Quality Improvement Project

RUNNING HEAD: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Quality Improvement Project: Patient Ratios and Safety

Priscilla Ambang
Bon Secours College of Nursing
Barbara Fitzgerald, RN, MSN
Nursing 3207: Quality and Safety in Nursing Practice II
April 30th, 2017
Honor Code: “I Pledge”
The outpatient infusion setting provides a variety of treatments and care, from wound
care, chemotherapy, injections, hydration, etc. Patient census fluctuates daily, with trends noted
on certain days of the week. Additionally, with many patients seen in outpatient infusion on
active cancer treatment, spontaneous symptom management happens frequently, in the form of
intravenous antiemetics, hydration, treatment for electrolyte imbalances, blood transfusions, etc.
Depending on the day, a staffing challenge may have already been present, with a high census.
By the end of the day, with add on patients and limited staff, an already challenged nurse patient
ratio, can be propelled into a literal, or perceived, unsafe nurse patient ratio by staff and patients.
This frequently occurs in the outpatient infusion setting, with pronounced implications, including
poor nurse retention and decreased patient satisfaction.
The healthcare climate is constantly changing, with new ideas, technology, treatment
protocols, type of care, and staffing ratios. Needless to say, the latter, staffing ratios, affects all of
the former, in one way or another. Nursing staff over the course of numerous years, waxes and
wanes, from superior, to adequate, to short. When staffing ratios are ideal, nurses feel valued and
effective, resulting in excellent care for patients, and positive interactions amongst co-workers
and other team members. If these ratios are inadequate, especially if consistently, nurses feel
undervalued, stressed, and job satisfaction is low, leading to less optimal care for our patients
and poor staff retention. High percentages of positive patient outcomes and/or nurse retention
align with facilities that have adequate, more educated nursing staff. (Aiken, Clarke, Sloan,
Cheney, 2008) Inadequate staffing ratios can also decrease safety and lead to errors, endangering
patients and staff.
Nursing shortages is a problem around the globe, not just in the United States. Facilities
and healthcare leaders understand the correlation between patient safety and inadequate nurse
staffing ratios. Several states in the US have passed legislation addressing these ratios.
(Rothberg, Abraham, Lindenauer, 2005) Some will argue that the increased ratios have gone
from one extreme to another, resulting in a perceived financial burden on facilities. (Rothberg,
Abraham, Lindenauer, 2005). While this may be the case, research also supports improved
staffing ratios lead to better patient outcomes and decreased financial implications for hospitals.
Per one article, “as a patient safety intervention, patient-to-nurse ratios of 4:1 are reasonably
cost-effective.” (Rothberg, Abraham, Lindenauer, 2005). Certainly ratios are dictated by patient
acuity and the care environment involved. In the outpatient infusion setting, high nurse to patient
ratios are the result of two primary causes, understaffing of nurses and overscheduling of
patients. Our company has a “turn no one away rule.” The physicians who use the outpatient
infusion are very much aware of this, and use it to defend their actions at times, somewhat
disregarding patient safety and the burden on the nursing staff. “Inefficient and ineffective
scheduling leads to delayed appointments and decreased patient and staff satisfaction.” (Riley,
2016) This is in no way intended to minimize our purpose to serve and put patients first. The goal
of addressing these issues, staffing and scheduling, is threefold, patient satisfaction, nurse
retention, and patient safety.
In this quality improvement project, our initial step would be to gather some information
regarding staffing numbers, scheduling trends, and nurse patient ratios. In order to be useful and
demonstrate trends, data collection would need to occur over several weeks. Daily
documentation would be imperative to obtaining accurate information. The number of nurses
scheduled, the census at the beginning of the day and at the end of the day, the number of add on
patients, anticipated nurse patient ratio, and actual nurse patient ratio are all key pieces of
information. After we have obtained and collated data then would need to determine the ideal
nurse patient ratio, and if proved to be an issue, determine the appropriate schedule for patients
and nurses. Upon completion, we could then conduct several PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles
to implement our changes on a small scale, one each week for one month, if successful increase
and pilot in small phases.(Lloyd and Murray, 2017) If not successful, then we would return to
gather additional information to attempt to address these issues.
The anticipated goal, for example a ratio of 6:1, increasing to a maximum 7:1 with add on
patients, would dictate whether or not our project was successful. The result would be evidenced
by increased patient safety and satisfaction, increased job satisfaction, and staff retention. This
outcome would need to be constantly monitored to ensure ongoing progress.

Reference List
Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Lake, E. T., & Cheney, T. (2008). Effects of Hospital
Care Environment on Patient Mortality and Nurse Outcomes. The Journal of Nursing
Administration, 38(5), 223–229. http://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNA.0000312773.42352.d7
Lloyd, R., Murray,S. (2017) QI 103, Lesson 2:How to use data for improvement. Retrieved from
http://app.ihi.org/lms/lessondetailview.aspx?LessonGUID=7ea95efc-454f-44a9-a0d0-
b70a0152e1e8&CourseGUID=7ab177dc-a9cf-4d1d-b870-
f4be6e8d8f67&CatalogGUID=6cb1c614-884b-43ef-9abd-d90849f183d4
Riley, A. (2016). Infusion Center Insights: The ins and outs of infusion center scheduling.
Advisory Board Oncology Rounds. Retrieved from
https://www.advisory.com/research/oncology-roundtable/oncology-
rounds/2016/05/infusion-center-scheduling
Rothberg, M., Abraham, I., Lindenauer, P., Rose, D. (2005). Improving Nurse-to-Patient Staffing
Ratios as a Cost-Effective Safety Intervention. Medical Care, 43(8), 785-791


Quality Improvement Project

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Quality Improvement Project

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Quality Improvement Project

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What issues does the document discuss regarding nurse staffing ratios?

What steps does the document propose to address issues with nurse staffing ratios?

RUNNING HEAD: QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Quality Improvement Project: Patient Ratios and Safety

poor nurse retention and decreased patient satisfaction.

patients and staff.

retention, and patient safety.

documentation would be imperative to obtaining accurate information. The number of nurses

gather additional information to attempt to address these issues.

outcome would need to be constantly monitored to ensure ongoing progress.

Administration, 38(5), 223–229. http://doi.org/10.1097/01.NNA.0000312773.42352.d7

Advisory Board Oncology Rounds. Retrieved from

Ratios as a Cost-Effective Safety Intervention. Medical Care, 43(8), 785-791

You might also like