1.1 Statement of The Problem
1.1 Statement of The Problem
1.1 Statement of The Problem
INTRODUCTION
1
estimating the elastic ground story drift, based on the first mode response of a shear
beam. Use of shear beam model may provide sufficiently good estimates for the ground
story drifts of frames having beams relatively stiffer than columns (shear frames).
However, for the frames having beams and slabs relatively more flexible than columns
the use of shear beam model results in inaccurate estimates of the ground story drift. To
overcome this inaccuracy, this study aims to introduce a set of modifying coefficients to
the approximate equation proposed by Gülkan and Akkar (2002).
This study also presents an initial survey for estimating the inelastic displacement
demands of structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Estimation of inelastic
displacement demands, based on the elastic analysis of structures subjected to near-fault
ground motions would provide a useful tool for seismic engineering practice. Although
a number of methods exists in the literature for estimating the inelastic demands based
on elastic analysis, a method directly taking into account the intrinsic features of near-
fault ground motions has not been proposed. This study is an initial survey for such a
method. Furthermore, as it will be seen in Chapter 4, C1 coefficient employed in
FEMA356(2000), which is one of the most discussed technical documents on inelastic
analysis, may provide alarmingly inaccurate estimates of inelastic displacements for the
case of near-fault ground motions. A set of preliminary equations was established for
estimating the inelastic displacement demands imposed on inelastic non-degrading
SDOF systems subjected to near-fault ground motions based on elastic analysis of the
systems.
Integration of the two procedures stated above would provide a useful tool for
estimating the local inelastic displacement demands of moment resisting frames
subjected to near-fault ground motions. However, it should be noted that such an
integration process requires a comprehensive research on the effects of nonlinearity on
the response of frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Such a
comprehensive research is beyond the scope of this study.
2
1.2 Review of Past Studies
3
noticed that when the rupture propagates away from the site, arrivals of seismic waves
are distributed in time and named this phenomenon as backward directivity. They
observed that backward directivity resulted in long duration motions having low
amplitudes at long periods. Akkar and Gülkan (2002) examined the forward directivity
effects in the near-fault strong ground motion records taken during the 17 August 1999
Kocaeli and 12 November 1999 Bolu-Düzce earthquakes. They observed that the
ground motion component with highest displacement demands were not always in the
fault normal direction. Akkar and Gülkan (2002) stated that the ground motion
components in the maximum ground velocity direction does correlate better with the
larger drift demands, compared to the strike normal component for the near-fault ground
motion records taken from the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli and 12 November 1999 Bolu-
Düzce earthquakes.
Heidebrecth and Stafford Smith (1973) studied the interaction of shear walls and
frames and derived closed form solutions for lateral displacements. Using these closed
4
form solutions Miranda (1999) set up an approximate procedure for estimating the
maximum lateral deformations, maximum roof displacement and maximum interstory
drifts of frame type of structures with uniform stiffness. Miranda and Reyes (2002)
further improved the approximate method proposed by Miranda (1999), by adding the
capability of estimating the lateral displacements of frame structures with non-uniform
stiffness distribution.
Chopra and Cruz (1986a) analyzed the accuracy of response spectrum analysis
using a set of 5 story generic frames having various fundamental periods of vibration
and beam-to-column stiffness ratios. Comparisons of the response quantities obtained
from response spectrum analysis with the elastic response history analysis for 8
simulated ground motions showed tolerable errors. Making use of those results they
proposed a method called Simplified Response Spectrum Analysis (Chopra and Cruz
1986b). This method involved a practical procedure to estimate the first two
fundamental modes, periods of vibration and modal participation factors.
5
approximate equivalent shear stiffness formula for portal frames, derived by Heidebrecht
and Stafford Smith (1973). Heidebrecht and Rutenberg (2000) further improved this
method by employing the approximate fundamental period formulas for frame
structures. Gülkan and Akkar (2002) developed a simpler procedure, utilizing the shear-
beam model, for constructing the drift spectrum.
Chopra and Chintanapakdee (2001a) compared the ground story drift ratios
found from response spectrum analysis with that of drift spectrum analysis and stated
that the difference is due to effects of higher modes. They also pointed out that a
sufficient degree of accuracy may be obtained using response spectrum method, if at
least five modes are included in the analysis.
6
primarily based on far-field ground motions whose characteristics are very different
from near-fault excitations.
Baez and Miranda (2000) studied the inelastic displacement demands imposed
on single degree of freedom systems by near-fault ground motions. They stated that
structures subjected to ground motions with large velocity pulses may experience
maximum inelastic deformations larger than those subjected to ground motions that do
not have these pulses, even if the linear elastic ordinates in the short period spectral
region are similar.
Another set of methods (Rosenblueth and Herera, 1964, Gülkan and Sözen,
1974, Iwan 1980) are based on equivalent linearization. In equivalent linearization
methods maximum response of the inelastic system is approximated by the elastic
response of a linear elastic system with increased damping and lowered stiffness.
Capacity Spectrum Method is a method developed by Freeman et al. (1975), and based
on the iterative use of equivalent linearization. Capacity spectrum method is employed
in ATC-40 (1996), which is one of the most debated technical documents on inelastic
analysis of structures.
7
1.3 Object and Scope
This study examines the properties of near-fault ground motions and effects of
ground motions containing pulses on the response of structures. Important
characteristics of near-fault ground motions were studied for this purpose. Performances
of various attenuation relationships were evaluated. Effects of various parameters on the
characteristic properties of near-fault ground motions were examined.
Another set of equations have been established for estimating the inelastic
deformation demands of non-degrading SDOF systems, based on the maximum elastic
displacement demand imposed on SDOF systems with the same natural period and
damping. Equations for estimating the inelastic displacements were established by
directly performing regression analysis on elastic to inelastic displacement ratio, natural
period and strength reduction factor. This study is an attempt for establishing a direct
link between the strength capacity of the structure and inelastic displacement demand.
Such a methodology may serve as a convenient and practical tool for performance
evaluation of existing structures excited by near-field earthquakes.
This thesis is composed of five main chapters and two appendices. Contents of
each chapter may be summarized as follows:
8
Chapter 1 Statement of the problem and review of past studies on the estimation of
the displacement demands imposed on structures, effects of near-fault
ground motions on the response of structures and fundamental
characteristics of near-fault ground motions.