Comptes Rendus Bibliographiques

BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHIE
Book Reviews & Notices

Comptes rendus bibliographiques
Downloaded from http://ulr.oxfordjournals.org/ at East Carolina University on July 6, 2015

Jurgen Basedow / John Birds / Malcolm Clarke / Herman Cousy / Helmut Heiss
(Editors), Principles of European Insurance Contract Law (PEICL) – Sellier, Munich –
2009 – ISBN 978-3-86653-069-0 – pp. lxviii + 668.
The Project Group “Restatement of European Insurance Contract Law” started its
work in September 1999, under the chairmanship of Professor Fritz Reichert-
Facilides, and, after his death in 2003, of Professor Helmut Heiss. The Group
joined the European Network of Excellence on European Contract Law, set up by
the European Commission, in 2005. In June 2009, it produced the “Principles of
European Insurance Contract Law (PEICL)” as its contribution to the Common
Frame of Reference of European Contract Law.
This imposing volume presents the results of this work. In addition to an
Introduction by Professor Heiss, it contains the text of the Principles – Rules,
Illustrations and Notes. It also reproduces the Czech, Dutch, French, German,
Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Spanish and Swedish
translations of the Rules; tables on legislation and case law, a bibliography as
well as an extensive index complete the book.
As indicated by Professor Heiss in his Introduction, the Project Group started
from the premise that “the law of insurance [in Europe] must be one”. The first
studies conducted by the Group demonstrated that the lack of harmonisation of
the substantive legal regime governing insurance contract law at the European
level was hampering the development of the internal insurance market. Basing
their work also on an extensive comparative analysis of insurance contract law in
Europe (published as BASEDOW / FOCK, Europäisches Versicherungsvertragsrecht,
vols. I-III, 2002 and 2003), the Project Group prepared the Principles of European
Insurance Contract Law by drafting Rules, followed by Comments setting out the
reasons for the rule and giving examples of how it should be applied, and by
Notes illustrating the provisions of insurance contract law in each Member State
and of the relevant European Union law.
The Principles provide general rules of insurance contract law, applicable to all
types of insurance except reinsurance. In order to avoid, as far as possible,
Rev. dr. unif. 2010 611

Book Reviews & Notices
recourse to national law for the aspects not covered by the Rules, and to rule out
any duplication, the Project Group conducted its work bearing in mind the need
for consistency, both in respect of substantive issues and of terminology, with the
Principles of European Contract Law (PECL). The edition used by the Project
Group in its work was the last edition issued by the Lando Commission; as the
general rules on contract of the Common Frame of Reference, which became
available in full only after the PEICL had been completed, are themselves based
on the PECL, the texts should be consistent with one another.
The PEICL are intended as an optional instrument, whose application would
depend on a choice being made by the parties to the contract. This would be of

benefit both to economic operators in the European internal market and to
private parties, who would be able to rely on a single, sound and balanced
regime for their transactions, consistent with the acquis communautaire.
The Rules are divided into three parts: Provisions common to all contracts
included in the PEICL, Provisions common to indemnity insurance, and
Provisions common to insurance of fixed sums. Part I includes Chapters 1 to 7
(introductory provisions; initial stage and duration of the insurance contract;
insurance intermediaries; the risk insured; insurance premium; insured event;
prescription); Part II comprises Chapters 8-12 (sum insured and insured value;
entitlement to indemnity; rights of subrogation; insured persons other than the
policyholder; insured risk); Part III consists of Chapter 13 on admissibility.
The European Union is now dealing with the future developments of the
Common Frame of Reference, of which the PEICL are a part, and which is
receiving serious political consideration. Although it is premature at this stage to
predict the final outcome of this effort, it is safe to say that the PEICL could, if
nothing else, serve as a model for future instruments. They could, of course, be
chosen by the parties, in the exercise of their contractual freedom; but this would
not be without exclusions and restrictions, and national law would continue to
play a relevant role on insurance contracts. It is worth stressing that the Principles
were drafted in such a way as to permit the European Union to enact them as an
EU regulation. Their nature as an optional instrument would be maintained and
they would become a “2nd regime” of insurance contract law in each Member
State, as illustrated in the Introduction, at p. lxv. This would be a more effective
way of enabling the parties to choose the PEICL. Indeed, the Opinion issued by
the European Economic and Social Committee (“The 28th regime – an alternative
allowing less lawmaking at Community level” (CESE 1869/2009 fin), on 27 May
2010), stresses the advantages of such an approach.
The Comments and Notes will also prove of great interest to the reader,
containing as they do ample and well documented examples and references to
case law and legislation. All in all, this book is an impressive achievement,
612 Unif. L. Rev. 2010

Comptes rendus bibliographiques
drafted by the leading European experts of the field, based on an extensive and
thorough comparative study and timeously completed under the guidance of
Professor Heiss.
Alessandra Zanobetti *
* Deputy Secretary-General, UNIDROIT

Stephan Hobe / Bernhard Schmidt-Tedd / Kai-Uwe Schrogl (Editors), Géraldine M.

Goh (Assistant Editor), Cologne Commentary on Space Law: Volume 1, Outer Space
Treaty – 2009 – Carl Heymanns Verlag, Cologne – ISBN 978-3-452-27185-3, 298 pp.
As humans increase their presence in outer space, the laws that govern human
activities in that environment are becoming increasingly relevant and important
to both Governments and the commercial space sector. In this context, it is
critical that these parties have a clear understanding of the international regimen
that has emerged from within the United Nations in order to ensure the peaceful
exploitation of outer space. To this end, the University of Cologne (Köln) has
undertaken an exhaustive commentary on the international instruments that
make up international outer space law, bringing together some of the premier
minds in this field for the purpose of producing a single body of work that
provides both insight and inspiration for the future. This work, organised by the
esteemed Professors Dr S. Hobe, Dr B. Schmidt-Tedd and Dr Kai-Uwe Schrogl,
will be published in three volumes, the first being devoted entirely to the text of
the United Nations Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the
Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial
Bodies (hereinafter referred to as the Outer Space Treaty). Two further volumes
will deal with the four subsequent United Nations treaties governing activities in
outer space and the United Nations Principles on outer space activities.
As mentioned above, the first volume of the Cologne Commentary on Space Law
(hereinafter referred to as the Commentary) focuses entirely on the Outer Space
Treaty, the underlying instrument which sets out the most fundamental policies
adopted by the international community to govern human activities in outer
space and, moreover, the basis upon which all other instruments have been
developed. Particular attention must be paid to this Treaty since it has become,
although not conclusively, so widely accepted by States that it has taken on the
form of customary law. This Commentary, therefore, provides an in-depth article-
by-article analysis of the Outer Space Treaty, looking into the history,
interpretation and application of each and every provision therein. But while
commentaries on the Outer Space Treaty have been published before, this
Commentary is particularly helpful because of, first, the calibre of the
contributors that have provided their insight on the origins of the Treaty,
Rev. dr. unif. 2010 613

Comptes Rendus Bibliographiques

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Comptes Rendus Bibliographiques

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Comptes Rendus Bibliographiques

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Book Reviews & Notices

Downloaded from http://ulr.oxfordjournals.org/ at East Carolina University on July 6, 2015

Rev. dr. unif. 2010 611

Downloaded from http://ulr.oxfordjournals.org/ at East Carolina University on July 6, 2015

612 Unif. L. Rev. 2010

Stephan Hobe / Bernhard Schmidt-Tedd / Kai-Uwe Schrogl (Editors), Géraldine M.

Downloaded from http://ulr.oxfordjournals.org/ at East Carolina University on July 6, 2015

Rev. dr. unif. 2010 613

You might also like