all
It
is
the
arbitrator
that
It
is
the
parties
or
certain
disputes
which
have
arisen
or
which
may
arise
decides
the
dispute
and
themselves
who
enter
between
them
in
respect
of
a
defined
legal
relationship,
renders
an
arbitral
award
into
and
execute
a
whether
contractual
or
not.
By
nature,
an
arbitration
to
conclude
the
arbitral
mediated
settlement
agreement
is
contractual,
it
should
have
the
essential
proceeding.
agreement
to
conclude
requisites
of
a
contract
(Consent,
Object,
Cause).
the
mediation
proceeding.
There
are
2
modes
of
submitting
a
dispute
or
controversy
to
arbitration:
1.
Agreement
to
submit
to
arbitration,
and
KINDS
OF
ARBITRATION
2.
Submission
agreement.
1. Voluntary-‐
parties
freely
consent
in
advance
to
abide
by
the
arbitral
award
Agreement
to
submit
to
Submission
Agreement
2. Compulsory-‐
where
the
parties
are
compelled
to
Arbitration
accept
the
resolution
of
their
dispute
through
Some
future
dispute
An
agreement
to
submit
an
arbitration
by
a
third
party.
usually
stipulated
upon
in
a
existing
matter
of
civil
contract
between
the
difference
to
arbitrators.
Notes
by
Geraldine
L.
Yu
5
Alternative
Dispute
Resolution
AUSL
2018-‐2019
parties
Under
the
Special
Rules
of
Court
on
ADR,
the
court
may
issue
an
order
directing
the
inclusion
in
the
arbitration
of
An
arbitration
agreement
is
a
formal
contract;
its
validity
those
parties
who
are
not
bound
by
the
arbitration
is
dependent
on
the
contract
being
executed
in
a
agreement
but
who
agree
to
such
inclusion
provided
particular
form.
It
shall
be
in
writing
and
subscribed
by
those
originally
bound
by
it
do
not
object
to
their
the
party
to
be
charged,
or
by
his
lawful
agent.
It
may
be
inclusion.
included
in
the
container
contract
in
which
case,
it
is
referred
to
as
an
arbitration
clause
or
a
compromissoire,
Non-‐compliance
with
the
arbitration
agreement
renders
or
may
be
constituted
in
a
separate
contract.
null
and
void
all
the
judicial
proceedings
conducted
after
the
case
should
have
been
referred
to
arbitration.
DOCTRINE
OF
SEPARABILITY
Otherwise
known
as
the
doctrine
of
severability,
this
CHAPTER
5
doctrine
enunciates
that
an
arbitration
agreement
is
INTERNATIONAL
COMMMERCIAL
ARBITRATION
independent
of
the
main
contact
even
if
it
is
contained
in
UNDER
THE
ADR
ACT
OF
2004
AND
ITS
IRR
an
arbitration
clause.
International
Arbitration:
DUE
PROCESS
IN
ARBITRAL
PROCEEDINGS
Parties’
place
of
business:
Is
in
different
Principles
of
Administrative
Due
Process
equally
apply
to
states
arbitral
proceedings.
Place
of
arbitration:
Outside
the
PH
Place
where
a
substantial
part
of
the
Outside
the
PH
JUDICIAL
REVIEW
AND
COURT
INTERVENTION
obligation
is
to
be
performed
or
the
Three
types
of
Judicial
Intervention:
place
with
which
the
subject
matter
1. Judicial
Assistance
in
Arbitration
of
the
dispute
is
mostly
connected:
-‐
Allows
the
parties
in
an
arbitration
to
secure
Parties
have
expressly
agreed
that
the
subject
matter
of
from
the
courts
orders
or
processes
that
will
the
arbitration
agreement
relates
to
more
than
1
country.
aid
in
the
conduct
of
arbitration.
2. Judicial
Review
of
Arbitral
Awards
Arbitration
is
commercial
if
it
covers
matters
arising
form
-‐
Involves
the
passing
upon,
to
the
extent
allowed
all
relationships
of
a
commercial
nature,
whether
and
on
grounds
provided
for
by
law,
the
contractual
or
not.
propriety
of
the
arbitral
award.
3. Judicial
Review
of
Court
Decisions
in
ADR
Related
International
Commercial
Arbitration
(ICA)
vs
Foreign
cases
Arbitration
-‐
Involves
the
remedies
available
from
decisions
ICA
FOREIGN
or
orders
of
the
RTC
and
the
CA
rendered
in
An
ICA
with
the
PH
as
its
An
ICA
whose
seat
is
the
first
two
types
of
judicial
intervention.
seat
is
governed
by
the
outside
the
PH
is
a
foreign
ADR
Act
and
the
IRR,
even
arbitration
even
if
the
place
Decisions
of
an
arbitral
award
are
subject
to
judicial
if
the
place
of
arbitration
is
of
arbitration
is
in
the
PH.
review.
outside
the
PH.
A
review
by
the
SC
is
not
a
matter
of
right,
but
of
sound
COVERAGE
OF
IRR
PROVISIONS
ON
ICA
judicial
discretion,
which
will
be
granted
only
for
serious
The
provisions
of
Chapter
4
of
the
IRR,
dealing
with
the
and
compelling
reasons
resulting
in
grave
prejudice
to
the
subject
of
ICA,
are
applicable
only
to
ICA
conducted
in
aggrieved
party.
The
error
imputed
to
the
CA
must
be
accordance
with
Philippine
Law
covering
disputes
that
grounded
upon
any
of
the
prescribed
grounds
for
review
are
not
prohibited
by
Philippine
law
to
be
submitted
for
or
be
closely
analogous
thereto.
arbitration.
This
may
also
be
applied
for
ICA
conducted
outside
the
Philippines
if
they
are
adopted
as
the
rules
of
Arbitration
and
court
action
are
not
incompatible.
They
procedure
by
the
parties
in
the
exercise
of
their
privileges
may
proceed
at
the
same
time
and
independently
of
each
of
party-‐autonomy
and
self-‐determination.
other.
They
may
even
complement
each
other.
The
provisions
of
the
IRR
on
ICA
are
default
rules,
As
a
rule,
only
those
parties
who
have
agreed
to
submit
a
meaning
they
are
applicable
only
in
the
absence
or
in
controversy
to
arbitration
may
be
compelled
to
submit
to
default
of
applicable
provisions
contained
in:
arbitration,
including
their
heirs
and
assignees.
However,
1. An
agreement
in
force
between
the
Philippines
in
a
jurisprudence,
the
SC
held
that
corporate
and
other
state
or
states;
and
representatives
may
be
compelled
to
submit
to
2. An
agreement
between
the
parties
on
the
arbitration
proceedings
pursuant
to
a
contract
entered
applicable
rules.
into
by
a
corporation
they
represent
if
there
are
allegations
of
bad
faith
or
malice
in
their
acts
warranting
RULES
OF
INTERPRETATION
the
piercing
of
the
veil
of
corporate
fiction.
1. Interpretation
of
the
ADR
Act
-‐
Shall
have
due
regard
to
the
policy
of
the
law
favoring
arbitration.
Notes
by
Geraldine
L.
Yu
6
Alternative
Dispute
Resolution
AUSL
2018-‐2019
2. Interpretation
of
the
Model
Law
APPOINTING
AUTHORITY
IN
ICA
-‐
Concepts
and
principles
under
the
Model
Law
The
appointing
authority
in
an
ICA
is
the
person
or
should
be
understood
in
the
light
of
their
institution
named
in
the
arbitration
agreement
as
such,
or
international
usage
rather
than
their
ordinary
the
regular
institution.
The
appointing
authority
in
an
ICA
domestic
or
international
usage.
has
the
following
functions:
3. Interpretation
of
the
IRR
1. Take
the
necessary
measures
to
appoint
an
arbitrator
RULES
ON
RECEIPT
OF
WRITTEN
COMMUNICATIONS
2. Decide
on
the
challenge
against
an
arbitrator
if
IN
ICA
the
arbitral
tribunal
rejects
the
challenge
In
default
of
such
rules,
communication
is
deemed
3. Consider
the
qualifications
of
an
arbitrator.
received:
1. If
it
is
delivered
to
the
addressee
personally
or
at
The
default
appointing
authority
in
an
ad
hoc
arbitration
his
place
of
business,
habitual
residence
or
is
the
IBP
National
President
or
his
representative.
mailing
address;
or
2. If
there
is
none,
if
it
is
delivered
by
registered
ARBITRATORS
AND
ARBITRAL
TRIBUNALS
IN
ICA
letter
or
any
other
means
which
provide
a
record
In
line
with
the
principle
of
party
autonomy,
the
parties
to
of
the
attempt
to
deliver
it,
to
the
last
known
an
ICA
are
free
to
determine
the
number
of
their
place
of
business,
habitual
residence
or
mailing
arbitrators
and
the
procedure
for
their
appointment.
The
address.
default
number
of
arbitrators
is
3.
The
default
procedure
Written
communication
is
deemed
received
on
the
day
it
for
the
appointment
of
arbitrators
is:
is
delivered
and
not
on
the
day
the
mail
is
posted
with
the
1. In
an
arbitration
with
3
arbitrators,
each
party
post
office.
shall
appoint
1
arbitrator,
and
both
appointed
arbitrators
shall
appoint
the
3rd
arbitrator,
failing
WAIVER
OF
THE
RIGHT
TO
OBJECT
IN
ICA
which
the
appointment
shall
be
made
by
the
Objections
to
non-‐compliance
with
the
rules
or
any
appointing
authority.
requirement
under
the
arbitration
agreement
must
be
2. In
an
arbitration
with
a
sole
arbitrator,
the
raised
without
undue
delay
or
within
the
time
prescribed
arbitrator
shall
be
appointed,
upon
the
request
of
therefor,
failing
which,
the
right
to
object
is
deemed
the
party,
by
the
appointing
authority.
waived.
This
rule
is
based
on
the
equitable
doctrine
of
estoppel.
The
appointing
authority
shall
consider
the
ff.
factors
in
the
appointment
of
arbitrators:
CONFIDENTIALITY
IN
ICA
1. Qualifications
required
by
the
agreement
of
the
The
proceedings,
records,
evidence,
and
the
arbitral
parties;
award
in
an
ICA
are
confidential
and
shall
not
be
2. Considerations
as
are
likely
to
secure
the
disclosed
except:
appointment
of
an
independent
and
impartial
1. With
the
consent
of
the
parties;
or
arbitrator;
and
2. For
the
limited
purpose
of
disclosing
to
the
court
3. In
the
case
of
sole
or
3rd
arbitrators,
the
relevant
documents
in
cases
where
resort
to
the
advisability
of
appointing
an
arbitrator
of
a
court
is
allowed.
nationality
other
than
those
of
the
parties
(to
avoid
bias)
DUE
PROCESS
IN
ICA
The
parties
shall
be
treated
equally
and
shall
be
given
full
If
any
party
is
not
satisfied
with
the
appointment,
he
may
opportunity
to
present
their
sides.
The
essence
of
due
file
a
petition
in
court
challenging
the
appointment
of
process
lies
in
the
reasonable
opportunity
to
be
heard.
arbitrators.
PLACE
OR
VENUE
OF
ICA
Grounds
for
Challenge
of
an
Arbitrator
in
ICA
-‐Shall
be
determined
by
the
parties.
An
arbitrator
may
be
challenged
only
if
circumstances
-‐The
default
place
of
arbitration
shall
be
in
Metro
Manila
exist
that
give
rise
to
a
justifiable
doubt
as
to
his:
unless
the
arbitral
tribunal
decides
on
a
different
place
of
1. Impartiality
or
independence;
or
arbitration.
2. Possession
of
the
qualifications
agreed
upon
by
the
parties.
COMMENCEMENT
OF
ICA
PROCEEDINGS
-‐To
be
determined
by
the
parties.
A
party
who
appointed
an
arbitrator
shall
not
be
allowed
-‐The
default
date
of
commencement
of
arbitration
is
the
to
challenge
and
arbitrator.
This
rule
is
grounded
on
date
on
which
a
request
for
that
dispute
to
be
referred
to
estoppel.
However,
estoppel
does
not
apply
where
the
act
arbitration
is
received
by
the
respondent.
of
appointing
was
performed
without
the
knowledge.
LANGUAGE
OF
ICA
Procedure
for
the
Challenge
in
ICA
-‐Determined
by
the
parties
The
Default
procedure:
-‐The
default
language
is
English.
1. The
challenging
party
shall
send
a
written
statement
of
the
reasons
for
the
challenge
to
the
Notes
by
Geraldine
L.
Yu
7
Alternative
Dispute
Resolution
AUSL
2018-‐2019
arbitral
tribunal
within
15
days
after
becoming
ruling
for
review
by
the
RTC
within
30
days
form
receipt
aware
of
the
circumstance
constituting
the
of
the
ruling,
and
the
decision
of
the
court
therein
shall
be
ground
for
challenge.
Thereafter,
the
arbitral
immediately
executor
and
not
be
subject
to
a
motion
for
tribunal
shall
decide
the
challenge.
reconsideration
or
appeal.
2. If
the
challenge
before
the
arbitral
tribunal
is
not
successful,
the
challenging
party
may
request
the
If
the
arbitral
tribunal
defers
the
resolution
of
the
appointing
authority
within
30
days
from
notice
jurisdictional
issue
which
will
be
resolved
as
part
of
the
of
the
decision
rejecting
the
challenge,
to
decide
arbitral
award,
the
order
of
deferment
is
not
susceptible
the
challenge,
which
decision
shall
be
of
judicial
relief.
immediately
executor,
and
not
be
subject
to
a
motion
for
consideration
or
appeal.
Jurisdiction
Over
the
Parties
The
jurisdiction
of
an
arbitral
tribunal
over
the
person
of
Procedure
in
Case
the
Arbitrator
Fails
to
Act
in
ICA
the
parties
in
an
arbitration
is
conferred
by
the
consent
of
If
an
arbitrator
in
an
ICA
becomes
de
jure
or
de
facto
the
parties
to
submit
to
arbitration.
This
consent
may
be
unable
to
perform
his
functions
or
fails
to
act
without
contained
either
in
an
agreement
to
submit
to
arbitration
undue
delay,
his
mandate
terminates:
(pre-‐causal)
which
is
entered
into
at
the
time
of
the
1. If
he
withdraws;
or
execution
of
an
arbitration
agreement
or
a
contract
which
2. If
the
parties
agree
on
the
termination.
includes
an
arbitration
clause,
or
in
a
submission
agreement
(present
causal)
between
parties
who
do
not
JURISDICATION
OF
ARBITRAL
TRIBUNAL
IN
ICA
have
an
arbitration
agreement
or
a
contract
with
an
Jurisdiction
is
the
right
to
act
or
the
power
and
authority
arbitration
clause
but
who
nonetheless
agree
to
submit
an
to
hear
and
determine
a
cause.
In
the
case
of
arbitral
existing
dispute
or
controversy
to
arbitration.
tribunal,
it
is
the
authority
by
virtue
of
which
it
can
resolve
disputes
in
an
arbitration
proceeding
by
rending
INTERIM
MEASURES
IN
ICA
an
award
thereon.
1. Request
shall
be
in
writing
transmitted
by
reasonable
means
to
the
arbitral
tribunal
and
the
Jurisdiction
over
the
Subject
Matter
adverse
party
-‐Conferred
by
law.
2. Relief
may
be
granted
in
order
to
prevent
-‐There
are
2
instances
when
a
court,
quasi-‐judicial
agency
irreparable
loss
or
arbitral
tribunal
acts
without
jurisdiction:
3. Grant
of
interim
measures
may
be
conditioned
1. When
there
is
lack
of
jurisdiction;
upon
the
provision
of
security
-‐
Challenge
should
be
raised
not
later
than
the
4. The
order
either
granting
or
denying
the
request
submission
of
the
statement
of
defense
in
the
for
interim
measures
shall
be
binding
upon
the
answer
or
in
a
motion
to
dismiss,
otherwise,
parties
the
objection
is
deemed
waived.
5. A
party
who
refuses
to
comply
with
the
order
for
2. When
there
is
excess
of
jurisdiction.
an
interim
measure
shall
be
liable
for
damages
-‐
A
Party
may
raise
the
objection
as
soon
as
the
resulting
from
non-‐compliance
excess
of
jurisdiction
over
a
matter
alleged
to
6. Interim
measure
may
be
requested
from
the
be
beyond
the
scope
of
its
authority
becomes
courts
in
accordance
with
the
Special
Rules
of
apparent;
otherwise,
the
objection
will
be
Court
on
ADR.
deemed
waived
unless
the
delay
is
valid.
LEGAL
REPRESENTATION
IN
ICA
Judicial
Review
of
Jurisdictional
Issue
In
an
ICA
conducted
in
the
PH,
a
party
may
be
The
arbitral
award
if
an
arbitral
tribunal
which
does
not
represented
by
a
person
of
his
choice
even
if
a
non-‐ have
jurisdiction
over
the
subject
matter
is
null
and
void
lawyer,
but
he
shall
not
be
authorized
to
appear
as
ab
initio
unless
there
is
a
waiver
of
the
absence
of
counsel
in
any
PH
court
or
any
quasi-‐judicial
body
even
if
jurisdiction.
such
appearance
is
in
relation
to
the
arbitration
in
which
he
appears.
The
arbitral
tribunal
whose
acts
are
challenged
for
lack
or
excess
of
jurisdiction
may
either:
RULES
OF
PROCEDURE
IN
ICA
1. Consider
the
challenge
as
a
preliminary
question
Determination
of
Rules
of
Procedure
or
a
threshold
issue
and
render
a
ruling
thereon
General
Rule:
the
parties
in
an
ICA
are
free
to
determine
before
conducting
the
arbitration,
or
the
rules
that
will
govern
their
arbitration
proceedings.
2. Defer
the
resolution
thereof
until
the
rendition
of
In
default
thereof:
the
arbitral
tribunal
shall
apply
the
the
arbitral
award
and
the
resolution
of
the
UNCITRAL
Arbitration
Rules.
jurisdictional
issue
shall
form
part
thereof
especially
in
instances
when
the
jurisdictional
The
procedure
in
ICA
in
default
of
an
agreement
of
the
challenge
does
not
appear
to
be
indubitable.
parties
is
as
follows:
1. Statement
of
Claims
If
the
arbitral
tribunal
renders
a
preliminary
ruling
on
the
jurisdictional
issue,
an
aggrieved
party
may
elevate
the
Notes
by
Geraldine
L.
Yu
8
Alternative
Dispute
Resolution
AUSL
2018-‐2019
-‐ The
claimant
shall
state
the
facts
supporting
1. The
petitioner
furnishes
proof
that
there
was:
his
claim,
the
issues
and
relief
or
remedy
a. Defect
in
the
Arbitration
Agreement
sought
b. Violation
of
Due
process
2. Statement
of
Defenses
c. Lack
or
excess
of
jurisdiction
on
the
part
3. Default
of
the
Parties
of
the
arbitral
tribunal
-‐
Default
of
the
claimant
for
failure
to
d. The
arbitration
agreement
was
violated
communicate
his
statement
of
claims
results
2. The
court
finds
that:
in
the
termination
of
the
proceedings.
a. The
subject
of
the
dispute
is
not
capable
-‐
The
default
of
the
respondent
to
communicate
of
settlement
under
the
laws
of
the
RP
his
statement
of
defenses
shall
not
terminate
b. The
award
is
in
conflict
with
public
the
proceedings
and,
instead,
it
shall
proceed
policy
of
the
PH.
without
such
failure
being
considered
as
an
admission
of
the
claimant’s
allegations.
Time
for
Filing
the
Petition
for
Setting
Aside
-‐
Failure
of
any
party
to
appear
during
the
Petition
for
setting
aside
must
be
filed
within
3
months
hearings,
or
to
produce
documents,
amounts
from
the
date
on
which
the
party
making
that
application
to
a
waiver
thereof
and
the
arbitral
tribunal
received
the
award,
or
from
the
date
on
which
a
request
shall
render
an
award
on
the
basis
of
evidence
for
correction,
interpretation
or
additional
award
has
submitted
to
it.
been
disposed
of
by
the
arbitral
tribunal.
4. Amendment
of
Claims
or
defenses
5. Hearings
RECOGNITION
AND
ENFORCEMENT
OF
ICA
AND
-‐
In
the
conduct
of
hearings,
the
arbitral
tribunal
FOREIGN
ARBITRAL
AWARDS
can
employ
the
following
processes
in
taking
1. Recognition-‐
means
by
which
the
PH
court
gives
evidence:
legal
acknowledgement
to
a
foreign
arbitral
a) Court
Assistance
in
taking
evidence
award
and
confers
upon
it
the
capacity
to
be
b) Subpoena
enforced
under
PH
law
through
PH
legal
c) Expert
processes
6. Conclusion/Closure
2. Confirmation-‐
Judicial
affirmation
of
a
domestic
-‐
May
be
concluded
in
either
of
2
ways:
arbitral
award.
a) By
an
award
or
settlement
3. Enforcement-‐
the
execution
and
implementation
b) Termination
of
the
foreign
arbitral
award
through
PH
legal
processes.
COSTS
IN
ICA
1. Fees
of
the
arbitral
tribunal
Jurisdiction,
Venue
and
Nature
of
Proceedings
2. Travel
and
other
expenses
Jurisdiction
over
proceedings
for
the
recognition
and
3. Costs
of
Expert
Advise
enforcement
of
ICA
and
foreign
arbitral
awards,
is
vested
4. Travel
and
other
expenses
of
witnesses
by
the
ADR
Act
on
the
RTC.
5. Costs
for
legal
representation
and
assistance
6. Fees
and
expenses
of
the
appointing
authority.
The
venue
of
the
proceedings
shall
be:
In
principle,
the
cost
shall
be
borne
by
the
unsuccessful
1. Where
the
arbitration
proceedings
are
conducted
party,
but
the
Arbitral
tribunal
may
apportion
the
costs
2. Where
the
asset
to
be
attached
or
levied
upon,
or
among
the
parties
if
reasonable
under
the
circumstances
the
act
to
be
enjoined,
is
located
of
the
case.
3. Where
any
of
the
parties
to
the
dispute
resides
or
has
his
place
of
business
CORRECTION
AND
INTERPRETATION
OF
ICA
AWARD
4. In
the
NCR,
at
the
option
of
the
applicant.
An
arbitral
award
may
be
amended
in
any
of
the
following
manners:
GROUNDS
FOR
REFUSING
RECOGNITION
AND
1. Agreement
of
the
Parties
PROCEDURE
FOR
RECOGNITION
OF
CONVENTION
AS-‐ 2. Quantification
of
the
costs
and
the
determination
IN
CONVENTION
AWARDS
of
the
party
liable
therefor,
or
the
division
thereof
In
general,
the
conditions
and
requisites
for
the
between
the
parties
recognition
and
enforcement
of
foreign
judgments
in
the
3. Correction
of
typographical
and
similar
errors
PH
are:
initiated
by
a
party
1. Proof
of
foreign
judgment
4. Correction
of
a
typographical
error
initiated
by
2. The
judgment
must
be
on
a
civil
or
commercial
the
arbitral
tribunal
matter
5. Interpretation
of
the
award
3. There
must
be
no
lack
of
jurisdiction,
no
want
of
6. Additional
Award
notice,
no
collusion,
no
fraud,
no
clear
mistake
of
Only
arbitral
tribunal
may
correct
an
ICA
award.
law
or
fact
4. The
judgment
must
not
contravene
a
sound
and
SETTING
ASIDE
AN
ICA
AWARD
established
public
policy
of
the
forum
The
court
may
set
aside
an
ICA
Arbitral
Award
provided
5. The
judgment
must
be
res
judicata
in
the
state
that:
that
rendered
it.
Notes
by
Geraldine
L.
Yu
9
Alternative
Dispute
Resolution
AUSL
2018-‐2019
-‐ Convention
Award-‐
is
a
foreign
arbitral
award
PLACE
OR
VENUE
OF
ARBITRATION
made
in
a
state
which
is
a
party
to
the
new
york
-‐To
be
determined
by
the
parties
convention.
Its
recognition
and
enforcement
shall
-‐If
there
is
no
such
agreement,
the
arbitration
shall
be
be
governed
by
the
New
York
Convention
as
conducted
in
Metro
Manila,
unless
the
arbitral
tribunal
implemented
by
the
IRR.
shall
decide
on
a
different
place
taking
into
account
the
-‐ Non-‐convention
Award-‐
is
a
foreign
arbitral
circumstances
of
the
case
and
convenience
of
the
parties.
award
made
in
a
state
which
is
not
a
party
to
the
New
York
Convention.
It
cannot
be
recognized
or
LANGUAGE
enforced
under
the
ADR
Act
of
2004
but
it
may
be
-‐Default
language
in
domestic
arbitration
shall
be
Filipino
deemed
as
a
presumptive
evidence
of
right
as
or
English.
between
the
parties
in
accordance
with
sec
48,
rule
39
of
the
1997
Rules
of
Civil
Procedure
CONFIDENTIALITY
-‐ As-‐In
Convention
Award-‐
one
which
is
made
in
a
GR:
Confidential
Information
are
privileged
and
shall
not
state
which
is
not
a
party
to
the
New
York
be
published
Convention
but
which,
by
reason
of
comity
and
XPN:
1.
With
the
consent
of
the
parties
reciprocity,
may
be
recognized
and
enforced
as
if
2.
for
the
limited
purpose
of
disclosing
to
the
court
it
is
a
convention
award.
relevant
documents
where
resort
to
court
is
allowed.
Grounds
for
Refusing
Recognition
RULES
ON
RECEIPT
OF
WRITTEN
COMMUNICATIONS
-‐Similar
to
the
grounds
for
the
setting
aside
of
an
Written
communications
among
the
parties
and
the
arbitral
award
in
an
ICA
(refer
to
page
9)
arbitrators
shall
be
delivered
personally,
by
registered
mail
or
courier
service,
and
shall
be
deemed
to
be
Procedure
for
Recognition
of
Convention
and
As-‐in
received
on
the
date
it
is
delivered
at
the
addressee’s
Convention
Awards
address
of
record,
place
of
business,
residence
or
last
1. Filing
of
Application
known
address.
-‐
shall
filed
with
the
RTC
the
original
or
duly
authenticated
copy
of
the
award
and
the
Use
of
electronic
mail,
facsimile
transmission
or
other
original
arbitration
agreement.
electronic
means
is
permitted
as
long
as
there
is
a
record
2. Recognition
of
the
sending
and
receipt
of
the
communication
at
the
3. Consolidation/concurrent
hearings
recipient’s
mail
box,
and
such
shall
be
deemed
to
have
4. Rejection/suspension
been
received
on
the
same
date
of
its
transmittal.
5. Appeals
WAIVER
OF
OBJECTIONS
LEGAL
EFFECTS
OF
NON-‐CONVENTION
AWARDS
A
party
may
be
estopped
from
questioning
non-‐ A
non-‐convention
award
which
does
not
qualify
as
an
as-‐ compliance
or
is
deemed
to
have
waived
his
objection
in
convention
award
is
either
“conclusive
upon
the
title
of
thereto
if
he
fails
to
raise
the
objection
without
delay
or
a
thing”
or,
at
the
best,
is
a
“presumptive
evidence
of
a
within
the
time
prescribed
therefor
(30
days
if
no
period
right
as
between
the
parties
and
their
successors
in
is
prescribed),
provided
he
knows
of
such
non-‐ interest
by
subsequent
title,”
provided
there
is
no
want
of
compliance.
jurisdiction,
no
want
of
notice,
no
collusion,
no
fraud
and
no
clear
mistake
of
law.
EXTENT
OF
COURT
INTERVENTION
GR:
No
court
shall
intervene
CHAPTER
6
XPN:
Instances
allowed
by
the
Arbitration
Law,
ADR
Act
DOMESTIC
ARBITRATION
and
Special
ADR
Rules
a) 30
days
having
elapsed
from
receipt
of
the
DOMESTIC
ARBITRATION
request
for
arbitration,
the
appointing
Parties’
place
of
business:
authority
fails
to
perform
functions
imposed
Place
of
arbitration:
under
Art.
5.10(c
and
d),
5.11,
5.13
Place
where
a
substantial
part
of
the
obligation
is
to
be
performed:
Located
In
the
PH
REPRESENTATION
Place
where
the
subject
matter
of
A
party
may
appear
by
himself
or
be
represented
or
the
dispute
is
mostly
connected:
assisted
by
a
person
of
his
choice,
provided
that
such
representative,
unless
admitted
to
the
practice
of
law
in
DISPUTES
COVERED
BY
RULES
ON
DOMESTIC
the
PH,
shall
not
be
authorized
to
appear
as
counsel
in
ARBITRATION
any
PH
court
or
quasi-‐judicial
body.
A
party
desiring
to
be
The
provisions
and
rules
on
domestic
arbitration
cover
represented
by
a
counsel
shall
notify
the
other
party
of
both
commercial
and
non-‐commercial
disputes
provided
such
intention
at
least
5
days
prior
to
the
hearing.
they
are
susceptible
of
arbitration
and
do
not
fall
within
the
exclusive
original
arbitral
jurisdiction
of
quasi-‐judicial
ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT
agencies.
Notes
by
Geraldine
L.
Yu
10
Alternative
Dispute
Resolution
AUSL
2018-‐2019
The
arbitration
agreement
must
satisfy
the
essential
3. He
has
personal
bias
which
might
prejudice
the
requisites
of
a
valid
contract.
It
must
be
in
writing
and
right
of
any
party
to
a
fair
and
impartial
award;
subscribed
by
the
party
sought
to
be
charged,
or
by
his
4. He
has
been
selected
to
act
as
champion
or
to
lawful
agent.
advocate
a
party’s
cause.
The
consent
to
arbitrate
can
either
be
a
pre-‐causal
Procedure
for
the
Appointment
of
Arbitrators
consent
(agreement
to
submit
to
arbitration)
such
as
Parties
in
a
Domestic
Arbitration
are
free
to
agree
on
the
when
the
parties
agree
in
a
contract
to
settle
by
procedure
for
the
appointment
of
arbitrators
except
that,
arbitration
a
controversy
that
will
arise
between
them;
or
in
order
to
prevent
undue
advantage,
an
agreement
or
a
present
causal
consent
(submission
agreement)
such
as
clause
giving
a
party
the
power
to
choose
more
when
the
controversy
already
exists
between
the
parties
arbitrators
than
the
other
is
void.
at
the
time
of
the
submission
to
arbitration.
The
submission
and
contract
shall
be
valid,
enforceable
and
[skipped
rest
of
chapter
6,
stopped
at
page
124
of
the
irrevocable
except
upon
grounds
provided
by
law
for
the
book
of
Robeniol]
revocation
of
contracts.
The
arbitration
law
and
the
IRR
emphasize
the
incapacity
of
a
party.
The
incapacity
of
a
party
will
bar
the
dispute
to
enter
into
an
arbitration,
unless
referral
is
made
by
a
general
guardian
or
a
guardian
ad
litem.
COMMENCEMENT
OF
ARBITRAL
PROCEEDINGS
In
general,
the
commencement
of
arbitral
proceedings
is
determined
by
the
prior
arbitration
agreement
between
the
parties.
The
following
are
the
specific
rules
for
the
commencement
of
domestic
arbitration:
1. In
an
institutional
arbitration
where
there
is
no
prior
arbitration
agreement,
it
is
commenced
in
accordance
with
the
arbitration
rules
of
the
institutional
arbitrator.
2. In
an
ad
hoc
arbitration
where
there
is
prior
arbitration
agreement,
it
is
commenced
upon
the
delivery
by
the
claimant
to
the
respondent
of
a
demand
for
arbitration.
Where
there
is
no
prior
arbitration
agreement,
it
is
initiated
by
one
party
through
a
demand
upon
the
other
to
submit
their
dispute
to
arbitration,
and
arbitration
is
deemed
commenced
upon
the
agreement
by
the
other
party
to
submit
the
dispute
to
arbitration.
ARBITRATORS
AND
ARBITRAL
TRIBUNALS
Number
of
Arbitrators
GR:
3
Arbitrators
for
domestic
arbitration
XPN:
Unless
the
parties
have
agreed
otherwise.
Qualifications
and
Disqualifications
An
Arbitrator
must
be:
1. of
legal
age
2. in
full
enjoyment
of
his
civil
rights
3. know
how
to
read
and
write.
No
person
shall
serve
as
an
arbitrator
in
any
proceeding
if:
1. He
is
related
by
blood
or
marriage
within
6th
degree
to
either
party
to
the
controversy;
2. He
has
or
has
had
financial,
fiduciary
or
other
interest
in
the
controversy
or
cause
to
be
decided,
or
in
the
result
of
the
proceeding;