Social 20-2 Source Analysis 2

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Social Studies 20-2

Source Analysis 2
Examine the following source and write one paragraph to answer the following question:

(Bastille Prison, July 4, 1789)

How do the events in the French Revolution demonstrate collective


identity?

Reminders for Writing:


• Organize your response
• Proofread your response
Interpretation of Sources (8) Communication (2)
• quality of the interpretation of each source • organization and coherence
• quality of evidence drawn from the sources • vocabulary (e.g., specificity, accuracy)
• quality of evidence drawn from knowledge of social studies • sentence construction (e.g., clarity, completeness)
• understanding of the assigned task • grammar and mechanics (e.g., consistency of tense,
punctuation, spelling, capitalization)
E Interpretations are insightful, comprehensive, and address all sources. Evidence is specific and The writing is fluent and purposefully organized. Effective stylistic
Excellent accurate, and errors, if present, do not detract from the response. The student demonstrates a choices may contribute to the creation of an engaging voice.
thorough and perceptive understanding of applicable social studies knowledge and the assigned Vocabulary is precise. The writing demonstrates confident
task. control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics.
Errors, if present, are inconsequential.
Pf Interpretations are specific and accurate but may not address all sources. Evidence is relevant and The writing is logical and clearly organized. Appropriate stylistic
Proficient appropriate, but may contain some minor factual errors. The student demonstrates a clear choices may contribute to the creation of a distinct voice.
understanding of applicable social studies knowledge and the assigned task. Vocabulary is specific. The writing frequently demonstrates
effective control of sentence construction, grammar, and
mechanics. Errors do not detract from communication.

S Interpretations are valid but general and may contain minor misconceptions. Interpretations may The writing is generally clear and functionally organized. Basic
Satisfactory not address all sources. Evidence is relevant, but general, may be incompletely developed, and/or stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of a voice that is
contains minor errors. The student demonstrates an acceptable understanding of applicable social adequate. Vocabulary is adequate. The writing demonstrates
studies knowledge and the assigned task. basic control of sentence construction, grammar, and mechanics.
Errors do not seriously interfere with communication
L Interpretations are overgeneralized and may contain substantial misconceptions. Evidence is The writing is uneven and incomplete but is discernibly
Limited superficial, may not always be relevant, and may contain significant errors. The student may organized. Awkward stylistic choices may contribute to the
demonstrate a confused, yet discernible, understanding of applicable social studies knowledge and creation of an unconvincing and/or inappropriate voice.
the assigned task. Vocabulary is imprecise and/or inappropriate. The writing
demonstrates a faltering control of sentence construction,
grammar, and mechanics. Errors hinder communication
P Interpretations are mistaken or irrelevant. Evidence, if present, is incomplete and/or marginally The writing is unclear and disorganized. Ineffective and/or
Poor relevant and frequently contains significant errors. The student demonstrates a minimal inappropriate stylistic choices may contribute to the creation of
understanding of applicable social studies knowledge and the assigned task. an ineffective and/or unsuitable voice. Vocabulary is ineffective
and frequently incorrect. A lack of control of sentence
construction, grammar, and mechanics is demonstrated. Errors
impede communication.
INS Insufficient is a special category. It is not an indicator of quality. It is assigned to responses that are Insufficient is a special category. It is not an indicator of quality.
Insufficient off topic, do not contain a discernible attempt to address the task, or that are too brief to assess in It is assigned to responses that are off topic, do not contain a
any scoring category discernible attempt to address the task, or that are too brief to
assess in any scoring category.

You might also like