Surcharge Rate Updates... : Avoid Undercharging (Or Overcharging) Your Industrial Users

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 30

Surcharge Rate Updates...

Avoid Undercharging (or Overcharging)


Your Industrial Users
Jerald O. Thaler, PE
FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR, & HUBER INC.
AGENDA
 Background
 Methodology for Updating Surcharge Rates
 Case Study
 Discussion

IPP Seminar - 2015


BACKGROUND

IPP Seminar - 2015


STRENGTH SURCHARGES
 Utility wastewater billings to industrial users can include:
 Service charge
 Volume charge
 Strength surcharge
 Strength surcharges used to recover costs to treat more
concentrated wastes
 Strength surcharges are not penalties or fines, and do
not replace enforcement for limit exceedances

IPP Seminar - 2015


APPLICABILITY
 Strength surcharges generally focus on:
 BOD5
 TSS
 Total P
 Ammonia-N (or TKN where appropriate)
 Not recommended for FOG
 Not appropriate for toxics

IPP Seminar - 2015


HISTORY
 Strength surcharges began in 1972 with Clean Water Act
 Part of construction grant requirements
 Intent was to recover O&M costs
due to industrial users
 Exclude non-O&M costs (depreciation,
debt service, etc.)

IPP Seminar - 2015


STRENGTH SURCHARGE BASIS
 Threshold concentration (mg/L)
 Surcharge rate ($/lb)

Example
Assume 200 mg/L threshold and
$0.50/lb rate. If user discharges
0.015 MGD at 400 mg/L:

IPP Seminar - 2015


THRESHOLD CONCENTRATIONS
 Should represent median-to-high domestic waste
 Typically set based on literature values, but can use site-
specific background data if available:

IPP Seminar - 2015


SURCHARGE RATES
 Should represent treatment cost difference between
high strength waste and normal domestic waste
 May be inaccurate (high or low) if not specific to the
POTW and/or not based on current O&M costs
 Traditional calculation methods
 Survey of other POTWs
 General rule-of-thumb
 Estimated distribution factors

IPP Seminar - 2015


METHODOLOGY FOR UPDATING
SURCHARGE RATES

IPP Seminar - 2015


OPTION A -- SURVEY OF OTHER POTWs
 Wide range of values
 Unknown when/how calculations performed
Example

IPP Seminar - 2015


OPTION B – GENERAL RULE-OF-THUMB
 Standard factors to distribute the total O&M cost
→ What is a “standard” POTW?
 Origin unknown; most likely came from USEPA

IPP Seminar - 2015


OPTION C – ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION FACTORS
 Generally developed for a particular POTW
 More complicated to apply and keep current
Example

IPP Seminar - 2015


OPTION D (NEW) -- COMPUTER SIMULATION
 Run O&M costing software with increasing pollutant load:
5 5
4 4
3 O&M Cost 3

lb/day

$/day
2 Software 2
1 1
0 0 1 2 3 4
0 0 1 2 3 4

 Plot incremental O&M cost vs. incremental load to yield


$/lb rate: 5

3
$/day
2

1 slope (Δ$/Δlb) = surcharge rate


0
0 1 2 lb/day3 4

IPP Seminar - 2015


O&M COSTING SOFTWARE
 1970s EXEC (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
Executive Digital Computer Program for Preliminary Design of
Wastewater Treatment Systems
 1980s CAPDET (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)
Computer Assisted Procedure for the Design and Evaluation of
Wastewater Treatment Systems
 1990s CAPDET-PC® (Hydromantis, Inc.)
Rewritten version of CAPDET for personal computers
 2000s CapdetWorks® (Hydromantis, Inc.)
Updated CAPDET-PC for Windows

IPP Seminar - 2015


CAPDETWORKS® FEATURES:
Fast, friendly, and accurate
Powerful
 Models for typical wastewater unit operations
 Models for typical biosolids unit operations
 Steady-state mass balance analysis (with recycle streams)
 Automatic cost index updates
 Highly detailed O&M cost data

IPP Seminar - 2015


CASE STUDY

IPP Seminar - 2015


LAKEWOOD WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
 Rural facility with very large industrial component:
 50% of flow
 95% of BOD5 load
 75-85% of other compatible loads
 Unique design
 Dissolved Air Flotation + Oxidation Ditch
 Biosolids storage lagoon (no disposal)
→ Definitely not a “standard” POTW

IPP Seminar - 2015


PERFORMANCE/COST DATA
 Pollutant Removals:

 O&M Costs:

IPP Seminar - 2015


OPTION A – SURVEY OF OTHER POTWs
 Based on most recent survey of Michigan POTWs:

IPP Seminar - 2015


OPTION B – GENERAL RULE-OF-THUMB
 Based on factors for “standard” POTW:

IPP Seminar - 2015


OPTION C – ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION FACTORS
 Based on example:

IPP Seminar - 2015


OPTION D – COMPUTER SIMULATION

CapdetWorks®

IPP Seminar - 2015


CURRENT O&M COST BREAKDOWN

IPP Seminar - 2015


COST VS. LOAD PLOTS

IPP Seminar - 2015


COST VS. LOAD PLOTS

IPP Seminar - 2015


RESULTS SUMMMARY

IPP Seminar - 2015


PERSPECTIVE
 Strength surcharges key component of O&M cost recovery
 Strive to have appropriate surcharge rates
 If undercharging, lose justifiable revenues
 If overcharging, may harm local economy
 Traditional calculation methods vary in accuracy/complexity
 Computer simulation method accurate, straightforward,
and relatively inexpensive

IPP Seminar - 2015


Thank You
Jerald O. Thaler, PE
E-mail: [email protected]
Office: (517) 887-4080
Cell: (248) 207-1710

FISHBECK, THOMPSON, CARR, & HUBER INC.


LIST OF ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS
 Ammonia-N ̶ ammonia, as nitrogen
 BOD5 ̶ 5-day biochemical oxygen demand
 FOG ̶ fats, oil, and grease
 IPP ̶ industrial pretreatment program
 lb ̶ pound
 mg/L ̶ milligrams per liter
 MGD ̶ million gallons per day
 MWEA ̶ Michigan Water Environment Association
 O&M ̶ operating and maintenance
 POTW ̶ publicly owned treatment works
 TKN ̶ total Kjeldahl nitrogen
 Total P ̶ total phosphorus
 TSS ̶ total suspended solids
 USEPA ̶ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

IPP Seminar - 2015

You might also like