Unit Outline: A Student
Unit Outline: A Student
Unit Outline: A Student
https://www.australiancontractlaw.com/cases/carlill.html
www.scamwatch.gov.au
http://commercelesson.weebly.com
Justification
The school that this unit outline is covering covers year 7-12 and is located in Western
Sydney. This school offers top of the range technology in every classroom whether it be a
smart board or computers. The school consists of approximately 800 students and aims at
meeting the needs of all diverse learners using ICT in every lesson.
The NSW Quality Teaching Model was developed to focus on teacher self-reflection with the
aim to understand, evaluate and develop their teaching practices to improve student learning
(Liberante, 2012). This model provides all NSW teachers and schools with a consistent
pedagogical framework whereby they can operate at a high quality. In order to reach this
quality of teaching, technology based learning is implemented in order to meet the needs of
diverse learners. The technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework
effectively implements technology into the content of learning thereby adopting a new
teaching method. The model allows students to accomplish a number of varying tasks using
information technology to enhance differing ways of completing classroom tasks (Koehler &
Mishra, 2009). Webb (2011) states that TPACK is required for the ongoing development of
pedagogical reasoning and teachers must therefore know what resources are available to them
in order to check for student understanding.
In the unit outline, numerous ICT components were used and outlined for students to
participate in. Examples of ICT tasks included research tasks, presentations, pamphlets and
mind maps just to name a few. Not only were these used but there was also the
implementation of an interactive online activity that was spread across 2 lessons. This online
website allows students to freely navigate through each activity at a self-directed pace where
they are engaged and interacting. Self–regulated learning is
The SAMR model is a framework used to assess the significance of technology integration
into learning. It consists of four classifications regarding technology use in learning which
are; substitution, augmentation, modification and redefinition. Substitution is where the
technology provides a substitute for other usual learning activities in the classroom and is
seen in the unit outline where there is a prescribed role play activity instead of explaining
what would happen in a situation to get the students to think and create (Romrell, Kidder, &
Wood, 2014). This model aids in enhancing student learning through the implementation of
technology as a substitute for other learning activities.
Bloom’s taxonomy is a theory that ensures curriculum is differentiated in order to meet the
needs of diverse learners in the classroom. It allows the direction of cognitive processes to
become higher order critical and creative thinking amongst students. Students are given the
opportunity to engage in different levelling domains meaning they can access numerous
pathways to end up at the same common objective (Noble, 2004). In 2007, Bloom’s digital
taxonomy was created where technology and ICT was introduced and implemented. Students
are capable of learning critical thinking of skills through researching to develop a deeper
understanding (Skiba, 2013). Through having access to databases and library research it
facilitates engaging lessons and interacting students.
The trialogical learning approach is another model used in the unit outline where it aims at
supporting students in developing knowledge artefacts collaboratively. This model favors the
surrounding environments and available tools to allow students to create, share and progress
in learning to facilitate the transformation of knowledge practices (Sansone, Bortolotti, &
Buglass, 2016). This model revolves around creating and constructing collaborative
knowledge artefacts with knowledge practices through using modern technologies such as a
digital artefact created in the unit outline. This form of technology is necessary in order to
construct educational activities using technology to focus them on the specified outcomes of
the course content which is consumer choice (Paavola, & Hakkarainen, 2014).
The activities and programs conducted in the unit outline, showcase differentiation for all
diverse learners. Differentiation can be defined as a teaching practice where students are
acknowledged for their differences, background and interests (Westwood, 2009).
Differentiation is showcased in ways such as role play, youtube videos, class debates and
research tasks which cater for all diverse learners in the classroom. Students are also given
the opportunity to enhance their learning in interactive ways demonstrated through posters,
mind maps, and powerpoint presentations where they also interact and collaborate with one
another to share ideas (Budd, 2004). When incorporating differentiation into units of work,
teacher-centered approaches are substituted with student-centrered approaches providing
students with choice and self-directed progression (Alkin & Christie, 2002). Teachers are
constantly encouraged to facilitate learning through constant questioning and feedback to
students as a way of assessment for learning and to check progress.
References
Alkin, M., & Christie, C. (2002). The Use of Role-Play in Teaching Evaluation. American
Journal Of Evaluation, 23(2), 209-218.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821400202300210
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Noble, T. (2004). Integrating the revised bloom's taxonomy with multiple intelligences: A
planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 193-211.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00328.x
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Trialogical approach for knowledge creation. In
Knowledge creation in education. Springer: Singapore, 53-73.
Romrell, D., Kidder, L., & Wood, E. (2014). The SAMR Model as a Framework for
Evaluating mLearning. Online Learning, 18(2).
http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i2.435
Skiba, D. (2013). Bloom's Digital Taxonomy and Word Clouds. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 34(4), 277-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-34.4.277
Sansone, N., Bortolotti, S., & Buglass, S. (2016). The trialogical learning approach in
practices: reflections from pedagogical cases. QWERTY 11 (2) , 99-120.
Webb, M. (2011). Changing models for researching pedagogy with information and
communications technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. doi:
10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00465.x
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10