0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views9 pages

Lim (2f (X) + H (X) ) Lim G (X) Since Lim G (X) 6 0 2 Lim F (X) + Lim H (X) Lim G (X) 2 (2) + 0 5 4 5

1. The document discusses laws of limits that can be used to calculate limits quickly and easily, such as the sum, difference, constant multiple, and product laws. 2. It also discusses limits of quotients, noting that the limit of a quotient is the quotient of the limits as long as the limit of the denominator is not zero. 3. Examples are provided to demonstrate evaluating limits using these laws, as well as evaluating infinite limits and limits of rational functions.

Uploaded by

Athena Diesta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views9 pages

Lim (2f (X) + H (X) ) Lim G (X) Since Lim G (X) 6 0 2 Lim F (X) + Lim H (X) Lim G (X) 2 (2) + 0 5 4 5

1. The document discusses laws of limits that can be used to calculate limits quickly and easily, such as the sum, difference, constant multiple, and product laws. 2. It also discusses limits of quotients, noting that the limit of a quotient is the quotient of the limits as long as the limit of the denominator is not zero. 3. Examples are provided to demonstrate evaluating limits using these laws, as well as evaluating infinite limits and limits of rational functions.

Uploaded by

Athena Diesta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Lecture 4 : Calculating Limits using Limit Laws

Click on this symbol to view an interactive demonstration in Wolfram Alpha.


Using the definition of the limit, limx→a f (x), we can derive many general laws of limits, that help us to
calculate limits quickly and easily. The following rules apply to any functions f (x) and g(x) and also
apply to left and right sided limits:
Suppose that c is a constant and the limits
lim f (x) and lim g(x)
x→a x→a

exist (meaning they are finite numbers). Then


1. limx→a [f (x) + g(x)] = limx→a f (x) + limx→a g(x) ;
(the limit of a sum is the sum of the limits).
2. limx→a [f (x) − g(x)] = limx→a f (x) − limx→a g(x) ;
(the limit of a difference is the difference of the limits).
3. limx→a [cf (x)] = c limx→a f (x);
(the limit of a constant times a function is the constant times the limit of the function).
4. limx→a [f (x)g(x)] = limx→a f (x) · limx→a g(x);
(The limit of a product is the product of the limits).

5. limx→a fg(x)
(x)
= lim x→a f (x)
limx→a g(x)
if limx→a g(x) 6= 0;
(the limit of a quotient is the quotient of the limits provided that the limit of the denominator is
not 0)

Example If I am given that


lim f (x) = 2, lim g(x) = 5, lim h(x) = 0.
x→2 x→2 x→2

find the limits that exist (are a finite number):


2f (x) + h(x) limx→2 (2f (x) + h(x))
(a) lim = since lim g(x) 6= 0
x→2 g(x) limx→2 g(x) x→2

2 limx→2 f (x) + limx→2 h(x) 2(2) + 0 4


= = =
limx→2 g(x) 5 5

f (x) f (x)h(x)
(b) lim (c) lim
x→2 h(x) x→2 g(x)

Note 1 If limx→a g(x) = 0 and limx→a f (x) = b, where b is a finite number with b 6= 0, Then:
the values of the quotient fg(x)
(x)
can be made arbitrarily large in absolute value as x → a and thus

1
the limit does not exist.
If the values of fg(x)
(x)
are positive as x → a in the above situation, then limx→a f (x)
g(x)
= ∞,
If the values of fg(x)
(x)
are negative as x → a in the above situation, then limx→a fg(x)
(x)
= −∞,
If on the other hand, if limx→a g(x) = 0 = limx→a f (x), we cannot make any conclusions about
the limit.
cos x
Example Find limx→π− x−π
.

As x approaches π from the left, cos x approaches a finite number −1.


As x approaches π from the left, x − π approaches 0.
cos x
Therefore as x approaches π from the left, the quotient x−π
approaches ∞ in absolute value.
The values of both cos x and x − π are negative as x approaches π from the left, therefore
cos x
lim− = ∞.
x→π x−π

More powerful laws of limits can be derived using the above laws 1-5 and our knowledge of some
basic functions. The following can be proven reasonably easily ( we are still assuming that c is a
constant and limx→a f (x) exists );
 n
6. limx→a [f (x)]n = limx→a f (x) , where n is a positive integer (we see this using rule 4 repeatedly).

7. limx→a c = c, where c is a constant ( easy to prove from definition of limit and easy to see from
the graph, y = c).

8. limx→a x = a, (follows easily from the definition of limit)

9. limx→a xn = an where n is a positive integer (this follows from rules 6 and 8).
√ √
10. limx→a n x = n a, where n is a positive integer and a > 0 if n is even. (proof needs a little extra
work and the binomial theorem)
p p
11. limx→a n f (x) = n limx→a f (x) assuming that the limx→a f (x) > 0 if n is even. (We will look at
this in more detail when we get to continuity)

Example Evaluate the following limits and justify each step:


x3 +2x2 −x+1
(a) limx→3 x−1


3
(b) limx→1 x+1

2
(c) Determine the infinite limit (see note 1 above, say if the limit is ∞, −∞ or D.N.E.)
x+1
limx→2− (x−2) .

Polynomial and Rational Functions


Please review the relevant parts of Lectures 3, 4 and 7 from the Algebra/Precalculus review
page. This demonstration will help you visualize some rational functions:

Direct Substitution (Evaluation) Property If f is a polynomial or a rational function and


a is in the domain of f , then limx→a f (x) = f (a). This follows easily from the rules shown above.
(Note that this is the case in part (a) of the example above)
P (x)
if f (x) = Q(x)
is a rational function where P (x) and Q(x) are polynomials with Q(a) = 0, then:
P (x)
If P (a) 6= 0, we see from note 1 above that limx→a Q(x) = ±∞ or D.N.E. and is not equal to ±∞.
If P (a) = 0 we can cancel a factor of the polynomial P (x) with a factor of the polynomial Q(x)
and the resulting rational function may have a finite limit or an infinite limit or no limit at x = a.
P (x)
The limit of the new quotient as x → a is equal to limx→a Q(x) by the following observation which
we made in the last lecture:

Note 2: If h(x) = g(x) when x 6= a, then limx→a h(x) = limx→a g(x) provided the limits exist.

Example Determine if the following limits are finite, equal to ±∞ or D.N.E. and are not equal
to ±∞:
x2 −9
(a) limx→3 x−3
.

x2 −x−6
(b) limx→1− x−1
.

(c) Which of the following is true:


2 −x−6 x2 −x−6 x2 −x−6
1. limx→1 x x−1 = +∞, 2. limx→1 x−1
= −∞, 3. limx→1 x−1
D.N.E. and is not
±∞,

3
Example Evaluate the limit (finish the calculation)

(3 + h)2 − (3)2
lim .
h→0 h
(3+h)2 −(3)2 9+6h+h2 −9
limh→0 h
= limh→0 h
=

Example Evaluate the following limit:



x2 + 25 − 5
lim .
x→0 x2

Recall also our observation from the last day which can be proven rigorously from the definition
(this is good to keep in mind when dealing with piecewise defined functions):

Theorm limx→a f (x) = L if and only if limx→a− f (x) = L = limx→a+ f (x).

Example Evaluate the limit if it exists:


3x + 6
lim
x→−2 |x + 2|

The following theorems help us calculate some important limits by comparing the behavior of a
function with that of other functions for which we can calculate limits:

4
Theorem If f (x) ≤ g(x) when x is near a(except possible at a) and the limits of f (x) and g(x)
both exist as x approaches a, then

lim f (x) ≤ lim g(x).


x→a x→a

The Sandwich (squeeze) Theorem If f (x) ≤ g(x) ≤ h(x) when x is near a (except
possibly at a) and
lim f (x) = lim h(x) = L
x→a x→a

then
lim g(x) = L.
x→a

Recall last day, we saw that limx→0 sin(1/x) does not exist because of how the function oscil-
lates near x = 0. However we can see from the graph below and the above theorem that
limx→0 x2 sin(1/x) = 0, since the graph of the function is sandwiched between y = −x2 and
y = x2 : 1

0.5

K1 K0.5 0 0.5 1
x

K0.5

Example Calculate the limit limx→0 x2 sin x1 . K1


We have −1 ≤ sin(1/x) ≤ 1O for all x,
multiplying across by x2 (which is positive), we get −x2 ≤ x2 sin(1/x) ≤ x2 for all x,
Using the Sandwich theorem, we get

0 = lim −x2 ≤ lim x2 sin(1/x) ≤ lim x2 = 0


x→0 x→o x→0

Hence we can conclude that


lim x2 sin(1/x) = 0.
x→0

Example Decide if the following limit exists and if so find its values:

limx→o x100 cos2 (π/x)

5
Extra Examples, attempt the problems before looking at the solutions

Decide if the following limits exist and if a limit exists, find its value.

(1) limx→1 x4 + 2x3 + x2 + 3

x2 −3x+2
(2) limx→2 (x−2)2
.

(3) limx→0 ( x1 − 1
|x|
).

|x|
(4) limx→0 x2 +x+10
.


4+h−2
(5) limh→0 h
.

(6) If 2x ≤ g(x) ≤ x2 − x + 2 for all x, evaluate limx→1 g(x).

(7) Determine if the following limit is finite, ±∞ or D.N.E. and is not ±∞.

(x − 3)(x + 2)
lim− .
x→1 (x − 1)(x − 2)

6
Extra Examples, attempt the problems before looking at the solutions

Decide if the following limits exist and if a limit exists, find its value.

(1) limx→1 x4 + 2x3 + x2 + 3

Since this is a polynomial function, we can calculate the limit by direct substitution:

lim x4 + 2x3 + x2 + 3 = 14 + 2(1)3 + 12 + 3 = 7.


x→1

x2 −3x+2
(2) limx→2 (x−2)2
.

This is a rational function, where both numerator and denominator approach 0 as x approaches
2. We factor the numerator to get

x2 − 3x + 2 (x − 1)(x − 2)
lim 2
= lim
x→2 (x − 2) x→2 (x − 2)2

After cancellation, we get


(x − 1)(x − 2) (x − 1)
lim = lim .
x→2 (x − 2)2 x→2 (x − 2)

Now this is a rational function where the numerator approaches 1 as x → 2 and the denominator
approaches 0 as x → 2. Therefore
(x − 1)
lim
x→2 (x − 2)

does not exist.


We can analyze this limit a little further, by checking out the left and right hand limits at 2. As
x approaches 2 from the left, the values of (x − 1) are positive (approaching a constant 1) and
(x−1)
the values of (x − 2) are negative ( approaching 0). Therefore the values of (x−2) are negative and
become very large in absolute value. Therefore

(x − 1)
lim− = −∞.
x→2 (x − 2)

Similarly, you can show that


(x − 1)
lim− = +∞,
x→2 (x − 2)
and therefore the graph of y = (x−1)
(x−2)
has a vertical asymptote at x = 2.
(check it out on your calculator)

(3) limx→0 ( x1 − 1
|x|
).

1 1
Let f (x) = x
− |x|
. We write this function as a piecewise defined function:
 1 1
 x−x =0 x>0
f (x) = .
 1 1 2
x
+x=x x≤0

7
limx→0 ( x1 − |x|
1
) exists only if the left and right hand limits exist and are equal.
limx→0+ ( x − |x| ) = limx→0+ 0 = 0 and limx→0− ( x1 − |x|
1 1 1
) = limx→0− x2 = −∞.
Since the limits do not match, we have
1 1
lim ( − ) D.N.E.
x→0 x |x|

|x|
(4) limx→0 x2 +x+10
.

Since limx→0 x2 + x + 10 = 10 6= 0, we have

|x| limx→0 |x| limx→0 |x|


lim = = .
x→0 x2 + x + 10 limx→0 (x2 + x + 10) 10

Now 
 x x>0
|x| = .
−x x≤0

Clearly limx→0+ |x| = 0 = limx→0− |x|. Hence limx→0 |x| = 0 and

|x| limx→0 |x| 0


lim = = = 0.
x→0 x2 + x + 10 10 10

4+h−2
(5) limh→0 h
.

Since limh→0 4 + h − 2 = 0 = limh→0 h, we cannot determine whether this limit exists or not
from the limit laws without some transformation. We have
√ √ √ √
4+h−2 ( 4 + h − 2)( 4 + h + 2) ( 4 + h)2 − 4)
lim = lim √ = lim √
h→0 h h→0 h( 4 + h + 2) h→0 h( 4 + h + 2)

(4 + h) − 4 h 1 1
= lim √ = lim √ = lim √ = .
h→0 h( 4 + h + 2) h→0 h( 4 + h + 2) h→0 ( 4 + h + 2) 4

(6) If 2x ≤ g(x) ≤ x2 − x + 2 for all x, evaluate limx→1 g(x).


We use the Sandwich theorem here. Since 2x ≤ g(x) ≤ x2 − x + 2, we have

lim 2x ≤ lim g(x) ≤ lim (x2 − x + 2),


x→1 x→1 x→1

therefore
2 ≤ lim g(x) ≤ 2
x→1

and hence
lim g(x) = 2.
x→1

8
(7) Determine if the following limit is finite, ±∞ or D.N.E. and is not ±∞.

(x − 3)(x + 2)
lim− .
x→1 (x − 1)(x − 2)
Let P (x) = (x − 3)(x + 2) and Q(x) = (x − 1)(x − 2). We have P (1) = −6 6= 0 and Q(1) = 0.
P (x) (x−3)(x+2)
Therefore the values of Q(x) = (x−1)(x−2) get larger in absolute value as x approaches 1.
As x approaches 1 from the left, (x − 3) < 0, (x − 2) < 0, (x − 1) < 0, and (x + 2) > 0, therefore
(x−3)(x+2)
the quotient (x−1)(x−2) < 0 as x approaches 1 from the left and therefore

(x − 3)(x + 2)
lim− = −∞.
x→1 (x − 1)(x − 2)

You might also like