Losses in Hay
Losses in Hay
AND SILAGE
by J. A. LeClerc ^
HAY
UNTIL a very few years ago field curing w^as practically the only
method ever used m preparing hay for storage. Considering the
fact that even with normal practice and under normal weather condi-
tions, haymaking in many sections of this country is accompanied by
a loss of dry matter amounting to 10 percent or more, it follows that
the loss to farmers each year may amount to at least 75 million
dollars. If the w^eather during haying is unfavorable, the loss in
nutritive value may easily be several times as great as normally,
entailing a correspondingly larger financial loss.
Studies of hay crops cured and stored by traditional methods as
compared wàth newer methods appear to support the following
conclusions:
1. Field curing of hay, under ordinär}^ conditions, is always accom-
panied by appreciable mechanical losses of leaves—that portion of
the crop richest in dry matter, protein, vitamiîis, and minerals.
2. Losses of valuable constituents of the hfij as the result of rain
may account at times in certain localities for as much as half the
value of the crop (hence the old adage, ''Make hay while the sun
shines'0.
3. Losses by artificial drying are small compared to those by field
cming.
1 J. A. LeClerc is Senior Chemisr. Food Researcii Divisiüii, Bureau of Chemistry- and Soils.
992
LOSSES IN HAY AND SILAGE 993
TABLE 1,—Weight and percentage of dry matter and protein in 1 ton of green alfalfa^
1 Basis of calculation: Leaves in green crop. 55 percent. Loss of leaves, 30 percent; of stems, 10 percent.
ios. Pet. Lbs. Pet. \ Lbs. Pet. \ Lbs. Pet. Lbs. Pet.
Green crop 1,580 70 810 90 ! 420 I 21 j 330 30 90 10
Dry matter 478 70 i 324 90 ' 102 i 17.6 i 66 30 36
Protein of green al- 10
falfa- 72.6 70 ' 35.64 90 19.80 i 21. 5 i 15.84 30 3. 96 10
Protein of crop I 15.2 24.0 ! 11.0 i 19.4 24 11
On the basis that during held curing there is a loss of 30 percent of leaves and
10 percent of stems, 1 ton of green alfalfa will yield 478 pounds of drv matter, con-
sisting of 1.54 pounds of leaves and 324 pounds of stems. The amount of protein
in the dried crop will be 72.6 pounds, of which 36.96 is in the leaves and 35.64
in the stems. When compared to the amount of dry matter and of protein in the
2,000 pounds of green alfalfa, these figures represent a loss of 102 pounds of dry
matter during the curing process, equivalent to 420 pounds of the original green
crop; and likewise a loss of 19,8 pounds of protein. In other words, 21"percent of
the green crop (equivalent to 17.6 of the dry matter and 21.5 percent of the pro-
tein) was lost during field curing.
TABLE 3.—Composition, digestibility^ and digestible nutrients in field grass and early
hay. on dry basis
Constituent
p , Hay Hay Hay Hay Hay Hay
lllf' from from Fresh Fresh
from from from from
^^^^^ field stacks grass
field stacks field stacks
TABLE 4,—Distribution of losses of dry matter and of starch equivalent as the result of
field curing of hay
On the basis of a 26,000,000-ton crop of alfalfa, the loss of dr^^ matter and of
protein would be 1,326,000 and 257,000 tons, respectively.
Besides this tremendous loss of protein and dry matter as the result of ordinary
field curing, the loss of 30 percent of leaves during this process involves corre-
spondingly large losses of calcium, phosphorus, and other essential minerals, for
the leaves are the richest part of the plant in minerals as well as in protein and
vitamins.
Watson, Ferguson, and Horton {1194) analyzed fresh grass, hay from the field,
and hay from stacks with the results shown in table 3. Under quite different
haymaking conditions, of course, the results might be materially different.
Losses in Curing
The classical researches of Fleischmann (364) in Germany constitute the most
important contribution to the study of hay and the losses that take place during
field curing. Until this study was made it was generally believed that if the hay
was cut and dried under favorable conditions, unaccompanied by any loss of leaves,
the dried hay retained unchanged, and in toto, the feed constituents present in
the green crop, and that the only difference between the freshly cut grass and the
field-cured hay was physical and in the moisture content.
Some of Fleischmann^s general conclusions are well worth reproducing here.
It is a question, of course, whether European data can be applied to this country,
especially to those localities where drying of hay in the field can be completed in
at most 2 days owing to continuous sunshine. In Europe because of rains or
heavy dew field curing frequently requires several days.
(ly If hay is dried the same day it is cut the loss, if any, will be small.
(2) Slow drying (as on a sunless day) causes losses in dry matter of 4 to 13
percent. The longer the time required to dry, or the higher the temperature of
drying in cloudy weather, the greater the loss of dry matter.
(3) The loss of dry matter ceases, however, when the partly dried hay still
contains 38 percent of moisture (or, in other words, when hay has lost 87 percent
of its original moisture) even though drying still be continued.
(4) The loss (about 9 percent) due to vitaJ activity (enzymes) is considerably
more than the loss (2 to 4 percent) due to micro-organisms.
(5) The drier the grass the greater the possibility of loss due to leaching from
rain. When fresh or partly wilted grass is rained upon, the losses are due chieñy
to activity within the cells. If wilted or dried hay becomes wet some loss may be
caused also by bacteria.
(6) In live grass the loss due to bacteria is small. In dead grass this loss may
reach 20 percent.
(7) In freshly cut and freshly made hay the content of lecithin (a fatlike sub-
stance containing phosphorus) averages about 88 milligrams per 100 grams of
dry matter; in stored hay only 20 milligrams are left, a loss of 75 percent.
(8) The amount of protein nitrogen is always greater in the freshly cut grass
than in hay (calculated on the same moisture content). On the other hand, the
amount of amides (protein decomposition products) is always greater in hay.
During haying there is always a loss of protein nitrogen but not of total nitrogen.
This loss is due to activity within the cells. Freshly cut hay may contain as little
as 9 percent of amide nitrogen and dried hay as much as 33 percent, especially if
this hay has been dried under unfavorable conditions.
(9) There is always a loss of fat during haymaking, and this may be as high as
40 percent. This loss occurs whether the hay is dried in the sun or in the shade.
The decrease in fat is correlated with the decrease in dry matter.
(10) Ño change has been noted in the crude fiber content.
(11) The loss of starch is significant if the hay is dried slowly, but when the
drving is done quickly the loss is reduced to a minimum.
(12) The percentage of sugars decreases with the length of time of drying and
with the temperature.
In a growing plant ingredients move from one part of the plant to another,
especially tow^ard maturity (151). In the drying of grass to hay there is a con-
tinuation of this interchange of ingredients.
According to Watson {1187), the losses by shattering of leaves, leaching,
fermentation in the stack, the destruction of the carotene, etc., when hay is made
in the ordinarv way, may in the aggregate amount to 25 percent or more of the
food value of the hay. Studies in Norway have shown average losses of 20 percent.
In ordinary hay curing there is always a natural fermentation going on, with more
996 YEARBOOK OF AGRICULTURE, 1939
or less production of heat, depending largely on the moisture content. The
niaximum temperature as the result of this fermentation is attained in about 10
days. A secondary fermentation is noted about 3 weeks after tlie hay is stacked.
The highest temperature noted in some of these experiments was 150° F.
Under average conditions of haymaking in the British Isles the losses in feed
value from harvesting to storing in stacks may amomit to 30 percent or more of
the starch equivalent and digestible crude protein, and in unfavorable weather
these losses may even exceed 50 percent (1189).
The losses that take place in the field and in stacks with both early hay and
ordinary hay were studied by Watson and his associates (1194), with the results
shown in table 5.
FABLE 5.^—Losses of feed constititejits thai take place in raring hay
In field In stack«
Constituent
' Giiin.
During favorable years the losses of dry matter and of starch equivalent in
ordinary hay averaged 8 and 20 percent, respectively; in bad years, 34 and 47
percent. With early hay the respective losses were 13 and 25 percent in good
years, and 23 and 44 percent in bad seasons.
TABLE 6.—Total nitrogen, protein nitrogen, and amide nitrogen in grass dried under
dißerei it con dit i o n s
<^ ^
- c Xitrogcn in water- Nitrogen in water-
c Iree substance an- free orisfinal sub- Total ni-
alyzed stance trogen
Î Control.
LOSSES IN HAY AND SILAGE 997
Fleischmaiin's elaborately conducted experiments (364) in drying hay (I) in a
vacuum^ (2) in the greenhouse, (3) in the cellar, (4) in shade, and (5) in sun,
show that under certain conditions nearly one-half of the protein niay be broken
down into amides. This is especially true when the hay is being dried for several
days in the shade. When dried under good conditions, however, hay may con-
tain as little as 10 percent of amide nitrogen (table 6).
The loss of leaves during the field curing of alfalfa under good conditions varies
from 5.9 percent to 9.2 percent (see the article, The Nutritive Value of Har-
vested Forages, p. 968). This is an important factor, for leaves are the richest
part of the plant in food nutrients. Leaves of cereal ha^^s constitute one-fifth of
the weight of the plant. After the milk stage these leaves contain nearly one-
half of the minerals and 40 percent of the fat of the whole plant {1091).
did not reduce the availability of the protein or calcium {490). Grass dried by
direct heat in a kiln at 239° for 3 hours was only slightlv less digestible than when
dried with steam at 212° {1257).
It has beea demonstrated that the temperature of the drying gas does not
affect the carotene content of hay or the digestibility of the protein {1187), as
table 7 shows.
TABLE 7.—Carotene content and the digestibility of the protein of hay dried
at different temperatures
Carotene content, per 100 grams of dry matter. milligrams _ _ : 26. 8 ; 30. 7
Digestibility of crude protein percent__! 77,8 76.7
It has been shown by Kane and coworkers {607) that ordinary market hay
may frequently contain as little as one-tenth the carotene in the green crop, and
that alfalfa quickly dried in a tunnel drier at 260° to 264° F. may have as much
as seven times the vitamin A content found in poor-quality hay; that when alfalfa
was dried in a rotary drum, being momentarily exposed to a temperature of
1,200° to 1,382°, its carotene content was almost as high as in the freshly cut crops
and 2 to 10 times as much as in the field-cured alfalfa. If, however, the artificially
dried alfalfa is subsequently exposed to sunlight, it may lose much of its carotene.
The amount of loss on exposure to sunlight is dependent largely on the tempera-
ture during the time the dry hay is exposed, there being no loss at 32° in 8 weeks'
time. At 68° to 86°, however, the loss may reach 30 percent. Alfalfa can, there-
fore, be stored even in the light during the cold months without loss.
When, however, the green material has once become dried and is then kept
exposed to hot air, there is a loss of both vitamin A and of digestible protein
(1188) (table 8).
Tem- Caro-
Time tene Digest- pe'rT ' Time : ^^¡^; \ Digest-
pera- of ex- ible pro-
ture per 100 ?ure of ^^- ipSToo'^bl^P^'^- too i oí ^^- iDe?Tooi^^^«P^o-
posure tein (0 F ) I ^^'^'^ grams Î ^em
(°F.) grams
Green pasture grass and the same grass after drying at different temperatures
has been analyzed with the results shown in table 9 ^^^'^^
TABLE 9.—Chemical composition of fresh and dried pasture grass, on dry basis
I Nitrogen-1
Dry Crude Ether
Condition of grass matter Protein ! free ex- I Calcium ' Phos-
fiber extract phorus
1 \ tract !
McCliire (719) gives equally interesting results after having analyzed green
pasture, field-cured hay, and artificially cured hay (table 10).
This same author found that drying at a temperature up to 250° F. did not
injure the color of the hay, but concludes that artificial drying should not super-
sede field curing in locahties where ideal haying conditions prevail.
Woodman, Bee, and Griffith {1257) give results showing the coefficient of
digestibility of the constituents of freshly cut and of kiln-dried grass (table 11).
It is concluded that direct heat in a kiln does not depress the coefiicient of
digestibility.
While the temperature of the inlet gases (which come in contact with the
young grass) may be as high as 302° F., the temperature of the grass itself never
rises beyond 176°-194° so long as active evaporation of water is taking place.
In the use of a band drier, with inlet temperature of 392° F., grass was dried
down to 10-percent moisture content in 10 minutes, the amount of digestil:»]e
protein being only slightly depressed. When, however, grass was dried in a
pneumatic conveyor in 15 seconds at 1,112°, the digestible protein was appreciably
decreased {1191).
Artificial drying also saves space. Dried, chopped grass, for example, will
require only about half the storage space needed for ordinary hay.
Young Grass
The artificial drying of young grass, or short leafy herbage, before the stemming
stage or before the nodes appear is a relatively new idea in the production of hay.
Such young grass is extremely rich in protein, fat, minerals, and vitamins. W^hen
it is cut weekly, the amount of protein in the grass after being dried may be as
high as 21 percent; when cut at intervals of 3 weeks, the protein content will be
about 19.3 percent; at 4-week intervals, 17.2 percent; and at 5-week intervals,
14 percent {971). The cutting and drying of young grass to make a concentrated
feed is a more urgent problem in England than in the United States. The
frequent rains in England also favor the growth of grass.
The composition and digestibility of fresh and dried young grass (table 12) have
been studied by Watson {1187), the inlet temperature of the drier being 392° F.
Drying of young grass apparently does not affect the content of vitamins A, B,
G, or D. The carotene is retained almost entirely. If, however, the grass is
wilted for 6 hours before artificial drying, as much as 14 percent of the carotene
may be lost. Young grass has been found to be effective in giving animals
greater powders of resistance against disease. It has been noted, for example, that
white scour in calves and udder troubles in cows are less frequent wiien dried
young grass is fed {971),
LOSSES IN HAY AND SILAGE 1001
TABLE 12.—Composition and digestibility of fresh and dried grass^ on water-free basis
Instead of merely drying the young grass, so-called grass cakes have been made
by first steaming the grass in troughs in order to dry it to less than 10 percent of
moisture and then compressing this dried grass with a hydraulic press to a density
such that 2,000 pounds occupied a space of 40 cubic feet. This grass cake con-
tained 23 percent of protein, or 2}^ times as much as is found in ordinary hay, and
retained the original grass color (1^54).
The percentage of fiber in dried young grass is less than in hay. Further, the
fiber is practically as digestible as that of fresh grass. A yield of S% tons of dried
young grass per acre is obtained when cuttings are made monthly. It is claimed
that young grass provides more protein per acre than almost any other crop, except
possiÍDly marrow-stem kale.^ One hundred pounds of dried young grass contains
13 to 14 pounds of digestible protein and 67 pounds of starch equivalent. A cow
giving 5 gallons of milk a day will obtain all the protein, energy, and minerals
required by consuming 33 to 34 pounds of dried grass.
After having been dried, young grass may be ensiled as well as compressed.
SILAGE
The curing or preserving of legumes and grasses by ensiling in order
to produce high-quality roughage is not only a source of national
wealth but is destined to play a role of paramount importance in the
agriculture of the future.
Such a product is known as silage. According to one definition
{1193) silage is a succulent fodder, made from fresh forage crops by
storing them in a stack, trench, pit, or silo, from which air is excluded
as much as possible ; according to another, it is a preserved fodder that
has acquired a more or less aromatic odor and an acid taste without
putrefactive or moldy flavors {53)] and according to a third, it is
moist feed conserved in the absence of air (see The Nutritive Value of
Harvested Forages, p. 981). Woodman and Amos {1265) divide
silages into five distinct groups: (1) Sweet, dark-brown silage; (2)
acid, light-brown silage; (3) green, fruity silage; (4) sour silage; and
(5) musty silage.
Silos are of more recent origin than granaries. Columbus found
that the Indians used pits or trenches to preserve their grain. But
antedating that by centuries, Pliny tells of grain being stored in pits,
as airtight and air-free as possible, in Greece, Spain, and Africa.
Varro, who lived during the second century (116-27) B, C, relates
how grain was kept for over 50 years in pits. It is also known that
in ancient Egypt silos constructed of masonry were used for preserving
grains.
In Metz, France, in 1707, there was uncovered a granary containing
3 Daily Digest, U. S. Departmont of Agriculture, May 26, 1936. [Mimeographed.]
1002 YEARBOOK OF AGRICULTURE, 1939
grain that had been stored in 1528 and that was still in such good
condition that, it is claimed, good bread was made with flour milled
therefrom. Green forage is said to have been preserved during the
early history of the Baltic Provinces and in Sweden, where the uncer-
tainty of the weather rendered difficult the proper curing of hay
(1251).
According to Samarani (1008) mention is made by John Symonds
(University of Cambridge, 1786), of the ensiling of leaves by the
peasants of Italy. The leaves were gathered in the cool of the day,
allowed to wilt for 3 to 4 hours in sunlight, placed in wooden tanks
that had been partly buried in the soil, compressed, and covered with
earth. The tanks themselves were then covered with straw and more
earth. This procedure is quite similar to the Crema process used
today and described later in this article. In the course of time the
buried tanks were modified into above-ground silos, made of wood,
stone, concrete, and other materials. The present-day silos are in
general not very different from those in use during the early years of
the eighteenth century.
In 1875 Goffart, in a paper presented to the Société Centrale
d'Agriculture de France (26), related his experience with corn silage.
He is reported to have said that at the time he purchased his farm in
1840, 8 scrawny cows and 120 sheep lived a miserable existence,
whereas ^^today the same farm. (300 acres) nourishes abundantly 68
cattle, 6 horses, and 300 sheep.'' The method of ensiling used at
that time was somewhat similar to the American tower process. Ac-
cording to Woll (1251), Goffart may justly be called the ''father of
modern silage."
The first silo built in the United States, also according to Woll,
is said to be that erected by F. Morris in Maryland in 1876. With
a yearly production of over 60 percent of the world corn output and
the consumption of some 40 million tons of silage made chiefly from
corn, the United States is justly known as the land of silos.
The amoimt of corn silage produced per acre in the United States
ranges from 4 to 20 tons. Depending largely on the nature of the
crop and the locality, as much as 40 tons of silage (in the case of sun-
flowers, for example) may be produced per acre. A corn crop that if
allowed to mature would yield 50 bushels of shelled grain to the acre,
would produce 8 to 12 tons of silage. A ton of ensiled corn would
have yielded on the average only 5 to 5)^ bushels of shelled grain
(im).
The feed value of corn silage is evident when it is realized that 100
pounds of dry matter contain 4.3 to 4.8 pounds of digestible crude
protein and about 40 pounds of total digestible nutrients (521).
Though corn is the principal crop utilized for silage in this country,
grass silage can be made as advantageously in many places, and
sometimes more economically than field-cured hay.
Practices in different countries have shown that almost any herba-
ceous crops can be used singly or in combination in making satisfac-
tory silage. These crops include corn, oats, and vetch, alfalfa, clover,
and other legumes, timothy and other grasses, sunflower plants, beet
tops, potato leaves and stems, soybean plants, and others. The only
crops that do not lend themselves satisfactorily to ensiling are the
LOSSES IN HAY AND SILAGE 1003
which the acids of the organic type have been naturally formed.
6. The question whether lactic acid made by the farmer himself
from some of his waste farm products can be economically and suc-
cessfully used in silage instead of mineral acids may be w^orthy of
study.
7. The vast amount of data, much of it inconclusive, reported by
the various workers in this field indicates the necessity for concerted
cooperative study of silage questions. For example, what kind of silo
should be used under various conditions—with various crops harvested
at different stages of growth, in different localities, under different
weather conditions, by diñ'erent processes, and with the aid of various
added substances, chemical or otherw^ise?
8. The methods of sampling silage for analysis and the basis used
for the calculation of results may lead to erroneous conclusions regard-
ing the feed value of the silage. These sources of error should be
eliminated.
9. The variation in the loss of dry substance resulting from the
ensiling of dift'erent crops by different processes is of great economic
importance. For example, with a consumption of 40 million tons of
silage a year, a loss of 5 percent of dry matter w^ould be equivalent to
over 2 million tons of feed and a loss of 15 percent would mean that
farmers would have fully 7 million tons less of feed at their command.
10. Practically no information is available regarding the effect of
fertilizers, soil treatment, and other factors on the quality of silage
produced from the same crop growm in different localities or under
differing systems.
11. Little or no information is available regarding the relative effect
of added mineral acids and of natural^ formed organic acids on the
character and utilizability of the mineral constituents of silage and oí
some of the important organic constituents.
12. Under certain favorable conditions the losses in haymaking are-
less than in ensiling (^7^, 1256), The silo, however, is a means of
saving considerable feed, which, if field-cured under ordinary or un-
favorable conditions, would suffer appreciable loss. Silos can be filled
in almost any kind of weather. Silage is an emergency feed.
13. Protein-rich crops—that is, crops with a ratio of 1 part of pro-
tein to 2 parts or less of carbohydrate—are generally most successfully
ensiled if mineral acids or molasses is added (4-^4) •
14. Carbohydrate-rich crops—that is, crops with a ratio of 1 part of
protein to more than 2 parts of carbohydrate—can be ensiled without
any addition of sugar or acid if they are ensiled in a moist condition.
DATA ON LOSSES AND FEEDING VALUES IN SILAGE
largely disappears also, having been oxidized to acetic acid through some kind of
fermentation by a combination of yeasts and bacteria, both of which are present
in large numbers in freshly made silage. The acid bacteria grow until they
produce enough acid to inhibit their own growth, when they die, but yeasts are
still able to grow in such a medium and continue to convert sugar to alcohol,
which in turn is finally oxidized to acetic acid.
Living: maize— Maize plus tolu- Maize plus heat at Maize plus silage | Living maize-
protoplasm, en- ene—enzymes juice—protoplasm, j protoplasm, en-
98° C—spore-forming enzymes,
zymes, and bac- only active and micro- zymes, and bac-
organisms only active organisms
teria active present teria active
Among the acids formed, lactic and acetic apirear to have a favorable effect oji
the quality of the silage, while butyric acid, which is the result of imperfect
methods of ensiling and of putrefactive processes, injures the silage as a feed.
The presence of acid is one of the criteria of good silage. The role of organic
acids is as a preservative, for bacteria cannot grow except in a neutral or alkaline
(or only slightly acid) medium. If air is kept excluded—that is, if anaerobic
conditions arc maintained—the acidity formed in silage during the first 2 weeks
is sufficient to check decomposition. Esten, Christie, and Mason {836) regard
the process of acid formation in silage as identical to that in the making of sauer-
kraut. The amount of acid in silage is from 1 to 2 percent. In a 100-ton silo
there are from 2,000 to 3,000 pounds of mixed organic acid. An animal con-
suming 40 pounds of silage a day will ingest an amount of acid equal to that in
7 pints of vinegar.
Fully 90 percent of the volatile acid found in good silage is acetic; propionic
acid is next in amount. Butyric acid is found only in silage that shows evidence
of spoilage. Lactic and acetic acids are always found in silage, irrespective of
the kind of silo construction or the type of silage, according to Dox and Neidig
The most obvious phenomena in silage making are, therefore, a rise in tem-
perature (depending on the conditions under which the silage is made), changes
in the color of the silage, the development of acids due to the oxidation of carbo-
hydrates during cell respiration in the absence of air, the production of an aromatic
odor, and the break-down of the proteins by hydrolysis.
Carbohy-
Dry drate
Basis matter Protein Fiber Fat (nitrogen- Ash
free
; extract)
Clamp Silage
What is known as "clamp silage" in England is similar to silage made in the
so-called pit stack frequently found in the West, where a tractor is sometimes
used to compress the material ensiled. This form of silage requires very little,
if any, expense other than that of digging the pit, but it is difficult to make the
silage without considerable loss—greater loss, in fact, than there is in most other
forms of silage. The wastage on the top and sides may be as high as 25 percent,
and the smaller the clamp the greater the loss; hence this form of silage should
be made only on a large scale. Further, considerable sour silage is apt to be
found at the bottom, owning to the very tight packing of the ensiled material by
horse and cart (the English way) or by tractor. When succulent materials are
ensiled and low temperatures are maintained, as often is the case with sour
clamp silage, butyric acid, which accompanies putrefactive changes, may develop.
Ammonia and other useless or harmful substances may also be produced at the
expense of the proteins {1256), The best that can be said of clamp silage is that
it is useful in saving green fodder in a succulent form when conditions are un-
favorable for haymaking. The trenches used in the United States appear to
preserve the silage more effectively than the British clamp silos. In the South-
west particularly, trenches are being used to preserve various forage crops. If
the trenches are well drained and the material is covered and packed to exclude air,
the losses of nutrients may be little if any greater than in tower silos.
Tower Silage
Green material ensiled in a tower silo is generally chopped into small pieces
and blown into the silo. Almost any kind of green crop may be used, although in
the United States corn is the principal crop thus ensiled.
Study of the transformations that take place in ensiled corn show that in 1 day
after the silo is filled, the oxygen is reduced practicalh^ to zero and carbonic
acid increased to 45 percent of the silo gas. In 2 days the percentage of carbonic
acid is approximately 70. From this point the relative amount of this gas de-
creases, so that at the end of 131 days less than 20 percent is left. The moisture
1008 YEARBOOK OF AGRICULTURE, 1939
Potato
Vetch stems and Clover Frozen Meadow
Constituent beets grass
leaves
A special study of acid-brown silage and of so-called fruity silage was made
by Woodman and Amos {1255) ^ who noted the gains or losses of constituents
(table 17).
TABLE 17.—Losses or gains of feed constituents in acid-hrown and green fruity si/age
made seven accurate trials, conducted at Jealott's Hill, with silage prepared by
different methods. The results showed that the loss of dry matter by the A. I. V.
process was 17.7 percent as against 18.2 percent by the ordinary ensiling method,
16.1 percent in the case of silage with added molasses, and 17.7 percent in silage
with added whey. The loss of protein was 3.8 percent in A. I. V. silage, 5.7 per-
cent in ordinary silage, and 5.4 percent in silage containing molasses, while with
silage containing whey a gain was recorded.
These results are at variance with those obtained by Virtanen {1169), whose
experiments indicated that A. I. V. silage suffers not over 8-percent loss of ávy
matter, in most cases the loss being nearer 3 percent.
Recent experiments conducted at the Rowett Institute {569) demonstrate
again that there is little if any difference between fresh timothy grass and the
same grass ensiled by the A. I. V. process in quantity of dry matter, crude protein,
true protein, and soluble protein. The addition of mineral acids to grass lowers
the palatability but maintains the high carotene content and preserves the dry
matter. The comparative absence of ammonia in A. I. V. silage was recently
corroborated by Peterson, Bird, and Beeson {915).
Butyric Butyric
Kind of silage pH acid in pH acid in
value fresh Kind of silage
value fresh
silage silage
Percent ■ j Percent
Warm fermentation in towers _ 4.1 0.23 Cold fermentation, plus molasses. 3.9 0.09
Warm fermentation in stacks.. 4.7 .56 ; Silage plus mineral acids . 3.5 I .00
Cold fermentation 4.3 .52 1
Drainage Losses
Drainage samples were collected by Godden Ui'5) every 2 hours each day for
20 days—that is, during the period of flow—and, on analysis, 47 to 82 pounds of
dry matter were found in each 100 gallons of drainage liquid. The analysis of
the dry matter showed it to be composed of 17 to 28 percent of protein, 19 to 23
of ash, 2.3 to 4.3 of lime, 1.3 to 2.2 of phosphoric pentoxide (phosphoric acid),
0.19 to 0.28 of sulfur trióxido, and 0.00 to 2.07 percent of potash. According to
this author, drainage causes an appreciable loss of nitrogen and of minerals and
hence should be prevented.
As losses from ensiled wet crops are largely due to di-ainage, it is advisable to
ensile crops so that there will be no drainage of juice or, at most, very little. The
most favorable dry-matter content in crops to be ensiled is about 3Ó percent. If
LOSSES IN HAY AND SILAGE 1013
i Tlie ranges in pH value in each type of silage are: A. I. V., 3.4-4.3; 1 percent of sugar added, 3.8-4.3;
some acid, little sugar added, 4.0-4.2; with no additions, 5.0-5.3; and Holland type, 4.7-5.4.
2 Upper part.
3 Lower part.
Changes in Acids and Bases
In a study of the changes that take place in the content of acid, volatile bases,
and dry matter in crops during the process of making silage, Amos and Woodman
{21) show the following relative amounts of these constituents before and after
ensiling (table 21):
1014 YEARBOOK OF AGRICULTURE, 1939
TABLE 21.—Comparative content of acids, bases, and dry matter in green crops
and in silage
Kitrogen- Acidity,
Feed Moisture Ashi Protein i Fiber i free ex- Fati on fresh
tract 1 basis
i Dry basis.
TABLE 24.—Comparative composition {on dry basis) of various green crops and of silage
made therefrom
Per-
Percent Percent Percent Percent cent Percent
Grass 80. Ô 3.0 0.4 5.0 1.7 9.5 A. I. V 043)
Grass silage 79.0 3.1 .6 5.5 1.6 9.3 --^--do U4S)
Sunflower 78.6 9.3 1.5 30.3 9.9 49.0 Tower {205)
Sunflower silage 73.8 10.2 2.8 32.6 10.0 44.5 -----do
Sunflower, wet by rain. 68.2 9.6 2.2 33.3 12.7 42.1 do {20Ô)
Sunflower silage 73.9 8.2 2.1 38.2 16.0 35.6 .---_do
Corn, milk-stage 76.3 8.4 2.2 20.8 7.6 61.0 do {206)
Corn silage 75.6 10.2 2.7 22.9 7.9 56.4 do
Corn, glazed-stage 62.9 8.1 2.9 16.8 5.1 67.0 do {205)
Corn silage 69.5 8.3 2.8 22.5 7.1 69.4 do
Sweetclover, bud stage. 66.2 21.2 2.0 29.6 9.2 38.0 ---.do {205)
Sweet clover silage 65.2 21.5 3.3 35.7 9.7 29.8 do {205)
Sweetclover, full bloom 57.2 19.6 2.1 33.5 8.9 35.8 do {205)
Sweetclover silage 67.9 21.4 2.7 32.0 10.0 34.0 do {205)
Fresh vetch fodder 67.7 9.8 3.6 23.5 5.9 54.2 -.---do {472)
Fresh vetch silage 67.2 15,4 3.6 30.2 7.9 41.6 do
Grass 75.4 10.6 1.6 26.7 8.2 63.0 1 Concrete trench i{281,
Grass silage 75.5 9.2 3.9 39.0 8.2 39.7 / silo. \282)
Grass 79.5 12.5 1.6 24.7 8.4 54.9 Tower {2S1,
282)
Grass silage 75.4 12.6 31.0 7.6 45.2 do
Sunflower 81.0 8.4 2.6 27. 0 10.0 52.1 do {129)
Sunflower silage 3.0 29.7 49.8 do
The percentage of ash and fiber especially, and in many cases of fat also, increase
somewhat during the ensiling process owing, as has already been stated, to the
greater loss in carbohydrate, or nitrogen-free extract.
From data of this kind, however, it is difficult to obtain any real comprehension
of the changes that take place during the ensiling process. To do this, the amount
of dry matter lost must also be taken into account; that is, the actual weights of the
dry matter in both the fresh crops and the silage are the only safe criteria from
w^hich losses can be determined.
Feed Values of Hay, Silage, and Fresh Crops
The nutritive value of feeds, fresh, ensiled, or field-cured (see the article, The
Nutritive Value of Harvested Forages, p. 956), is dependent on several factors—
yield, palatability, composition, digestibility, and physiological effect upon the
animal organism.
The coefficient of digestibility of the feed nutrients in the green crop, in silage,
and in field-cured hay has been studied by Drew, O'Sullivan, and Deasy {281) ^ who
found that good silage is little, if at all, inferior to the green crop.
In a recent survey made by the New Jersey and other agricultural experiment
stations {821), 214 farmers considered grass silage superior to hay, 63 noted no
difference between grass silage and hay, while 13 thought the silage inferior.
Incidentally, 154 farmers and feeders considered grass silage equal to corn silage
for milk production, 116 believed it superior, and 57 inferior.
1016 YEARBOOK OF AGRICULTURE, 1939
Experiments with oat and vetch silage indicate that it does not differ materially
in composition (on the dry basis) from the hay or the fresh crop {1256). In com-
paring the feed value of silages, it should be remembered that the moisture content
plays a large role. If, for example, one silage has 75 percent of water and another
80, then in all feeding tests 50 pounds of the latter must be used to replace 40
of the former.
The role of mineral acids present in fodder on the animal organism has been
studied by Crasemann {239)^ wlio concluded that when silage of the A. I. V. type
is fed to animals it produces an acid reaction in the system and an increase in the
amount of ammonia and of calcium in the urine; that the feeding of such fodder
results in an attack upon the base reserves of the animal tissues; and that such
acid-containing feeds should be fed only in connection with high-alkaline hay.
While there is apparently no loss of carotene or vitamin A during ensiling,
Watson and Ferguson {1192) have concluded that A. I. V. silage is not so efficient
as hay artificially dried. Further, while A. I. V. grass silage has about the same
feed value as natural-fermentation silage, the latter is more convenient for general
use {281, 282).
The opinion of other investigators is that silage prepared with the aid of mineral
acids should not be fed too liberally because of possible harmful effect on the animal
organism due to the action of the chlorine and sulfuric acid ions. These ions may
likewise act injuriously through manure spread upon soils poor in lime, and hence
every attempt should be made to replace mineral acids (4^4)-
On the other hand, Davies, Botliam, and Thompson {187) found the loss of
starch equivalent by the A. I. V. process to be only 12.8 percent as compared with
24.0 in silage to which molasses was added and 36.2 in ordinary silage. The corre-
sponding losses in digestible crude protein w^ere, respectively, 7.8, 21.1, and 38.2
percent, thus indicating the superiority of k. I. V. silage from this standpoint.
Furthermore, Virtanen {1169) showed that the nonprotein nitrogen of A, I. V.
silage is made up largely of peptides with little ammonia, whereas ordinary silage
contains little peptides and considerable ammonia. Hence the feeding value of
nonprotein fractions of A, I. V. silage is superior to that of ordinary silage. It was
also shown that the amount of calcium and of phosphorus in the blood of cows
that had been fed with A. I. V. silage throughout the winter was normal; that the
composition of the teeth and bones of animals fed during a long period was essen-
tially the same as that of animals living on ordinary winter forage; and that though
the acidity of the urine increased appreciably, no significant amount of carbonic
acid was found. Virtanen fed a limestone mixture containing one-third dehy-
drated soda in connection with A. I. V. silage and noted that cows consuming as
nuich as 45 pounds daily of this silage mixture gave birth to healthy calves.