Comparative Analysis of Mutual Fund of HDFC & ICICI
Comparative Analysis of Mutual Fund of HDFC & ICICI
Comparative Analysis of Mutual Fund of HDFC & ICICI
On
"Comparative Analysis of Mutual Fund of HDFC & ICICI"
1
CONTENT
DESCRIPTION
1. Acknowledgement
2. Certificate
3. Executive summary
9. Conclusion
10. Questionnaire
11. Bibliography
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION:
The Indian financial system based on four basic components like Financial
Market, Financial Institutions, Financial Service, Financial Instruments. All are
play important role for smooth activities for the transfer of the funds and allocation
of the funds. The main aim of the Indian financial system is that providing the
efficiently services to the capital market. The Indian capital market has been
increasing tremendously during the second generation reforms. The first generation
reforms started in 1991 the concept of LPG. (Liberalization, privatization,
Globalization)
Then after 1997 second generation reforms was started, still the it’s going
on, its include reforms of industrial investment, reforms of fiscal policy, reforms of
ex- imp policy, reforms of public sector, reforms of financial sector, reforms of
foreign investment through the institutional investors, reforms banking sectors. The
economic development model adopted by India in the post-independence era has
been characterized by mixed economy with the public sector playing a dominating
role and the activities in private industrial sector control measures emaciated form
time to time. The last two decades have been a phenomenal expansion in the
geographical coverage and the financial spread of our financial system.
The spared of the banking system has been a major factor in promoting
financial intermediation in the economy and in the growth of financial savings with
progressive liberalization of economic policies, there has been a rapid growth of
capital market, money market and financial services industry including merchant
banking, leasing and venture capital, leasing, hire purchasing. Consistent with the
growth of financial sector and second generation reforms its need to fruition of the
financial sector. Its also need to providing the efficient service to the investor
mostly if the investors are supply small amount, in that point of view the mutual
fund play vital for better service to the small investors. The main vision for the
3
analysis for this study is to scrutinize the performance of five star rated mutual
funds, given the weight of risk, return, and assets under management, net assets
value, book value and price earnings ratio.
5
other trusts followed that not only targeted investment in America, but led to the
introduction of the fund investing concept on U.S. shores in the late 1800 and early
1900s.
Nov. 1925. All these funds were open – ended having redemption feature.
Similarly, they had almost all the features of a good modern Mutual Funds – like
sound investment policies and restrictions, open end ness, self – liquidating
features, a publicized portfolio, simple capital structure, excellent and professional
fund management and diversification etc…….and hence they are the honored
grand – parents of today’s funds. Prior to these funds all the initial investment
companies were closed – ended companies. Therefore, it can be said that although
the basic concept of diversification and professional fund management, were
picked by U.S.A. from England Investment Companies “The Mutual Fund is an
American Creation.”
ecause of their exclusive feature, open – ended Mutual Funds rapidly
became very popular. By 1929, there were 19 open – ended Mutual Funds in USA
with total assets of $ 140 millions. But the 1929 Stock Market crash followed by
great depression of 1930 ravaged the U.S. Financial Market as well as the Mutual
Fund Industry. This necessitated stricter regulation for mutual funds and for
Financial Sectors. Hence, to protect the interest of the common investors, U.S.
Government passed various Acts, such a Securities Act 1933, Securities Exchange
Act 1934 and the Investment Companies Act 1940. A committee called the
National Committee of Investment Company (Now, Investment Company
Institute), was also formed to co – operate with the Federal Regulatory Agency and
to keep informed of trends in Mutual Fund Legislation.
As a result of these measure, the Mutual Fund Industry began to develop
speedily and the total net assets of the Mutual Funds Industry increased form $ 448
million in 1940 to $ 2.5 billion in 1950. The number of shareholder’s accounts
increased from 296000, to more than one Million during 1940 – 1951. “As a result
6
of renewed interest in Mutual Fund Industry they grew at 18% annual compound
rate reaching peak of their rapid growth curve in the late 1960s.”
7
The Mutual fund organization as per the SEBI formation and necessary
formation is needed for sooth activities of the companies and achieved the desire
objectives. Transfer agent and custodian play role for dematerialization of the
fund and unit holders hold the account statement, but custody of the unit is on
particular Asset Management Company. Custodian holds all the fund units on
8
dematerialization form. Sponsor had decided the responsibility of custodian
when investor to purchase the fund and to sell the unit. Application forms,
transaction slip and other requests received by transfer agent, middle men
between investors and Assts Management Companies.
9
1996, mutual fund assets have exceeded bank deposits. The mutual fund industry
and the banking industry virtually rival each other in size.
Wide variety of Mutual Fund Schemes exists to cater to the needs such as
financial position, risk tolerance and return expectations etc. The table below gives
an overview into the existing types of schemes in the Industry.
10
ADVANTAGES OF MUTUAL FUNDS:
Mutual funds have designed to provide maximum benefits to investors, and
fund manager have research team to achieve schemes objective. Assets
Management Company has different type of sector funds, which need to proper
planning for strategic investment and to achieve the market return.
Portfolio Diversification
Mutual Funds invest in a well-diversified portfolio of securities which enables investor to hold a
diversified investment portfolio (whether the amount of investment is big or small).
Professional Management
Fund manager undergoes through various research works and has better investment management
skills which ensure higher returns to the investor than what he can manage on his own.
Less Risk
Investors acquire a diversified portfolio of securities even with a small investment in a Mutual
Fund. The risk in a diversified portfolio is lesser than investing in merely 2 or 3 securities.
Liquidity
An investor may not be able to sell some of the shares held by him very easily and quickly,
whereas units of a mutual fund are far more liquid.
Choice of Schemes
Mutual funds provide investors with various schemes with different investment objectives.
Investors have the option of investing in a scheme having a correlation between its investment
objectives and their own financial goals. These schemes further have different plans/options
11
Transparency
Funds provide investors with updated information pertaining to the markets and the schemes. All
material facts are disclosed to investors as required by the regulator.
Flexibility
Investors also benefit from the convenience and flexibility offered by Mutual Funds. Investors
can switch their holdings from a debt scheme to an equity scheme and vice-versa. Option of
systematic (at regular intervals) investment and withdrawal is also offered to the investors in
most open-end schemes.
Safety
Mutual Fund industry is part of a well-regulated investment environment where the interests of
the investors are protected by the regulator. All funds are registered with SEBI and complete
transparency is forced.
No Customized Portfolios
The portfolio of securities in which a fund invests is a decision taken by the fund manager.
Investors have no right to interfere in the decision making process of a fund manager, which
some investors find as a constraint in achieving their financial objectives.
12
Difficulty in Selecting a Suitable Fund Scheme
Many investors find it difficult to select one option from the plethora of funds/schemes/plans
available. For this, they may have to take advice from financial planners in order to invest in the
right fund to achieve their objectives.
Role of SEBI
A index fund scheme’ means a mutual fund scheme that invests in securities
in the same proportion as an index of securities;” A mutual fund may lend and
borrow securities in accordance with the framework relating to short selling and
securities lending and borrowing specified by the Board.”A mutual fund may enter
13
into short selling transactions on a recognized stock exchange, subject to the
framework relating to short selling and securities lending and borrowing specified
by the Board.” “Provided that in case of an index 13 fund scheme, the investment
and advisory fees shall not exceed three fourths of one percent (0.75%) of the
weekly average net assets.“
“Provided further that in case of an index fund scheme, the total expenses of
the scheme including the investment and advisory fees shall not exceed one and
one half percent (1.5%) of the weekly average net assets.” Every mutual fund shall
buy and sell securities on the basis of deliveries and shall in all cases of purchases,
take delivery of relevant securities and in all cases of sale, deliver the securities:
Provided that a mutual fund may engage in short selling of securities in accordance
with the framework relating to short selling and securities lending and borrowing
specified by theBoard: Provided further that a mutual fund may enter into
derivatives transactions in a recognized stock exchange, subject to the framework
specified by the Board.”
14
Following are ts Management Companies under India
15
16
Tax Planning and Mutual Fund
Investors in India opt for the tax-saving mutual fund schemes for the simple reason
that it helps them to save money. The tax-saving mutual funds or the equity-linked
savings schemes (ELSS) receive certain tax exemptions under Section 88 of the
Income Tax Act. That is one of the reasons why the investors in India add the tax-
saving mutual fund schemes to their portfolio. The tax-saving mutual fund
schemes are one of the important types of mutual funds in India that investors can
option for. There are several companies in India that offer – tax – saving mutual
fund schemes in the country.
2) Regulation
3) Intermediaries
4) Opinion Market
5) Knowledge Generate
6) Issuer
17
2. School of Regulatory Studies and Supervision (SRSS)
Having a positive net worth in the five years immediately preceding the
application of registration.
Net worth in the immediately preceding year more than its contribution to
the capital of the AMC.
Earning a profit in the three out of the five preceding years, including the
fifth year.
3. The sponsor should hold at least 40% of the net worth of the AMC.
4. A party which is not eligible to be a sponsor shall not hold 40% or more of the
net worth
19
of the AMC.
5. The sponsor has to appoint the trustees, the AMC and the custodian.
6. The trust deed and the appointment of the trustees have to be approved by SEBI.
LAUNCHING OF A SCHEMES
Before its launch, a scheme has to be approved by the trustees and a copy of its
offer documents filed with the SEBI.
1. Every application form for units of a scheme is to be accompanies by a
memorandum containing key information about the scheme.
3. All advertisements for a scheme have to be submitted to SEBI within seven days
from the issue date.
20
5. The offer documents and advertisements should not contain any misleading
information or any incorrect statement or opinion.
6. The initial offering period for any mutual fund schemes should not exceed 45
days, the only exception being the equity linked saving schemes.
9. All advertisements need to carry the name of the sponsor, the trustees, the AMC
of the fund.
11. All advertisements shall clarify that investment in mutual funds is subject to
market risk and the achievement of the fund’s objectives can not be assured.
12. When a scheme is open for subscription, no advertisement can be issued stating
that the scheme has been subscribed or over subscription.
21
beginning to change. Recent figures indicate that in the first quarter of the current
fiscal year mutual fund assets went up by 115% whereas bank deposits rose by
only 17%. (Source: Thinktank, the Financial Express September, 99) This is
forcing a large number of banks to adopt the concept of narrow banking wherein
the deposits are kept in Gilts and some other assets which improves liquidity and
reduces risk. The basic fact lies that banks cannot be ignored and they will not
close down completely. Their role as intermediaries cannot be ignored. It is just
that Mutual Funds are going to change the way banks do business in the future.
23
METHODOLOGY & STUDY
A large number of studies on the growth and financial performance of mutual
funds have been carried out during the past, in the developed and developing
countries. Brief reviews of the following research works reveal the wealth of
contributions towards the performance evaluation of mutual fund, market timing
and stock selection abilities of fund managers.
In LUCKNOW, one of the earliest attempts was made by National Council of
Applied Economics Research (NCAER) in 1964 when a survey of households was
undertaken to understand the attitude towards and motivation for savings of
individuals. Another NCAER study in 1996 analyzed the structure of the capital
market and presented the views and attitudes of individual shareholders. SEBI –
NCAER Survey (2000) was carried out to estimate the number of households and
the population of individual investors, their economic and demographic profile,
portfolio size, and investment preference for equity as well as other savings
instruments. Data was collected from 30,00,000 geographically
the study are : Households preference for instruments match their risk
perception; Bank Deposit has an appeal across all income class; 43% of the non-
investor households equivalent to around 60 million households apparently lack
awareness about stock markets; and, compared with low income groups, the higher
income groups have higher share of investments in Mutual Funds signifying that
Mutual funds have still not become truly the investment vehicle for small
investors.
Since 1986, a number of articles and brief essays have been published in financial
dailies, periodicals, professional and research journals, 20 explaining the basic
concept of Mutual Funds and highlighted their importance in the LUCKNOWn
capital market environment. They touched upon varied aspects like regulation of
Mutual Funds, Investor expectations, Investor protection, and growth of Mutual
Funds and some on the performance and functioning of Mutual Funds. A few
among them are Vidyashankar (1990), Sarkar (1991), Agarwal (1992), Sadhak
24
(1991), Sharma C. Lall (1991), Samir K. Barua et al., (1991), Sandeep Bamzai
(2001), Atmaramani (1995), Atmaramani (1996), Subramanyam (1999),
Krishnan (1999), Ajay Srinivsasn (1999). Segmentation of investors on the basis
of their characteristics was highlighted by Raja Rajan (1997). Investor’s
characteristics on the basis of their investment size Raja Rajan (1997), and the
relationship between stages in life cycle of the investors and their investment
pattern was studied Raja Rajan (1998).
Friend, et al., (1962) made an extensive and systematic study of 152 mutual funds
found that mutual fund schemes earned an average annual return of 12.4 percent,
while their composite benchmark earned a return of 12.6 percent. Their alpha was
negative with 20 basis points. Overall results did not suggest widespread
inefficiency in the industry. Comparison of fund returns with turnover and expense
categories did not reveal a strong relationship. Irwin, Brown, FE (1965) analyzed
issues relating to investment policy,
portfolio turnover rate, performance of mutual funds and its impact on the stock
markets. They identified that mutual funds had a significant impact on the price
movement in the stock market. They concluded that, on an average, funds did not
perform better than the composite markets and there was no persistent relationship
between portfolio turnover and fund performance.
Treynor (1965) used ‘characteristic line’ for relating expected rate of return of a
fund to the rate of return of a suitable market average. He coined a fund
performance measure taking investment risk into account. Further, to deal with a
portfolio, ‘portfolio-possibility line’ was used to relate expected return to the
portfolio owner’s risk preference. Sharpe, William F (1966) developed a composite
measure of return and risk. He evaluated 34 open-end mutual funds for the period
1944-63. Reward to variability ratio for each scheme was significantly less than
DJIA (Dow Jones Industrial Average) and ranged from 0.43 to 0.78. Expense ratio
was inversely related with the fund performance, as correlation coefficient was
0.0505. The results depicted that good performance was associated with low
25
expense ratio and not with the size. Sample schemes showed consistency in risk
measure. Treynor and Mazuy (1966) evaluated the performance of 57 fund
managers in terms of their market timing abilities and found that, fund managers
had not successfully outguessed the market. The results suggested that, investors
were completely dependent on fluctuations in the market. Improvement in the rates
of return was due to the fund managers’ ability to identify under-priced industries
and companies. The study adopted Treynor’s (1965) methodology for reviewing
the performance of mutual funds.
Jensen (1968) developed a composite portfolio evaluation technique
concerning risk-adjusted returns. He evaluated the ability of 115 fund managers in
selecting securities during the period 1945-66. Analysis of net returns indicated
that, 39 funds had above average returns, while 76 funds yielded abnormally poor
returns. Using gross returns, 48 funds showed above average results and 67 funds
below average results. Jensen concluded that, there was very little evidence that
funds were able to perform significantly better than expected as fund managers
were not able to forecast securities price movements. Fama (1972) developed
methods to distinguish observed return due to the ability to pick up the best
securities at a given level of risk from that of predictions of price movements in the
market. He introduced a multiperiod model allowing evaluation on a period-by-
period and on a cumulative basis. He concluded that, return on a portfolio
constitutes of return for security selection and return for bearing risk. His
contributions combined the concepts from modern theories of portfolio selection
and capital market equilibrium with more traditional concepts of good portfolio
management.
Williamson (1972) compared ranks of 180 funds between 1961-65 and 1966-70.
There was no correlation between the rankings of the two periods. The investment
abilities of most of the fund managers were identical. He highlighted the growing
prominence of volatility in the measurement of investment risk. Klemosky (1973)
analyzed investment performance of 40 funds based on quarterly returns during the
26
period 1966-71. He acknowledged that, biases in Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen’s
measures, could be removed by using mean absolute deviation and semi-standard
deviation as risk surrogates compared to the composite measures derived from the
CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Modal).
McDonald and John (1974) examined 123 mutual funds and identified the
existence of positive relationship between objectives and risk. The study identified
the existence of positive relationship between return and risk. The relationship
between objective and risk-adjusted performance indicated that, more aggressive
funds experienced better results. Gupta (1974) evaluated the performance of
mutual fund industry for the period 1962-71 using Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen
models. All the funds covered under the study outperformed the market
irrespective of the choice of market index. The results indicated that all the three
models provided identical results. Return per unit of risk varied with the level of
volatility assumed and he concluded that, funds with higher volatility exhibited
superior performance. Klemosky (1977) examined performance consistency of 158
fund managers for the period 1968-75. The ranking of performance showed better
consistency between four-year periods and relatively lower consistency between
adjacent two-year periods. Ippolito’s (1989) results and conclusions were relevant
and consistent with the theory of efficiency of informed investors. He estimated
that risk-adjusted return for the mutual fund industry was greater than zero and
attributed positive alpha before load charges and identified that fund performance
was not related to expenses and turnover as predicted by efficiency arguments.
Gupta Ramesh (1989) evaluated fund performance in LUCKNOW comparing the
returns earned by schemes of similar risk and similar constraints. An explicit risk-
return relationship was developed to make comparison across funds with different
risk levels. His study decomposed total return into return from investors risk,
return from managers’ risk and target risk. Baruan Varuan (1991) made an attempt
to evaluate the master share scheme of UTI using the data from 1987 to 1980.
Their conclusion was that the Master Share Scheme outperformed the market in
27
terms of net assets value (NAV) and the master share scheme (MSS) benefited
large investors rather than small investors.
24 Obaidulla and Sridhar (1991) evaluated the performance of two major growth
oriental mutual fund schemes - Master share and Canshare. They both concluded
that both the funds provided abnormal returns. Master share out performed based
on market risk. Gupta L C (1992) attempted a household survey of investors with
theobjective of identifying investors’ preferences for mutual funds so as to help
policy makers and mutual funds in designing mutual fund products and in shaping
the mutual fund industry.
Lal C and Sharma Seema (1992) identified that, the household sector’s share in
the LUCKNOW domestic savings increased from 73.6 percent in 1950-51 to 83.6
percent in 1988-89. The share of financial assets increased from 56 percent in
1970-71 to over 60 percent in 1989-90 bringing out a tremendous impact on all the
constituents of the financial market. Shashikant Uma (1993) critically examined
the rationale and relevance of mutual fund operations in LUCKNOW Money
Markets. She pointed out that money market mutual funds with low-risk and low
return offered conservative investors a reliable investment avenue for short-term
investment.
Ansari (1993) stressed the need for mutual funds to bring in innovative schemes
suitable to the varied needs of the small savers in order to become predominant
financial service institution in the country.
Shukla and Singh (1994) attempted to identify whether portfoliomanager’s
professional education brought out superior performance. They found that equity
mutual funds managed by professionally qualified managers were riskier but better
diversified than the others. Though the performance differences were not
statistically significant, the 25 three professionally qualified fund managers
reviewed outperformed others.
28
RECENT TRENDS IN MUTUAL FUND MARKETING
The mutual fund industry in India has evolved little over three decades but
the real impetus has come after the changes in the mutual fund regulations in early
80s. Private and foreign mutual funds are operating in the Lucknow market and
constitute a substantial portion of the mutual fund industry. Today the industry
consists of Unit Trust of India, mutual funds sponsored by public sector banks and
insurance corporations, private and foreign mutual funds. Investors are constantly
being bombarded byquestions concerning their risk profile. Either a money market
or guilt fund is targeted for the risk averse or a low graded company offering a
high return on its fixed deposits. Banks like Many managers are now taking
interest in designing mutual fund products with multi feature options for investors.
Customers are often benefited from the improvements that are offered by new
features, for example by enhanced quality products [Garvin (1984)]. These
additions of features also offer advantages to others in the value chain. For the
mutual fund agents new features provide new sales arguments in seller buyer
interaction. New features do not only infuse single products but also entire product
categories periodically with new lease of life [Broadbent (1980), Dowdy W.L.
(1986)].
29
Update
Indian equity markets have been volatile and trading in a broader
rangein the last 15 months with selling pressure being witnessed at
higherlevels and buying emerging at lower levels
Domestic markets recovered smartly from the lows since the lows
ofaround 26000 on the Sensex levels at the start of October to
27500levels before correcting at end-October and beginning of
November
30
amassive de-hoarding operation to ensure that pulses are easily
availableto common people. The operation resulted in seizure of 50475
MT ofpulses. It is believed inflation may moderate once festival
demandsoftens and prices of lentils and vegetables fall as imports
increase
Outlook
The government has initiated a number of structural policy reforms
likepower reforms, road sector reforms, implementation of DBT in
centrallyfunded welfare schemes, increasing FDI in many sectors, thrust on
manufacturing in sectors like defence, focus on ease of doing
business,taxation reforms, etc
Structurally, the outlook for the Indian equity markets remains bright on the
back of a steep correction in commodities, especially crude oil &industrial
metals, a 125 bps repo rate cut and subsequent transmissionof the same to
the corporate balance sheets along with relatively stableexchange rates
In the near term, markets may continue to trade in a broad range as aslow
improvement in earnings growth and fears of a US Fed rate hikemay
pressurise while the government’s reform and policy action maykeep
sentiments upbeat
31
Any intermediate throwbacks from here on should be utilised to buy ina
staggered fashion from a medium-term perspective to ride the
largeruptrend
32
Debt Market
Update
The yield on government securities was under pressure on the back
ofweak global cues as strong jobs data and comments from US Fedofficials
increased the probability of a rate hike in December 2015.Comments from
the RBI Governor that they are comfortable with thecurrent level of rates for
the near term, indicating status quo for the nextfew months, also impacted
market sentiments
After touching a low of ~7.5% post the recent repo rate cut by the RBIin its
last policy meeting, 10-year G-Sec yields continued to harden inthe last
month. During October, the benchmark US 10 year G-Sec yieldmoved up
36 bps from below 2% to 2.34% currently
October 2015 inched up to -3.81% but was still in the red for the twelfth
33
consecutive month. Core WPI at -2.04 signifies slack in demand for input
commodities.
Outlook
An increase in FII limit in a phased manner to 5% of
outstandinggovernment securities (that are currently at 3.8%) along with
2%additional limit for state development loans are a structural positive
forlong term bonds
34
Investors may consider both duration as well as accrual fundsdepending on
their risk-return profile.
MF industry synopsis
Inflows into equity schemes were | 6269 crore in October 2015 while
inincome funds were | 22875 crore. Liquid funds also witnessed inflows to
the tune of | 103306 crore
35
MF Category Analysis
Equity funds
Midcap funds delivered 10% return in the last year,
significantlyoutperforming large cap funds that delivered negative returns of
2.5%
36
Exposure to banks and finance stocks together account for the highest proportion with
27% of equity assets followedby technology and pharma
View
Short term: Positive
Long-term: Positive
37
The government has initiated a number of structural policy reforms
likepower reforms, road sector reforms, implementation of DBT in
centrallyfunded welfare schemes, increasing FDI in many sectors, thrust
onmanufacturing in sectors like defence focus on ease of doing business
taxation reforms, etc
38
Recommended funds
Large cap
Axis Equity
Birla Sunlife Frontline Equity
ICICI Prudential Focused Bluechip Equity
SBI Bluechip
UTI Opportunities
Diversified
Midcap
39
View
Short-term: Positive
Long-term: Positive
Thirdly, the recent RBI action to reduce the repo rate by 50 basis points
(bps) also augurs well for the infrastructure sector as this will not only
reduce their borrowing cost but also improve liquidity through a better
working capital cycle
40
Fourthly, with the RBI's action allowing banks to issue long term bonds for
infrastructure with benefits such as relaxation of CRR & SLR norms and
longer duration of bonds, we believe the pressure on developers to fund
infrastructure projects would ease. Hence, cost of funds and strain on cash
flow are likely to reduce, going ahead
Preferred Picks
41
View
Short-term: Neutral
Long-term: Positive
42
lowering bad assets formation, revival of capex and a surgein credit growth
are key factors to provide boost to the sector. Weremain neutral on the
sector in the near term
Preferred Picks
View
Short-term: Neutral
Long-term: Neutral
Equity FMCG
FMCG companies continue to witness muted demand from both rural and
urban India. With the significant correction in commodity price the industry
has taken price cuts to pass on raw material benefits. Thishas affected
revenue growth, mainly due to the absence of a price hikein sales.
43
However, a decline in commodity prices has resulted in aconsiderable
expansion in operating margins despite companiesincreasing their
advertisement & promotion (A&P) spend
In the last few months, the valuation multiples of FMCG companies have
seen some contraction in the wake of concerns over a demandrevival. We
believe a delay in demand revival could result in a furthercontraction in
multiples.
Preferred Picks
44
View
Short-term: Neutral
Long-term: Positive
45
View
Short-term: Neutral
Long-term: Positive
46
Preferred Picks
Traded volumes should be the major criterion that is used while deciding on
investment in ETFs. Higher volumes ensure lower spread and better pricing to
investors...Tracking error, though it should be considered, is not the deciding
factor as variation among funds is not huge...
In India, three kinds of ETFs are available: Equity index ETFs, liquidETFs
and gold ETFs.
47
Tracking error, which explains extent of deviation of returns from
theunderlying index, is usually low in ETFs as it tracks the equity index on a
real time basis whereas it is done only once in a day for index funds.
There are over 400 ETFs traded globally. ETFs are transparent and
costefficient. The decision on which ETF to buy should be largely
governedby the decision on getting exposure in that asset class.
CPSE ETF is a new entry in the Goldman Sachs ETF offering. The
ETFinvests in select 10 PSU stocks and has been listed on the
exchangesince April. It has delivered 16% return since its launch.
48
49
View
Short-term: Positive
Long-term: Positive
Balanced funds
Balanced funds are hybrid funds. More than 65% of the overall portfoliois
invested in equities. Hence, as per provisions of the Income Tax Act,
1961,any capital gains over one year become tax free. Also,
dividendsdeclared by funds are tax free
50
Preferred Picks
51
ICICI Prudential Balanced - Advantage Fund
View
Short-term: Neutral
Long-term: Positive
MIPs can be classified into aggressive MIP and conservative MIP basedon
its equity allocation. Risk averse investors should invest in MIPs withlower
equity allocation to avoid capital erosion
52
The change in taxation announced in the Union Budget 2014, shall
beapplicable to MIP funds (refer to debt funds section for details)
Preferred Picks
View
Short-term: Positive
Long-term: Positive
Arbitrage Funds
Arbitrage funds seek to exploit market inefficiencies that get manifestedas
mispricing in the cash (stock) and derivative markets
53
Arbitrage funds are classified as equity funds as they invest into
equityshare and equity derivative instruments. Since these are classified
asequity funds for taxation, dividends declared by the funds are tax free.No
capital gains tax will be applicable if they are sold after a year
54
On the other hand, a range bound market does not give ample room
tocreate arbitrage positions
Preferred Picks
55
The RBI has cut its repo rate by125 bps in the current year,Whichwill push overall
interestRatesdown, thus benefitingduration funds further
Investment into securities with maturity of less than 90 days and more than one year
dominate total investments bymutual funds
56
View
Neutral
Liquid Funds
Liquid fund returns moderated to 8.1-8.7% pre tax from over 9% earnedin
the previous year. Liquid funds witnessed an inflow of | 103306 croreas a
quarter end phenomenon
For less than a year, individuals in the higher tax bracket should opt
fordividend option as the dividend distribution tax @ 28.325% is marginally
lower. Also, though the tax arbitrage has reduced, they stillearn better pre-
tax returns over bank savings (3-4%) and currentaccounts (0-3%)
57
View
Ultra-short term: Positive
Short-term: Positive
Long-term: Positive
Income funds
In the income funds category, long term debt funds outperformeddelivering
9.2% absolute return in the last year (as on November 17,2015). RBI’s
recent 50 bps rate cut has boosted returns of long-termbond funds,
including income and gilt medium and long-term funds
58
Given the sharp rate cuts of 125 basis points this calendar year, it
isbelieved there may be an extended pause or another 25 basis points
tillMarch 2016. Hence, it may make sense to invest in a mix of short-
termincome funds and dynamic bond funds and avoid long duration gilt
funds.
Short-term funds will benefit as the bond curve reverts to an upward slopping curve.
Credit opportunities funds earnthe highest accrual and are the best in the category
Dynamic bond funds are suitable for all types of investorsand for longer duration.They
can take exposure to all durations as per the interest rate outlook and switch between G
secs and corporate bonds
Recommended funds
Short
Term
Funds
Bir
la
Sunlife
short term fund
59
HDFC Short Term Fund
ICICI Pru Short Term Plan
Long term/Dynamic
60
View
Short-term: Neutral
Long-term: Neutral
Gilt Funds
In October 2015, gilt funds delivered 9% absolute return last year,
thehighest among debt funds. We believe the odds remain in favour of
thegovernment securities yield trending down over the next year or two.
Inthe quarter gone by, 10 year G-sec yields have fallen 28 bps. While
thespread between these instruments and repo rate was generally 40-
50bps, it is currently around 90 bps, meaning yields could slide further
by~40 bps. However, gilt funds will be less attractive due to the
longerholding period (more than three years) as lower accrual income
willneutralise the impact of moderate capital gains in the near term
The 125 bps rate cut by the RBI in CY15 can push overall interest
ratesdown depending on how soon banks transmit it into the system
byrepricing their assets and liabilities lower
The RBI has increased the FPI limit in government bonds to 5% of thetotal
outstanding government securities in a staggered manner byMarch 2018.
Currently, the FPI holding is at 3.8%. The change in FPIlimits has further
opened up room for | 1,20,000 crore in central government securities by
March 2018. All these augur well for debtfunds, especially duration funds
61
The central government has signed a memorandum with the RBI settingout
a clear inflation objective to bring the inflation rate to the mid-point of the
band of 4 +/- 2%. CPI, as per our assessment, should average close to 5%
for FY16 (on assumption of normal monsoons and a stablecurrency). The
government’s commitment towards controlling priceshocks and steps taken
to improve the supply chain are commendable.Also, global prices have
corrected sharply and are supportive rangingfrom crude, metal to food
prices. Hence, inflation should likely stay onthe intended path. This creates
room for the RBI to cut rates by another100-150 bps in the long term to
earn a real return of ~1.5-2%
On the supply front, the Budget has pegged the market borrowing forFY16
at | 6 lakh crore on a gross basis and | 4.56 lakh crore on a netbasis (out of
this, | 2.34 lakh crore through dated securities and | 15000through gold
bonds have been scheduled for H2FY16). Both gross andnet market
borrowings were close to market expectations. Borrowingrelated concern is
expected to come down, given the government’scommitment towards
reducing the fiscal deficit to 3% of GDP by FY17
Recommended funds
62
Technically, after the multiyear bull phase during 2004-12, gold prices corrected
significantly. The violation of the long term trend line highlights the breach of a decade
long trend of outperformance and signals a period of medium-termConsolidation
Global gold prices in October remained volatile with prices advancing inthe
first half of the month post the weak US jobs data. However, a subsequent
strengthening of the dollar, the hawkish tone of the October FOMC policy
meet and comments by US Fed members fuelling expectations of a rate
hike in December 2015 led to significant pressure on the precious metal
One of the major determinants for global gold prices is benchmark real
interest rates. With increasing probability of US Federal Reserve hiking
interest rates in December 2015, the opportunity cost of holding gold will
increase while the same is likely to put pressure on gold prices from a
medium-term perspective
63
adding to deflationary pressure, inflationary demand factor for gold remains
absent in the near term
New Fund Offer will not be kept open for more than 30 days
Offer of Units of ` 10/- each for cash issued at a premium approximately equal to the difference between face value
and allotment price during the New Fund Offer Period and at NAV based prices during continuous offer.
Introduction
The previous chapter dealt with the impact of liberalization on the Indian mutual
funds
industry. The chapter also dealt with the various issues and challenges of the
industry, regulatory frame work for the industry, and the role of mutual funds in
the mobilization of the house hold sector savings. The present chapter is devoted to
64
the study of HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd (AMC), sponsors and trustee.
Theresearcher has selected five schemes namely HDFC Balanced
Funds(HBF),HDFC growth Funds(HGF), HDFC Equity Funds(HEF), HDFC Tax
Saver(HTS) and HDFC TOP –200(HT200) to find out the performance of these
funds in comparison to the market, their diversification and the relationships
between these funds objectives and their risk characteristics.
It can be observed from the table that HDFC is the bigger partner ofthe AMC
having a share of 60percent while Standard Life Investment limited has share of
40percent2. To consolidate its business HDFC Asset Management Company took
over Zurich Insurance Company (ZIC), the sponsor of Zurich India MF. The AMC
entered into an agreement with ZIC to acquire the said business, subject to
necessary regulatory approvals. After getting necessary clearance, the following
65
schemes as shown in table were acquired by HDFC mutual funds on June 19,
2003. The schemes were than rechristened as can be observed from table 4.2. It is
evident from the table that in total 8 schemes were acquired by HDFC Mutual
Fund.
The AMC at present managing 24 open-ended schemes and 13 closed ended Schemes
of the HDFC Mutual Fund. Besides managing schemes the AMC is also providing portfolio
management / advisory services and such activities which are not in conflict with the
activities of the Mutual Fund. The AMC has renewed its registration from SEBI vide
Registration No. - PM / INP000000506 dated December 8, 2006 to act as a
Portfolio Manager under the SEBI (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 1993. The Certificate
of Registration is valid from January 1, 2007 to December
31, 2009.
66
(HDFC) and Standard Life Investments Limited as the Sponsors and HDFC
Trustee Company Limited, as the Trustee. The Trust Deed has been registered
under the Indian Registration Act, 1908. It is registered with SEBI, under
registration code MF / 044 / 00 / 6 on June 30, 2003.
67
Sponsors
The sponsors of HDFC Mutual Fund are Housing DevelopmentFinance
Corporation Limited and Standard Life Investments Limited. Bothhave contributed
sum of Rs. one lakh each to the trustee in the corpus of the Fund.
68
Standard Life Investments Limited is wholly owned subsidiary of
Standard Life Investments (Holdings) Limited, which in turn is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Standard Life plc. It is the investment management
company of standard life. It has global assets under management of
approximately US$ 169 billion as at March 31, 2009 and is one of the
world's largest investment company5. It invests money on behalf of five
million institutional and retail clients throughout the world. The company
has its operation in USA, UK, Canada, Korea, Ireland and Australia
making it a truly global investment company.
The Trustee
The function of the trustee is performed by the HDFC Trustee
Company Limited (the "Trustee"). Its prime function is to ensure that the
working of the AMC is being carried out in accordance with the "SEBI (MF)
Regulations". It also reviews the activities carried on by the AMC. After
having a comprehensive discussion about the establishment of HDFC
mutual funds, its organizational structure we will have a look at the sample
funds chosen for the purpose of study. The following sample funds were
chosen taking consideration about their duration of operation and their
investment objectives. Attempts has been made that equal number of
observation is taken to find out the result of empirical analysis.
69
the share of debt is 40 percent. The entry load for the fund is 1.5 percent6.
The table 4.3 contains basic information of the schemes.
/ Systematic Transfer Plan (STP)) less than Rs. 5 crore in value, an Entry
70
distributor/agent/broker : Nil
71
Minimum Application Amount For new investors :Rs.5000 and any
amount thereafter.
(Other than Systematic Investment Plan
For existing investors : Rs. 1000 and any
/ Systematic Transfer Plan (STP) amount thereafter.
Lock-In-Period Nill
Investment Pattern
The investments under the schemes are made primarily in equityand
equity related instruments as well as in debt and in money market
instruments. The table 4.4 provides the asset allocation of the Scheme's
portfolio.
Asset allocation under the HDFC Balanced Fund Scheme
Sr. No. Type of Instruments Normal (% of Net Risk
Allocation Assets) Profile of
72
Related 60 20 Medium
Instruments to High
2 Debt Securities
(including
securitized Low to
40 30 Medium
debt) and Money
Market
instruments
However besides the above mentioned allocation of funds under equityand
debt instruments, the AMC can invest in short term deposits of scheduled
commercial banks as per the investment objectives of the schemes.
Investment Strategy
The investment strategy of HDFC Balanced Fund is aimed atlowering
risk and maximizing return. In pursuance of this it allocates its fund in
ratio of 6:4 in equity and debt respectively7. The Scheme also provides the
Investment Manager to make investments as per the worthiness of the
securities. This means that fund manager can exercise their power and
make changes in assets allocation to meet the investment objectives of the
schemes. As the allocation of the balanced fund is based
on the mix of equity and debt their ratio is critical in determining future
returns. A good balance between the two will optimize return and
minimize risks.
Investments in Equity
73
The investment of HDFC balanced fund in equity is to
generateincomes by investing in select category of assets class. For this, five
principles are followed by the fund manager. They are as follows:
To focus on the long term investment
When the rise in value of equity has reached its optimum level
andfurther improvement in the present level is not possible.
74
Debt Investments
Debt securities (in the form of non-convertible debentures,
bonds,secured premium notes, zero interest bonds, deep discount
bonds, floatingrate bond / notes, securitised debt, pass through
certificates, asset backedsecurities, mortgage backed securities and
any other domestic fixedincome securities including structured
obligations etc.) include, but are not
limited to:
Commercial papers
75
Commercial bills
Treasury bills
Certificate of deposit
Controlling Risk
The portfolio construction of HDFC balanced fund is done in a wayby the
fund manager to maintain the risk at moderate level. The Fund Manager
avoids adopting either a very defensive or aggressive posture at any point
of time. To control risk, portfolio is diversified and adequate level of
liquidity is maintained to mitigate unforeseen circumstances. At the macro
level, continuous review of business and economic environment is carried
out to find out ongoing trend and take corrective measures likewise to
minimize the risk. To earn higher rate of return the fund manager can
make investments in securities and other instruments not mentioned
earlier provided that such investment are in accordance with SEBI
regulations. The table 4.5 gives details of the portfolio of the HDFC
balanced fund as on 31st March 2008. From the table it is evident that the
total share of equity is 68.59. The reliance industries limited has maximum
of 6.99percent followed by Coramandal Fertilizers Ltd. ICICI Bank Ltd. has
the least share of 3.45 percent. The debt and money market instruments
77
CONCLUSION
78
QUESTIONNAIRE
Q.2. Do you have all materials you need to do your work right?
Q.3. Does you supervisor, or someone at work, seems to care about you as a
person?
Q.6. Do you think present system of Forest Department is beneficial for you?
Q.8. Does your supervisor provide you with feedback & guidance?
79
BIBLIOGRAPHY
www.icici.co.in
www.hdfc.com
www.uti.co.in
www. upgvt.com
iciciwikipedia.com
utiwikipedia.com
hdfcwikipedia.com
80