Scribd
Upload
205 views1 page

Why Buildings Collapse

This project aimed to address gaps in theoretical models for predicting the progressive collapse of concrete buildings. The research team developed a dynamic model and applied it to a real UK office building to estimate failure probabilities under different damage scenarios. Their achievement was using theory to solve practical problems and reduce uncertainty in building design. Their next step is to write guidelines based on the findings to incorporate into building regulations and codes used across Europe and the US.

Uploaded by

mohamed_ahmed_23
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
205 views1 page

Why Buildings Collapse

This project aimed to address gaps in theoretical models for predicting the progressive collapse of concrete buildings. The research team developed a dynamic model and applied it to a real UK office building to estimate failure probabilities under different damage scenarios. Their achievement was using theory to solve practical problems and reduce uncertainty in building design. Their next step is to write guidelines based on the findings to incorporate into building regulations and codes used across Europe and the US.

Uploaded by

mohamed_ahmed_23
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

IAA Review 2014 /15

Why buildings collapse


Application of theoretical models against progressive collapse of flat slab concrete structures
Academic: Dr Juan Sagaseta

Current building regulations are based on engineering intuition and experience of structural
failures dating back to the early 1970s. The urgent need for accurate theoretical models
to ensure the robustness of concrete buildings was the driving force behind this IAA project.

Considering progressive collapse when designing structures


such as buildings or bridges is a relatively recent development.
The concept of robustness was first introduced in building
regulations in the UK in the early 1970s after the Ronan
Point collapse in 1968, triggered by a domestic gas explosion.
Accidental loads such as vehicle impacts against columns in
underground car parks or a local fire inside a building are
possible events, which in some cases have led to structural
failures and loss of lives in the last decade.

Lead researcher Dr Juan Sagaseta of the University of Surrey’s


Department of Civil Engineering collaborated with multinational
engineering company Arup to address the huge knowledge gap
that exists in modelling the structural response of these types
of concrete structures. Current building regulations in the UK
are based on outdated prescriptive rules with little supporting
scientific evidence, and knowledge focuses on static rather
than dynamic situations. The IAA project took an innovative
theoretical dynamic model and applied it to real structures.

The research team first reviewed available literature on the


subject and then applied a model (developed by Dr Sagaseta
for a previous EPSRC project) to a known UK office building,
establishing its probability of failing based on different local
damage scenarios.

Dr Sagaseta explains: “Our achievement has been to use a


theoretical model to solve real, complex issues, and to reduce
uncertainty by enabling the design of more robust buildings.

“Our next step will be to write guidelines based on


our findings which could ultimately be incorporated
into UK building regulations. Since there is a similar
lack of knowledge elsewhere, they could potentially
become part of Eurocode and used in countries across
Europe, as well as in US regulations. The impact
could be significant.”
Ronan Point collapse (The Daily Telegraph)

You might also like