Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    Chi-Square Test Case Processing Summary

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous qRAAceP
    This document presents the results of three statistical tests: a chi-square test, a correlation test, and a one-way ANOVA test. The chi-square test examined the relationship between two categorical variables and found no significant relationship. The correlation test examined the relationship between two continuous variables and found a moderate positive correlation that was statistically significant. The one-way ANOVA compared mean scores on one continuous variable across multiple categorical groups and found no significant difference between the group means.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Chi-Square Test Case Processing Summary

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous qRAAceP
    35 views4 pages
    This document presents the results of three statistical tests: a chi-square test, a correlation test, and a one-way ANOVA test. The chi-square test examined the relationship between two categorical variables and found no significant relationship. The correlation test examined the relationship between two continuous variables and found a moderate positive correlation that was statistically significant. The one-way ANOVA compared mean scores on one continuous variable across multiple categorical groups and found no significant difference between the group means.

    Original Description:

    k

    Original Title

    Mohana -A Study on Performance Appraisal in Event Management Sai Leaf Plate Indutsry at Karur

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document presents the results of three statistical tests: a chi-square test, a correlation test, and a one-way ANOVA test. The chi-square test examined the relationship between two categorical variables and found no significant relationship. The correlation test examined the relationship between two continuous variables and found a moderate positive correlation that was statistically significant. The one-way ANOVA compared mean scores on one continuous variable across multiple categorical groups and found no significant difference between the group means.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    35 views4 pages

    Chi-Square Test Case Processing Summary

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous qRAAceP
    This document presents the results of three statistical tests: a chi-square test, a correlation test, and a one-way ANOVA test. The chi-square test examined the relationship between two categorical variables and found no significant relationship. The correlation test examined the relationship between two continuous variables and found a moderate positive correlation that was statistically significant. The one-way ANOVA compared mean scores on one continuous variable across multiple categorical groups and found no significant difference between the group means.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    CHI-SQUARE TEST

    Case Processing Summary


    Cases
    Valid Missing Total
    N Percent N Percent N Percent
    properplatform * 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
    Feedbackregularly

    properplatform * Feedbackregularly Crosstabulation


    Count
    Feedbackregularly Total
    Strongly Agree Disagree Neither
    Agree Agree nor
    Disagree
    Yes 8 19 5 3 35
    properplatfor
    No 8 18 11 6 43
    m
    Sometimes 4 5 9 4 22
    Total 20 42 25 13 100

    Chi-Square Tests
    Value df Asymp. Sig.
    (2-sided)
    Pearson Chi-Square 8.277a 6 .218
    Likelihood Ratio 8.515 6 .203
    Linear-by-Linear 4.032 1 .045
    Association
    N of Valid Cases 100
    a. 3 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
    minimum expected count is 2.86.

    Symmetric Measures
    Value Approx.
    Sig.
    Nominal by Contingency .276 .218
    Nominal Coefficient
    N of Valid Cases 100

    CORRELATION METHOD

    Case Processing Summary


    Cases
    Valid Missing Total
    N Percent N Percent N Percent
    continuouslyupdated * 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
    receiverecognition

    continuouslyupdated * receiverecognition Crosstabulation


    Count
    receiverecognition Total
    Strongly Agree Disagree Neither Agree
    Agree nor Disagree
    Strongly Agree 6 7 5 1 19
    Agree 9 11 9 6 35
    continuouslyupdate
    Disagree 7 5 14 6 32
    d
    Neither Agree nor 1 5 6 2 14
    Disagree
    Total 23 28 34 15 100

    Symmetric Measures
    Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Approx.
    Errora Tb Sig.
    Nominal by Contingency .285 .450
    Nominal Coefficient
    Interval by .202 .088 2.040 .044c
    Pearson's R
    Interval
    Spearman .208 .090 2.108 .038c
    Ordinal by Ordinal
    Correlation
    N of Valid Cases 100
    a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
    b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
    c. Based on normal approximation.

    ONE WAY ANOVA TEST

    ANOVA
    encouraged
    Sum of df Mean F Sig.
    Squares Square
    Between 1.601 3 .534 1.062 .369
    Groups
    Within Groups 48.239 96 .502
    Total 49.840 99

    Multiple Comparisons
    Dependent Variable: encouraged
    Tukey HSD
    (I) extremelysatisfied (J) extremelysatisfied Mean Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence I
    Difference (I- Lower Upp
    J) Bound
    Agree -.29199 .19900 .461 -.8123
    Disagree -.07937 .21416 .983 -.6393
    Strongly Agree
    Neither Agree nor -.31313 .27129 .657 -1.0224
    Disagree
    Strongly Agree .29199 .19900 .461 -.2283
    Disagree .21262 .17214 .606 -.2375
    Agree
    Neither Agree nor -.02114 .23951 1.000 -.6474
    Disagree
    Strongly Agree .07937 .21416 .983 -.4806
    Disagree
    Agree -.21262 .17214 .606 -.6627
    Neither Agree nor -.23377 .25225 .791 -.8933
    Disagree
    Strongly Agree .31313 .27129 .657 -.3962
    Neither Agree nor
    Agree .02114 .23951 1.000 -.6051
    Disagree
    Disagree .23377 .25225 .791 -.4258

    encouraged
    a,b
    Tukey HSD
    extremelysatisfied N Subset for
    alpha = 0.05
    1
    Strongly Agree 18 1.7778
    Disagree 28 1.8571
    Agree 43 2.0698
    Neither Agree nor 11 2.0909
    Disagree
    Sig. .516
    Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are
    displayed.
    a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 19.471.
    b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic
    mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error
    levels are not guaranteed.

    You might also like