Lab Report Exp2 (Group 3)
Lab Report Exp2 (Group 3)
EXPERIMENT NO. 2
GROUP NO. 3
LECTURER/INSTRUCTOR/TUTOR 1) TS. DR. SITY AISHAH BINTI MANSUR
2) N. MASAYU BINTI MASLAN
DATE OF REPORT SUBMISSION 17 OCTOBER 2018
ATTENDANCE/PARTICIPATION/DISIPLINE: /5%
INTRODUCTION: /5%
PROCEDURE: /5%
ANALYSIS /15%
CONCLUSION /10%
REFERENCES: /5%
TOTAL: /100%
I hereby declare that I have prepared this report with my own efforts. I also admit to not accept
or provide any assistance in preparing this report and anything that is in it is true.
1) Group Leader
Name : SYUHAIMI BIN YUSOF
Matrix No. : AN160144
2) Group Member 1
Name : NURUL AFIQAH BINTI ABDUL GHAFAR
Matrix No. : DN160324
3) Group Member 2
Name : DEONG JING MEI
Matrix No. : DN160284
4) Group Member 3
Name : HO CON NIE
Matrix No. : AN160197
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this experiment is to understand the principle of DNS reaction on reducing sugar.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
a. At the end of the study, student will be able: a. To conduct a colorimetric assay independently.
INTRODUCTION
This technique tests for the presence of free radical (C=O), of the questionable reducing
sugars. This involves the reaction of the organic compound practical cluster gift in, for instance,
aldohexose and therefore the organic compound practical cluster in fruit sugar. at the same time,
3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) is reduced to 3-amino,5-nitrosalicylic acid below alkali
conditions:
Oxidation
Reduction
The higher than reaction theme shows that one mole of sugar can react with one mole of three,5-
dinitrosalicylic acid. However, it's suspected that there are several side reactions, and also the actual
reaction ratio is additional sophisticated than previous mentioned. The sort of side reaction depends on the
precise nature of the reducing sugars. Different reducing sugars usually yield different color intensities;
therefore, it is necessary to calibrate for every sugar. Additionally to the oxidization of the carbonyl teams
within the sugar, alternative aspect reactions like the decomposition of sugar additionally competes for the
supply of three,5-dinitrosalicylic acid. Consequently, cellulose will have an effect on the standardization
curve by enhancing the intensity of the developed color.
Although this is often a convenient and comparatively cheap methodology, thanks to the
comparatively low specificity, one should run blanks diligently if the colorimetrical results are to
be taken properly and accurately. One will confirm the background absorption on the first polyose
substrate answer by adding cellulase, straightaway stopping the reaction, and measurement the
absorbance, i.e. following precisely the same procedures for the particular samples. Once the
results of unnecessary compounds be situated glorious, one will effectively embrace an alleged
internal common place by first absolutely developing the colour for the unknown sample; then, a
known quantity of sugar is extra to the present sample. The rise within the absorbance upon the
second color development is equal the progressive quantity of sugar added.
PROCEDURE
1. 6 test tubes of set A were prepared and labelled with 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A and 6A. 6 test tubes
of set B were also labelled as 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B, 5B and 6B. 2 test tube of set A with two
unknown concentration of glucose is labelled as SA1 and SA2. 2 more test tube of set B with
two unknown concentration of glucose is labelled as SB1 and SB2.
2. 1mg/mL of glucose stock solution was pipetted out in the range of 0.2 mL, 0.4 mL, 0.6 mL, 0.8
mL and 1.0 mL into 10 separate test tubes starting from test tube 2. Test tube 1 was not being
filled and left it blank. Unknown concentration test tube is filled with 1.0 Ml of unknown
concentration solution each.
3. The volume of each test tube was filled up with ultra pure water to 1.0 mL.
4. 2.0 mL of DNS reagent was added to each test tube.
5. The mixtures of all test tubes were mixed well using vortex mixer.
6. The test tubes were covered by using parafilm and were heated in a 90°C water bath.
7. The test tubes were taken out from water bath after 5 minutes and they were cooled down to
room temperature.
8. 7.0 mL of distilled water was added into the test tube except for the unknown concentration
testubes.
9. The mixtures in test tubes were mixed well again using vortex mixer.
10. The cuvettes were labelled with 1 to 6 and about 1.0 mL of the solution in test tube 1 to 6 for
set A were poured into the labelled cuvettes accordingly. Same goes to the unknown sample
also being labelled.
11. The cuvettes were placed into a uv-vis spectroscopy and the readings of absorbance at the
wavelength of 540nm were recorded in the table.
12. Steps 9 to 10 were repeated for solution in set B.
13. The average reading of the absorbance was calculated and the standard curve was plotted.
RESULTS AND CALCULATIONS
a) The concentration of standard glucose solution: 1.0 mg/mL
0.1𝑔 1000 𝑚𝑔 𝑚𝑔
× = 1.0
100 𝑚𝐿 1𝑔 𝑚𝐿
Standard
1 0.0 0.0 0.000 0.000 0.000
Glucose
Standard
2 0.2 0.02 0.153 0.157 0.155
Glucose
Standard
3 0.4 0.04 0.327 0.323 0.325
Glucose
Standard
4 0.6 0.06 0.518 0.501 0.5095
Glucose
Standard
5 0.8 0.08 0.705 0.685 0.695
Glucose
Standard
6 1.0 0.10 0.901 0.858 0.8795
Glucose
Tube 2: 0.20 mL
C1 V1 = C2 V2
(1.0 mg/mL) (0.20 mL) = C2 (10 mL)
C2 = 0.02 mg/mL
Tube 3: 0.40 mL
C1 V1 = C2 V2
(1.0 mg/mL) (0.40 mL) = C2 (10 mL)
C2 = 0.04 mg/mL
Tube 4: 0.60 mL
C1 V1 = C2 V2
(1.0 mg/mL) (0.60 mL) = C2 (10 mL)
C2 = 0.06 mg/mL
Tube 1: 0.80 mL
C1 V1 = C2 V2
(1.0 mg/mL) (0.80 mL) = C2 (10 mL)
C2 = 0.08 mg/mL
Tube 1: 1.00 mL
C1 V1 = C2 V2
(1.0 mg/mL) (1.00 mL) = C2 (10 mL)
C2 = 0.10 mg/mL
c) Standard Curve graph
y = 8.6464x
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
Absorbance
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
Concentration (mg/mL)
Sample A
Given the linear equation is:
y = 8.6464x
0.141 = 8.6464x
x = 0.0163 mg/Ml
Sample B
Given the linear equation is:
y = 8.6464x
0.004 = 8.6464x
x = 4.626 × 10−4 mg/Ml
25.9496 𝑚𝑔 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡
× 250 𝑚𝐿 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒 = 6487.4 𝑚𝑔
1 𝑚𝐿 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒
Glucose Sample B
C1 V1 = C2 V2
(0.4579 mg/mL)(100 mL) = C2 (250 mL)
C2 = 0.18316 mg/mL
0.18316 𝑚𝑔 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡
× 250 𝑚𝐿 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒 = 45.79 𝑚𝑔
1 𝑚𝐿 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒
Figure 3: Test tube for calibration curve with known glucose concentration
In this experiment, there are 2 sample of unknown concentration of glucose need to be
determined which labelled as sample A and sample B. The sample A gives an average absorbance
of 0.141 while sample B gives an average absorbance of 0.004 at 540 nm wavelength. After
calculation, the sample A have a glucose concentration of 32.437 mg/ml whereas sample B has a
glucose concentration of 0.4579 mg/ml. Thus, sample A is having more glucose in solution than
sample B.
ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS
1. Define ‘reducing sugar’? Name and sketch structure of a reducing sugar. (2 marks)
Reducing sugars possess a free carbonyl group (either an aldehyde or keto group
Types of reducing sugars include glucose, fructose, glyceraldehyde, lactose, arabinose and
maltose. Sucrose is an example of reducing sugar.
2. DNS is an important reagent in this type of reaction. Identify the starting materials and
explain how to prepare DNS reagent. (3 marks)
The starting materials for DNS reagent are 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic Acid (DNSA) with sodium
potassium tartrate solution. To prepare DNS reagent, first we dissolve 1g of 3,5-
Dinitrosalicylic Acid in 20mL 2M sodium hydroxide, NaOH. Then add slowly 30g sodium
potassium tartrate (MW=282.2 g/mol) and dilute to a final volume of 100mL using distilled
water.
3. What is the control in this experiment and the significance of control? (2 marks)
The control of this experiment is the volume of the DNS reagent and the total volume of the
solution. Time reaction also needs to keep constant for the entire sample as it will affect the
concentration of the glucose.
6. Identify TWO (2) other methods available for testing sugar and discuss the advantages
and disadvantages of these methods? (5 marks)
Methods Benedict's Test Fehling's Test
The test only used a single The test has ability of
Advantages solution, and has no caustic aldehyde containing sugars
properties, thus it easier to to reduce blue Cu2+ ions to
handle and more stable Cu+ ions
It forms a visible positive
result of formation of brick
red precipitate
It takes too long time for Only detect the presence of
Disadvantages testing. aldehydes but not ketones
The results could be
inaccurate if there were any
substances or contaminants
left in the test tubes.
7. Recommend TWO (2) preventive measures during experimental work for the best
outcomes. (2 marks)
One of the preventive measures for a better outcomes is improved the technique of dilution and
using micropipette. The technique of the dilution and using micropipette are very important
especially to prepare the standard curve. The little error in dilution can lead to a significant
effect to the reading of the concentration of the glucose in the sample. The other preventive
measure is make sure the cuvette is free from any dust and clear before put in the uv-vis
spectroscopy. Clean with non-abrasive cuvette tissue is recommended. The present of dirt on
the cuvette will block the light to pass through the sample and effect the reading as well.
CONCLUSION
The objective of the experiment is achieved as we understand the principle of DNS reaction on
reducing sugar. In the experiment, we use UV-VIS Spectroscopy for Dinitrosalicylic (DNS)
method to detect the concentration of glucose in two different samples, which labelled as sample
A and sample B. The experiment is duplicated to get the more accuracy of results by calculating
the average value. For the reading, the sample A gives an average absorbance of 0.141 while
sample B gives an average absorbance of 0.004 at 540 nm wavelength. After calculation, the
sample A has a glucose concentration of 32.437 mg/ml whereas sample B has a glucose
concentration of 0.4579 mg/ml. Thus, we can conclude that sample A contains more concentration
of glucose in solution than sample B. Our hypothesis by observing the colour intensity of the
sample is also accepted, the higher the intensity of colour, the greater the concentration of glucose
in solution. Sample A have higher intensity of colour compared to sample B, thus we assume
sample A will contains more glucose compared to sample B. The final result had support our
hypothesis where sample A has more glucose in solution than sample B.