NLP Modeling, Finding The Structure of Excellence
NLP Modeling, Finding The Structure of Excellence
NLP Modeling, Finding The Structure of Excellence
[showmyadsrt]It is about achieving an outcome by studying how someone else goes about it.
When Richard Bandler and John Grinder modeled the strategies of Virginia Satir, they were trying to achieve
what many others before them had attempted. They wanted to duplicate her extraordinary results in family
therapy.
What Bandler and Grinder did differently was to find the thinking strategies she was using, rather than merely
copy behaviors. The biggest problem interviewing experts is that skills are usually unconscious. We can not
explain how we walk, talk or write for instance. What makes you a successful parent or golfer? The expert’s own
theories explain their success. These theories can include irrelevant habits and superstitions such as sportsmen
and their lucky socks.
NLP Modeling involves transferring what an expert thinks they know and what they unconsciously know. It
involves being able to produce the outcome and transferring the behavior to others.
The use of modeling in NLP does not just involve extraordinary skills. For example, you could model how
someone keeps her desk clean. We can use the same key questions to find out how someone keeps himself
depressed, or becomes frustrated.
NLP Modeling is a powerful process that can accelerate learning of skills. Strong modeling practices are the basis
of good NLP training.
Futher Reading: NLP Going Meta: Advanced Modelling using Meta Levels by L. Michael Hall
NLP Going Meta integrates the Meta States model into the modeling process by considering
logical levels. This is an advanced book about modeling which beginners would find difficult.
It considers Modeling from the perspective of changing unwanted behaviors.
Check out Nlp Going Meta: NLP Advanced Modeling Using Meta-Levels at Amazon
The central NLP Modeling attitude asks, “Teach me how to do that – if I were you for the day,
what would I need to do to fill in for you?” It asks questions about process.
NLP itself is the byproduct of modeling Milton Erickson, Fritz Perls – Inspiration for the Meta
Model and Virginia Satir – Family Therapy. It codifies their patterns and procedures (among
other things). Richard Bandler and John Grinder made the components of human subjectivity explicit as
Representational Systems. The sequencing of the elements is the strategy model.
mapping out the territory, generating internal sights, sounds, sensations (representations)
mapping linguistically when we say words about those first level representations
Using submodalities to frame our representations
Using meta level phenomena such as beliefs, values, criteria, frames, metaphors, presuppositions and
narrative
Map Building
We don’t operate on the world directly but via our mental maps. In the physical world, there are events, forces
and impacts. In the world of ideas, there is only news of difference.
Our maps are our model of how things work, what things mean and what’s out there. We respond to our world
in terms of our maps. Information feeds back to update our maps and/or take different actions.
Strategies
Strategies are a formal description of what we do in our head and nervous system to generate a particular
behavior. Strategies exist inside our maps and are a first approximation of a model.
At the micro level, we have thoughts and beliefs. At a macro level, we have skills and communication.
Identifying a person’s strategies can increase our effectiveness in communicating and persuading.
The expert’s purpose and intention organizes the particular skill. It is usually not in their conscious awareness. It
provides the big “why”.
NLP generally has a polarity response to “why”, preferring to concentrate on the “how”. This kind of “why” is
important in understanding their overall motivation for acquiring and maintaining the skill.
Meta States
The failure of some NLP Techniques comes from trying to work with Meta level experience using primary state
technology. You cannot anchor a Meta state the same way you link a primary state. You need a Meta
mechanism such as language, symbols or metaphor. Language primarily drives Meta states.
Meta States are the leverage points in the experts processing system. A Meta State is one state referencing
another. Meta States can be complex. Our expectations about ourselves control both our perceptions and
behavior. They operate both sequentially and simultaneously. How do you feel about that? What is the meaning
about the meaning?
As humans, we are amazing. We can think about our thinking (reflexive thinking). We have expectations that
can create self-fulfilling prophecies (for good or bad). We can say things like I feel spectacular, dumb or useless
which don’t relate to feeling at all. We can even reflect about our reflections – loving love or fearing fear.
We have ideas, frames and beliefs about our abilities, about being a human self (identity), about meaning and
purpose (spiritual).
Beauty is a class word. What does it mean? It is about order and symmetry. What does the state of recognition
feel like? As we move up the levels of abstraction, we summarize, integrate and evaluate.
We respond to the perception of the whole structure. When we try to analyze the wholeness, the structure
disappears.
Emergence is an organized effect of the system itself. For example, the constant temperature of the thermostat
is an emergent thing. It has no existence apart from its organization within the system.
Meta Programs
Meta programs are our perceptual sorting devices. They evolve from habituated Meta States. They are how
we perceive stimuli
we pay attention to information
we input and process
reframe and sort
They are cognitive patterns that critically affect how we see ourselves, how we feel, what we value, which states
we access and how we speak and behave.
They are part of our “personality”. Personality refers to the characteristic ways a person behaves, responds. It is
the overall set of metaprograms, frames, content programs, strategies and our style of structuring information
They can exist overall as a life state or be subject to contextual markers. One of our most central Meta programs
is representational systems
Beliefs can drive abilities behaviors and purposes i.e. they out frame. They have a frame of validation or
confirmation. What we believe doesn’t make it real, only subjectively. It actualizes in body, mind and behavior.
Primary States
This is the level of conditional stimuli, and the Pavlovian anchoring of content. With primary states, any
“aboutness” refers to the external world. Primary states are not about ideas and concepts. Primary states are
things in the world. Meta states are references to earlier abstractions.
Primary states in modeling refer to behaviors (both micro and macro), capabilities in terms of genetic
predispositions and the immediate context.
Frames
Meta states show the critical importance of unconscious frames. We frame our messages and actions. What
meanings do we attach to stimuli?
Out framing
Out frames are higher-level frames about other frames. Experts will usually have different overall frames than
less skilled people. What Meta state or perception has been filtering out useful solutions? What overall Meta
perception could shift everything?
Modeling Procedure
Modeling almost always begins with strategy work. You need to slow down the process by asking good
questions. Questions also directionalize the brain and install higher frames. An elicitation frequently works as
an installation.
1. Listen to important words and synesthesias (combined representational systems). We literally describe
what we do.
2. Eye accessing cues – all behavior makes internal processes explicit.
3. Logical questions – the strategy makes sequential sense. What is the difference between someone who
has the skill and someone who doesn’t
4. Use a notation to describe the strategy consistently – like musical notes describe a piece of music.
Meta Strategies
Meta words are cues that the person is accessing a Meta state
Logical Levels
There is a difference between list items (like the hierarchy of values) and those where an item is a member of
the higher class (logical levels). With lists of values, there is no logical set of relationships between them.
Various frames can install strategies, particularly out frames. A great example of an out frame is the miracle
pattern or “as if”. Another example is “this is just food; I refuse to allow it to mean status, prosperity or love”.
The majority of conversational reframes (Mind lines and Sleight of Mouth) operate as outframes.