1
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS SETTING
1.1 Background of the Study
In 2011, the Department of Education (DepEd) directed a move to a fresh
learning plan — the K to 12 educational program. The curriculum doesn't just
simply add two years to basic education and rehashes kindergarten, it also
suggests the usage of the spiral progression approach to guarantee dominance of
learning and skills after each level. It is said to be DepEd's present way to deal
with improving the educational system in the Philippines. (Estacio, 2015)
DepEd attempts to cover excessively numerous things at one time, without
center and prioritization. This approach requires the teachers to master certain
subjects that are not on their field. With that in mind, teachers in different high
schools who lack the staff members to adjust to the changes DepEd has made,
specifically Marikina Science High School, are forced to deal with this issue in a
way that would likely be straining for the teachers. A spiral approach that deals
with a variety of points on different disciplines requires a lot from any educator.
Due to the lack of teachers in Marikina Science High School, some teachers have
no choice but to teach different grade levels, doing so may have affected the
teachers in a way that we might not know. Like the amount of sleep they get and
the time they most likely to spend for themselves, their family and for their other
loved ones.
2
Teaching multilevel was not the way DepEd most likely envisioned the spiral
approach to be handled, but because of the lack of time to prepare, and short
notice given to some schools to address the issue, a solution like this had popped
out. Some teachers might have been pointed out to deal with teaching different
multilevel and some might have even volunteered.
The researchers conducted this study in order to find those possible effects
that the teachers have experienced once they have started teaching multilevel
students. The researchers would like to help, in any way they can, in finding
solutions that may possibly address the currently observed struggles or problems
manifested by teachers of` Marikina Science High School who happen to teach in
multilevel. In doing this, the researchers hope to determine if the possible effects
may have been a positive or negative effect to the teachers who teach in multilevel.
Also, the researchers would like to find possible suggestions and treatments to
other teachers who would undergo the same path, based on the formulated results
of the study.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
The main problem of this study is to identify the effects of teaching students
in different grade levels to teachers of Marikina Science High School. The study
also aims to answer the following questions:
1. How does teaching in different grade levels affect the relationship of the
teachers to the students?
3
2. What are the benefits experienced by the teachers teaching across grade
levels?
3. What are the challenges experienced by the teachers teaching across
grade levels?
4. How do teachers respond to the challenges they experience in teaching
different grade levels?
1.3 Theoretical Framework
Theory of Teacher-behaviour. David G. Ryan (2011), explained the concept
of teacher behaviour. The theory of teacher-behaviour explains the relationship of
the teacher to the pupils and teachers to the environment. Two postulates were
formulated in order to explain how the variables affect the behaviour of the
teachers. The postulates are as follows:
a) Teacher-behaviour is social in nature. Both the teachers and students
influence each other. In this case, the performance of the teacher depends
on the performance, specifically the effort that pupils exert during classes.
Therefore, it is considered as a social behaviour.
b) Teacher-behaviour is relative. The activities that teachers let his or her
students do are based upon social situations. Teacher’s activities are the
products of social conditions and are related to the cultural settings in which
teacher performs the teaching task. Teacher-behaviour is good or bad,
effective or ineffective, it can be judged with reference to a particular cultural
value system and set of objectives. Therefore, teacher-behaviour is a
relative concept.
4
This theory is relevant to the study since the postulates formulated within the
theory supports the study that will be conducted by the researchers. The theory is
related to the study because the stated postulates will contribute greatly to the
possible results of the study. The given postulates has somehow helped the
researchers in formulating additional guide questions for the interview that will be
of great help in obtaining necessary data for the study.
1.4 Scope and Limitation
The general purpose of this study is to show if there are any effects on a
teacher of Marikina Science High School who teaches students in different grade
levels. The study is limited only to the teachers in Marikina Science High School
who have at least taught students from three different grade levels for at least two
years. The researchers will interview four teachers that are qualified for the study.
The researchers aim to conduct the study within the time frame of January 2017 -
March 2017.
1.5 Significance of the Study
This research will be useful to the following people:
Teachers. The study would mostly be significant to teachers since they are the
main subject. Teachers may use this study as a reference in case they are deciding
if they should consider handling classes of different grade levels.
5
Students. The data gathered may help students in dealing with teachers who
handle different grade levels, it may as well help the students on understanding
and taking to consideration the behaviour and actions of the teachers.
School Administrators and School Head. This research will be able to help the
school head and school administrators of Marikina Science High School in
determining the possible effects of teaching multilevel to their co-workers who
teach in different grade levels. This research would aid them in providing
necessary measurements that would help in improving the quality of teaching in
the school.
Future Researchers. This research will be useful to other researchers for this
study can be used as a reference by other researchers who are planning to
conduct a similar research. The study will give benefits to other researchers for it
can give information about the topic and it would also help the formulation of new
research topics.
1.6 Definition of Terms
1. DepEd. This term refers to the executive department of the Philippine
government responsible for ensuring access to, promoting equity in, and I
improving the quality of basic education.
2. K12 Program. This term refers to the curriculum that was implemented in the
Philippines that covers kindergarten and 12 years of basic education to
6
provide sufficient time for mastery of concepts and skills, and prepare
graduates for tertiary education, middle-level skills development, employment,
and entrepreneurship.
3. Multilevel Teaching. This term refers to teaching students not only of different
ages and abilities but also at different grade levels.
4. Spiral Approach. This term refers to an approach to education that introduces
key concepts to students at a young age and covers these concepts
repeatedly, with increasing degrees of complexity as they go through different
grade levels.
5. Student. This term refers to a learner who is willing to attend an educational
institution to further increase his/her knowledge
6. Teacher. This term refers to a person who gives lectures and lessons to
people who are willing to learn from them.
7. Teacher-Behaviour. The term refers to those acts that the teacher performs
typically in the classroom in order to induce-learning.
7
1.7 Research Paradigm
INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT
Researchers
will search and
Effects of The researchers
interview
teaching assume that the
respondents
students in teachers have
who fit the
different grade adjusted to the
requirements of
levels to stress and new
the study.
teachers of environment
Marikina Researchers given to them in
Science High will then the time frame
School. analyze the they have been
information and given
data given by
the
respondents to
formulate
results and
conclusion.
Feedback
Figure 1. Research Paradigm
The input part of the paradigm tackles about the effects of teaching students
in different grade levels to teachers of Marikina Science High School. In order to
conduct the study, all the procedures required in doing the study were included in
the second component namely the process part. The Researchers will search and
interview respondents who fit the requirements of the study. An interview will then
8
be administered. Basic facts will first obtained, and then the in-depth interview will
follow. Researchers will then analyze the information and data given by the
respondents to formulate results and conclusion. The researchers expect that the
result, based on the yielded information, would be that the teachers have adjusted
to the stress and new environment given to them in the time frame they have been
given.
9
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
The importance of this part of the study is to look for references and other
works cited that may be related to the study and would help in formulating results
and gathering significant results. Some subjects cited at this chapter must be at
least mentioned at the background of the study, or hinted out which would point
that it is involved in the study.
Benefits of teaching across grade levels
The feeling of being able to teach something, being able to sustain and uplift
the confidence of the students and that everyone is looking forward to the next
lesson are the things that keep the teacher dedicated and determined to move
forward to teaching with staunch resolve. (Roberts, 2007). The above mentioned
literature is related to the study conducted by researchers for the literature
presents a positive outcome or result from multilevel teaching not only for the
teachers but also to the students as well.
Challenge in teaching across grade levels
Multilevel teaching can present difficulties to teachers, who need to engage
interest of all the learners in their classes while helping them achieve their diverse
educational goals. The more the teacher is familiarized and thoroughly determined
about the differences each student has, the higher the probability of meeting the
learning needs of the students.
10
Planning and teaching in multilevel places a burden on the teacher, who is
obliged to dedicate and allot more time in preparation for the class and extra effort
to classroom management. (Mathews-Aydinli and Van Horne, 2006). This
information is relevant to the study conducted by the researchers since it
exemplifies how teachers who teach in multilevel do their jobs in order to meet the
educational needs of their students.
Ways to cope with the challenges
According to Mulryan-Kyne (2007), competent insight and prowess that are
needed in order to adequately explain single-grade contexts are also related and
necessary for multi-grade teaching. Nevertheless, these abilities would need to be
improved in order to be readily prepared by the teachers who would go multi-grade
teaching. This is relevant to the researchers` study because this helps show what
preparations will be needed in order to adequately ready teachers who might teach
multilevel students. This study might possibly appear on the researchers`
recommendations to teachers. Moreover, (Certain, Guarino, & Greenwald, 2012)
suggests that Broadening (asking “what if” questions), Targeting (directing
questions at specific team members), and Novelty (teaching newly published
information) were the most effective techniques for multilevel teaching, while the
least effective were techniques that taught advanced material unfamiliar to most
students.
There is a huge difference between teaching different age groups. Each
group has their own learning style, completely different reasons for being in a
11
class, and a drastically different level of self-motivation and discipline. This means
that each age group requires a certain teaching style tailored to their needs. (Long,
2015). This study is relevant to the study of the researchers since it suggests that
difference in age groups require various teaching strategies. This can as well be
supported by another study conducted by (Felder, 2006) in which he stated that
students’ performance vary for students possess different levels of motivation,
different attitudes regarding teaching and learning, and different responses to
specific environments and instructional practices.
After reviewing all the related literature and studies used in this chapter, the
researchers were able to note important key points that could help in conducting
the study. The researchers have considered the suggestion that different age
group, require different teaching styles. In order for the teacher who teach in
multilevel to become an effective educator, he or she is required to determine how
these age groups differ in different aspects such as the level of motivation, attitude
towards learning, and responses to the environment they move in. In this case,
teachers who teach in multilevel are believed to dedicate more time and effort in
preparing and planning their lessons since they handle and interact with different
grade levels.
12
Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
The main purpose of this chapter is to describe the methods applied in
conducting this study. The case study approach has been chosen to determine the
effects of teaching multilevel students to teachers of Marikina Science High
School. Moreover, this chapter shows the research locale, research respondents,
research design, and the instrument of data collection.
3.1 Research Design
The research design that the researchers would make would be descriptive
mainly because the method of collecting data from the respondents would be in
the form of case study. Salkind (2007) suggested that descriptive research
provides a detailed account of a social setting, a group of people, a community, a
situation, or some other phenomenon. There are three main types of descriptive
methods: survey method, observational method and case-study method. This
study will be using the case study method. According to Hale (2011), case study
involves an in-depth study of an individual or group of individuals. Case studies
often lead to testable hypotheses and allow people to study rare phenomena. The
case study approach is a highly appropriate method for determining the effects of
teaching multilevel students to teachers of Marikina Science High School.
3.2 Research Locale
13
The study will be conducted at Marikina Science High School. The school
offers basic and secondary education where in basic education only covers 7th and
8th grade. Since Marikina Science High School is a science high school, the school
gives priority to the quality of education, most especially in the subjects: Science
and Mathematics, which students may acquire throughout the school year. Due to
the implementation of K-12 curriculum in the Philippines, which does not only add
2 years to basic education, but also suggests the use of spiral approach, teachers
of Marikina Science High school were required to teach subjects that are not within
their field of specialization. Teachers are obliged to teach their branch of expertise
to different grade levels in order to follow the implemented instruction required for
the curriculum and at the same time meet the learning needs of the students. Thus
Marikina Science High school is most likely the school that could provide the
necessary answers that can help the researchers in conducting the study.
3.3 Sampling
Purposive sampling will be used in this study. According to Crossman (2016),
a purposive sample is a non-probability sample that is selected based on
characteristics of a population and the objective of the study. The study will be
conducted to determine the effects of teaching multilevel students to teachers of
Marikina Science High School, and that being said, the researchers will get the
sample from the population of teachers in Marikina Science High School. This will
help the researchers in getting relevant information and avoiding wasting time
taking samples that have nothing to do with the research topic. The researchers
14
will set a standard that will determine if a certain teacher is fit for the study that will
help in gathering more accurate and precise data.
3.4. Research Respondents
At least 4 participants will be involved in the gathering of data to to answer the
questions the researchers made about the effects of teaching different grade levels
to students. The participants that would be included in the study would be teachers
on Marikina Science High School of school year 2016-2017 who are teaching at
least 3 different grade levels on Marikina Science High School. They also should
at least have 2 years of experience of teaching different grade levels.
3.5 Method and Instruments of Data Collection
The researchers will interview their respondents, doing so would help the
researchers gather as much information necessary to accurately get the results, it
is also safe to use because there is not that much people to interview and it only
requires a small sample size. Boyce and Neale (2006) said that interviewing is a
qualitative social research method that involves “conducting intensive individual
interviews with a small number of respondents to explore their perspectives on a
particular idea, program, or situation” (p.3).
The researchers will also use an interview guide, this will serve as a guide for
the researchers on what to ask their respondents in order to ask the same
questions on to every respondents or to simply keep consistency and avoid the
misinterpretation and misunderstandings.
15
The researchers will use a voice recorder in order to accurately gather the
information the respondents would give to the researchers while doing the
interview, the researchers would also use it in order to record and show progress
on their research.
3.6 Research Procedure
Identification of the Problem
Formulating an interview guide given by the researchers
to the teachers
Interviewing the teachers
Gathering and interpreting the data
Analyzing the results
Figure 2. Research Procedure
1. Identification of the problem
16
The study will be based on knowing the possible effects of multilevel teaching
to teachers on Marikina Science High School by gathering respondents who would
fit the requirements that the researchers have given out. The researchers can use
this gathered information in order to help other teachers who might also teach in
different grade levels. The researchers would then formulate possible questions to
be given by teachers who are multilevel teaching.
2. Formulating an interview guide given by the researchers to the teachers
The researchers will make an interview guide that will serve as the
questions that will be given to the researcher`s respondents.
3. Interviewing the teachers
The researchers will arrange a date on when they would interview all the
teachers. Due to the small amount of respondents, the researchers can possibly
interview all of the respondents in a single day, given that the maximum time
allotment for each interview will be around 20 minutes. If such instances happen
that a teacher would have an urgent meeting or emergency on the day of the
interview. The day of the interview for that respondent would be moved until he/she
is finally free.
4. Gathering and interpreting the data
The researchers would then gather all the data given by the respondents
and interpret the results given to them. When all the data has been interpreted, the
researchers would make a draft result that would further be explained in the
17
formulation of results. This rough draft would serve as a guide for the researchers
to formulate the results much easier.
5. Analyzing the results
The researchers would formulate the final results that is based from the data
gathered. The results gathered would help people who are concerned in our
subject so that they know what people who are teaching in different grade levels
would experience when they are going to teach in different grade levels.
18
INTERVIEW GUIDE
1. What is your idea about the spiral progression of K12 Curriculum?
2. How did you react or feel when you were informed that you will be teaching
multilevel?
3. How will you compare single level teaching to multilevel teaching in terms of:
3.1. Time allotted for preparation of the lesson?
3.2. Effort in handling and managing the over-all class behavior?
3.3 Accuracy in giving grades?
4. How do you feel regarding those who question your credibility in giving grades
to students?
5. How do you feel when students compare your performance and method of
teaching to other teachers?
6. On your first year in teaching multilevel, how did the transition from teaching
in single level to multilevel affect you?
6.1. How did it affect your schedule and amount of time allotted for eating?
6.2. How did it affect your quality time spent for your family and other significant
people in your life?
6.3. What difficulty or struggle did you encounter while you were adjusting to
the new schedule?
19
6.4. What coping mechanism did you use in order to let yourself adapt to the
new teaching style?
7. Do you treat students of different grade levels the same? If yes, why?
7.1. If no, describe how you treat your students in each grade level.
8. Do you think multilevel teaching is a good strategy in improving the quality of
education in Marikina Science High School? Why?
9. What advice can you give to your old self who was then adjusting to multilevel
teaching?
10. How did your perspective regarding teacher-student interaction change when
you started teaching in multilevel?
11. If you were given the chance to back out from teaching in multilevel, would you
do so?
20
References
Estacio, M. (2015). K to 12 milestone. All set for k to 12 implementation.
Retrieved from http://www.deped.gov.ph/regions/region-xi/regional-
press-releases/all-set-k- 12-implementation
Aydinili, J.M., & Van Horne, R. (2006). Promoting success of multilevel ESL
classes: What teachers and administrators can do. Washington, DC: Center
for Adult English Language Acquisition.
Brent, R. & Felder, R. M. (2005). Understanding student differences
[Abstract].Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), 57-72.
Boyce, C. & Neale, P. (2006), A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth
Interviews for Evaluation Input. USA: Pathfinder International.
Crossman, A. (2016). Understanding Purposive Sampling. Retrieved from:
http://sociology.about.com/od/Types-of-Samples/a/Purposive-Sample.htm.
Hale, J. (2011). The 3 Basic Types of Descriptive Research Methods. Psych
Central. Retrieved on February 23, 2017, from
https://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2011/09/27/the-3-basic-types-of-
descriptive-research-methods/
Long, S. (2015, January 7). Self-motivation and classroom management. [Web log
comment]. Retrieved from
http://www.reachtoteachrecruiting.com/blog/teaching-adults-vs-kids
21
Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2007). Teaching is often more difficult in multigrade classrooms.
K-12 Classrooms: Research review of multigrade multiage and combination
classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.work-learning.com/2010/11/k-12-
classrooms-research-review-of-multigrade-multiage-combination-
classrooms.html.
Roberts, M. (2007). Teaching in the Multilevel Classroom. Retrieved from
http://www.pearsonlongman.com/ae/download/adulted/multilevel_monogr
aph
Salkind, N. J. (2007). Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics : SAGE
Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781412952644