Open Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine 3(2): 53-58, 2015 http://www.hrpub.

org
DOI: 10.13189/ojdom.2015.030204

Management of Thin Gingival Biotype with Hard and Soft

Tissue Augmentation Post Orthodontic Treatment:
A Case Report
Nima Ebrahimi1, Julio E Obando2, Michael L. Schmerman2, Saba M. Khan2, Nadia I. Kawar2,*

1
University of California, USA
2
Department of Periodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois, USA

Copyright © 2015 Horizon Research Publishing All rights reserved.

Abstract Background: In the United States, orthodontic [2]. As with most treatment and preventive modalities,
therapy has become a common phase in people’s lives. orthodontic treatment is associated with potential risks and
Patients seek treatment for esthetic and functional reasons. side effects. Patients present with various facial and skeletal
As with most treatment modalities, it has its own risks and characteristics and no orthodontal approach can fit all
benefits. Anatomic variations can predispose certain patients patients. Those anatomical variations can predispose the
to problems. Presenting with a thin gingival tissue biotype, patients to certain risks. Thin gingival tissue biotype can
where arch expansion is needed, can predispose the patients predispose patients to loose supporting alveolar bone hence
for mucogingival defects and bony dehiscences. The purpose compromising esthetics and function. Multiple studies have
of this case report is to present a surgical approach to associated periodontal and mucogingival defects with
augment both hard and soft tissue, post orthodontic treatment orthodontic treatment [3]. A retrospective study of
to manage the resulting dehiscence and prevent potential orthodontically treated adults, found 5% prevalence of
future recession. Methods: An eighteen year old patient mucogingival defects [4]. A narrow band of gingiva is
presented to the University of Illinois, College of Dentistry capable of withstanding the stress caused by orthodontic
six years after completion of active orthodontics. The lower forces [5]. A study performed on adult monkeys revealed
anterior segment was characterized by a thin gingival tissue that irrespective of the soft tissue dimensions, provided that
biotype, prominent roots and a minimal zone of keratinized the tooth is moved within the envelope of the alveolar
tissue. A surgical procedure was performed by placing an process, the risk of harmful effects on marginal soft tissue is
allogenic bone graft with subepithelial connective tissue minimal [6]. However, it is possible for teeth to be moved
graft and enamel matrix protein. Results: Surgical procedure outside their alveolar housing to fulfill orthodontic therapy
augmenting hard and soft tissue was completed with goals. The probability of recession during tooth movement in
uneventful post-operative healing. The goals of increased thin biotype is high to justify gingival augmentation when
tissue thickness and prevention of recession were the dimension of gingiva is inadequate. In addition, cases in
accomplished through this technique and the results were which there will be a facial tooth movement outside of the
stable after a one year follow up. alveolar process need to be considered for a gingival
augmentation procedure [7]. These risks should be carefully
Keywords Recession, Post-orthodontic, Hard and Soft assessed prior to initiation of orthodontic therapy.
Tissue Augmentation There are four main categories describing the
mucogingival problems, which occur with orthodontic
therapy: Labially prominent teeth, rotated teeth with labial
prominence, anticipated labial movement or lingual tipping
(i.e. Angle Class III correction), or distal movement of teeth
1. Introduction with thin periodontium into an area of the alveolar ridge with
Orthodontic Therapy has become a common phase of narrow width [8].
many dental patients’ life at least in the US. Patients seek An alveolar dehiscence is described as a defect of the
orthodontic treatment for many reasons, not only esthetics, crestal bone margin exposing the root surface [9].
but also for function and a better overall oral health [1]. Controversy exists regarding the association between lower
According to an NHANES III survey, the Index of Treatment incisor advancement and the incidence of bony dehiscences
Need to the reveals that 57% to 59% of each racial/ethnic in susceptible individuals [10]. Gingival thickness had
group has at least some degree of orthodontic treatment need greater relevance to gingival recession when comparing
54 Management of Thin Gingival Biotype with Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation Post Orthodontic Treatment: A Case Report

gingival thickness to facial inclination of lower incisors [11]. region. The area exhibited prominent root surfaces and
A moderate association has been shown between the clinical minimal zone of attached and keratinized gingiva. The
thickness of the labial gingival and the underlying bone [12]. patient is a non –smoker, her medical and social histories
Thin gingival biotype, visual plaque, and inflammation are were non-contributory.
useful predictors of gingival recession [10]. Periodontal A comprehensive periodontal exam was performed on the
biotype is significantly related to labial plate thickness, patient. Oral hygiene was determined to be fair with an
alveolar crest position, keratinized tissue width, gingival O’Leary’s Plaque index of 17%. Periodontal probing depths
architecture, and probe visibility but unrelated to facial ranged from 2 to 3 mm with no mobility in the mandibular
recession [13] anterior region. The mucosa overlying the labial surfaces of
Proper diagnosis and treatment planning is of utmost the lower anterior teeth appeared to be thin. The patient’s
importance in minimizing the iatrogenic effects. The gingival tissue biotype was classified as a thin-scalloped type
gingival biotype of the patient must be taken into or thin biotype [14]. Prominent roots were observable with
consideration when deciding on orthodontic treatment no gingival recession noted. A zone of attached and
mechanics. There are two major biotypes; a thin-scalloped keratinized gingiva of 1 mm in height throughout the labial
and thick-flat [14]. Gingival biotypes can be categorized aspect of the anterior region was noted. Figure (1) the
into three groups: flat, scalloped, and pronounced scalloped outlines of the roots were clearly evident and prominent
[15] . The distance from CEJ to the direct facial aspect of concavities were seen between the roots. Radiographic
crestal bone normally ranges from 0.5 mm to 1.9 mm and the examination of the area revealed no apparent interproximal
gingival margin is on enamel [16, 17]. In scalloped and bone loss.
pronounced scalloped biotypes this distance is 2.8 mm and
4.1 mm on average respectively which results in the gingival
margin being right at the CEJ or on the cementum [15].
Numerous studies have shown that a thin gingival biotype
is associated with thin underlying labial plate [13]. It has
been reported that thin biotypes (scalloped or pronounced
scalloped) are more associated with gingival and periodontal
diseases [18].
Advancement of lower anterior teeth during orthodontic
treatment is done in order to reduce the overjet or increase
the arch length to relieve crowding. This movement can
become even more pronounced in non-extraction treatments.
The increased risk of plaque accumulation throughout the
course of fixed orthodontic therapy also contributes to the
periodontal problems seen post orthodontic treatment [3]. Figure (1). Pre-operative
Post orthodontic hard and soft tissue defects present a
Given the fact that the patient has a thin gingival biotype,
challenge to the treating clinician. In many cases, the
with minimal amount of keratinized and attached gingiva in
connective tissue is firmly attached to exposed root surfaces
the mandibular anterior region at a young age with
and upon surgical entry these attachments are severed
inconsistent plaque control, it was decided to perform a
causing an exacerbation of the mucogingival problem [9].
grafting procedure with the purpose of augmenting both hard
Guided bone regeneration and subepithelial connective
and soft tissue using an autogenous subepithelial connective
tissue grafting have been proposed as useful in treating these
tissue graft procedure and an allogenic bone graft and
clinical situations [19].
biological material to enhance healing. This procedure
The objective of this case study was to treat areas of thin
would produce a thicker band of attached gingiva, increase
soft tissue and bony dehiscences in the anterior mandible by
the thickness of the labial plate which would allow for
simultaneous bone grafting and subepithelial connective
long-term stability and health of the periodontium. The
tissue grafting to enhance the quality and stability of the soft
findings and recommendations were explained to the patient
and hard tissue.
and the patient consented to undergo the surgical procedure.

2. Case History
3. Surgical Technique
An eighteen-year-old white healthy female patient
presented to the Postgraduate Department of Periodontics at Local infiltration was used to anesthetize the surgical site
the University Of Illinois College Of Dentistry, Chicago, using 3 cartridges (102 mg) of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000
Illinois. The patient had completed orthodontic treatment epinephrine. A buccal horizontal incision was made at the
approximately six years prior to being referred for a level of cemento-enamel junction from the distal of the lower
periodontal consultation regarding the mandibular anterior left first premolar to the distal of the lower right first
 Open Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine 3(2): 53-58, 2015 55

premolar. The papillae were kept intact. A full was repositioned at the level of the cemento-enamel junction
mucoperiosteal flap was reflected to access the defect [20]. and single interrupted Vicryl sutures were placed. Figure (7).
Upon entry, dehiscences were seen on all the teeth. The
lower left canine showed the largest labial dehiscence
extending to the apical third of the root. The lower left lateral
also exhibited a large defect extending to the apical third of
the root. The defects on lower central incisors and lower
right lateral incisor extended 2-4 mm apically from the CEJ.
The lower right canine also exhibited a significant
dehiscence extending to the apical third of the root. Figure
(2).
Figure (4A). Connective tissue donor site

Figure (4B). Connective tissue donor site

Figure (2). Full thickness flap

A 0.25 mm round carbide bur was used in high speed with

copious irrigation for decortication of the labial cortical plate
at multiple sites. Freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA)
material was used for the grafting procedure. The graft
material was hydrated with enamel matrix protein derivative
(EMD). The EMD was also applied to the root surfaces and
the bone graft material was placed over the root surfaces Figures (5A). Subepithelial connective tissue graft
Figure (3)[21-26]

Figure (5B). Subepithelial connective tissue graft

Figure (3). Grafting using FDBA and EMD

The palate was anesthetized utilizing a single cartridge (34

mg) of 2% lidocaine with 1:100.000; epinephrine via greater
palatine nerve block and local infiltration. Subepithelial
connective tissue (SECT) graft was harvested from the palate
bilaterally, Figures (4A) and (4 B). Each graft measured 4
mm in width and 25mm in length and approximately 1.5 mm
in thickness. Figures (5A) and (5B). Adequate hemostasis
was achieved at the donor site and the site was sutured using
resorbable sutures (4-0 chromic gut). The SECT grafts were
positioned over the bone graft and secured in place using 5-0 Figure (6). SECT sutured at recipient site
chromic gut in continuous sling sutures. Figure (6) The flap
56 Management of Thin Gingival Biotype with Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation Post Orthodontic Treatment: A Case Report

Figure (9). Two weeks post op

Figure (7). Flap repositioned

Periodontal dressing (Coe-Pak) was placed over the flap

interlocking in the interproximal areas [27, 28]. The patient
was prescribed Amoxicillin 500mg (tid for seven days),
Ibuprofen 800mg (tid for seven days) and 0.12%
Chlorhexidine rinse (bid for 30 s for 7 seven days) for
post-operative use. Verbal and written postoperative
instructions were given.

4. Results Figure (10). Four weeks post op

The patient returned for a post-operative visit one week

after the surgical procedure. Periodontal dressing was still in
place. It was removed to assess the surgical site. Both
recipient and donor sites were healing well without
complications. The patient reported no discomfort. Sutures
were still intact. Healing with primary intention noted on all
the teeth. Concavities between the roots were no longer
present. Sutures were left in place for an additional week.
Figure (8)
The patient returned for two weeks post-operative visit,
the thickness of the tissue at the lower anterior area was well Figure (11). Six months post
increased compared to the pre-operative thickness. Figure
(9)
The sites were healing satisfactorily and no gingival 5. Discussion
recession noted. Subsequent follow up visits at four weeks
and six weeks the thickness of the soft tissue continued to be Orthodontic tooth movement may result in loss of
stable and no gingival recession was noted. Figures (10) (11) connective tissue attachment and dehiscence when the tooth
The patient was followed up for a year and was receiving is moved out of the envelope of the alveolar process [6].
periodic maintenances, the surgical area was observed and Maynard and Ochsenbein suggest that teeth that show
the results were stable. minimal amount of keratinized gingiva pre-orthodontically
are prone to more mucogingival problems following tooth
movement and hence the mucogingival problems should be
addressed prior to initiation of orthodontics. In addition,
lingual movement of labially positioned lower incisors does
not increase the width of keratinized tissue on the labial
aspect of these teeth [29]. In the majority of the patients who
exhibit gingival recession, the alveolar plates of bone are
either thin or absent [8]. It may be concluded that soft and
hard tissue defects occur simultaneously. Several
considerations must be factored in when treating thin
Figure (8). One week post op gingival tissue. The soft tissue augmentation of areas with
thin gingival tissue is often accomplished by subepthelial
connective tissue grafting. The hard tissue defects including
 Open Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine 3(2): 53-58, 2015 57

dehiscence and fenestrations could potentially and arguably loss in the thickness of the labial plate [36, 37] a single
be augmented using bone graft materials. surgical entry could be superior to conventional multi-stage
A case series of a patient presenting a similar problem in surgeries especially in terms of morbidity, surgical time and
the lower anterior region post orthodontic treatment had been cost. Further long term randomized controlled trials will
published previously [19]. Two separate surgical procedures shed more light on the success of this approach.
were performed to treat the case. As a first stage surgery, a
bone grafting procedure using DFDBA was performed. A
second stage surgery performed six months later to perform 6. Conclusions
the subepithelial connective tissue grafting.
The present report represents a simultaneous It is crucial to assess the amount of hard and soft tissue in
augmentation of both soft and hard tissue using bone grafting comparison to teeth size and the anticipated orthodontic
material as well as connective tissue grafting procedure in a movement prior to starting orthodontic treatment. In patient
single surgical entry. Enamel matrix derivative has been with thin gingival biotype, labial movement of teeth outside
used to improve the soft tissue healing and clinical the alveolar housing will predispose the patient for future
attachment level in surgical root coverage procedures [30, loss of supporting labial alveolar bone and so recession
31]. In this clinical situation, the use of EMD might have compromising esthetics and function. Treating a patient after
enhanced the healing process post surgically. the fact that labial dehicenses has already occurred can be
No surgical re-entry was performed in this case so it is not challenging. As single stage soft and hard tissue
possible to assess any regeneration and the amount of bone augmentation using biological material can be performed
formation in the area without surgical re-entry or the use of post-orthodontic treatment to prevent future recession.
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scan (CBCT)
technology. Clinically, the filling of interradicular
concavities and the presence of thick connective tissue can
be considered as markers of success in this particular
situation, given the duration of the follow up in this patient.
REFERENCES
This patient was followed up for a year after this procedure [1] de Souza, R.A., et al., Expectations of orthodontic treatment
and the results were stable. Further long-term studies are in adults: the conduct in orthodontist/patient relationship.
needed to support clinical and histological evidence of hard Dental Press J Orthod, 2013. 18(2): p. 88-94.
and soft tissue regeneration using the combination Enamel [2] Proffit, W.R., H.W. Fields, Jr., and L.J. Moray, Prevalence
matrix protein derivative along with bone allograft and of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the
autogenous connective tissue graft. United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J
It would have been optimum if a thorough assessment was Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 1998. 13(2): p. 97-106.
performed prior to starting tooth movement orthodontically, [3] Dannan, A., An update on periodontic-orthodontic
and the need of soft and hard tissue augmentation is realized interrelationships. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2010. 14(1): p.
and planned before moving the teeth outside the alveolar 66-71.
housing. Chaturvedi R. et al presented a case of Miller's [4] Trossello, V.K. and A.A. Gianelly, Orthodontic treatment
Class III gingival recession that developed in relation to the and periodontal status. J Periodontol, 1979. 50(12): p.
patient's lower right central incisor following orthodontic 665-71.
therapy [32]. In another case report, an 11-year-old girl who
[5] Dorfman, H.S., Mucogingival changes resulting from
presented with thin gingival and minimal attached tissues in mandibular incisor tooth movement. Am J Orthod, 1978.
the mandibular anterior sextant. As an alternative to free 74(3): p. 286-97.
autogenous grafting, an acellular dermal matrix allograft was
used to augment these areas prior to orthodontic treatment, [6] Wennstrom, J.L., et al., Some periodontal tissue reactions to
orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol,
negating the requirement for a second palatal surgical 1987. 14(3): p. 121-9.
procedure, the results were judged to be successful in terms
of increasing the band of attached tissue, color match, ease of [7] Kim, D.M. and R. Neiva, Periodontal soft tissue non-root
the procedure, and rapid recovery of the patient [33]. coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP
regeneration workshop. J Periodontol, 2015. 86(2 Suppl): p.
Another approach would have been to use an alternative S56-72.
orthodontic approach. The Surgically facilitated orthodontal
treatment would have been another approach to this case [34, [8] Maynard, J.G., The rationale for mucogingival therapy in the
35] the SFOT approach addresses hard tissue deficiencies child and adolescent. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,
1987. 7(1): p. 36-51.
and orthodontic treatment beside the other benefits of faster
treatment). Although the current report is limited to a single [9] Watson, W.G., Expansion and fenestration or dehiscence.
case and the documented follow up period is relatively short, Am J Orthod, 1980. 77(3): p. 330-2.
this surgical approach utilized may be used as an alternative [10] Melsen, B. and D. Allais, Factors of importance for the
treatment option for future cases. Given the fact that each development of dehiscences during labial movement of
surgery has its own risks and side effects, including further mandibular incisors: a retrospective study of adult
58 Management of Thin Gingival Biotype with Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation Post Orthodontic Treatment: A Case Report

orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005. regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in reconstructive
127(5): p. 552-61; quiz 625. periodontal therapy: a systematic review. J Periodontol, 2012.
83(6): p. 707-20.
[11] Yared, K.F., E.G. Zenobio, and W. Pacheco, Periodontal
status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic [25] Trabulsi, M., et al., Effect of enamel matrix derivative on
proclination in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, collagen guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage
2006. 130(1): p. 6.e1-8. procedure. J Periodontol, 2004. 75(11): p. 1446-57.
[12] Fu, J.H., et al., Tissue biotype and its relation to the [26] Aspriello, S.D., Effects of enamel matrix derivative on
underlying bone morphology. J Periodontol, 2010. 81(4): p. vascular endothelial growth factor expression and
569-74. microvessel density in gingival tissues of periodontal pocket:
a comparative study. J Periodontol, 2011. 82(4): p. 606-12.
[13] Cook, D.R., et al., Relationship between clinical periodontal
biotype and labial plate thickness: an in vivo study. Int J [27] Baghani, Z. and M. Kadkhodazadeh, Periodontal dressing: a
Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2011. 31(4): p. 345-54. review article. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects, 2013.
7(4): p. 183-91.
[14] Seibert JL, L.J., Esthetics and periodontal therapy. 2nd ed.
1989: Textbook of Clinical Periodontology. [28] Sachs, H.A., et al., Current status of periodontal dressings. J
Periodontol, 1984. 55(12): p. 689-96.
[15] Becker, W., et al., Alveolar bone anatomic profiles as
measured from dry skulls. Clinical ramifications. J Clin [29] Maynard, J.G., Jr. and C. Ochsenbein, Mucogingival
Periodontol, 1997. 24(10): p. 727-31. problems, prevalence and therapy in children. J Periodontol,
1975. 46(9): p. 543-52.
[16] Kallestal, C. and L. Matsson, Criteria for assessment of
interproximal bone loss on bite-wing radiographs in [30] Chambrone, L., et al., Evidence-based periodontal plastic
adolescents. J Clin Periodontol, 1989. 16(5): p. 300-4. surgery. II. An individual data meta-analysis for evaluating
factors in achieving complete root coverage. J Periodontol,
[17] Hausmann, E., K. Allen, and V. Clerehugh, What alveolar
2012. 83(4): p. 477-90.
crest level on a bite-wing radiograph represents bone loss? J
Periodontol, 1991. 62(9): p. 570-2. [31] Henriques, P.S., et al., Application of subepithelial
connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix
[18] Claffey, N. and D. Shanley, Relationship of gingival
derivative for root coverage: a split-mouth randomized study.
thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in
J Oral Sci, 2010. 52(3): p. 463-71.
shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J
Clin Periodontol, 1986. 13(7): p. 654-7. [32] Chaturvedi R et al, Mucogingival considerations following
orthodontic therapy: a case report.Compend Contin Educ
[19] Bonacci, F.J., Hard and soft tissue augmentation in a
Dent. 2011 Oct;32(8):36, 38-41.
postorthodontic patient: a case report. Int J Periodontics
Restorative Dent, 2011. 31(1): p. 19-27. [33] Fowler EB1et al, Mil Med. Use of acellular dermal matrix
[20] Langer, B. and L. Langer, Subepithelial connective tissue allograft for management of inadequate attached gingiva in a
graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol, 1985. young patient. Mil Med. 2003 Mar;168(3):261-5.
56(12): p. 715-20. [34] K, S., et al., Wilckodontics - a novel synergy in time to save
[21] Boyan, B.D., et al., Porcine fetal enamel matrix derivative time. J Clin Diagn Res, 2014. 8(1): p. 322-5.
enhances bone formation induced by demineralized freeze
[35] Roblee, R.D., S.L. Bolding, and J.M. Landers, Surgically
dried bone allograft in vivo. J Periodontol, 2000. 71(8): p.
facilitated orthodontic therapy: a new tool for optimal
1278-86.
interdisciplinary results. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2009.
[22] Al-Hezaimi, K., et al., The effect of enamel matrix protein 30(5): p. 264-75; quiz 276, 278.
on gingival tissue thickness in vivo. Odontology, 2012.
100(1): p. 61-6. [36] Wood, D.L., et al., Alveolar crest reduction following full
and partial thickness flaps. J Periodontol, 1972. 43(3): p.
[23] Sculean, A., et al., Emdogain in regenerative periodontal 141-4.
therapy. A review of the literature. Fogorv Sz, 2007. 100(5):
p. 220-32, 211-9. [37] Fickl, S., et al., Bone loss after full-thickness and
partial-thickness flap elevation. J Clin Periodontol, 2011.
[24] Koop, R., J. Merheb, and M. Quirynen, Periodontal 38(2): p. 157-62.